Like That Guy in The Seventh Seal Watching the Newly Dead Dance Across the Hills
November 5, 2009 
67 Comments
Be sure to see our Alex Linder thread for some very interesting back-and-forth between Christians and atheists.
“We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” ~ physicist Niels Bohr
Please contact these atheists to make provisions for your pets after the Rapture. You don’t want them wandering around like Snoopy with an empty dish.
We’re very, very pleased to see TOQ link to this Taki article about the utter failure of liberal secular humanist atheist Darwinists (whether nationalist or cosmopolitan) to give the white race any hope of a future. They even included a picture of the Duggar family. Religion is absolutely essential to our longevity, writes Hoste. (But keep in mind that a Nietzschean, anti-Christian trick is being played on you, which is explained in the Linder thread.)
[Religious faith is] the only proven method for replacement Caucasian fertility. The potential success in this area of any secular philosophical system is speculative [i.e., wake up from your dreamworld]. Remember that next time you see Bill Maher on TV foaming at the mouth about those stupid Christians who won’t bow before the god of evolution. The ultimate irony is that championing Darwinism has, as Katarina Runske wrote of feminism, been a Darwinian dead end.
Put bluntly, liberal secular humanists are on the verge of extinction…
If, in the end, all evolution cares about is survival, it’s liberalism that must be considered the virus. Our ancestors who had religion survived while those of us without it might not…
The patriarchal and god-fearing will inherit the earth, one way or another.
In the Linder thread, you’ll see that some commenters want to put their heads together (aided by liquor, of course) and think up an alternative to Christianity because they know that, though men have sometimes rallied behind humanism for a short time, it always falters. Thus they are always experimenting, “always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth” (2 Tim. 3:7). They have much in common with libertarians, communists, faggots, feminists, and others whose theories get off the ground about as well as pre-Wright airplanes.
The article’s central flaw is the assumption that religion was not revealed but rather evolved. Why any natural being would find “hope” in the existence of a supernatural being, and why this fiction would lead to the family formation necessary for survival is not explained by the Darwinist writer. How convenient that Darwinists can always plead ignorance and continue their perpetual quest for unattainable truth. How very convenient indeed.
How is the Spenglerian cycle of history presumed by Guillaume Faye any different than a fatalistic belief in reincarnation or the once popular cosmological theory of an oscillating universe? The Christian, by contrast, believes that history has a beginning, middle, and end, and then eternity, all of it either in the shadow or the glow of the central event of history, the cross on the hill of Calvary.
Doug Wilson makes an excellent point in this clip (click on Collision) – or better, here – that Christopher Hitchens and any atheist can respect: Christianity is not good for the world at all if it is not true. Most Christians tend to say that it is good merely because it helps people, or as Hitchens puts it, they think “faith” is synonymous with community organizing. It’s telling that when Hitchens is asked what he would die for, he says “free expression.”
“I think conscience, truth, and um…uh…the commonality of purpose, whether it’s Confucianism, Hinduism, or otherwise.” ~ presidential candidate John Kerry on what unites “people of faith”
Here you can see the Collision duo on the Don Imus show. Wilson makes the very good point that atheists want to believe that we have evolved genetically but morality remains absolute. Sure, they say that morality evolves too, but they don’t really mean it, and in this sense Nietzsche was more consistent than your village Darwinist, because he could see the problem: If “God is dead,” some other basis for absolutes, i.e., truth, would have to be found. Wilson contends that atheists are like the boy who climbs to a great height on the ladder of Christianity and then kicks it away, saying it was never needed. This is very true. They say they don’t really need the Ten Commandments revealed to them because they don’t need anyone to tell them that killing and lying are bad. But of course they do, because those commandments are violated routinely. And once again, we see that without the revealed law they would have no basis for calling anything “bad” or “wrong.” The atheist sees evil in the world but must borrow from Christianity in order to call it evil. He then denies that he is borrowing the answers that his own failed ideology lacks, even while calling his blind-as-a-bat faith “rationality.”
The SPLC is going after Wilson again here, and their desperation is hilarious. I’m just amazed that anyone still takes these Jews seriously.
Even the Wall Street Journal is making the SPLC look foolish. The SPLC calls Craig Bodeker a “bigot,” and then the WSJ favorably reviews Bodeker’s excellent documentary. Dr. Carol Swain calls the documentary “outstanding,” the SPLC calls Swain “an apologist for white supremacists,” and the WSJ, in the politest way possible, gives the SPLC a literary eye-roll but, just to be “fair,” calls Bodeker a “racist” on the authority of the SPLC! It just doesn’t get any weirder. The WSJ unwittingly proves the whole point of the documentary, which leaves Craig smiling broadly, I assure you.
The WSJ then makes itself look more foolish by questioning whether “interracial rapes are racially motivated,” even when statistics show that the numbers could not be more lopsided. “[Taranto] gets so wrapped up in the semantics of what does or does not constitute a hate-crime that he cannot see the larger issue here; the rampant rape and assault of white women by black men today… Just how can a normal person be expected to be concerned about the rare and ill-defined racism of whites toward blacks, yet at the same time be oblivious to the more common, and clearly defined criminality of blacks toward whites?” This is the question we have spent long, sleepless nights pondering. We ask our idiot pastors, and they stare at us with heads cocked to one side, like the dog who wonders if the hat on your head makes you a different person.
Watch this video of Nick Griffin at 40 seconds in. It’s just astounding. Jews are searching for anything they can find to discredit the BNP, even blog comments. I’m not sure why Griffin goes along with the Holohoax so meekly (yes I do – it’s a political move), but he almost gave the perfect answer at one point. He almost said, sarcastically, “It must be true because the government has made it illegal to question.” This is a great way to douse an insidious question with mockery. Then the interviewer implies that a person can’t praise the valor of the British Air Force while also calling the bombing of Dresden mass murder. Anyone who fought against Hitler could not possibly have been guilty of war crimes, don’t you see. He also implies that not a single Nazi was courageous, and if they were, the last thing we should do is notice it. I see Jew desperation here from start to finish. They’ve already made it illegal for the BNP to have a racially-exclusive membership, and they don’t know what else to try.
