If You Seek the Monument to Our Folly

If You Seek the Monument to Our Folly

…look about you. So said the great Richard Weaver.

Remember how men on the Titanic saved the women and children and sacrificed themselves? Yeah, well, those were white men, and specifically, Christian white men. The white men who had earlier rejected their Lord were exemplified by the barbaric reason-worshipers in France. Edmund Burke lamented, in his Reflections on the Revolution in France, “I thought that ten thousand swords would have leaped from their scabbards to avenge even a look that threatened her [Marie Antoinette] with insult. But the age of chivalry is gone. That of sophisters, economists, and calculators has succeeded.”

In the same book, Burke tells us that “superstition is the religion of feeble minds,” which is why, even long after Christianity was introduced to Haiti, there is nothing like chivalry to be found there. The United Nations has now opened food distribution sites for women only since the men will trample the women and children.

Many charities are taking their own crews to Haiti to unload supplies. “Whenever Haitians are asked to unload anything, they grab as much stuff as they can and run away. In many cases, armed and masked UN soldiers have to hold Haitian thugs back at gun point while UN workers unload trucks.”

There’s a huge effort to get orphaned Haitian children adopted by white families, and it’s mostly spearheaded by Judeochristians who have no interest in keeping the children with anyone who closely approximates their own lost families. We now have the spectacle of Christians engaging in child trafficking. That’s because it’s not really about the children, it’s about the vanity of white adults who can’t sleep at night unless they know that they are blessing someone, somewhere with their charity. This is an admirable virtue when properly directed, and an abomination when it is not.

Whites have not yet begun to cut their own veins for Haitians, but white women are being asked to pump their breasts to feed Haitian infants. It seems that our gross national product, which David Yeagley calls the Great White Throne, is not enough.

Jew Elliott Abrams has the solution for Haiti: Move them all here and throw money at them until they turn white, or at least a jaundiced shade of Sammy Sosa-yellow. I’m sure this will work, because Jews know about such things and always have the best interests of others at heart. They are so brave, giving, and forgiving that I feel like opening my wallet and telling them, with a wink, to take whatever they can find. Others, with Chewy Jewy names like Berg, Kahn, and Zelinsky have joined Abrams in volunteering to steal our wealth.

Hey, look! It’s the “cultural heartland” after those black adoptees come of age:

There sure are a lot of racists out there trying to prevent poor, family-oriented Haitians from living the American Dream.

A Haitian barbecue and beach party.

Can the Negro rule himself? Is he congenitally capable?

We torched your farm and we’ll come back to eat your children.” No U.S. military “peace-keeping” force, no United Nations involvement, no corporate charity, no concern of any kind in the world, except from a few white “racists.” Even if there had been a 7.0 earthquake, no one else would care. As Steve Sailer says, “There’s no chance that the international community will declare the first-ever black republic an official failure,” no matter how much it costs us.

Black Independence, as good as it gets.

Pretty much everyone – even the local government officials – defecates and urinates in the open. Drugs, prostitution and armed robbery are the main industries… Next we visited a local brothel. The women who lived there talked with us about the U.N. soldiers who have sex with the child prostitutes and beat the older women, and then leave without paying… But perhaps the most revelatory portions of our trip to Liberia came from meeting the major warlords of the nation’s civil wars. There’s a tradition in Liberian militias of taking on extravagant noms de guerre. Hence, our subjects were named General Bin Laden, General Rambo and General Butt Naked. The ulatter, in particular, was one of the most notorious Liberian warlords. He claims to have personally killed 20,000 people including babies, and to have sometimes cannibalized his victims.

Footage from Liberia here. Malaria, AIDS, rape, murder, prostitution, cannibalism, and Obama supporters squatting on the beach. It’s all very sad. As R.L. Dabney said centuries ago, black women, without white paternalism, become “the besotted victims of brutal passions.” We wish that no one in the world had to live like this, but our first duty is to our own people. We must pledge that only over our dead bodies will our children be considered the equals of the subjects of these videos. As Dabney also wrote, black women “breed the future incubus of your descendants.”

Theodore Roosevelt’s contention that the United States only has room for one flag and one language is racist.

Cheering for Brett Favre is racist.

Reliability is racist.

Forgetfulness is racist. Bad news for the elderly.

Not wanting Iran invaded is racist.

Everyone deserves respect, says Katie Couric, except racists.

If you think saying the word “Negro” is wicked, vile racism, don’t ever refer to “those folks” in front of Chicago County Commissioner Deborah Sims.

I’m offended. “Those folks?” If that isn’t the most racist statement that’s ever been made in this board… You know, I’m not a person who…calls people names, but you are the worst person I think I have ever seen!

That’s an actual quote. You might recall that “I’m Ross, You’re the Boss” Perot once addressed Negroids as “you people,” which caused them to make more noise than welfare queens and pickaninnies shouting for paternity rewards on the Maury Povich show. I can’t decide if I like “You-People-Americans” or “Kaffirnated-Americans” better.

This 1921 headline was unusual in that the New York Times printed something true: “Negroes a Problem in South Africa.”

