We’re ecstatic to hear that George Tiller is finally in hell. Far be it from us to condemn the actions of his killer, or vigilantism in general. Never was a single bullet more appropriately used. All the decades of Christian protests and trust in lying politicians are as nothing compared to its effectiveness. And in case they’re too dense to figure it out on their own, let this be a clear message to wayward young obstetricians: Turn back! This way lies death.

Still, only five baby murderers in 36 years have been dispatched to their final reward, which shows remarkable restraint compared to their 49 million victims. Whites have had to endure many more murders per minute than abortionists have endured in 36 years, but we don’t get any special laws designed to ensure our survival. In fact, we’re called names and fired from our jobs for even raising the point. When there are spontaneous outbursts of violence from white activists, they are every bit as rare as the violence of anti-abortion activists, and denounced just as vociferously as “hate” by the Jewsmedia. But the cherished practice of baby murder is protected with many special laws, such as FACE (Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances). These women wanted freedom of access to their own homes, and the police and politicians could not have cared less.

It apparently doesn’t take much to be a vigilante. According to this kook, calling baby killers baby killers is “incitement to murder and terrorism.” Lest you think this is a fringe idea, remember that Europe has a multitude of laws designed to prosecute free speech as incitement. So we could say that we have no desire to be vigilantes ourselves, which is true, but we know it will not avail us. The Department of Homeland Security has already identified anti-abortionists, along with anti-immigrationists, as terror suspects.

Yes, Tiller belonged to a church; most abortionists are members of synagogues. The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America gives us this Bible lesson, found on their official website: “A developing life in the womb does not have an absolute right to be born.” Nothing is said about the duty of the parents or the church, because all references to duty and obedience have been excised from the Bible; there is only the right that the libertine fetus is unable to claim for himself. Who wants to bet that Tiller’s Lutheran church would never allow vocal “racists” to be members? Come on, place your bets. After all, in the mind of the liberal, determining what constitutes “racism” is much easier than determining the point at which life begins.

Here’s one of Tiller’s little victims. Since Tiller pretended to be a Christian, the God-damned bastard soothed the guilt of parents by conducting memorial services over the corpses. This little girl was given a rose, a teddy bear, and a picture of Jesus to accompany her to the Lutheran incinerator. Sorry, little girl. If only you hadn’t been born with cystic fibrosis the Lutherans would have allowed you to live. If only your head had emerged before having your brain jabbed with scissors, you could have made a sound of some kind, and we could have interpreted it as your claim for an absolute right to live. But it was all very quiet. Therefore you had no rights. Even animals have “rights” in this perverted world, but not little children.

At Tiller’s funeral, his wife and co-conspirator of 40 years stood to sing the Lord’s Prayer, which would be hard to top on the scale of blasphemy. And the next day, at exactly one week after the shooting, the members of his Lutheran church prayed: “Oh God, we are consumed by grief for what we have witnessed in our community. Come to our aid, walk with us, hold us, strengthen us and give us courage for the days ahead.” But God was reloading.

Our old friend Doug Wilson, who ran all the way to White-aho to escape the nation’s greatest strength, compares Paul Hill to John Brown, the abolitionist murderer. I wish he had expanded upon this idea, because it’s rather clever, and rather wrong. He is suggesting that both men took it upon themselves to defend those whom they perceived to be innocent and dispensed justice when no one else would. But here’s the little difference, which Wilson himself recognizes: murder is sinful, slavery is not. So right out of the gate we’re confused. Wilson then writes: “One of the reasons we published the Southern Slavery booklet back then was because we were trying to counter the idea that abolitionist violence is something God approves.” This was the book in which he contradicted himself left and right, calling slavery benign, beneficial, or evil, depending on his daily vapors. We are agreed that John Brown and the Secret Six who funded him deserved to be hanged. But it remains to be shown that “violence” in the service of “abolishing” crime meets with God’s disapproval (see the first comment on that page). If a thief breaks a window in my friend’s house where I am spending the night, crawls through it, and then has a sudden drop in blood pressure resulting from a bullet in his head, it means that I have committed violence for the purpose of abolishing both crime and the criminal. Surely we agree that this is a necessity, because the fabled justice system is truant. And one can argue that the difference is in premeditation. But if the government decrees that breaking and entering is legal, and I still fail to do my duty, anarchy reigns. This is the point of vigilantism; it is justice in a vacuum. Such was the case during the post-war period called Destruction (popularly known as Reconstruction), when only vigilantes stood between Negro predators and the ladies of the South. God bless our gray ghosts for it.

