Doug Phillips flew a crew to the devastated island of Haiti to film himself as he walked the streets, urging white American Christian families back home to adopt orphaned black children.
In one video, we see that the company’s Jeep is stuck in a rut and must be pushed out. If not for the courage of the fearless crew, the footage would be lost. The footage would be lost.
Phillips has a bellyful to say against UNICEF, the laws of Haiti, and anyone else who gets in the way of his New Gospel. He’s particularly incensed that those baptist child smugglers were jailed. The baptists (“We jess wanna hep yoo”) were in fact taking advantage of vulnerable families and exploiting them. It matters not that the Haitian parents gave their children willingly. It’s against the law to help anyone cross a border without proper authorization. Judeochristians simply don’t care about these very important laws, which is also why they support amnesty for wetbacks. What about the language barrier? Did these parents really understand that they would never see their sons and daughters again? According to the NYT, some of the parents were assured that their children would be educated in the Dominican Republic, not flown to America to be stripped of their names and heritage. We know that many of the Haitian parents are even now placing their children in orphanages just so they can be fed.
Were there no close relatives who could have cared for the children? There is apparently no time to find out when one is preaching the gospel of Judeojesus. Even though a great tragedy had occurred, aid was being given, and there was no reason for anyone to circumvent the law. This is why aid organizations like UNICEF and the Red Cross, not to mention orphanages, exist. But Phillips dismisses everything UNICEF has to say simply because they support abortion. The fact remains that more than 80% of child trafficking occurs with the consent of the child’s parents. Since there are no international laws to prevent the sale of children, child prostitution, or trafficking, it becomes all the more important to prevent anyone, no matter how well-intentioned, from smuggling children across borders.
One of the Judeobaptists, Laura Silsby, admitted that she was breaking the law, but that’s okay, because her group was “just trying to do the right thing,” and “our hearts were in the right place.” Her heart is more important than the law, apparently. Do race-mixing Judeochristians even recognize the existence of borders?
And if your intention is to bring these children to the DR and put them up for adoption to “loving Christian homes,” how does telling their parents they are just going to get an education and can “come back to Haiti to visit” make you much different than the labor or sex trafficker who promises a woman that she is going to find lucrative work abroad in a new industry, only to be trafficked for other purposes? While these children might be adopted to “good homes” that does not obviate the lies, deception and abduction in which the group engaged to secure access to these children.
It’s admirable to see white folks dig into their own empty coffers and give freely to those in need, even to complete strangers. But which of our missionary ancestors, who took the gospel to the darkest corners of the globe, ever advocated adopting children of foreign races? The new evangelism is different because it operates on the premise of white supremacism; the goal is to grow the kingdom of God by removing children from “obviously inferior” circumstances (meaning people) and raise them in white homes. The objects of their compassion are really just props to fuel their own vanity.
The new evangelists have resigned themselves quietly to the fact that other races are not capable of maintaining orthodox religion. Therefore, if the tree of Equality is ever to bear fruit, whites must take charge and remove black children from black families, as Australians once did to Aborigines, even though this harms all parties involved. (Edmund Burke condemned the “doctrine of the equality of all men, which has been preached by knavery, and so greedily adopted by malice, envy, and cunning.”)
The objectives are no longer kept secret. Russell Moore, senior vice president for academic administration and dean of the School of Theology at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, is critical of the Idaho baptists for attempting to smuggle children out of Haiti because it “could give a black eye to a budding movement of evangelicals who view adoption as a means of spreading the gospel.”
We predict a bitter backlash from this misguided do-goodism which is being gussied up as the work of the Holy Spirit.
There are probably many factors contributing to why the traffickers were released from jail, but it stands to reason that this will serve as an invitation for sex slavers and drug runners and other scum.
It is not hard to imagine the Chinese, some decades hence, sitting astride the world after Jew-usury has collapsed the West, coming to America to “liberate” (not “enslave”) white children from the “bondage” of Christian parents who are incapable of providing for them. (Someone could write a very believable work of fiction about this. White genes are highly coveted throughout the world.)
Viewed from this perspective, it is easy to see the white supremacist element at work in the adoption-evangelism of the new, false gospel, with the “better life” defined as being dependent on white people. This is only true materially; it is never better for a child to be separated from his parents and his people, even if the parents, in a fit of desperation, believe it to be true. But white, Judeochristian supremacists are unable to comprehend this. After all, they’re so full of love. Anthea Butler writes:
These ten do-gooders walked into the trap many well meaning white evangelical Christians fall into: those poor brown/black/yellow/red people need My help. Jesus wants Me to help them. To much of White American Evangelical Christianity the We often means Me. It’s what God called Me to do. It’s what God would want Me to do. The problem with the Me mentality of much of conservative Evangelical Christianity is that they often can’t see the We—the people of Haiti—who love their kids so much they’re willing to let some white people who claim to be “Christians” take them away to what they promise will be “a better life.”
This is because race-mixing neo-Christians believe that nationhood and ethnic solidarity must be delegitimized in favor of a coffee-colored race of the world and absolute (i.e., false) unity.
There have been many, many parents in such desperate straits that they would sell one or more of their children to buy food to live for another week. Would Doug Phillips advocate purchasing these slaves, even when slavery is illegal, in order to “help” the children? I would love to know the answer. And would he be willing to serve as a sterling example to others by taking the lead in “adopting” a Haitian or two into the Phillips family? Or is this a burden for others to bear?
What in the name of all that is holy?
As Generation5 points out, Phillips is hoping for jobs to magically appear for Haitian men, but they won’t, for the same reason that Zimbabwe has lost its wealth. Whites will dominate any free market that is truly free, because of IQ. But in Haiti, no one is even sure who owns what. Far from there being a free market, there is hardly any evidence of property rights. “Is there any indication that the racist attitudes of Haitians towards the property rights of white people can be reformed?” If not, money given to Haitians to rebuild and plant will be wasted.
The natural, fallen human instinct is to respond with envy and accuse the more successful group of exploitation, much like many blacks here in the US whine about their lack of success and blame it on racism. The only way to square this circle is either to A) talk openly about the reality of white advantages and hope that this explanation assuages blacks’ envy and hatred or B) pursue racial separation as a means of preventing the opportunity for conflict. Haiti has in its history chosen B), through murderous means, with horrible consequences for her people.
White people have unfortunately never met a problem that they thought could not be solved by throwing money at it. It rarely occurs to them that misguided aid can impoverish both the givers and the takers. Go ahead, check back in five or ten years and see if the “racists” were correct. Even though we now have no money, few of us have the sense to realize that there has been no return on the trillions that have been wasted.
Let’s waste some more and call it “compassion.”
To suggest that the best thing that outsiders can do once the immediate rescue work is finished, and the water is flowing, is to leave the Haitians to rebuild their own country is merely to invite shrill accusations of racism. However, you might have forgotten that the Chinese were hit by an earthquake two years ago. It killed 68,712 people, left 17,921 missing, with more than 374,000 injured and at least 15 million homeless.
Even if those figures are invented—and I suspect they’re not—they bespeak the existence of a government that can count, which is more than Haiti has ever had. (Cue hisses of “racist!” at this irrefutable truth)…
Pity is the most human of emotions. It is also one of the most ruinous. It robs its subjects of responsibility, initiative, independence, courage, self-respect and will: hence the fate of so many African countries. Yet no pity rescued Poland or Italy or the Ukraine or Germany or Japan after the Second World War. Their peoples alone did.
