Repent, racists!
Liberals in Britain this month got behind a big drive to posthumously apologize to computer genius Alan Turing for prosecuting him under sodomy laws. Sodomy was illegal in Britain in 1967 because, though times were rapidly changing, the West still had a partial grip on its racist-sexist-homophobic-Christian past. Unfortunately, do-gooders took A Clockwork Orange seriously and offered Turing the choice between prison and “chemical castration,” which consisted of injection of female hormones, which caused him to grow breasts, which caused him to commit suicide. As unfortunate as this incident might have been, liberals are pleased that faggotry is no longer considered a mental illness in our enlightened age. Liberals have resolved the nature vs. nurture question as being mostly (if not all) genetic.
In contrast, Christians believe that a fag can change his ways, just as a smoker can wean himself from nicotine. But too many Christians, reacting against liberal extremism, fly to the opposite extreme and reject any genetic predisposition at all to sinful behavior. For instance, Gary DeMar says, “biologically you could not really make the case” that genes are linked to drug abuse and risky sexual behavior. He doesn’t believe that a genetic link to behavior will ever be discovered, even though we can see evidence for it everywhere. We know that Indians are inclined towards alcoholism and blacks are inclined towards violent crime. We may never be able to identify the genes that cause this, but we can easily study statistics. We also know that genes are not determinative. Almost everyone accepts that behavior is brought about by some combination of nature and nurture, and as we know from multiple sources, as soon as you tip the scales greater than 50% in the direction of nature, you’re a racist.
We believe it ultimately undermines the gospel when Christians deny the aggregate reality of genes because it puts them on the same path as the Jewish Boasian and Frankfurt schools of thought. If all people are born as blank slates and cultures are historical accidents, we never need to worry about the adverse effects of racial mixture or the likelihood of failure in pouring vast sums of money into projects designed to equalize the races. Ironically, liberals who think this way always take the one-size-fits-all approach to worldwide cultural regeneration, always administered by Great White Teachers like themselves. This is what has motivated Gunnar Myrdal and countless preachers who are arrogant enough to believe that they can recast the world in their white image. This is nothing less than supremacism.
The Jon and Kate Gosselin train wreck of a “family” was discussed at SWB well before their troubles became a popular obsession. They are a textbook example for anyone curious about interracial incompatibilities and the devastation wrought upon the children produced from such illicit unions. The Gosselin children, like all children, want to look like their parents, and since they don’t look like their mother, they are suffering identity issues, not to mention the typical trauma from divorce, which the Bible calls “violence.” The shrews at Racialicious have a post on the Korean dinner episode. In this episode, Kate observes that the children “have arguments in the car about who is Asian and who is not, and it boils down to me and Alexis are the only non-Asians in the whole house.” But then one child tells her, “I’m Asian just like you.” Kate laughs. “You are?” She says the children get angry when they are told they are not Asian. The shrews also tut-tut because “Some of the children even wonder if their stuffed animals are Asian.” They completely miss the point, being race-mixers. The point is not that “Jon and Kate could have at least pulled out a map, pointed to Korea and explained that Koreans are people from that country.” What the hell does a geography lesson matter to a child who is suffering from racial and familial alienation due to the terrible choices of their parents? Then the shrews write: “There’s no reason why they should go around believing that inanimate objects can be Korean.” Of course there is, just as every little white girl wants a white doll, because she projects herself through the doll. You would have to be a moron or a rebel against nature to not understand this.
A very good essay on what Tolkien called the “evil of mixing”:
Now the descendants of the kings had become few. Their numbers had been greatly diminished in the Kin-strife…while others had renounced their lineage and taken wives not of Numenorean blood. So it was that no claimant to the crown could be found who was of pure blood…and all feared the memory of the Kin-strife, knowing that if any such dissension arose again, then Gondor would perish.
Perhaps I am revealing my nerdishness, but there are a couple of minor errors in the essay. The name of the devil character is Morgoth or Melkor, not “Margoth.” Also, orcs are not “giant goblins” but tortured and demented elves. The Uruk-hai are orcs cross-bred with goblins for hybrid vigor and exposure to sunlight. You can see why I’ve never had a girlfriend.
Revilo Oliver, who coined the phrase “politics is the art of the possible,” rejected the Bible as “the Jew-book,” as well as any attempt to base conservatism on Christianity, because of the fact that Christians disagree among themselves on doctrine. Instead, he advocated rallying around the Constitution. Now, consider the absurdity of this. The Bible, having been validated as the Word of God by thousands of years of miracles, and attested as such by the vast majority of Europeans, is not valid because Christians themselves have disagreements. Even though states have established churches in spite of these differences, even in the New World, it should never have happened, says Oliver, because consensus has never been reached. Instead, we can treat the Constitution as the document that God would breathe, if there were a God, and there is hardly any chance that the Right will ever disagree about the meaning of such a young document, even though it has long since been rendered meaningless, and even though the men who wrote it never expected that future generations would consider it so sacred, and never would have guessed that anyone would consider it more concrete than Holy Scripture or a better basis for “a realistic and rational patriotism.” If Oliver represented conservatism, it’s good that he has been forgotten. Of what use is an erudite liar?
“And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.” ~ John 3:19
It seems to me that Revilo Oliver and other race-worshipers have much in common with transcendentalists like Ralph Waldo Emerson. Emerson wrote: “In the woods, we return to reason and faith. There I feel that nothing can befal me in life, – no disgrace, no calamity, (leaving me my eyes,) which nature cannot repair. Standing on the bare ground, – my head bathed by the blithe air, and uplifted into infinite space, – all mean egotism vanishes. I become a transparent eye-ball. I am nothing. I see all. The currents of the Universal Being circulate through me; I am part or particle of God.” But the god of the transcendentalists was really the transcendentalists themselves. They had much in common with Jews, who, contrary to popular opinion, are not waiting for a messiah. The Jewish messiah is the Jewish race itself.
Good news! Immortality is just 20 years away. There will be no human tissue left on the cyborg exoskeleton, but one has to make sacrifices for idolatry.
Liberals are gushing over the new Ken Burns documentary about the national parks. One of the themes is black exclusion. There is also well-deserved attention given to pioneering conservationist John Muir. But liberals are a lot like presbyterian preachers in how they excise from history the inconvenient views of important figures. In Muir’s case, liberals have forced themselves to forget that he called Lincoln’s war a “demon war” and refused to be drafted, escaping to Canada. Of course, ignoring the truth is the only way to tell the history of modern conservation and also make blacks feel included in what was solely the creation of white men.
One wonders what Burns and Brinkley would make of Roosevelt’s attack on birth control and smaller family size among whites, practices which were beginning to come into popular acceptance in his time. Roosevelt absolutely believed that white Americans should predominate; another inconvenient biographical fact policed out of consideration by our elite myth-makers, whose mendacious narrative is endorsed by what passes for the highest levels of broadcasting, publishing and education.
