Spirit/Water/Blood

The great R.L. Dabney had this to say about Sarah Palin:

…[W]hen the mother shall have found another sphere than her home for her energies; when she shall have exchanged the sweet charities of domestic love and sympathy for the fierce passions of the hustings [politics]; when families shall be disrupted at the caprice of either party, and the children scattered as foundlings from their hearthstone, it requires no wisdom to see that a race of sons will be reared nearer akin to devils than to men. In the hands of such a bastard progeny, without discipline, without homes, without a God, the last remains of social order will speedily perish, and society will be overwhelmed in savage anarchy.

…[T]he very traits which fit her to be the angel of a virtuous home unfit her to meet the agitations of political life, even as safely as does the more rugged man. The hot glare of publicity and passion will speedily deflower her delicacy and sweetness. Those temptations, which her Maker did not form her to bear, will debauch her heart, developing a character as much more repulsive than that of the debauched man as the fall has been greater. The politicating woman, unsexed and denaturalized, shorn of the true glory of her femininity, will appear to men as a feeble hybrid manikin dwarf, with all the defects and none of the strength of the male. Instead of being the dear object of his chivalrous affection, she becomes his importunate rival, despised without being feared!

Communists were way ahead of Judeochristians in destroying Christian families:

I think H.L. Mencken would gladly have applied his definition of an idealist to those who invest their fleeting political hopes in a woman whose appeal rests largely in being beautiful and unknown. “An idealist,” said Mencken, “is one who, on noticing that roses smell better than a cabbage, concludes that they will also make better soup.” For those who are slow with analogies, women are roses and men are cabbages.

John Knox said, “To promote a woman to bear rule, superiority, dominion or empire above any realm, nation, or city, is repugnant to nature, contumely to God, [and] a thing most contrary to his revealed will and approved ordinance.”

“When, in the name of equality, you introduce women into institutions and areas of life that have always been male dominated, you inevitably alter the character of those institutions.”

“All women want to be put in their place, because their place is an exalted one: home and hearth. The more women are allowed to pervert their spiritual natures, the more unhappy and enraged they will become. The cruelest thing a man can do to a woman is to give her what she asks for, rather than what she longs for.”

Sweet bitterness:

To me, the strangest thing about the Palin nomination is that evangelicals are now joyously supporting a liberal and race-traitor simply because his running mate is nominally pro-life. But a warmonger is not pro-life, and it’s beyond strange to see Judeochristians who offer up their sons to the Molech called Israel throw all caution to the wind in the hope that somehow a holy-rolling beauty queen (and an expert on Lubavitch Satanism) will overturn Roe vs. Wade. But this is the farce we call American Christian Conservatism in a nutshell. (At the link, Chris Ortiz once again shows why the Chalcedon Blog is so valuable. Here too. And here on the Jew’s program of enhancing his power and influence by playing on the fears of the sheeple, and actually leading terror campaigns against them, like 9/11.)

“The garrison state is on the march, due to our sins. This militarized nation of ours is punishment for sin. Let us ask God for mercy and let us amend our lives so that a better leadership and a better day may dawn for our land.”

We have a very good chance of passing legislation at the next Congress that will severely limit the number of families the ATF can murder.

In the clip below, Joe Biden says there is a very strong and common bond in culture, religion, and ethnicity. What? you say. Joe Biden is a White nationalist? No, silly, he’s just kissing up to Jews, and a necessary part of this is advocating leniency for the scum named Pollard. He would never acknowledge any such thing for the benefit of his own people. He would never call himself a White separatist but is happy to call himself a Zionist (a Jew-blood separatist).

And then there was the nasty business about Iowa schools outperforming D.C. schools because of “what you start off with, what you’re dealing with,” meaning White kids. Tsk, tsk. Are the unsatisfying hair plugs to blame for such hatred and bigotry? We may never know.

Tom Wolfe explains the duties of a “community organizer,” which is the only thing Obamination has ever done.

John McCain’s “daughters.”

Get to know the people who touch your salad.

“Oh, the horror of Mexicans forced to live in Mexico! Is there any more abominable cruelty?”

By the time Whites are a minority in their own country, the equivalent of the entire populations of Mexico and Canada will have moved here.

The racial gap is growing on the SAT test, despite the untold billions that have been spent trying to close it. Just think of all the money we would have right now if we had listened to “racists” decades ago.

