…so said President Andrew Jackson.

“Of Nicholas Biddle’s Bank of the United States, the great Andrew Jackson was eloquent. ‘It has tried to kill me,’ he said. ‘But I will kill it.’ And he did. Should not this creature from Jekyll Island, for all its manifold crimes and sins against the republic, also be summarily put to death?”

Another cakewalk is on the way. You’ll soon hear arguments like this again.

What’s this? Thermite has just been discovered in the 9/11 debris. How is it that anti-Semites are correct about everything? Can’t they be wrong just once?

George Will is almost 150 years late in getting upset about one branch of government hijacking the duties of another branch. What a wasted life.

Greg Durand has posted the entire e-book online of the greatest book on Lincoln ever written. No need to thank me. Thank Greg instead. This is why I love the intrawebs that Al Gore invented.

Listen to this recording to get a little taste of the state of liberty in the year 2009. Now Ron Paul supporters strolling through the airport with more cash than average are considered threats to air safety! It was funny, though, when Judge Napolitano put the man’s White face on the screen and asked the viewers, “Is that the face of a terrorist?” We’re big fans of racist humor at this website, although I know it’s hard to believe.

Half off, today only, on Al Sharpton’s taxes.

“The ‘free American’ starts off with a 30% tax rate, the position of a medieval serf. In medieval Europe, when tax rates reached beyond 30%, serfs rebelled and killed their masters.” As Southerners have always said, there were no slaves freed by Lincoln. That’s a comforting fiction.

Egalitarianism 101.

Some populations are more expensive than others.

Only 28.5% of Black male students are able to earn college degrees, in spite of colleges making it very easy for them with quotas and cushy degree programs. This is a huge waste of money for taxpayers; Black colleges receive more than half of their funding from the government (meaning us). At what point should we cut our losses? A White country that invests in White education will receive a substatial return on the investment. But this Lincolnized country in which we live is turning into one big Mogadishu.

This old guy in Detroit is surviving by hunting racoons, but he knows that when the Super Value Dollar Menu becomes unaffordable, cannibalism will follow, just as it existed among Negroes in Africa and Indians in the Americas. Yes, we are living in what James Edwards calls Marren Loofer Keen’s Diversity Wonderland. And we are on the verge of destruction because we have hated our own children and have given (not even sold!) their inheritance to strangers. At least Esau got a hot meal from selling his birthright.

Ice Cube becomes a humanitarian and Puff the Magic Jigaboo color-coordinates his latest commercial. But you know what’s evil? When David Duke tries to rent a hotel conference room in Memphis. There are some things that polite society simply cannot tolerate.

A 78-year-old woman is raped and set on fire. Quick, guess the race of the criminal!

Another high-tech lynching. More things that are racist.

I’m trying to remember why apartheid was such a bad thing. “‘You must have the soil in your blood. The Human Sciences Research Council has found a way to check which soil you have in your blood,’ said the president elect. He further clarified that the reclassification was retroactive and that all textbooks would be re-written for the new school year.”

A map showing the growth of mosques in France.

These cute little girls need to put away their Easter bonnets because their country now belongs to those who worship a man who raped little girls.

“Demography is destiny,” said Auguste Comte. “Race is not a social construct. Society is a racial construct.”

Racist Youth for Racist Western Racist Civilization.

Watch this documentary called Indoctrinate U. The director is interviewed here by Lou Dobbs. College professors are now required to “develop race, class, and gender” issues in every class, including physics and horticulture. I especially find it of interest that Blacks are considered “inauthentic” if they oppose quotas, and even racial egalitarianism is now an unwelcome ideology on campus. The documentary is purportedly about political correctness on campus, but it’s really all about race, as you’ll see. The man who made it is a classical liberal and wants universities to be hospitable to a multitude of views. This is not the same thing as being a conservative. A conservative would not be so obtuse as to believe that all races and religions can live in harmony under the same government. The university (unity in diversity) is a White creation; only an homogeneous people can exchange diverse ideas and not resort to killing each other.