A good clue to their contempt is Griffin standing before Parliament to charge party leaders with war crimes for waging illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. “The Nuremberg War Crimes Trials set the precedent when the leaders of Nazi Germany were charged with invading other countries which represented no military threat to Germany.” Bush and Blair could be hauled before a similar tribunal for the same reason. Notice the absurdity of repeatedly asking Griffin his opinion on events of 70 years ago while the current leaders of Britain are doing the same thing the Nazis did! It’s so absurd that I have trouble believing it’s not American.
But of course, the news that has dominated the British kikenpress is the lynch mob arrayed against Griffin in a candidate’s forum called Question Time. Here’s a hilarious but almost accurate abridged transcript:
Mr Griffin, I’ve got a puppy in this bag. Very cute. But it’s a black puppy. Am I right in thinking that you, and members of your odious party, would like to kick it to death and then eat it?
It was clearly a stacked audience. I counted one sympathetic question from the very back of the room which was promptly ignored. One witty sod purposely addresses Griffin as “Dick” and then changes it to “Nick.” Oh, I say, those cheeky, ribald Brits! Snort, snort. Honestly, you need to see the men in the audience who worked their way up near the front. I can’t recall ever seeing a more effeminate lot.
The panelists and audience were all quite outraged that words like “genocide” and “indigenous” are used by the BNP. Griffin made the self-evident point that not a single person there would dare go to New Zealand or Australia and pretend not to know that the Maori and Aborigines are the indigenous peoples of those islands. But for the island of Britain, whites are not allowed to be indigenous. One black woman (an “expert” on “culture”), who is married to a white man of course, went all the way back to the Ice Age in the attempt to show that the island was once uninhabited, and therefore Pakistanis have just as much right as the natives to be citizens. She tries to say the word “Neanderthal” but can’t pronounce it. (Insert your own Neanderthal joke here.) The retardation of the blacks, both on the panel and in the audience, is as stunning as ever, and everyone else either smiles nervously or ignores them, as though they are like the child at a dinner party who can’t stop fiddling with his diddle. See part 5, 3:20, for a good example.
Winston Churchill was a big subject during the debate, all sides wanting to claim him. But as Griffin said, the others would not have really been so eager. In 1955, Churchill said immigration “is the most important subject facing this country, but I cannot get any of my ministers to take any notice.” And they still take no notice. He also wanted the Conservative Party to adopt the slogan “Keep England White.” The idea expressed by the crowd that just because there are some Indian-sounding names on headstones in a WWII cemetery somewhere in Britain means that Britain must necessarily become Asiatic, is nothing less than ethnic cleansing.
But in spite of it all, the consensus is that Griffin did not do a good job. Rather than learning from David Duke, who handles the media the way a farmer handles a tractor, he actually posed as one who is rescuing impressionable youths from Duke’s influence.
Duke comments on this here and here with fantastically helpful advice that we all need to learn. For instance:
The most powerful points you repeat and bore in. When you have your debating opponent on the ropes, you finish him off. Nick pointed out that he was, unlike Straw, opposed to the disaster of the Iraq War. But Nick should have waded in and made the death blow of argument saying something like, You are responsible for the lives and limbs of thousands of Brits and 2 million Iraqis in a war based on lies, and you have the nerve to question my morality, you hypocrite? If I were in your position, we would have not gone into that insane war! And your policies on immigration are just as devastating. We have lost even more Brits, including the most innocent of us, thousands of women and children, beaten, robbed, raped or killed due to the massive numbers of brutal crimes that have come from your destructive immigration policy! That is a fact that cannot be denied, but one that is ignored by our controlled media and controlled politicians.
That’s how you do it.
But like Jared Taylor, Griffin has staked a philosemitic position, and he feels that he must ride that wave until the inevitable, head-over-heels wipeout. A good example of the futility of trying to play nice with Judaics: When Griffin said, “I am the most loathed man in Britain in the eyes of Britain’s Nazis” (part 2, 3:37), the kikenpress headline the next day was “I am the Most Loathed Man in Britain.”
Griffin came out swinging the day after the debate.
The desperation of the ruling class has been fun to watch. It didn’t take long for many liberals to realize what Griffin himself knew from the start, that attacking him so blatantly would backfire because it would make his views even more widely known. In other words, even bad press is good press. And it has backfired. Support for the BNP is up over 300%, and still the liberals are chanting that no one is actually voting for the BNP, only against established parties.
Outside the building, there were protesters pounding on the gates. Liberals love to talk about tolerance and diversity until they actually meet it.
According to these objective newsmutts, “The BNP is like salmonella, satanic abuse and paedogeddon…”
The former head of the Church of England calls Griffin’s statement that Muslims need to accept that England is a British and Christian country “irredeemably evil.”
London is no longer British. See how many white people you can count on the street.
According to a former advisor to Tony Blair, the Labour Party opened the multiracial floodgates in order to rub the noses of the Tories in it. Once again, internecine conflict is the white race’s worst enemy. Sadly, I’ve heard American Southerners talk the same way. Much of Obama’s support during the election was from conservatives for the same reason.
It is racist and a serious crime in England to disagree with a Muslim. Now this couple will likely lose their business in a country that still pretends to protect free speech. There is no longer freedom to share the gospel in once-Christian countries, which is the ultimate Jew victory.
A map of nationalist parties in Europe.
We need a European revival, not a classical revival.
“Our ethnic homogeneity is a blessing,” says a South Korean. “Even a friend of mine confided to me that when he sees a Korean woman walking with a foreign man, he feels as if his own mother betrayed him.”
Just in time for Obamacare, HIV positive immigrants are being officially welcomed.
And let’s be clear. Our criticism of Obama does not mean we are racists. How could we be racists? We hate his white half too.
Proximity to Canada engenders trust. But not because there is magic dirt to the north. It’s because there are more white people to the north. According to a recent Gallup poll, if you happen to lose your wallet, you want it to be lost in Utah or South Dakota. If you lose it in Negro-filled Mississippi, you will surely never see it again. It doesn’t seem to help that almost every black person in Mississippi calls himself a Christian.
Thar’s racists in them thar hills!
“The crucifix creates discrimination.”
Short names without strange marks over the letters are racist. “I came into this landmine of Anglos versus Spanish versus Mexicans versus Indians versus everybody up here.” I thought diversity was our greatest strength, not a landmine.
Cookies are racist. Pulling them from shelves has nothing to do with pandering, of course.