Translation: Jews are censoring white history for their own benefit.
As you know, liberals who buy “Save Tibet” bumper stickers could not care less about saving their own country for their own people and posterity. Yet while they consider sweeping generalizations about other races to be “racist,” they do it all the time when it comes to their own homes and families. Tibetan nannies are fashionable because they are considered to be “very balanced and Zen” and aid in children’s “spiritual development.” The preschool in Astoria, New York, even has a Tibetan nanny referral service.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu denounced the UN for allowing Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to speak, and worst of all, to publicly deny the Holohoax. “Have you no shame? Have you no decency?” The Jew came armed with two documents to prove that the Holohoax really did occur: a copy of the minutes of the Wannsee Conference, in which it is alleged that Nazi officials planned the Final Solution that led to the extermination of six million Jews, and the original blueprints, bearing Himmler’s signature, of the Auschwitz-Birkenau camps. “And what of the survivors whose arms still bear the tattooed numbers branded on them by the Nazis?” he asked. “Are those tattoos a lie, too?”
First, see here if you want to learn why the Wannsee Conference Protocol was a fraud. Second, why would blueprints of the camps be more important than the fact that it was not possible to kill as many at the camps as has been claimed?
In the expert opinion of Dr. Fred Leuchter, who did the first and only forensic study of Auschwitz, it would have taken 68 years, working full tilt, for six million persons to be executed in the “gas chambers.” But this number assumes that the facilities were actually capable of mass executions, and they were not. They were not sealed or gasketed, and the toxic runoff was not diverted from the storm drain, which would have created a lethal situation for camp personnel – the very same personnel who would have been needed, without a break, to get the job done in less than 68 years. Not surprisingly, Leuchter found that there is no cyanide residue on the chamber walls. The cremation alone for six million bodies would have taken more than 40 years with the equipment available.
Heeb Magazine is hosting a timely Fake Holocaust Memoir Competition.
Here are some pictures of one of the Auschwitz prisoner bands. The guy who is smoking a pipe and playing an accordion just returned from doing a few laps in the Auschwitz swimming pool. Nazis apparently sent away for the Brer Fox Correspondence Course on Genocide. Perhaps they ordered their killing machines from Acme, where Wile E. Coyote got his gear.
Pity that Simone Weil “survived” Auschwitz. After being “liberated,” she led the drive to legalize abortion in France. “We are out to destroy the family,” said the Jew bitch. “The best way to do that is by attacking its weakest member, the unborn child.” In the present day, a newly-confirmed “czar” with the Jewy name of Sunstein is teaching that unborn children “use” the bodies of their mothers. “Restrictions on abortion, surrogacy and free availability of pornography are troublesome,” writes the Jew. And cloning is fine too, he says, since unborn children are “only a handful of cells.”
Charles Lindbergh warned that Jews were agitating for war in the 1930s and 40s. The Jew-media then dove in and glorified war in newsreels and entertainment. The word “anti-Semite” was invented, and men actually lost their jobs for opposing war. Now, 70 years later, you’re an anti-Semite if you fail to agitate for war against actual Semites in the Middle East. We are on the verge of war, said Lindbergh, in which the only victor will be chaos. It was actually much worse; as Pat Buchanan has written, it was nearly our death blow.
“Carthage had been destroyed, but among the Carthaginian satellites had been the Jews, scattered westward from Palestine but of Asian origin and sympathies, potential spies and rebels, difficult to assimilate and impossible to trust. The Jew represented then, and has appeared ever since as an enemy agent behind the European lines, tolerated when the East is in retreat but thought dangerous when the movement goes the other way.” ~ East and West, 1965, C. Northcote Parkinson, p. 104
Iran has three months to halt uranium enrichment. Israel is free to proceed with its “secret” program, because anything less would be anti-Semitic.
At a couple of points in this video, you’ll hear Jew Chertoff say that believing that the U.S. government orchestrated the 9/11 attacks – or even believing that Obama was not born in Hawaii! – is equivalent to holocaust denial. (When a Jew uses the word “holocaust,” he has only one of them in mind: the Holohoax.) Will truthers and birthers now be joining Ernst Zundel in the gulag?
Meanwhile, German Prime Minister Angela Merkel calls the holocaust in Gaza at the hands of Jews a “clash.” She says Justice Richard Goldstone’s report on Israeli genocide in Gaza is “nothing to get worked up about.”
If you found Pat Buchanan’s recent article on the usefulness of WWII intriguing, I think you’ll be amazed by the grasp of history demonstrated by Michael Butler and Tim Harris in this conversation.
Judeochristians lift their skirt and reveal the world’s most beautiful leg.
A classic clip from The Line in the Sand.
Is it fair to give the Jew Frankfurt School so much credit in pushing egalitarianism? What about Napoleon distributing thousands of copies of Thomas Paine’s “Rights of Man”?
Only about seven people attended the funeral of H.P. Lovecraft in 1937, but he has been a world-famous author ever since. His impression of New York City nearly a hundred years ago coincides with our own in the present day: “The population is a mongrel herd with repulsive Mongoloid Jews in the visible majority, and the coarse faces and bad manners eventually come to wear on one so unbearably that one feels like punching every g– d— bastard in sight.”
The Mulatto speaks yiddish and pronounces this blessing on anti-Christs: “May you be inscribed for blessings in the Book of Life.” He then confuses the Judeans of the Bible with the Jews of today as those who are to be “a light to the nations.” As a Christian, Obama makes a fine Jew.
“Red and yellow, black and white, all are equal in his sight.” My kids are really missing out on life by not going to public schools. Missing out indeed.
“Lord, how unequally you divide your blessings. All of them are my children, whom I have brought into the world. You should favor them all equally.”
Obama is making good on his promise to provide more jobs for the “civil rights” scam. The affirmative action lawyers hired will undoubtedly continue to ignore the black crime epidemic and produce Great White Defendants where none exist, just as Obama’s “teachable moment” during the Jena Six incident, in which six black football players beat a white student unconscious, was to deploy the Justice Department to combat white racism.
Everyone protesting the black bus bullies in St. Louis as (all things being equal) hate criminals is being called a “neo-Nazi” and a “white supremacist” by this bastard.
Mark Potok went on the Chris Matthews show to accuse Rush Limbaugh of being a racist for sarcastically calling for a return to segregated busses. That’s very funny, and typical of Potok’s breathless “The Nazis are Coming!” approach. We wish Limbaugh had been serious, but we know that he doesn’t really care about the safety of white children. It is self-hatred that leads a man to embrace his own death, his culture’s death, and his people’s death.
Black men are the leading cause of death among young blacks, according to the CDC. But you know what’s really evil? White supremacists and neo-Nazis.
The black murder rate in New York City is 13 times the white murder rate. Since blacks are only 24% of the population but 61% of perpetrators, you can see that it is a blessing for any city to have a low or zero black population.