Sarah Palin calls the Spanish word for black “unacceptable.” Well, I guess she doesn’t hear much Spanish up in Alaska. James does an excellent job here of expounding on the wonders of black “conservatism.” He writes: “If [whites] want to hear about ‘racism’ and what’s good for blacks all the time, they can watch MSNBC. And the movement eventually fizzles out, just as the Tea Party movement will.” Well, no sooner did I read this than I heard Glenn Beck say something hilarious. He’s now looking for a way to “restore honor,” which is a flowery way of beating Hannity and O’Reilly in the ratings by banking on his enthusiastic Tea Party supporters, most of whom want him to run for president. He said the other day, in an interview with Don Imus, that the last big Tea Party was held in front of the Capitol, but conservatives know that no honor is to be found there. So Beck is going to lead his flock back to first principles by hosting a big MLK rally in front of the Lincoln Memorial, at the other end of the Mall. This is how to restore honor, he said. He was serious, which made it even funnier.

Obama means “black.”

According to a black wunderkind at the Washington Post, criticizing John Edwards is like calling him a “nigger” or dragging him behind a pickup truck.

During Black History Month, Knoxville Negroes wax nostalgic about living like apes in squalor. A pig to the mire, a dog to his vomit.

Affirmative Action is creating jobs, and jobs are good for the economy.

This theory, that slaves did not build the pyramids, is very interesting. The Hebrew slaves built storage cities for the Egyptians, not pyramids. Though there was an abundance of black slaves in Egypt, it’s difficult to imagine them building anything. I’ve never even met a black general contractor. But maybe everything I know about history is wrong. I just learned that the Anglo-Saxons were black! And the knights of the Crusades were “black Jews.” And the word “Scotland” means “black son,” or something. Blacks also invented chess and Greek dancing. And “Plantagenet” is pronounced “Plantagenic.” There’s pretty much nothing you can’t learn on Youtube.

Racists used to believe that Christian children needed Christian education, but that outdated way of thinking causes the youngsters to miss out on a variety of motivational speeches. It’s best to leave things like “education” to the experts.

The Department of Health and Human Services finally admits that Head Start is a colossal failure that has cost hundreds of billions of dollars. “Out of 44 separate cognitive tests given to former Head Start students at the end of the first grade, only two showed even marginally significant effects.” They seemed so sure that they could turn black kids white if they could get to them soon enough. Well, I hope you don’t miss the money. The important thing is that liberals care enough to dip into your paycheck, even if they never produce results. (This is what aid for Haiti is all about too.)

White teenagers used to have vocabularies of tens of thousands of words before reaching age 16. Now it’s down to 800, and about a hundred of those are variations on the word “like.” Keep in mind that over $10,000 is being spent on each of these dummies every year for “education.”

“Every schoolboy knows who imprisoned Montezuma, and who strangled Atahualpa,” wrote Lord Macaulay 168 years ago. Schoolkids don’t even know how to spell these words now. They know all about Lincoln, King, Parks, Tubman, Carver, and Sojourner Truth though.

Bill Gates’s billion-dollar scholarship endowment is off-limits to white students. “Students are eligible to be considered for a GMS scholarship if they are African American, American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian and Pacific Islander American, or Hispanic American.” I wonder when King’s I-Have-a-Dreamworld speech, about the content of character rather than the color of skin, is going to take effect.

The rebirth of sportsmanship. This new white basketball league is being formed to get away from Negro “street-ball” and return to “fundamental basketball.” I wonder how few in number we must become before the Tolerant will indulge us and allow us to have our own institutions. I propose a White Entertainment Television channel stat.

With the whole house of cards about to topple, the black president has his priorities.

Michelle Obama has her priorities too: 60 new outfits in 79 days. I wonder where the peasants take their dry cleaning.

One of Obama’s appointees advocates, in all seriousness, banning conspiracy theories, taxing them, or mounting secret conspiracies against conspiracy theorists. There were some white racists and slaveowners who governed us a long time ago, and they gave us the First Amendment. You might have read about this in a book, but surely not in school.

Erroll Southers, the black man who was nominated to head the Transportion Security Administration (now withdrawn), is apparently a big fan of Jewfilms, where nuclear physicists look like supermodels, ebonic blacks are computer hackers, and Aryans are terrorists. He was asked in a 2008 interview: “Which home-grown terrorist groups pose the greatest danger to the U.S.?” His amazing answer:

Most of the domestic groups that we have to pay attention to here are white supremacist groups. They’re anti-government and in most cases anti-abortion. They are usually survivalist-type in nature, identity orientated. If you recall, Buford Furrow came to Los Angeles in, I believe, it was 1999. When he went to three different Jewish institutions, museums, and then wound up shooting people at a children’s community center, then shooting a Filipino postal worker later on. Matthew Hale, who’s the Pontifex Maximus of the World Church of the Creator out of Illinois, and Ben Smith, who went on a shooting spree in three different cities where he killed a number of African Americans and Jews and Asians that day. Those groups are groups that claim to be extremely anti-government and Christian-identity oriented.

I count two valid examples, and von Brunn could also be mentioned, out of tens of thousands of anti-white murderers. Lopsided isn’t the word.

Wilhelm Marr wrote of “the loathing Jews demonstrate for real work…their codified hatred against all non-Jews…[their subduction of] the monarchical, knightly, lumbering German by enabling him in his vices.” This next quote will make your knees tremble. It is a shot between the eyes of the Judeochristian West, as though Marr could look more than a hundred years into the future and see precisely what is happening to us.

