There’s a new dud of a movie called 10,000 B.C. that depicts the people of prehistoric times as mud-colored. In this picture, you can see that the male actor is black and the female actor is White with makeup. Rejection of black women at the cinema, on the runway, and in other forms of advertising is commonplace. White women are simply more beautiful, even when painted black and donning dreadlock wigs. But primarily, it has the benefit of allowing the Jews who make such movies to promote miscegenation. Blacks don’t like the fact that, in this movie, the leader who unites the tribes of Africa against the Egyptians is light-skinned. Blacks apparently don’t like fair saviors. (Mel Gibson drew the same criticism when, at the end of Apocalypto, the heroic White Christian Spaniards arrive to slay the monsters and establish order.) Even worse, a child whose coming is foretold by prophets has fair skin and aquatic blue eyes! She looks nothing like a cave-woman, of course, and is so highly-prized by the mulattos that retrieving her after she is stolen is the plot of the film. Perhaps our grandchildren can experience a savage world like this, in which recessive White genes are so rare that their appearance sparks a sort of Trojan War. I suppose it’s unlikely that the actors of 10,000 B.C. will receive NAACP Image Awards, but there’s always hope for other actors promoting afrocentrism, because racism is still in vogue if you’re the right kind of person.

And just when you thought it couldn’t get any more ludicrous, here comes a young-earth nutjob with an infallible calendar to wax critical on the aforementioned film. "The movie and the afrocentrists both have it wrong, the ancient world had all ‘races’ of people, and combinations of them, many of whom were precisely navigating to and settling disparate parts of the globe, and ancient Egyptian evidence indicates there were all the ‘races’ in ancient Egypt too, not just black, and not just white, all members of the human syngameon, the human kind in biblical parlance. The ‘races’ of humans were naturally selected from the founding gene-pools of the tribes who descended from Ham, Japheth, and Shem, see the Table of Nations in the Bible (Genesis 10), as they moved off into new ecologogical niches in the post Deluge, Ice Age world, with darker-skin people having greater survivability in the middle latitudes, and lighter-skin people having greater survivability in the more extreme latitudes; elementary biology, read more about it all in the free ebook download of my first book, Old Earth? Why Not!, and see how the ancients during the Bronze Age, which was ongoing during the Ice Age, accurately measured and mapped the globe, as evidenced with the astronomically-derived dimensions of the Great Pyramid, under category here Ancient Navigation." I’ll bet there’s some fascinating punctuation in that e-book. I wonder if he explains how the racial diversity that still exists today came about "instantaneously" between Noah’s Flood and the Egyptian dynasties. According to Ussher, a global Flood destroyed all life on earth, save eight, in 2348 BC, and according to scientists, the Egyptian dynasties began as far back as 3200 BC. Were the other races that we see in Egyptian drawings smuggled onto the ark along with the dinosaurs? And do answers really matter to the race-mixing nutjobs? All that matters to Ken Ham is his infallible calendar. Even if we hyper-generously date the drawings at 1700 BC, that leaves only 600 years for Noah’s own grandchildren to evolve into Caucasoid, Negroid, and Mongoloid races. Not even Darwinists believe in such rapid mutations. Wait a minute! I just had a thought. Perhaps dinosaurs built the pyramids!

Now that we’ve had a good laugh, let’s get into the serious stuff. You’re probably like me. You read Hearthstone regularly, and you think to yourself, "For the love of Pete, this is terrific. It just couldn’t get any better." But you would be wrong, my friend. Dead wrong. The latest article, "A Kinist Cosmology," is not to be missed. Two things jump out at you even before you start reading. The first is Psalm 144:11-15, written by a Kinist named King David: "Rescue me and deliver me from the hand of foreigners… That our sons may be as plants grown up in their youth; that our daughters may be as pillars…that our barns may be full, supplying all kinds of produce…that there be no breaking in or going out; that there be no outcry in our streets. Happy are the people who live in such a state; happy are the people whose God is the Lord!" Happy are the people who follow Tobit 4:12-13: "Beware, my son, of all immorality. First of all, take a wife from among the descendants of your fathers and do not marry a foreign woman, who is not of your father’s tribe; for we are the sons of the prophets. Remember, my son, that Noah, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, our fathers of old, all took wives from among their brethren. They were blessed in their children, and their posterity will inherit the land. So now, my son, love your brethren, and in your heart do not disdain your brethren and the sons and daughters of your people by refusing to take a wife for yourself from among them."

