An excellent, excellent Holohoax film review from First Word. There can be no pull-quote because all of it is so good.
“The most critically acclaimed film in the history of Polish cinema.” The Jews in the Soviet NKVD really did murder by the millions, and they did it with cheap bullets. This is quite unlike the outlandish stories told about Nazis. Get it from Netflix. I think it’s safe to conclude that Jews are not in control of the Polish movie industry.
This is a very interesting look at why Germany invaded Poland.
In Judaic-Germany, which loves only one law of Hitler’s, it is better to be a Muslim than a Baptist.
Five more Holohoax films are coming in the next few months. Why so many? “The Holocaust has 6 million compelling stories, and Hollywood is always desperate for a good story,” says Jew Meyer Gottlieb. If this were true then WWII would have 60 million compelling stories converted to film, and you would go to prison for questioning any aspect of them. The executive director of the National Center for Jewish Film at Brandeis University remembers “only two feature films about the Armenian genocide, neither one with much impact.” Thus it becomes necessary to explain why, when Equality is forced upon business endeavors of every other kind, the Jews are allowed a free pass for their own tragic history. One author offers this phony explanation: “Hollywood Jews are secular Jews, they are American businessmen who don’t put their race or religion first.”
The new District 9 movie is intended to be some kind of post-apartheid allegory with unintended hints of The Camp of the Saints. Aliens (the extra-terrestrial kind, not the black kind) are herded into a ghetto in South Africa after tolerance for them wears thin. They’re lazy, on welfare, eat trash, destroy property, fight constantly, have no respect for authority, and urinate all over their ramshackle homes. “The prawn doesn’t understand. One has to say, ‘This is our land. Please, will you go?’” Now, if this sounds like Swedish behavior to you, you’re wrong. It sounds very much like a certain race that quickly came to be dominant in South Africa. Of whom does this remind you? “They steal sneakers, then check for the brand.” As this reviewer knows, it’s not possible to make a book or film about inequality, which is based on the true history of white nations, and not come across as “racist.” District 9 subtly casts the real-life white Afrikaaners in a very reasonable light. There are Negroes in the movie (Nigerian mobsters), and here is where a second serving of racism (i.e., reality) is ladled. The Nigerian mercenaries are bloodthirsty, cold-blooded torturers and murderers. No surprise there, but they are also cannibals, and they have a witch doctor who commands them to eat the aliens raw in order to gain their powers, much the same as Africans in real life rape babies to cure themselves of AIDS or eat albinos to make themselves wealthy. Oh, but that’s not all. The female Nigerians prostitute themselves to the aliens before their male counterparts dine on them. And this is supposed to be a lesson against racism? It may just be brilliant in how it depicts alien incursions, with which we are all too familiar, using real aliens. It’s not surprising that Peter Jackson is involved. He comes under a lot of criticism for casting black characters in a negative light. His favorite movie is King Kong, if that tells you anything, and he was true to Tolkien’s “racist” vision for The Lord of the Rings, which in retrospect is unthinkable. Jew Line Cinema gave him $300 million to make that trilogy, and failure would have bankrupted the company. How did that ever happen? We eagerly await his two forthcoming Hobbit films.
Just as is true of “racism” in District 9, Quentin Tarantino’s Inglourious Basterds can’t help but come across as what yids call “anti-Semitic,” despite its pretensions. Read this excellent review by Trevor Lynch.
Indeed, this is probably the most anti-Semitic movie ever released by Hollywood. Tarantino’s Jewish characters are one-dimensional, inhuman monsters. The Jewish Basterds are all as ugly as Der Sturmer cartoons. They have virtually no lines in the entire movie. All they do is skulk around, waiting for Aldo the Apache’s commands to murder and torture Germans…
Why would Quentin Tarantino make a movie about World War II in which Germans are portrayed as attractive human beings, Americans are portrayed as sadistic buffoons, Englishmen are portrayed as effete wankers, and Jews are portrayed as cold-blooded, inhuman mass murderers?…
In Inglourious Basterds, Tarantino has taken the one truly sacred myth in modern Jew-dominated America—especially in modern Hollywood—namely WW II and the holocaust, and he has desecrated it by inverting all of its core value judgments and reversing its stereotypes. In the process, he has exposed the true anti-white agenda of Hollywood…
The fact that Quentin Tarantino could desecrate the holocaust, expose Hollywood’s agenda, and sell it back to Hollywood’s Jews is a testament to his twisted genius and their shallowness and moral imbecility.