Germanic indolence, Germanic stinginess, convenient Teutonic disdainfulness of expression are responsible [for the fact] that the agile and clever Israel now decides what one shall say and what not… You have turned the press over to them because you find brilliant frivolity more to your liking than moral fortitude… The Jewish people thrive because of their talents and you have been vanquished, as you should have been and as you have deserved a thousandfold…

We are no longer a match for this foreign tribe.

There is a very clear and simple reason why nominal Christians are no longer a match for racially-cohesive anti-Christs, and it is our mission in this world as Kinists to tell it. But Kevin MacDonald doesn’t seem to get it. He claims that “medieval Christianity tend[ed] to be bad for Jews” because it was “collectivist” and because it was a “strongly defined ingroup.” This is a badly half-digested interpretation of history, and it stems from failure to understand that “Europe is the Faith, and the Faith is Europe,” and idolaters were purposely driven out of it. This is why MacDonald implies that post-Enlightenment societies were every bit as successful as Christian societies in “develop[ing] cultures with a strong sense of national identity,” which is preposterous.

More quotes from Marr:

The Jew has no real religion, he has a business contract with Jehovah and pays his god with statutes and formulations and in return is charged with the pleasant task of exterminating all that is not Jewish…

Jewry will have to face a final, desperate assault particularly by Germanism, before it will achieve authoritarian dominance…

To comment on [Jewish] rituals is ‘hatred,’ but if the Jew takes it upon himself to pronounce the last word in our religious and state affairs, then it is quite a different matter…

Within less than four generations there will not be a single office in the land, including the highest, which will not have been usurped by the Jews.

While Kevin MacDonald rightly identifies the Jewish agenda for our dispossession, Sam Francis was a Burnhamite who believed that this was the work of a nameless, faceless managerial elite, whose agenda just so happened to be “perfectly congruent” with that of the Jews. He did say that Jews “serve as the cultural vanguard of the managerial class” and are instrumental in “public bureaucracies, mass labor unions, political parties, mass media, financial institutions, universities, foundations, and other organizations that [are] immense in size, scale, and technical complexity.” But he never gave sufficient reason for what motivates the managers. Not even money is a reason as good as the bond of blood. Race is the key to history, as Benjamin Disraeli said. Francis knew it but was unwilling to connect certain dots because he had to earn a living as a writer.

It’s always dangerous for unitarians, who have dualism on the brain, to write about weighty material like Christianity and the history of the white race. This is as true for race-worshipers as it is for Babelist Christians. Here’s a painful-to-read article by Tom Sunic that shows what I mean.

Whites are not naturally submissive to God, he writes, contrary to all of recorded history. As proof for the “tolerance” of pre-Christian Europeans, he mentions the Iliad, which is quite funny if you think about it for a moment. Sunic can be comforted that the Trojan War was never intended to convert anyone to faith in Jesus Christ or to “make the world safe for democracy.” The bloodshed was mercifully free of preaching and proselytizing.

When the “Semitic spiritual baggage of Christianity” rose like the sun over Europe, whites failed to see that “Yahweh is a merciless totalitarian god.” Sunic does his best to explain this Great Truth to us, and urges us to pay no attention to thousands of years of unprecedented prosperity and blessings. Christianity is dualistic rather than organic, he says, and merely “preaches individual salvation.” This is all quite false, of course, as millions of Europeans and the European diaspora have known for millennia. It can never be denied that whites are the most cooperative people on earth and have almost always exhibited a healthy balance between individual liberty and corporate duty. If this were not the case, we would be as communal as Chinese or as libertine as Negroes. In fact, the cold winter theory of intelligence has been formulated to explain why whites are so cooperative and why they expect everyone else in the world to be just as cooperative. Now Sunic claims that the faith which has transformed us (and there is no going back, as Flannery O’Connor knew) is strictly individualistic. But if salvation had ever been viewed as solely eternal and not temporal as well, Christianity would never have reached the starting gate, and the world as we know it would not exist.

After brutally misinterpreting Galatians 3:28, the most-raped verse in all of Scripture, Sunic proclaims, without any proof whatsoever, that Christianity is “a Universalist religion with a special mission to transform the Other into the Same.” He plays several tricks in this regard. He says Christian churches never endorsed miscegenation historically, but they never opposed it either. We white Southern Americans immediately think of our fathers, who opposed it to the death. Rather than draw attention to what would contradict his theory, Sunic points to libidinous Spanish and Portuguese, who eagerly bedded the natives.

“There is a race which, coming down through the centuries, enveloped with antagonistic influences and hostile nationalities, has stood out in perpetual protest against surrendering our principles by amalgamating with other peoples.” ~ John L. Girardeau

Reading Tom Sunic brings to mind the excuse of Charles Babbage for being at a loss for words: “I am not able to rightly apprehend the confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.”

To all enthusiastic Darwinists, atheists, and neo-pagans who would like to convince us that Our Lord Jesus Christ did not really come to seek and save His lost sheep, because they are not really lost, and who would like to argue that trust in our Savior has been a curse upon our people, we propose that proofs are more pleasing than platitudes. And for the sake of heaven, please inform us of our destination after we jettison Christianity. Where is this train going, and will there be tracks under it when it gets there?