To notice a pattern is racist, and four-year-olds are the worst offenders.
Forty thousand racist schoolchildren!
“Everybody’s racist,” says the black, $475,000 a year, New Orleans “recovery czar.”
Actual pictures that were visible for a week on the RNC’s Facebook page.
Even those who try to get a white man hired in a position of authority in an all-black city will lose their jobs. “They’ll hire black police officers with outstanding warrants for battery, but a white chief would be beyond the pale.”
“Racists” aren’t the only ones being fired without cause. Here’s a Christian who has been fired from the Mexican Depot for having a button with the word “God” on his apron.
Even Ghandi’s grandson has been fired for saying that Jews “are the biggest players” in a global culture of violence. It’s a crime to offend Jews.
Someone is shooting at the wife of Lou Dobbs. This is why we get very upset when preachers and other scoundrels use communist words with the intention of stirring up resentment against us. Liberals have been slandering Dobbs for a long time now, knowing it would all lead to violence, but Dobbs knows that he doesn’t have the luxury of hate crime laws to protect him.
The mockery of marriage intensifies.
Two homos = “family.”
It didn’t take long for Keith Bardwell to be hounded from office after 34 years for his bold stand for traditional marriage. Now he faces a “civil rights” lawsuit.
Do the words “wonderful” and “mixed-up” go together? Race-mixers think so. Almost 10% of all children in Britain are now mongrels. Notice that the writer, a geneticist, blames our instinct for consanguinity on “our predilection for holding tightly to our caste systems and religions.” Social hierarchy and religious faith are to blame, she says. Contrary to all evidence, as though she is living in a parallel universe, she writes that “mixed-race people are more symmetrical than the rest of us, and being more symmetrical translates into being more attractive, having less infection, being less stressed, and having greater genetic diversity.” In this alternate universe, “mixed-up” really is synonymous with “wonderful.” Towards the end, when she writes about Brazil, her article sinks to a level of imbecility that rivals the term papers of Education majors.
Some new American voters had an unfortunate incident at their mamzer shower.
Here’s a textbook from 1953 called When You Marry. The great thing about matrimonial advice from the 1950s is that most Americans were still Christians then. Liberals had not yet come to dominate churches (although this was certainly a work in progress at the time), and therefore most Americans still had a Christian understanding of marriage and were repulsed by miscegenation. Have a look at this illustration. Now teach your children what marriage is all about, and tell your lying pastor to stuff it.
Pippi Longstocking is copulating with a Negro too. There should be a law against public indecency.
A simian named Carlton Banks is proudly attracted to white girls, which is why we must protect those girls from bestiality.
Miscegenation as a fruity musical. Even fruit salad is hateful because you can still distinguish the pieces. It’s time to banish the segregation of the produce aisle. Dr. King had a dream!
Tonight I’m going to run my supper through the blender. If all races are equal then why can’t our meals also be equal? I’ve taken up painting, but I like to mix all the colors together, in the name of equality, until I get a sickly gray-green color. I feel that this indiscernible-splotch technique of painting is necessary to avoid being called a racist by the PCA. Racism, according to these geniuses, includes “any activity by individuals or institutions that treats human beings in an inequitable manner because of color.”
Barney Fife and the beaners. Back when Mayberry was white, Andy Griffith didn’t carry a gun, and Barney was constantly in search of his lucky bullet. Here are Mayberry’s five most wanted today.
We need more American voters like these charming people.
“Nancy Grace would probably have an epileptic seizure on live TV if she heard about five white kids doing this to a black kid.” Balloon stories are considered far more important.
Has anyone ever seen a “thug mentality” or “immaturity” roaming the streets and killing people? I didn’t know they could take bodily form. I know Negroes like to do these things though.
“Not only are blacks nine time more likely to be murderers than white people, black men are about two and a half times as likely to be serial killers than white men.”
As you know, when we hear of crimes like the more than two hours of hell endured by the 15-year-old girl in Richmond, CA, we seethe with anger at “Christians,” who have allowed our country to be filled with trash in the name of “Christian” equality. Theirs is a false gospel, and every one of our Christian forefathers would have agreed with us. “While Richmond, California is only 26 percent Hispanic, Richmond High School is 78 percent Hispanic, 2 percent white.” A sniffly friend of the victim says, “There are Mexicans and blacks around me everywhere.” The Jewmedia calls that hate talk. Notice how the lying sacks-of-shit on CNN never mention the source of the crime. Like a columnist for the Contra Costa Times, they believe that all races rape equally, and race has absolutely nothing to do with anything, except in a negative sense, when whites, as a race, expect to keep their own property. In other words, they believe that race is imaginary but racism is real. This girl was beaten and raped by up to ten men, which would have been bad enough, but others also came to gawk. Instead of reporting the crime, they took pictures with their cell phones. And Salon Magazine calls us white bloggers “racists” for talking about it.
Crimes that are perfectly explainable are always said to “defy explanation.”
A walkthrough of the hell house.
Thanks be to God that Lemaricus Davidson will someday soon be executed. His defense attorneys tried their best to deniggerize him by dressing him like a college student, but it didn’t work. And of course, it goes without saying that he was a model citizen and Bible study leader when in a group home, etc., etc. Justice is finally served. As to the charge, popular on nigger websites, that Christian and Newsom went to the hell house looking for drugs, Gary Christian says: “And that Channon Christian may have had consensual sex with that animal, over my dead body. The next person that says out of their mouth that my daughter had consensual sex with him, ain’t got but one person in this world to deal with and that’s me, over my dead body.” Sadly, two rapists are still roaming free. This is actually very foolish of them, because the police will treat them much more humanely than some other people we know.
The sheriff and DA decided that these gruesome crimes were not racially motivated “hate crimes” because the main perpetrator “had been sleeping with a white female.” In fact, there seemed to be an endless stream of white skanks who paraded to the witness stand. It apparently never occurred to the sheriff and DA that rape and murder were just additional ways of treating white women like the trash Davidson believed them to be, just as Michael Vick treated dogs. “Imagine a white male trying to claim he can’t be charged with a hate crime because he has socialized with black people in the past. People would just laugh. In fact, a 14-year-old white boy in suburban Chicago was charged with a hate crime last year for using a racial epithet toward his black girlfriend after she broke up with him.”
