The Dallas Jew Reserve Bank believes our liabilities have reached $99 trillion. The Chinese, with their antiquated sense of honor, are worried that Jews in the West are going to print more money to deal with the debt. And we all know this will happen, and in fact is already happening. When it happens, the socialist government will blame the private sector. Zimbabwe’s 100 trillion dollar note is actually not as bad as it can get. The record for hyperinflation is held by Hungary, where at one time, after 42 quintillion percent inflation, all Hungarian banknotes combined equaled one-tenth of one U.S. penny.

Asking questions about 9/11 is like asking questions about the Holohoax. In either case, Jews try to silence dissent, as this Jew does to Governor Jesse Ventura.

The empire needs a new threat.

God is ANGRY with us, according to these Zionists.

Like almost everything else that has afflicted the West, this story grows out of the French Revolution and its promotion of anti-Christianity. Actually, you could go back to the third century when Eusebius said that God would never let the Jews rebuild Jerusalem. This was for thousands of years called the Curse of Eusebius. The Roman Emperor Julian the Apostate proved it when he tried to restore the Jews to Jerusalem and rebuild the temple, but he died before it could be done. Then the Crusades proved it again. Not until the rise of the Puritans in England, who took names for themselves from the Old Testament, was there a concerted effort to reward anti-Christs, and this had everything to do with Oliver Cromwell allowing Jews to return to England, from which they had been expelled since the year 1290. (And they had not lived there for long. There is no record of Jews in England prior to the Norman Conquest in 1066. William the Conqueror imported them as moneylenders so that Christians themselves could avoid the sin of usury. And they were not considered to be regular subjects but were “king’s men.” Conveniently, upon the death of a usurer, all of his property was transferred to the king.) But let’s be honest, it also had much to do with common folk reading Scripture in English for the first time and misinterpreting it for themselves.

But it was the French Revolution that really set the gears in motion. On the basis of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, Napoleon encouraged assilimation of Jews in his empire, although he continued to refer to usurers as “locusts.” He said:

[It is necessary to] reduce, if not destroy, the tendency of Jewish people to practice a very great number of activities that are harmful to civilisation and to public order in society in all the countries of the world. It is necessary to stop the harm by preventing it; to prevent it it is necessary to change the Jews… Once part of their youth will take its place in our armies, they will cease to have Jewish interests and sentiments; their interests and sentiments will be French.

This has worked out very well for America, as we all know. Napoleon abolished Jewish ghettoes, but only in conquered countries, similar to Lincoln’s “emancipation,” which was also a war measure. He even made Judaism one of the official religions of France, which was unheard of. He declared all Jewish debts to be null and void, which Russia would never dream of doing today. In fact, Russian Czar Alexander I called Napoleon “the Anti-Christ” and the “Enemy of God” for granting equality to Jews. The rest of Christendom agreed with the czar, because in those days Christians were actually Christians rather than craven faggots who make “brothers” of those who consider their Lord to be the bastard son of a whore, who is now boiling in semen for eternity in hell.

Napoleon’s actions were taken not out of a love for Jews but a desire for them to come and benefit the empire with their ingenuity in filthy lucre. Many kings before Napoleon had done the same thing, and it always turned out badly. Jews were usually holding the moneybags for other rulers, and Napoleon knew that his cunning would appeal to Jewish racial solidarity and only benefit him in the long run. For similar reasons, and as a means of cutting his British rivals away from Asian and African trade routes, he offered Palestine to its “rightful heirs.” The Ottoman Turks prevented this from happening (the Curse of Eusebius again), and Napoleon might not have been serious about it in the first place, but Jews later pushed the British to do the same thing. The British were eager to make this deal because to plant some Jewish subjects at a major continental crossroads would better establish the empire, which at the time covered a fourth of the globe.

In Britain, there were Hal Lindsey-like predictions of the judgments of Revelation throughout the 19th century. Charles Finney predicted the imminent advent of the millennium “if the Church will do her duty.” Then came John Nelson Darby, the father of dispensational premillennialism, and Cyrus Scofield, and ultimately the Rapture cult.

“The Church has sought to settle itself here, but it has no place on the earth… [M]aking a most constructive parenthesis, it forms no part of the regular order of God’s earthly plans, but is merely an interruption of them to give a fuller character and meaning to them [the Jews].” ~ J.N. Darby

What we now know as Zionism was presaged by Lord Shaftesbury’s Jewish Restorationism, the idea that it was incumbent upon Christians to restore a racial claim upon the Promised Land, and that the Jews are “not only worthy of salvation but also vital to Christianity’s hope of salvation.”