Schools have a “zero tolerance” policy against drugs but not against Negroes.
Another “robbery gone wrong.” Mark Potok requests that you not call it a hate crime.
Rev. James Manning calls whites “creators” and blacks “destroyers.” He tells his congregation that they might not like it but they know it’s true. “Don’t hate me, and don’t hate the truth… You know everywhere black folk are, they tear it up. What’s the difference with a black president?… You’re nothing but the sons of the devil, all you black folk… Black people are servants of the devil, because they love to destroy stuff, and if you give them something, they’ll tear it up in a minute, and everyone knows it. Plus, if you’re not careful, they’ll kill you.”
He sounds a lot like the Apostle Paul rebuking Cretans. I know it’s not easy for his church to hear this message, but it’s his duty to convince, rebuke, and exhort. Meanwhile, white churches are doing their best to fulfill 2 Timothy 4: “For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables.”
The Black Panther coloring book, in which small children are taught how to kill policemen.
Professional Idiot Hillary Clinton is stunned that rape is being used as a tool of war in Africa. (East Congo is the rape capital of the world, and as usual, women are the only ones trying to fix the problem.) The same men are doing the same thing here in America, but it would be racist for Hillary to notice.
AIDS is now a black disease. The black motto: Anything With a Hole.©
“We of the South have never recognized the right of the negro to govern white men, and we never will. We have never believed him to be the equal of the white man, and we will not submit to his gratifying his lust on our wives and daughters without lynching him.” ~ Ben Tillman, The Blight That is Still With Us
Dish here niggruh wimminz done got electamacated as mare o’ duh poe-lease. Well, we’re movin’ on up, to the top, to a de-luxe apartment in the sky…
It’s hard out there on a wigger.
Razor wire for the rocket scientists of tomorrow. Though it’s not mentioned at the Keep, don’t miss the title of that Times article: “Eager Students Fall Prey to Apartheid’s Legacy.” This is why their accounting teacher’s tardiness caused them to stab another teacher in the head with scissors. Damn you, apartheid!
Look at this response to the Houghton Mifflin textbooks that overstate black influence in shaping America. “Students will learn that in contrast to the mendacious leftist approach of the Making Europe series, it is actually true that Europeans ‘made Africa,’ in the sense that Europeans created ALL the nations that exist in Africa today.” How many college students in African Studies have ever heard of Henry the Navigator or Cecil Rhodes? And how is it possible to tell the history of Africa without them?
“When liberals hear ‘monkey,’ they think ‘black people,’ and so nobody’s allowed to mention monkeys, especially when talking about Washington, DC.”
The racial aptitude gap has widened despite new cultureless exam questions. “Al Sharpton walks into a chicken joint and orders a bucket of fifteen pieces. Latifah, the clerk, forgets to put two drumsticks into the bucket. How many pieces of chicken does Al Sharpton have?”
We need these stupid black people on our side if we’re going to outlaw faggotry.
“Just Google ‘Melanin and the Pineal Gland‘ to see the wisdom you lack as a uni-dimensional honky ass.”
Newt Gingrich, having long since acquiesced on race, acquiesces on language too. Here is his website that will finally convince Hispanics to become Republicans.
Just imagine how much this one raid cost us.
Ammo can’t be made fast enough, and those who can’t shoot are drugging themselves into a stupor. Multiracialism doesn’t seem to be engendering the “it’s a small world after all” feeling that Ted Kennedy promised.
The Semitic Poofter Libel Center is launching an attack on Lou Dobbs, Jerome Corsi, and the Political Cesspool.
Sweden is now less socialist than the American Empire. In this video, a man makes the stunning statement that for every thousand students in Swedish schools, two are Swedes. The rest are Muslim immigrants, many of whom are raping the world’s most beautiful women as fast as they can. What madness has taken the Swedes and the rest of the West?
Offending Muslims is hate and a criminal offense in Britain.
This is why “hate speech” laws were invented, no matter how many times their proponents deny it. The Jewish ADL invented the concept of “hate speech,” and one of their primary motivations is their raging hatred of Jesus Christ and Christians.
James O’Keefe is a wonder. He and Hannah Giles did the famous ACORN sting, but he also is the one who phoned Banned Parenthood and got them to agree to restrict his donation to only to pay for abortions for minorities. “There are way too many black people in Ohio.” He also lampooned Rutgers racial admissions by complaining about the racist depiction of leprechauns on cereal boxes.
This is an absolutely engrossing conversation between two agrarian geniuses, Joel Salatin and Franklin Sanders. Except for the part about eating swine which have rooted through four feet of winter excrement. I would sooner eat my dog.
This sign-holder thinks he is clever by quoting passages of Scripture that he believes will embarrass Christians. It would have been more honest to hold a sign advocating the legalization of harlotry. Here is the passage in context.
Consider the differences between this clip of Rev. Steve Wilkins [Play] [Play] [Play] [Play] [Play] and this clip of Rev. Francis Nigel Lee [Play] [Play] [Play] [Play] [Play]. Though he professes to be a loyal Southerner, we can’t express how disappointed we are in Wilkins. What a waste of a great talent. But if every pastor out there agreed with what Dr. Lee said, there would be no reason for this website to exist. We would be on the highway to victory.
Harry is giving us some good updates on Knoxville jury selection from his Twitter page. To be updated, you can sign up as a follower, or what he calls a proselyte.
“And this is the comdemnation, that light is come into the world and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.” John 3:19
But those who remembered the ancient darkness of the North – the skildic vision of the sagas did not love it.
This week the dysinformation industry is in full cry about the largest hoard of Anglo Saxon treasure ever discovered. It has just gone on display in the Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery in N. England and thousands are queuing to see artifacts that will certainly reshape our understanding of the Dark Ages – say the experts.
The Experts are wrong (as usual). They have always argued for a pagan ‘Dark Ages’ in the most facetious terms, merely toying with this concept. It is because of the ‘Experts’ that the dark ages are dark. It is Modernist history that suppressed the true poetic and racial memory of the early conversion to Christianity (before the 4th century A.D.) of the Anglo Saxons.
It is Modernist historians and liberals who romanticise the ancient darkness of John 3:19. They repeatedly deny the witness of the Christian Anglo Saxon poets who preserved that memory as a setting both authentic and meet for a White Horse Anglo Saxon culture that rejoiced in the Light of the Evangelium.
So here we have the largest hoard of Anglo Saxon treasure ever discovered bearing out exactly what the Inklings like C.S. Lewis, J.R.R. Tolkien, Owen Barfield etc have always said about the dawn of the Evangelium in England and the witness of the Old English poets to it. The only reason why the Experts are acknowledging this now is because they think they can put their Spin on it. Ha!
The Lord of the Rings was written expressly to bury their Spin and equivocations before they ever get to work on it.