The judge in the case made “Knox County judicial history,” according to Knoxville News Sentinel reporter Jamie Satterfield, when he informed the jury that it is more expensive to execute a prisoner than to send him to prison for life. Then he said he didn’t want that fact to influence the decision of the jury. The prosecution asked him why he brought it up then. It’s not even true. As Satterfield discovered, there is a study showing that “a death penalty-eligible prosecution is more expensive than one in which the worst potential sentence is life without parole,” but execution instead of a life sentence without parole saves taxpayers about $770,000. Part of the cost for the trial is because an appeal is mandatory, and only the most expensive lawyers (death penalty-certified) are allowed to work the case. So Letalvis Cobbins, who was convicted of the most grisly rape and murder imaginable, will cost Tennesseeans more than three-quarter million dollars too much because the jury, thanks to the shenanigans of the liberal judge, failed to send him to his well-deserved death.
As Stix notes in his article, blacks can be counted on to not send blacks to their deaths, regardless of the crimes they commit. The racially stacked jury in the first trial made all the difference, and Cobbins got away with almost the lightest sentence possible. Davidson’s defense team banked on the one black juror to “hang” the jury. (Is it racist to use the word “hang” when referring to Negroes?) Read about the other defense tactics. They even tried to get the evidence collected at the crime scene, including Channon Christian’s corpse, suppressed because an investigator forgot to sign the second page of the search warrant. This is why people hate lawyers. The defense “perpetrated their unscrupulous smears of the character of the victims in court in the presence of their grieving families.” Hence Gary Christian’s anger. You can see why many victims remain silent. To go through court is like being raped all over again. Such is the bitter fruit of “diversity.”
Hugh Newsom says it’s deplorable that his son, the victim, is being put on trial, yet even he feels the need to present his son’s non-racist bonafides by referring to a black kid at a motorcycle shop he once helped. God help us.
For the sentencing phase, the defense “switched to the standard pity play: ‘Hey, I’m depraved on account I’m deprived.’” The old tried and true Negro excuse, that they act like animals because they’re poor. “Some of the same weepy, pathetic relatives who had testified in Cobbins’ defense reprised their performances.”
Spurious brood like Davidson and Cobbins and their co-bastards, and the astronomical cost of their crimes, are why a New Zealand politician named Michael Laws is proposing that the “appalling underclass” be given financial incentives not to breed.
Liberals loved Alex Haley’s plagiarized novel, Roots, but this other work, in which Malcolm X is revealed to be a queer prostitute, has not been as well received. Malcolm apparently had the same sexual proclivities as the Knoxville terrorists.
The Attorney General admits that blacks are too stupid to learn what they’re voting for; they have to be told to vote Democrat. This is another one of those things that would be impossible to make up if it weren’t actually true. How, in the name of Justin Martyr, were these people ever handed the reins to our future?
“Catareon” and “Ladareon” (what the hell?) were fatally burned in a fire, and their “unt” doesn’t feel bad about leaving them alone. In fact, she’s more worried about her food stamps being burnt.
A staggering “90 percent of Black youngsters will be on food stamps at some point during childhood.” How much more money can we spare?
A staggering 90 percent of the Forbes 400 is either Aryan or Jewish.
How to get rich during a recession.
“Christmas is under assault because white people are under assault. It’s why manger scenes are banned on government property in December, but menorahs are everywhere. It’s the same reason you can’t even mention the Bible in most schools, but there are public and charter schools all over the country teaching Islam and Kwanzaa. Those religions are fine, because they’re non-white religions… Really, the only holidays we should be observing are Cinco De Mayo, Martin Luther King Day, Juneteenth, Harvey Milk Day, Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur, Hanukkah, and Holocaust Awareness Day.”
The president of the Catholic League asks: “Where have all the comedians and late-night entertainers been in cracking jokes about rabbis raping kids?… Last year, 40 minors in this small Jewish community said they were abused. Last year, there were 10 such allegations in the entire Catholic Church in all 50 states. Catholics are fed up with the duplicity.”
Bishop Williamson has been fined $16,822 for saying that he doesn’t believe any Jews were killed in gas chambers. Blaspheme Jesus Christ and you won’t be fined a penny. In fact, you’ll become so popular that you might need to hire a booking agent. Now a black comedian, “Dieudonne M’bala M’bala, has been fined $30,000 by a French court for inviting Auschwitz revisionist Robert Faurisson on stage in Paris during a satirical skit, to massive applause from the audience.” This fellow has accused Jews of “memorial pornography,” which is a very good way of putting it, I think.
Jews do some gassing of their own, this time to a woman who walked on the wrong sidewalk. She’s obviously an anti-Semite.
A Jew-maggot has made it impossible to buy David Irving’s books with the American Express card. Jews and free speech go together like oil and vinegar – always reluctantly and never for long.
A few brave men are standing firm against the Jewish reign of legal terror. A law professor at the University of Rome has said he believes that legends need to be verified, and for this shocking statement the Jews of Rome are taking legal action against him. Your Judeochristian pastor is on the side of the Jews because they are The Chosen. We prefer to be biblical in our nomenclature and call them anti-Christs.
Another “hate crime” hoax and another Jew spy for Israel.
It is anti-Semitic to compliment a Jew by calling him thrifty. As always, your punishment is the loss of your job. It’s always amazing that do-gooders punish innocent women and children whenever they’re offended. There are plenty of “Christians” who are like this too, which is even more amazing.
Jew John “Podhoretz more or less implies that Judaism is, in essence, a faith focused upon one lineage, a religion of race. In his concluding chapter, he argues that liberalism threatens racial suicide for the Jews: ‘fashionable conceptions of what constitutes progress and how to define justice…could be tantamount to committing suicide.’”
A Hungarian member of parliament has said that Jews want to devour the world with their capital. Paradoxically, Europeans are bolder on the JQ even though their hate speech laws are more repressive.
Rudy Giuliani tried to give Jews a wink and a nudge about having a black mayor and the massive crime wave that followed, and now he’s being called a racist. Then Mayor Jew Bloomberg tried to defend him with more racist talk! “Remember, white folks – never, ever say anything negative about a non-white, no matter how true it is, or you’re a racist.” Someone needs to put this helpful advice on Wikipedia under the definition of racism.
