Little Geneva Still Terrifies Liars
November 15, 2009 
21 Comments
“If Gal 3:28 proves that interracial marriage is okay, then it also proves that homosexual marriage is okay.” Tim Harris asks Ken Ham to write this sentence on a flashcard and memorize it. I promise you that Ham and his colleagues have never received a book review like the one Mr. Harris is giving them, and if they were intellectually and professionally honest as teachers and ministers, they would not hesitate to respond. But don’t hold your breath. Tim asks why Ham counsels white non-Christians to get married if marriage is for the purpose of producing godly seed. Why is non-Christian marriage not sinful if Ham is correct that race is meaningless?
The eagerness to ratify political correctness leads to a suspension of thought, and a suppression of sanctified instinct. It reminds me of a Board that I twice sat on, which, upon the agitation of one busybody on the Board, became concerned about a “dangerous outbreak” of opposition to miscegenation—well at any rate, a fellow out in the hills that demurred from miscegenation had once visited the busybody’s church. This created a crisis that had to be addressed immediately. The catalog could wait, finding ways to recruit new students could wait—everything could wait until this dire heresy would be stamped out. (Geneva could not even be used in the institution’s name, because someone—why, is anyone’s guess—might associate it with a website known as “Little Geneva” that the busybody found objectionable.) So, in fourteen minutes, they proposed, debated, and passed a motion defining a new heresy, in these words: “The Board of [such and such] denounces the Kinist core idea that miscegenation is a sin, and affirms that the only Biblical limitation for Christian marriage is that believers marry only in the Lord, 1 Cor 7:39.” From the context, it was clear that by “in the Lord,” they meant “another Christian”—for, if “in the Lord” is meant to designate “all relevant biblical principles,” it would be question-begging so far as settling the miscegenation question—then all the biblical data would have needed to be scanned to make sure, and this can surely not be done in 14 minutes; and it was not done. The context is clearly, that only the religious faith of the person functions as a norm when choosing a mate.
They never noticed that according to their new definition, you can marry your mother as long as she is a Christian!
Such is the result of a generation that feels the magnetism of the politically correct, and acts in haste born of fear.
Tim then lists some excellent “considerations that might lead fathers or tribal leaders to forbid their daughters to be wooed by tribal outsiders.” One of these that you might not have considered is the aggression of the male sex of a race that is suffering from a marriage imbalance. Orientals are not very aggressive personally (not until something stirs the hive, and then their honor makes them deadly), but even they come to this country and see a huge number of their womenfolk marry white men. It only gets worse from there, as every other race lashes out with increasing rage, until we arrive at the black man, who stands in a class of belligerence all his own. Therefore, it seems that lying preachers have two options: 1) They can hope that their false gospel castrates men, making them more like women, unwilling to fight for territory; or 2) Stop the satanic, race-mixing, genocidal death-doctrines. They have clearly chosen the former and have been rather successful.
Mr. Ham and his colleagues make the analogy between dog breeds and the speciation of humanity from a common pair of parents (pp. 36-45). The differentiation in the case of humans came about by natural selection, they say, but the inter-breedability establishes that there is no racial norm. But carry the analogy through: if you had a nation of cocker spaniels, another of great Danes, and another of Labradors, might it not be well within the rights and natural desires of each of these “tribes” to preserve its distinctives? To forbid the dams to make themselves available to the dogs of the other breeds? What possible “biblical argument” could there be to say that inter-breeding must be permitted, if not encouraged? What could possibly be wrong with recognizing the great gifts inherited by your breed and wishing to preserve them?
Tim does a brilliant job of revealing such men to be libertarians. First they create an oxymoronic tribeless society, and before you know it, borders no longer mark off the territory of a distinct people with a national memory of its own, but rather circumscribe the tax base of the “Brazilian” empire. And since taxes never decrease, the borders must widen to encompass the world. As Tim writes, “there is a teleology of one-world government when one ponders this matter deeply.” We always remind lying pastors about Babel because that great judgment put into effect a failsafe. It is not possible for anyone to conquer the world. Those who try will only succeed in killing themselves.
Fear is at the root of this “messianism on man’s terms.”
The desire for praise and acceptance by those holding power leads to a double mind. The beaten dog not only wags his tail but really does desire acceptance by its abusive master. The busybody who brought complaint against me to the Board very clearly and explicitly indicated his fear of the ruling establishment: but it was a fear his conscience approved of, a fear that he did not blush to admit…
We should hope for better from them: that they will come to their senses. Let us pray and hope so, before the gifts that God has distributed to humanity, organized into tribes, are washed away, never to be recovered again so far as what can be discerned humanly.
As the Bible tells us, “There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear” (1 John 4:18). “For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind” (2 Timothy 1:7). Sometimes we falter, but God’s Word can always help us return to the course.
Accent is acquired from the womb.
Some neo-Babelist wrote this to Lawrence Auster, all of it quite false:
Biblical law specifies that foreigners should have the same legal rights and be subject to the same legal prohibitions as natives. They are allowed to benefit from equal participation in the religious and political life of the nation and, they have equal rural land rights in addition to property in the walled cities… The idea of foreigners as equal citizens in Israel is spiritualized and universalized by the apostles.
Notice how he misinterprets the word “stranger” in Ezekiel 47:22-23 to show that aliens could waltz across the border of Israel and buy property, and the law compelled the Israelites to give their nation away. But in Ephesians 2:12, Paul reminds Gentiles that they “were excluded from the commonwealth of Israel.” The word ger, from which we get the word “stranger,” indicates a sojourner.
The JFB Commentary is helpful here:
It is altogether unprecedented under the old covenant, that “strangers” should have “inheritance” among the tribes. There would not be room locally within Canaan for more than the tribes. The literal sense must therefore be modified, as expressing that Gentiles are not to be excluded from settling among the covenant-people, and that spiritually their privileges are not to be less than those of Israel (Ro 10:12; Ga 3:28; Eph 3:6; Col 3:11; Re 7:9, 10). Still, “sojourneth,” in Eze 47:23, implies that in Canaan, the covenant people are regarded as at home, the strangers as settlers.
There was no “citizenship” at the time, as we understand it, which grew out of Roman and then French statism, but rather tribal descent. There was no great need to guard the borders because the land was held only by the “racist” tribesmen. This obviously makes a whole lot more sense than our current reign of despotism.