The problem here, in a nutshell, is the popular and fallacious misinterpretation of Romans 13. Christ-deniers have no right to define that which is “lawful.” They can (and do) claim such a right, but it derives from no authority other than their vain imagination. God has most certainly not instituted illegitimate government, or whatever government happens to exist, any more than he instituted the governments of Sodom and Gomorrah. There are times when we must labor under such, as in Babylon and now, but we pray for deliverance, not an opportunity to legitimize the false government. Those in the latter category are just like Wilson, who think that voting for (i.e., approbating) reprobates in the hope that an accidental and temporary reprieve of bloodlust will result is so far beyond insanity that one hardly knows whether to laugh or cry.

We wish it were not the case, but bullets have always been the most effective agents of change, and this will never change. Another thing that will never change is the spectacle of pastors who denounce violence in thundering oratory until a quorum for violence is reached, and it is resolved that we have exhausted our constitutional right for legal redress of grievances, and there is no alternative but to revolt. There is no question that the latter is more expedient, but it doesn’t change the fact that in this case democracy, not law, is the determining factor. If it all ends in victory, the controversy is conveniently forgotten.

It reminds us of this sign:

“Democracy is the great love of the failures and cowards of life.” ~ Rousas John Rushdoony, Thy Kingdom Come

Of course, if Tiller had secretly been a Nazi and aborted only Jew babies in his clinic, there would be no such equivocation. He would have been shut down instantly, arrested, and excommunicated from his church. If a Christian sniper had then intercepted Tiller as he walked with arms and legs bound in chains, the shooter would have been decorated with medals of valor and canonized as a saint. Predictably, one of the commenters at Doug Wilson’s Blog of Perpetual Pettifoggery proves our Nazi theory:

Also if one were a resistance sniper on the roofs of Warsaw in 1939, one would be justified in taking out an SS trooper about to murder a Jewish child. No law instituted by a properly constituted gov’t to break, there.

It’s so predictable that it’s scary.

Speaking of ministerial pettifoggery, get a load of Mark Horne’s statement that Tiller’s murder was nothing more than vengeance because it won’t stop abortions. I’m going out on a limb here, but I’m going to predict that Tiller’s abortive activities will be severely curtailed. In fact, it is doubtful that his slaughterhouse will ever reopen.

Besides, vengeance would not involve a bullet; vengeance would involve an awl to the base of the skull and a wet/dry vac. These gabby poltroons should get real jobs. They can start by waking us as soon as the “pro-life” movement actually does anything useful.

“When will we take abortion doctor killings out of the back alley and ensure a safe, orderly environment in those cases where such a tragic choice may be felt to be necessary?”

Except for the title, this Ann Coulter article is excellent. She makes the point that every other constitutional right is celebrated openly. Protests and demonstrations and church services celebrate the first, hunters celebrate the second, etc. But the purported “constitutional” right to dismember unborn children is kept very quiet. “[T]hey won’t even call abortion by its name, preferring to use a string of constantly changing euphemisms, such as ‘reproductive health’ and ‘choice.’ It would be as if gun owners refused to use the word ‘gun’ and the NRA‘s motto were, ‘Let’s all work together to keep hunting safe, legal and rare’… How about having the president throw out the ceremonial first fetus, like on opening day in baseball?” A week before Tiller was assassinated, Coulter suggested that Notre Dame could have asked him to demonstrate his technique on stage at the next graduation. After all, this “Christian” university has no qualms about inviting baby-killer Obama to speechify in his authoritative baritone.