Our misguided friends should ponder whether their morality is merely a chemical reaction. As author Marilynne Robinson has written,

[S]cience cannot serve in the place of religion because it cannot generate an ethics or a morality. It can give us no reason to prefer a child to a dog, or to choose honorable poverty over fraudulent wealth. It can give us no grounds for preferring what is excellent to what is sensationalistic… If, as the Darwinists assure us, there is only the natural world, then nothing can be alien to it, and our arrangements, however extravagantly they depart from the ways of other creatures, can never be called unnatural… We are to believe we are the dupes of the very reactions that make us judges of circumstance, and that make us free in relation to it.

Our atheist friends assure us that there is no proof for God, therefore He must not exist, therefore they are free to live as they wish. If they are Darwinists, they will say that evolution programs us to do what works, and this is why we form families and the like; acts that have the facade of selflessness but are actually fundamentally selfish in that we are each compelled to leave a legacy. This is, quite simply, amorality.

I love this line from CWNY: “Post-Christian Europe is hell, and we can’t vote hell away.”

There is a true statement (with reservations) at the bottom of this article: “Acceptance of macroevolutionary theory is not a precondition for the intelligent study of racial biology. It is perfectly possible to remain an unbeliever, skeptic, or agnostic about cosmology and ‘ape into man’ but still acknowledge the objective existence of human races and oppose white genocide because it is evil.” The only part that is disagreeable is the insinuation that cosmology objectively proves macroevolution, but some of us are too stubborn to accept it. Darwinists who pretend that they are solely driven by “science” are fooling themselves. The belief that the universe came into being from nothing, of its own accord, requires more blind faith than I am capable of stirring, but there can be no denying that it is a religious faith, blind or not. Moreover, on what basis can those who deny the existence of God and a metaphysical standard for law and morality believe that white genocide is evil? How can survival of the fittest be considered wrong or bad? Without God, there is no hope for us, and most certainly no hope for our race.

Michael Sheuer with some excellent statements aired live on C-SPAN, to the consternation of anti-Christs:

Israel is a country that is of no particular worth [strategically] to the United States… Their association with us is a negative for the United States… Why don’t we talk about that? Because AIPAC and other influential American Jewish groups are extraordinarily involved in the funding of American political campaigns and have the ability to reach out and make sure that people lose their jobs, or are otherwise hurt, if they dare to criticize Israel.

He says it’s a fact that Israel’s association with us is a negative, and he knows what he’s talking about. Jews caused him to lose a think tank job when he said candidate Obama was “doing what I call the Tel Aviv Two Step.”

Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic “strongly believes that Jews should enjoy the privilege of having their racial and ethnic motives exempt from criticism.” If you doubt it, see here, here, and here. Also see the film Defamation, made by a Jew in search of “anti-Semitism.” You’ll discover that there are Jews who don’t get floating holidays and who read articles that are disagreeable in their newspapers, both of which are blocks in a pyramid of unpleasantness that is capped with genocide.

Rush Limbaugh runs to the Jews for cover when he is accused by the ADL of anti-Semitism, because he knows that his career is on the line for offending Chosenites. The question is never asked, What gives these people the right to outlaw criticism of them? And why should white Christians care what anti-Christs think anyway? Why should we give a moment’s thought to their gutter religion and racist, terrorist state?

Commentary is “a magazine with a special mission to explain the Jewish community to itself… Jew to Jew.” Don’t try this at home, kids, because it’s racist unless you have Approved Genes.

A Jew who says accusing people of being “anti-Semitic” is “a trick” that Jews have perfected.

This is hilarious. When a Jew asks Mel Gibson why anyone should allow him to earn a living after he offended the most holy and sacred people on earth (not even humans really but more like gods), Gibson asks him, “Do you have a dog in this fight?” You can’t help but laugh when you realize that Gibson knows that only a Jew would raise the issue. No one else cares.

If retirement is not scrapped, there won’t be enough revenue to fight wars for Israel, the ethnostate of the wealthiest race in the world.

Here’s a Jew who believes that the “greatest mass murder in world history” (what about Stalin?) should remain uninvestigated. Instead, we should rely exclusively on testimony from former inmates, none of whom had anything to do with the planning and execution. “Try to imagine murder trials in which there are no bodies of victims, no autopsy reports, no expert opinions as to cause of death, no time of death, etc.!”

This is a funny line from one of the Holohoaxers: “To put the Holocaust in some separate category and to demand that it be there – to demand that we have more material evidence – is actually us somehow giving in to the Holocaust deniers by providing some sort of special evidence.” Evidence detracts from the mythology.

Jews are excellent writers of fiction. How do they think up these crazy stories?

A Jew liar named Moshe Peer says he was sent to the gas chamber at least six times. When asked how it could be true, given that the Nazis were expert killers, he fishes for an escape hatch from his lie: “Maybe children resist better, I don’t know.” At Bergen-Belsen, where there were no gas chambers, he says the corpses were strewn about on the ground, and the in-mates, who were given no food or water, turned to cannibalism. Where is Steven Spielberg when you need him? I smell an Academy Award.

Jew Norman Finkelstein is tired of his fellow Jews exhuming the bodies of his parents and parading them through the streets in order to extort money for every war that Israel wants to fight. To be silenced, Finkelstein has been fired from his professorship. He is not what you would call a Jew in good standing.