Even in our land of material plenty, blacks responded to Hurricane Katrina with threats against whites who were perceived as being reluctant to throw more money at them. All attention was focused on New Orleans, even though the hurricane did not hit the city directly. It hit Mississippi, where white folks suffered in silence and worked hard to rebuild. This story never changes.
You absolutely must read Steven Van Zandt’s solution for Haiti’s future. It would be funny if it had not already been tried again and again for decades. White liberals are inspiring in a grotesque sort of way, because they never lose hope that by the power of sheer will, they can transform anyone in the world to someone just like them.
Haiti doesn’t need to be rebuilt. Haiti needs to be reimagined.
The Haitian people need a partnership with a group of individuals that will help them, for the first time in their existence, establish a state-of-the-art infrastructure that will last 100 years, unencumbered by political and economic corruption. Then let the ingenuity, work ethic and spirit of the people do the rest.
So it’s time to call on Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, Larry Ellison, Sergey Brin, Larry Page, Michael Dell, Jeff Bezos, Oprah Winfrey, Steve Jobs, Paul Allen, George Clooney, Robert Johnson, Angelina Jolie, Jay-Z, Brad Pitt, Wyclef Jean, John W. Thompson, Bono, Bruce Springsteen, the Beatles, Sean Combs, the Rolling Stones, Jonathan Demme, Steven Spielberg, George Lucas, David Geffen, James Cameron, John Lasseter, futurist architects and engineers, and anybody else with expertise, vision and passion to organize a summit of Haitian leaders, with Clinton as chairman, and design a new Haiti. Let’s make it the high-tech capital of the world.
We need to start solving problems permanently on this planet instead of wasting time, money and energy on temporary Band-Aids that make us feel good.
This horrible event will be all the more horrible if we don’t learn from it. Either tens of thousands of lives have been lost in vain, or they have left us the one chance to begin to build the archetypal country of the future.
There will never again be an opportunity so obvious or a people more deserving of a chance to prove what they can do.
There will never again be an opportunity to permanently turn the kleptocracy of Haiti into the high-tech capital of the world. Now you know why we have no money.
Jack Kemp, who died last year, told a group of Republicans years ago that Haiti would have one of the highest standards of living in the world in just five years if it would adopt the same business ethics as Hong Kong. When he was politely asked after the speech if he really meant what he said, Kemp bristled and snarled, “Not five years. FOUR YEARS! Next question, please.” This loon nearly became Vice President of the empire. I recall hearing him talk endlessly about “enterprise zones” in the hood. It was all wasted breath and wasted ink. Kemp fancied himself an expert on black people, having showered with some of them while in the NFL.
Few and far between are the inquiring minds who wonder why there is such a difference between Haiti and the Dominican Republic. Once again, the answer is found in the blood. In the DR, the people work very hard to separate themselves from the blackest among them, and classify themselves as criollo, metizo, trigueno, mulato, indio, havao, and cuarteron.
Generation5 has an excellent suggestion for white families who would like to have children but are unable to conceive: embryo adoption. (See reasonable objections at The Thinking Housewife.) There are almost no already-born white children available for adoption; it’s very expensive, no matter what the race; and non-white children should not belong to white families. But there are (unfortunately) an abundance of white embryos. As Christians, we believe that these are conceived persons whose lives are treated as nothing. Almost all of them are killed, yet I haven’t heard a single preacher encourage white families to take them and carry them to term as natural-born children. Instead, these families are encouraged to run off to Haiti or China to “adopt” strangers. If white families effectively participate in black procreation through adoption, what objection could there be to participating in white procreation by carrying white embryos to term? Not an easy question, but there is an easy answer: Love your race! Despise lying preachers.
Are “racist” white women more fertile, or does high fertility sharpen the racial senses? Either way, we’ll take it. It means that women are natural Kinists, and though they very often rebel against their instincts, they are truly repulsed by miscegenation when they are true to themselves.
“This Valentine’s Day,” we read in Time Magazine, “relatively few women on mainstream dating sites will bother to respond to overtures from men of Asian descent. Likewise, black women will be disproportionately snubbed by men of all races.”
It doesn’t help that the Black Belt is the most obese area of the country.
Even though 70% of professional athletes are black, Sports Illustrated has only once put a black woman on the cover of the swimsuit issue, and she’s a mulatto (Tyra Banks). Of the 18 models in the current issue, only two are black, and they don’t appear until page 140. There sure is a lot of racism out there.
If a billboard were to read, “White children are an endangered species,” how long do you think it would last in Atlanta? In 2006, an Amren attendee from New York told a Washington Post reporter that “European Christian Americans are an endangered species.” The ADL hate group successfully pressured his employer to fire him.
Speaking of Amren, though you would never be able to tell from Judaic media outlets, Jared Taylor has not been able to secure the alleged rights to speech and assembly for hundreds of his friends, one of whom is a member of the European Parliament. Here is a very good compendium of recent terrorism. Sadly, the event was canceled again.
“Is there freedom of speech and assembly in Virginia?” Suppose the tables were turned and racialists called in terrorist threats to a hotel where the NAACP or La Raza was meeting. Suppose that this was the NAACP’s fourth attempt to find a meeting place and each time the hotel canceled the agreement because of death threats. How many news outlets would not be covering the story? Cable news stations would never give the story a rest. It would be in every newspaper, even overseas. Obama’s oratory would be suffused with indignation as he dispatches the FBI and Justice Department and pledges to bring the heavy hand of justice down upon the terrorists. But the tables aren’t turned. We “racists” don’t have any rights, it is widely believed, and this is why almost no one knows a think about what has happened.
As Jared says, “If AmRen can be shut down this way then anyone can be shut down. The meatpackers meeting can be shut down by PETA.”
Sometimes love-mongers must resort to death threats. As long as the end result is spreading the love around, what could hurt? To make an omelet one must crack a few eggs, as the Commies used to say.
Leftists are always very concerned for the ability of rightists to do their jobs. Better to take those jobs away so that nobody gets hurt.
For them, “diversity” is merely a euphemism for the stigmatization and dispossession of whites by Jews and non-whites.
“Diversity” does not mean diversity of opinion. It means black leftists, lesbian leftists, Asian leftists, mestizo leftists, feminist leftists, etc. all working under the tutelage of Jewish leftists to root out every possible form of white racial consciousness.
“Diversity” does not mean that all races and ethnic groups should take pride in themselves and watch out for their interests. No, when whites do that, it is not “diversity,” it is “hate.” And the fanatical persecution of “hate” is what leftists call “tolerance”—and, presumably, “love” (they are all just snarling and sputtering with love).
“All of those in our movement, who engage in any level, are taking tremendous risks. The strategy of anti-fascists is to increase the costs of involvement to the point that people fear not just to take action but to even think forbidden thoughts or associate with those who do… White advocates are not just opponents of the system—we are the only opponents of the system.” You can call us the disloyal opposition.
“I believe it was Huey Long who famously said that when fascism comes to America, it will come in the guise of anti-fascism.”
Many thanks to Wikitopian for putting us at #2 on his list of the top ten pro-White sites. Oh, so close! Edged out by Occidental Dissent. But that’s like complaining that you’ve lost a swim meet to Michael Phelps. (OD was the first to break the Amren 2010 terrorism news.) And what a list! Every site on it is far better than this Zionist trash. Wikitopian pays us the very handsome compliment that we are “a welcome alternative to the repackaged humanism of contemporary Christian ‘leaders’ and [we defend] White America with the same honor and vigor that Christians once defended Europe.”