We’re very pleased to see the Christian and Newsom families pressing for execution in Knoxville. We had low expectations from the beginning, when police and attorneys lied to the public about the crimes. Hugh Newsom’s resolve was only fortified when he visited the prison where each defendant would allegedly spend 23 hours a day in a tiny cell, and discovered that the prison’s golf gourse is only slightly less manicured than Augusta National. That’s almost a direct quote. Now everyone is trying to dissuade him from having these animals killed. “The warden told me to my face that the death penalty was a lifetime commitment,” he said. Read the article and see how allergic “law enforcement” has become to justice. Justice cries out by the gates (Proverbs 8:3). The parents of these victims have had their lives destroyed. They should not have to engage in this full-time job. It’s easy to understand why so many others are accepting of plea bargains. On top of everything else, they must tolerate the media’s questions about racial unfairness and the defense’s petition for racial clemency. Lemaricus Davidson’s attorney has even filed a motion to dismiss the death penalty based on racial disproportionalilty! Mr. Newsom remains resolute. “We’re persecuting somebody that raped, tortured and murdered two innocent kids. I could care less what color they are.” You see, there are Jews infesting the legal profession who make it necessary for a man in his position to prove that he is not a racist. The underlying message is that “racists” are not worthy of justice.

Back when there were more Christians around, capital offenses were always met with capital punishment. In 1915, when a judge failed to execute Jew Leo Frank for raping and killing little Mary Phagan, vigilantes took him to Marietta, Georgia, and hanged him themselves. Jews formed the ADL to prevent anything like it from happening again. And now we live in a world where appropriate punishment for murder is a surprise.

This just in: Native U.S. white supremacist militia anthrax hate-bombers attack the entire galaxy! Film at 11.

Guns in bars and at church. Just two reasons why we love white people.

The prerequisites for nationhood, according to Zionist Fritz Kahn, are “consanguinity of the flesh and solidarity of the soul” together with the “will to establish a closer brotherhood over [and] against all other communities on earth.”

The great Charles Lindbergh, who was at one time, like Jesse James, an American who was the most popular man in the world, called aviation “a tool specially shaped for Western hands, a scientific art which others only copy in a mediocre fashion, another barrier between the teeming millions of Asia and the Grecian inheritance of Europe–one of those priceless possessions which permit the White race to live at all in a pressing sea of Yellow, Black, and Brown.” But great intellect and accomplishment can also be our undoing.

Since aviation is dependent on the intricate organization of life and industry, it carries with it the environmental danger of a people too far separated from the soil and from the sea—the danger of that physical decline which so often goes with a high intellectual development, of that spiritual decline which seems invariably to accompany an industrial life, of that racial decline which follows physical and spiritual mediocrity.

A great industrial nation may conquer the world in the span of a single life, but its Achilles’ heel is time. Its children, what of them? The second and third generations, of what numbers and stuff will they be? How long can men thrive between walls of brick, walking on asphalt pavements, breathing the fumes of coal and of oil, growing, working, dying, with hardly a thought of wind, and sky, and fields of grain, seeing only machine-made beauty, the mineral-like quality of life. This is our modern danger—one of the waxen wings of flight. It may cause our civilization to fall unless we act quickly to counteract it, unless we realize that human character is more important than efficiency, that education consists of more than the mere accumulation of knowledge.

He knew, before it even began, that WWII would be “a war in which the White race is bound to lose, and the others bound to gain, a war which may easily lead our civilization through more Dark Ages if it survives at all.”

It is time to turn from our quarrels and to build our White ramparts again. This alliance with foreign races means nothing but death to us. It is our turn to guard our heritage from Mongol and Persian and Moor, before we become engulfed in a limitless foreign sea. Our civilization depends on a united strength among ourselves; on strength too great for foreign armies to challenge; on a Western Wall of race and arms which can hold back either a Genghis Khan or the infiltration of inferior blood; on an English fleet, a German air force, a French army, an American nation, standing together as guardians of our common heritage, sharing strength, dividing influence.

