The North is Full of Tangled Things

…so said G.K. Chesterton.

John Holzmann discovered that questioning the Infallible Interpretation of Genesis will turn a man into a pariah and threaten his livelihood. After he wrote this very good article on the fanaticism of one side of the creation debate, his homeschool curriculum company was banned by the Christian Home Educators of Colorado, which is led by a shrill and obnoxious man named Kevin Swanson. Swanson is basically a cross between Doug Phillips and Jonathan Krohn. Mr. Holzmann writes:

CHEC, apparently, can’t trust Christian homeschoolers in Colorado to do their own research, read what “the other side” is saying, and/or come to their own conclusions in these matters. CHEC feels the need to protect homeschool families from themselves…and from companies like Sonlight that don’t teach origins in quite the way CHEC prefers…

Only leaders who teach in lock-step with Ken Ham and the Answers in Genesis and Institute for Creation Research crowd deserve a place at the CHEC convention.

Just read this if you want to see how modern evangelicalism has warped under the influence of censors like Swanson and his mentors, Doug Phillips and Bill Gothard. They have even gone so far as to ban “non-Christian” books from homeschool conferences, and this includes any book without a “Christian metaphysic,” whatever that means, regardless of its factual and educational content. They like to denounce any views that fail to meet Ken Ham’s approval as irredeemably tarnished by evolutionary thinking. Anyone who disagrees with Ham has “agreed with the world that the Bible can’t be trusted,” in Ham’s words. Of course, it doesn’t end at the debate on creation. Holzmann has observed that whereas Christians founded most of the leading educational institutions in the West, the Phillips and Ham clones are teaching Christians “to shun the very institutions they founded,” despite the fact that each of the Hamites “is, himself, a highly-educated person – enjoying not just a high school education, but a college and post-graduate degree!… But they feel their own children are unable to match them?”

The comfort of having a truth filter is hardly unique to Christians, but at some point the warning flags should fly when men are forming businesses based on opinions that they insist are normative for all, without exception, but which have found vast disagreement among our Christian forefathers in all ages. (It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see how race and miscegenation apply to this discussion.) It’s no surprise that women are doing the actual homeschooling while these businessmen have created the homeschooling market. Perhaps this is why the focus of major homeschool organizations is no longer on education, which would mostly encompass materials beyond the control of these men, but on “discipleship” and “nurture” and “vision-casting.” They use a lot of buzzwords like this which are simply designed to gain market edge. The market is what motivates Doug Phillips to teach that it is unbiblical for a woman to have a career, regardless of circumstances.

I take it he thinks St. Paul must have been horribly mistaken to list the seven or eight women he does among the “workers in the Lord” he specially greets at the end of the book of Romans (chapter 16): Prisca (Priscilla), Mary, Junia (female name, or, possibly, Junias, a masculine name), Tryphaena, Tryphosa, Persis, Julia, and the sister of Nereus. And, of course, he seems to ignore the Proverbs 31 woman who engages in all kinds of commercial ventures, buys real estate, earns enough from some venture to plant vineyards…and is educated enough that she can “open her mouth in wisdom” (see especially, vv. 13-14, 16, 19, 24, and 26).

I ask myself: Where does this kind of dominionist stance toward women end? When daughters are no longer permitted to learn how to drive? When wives are disciplined through spanking?

This tendency to disparage liberty and impose restraints that everyone is expected to follow on pain of excommunication and legal jeopardy is essentially Yankee. And sure enough, that’s what all of these men are. Funny how that happens.

Mr. Holzmann continues his very enlightening analysis of Swanson here, although it is blunted by unfortunate links to a gaggle of harpies who gossip endlessly on their blogs about third-hand information and couldn’t care less about who is harmed as a result of it.

The marketing buzzwords Swanson uses are very feminized, based on personal feelings and emotions, which is not surprising because the audience is almost entirely female. This market doesn’t respond to masculine concepts, including the objective, abstract, and analytical. The masculine scientists and artists of antiquity are thus demoted due to their inadequate “discipleship” and failure to teach truth in “the womb of relationship.” Swanson asks:

Can you remember a teacher say, “My student, give me your heart”? Did you ever have a college professor do that? “William, I’m concerned about you”? That’s not taught in teaching colleges. They’re not taught about hearts. They’re not taught about relationships. They’re not taught about discipleship and nurture and love…

We need to call [Christians] to use words like discipleship and nurture. Stop talking schools with me. Don’t talk about education with me. Let’s not talk about home education and Christian education, Christian schools. Let’s talk about discipleship.