David Yeagley, the great-great-grandson of the Comanche leader Bad Eagle, calls us anti-Semites. Here is what the ADL calls the most anti-Semitic verses of the Bible. I guess we are then. Yeagley is a good man, though. He was going to be one of the speakers at the Amren conference this weekend.
No list of the kind that Wikitopian assembled would be complete without TOQ. Jew Leonard Zeskind writes:
The Occidental Quarterly, with half a dozen PhDs on its advisory board, has emerged as the central address for the most advanced strategic thinking among intellectual antisemites, scientific racists and anti-immigrant white nationalists.
And for Wilmot’s sake, bookmark this one!
If you doubt that the words “white” and “racist” are synonymous, read all about how to raise racist children:
Step One: Don’t talk about race. Don’t point out skin color. Be “color blind.”
Step Two: Actually, that’s it. There is no Step Two.
To make matters worse, religious fidelity is directly proportional to racism.
In general, the more devout the community, the greater the racism, according to the authors of the analysis, led by Wendy Wood, Provost Professor of Psychology and Business at USC College and the USC Marshall School of Business.
Just ask Keith Olbermann, who says that “prejudice and discrimination still sit, defeated, dormant, or virulent, somewhere in the soul of each white man in this country.” Well, this is encouraging news.
Celebrating Black History Month is racist.
Being born in Texas is racist. “The word ‘racist’ simply means white person. Period.”
Never color a train line yellow if it goes through an Asian community. This is racist!
Snowfall is an expression of white supremacy, says Ima Daike, a transgender, biracial, bisexual, bi-polar Jewish Hottentot.
“Racism” is healthy.
How to get rich in the gospel business.
The United Reformed Church has an anti-BNP plank: “The United Reformed Church believes support for extremist parties to be incompatible with Christian discipleship… [S]upport of parties that discriminate on racial grounds has no place amongst Christians.” We can expect many resolutions of this kind here in America now that pro-white parties are being formed. These impostors prove nothing from Scripture, of course. You’re just supposed to get on board with the modern idea that ethnic exclusion is forbidden in government, including family government. The moderator of the URC says: “Let us focus clearly on the truth that we are all members of one race – the human race. Within God’s Kingdom there is no place for racial hatred and I call upon us all to remain firm in our commitment to practise and promote racial justice and inclusion.” The assumption here is that ethnic interests never legitimately diverge within the human race, therefore no group of people has the right to determine its own course. To even suggest such a thing is “racial hatred.” Church property is off limits to such haters and “extremists,” but groups like the Boy Scouts, whose religion is patriotism, are more than welcome.
Presbyterian lunatics have just discovered, more than 40 years too late, that Equality is the gift that keeps on giving. Read on in stunned silence:
On the agenda is an overture rejecting a document on the sin of racism that some believe may be misused to promote gay ordination and other “same-sex causes”… The document partly declares “that separation, enmity and hatred between people and groups is sin which Christ has already conquered, and accordingly that anything which threatens this unity may have no place in the church and must be resisted.”
Notice that “separation” of any kind equals “hatred” and sin. As if this is not alarming enough, liberals are seeking to push this through as an amendment to the Confession. One presbytery correctly cautions that political opinions, convictions, ideals, and value judgments do not qualify as a confession of the church “for all times in all places.”
We will defeat these liars. Tomorrow Belongs to Me.
“Christianity without the cross is liberalism, and racial anemia is the result of liberalism.”
Go through the European’s history; everything the European ever did of lasting consequence was done because he kept faith with his God. Even if the neo-pagans could achieve their goal of a white-dominated society by 2020, who would want to live in such a world? A Godless Tower of Babel with whites at the top is still a Tower of Babel. What the faithful European wants to see is a renewal of the covenant between God and the European…
It will avail us nothing if we achieve equal rights within heathendom or if we teach “white history” without mentioning Christ. The European achieved world dominance because he sought and found the God above the gods of the colored tribes. Without his God, the European is a pathetic member of the rainbow coalition of colored peoples.
I wonder if our friend from Cambria was watching the opening ceremony of the Olympics when he wrote this. As always, the non-whites who attended the event were a tiny fraction, yet a large portion of the program was devoted to making Indians feel better about themselves, despite having nothing to do with the games in any respect. The reason for this is apparently because they were on the continent first, even though they weren’t, and as if this has anything to do with snowboarding.
According to Mulatto Gumbel, “any sport without gratuitously large numbers of Negroes is worthy of denigration instead of praise.” I wonder why he never says this about the game of golf. Could it have anything to do with Tiger “Where-My-Honeys-At” Woods?
Despite getting “high marks for diversity,” the NBA lost $400 million this year. We eagerly anticipate the new white basketball league.
Here’s why you won’t hear about the Pearcy Massacre through your local Yiddish news outlets.
How to make hot news items disappear.
Don’t forget: “white people, no matter how much they love black people, simply aren’t allowed to use a word that the average black person uses several times a day.” Don’t try to understand this; you’re just supposed to go along with it, as is true for the U.S. tax code. The last two lines of James’s post are comedic gold.
Leroy the Jungle Savage messes with the wrong grandfather while trying to keep it real. Nigga say, “Call me a ambalamps!”
A sensible black mayoral candidate who wants to bring back lynching.
Stereotypes are bad because they’re generally true.
It’s important to emphasize the positive. A stereotype has been avoided!
The black man’s favorite terrorist, Denmark Vesey. The mayor of Charleston calls him a hero.
The “president” of South Africa has fertilized his twentieth child with his seventh concubine, but the important thing is that apartheid has ended. Souldaddy Lovethang laments that there are those who “think that their culture is superior to others,” and this “is a problem we have in the world.” Indeed, indeed.
You can have equality or liberty, but you can’t have both. The loss of your freedoms is the price for not being “racist.”
Thirty years after Indians banned miscegenation (just wait until I tell my pastor!), straggling honkies are being kicked off the reservations. “They are people with no native ancestry at all.” Well, shit. I’ve said the same thing at town council meetings, and it never works.
Too many autistic children are white, which makes it more difficult to steal white money and give it to strangers.
Your country is destined to change, says Sarah Palin, which means that it’s not your country. It belongs to the world, not the American tribe.
“A mixed race shall settle in Ashdod, and I will cut off the pride of the Philistines.” ~ Zechariah 9:6
“And it shall be as the chased roe, and as a sheep that no man taketh up: they shall every man turn to his own people, and flee every one into his own land. Every one that is found shall be thrust through; and every one that is joined unto them shall fall by the sword. Their children also shall be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses shall be spoiled, and their wives ravished.” ~ Isaiah 13:14-16
“Look, conservatives, any candidate who is not speaking up explicitly and unreservedly for white people is not on your side, and will eventually betray you.” Write that down.
“Ask your ‘colorblind’ conservative friends who think race doesn’t matter just how long America can continue to be a world leader at this rate.”
Tom Tancredo proposes a literacy test for voters, seeing as how we’re now being governed by the upper class of Bangladesh, and those who applaud him are called “haters” with “white hoods.” It’s now “hate” to expect that those who are voting our future away from us can at least read? I thought that we, who wish to be governed by our own kind, as the Bible requires, are the haters.
One-half of all immigrants are on welfare. California, the largest state, is now 58% non-white. Therefore, it stands to reason that President Who’s-Your-Daddy has decreed a back door amnesty for illegal aliens from Haiti, even releasing Haitian illegal alien criminals! Lying preachers will applaud this because “the mission field is coming to us.” The Democrat Party will applaud it because the children these people bear will be new voters. Our ancestors are turning in their graves, but that’s because they were “racists.”