The condition of liberty is order, said Orestes Brownson, and we are to seek justice, not equality. Liberty is not the absence of authority, but rather obedience to just and legitimate authority that is not merely the agent of society. “I became henceforth a conservative in politics, instead of an impracticable radical and through political conservatism I advanced rapidly towards religious conservatism.” Think of this in the context of our own perverse generation. We are told that Blacks and Mestizos have no less right to be agents of our society than our own descendants, and that Equality is what Jesus died on the cross to secure. But order and the rule of law have disappeared, and while there can be no liberty without order, we hear “conservatives” chant the word “freedom” like a mantra. This is essentially the flaw in the Indoctrinate U documentary.

And read this from Sir Walter Scott to see why loathsome, race-mixing pastors are anything but conservative:

An established system is not to be tried by those tests which may with perfect correctness be applied to a new theory. A civilized nation, long in possession of a code of law, under which, with all its inconveniences, they have found means to flourish, is not to be regarded as an infant colony, on which experiments in legislation may, without much danger of presumption, be hazarded. A philosopher is not entitled to investigate such a system by those ideas which he has fixed in his own mind as the standard of possible excellence. The only unerring test of every old establishment is the effect it has actually produced, for that must be held to be good, from whence good is derived. The people have, by degrees, moulded their habits to the law they are compelled to obey; for some of its imperfections, remedies have been found, to others they have reconciled themselves; till, at last, they have, from various causes, attained the object which the most sanguine visionary could promise to himself from his own perfect unembodied system.

CWNY states it very simply and elegantly: “The Europeans no longer see Christ as the one true God because they no longer see anything in the particular.” Volumes could be written with this sentence as the thesis. You never want to miss a CWNY post, but especially not this one. And for a chill down your spine, read what he has posted about Lothrop Stoddard’s account of Jacobin intransigence in the face of genocide in Haiti. With very minor rewording, it could serve as an account of how our own leaders have ignored our suffering from the 1965 Non-White Immigration Act until the present day.

On Ash Wednesday, the first day of Lent, Anglicans used to issue a Kinist call to repentance from the Book of Common Prayer that began:

Cursed is he that curseth his father, and mother.
Amen.
Cursed is he that removeth awaye the marke of hys neighbours land.
Amen.

This is taken from the 1549 Book of Common Prayer. These words of penance were removed in the 1559 version by Queen Elizabeth, and they do not appear in the 1928 American version.

“Abortion is a blessing,” says a lesbian Anglican seminary president.

The famous homeschooling family from Germany who had to flee for their lives for disobeying the only law of Hitler’s that the anti-Christs love has settled in east Tennessee to seek asylum. Ernst Zundel is another famous German who sought asylum in east Tennessee and is now languishing in a German jail.

Doug Phillips explains his Jacobin and Marxist idea that interracial marriage is biblical. He always puts the word “race” in quotation marks because he doesn’t believe in the concept of race unless the reference is to the human race as a whole. He even uses the phrase “so-called skin color.” This is particularly funny because I didn’t think anyone actually disputed the fact that skin comes in different colors. Of course, as Scarborough Fayre observes in our comments, the idea that there is only one race renders the concept of adultery meaningless in verses such as Hosea 7:4,8 and Daniel 2:43. Ken Ham realizes this and argues that there are two races in the world, believers and unbelievers. But this too changes the meaning of the word, as commonly understood by Christians for millennia. And neither Ham nor Phillips attempts to actually prove what they assert to be “deviant, ungodly, and unscriptural.” If it is so abhorrent to agree with our Christian forefathers that God fulfills His divine purpose by keeping races distinct, should this not have been discovered long ago by our elders in the faith and the church fathers upon whom we depend for our doctrines and creeds?

Voddie Baucham seems to be a likeable fellow, not a pompous ass like Doug Phillips and RC Sproul Jr. His comments about Sarah Palin on CNN are classic; he was called a sexist by the hostess. And Doug Wilson is glad that Phillips is now renting him out for speaking engagements. But alas, he is yet another independent, unaccountable personality cultist. (See here for a tragicomic transcript from Baucham on why it is “racist” to wait for “certification,” “permission,” and “instruction” before starting a church. I think he’s serious.) These men have hitched their cars to the Great American Church Gravy Train. Anyway, Baucham has written a book called What He Must Be if He Wants to Marry My Daughter, and he says it was quite intentional to hide the skin of the man on the cover of the book. So, the answer to the book’s title: a headless quadruple amputee. Ironically, the very men who are pushing the practice of courtship and patriarchy the strongest know the least about it from a biblical perspective. We’re sure their understanding of adoption is equally conventional and equally unbiblical.