Rather than patriarchists, I think these homeschooling businessmen are more properly recognized as feminarchists. And as Holzmann observes, they have an unusual grasp on Christian dominion. True Christian dominion is not very sexy; it doesn’t lend much time to the drafting of manifestos; it produces dirt under the fingernails and various unpleasant smells that one could never imagine clinging to the outerwear of feminarchist businessmen. Holzmann rattles off a few: “food gathering or production; the building of houses; the caring for children; protection with lethal force, if necessary; trade…” In fact, do me a favor and don’t presume to lecture anyone about discipleship unless you have calluses on your hands.

Get a load of General Swanson: “I want men willing to die, to shed their blood for the Christ who shed His blood for us. Oh, would that God would make us willing to bleed for the Kingdom, to bleed for the truth, and to bleed for the love of the brothers!” He bled on a can of tunafish once. Below you’ll read about a hero named Horst Mahler who is truly laying down his life for the brethren, and he doesn’t have time to thrill the ladies with his manliness and gargantuan ego.

And this is where we come directly to the dead end of a “Christianity” that has drained the blood of our kinsmen from it. Swanson has constructed a false dichotomy between what he calls the City of God and the City of Man, which is not at all what Augustine theorized. Abraham taught his children to memorize extensive genealogies and exploits, but all that stuff is so “City of Man,” says Jonathan Krohn Swanson. He suggests spending no more than “about 30 seconds” teaching our children the history of our people. Greeks? Romans? Americans? “They all fall down. That’s the history of the City of Man. And that’s all our children need to know.” Then, we are to spend four years teaching them “City of God” stuff, such as church history and missions and manifestos and Ham-approved literature. “We want to give our children a radically different education than what they will get in the City of Man.” And the education will suck, to put it mildly. Ask yourself how long the Tolkiens and Lewises and other Christian academic luminaries of our age would have tolerated this rubbish. Yeah, for about 30 seconds.

The feminarchist approach to education is the same as their approach to science in general. Swanson says: “I believe that the reformation of the modern era began in the 1960s…with Henry Morris and John C. Whitcomb who said, ‘There is a God who made these things.’” Of course, the Christians who gave birth to modern science trusted in God to guide their minds and believed every word of the Bible. This is the sort of arrogance that leads Swanson to suggest that physicists and chemists who don’t join hands and pray before splitting every atom are building the “City of Man.”

It’s strange that the word “dominion” can mean so many different things. Gary DeMar does a good job here of exposing the amillennial, anti-dominionist stance of Michael Horton and those “confessing evangelicals” who share his goofy ideas about separating church and state. They think that Israel-under-Caesar is the normative condition of the Church, that exile is permanent. But judgment in Babylon was a temporary judgment. Horton thinks we’re still in Babylon, and there will be no dominion until Christ returns. As such, the Church “inadvertently ends up transforming culture as a side-effect.” Obviously, this kind of muddled thinking results in Christians who fully expect to be ruled by pagans and who consent to the evil regime called America because it is “relatively” better than life under the Khmer Rouge. As DeMar points out, God’s Church was sent into exile for 70 years under the old covenant. If exile is to last 2,000+ years under the new covenant, how is the new covenant better?

DeMar calls Horton’s theology “status quo amillennialism.” It is very much in accord with this nonsense from John Piper, who calls miscegenation “a positive good” to be “celebrated”:

The closer we get to Dominion Theology the closer we get to living by the sword. Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world my disciples would fight.” This seems to mean that we are not moving toward a true understanding of the kingdom of God in this world as we move toward a greater and greater use of the sword to authorize kingdom values…

It seems that the theocratic ideal of Israel in the Old Testament was specifically abandoned in the New Testament as the Gospel ceased to be focused on an ethnic and political reality called Israel (Matt. 21:43) and became a multicultural, multiethnic worldwide movement without ethnic or political definition. It will be fitting, when Christ returns, that he be given the right to establish a kingdom of more specific political boundaries. But in the meantime we do well to exert our influence in ways that do not put the sword into the hands of the priests.