Tarantino’s good friend is a Jew who is a pioneer of something called “torture porn.” He explains his genocidal fantasies in service to his tribe:
It’s almost a deep sexual satisfaction of wanting to beat Nazis to death, an orgasmic feeling. My character gets to beat Nazis to death. That’s something I could watch all day. My parents are very strong about Holocaust education.
This points to a fact that has been known for a long time, which is that, unlike Christians, Jews have no concept of forgiveness. They have a system in which they are able to “redeem” themselves according to their conventional law. And they obviously care for their own, but as our Lord asked rhetorically in Luke 11, What father will give his child a stone when asked for bread, or a serpent for a fish, or a scorpion for an egg? True graciousness is when we give to those who do not deserve it. Christians have done this with Muslims, for instance, who once enslaved and terrorized them, and would gladly do so again.
It’s hard to find a man more insightful thanYggdrasil. I’ll never forget an enjoyable evening I spent with him and some other friends watching the banned film Africa Addio. In this review of Jew Kubrick’s Dr. Strangelove, you will find that sometimes it takes a perceptive Jew to hold up a mirror and show whites their own blemishes. Yggdrasil explains the willingness of Jews to pass oppressive tax legislation:
Their acquiescence in the high taxes only made sense if they knew they could evade them, or if they felt that their own incomes were so easily taken from others in the first place that their own tax bills were nothing other than an indirect funneling of other peoples’ money into governmental institutions that they controlled. These people were far too smart to be mistaken about such things.
But how to explain the unexplainable—the willingness of whites to be oppressively taxed? The answer is to be found in the innate white preference for theoretical abstractions over self-interest. No other people on earth but whites would freely open their borders to other races, and especially not when it is painfully clear that it will mean the end of their civilization. Whites do this because the future of their own children is far less important to them than abstractions like capitalism and democracy, even “fairness.” These proclivities are so ingrained in our genes that when we come into close proximity with a foreign race that always puts their own interests first, it is generally beyond our comprehension. Thus, Kubrick places just such a white man in his movie, names him Ripper, and has him set doomsday in motion, because a nameless, faceless entity called Communism is fluoridating his water.
Neither Ripper nor any of the other outer party officers portrayed in the movie ever asks the question, “Who benefits from Communism?” If the program is obviously flawed at delivering economic growth, maybe its objective is something other than economic growth! Indeed, the most obvious beneficiaries are those who acquire power under the system, and when you look at the early politburos, you will see that there wasn’t a Russian anywhere to be found. All were inner party and minority nationalities.
And that tells you Communism probably has a lot more to do with race than with economics.
The movie climaxes with the pseudo-Jews turning into Nazis and finding ten women for every man present (white women, of course) to breed the master race.
Jew Marcuse, following Jew Freud, taught that “Western Culture was founded by a band of sons who wanted to sleep with their mother and kill their oppressive father (patricide). In guilt, the sons reestablished the tyranny of the father and the result was European Man. Marcuse speculated that Western tyranny will be broken through a cathartic event: minorities and women would rebel, crushing Western Culture and ushering in a fuzzy utopia that is liberated from logic and reason.”
“The Jews look forward to world domination. This requires them to maintain their own close-knit identity. If the Jews are given equal legal rights in Russia, but are allowed to keep their ‘State within a State,’ they would be more privileged than the Russians. The consequences of this situation are already clear in Europe.” ~ Fyodor Dostoyevsky
A Jew “ethicist” considers it perfectly acceptable to cheat goyim if they are too “provincial” to learn about anti-Christ “holidays.”