Oliver Stone is causing Jews to hyperventilate by depicting Hitler as a real man rather than a demon, but the end result will be to tame Stalin, which will only cement the exclusivity of the Holocaust. Stone is very clever.

To accuse these Jews of sterilizing Negroes would be anti-Semitic.

Jews hate Bible verses and call them unconstitutional. It’s amazing that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” has come to mean that no religious message of any kind can be witnessed under the state’s jurisdiction.

One of the ways in which Jews have subverted White Christian Culture is through music. In this clip, Jew fag Leonard Bernstein indoctrinates a group of young white kids on what makes American music “American.” Our music, he says, reflects “our great, varied, many-sided democracy… Think of all the races…from around the globe that make up our country.” (He lists only white countries.) Then he introduces fellow Jew fag Aaron Copland as a “real American composer.” (Naturally, Copland supported the Communist Party USA ticket during the 1936 presidential election.)

This event was held under the auspices of American Youth for Democracy which, until WWII reached its peak, was called the Young Communist League. One of the Negro Communists who belonged to it was Frank Marshall Davis, the Stalinist pedophile who, along with Jew Communist Saul Alinsky, mentored Barack Obama in red “community organizing.” Two other Negro Communists in the group were Langston Hughes and Adam Clayton Powell. These were men who paved the way for the most significant Negro Communist of all, Michael King. (Julian Bond, the high-yellow chairman of the NAACP, appreciatively calls King a “radical” who “sought a modified form of socialism for the United States.”)

In 1970, Tom Wolfe charged Bernstein with “radical chic” for hosting a fundraiser for the Black Panthers.

This cartoon appeared in the Chicago Tribune in 1934. In the lower left, you can see Jew Leon Trotsky writing the planks of the Roosevelt/Communist Manifesto. “It worked in Russia!” he says. There are also several Jews in the wagon, and Roosevelt himself was a Rosenfeld. Purely coincidental, I’m sure.

Does any of this sound familar? They’ve been doing this for a long time, and they’ve almost succeeded.

We now have over a thousand times more debt than gold.

“In the current hodge podge of abstract finance, it is easy to get lost in the numbers and lose sight of the forest for the trees. Which is why we provide the ultimate simplification: In calendar (not fiscal) 2009, the US grew its budget deficit by $1.47 trillion. In the same time, the Federal Reserve grew its securities holdings from $500 billion to $1.85 trillion, a $1.34 trillion increase. Keeping it simple: 91% of the budget deficit increase in 2009, under the authority of President Obama, was funded by the…United States.”

The second pope to ever visit a synagogue of Satan condemns Christians for the “scourge” (torture) of telling the truth about Talmudists, which he calls “anti-Judaism”! Hoffman explains:

Christ was scourged at the pillar and we are supposed to believe that the rabbis are scourged by telling them the truth about their Bible-nullifying oral tradition (Torah shebeal peh) and Babylonian superstitions.

The pope, who as a much ballyhooed scholar certainly knows better, nevertheless proceeds to deceive by conflating the religion of rabbinic Judaism, which destroys the word of God, with the Old Testament religion itself.

The Bible tells us that light has no fellowship with darkness, but the pope gushes about the “closeness and spiritual fraternity” that Christians share with anti-Christs, and of “our common roots, our history and the rich spiritual patrimony that we share.” He says we have this “profound bond” with the Jews of today, who have no spiritual descent whatsoever from the ancient Hebrews, and only a claimed but likely false descent from them by blood. He therefore infers salvation by race, which is not Christianity at all but rather Holocaustianity. If you harbor any doubts, you will be floored by the evil implications of this statement from the pope:

The Jewish faith, unlike other non-Christian religions, is already a response to God’s revelation in the Old Covenant. To the Jews “belong the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises; to them belong the patriarchs and of their race, according to the flesh is the Christ” (Rom 9:4-5), “for the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable!” (Rom 11:29)

Read that a few times until you understand the spiritual and physical connections he is drawing. (It’s the same as what John Hagee is teaching, but Hagee is actually more consistent; he is forced to conclude that “Jesus did not come to earth to be the Messiah,” and the Jews did not therefore reject the Messiah.) Because of this requisite “solidarity,” says the pope, Christians must promote “a renewed respect for the [false] Jewish interpretation of the Old Testament.” He even supports a sort of Noahidism that is binding “for all of humanity.” He teaches that “the living covenant between God and the Jewish people is irrevocable, and that the charge of deicide is utterly baseless.” This man is a rabid wolf in the clothing of an ostentatious sheep. I feel guilty even writing the word “pope” because it means “father.”

Norway pays the price for being colorblind. Bringing this to the attention of the public is “controversial,” says Oslo Police Woman.

Westergaard, the BBC, and the entire Western world take it for granted that he must live for the rest of his life under security. It doesn’t occur to them for even a hundredth of a second that a Muslim community which presents such threats to the Danish people and Danish liberties should not be in Denmark.”

One-fifth of the Swedish population is now foreign.

French president Jew Sarkozy is hoping for the same fate to befall France. As the first non-French president of France, he says the French have a duty to “métissage” (miscegenate).

Concretely, this means giving preference to minorities in job hiring and prosecuting those who do not comply. In other words, affirmative action as a government policy from which none are exempt.

In his message Sarkozy insisted that the French people must change, that there will be dire consequences if they don’t, and that not to intermarry racially is bad for the survival of the country.