Translation: open borders, race-mixing, and the necessity for Christians to abstain from the “legislation of morality” because God’s kingdom is spiritual and apolitical. That last part about ecclesiocracy is a red herring. The practical immediacy is to turn the world’s functions over to our enemies because we are to view ourselves as being in permanent political exile. Rushdoony described this thinking as pietistic, retreatist, and irrelevant.

The difference between a pagan’s love for his own race and a Christian’s love for his own race is a difference in intensity. Just as shame turns to guilt and kindness to charity in a Christian culture, so does pride of race turn to love of race in a Christian culture. What is missing in the pagans’ pride of race is a fully developed appreciation for the human personality. Only the Christian can be fully aware of the divinity within man, because only the Christian is linked to the divine personality.”

Logician Tim Harris is one of our all-time favorite writers. He asks Chuck Baldwin what is the point of a non-violent militia.

Using the SPLC hate group as a source didn’t work out too well for the governor of Missouri.

Franklin Sanders presents the Georgia legislature with a Zimbabwe note and other notes that have gone the way of history, but not before inflating and bankrupting the empires that printed them. Jews have doubled our money supply in the last 12 months.

Is it too late to replace Obama with this cousin of ours from back east? Laurel on the voice of authority.

The president of Brazil has blamed the global economic crisis on “white people with blue eyes.” “I do not know any black or indigenous bankers,” he said. That’s because the “indigenous” can’t escape from the seven miles of concrete wall around 19 slums on the outskirts of Rio de Janeiro. Apparently, polluting their genes by marrying anything with a pulse still hasn’t taught Brazilians how to make that whole integration thing work. Still, “white people with blue eyes” is a strange way of describing Jews like Bernard Madoff, Michael Milken, Ivan Boesky, Marc Rich, Boris Berezovsky, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, George Soros, etc. Prime Minister Gordon Brown has merely “distanced” himself from these remarks, but if the president had blamed the crisis on Jews, there would be unprecedented pandemonium in the media. See, for example, this cartoonist who wants to gas, bury, exhume, and roast six million Jews in the dead of winter!

Horst Mahler was taken away to prison a few days ago for having his own opinions about the Holohoax. He is 73 years old and is facing 12 years of incarceration. It could very well be a life sentence. These inspiring words are taken from his final public statement:

If one realizes, as I do, that the “Holocaust” Religion is the principal weapon for the moral and cultural destruction of the German nation, then it is clear that what is at stake here is nothing less than the collective right of self-defense, that is, Germany’s right to survive…

Does the world really believe that we Germans will unresistingly allow ourselves to be destroyed as a Volk, that we will passively allow our national spirit to be extinguished without a struggle? What kind of jurists argue that self-defense is a criminal act? As a Volk and a living collective entity we have a national and a spiritual nature. The surest way to extinguish Germany as a spiritual entity is to destroy our national soul and identity, so that we no longer know who or what we are… Once we realize that we are faced with the threat of annihilation, we no longer have doubts about who our enemy is: it is the ancient murderer of nations

Every German has an obligation to do his duty to the Fatherland! We have a right and sacred duty to defend ourselves, to preserve our nation and our Volk! In every civilized country, there is a legal obligation to come to the aid of those who are in danger. In fact, the law prescribes punishments for those who fail to render aid. Failure to assist and render aid is a serious violation of law; it constitutes a corpus delicti in itself. I would be guilty of a serious crime if I failed to render aid to my Volk – if I kept quiet and failed to come to its aid, knowing that the monstrous fraud called “Holocaust” did not really occur. In that case, I would be a truly depraved criminal!…

The Jews are about to experience their Waterloo… Christian faith is based on the Truth, the Rock of Ages.

It is easy to be filled with fury at those who have done this and to dedicate ourselves to revenge. As Christians, however, we must constantly remind ourselves that we wrestle not with flesh and blood but with the accursed father of these Pharisees. This doesn’t cause us to lose one iota of our resolve, but it does compel us to pray for the redemption of our enemies. Mahler, to his eternal credit, recognizes this. He is a true Christian, and he has lain up for himself a better reward in heaven. God bless him. I’m too ashamed of my own faithlessness, in comparison, to say more.

Jimmy Carter could never have become president if he had talked like this back in the seventies. Even though he was a president, the Israel lobby has almost put him out to pasture.