You can see that these theological heresies were distinctly British. It is a common misconception that Zionism was born with Jew Theodore Herzl at the close of the 19th century. But 50 years before Herzl said, “A land of no people for a people with no land,” Lord Shaftesbury sought “A country without a nation for a nation without a country.” Even five years before Herzl became a Zionist, Christian William Blackstone was sending large sums of money to Brandeis, the first Jew on the American Supreme Court, for resettlement. “We have prepared the ground for you!” Christian William Hechler told Herzl, though Herzl rightly considered him to be “naive.” Hechler even calculated that the rebuilt temple should be located in Bethel.

This religious idea that Jews were still in a unique racial covenant with Christ was born as a result of, and propagated by, imperial British political machinations. Before he became Prime Minister, David Lloyd George told Jew Chaim Weizmann that the invention of “acetone converted me to Zionism.” Weizmann was a chemist who invented mass production of acetone to be used in cordite explosives against Germany in WWI. He said he wanted no payment, “just the rights over Palestine.” (It was Weizmann’s idea to claim Palestine for the Jews; prior to this time it was believed that there would be more political support to settle them in Uganda.) According to Benjamin Freedman, Weizmann and his fellow Jews, Brandeis and Baruch, blackmailed Woodrow Wilson with disclosure of an extramarital affair in order to force America to enter the “war to end all wars” against the German Kaiser.

In 1917, one of Lloyd George’s first acts as Prime Minister was to attack the Ottoman Empire and conquer Palestine. Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour then issued the declaration (drafted 20 months earlier by Jews) that Palestine was to be “a national home for the Jewish people” (not an independent state). He called it “an instrument for carrying out the Divine purpose,” but the measure was primarily suffused with political considerations and likely catalyzed by bribery or blackmail. Such chicanery is on the order of Howe’s satanic “Battle Hymn of the Republic” being appropriated by Lincoln, and the bankers who funded him, as a tool of propaganda. As Stephen Sizer explains in his writings, The Brits and Jews were using each other, and neither intended to fulfill their promises. But today, the Christian Zionists simply don’t care about the history behind these intrigues. Their only concern is that anti-Christs have been restored to their racial inheritance.

In 1917, as now, the Jews cared not at all for the 700,000 Arabs who occupied the land, but a key stipulation of the Balfour Declaration (now forgotten) is that “nothing shall be done” to “prejudice” the “civil and religious rights” of the natives. This was completely disingenuous.

“For in Palestine we do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country… The Four Great Powers are committed to Zionism. And Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in age-long traditions, in present needs, in future hopes, of far profounder import than the desires or prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land… [S]o far as Palestine is concerned, the Powers have made no statement of fact which is not admittedly wrong, and no declaration of policy which, at least in the letter, they have not always intended to violate.” ~ Lord Arthur Balfour

An interesting aside: Lloyd George said on March 9, 1934, that the Geneva Conventions on war should have prohibited the use of planes for bombing purposes (which is today a common practice of “democracies” but should be considered evil and barbaric) but the British insisted on reserving the right “to bomb niggers” in the colonies. Thus it remains in practice today throughout the world. American presidents routinely issue executive orders to do it, and they don’t even bother to get permission from congress. Two years later, Lloyd George called Hitler “the greatest living German” and “the George Washington of Germany,” but soon rescinded the compliments. Now it is considered a hate crime to remember anything good that Hitler did.

As we know, the world has been forged by the white man, but that’s not always a compliment. In this case, most of the foreign policy problems that still plague us today were created by England, France, and Germany each trying to gain an edge over the others, and manufacturing wars for the purpose of stealing land and killing hundreds of millions of our race in the process. In the year 1900 we were one-third of the population of the world and ruled most of it. In a few short years from now we will be well below 10% of the world’s population and our homelands will be ruled by Asians – Muslim, Hindu, and Buddhist. Our downfall began by trusting the Jew, who is a walking, breathing curse. But it’s not fair to blame the Jew himself for our destruction. The West has committed suicide. It has always been within our power to put an end to this insanity, and we could do it today if we had the will.