The Anglo Saxon hoard was discovered in the West Midlands – in Staffordshire. In Anglo Saxon England this was near the border (as in Offa’s Dike) on the West Marches of Mercia. This was THE Kingdom of the White Horse chalked on all the borders. The White Horse of Uffington, of Kent etc . And so we find that on one of the sword belts a Latin inscription from Psalm 68:1 “Arise Lord, let Thine enemies be scattered..”
What they have found is the wargear of the Anglo Saxon horsemen who were schooled through their poets in the ancient pagan darkness. THEY KNEW – what we who have merely abstract (or worse fashionable and romantic) notions of that darkness merely guess.
But J.R.R. Tolkien, that great scholar of the Beowulf poet knew. He understood the hard sayings of the North about how Fafnir became a dragon, of the Biblical witness that Nimrod began to become a Gibborim” – translated in the KJV as “a mighty hunter before the Lord”.
In one of his addresses at Oxford (1935?) Tolkien puts it like this: “In our own time the spirit of Ragnorak revives”. This is the darkness which the Christian Skilds remembered in their sagas – the ancient darkness before the Light of the Evangelium ever dawned for the Anglo Saxons.
Ragnorak is the true skildic vision of the ancient pagan North. It is the spectre of the Ninth Night; the wind howling across a torrid waste, the skein of all life unravelling as the land passes under sceadu bragdan – under the shadow. In Ragnorak, the gods and men would fight the dark forces and lose.
The Beowulf poet is a Christian, but he understands well the Skildic vision of the North. He “saw in his thought the brave men of old walking under the vault of heaven upon the island earth (middangeard), beleagured by the shorless seas and the outer darkness, enduring with stern courage the brief days of life (laene lif) until the hour of the fate (metodsceaft) when all things shoudl perish (leoht and lif samod) light and life together.” (remarks on The Saga of King Heidrek the Wise ed and trans C. Tolkien. 1960. pp xxvii)
And now as that ancient darkness returns, what is heard loud and clear around the globe is the answer of the Anglo Saxons of the ‘Dark Ages’ to those who preferred the darkness to the Light. They engraved it on their sword belts in a pidgin Old Saxon / Latin:
“Let God arise, let his enemies scattered; let those who hate him flee before him! As smoke is driven away, so drive them away; as wax melts before fire, let the wicked perish before God!” Ps 68:1-2
It is often remarked that Tolkien’s stories could only have been written by a Christian, and this is true, but as Lynda reminds us, they could only have been written by a Christian who also had a love for his people’s pre-Christian heritage. His whole purpose was to write a mythology for England. Race-mixing Christians today, who have a perverted understanding of Galatians 3:28 (and the rest of the Bible, for that matter), can enjoy his stories but have no clue as to why he was motivated to write them.
Great art is always born from having one foot planted in earth and the other in heaven. This is why naturalistic accidentologists, pagan racialists, and deracinated evangelicals will never produce it. Like many of the people crowding the museum in Birmingham, they can only marvel at the wonders of the ancient world.
We Kinists have frequent opportunities to mingle with each of these types, and it’s often very sad, because they all have great potential but are incomplete. This is what caused us to think of the title of this post: “Wholiness.”
Speaking of H.P. Lovecraft and his intense love for Anglo-Saxons but not necessarily other white groups… Perhaps some of you guys can help me out?
Why have the white Anglo-Saxons, our great European ancestors, define and create the beauty of western civilization, but then we see countries like Romania, the Ukraine, etc., and those places are despicable wastelands? I assume that it has to do with wars, disease, a less powerful impact of Christianity having taken root there, gypsy issues… What else? I’m just confused as to why some whites set the standard for excellent Christian dominion soldiers, and the rest were stuck being bait for Dracula in tents, or whatnot.
Thanks.
Hi Norm in AK.
What so many have been saying here is that the European race in its nations is the Christ bearing race or Christopherian race because we converted to the Christic Light of the Evangel as nations – and that very early, starting with the 2nd century A.D.
“To whom much has been given…”
The White or European Russians converted to the Christian faith through the missionary efforts of Sts Cyril and Methodius. Kiev in the Ukraine is the ancient capital of Rus and their Kievan icons are probably the most beautiful Christian art ever made. Today these people are Catholic Uniate Rite, Ukrainian Orthodox and Russian Orthodox.
The wars of the ‘Dark’ Ages were fought in the West and in the East. This was the war of Reconquista in Western Europe (for about 900 years). But in Eastern and Central Europe, the Christendom fought the pagan Kingdom of Khazaria for about the same time frame.
Get an ancient map and look at Khazaria – which commanded the Bosphorus and the Silk Road and you will see why this fabulously wealthy and powerful kingdom would be a war with the Russias of Christendom. This was when the Byzantine Empire unified the polity of New Rom through the imperial rule in Constantinople and the Apostolic Sees in communion with Rome – the See of the Petrine government of the Church.
The nation of Khazaria pursued a scorched earth policy against Eastern and Central Europe for centuries and they captured the genetics of white Russia by taking women captive.
The Khazarim were and are a people of ancient Urgaritc stock (Ur of the Chaldees) and their nation was a vast polity of Turkic and Mongolian tribes spread out across the Caucasian steppes. They are one of the great warrior nations of the world. In the museusms of Europe there exist many paintings of them – their cavalry bore a unique device of what looks like wings made from silk flags which they wore across the back. At full gallop the wind in these ‘flags’ sounded like the devil wind, the Samiel, roaring across the steepes of the Caucasus.
From the accounts of the Christian embassies sent to them, the Khazarians worshipped the Devil as the Devil – they took their Satanism neat, having no use for the angel of light masquerades employed in other cultures. But there were converts to the holy faith among them. The Lord’s prayer was translated into their Khazarian language at Kiev by the saints and martyrs who laboured for their conversion. Sadly, the converts among the Khazarim were few in number. As a nation they converted to Judaism in about 700 A.D. under King Bulan. Their law became the Talmud.
Their Khaganate supplied the mint of the Ommayyad Dynasty of the Turkic Ottoman Empire which invaded Western Europe through Africa and conquered what is now Spain and Portugal in the West and they successively invaded through the Balkans in the East.
Khazaria was defeated and their nation destroyed by the Ukrainian princes about the time that Western Europe won the Reconquista. This was the great war of the ‘Dark Ages’ fought for about 700 – 800 years by the European nations of Christendom on two fronts. With victory won in the West, the Pope called for the Crusades to be mounted to continue in the East until the Christian nations of the East were free of the Ottoman and Turkic yoke. The Orthodox make a deal of the Crusaders as invaders and having a gutful of the Turks in Constantinople, they did sack it (probably on more than one occaision). But the idea was still to liberate the Christian East and the Holy Land. For which the Roman Catholic Church should make no apologies.