If you don’t think the Israel lobby has power, read this. “To bar a sitting Member of Parliament from the Commonwealth country of Canada is mind-boggling.” Those who disagree with Jews are now “threats to national security.”

Israelis really are like Americans!

Ann Althouse gets a taste of her own medicine.

Jews are offering women high-paying jobs.

The Jews at Disney are pushing miscegenation on preteens this year through their first Black “princess.” Just to muddy the waters (literally), they have made the prince look White but have given him a Brazilian accent. Ah, Brazil, where the genetic soup is the color of vomit. One supporter of the heroine is a “good” voodoo priestess who looks like a raisin wrapped in a Kleenex. But it is very funny to read about how the plot of the movie has been focus-grouped to death, as hyper-sensitive Miscellaneous-Americans have protested anything that even hints at stereotypes. The quality was better when Walt was alive. He made The Jungle Book, written by the famous racist Rudyard Kipling, at the height of the Civil Rape Movement. Oh, but that wasn’t good enough for him. He also filled it with baboons who scat, use urban slang, dance to jazz music, and pine for the secret of being like men.

“In one scene, Mowgli is told he can’t live with Baloo the bear because different species need to keep to themselves.” Walt owned the last non-Jewish movie studio in the country. It’s an interesting case study in how the creativity of Whites will eventually end up being owned by anti-Christs. Until we get serious about the rule of law, that is.

Now, watching a Disney cartoon is similar to this experience:

Jew Foxman defines “racism” as excluding anyone from anything:

Can you be anti-Zionist and not be an anti-Semite? Almost never. Unless you can prove to me you’re against nationalism. If you’re one of those unique individuals in this world that’s opposed to American nationalism, French nationalism, Palestinian nationalism, then you can be opposed to Jewish nationalism. Is it racist? You bet it is. Every nationalism is racist. It sets its laws of citizenship, it sets its own capital… It sets its songs, it sets its values. It is, if you will, exclusive, and you can even call it racist. But if the only nationalism in the world that is racist is Jewish nationalism, then you’re an anti-Semite… I don’t want to make any apologies for it.

Leonard Pitts is confusticated that “racism” still exists, Obama’s election notwithstanding. We will not reach the “promised land,” he writes, until “racial inequities in employment, housing, education, criminal justice, health and other arenas” are erased. Until then, Pitts will continue “engaging Americans on the knotty conundrums of race,” which we “racists” are not allowed to do, more’s the pity. Pitts is the one who wrote “cry me a river,” in mockery of those of us who protested the savage race murders in Knoxville, Tennessee.

The beasts who committed those crimes have already cost Knox County more than $2 million, before any trial has even begun. Defense attornies are tossing motions at the judge like spaghetti against a wall, hoping that something will stick. “Presently, the trials are slated to begin on July 6 (Cobbins); August 10 (Coleman); September 21 (Davidson); and December 2 (Thomas), respectively… But in the world of diversity, no capital case sentence of a black or Hispanic defendant is a foregone conclusion.”

In the dock for this racial atrocity we have men whose days, when they are not in prison, are spent hurtling from one violent crime against hardworking citizens to another, buying food and drugs with the proceeds from those crimes, having sex (whether through consent or rape), falling asleep, and starting a new series of crimes the next day; and a drifter of a woman who is content to go along for the ride.

A sane, decent, prudent society seeks to limit both the number of such people, and the damage they can do.

But we live in a society whose elites “celebrate diversity”—a euphemism for more madness, evil, and, of course, ever-rising expense.

Have our people gone completely insane? Is the religion of Equality really worth the cost?

Another brutal race murder is squelched by the Jew-media. The victim was not of a favored race. Let’s see if there are any protests in Cincinnati. If so, you can be sure that Jew lawyers and college students dressed as clowns will turn up to denounce racism. Here’s another, which would be called a hate crime if the tables were turned, described as a “chance” rape and murder, and still there is no justice. This bastard just killed four White cops, and he is called by a San Francisco newspaper one of the “heroes in the human rights struggle for Black people in America.”

The “real” victim.

“White guilt makes people say crazy things.”

Somalis in Minnesota act just like Somalis in Somalia, and it’s the fault of White people!

The CofCC disproves Pitts’ statement that Whites are to blame for Black academic incompetence.