Gary North believes that this passage from Ezekiel allowed resident aliens to own land in Israel even if they wanted to become pig farmers. He admits that such aliens would have had to surrender rural (tribal) land at the Jubilee every fifty years, but after the return from Babylon he believes this passage from Ezekiel granted “lawful permanent access to the land.” This is jarringly false, cuts against everything else we read about property laws in the Old Testament, and has a lot of neo-Babelist wishful thinking baked into it. This is why JFB says it would be unprecedented if taken literally.
I don’t know the exact moment when neo-Christians began to think that spiritual unity requires physical amalgamation, but our Christian ancestors absolutely denied it, and I have yet to meet a neo-Christian who can honestly deny that they denied it. As Auster says, “People who insist that there is only one level to reality will always distort or hate Christianity.” This is true. One of the proofs that the Bible is divinely inspired is that we should expect nothing less than the space and time paradoxes it presents, for the true God must necessarily be above and outside His creation. The pagan conception of gods never took this into account. The old gods were always prisoners of three dimensions of space and one dimension of time, just as we are, because they were creations of the human imagination. Even when Christ revealed Himself to us as pure God and pure Man, and it was explained to us that God is three and one, and eternally proceeds from Himself, we could only apprehend but not fully comprehend these truths, because our minds are finite. Try to imagine what five-dimensional space is like and you’ll see why God has essentially spoken to us in baby-talk. In short, only the God of the Bible professes to be the Creator rather than another creature.
Has apathy set in to the Seal/Klum “marriage”?
Here’s a woman who writes that feminism has been “a major cause for the growth in transracial adoption.” She explains that such adoptions are selfish and always have serious “cultural and psychological implications” for the children involved. A black woman read this, and a big argument ensued. The hate word “racist” was tossed, of course.
The belief that race is pure fiction and that all humanity is essentially the same represents, in my opinion, a rebellion against God. Here is where I deeply disagree with you. You suggest I am ungodly for recognizing that race is a facet of human existence which will never go away and that people do feel some sense of connection with their own race. I say it is ungodly not to recognize the order of God’s creation, and that part of that order is distinct races.
Then the black woman put up a post of her own about how there is no such thing as interracial marriage. If you don’t want to be severely depressed, don’t read the comments of the “Christian” whores on that page.
On today’s episode of That Makes Sense!, the EU Parliament Building is based on Brueghel’s Tower of Babel painting.
Ben Merkle reflects on the “self-detestation” that is rife among white Americans. This is very similar to what you’ll read at TOQ, but from the opposite angle. At TOQ, many of the writers are saying that if only whites will accept the deep juju of Darwinism, and put their hand in the hand of the man who sailed the Beagle, they’ll stop committing suicide, because they’ll learn to behave more like animals and appreciate survival of the fittest. Well, that’s my spin on it anyway. Merkle (Doug Wilson’s son-in-law) says no, “the culture at the top begins to loath itself for being at the top” even while being “convinced of the Darwinian worldview” because they realize that they can call nothing evil and nothing good, including their own survival. This is a case where the Wilson-Merkle race-mixers score a point against the vast majority of nationalists, and the difference is Christianity.
“Our diversity, not only in our Army, but in our country, is a strength. And as horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.” ~ General George Casey
Ron Paul boasts that his 2007 campaign had more black support than that of any other Republican, which Richard Hoste says is like boasting of being the most popular Jew in Yemen. Dr. Paul gushes: “I have never seen such a diverse coalition rallying to a single banner. Republicans, Democrats, Independents, Greens, constitutionalists, whites, blacks, Hispanics, Asian-Americans, antiwar activists, home schoolers, religious conservatives, freethinkers – all were not only involved, but enthusiastically so.” So Hoste posts pictures of the lily-whiteness of every Ron Paul rally, and says that he thinks he can see the same token Indian in every picture.
White post-Christians are now becoming Hindu. It is now widely believed, even by people who call themselves Christians, that all religions lead to God. This is the question that is asked of every famous evangelical, like Billy Graham, when he goes on a show like Larry King, and the question is never answered. Instead, it is said that God will sort out those uncomfortable details. Almost every white person I know believes in karma (good things happen to good people, bad people get what they deserve). Only one-fourth of all Americans believe in reincarnation, but that’s still a very high number in what was until recently a Christian country.
How will this tide be turned back? The vast majority of evangelicals – I’ll call them baptists, since in the South at least, the words are synonymous – have no weapons for the fight. Almost all of them think the gospel is about “getting saved” rather than Christ’s substitutionary atonement and sovereign election. They think the point of the gospel is accepting-Jesus-Christ-as-my-personal-Lord-and-Savior and all that goes into making me a happier and more fulfilled person, rather than Christ crucified and resurrected, and our being found in Him. One is subjective, the other is objective. One produces a warm glow in the chest region based on feelings, the other produces assurance based on promises. Only the gospel can fight the new Hinduism, but Christianity with “me” as the center rather than Christ is not Christianity at all. Neo-Hinduism has a chewy “karmal center.” Sorry, I couldn’t resist that lame joke.
The conservative Christians often hurl the “whited sepulchre” accusation at the recalcitrant, kinist Europeans, claiming they have made a whited sepulchre of the European past. All right, let’s look that accusation in the face. The kinist European hopes to maintain his faith and restore the faith of his countrymen by keeping faith with a people and a civilization that believed that Jesus Christ suffered, died, and was buried, only to rise again on the third day. The conservatives want us to reject that European past and place our faith in the hope, not the reality, that the clever and oh so spiritual yellow people, or the vital and earthy black people will show us how to be truly Christian and build a Christian society…
Those who don’t believe in a personal resurrection cannot believe in the resurrection of a civilization. But this the man of Europe knows: Wherever there are white Europeans gathered together in His name, there, and only there, is civilization. When the mad-dog liberals, the neo-pagans, and the conservative liberals are outnumbered by the colored hordes, they will be exterminated. But the white Christian remnant will survive, because Europeans, real Europeans united to Him, will always – come plague, famine, death, barbarian hordes, and hell itself – protect and preserve Europe with a will and a love that passeth the understanding of the barbarian, the liberal, the conservative, and the neo-pagan. It all has to do with the blood of our ancestors and the blood of the Lamb.
This is a fascinating article from Jared Taylor on the racial ideology of empire. About a hundred years ago, Cecil Rhodes said: “We are the first race in the world, and the more of the world we inhabit, the better it is for the human race.” While it’s true that whites have been the greatest blessing to the world, empire-building has backfired on us in a horrible way.