Our civilization depends on peace among Western nations, and therefore on united strength, for Peace is a virgin who dare not show her face without Strength, her father, for protection. We can have peace and security only so long as we band together to preserve that most priceless possession, our inheritance of European blood, only so long as we guard ourselves against attack by foreign armies and dilution by foreign races…

With all the world around our borders, let us not commit racial suicide by internal conflict. We must learn from Athens and Sparta, before all of Greece is lost.

IQ is a very real thing, and we can accurately measure it, but in the final analysis it is like judging national dominance based on military spending or number of factories. It doesn’t begin to account for the “intangible qualities of character, such as courage, faith, and skill, [which] evade all systems, slip through the bars of every cage. They can be recognized, but not measured. They lie more in a glance between two men than in any formula or mathematics. They form the unseen strength of an army, the genius of a people.” And on these intangible points, we find that the gap between some races widens to a chasm. They are what led Lindbergh to believe that only the white race could have invented aviation. Who else would have the courage and vision to try?

And who would believe today that such stirring words could have been printed in Reader’s Digest only 70 years ago?

Jimmy Webb’s song The Highwayman, made famous by these men, is about the restless white spirit of adventure, the same Spirit of St. Louis that spanned an ocean.

I was a highwayman
Along the coach roads I did ride
With sword and pistol by my side
Many a young maid lost her baubles to my trade
Many a soldier shed his life blood on my blade
The bastards hung me in the spring of ’25
But I am still alive

I was a sailor
I was born upon the tide
And with the sea I did abide
I sailed a schooner ’round the horn of Mexico
I went aloft to furl the mainsail in a blow
And when the yards broke off they said that I got killed
But I am living still

I was a dam builder
Across a river deep and wide
Where steel and water did collide
A place called Boulder on the wild Colorado
I slipped and fell into the wet concrete below
They buried me in that great tomb that knows no sound
But I am still around

Seems like it all goes ’round and around
and around and around…

I’ll fly a starship
Across the universe divide
And when I reach the other side
I’ll find a place to rest my spirit if I can
Perhaps I may become a highwayman again
Or I may simply be a single drop of rain
But I will remain

And I’ll be back again
and again, and again, and again.

I’m reminded of this verse written by just such a man, warrior-poet George S. Patton:

So as through a glass, and darkly
The age-long strife I see
Where I fought in many guises,
Many names, but always me.

Our generation is expected to exit the stage of history with a whimper, and there is widespread hope that our children’s generation will be the very end of the white race. But we will not go gentle.

“And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.” ~ Revelation 20:9

It’s sad but true. When God delivers our people from impending death by the power of His mighty hand, atheists will still curse His name. Nevertheless, they will witness a miracle with their own eyes.

Oh, to have Rudyard Kipling with us today. His favorite symbol was the swastika, and his wonderful poetry was the bane of the Jew.

Land of our Birth, we pledge to thee
Our love and toil in the years to be;
When we are grown and take our place,
As men and women with our race.

Father in Heaven who lovest all,
Oh help Thy children when they call;
That they may build from age to age,
An undefiled heritage.

He heralded a more hopeful day.

Now, this is the cup the White Men drink
When they go to right a wrong,
And that is the cup of the old world’s hate—
Cruel and strained and strong.

We have drunk that cup—and a bitter, bitter cup
And tossed the dregs away.
But well for the world when the White Men drink
To the dawn of the White Man’s day!

He compared the bond of race to holy communion.

This was my father’s belief
And this is also mine:
Let the corn be all one sheaf—
And the grapes be all one vine,
Ere our children’s teeth are set on edge
By bitter bread and wine.

We shall not see his like again. Or shall we?

Calling the clans with the Fiery Cross:

Change we can believe in?