You’re not going to believe this, but a decent white family has been granted asylum.
Quota-industry “professionals” who laugh in their round trips to the bank.
It’s getting harder to keep score.
Crazy Uncle Tom Fleming strikes again. Just to show you how double-minded his Chronicles team can be, see this excellent article on secession by Pat Buchanan (which your children should know, if you want us to recognize them as educated), followed by this insanity by Alexander Cockburn. A commenter stings Crazy Uncle Tom where it counts:
I’ve always thought it strange that certain elements on the right will scream “racism” at people like Jared Taylor and then turn around and publish people like Cockburn.
Crazy Uncle Tom replies (spelling errors intact) that the Cockburn articles are free, and besides, the hallowed halls of impotent, colorblind paleoconservatism have no place for “bigots” like our ancestors:
How many errors–or are they lies–can one cram into a brief comment. First there is no alliance with Mr Cockburn, whom I met just once. We started taking his column because his syndicatemade gave us some free columns when Sam [Francis] died and whe continued because it stimulates discussion, at least among those capable of thinking. I don’t recall ever screaming raciism at Taylor. Why should I? He is a scientific racist. This does not disturb me. I have more than a few racist friends and according to all right thinking people I am also a bigot. But he is also an antiChristian and a man of some guile. He has many fine qualities–intelligence and courtesy–but after some experience I concluded he does far more harm than good. Most of his associates and followers are, with one or two exceptions, people I would not like to meet again. People who would visit our website to spew their lies.
Remember when it wasn’t considered “racist” to have all white people in an advertisement?
I can’t wait to hear lying, anti-gospel preachers explain to Wake Forest Assistant Professor of Psychology Lisa Kiang that ethnic bonds are not important.
I don’t think this or this could be shown on TV today. White people are no longer allowed to be involved in what’s really funny, meaning race humor. This is now the exclusive domain of blacks, Jews, and fags, or some combination of the three.
Obama is on the job! He has determined that our problem is not enough government.
He is on track to be the biggest spender in history, bigger than FDR. It’s all about hopeful change and changing hope.
“Since 1930, the federal government has run deficits in all but eight years.” You can see in the graphic that not enough is being stolen by the legal counterfeiters in D.C. to cover discretionary spending, and the debts are locked in. If this were the budget of a company, it would have to declare bankruptcy.
One dollar in 1913 was worth $21.57 in 2008 dollars. (The Federal Jew Reserve was established in 1913.)
Radical Muslims are gainfully employed by the U.S. military, but displaying a cross at the Air Force Academy is a hate crime that must be investigated forthwith.
Now, in addition to escorting little Afghan girls to school, we must prevent the Haitian economy from inflating. Next stop: the Brazilian “rainforest.” And after that, there are surely seals somewhere giving penguins hell. These injustices shall not stand!
Captain America sez: Tea Parties are racist. It looks like a Ron Paul campaign rally.
Tea Partiers are mass murderers, says Jew Kunstler.
All “subversives” in South Carolina are now required to register themselves with the Secretary of State. “There’s even a $5 filing fee.” I’m sure the definition of “subversive” will expand soon to include anyone disliked by Jews.
It’s the American Way: Require teachers to do the impossible and threaten them with job loss if they fail to accomplish it. The important thing is that we Americans care. This is why the principal who threatened to commit suicide if his teachers did not somehow raise black test scores fills us with the warm glow of patriotism.
State temples in North Carolina will now teach “students” that nothing meaningful happened in America prior to 1877.
“The only freedom which can last is a freedom embodied somewhere, rooted in a history, located in space, sanctioned by genealogy, and blessed by a religious establishment. The only equality which abstract rights, insisted upon outside the context of politics, are likely to provide is the equality of universal slavery.” ~ M.E. Bradford, A Better Guide Than Reason
“A People without a culture exclusively their own will perish.” ~ David Lane
Eustace Mullins died last Wednesday. We wrote about him last October after hearing Bill Rolen’s interview, but there’s even more about him in this post. Rest in peace, Eustace.
Ever on guard against the possibility that little white girls might turn into mothers, Mattel has found a new career for them. You go, girl! George Gilder has made some astute observations on the cancer of feminism, but for my money there is none wiser than Roger Devlin. “Sexists” like us used to place women on a high, untouchable plane. Feminism has devalued them to the degree that they are now merely political subjects and cannon fodder.
Wikitopian has written an excellent article called “Revenge of the Matriarchs.” Having gained “equality,” by which they mean mass mastectomies, what do women now fantasize about? Simple home life and domestic graces, of course.
American women are liberated from their homes, unburdened by the biological curse of motherhood, and treated by society like tiny castrated men. They’ve achieved the feminist dream! For some reason, a growing number of White American women aren’t even grateful for the cubicle that they’ve worked so hard for the opportunity to dwell in. They spend their lunches in the corporate break room, eating corporate food, in their corporate pantsuits, reading fantasy novels about being barefoot and pregnant in a country kitchen…
Every few months, somebody in the White Advocacy movement writes an article lamenting the fact that our movement ought to have more ladies. Our atheists and materialists will keep writing these because they’re fundamentally incapable of offering what women want: Tradition…
Travel back in time and tell a Russian dissident in the eighties that his omnipotent oppressors would disappear altogether within a few years; that the Russian national spirit would rise like a phoenix from the ruins of the once-invincible Jewish oligarchy. Would he believe you? Would you believe me if I told you that there are millions of potential matriarchs hiding in plain sight in corporate break rooms across America, patiently awaiting the opportunity to restore our White American nation and its communities to their former glory?
It can’t be done without them.
Happy shoveling!
http://www.toqonline.com/2010/02/epic-beard-man-american-folk-hero/
http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/40477
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2010/02/19/epic-beard-man-interviewed/
For an examination of the psychological-theological intersection of White-guilt one can scarcely do better than the theory posited by Rushdoony in his Politics of Guilt and Pity.
He says that the white man’s self-sacrifice for other races is a masochistic Christ-complex in which he seeks to atone for the sin of the world by his own suffering.
And the Non-White’s motivation plays the other side of the psychological-theological dichotomy in that their recognition of the need of a superior scapegoat compels them to a sadistic sacrifice of their benefactors in perpetuity.
In this Humanist gospel the White Man is an eternal sacrifice and the dark races represent an infinite wrath poured out upon that sacrifice. And it is by this self-atoning dichotomy that they actualize the millennial reign of Humanism.
By extension, I argue that the White adoption of Non-White children represents the process of “double imputation”: Where our sin (a thing foreign to Jesus) was imputed to Christ and His perfect righteousness (a thing foreign to fallen Man) was imputed to us, the new Humanist version compels the do-gooder to take the foreign child into their most intimate relations, and imbue the dark child with the benefit of the White Man’s civilized culture. The White family takes upon itself the burden of intimate acquaintance with a people whose appearance, manner and appetites they regard as base, crude and deeply offensive; in turn, they impart to the foreign child the grace of their superior nurture and habits.
Really, this cross-racial adoption is the necessary outworking of the White Man’s post-Christian quest for self-atonement. As Christ “became sin” on our behalf, these neo-Christians “become other” in order to redeem all.
Best comment ever, Ehud.
despite his feigned “xtianity”, the “admin” of this ‘blog can offer no rational reason why jews, niggers or, indeed, non-whites in general, should even be allowed to exist….their cruel, pscyopathic behaviour to both man and beast and their un-relenting genocidal attatcks on the best thing that has ever happened to this planet (viz: the White Race), must, clarly, “cancel out” their right to life…placing them fairly & squarely in the category of “oxygen thieves”!