In this old Commentary article (Feb 1963) from Jew Norman Podhoretz, after describing the “hatred I still feel for Negroes,” he mentions “the disgusting prurience that can stir in me at the sight of a mixed couple.” He ends by saying he “wouldn’t like it at all” but he hopes he “would have the courage to curse myself” if he were inclined to prevent his daughter from marrying a Negro. He would have made a good presbyterian.
What a difference 20 years or so makes for the Christian Right. Beverly LaHaye and D. James Kennedy endorsed this comic book that refers to queers as “fags,” “homos,” and “perverts.” Prominent evangelicals would never do this today.
It probably will surprise no one that, among Christians, holy rollers are at the bottom of the IQ heap.
Notice, in this video, that even when pro-lifers say and do some things that are off to the left, you can’t help but notice one important thing about the movement: it is almost completely white. If not for whites, there would be no pro-life movement, and that’s not debatable. Has there ever been another race who cares so deeply about others that they would put their lives on the line to bring an end to immorality? Go to Mexico or India or China and see if you find anything of the kind. This is just a glimpse into why the white race, perfected by the holy faith, has been the greatest blessing to the world. Some might say the only blessing to the world. Without whites, the world would spiral into anarchy.
Marines in Afghanistan are burning $320,000,000 in fuel every day. “Only a country totally out of control would squander resources in this way.”
Take up the White Man’s burden -
Send forth the best ye breed -
Go bind your sons to exile
To serve your captives’ need;
To wait in heavy harness,
On fluttered folk and wild -
Your new-caught, sullen peoples,
Half-devil and half-child…Take up the White Man’s burden -
The savage wars of peace -
Fill full the mouth of Famine
And bid the sickness cease;
And when your goal is nearest
The end for others sought,
Watch sloth and heathen Folly
Bring all your hopes to nought.
Afghans get to vote on how many gallons of American blood will be shed to keep their regime in power. Democracy at work!
“At least Rep. Ron Paul wants to audit the Federal Reserve and eventually abolish its counterfeiting operations. This is a good start. Mr. Paul’s economic philosophy is seriously flawed at its heart, however: he espouses a ‘free market’ philosophy based on Ayn Rand’s open advocacy of selfishness and greed, which sees nothing wrong in usurious shylock interest, which is the actual root of our economic crisis. Avarice is a mortal sin, not a virtue. (Paul’s son is named Rand in honor of this guru of greed.)”
“To say [that John Brown was] a homicidal maniac misses the point,” says a damnyankee.
They all look alike. “No, I’m the other media-hungry Negro scam artist.”
Sikh freaks in need of a chiropractor.
The twenty whitest colleges. Topping the list is R.C. Sproul Jr’s alma mater.
Girls, binge drinking, and public lewdness.
I wish I had a collar like Chet Atkins and a pencil-thin moustache like William Powell. By the way, William Powell and Myrna Loy had the best screen chemistry of any couple in film history. Rent their old “Thin Man” mysteries from Netflix.
“One thing, at least. Both sides of this discussion have their lone kook.”
alfred, who’s the kook on the anti-christian side? i’m pretty sure i know the other one you’re referring to, ha.
i have to say, i find myself agreeing much more with what the narrator, linder, chopperdan, et al. are saying than the kinists. they just make a lot more sense to me, but hey what do i know.
“Two things about Christianity that bother me the most. One is the good vs. evil stuff. It always leads to fanaticism…”
Well, with a name like Rosenberg, look who’s talking! I leave it up to a former President of the lone [sic] ‘Jewish state’ to delineate fanaticism: ‘”Jews as individuals are great individuals — talented, ambitious, intelligent, smart. As a people, I would not give them as high a grade. Jews know how to hate.” – Ariel Sharon, Prime Minister of Israel
or how about the ‘holy book’ of Talmudism?
“A Jew is permitted to rape, cheat and perjure himself; but he must take care that he is not found out, so that Israel may not suffer.” – TALMUD, Choshen Ha’mishpat, 348
Pot calling kettle, come in kettle. At least G. K. Chesterton knew that evil resides in each of us. When asked by the Times of London ‘Who among us is an exemplar of moral evil in this modern, rational age?’ Chesterton’s succinct response put it into biblical, Christian perspective.
Dear Sir,
I am.
Respectfully,
G.K. Chesterton
When you contrast Sharon’s statements above, with this statement below-
“Our Race will take its rightful place in the world, with every Jew a king, and every Gentile a slave.”
Rabbi Emmanuel Rabbinovitch, Common Sense, Jan. 12, 1952
I think St. Chrysostom put it [the [sic] “Jewish” question] in to perspective as well, when he wrote:
“The Jew will live under the yoke of slavery without end. God hates the Jews.” – Saint John Chrysostom: Six Homilies Against the Jews
“As for needing a religion in order to care about one’s children, admin, with all due respect, that’s crazy! Human nature takes care of that, as it did before Christianity and as it still does for those of us with the common sense to embrace it and to steer clear of voodoo and mysticism.”
But what the Admin was trying to say is that from a purely materialistic point of view, human nature itself merely the result of chemical reactions that arrived out of chaos and are in themselves inherently meaningless. There is nothing in pure materialism that would designate the natural and healthy instincts of man as “good” or “worthy” things. One could just as easily sink into self-centered hedonism, and there would be no rational way for that lifestyle to be condemned as inherently inferior as another. What use is survival and the passing on of genes when the universe will eventually suffer heat death and the entire human species will eventual fade from all existence anyway? “Drink and be merry, for tomorrow we die.” P.S. For the sarcastically challenged among this blog’s readers, I am NOT advocating this extreme form of nihilism, but merely pointing out the mindset of those with this view.
Precisely, Passerby, and no matter how many times someone shows the atheists that they are unable to explain why one idea or action is better than another, or even why life is preferable to death, they will always change the subject, because they have no answers.
They are rather amateurish when it comes to their own ideology. You would have to read someone like Sartre or Camus to get closer to the implications of it. Camus believed suicide to be the fundamental question of philosophy. If the individual is the sole source of meaning, which is exactly what Linder is saying, there is only one masculine response in the face of absurdity and chaos, said Sartre, and that is to commit suicide. This is the ultimate act in crafting one’s own morality, as our village atheists are attempting. The problem, as men like Sartre and Camus saw it, mainly because they were chickens, is that in death they would become prey for the living, and all that they cherished about their lives would be absorbed into the absurdity that is the universe outside their individualistic bubble.