Roger Devlin is a brilliant writer whose work you won’t read nearly enough unless you happen to be fortunate enough to subscribe to the Occidental Quarterly or Occidental Observer. He reminds us of these wishful lyrics from the band Three Dog Night:

The ink is black
The page is white
Together we learn to read and write
The child is black
The child is white
The whole world looks upon the sight
The beautiful sight

And now a child can understand
That this is the law of all the land
All the land…

“The justices of the Supreme Court,” according to Law Professor Michael J. Perry as cited by historian Raymond Wolters in his new book Race and Education 1954-2007, “were modern ‘prophets’ selected by an ‘American Israel’ and authorized to strike down laws they deemed mistaken.” At least until they discovered that “the very Congress which submitted the 14th Amendment to the States had itself established segregated schools in the District of Columbia!” But this didn’t prevent the Court from using the illegal 14th to justify race-mixing in schools and then in marriages, and most recently the living arrangements of faggots. The work of Equality is never done.

Cleared for takeoff on Aboriginal Airlines:

California Republicans are on the verge of waking up to reality, just a few decades late and a few trillion dollars short. “Traditional conservative principles have never appealed to black and brown people, and they never will. Any conservative party can only win by turning out enough white voters to defeat the non-whites and white liberals. And in California, there simply aren’t enough white people left to do that. It’s as simple as that.”

But who knows? Perhaps a clever marketing campaign can save California. Nigerians are hoping that the slogan “Nigeria: Good People, Great Nation” will convince the world that Nigeria is not full of Negroes. “But many Nigerians wear their country’s reputation for mayhem and chaos as a mark of pride – if you can survive Nigeria, you can survive anywhere, they say.” Let’s put our heads together and think up a catchy jingle for California. Let’s see; “California: It Only Stinks When You’re Downwind.” Okay, it may need some work. Coincidentally, some holy-rollers from Nigeria have moved the headquarters of their 5-million-member “Redeemed Christian Church of God” denomination from Lagos to Greenville, Texas, which until recently had a big sign above the highway that read: “Welcome to Greenville, the Blackest Land, the Whitest People.” Now it has people who match the color of the soil, and the lion and the lamb nestle together on breezy hillsides where dandelion spores take flight. And there’s absolutely no chance that quaint Greenville will turn into a festering armpit like Lagos. After all, these are Christians.

What could possibly go wrong?

Blacks have caused more suffering than any other people on the planet, says Reverend James Manning. Even during the terror of Hurricane Katrina, Black men acted “like niggers,” he says. As for Obama’s election, “Ain’t nothin’ changed. Niggers are still niggers, and they’re gonna be niggers until Jesus gets ahold of ‘em.” We’ve always wondered how this will manifest. Blacks in America are the most self-professed Christian people in the world. How much more should they talk about Jesus until we know He has “ahold of ‘em”? But we appreciate this about Reverend Manning: He knows that even if that day arrives, it still doesn’t mean that we’re all supposed to intermarry. Does Mr. Manning preach the Word of God perfectly? No, and neither do White men. But it’s good enough, and we thank him for his boldness.

As I’m sure you know, the three leading causes of death for men are heart disease, cancer, and stroke. The leading cause of death for young Black women? Black men. Black women have a maternal homicide risk about seven times that of White women, which explains why Disney doesn’t want to be in the business of promoting domestic violence through its new “princess” cartoon. But guess what: “The incidence of spousal homicide is 7.7 times higher in interracial marriages compared to intraracial marriages,” according to WebMD.com. And this is the devilry that your pastor is promoting as the will of God.

She was wounded for our transgressions, bruised for our iniquities.

Karl Marx supported Lincoln in his war of fratricide and genocide, and like Lincoln, he had initially opposed the emancipation of slaves in America. He frequently described his son-in-law and disciple, Paul Lafargue, who was perhaps one-eighth Negro, as “the negrillo” and “the gorilla,” observing that his daughter had contributed to solving the race problem “by marrying a nigger.” This was almost enough to convince Joe Morecraft to ordain him in the RPCUS, but then it was discovered that Karl disagreed with Ken Ham on the length of the creation days. Oh, so close.