Regarding the color-caste system in the Dominican Republic: you might be interested by this piece written by a leftist Latino about the recent affair of Dominican baseballer Sammy Sosa whitening his skin a lá Michael Jackson:
http://carlosqc.blogspot.com/2009/11/sammy-sosa-wants-to-be-latino-in-world.html
Interesting videos. Charles Barkley doesn’t think twice about being in whiteface, even though it’s considered unspeakable racism for whites to be in blackface. His co-host keeps chanting, “Say it loud, I’m black and I’m proud!” (from the James Brown song), even though it would be considered unspeakable racism for whites to sing, “Say it loud, I’m white and I’m proud!”
I’m not sure it’s proved in the second video that the DR is trying to keep Haitians out just because they’re blacker than the DR mulattoes. Maybe that’s true, but the judge in this case is saying that the man’s birth certificate is fraudulent, right?
That is a great post, Ehud. But I do wonder if you’re not giving judeo-christians more credit then they deserve. I really doubt they think that much about the theological meaning behind inter-racial adoption. I think most of them are just cowardly, timid whites who desperately want to be liked by all, and never ever want to be considered (gasp!) racist by anyone.
The irony is they are in fact white supremacist in their thinking, as this post rightly points out. ‘All these poor little dark chilluns need is a white mom and dad to raise them.’ The unspoken arrogance of such thinking is breathtaking.
In the mean time, we ignore our own blood to rescue cast-offs from other tribes. That was a great suggestion, admin, about adopting white embryos. But I wonder, is that even legal? Do the ‘parents’ of said embryos have to relinquish parental rights to them first? Definitely something to consider though.
Years ago, when God laid adopting another child on our hearts, we prayed to be a blessing to 1) someone local and 2) someone who looked pretty much like our natural ‘home grown’ kids. We didn’t have to look very far. A single mother in our town who was struggling jumped at the chance to place her toddler with us. It was the only way we could have had a blue-eyed child as well as a house full of brown-eyed ones, and how we rejoice in them all.
Dominican Republic has not only Mulattoes, but actual Whites as well. Like this guy, the current vice president:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rafael_Alburquerque
“despite his feigned “xtianity”, the “admin” of this ‘blog can offer no rational reason why jews, niggers or, indeed, non-whites in general, should even be allowed to exist….their cruel, pscyopathic behaviour to both man and beast and their un-relenting genocidal attatcks on the best thing that has ever happened to this planet (viz: the White Race), must, clarly, “cancel out” their right to life…”
Hath not the potter power over the clay, to make one vessel to destruction, and another to noble use? Who art thou, O Jimbo, to talk back to God?
St. Paul clearly knew fools like Jimbo….
That’s great to hear, Gerard. I’m glad you were able to adopt a white child, because it’s exceedingly rare. Years ago (like 40 or so), I know that adoption agencies used to place children in families according to skin color, and even eye and hair color, to make them appear as natural children. I’ve never looked into it, but I wonder if this sort of thing is discouraged today as racist.
I had no idea that a white man is VP of the DR! Fascinating.
In a recent post you praised the work of F. Roger Devlin. Thank you very much for this suggestion. I searched for him on Google and have been reading his essays with great pleasure and profit.
If one clicks on the tab for “F Roger Devlin” on TOQ, one gets a list of essays, all of which are worth reading.
I believe you will find especially apropos his reviews of the thought of the French counter-revolutionary philosopher Bonald who defended the natural order of the family and agrarian society. The Southern Agrarians would have found Bonald to be a fruitful source of ideas and expressions.
Devlin himself appears to be more well known for his essays eviscerating our current feminist regime, essays which are the best I’ve read on the subject. They are located at sources other than TOQ.
He also has essays on available on TOQ addressing racial and Jewish questions which SWB would find congenial. I believe that Devlin can add a depth of profundity to the kinist position, and I suggest it would be profitable for SWB to continue highlighting his works.
Absolutely. In a decent world, Devlin would be an instantly-recognizable name and a literary giant. (He is to us.) I think he lifts TOQ to a whole new level, the way Sam Francis did to Chronicles. I’m glad we can steer readers in the right direction – in our more serious moments, at least.
Yet another snow joke: February was the whitest Black History Month ever.
Thank you John and Admin for highlighting F John Devlin’s writing on TOQ Online.
I agree, he is taking discourse in ethnopolitics to a new level.
Once upon a time in a former incarnation I too wondered greatly how it was that ideological discourse had commandeered the university and come to establish the frame of reference in every liberal arts subject.
I relate to this because I lived it.
“I was fascinated by the sheer power which racial ideology exercised over many mens’ minds and by how a band of resentful mediocrities armed with little else had infiltrated and virtually subjugated an institution made up of highly intelligent people.”
F Devlin on “Why We Write”
http://www.toqonline.com/2009/10/f-roger-devlin-on-why-we-write
This is a deep observation.
And the one who look into it needs to move beyond the paradigms of the social sciences and into subjects that the university regards as Verboten: the realm of Christian doctrine.
One needs concepts like JudeoMasonry, “body of antiChrist” from scripture, theological reflection and the magisterium of the Church. And a tome like Eustace Mullin’s The Curse of Canaan: a study of the demonology of history will all assist the inquirer to pursue this thought.
“Having gained “equality,” by which they mean mass mastectomies, what do women now fantasize about? Simple home life and domestic graces, of course.
American women are liberated from their homes, unburdened by the biological curse of motherhood, and treated by society like tiny castrated men. They’ve achieved the feminist dream! For some reason, a growing number of White American women aren’t even grateful for the cubicle that they’ve worked so hard for the opportunity to dwell in. They spend their lunches in the corporate break room, eating corporate food, in their corporate pantsuits, reading fantasy novels about being barefoot and pregnant in a country kitchen…
Every few months, somebody in the White Advocacy movement writes an article lamenting the fact that our movement ought to have more ladies. Our atheists and materialists will keep writing these because they’re fundamentally incapable of offering what women want: Tradition…
Travel back in time and tell a Russian dissident in the eighties that his omnipotent oppressors would disappear altogether within a few years; that the Russian national spirit would rise like a phoenix from the ruins of the once-invincible Jewish oligarchy. Would he believe you? Would you believe me if I told you that there are millions of potential matriarchs hiding in plain sight in corporate break rooms across America, patiently awaiting the opportunity to restore our White American nation and its communities to their former glory?
It can’t be done without them.”
I don’t know. It can’t be done without them, but how many of them are there? In some ways, the sexual disaster is worse and is more irreperable, even at this point, than the racial disaster. Still, I find it hard to believe that these unsexed female creatures of the West today would ever return to the cradle and the hearth. There have been too many years of Cosmo and other filth of that nature. Their minds are ruined. You are correct that Roger Devlin is the best on the subject of feminism.
You’re right, it’s pretty bad, but I think Wiki is correct that all of our sisters out there are waiting for us to restore tradition for them, and it begins by treating them as ladies, not as shorter men. I know it sounds trite, but even a whisper to her blood will call her out of the darkness.
The biggest problem that we in the pro-white movement face is the contingent of atheists, Darwinists, and neo-pagans who want the white race to survive but will never inspire anyone – least of all women – with their arrogant gene worship.
Here’s a little clue that we’ve been trying to telegraph to all of them: Women nurture children. They’re not impressed with foolish talk about propagating genes, because this reduces them to pieces of meat whose purpose is no more profound than that of an animal or a plant. We don’t work that way. We’re created in the image of God. We have been redeemed by Christ, and there is no going back to frolicking naked around Thor’s oak trees like a bunch of idiot savages.