Having given us no actual reasons for why Kinism is “deviant, ungodly, and unscriptural,” Phillips denounces us as “bigots.” He asserts that those of us who “claim to be Christian…have an errant perspective on the book of Genesis—a perspective which is often linked to a clear theological compromise with evolutionary thinking.” Translation: Christians who disagree with the Infallible Interpretation of Henry Morris that the universe was created in exactly 144 hours 6,000 years ago, and that dinosaurs clambered aboard Noah’s Ark, are Darwinists in disguise, and their antipathy to miscegenation is a Darwinist presupposition bubbling to the surface of their pseudo-Christian veneer. I don’t know what more we could say about this than has already been said, but it’s the sort of arrogance that can be expected of men who think that founding a church is integral to a successful business plan.

Having addressed the Kinist thorn in his side, Phillips turns his attention to the nattering feminists we mentioned last time. These are your busybodies who squeeze out a half dozen children, grow dissatisfied with their lives, and then spend every waking hour of every day gossiping online about people they’ve never met, who are known by them only through false associations of the roosters-cause-the-sun-to-rise variety. We doubt that Phillips is far off the mark with his description of them, but he is hardly one to talk. Anyone who has read the balderdash of Matt Chancey and seen Phillips trumpet it as an “independent investigation” into his “enemies” knows that the National Enquirer has nothing on these clowns. (Here’s an independent investigation by a cult-watch ministry that Phillips would like to forget in a hurry.) And then Dapper Doug writes: “When all else fails—call your enemy a racist.” Except that Doug has been a racist by any measure of the word, and his ducking for cover doesn’t change the facts.

Then he publishes this very sad letter from a woman who has absorbed this cult leader’s lies and is now raising a Frankenfamily:

Dear Doug

I loved reading today’s blog on race and marriage. My children and I were just discussing this the other day as they were asking what ethnicity their children would be. We are a family that is built through biological children and internationally adopted children, so far from Korea. I was stating that it depended on the ethnicity of the person each child married. Our younger three children would have children that are at least 1/2 Korean but could be 1/2 caucasion/black/chinese, etc. or full Korean. Our older children will have children that are at least 1/2 caucasion but could be half Korean/black/hispanic, etc. They all looked at me as if this was so wonderful. Of course we discussed that the key is that their spouse is 100% in love with Christ. This was in complete contrast to the racist family I grew up in, so it was so wonderful to have this very natural discussion with them and mean it with my whole heart that race was not the factor. I hadn’t phrased it with the one race…human race concept, but that compliments it nicely. Thanks for the salt!! And that was the first thing I noticed on the book cover…you could not tell the ethnicity of the man on the cover. J. D.

Thanks for the salt? And just to rub salt in the wounds, Doug Gantry tells her that if her children walk the path of the righteous they can score a freakish family photo like this one. Pastors and theologians for thousands of years missed this parade, for some reason. Perhaps this was because, just like Phillips, they would faint with horror if it ever happened in their own families. The difference, quite simply, is that they were not hypocrites, for they would have been appalled at praising a letter-writer like the deluded soul above for doing what they would never desire for their own children. They knew that 1 Peter 5:3 commands them to be examples to their flocks, and that being an example is not limited to rhetoric.

This is where Phillips finally gives us an answer for why segregation and ethnonationalism, which were the bases of nationhood for all of human history, are wicked and sinful. They are wicked and sinful – “foolish” even – for the very reason that God’s design for humanity can be thwarted and freaks like these can be born. As Phillips puts it: “These twins, born in April 2005, are a living testimony to the potential for tremendous variation in skin color that God has built into the human genome, and the foolishness of those who would claim that we should be divided on the basis of melanin count.”

As for the charge of bigotry, “Rollo, the first duke of Normandy, refused to kiss the foot of the French king Charles III, uttering the phrase bi got, his borrowing of the assumed Old English equivalent of our expression by God. Although this story is almost surely apocryphal, it is true that bigot was used by the French as a term of abuse for the Normans, but not in a religious sense. Later, however, the word, or very possibly a homonym, was used abusively in French for the Beguines, members of a Roman Catholic lay sisterhood. From the 15th century on Old French bigot meant ‘an excessively devoted or hypocritical person.’ Bigot is first recorded in English in 1598 with the sense ‘a superstitious hypocrite.’” Therefore, a bigot is not someone who is racially prejudiced, where “prejudice” means making a decision before becoming aware of facts. And Kinists do not prejudge; a casual perusal of Kinist websites should convince anyone that we eat facts for breakfast. We rarely discuss anything that we have not studied in depth. No, a bigot has been known for hundreds of years as a hypocrite. You can draw your own inferences.