You could boil everything said and done by Jews down to one basic theme: Whites must change. Truly, it’s either them or us.

\

Agricultural workers in Italy are shocked that Italians are retaliating over lost jobs. The commentariat chimes in to say that the migrants are being “ethnically cleansed” by the Italian version of the “Ku Klux Klan,” as though jobs should be freely given by any business that wants to save money. Then the pope chimes in with more irrelevant statements, such as: “An immigrant is a human being… God loves him as God loves me… He is a person to respect… We have to go to the heart of the problem, of the significance of the human being.” If only the “KKK” had realized that they were running human beings out of town!

I have conservative nationalist literature dating as far back as 1979 in which the reader is urged to stop illegal and legal colored immigration by writing to his local congressmen. Why do such actions never work? Because we cannot stop an invasion by placing a form of government above the interests of our people. The cry should be, ‘In the name of our God and our people, this invasion must be stopped!’ Fortunately, Alfred the Great didn’t have a congressman to write to; if he had, he never would have become Alfred the Great.”

“Are we to bring into the body politic eight or ten million Asiatics so different from us in race and history that amalgamation is impossible? Are they to share with us in making the laws and shaping the destiny of this nation? No republican of prominence has been bold enough to advocate such a proposition.” ~ William Jennings Bryan

The Aristotelian view of abstractions.

Not only is the Aristotelian view incorrect, it is profoundly destructive and dangerous. One need only repeat the Aristotelian view often enough, taken to sufficiently great extremes, to destroy the basis of all human knowledge. The fallacy of the Aristotelian view of abstractions becomes obvious if I say, “There is no such thing as courage, only individual acts of courage,” or “There is no such thing as the complete works of Shakespeare, only the individual words which make up these works”…

Common variants include the following:

“There is no such thing as the nation, only individual members of the nation.”

“There is no such thing as society, only individual members of society.”

“There is no such thing as the American people, only individual American citizens.”

“There is no such thing as the White race, only individual white people.”

You might notice that this also relates to Tom Sunic’s fallacious view of Christianity.

California joins Arizona, Hawaii, Maryland, Nevada, New Mexico, and Texas as states where diversities are now the majority. Florida is almost there.

“Immigrants are 21 percent of the uninsured but only 7 percent of the population. This means white folks on Medicare or headed there will see benefits curtailed, while new arrivals from the Third World, whence almost all immigrants come, get taxpayer-subsidized health insurance. Any wonder why all those tea-party and town-hall protests seem to be made up of angry white folks?” ~ Pat Buchanan

The sanctuary given over to aliens.”

Half of all young blacks in England are unemployed.

America exists solely for the purpose of allowing immigrants to earn money.” It’s racist to think of Americans being of a particular tribe with property of their own.

What do these liberals mean by “our” when they say “our daughters should not be cut”?

Through the Blood.

Who do liberals and blacks routinely blame for all the ills of the world? White people, of course. And to whom do blacks and liberals appeal for aid? Let’s take a page from Frank Capra’s It’s a Wonderful Life script and imagine a world without white people. Would such a world be a happy paradise of blended brown people? Well, you wouldn’t have to worry about earthquake relief efforts any more, because there would be no concept of charitable outreach in the blended brown world. The idea of relieving someone else’s misery would be as inconceivable as self-propelled flight…

The post-Christian European still engages in feel-good charity, the charity that stems from human pride, while the people of color continue to regard charity as an entitlement to be had on demand…

The European, because of his union with Christ, loved his kith and kin with a far greater intensity than the savage races who did not regard each and every individual soul as a personality of “eternal moment.” Ties of family and blood were doubly important to the European, because it was through those human ties of blood that Christ entered the world…

Why is it that anywhere the idea that “every man is our kith and kin” flourishes, as in the egalitarian United States and the former Soviet Union, there are abortuaries and gulags? Perhaps it is because saving grace comes to us through our ties to kith and kin and not via the medium of generic, diverse humanity.

In other words, Jesus is a Kinist.

Jew Ben Wattenberg has a good line about expecting too much from minorities: “If I own a horse, that horse will not survive long if, under the delusion that it is a unicorn, I insist on giving it stardust to eat and moonbeams to drink.” But in response to this Jew’s genocidal wishfulness about America being the world’s First Universal Nation, Chilton Williamson writes: “Soon perhaps he will suggest changing the printing on our currency from ‘In God We Trust’ to ‘God We Are.’” That’s the way to think like a Talmudist.

According to NPR, one-third of women in the military have been raped. How is feminism working out for you gals?

In praise of women with curves.

“While there are plenty of sites for blacks seeking blacks, and whites and blacks seeking each other, there don’t appear to be any dating sites for whites seeking other whites. In fact, when reclusive publishing heir William Regnery proposed creating such a dating site in 2004, he was attacked for it.”

Fundamentalist Mormons prove that white people can still thrive, even if they’re idolaters.

If 99% of your town shares your race, language and religion you may end up believing that the biggest difference you could have with a human being is over what the tax rate should be.” ~ Richard Hoste

Race suddenly becomes important in stories about white criminals.

The kikenmedia plays into the hands of “racists” when it fails to censor black behavior, says the Huffington Post.

MSNBC is all about diversity…for others.

Thirty percent of megachurches have racial integration of 20 percent or more, which is very high for churches.

