Mother Jones Magazine has published a story on Sam and Serene Allison and the psychotic “orphan theology” that is so popular now in evangelical brazilnut churches. Serene is the daughter of Nancy Campbell, who publishes the Above Rubies newsletter that is popular among homeschoolers. In 2005, Above Rubies began advocating adoptions from Liberia, which were promoted as “missions under our very own roof!… When we welcome a child into our heart and into our home, we actually welcome Jesus Himself.” Says one member of a Yahoo forum, “Families lined up by the droves.” They “were going to Liberia and literally saying, ‘This is how much I have, give me as many as you can.’” As was true of the Allison household, most of these families were already blessed by numerous natural children, but because of their twisted view of the gospel, they were taking on many more strangers as well. Nancy Campbell was responsible for placing about a thousand niglets in white homes (never black homes). She took four children, and her daughter Serene took six. These people promoted the adoptions as “cheap, easy and fast,” which was relatively true but was also an opportunity for fraud and bribery, not to mention potential kidnapping and trafficking, as was seen in Haiti after the earthquake, when baptist do-gooders wanted nothing more than to uproot black children from their homeland and people and send them off to be raised by white families in America.
Liberian parents began complaining that adoption had been misrepresented to them as some sort of temporary education arrangement…
This was also true in Haiti, where some parents believed that their children were being taken to safety, away from immediate peril, without realizing that they would never be seen again. We noted at the time that these gospel vampires are the true white supremacists, because they can’t imagine why anyone would not view them as the ideal parents of the world. They never paused to consider the damage they might cause to their little black props, much less to the homogeneity of their own nation, which they dismiss as something that would only be of concern to a pagan. The only thing that mattered to them was “building the kingdom” and the social status that they could acquire as a result.
The author of this article clearly disdains the fact that some people live closer to the land, and work with their hands, and eat healthy food which they grow themselves, and homeschool their children, and discipline their children. They might even build their own house, during which time they might not have air conditioning and only a wood stove for heat. Lo and behold, their children are actually expected to work, the poor dears! This is all presented by the author as shy of child abuse. She is particularly appalled that people with guns kill game and eat it. We all know that Africans don’t like to work, which is why the people of Africa are so poor, even though Africa itself is so rich. And when the oldest of the Allisons’ props realized that she was expected to work, she said, “We went from Africa to Africa… They treated us pretty much like slaves.” This is Mother Jones, after all, and the liberal, anti-Christian bias is thick.
If it’s true that the Allisons’ discipline strategy was being learned from Michael and Debi Pearl and their book, To Train Up a Child, there is indeed cause for alarm. But even Michael Pearl would have warned them against exposing their precious children to this danger. He writes:
Right here in our own community a family adopted three children from Liberia. We warned them, but they were so caught up with good feelings about how they were sacrificing their lives to save poor starving children from orphanages that they danced their way into tragedy. They have several children younger than the three adopted kids, who, unknowing to them, were well versed in all the dark arts of eroticism and ghastly perversion.
We have received many letters from families who have adopted children from overseas, quite a few from Liberia, and nearly every one of them—if not all—told sad stories of the fall of their natural children into sexual deviance.
It didn’t take long for reality to intrude on the Allisons. What kind of sickness must possess the minds of parents to place their own children in such a chaotic environment? They brought pubescent blacks into their home, and one of the boys reportedly “admitted that he had kissed and lain on top of one of the Allisons’ biological daughters, four years his junior.”
Social workers got involved, and a judge sent a couple of the kids to live with (what do you know) a Liberian uncle, also in Tennessee. Another girl was bounced around to other homes. Another boy was sent back back to Liberia after spying on Serene as she showered. While there, he reportedly scavenged for food and contracted malaria until some other white lunatics brought him back to Atlanta.
It may not be accurate, but according to the article, all but three of the ten Campbell and Allison adoptions resulted in serious problems. The Allisons eventually left Tennessee for a time after being hounded by the Department of Children’s Services, which is not necessarily a poor reflection on the Allisons. DCS is run by busybody feminists who are much like the author of this article and are predisposed to be antagonistic to large, conservative, homeschooling families.
It’s doubtful that the Allisons have actually learned anything from their folly. The oldest adopted girl moved to Charlotte, NC, to meet up with other displaced Liberians (funny how they have the good sense to stick together). She now has a baby of her own. Serene calls him her first “grandchild,” proving that there’s no cure for stupidity.
James Dobson’s Focus on the Family has predicted that, within the decade, it will be “pretty uncommon” for Christians “to not adopt or not care for orphans.” The Southern Baptists have called for their 16 million members to go and do likewise, and Pentecostal leader Lou Engle has said that adoptive families will gain “moral authority in this nation.” One ministry declared: “Adoption is the new pregnant.” This perverted race-mixing cult is now considered the fundament (i.e., the buttocks, the anus) of the faith. “The ultimate purpose of human adoption by Christians,” writes Dan Cruver in Reclaiming Adoption, “is not to give orphans parents, as important as that is. It is to place them in a Christian home that they might be positioned to receive the gospel.” Here you see plainly that race-mixers are overturning the doctrine of the trustee family that Rushdoony made the centerpiece of his ministry. This is what happens when faith is detached from the God-ordained context of family, blood, tribe, nation, and race. It turns into the bastard creed of Alienism, and it ruins lives.
“Kinism doesn’t advocate anything other than the preservation and destiny of European blood, which is also (incidentally) the advancement of the blood of all humans – Christian Europe was the standard-bearer of Christ, the seneschal of the kingdom of heaven. The world would be a hell were it not for Christian Europe; this does not denigrate other peoples or groups, but recognizes the truth of the obvious. To seduce and ruin this standard-bearer, on the other hand, would be to plunge the world into an even greater hell than if the white peoples had never existed. Corruptio optima pessimi – the noblest natures corrupted make the worst villains. The last best hope of earth is not America, but the European Christ Culture, which ‘grew’ in the topsoil of a white culture and race. No amount of wishful thinking can guarantee that it can do without it – in fact, the signs of the times are against that.”~ Casey LeFroy
International adoption has been on the wane since 2004 because other countries are intentionally making it harder for nutty white evangelicals in America to take their children. “In 2009, Liberia imposed an emergency moratorium on international adoptions, citing ‘gross mismanagement.’” It’s up in Uganda and Congo though.
In Christian Russia, Putin has ordered a ban on adoptions by foreign faggots, following his ban on adoptions by Americans. May the Russian tribe increase. May God bless them for their faithfulness. He breaks the fangs of the wicked (Job 29:17).
I said “Christian Russia.” The R2K nutjobs will hate this. They don’t even believe that Christian schools exist, or Christian families or nations or cultures, because these occupy the common realm of natural law, not the grace realm of the gospel. Freaks.
The head of the Russian Orthodox Church calls “feminism very dangerous, because feminist organisations proclaim the pseudo-freedom of women, which, in the first place, must appear outside of marriage and outside of the family. Man has his gaze turned outward – he must work, make money – and woman must be focused inwards, where her children are, where her home is. If this incredibly important function of women is destroyed then everything will be destroyed – the family and, if you wish, the motherland. It’s not for nothing that we call Russia the motherland.” The Jew-Soviets are cold and dead, and the gospel of Christ marches on. There is still hope for our own reprobate nation. Hope dies last, as the Russians say.
“Google is proud to celebrate the 19th Amendment with a cute pink checkbox, [but] I doubt Google would celebrate the 2nd Amendment with an illustration of a White Man holding a rifle. And all of us who were raised under Cultural Marxism instinctively know why this is the case… Try suggesting to a typical God-fearing, flag-waving, Republican and Tea Party conservative that giving the vote to women was a bad idea, and watch him recoil in horror like a vampire looking at a cross.”
Madeline Dahlgren wrote in Thoughts on female suffrage and in vindication of woman’s true rights (1871):
It is our fathers, brothers, husbands and sons who represent us at the ballot-box. Our fathers and husbands love us. Our sons are what we make them. We are content that they represent us in the corn-field, the battle-field and the ballot-box, and we them in the school-room, at the fireside, and at the cradle; believing our representation, even at the ballot-box, to be thus more full and impartial that it could possibly be were all women allowed to vote.
And she made this perfect prediction:
We hold that the new status will prove to be the worst kind of communism. The relations between the sexes, so carefully guarded by religion and by parents, by law and by society, will become common and therefore corrupt. The family, the foundation of the State, will disappear. The mothers, sisters and daughters of our glorious past will exist no more and the female gender will vanish into epicene.
The godly woman of the South, whose home was “one of simple faith, and of a sound mind, of love unfeigned, of modest reserve, of abounding good works.” She has now been replaced by Lady Gaga.
Listen to this excellent talk on homeschooling by Bobbi Leigh Swagger. She talks about how Voddie Baucham is Homeschooling, Inc.’s Magic Negro. At a time when homeschooling companies have barely updated their curriculum in 20 years, white families are snatching up all the materials they can from this black man, even though he isn’t saying anything that hasn’t been said countless times before, and in cheaper books. At homeschool conventions, Rastus Baucham speaks in a ghetto accent and tells corny racial jokes about how white men can’t jump, and all the families who have driven across the state at 9 mpg in their 15-passenger vans laugh with the humorous Negro and bask in the warm feeling that they can’t be accused of racism. Lady Swagger is correct that white people should be ashamed that they need a stranger to teach them how to raise their children.
She talks about the “victorious manhood” warmongering of Douglas Winston Phillips at a time when our men are being used as fodder for Israel.
Our young men don’t learn how to break this vicious Judaic thralldom, partly because of their homeschooling leaders. Phillips marks up coonskin caps and plastic swords like the Jew that he is, but these trinkets teach our children nothing about the dangers we face today, which we need real men to stand against. Battle reenacting, folk dancing, hairbows, and cookies all have their place, but they don’t equip young people to identify and fight against the aliens who hate their God and want them dead.
Swagger suggests avoiding any so-called Christian groups who spend time on Capitol Hill but are well-liked, who use words like Vision, Generations, or Family in their names, or whose title is written in Latin, or who are led by a guy whose name is Junior. We couldn’t agree more.
If you homeschool, look at the New Ron Paul curriculum coming on Sept. 2 from Gary North. It’s free for grades K-5 and the cost is paltry after that. I hope it’s not poisoned by libertarianism and market worship, but even so I think it’s going to be a lot cheaper and better than what can be found elsewhere. The consumers of my household economic unit will give it a try as charter members.
Homeschooling is illegal in Germany; this is the only law of Hitler’s that the Judaics now in charge still like. The case of the Romeike family was the first ever in America to recognize homeschooling as a reason for granting asylum. The judge stated that persecuting homeschoolers is “repellent to everything we believe in as Americans.” But now Obama’s ICE has appealed the decision, stating that homeschoolers are too “amorphous” to be a “particular social group,” and “the public education laws of Germany do not violate basic human rights,” because even the American empire could outlaw homeschooling at any time. According to the appeal, “United States law has recognized the broad power of the state to compel school attendance and regulate curriculum and teacher certification,” as well as the “authority to prohibit or regulate homeschooling.” So the imperial argument is that groups that it cannot regulate or identify in a census are not worthy of defense. They take every opportunity to blur the lines or downplay the existence of the white race and Christianity too, so this is where it’s all headed. Citizenship, asylum, and the power to compel mandatory “school” attendance is seized by the empire, and the state of Tennessee is told that it has no right to interfere.