The simple message of Kinists is that the white race is going to serve the Master who died for it or is going to perish in its sins. There is no middle ground. There is no possible hope of salvation in blonde hair and blue eyes, or in monogamy, or in democracy, or in science.
I was listening to one of those TED talks where a Darwinist was saying that altruism and heroism are very much the same as a parasite that wants to make its way into the stomach of a cat. So in order to do this, it burrows into the brain of a mouse, turning it into Mighty Mouse, and it charges the cat and is eaten, thereby accomplishing the instinctive goal of the parasite. But the parasite itself is no smarter than a carrot, says the Darwinist. Ergo, the universe was not created and has no purpose whatsoever, but natural selection produces all sorts of things that strike us as brilliant and noble, even virtuous.
Now, I have no patience for such quackery. It seeks to explain away everything that is most important in life. But getting back to our purpose here, which is to save the white race, it flabbergasts me to think that there is any man among us who believes that such poppycock is going to inspire women to devote themselves to us as helpmeets and bear future generations. Good luck with that little project.
We’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: ALL WHO HATE GOD LOVE DEATH. And the grave is exactly where this foolish thinking is going to take our race, and I mean in a hurry.
Asia for the Asians. Africa for the Africans. White countries for everybody. It isn’t an African problem. Nobody is flooding Africa with non-Africans and giving them affirmative action, special rights and privileges and free health care. Only white countries are doing this. Only white leaders are supporting this. Only white children are suffering from it. It is genocide.
“We’re created in the image of God. We have been redeemed by Christ, and there is no going back to frolicking naked around Thor’s oak trees like a bunch of idiot savages.”
Oh, the imgages you guys conjure up! Ho-jo-to-ho!
The frolicking under the oaks is a hippy fantasy of the people who are still living on the capital of Christendom even if their world is post Christian, post modernist, post everything.
It is a pleasant fiction and the stuff of Christian jokes.
The real oak groves of the pagans held darker truths.
“They make sacrifice on the tops of the mountains and make offerings upon the hills, under oak, poplar and terebinth because their shade is good.” Hosea 4:13
C.f. Ezek 6:13
The Canaanites made human sacrifices under the oak sacred to Baal in his aspect of the bull.
The Israelites who went over to the Canaanite fertility rites were very big on the oak groves and they brought this practice to Europe.
The mythology of the Oak King in Britain was about the sacrifice of the King of the light half of the year. The Oak King was sacrificed at Yule for Sun Return. The burning of the yule log in Christendom only signified the burning of the old year, but for the pagan mentality Sun Return was bound up with a lot of human sacrifice as if the cycle of the earth around the solar orb depended upon humans.
Rather like all the responsibility being heaped on human beings today breathing carbon dioxide – as if this had anything to do with climate change due to the solar max cycle.
The neopagans just do not get the ancient pagan sacrificial system that came north with the Phonecians.
Lynda,
I ran across a book years ago on the Phoenician influence on Europe economically and culturally. But along the way I lost the reference.
Do you know any titles on the subject, Lynda?
Thanks.
Unreconstructed said:
“I don’t know. It can’t be done without them, but how many of them are there? In some ways, the sexual disaster is worse and is more irreperable, even at this point, than the racial disaster. Still, I find it hard to believe that these unsexed female creatures of the West today would ever return to the cradle and the hearth. There have been too many years of Cosmo and other filth of that nature. Their minds are ruined. You are correct that Roger Devlin is the best on the subject of feminism.”
This is a valid point. For the adult women of today, even if some forgotten corner of their heart still cries out for the truth, the reality is that they are so utterly corrupted that there is no hope from any human perspective, and God only works so many miracles. Even those older women who identify themselves as “traditional” in some way still identify too strongly with the demonic system of sexual equality which currently reigns in our society.
Our only hope is with the next generation. Start with our daughters. Don’t let them join the servile sluts of the modern generation. Insist on modest dressing and chaste behavior. Show them that there is still hope for a life of true love (which requires subordination to their husbands and service to and affection for their children) before it is too late and the devil has already gotten hold of their hearts. We have to do this even if it means fighting against their mother — which it probably will.
40 years in the desert clears out the riff-raff.
Very true, John. The problem is, as Dr. Devlin and others have thoroughly documented, if a man tries this he is apt to receive the full weight of the Serpent’s “legal” system hitting him before he knows what is happening. Then he is faced with the loss of his children and any minimal influence he might have on them. Women are armed with the full force and power of the corporate superstate. Going against their mother is defined, as far as I know in all 50 states, as “domestic abuse.” Withholding money is defined as domestic abuse. Insisting on a certain standard of dress that is not “normal” is – you guessed it – abuse. The marriage only exists at the whim or convienience of the female. A man, especially a white man, literally has no legal rights as a husband or parent.
As to ever returning to tradition, ponder this one point – the overwhelming support for Sarah Palin among the Christian men of each of your acquaintance. Then think about the “conservative” women who hold political office in your locale, and how many OLD Christian men and women vote for, and approve of, their doing so. Now think of your father, or grandfather (or for that matter your mother or grandmother) and what they thought of women in such positions. I can’t see men, let alone women, ever returning to any semblance of a traditional order.
Devlin’s article “Rotating Polyandry” is down from The Occidental Quarterly, but is still available at http://www.argumentations.com/Argumentations/StoryDetail_7731.aspx
His “Home Economics” series is also an sobering piece, found here: http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/index.html
Hi CL,
The best work I know which establishes the identity of the Canaanites and the Phonecians and other Canaanite tribes is Eustace Mullins The Curse of Canaan, a demonology of history.
It is an amazing work and many of his Library of Congress sources are now suppressed. The only way to access them is through the refs of Eustace Mullins in this work which is still available second hand.
This book answered many, many questions for me and I can not recommend it too highly.
Doug Phillips cracks me up:
http://www.visionforum.com/hottopics/blogs/dwp/2010/02/6302.aspx
This guy is the most narcissistic hambone I’ve ever seen. Let’s hope that no Haitian children try to get between him and the camera.
Thanks for the tip, Lynda. As I’ve gotten older, I’ve come to realize just how valuable citations in a book can be.
Regarding Doug Phillips technically terrific video. . .
One of the most amazing things I’ve seen in my life is the “democratization” of print publishing that became evident in the early to mid 90′s–and of image printing along about the same time–and of video production probably around 2000. All of this is a consequence of the rapidlly rising computer hardware capability (and thus the software became possible to accomplish these tasks at a much lower cost than before).
Before. . .say. . .1995, Christian media was terrible. Cheap, raggedy, silly. Walk into a Lifeway today and it looks as good or better then Barnes and Noble. Ditto the whacky “end times” productions aired on the cable channel of (probable homo, certain traitor) Paul Crouch.
Technically, their stuff looks better than what you’d see on effects-heavy TV productions ala Sci Fi channel. Effects-lite offerings look *as good* as comparable major studio produtions.
The American Vision catalog also reflects this seismic shift in technical quality.
But if there’s ever been a better time to remember one “can’t judge a book by its cover,” that time is now.
At least DP is honest–I think he’s really swallowed his own BS. And with digitization, he’ll be able to fawn over his own images straight through to rapture (so to speak).
That’s true, the Vision Forum catalog is probably the best I’ve ever seen. But underneath the glossy polish, the objective is to destroy white families, not to prosper them. Jews must marry “belles,” white children must accept black children as siblings, the heroes of the South must be deconstructed, and warmongering must be promoted. This is suicide, not patriarchy.