Here in America, Dallas Theological Seminary, which has always been down-home for dispensational wackos, endorsed the Scofield Bible. Scofield argued that it was actually a mistake for the Children of Israel to accept the Ten Commandments at Sinai.

“The Dispensation of Promise ended when Israel rashly accepted the law (Ex. 19.8). Grace had prepared a deliverer (Moses), provided a sacrifice for the guilty… (Ex. 19.4); but at Sinai they exchanged grace for law.” ~ Cyrus Scofield

Lewis Chafer, the president of Dallas Theological Seminary, defined his Rapture cult in this way:

The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved, which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity… Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne… [In eternity,] never the twain, Israel and church, shall meet.

In other words, those who hate Christ are still in covenant with him by blood, not by faith, and will be saved by race, not by grace. But somehow we are the racists, not they. Those who belong to this cult are not Christians but Judeochristians, with an emphasis on the Judeo.

Chaim Weizmann became the first president of Israel in 1949, and the Holohoax industry began to work overtime to give the bastard “nation” an air of legitimacy. The rest is true history. Now, pretending to be ministers of the gospel, we have filthy liars like LaHaye and Hagee who have learned how to get rich from Falwell, who once said, “God has been kind to America because America has been kind to the Jew.” And of course, Charles Ryrie’s false view that the Bible is “history prewritten” has led many Christians in our time to make dogmatic historical statements about the Bible, especially its first two chapters. Ken Ham has built his arrogant, hyper-literalist, Scofieldian career on this.

“We should take Genesis literally. Furthermore, it should be noted that you cannot ‘interpret literally,’ for a ‘literal interpretation’ is a contradiction in terms. You either take it literally or you interpret it!” ~ Ken Ham, The Lie, p. 162-163

Things “we all know.”

As Tim Martin says, young-universe creationism requires futurism and is born of premillennialism. “If you take Genesis literally,” reasoned Henry Morris, “you’re more inclined to take Revelation literally” (Ronald L. Numbers, The Creationists, p. 339). And that’s the point of it.

Anyway, that was just a long, diversionary way of saying that whites, far from being the “supreme” race, have nearly destroyed themselves, and have not been coerced by anyone else. It’s worth remembering that the alternate title for George Orwell’s 1984 was The Last Man in Europe. And sometimes it’s hard to know which came first – the religious movement or the political movement. The Puritans simply wanted to purify their church, but they set into motion (with plenty of atheist support!) a bloodbath that has nearly annihilated our race. On the flip side, they would not have existed if not for radical political swings that went by the names “Catholic” and “Protestant,” which led them to oppose the policies of the Stuart rulers and ultimately to wage civil war and execute the monarch. From the perspective of history, there is no separation of church and state. Great religious tides are usually advanced by conquerors, such as Constantine, and we have seen no evidence that democracies or republics are any better at securing the good fortune of the nation. In fact, quite the opposite, and oligarchies filled with Judeochristians are the worst of all.

In Philadelphia there is a miniature “Washington Mall” with a green space surrounded by Independence Hall, the Liberty Bell, and various centers of alleged national importance. The National Museum of American Jewish History opens next year. Jews know that they have to dodge charges of racism from those who see through their double standards, and so they write things like this: “By focusing on the particular experiences of one ethnic group and its relationship with the larger society, the Museum illuminates ethnicity in American life.” Which is a long way of saying nothing. It would be better to explain why Jews should be recognized for having anything to do with founding this country.

Well, they were instrumental in founding the institution that drove a wedge straight through the heart of the nation: the slave trade. Let’s give credit where credit is due!

“Jews also took an active part in the Dutch colonial slave trade; indeed, the bylaws of the Recife and Mauricia congregations (1648) included an imposta (Jewish tax) of five soldos for each Negro slave a Brazilian Jew purchased from the West Indies Company. Slave auctions were postponed if they fell on a Jewish holiday. In Curacao in the seventeenth century, as well as in the British colonies of Barbados and Jamaica in the eighteenth century, Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated. This was no less true on the North American mainland, where during the eighteenth century Jews participated in the ‘triangular trade’ that brought slaves from Africa to the West Indies and there exchanged them for molasses, which in turn was taken to New England and converted into rum for sale in Africa. Isaac Da Costa of Charleston in the 1750’s, David Franks of Philadelphia in the 1760’s, and Aaron Lopez of Newport in the late 1760’s and early 1770’s dominated Jewish slave trading on the American continent.” ~ Rabbi Marc Lee Raphael

There’s a black museum at the Philadelphia Mall as well. What did blacks and Jews have to do with writing the Declaration of Independence from Britain, fighting at the cost of their very lives, and then writing the Constitution for the new government, you ask? I have no idea. It must have something to do with Equality being the sine qua non of Democracy, which was not even imagined until the time of Lincoln.