This quote from Sir Francis Younghusband, who was born in India and led a British force into Tibet, is particularly interesting:
No European can mix with non-Christian races without feeling his moral superiority over them… It is not because we are any cleverer than the natives of India, because we have more brains or bigger heads than they have, that we rule India; but because we are stronger morally than they are.
This indicates that whites recognized Christian faith to be the main difference, as well as the inability for non-whites to adopt true Christianity but only a superficial, superstitious approximation of it. In this regard, whites have always considered blacks to be the most alien. A 17th century Englishman wrote of Africans that “the men and women go so alike, that one cannot know a man from a woman but by their breasts, which in the most part be very foule and long, hanging downe low like the udder of a goat.” The great missionary David Livingstone finally gave up on preaching to Africans in the 1840s because he was making no progress:
It must be difficult or rather impossible for Christians at home to realize anything like an accurate notion of the grossness which shrouds their minds… Their ideas are all earthly and it is with great difficulty that they can be brought to detach [themselves] from sensual objects.
He would not have been surprised that, 200 years later, nothing has changed. We see that black promiscuity brooks no real distinction between masculinity and femininity. Women are prized for being as promiscuous as the men. The women have discovered cosmetics and hair irons, but morally, they look as much like men as they did hundreds of years ago.
The “South Africa Sucks” blog has been taken down after threats to the proprietor. He writes: “It really hurts like hell that the worst betrayals came from within our own ranks.” Yes, we can relate.
The closest thing to Negro literature we could find.
Tasha and Markeith (lovely names) took a horse-drawn carriage to begin their fairy tale. Then the groom forgot that he was not at a strip club that day and began tossing money on the dance floor, which his kind call “making it rain.” This was when the fairy tale turned into a scene from Mutual of Omaha’s Wild Kingdom. The comments on that page show that white people still know how to think. One writes: “You guys really didn’t need to post a picture of the bride and groom. We could guess, more or less, what they looked like.”
Just in case anyone thought the Michael Jackson experiment was an anomaly, I think Sammy Sosa has proven that blacks look better with black skin.
If Peter Brimelow is hurting so much for material that he is publishing advertisements for Michael Jackson, I’m sure I could dig around in my stacks of stuff for something to send to him. Like a joke, for instance.
So Michael Jackson got to the proverbial pearly gates, as every subject of a joke does, and was met by Elvis. “Boy,” said Elvis, “I heard you married my daughter.” “Yes sir,” replied Jackson, nervously. “Good,” said Elvis. “That liar, Sinatra, told me she married a nigger.”
Lala is the most addictive website ever. It’s the only place I know where you can listen to entire songs for free before buying them. Listen to the excellent acoustic guitar music of Rodrigo y Gabriela. I just love it, and that’s unusual, because generally, Mexican music is the second most-unlistenable trash on the planet.
“When I come to Mass at noon, the Anglos leave, and [Latinos] go in and we don’t even say ‘hi’ to each other, not even ‘hi.’ Sometimes I think there is a wall, but that wall exists only because we don’t have enough faith.” Wrong, Mr. Jesus. It’s because multiracial chaos reigns.
Wetback technology. Lou Dobbs would be talking about this if he had not quit his job at CNN. I think he’s probably going to run for president and try to put the first Mexican in the White House.
“From January 2001 through October 2009, Hispanic employment increased by 3,437,000 positions (+ 21.3 percent), and non-Hispanic employment fell by 2,938,000 positions (-2.4 percent).”
“Hispanics now make up 31.5 percent of U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel.”
Remember when Oklahoma was filled with white people?
“I’ve seen many migrant crop-picking people about the country: Hindus, Filipinos, Mexicans, Okies away from their states. Here in Maine a great many were French Canadians who came over the border for the harvest season. It occurs to me that, just as the Carthaginians hired mercenaries to do their fighting for them, we Americans bring in mercenaries to do our hard and humble work. I hope we may not be overwhelmed one day by peoples not too proud or too lazy or too soft to bend to the earth and pick up the things we eat.” ~ John Steinbeck, 1960, Travels with Charley
Mercenary work in Iraq is now being outsourced to Kenyans.
“Minorities have suffered only 20 percent of the military deaths in Operation Enduring Freedom, despite making up 38 percent of the 20 to 24 year olds in 2008. Per capita, Non-Hispanic whites have been 2.47 times as likely as minorities to die in Afghanistan.” So the kikenpress spins this with the headline: “Whites Get More Free Burials.” See? Sacrificing your life for Israel isn’t so bad if there are freebies.
Oh no, now Hillary is a white supremacist, even though married to the first black president.
The Chinese expect black Obama to support their crushing of Tibet in the name of “protecting national sovereignty and territorial integrity” because they are just like Abraham Lincoln, who crushed the South. I would love to know how any Yankee could argue with this. For some reason, almost every white person with a “Free Tibet” bumper sticker thinks we’re evil racists for trying to save our own people.
Seven lies in under two minutes.
The House ethics committee is currently investigating seven Negro lawmakers (two words that should never be allowed to go together), which is more than 15% of total black representation in the House. Those are only the ones who have been caught.
Americans are intervening on behalf of Negroes yet again, taking money from their own children to supply Haiti with “unicorns, centaurs, and mermaids, to give the inhabitants some much-needed food and sport.”
Is it child abuse or rehearsal for the church harvest social?
Compare the noise of demonic jungle orgies to the heavenly Clair de Lune. This comment is quite on target: “And to think it all started over a fluffy plant fiber.” God forgive us for our sins. Don’t let us perish from our own ignorance.
Shoes are racist. I’m pretty sure this is racist too.
“The white race is an outlawed race and the black race is a deified race. Does the accusation of black racism ever result in punitive action by the government? Of course not. But alleged white racism? The list is endless.”
Some of the earliest video of London, from 1927. Watch it and consider what has been lost. This is what London looks like today. This is the skyline.
“A prominent Columbia architecture professor” who likes to carry on about “white privilege” proved that he is a Negro by slugging a woman in the face who disagreed with him. As Kipling said, “half-devil and half-child.” She was asking for it, really, because she represents the “nation of cowards” who “act stupidly” by refusing to have “a conversation about race.”
Say, do you think a white professor who had punched a black woman after talking about out of control black crime would have gotten charged with a hate crime? Me too. But this guy doesn’t have to worry about that. Hate crime charges are for white people.