What Sweet Daddy Bailey did to the sacrament of baptism.

This sermon is about as deep as every other sermon I’ve heard in such churches. I’m sure Sarah Palin has heard a few in her day.

Sarah Palin’s pastor actually said this: “I hate criticisms towards the President because it’s like criticisms towards the pastor - it’s almost like, it’s not going to get you anywhere, you know, except for hell. That’s what it’ll get you.” Who could have guessed that the CREC has planted churches in Alaska?

“Boundaries are an essential element in any art,” writes Double-Minded Doug Wilson. “Sexual boundaries follow the same kind of pattern.” What about boundaries for blood heritage? The always-impressive Dave Hodges asks,

What would you say if somebody were to tell you that the slippery slope started when all the miscegenation laws were eradicated? Do you think the rejection of the ancient and longstanding respect of the prohibition against miscegenation has anything to do with the sudden rejection of all traditional views of sexuality? Even recent laws regarding gay “marriage” have cited the repeal of the anti-miscegenation laws as proof of their position… Or were all Christians prior to the 1960’s completely deluded?

You might expect an intelligent response to Dave’s intelligent question, but you forget that Wilson’s blog is a haven for the double-minded. The first response was a KKK joke, and it fell apart from there, despite Dave’s valiant efforts. Wilson, who has never attempted to rebut age-old opposition to miscegenation, “not to mention all the arguments based on nature, prudence, kinship, and science,” just as he has never attempted to flap his arms and fly to Venus, makes more jokes, saying that he would need “five hours, a pair of vise grips, duct tape, sheet metal snips and a rubber mallet” to show that miscegenation is perverted. When the blind lead the blind, they congratulate each other on their powers of discernment. Dave offers to educate these ignorant folks by linking to some Kinist writings, but it’s all ignored. (Hence the ignorance.) Nothing is quite so reassuring as continuing in ignorance. Dave writes, “When marriage is based solely on the anti-Christian notion of equality, and is merely reduced to ‘two people who love each other,’ there is nothing preventing any two people from feigning the Holy State of Matrimony.”

One commenter attempts to help Wilson by denying the whole point of his post, saying, “It seems to me that boundaries are inherently arbitrary and only required for sub-Christian assumptions.” Another writes, “I am increasingly of the view that kinists should only marry other kinists.” Another consigns Hodges to the “brood of vipers.” Yet another offers up this devastating rejoinder: “David, do you know any black people?” Dave mocks their liberalism by saying that “Rushdoony, Dabney, Robert E. Lee, George Washington, Matthew Henry, Thomas Aquinas, Augustine, Cyprian, and a whole host of others…were all a bunch of idiots. Maybe those people should have read the Bible more.” And on a serious note, he writes, “As much as it pains me to say it, R.L. Dabney was right. And he’s rolling over in his grave with all the people who call themselves Southern Presbyterians proving him right at every turn.”

The award for most hilarious and laminatable comment goes to one Will S., who amuses us thusly:

I think kinists need to be ignored. They are maybe .0005% of the population and I am not sure about Idaho but I know they are not growing in Detroit. In other words, I think that we as Christians should probably focus on the true and growing presense [sic] of secularism, paganism, weak evangelicalism, pentacostalism [sic], etc. These are areas in which our efforts might affect more than a handful of people. If Kinists, by thier [sic] charm and engaging message, start to grow and impact society, we can take on thier [sic] stupid arguments then. For now, ignore. And I would even suggest delete posts - or does that make me close minded?

Dave is correct that “the Old Law was pretty clear about not marrying other races. The question is how the Old Law applies to us in the New Covenant.” As we’ve seen, there is mass confusion on this point among Christians of all stripes, including self-described conservative, Reformed Christians. Even John Calvin, in chapter 16 of On Civil Government, proposed that constitutions are to be based not on God’s law but a vague “equity.” He equates God’s moral law to natural law, which is not revealed. R.J. Rushdoony gets right to this matter on page 9 of The Institutes of Biblical Law, calling this idea of Calvin’s “heretical nonsense” and “classical humanism.” Calvin lived in Christian Europe, and his diversity of constitutions would not have encompassed this. The church fathers did not have to even think about a great many things that plague us today, courtesy of our fellow Christians. Is it any wonder that the Christian faith has been dumbed down to helpful advice on relationships, health, and finances?