Take a look at the differences between these pictures:

On top we see the White community of Fargo cooperating with each other last Thursday to prevent flooding. On bottom we see New Orleans rabble looting stores and looking out for cops, who were also looting stores (8/28/05). This is the picture that speaks a thousand words, in case you were looking for it.

We were talking about witchcraft last time. How can this new push to create synthetic blood from human embryos not be classified as witchcraft? Remember that life is in the blood, as the Bible says, and it is synthetic blood that is produced from the children sacrificed by these witches with doctoral degrees. This may also be a good time to point out why Kinists are not “white supremacists,” as commonly understood. High IQ without redemption of the soul merely yields creative new ways to blaspheme and to sin on a grander scale.

It’s fascinating that the Daryal Pass over the Caucasus mountains into Europe is called “the pass of Israel.” The Turks who dwelled on the other side were the Khazars, who are the anti-Christ Jews of today. It’s unclear whether this could indicate that the Khazars are descended from the Hebrews and took this pass into Europe or if the dispersed Hebrew tribes came to Europe through this pass and took the name Caucasian for themselves, only to have the Khazars pretend that they, not the Caucasians, descended from the Hebrews. Here’s an interesting map of ethnicities in the region.

We have something quite fascinating for you fellow farmers out there. Watch this documentary on “permaculture” and forest gardens. Learn how to grow food without petroleum, and even if you only have a small lot, it may soon be worth a small fortune.

I received a greeting card made by one of those “green” companies. It says on the back: “Made in USA with soy inks on acid-free, recycled, chlorine-free paper, which produces no dioxins in the mill waste. Printed using wind-generated electric power.” I’m disappointed that they neglected to moisten the pulp with the saliva of a pregnant yak.

We conservatives are as interested in conserving nature as in conserving our people, but tree-huggers are generally insufferable. They complain about over-population but refuse to protest mass immigration for fear of being called racists. They also tend to have a worshipful reverence for animals. I’ve considered forming a new group called PETCO: People for the Ethical Treatment of Coyotes. Our slogan: “Eet Mor Chikin.”

Twitter Digg Delicious Stumbleupon Technorati Facebook

14 Responses to “The North is Full of Tangled Things”

  1. I need some help, and you guys are the best men to ask. I’m having a discussion on another board where I’m defending racism as an essential foundation of Christian society (and I’m actually winning the argument, the defenders of miscegenation are on their heels — only because they are sufficiently honest and charitable to listen to truth rather than engage in name calling and kick you off the board like others would do). I pointed out that in the OT, miscegenation was the worst of sins for which God would destroy nations, including Israel. Someone asked me for a list of verses, and I thought your Archive would have some good references. But it looks like there is no single article where you put together OT and NT references to race and God’s abhorrence of race mixing.

    Compiling such a list and then keeping the link at the top of your home page might be a good idea and a powerful weapon for the rest of us to use. In the meantime, if you could please give me the location of a handful of the most relevant verses, I think I can successfully conclude this argument.

    I was thinking, btw, that you might want to look to the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood as a model. They have taken a subject that is nearly as unpopular as racism (female subjection), and they have created a whole library of scholarly works to defend it. By assembling your material into coherent arguments and the organizing those into a systematic presentation, your material would be able to achieve broad ripple effects.

  2. That sounds like a good project. You could mention that God destroyed a couple of cities over faggotry (Sodom and Gomorrah) but sent the Great Flood because of miscegenation. Then the patriarchs, even though polygamists, refused to countenance the thought of marrying anyone but close kin. Even faith was less important to them than blood; Abraham sought Rebekah among his pagan kin. Later, homogeneity was so important to Ezra and Nehemiah that even the mixed Israelite-Babylonian children were sent away. These were children who were raised in the covenant, but they were blood strangers, and they had to go.

    “The God of heaven Himself will prosper us; therefore we His servants will arise and build, but you have no heritage or right or memorial in Jerusalem.” ~ Nehemiah 2:20

    The list is so long that it runs as a theme through the whole Bible. Consanguinity is so fundamental to being, and such a natural thing, like eating food when hungry, that not until our own perverse time was it ever controversial. Now we are asked to prove from the Bible that our people have a right and a duty to survive. But the kind of person who would question this would not even believe the warnings of a man who returns from the dead.

    Be sure to mention that wonderful and comforting statement from the Apostle Paul that God has appointed the bounds of our habitations so that we might grope for Him and find Him. God is not a one-world race-mixer.