Notice how this relates to Nil’s arguments for strong Kinism. He writes that the basis of Alienism is the idea “that race is nothing more than a seat of statistical generalities, completely unrelated to God’s design of our social interactions.” Christian faith receives the same treatment, becoming so syncretized that it can no longer be distinguished; and when it is no longer distinguished, it is no longer meaningful and effective.
A country’s obligation to have an immigration policy seeking to retain the ethnic core of the native population, or (very differently) society’s obligation not to abolish the distinction between male and female, or any other obligations related to race or gender as such, all require God as their basis—as their ratio essendi. It simply makes no sense to say that we have moral obligations related to some natural category unless we posit the metaphysical basis of those obligations in a consciously and intentionally crafted design plan for human nature. Essentialism is theism.
The “debate” (more like a very unpleasing sneezing and wheezing) between Doug Wilson and Shaka Zulu on whether domestic slavery should have ended in America by a sectional war of aggression is a lame topic, in the sense that I can’t imagine how a Christian could argue for the necessity of bloodshed in ending a practice that is sanctioned by God and ubiquitous in history, or how an opponent could heap praise on such a man. “Courtesy of tongue” said Rowena in Ivanhoe, “when it is used to veil churlishness of deed, is but a knight’s girdle around the breast of a base clown.” There’s nothing Christian about supporting Yankee lust for “beauty and booty,” regardless of outcome. But this is standard operating procedure for the so-called black “Christian” today.
“Verily, the Massachusetts Rehoboam maketh his little finger thicker than the Southern ruler’s loins.” ~ R.L. Dabney
This impotent “debate” was not deserving of the endless verbiage and butt-kissing that these men devoted to it and to each other, but Wilson indulged the opportunity to pad his anti-racist credentials by gaining understanding from a Real Black Person, which is to say one who is anointed to judge all things racial. He doesn’t find too many of them in Idaho. Since the two are in agreement about the alleged sinfulness of the institution of slavery, Wilson was unable to go for the jugular and demand to know why the abolition of slavery is the non-negotiable criterion for acceptance of the gospel on the part of blacks. Whites, who have often been enslaved in history, have no such requirements. The debate never touched on the real question of slavery and what the Bible says about it. It became all about how Wilson writes and the need to avoid hurt feelings.
One post from Shaka is worth pointing out for sheer audacity and humor value. Read in amazement as he equates “racial insensitivity” with sin. You might expect that he would define “racial insensitivity” if it really requires a Matthew 18 treatment, as he suggests. You sure might, mightn’t you? But rather than define anything specific, as we should expect for what is allegedly sinful behavior, we learn that it is the failure “to sense and lovingly consider the concerns, feelings, and perspectives of others across racial lines.” These are what he calls “cross-cultural gaffes” which are apparently synonymous with “hate.” This “hate” causes us to “suspect and mistrust one another,” as though prejudice could not possibly have any rational and experiential basis. You can see that he reasons like a woman, focusing on feelings. He also insults like a woman, through false flattery. Preachers know that empathizing and emoting are the money shots of their profession, because their industry now revolves around women rather than men. To men, feelings are secondary to the central questions which Shaka persistently evades: Is it true? Is it false? That which is true can be neither “racist” nor “racially insensitive.”
We learn from Reverend Zulu that “racial insensitivity” is not as bad as “racism.” (“Racism” appears to be undefined but probably has something to do with a sense — that feminine word again — of superiority over other races, which is a subjective quantity. This means that the anti-racist presumes, quite illogically, that all races are innately equal in every respect. Shaka and Wilson agree that if any temporary differences exist, it’s only because the gospel has not had enough time to make equality more evident, and would it please hurry up already. This is wishful thinking that has no precedent in history, but we’ll set it aside.) Shaka claims that racial insensitivity is to racism as a civil case is to a criminal case. “Think O.J. Simpson’s criminal acquittal for the murder of Nicole Brown Simpson and his subsequent civil conviction in a suit brought by her family.” I was elated to read this, because it means that if I can avoid being called a racist, as Wilson is trying so hard to do, it means that I’ll not officially be like a murderer. Sure, I’ll still be considered guilty of wrongful death and fined $33.5 million, but you have to count your blessings. Racial insensitivity requires a lower threshold of proof, Shaka says. Okay, good, so now I’m sure you want to know what this proof entails. His answer: “some indication that damages have occurred”! The mind reels, the knees buckle, the face meets the floor, and visions of Soul Train ensue.
“I think the way Wilson wrote Black and Tan—its tone and balance—is the problem.”
The most hideous example of Wilson’s wretched insensitivity, according to Shaka, is that—I can barely force myself to write the words—he said he has no problem with the story Little Black Sambo and even praised the lad for his ingenuity in turning tigers into butter for his pancakes. Shaka explains: “Honestly, I staggered over the racial insensitivity in these comments… It’s a racial slur…a potent tool of hatred, oppression and misrepresentation… If you want to know what racial insensitivity looks like, it looks like this anecdote. With all Wilson’s learning and reflection on these issues, it’s difficult for me not to think this anecdote isn’t an example of that racial insensitivity born of willful ignorance.” Now, I don’t care who you are, this is good Internet. Best of all, Wilson writes that he would never publish “the Christian equivalent of Little Black Sambo” today “because I think to do so would be racially insensitive. It really would be.” Then he apologizes for wounding Shaka’s hyper-sensitive, womanly feelings. Yep, Wilson is a white man, alright. But Shaka didn’t buy it. He said that the apology was preceded by evasiveness and blame-shifting and followed by “defensive explanations where he essentially denies each instance of insensitivity.” Shaka then urges him to truly repent of his insensitivity, which is a sin, remember.
Wilson responds by finally, in his maddening, verbose way, telling Shaka to stop being embarrassed by the Bible and get over his unbiblical idea that Scripture condemns the owning of slaves as sin. He finally quotes from Lev. 25, as we did in our previous post. This could have been done from the start to spare their poor readers of the reams of feminine passive-aggression. He writes: “Demands that we change the language we are allowed to use is a prelude for a change in the laws… We are already living in a day where it is uncouth to use the word sodomite in print, or in the pulpit, and so I am preparing for the day when it will be illegal to do so.” We couldn’t agree more.
In his conclusion, Wilson writes: “Jesus came to cast down the middle wall of partition, not only between Jew and Gentile, but also to cast down any other walls that exist between any other races, nationalities, tribes, or tongues.” The wall in the first clause is broken so that all men may access the Father. The Prince of Peace removed the enmity between us and God. This much is Christian orthodoxy. But when Wilson claims that all other walls are to be removed (race, class, language, nationhood, customs, cultures?) he has veered from the old path and has gone off into the thicket of Alienism. And “racism” is defined as opposition to this insane program.
Walter Williams on equality. “There is absolutely no evidence anywhere, at any time, that proportionality is the norm anywhere on earth; however, much of our thinking, many of our laws and much of our public policy are based upon proportionality’s being the norm.” Preacherfools have the funny idea that the gospel produces proportionality, even though this has never actually come to fruition. Faith is supposed to be substance and evidence, but this is a matter of blind faith among race-mixers.
“There is no issue in American life, be it crime, health care, the environment, education, defense, or even public transportation that can be addressed intelligently without confronting the central role of race.”
It’s too bad that most disagreements between races come down to who can garner more sympathy, but all you have to do is follow the money to understand why. We can try to be all things to all men, but first we must speak the truth. There are so many girly-men in the pulpits who craft their whole delivery for how it will be received by chicks that it’s no wonder most men want nothing to do with churches. That’s a problem for everyone, because without men there is no leadership.
They haven’t got no noses,
The fallen sons of Eve;
Even the smell of roses
Is not what they supposes;
But more than mind discloses
And more than men believe.
~ G.K. Chesterton, The Song of Quoodle
It’s important to remember that Southerners of the Old Republic did not share with modern American “Christians” a love for Marxist equality. As R.L. Dabney often said, multiple levels of government have been ordained for mankind. The most basic level is that of the family. Above this, you might have governments in the church, city, county, state, and nation. “The government closest to the people serves the people best,” said Thomas Jefferson. (He said the proper sphere of government for originating tax measures is that which is closest to the people, and therefore more subject to their approval.) He also said: “Most bad government has grown out of too much government.” As the Bible says, a house divided against itself cannot stand. The modern conceit against domestic slavery is born of the exact opposite worldview, which is that family government is by nature more unjust than government at the highest level. Whereas the slave owner used to provide for the slave’s needs, the emancipated slave seeks his welfare from his new masters, at the imperial level, who are farthest removed from him but who promise him free money without having to work for it.
Great stuff at 4:30 from Rev. James Manning on niggers in the streets and pimps in the churches. That’s a man, folks. He doesn’t mince and lisp and sashay like most of the white preacher-fags we know. He doesn’t have time to preach silly, self-help, psychobabble sermons because he’s too busy speaking the truth to real problems. It’s our shame that we have almost no men like this leading our churches.
“The black feels that it is his inherent right to eyeball White women; live on welfare, which comes out of someone else’s pocket; have an excess number of children, that someone else will take care of; go to places where he is not welcome; live permanently in housing that is paid for by the taxpayer; be on permanent charity; ask for special privileges; and be different from the norm; demand privileges without obligations; vote to ‘share the wealth’ with those who work to produce it; destroy residential beauty through his slumster tactics; park wherever he pleases; permit his children to run wild on the streets and trespass on private property and discard garbage wherever it is convenient… Sex provides the black man in particular, with a glorious moment of satisfaction, a feeling of equality. If his partner happens to be a White woman, so much the better, since at that moment, all inequalities disappear. Sex is used by many blacks in the same way that they use drugs and alcohol.” ~ Albert Lee Burton, a black businessman, from his book, Whole Nigger or None
Slavery has not gone away, because the nature of the slave has not gone away. One master has been traded for another, but to the detriment of all. Blacks themselves, and the whites who benefit from their patronage, have a monetary interest in maintaining the new plantation. But we, as Christians, are obligated to know and speak the truth. We are under no obligation to be “sensitive” to those who believe lies.
“A man must be just before he is generous.” ~ Robert Lewis Dabney
By the way, what in the name of Rupaul is “the Christian equivalent of Little Black Sambo“? It must be to books what CCM is to music: a crappy reproduction. It’s like finding a Christian fish symbol on a business card. If experience is any guide, this is how shoddy service is advertised.
The battle of Shiloh was when the Yankees realized that they weren’t going to win the war as easily as they had first imagined. After this battle, which killed or wounded 26,000, Grant wrote, “I gave up all idea of saving the Union except by complete conquest.” The man who was blamed for the Yankee loss was the youngest major general in the Union Army, Lew Wallace, who was late in bringing his troops to the field. He never regained the confidence of his superiors, but the story goes that he later saved Washington from falling to the Confederates when Grant and Lee were wrapped up at Petersburg, and Jubal Early and his 13,000 troops made a dash for the Yankee capital. A Navy boat was prepared to whisk Lincoln away at a moment’s notice. Wallace described Lincoln, upon seeing him for the first time, as “the gauntest, quaintest, and most positively ugly man who had ever attracted me enough to call for study.”