The second thing that grabs you in the Hearthstone article is the wonderful quote from St. Cyprian of Carthage: "If it is a source of joy and glory to men to have children like to themselves – and it is more agreeable to have begotten an offspring then when the remaining [successive] progeny responds to the parent with like lineaments – how much greater is the gladness in God the Father, when any one is so spiritually born that in his acts and praises the divine eminence of race is announced!" The word "race" in this quote is the Latin word "generositas," which means "noble breed," or good breeding.

The Hearthstone article is a masterpiece, and I would never say such a thing lightly. The only objection I have, as we shall see, is to the idea that Africans descended solely from Ham, although it is a minor objection, for it is quite plausible that the Hamites merged into foreign stock, having immediately after the Flood become outcasts due to Ham’s treachery. It is all the more plausible because Nimrod and the other postdiluvian "titans" bear such a striking resemblance to their antediluvian counterparts, called Nephilim, who were likewise the mixed offspring of the lines of Seth and Cain. It is therefore perfectly understandable, and at least partially correct, that our fathers considered Africans, who are "morphologically, psychologically and intellectually divergent from all other races" to be Hamites.

The idea of Naamah, a Cainite, marrying Ham is fascinating to ponder. The most interesting quote of all comes from Saint Augustine, who wrote that Ham is to be "’included neither in the first-fruits of Israel nor in the full harvest of the Gentiles, and he can only stand for the hot breed of heretics.’ Moreover, he subsequently tells us that ‘we all (that is, all Christians) hold confidently to the firm belief’ in the perpetual segregation of the City of God." The article elicits some interesting questions: In exactly what way was Eve tempted? What was the Mark of Cain? The answers to these questions have everything to do with why Noah was "perfect in his generations." Ask a race-mixing neo-Christian what "perfect in his generations" means, and you’ll hear all manner of nonsense about Noah having a warm personality and being a charming dinner companion. No, it meant that he had none of Cain’s blood. And this gets us right back to the question of whether the catastrophic Flood was global or regional. Was it designed to destroy the faithless, bloodsmutting Sethites, among whom Noah was assuredly ostracized, or was it also designed to kill polar bears and dig the Grand Canyon? The former makes perfect sense, and the latter is nonsense, especially in light of what we know about the existence of various races both before and after the presumed date of the Flood. (The global flood theory is not even biblically necessary, as erets means not the entire globe but "country," "ground," or "land." Also be sure to read this informative piece by Charles Weisman.)

There were very likely unspecified gaps in the recorded genealogies between the Flood and Babel, which leaves in doubt the presumed date of the Flood. Hamite migration routes are also in question. But Hearthstone raises a point that many will overlook: When the Israelites, led by Joshua and Caleb, investigated the Promised Land for the first time, they encountered descendents of the Nephilim (Numbers 13:33) who were also Canaanites, descended from Ham. This supports the stated theory that the line of Cain was carried aboard the ark through Naamah. On the other hand, if Noah was perfect in his generations, why would he have permitted anything less in his sons?

Though Christ likens the "days of Noah" with the "days of Lot" in Luke 17:26-29, it is certain that, while God destroyed two cities – Sodom and Gomorrah – over faggotry, he destroyed an area far, far greater over miscegenation. And today we are cursed with liars and charlatans who, under the pretence of Christianity, corrupt the youth by teaching, "There is only one race; the human race." Thank God in heaven that our fathers did not believe this, but instead gave us an inheritance among a people with whom we share family and familiarity.