Here’s another voter who showed a woman that blacks can be privileged too, just like whites. She “was hit so hard that a tooth—root intact—flew to her bedroom floor. Another blow crushed bones in the middle of her face. Another shoved her jaw backward, leaving her brain starved for blood.” No hate crime to be seen here, folks!
When a six-year-old white girl tells a black girl that she has “chocolate on your face,” a complaint must be “logged as required by law,” in accordance with the “zero-tolerance policy for racism and bullying.” The school principle, whose name is Mikey Kikerson – sorry, that would be Carolyn Cohen – took the side of the one who has been oppressed, downtrodden, disempowered, and disenfranchised by candy.
“Businesses who reject fascist social engineering and want to assert their freedoms guaranteed under the constitution are being sued out of existed.”
The wave of fag-related firings begins. Let’s watch how fast the “anti-racist” preachers fold.
Faggotry is clearly more popular in New England. Some Christians are still holding on in the South.
Crosses are inappropriate and embarrassing, according to bargain shoppers.
We were hasty when we wrote that Bishop Williamson had recanted. Actually, he regretted saying anything, which is not the same thing as apologizing for saying something that was false. Now he has appealed his hefty fine, “which means there will be a trial.” This is very encouraging news. Ingrid Zundel has written that there are young people turning themselves in willingly for thought crimes in the attempt to overwhelm the courts and turn public opinion against the tyranny.
St. John Chrysostom, my favorite anti-Semite.
According to the ADL hate group, 12% of all Americans are anti-Semitic, including 28% of blacks and 35% of Hispanics. Well, we can’t all be perfect. We need to knuckle down and get those numbers up.
As if Jews didn’t have enough to worry about:
Jew Goldsack is “doing God’s work.”
Global government and global currency.
“We are borrowing from Europe in order to defend Europe, we are borrowing from Japan in order to keep cheap oil flowing to Japan, and we are borrowing from Arab regimes in order to install democracy in Iraq.” ~ attributed to Pat Buchanan
“…and bank-notes will become as plentiful as oak leaves.” ~ Thomas Jefferson
“It has been justly stated by a British writer that the power to make a small piece of paper, not worth one cent, by the inscribing of a few names, to be worth a thousand dollars, was a power too high to be trusted to the hands of mortal man.” ~ John C. Calhoun
“If the people only understood the rank injustice of our Money and Banking system, there would be a revolution before morning.” ~ Andrew Jackson
An image of white America riding the beast of usury:
“Nothing fills me with deeper sadness than to see a Southern man apologizing for the defense we made of our inheritance and denying the great truths on which all our institutions were founded.” ~ Jefferson Davis, President of the Confederate States of America
As Waylon Jennings sings here, we’ll take your starry rag and wipe our horses with it. We might even use it to wipe other things.
Another good post! God bless Tim Harris.
“Hispanics now make up 31.5 percent of U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel.”
Spanics now make up 54% of the U.S. Border Patrol, which is part of U.S. CBP. Many speak Spanic as their first language (barely speak English), doing this on the job. Many are naturalised, and have immediate family below the Rio Grande. Many look like the Border Bandits we would have arrested years ago. Also, there are an increasing # of woymns, negros, and other non-Whites in the Patrol. How many White males are now in the BP?
This is happening to the entire U.S. Government, military, law enforcement, et al.
Wake up and smell Baby Doc Duvalier’s Tonton Macoutes !!!
This is not gonna stop, it is part of “their” plan, and will be used against our people. Although, I agree %100 with CWNY’s most recent must read post linked above.
We do not have unlimited time.
God save our people.
Solo Christus!
You know, the phenomenon of one people exploiting another in the name of Christianity isn’t entirely unprecedented. Just check out the interesting phenomenon of “Bulgarian Schism” (1870-1945).
When the Turks conquered the Balkan peninsula, they put all their Eastern Orthodox subjects under the religious jurisdiction of Greek patriarch of Constantinople. And during the centuries of Turkish rule, these often very venal Greek clergymen used the opportunity to monopolize higher church offices even amongst Slavic Orthodox populations.
By the 19th century, the Turkish rule was falling and Slavs were becoming more nationally conscious, no longer content of being ruled by Greek clerics:
“It is a natural fact that the self-assertive sense of ignored nationality was first manifested in an ecclesiastical phase. The herald, for example, of the rousing of Bulgaria was the universal demand among that people that the bishops, sent to the region inhabited by them between the Danube and the Balkans, should be not Hellenes but Bulgarians. All should receive appointment and consecration as before from the Ecumenical Patriarch, but it was fitting that they should be of the same branch of the human family as the flocks to which they were sent. Every detail of creed and ceremonial was to remain unchanged. If the course hitherto pursued was followed, each new bishop on arrival in his diocese was regarded as an unwelcome foreigner. If the now longed for innovation was made, he would be hailed as one of their own kith and kin, from whose lips they would listen to their own tongue.”
http://armenianhouse.org/bliss/turkey/07-greeks.html
The Greek prelates then, in essence, condemned the Bulgarian Slavs for daring to notice that they were being taken advantage of – like today White Christians are told not to notice that they are being taken advantage of in the name of Christian charity:
“The subsequent Council in Constantinople, chaired by Ecumenical Patriarch Anthimus VI, in September 1872, wherein the Patriarchs of Alexandria, Antioch and Jerusalem (the latter declined to sign the Council’s decisions) also participated, declared on September 18 (September 30[1]) the Bulgarian Exarchate schismatic and declared its adherents excommunicated. The latter were accused of having “surrendered Orthodoxy to ethnic nationalism”, which had been qualified as a heresy – “ethnophilitism” (φυλετισμός).”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulgarian_Exarchate#Bulgarian_schism
… and sure enough, they cited the Galatians 3:28!
“The Patriarch and Holy Synod obstinately resisted the demand. If granted, it seemed to shatter every hope of an ultimately to-be-restored Greek dominion. Every argument, which ingenuity could suggest or which superstition and ignorance might heed, was devised to quiet the awakened aspiration.
In the gospel there was neither Greek nor Jew; therefore it made no difference from what nationality a bishop was chosen; therefore it was appropriate that all the bishops should be Greeks!”
http://armenianhouse.org/bliss/turkey/07-greeks.html
This is sort of how Black Christian preachers are today demand material goodies like extra welfare and reparations, and White Christians are not supposed to notice how this is motivated by transparently selfish tribal concerns, even while it’s cloaked in the language of altruism.