With the defeat of Khazaria in the East, so began in earnest the Ashkhanazim invasion of the West with wealth of nations built up over at least 7 centuries. Many had been able to change their appearance due to the policy of taking sex slaves from among the white Russian women. The term slave comes from the word slav. With their wealth they began to marry into Europe’s most noble Christian families as conversos.
So began the great work of centuries to infiltrate and destroy the Church from within. A work now substantially complete: first the Christian aristocrcy, the the monarchies of Christian nations, then the altar of Christendom.
And their blood rites followed them – of which the European populations of central Europe have preserved much lore. Vlad the Impaler was obviously of the ancient Scythian or Khazarian dragon court.
In the West, the Church proclaimed many of the holy innocents murdered in these rites as saints and martyrs of the faith. Those who believed they had lost kin in these secret rites (documented by Prof Ariel Toaff in the work Bloody Passovers) could make pilgrimages to the shrines of these saints and give thanks to our Lord for these glorious lives and their witness to the Church.
And if we believe these saints now reign with our Lord in heaven we can ask them to pray to our Lord for us and with us for our intentions. The Church in Eclipse – the Roman Catholic Church with its See in Rome now completely overthrown in the 1958 coup by the Marrano / Masonic ‘cardinals’ now calls upon the holy infant martyr St Simon of Trent to pray for us and with us to restore the Church and to help the Holy Father in his exile.
St Simon of Trent, murdered in your innocence, ora pro nobis.
Great article on Tolkien at the TOQ. I’m a fan of LOTR, the Silmarillion and other such nerdery myself, so I caught those as well. Much like satan’s work in the world, Morgoth was only able to pervert and imitate Iluvitar’s creation.
I’m going to have to throw up a post on the Orc/African connection.
As my Dutch buddy mentioned, “I have yet to get any free Tibet… and we Dutch love free stuff”.
How about those Tibetian burial tactics? I’m considering a request in my last will and testament to be buried in this beautiful cultural manner.
Regarding the photo at the top of this post…I haven’t seen so many misused apostrophes since Michael King’s doctoral dissertation.
Yeah, I was laughing about that too. There isn’t a lot of time to worry about grammar when there are “sophisticated swine” and “sport’s nut’s” who need to repent. I also laughed about “high fullutent.” I think they mean “highfalutin,” which is “high fluting” or pomposity. Speaking of freeloaders, I just walked into the boys’ room as they were drifting off to sleep and yelled “REPENT!”
Tom Tancredo strikes back at the SPLC for lying about him:
http://www.vdare.com/misc/090928_tancredo.htm
He also mentions that the SPLC attacks The Lord of the Rings for being “Eurocentric” and for being like “promotional ads for those tired old race and gender paradigms.”
Some things are so predictable.
“First, see here if you want to learn why the Wannsee Conference Protocol was a fraud.”
In my honest opinion, no good pro-White cause is served by making apologia about EVERYTHING that Nazi Germany did. Pro-White activists of today have better things to do than act as Hitler’s full-time PR agents.
And so, I would advise you not to believe every piece of revisionist denial that you come upon. Even David Irving does not consider the Wannsee Report to have been a “forgery”, but rather debates about what it exactly says:
http://www.fpp.co.uk/Letters/Auschwitz/Ramanujan270104.html
Both the Wilkins audio and the FNL audio are very interesting, but what is it about the Wilkins audio that you disapprove of? Was it something he said, or something he didn’t say?
Petr, I think the authenticity of those minutes is by no means certain, but let’s grant it for the sake of argument. What does the document actually say? It is all about deportation, as had been discussed before the war when Jews were going to be resettled on Madagascar. Those who claim it is about extermination admit that it must be “read between the lines.” Jews apparently treat the Wannsee minutes like our own Constitution – as a “living document.” The document CAN’T POSSIBLY mean that Jews were interned at labor camps in Poland until after the war. Oh no, it couldn’t possibly mean that, because as any Jew will tell you, the Nazis tried to exterminate the entire Jewish race. Sorry, I don’t follow circular reasoning.
We are commanded (not asked) to believe that Germans, who were notorious record-keepers, pulled off such a monumental task without documenting or speaking publicly of any of it, despite being at war and despite an epic loss of wealth, but they left some vague innuendos on one sheet of paper written at a meeting of 15 men, and this is the great trump card that Netanyahu takes with him to the United Nations? Don’t make me laugh.
We are not neo-Nazis. We are nationalists but not socialists, and so I’m not sure what you mean about defending “EVERYTHING that Nazi Germany did.” I think what you really mean to say is that we whites hurt our cause by speaking of these things at all. Our friends are rotting in prison right now for questioning these things. I’ll be damned if I let anyone lie about my ancestors and my friends. THEY ARE MY CAUSE!
Chris, Wilkins admits that “most Americans” wanted America to remain in white control, and he calls this “a racist sentiment.” He defines what he means by racism: that whites are created in God’s image but others are not. This is slander against our ancestors. They believed no such thing. They also did not believe in equality, and this is Wilkins’ real beef. He then rattles off some quotes about “indiscriminate amalgamation” from Lincoln, but he does this because Lincoln was evil, and everyone listening to him knows it. He neglects to mention that Jefferson or anyone else alive at the time would have completely agreed.
Thanks for the clarification re: Pastor Wilkins. I would want to reserve judgment on Pastor Wilkins himself until I could ascertain what he is saying in a larger context, or put the criticism to him and get a response, but I can see the problem in suggesting that most white Americans in the 19th century thought blacks are not created in the image of God. Thanks for pointing that out.
National Socialism be damned, but at least Hitler had a love for his people. We get to enjoy Democratic Socialism with a white-hating son of Africa as our king.
And to think the Soviet Jews would ever tell a lie.
Right, once you move beyond all the Jew-manufactured hype, Hitler was just another dictator. But if given the choice between a dictator who loves his own people, snatches them from the jaws of economic ruin, and restores their hope, and a dictator who is installed by oligarchs to do their bidding, I’ll take Hitler. But I prefer no dictator at all.
You stated it very well: If the choice is between national socialism and democratic socialism, the choice is easy. Bonds of blood are stronger than the whims of a mob. The oligarchs and crony capitalists can turn a mob the way a bit can turn a horse, but blood is stronger. This is why nationalists, with effectively no budget, are holding their own against the greatest wealth and military might in the world.
Admin, have you read F. N. Lee’s “The Christian Afrikaners”?
http://www.dr-fnlee.org/docs3/ca/ca.pdf
If you have not read it, I recommend it. A word search on “Babel” is interesting. BTW do you know where the F. N. Lee quote in the letter to Rev. Morecraft came from?