For the average family, one in every six dollars of income is transferred from government. “The safety net is working,” advocates say. Whatever you do, don’t call it socialism.

The Obama/Sotomayor interpretation of American history.

Like Michelle Obama, Sotomayor has wanted “to enjoy the advantages of affirmative action—while being peeved that anyone might notice that she was enjoying them.”

“Studying Filipino-Americans would be particularly useful because they show the paradoxical benefit of not being constantly targeted by diversity outreach. Nobody much cares that Filipinos are more likely to become nurses than, say, lawyers, but African-Americans are constantly lured in over their heads by affirmative action.”

The black Dallas school superintendent makes $300,000 a year, and his son was just allowed to cut to the head of the line at Harvard under a program for disadvantaged minority students, funded by your tax dollars, naturally. Are you thinking what I’m thinking? Presidential material!

God bless Latvia. Blonde women marching in a parade? God bless them, I tell you. I’ve never seen anything so racist!

Horrifying stories of sex slavery (“racial grooming”) in once-white, once-Christian England. The police are doing nothing about it, the parties (except for the BNP) are doing nothing about it, and if you do nothing about it and continue to call yourself a Christian, you’re a liar. Christians love their brothers and sisters. They don’t run and hide when beasts break in to steal their women.

This is funny. Nick Griffin wins one for the race, and the lapdogs turn their backs on him and walk out of the room when he takes the podium. One Labor leader said: “I think it is horrific that we have representing Britain in the European Parliament people who think that black people and people of Asian origin have no place in this country.” As Griffin said in his press conference, he’s going to turn his researchers loose in Brussels, and I do believe some politicians will be in jail before he’s finished uncovering the corruption. Listen to this interviewer try his best to put Griffin on the defensive, and he can’t gain an inch. I love it when Griffin is asked if he is obsessed with the BBC. He says no, “It’s just that whenever I’m interviewed by the BBC, I’m asked the same damn fool questions.”

Speaking of the BBC, they have finally gotten around, 65 years after D-Day, to letting us know that black soldiers went on a raping and looting spree across France. But the important thing is that the hateful, racist military was finally racially integrated. “Of 29 soldiers executed for rape by the US military authorities, 25 were black… In Italy several black GIs were also executed for rape and murder. One rapist was the father of Emmett Till. He raped multiple Italian women and murdered one of them.”

You’ll hear it said again and again in these BNP interviews that the party only won seats because the Labor vote collapsed. But they don’t tell you anything about how the BNP has to scrape for every vote they get. There was more anti-BNP literature distributed in this campaign than for any other party. As every billionaire in this country knows, money gets out the vote, or suppresses it, as the case may be.

Leaning to the left like a Republican.

Do you see anything about white “issues and interests” on this form?

Happy Terrorist Fist Jab Anniversary Day!

The happy U.S. torturer.

Torture has been in the news for a very long time. Here is a nursery rhyme about Bloody Mary that you’ll recognize.

Mary Mary quite contrary,
How does your garden grow?
With silver bells and cockle shells
And pretty maids all in a row.

The “garden” is a burgeoning cemetery being filled with Protestants, silver bells are cathedral bells, cockle shells are symbols of pilgrimage, and the pretty maids are nuns. According to an alternate interpretation, the silver bells are thumbscrews, the cockle shells are attached to genitals, and the pretty maids are iron maidens—all instruments of torture.

Three blind mice. Three blind mice.
See how they run. See how they run.
They all ran after the farmer’s wife,
Who cut off their tails with a carving knife.
Did you ever see such a sight in your life
As three blind mice?

Bloody Mary is the farmer’s wife. She burned bishops Latimer, Ridley, and Cranmer at the stake, along with nearly 300 others.