    I don’t really know anything about the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, but it looks like they have an interesting website. Terms like “racism” and “female subjection” are very loaded and mean completely different things to different people. They are not words that I would use myself; I would simply say that races and sexes are different. And thank God for that!

  3. [i]Terms like “racism” and “female subjection” are very loaded and mean completely different things to different people. They are not words that I would use myself;[/i]

    I understand that. Personally, however, I’ve always been skeptical of the “conservative” types who spend their time fighting over words and labels. They write countless articles saying, “I’m not really a racist/sexist/anti-semite, because if you look at the etymolgy of the word, it really means blah, blah, blah.” I prefer to say, “I’m a racist, a sexist and an anti-semite.” Blacks would consider me a racist, feminists would consider me a sexist, Jews would consider me an anti-semite. These are their words, they can use them how they wish. On the other hand, I’m careful to whom I say it, since my duties in life don’t allow me to die as a martyr yet, although I hope perhaps one day they will.

  4. I completely agree. I’ve always relished provoking Christ-haters to hate me as much as they hate my Lord. Anything less would be uncivilized.

  5. “Therefore, in a CDD marriage, the husband is the authority of the household.
    The wife is submissive to her husband as if the Lord Himself was her husband.

    The husband loves his wife as himself. He is to lead by example. He is to lay down his life for her.
    The wife treats her husband with respect. She is to obey him, as long as what he directs her to do is not in opposition to God’s commands.

    He has the ultimate authority in his household, but this authority is tempered with the knowledge that he will answer to God for his actions and decisions.

    He is to be the head of the home. She is to be the heart of the home.”

    DId Sarah call Abraham, LORD, or did she not?
    If she did, then how can we in the New Covenant permit secular courts to co-opt the rule of the Husband over the Wife, and Children, via ‘domestic abuse hotlines, police interference, custody battles, and all the rest?

    If a Christian Civilization is to be a CHRISTIAN civilization, and if we allow the Hassidic Jews to rule the roost, ‘how much MORE’ to quote St. Paul, should we seek to re-institute this Vision?

    Just asking the question, to be clear….

  6. In relation to your comment above “The comfort of having a truth filter is hardly unique to Christians, but at some point the warning flags should fly when men are forming businesses based on opinions that they insist are normative for all, without exception, but which have found vast disagreement among our Christian forefathers in all ages. (It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see how race and miscegenation apply to this discussion.)”

    I just came across this piece of IDIOCY over at Dougie’s site.
    http://www.visionforum.com/hottopics/blogs/dwp/2009/04/5034.aspx

    In perusing websites for the upcoming Homeschool conventions, I am appalled at the obvious miscegenationist mindset of Holzmann’s Sonlight (with pics of bi-racial couples and their bastard children throughout their catalogue…as if this were good!?) and Wilson’s ‘forked tongue’ approach to history over at ‘Vision Forum’- show all white kids on the site, and then preach this twaddle.

    HAS the Evangelical community gone mad? Do they WANT genocide of the Races of Europe? It would damn well appear so. May God have mercy on us all… if this is ‘leadership’ of the race of “Adam’s seed and David’s line.”

  7. I think you meant to say Phillips instead of Wilson. It’s interesting that Phillips implies that one’s view of racial intermarriage is informed by one’s view of the creation timespan. But there really is no dividing line on race between creationists of today. They’re almost all race-mixers. Obviously, it was just the opposite in the past. Phillips would simply say that old-universe creationists are really Darwinists in disguise, and they’re not being true to their Darwinist principles if they still encourage intermarriage. He would say that only someone who shares his interpretation of Genesis is able to consistently recognize that there is only one race, the human race.

    One interesting thing to note about this is that Darwin was not really a eugenicist. Eugenics was formed by Francis Galton. Darwin said that pure natural selection would prevent aid and sympathy, “the noblest part of our nature.” He considered Galton’s idea of encouraging intermarriage within a “caste” of the “naturally gifted” to be utopian. After Hitler, eugenics fell out of favor, even though some form of it had always been practiced among Christians (Rushdoony tells us this was true of the Armenians), and all of a sudden the Darwinists became neo-Darwinists, distancing themselves from ideas that had come to be associated with Darwin. And it still serves them well, because Darwin had very primitive (and false) ideas about cell structure. Modern scientists would be ridiculed to scorn if they were truly Darwinists in the purest sense.