Such are the extremes to which one must go if logic means anything in a world devoid of God. In this light, our atheist nationalist friends are very much like children who think that honking a horn and jerking on a steering wheel is the same thing as driving. If they ever find the car keys, they’re only going to hurt themselves.
They think their desire to save the white race is superior to the desire of other atheists and Darwinists to see it perish, but not a single one of them can explain what makes their plan superior other than their own gut feelings. But those who disagree with them have feelings and ideas of their own, so why should anyone care? If there is no God, nothing makes sense. If there is no God, nothing is worth saving, least of all the white race. No law is worth obeying. Just as it is inconsistent to be a Christian and not cherish the gifts that God has given, including our families and race, it is inconsistent to be an atheist and a nationalist. They sure do get worked up over a big pile of nothing.
At the core, their race-worship is really self-worship, because they can project their own megalomania on a larger body of distant relations, of which they will only ever personally know an infinitesimal part. Unlike God, this abstracted racial entity will never place any demands or requirements upon them or penalize them in any way. They are their own god, and that sure does make the prayer list simple.
ain’t it amazing how modernist/post-modernist “questioning of existence”/nihlism is the ultimate answer (if you don’t believe in the judæo-xtian “God”) and that “the suicide solution” seems to afflict the White Race specifically?
could it be because such self-destructive “philosophy” springs, ineluctably, from the filth of the jewish psyche? …. kikes controlling the media and public discourse in the (je-)West
you cite Camus & Satre….of the former, i cannot comment….but, Sartre was an anti-Nazi, kike-loving, judæo-marxist….as such: you could expect some such self-destructive drivel to spew from his kike-infected mind….you continually criticise Nietzsche….but…as far as i know, no white person ever contemplated suicide after reading Thus Spake Zarathustra (or Kant’s “The Critique of Pure Reason”, for that matter!)….William Gayley Simpson spent ½-a-life-time studying Nietzsche, in the original German, and made claim to having read his entire corpus at least three or four times!….and, yet, “Which Way Western Man?” (which has the first ¼ of its 1100-pages content devoted entirely to Nietzsche) makes nary a reference to the “suicide solution”….no!…..that is an exclusive kike-crafted doctrine aimed specifically at the White Race….like kike-controlled fraticidal wars (WWI, WWII), the HollowHoax, the counter-cultural “filth” revolutions of the 1960s/1970s, the abortion holocaust, feminism, gun control & Turd World “immigration”…they are all forms of genocide against our people!
“The Believer” café scene … a nice “exposition” of the ugly, nihlistic sewer that is the jewish “mind”!
Jimbo, this banter won’t continue for long here unless you and your friends are able to stay on point and stop changing the subject. Are we talking about God or Jews?
If Jews did not exist, you would still have to account for logic, love, beauty, truth, and why we should accept that anyone’s ideas mean anything. Are you really trying to blame Jews for the end result of your philosophy?
Mystic Control-Freak Gets Petulant
(Apollonian, 17 Nov 09)
SWB “admin,” u’re a just mystic who’s against reason/rationality–and remember then, this gets to reason/health vs. psycho-pathology. U evidently want to pretend to that sort of imagined mysticism which entails reason at same time, thus retaining health. Thus we see ur petulance seeping out for ur control-freak inclination pretending now to intimidating “Jimbo.”
What hubris it is for u to complain about my “one-trick pony”–at least I’m honest, which honesty u must suppress as u publish gross lies and slander as by “Wheeler MacPherson.” U’re pathetic and funny at same time as u pompously pontificate, all in the effort to fool urself w. idea u’re “good,” in tune w. “moral order”–right.
CONCLUSION: But if u’re soooooo “good,” question is why u can’t demonstrate this pretended, presumed “good”–it’s just not in realm of reason, is it? So u continue to babble and pontificate endlessly, complaining about others’ “one-trick pony” so fatuously, publishing lies and slander. Eventually people get wise to ur corrupion, sucker, beginning w. ur smug irrationality. Soon enough, the only people who will talk to u are purest scum, like ur buddy “Wheeler” the dealer. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
Jimbo, like many post moderns you find yourself reciting dialogue from the novels of Albert Camus. Yes, I realize you have never read any of his works like The Stranger or The Myth of Sysyphus.
But Camus understood post moderism and the demoralisation of Western man so well that people like you quote him all the time. His novels are essentially about the meaninglessness of existence. (Which is why anyone with half an ounce of psychological health or robustness would never waste their time on his books unless they had to read this stuff for school).
As a tool for self understanding and analyzing our Western society, however, Camus’ work is important. In his fiction he ‘workshops’ the demoralisation of the West. He understood that the ideologies of the Enlightenment leave people in the situation of meaninglessness and paralysis. The only way out is to create one’s own meaning.
The best that can be done is the creation of values (by definition relative). E.g. X values banking as a tool for the ownership of nations. Y values apple pie and motherhood. Somebody else values fighting the Jews who own the banks as a tool for owning nations. Most value slavery as long as they’ve got a house and cable. An angst ridden young man whose girlfriend broke up with him values suicide. None of these values are right or wrong in a moral sense to the modern man – but the values that collectivise and achieve the strongest power base will win the future and engineer the minds of the future generations. The only question is: ‘what values work?’ and ‘for whom?’
(The Values are by definition at war and the strongest will/s decide which values rule at the level of political order). The Marxist process of dialectical materialism describes the way in which the power issues of conflicting values will be decided.
In our post modern reality, the strongest collective which controls banks, media, corporate infrastructure, education, government will weigh in on all sides of every conflict so it can be managed by the change agents according to a predetermined outcome. The conflict of values serves the strongest will.
What you don’t learn from Camus is The Protocols of Zion. Ideologies (the ISMS – Darwinism, Atheism, Liberalism, Conservatism, Agnostism, Racism, Feminism, Faggotism, Marxism, Internationalism a.k.a. Communism, Capitalism / Corporate Statism, Nationalism) were all crafted for the purpose of demoralising the West by attacking the pillars of human identity: faith, race, nation, gender on all fronts.
Jewry is a nation and it is organised as an international nation state. All clear thinking about it begins here.