Hungarians are racists who have never read Galatians 3:28! “There is neither Hungarian nor Romanian nor borders nor boundaries nor distinctions.”

American Judeochristians obviously need to send missionaries to compel these people to open their borders, hearts, and legs to other races. Doug Wilson can explain to them how our Brave New Generation learned to expose the hatefulness of our fathers and mothers, strike off into uncharted territory, and convince all of our friends that it was The Biblical Thing To Do.

There sure are a lot of racists out there.

Whites literally exhaust themselves mentally trying to treat blacks as their equals. This is one of about 10,000 scientific discoveries that we “racists” could have perfectly hypothesized. Isn’t it odd that racists are always right?

There were ten times as many black slaves transported across the Atlantic as there were White slaves taken by Muslims, but in British schools the former get all the attention and the latter none. That’s called Equality. And here in the late states the story is even more skewed because only about a half million of the 10 million blacks that crossed the Atlantic were purchased here. They thrived, of course, under gracious Christian tutelage, though their descendants treat this as the worst crime since Calvary.

Aquanetta wants more. If your children have the audacity to ask why they, rather than Savage-Americans like Aquanetta, should not benefit from the toil of your hands, tell them to stop acting like Nazis. Do they want the terrorists to win?

What you can give to the person who has everything.

White people who have fun are insensitive, says a High Yaller organization. And watermelon art is clearly racist. So is garbage bag art.

Obama’s brother from another mother, or something:

“…[W]hiteness is the symbol of the antichrist… Black theology seeks to analyze the satanic nature of whiteness and by doing so, prepare all nonwhites for revolutionary action… Christianity and whiteness are opposites.” So wrote James Cone (The Case Against Barack Obama, by David Freddoso, pp. 158-159). And the “church” to which Obama belonged for 20 years bases its “vision statement,” according to its own website and numerous statements by its “pastor,” on the black liberation theology of James Cone. And this “church” received $1.5 million (poor, oppressed Negroes) through Bush’s so-called faith-based initiative. But the important thing is that America is moving beyond its racist past with the nomination of the Obamination of Desolation.

“No crosses for murdered cops, but a city can own a kosher dairy plant that employs rabbis to make sure their products adhere to Jewish law?”

An international banker is on your face!

Jew-media is doing its best to hide the races of criminals.

If you want to know why Jews control the media, here is an excellent reason. Read it very carefully. A Jew writes his will and wants his money to go only to Jews. As everyone should know, Jews identify themselves by blood, through the mother, they say. One can be an atheist Jew or a religious Jew (but they really are disowned if they become Christian Jews). The news article must not put it in these terms, however, because to do so would expose the “racism” of so-called “Judaism.” So it is framed entirely in terms of belief, which is a red herring. This is why ownership of the media is so important for revolutionaries. (You’ll only see this story in one place, and it will fall into the memory hole very shortly.) Needless to say, a White man who disinherits his children if they marry non-Whites will experience the full weight of the media.

Yet all the world came together to celebrate Chineseness during the Olympics, which is thoroughly and completely “racist.”

And the most prominent Chinaman of the opening ceremony, Yao Ming, is the product of a eugenics experiment. But White folks who engage in their own selective breeding, especially when faced with extinction, are racists.

The word “Chinaman” is racist. Make a note of it. See how many times you can say it before suppertime.

I love the Japanese. They’re so racist.

And I love Russians for many reasons, foremost of which is that they don’t tolerate Jews. Read about the Tel Aviv-Tbilisi military axis. Georgia is called the Israel of the Caucasus, and so it won’t surprise you that human trafficking is legal there, making Tbilisi one of the main hubs for sex slavery. Hitler could see all of this coming, of course, and so could anyone who lived in Berlin during the early part of the 20th century. Example:

James Edwards is the devil, says Abe, but so are all “homophobic” Christians. It’s good that faggots, child molesters, and baby-killers, when not attending the Democratic National Convention, are warning us about these things. You never know who you can trust anymore.

Here is one ebullient Democrat who plans to vote wisely this November:

A college degree is not what it used to be.

Now that’s rock and roll. Accept no substitutes.

The countries of the world that do not use the metric system.

Show-off.