The Negro museum lists James Forten, Alice of Dunks Ferry, Absalom Jones, Richard Allen, and Octavius Catto as being worthy of mention alongside the founding fathers. We’ve linked to their Wikipedia pages to show that they never did anything more notable than agitate for emancipation and suffrage, thwart the plans for African colonization, and work with terrorists like Frederick Douglass, who conspired with other terrorists and murderers like John Brown. These are the exemplary blacks who are to occupy places of honor alongside Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Franklin, and the others who sacrificed their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor for the good of their people? Most ludicrous of all is this sentence from Catto’s wiki page: “De Tocqueville prophesied that if ever America underwent Revolution, it would be brought about by the presence of the black race, and that it would result from the inequality of their condition.” That thumping noise you hear is Otto Scott spinning in his grave like the Tasmanian Devil. Otto knew that Tocqueville knew what we still know today, which is that blacks are a liability, not an asset, and futile attempts to make them equal result in violence and destitution. It would be the most hateful thing we could do to our children, and we’ve done it. It’s funny that whoever wrote the wiki page considered Tocqueville to be in sympathy.

The most striking thing of all about Philadelphia is that the elegant architecture and accomplishments of the white founders of the city have become museum pieces, and the new citizens have surrounded these artifacts with squalor (Filthy-delphia). As Christians, we don’t have to guess the identity of Christ’s brothers. His sheep hear His voice and follow Him. We don’t have to guess who are the true Americans either. The heirs of the “national consciousness,” which Germans call Volksbewusstsein, are obvious.

Qua patres difficillime adepti sunt nolite turpiter relinquere (“What our forefathers with so much difficulty secured, do not basely relinquish”) ~ etched on the grave of William Bradford at Plymouth Burial Hill

“The God of heaven Himself will prosper us; therefore we His servants will arise and build, but you have no heritage or right or memorial in Jerusalem.” ~ Nehemiah 2:20

Forty-six wetbacks in one bedroom.

Sonia Sotomayor, Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, has said, “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male.” She has said that “inherent physiological or cultural differences” and “our gender and national origins [sex and race] may and will make a difference in our judging.”

Jared Taylor writes: “(These remarks appeared in a publication that is called—apparently with a straight face—the Berkeley La Raza Law Journal.) Miss Sotomayor is certainly no stranger to identity politics. She is a member of the Puerto Rican Bar Association, the Hispanic National Bar Association, the Association of Judges of Hispanic Heritage, and the National Council of La Raza.” Any party or organization, like the BNP, that is restricted to ethnic whites is loudly denounced as hateful and exclusive, but the aforementioned credentials are considered no impediment whatsoever in promoting a stranger to sit in highest judgment over the heirs of this country.

James Edwards writes: “Imagine the reaction if someone had unearthed in 2005 a speech in which then-Judge Samuel Alito had asserted, for example: ‘I would hope that a white male with the richness of his traditional American values would reach a better conclusion than a Latina woman who hasn’t lived that life’ — and had proceeded to speak of ‘inherent physiological or cultural differences.’” We can only imagine.

“When you hate white people, the laws, arguments and facts of the case are of no import whatsoever. It was non-whites vs. whites, and Sotomayor didn’t need any ‘facts’ to decide how to rule.”

Being white is now a liability, not an advantage.

It’s your fault that black women jiggle when they waddle.

Obama and the Black Panthers.

A man with 21 children by 11 mothers. And a minimum wage job. James writes: “These idiot ‘pro-family’ groups don’t say a word about this garbage, but they’re apopletic about two fags getting married? And they wonder why nobody pays any attention to them anymore?” This is an excellent point. God save us from the “pro-family” and “pro-life” race-mixers.

If you are not actively doing something to prevent stories like this from happening, you deserve to be shot yourself. And please, spare us of your hate speech, that in Christ Jesus there are no borders, and race is a social construct. “If someone says, ‘I love God,’ and hates his brother, he is a liar” (1 John 4:20).