Are you aware of any areas where you and Francis Nigel Lee are in clear disagreement with regard to some aspect of the Bible’s teachings on race and the nations? (I suspect that he may not have focused on such matters with anywhere near the level of emphasis that you have devoted to them, so there may be more disagreements that have simply never had a chance to surface, but anyway — )
BTW off topic but I found these to be enjoyable –
http://www.theaterofgod.com/session/3
http://www.theaterofgod.com/session/5
http://www.theaterofgod.com/session/6
“But if given the choice between a dictator who loves his own people, snatches them from the jaws of economic ruin, and restores their hope, and a dictator who is installed by oligarchs to do their bidding, I’ll take Hitler.”
There was a cartoon in the Sunday paper recently by that leftist Gary Trudeau making the claim that the Nazis were the “most evil force in history.” Yet even if Nazism did systematically exterminate the number of people alleged, it came nowhere close to Communism, or even to Stalin by himself. Apparently Nazism was still worse – why? Oh, right. One Chosenite has got to be worth at least ten Goyim.
Meanwhile the graduates of our fine public schools proudly wear Mao Zedong t-shirts while getting a sick sexual satisfaction of seeing Jews kill Nazis in a filthy Tarantino film. And the gang-raping Soviet bastards get their own glowing monument in Berlin.
Exactly, Siegfried. Since the Jewish race is the Jewish messiah, their goal has always been to convince the rest of the world that the loss of one Jew is ten times worse than the loss of a Christian, and they’ve done a good job of it through their media organs.
Chris, I’ve seen some areas of disagreement with Dr. Lee, but I can’t recall what they are at the moment. I think his pluralistic definition of the word “nation” is not quite biblical. But on balance, I find his racial views to be refreshing, and I think it’s due to his South African perspective.
Thanks for linking to that paper. I enjoyed perusing it.
On page 5, he explains that “God created mankind as a triunity: the one and the many!… Only anti-Trinitarian humanists – with their monotonous Unitarian idol of ‘one man; one vote; one world; and one race’ – have insisted that nationality should disappear (and that an amalgamated mankind should then itself be deified).”
Incidentally, RJ Rushdoony, in one of his old recordings, takes Billy Graham to task for participating in this 1966 conference called “One Race, One Gospel, One Task.” A unitarian idol, indeed.
On page 32, Lee writes that the problem in South Africa of the sons of Japheth (whites) failing to multiply is a problem that is reflected throughout the world, “while Blacks are multiplying and sometimes almost teeming.” Clearly, Dr. Lee does not consider race to be “insignificant” as Dr. Morecraft does.
On pages 69 and 70, he writes: “Race is not regarded in South Africa by Calvinists as being a consequence of sin nor of the curse.” I agree. He considers the idea that Pentecost overturned or reversed the judgment at Babel to be liberal. But I’ve lost count of how many “conservatives” believe it. Babel proves that division and segregation “promote the expansion of the covenant people,” he says. This is precisely correct, but it’s such a rare view of Babel in our time that one would have to learn it from a Kinist if not from Dr. Lee.
On page 101, he approvingly quotes Hebden Stacey Taylor on race relations: “The South African approach of separate development has evoked the concentrated hostility of the United Nations and so-called world opinion. The impartial observer can only conclude that race is not really the issue at all, but merely the ogre created to work up emotion and troubles in the councils of mankind. What, then, is South Africa’s real crime? The answer must be that she has dared to call into question that great sacred cow of our revolutionary age – that godless dogma, that sovereignty over the individual resides in the general will of the majority rather than in the revealed will of Almighty God written in the Holy Scriptures!”
You can see how democracy is instrumental in one-worldism and race-mixing.
You asked about the Lee quote in the letter to Morecraft. I think this was transcribed from one of his sermons on SermonAudio. I think it’s from one of these, but he has several that run along the same theme:
http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=220572821
http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=28059234
I recall a dustup over Kinism on “the Puritan Board” forum some years back. Dr. Lee was posting comments there at the time but did not get involved, except to say that racism is wrong. The trouble, as always, is in how to define racism. We certainly agree that race-based hatred is wrong, but that wasn’t the issue that riled the “Puritans.” Instead, they were riled by the idea that race may be used to prohibit marriage, whether by the family or the state.
On another occasion, a friend of ours signed into that forum and wrote four words: “Thank God for Kinism.” Some of the “Puritans” then reenacted scenes from The Exorcist. Or maybe it was a Godzilla movie, I’m not sure.
Gee, and just who were “Stalin’s Willing Executioners”?
VDARE.COM – http://www.vdare.com/misc/051105_macdonald_stalin.htm
November 05, 2005
“Stalin’s Willing Executioners”?
By Kevin MacDonald
Christopher,
Thank you for the Desiring God Conference links. I do not follow John Piper’s ministry so I was not aware of these sermons and lectures. I am listening to the Panel Discussion right now. I am delighted to hear Doug Wilson sharing the importance of God’s Law in the civil realm. I would wish that the Jew Marvin Olasky were not in this panel. He continually attempts to deflate, question, and contradict what Wilson is saying.
I think you might find this of interest:
http://www.orestesbrownson.com/359.html
Orestes Brownson was a Boston transcendentalist, a friend of Emerson and Thoreau, who participated in a utopian community with the Alcotts, but then converted and became an orthodox Roman Catholic.
When he converted he left behind him all his former beliefs with one exception: he was still an ardent abolitionist. His articles from the time of the war are all pro-North and attack Lincoln only because he thought Lincoln was too soft. This article likewise is totally pro-abolition.
But when you scroll down a little, you see something interesting. Here is what he says about the black slaves that are to freed:
“We may talk as we will, spin any fine theories we like, praise the negro as we please, and sneer at the boasting Caucasian to our heart’s content, but we cannot alter the fact of negro inferiority, or make it not a fact that the negro is the most degenerate branch of our race. This is no reason why we should enslave him, oppress him, throw obstacles in his way, but it is a reason why we should not seek to form one community with him, or seek to mould blacks and whites into one people. The basis, under God, of society, is family, and the basis of family is marriage, and where there are classes between whom intermarriage is inadmissible or improper, they do not and cannot form one common society. Society proper did not exist in the middle ages between the nobility and the serfs, for they did not intermarry. It exists now in France, Italy, and Great Britain, to some extent, because intermarriage between the nobles and commons has ceased to be infrequent. Between blacks and whites marriage is anomalous and never desirable. Both races suffer by it, because the distance between them is too great to be leaped by a single bound. The mulatto is intellectually inferior to the white man, and as an animal, inferior to the black man. All observation proves that the mixed breed is shorter lived and less prolific than either parent stock. Mixed breeds even in animals, without frequent new crossings, soon run out. One or the other race gets the upper hand, and eliminates the other, as English agriculturists and stock farmers know very well. Whites with abnormal tastes may now and then marry a black, but as a rule, both blacks and whites prefer to marry each with their own color. Even if they inhabit the same country, the blacks and the whites are, and will be too diverse to constitute really one people, one society. We are not, therefore, in favor of placing them on a footing of even political equality.”