Here’s an Israeli politician who calls Obama’s policies “borderline anti-Semitic.” You may not be aware, but anti-Semitism is defined solely by Jews.
This is an amazing video on Jew Emanuel and his corruption. I don’t know about you, but I find it hard to believe that the son of a terrorist would be accused of corruption. The New York Times, a Jewish operation, has published this article as a “wink, wink” about who is really in charge.
Incredibly, President George W. Bush told French President Jacques Chirac in early 2003 that Iraq must be invaded to thwart Gog and Magog, the Bible’s satanic agents of the Apocalypse.
Honest. This isn’t a joke. The president of the United States, in a top-secret phone call to a major European ally, asked for French troops to join American soldiers in attacking Iraq as a mission from God.
Former-Jew Robert Novak knew that his sympathetic reporting about the plight of Palestinian Christians was enough to cause Jew-newpapers to drop his syndicated column as being “anti-Israel.” You think other journalists who are not raised as Jews can withstand that kind of pressure?
“Novak talked tough about freedom and liberty. But he didn’t defend mine,” writes Kevin Lamb.
Ann Coulter calls Barry Lynn a Jew in sheep’s clothing. He is most likely what the Spanish call a marrano.
No one ever demands separation of synagogue and state, least of all our worthless preachers.
“The country the founders envisioned was a formal system of white supremacy,” quoth Jew Tim Wise.
“We White Nationalists are lions… The conservatives are dung beetles. After the jews have eaten the wildebeest and pooped out the remains, the Pat Buchanans of ‘It’s Pat’ fame crinkle by on their six little feet and roll up the salubrious balls of dung on which they subsist. Do you want to be a lion or a dung beetle, White man?”
God bless you my brothers and sisters. May the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ grant you peace amidst the storms of our present travail. May He prepare for you a table of feasting in the midst of our enemies. And may you pass to the enemies of our ancestors and our children the bitter cup prepared from time immemorial for the Devil and his Angels.
“Monarchy, clans, blood ties, feudal oaths all seem so unscientific, so unclean to modern, scientific man. Democracy seems so much more up-to-date and independent. A man who no longer bends his knee to God certainly has no need to bend his knee to a king or a clan leader. ‘So, let’s all be democratic and king of ourselves.’ The synthesis of science and democracy has a name; it’s called liberalism.”
Braveheart, the giant of Western nationalist cinema, should not be watched without first watching Seven Samurai, the giant of Eastern nationalist cinema. In the latter, the elites exist to sacrifice themselves for their people. In the former, even the intensely-tribal Scots find that their elites have betrayed them for personal gain.
Never once do they recognize that the only reason the English king is willing to give them lands is that their peasants are rebellious and tribally-minded. Giving the nobles additional lands is far cheaper than fighting the Scots as a unified people. The nobles never ask themselves what would happen to them if their own people were suddenly de-nationalized and rendered meek and obedient. Would not the English King strip them of their lands just as quickly as he granted them?
Braveheart is as far from a libertarian movie as one could imagine:
Wallace clearly is not talking about abolishing obligations of servitude or payment to Scottish nobles or a Scottish king.
Rather, it becomes clear that Wallace is using the term “freedom” in exactly the same way that a modern member of a dissident militia group uses the term. It is a code word meaning independence of the group and control over its evolutionary destiny.
Yet in the beginning, the hero “does not daydream out loud about Scottish nationalism nor wars of independence and secession.” His rebellion is sparked in “the defense of Scottish women.” This is a far cry from the best that can be expected in masculine films today—”the typical Eastwood shoot-em-up, for example, in which the symbol of European strength and resistance exists only as the lone individual adrift in a polyglot world, destined for absorption or displacement…”
Braveheart “is a magnificent flower poking its head up through the layers of concrete in which our dying civilization has been encased by the inner party and its culture of critique.” Notice the detail, which all of us have surely missed, until Yggdrasil comes along to educate us:
Following Wallace’s execution, we see a fictional dramatization of the prelude to the battle of Bannockburn in 1314, a scene in which Robert the Bruce, then King of Scotland, is expected to pledge fealty to the English crown before an English army and is waffling as ever over what to do. Finally he makes up his mind and decides to fight, shouting to his assembled troops, “You bled with Wallace, now bleed with me!”