Wesley Pruden, who fired the great Sam Francis, sounds a lot like Francis now when he writes that Obamination “is our first president without an instinctive appreciation of the culture, history, tradition, common law and literature whence America sprang. The genetic imprint writ large in his 43 predecessors is missing from the Obama DNA… Kenya simply routed Kansas.” Being fired by this blackguard and Jew-tool left our friend Sam with little money for retirement, forced him to work long hours, and probably drove him to an early grave. Sam’s heinous sin was merely talking and thinking about race and genetics, just as Pruden is doing now.

As Sam Francis said, when whites have ceased to exist subjectively, they will cease to exist objectively. This article makes the very interesting point that the very same government which now enforces “hate speech” laws once gave its tacit blessing to “communal vigilantes” who performed the very same function. Now it has simply been transferred to the the public sector. So we see that just as Christians feel the need to become vigilantes in a vacuum of justice, anti-Christians will do the same thing when the tables are turned.

A notable feature of white racial consciousness is the absence of vertical cultural transmission—which is to say, transmission from one generation to the next, whether intra-family, via the educational system, or by means of a dedicated organizational nexus. Vertical transmission has been impossible for a long time. It is rare indeed that anyone obtains pro-white ideas from his family, and never through the educational system, church, or community. More often than not the conscious man’s views are completely at odds with those even of close family members, including parents and children—never mind more distant kin.

Contrast this with vertical transmission within the Jewish community, which is alive and well. Of course, that community is not targeted for eradication, making all the difference.

Horizontal transmission is just as impossible as vertical transmission. The mass media promote only anti-white messages. Whites cannot obtain positive racial images from the media or other contemporary institutions. Such entities are instead the fount of white self-hatred and of the hatred of other groups for whites. We are the only race for which this is true. The racial consciousness of Blacks, Amerindians, mestizos, Jews, Asians, and others is not only transmitted and fostered, but conspicuously glorified by the media, churches, big business, and other influential institutions.

If we no longer exist consciously as a race, do we still exist? Our enemies believe so, at least as a remnant, and we are now like a city under siege, because there is no immediate need to finish us off. It is much easier to slowly starve us. Our enemies tantalize their countrymen with warnings of a “white backlash,” but only to keep their senses alert, knowing that it will never materialize.

What did not occur in a whiter, freer era is not going to happen in a racist, totalitarian environment in which whites comprise a bare majority of the population, are rapidly dwindling in numbers and social and economic influence, and are discriminated against at every turn.

The enemy does not believe that we will ride, like Theoden at Helm’s Deep, into the jaws of encircling armies. But destruction will come upon them in an instant.

The financial crisis of 2008 is instructive in this regard. The terrible suddenness and violence with which it drove the world instantly to the brink of total financial collapse revealed a deeply vulnerable system. Had events proceeded, tens of millions of people would have discovered their savings had vanished–FDIC-insured bank accounts, checking accounts, money market funds. Stocks and mutual funds, too, would have imploded. Bankruptcy of firms would have created massive unemployment. Few to this day comprehend the seriousness of what transpired…

But it would be foolish to assume that such an event would automatically redound to the benefit of the white race, or put paid to the totalitarian elite. During the last major crisis, the Great Depression, Jews leveraged already formidable power to achieve racial dominance. Although pro-white movements briefly grew in size and influence [such as the America First of Lindbergh, Disney, et al.], they were quickly crushed everywhere, internally as well as externally. It was Communism that emerged victorious over half the European world while extending its tentacles into the upper echelons of government and academia in the remainder. Communism “collapsed” when Jewish enthusiasm for it waned. Its Orwellian essence did not disappear, however, but became universal.

The incredibly ugly monument to Communism left behind in the former Yugoslavia:

Since at least the 1920s, Jews have made sure that we are unable to form an effective counterculture. The very thought of it has been stigmatized as evil and Hitlerian. “Law, human rights, freedom of speech and association, the Genocide Convention—everything goes out the window when it comes to accomplishing this one essential task.”

Libertarian Justin Raimondo launches into Jared Taylor in this article, saying that white nationalism is just a cover for opposition to miscegenation. But why would anyone cover one thing with another that is not less controversial? Raimondo is gleeful that a time limit has been imposed on the goals of the white nationalists.