After the war, he served on the show trial for the Lincoln assassination “conspirators” and presided over the one that convicted Henry Wirz, the commandant of Andersonville, the only Confederate who was executed for trumped-up war crimes. But Wallace’s fame was still to come: he was the author of Ben Hur. Unlike the movie starring Charlton Heston, which still holds the record for Academy Award wins, the book is about Judah Ben Hur taking vengeance on Massala and the Romans and trying to run them out of Israel, until he meets Christ and learns to lay down his sword and take compassion upon those who have wronged him. It is said that Ben Hur “restored” the “Union” just as Uncle Tom’s Cabin had split it, because the Romans represent the Confederates and the protagonist represents the humble Yankee who first beats them into the ground and then is willing to forgive the sins of his errant Southern brethren. This is in the vein of the Battle Hymn of the Republic, where God is on the side of the North, and crushing the rebellion is an act of divine justice. One funny line from the book, though, (racist by today’s standards) is when Judah Ben Hur describes Christ’s “locks of yellowish bright chestnut hair; a face lighted by dark-blue eyes, at the time so soft, so appealing, so full of love and holy purpose, that they had all the power of command and will.” Though Wallace was ever after marketed as a Christian, he never bothered to actually join a church.
Two North Carolina legislators have introduced a resolution asserting that the state can decide whether to establish religion and that the imperial government has no say in the matter. Although they’ve since backed away, saying that their resolution was merely meant to allow for prayer at the opening of county meetings, it’s true that the empire has no constitutional role in the matter. It seized this authority when the Old Republic died at the hands of Lincoln.
Here’s a timeline for established churches in the first 13 states. You can see that the national Constitution didn’t change anything.
Today it is widely and erroneously believed that the illegal 14th Amendment makes established churches null and void. This error is closely connected to racial equality. Prior to Lincoln’s War, each person was a citizen of a state. There was no entity called the “United States of America” that granted citizenship until the South had been vanquished, because this was the only way to make citizens of blacks. Radical Republicans (i.e., Abolitionists) in 1866 didn’t have the votes to approve the 14th amendment by a two-thirds majority in the House of Representatives, so they excluded Southern votes and counted the votes of West Virginia and Nevada, both of which were unconstitutionally created by Lincoln. Even so, the measure would have been defeated in the Senate had John Stockton of New Jersey been allowed to vote, but the Republicans expelled him. So the amendment was sent to the states for ratification, and it was defeated. (There were only 37 states at that time, which means that at least 28 were needed, but only 21 were in favor.) Yet the Republicans, undaunted by law, created the Reconstruction Acts in 1867, which declared “no legal state governments” to exist in ten Southern states, although they had been officially recognized by Congress since 1865. The very existence of the 13th amendment (abolishing slavery) depended upon the legitimacy of these Southern state governments. The South was placed under martial law, and the provisional shill governments placed in Southern capitols quickly ratified the 14th. But these provisional governments were not duly elected and therefore could not legally ratify anything. When the Supreme Court in 1868 indicated agreement with the South’s argument that the 14th Amendment is illegal, the Congress invoked Article 3, Section 2 of the Constitution and removed the subject from the court’s jurisdiction. “After 1868,” writes Joseph E. Fallon, “the federal government has not permitted any serious legal challenge to the constitutionality of the 14th amendment. To do so would risk dismantling the entire apparatus of the federal government in a single stroke, depriving federal officeholders—Democrats and Republicans, judges, politicians, and bureaucrats—of the powers and perks they enjoy and expect.” Suppose the Court had been allowed to decide. If the Republicans had been found to be correct that Southern governments were illegitimate from 1865 to 1867, the 13th amendment doesn’t exist and slavery is still legal. Conversely, if Republicans were wrong, the 14th Amendment doesn’t exist, blacks are not citizens, and every egalitarian measure that has come down the pike is null and void.
Here are some gifts that the 14th Amendment keeps on giving: In 1947, the Supreme Court ruled that, based on the 14th Amendment, a New Jersey school district could not reimburse parents whose children used public transportation to go to private schools (Everson v. Board of Education); in 1954, the Supreme Court ruled that, based on the 14th Amendment, public schools had to integrate (Brown v. Board of Education); in 1961, the Supreme Court ruled that, based on the 14th Amendment, the state of Maryland had to allow atheists to work in city government (Torcaso v. Watkins); in 1967, the Supreme Court ruled that, based on the 14th Amendment, Virginia’s anti-miscegenation law was unconstitutional (Loving v. Virginia); in 2003, the Supreme Court struck down Texas’s anti-sodomy law, based on – you guessed it – the 14th Amendment (Lawrence v. Texas). Now faggot “marriage” hs been made possible by the same illegal act.
The big innovation that has secured this nightmare of egalitarianism is the doctrine of Incorporation, which uses the Due Process clause and the Privileges and Immunities clause of the 14th Amendment to hold the Bill of Rights applicable to the states, contrary to everything that the founders intended. So while the anti-Federalists clearly and unquestionably intended the Bill of Rights (the first ten amendments to the Constitution) to rein in the power of a central government which would otherwise allow no constraints, the work of the Yankees in destroying the last outpost of Christendom in the New World and making slaves our equals has meant that the prohibition against the central government establishing a church has now been illegally imposed on the states, even though everyone knows very well that the states, which formed this once-voluntary union, had already established churches centuries earlier. The judicial system is such an elaborate con game that it makes the insurance industry look monastic.
As the Supreme Court correctly ruled in Norton v. Shelby County, “An unconstitutional act is not a law. It confers no rights. It imposes no duties. It affords no protection. It creates no office. It is in legal contemplation as inoperative as though it had never been passed. Therefore an unconstitutional act purporting to create an office gives no validity to the acts of a person acting under color of its authority.”
Since 2005, Atlanta suburbs have been incorporating themselves to get away from the Negro quicksand that calls itself The City Too Busy to Hate. In 2011, the Georgia Legislative Black Caucus filed a lawsuit to dissolve the new cities, claiming that “super-white majorities” had been formed which dilute the voting power of minorities in those areas. The same arguments are being used here that were used for the Brown v. Board of Education decision, which is that white schools are good for whites, but black schools are bad for blacks. Blacks in Atlanta are implying that whites have a duty to care for them and not leave them on their own. If this sounds to you like slavery, but with benefits for only one side, you’re exactly right. Then Atlanta will become Detroit even faster. Notice that the South was allegedly wrong for seceding from the North (just as America had seceded from Britain), all because slaves were held in the South, just as they had been held in the North and Britain; but courts are upholding the right of unincorporated groups to secede from cities. And to prevent it, blacks are attempting to use the same argument that Yankees still use against the South: that secession is forbidden because it is “racist.” But thankfully, the courts aren’t buying it.
To detect signs of witchcraft, the “judge” uses a nylon thread that is “extraordinary and resistant,” explained the tribal elders that we spoke to. The thread is put on a metal plate, which is heated with fire. If the thread breaks, the person on trial is a witch.
Remember, orphan-heaving “Christians” consider these people to be your neighbors and fellow voters. At what point do we stop using the word “Christian” indiscriminately and start calling them devil-worshipers, like the scum at Liberty University who produced this crotch-grabbing video?
Insightful words that are still very much with us, written in 1965 by R.J. Rushdoony and published in Journal of Reconstruction, Volume 13, Number 1 (1990-1991).
Norman Mailer has pointed out that the modern outsider to God and law finds his hero in the Negro, whom he sees as a “natural and social adventurer sworn against respectability, conformity, dullness, and emotional timidity.” The modern “white Negro” is a man who imagines the Negro to be the ideal man, a natural anarchist and nihilist, and therefore a social hero. Moreover, to gain the acceptance of the Negro, irrespective of his character, is to gain a victory against law and standards in the name of equality.
There is indication already of another “civil rights” offensive as a next step after the Negro: The homosexual may be partly replacing the Negro as an object of liberal solicitude and the prime test of liberal tolerance. If there is no God and no divinely ordained law, then not only does perversion have equal rights with morality, but actually truer rights, because Christian morality is seen as an imposition on and a dehumanization of man, whereas perversion is an act of liberty and autonomy for this school of thought.
He said the same thing in his lecture on Magic and Witchcraft, transcribed at the wonderful Pocket College archive:
You see, a few years ago Norman Mailer put his finger on the situation. Now Norman Mailer is one of our more peculiar minds on the left, but on the other hand he is a remarkably discerning mind at times. And he said the goal of the average liberal today was to be, in his words, a white nigger. Because, you see, sharing the perspective of magic, all you need to add to that is witchcraft, and where are you going to seek for power? Below. And so his goal, to be a white nigger. To have that closeness to that which is primitive, animalistic, and hence the appeal. It was some years ago when a professor of a major university here on the Atlantic coast, told me of going to a voodoo service. Now why was a man like that interested in it? He was looking for power from below.
It’s amusing that Rush softened his language with the scholarly crowd and used the word Negro, but to the homefolks he used Mailer’s actual word, “nigger.” But the point is that wise men could see this coming half a century ago.
Even more than 80 years ago, in 1932, Chesterton wrote: “In certain respects (not all, or even perhaps most), current culture seems simply to have fallen to a lower level of civilization and to be now a little nearer to niggers or even to monkeys.”
“All this has consequences. We have seen, in many hijackings and kidnappings, the victims identify with their captors against their own family or country. They may be brutalized by their captors, in one case raped, and yet they will side with them in all too many cases. This should not surprise us. If men do not have an overruling and governing communion with God, they must have, and will have, such a relationship with men. In our humanistic age, men draw their standards and laws from men, and therefore their basic community and communion is with men. It is only such people who can be ‘brainwashed’; in truth, ‘brainwashing’ is a myth. It simply means that men without faith are dependent on and vulnerable to men and will be shaped by them. If the Lord does not mold us then men will.” ~ R.J. Rushdoony
”The faith of modern man is Pelagianism. As a result, literature abundantly reflects this faith. It shows us the hero as one who stands ‘for truth or Edenic innocence’ and is victimized by society (as in Truman Capote, Jean Stafford, James Purdy, and others). The hero is a lonely youth ‘exposing the corrupt adult world’ (Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye). The hero is a well-meaning lover (in Nemerou, Bulchner, and Macauley), or a homosexual (in Vidal and Baldwin) whom evil institutions condemn. ‘In time of organization, Eros is utterly disorganized.’ The Negro especially is seen as the poor innocent condemned by an evil society, and so on. (See Joseph J. Waldmeier, editor: Recent American Fiction, Some Critical Views, p. 31. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, 1963.) In brief, the more evil, or the lower society deems a man to be, the better he must be in the eyes of the Pelagian! It is the debased, the pervert, the criminal, and the shiftless who ipso facto represent the most oppressed and down-trodden, the most naturally good of society. As a result, the hero for modern fiction, and, increasingly, the hero for modern life and politics, is increasingly the lowest kind of man. The worst elements are subsidized, lionized, and catered to, because, in the eyes of Pelagians, they are really the best. The law-abiding and orderly people become a part of the evil environment; if they were good, they would revolt. To revolt is a sign of natural goodness. Thus, the more Negroes riot and revolt, the better they are in the eyes of the Pelagians; if they are godly, they are overlooked.” ~ R.J. Rushdoony in Chalcedon Report No. #38, October 1, 1968
Worship of the savage has fed into fag worship, and God knows what’s next.