It is a remarkable scene fraught with ambiguity and indecision. Note that Robert the Bruce does not say, “fight for freedom,” nor “fight for Scotland,” nor “fight for the freedom of Scotland.” Rather, he asks the assembled Scots to fight for him and his crown, implying that the nation and his crown are one and the same thing.
This goes to show what great art can be produced when whites have cast strangers aside and govern their own affairs. In the case of Braveheart, the only Jew involved was a lone film editor. Even if Jews were capable of following the story as written for them, it would never be possible for them to invest it with their souls, as Gibson did. Likewise, Middle Earth could never have been the creation of anyone but a Christian. (And a Christian, mind you, whose art flows reflexively from his racial consciousness, not the Doug Phillips sort of filmmaker who begins by calculating which genres are “biblical,” chooses one as a medium for preaching, and ends with a reel of cheese.)
A Tintin book for children is so “racist” that it is kept behind the steel door of a vault at the Brooklyn library. “It’s not for the public,” says the librarian.
There is now a full court press against Glenn Beck merely for calling Obama a racist. Terrorists always try to kill a man’s livelihood. It’s the coward’s way of killing the man.
Dang! Now Fidel Castro is calling us racists. That hurts.
Newly-minted “racist” words. As your pastor will tell you, you are in sin if these words proceed from your lips, because it’s hate, Hate, HATE. You must never again say “master bedroom” or “black sheep.” And if you want to avoid big trouble, never suggest that the color white signifies purity. In fact, it’s best to stay away from discriminatory words like “purity.”
More things that are racist, as defined by those who define the word: “Pride & Prejudice, A Tale of Two Cities, Wuthering Heights, etc.” Oh, how are we ever to atone for our wickedness? The Macpherson Report of 1999 defined a “racist” as one who is believed by others to be a racist. But as we all know, the opinions of “racists” don’t count, and so by circular reasoning, they are excluded from the vote. As we also know, circular reasoning has never prevented pastors from approbating racism and other Communist concepts.
Remember, it’s a sin to say the word “nigger” if you’re white, but here are some popular musicians with an album called “White Trash, Two Heebs, and a Bean,” and a song called “Kill All The White Men.” Here are the lyrics, and remember, what you are reading is not a hate crime. It’s what the Jews call art.
Did this black congresswoman really just praise Che Guevara? Oh dear, I’m afraid she did. It was Guevara who said blacks “have maintained their racial purity thanks to their lack of an affinity with bathing.”
What on earth was going through the minds of the band Toto when they made the laughable video for their song Africa? In the video, while a white man is absorbed in library books about the dark continent, a spearchucker bursts through the door and kills the black librarian, knocking over an oil lamp in the process and burning the library down. Wait, what? I think there’s a metaphor hidden somewhere beneath the early-eighties low-budget music video crust. I’ve always liked that song. One thing is for certain: there will never be a song written by blacks with such poetic phrases as “Kilimanjaro rising like a leopress above the Serengeti.” Negro poetry is more along the lines of “Bitch, where my money at?”
Here’s a poet in need of a Cobbins-like jury, says the NAACP.
See all the white “bigots” in this indoctrinational film from 1959. The liberals who made such films did a good job of making them as tame as possible, but the message was that “prejudice” in all its forms had to be vanquished. Just two years later, this anti-fag film was made, which by today’s anti-standards would be universally denounced as bigoted and evil. You can see that the two films are coming from the same angle, but the liberals who made them did not realize that lust for Equality must go all the way to be satisfied.
Europeans are every bit as stupid. It’s in our genes to be facilitators. (I’m not sounding very much like a white supremacist, I know, but that’s because I feel under the weather.)
Funny how liberalism is peeled away in prison.
Neo-Americans consider Christianity to be wicked and hateful.
Ossifer Cheeks be all constitooshamalizin’ and whatnot. Y’urr me?