Tribal sympathies shone through in this schism also in that the Russian Orthodox kept fellowship with the Bulgarians in spite of the decision of Greek council:
“Forthwith the Bulgarians were anathematized by the Holy Synod, not for any error of doctrine or depravity of life, but on account of ecclesiastical insubordination. Lo, though Orthodox on every point, holding in all its minutiae the Orthodox creed, theirs is in the eyes of the Greeks a Schismatic Church. It is however in full communion and paternal fellowship with the Orthodox Church of Russia.”
http://armenianhouse.org/bliss/turkey/07-greeks.html
Aren’t there some Kinists who are excommunicated for their mere insubordination in ethnic questions?
The Catholic Encyclopedia (1909 edition) has more about these, well, Byzantine affairs:
“During the greater part of the nineteenth century the principle of nationality long cherished at Constantinople, which had employed it against the popes when robbing them of jurisdiction over Illyricum and at one time over Southern Italy was turned against the Greeks themselves, especially against the Church of Constantinople. Every province or kingdom that shook off the Turkish suzerainty freed itself at the same time from the ecclesiastical yoke of the Phanar. Curiously enough, it was the Greeks of the Hellenic Kingdom who first set up, in the nineteenth century, an autonomous Church. The Servians and Rumanians were not slow to imitate them. The Bulgarians went farther and, while remaining Ottoman subjects de jure until October, 1908, they established about forty years ago an exarchate of their own, independent of the Phanar, with jurisdiction not only over all Bulgarians in Bulgaria, but also over Bulgarians in Turkey. … In recent times, also, the rivalry of nationalities has passed over from Europe into Asia. In 1899 the Greeks were ejected by the Syrians from the Patriarchate of Antioch; in the same way they may soon lose Jerusalem. In Egypt similar divisions exist between the Greek and Arabic-speaking elements; the latter, aided by their Mussulman fellow-countrymen, may eventually cast off the ecclesiastical control of the Greeks. In short, at no very distant date the Greeks, who have so long ruled the Orthodox world. will have to he content with the Church of Athens, that of Cyprus, and the sadly weakened Church of Constantinople.”
http://oce.catholic.com/index.php?title=Greek_Church
Another great post! Keep up the good work. Glad to learn the good Bishop Williamson did not, in fact, recant his holocaust proclamations and is appealing his fine to a higher court. To paraphrase Sean Hannity’s phrase, “Let freedom of Speech ring” If we let the Jews define the parameters of acceptable thought, and speech, we allow them to enslave our hearts and minds.
The supreme law of the Church is the salvation of souls. The use of the Galatians text to frustrate the mission of the Church to elevate the nation and bring it to Christ is in opposition to this. The best policy has always been to train indigenous clergy as soon as possible.
I think the Ben Merkle comment on white American ‘self detestation’ is the deeper juju of Judaism upon the “deep juju” of Darwinism, atheism, liberalism etc.
This social agony of alienation, meaninglessness and nihilism which convulses the West did not just happen. As a general social condition among the white populations, it was long prepared as “an astute fraud”.
That is why the Church condemned and anathematized ex cathedra the ideologies of naturalism (Darwinism), rationalism and liberalism as “astute frauds” contrived for the ruin of nations – specifically the ruin of Christian nations.
The Syllabus of Errors. Apostolic Constitution decreed by Pope Pius IX, Dec 8 1864.
Condemned and anathematized is the proposition (58) “No other forces are to be recognized except those which reside in matter and all the rectitude and excellence of morality ouht to be placed in the accumulation and increase of riches by every possible means and the gratification of pleasure.”
Well. Now we know what this looks like in sociological space – people who actually believe this or who have been socially engineered to believe it.
But there is more. The great pope, Pio Nono continues, “…anyone who knows the nature, desires and intentions of the sects, whether they be called masonic or bear another name and compares them with the vastness of the obstacles by which the Church has been assailed almost everywhere, can not doubt that the present misfortune must be mainly imputed to the machinations of these sects. It is from them that the Synagogue of Satan (“they that say they are Jews and are not” Apoc 2:9) which gathers its troops against the Church of Christ takes its strength…this scourge winding through sinuous caverns…deceiving many with ASTUTE FRAUDS (my emphasis, for which please Lord forgive) finally has arrived at the point where it comes forth impetuously from its hiding places and triumphs as a powerful master. Since the throng of its propagandists has grown enormously, these wicked groups think that they have already become the masters of the world and that they have almost reached their pre-established goal.”
Thus secure, the public spectacle of this smirking Jew, Ben Merkle playing with his shmeckle and offing himself on the social collapse of white America as “White Angst Akbar” – attributing it to holocaust guilt. But unless this smirking Jew comes to conversion and repentance, he will not escape the anathemas of Pope Pius IX and Pope St Pius X because they are bound in heaven and upon earth.
Photos of a real death camp.
After holocausting the German nation by incendiary bombing (initiated by that loathsome reptile Churchill), Operation Keel Haul (American) / Operation East Wind (British) was mandated by the two crypto Jews: Eisenhower and Churchill – stooges of the Jewish empire which owns the Allied powers as a banking cartel (in the West) and as a Soviet (in the East).
The death camps were formed by military cordon around surrendered German nationals in the Zones after the German surrender. Entire populations of German nationals herded out onto the bare fields – no food, no water, the Red Cross (which accessed all German concentration camps during WW II AND KEPT RECORDS) denied all access. The idea was for entire surviving populations (of the German holocaust) to die of dehydration and exposure. Which they did.
The Canadian historian James Bacque using much primary data from both government records and the Red Cross has documented Operation Keel Haul in his book: Crimes and Mercies: the Fate of German Civilians under Allied Occupation 1944-50.
Bet they won’t be any holocaust memorials to the white victims of these crimes and atrocities.
“White post-Christians are now becoming Hindu. It is now widely believed, even by people who call themselves Christians, that all religions lead to God. This is the question that is asked of every famous evangelical, like Billy Graham, when he goes on a show like Larry King, and the question is never answered. Instead, it is said that God will sort out those uncomfortable details. Almost every white person I know believes in karma (good things happen to good people, bad people get what they deserve). Only one-fourth of all Americans believe in reincarnation, but that’s still a very high number in what was until recently a Christian country”
It more like they are becoming Idealistic. German Idealism from Kant to Schopenhauer is European. It is no small thing that the Reformation began in Germany. In Hinduism the Big God is Brahman which is you. The logic goes that Brahman is the supreme Consciousness. The consciousness is the subject which cannot take object state, “as a light illuminates all but itself”.