A recent article in Slate calls for the legalization of polygamy as “the constitutional, feminist, and sex-positive choice.” After all, “legally polygamous marriages…get ripped apart during the immigration process” to America, just as slave families were allegedly ripped apart! But while these people view antebellum domestic (family) governments as entirely irresponsible and too self-centered to protect the rights of slaves, they view individuals as fully capable of determining whatever kind of marital relationship they might be able to dream up. “The definition of marriage is plastic,” she writes. “Arguments about whether a woman’s consensual sexual and romantic choices are ‘healthy’ should have no bearing on the legal process.” L’état, c’est moi!
The inappropriately-named American Conservative magazine “has had dozens of articles and posts on gay marriage. The general tenor has ranged from arguing that gay marriage is inevitable to criticizing opponents of gay marriage to arguing that support for gay marriage is the conservative position.”
The Supreme Court recently heard arguments on whether a ban on fag marriage is constitutional. Antonin Scalia asked attorney Ted Olson, “When did it become unconstitutional to exclude homosexual couples from marriage?” He was implying that marriage is ancient, and no government’s laws have ever recognized it as including fag couples. So how can a ban be called unconstitutional when not even the date at which it became unconstitutional can be known? Olson shot back with a question that Scalia did not want to answer: “When did it become unconstitutional to prohibit interracial marriages?” Scalia is right, but the equality cultists know how to hit the Supreme Court in its sore spot. By opening the door to “marriages” that were previously outlawed, now anything goes, and they won’t stop until marriage is meaningless.
Rick Warren is the pastard of the eighth largest church in the country and the author of the most-translated book in the world aside from the Bible (the new edition has QR codes!). At the first Obamination inauguration, he prayed that God would remind us that we are “united not by race or religion or blood”—because who would pray for such a thing but a Kinist?—”but by our commitment to freedom and justice for all.” He’s very much into pluralism, and he says things like he’s “not called to hate anybody” but “treat everyone with dignity and respect, as children of God,” which is the exact opposite of what the Bible teaches. He often says that he has “many, many gay friends,” and that he has “given millions of dollars” to fight AIDS.
Later during the interview, when Hill asked Warren if he believes homosexuals will go to Hell, he replied that they will not.
“No, not because they’re gay,” he said. “We go to Hell because we choose to reject the grace of God.”
When Hill asked what happens to a homosexual that accepts Jesus, Warren responded enthusiastically.
“He’s going to Heaven!” he declared. “Without a doubt.”
Warren knows how to stay on the cutting edge of Relevance, and now other pastards are following his lead. “Will a gay person be accepted into heaven, as you see it?” Oprah Winfrey asked Joel Osteen. “I believe they will,” he replied. Now Rob Bell says: “I am for marriage. I am for fidelity. I am for love, whether it’s a man and woman, a woman and a woman, a man and a man. I think the ship has sailed and I think the church needs — I think this is the world we are living in and we need to affirm people wherever they are.”
Here is a list of “affirming” denominations which can no longer be considered Christian in any sense. These include mainline denominations such as the Presbyterian Church (USA), Episcopal Church (United States), United Church of Christ, and Christian Church (Disciples of Christ).
Here’s the PCUSA publicizing a band called Micah’s Rule. The breaking of barriers is considered to be a righteous act, according to the PCUSA.
The three musicians of Micah’s Rule are an openly gay man, transgender woman and a lesbian.
But Greg McCaw, Chasity Scott and Mary Anne Hewett don’t want their sexuality to define them. They want their music to be the centerpiece of their life and ministry…
Their band name refers to the passage their church adopted — Micah 6:8 — “He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God.”
Notice that the word “mortal” is used, because “man” is sexist. They’re using this verse to declare themselves as just, merciful, and humble, regardless of what the rest of the book says.
Where preachers are concerned, it’s good to remember the phrase “Illegitimis non carborundum est,” which is mock-Latin for “Don’t let the bastards wear you down.”
“When the shepherd is weak, the wolf shits wool.” ~ the last line of the medieval fable Bèrenger of the Long Arse
Good words from TJH on the patricide of Frank Schaeffer and how it might have originated:
When he goes on a tirade against Protestantism for multi-fracturing, it needs to be remembered that his own father was the quintessence of the “split P.” He was part of the group that, after splitting from the PCUSA to join the OPC [Orthodox Presbyterian Church], split from the OPC to follow nutcase Carl McIntyre to form a denomination that required confessing premillennialism and being purified of alcohol and tobacco. Not long after that he was with a group that split again. Then, that group reversed its natural splitting tendency by making a merger that formed the RPCES. However, Schaeffer in Europe soon split from that group to form his own “International” Presbyterian Church. There are very few ordained men in the history of Christendom that have split as many times as Francis. So Frank’s hostility to Protestant “splits” should be seen as part of his more general Oedipal complex, killing not only his father but everything his father typified.
The OPC received this question:
I have noticed a recent influx of online discussions in supposedly reformed groups saying that interracial marriages are a sin. I believe they consider themselves “kinists.” What is the history of this doctrine? Would the OPC consider it heresy, or just bad theology?
The unfortunate response coaxes us to once again correct the tidal wave of misinformation that exists in no small part because our opponents have no desire to represent us faithfully.
Kinism appears to be one of those odd systems which pop up from time to time among those with a tendency toward conspiracy theories, an over-inflated sense of entitlement, and an unhealthy victim mentality.
The correct way to handle this would have been to show how we are factually wrong, line by line, but ain’t nobody got time for dat.
It being about as fringey as fringe can be [as opposed to the mainstream OPC], any knowledge I or another OPC pastor might have on the movement would come entirely from internet research, which you no doubt have already done.
In other words, this guy has spent about an hour surfing the web, if we’re being generous, and now he is qualified to render a verdict on a school of thought that he has just discovered.
A central tenet of kinism seems to be that God wants people to keep themselves within strict ethnic groupings.
This is not quite accurate, but we’ll let it slide.
Were this so, one would expect the Lord to have mentioned this some place in the Scriptures.
The Bible doesn’t mention cannibalism, but we infer that it is sinful. There’s an old saying: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Not only is there no such mention, but the Bible explicitly teaches that ethnic and tribal identity are utterly beside the point when it comes to one’s relationship to God.
As we’ll see, he completely mishandles the “explicit” proof that he promises. Ethnic and tribal identity are extrapolated from family identity, which is countenanced by the Fifth Commandment. This is why those endless genealogies that you always skip over when you read the Bible were so important. Children walk in the steps of their fathers, which means that genetic identity most certainly bears on one’s relationship to God. People do not become Christians in an impersonal vacuum.
What kinist scriptural arguments I have found are classic examples of eisegesis: that is, reading an existing belief into a Bible verse which does not in fact teach that doctrine. I won’t quote Romans 4:1-12 here, but you will note that faith in Christ’s work makes one righteous before God and a child of Abraham. Paul argues very strenuously that Jews (“the circumcised”) are not truly descendants of Abraham in God’s eyes unless they share his faith. If the Lord Christ has no place for gene pool considerations within his church, why would he be concerned with them among the nations which exist only to provide members for the church?
We are saved by grace, not race. Therefore, we are not like Jews who believe that they are in a special covenant with God by virtue of their descent. We are also obligated to understand that when the Bible teaches a lesson about spiritual descent from Abraham by faith, it is not suggesting that blood and nationhood are meaningless in life. This Alienist pastor is mixing categories, as everyone does who misinterprets Galatians 3:28 to mean that there is no such thing as race for those who are in Christ, rather than saying that race gains no favor in the salvific equation. Only the latter is true, because men of all races are equally lost without Christ.
And how do you like the statement that “nations…exist only to provide members for the church”? This is an ecclesiocentric view of history that seeks to rob the family of its place at the head of the table of society. Idolatry of the Church has no place in the Church.
Technically speaking, “heresy” is the same thing as “bad theology,” so I presume you are drawing a distinction between damnable theological error and an otherwise normal Christian coming down with a case of the stupids. Frankly, kinism’s place on this spectrum is difficult to identify. The OPC’s Book of Discipline (chapter 3) says this: “An offense serious enough to warrant a trial is: (1) an offense in the area of conduct and practice which seriously disturbs the peace, purity, and/or unity of the church, or (2) an offense in the area of doctrine for the nonordained member which would constitute a denial of a credible profession of faith as reflected in his membership vows….” (An “offense serious enough to warrant a trial” means that if the offense were proven true, it would be worthy of church discipline, up to excommunication.) So far as I’ve been able to discern, kinism does not teach salvation is restricted to certain races (as do other systems I’ve had the misfortune to run across), and so may not constitute a denial of a credible profession of faith.
Yes! We’re not damned! I’m finna call the neighbors and…
However [uh-oh], the kinist websites I looked at contained any number of deliberately insulting and demeaning racial epithets. A member of the OPC who engaged in such behavior would be seriously disturbing the peace, purity, and unity of the church, and could very well be brought to trial. Thus, while kinism may not be a gross heresy, it certainly is a schismatic (divisive) movement, one which any sane Christian should give a very wide berth.
So we’re not damned, but we’re insane. It’s important to have a “cup is half full” attitude, I always say. Actually, we like to use language that is similar to language used by our ancestors. If you don’t like it, you pusillanimous pismires can “taste sack,” as Shakespeare wrote. But schism and divisiveness are not defined by what is unpopular. If faggots (another word this impastor won’t like) were to play the same trick, arguing that Christians have “seriously disturbed the peace, purity, and unity” of the country by using words like “faggot” and “exit-holer,” the proper Christian response would not be to agree to call these people and their Weddings of Ass Destruction whatever they wish. Even the words “Eskimo” and “Indian” are considered as bad as the word “nigger” these days, to Eskimos and Indians at least. Eventually, by being overly concerned with this drama, communication itself breaks down. We are under no obligation to grant equal weight to every opinion. We are obligated to treat every man fairly, according to the second table of the Law, but respect must be earned.
I hope you, as I do, find kinism not only personally distasteful and morally repugnant, but fundamentally at odds with the Gospel itself. Because God has reconciled sinners to himself through the Cross, all sinners must be reconciled to one another. If kinism, with its offensive regard for the flesh, is true, the Apostle Paul is wrong.
For the love of Christ controls us, because we have concluded this: that one has died for all, therefore all have died; and he died for all, that those who live might no longer live for themselves but for him who for their sake died and was raised. From now on, therefore, we regard no one according to the flesh. Even though we once regarded Christ according to the flesh, we regard him thus no longer. Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come. All this is from God, who through Christ reconciled us to himself and gave us the ministry of reconciliation; that is, in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and entrusting to us the message of reconciliation. Therefore, we are ambassadors for Christ, God making his appeal through us. We implore you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God. For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. (2 Cor. 5:14–21)
So let’s recap. We have learned from the OPC that Kinism is “morally repugnant” and “fundamentally at odds with the Gospel itself” because a) people can only be identified by words that they approve, and b) sinners will not be reconciled to each other if we esteem tribes and nations as important for human development and for teaching future generations to walk in the old paths. Brilliant exposition.