The “walled world” is the white world. The red lines in the picture are supposed to indicate that wealthy whites, Asians, and Jews have walled off their money and resources from the rest of the world. The underlying assumption is that borders are bad.
Our friend at Lee in the Mountains makes the very good point that the Yankee in the “last American” picture we posted recently could just as well have been John C. Calhoun, standing in front of the last Confederate battle flag in Columbia, South Carolina. The picture was published not long after the war, in 1899.
Political scientist Frank Salter calculated that compared to the Danes, any two random English people have a kinship of 1/32 of a cousin. Two English people become the equivalent of 3/8 of a cousin by comparison with people from the Near East, 1/2 cousin by comparison with people from India, half-siblings by comparison with people from China, and like full-siblings compared with people from sub-Saharan Africa.
Thus, the aggregate of genes people share with co-ethnics dwarfs those shared with extended families. Rather than being a poor relation of family nepotism, ethnic nepotism is virtually a proxy for it.
Sadly, Rushton is a Darwinist who believes that altruism is selfish gene propagation, which is another way of saying that love is a virus. Auster’s review of this article is spot-on:
Rushton doesn’t just reference the unquestionable facts of human distinctiveness; he is a full blown Darwinian/Dawkinsian reductionist, subscribing to the notion that the evolutionary “purpose” of the organism is to serve the survival of its individual, “selfish” genes. Does he seriously expect to derive a viable theory of nationhood from this? That’s like expecting to derive a viable model of society from comparing the behavior of men to “alpha” and “beta” animals in packs.
This is precisely correct, and worthy of some thought. I would have said it’s like comparing the behavior of creatures who bear the divine image to ants and bees. But colony societies are more similar to what we see in the East. Pack animals are different, and more closely approximate predatory Negro behavior. How does the Darwinist hope to inspire the mystic chords of nationhood from a theory of selfishness that, in actual practice, would reduce us all to competition for survival of the fittest? And not the fittest race, but the fittest individuals! Look to the street gangs to get an idea of how Darwinism would look if removed beyond the realm of textbooks. Even at its very best, Darwinist racialism tells us nothing more than that we want our race to survive because it benefits us personally. The theory renders purpose meaningless; our actions and ideas as random as the strokes on Rushton’s keyboard; our national destiny an accident, our eternal destiny a fantasy. Christians have quite different explanations for Being.
It should be obvious to anyone and everyone that atheism does not encourage large family formation, without which white nationalism is an academic exercise. As a friend of ours puts it, the only people who have lots of children are the people who want them, and the people who want lots of children are invariably religious. The Ubermensch Boy’s Club rails against obedience and devotion to Jesus Christ but have never demonstrated that the white race can survive without Him. Where are the fecund clans of atheists? Perhaps they are hiding in the forest, teaching the wisdom of Revilo Oliver to their children and riding unicorns and griffins.
I quote my friend:
My basic hypothesis here is not mystical. It’s simply that the more one believes there is a God who gives commands to have children and holds one eternally accountable to those demands, the more one is likely to choose to have children in a post-contraception environment. The pleasures of not having lots of children and the pain of having them in the short-term is too high to overcome except by divine command… Man is an irrational animal at root who will pursue pleasure at all costs (as pleasure has become disconnected from fitness in our world)…
Show me a group of atheists or agnostics anywhere with an above-replacement birth rate, even among the racially-aware. The problem is that hedonism is the inescapable conclusion of atheism for most people (and mental self-stimulation, i.e. intellectualism, is a form of hedonism)…
Kind hearts are more than coronets
And simple faith than Norman blood.
Who but white people would ever think to do this?
At McDonald’s®, we believe that African-American culture and achievement should be celebrated 365 days a year—not just during Black History Month. That’s the idea behind 365Black.com. It’s a place where you can learn more about education, employment, career advancement and entrepreneurship opportunities, and meet real people whose lives have been touched by McDonald’s. Plus, you can also have a chance to win exciting once-in-a-lifetime opportunities. So make sure you visit often—you just might get inspired.