It has an executive (covert), it has a financial structure that owns Gentile nations, it aspires to own the population in terms of debt and their land in terms of fee simple, it has a legal code, it has an imperium. Individuals who identify as Jews participate in this to varying degrees: for, against, indifferent and assimilated as liberal, secular, materialists. But the JudeoMasonic covert order has utilizes all who hold these ideologies to relentlessly attack the West from within (as a fifth column) and from without through its Masonic Revolution (now culminating in its International / Communist phase) and from around by building the international (Communist) world order power bases.
The throne and altar of all European nations has fallen to the Revolution and the population in the mass been re-tooled for social chaos by means of these ideologies. True International order can only emerge from this chaos. ‘Ordo ab Chao’ – motto of the Supreme Council of the 33rd Degree.
The most instructuve of Camus’s works is The Plague. It is a matter of basic survival (of the fittest) for the population to fight The Plague. Hence the famous ‘But we must fight The Plague’ (or the Jews or Global Warming or Apathy or whatever), but no one can say why they must fight the Plague. Just as there is no reason why many will choose not to fight the Plague. If there is no basis for moral law; it is irrelevant.
All that matters for the mass is the strongest will (however organized at this time)and whether or not that will (collectively) chooses to fight the plague. For postmodern man: the pillars of human identity are going to be retooled on that basis.
Reading through your kiketalk, it is clear that you have no comprehension of Jews and their imperium. They want this kind of talk on the internet. If people like you or their agents were not out there with the J_wSpew on the message boards they would have to do it themselves. This is because they work according to Double Mind / Double Bind. By deception do war. Their strategy is dialectic. They want a hate law lockdown on all public fora. That is their agenda. Doubt me. Please read the ADL website and inform yourself. Abe will get his tzvitzies in a real tizzy if people like you arn’t falling in with their plans. They will have to go out and start drawing the swastikas on the synagogues if the stupid goyim don’t play the hand they are dealt.
Therefore in the social laboratory, hate talk against the Jews must be out there so that when the next black op is staged, the Je_wMSM can join the dots for the sheeple and talk about how all this ‘hate talk’ (examples will be produced) has instigated a terrible event. A real morality play for the national stage.
If you read The Protocols of Zion, the covert government talks about this in their ‘responsibilities of freedom’ disocurse. Thus dialectically we achieve the Slavery is Freedom stage.
If Jews did not exist, you would still have to account for logic, love, beauty, truth, and why we should accept that anyone’s ideas mean anything. Are you really trying to blame Jews for the end result of your philosophy?
white men have been “philosophising” and “questioning ideas” for millenia…going back to the time of Plato & Socrates….and, maybe even, before that!…it is only the “jewish philosophy” of the last hundred years or so that says we haven’t been able to account for “logic, love, beauty, truth & ‘meaning’ “….so….yeh!…i’m blaming the kikes & the kike-a-likes apropos Sartre, Marcuse, Rorty et al….all scum-bag nigger lovers & kike-kissers!
that IS “on point” & “on topic”…unless i was being a bit too “subtle” for you in my previous post!
“the modern world is a jewish disease!” …….. “sums up” that YT “Believer” clip nicely…perhaps you should watch it a few times….and, then, go away and HAVE A GOOD, HARD, LONG THINK ABOUT IT, eh?!?
Okay, I give up. You don’t understand what I’m saying.
Obviously, Jews have taken the place of sin in your mind. This logically entails that Jews must be exterminated and that whites can do no wrong except when they act like Jews. To say that this is madness is putting it mildly.
Not possible to reason with these sophists on the basis of morality or even non-contradiction. All their reasoning is dialectical. Ha Ha. The Jews invented dialectical reasoning. They call it pil pul.
These Aryan racial supremacists are a whole new take on the Socratic ‘the unexamined life is not worth living.’
This type of idolatry is foreign to the white nations. But the Jews are racial supremacists – they invented this particular code, religion and imperium. It looks like the Aryan racial supremacists are going to learn all about it at the feet of (that probably should be under the feet of) the masters.
I am sure the Jews who are directing this bad movie can doctor the script for the goyim who just want to have a religion of racial supremacy too. Jews are very creative that way. But as the Talmud suffers no rivals or slave flatteries, there will be plenty of low farce as the new plot unfolds. I can hardly wait to see the cartoons in Heeb.
Jimbo – The Cafe Scene to which you refer is from The Believer – a JEWISH film. And it deservedly collected all the awards at Sundance, Co in 2000 or 20001. The young actor Ryan Gosling if he is not in fact Jewish himself (born of a Jewish mother) has got some serious Jewish paternity on the family tree. The fact that he could just walk into a lead role in an industry owned and dominated by the Jews is a point to consider.
He plays a JEWISH neo Nazi skinhead. Thanks to the internet we know that the neoNazi movement is largely financed by the Jews. There is no excuse, however, for not knowing why. Do the clueless goyim out there in tv land paying the kosher tax to eat on the corporate K farm have any idea why the neoNazi movement would be in large part financed by Jews?
This film is another head job on the goyim.
The subject of the film is not the Jews and their crimes and why a neoNazi movement would ostensibly exist to oppose this. The subject is Judenrat – it is a story of a self-hating Jews’s redemption to the JEWISH mind.
For the European Christian this is an important study in Jewish psychology and THEIR understanding of anti-Semitism, holocaust denial etc and how they want this to play to the goyim. If you would actually listen to the cafe speech – it boils down to: the young Daniel David, former illui and now a neo Nazi, hates the Jews and he hates himself as a Jew because he perceives them / himself to be feminine and weak in the face of their unending sufferings AND their will to anti life. This last is really telling – but the film will use this important revelation not as the true insight it is, but as a way to characterize ‘anti-Semitism’ for the goyim. This anti-Semitism is some kind of unreasoning, inscrutable, bind force of hatred which characterises the Jews as ‘anti-life’. Kind of like their version of the mystery of iniquity. The young skinhead is infected with it because of his self hatred, according to the film. Of course, this dis-ease never becomes self knowledge, historical knowledge and purpose.
In real life, a Jew with the insights of young Daniel could become another Benjamin Freedman.
Therefore, the self knowledge of which young Daniel is the bearer is taken smartly in hand by this film. Are the Jews weak? And why do those who may be completely innocent of any personal wrong doing suffer at the hands of the goyim? Why do they suffer at the hands of those whose hands actually turn the wheels of the world in making a sacrifice of ‘our own’ lesser brethern? The Protocols of Zion does explain this last.