“Now, my dear friend, let me not shock you, but I do not believe your poor, ignorant, and inexperienced negroes, whose religion is for the most part mere sensibility or animal excitement, and whose moral habits are those of lying, stealing, and cheating on a small scale, are better than white men of a corresponding class, or any less likely to be used by wily and unprincipled demagogues. The gentleness, docility, and even affectionateness, you admire so much in them, are due in the main to the dependent condition in which they have lived, to their habits of deferring to superiors, and consulting only the will of their master or mistress. Free them, give them votes, and put them on the footing of political equality with their former masters, and these amiable qualities, these virtues, if you please, will disappear, and your beloved negroes will become vain, proud, insolent, overbearing, and exhibit the usual vices and manners of freedmen. They are nothing without leaders, and at present their leaders are their preachers ; and the demagogues have only to gain their preachers to gain them. These preachers, for the most part themselves very ignorant and vain, can be bought, wheedled or deceived, and gained over to the support of measures any thing but advantageous to their own people.”
The essay is too long and there are too many great lines to provide more excerpts without filling up too much of your space, but I think you will find sentence after sentence that agrees exactly with your sentiments, thus showing that what is considered a radical fringe today was the common opinion even of Yankee abolitionists at the time of the war.
[P.S. How does one add bold or italic to comments so that I can highlight the key sentences in longer excerpts?]
Fascinating quote, from an abolitionist, no less. Sorry about the formatting. We’ll try to automate it soon, but for now you can do
<b>your text</b>
Naamah the mother of Rehoboam, an Ammonitess . . . what’s up with that?
As you may know, we’ve written quite a bit about why Ruth was not an ethnic Moabitess. There are many reasons for this, but I won’t rehash them here. She is called a Moabitess because she lived in the former land of Moab, just as those who lived in Galilee were called “Galileans” but were Israelites just the same, and just as the “Greeks” of Acts 6:1 were also Israelites.
The same is true of Naamah, who is called an Ammonitess. If she had been an ethnic Ammonitess, her son Rehoboam could not have become king of Judah. Again, there are several reasons for this, but the big one is that mamzers were not allowed to enter the congregation, meaning that they had no legal standing in church or state. A mamzer is not simply one who is born out of wedlock. It is also one of mixed parentage, and however that might have worked out in practice, we know for sure that it would have applied to Moabites and Ammonites, who were born of incest and were NEVER to enter the congregation (see Deut. 23:3 and Neh. 13:1).
St. Augustine wrote that Ham is to be “included neither in the first-fruits of Israel nor in the full harvest of the Gentiles, and he can only stand for the hot breed of heretics.” This is a hard thing for many to accept, because we live in a predominantly Arminian age. But this is how God has operated in history. Remember the Amalekites.
It comes down to the fact that those who argue for exceptions in cases like Rahab, Ruth, and Naamah don’t really believe what the Bible plainly says about strict marital and national laws. We are not suggesting that laws were not broken. After all, Solomon was the biggest marital miscreant of all. Instead, we are saying that an elaborate mythology has been constructed (including a black wife for Moses), based on no proof at all, as a way of showing that the law had no force at all.
It’s no wonder that as the races have mixed, respect for the Holy Scriptures has hit rock bottom. We were most faithful when we were at our most “racist.”
“Regarding the photo at the top of this post…I haven’t seen so many misused apostrophes since Michael King’s doctoral dissertation.”
And I haven’t seen so many misused apostrophes since the latest list of popular ghetto names was published.
Heh, “kick them all out” –
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBBR6Ronfjg
Crikey, he really is a cardboard cutout –
http://www.break.com/index/obama-makes-the-same-face-in-every-pic.html
Just curious, since I don’t think there are any references to them on this website, to know whether you are familiar with the works of Barry Fell, Cyrus Gordon and other archeologists, linguists and scholars researching links between the ancient Near East, Europe, and pre-Columbian America –
http://www.ensignmessage.com/archives/stonesecrets.html
Although known today for his sagas, in his professional life, J.R.R. Tolkien was a professor of Old English and a philologist. This latter is the radix of all nerdery in our degenerate age. For which no apologies.
In reality, the study of words and their origins is one of the great keys to knowledge. If you want to seriously interfere with an organism you mess with its life code – its DNA ‘script’ through nanotech via vaccination and EM scalar waves or ELF frequencies that sync with Schumann resonance (the frequency of the earth’s rotation on its axis). If you want to mess with its mind you interfere with its power of word to comprehend, declare and reveal and change. Intonation of words that sync with these frequencies is not a concept that the dumbed down sheeple are permitted to learn. But the Bardic culture of N.W. Europe knew all about it.
The older words where sound / sense are closely aligned are words of power, subcreation and fiat. I say subcreation to distinguish from the Creation of the primary reality of universe: time / space; energy / matter; the great forces electromagnetism, nuclear etc – all that is in toto the primary Creation of the Eternal Logos Who creates (ordains) existence by fiat and every moment upholds His Creation by Word bridging the abyss of being and nothingness. And within that Creation, the Eternal Logos breathes into being other personal creations in possession of intellect, memory, imagination and will – the spiritual races (the angelic order), the ensouled race (the human race).
These races use word to shape realities.
Tolkien knew that words – particularly the ancient words of oral tradition and encoded in hieroglyphs and runes were the basis of all magecraft. And when he reforged the ancient matter of Northwest Europe, he used words of command and recognition in the sagas to represent realities that are needful for the degenerate Anglo Saxons of his own age to know.
Orc is one such word – from the orcne’as of the Beowulf poet. Ocne’as means ‘demon corpses’. Other O.E. cognates give the connotation of giant.
Tolkien knew that in “our own age the spirit of Ragnorak revives”. For this reason, in the wordcraft of his sagas, he encoded a lot of ancient lore that must be conveyed to the degenerate ayrans of this day and age. And that lore has to do with the ‘secret doctrine’ – as in Mt Hermon which is Sion (Deut 4:48) where the angels “who kept not their first estate” (Jude 6) descended in the days of Jared. It has to do with the oaths they swore upon Ardis (the summit of Mt Sion) and with miscegenation between the angelic and human races. It has to do with the hidden aristocracy of a unique genotype – the Moriah (all conquering wind). The Moriah is of Urgaritic racial stock and has historically incorporated many of specific tribes: Cainite, Edomite, AshKhanaz, Scythian, it insinuated itself into the Messianic lineage of Israel through Solomon and his idolatrous wives. Today, it incorporates specific dynasties of many European nations as well. But, members of any nation can be chosen to become initiated into the mysteries of its bloodline and perform the works of its Masonry.