    So Phillips is able to thrill the ladies who make a fantasy of his phony public image, and their hapless husbands who think they need to compensate for their own inadequacies, but the straw man arguments won’t impress anyone else.

    Regarding the pictures, Phillips has taken so much ribbing over the years about his unavoidably White worldview and his glorification of the White race, and even adulation of White firebrands like Dabney, that he goes out of his way now to prove to the world that a few non-Whites show up for his conferences. He doesn’t realize that doing this makes him look even more like a tool, but at least it has entertainment value. Of course, he realizes that there is a tipping point beyond which Whites will refuse to show up or keep his business running.

    I just hate to see what these politically-correct jackals routinely do to men like Holzmann.

  8. I don’t know the best way to keep older discussions alive, but this is in regard to your Jan 18 post. There was a Mark Weber quote there that I found quite disturbing, and so it was gratifying to see that Faurisson has pounced on it and ripped it to shreds. See about 80% down in this article, though the whole is also worth a read.

  9. Scarborough Fayre April 4, 2009 at 10:00 pm

    I was a biology major in my college days and I’ve neve understood the miscengenist pseudo-christian idea that interracial marriage confounds Darwinism. One of Darwin’s prerequisits for natural selection to occur is “random mating”. Since virtually everyone does not mate randomly (even those who chose mates poorly still don’t do it randomly), then promoting interracial marriage actually increases the “randomness” of mating. In other words because most people still marry and mate within their own race ecouraging interracial marriage would actually help breeding turn into a more “random mating” pattern and genetic variation requisite for Darwinian natural selection to take place. So if the Doug Phillips’ of the world want to “confound evolution” then he should do everything within his power to oppose intermarriage. Not that this matters anyway, no one should breed simply for the reason of confounding an opposing worldview. This just goes to show that Doug Phillips doesn’t understand Darwinism at all.

  10. Scarborough Fayre April 4, 2009 at 10:30 pm

    Another comment on the idea that there is only one race, Adam’s race. I agree that the Bible teaches that all people are descended from Adam. Thus speaking of Adam’s race is proper in its proper context. However there are certainly races based upon differential descent from Adam. All linguists understand this, which is why Samuel Johnson and Noah Webster, two great lexograpers of the English language, both understood race this way. If there is only one race why does the Bible mention mixing of various peoples in Jeremiah and Ezekiel? One kinist arguement is that adultery does not just mean marital infidelity, but other unnatural mixings. This is how it is used in Hosea, the prophet against adultery. In Hosea, the concept of adultery is used of actual marital infidelity, national religious adultery (Israel going whoring after other gods), but also of mixing of peoples (see Hosea 7: 8-9). The concept of unnatural mixing is of plants as found in Leviticus 19:19 is also used with people in Daniel 2:43 and elsewhere. Again, why talk about mixing if we’re all from the same race to begin with? Sometimes I think that modern Christians pride themselves on their inability to think.

  11. Tim, that’s very interesting! I didn’t realize that Weber was with Leuchter and Faurisson when they collected samples from Auschwitz. The mental image of them chipping away at the rock walls and hoping not to be seen, even as they make history, is quite an image indeed. It sounds like Weber takes the view of Irving that there were gas chambers, but they were not used for planned extermination of anything but nits, and we cannot be certain of the casualties caused by either natural or war-contingent circumstances, or other atrocities. Is this your understanding as well? It seems that Weber is trying to be an historian who doesn’t like to talk about his beliefs so that he can be recognized as an objective authority. I know why other historians do this – to get on TV – but it’s a strange tactic for a revisionist, because he’s going to be hated regardless.

    SF, you’ve written some fascinating stuff there, and I need to stew on it for a while to let it all sink in!

  12. Scarborough Fayre April 5, 2009 at 11:56 am

    Thanks admin. I could stew on just one post from Spirit, Water, Blood for months.

  13. Tim, Jew Auster comments on the same thing here:

    http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/012915.html

    And he writes this line, which makes the pursuit of truth so gosh-darned easy:

    “It becomes clear that the main purpose of Holocaust denial was to make people hate Jews and see them as uniquely evil.”

Leave a Reply

 characters available