Funny how when blacks talk “about race in general,” it never fails to be cosmopolitan in spirit but rooted in black self-interest; it’s never “about race in general.” Likewise, liberals who seek racial “dialogue” never seek dialogue from us.

In Finland, “just visiting a racist website would be enough to sentence someone to 4 years in prison.” This is what happens when you “liberate” yourself from God’s law. The Ten Commandments of God are replaced by the 10,000 commandments of men, which are disproportionate and unjust.

Saudi women are buying expensive placenta injections to lighten their skin.

Beautiful White art, for children no less.

White music played for a sea of white faces.

The ‘pro-life’ movement has aborted itself.” Christians refuse to admit that the abortion industry is simply another facet of the genocide of our people. Even when it’s clearly explained to them, they refuse to admit it or do anything about it. As this excellent post from CLR shows, courage is the prince of virtues, for without it no other virtues are possible.

The latest target of the Tolerant is Andre Bauer, Lt. Governor of South Carolina, for having too much common sense. Bauer says what we all know to be true, that what you subsidize will grow, and what you tax will diminish. But saying that teenage mothers should not be subsidized is the same as saying that white money should be withheld from blacks, which is gloriously racist.

Is it merely a coincidence that the United States flag bears a striking resemblance to the British East India Company flag?

No African, Asian, Arab, Caribbean, or Latino “Briton” is eligible to assume the role of British head of state.

Get your stab vest for the World Cup in South Africa. The important thing is that apartheid has ended, because mass murders are fine, but racism is really bad.

Blacks are at higher risk of diabetes because they metabolize sugar differently than whites.

A long article on Kent Hovind.

This is a very interesting site showing Bob Jones University race correspondence.

“The ADL and SPLC must be very proud to have a person like Perez Hilton in their corner.”

Not to mention Jeffrey Imm, who is trying to shut down this year’s Amren conference in the name of “love.” It’s actually amusing to hear him talk because he rattles off so many slogans and buzzwords that he could stretch two substantial sentences out to a half hour. He must have a seminary degree. Watch this. It’s fascinating that he can rationalize revoking our constitutional rights in the name of liberty and equality, which are opposite concepts.

I’m reluctant to even use the words “constitutional rights,” because Americans today have forgotten (and have not been told) that our founding fathers considered these rights to be given by God, and the Constitution merely listed them and prevented the government from interfering with them. We should have known that we would lose our Constitution the day we came to think that a piece of paper is all that stands between us and our dispossession.

As for love, we have instructions in the second table of the Ten Commandments. Dr. R.J. Rushdoony knew that love “is not an emotional attitude but a keeping of the law in relation to our neighbor. This means respecting his right to life (Thou shalt not kill), the sanctity of his home (Thou shalt not commit adultery), and his property (Thou shalt not steal), and his reputation (Thou shalt not bear false witness), and finally, respecting these things in thought (Thou shalt not covet) as well as in deed.” Our people are victimized by these sins every day.

Ted Olson is making a consistent case for Equality. He’s correct that fag marriage is a necessity according to the illegal 14th Amendment, and “conservatives” are too blind to see the ramifications of their cheering after the South was vanquished.

The best thing a Jew ever wrote:

[W]e must always remember, we must never forget, we must put in the dock and hang higher than Haman, those who, in modern times, opened the Pandora’s Box of genocide and the extermination of civilians: Sherman, Grant, and Lincoln.

Perhaps, some day, their statues, like Lenin’s in Russia, will be toppled and melted down; their insignias and battle flags will be desecrated, their war songs tossed into the fire. And then Davis and Lee and Jackson and Forrest, and all the heroes of the South, “Dixie” and the Stars and Bars, will once again be truly honored and remembered.

Twitter Digg Delicious Stumbleupon Technorati Facebook

10 Responses to “If You Seek the Monument to Our Folly”

  1. Regarding KMAc’s and Tom Sunic’s scholarship.

    Here I point out that MacDonald does not actually have any training or background as a HISTORIAN:

    “In other words, MacDonald probably isn’t such an expert on the fine details of historical and ideological issues as many people believe him to be. He is frankly out of his field (and sometimes out of his depth), a biologist-psychologist trying to do political science.”
    http://www.originaldissent.com/forums/showpost.php?p=51210&postcount=72

    As for Tom Sunic, I saw in his article that he still believes that “two-thirds” of Germany’s population perished in the Thirty Years War – modern scholarship has proven otherwise:

    “Earlier estimates that the war had destroyed half or two-thirds of the German population are no longer accepted. More recent estimates are much more conservative, suggesting that the population of the Holy Roman Empire may have declined by about 15 to 20 per cent, from some 20 million before the war to about 16 or 17 million after it.”

    http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=27063&highlight=richelieu

    As we can see from this example (I could pick out many others), Sunic was relying on quite dated scholarship to make a “holohoax” claim of his own. Makes you question his expertise on other matters as well.

  2. Sunic also cited another seriously overrated guy:

    “The unavoidable racialist thinker Hans Günther — a man of staggering erudition and knowledgeable not only of the laws of heredity, but also of comparative religions — reminds us that the submissive and slavish relation of man to God is especially characteristic of Semitic peoples.”