Over all, this true multinational and international polity is an order – with Jewry(and its orgs) being preiminent; it has Law (the Tradition of the Elders codified in the Talmud with its Noachide for nonEdomites or nonJews), it has Magecraft (Ka Ba’ alah) and extended sciences that are covert, it has an operative Masonry. It worships ‘Samael’ or Lucifer as universal architect; it claims Mt Moriah. Its imperium demands the extinguishing of the human race except for a slave population – survivors of its global conflagrations – that it will modify into a kind of hominid breed to serve those who would be the gods on this planet.
The Moriah’s Great Work against nature and God seeks to establish over the earth the throne of their god – the great Dragon / Lucifer (who in Tolkien’s mythology are depicted as Morgoth and Sauron). The first edition of the LOTR bore upon its cover the hieroglyph of the wadjet eye of Osirus / Lucifer. (That was really telling, so I note that the publishers got that sign removed in succeeding editions). But there is no way they could remove it from the text itself.
Frankly, good people, we do not want to get this. We do not want to go there. But in our own time – ‘there’ is where we are now. As we read in (even) the major news media of international organ harvesting networks and rings (as in rings of power), and we see the global abortion industry for the harvesting of fetal tissue and we see the imprisonment of entire populations where the young may be hunted and killed at will (for their organs) among other reasons – then we have to understand what our Old English poets are telling us about Orcs, Orcne’as and demon corpses and their blood rites for immortality.
We have to ‘get’ words like Ur, Urgaritic, Orkhon, the Orkhon cultures of the Causasian steepes North of Babylon, Uigur. We have to see the Causasian steppes, the Orkon script, the blood rites of those tribes. We have to see the rise of that White Horse Culture of the Gothic peoples upon those plains to do battle with precisely these forces. We must see this unique aristocracy, the Moriah (all conquering wind), at the centre of it all. And we have to see it in our midst and at work in our world in a way that for the White Horse Culture of N.W. Europe will culminate in what Tolkien depicted in chapters like Helms Deep and the The Ride of the Rohirrim:
“Death, they cried with one voice loud and terrible and gathering speed like a great tide their battle swept down..
We have to hear a word of command like ‘Forth Eorlingas’. We have to hear it in the key of F – F# on the horns of the North like the modern French horn. F# on the intrinsic or Pythagorean scale is a frequency that will destroy virus (a geometry and therefore a frequency). F – F# is the frequency of command over discordant noise and gibberish.
For all of these reasons and more, the great bards and skilds of England lit the beacons.
” ‘Do we walk in legends or on the green earth in the daylight’?”
” ‘A man may do both’,” said Aragorn. ‘For not we but those who come after will make the legends of our own time’. “The green earth, say you”? ‘That is a mighty matter of legend, though you tread it under light of day’.”
If you are not already familiar with this book you may find it an interesting read:
The Thousand Generation Covenant: Dutch Reformed Covenant Theology and Group Identity in Colonial South Africa, 1652-1814 (John Niel Gerstner, 1991)
http://books.google.com/books?id=-awAQzuQ_94C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_v2_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q=&f=false
Large sections of it can be read online using the Google Books Preview feature.
Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation was used as a war measure, though people these days think he was serious. It was a more shrewd way of provoking opposing forces. The British had tried to do this prior to the War of 1812 when they supplied Indians with arms. Lincoln believed that the EP would be far more economical and would prove to be the best method for generating internal strife, but it’s important to realize that the EP utterly failed in its intended purpose.
Perhaps Lincoln knew his history, and knew what the English did to get rid of the Boers in 1833 by issuing an “Emancipation Act” to free all slaves. Two years later, more than 10,000 Boers, the Voortrekkers, made the Great Trek north from the Cape Colony, founding several new states, including the Transvaal. Two Anglo-Boer wars followed, and it’s interesting that the English held to the same strategy in 1899 when they demanded voting rights for foreigners in the Transvaal. The strategy was always to dispossess the Boers, whether through war or Jew-like political machinations.
There is a very interesting quote about the Great Trek from one Anna Elizabeth Steenkamp in that Gerstner book you linked. It shows that, from the British and Yankee perspective, race was used as a weapon to gain the upper hand against other whites. But from the Boer and Southern perspective, it was one of the hinges on which their liberty turned. Steenkamp writes:
“Our slaves…being placed on an equal footing with Christians, contrary to the laws of God and the natural distinction of race and religion…it was intolerable for any Christian to bear down beneath such a yoke; wherefore we rather withdrew in order thus to preserve our doctrines of purity.”
The words “slave” and “Christian” were used to denote what were, almost without exception, racially distinct roles, but what Steenkamp actually means is that the Boers were opposed to racial amalgamation in any area of life, for they believed it to be impure (adulterous) and contrary to God’s law. These folks were Kinists, obviously.
We Kinists of the 21st century simply want churches today to be honest and consistent. Whoever denounces us as heretics needs to be responsible enough to put together a list of all the Christians throughout history who were also heretics. If Archbishop Morecraft wants to denounce Kinism as heresy, we had better hear him say that R.L. Dabney was also a heretic, and therefore not a Christian. But they want to skip along on both sides of the fence.
Ted Weiland has a great talk about fearmongering:
http://www.kingdompromises.org/kingdompromises_audio/830.mp3
Seriously, we already know what he’s talking about but it sure never hurts to get a reminder.
These Brits go out of their way to slander and offend American Southerners in this piece, but the cohesiveness of the regional society they encountered is definitely a good thing if you happen to live there and want to preserve and protect your own culture from those who despise it. If Brits had half this much cohesiveness they would not be looking forward to a future under Shariah.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/driving/features/article6858884.ece
Here is the accompanying YouTube clip. A huge world of difference between the Alabamans and the people of New Orleans who apparently think “Riots R Fun.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2syY12OPkwI
Maybe Polanski and Manson will spend eternity taking turns violently sodomizing each other:
http://www.rense.com/general87/polanss.htm
Are you sure Fred Leuchter said it would take 68 years to dispatch six million Jews at Auschwitz? Auschwitz was only one camp in a constellation of camps throughout Germany, Austria and Poland. Why would Leuchter assume the claim is that all six million were exterminated at Auschwitz? Isn’t this patently preposterous when you consider the totals for Treblinka, Belzec, Sobibor and Majdanek etc? I believe the new sign at Auschwitz says 1.2 million died there and not all of them were Jews. Also, the claim is that the six million were shot, starved, worked to death, felled by disease, force marched and….gassed. Leuchter’s supposition would have them all gassed in one place which is rather silly.
Listen at 1:40 of the video linked above.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pF7Y7pAMtFk
He’s referring to all six million (claimed) at all camps. The number for Auschwitz was originally 4 million and revised down to 1.5 million officially, but the magic number of 6 million total was kept. You’re correct that not all of them were gassed, according to the claim, so I’m not sure how Leuchter is calculating this. In any case, 2 1/2 years was not nearly long enough to kill so many people, even if it had been possible to stack bodies 6 to 8 deep and incinerate them with nothing more than a few logs underneath.