A few words should be said about 2 Cor. 5:16-17 in this context:
Therefore, from now on, we regard no one according to the flesh. Even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, yet now we know Him thus no longer. Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; old things have passed away; behold, all things have become new.
To “regard no one according to the flesh” does not mean that flesh does not inform our judgments or duties. When the Apostle Paul said that all Cretans are always “liars, evil brutes, and lazy gluttons,” he was doing the very same. Instead, we are not solely to form our estimate of others or be influenced by others according to the flesh. This means, for instance, that we are not to form attachments to white people simply because they are white. (This applies to class and sex as much as race.) It does not mean that being white has no bearing on our affections. Ditto for placing no confidence in the flesh (Philippians 3), because our flesh and our works, and all the things that most people rely on, do not save. Science confirms what we all know innately, that we are naturally more at ease among our own kind, and familiarity produces greater intimacy. You can imagine some clod telling you that you must suppress the natural inclinations that were given to you by God because he has an infallible interpretation of Paul’s epistle which tells him that the flesh is meaningless. You would tell the gnostic to go take a flying leap from a 10-story building and let his airy-fairy theory cushion his fall.
You can see in the quote above that the first sentence is modified by the second. Was Christ’s sojourn in the flesh meaningless? Was it meaningless that He came first for His own tribe? No, the point is that He is now the risen Redeemer. That’s how we know Him. Scripture must interpret Scripture.
Here’s a quote from Tolkien that our impastor friends from the OPC should ponder:
“For I am Saruman the Wise, Saruman the Ring-maker, Saruman of Many Colours!”
I looked then and saw that his robes, which had seemed white, were not so, but were woven of all colours, and if he moved they shimmered and changed hue so that the eye was bewildered.
“I liked white better,” I said.
“White!” he sneered. “It serves as a beginning. White cloth may be dyed. The white page can be overwritten; and the white light can be broken.”
“In which case it is no longer white,” said I. “And he that breaks a thing to find out what it is has left the path of wisdom.”
Here’s a great one from CWNY:
Haiti was not an aberration: it was and always shall be the model for colored people. The colored people have a barbarian’s pride of race, which gives them an insatiable desire to conquer other races, but they do not love their own race as whites did when they were Christian. The love of one’s own race fosters a respect for other races, while a pride of race fosters a hatred for other races…
Love of our neighbor implies the love of our own, those who are close to us. It is extremely difficult to love because human beings are small of heart and selfish. That is why God gave us a particular people to dwell with, which constitutes our best chance of stepping outside of ourselves, maybe for just a moment, and truly loving our neighbor as ourselves. The type of love the New Age clergymen recommend is a purely selfish love. Their “neighbor” is a mind-forged abstraction who exists only to gratify their selfish need to worship a pagan god of nature, who prefers sacrifice to mercy.
“Before 1973, the American Psychiatric Association regarded homosexuality as a mental disorder. Most states treated it as a crime… A common faith and moral code once held this country together. But if we no longer stand on the same moral ground, after we have made a conscious decision to become the most racially, ethnically, culturally diverse people on earth, what in the world holds us together?” As Pat Buchanan alludes, once you move in the direction of pluralism and cast down age-old prohibitions against interracial marriage, and treat your own people as interchangeable with any other, the old morality will fall in short order, and there will be nothing to avert total destruction because there is no longer a holy standard that holds us together. We are now like Weimar, Germany, before the Nazis sandblasted the faggotry and pornography and Jewish decadence from the Fatherland; and but for a great revival, we will soon be like Sodom and Gomorrah. (You would have to go back to Sodom and Gomorrah to find the last time Equality was enshrined and celebrated to the same degree.) This answers the question of the myopic Cultural Marxist from the OPC: What does the gene pool have to do with covenant relations in the Church? You can see the answer unfolding all around you. The ancient landmarks have been removed, and civilization is crumbling, and only a fool would deny that this is causal or believe that it bodes well for the Church.
From Rushdoony’s sermon, Marriage and Woman:
[T]he biblical doctrine is that the wife is a helpmeet. Eve was created to be Adam’s counterpart, his image. This means, therefore, in the first marriage, which is a pattern of all marriage, there was a racial, a cultural, and especially a religious similarity and congeniality. Therefore, we must say that mixed marriages, religiously and culturally and racially, are not in conformity to the biblical standard. The wife cannot be a helpmeet, a counterpart to her husband, if she reflects an alien standard. As a result, cross-cultural marriages are normally failures.
“In a country that practices mixed religion you should expect to find an abundance of mixed marriages.” ~ R.J. Rushdoony
Chesterton said, “This triangle of truisms, of father, mother and child, cannot be destroyed; it can only destroy those civilizations which disregard it.” He also said that birth control was a misnomer, because it means no birth and no control. He said the same about “free love,” which is neither free nor love. Similarly, “gay marriage” is neither gay nor marriage.
Judeochristian race-mixers tell us that we’re guilty of “hate speech” or some other related “sin” for using language that they don’t like. Now they are being held to a consistent standard, which is to be expected, since to profess Christ is to be accused of the ultimate “hate speech,” as the world defines it. A pastor who ran for president of Ecuador has been fined more than $3,000 and banned from running for office or being involved with any political party for one year because he denounced the country’s legalization of faggot “marriage.” He called faggotry “immoral” and a “severe deviation of conduct.” This violates a law which “forbids candidates of publicly expressing any thoughts that discriminate or affect other people’s dignity or utilize symbols, expressions or allusions of a religious nature.” Another Christian was convicted of a hate crime in Ecuador for distributing flyers more than a decade ago to denounce a faggot pride parade and the teaching of faggotry in schools. The flyers used the word “sodomites” and denounced faggotry as an “abomination,” according to 1 Corinthians 6:9. It’s always fun when our fellow Christians accuse us of using “hate speech,” and then they are accused of the same thing by the rest of the world.
Hyphenated mulatto devil-bitch Melissa Harris-Perry says that the empire must take a collective view of children. Families are no longer allowed a private view of children. Children don’t belong to their parents, she says; they belong to the “community.” Jared Taylor recently mentioned Marion Wright Edelman’s similar denunciation of the desire to “distinguish between our own children and other people’s children.” Even the love parents show their own children is now bigotry, because it discriminates against other children.
This is an excellent video to expose the bloodthirsty slags at Planned Parenthood for the murderers they are. They don’t even want doctors to save a child who is born alive as the result of a botched abortion, or to transport the child to a hospital. The legislators listening to this are incredulous. Even when the child is alive and on the table, these diseased whores want the “mother” (i.e., murderer) and her “physician” (i.e., executioner) to choose whether the child lives or dies. We’ll wash our feet in their blood (Psalm 58:10).
The Jewmedia has been silent on the trial of consistent abortionist Kermit Gosnell in Philadelphia, who is charged with killing one pregnant woman and at least seven children who were born and then killed by having their spinal cords severed. The media silence is due to abortion (the “right to choose”) being a sacrament of the humanist religion. There is boldness now in a return to pagan exposure of infants.
When the Reagan Administration sought to protect handicapped infants from being left to die in hospitals, the New York Times was outraged. Barack Obama, back when he was an Illinois state senator, opposed legislation to give legal protection to children born following a failed abortion. Princeton philosophy professor Peter Singer has argued that parents should be able to kill children up to the age of two. And just recently a Planned Parenthood representative, asked in the Florida legislature what should happen to a baby born after a failed abortion, replied that the doctor and the mother should be the ones who decide what happens to the baby they had tried to kill.
Somehow this doesn’t qualify as terrorism, like what happened recently in Boston. (When bombs are set off, terrorists are blamed, but when shootings occur, guns are blamed. And guns have to be banned to protect all the children who have not been aborted.) No, news about abortion needs to be downplayed for fear that it might inconvenience “women” and their “right to choose.” Instead, the Jewmedia chooses to portray Michael Vick as the face of evil.
Read about the shockingly stupid parents of the traitor who married one of the terrorists.
Anti-white, anti-gun advertisements from “Moms.”
Alabama State Rep. Joe Mitchell (D-Negro) went off on a white voter who told him that he was violating his oath of office by unconstitutionally banning guns. Quoth the eloquent Kaffir:
Hey man. Your folk never used all this sheit to protect my folk from your slave-holding, murdering, adulterous, baby-raping, incestuous, snaggle-toothed, backward-assed, inbreed, imported criminal-minded kin folk…
Yes, this is a state representative accusing whites of being murderous, incestuous, adulterous baby-rapers, all because blacks were held as slaves. How does the white man respond to this slander? By getting into a pissing match over who identifies with the plight of the worshipful black man more! He even says that his father once invited a black man to church, and hired another to work in his shop, as if this has anything to do with the price of Dapper Dan pomade. The black man exonerates himself from charges of racism with this delightful chestnut: “Eddie, a person without the power to exercise a threat cannot be a racist because he or she will be eliminated.” He then told the Associated Press that “he was explaining that citizens who descended from slaves and were disenfranchised by the state constitution have a different view of history and the constitution than white citizens.” Exactly! This is what we’ve been saying for years. There’s a lot of wisdom to be found in the biblical law that we are to be ruled only by our kinsmen. You can’t pretend that blacks have an equal interest in our history and laws and expect to survive the consequences.
If Shoeshine Boy Mitchell were a white man and had used such epithets against a black man, it would have been front page news for weeks. Instead, it was almost completely ignored. And unlike the average white man, Mitchell has vowed never to apologize. Meanwhile, when CBS sports analyst Doug Gottlieb joked with an all-black panel during Final Four coverage that he was “just here to bring diversity to this set, give kind of the white man’s perspective,” it had the same effect as if he had hung a noose from the ceiling. ESPN football analyst and former NFL player Mark May tweeted that Gottlieb should be “canned” from CBS for what he said. “That type of comment is ment [sic] for a bar not a national stage. Nice job Gottlieb I hope all the kids 12 and under didn’t hear it!” Yes, it would shock their tender ears to hear the word “white” on TV, coupled with the word “diversity,” no less, from a token white man in an all-black cast. Gottlieb did the traditional, white, Doug Wilson-style ankle-grab and issued a statement after the show: “‘It was not a smart thing to say and I apologize.”
The hilarious new definition of racism from Great Thinker Chris Matthews is the belief that only white people should rule over all other peoples. “Racism” is such a great word. It can mean literally anything you want it to mean. “Honey, there’s a racist residue on these dishes. Did you use the rinse agent?” And when violence is committed against some of us because borderline retarded “citizens” and preachers accept these new definitions at face value, implicitly associating them with the fanatical desire to murder those of other races, the inventive wordsmiths can recline at ease and plead innocence. The best part is, none of this slander is illegal!
The Associated Press has banned the term “illegal immigrant” with the excuse that it “dehumanizes” spics. There sure are a lot of politically correct rules, and most of them don’t make any sense. They’ve now banned the word “schizophrenic” in favor of one who is “diagnosed with schizophrenia.” In the same way, these morons think that “colored people” is offensive but “people of color” is respectful. They’ve also banned the word “Islamist” for those who practice right-wing Islam. But they will never trade the word “racist” for “whites who have racial priorities.” The respect thing only goes so far.