“The fiery cross. In its ancient origin this sign of the Scottish Highland means that the Clans must gather to the Holy Rood. The pipes calling from glen to glen say that the usual raiding and reeving and feuding across the borders (always in dispute) must stop and the Clans must unite and they must fight for the greater polity. That polity was once the Christendom.”

To disregard the summons of the Fiery Cross (the Crann Tàra) was to be unanimously branded as a traitor and coward, despised even by one’s own parents, and to be chased far from home. There was no excuse. “The groom forsook his bride at the church door; the pall-bearers abandoned the funeral bier, wherever the Cross was met.”

Woe to the wretch who fails to rear
At this dread sign the ready spear!
Far o’er its roof the volumed flame
Clan Alpine’s vengeance shall proclaim,
While maids and matrons on his name,
Shall call down wretchedness and shame,
And infamy and woe.
When flits this cross from man to man,
Vich-Alpine’s summons to his Clan,
Burst be the ear that fails to heed!
Palsied the foot that shuns to speed!
May ravens tear the careless eyes,
Wolves make the coward heart their prize!
As sinks that blood stream in the earth,
So may his heart’s blood drench his hearth!

Fast as the fatal symbol flies,
In arms the huts and hamlets rise,
The fisherman forsook the strand,
The swarthy smith took dirk and brand;
With changed cheer, the mower blithe
Left in the half-cut swath his scythe;
The herds without a keeper strayed,
The plough was in mid furrow stayed,
The falc’ner tossed his hawk away,
The hunter left the stag at bay;
Prompt at the signal of alarms,
Each son of Alpine rushed to arms.

I watched episode four of this documentary, called The Promise of Home, and I could see right away that it dodges the most important question, which is whether a race or ethnicity can legitimately organize for its own interests and peacefully pursue secession if necessary. Instead, it asks who we are as an empire, and what does citizenship mean, and how can we avoid the cacophony of balkanization. But “balkanization” (i.e., natural ethnic solidarity and eventual secession from empire) is the very thing that brought peace after the scourge of the Soviet Union. It’s fine that such questions are raised, because we’ll have to work with other races if we hope to avoid bloodshed, but please don’t neuter yourself and call it magnanimity.

Episode 11 is devoted to “Racists, Xenophobes, and Bigots,” who presumably are greater threats to the peace than Murderers, Rapists, and Lechers. Here again, the problem is that the episode is all about minorities. There are blacks who came from slaves, and they’re all upset for being disrespected and not being given free things, and mestizos who came from wetbacks, and they’re all upset because they want to steal land and get free things, and Indians who came from Big Water, and they’re all upset because they want Heap Big Wampum. Oh, woe is us! How are we to atone for our sins? By paying more money, of course.

The underlying message is that whites have killed, or at least hurt the feelings, of the hordes who have come here to take advantage of their wealth. But then whites unite with blacks and Indians against the newcomers, and we stand with the blacks and Indians because of our history of “bigotry, racism, slavery, and so forth.” You’ll hear all about the “patriotic call to arms” of Molech Luther King, the “evil” of Jim Crow laws, and the idea that mestizos are not “racially different.” Piss off, and piss on “Americanization” too. One black woman has the nerve to say that her “community” has been “devastated” by illegal immigration. You can be certain that Chuck Baldwin would not endorse these videos, as he has, if anyone in them had lamented the devastation of the white community. As Negro William Raspberry has written, it is “always illegitimate for white men to organize as white men.”

This BNP ad is fundamentally flawed, we believe. The necessity of racial awareness is that we belong to our own by birth, just as is true in our families. But when racialists adopt the perverted ideas of liberals, they imply that national unity is not only assisted by soldiers who die in imperial wars but originates with them. Thus, Griffin justifies “British jobs for British workers” not because the British are British but because the names on the tombstones from those horrible Jew-wars were British names. One major problem with this argument is that Britain was the aggressor in WWII and Churchill, whose image is used in the ad, was a war criminal. (The Dresden holocaust and the post-war Soviet rape of Germany are just two reasons why this is a shitty basis for national pride, even more so because of why WWII is mentioned at all in the ad: to ally the party with Jews and trump accusations of anti-Semitism.) We like the BNP and we like Nick Griffin (very shrewd), but we like to tell the truth even more. We despise equivocation. I suppose this is why we would make the worst politicians imaginable.