Like the unique African Boabab tree, which nourishes its community with its leaves and fruit, McDonald’s has branched out to the African-American community nourishing it with valuable programs and opportunities?
May I ask a few impertinent questions? Are we allowed to celebrate explicitly white culture and achievements every day of the year? Are we allowed to have corporate-sponsored websites that serve as white networking tools, and which distribute race-based prizes? Are we allowed to have our own tree that nourishes our own community? Or am I once again brandishing the lightsaber of Hate and swinging it at the knobby heads of innocent droids? Oh, how shall I atone for my nativism?!
Nice words from Doug Wilson here:
If an ancient tyrant builds a Taj Mahal on the backs of slaves, he will have no shortage of of modern historical sychophants lamenting the lost glory days. But if there are five centuries of peace, with every Israelite under his own fig tree, minding his own business, there is no ruined grandeur for the modern statist writer to grovel in front of…
The three pillars of “capitalism” are free markets, free labor, and secure property. All of that was there centuries before Adam Smith, developed, nurtured, and defended by a Christian civilization. And they were developed, nurtured, and defended in no other civilization. And then, when modernity did arrive, the modernists waltzed in and seized houses they did not build and wells they did not dig, and said, “Look what we did!” The tragedy is that many Christians believed them.
Somewhere in Iowa, a pig is being raised in a confined pen, packed in so tightly with other swine that their curly tails have been chopped off so they won’t bite one another. To prevent him from getting sick in such close quarters, he is dosed with antibiotics. The waste produced by the pig and his thousands of pen mates on the factory farm where they live goes into manure lagoons that blanket neighboring communities with air pollution and a stomach-churning stench. He’s fed on American corn that was grown with the help of government subsidies and millions of tons of chemical fertilizer. When the pig is slaughtered, at about 5 months of age, he’ll become sausage or bacon that will sell cheap, feeding an American addiction to meat that has contributed to an obesity epidemic currently afflicting more than two-thirds of the population. And when the rains come, the excess fertilizer that coaxed so much corn from the ground will be washed into the Mississippi River and down into the Gulf of Mexico, where it will help kill fish for miles and miles around. That’s the state of your bacon—circa 2009.
The Zimdollar is finally dead, if anyone cares. It lasted longer than we thought, but then so has the phony-baloney dollar of the American Empire.
The state just wants to help parents do their job. It looks kindly in your eyes and purrs, “We jes’ wanna hep yooooo.”
After only 40 years, this is what we have to show for all the trillions of dollars that have been spent on the education racket. By “education,” I mean “self-actualization, following one’s joy, social adjustment, or multicultural sensitivity”—anything but knowledge.
The mayor of Detroit says the city could run out of money by October. For a long time now, no major grocery chain has had a store in that forsaken corner of Africa. This means that the local color can’t get produce and keep themselves regular. The solution is obvious: the state will tax whites to subsidize the delivery and sale of fresh fruit. Eureka!
Likewise, it is the duty of “the community” (i.e. white people) to give hundreds of millions of dollars to wets in Texas to improve their “quality of life.” This is imperative, says one consultant, because wets are in the majority. But when whites were the majority race in Texas, back during the good old days of “racism,” they were told that simply because they were the majority, it was their duty to give money to minorities without complaining. We’ll see more of this in the near future. Race hustlers justify quotas and artificial advantages because minorities need to be raised to a level playing field. But when whites are in the minority, as we already are in Texas, California, and two other states, we will receive no such freebies. Instead, we will get the South Africa and Zimbabwe treatment. When that day comes, we Kinists will remember every face of every lying pastor who put us there.
California’s troubles are linked to Reagan’s amnesty program.
Down in Texas, the great names of Houston, Travis, Bowie, and Crockett are being replaced by Cisneros, Huerta, Garcia, and Gonzalez. By the time the new textbooks arrive in 2013, “a majority of the children attending Texas public schools will be Hispanic.” These neo-Texan children “want to see some brown faces,” says State Board of Education member Patricia Hardy, a Republican.