U.S. Senator John C. Calhoun of South Carolina opposed annexing Mexico in 1848 because he was a great Christian “racist” and our last founding father:

I know further, sir, that we have never dreamt of incorporating into our Union any but the Caucasian race – the free white race. To incorporate Mexico, would be the very first instance of the kind of incorporating an Indian race; for more than half of the Mexicans are Indians, and the other is composed chiefly of mixed tribes. I protest against such a union as that! Ours, sir, is the Government of a white race. The greatest misfortunes of Spanish America are to be traced to the fatal error of placing these colored races on an equality with the white race. That error destroyed the social arrangement which formed the basis of society…

Sir, it is a remarkable fact, that in the whole history of man, as far as my knowledge extends, there is no instance whatever of any civilized colored races being found equal to the establishment of free popular government, although by far the largest portion of the human family is composed of these races…

We think we may now indulge in everything with impunity, as if we held our charter of liberty by “right divine” – from Heaven itself. Under these impressions, we plunge into war, we contract heavy debts, we increase the patronage of the Executive, and we even talk of a crusade to force our institutions, our liberty, upon all people. There is no species of extravagance which our people imagine will endanger their liberty in any degree. But it is a great and fatal mistake. The day of retribution will come. It will come as certainly as I am now addressing the Senate; and when it does come, awful will be the reckoning…

In other words, Calhoun was “deviant, ungodly, and unscriptural,” according to the race-mixing impastors of the 21st century. That’s why his face is up there at the top of the page in our logo.

“Evangelicals are the biggest promoters/enforcers of Diversity, second only to far left wing liberals, because, according to most preachers, Jesus wants us all to be brown.”

I finally figured out who Kevin Swanson reminds me of, with his absurdly irritating radio voice: Gerry Todd [Play]
[Play]
, the Rick Moranis character from SCTV. The young readers have no clue what I just said.

Never trust a man who takes this long to do his hair.

I thought the London bus posters that proclaimed “There’s probably no God” were a joke. It sounds like something a Christian would say to mock the blind faith of atheists. And this rope bridge over the canyon will probably not snap! The English dry wit has apparently gone missing. Likewise, I wonder if the hundred thousand British Christians who have renounced their faith by being “de-baptized” realize how silly they look. They are like the legions of atheists who realize that evil exists and conclude therefore that God must not exist. A presuppositional apologist will ask them how they can account for the existence of evil if God does not exist, and they are unable to answer. This is how Doug Wilson recently defeated Christopher Hitchens in debate, and that’s no small task.

Jew Gottfried writes that Lancaster County, PA, where he teaches, “registered the largest vote for Obama in the Democratic primary of any county in Pennsylvania that’s not predominantly black.” This is the heart of Amish country, of course, but I don’t think the Amish ever vote. “This result was owed much to Church of the Brethren, whose members in their zany anti-racism and open-borders postures make Abe Foxman sound relatively sane… [T]hese Anabaptists exemplify aspects of Christianity that are totally compatible with cultural Marxism and the politics of Western suicide.” Believe me, we know, and Gottfried is correct that “They do not need Jews, blacks, or North African Muslims to teach them self-destructive behavior…” On the other hand, one does not abstain from telling the truth about Jewish motives simply because Whites are ultimately responsible for their own destruction.

Kevin MacDonald mentions Werner Dannhauser’s tribute to Leo Strauss, the father of neoconservatism. He was “a good Jew,” said Dannhauser. “He knew the dignity and worth of love of one’s own. Love of the good is higher than love of one’s own, but there is only one road to truth and it leads through love of one’s own.” We all know that this would be condemned as vile racism if we were to say it. In fact, we have said it, and our pastors have barred us from the Lord’s Supper because of it.

Clyde Wilson observes that self-righteous Whites are our biggest problem.