Your definition of karma is more jewish and christian than anything, see Job. Karma is more related to Kama (desire) and Kama (death), there is a difference in the vowels.
Identity with Brahman also identifies with all consciousness, “You are that.” In Christian terms it is as Jesus said concerning visting those in prison, giving food and drink to the needy as doing it to him. Schopenhauer noted that Christianity was Aryan as much as it was based on the Vedic and jewish as much as it was based on the old testament and he feared a movement towards the judaic and away from the Vedic thanks to the seeming triumph of materialism.
Schopenhauer also noted that Christianity didn’t have a future in India as what was good in it they already had, and what was bad they didn’t need.
I suggest you study any religion you intend to repute in the future as you don’t seem to understand even the very basics of Sadhana.
That’s what my wife tells me too. How was I to know that she wanted to marry a gymnast?
Thanks SWB for another great post! Keep up the good work advocating for our Christian people.
the “admin” of this ‘blog is some sort of frickin’ CLOWN….clearly NOT PREPARED to engage in serious, rational discussion on racial issues…he never satisfactorily answered Alex Linder in the other “thread” or, for that matter, couldn’t even counter my own arguments…even though, i make no claim to have any-thing near the IQ or education of Linder….having only attended what, in the US, is called “a community college” and, in Australia, a “TAFE”….and only being qualified as a book-keeper (or: low-level “accountant”)…..never-the-less, he simply dismissed my assertions without adequate rebuttals….IOW: he chucked them in to the “too hard basket”….not even seeing fit to “clear” my last post!
irrespective of whether or not xtianity is valid….you simply can’t profess religious-type beliefs when yr very survival as a race/species and as an individual is at stake…our ABSOLUTE PRIMARY PRIORITY is to STOP the genocidal juggernaut that is ZOG…..SELF-DEFENCE comes FIRST….after that, when things are “settled”, you can expound “theology”!
Petr’s comments about the “Bulgarian Schism” were good to read, in that the great ‘sin’ of the Bulgarians (at least as far as the Greeks were concerned) was the ‘phyletism’ of wanting to rule and control their own National Church! Gee, go figure…
Nowadays, the Orthodox in the USA have warped the term ‘phyletism’ to include anyone that would PRESUME to think that the ‘Ecumene’ means, what all the great Orthodox authors knew it to mean- i.e., Continental Europe! SO, any attempts at pointing out that Christianity has for a long, long time been considered ‘the white man’s religion,’ is therefore, being ‘phyletistic’ it’s all so Obamaesque. Invent ‘sins’ where there weren’t any before, and not even base them on the Decalogue, but only on ‘feelings from the Frankfurt School.’
Frankly, with that sort of ‘spin’- even coming from the Orthodox, one begins to see that there a pattern between Massachusetts liberals, the GOA, SCOBA, Dukakis, Stephanopoulis, and Franky Schaeffer- they’ve all traded their inheritance for a mess of baklava. Oppa!
And lost the Gospel in the process….
“In the end, all the Churches will follow Antichrist.’ – Fr. Seraphim Rose.
Ok, OK, you guys ROCK.
Pigeon Impossible was the BEST thing I have ever clicked to from this site. Hysterical.
Thank you for your kind words, St. John. But I might as well take this opportunity to formally protest the way how you on your blog are promoting a CI-like notion that Whites are somehow ESSENTIALLY different from other races – that colored people aren’t “Adamites” like us:
“The ‘image of the Image’ may seem a bit abstraced to those (like the LDS) who see God as their procreative Celestial Father- literally!
But to those who know that YHWH God is ‘wholly other’, this definition makes a great deal of sense. God is uncreated, we are created. But!
NEvertheless, we are STILL created (as Members of the Race of Adam, in contradistinction to all other races on the planet) ‘in the IMAGE and LIKENESS OF GOD.’
That alone sets the Adamic (i.e., White, European, Caucasoid) race apart from all other homonids on the planet, and gives clarification and emphasis on the ‘anti-miscegenation’ statutes of the OT.”
http://thewhitechrist.wordpress.com/2009/11/19/this-is-what-ive-been-saying/
This is self-righteous self-idolatry. I firmly believe, and evidence clearly shows, that the superiority of Whites, both materially and spiritually, is merely that of degree, not of kind.
Quite frankly, you seem to be trying to force Eastern Orthodox doctrines to teach a mild form of “Christian Identity”. And that indeed would deserve to be condemned as “phyletism”. Nor is your mixing of Darwinian “homonid” jargon with EO theosis-idea truly traditional, but an artificial modernist mess.
So you can count me out, as I am not going to support such stuff.
“when yr very survival as a race/species and as an individual is at stake”
As I said before, from a materialistic worldview, the eternal death of all of humanity and all its races is inevitable, so why does it matter whether it occurs sooner or later? Such inconsistencies, tsk, tsk, tsk.
That’s pretty nonsensical, PB. The atheists have already said it; it matters to them because it does. Liberty, defiance, self-defense and racial preservation are ends in themselves, even if in the end all comes to naught. Now, not being an atheist myself, I’m not agreeing with them that it’s all over at death, but supposing it were, it would be up to them, not you or anyone else, to decide if their life had value and how to live it. They have no concept of transcendence and think we’re all ultimately just worm food, but they are proud White men who want to live free and see their race prosper. I accept that, why can’t you?
The VNN white nationalists posting here write as though the SWB website and its weblog argues against the natural law right of self defense. Or indeed the fact that a people threatened with harm will defend themselves. Does anyone seriously argue here against the Divine mandate to “be fruitful and multiply” after our kind? Does anyone argue against the thriving of the white race or that the white race should not redress its wrongs. No.
Linder asserts that “the white race is distinct and valuable and its members would be wise to preserve themselves in a group.” This is virtually the definition of ‘a group’ however defined. Christianity would add to this: the white race is distinct and valuable in its nations – its national heritages of its faith, languages, culture, customary laws many of which are institutionalized in the laws of the American republic.
It does not follow that people holding to this belief are beholden to permit their nation/s to be invaded by foreign populations, to legally and economically advantage invading foreigners above those of their own nationals or to allow hostile interests to control their government/s. Linder confidently asserts that he does not need a Bible quote for this. Neither do the Christians.
The fact that modern Christians can not think like this demonstrates that modern Christian institutions have been universally subverted; just as it demonstrates that that Americans who can not think like this about America as a polity of American citizens (of whatever ethnicity) have been subverted. A population that can not think like this has been seriously interfered with. A nation that can not perceive its own interests or accedes to social policy against its own flourishing and posterity has been seriously interfered with. This is the extent of The Problem.