RC Sproul interviews a Jew on intelligent design to the universe. They talk about "ultimate truth," ironically, and it’s amazing how many times American domestic slavery and the 20th century expulsion of Jews from Germany are brought up as the very sine qua non of Evil. The Jew-liar and P.C. Fool agree that we should never have an established church in this country like – as Stein puts it – "the Presbyterian Church or the Jewish Church or the Moslem Church." Next week, coincidentally, I’ll be interviewing various porn stars and child molesters on what they do for Mother’s Day. Don’t you hate the long lines in the restaurants? I know I do. I assure you that Jews laugh their asses off at the stupidity of Christians. I agree with them, but I’m not laughing.

The news that the parents of 166,000 homeschool/segregationist students in California could face criminal charges is really nothing new. From the book The Ancient City: A Study on the Religion, Laws, and Institutions of Greece, by Fustel de Coulanges: "The state allowed no man to be indifferent to its interests… Education was far from being free among the Greeks. On the contrary, there was nothing over which the state had greater control. At Sparta the father could have nothing to do with the education of his son. The law appears to have been less rigorous at Athens; still the state managed to have education in the hands of masters of its own choosing. Aristophanes, in an eloquent passage, shows the Athenian children on their way to school; in order, distributed according to their district, they march in serried ranks, through rain, snow, or scorching heat. These children seem already to understand that they are performing a public duty. The state wished alone to control education, and Plato gives the motive for this: ‘Parents ought not to be free to send or not to send their children to the masters whom the city has chosen; for the children belong less to their parents than to the city.’" In Athens, a man could be indicted for "incivism," which meant being insufficiently affectionate toward the state. It’s obvious that state control over education grows in proportion to state control of the military. Here in America, it was pushed by the same Abolitionists who destroyed the Old Republic. Now the American Empire is beyond gargantuan, with a budget in the trillions, and those who think their children belong to them and to Christ will eventually be viewed as enemies of the state, whether the current ruling ultimately succeeds or fails. Meanwhile, there is nothing more absurd than men like RC Sproul and Ben Stein who carry on about the woe-is-me-evil of benevolent domestic slavery in the 19th century. That was nothing compared to our enslavement today.

We leave you today with an inspiring letter from a friend of ours in Oklahoma who shall remain nameless but who has been instrumental in exposing the North American Corridor, and whose meddling in the dreams of megastate architects has even been the subject of a White House press briefing:

Mr. Brownfield,
I read your article posted on News With Views this afternoon, and found it rather insightful. However, I believe that a key component of the equation was left out, and exclusive emphasis was placed on political/statist attacks. I would suggest that there is another way, a way that has been demonstrated historically to work wonders, to destroy a nation.
The destruction of the stock of the original founders. (We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union…and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.)
We see this pattern throughout history, not least of whom it is evident with ancient Israel, ancient Rome, Portugal, Aztecs, and in fact, every nation and people who are no longer present, or a factor, in the world has this as another common factor. The Founding Fathers made it clear, through the enactment of particular immigration policies (Immigration Act of 1790, etc.), and through their writings throughout the 18th (Thomas Jefferson), 19th (John C Calhoun, Vice President) and early 20th century (Immigration policies until 1965), that it is a key factor to defend the hegemony of the founding stock and not abdicate, or acquiesce, to a new, possibly "immigrant" class, of a foreign stock.
To destroy the peoples who created America is the fastest, surest way to destroy America itself…and we are currently witnesses to this destruction. The institutions may remain for a time, but not the people who created it; the infrastructure may remain for a time, but not the people visionary enough to foresee its need; remnants of the culture may remain for a time, but not the people whose shared ethnic, linguistic, religious, and mythological history and connections gave birth to said culture.
A nation is not exclusively or entirely a statist term, but is very much an ethnic term. We use the word "nation" to translate the Greek word "ethnos," from which we derive our word "ethnic." If the institutions a particular people group create be destroyed, but the people themselves remain, then there is no fear for the future, for they will rise again to recreate the means of their cultural expression…the expression of a racial awareness. But once those people have faded from the stage of history, once they have lost the will to power necessary to ensure the survival of their own, the expressions they made manifest, which we alive currently hold dear, will likewise fade from the stage of history.
I appreciate your article, it was very interesting, I wish merely to point out what I believed to be a factor missing from the equation. Thank you for taking the time to read this.