Some blacks are overachievers, like this one, who was ordered by a court to “stay out of all the libraries on the face of the Earth.” It’s just as well; books are like kryptonite to them.
Nigger beasts beating a white girl on a train. It’s like when zoo animals maul their trainers, and all of us shake our heads and wonder why their wasn’t a cage between them. The beasts are called voters in our enlightened age.
Three niggers beat this white woman 40 times with a hammer, lead pipe, and crow bar, and she was still alive when her bed was set on fire with her in it. One of the perpeniggers told investigators that the crime was committed in part because he hates white people. So does the sheriff call it a racial hate crime? No, that’s just for white people. Instead, he said, “This was a particularly hateful crime.” Imagine if the races were reversed. There would be so much coverage that it would culminate in a march on Washington. Obama would say that it could have been one of his daughters. Politicians would rend their garments and gnash their teeth in front of the cameras.
Consider Ohio, where at least four white people were murdered by blacks within a period of six days in April. Not a single one is called a hate crime.
Remember when William Makgoba, the vice-chancellor of the University of KwaZulu Natal, used to grease himself every morning with lion fat to help him confront his opponents? Of course you do. He referred to white people as “superannuated apes.”
Because so many black men die young from violence and disease, the ratio of black males to black females plummets from about age 21 onward. In parts of New York City, there are 35% more black women than black men. This makes the women even more dependent on the state. Jonathan Tilove noticed that the gap is made greater in places where there are more blacks. There is no gap in places like Minneapolis and Portland, where there are relatively few blacks, and Seattle actually has more black men than women. “But it is the rule in those communities with large concentrated black populations that are the hub of African-American life, and it is as good an indicator as any of things gone wrong.” It is clearly healthier in every way for whites to live among whites, but this seems to indicate that the opposite is true for blacks. The simplest explanation for this is that when black men are around a large number of other black men, they act even more like niggers.
“The modern city is ugly not because it is a city but because it is not enough of a city, because it is a jungle, because it is confused and anarchic, and surging with selfish and materialistic energies.” ~ G.K. Chesterton, Lunacy and Letters
Africans are so sexually immoral that they take young girls and circumcise the clitoris, to deter promiscuity by females, and iron the breasts to deter sexual predation by males. Not even animals would do this to their own kind. Breast ironing is performed by heating stones, pestles, spatulas or coconut shells. One of every four girls in Cameroon, where it is practiced by all 200 ethnic tribes, has been victimized by this barbaric practice, equating to nearly four million young women. But remember, according to black preachers in America today, in their three-piece suits and their life of luxury, it was a vile sin for Southerners to hold their ancestors as slaves. It’s interesting that in Cameroon, breast ironing is primarily practiced in the Christian and Animist south of the country. Only 10% of women in the Muslim north are victimized. That’s the “new global center of Christendom” for you.
Actually, the well-known war is Sudan is said to be between Muslims in the north and Christians in the south. But the majority in the south is Animist, not Christian. According to the Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress, only 8% of the south Sudanese are Christian.
Meanwhile, in South Africa, this 61-year-old married mother of five has “married” an 8-year-old boy. They don’t intend to consummate, thank God. Even so, if the sexes had been reversed, media companies would correctly view this as child molestation, not as a cute and bizarre story of wacky jigaboos. The marriage was alledly ordered as a ritual of appeasement by the boy’s dead ancestors.
“By doing this we made the ancestors happy. If we hadn’t, something bad would have happened in the family.”
Helen said: “It is what the ancestors wanted.”
Let’s call this the perverted niggler version of Kinist adherence to the Fifth Commandment. And if this had been a consensual courtship of Christians, with no other marriage involved, how could an Alienist pastor object, seeing as how he believes that the only requirement for legal marriage is that it be “in the Lord”?
In niggerized South Africa, a stunning 25% of schoolgirls are HIV positive. Half of all the people who are dying in the country are dying of AIDS.
It’s easy to forget that the Boers covenanted themselves to the Lord before they defeated the Zulus at Blood River in 1838. This vow echoed the prayer of Jan van Riebeeck in 1654 that his people would “maintain justice and, if it is possible, may your true Reformed Christian teachings be established and spread among these wild and uncivilized people, to the honour and praise of your Holy Name and the prosperity of our God Almighty, without whose merciful help we are powerless.” Centuries later, his people discovered that without the Lord, they were powerless indeed.
There are now over 110 million venereal infections in the American empire. Venereal disease is growing at a rate faster than new jobs and college graduates.
“I’m so afraid to have any more babies now. I tried to raise really good kids in a wicked world.”
“The white majority is the problem” say race-mixers in Sweden, where young white girls are being raped left and right. Of all races in the world, whites stand alone in being chronically embarrassed by their own whiteness, or at least eager to cringe and cower when the Filthy Jew tells them to cringe and cower.
“If someone says, ‘There are a lot of blacks in the park today,’ the safest response is, ‘Really? I hadn’t noticed.’ Being aware of race, in any context outside of fulsome praise, is tantamount to racism.”
The light range was so narrow, Broomberg said, that “if you exposed film for a white kid, the black kid sitting next to him would be rendered invisible except for the whites of his eyes and teeth.”
You say that like it’s something bad.
It was only when Kodak’s two biggest clients – the confectionary and furniture industries – complained that dark chocolate and dark furniture were losing out that it came up with a solution.
Which was a button that boosted the flash by 42%, specially designed for Negroes. But what really worked the commies into a lather was “Kodak Shirley,” the reference card used as a standard for measuring and calibrating skin tone. Shirley was a beautiful white woman, of course. Can you believe that white people actually wanted an ideal skin tone in their photographs? How exclusivist. How nativist.
Unfortunately, the owner of Chink’s Steaks is changing the name, but patrons still refer to it as Chink’s.
The new Archbishop of Canterbury was enthroned in a ceremony that included spearchuckers with bongo drums and a Punjabi melody. These pictures are great. They perfectly depict modern white heretics marrying themselves to jungle savages in a blasphemous pageant amid the classical art and architecture of the past. Welcome to the New Britain!
Margaret Thatcher’s funeral turned London white again, but only for the day.
When I was a Revolutionary Marxist, we were all in favour of as much immigration as possible. It wasn’t because we liked immigrants, but because we didn’t like Britain. We saw immigrants—from anywhere—as allies against the staid, settled, conservative society that our country still was at the end of the Sixties… I have learned since what a spiteful, self-righteous, snobbish and arrogant person I was (and most of my revolutionary comrades were, too). I have seen places that I knew and felt at home in, changed completely in a few short years. I have imagined what it might be like to have grown old while stranded in shabby, narrow streets where my neighbours spoke a different language and I gradually found myself becoming a lonely, shaky voiced stranger in a world I once knew, but which no longer knew me. I have felt deeply, hopelessly sorry that I did and said nothing in defence of those whose lives were turned upside down, without their ever being asked, and who were warned very clearly that, if they complained, they would be despised outcasts.
But Hitchens places most of the blame on Enoch Powell, calling him “stupid,” “cynical,” “alarmist,” “derogatory,” and “inflammatory” for being right. The wicked always rail against the righteous. Powell predicted that Commonwealth immigration to Britain would be 10% by the year 2000. “He was off by a bit—it was only 8%. But in the years since, the immigrant population has exploded, constituting 17% of the population as a result of Labour importing voters useful for making the revolution of the hostile elites permanent.”
Our friend Mickey assembled this fascinating list of racial differences.
It fits well with what Carolus Linnaeus wrote in System of Nature (1758). He said Europeans are active, clever, inventive, and ruled by laws; East Asians are severe, haughty, desirous, and ruled by opinion; Amerinds are obstinate, contented, free, and ruled by custom; and sub-Saharan Africans are crafty, slow, foolish, and ruled by caprice.
Eighty percent of New York City high school graduates are unable to read. Eighty percent! If you have a pulse you can graduate from public school, and I’m sure they can arrange something if you don’t (you might have to enroll at an alternative school for a semester). As everyone knows, homeschoolers don’t get enough socialism. Notice how the mayor is being blamed in the article. In articles of this kind, someone or some program is always to blame, and they usually end on a hopeful note that the trend is about to turn around, but it never does. The “students” themselves are never to blame, nor is the punitive system of “free education,” because that would be racist. My old friend R.L. Dabney had a few words to say on this “cunning cheat of Yankee state-craft” (see pages 176-257). What you have just read is the final word on public education; you’ll never read anything better.
Differences in cognitive performance are just as big at age 18 as they are at age three. “The gap is there before kids walk into kindergarten,” says a Nobel prize winner in economics. “School neither increases nor reduces it.” Yet the entire premise of integrating schools and spending a fortune on poor children and diversities is that this gap can be closed. Once again, the “racists” are right. Not that we’ll get any credit. The fact that we’re always right only shows what horrible people we are.
By the way, notice how this article pretends that something can be done (no doubt another government program) to make all babies equal. One tactic is to convince parents to talk more to their babies. Tina Jew Rosenberg of the New York Times claims, with a straight face, “[I]f everyone talked to their young children the same amount, there would be no racial or socioeconomic gap at all.” It’s comedy fact! That’s why so few poor black youths grow up to be rappers, says Steve Sailer.
They’ll say anything except what is obvious, which is that children are born with the IQ that will be theirs through life, because it’s largely genetic. Neo-Babelists believe that genetics affect only the surface of the body (hair color, eye color, skin color), and we’re all the same beneath the surface. Because they are morally bankrupt, we are now economically bankrupt. We Kinists prefer to believe what our Christian ancestors believed.
I suppose we’re obligated to point out that IQ is not everything, as many pagan white advocates believe. We agree with Matt Parrott, who mocks those who believe that we should join up with all the smart Asians and Jews and form a Smartmanistan.
At the other extreme are Alienists in the death-churches who believe (I’m not making this up) that IQ is the work of the devil. When our friend Neill Payne commented to members of his PCA church in Black Mountain, NC, that blacks have made an utter mess of Zimbabwe and that “IQ is the best and most reliable and most accurate predictor of these results,” no one dared an attempt to prove him wrong with, you know, like, facts. Instead, he was branded a “racist,” was fired from his position as ruling elder, and was about to be put on trial to further investigate “the biblical character” of his views. It’s not true that this was the first time that a presbyterian denomination has disciplined a member over the issue of race, but it would be hard to find another example where a member has been dragged through the mud of the media to such an extent, merely for holding opinions. The church-coven intended to send a clear message to all others who dare to hold unfashionable racial opinions that they will be subjected to the same treatment — in Christian love, of course.
So anyway, warlock Joel Belz, the founder of World Magazine and a ruling elder in the same presbytery, said of the Payne case: “We believe as a matter of his theological sanctification before a holy God he did not have the right to be immersing himself…in the probability of IQs based on The Bell Curve.” Are you having a good time yet? Now a Christian no longer has the right to believe in IQ! The central doctrine of the Alienist cult is that all races and both sexes are potentially equal in capacities and talents and that God could not possibly have ordained otherwise.