Linder’s assertion that “the liberalism that admitted Jews as equals and destroyed our society is Christian in origin.”
Historically, this statement is false. Jewish emancipation occurred in Europe after the Masonic revolution (inaugurated 1789) overthrew both throne and altar in every Catholic nation state in Europe. In England, the Jews were only readmitted after Cromwell’s revolution (backed by Jewish finance from Amsterdam) had upended the entire country. Only after the Glorious Revolution was the nation of England owned by the Rothschild bank – the City or the Crown.
In America, a masonic republic at its founding, the population has been created by immigration. Many nations (as ethnic people) have rights as American citizens and the American law of traditional, Constitutional jurisprudence. At this time however, it is white America, that is being uniquely and demonstrably deprived of those rights.
At this point it is being exposed on the internet that there does exist a significant population of Americans who think:
invading populations are entitled to all the legal and economic advantages Americans can give them – over and above the rights of American nationals
Anointed Victim / Minority Group dicta against the rights of the majority should be enacted into law
dual nationals holding American and foreign passports should govern the nation
everyone is entitled to freedom of religion except Christians
every distinct group is entitled and empowered to speak in its own interests except white Americans
it is a matter of indifference that crime against white Americans is not acknowledged and indeed is actively concealed (by policy dictate) in the mainstream
it is a matter of indifference that hate crimes against white Americans where the perpetrator is witnessed making statements of hatred, menace and terror against a white victim/s as a white person is not charged with ‘hate’ crime.
For America as for the entire Western world, this constitutes THE PROBLEM.
If the unprejudiced observer would wonder: ‘ why would anyone think this way?’ , it is not to difficult to perceive the social engineering at work: through changing laws (Brandeis: ‘the law is the teacher’), through all media, through commerce and employment, through the public and private educational system at all levels, through litigation, through a virtual raft of action groups, through change agents infiltrating all public orgs, through the churches and so on (and on).
Because of the internet, it can no longer be concealed by any means that the unifying source and agency of THE PROBLEM is a nation organized at the level of an international nation state and government which owns all geopolitical republican states / entities (post the Masonic Revolution inaugurated 1789). A global banking cartel is the instrumentality by which the international nation state of Jewry exercises ownership over nations, republics, soviets and all corporate infastructure. JudeoCartelized Capitalism of the West is now converging with the JudeoSoviet state monopoly socialism of the East. This convergence is Communism.
This is the empire that is is growing out of these dialectical conflicts flaring across the globe.
The nation to whom this empire of Jewry belongs has a code of (its own) racial supremacy; it has its own law (the Talmud) and a law for its subject nations (the Noachaida); it has its own observances; it has its own covert government through its Agentur of secret, masonic societies; it has its own magick or supernatural influence that is camoflauged as a religion. Or its own nationals (who may or may not agree with the Judaic imperium) are camoflauged as liberal, secular, humanitarian materialists or some kind of spirituality. They are of a piece with the population of socially engineered goyim who are adrift in uncharted sociological space bereft of the mainstays of human identity: family heritage, religious faith, national legacy and gender identity. “Freedom’s just another word for nothing left to lose.”
The empire of Jewry and its nation has government at international, national, state and local echelons and at all levels over its subject nations; it has objectives for the consolidation of its empire and the economic utilization of its subject / host nations. Eventually, its supreme object is the elimination of its host / subject nations and for its posterity to enjoy the undisputed ownership of the earth as ‘gods on this planet’.
Their supreme law, The Talmud specifies that even the best gentiles should be killed. The ‘killing out of the goyim’ is not just in the Protocols of Zion. This so called ‘forged’ statement has contemporary expression in a rabbinic document just published in Israel and reported at length in the Israeli press. The legal and rabbinic minutiae of this document removes any conceivable impediment for Jewry to kill out the goyim through its instrumentalities and proxies while absolving itself of genocide. I seriously doubt that any of the goyim will ever know the status of this document under the Sanhedrin.
This document does not discriminate between any of the goyim or between Noachides and Christian ‘idolators’
Even though American jurisprudence is coming under the Talmud code, there does still exist rule of law more honoured in breach than enforcement and prosecution. Under rule of law and traditional American jurisprudence, individuals are recognized as individuals, not as members of a class or ethnicity or race. Under American jurisprudence, albeit not in fact and practice – Illegal aliens are recognized as illegals not because of their race but on the basis of their immigration status. Rule of Law still obtains in America even though both rule and law are being routinely gutted from the top. Yes, it does allow Jewry to operate in practice – but still outside the rule of law. That is, of course, why they are very busy changing not only laws but the foundation of American jurisprudence itself from the Constitution to the Talmud.
At this time, it is still possible for the FBI to round up a crime syndicate and charge them with organ trafficking. It will never be possible under any traditional American jurisprudence to round them up and charge them with being Jews. The time is coming, however, when it will be possible for American law enformcement operating under the new jurisprudence of the Talmud to criminalize white America as a distinct ethnicity of suspected terrorists (homegrowns) and to move against them under the din rodef definitions. It will be possible to move against all Christians as ‘idolators’ under Tamudic hate law.
“Under us people will be arrested on more or less of a suspicion of wrong doing” (Protocols of Zion)
I do not type in the name of the document in question because I do not want the search engines picking it up and bringing another swarm over to SWB. Please read Michael Hoffman’s exposition of ‘din rodef’ in his November posts of “On the Contrary” at his revisionist review blogspot.
The way the legal Revolution is shaping up in the U.S. directly parallels the JudeoBolshevik Revolution where white Russains were held guilty of membership in a proscribed class, (the bourgeouise) and criminalised as ‘anti-Semitic’. They were rounded up as entire populations and exterminated.
As American law in its institutions is being subverted and re-tooled under a new jurisprudence, namely the Talmud, Linder’s statements must be read in this context. He speaks of the Jews attempt to force white America to live on terms that “do not allow our kind to thrive, not even to survive”. He describes a war of survival: nation vs nation. In America, this remains a (hypothetical) foreseen context where the law of the American republic has failed white America in toto and is completely subverted. In such a conflict there are no individuals. People are dealt with as classes and as nationals. The true context of his statements is not the present situation but a war to the knife – a situation of: every gun to the gunfight. He seriously argues for this.