The real solution may have to wait another generation or two after which, if some who call themselves conservatives have their way, there will have been so much miscegenation there will be no more white people left to worry about.

This is genocide, of course, and I suppose libertarians justify being gleeful about the demise of an entire race as long as they are still personally “free.” This brilliant riposte was found at Majority Rights:

If Raimondo wanted a reason for white ethnic nationalists’ objection to miscegenation, he could’ve just asked: we like being white, and want white children; we like western civilization, and only whites have proven capable of creating it; we admire Jews, and want to emulate them. One wonders if Raimondo would get the connection if we changed names to protect the guilty; if for example we wondered aloud what promoting sterilization of all blacks could possibly have to do with discrimination against blacks, or black interests.

I need to remember that one.

As a libertarian, much of Raimondo’s opposition stems from the “statist implications” of white nationalism, which he argues are anything but conservative.

Taylor’s is the legacy of Lothrop Stoddard, Madison Grant, the Count de Gobineau, and that failed portrait painter from Vienna [Hitler]: ours is the legacy of Christianity, which recognized the centrality of the individual soul, and rejects collectivism, including racial collectivism, as inimical to freedom, reason, and just relations among men.

I don’t know where Raimondo finds in the Bible that Christianity is based on “the centrality of the individual soul.” Is that the Ayn Rand version of Scripture? But seriously, many Christians would agree with him that faith is inimical to wielding the power of the state to protect said faith, and by consequence the actual people in covenant with Christ. We’ve gone over this many times before. It’s neither an accurate depiction of Scripture nor of Christian history. It is always worthwhile to compare matters of race to the family. No father allows his children to fend for themselves or to believe that one person’s duties do not coincide with those of the others. Family government protects both the group and the individuals who comprise it. Everyone understands this, and no one bellyaches about “familist implications.” But Raimondo calls the extrapolation of patriarchy unreasonable and unjust.

He writes: “Taylor’s call for whites to organize along lines of ‘racial solidarity’ represents the most complete and abject surrender to multiculturalism.” This echoes David Horowitz’s belief that Taylor is imitating the left by presenting whites as a victimized minority. But imagine that Neighbor A and Neighbor B each have children. Neighbor A convinces the authorities to outlaw inheritance per family. Every man’s estate is to be confiscated by the Ministry of Love and distributed equally to citizens. Neighbor B protests this as theft, but Neighbor A rebukes him for presenting his children as a victimized minority. I think you get the picture. According to Raimondo, it is hypocritical for Neighbor B to pursue his own self-interest at the expense of Neighbor A. After all, the cooked books show a deficit for A if B gets his way. B is accused of stealing from A because the very definition of theft has been turned on its head.

Taylor’s response to Raimondo proves why he is one of the sparkling jewels in our patria’s crown. The article needs to be read in full, but let us pause to savor the near-poetry of the first two paragraphs.

Lost in Justin Raimondo’s torrent of mistaken assumptions and wild accusations is one useful question: What do “white nationalists” want? By putting the term in quotation marks, Mr. Raimondo has stumbled onto an important truth, namely, that there is no accepted term for contemporary Americans who still hold some of the views about race that were taken for granted by virtually all Americans until about the 1950s.

Until then, most people believed race was an important aspect of individual and group identity. They believed that the races differed in temperament and ability, and whites preferred the societies built by whites to those built by non-whites. They wanted the United States to be peopled by Europeans because they believed only people of European stock would maintain the civilization they valued. These views were so wide-spread, so taken for granted, so indisputable that there was no term for them. Just as there was no name for people who expected the sun to rise in the East, there was no name for people whose views are today sometimes given the clumsy term “white nationalism.”

Perhaps we should take for ourselves the name Normalists.