This is what Obama heard in his Episcopal “church” during the Easter service, from an empty robe named Luis Leon: “It drives me crazy when the captains of the religious right are always calling us back…for blacks to be back in the back of the bus…for women to be back in the kitchen…for immigrants to be back on their side of the border. The message of Easter is about the power of love over loveless power.” I was all excited about the religious right for half a minute. Apparently, much like with blacks and slavery, wetbacks don’t accept the gospel if it allows for nations to decide their own citizenship. At what point will Christians decide that the gospel is more important than wetbackery? Maybe when they actually become Christians instead of humanists?
Samuel Rodriguez, president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, says, “We [Hispanics] have a more complete vision of the gospel.” It’s not just that Alienists don’t believe that the stock of any nation should be protected; they believe that borders are antithetical to the gospel.
Rushdoony quotes from Lawrence Auster’s The Path to National Suicide in this old talk. One quote that caught his eye was from former California Supreme Court justice Cruz Reynoso: “America is a political union, not a cultural, linguistic, religious or racial union.” Auster writes: “Mr. Reynoso seems to be saying that the United States is nothing but a blank slate, a sort of political abstraction lacking any cultural identity that has a right to be preserved. Since, for example, we are not a linguistic union the English language has no special status. We could turn into a Japanese or Spanish speaking society tomorrow and, according to Mr. Reynoso, this would in no way change America’s essential character since in his view America has no essential character.”
Lawrence Auster, rest in peace. Laura Wood, who nursed him through his final days in much greater comfort than he had received in New York City, wrote a very nice obituary. It’s quite true that Auster’s work “stands out on the Internet and in the history of American letters as a tour de force of philosophical and cultural insight.” We can only hope for as much with our own meager efforts. Here’s a good picture of Auster.
Alienism is becoming the norm among churchgoers as majorities in every denomination have begun to read the Bible in a whole new way.
Two years ago, national evangelical leaders began to speak out in favor of legislation to give legal status to immigrants in the United States illegally. Now, as Congress is about to start a debate on overhauling the immigration system, conservative Christians, once inclined to take a hard line on immigrants they viewed as lawbreakers, are consulting their Bibles and coming around to the pastors’ view…
Evangelical leaders, seeing the opportunity to expand their influence on a social issue beyond abortion and same-sex marriage, have broadly united this year behind a path to citizenship for immigrants in the country illegally. They are conducting an ambitious push to sway Congress, including ad campaigns on Christian radio stations in five states, meetings with lawmakers and a challenge to churchgoers to pray every day for 40 days using Bible passages that speak of welcoming the stranger.
The next step is to demonize anyone who still agrees with our “racist” Christian ancestors that nationhood is by definition exclusive. These fools have already integrated their families because they don’t believe that the family blood means anything. Any Guatemalen orphan is just as important as their own natural children, because belief in Jeezus is all that matters. They view the country in the same way, not as a nation but as a mission field, indistinguishable from the rest of the world. Dawn take you all, and be stone to you!
Let’s just pause for a moment to reflect on the statistic that a majority of Christians now believe that border laws should be ignored. They would never dream of ignoring “civil rights” laws. They know what would happen to them if they did, and their hate-churches losing tax exemption would be the least of it.
Thomas Sowell reminds these Alienists that “laws are meant to protect the society from the law breakers.”
But our immigration laws are different. Here the whole focus is on the “plight” of those who have broken the laws, and on what can be done to lift the stigma and ease the pressures they feel, so that they can “come out of the shadows” and “normalize” their lives.
Merely using the word “illegal” to describe their breaking the law is considered to be a sign of mean-spiritedness, if not racism. The Associated Press refuses to let their reporters refer to people who sneaked across the border into this country, in violation of American immigration laws, as “illegal immigrants.”
On the other hand, if an ordinary American citizen breaks a law, no one cares if he has to live in fear for years — “in the shadows,” as it were — worrying that his illegal act will be discovered and punished. No one bothers to come up with euphemisms to keep from calling what he did illegal.
No cities announce that they will provide “sanctuary,” so that American shoplifters, or even jay-walkers, will be protected from the law. But, in some places, illegal immigrants are treated almost as if they were in a witness protection program.
What is even more remarkable about this special treatment is that you are not supposed to think about it as special treatment. When a new immigration law is proposed that simply overlooks violations of the old law, that is not supposed to be called “amnesty” — even though the word “amnesty” has the same root as “amnesia.” It is all about forgetting.
Why is it not supposed to be called “amnesty”? Because illegal immigrants must “earn” their citizenship. But if an ordinary American citizen gets a traffic ticket, the law is not going to just forget about it, no matter what good deeds he does afterwards…
Why are there immigration laws in the first place? For the benefit of the American people — not for the benefit of people in other countries who want to come here.
But political and media elites treat the American people as if they are the problem — a problem to be circumvented with sophistry and pious promises about border security that have not been kept in all these years since the last amnesty, decades ago.
Making an irreversible decision to add millions of people — and their dissimilar cultures — permanently to the American body politic is something that should take months of careful examination and discussion, both inside and outside of Congress. But it is likely to get less time than you would take to decide whether to buy a house, or perhaps even a car.
Whatever happened to youthful rebellion against conformity and complacency? asks the Derb. “The white American middle classes of today may be the most conformist population that ever lived, banking and turning in unison, old and young together, like a school of fish.” Young liberals believe every jot and tittle of what their liberal forebears believed. “Their transgressions reach no further than their awful beards.” This just goes to show that rebellion is always a moral issue and is not simply for the sake of having something to rebel against. “Evil” then becomes whatever might compel us to abide by moral weights and measures. With tongue in cheek, he recommends that yutes try racism to jumpstart political transgression again for maximum “cool” factor, where “racism” bears the new definition of “almost any recognition of race…and of difference (or average differences) between groups.”
A few scruffy, unwashed protesters showed up at the recent Amren conference with signs such as “Repeat Dresden” and a crude drawing of an AK-47 with the words “This machine kills fascists.” You can’t even imagine what would happen if white people showed up at an NAACP meeting with signs like “Repeat Rosewood” and “This machine kills niggers.” The FBI would be on it before the sun set. It won’t surprise you that the Amren attendees were more racially diverse than the protesters.
The old Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary definition of fascism: “the movement towards nationalism and conservatism as opposed to internationalism and radicalism.” Where do I sign up?
Number eight in Russell Kirk’s list of Ten Conservative Principles: “conservatives uphold voluntary community…” That one seems to have been tossed to the wayside by today’s rank and file “conservatives.”
At the Amren conference, Sam Dickson said the founding fathers fumbled badly because they failed to specify who could be an American. The black dictator Dessalines was smarter than Jefferson or Madison when he specified in the Haitian constitution that no white person could ever be a citizen or own property. Sam mused on how different our country would be if we “racists” had run it for the last ten years. We would not have squandered trillions on useless wars, nor would we have encouraged the minority-lending housing bubble that so damaged the economy. By avoiding just those two catastrophes, a sensible, racially-oriented regime could have saved six trillion dollars.
There was an intellectually stimulating counter-conference which was billed as “queer, trans, and feminist positive.” Topics covered included “Othering,” “Transphobia is Bigotry, Too,” and “Connecting the ‘Isms:’ How Racism, Sexism, Heterosexism & Speciesism Intersect.” What, no symposium on phallocentrism?
I love that word “speciesism.” The supposedly endangered San Fernando Spineflower is classified as a different species from the common San Gabriel Spineflower and was therefore the reason for derailing a billion dollar housing development in California. Genetic diversity of plants and animals is considered to be of paramount importance, but very few now care about the genetic diversity of human beings. Our Lord said that we are far more important than flowers and birds (Matthew 6). When we say that God created the white race with purpose, and for this reason alone it deserves to survive, the typical neo-Christian commits the fallacy of Loki’s Wager and denies that race exists because it can’t be rigidly defined for every person. They never treat species in the same way though. If interfertility defines a species, there are still fertile exceptions, like tigers and lions, or whales and dolphins. As Steve Sailer says, there are even species that reproduce asexually, and there are interfertile types that are obviously worth differentiating, like dogs, wolves, and coyotes. When it comes to saving animals, people accept this as an imperfect science and press on. But when it comes to saving the white race, we are told by Alienists that race is meaningless.
Hispanic Family Values have blown the lid off mortgage defaults since 2005. “Diversity, in the multiple meanings we assign that term, played a major role in the Recent Economic Unpleasantness. You might think that knowing this would be relevant to immigration policy, but that just shows you are a bad person.”
The aptly-named Brown University is working hard to fight racism. In a recent workshop, faggots were segregated by race to encourage the non-white queers to be attracted to their own kind and not to whites, who are usually viewed as the most attractive. Ah, higher education. Such a good use of Dad’s money.
Roland Martin, who was interviewed with James Edwards on CNN several times, was recently fired by CNN. Edwards was always portrayed as the racist for wanting the white race to survive, and Martin was always portrayed as the wise and compassionate lover of all humanity. Now Martin says:
I’ve always kept a foot in Black media. I’m absolutely committed to building up Black media and I think that is absolutely important in 2013 that we have strong Black cable networks, strong Black websites, magazines, and newspapers where we’re able to focus on our issues and our stories and highlight our people and not necessarily wait for somebody else to do it.
But White media that focuses on our issues and stories and people is racist and hateful, as all addicts of the American Way know well.
This is a good review of Fireproof, the most celebrated Christian movie on marriage. But the movie is not really about Christian marriage, as the author contends. It’s the idea that “wives divorcing their husbands are doing God’s work by creating enough pain for him so that God can then work to make him a better man.” Which isn’t true at either end. Divorce is arguably worse for women than for men. It places them in serious economic jeopardy, especially when they have no career to fall back on after having raised a number of children. But you can see why the sort of films that are promoted by feminized churches are at root female fantasies. At the center of a typical female fantasy is a caricature of a man, not a real man. Men are guilty of the same thing, of course. Hugh Hefner is the octogenarian adolescent who has always surrounded himself with caricatures of women, not real women. The difference is that female fantasies are all too often dressed up as biblical. The men who make these movies and sell books and other materials know that their target audience is women. Therefore, there is no market for pointing out the flaws in women, because women are the market.
One thing that you commonly see in this feminized culture where women are equal to men and have their own careers but also juggle the family thing unless it’s no longer convenient for them, at which time they expect to be given half of their expendable husband’s wealth, is the bizarre ritual where pets are treated like children. I’ve seen grown men break down and cry when a pet dies, which would make any farmer go slack-jawed. To farmers, animals are workers. They are most certainly not members of the family. Philip K. Dick wrote a book called Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, which was later turned into the movie Blade Runner. The book is very different from the movie, and its theme is what it means to be human, and what it means to be a steward. While human beings in the story spend their time caring for animals and even buy robot substitutes when they can’t afford real animals, androids yearn to be human.