And to implode America through Revolution is exactly what Jewry wants. Why else would Grand Orient Lodges (their school for Revolution) be going up in their key cities. It is like in chess, you position all your pieces necessary for your strategy to work and then you make your move.
All institutions are currently failing white America, most especially government and law. Grass roots organisation, economy and self reliance is what is needed now, a strengthening of white America in the legacy of its true faith. White America occupies ground. And that position must be re-inforced by every means.
Thanks, Petr, for your response to Fr. John. Couldn’t have said it better.
Don’t expect him to respond, though. He generally runs away when challenged on his weird hybrid of Orthodoxy and CI, and then comes back a little later to comment on unrelated topics. There has never been a CI movement within Orthodoxy, and medieval Christendom didn’t believe that the white race only was descended from Adam. On First Word, Fr. John was once challenged to unmask himself and reveal when he was ordained as an Orthodox priest and by whom, and of course he never did.
Petr-
I’m not asking you to ‘support such stuff’ – what I AM asking is to determine, FROM PRAXIS, the FATHERS, and SCIENCE (which is often Darwinian, but still makes some amazing discoveries) what the TRADITION of the first 1000 years of Christendom was, vis a vis race, and who the Church was as well. Then, ask yourself, why is it DIFFERENT nowadays? You can’t retreat into a chorus of ‘What the world needs now, is love, sweet love.’ IT just don’t cut it. Therefore, I cannot concur, with that preface, that it [Mother Church] was EVER ‘multicultural’ or ‘multiracial’ like the slutty whore who calls herself Christendom today, is.
Siegfried, I don’t NEED to tell you who my bishop is, or where I was ordained. As a protestant, most of the readers here don’t even BELIEVE in Episcopacy, let alone care about it. Let’s just say that my bishop clearly approves of my ministry, and I fully intend to point out these things to my congregants, and I am NOT giving my ‘c.v. here, because the jews and the antichrists would gladly shut me down, thereby! Moreover, I don’t need to do that, because the example of MR. Seabrook was warning enough. You seek to imply I am ‘preaching’ CI- what if I am showing the CI folk that they are preaching Orthodoxy, and need to abandon their more uniquely ‘baptist’ practices, instead? I do so because, if the modern Church is the Church of the Ages, I’m a buddhist. (and, just to quote St. Paul on that one, ‘May it never be.”)
Kinists can say all they want that they are not ‘racists,’ (though no one now believes them on that score) or that they (now)believe the fallacy that Acts 17:26 encourages miscegenation. (How long will it take to show the error on THAT verse- Doug Wilson only took about ten years to write his vindication of slavery- how much has an Obama presidency revivified Dabney among the conservatives in the Church, and yet, that is not an ‘aberrant’ view?) Well, looked at that way, I say that you folks now understand the fallacy of Gal. 3:28, and I once was (seven years ago) where you are now, and I see even MORE CLEARLY that God does NOT call ‘all men, everywhere’ to repentance- for if the Great Saint [Chrysostom] can say of the Jews (as a race) that they are ‘beyond forgiveness’ ( and he does- that ‘Ugly Truth’ post says it clearly) then that means that there EXISTS/ARE races that are NOT regenerate-able. AND… if an exemplar of a/that race are the [sic] “Jews,” then, proceeding to the text of Holy Writ, you are driven to decide either a) you folks are wrong in applying the promises of Rom. 9-11 to them. or b) St. Paul is a liar. I believe in ‘a’, myself.
If you can shake off the demonic attempts at making the Bride of Christ a polyglot, multicultural whore, instead of the Virgin Bride of israel, adorned for her Kinsman-Redeemer, you might grasp what Chrysostom et al. were talking about, when they didn’t even KNOW that the African was capable of being ‘spiritual,’ like the Rev. Wright… and his most famous disciple. I’ll just wait patiently until you come to where I am now. I understand it’s a steep learning curve, especially without the pnevma.
God bless, even so; for, “You are not far from the kingdom of God…”
I really appreciate your observations Petr and Siegfried. I see you both have a very clear perception of the job Fr John is doing on the Patristics with this Adamkind = Caucasian European nations (white race) = Covenant Israel thing; also this White Aryan Europe = oikoumene mischief complete with refs to chai humanity, cattle upon the hills, etc. Very Talmudic. Why not just call these people ‘the goyim’ if we are going to think like this?
I am banned from his blog for arguing with him and SWB Admin has told both of us to ‘cool our jets’ on this subject among others – which I do try to respect. But every time I read Fr John’s take on our Lord’s Great Commission, I am vexed.
Discourses on the subject of pre-Adamic hominids vexes me. I will grant you that there are members of Adamic humanity who are definitely not gifted as races with high IQs and technical ability, folk who lack impulse control and basic moral fortitude. And the Jews will drive these wretches to acts that are most truly diabolical. They should live on their ancestral lands and receive the Apostolic law and discipline of the Church to elevate their souls and regenerate them in Christ. But listening to comments that demonize the Khazarian ethnos of wonderful North Americans like the Canadian Jewish author Henry Makow who has suffered long the clueless goyim as well as excellent Christians like Benjamin Freedman and Brother Nathaniel Kapner who have made real sacrifices to renounce Jewry and bear witness for Christ – well, this just makes me mad.
So it is very good to see that Christians who love Patristics aren’t buying the gospel according to Fr John. His link over to the excellent website http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com is supposed to vindicate this pre-Adamic hominid mischief.
When I link over to that website I see an absolute treasure of discussion and reference on Patristics. Also, I spy with my little eye, a box on the sidebar of energetic procession informing the bloggers of the Orthodox outreach into Indonesia which I read with great interest. If ever there was a people who need the Evangel and the Christian faith, it is the folk who worship volcano gods and have to cope with the Mossad over there posing as an ‘Islamofascist’ insurgency. Good on those Orthodox, I say, who are taking the cross of our Lord over there.
Sweet Heart of Mary, be the salvation of Russia, of Spain, Portugal, Europe and the whole world. And by this Catholics mean that the prayer of Immaculate Heart magnifying our Lord above all will prevail upon his Mercy for a great victory for all these nations. He has confided it to her. Our Lady of Kazan still leads the Russias to victory. As a Roman Catholic, I believe this.
Great response, Lynda. To suggest that CI was some lost doctrine of the church taught for the first 1000 years A.D. is ludicrous and someone needs to come up with some serious, serious evidence before the claim can be given any real analysis.
Fr. John tried to prove CI with a wacky interpretation of the Septuagint, but Tim Harris rebutted him on First Word.