Affirmative action “heroes.” They’re about as useful as affirmative action “scholars.”
“One moves swiftly and imperceptibly from a world in which affirmative action can’t be ended because its beneficiaries are too weak to a world in which it can’t be ended because its beneficiaries are too strong.” Jared Taylor’s review of Christopher Caldwell shows his exasperation that someone who can so clearly identify the rot in Europe neglects to describe what is happening here in the same words. As Jared knows, it’s not really that odd. Caldwell simply wants to keep his job and continue to write for Jew publications. This is why he says that Enoch Powell was factually correct, “beyond any shadow of a doubt,” but was nevertheless “morally wrong.” I wish someone could explain that to me.
One of the most interesting of Taylor’s observances is that whites are inherently principled, even if to their own destruction.
When the French decided they couldn’t have Arab girls wearing veils to school, they felt compelled to ban yarmulkes and “large crucifixes” as well. Italians and Germans couldn’t ban veils without taking down classroom crucifixes that may have been up for centuries.
Europeans therefore cannot bring themselves to combat alien practices head-on. When the Danes got sick of Muslims fetching brides from the old country, they had to ban young spouses rather than illiterate Third Worlders. By forbidding the import of marriage partners under the age of 24, the Danes mostly stopped the practice, but they had to pretend they had an underage-spouse problem rather than an immigration problem.
Measures like this bother people who shouldn’t be bothered. If the authorities step up surveillance on fire-breathing imams, they think they have to keep tabs on other people, too. If they cut back on welfare because of immigrant chiselers, they have to change the rules for everyone. Although it came to nothing, one Swedish bureaucrat, shocked to discover female genital mutilation was going on in her country, argued for mandatory checkups for every Swedish girl.
On the tombstone of the West can be engraved these words: “It was a race that died too young, but it was principled to the end.”
Only two centuries to go and the racial achievement gap will finally be closed. We know this is an accurate figure because it comes directly from paid professionals. So if we now spend half a trillion dollars per year on education, it will only cost another hundred trillion dollars, a sum that no one can even envision. But since no politician ever spends less than his predecessor, it’s probably a lowball estimate.
Black “intellectuals” agree that racism has not ended because whites think they have the right to express disagreement with His Lordship.
Latonya, Fayetta, and Seraunna are demanding to know where they free house at! Racism is truly a plague upon our society. Only haters would deny these women a roof over their heads. Their half-sisters, Latrina, Urethra, and Velveeta, are also demanding homes for their litters.
Never call blacks “malcontents.” Always refer to them as a “multicultural tableau.”
Here’s something I’ll bet you’ve never seen before: Michael King as the Terminator being attacked by the scantily-clad ninjas of the KKK. Well, Terminators do try to destroy humanity, so that much of it is accurate.
Air Force One:
This was sent out by a woman at the Canton, Ohio, police department, while on duty. That wasn’t very smart, but she’s right, it is funny. And that’s just terrible. Only racists like to laugh. If you don’t believe me, watch Comedy Central. It should be called Funeral Central. You know what people really laugh about when they’ve had a drink or two.
Look at all the he-girls commanding our ships at sea. “The Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Gary Roughead announced in Annapolis recently that ‘diversity is the number one priority’ at the Naval Academy.” And you thought it was the other d-word, defense.
Lawrence Auster is correct: “a country that puts its women in regular military units (other than in conditions of dire necessity) doesn’t deserve to survive.”
The 1,000 surveillance cameras that have been installed in London have led to one crime being solved. Of course, that’s not really the purpose of the cameras. The cameras exist for the same reason that Jew Emanuel via Obama is reserving unconstitutional control of the Internet. Jews hate free media.
Are there really any differences between Orwell’s and Huxley’s predictions? “Every faction has its Big Brother and its Goldstein.”
Elderly whites are protesting socialized medicine because it could threaten their socialized medicine. Just another day at the honky follies.
The Jew media in Chicago is keeping black crime under wraps out of deference for Obama.
This woman makes a Jew go nuts. Shame of you!
It’s either Jesus or the weiner poopie. Which will it be?