Unreconstructed said:
“The problem is, as Dr. Devlin and others have thoroughly documented, if a man tries this he is apt to receive the full weight of the Serpent’s “legal” system hitting him before he knows what is happening. Then he is faced with the loss of his children and any minimal influence he might have on them. Women are armed with the full force and power of the corporate superstate. Going against their mother is defined, as far as I know in all 50 states, as “domestic abuse.” Withholding money is defined as domestic abuse. Insisting on a certain standard of dress that is not “normal” is – you guessed it – abuse. The marriage only exists at the whim or convienience of the female. A man, especially a white man, literally has no legal rights as a husband or parent. ”
All good points. What you say is certainly true. But we can’t despair. The men of old that Cambria Will Not Yield likes to recall to our minds were willing to die for their faith. The Christians in the Roman Empire were willing to watch their children being tortured to death before they would hand them over to the power of Satan. I’m not just an armchair traveller in these matters, and I know that you can lose everything, but I believe we have to be willing to pay that price to save the souls of our children.
I would take issue only with “losing any minimal influence he might have” on his children. Children are inspired by courage. A man might find that his influence increases exponentially when his children see him suffering for his faith. His wife, in contrast, might find that all the power of the state cannot win the hearts of her children for her.
The death of Christ on the Cross appeared to be a pointless defeat, and the deaths of the martyrs likewise seemed to be exercises in futility, but we know from history that it was only these sacrifices that created the Christian Church and sustained the faith of countless millions over the succeeding centuries. “Unless a grain of wheat falls to the ground and dies, it cannot produce any fruit.”
Wow, that was an excellent comment.
Thanks John! That goes straight to the heart as to who we say we are as Christian men!
To borrow from General Jackson, If all men believed such, all men would be equally brave.
Sola Deo Gloria,
I think so too, Admin.
A daughter looks to her father to affirm her in her identity as a woman – whether she imitates her mother or not.
The society into which she is being propelled is adverse to women generally and specifically adverse to women as virgins, and as Christian wives, mothers, as grandmothers because of the Church’s position on divorce.
In high school even to be recognized by her peers a young woman must ‘date’. Because there is no parental oversight of the social life of the youth, the young men are able to dictate the dating scene on their terms, which are sexual terms.
The young woman who is not going to meet these terms, therefore is not going to be accepted by her peers. She will be very isolated. And the girls who my grandmother would have called ‘fast’ will bully her mercilessly because they can not initiate her into the demands of the young men. (For which they are rewarded with popularity and admission to the sororities etc)
Without the protection of her father’s house and her father’s esteem for her in her identity as a daughter, his respect for her as a virgin and what that means for the integrity of her soul and her people, it will be exceedingly difficult for a young woman to persevere in chastity with a view to marriage should that be her estate in life.
In terms of the Matyrology, there is sublimity about the lives and witness of the young Roman women, virgins and martyrs for the faith raised to the altars of the Church and in the accounts of their deaths narrated in the liturgy.
It has always been of interest to me that in the public witness and testament of these deaths, our Lord chose to display the powers of the resurrection body while these young women were yet in their earthly bodies. Their testaments were so astonishing that Rome had to rethink the public executions of the Christian virgins in the circuses and came around to a preference for private executions of the young women because of the display of the powers of the resurrection body with their martydoms.
Just as the Apostle did not testify in “plausible words of wisdom, but in the demonstration of the Spirit and power” (1 Cor 2:5), so did the virgin daughters of the Christian patricians of Rome who were martyred for the faith. Many of the old basilicas that are stations of Lenten pilgramage preserve their relics and are dedicated to them.
Ladies and gentlemen, I agree with every single thing that has been written here. Truth is truth, and right is right, and we ought to follow after truth and right to whatever end. All I am saying is that the machine does not care if one more or ten thousand more white men are thrown into the meat grinder of the family court system. Perhaps the martyrs in Rome affected the Romans such because there was some shred of humanity still in the Romans. There is none in modern America. Look at their eyes, they are lifeless. Even many pagans publicly praised virginity and woman’s place in the home. Now the word and the associated concepts are mocking punchlines. We live in a post-Christian age. The house once swept clean has been re-infested with demons seven times worse than before. Yes, with God all things are possible, and yes, duty is ours and consequences are his. But, apart from a direct miracle of some kind, this situation is going to run to its logical end. God himself told us the consequences of defying his order.
Even the sons and daughters of professing Christians (some of whom know sexual and racial reality deep down, though they won’t say it) are lost by the age of 3 or 4. I would like to think that children are inspired by courage, but I just don’t see it. Daddy is an emasculated, buffoonish figure whose function is to buy the garbage output of industrial China and who is constantly browbeaten by his social climber consort within earshot of the children. Reality is that children are inspired today by pimps and whores. Has anyone heard of or seen the pop culture abomination “Toddlers in Tiaras?” Those are Southern people for the most part. The Bible belt indeed. Girl children, unless they are totally cut off from the popular culture, are trained from birth in all of the worse habits and vices of the female sex. (Boy children have their spirit and masculine development crushed, but that is another issue.) There are NO females of marriageable age, apart from the isolated instance of girls raised in strict Independent Baptist or maybe Presbyterian Covenanter families (and how many of either of these are there in total, and how many of that miniscule number are racially awake also?)who are not infected with the spirit of modernism and female licentiousness. Maybe I am too pessimistic, but I can see no light at the end of this tunnel, not in my lifetime.
Lynda, I particularly agree with this: “Without the protection of her father’s house and her father’s esteem for her in her identity as a daughter, his respect for her as a virgin and what that means for the integrity of her soul and her people, it will be exceedingly difficult for a young woman to persevere in chastity with a view to marriage should that be her estate in life.” My question is: HOW is a man to do this when he has no legally enforceable right to control his own household? Courage and the willingness to fight for right are wonderful Christian characteristics. We need much more of it. But a dead man, or a financially broken man in an imperial prison cannot do much to help his family. Unless I am missing something, all he can do practically as a husband and father is beg his wife and children as individuals to behave themselves.
While we’re on the subject of Africans I refer you all to that great theologian, Robert Duvall. He well obviated the illogic of Propositional -Nation Theory.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1ZQeCYLKtY
Unreconstructed said:
“There are NO females of marriageable age, apart from the isolated instance of girls raised in strict Independent Baptist or maybe Presbyterian Covenanter families (and how many of either of these are there in total, and how many of that miniscule number are racially awake also?)who are not infected with the spirit of modernism and female licentiousness.”
What you say is true, and it’s an important realization that each man needs to come to when he is considering marrying and starting a family. Let’s remember, however, that this SWB posting began with links and discussion of the series of TOQ articles which concludes with the mandate to seek communities apart. I agree completely with this advice. There is just no way we can live in the midst of today’s moral sewer and preserve any innocence for our children. We must follow St. Peter’s admonition on the day of Pentecost, “Separate yourselves from this perverse generation.” All generations are perverse to some extent, but that particular generation was facing a tribulation in which “not one stone would be left standing upon another,” and perhaps our own generation will witness something similar.
Are these communities guaranteed to protect us? No, the devil infiltrates everywhere, and no one is immune. The state sent their tank to knock down the gate of the YFZ ranch in Texas and now some of their men are in jail based on new laws written to target those specific men. And even greater likelihood is the insidious betrayal from within.