“If ever the history of our times comes to be written by scholars free of national prejudices, the ‘crimes against humanity’ committed by the victors of the Second World War of the twentieth century A.D., will appear as equal to those committed by the Nazis. For an objective observer of the ‘crimes, follies, and cruelties of mankind’ cannot deny that the expropriations and expulsion from their homes of millions of people for the sole crime of belonging to the German ‘race’ was an atrocity comparable with the extermination of the Jews and the massacres of the Poles and Russians by the Nazis. The women and children who died of hunger and cold on the long trek from Silesia and the Sudetenland to what remained of the German Reich, may have thought that a quick death in a gas chamber would have been comparatively merciful.” ~ Freda Utley, The High Cost of Vengeance

Read all about it. A desert called Peace. Doesn’t it just make the British and American heart swell with patriotism?

The mass rapes were perhaps the most appalling of these actions, in both the physical and psychological effects on the victims. All women, no matter of what age, faced rape, with gang rapes being commonplace. “Canny Berlin women,” the author writes, “learned quickly that it was wisest to give in and receive Russians one at a time than to have to put up with terrifying gang rapes.” The “wisest” gave themselves to Soviet officers, “as high-ranking as possible,” who could provide protection from the worst types of treatment (p. 101). As a result of the forcible sex, ten percent of German women were infected by venereal diseases, and, because of the scarcity of medicines in the war-torn country, lacked antibiotics for treatment. Abortion was rampant, and was often self-performed. Nevertheless, 150,000 to 200,000 babies fathered by Soviet soldiers were born. The psychological trauma of the rapes was immense, not only for the women but also for German men, who felt emasculated because they were helpless to stop these barbarities. The only way for women to avoid rape altogether was suicide, an option many of them took.

The end result: About 1.5 million German soldiers died in KGB camps, and another 5.7 million German civilians died from Allied policies. All in the name of “democracy, freedom, and racial harmony.”

“I tell the truth not to convince those who do not know it, but to defend those that do.” ~ William Blake

The BNP’s late founder, John Tyndall, was open to tactical political compromises, but he knew that compromise on the Jewish Question would not win the party any sympathy in the media or among globalists or among Jews themselves. He knew that compromise with hostile strangers for short-term political gain would only alienate the party’s base. (This is a lesson the Republican Party has never learned.) Therefore, he argued that Jews should not be admitted as members. He knew that,

though we may do everything possible to avoid conflict with Jewry, Jewry – or at least its politically organised elements – was determined on conflict with us. Protesting that one was not “anti-Semitic” was of no avail; the moment one became involved and identified with the struggle for one’s own race and nation – in my case the British race and nation – one became tarred by the Jews with the mark of the Devil…

The wrath and hatred of organized Jewry is a mountain that stands in the path of every movement of enlightened racial patriotism wherever one cares to look in the world, but in particular among nations of White European pedigree.

His “rules of engagement” in that article are quite agreeable.

The case for working with your own two hands.

Skilled Americans line up at a chicken processing plant near Nashville for scarce jobs. Also present are vanloads of Burmese and Copts who are transported by Christian churches. Of the 51 applicants hired, 14 are Burmese!

Praise the Lord from the earth, ye dragons and all deeps.

I just can’t understand this article. It goes against everything my pastor has been telling me about race being nothing more than a social construct. I can only conclude that doctors are racists who hate the Bible (“the Bible” being synonymous with Ken Ham’s interpretation of it).

If Nick Glasgow were white, he would have a nearly 90 percent chance of finding a matching bone marrow donor who could cure his leukemia.

But because the 28-year-old bodybuilder is one-quarter Japanese, his doctor warned him the outlook was grim. Glasgow’s background would make it almost impossible to find a match, which usually comes from a patient’s own ethnic group.

The doctor “didn’t say it was slim-to-none. He didn’t say it would be hard. He said ‘zero chance,’” Glasgow’s mother, Carole Wiegand, recalled with tears in her eyes.

Speaking of bedside manner, here’s a frog that was sliced open by a lawnmower and stitched together again. Some friends of ours had a similar experience with a cat that got under the wheel of their car.

No bones were broken. The skin was stitched together with needle and thread on the kitchen counter, and the cat was as good as new, except for a temporary limp. They’re now offering their redneck vet services to neighbors.

Stuff black people don’t like. Paternity tests, swimming pools, and books are like kryptonite to black people. Here are the top 60 ghetto names:

Hey, white people can be funny too!