“Not knowing the history of the civilization of which they are a part, today’s students are like amnesiacs, cut off from the past that makes them who they are. Or again, they have become like the anti-heroes of absurdist fiction (Kafka, Céline): trapped in a world they cannot understand, bit players in a drama whose basic themes remain a mystery to them. ‘The only reason we are still alive,’ said German philosopher Gerhard Krüger with only slight exaggeration, ‘is our inconsistency in not having actually silenced all tradition.’”

A bimbo speaks out against “white-trash” Middle America.

Oh yeah, you know that Tiananmen Square massacre in China? I still clearly remember watching it 20 years ago. We were told that students were rebelling against Communists and wanted democracy and were waving American flags, and even statues of liberty. But we weren’t told of how it began. It was started—and here comes a shock to your delicate systems—by violent attacks by African students at a Hehai University Christmas party. I know, you’re like me, and you’re probably thinking, “Africans committed violence? They weren’t in the library balancing equations and conjugating verbs?” True real! Three thousand joined the protest, which expanded to include other grievances, and it only ended when 241 people died (officially). “Unofficially the number could be several thousand.” I wonder why China and Japan don’t want to share our buh-boolies with us. They’re excellent tapdancers, and they’ve made Baltimore #1. It’s not easy to beat out every other city in the country in a competition like this. It’s kind of like the Negro National Spelling Bee.

Star Trek has never been anything more than visual pulp. The only reason to notice the series is that it has the dishonor of showing the small screen’s first interracial kiss, between Kirk and Uhuru; but Kirk was under some kind of alien, demonic possession at the time, so it was understandable. (In the 30 years that followed, it “seemed easier to sell images of black men as wise mentors, crime fighters, scientific geniuses, US Presidents, and God, than black women as attractive sexual partners for normal, non-defective white men.”) The latest installment, as usual, sends two very contradictory messages: that both “diversity” and miscegenation are normal. “All of the sexual/romantic relationships depicted in the film are interracial except for one (Kirk’s father and mother).” As Spock would say, this is very illogical. There is no way for both messages to be true for long, even in real life. In a world in which preachers have united with Marxists to erase borders, and “where any social controls against exogamy are considered morally wrong,” everyone would be Brazilian; coffee-colored. In the Star Trek series, after ten generations of sinful mixture there would be no “diversity.” Yet even the liberals who watch such dreck could not imagine this to be a pleasing state of affairs, and so the hero has to be a chiseled white young man from rural Iowa. (Even Superman, from another world, had to grow up in rural Kansas to be believable as an exemplar of virtue.) So liberals can allow themselves to be absorbed in the interracial fantasy as long as they don’t have to think about the ugly children that Kirk and Spock would spawn if left to their devices.

The people who create these movies—the directors, the writers, the producers, the casting directors—are not artists. They are abortionists. They are aborting the whole future of the white race. And they are not doing it by accident. We know this, because so many of them are Jews, who are constantly reminded from birth that marrying out leads to extinction for them, and they know that goes for us too.

“Everyone thinks that whites who date outside their race are somehow defective. If you don’t look defective, then people will just assume that you have some hidden physical, ahem, shortcoming, or a psychological problem. If you don’t want people thinking you are somehow defective, then don’t date a non-white.”

Multiracial people are the fastest growing group in the country. “Interracial marriages increased threefold to 4.3 million since 2000, when Alabama became the last state to lift its unenforceable ban on interracial marriages.” But what the article doesn’t say is most interesting: According to the census bureau, in 2007 4.6% of married blacks had a white spouse; less than 1% of married whites were married to a black.

On the subject of miscegenation, we reserve all of our scorn for whites. It’s easy to understand why black women want to marry up. Look at the crap they (and we, by consequence) are used to dealing with. We call it hateful and evil to deal with this for another day.

Well, we take back every compliment we ever paid to Rev. James Manning. Most of them, anyway.

We knew it was too good to be true. Thus the search for an honorable black man continues. When Cameron was in Egypt’s land, let my Cameron go! Why is James Edwards always right? I hate that guy.