    See below for a putdown of Günther’s scholarship – it was written in still relatively un-PC era (1961) by a scholar who was himself suspected of Fascist sympathies (A. James Gregor):

    http://dienekes.110mb.com/texts/nordicism_revisited.pdf

    Many examples of Günther’s childish tendentiousness are given. It is telling that Sunic is such an unreserved fan of his.

  3. LOLOLOL!

    “Give in to the dark side.”

    “I AM your Father = Io sono tuo PAPA!”

    NOW, I know why that man Benedict [Arnold] creeps me out. He’s the Dark Lord. Run fast, run far.

    Bravo!

  4. If Semitic peoples are characteristic of submissive and slavish relation to God, it explains why many believe that Europeans are descended from them – because more than all other people on earth, the will of our people has submitted to the will of Christ. Sunic may sneer at this, but what does he propose as an alternative? We’re going to serve something. It is currently the tyranny of the majority.

    I’m just always fascinated by those who work themselves into a panic over the threat of theocracy – as if liberty is truly possible otherwise. Do we really have fewer laws now that we’ve wiped the books clean of God’s laws? Of course not, just the opposite.

  5. With the fall of Christianity came the rise of Marxism, total war, multiculturalism, and a legion of other plagues. Coincidence?

    Excellent post, lots of interesting links and good commentary.

  6. Benedict as Darth Sidious.

    He has a liking for hats does that Benedict – the fireman’s hat, the santa hat, the Tyrolean hat. Don’t miss the one of him flashing the ‘il cornuto’ with both hands! Folks these Luciferians just can’t stop themselves. They just gotta do them horns.

    The website Tradition in Action has an entire photo file on Benedict’s hats. And he may yet don the cloak of a Darth Lord of the Sith for the cameras. And he won’t be forgetting his designer sunglasses if he does.

    http://www.traditioninaction.org/RevolutionPhotos/A190rcRatzHats.htm.

    The Church Revolution in Pictures section at http://www.traditioninaction.org is worth viewing.

    Lot’s of pix of Benedict in that file:

    paying homage to the UN and expressing admiration for the Masonic Document ‘the Rights of Man’ (April 18, 2008) Failed to mention the only name given under heaven by which men can be saved. (A mere oversight to be sure)

    defying the Wrath of God and praying at the Wailing Wall with the rabbis

    http://www.traditioninaction.org/RevolutionPhotos/A314rcWailingWall.html.

    venerating the torah scrolls in the New York synagogue

    The world will construe all of this according to its lights. Catholics must construe according to the mind of the Church – which has not been silent on this ‘type of thing’.

    The Apostolic Constitution of Pope Paul IV given on Feb 15, 1559 infallibly declares:

    Paul, Bishop, servant of the servants of God, for a perpetual remembrance

    6. Adding that if at anytime it will be found that some bishop, even conducting himself as an archbishop or patriarch or already mentioned cardinal of the Roman church, even, as shown, a legate or even a Roman Pontiff before his promtion or assumption as cardinal or a Roman Pontiff had deviated from the Catholic faith or fallen into some heresy, before his promition or assumption as Cardinal or as Roman Pontiff, that promotion or assumption concerning him, even if made in concord and from the unanimous assent of all the cardinals, is null, void and worthless. Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio, ex cathedra.

    Benedict has been praising the totally heretical ‘Rights of Man’ since the robber council of Vatican II.

    The correct term for Benedict is antipope – of which there have been at least 40 by name in the long history of the Church. One of them, Hippolytus even became a saint. But he was never the pope even though he acted invalidly in that office for awhile.

    Roman Catholics are not excused from holding up the lens of the Church’s own magisterium to Benedict, his heresies and scandals. Roman Catholics are not excused from looking at this debacle with the mind of the Church and drawing the only conclusion.

    How many souls following this antiChrist is he going to drag to hell?

    Our Lady of La Salette, pray for the Holy Father in exile.

    “Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of the AntiChrist”

  7. Women with curves….hmmm… crooksandliars would have us believe that common people believe that the voluptuous model woman is more desirable of the two pictured. Don’t they know that a woman must have adequate bodyfat to support a healthy pregnancy?! We wouldn’t want more white women trying to have healthy babies instead of being walking skeletons, would we?

  8. That’s a good point. I was also just thinking of a story that ran recently about a married couple who has learned to be asexual. Jews LOVE stories about white people engaging in aberrant behavior. Basically, anything that causes fewer white people in the world is Pulitzer material.

    I have no doubt that stick figure models find it easier to slip into any kind of clothing, but there is a huge parasitical benefit in requiring beautiful women to kill off their genes by robbing them of motherhood and at the same time imprinting an idea of beauty on the general public that is anything but. Real women have hips and curves, and there is no “sexy” without hips and curves.

    Notice that Jew pornographers portray curvaceous women, but this is because their work is directed at men, yet with the same purpose – of killing healthy white relations. This will be covered in the next post.

  9. It’s always dangerous to read the philosophical musings of someone who starts off by admitting that he has read nothing and knows nothing of philosophy. The author’s description of Plato and Aristotle at the link you provide would get an F in a Freshman philosophy course.

    The Aristotilean philosophy is realism, not rationalism, and realism is exactly what we need to rediscover. We cannot build our future upon ignorance of our heritage, including Aristotle. Despite what CWNY may claim, while Walter Scott may have his place, it is not as a substitute for Aquinas.

Leave a Reply

 characters available

Switch to our mobile site