Yet even if it is true that there are no 100% guarantees anywhere, at least these islands of traditional beliefs can offer a chance and a hope. Intellectually, morally and spiritually we already live in a post-apocalyptic landscape like “A Canticle for Leibowitz,” and like the protagonist in that story, we need the support of a community of like-minded people.
Also, as the “Swiss Family Robinson” discovered, the family is not a “perfect institution.” Even the best family is incomplete and requires other families for propagation. So even if we were to create our very own personal Shangri-la, we would still need other likeminded families in order to carry on the next generation.
Our ancestors pulled up roots and came to America, often with little more than the clothes on their backs, sometimes seeking economic opportunities, but often seeking freedom to practice their religion. We may be faced with the same necessity.
Unreconstructed said:
“My question is: HOW is a man to do this when he has no legally enforceable right to control his own household? Courage and the willingness to fight for right are wonderful Christian characteristics. We need much more of it. But a dead man, or a financially broken man in an imperial prison cannot do much to help his family. Unless I am missing something, all he can do practically as a husband and father is beg his wife and children as individuals to behave themselves.”
In this context, “fighting,” as we see in “The Passion of the Christ” — and it’s been a theme in other Mel Gibson movies — means the courage to accept suffering. We might go to jail. We might lose everything financially. It is then that we are forced to rely on our spiritual resources. We must take inventory of our treasure in heaven where rust does not corrode it and the moths don’t eat it. How much have we saved up? We might discover the virtues of poverty. “Freedom’s just another word for nothing left to lose.”
Could Alexander Solzhenitsyn ever have believed that spending 10 years in the Gulag would be the best thing that could have happened to him? He was on the road to perdition, and it was only that experience which allowed him to awaken to the truth, to become a different man, and then to influence millions of people around the globe.
The only answer to your question is that we need to win over the hearts and minds of our children (and hopefully our wives as well, although that might prove an impossible task). This is the hard, difficult road, and we wish the easy way was an option, where our authority was supported by the family, community and state. But ultimately being forced to take the difficult way can pay the biggest dividends in the long run.
Our children can be convinced of the truth, their hearts can be turned to God, they can turn from this sick society and choose a better way. But only if we have the spiritual resources to show them, to convince them, to prove by our actions and not just by words that the Kingdom of Heaven is worth fighting for.
To be specific, first they must come to the realization that they have a soul. That sounds simple, but the vast majority of people today, no matter what they might say on a survey, do not truly believe in their hearts that they have an immortal soul. But a child who has a strong experiential conviction of the reality of their soul will think differently, feel differently, and act differently every minute of every day. They will reject all the blandishments of the devil and follow you even into martyrdom if they are convinced that you can save their souls. “Where else can we go Lord, since you have the words of everlasting life?”
But if our own immortal soul is only an abstraction to us, then we cannot convince even ourselves, nonetheless our children or anyone else. Which brings us back to the point about suffering. A man discovers the reality of his soul only when he is put to the test. A man has little need for an immortal soul when he is enjoying a life of comfort and ease. “As gold is tried in the furnace, so are the hearts of men tried in the fire of humiliation.” Perhaps the day when I am led away from my home in handcuffs will be the day when I will be forced to discover the reality of my soul, and its shameful condition. Only then can I begin to have any true influence.
I hear you Unreconstructed.
The time in which we are living is the time forseen by St Louis de Montfort (1673 – 1716 ) when “the enemies of God, idolaters, schismatics, Mahometans, Jews and souls hardened in impiety who shall rise in terrible revolt against God to seduce all those who shall oppose them and to make them fall by promises and threats”
The Revolution inaugurated 1789 is buiding to its culmination in our time. And I think the words of St Louis do about sum it up.
When George Bush inaugurated the Terror War and culmination of the Revolution, he invoked Lucifer – “the angel that rides this whirlwind”.
However, it is the Lord Jesus Christ our Saviour and King who reigns, Unreconstructed. And he must reign until all his enemies are under his feet. 1 Cor 15:27; Eph 1:22.
Victory in this battle will go to the Church. And our King intends this Victory to be won with spiritual weapons despised as weak and foolish by his proud foes. These weapons were commended to all who would summon the faith to believe and to employ them in faith so that even the last and least among the faithful might make their contribution to the Victory that he intends.
In commending the prayers of Holy Rosary to individuals, families, the Church and nations, Sr Lucia of Fatima in her final prophetic interview (Dec 26, 1952) with Father Fuentes puts it like this:
“Look, Father, the Most Holy Virgin in these last times in which we live has given a new efficacy to the recitation of the Holy Rosary. She has given this efficacy to such an extent that there is no problem, no matter how difficult it is, whether temporal or above all spiritual, in the personal life of each one, of our families, of the families of the world, of the religious communities, or even the life of peoples and nations, that can not be solved by the Rosary. There is no problem, I tell you, no matter how difficult it is, that we can not resolve by the prayer of the Holy Rosary. With the Holy Rosary, we will save ourselves. We will sanctify ourselves. We will console Our Lord and obtain the salvation of many souls.”
It is the role of the father, Unreconstructed, to assemble his family for the prayers of the family. Let him lead his family in the contemplation of the saving mysteries of our Lord’s life, death and resurrection, the mysteries pondered in the Immaculate heart of the Blessed Mother. Perhaps a reading of holy scripture with the Mystery and then the recitation of the prayers together.
This is like when Moses elevated the image of the serpent in the wilderness. The people had to get their minds off their problems; they had to raise the vision of their faith in the Lord by the word of his prophet Moses and focus upon the image. And all who looked – lived. But in order to look, they had to get their minds off the bites of the serpents and onto the image that had been elevated. This is a type or a prefigurement of acts of faith which the Church commends.
Today a new in hoc signatio vinces has been raised and to solve all problems, wounds, fears and terrors that are being generated all around us we have to enter into the tranquility of our faith vision.
This is the recitation of the Holy Rosary.
At Fatima, on Oct. 13, 1917 our Lady told the young children that her Immaculate Heart would triumph over precisely these our apocaylytic times by means of the Holy Rosary and the Scapular of Carmel.
The world busy with its Terror War, the Jews busy with their antiChrist agenda, the people of nations in gross darkness and descending to a level lower than the beasts, the Church in Eclipse…
“In the end my Immaculate Heart will triumph, the Holy Father will consecrate Russia to me” and it will all turn over.
Until it does, please lay hold of the fact that this thing is indeed what three popes have declared: “the Signum Magnum” of Apoc 13. And in the culmination of the Revolution inaugurated 1789, victory will go to the Church.
I know one thing from personal experience. A man can’t expect his woman and his children to follow him joyfully, unless he is following Christ joyfully. Friends, I dislike the grim, joyless tone of many in their comments. Yes, humanly speaking, I will allow that our society is very far gone on the broad way to hell. So what? Do we wish we were born in less desperate times? It is not for us to choose, but to do what we can with what we’ve been given. And having done all, to stand.
Heroes are born for times such as these. And you are all HERE, in the providence of God! Who knows how many of us will go down swinging, only to have epics written, and songs sung about us for generations? Who knows what deeds we are put on earth to do, what evil we are to have a hand in vanquishing? Look up, my friends, your redemption draws nigh, one way or the other! Throw ink-wells at the enemy as Luther did. Laugh them to scorn. The best revenge is loving your own deeply, teaching them diligently, building your house with all fervor and devotion. Love will bind our children to us, and the joy of the Lord will be our strength, and theirs.
Does anyone know the source of the image below Denmark Vesey, presumably depicting what people thought the Vesey Rebellion would turn into?