The Believer takes quite a risk in posing these very real questions for the American goyim. But it answers in a way that will make the clueless goyim even more clueless. And this was the point of the entire exercise. It is the mental equivalent of diet coke.
of course: “The Believer” came from HymieWood…just like almost every other movie over the last ½-century or so….you need to be independently wealthy (a la Mel Gibson) to produce a movie that hasn’t been corrupted to some degree or t’other by the filthy claws of the kike…but…the point is, that the WN movement has now built up such momentum that the kike is more or less obliged to acknowledge it; hence: such movies as TB and, some-what earlier, “American History X”….another interesting movie is “Felon”, released last year & starring Val Klimer…incredibly, this movie, although, basically, a “jail-house drama”-type effort, is pretty much “white supremicist” from GO! to WHOA!
to say that “the kikes” are controlling & steering the WN/”neo-nazi” movement is, IMHO, patently absurd…if they did so originally, then, they have now pretty much totally lost control of it….WN has assumed a life of its own….it is a rampant, feral tiger just slavering to devour the entire edifice of kikery in either one or several large gulps!
the imprisoning of current, prominent WN figures (like, for instance, Matt Hale & Chester Doles) is proof that the kikes are scared….but….those actions have back-fired on them badly and have only served to inflame WNs to white-hot rage!
“false flags” like OKC will, thanks to the i/net, now no longer work either….@ last count, from my under-standing, more than ½ of the adult US population does not believe the official account of 9/11!, in one form or t’other, and a goodly % of that “½” are convinced that the kikes were wholly & solely responsible for it!
WN contains nothing but despair, disaster & destruction for the jews…it is, basically, “Nature” getting revenge on its deadly enemies!
our time in history has come!
we are, to para-phrase Shakespeare, on the flood-tide of our fortune…this is our hour!….the Age of the Kike is almost over…a new “white power” is arising…it’s victory is assured!….there shall be no “new dawn” for kikes!….the time of the Aryan has come!
HAIL VICTORY!
Narrator: You raise an interesting point. Should whites need divine sanction to do what common sense tells them to do, i.e., realize the threat before them and resist it? That certainly makes sense as a matter of logic, but human nature is not that logical.
What we whites have, along with everyone else, is a problem with sin. And our sin nature often keeps us from doing what is obviously in our best interest. As one of many examples, consider sex. The sexual revolution has been a disaster for our race and civilization. And generally it’s been a disaster for us as individuals.
Nevertheless, each of us as individuals may say: Yes, but I can can get away with debauching myself, why not? Especially, if there is no God and no divine law against it. And that’s the decision vast numbers of our people have made. The consequences have been the destruction of family life, the loss of love and romance, and bitter hatred between the sexes.
In this situation self-disgust flourishes, and it’s not just with sexual degeneracy, but every other type of sinful selfishness. The end result is disgust with life itself–a death wish. Certainly, whites should fight their destruction, but many won’t because death is exactly what they want. As God reveals in the Scripture, “All who hate Me love death.”
So what is the answer for this problem of sin? We Christians offer a Savior who forgives sin and leads us to a higher life. We also as kinists abhor the death wish of liberalism, and the doom it proposes for our people. We will resist. True, Christ taught us to love our enemies, but remember that He also beat His enemies with a whip when the need arose.
“a new ‘white power’ is arising…its victory is assured!…there shall be no ‘new dawn’ for kikes!…the time of the Aryan has come!”
Only Saruman’s script in the movies lends itself to this type of application of rhetoric.
In the Lord of the Rings Saga, the White Wizard was clearly a Golem of Sauron. His own ambitions to forge his own ring of power were always depicted as delusional. The Voice of Saruman clearly reveals the corruption of the reasoning power as a weapon of Sauron.
Aryan nationalist ambitions to create its own Talmud and defeat Jewry using Jewry’s own code of racial supremacism is a deceit of magia worthy of Saruman in exactly the way Tolkien depicted it.
In the Saga, Sauron strengthened Saruman in his ambitions and aided him to build up the Isenguard power as a means to an end. Saruman’s project was never regarded by anyone (except Saruman) as any serious rival to Baradur (which sufferred no rivals) but as a deceit of Sauron and agency to prevent the unification of Rohan and Gondor -ironically, the white nations.
Exactly as ‘Aryan power’ and its rhetoric is being used to today.
J.R.R. Tolkien wrote about immutable spiritual truths. These include truths of dark sentences: real politik, the deceits of magia, the conceits of guile, force and makebelieve, propaganda, mind control, ring forging, power mongering, Babel building. It is all there, virtually a textbook.
In Saruman, the White of Many Colours, we see an instrument, a Golem of Sauron. Like Gandalf, he was an Istari, but he was deceived by the craft of the enemy and his mind was overthrown. In the wisdom of his own conceit, he became an insturment of Sauron and was utilized as such by Sauron and by Gandalf.
In his discourses on the LOTR, as the author, J.R.R. Tolkien characterizes the Allied propaganda of WW II in terms of Saruman’s corruption: “…we are attempting to conquer Sauron with the Ring. And we shall (it seems) succeed. But the penalty is, as you will know, to breed new Saurons and slowly turn Man and Elves into Orcs. Not that in real life things are as clear cut as in a story, and we started out with a great many Orcs on our side.” To Christopher Tolkien (stationed in the Transvaal in the RAF), May 6, 1944. The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien (ed by Humphrey Carpenter & Christopher Tolkien) London: Unwin Paperbacks, p. 78.
As the voice of the Oak (the Bard), speaking through his own character Treebeard, Tolkien describes Saruman and his devices: “He is plotting to become a Power. He has a mind of metal and wheels; and he does not care for growing things, except as far as they serve him for the moment. And now it is clear that he is a black traitor. ..Men he has ruined or has blended the races of Orcs and Men!” The LOTR. The Two Towers, “Treebeard”.
Saruman projects necessarily require the ruin of men and the making of Orcs.
For all the above reasons, it is in the nature of things, in esse, that there will be some serious J_wi$h / ZOG investment in the Aryan nation project as a slave flattery and pretend rival to Jewry. Their Power Dialectic requires it. It is just a matter of time before the evidence is posted on the NET.
postmodernity = SEWER