Fireproof is for husbands, and Courageous is for fathers. Here’s the review of Courageous, which is about a harridan wife who upbraids her fatigued husband for not following her lead, which concludes with the man taking full responsibility for everything that goes wrong, even things that are beyond his control, and then sets off to find twice as many hours in the day to do all the things that are expected of him and pray that he can avoid a nervous breakdown. At no time do viewers realize that more women than men initiate divorce. Most divorces and fatherless homes are not the result of an unwillingness on the part of men to be fathers, as this movie suggests. Independent women often eject their husbands from the home and then expect them to pay through the nose for the home and family they can’t enjoy. At worst, the main character in the film has some minor, trivial flaws which hardly merit a lesson on absentee fathers. The viewer is also punished by this kind of baptist writing:
Nathan: I wonder where all the good fathers went.
Shane: Ain’t that the truth.
Adam: What? I remember you talking about your dad. Wasn’t he like an usher or something at your church?
Shane: Yeah, but that doesn’t mean anything. Soon as the church service started he’d step out back for a smoke. You know, one time he says to me, “I better not catch you drinking. Had a beer in his hand when he said it. My mom used to nag him. That is, until they got divorced. Look, it’s not like I don’t love the guy, but it’s hard to respect a hypocrite.
Oh, heaven forfend! Whatever shall we do? The “hypocrite” smoked and drank when he was supposed to be a deacon! I feel faint. Surely he deserved to be divorced by his pious wife, on whom angels descend with wings that shimmer like moonstones. The wonder is not that dreck like this is being written but that Christians snort it up like cocaine. Posers like Doug Phillips, who is also kept in business by gullible women, treat it as award-winning material.
The film builds to total female fantasy mode at the end, and the men dress up for a formal pledge ceremony. You have to recognize it as a female fantasy when you watch and suspend all belief that real men would ever act this way without guns held to their heads.
It’s ironic that the title of the movie is “Courageous.” Dalrock is correct that “the approach to entirely ignore the actions of grossly irresponsible women and instead pile on to good fathers along with the rest of the culture takes absolutely no courage.” The people who are truly courageous are the ones who dare to hold opinions for which they will be punished. I could introduce you to hundreds that I know personally, and I could count on one hand the preachers who are among them.
The filmmakers saw a merchandising opportunity and released “The Resolution for Women.” You have to read it! It’s full of the self-affirming claptrap that made Oprah Winfrey rich, like “Surprisingly satisfied, a resolution to be content,” and “My heart, a resolution to care.” Wow, don’t strain yourselves, ladies. The filmmakers, the Kendricks, are not about to exhort women to do what doesn’t come so easily to them, like submitting to the authority of their husbands. That kind of talk would dry up ticket sales in a hurry. It would be like Rick Warren including in The Purpose Drivel Life all the icky parts of the Bible, like sin, guilt, judgment, damnation, repentance, and the cross.
In this article from Doug Wilson, you can detect a similar theme. It’s true that the husband and father occupies the office of family priest. According to Ephesians 5:25-29, the husband is to the wife as Christ is to the Church. The husband must love his wife, and the wife must respect her husband, both of which are challenges for the respective parties. But you can see how a vast industry of materials like Courageous that “entirely ignore the actions of grossly irresponsible women” is able to proliferate when men are treated unquestionably as the primary cause of whatever their wives might do. Wilson writes: “Because of the organic and covenantal nature of marriage, the problem is never ‘over there, with her,’ but rather here ‘with us’… He must constantly remember and confess that she is not the problem, he is. By bringing this gently to her attention, he is not to be primarily pointing to her need to repent; rather, he is exhibiting the fruit of his repentance.”
“The differences between a man and a woman are at the best so obstinate and exasperating that they practically cannot be got over unless there is an atmosphere of exaggerated tenderness and mutual interest. To put the matter in one metaphor, the sexes are two stubborn pieces of iron; if they are to be welded together, it must be while they are red-hot. Every woman has to find out that her husband is a selfish beast, because every man is a selfish beast by the standard of a woman. But let her find out the beast while they are both still in the story of ‘Beauty and the Beast.’ Every man has to find out that his wife is cross — that is to say, sensitive to the point of madness: for every woman is mad by the masculine standard. But let him find out that she is mad while her madness is more worth considering than anyone else’s sanity.” ~ G.K. Chesterton, The Common Man
I don’t think I’ve ever read such an unintentionally hilarious headline: “The dwarves of Auschwitz; The story of a family of dwarves snatched from the gas chamber by Josef Mengele himself sounded incredible. But how to verify the testimony of Holocaust survivors? And should you even try?” Oh no, please don’t even try. As Jew Yehuda Bauer says, “One must never argue with a survivor.” As Joe Sobran expressed the unspoken rule of Jewish citicism: “You must only ever write of us as a passive, powerless, historically oppressed minority, struggling to maintain our ancient identity in a world where all the odds are against us, poor helpless us, poor persecuted and beleaguered us! Otherwise we will smash you to pieces.” Those bungling, madcap Nazis! We’re told that they had an elaborate scheme to exterminate an entire race, but they’re always doing something bone-headed like pulling midgets from the gas chamber. The stories grow more inventive with each passing year. If the Nazis really set out to kill the physically or mentally disabled, as alleged, what were they thinking when all 12 dwarves of the Ovitz family survived? But the dwarves “were transferred several times from one side of the camp to the other,” which was undoubtedly like a holocaust in itself. I’m sure there was endless kvetching and exclamations of “Oy, gevalt!”
Hot chili is a holocaust (from Boys’ Life, June 1952). Oy, vey. Meshugenah.
Here’s definitive proof that Nazis were inhuman beasts, in case the shrunken heads and skinshades didn’t do it for you. Joseph Hertz, the Chief Rabbi of the British Empire, in the presence of members of parliament, university professors, doctors of distinction, and the Lord Mayor of London, said that all the Jews of a town near Kiev were ordered to the football stadium, where Nazis in football attire snatched from the women their infant children “and used them as footballs, bouncing and kicking them around the arena. Soon the ground was drenched with blood and the stadium was filled with anguished cries of women driven insane as they saw their children being murdered before their eyes.” Can you believe those Nazis, kicking babies around? Babies aren’t supposed to be kicked around! Doesn’t it make your blood boil? I don’t know about you, but I think this calls for a movie starring someone who has the resolute jaw of Gregory Peck. There’s no business like Shoah business.
”The Jews frighten you as if you were little children, and you do not see it. Many wicked slaves show frightening and ridiculous masks to youngsters—the masks are not frightening by their nature, but they seem so to the children’s simple minds—and in this way they stir up many a laugh. This is the way the Jews frighten the simpler-minded Christians with the bugbears and hobgoblins of their shrines. Yet how could their ridiculous and disgraceful synagogues frighten you? Are they not the shrines of men who have been rejected, dishonored, and condemned?” ~ John Chrysostom
Michael Hoffman has the final word on deicide.
Modern people think they know the answer to the question, “Who killed Jesus Christ?” They answer as they have been indoctrinated: all of our sins killed Jesus generally, and the Romans in particular were responsible… We cannot content ourselves, out of fear and political correctness, with referring to those who conspired to kill Him, in bland generic terms as “the Chief Priests and the People”… Judas was not freed from the consequences of his betrayal by some occult notion of him serving as a righteous instrument of the inevitable… Woe unto him, and to all who do as he did.
Russia has just stripped two Jews of senatorial status for having citizenship in Israel, which is illegal in Russia but legal in America. Both of them fled the country. One was then denied entry to Canada for “being a member of a group engaging in organized or transnational crime.” The other is also the president of the World Congress of Russian Jewry and the head of another Jewish Supremacist group in France called “World without Nazism.” Before leaving Russia for France, he had introduced a bill on “combating xenophobia” and was behind the erection of a large monument to the Stalin-era Red Army in Israel. What a great story.
Netanyahu says that his objective as Prime Minister is to “ensure the future of the Jewish people” by ensuring the future of the State of Israel. “There is no Jewish future without an Israel,” he says. Meanwhile, in America, the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society is boasting that the Jew “Lautenberg Amendment” has been extended, which was established to accelerate the entrance of Russian Jews. Israel for Jews is good, America for Christians is evil. This is the Jew’s Ruse.
A reformed Hitler opens the gates to Tel Aviv! He’s quite the leader, you know, and he’s all about the love.
You’ve probably heard countless times that Hitler snubbed Jesse Owens at the 1936 Berlin Olympics. It’s a falsehood.
A lost and beaten German girl at the Czech border, 1945.
March 9 was the 68th anniversary of the firebombing of Tokyo by the U.S. Air Force, which incinerated 100,000 Japanese civilians. Michael Hoffman observes that this great tragedy is not studied in special curricula, not memorialized by American museums or exhibits, is without reparations, without apology, and based on the rationale of “victor’s justice,” the perpetrators were not prosecuted for war crimes and mass murder. But you’ll never hear the end of that other “holocaust.”
Jews have their greasy fingerprints all over this commercial.
Two more mini-Hebes have been infected with herpes from vile, disgusting, filthy, diseased Jew molesters who call themselves rabbis. And then the Synagogue of Satan hides the identities of the faggot fellators from the parents! This festering cancer of a “religion” can’t pass from the West soon enough. Our nation needs a Kinist laxative to flush the constipated lump of Jew-shit from its bowels. But enough about Martin Luther’s opinions. Let’s get back to the news. Does this post ever end?
The Jewpress has been predictably silent on DHS purchasing 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition (make that almost 2.5 billion rounds), even as the empire seeks to disarm the public. A number that large is almost impossible to visualize. At the height of the Iraq War, the Army used less than 6 million rounds per month, or 0.3% of 1.6 billion rounds, which would be enough to sustain a hot war for more than 20 years. DHS has placed heavily-armored personnel carriers, capable of withstanding mines and 50 caliber bullets, on American streets. There is obviously a reason for it, but there are so many good shows on TV, and niggerball season is right around the corner. It could be that mayhem is expected in cities following the imminent collapse of the dollar. We predict that the end of the evil empire is nigh. It’s understandable that mass murder of civilians would be their preferred approach to abating revolution, but it won’t change anything.
And on the other side of it, we can only hope that white people will come to their senses and realize that revolution could have been avoided if races and religions had not been mixed in accordance with a false gospel, and if Mammon had not been worshipped instead of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.
Obama will add more taxes to the tax code, which is already 13 miles long. Meanwhile, incomes of the bottom 90% have grown by only $59 in 40 years. During the same period, average income for the top 10% of Americans rose by $116,071. I feel confident that a 25-mile-long tax code will finally make the War on Class as successful as the War on Race, the War on Sex, the War on Poverty, the War on Drugs, and every other secular crusade.
Texas will soon demand that the empire return the state’s $1 billion in gold reserves that are currently stored by the Jew Reserve at a vault in New York. “We don’t want just the certificates,” says Gov. Rick Perry. “We want our gold.” That jingling sound you hear is centralized power slipping from the grasp of the kleptocrats.
The new “bitcoin” alternative currency now surpasses 20 national currencies in value. Shares have shot up in value recently; each bitcoin is worth more than 90 imperial dollars. And when the imperial currency collapses, alternative currencies like this which are free of government control might be traded as legal tender. Though the Jew Reserve has drained the dollar of almost 100% of its value since it was founded exactly one century ago, there will soon come a day when currency will once again be backed by real value.
Get your $100 trillion Zimbabwe bank note here for only 89 cents.