For instance, here’s the seal of the city of Toronto, as it was designed before Canadians were actually forced to follow through with their pretensions:

I don’t know if Tom Fleming is feeling ill or what the problem is, but he has actually written a good article.

Cochran and Harpending theorize that Indo-European expansion was driven by “a high frequency of the European lactose-tolerance mutation (the 1390-T allele).” God built in to White genes the ability to quintuple the usefulness of grasslands, and this was one engine for unrivalled economic growth in the West. James Bowery has observed that Indo-Europeans were also mead (honey wine) drinkers. Therefore, when God promised from the burning bush in Exodus 3 to lead Moses and his people to “a land flowing with milk and honey,” these words must “have had more significance to the Indo-Europeans than to a lactose-intolerant group that didn’t have mead as its primary ritual drink.”

We see this come up throughout the Bible. The fear and judgments of the Lord are called sweeter than honey in Isaiah 19:10, and in Isaiah 55:1, “every one that thirsts” is bidden to come and “buy wine and milk without money and without price.” These words could not have been as significant to non-Whites, who are almost all lactose-intolerant and do not live on the spacious expanses of grassland that are necessary for cultivating milk and honey.

Getting back to Moses then, we know that the early Egyptians who offered Israel refuge were Indo-Europeans, and said their fair land flowed with milk and honey. In the Exodus, God led the Israelites to just such a prosperous land of their own. But why did He give them the land of the Canaanites? One possible explanation is that milk and honey were necessary in the ritual worship of the Canaanite fertility goddess, Ashtoreth, and they symbolized female and male bodily fluids, respectively. God delivered this bounty into the hands of His people and then mercifully ordered the utter destruction of the Canaanites, who had sunk to depths of depravity that are unheard of even today. (Side note: It’s beyond strange to hear folks like David Duke condemn the ancient Hebrews for “being Jews” and ridding the world of these animals. We Kinists don’t shed a tear for them, or for the faggots of Sodom and Gomorrah. See Isaiah 19:10 above; the judgments of the Lord are sweeter than honey, and we know what that means, because we crave honey.) Where was I?

Mead is the oldest fermented beverage known to man, and it figures prominently in the oldest surviving epic in the English language, Beowulf. While mead appears from historical accounts to have originated independently among various Indo-European groups (Egyptians, Celts, Indians, and Scandinavians), is this really the case? Could it not have had a common White origin in the distant, pre-historic past? Like milk, mead was an important symbol for fertility. In medieval times, newlyweds were given enough mead to drink one glass per night for the first month. A month is, of course, a moon cycle, and the potency of the nectar was believed to incite pregnancy. This is the origin of the word “honeymoon.” We have other lingering pagan fertility symbols in our culture, including the Easter egg. Easter is named after Ishtar, the Babylonian goddess of fertility, and the egg is the symbol of new birth.

Here’s a page from a nice little sexist book by Whitney Darrow called I’m Glad I’m a Boy! I’m Glad I’m a Girl!

You may not know it from reading this website, but we love racism, sexism, homophobia, and anything else that causes barbarians to march in the streets.

Guess who wrote this “Good Will Creed” for ministers’ wives in 1952:

1. I believe in my religion and grant others the right to believe in theirs, and I respect their beliefs.
2. I believe in democracy, and that its essence is equality of opportunity for all.
3. I believe in the good life for all – good life on its several levels, material, social, emotional.
4. I believe in the worth of the individual, and I am in a conspiracy of appreciation and understanding of others.
5. I believe races are equal. Membership in my race is for me an accident. Therefore I do not feel superior or inferior to people of other races.
6. I believe in freedom of speech even if it is exercised in opposition to the things to which I give my allegiance; those who disagree with me may be as good citizens or Christians as I.
7. I believe in the power of good will, and will invite into my home not only those who think as I do, but people who differ from me in religion, race, and politics; and I will respect them in these differences.
8. I believe it is possible to have a world free from wars, poverty, slums, sweatshops, and hunger, with economic justice for all; and I will do what I can to have such a world.
9. I believe that I may cause personal sickness and sorrow to be bearers of blessing.
10. I believe Christianity is a way of acting.

A revolution in the garden.

“The biggest trend in farming is small.” The number of farms has risen by 4% in 5 years. These are the visionaries who will feed you when the empire collapses. “Recession gardens are springing up everywhere.” But Big Agriculture is trying close down farmer’s markets.