This is a fascinating glimpse into the Russian Right-Wing. You really need to watch it. On one level it’s disturbing, because these are people who clearly want to return to the Soviet era and reestablish an empire that can compete with America, Europe, and China. For now, they’re forming alliances with oil countries like Venezuela and Iran. But on another level it’s inspiring. There is no doubt in their minds that the Lord Jesus Christ is their permanent foundation. The Russian’s greatest strength is his refusal to be taken in by the Enlightenment voodoo that has infected the minds of Europeans and Americans. They put us to shame in this area. There are hardly any neo-pagans in that vast country, but even these are pro-imperial and anti-Zionist. In Russia, there is nothing like the veneration of “action figure” gods that we see among our own insufferable neo-pagan white nationalists.
A quick aside: This article, despite a few objections, has made Patrick Ford our favorite columnist at AltRight. He is correct that “nearly every aspect of the western world worth saving is a product of Christianity, not Paganism.”
A rejection of Christianity in favor of a false pagan faith would be antithetical to the defense of the West. As G.K. Chesterton wrote:
The French Revolution is of Christian origin. The newspaper is of Christian origin. The anarchists are of Christian origin. Physical science is of Christian origin. The attack on Christianity is of Christian origin. There is one thing, and one thing only, in existence at the present day which can in any sense accurately be said to be of pagan origin, and that is Christianity.
Neopaganism also presupposes that the West can be saved without the Church. This is impossible, mainly because throughout history the West was the Church. It was Christianity’s hammer, Charles Martel, that beat back the invading Muslims and saved the West, not Thor’s hammer. It was Richard I, not Fenrir, who beat back Saladin and was steps from retaking Jerusalem. It was the Catholic Inquisition, not Idunn, that expelled the Muslims from Sicily and Spain…
The traits of medieval Christendom are the traits that will save the West: social hierarchy, loyalty to blood and soil, and the elevation of nobility and heroism.
Ford and old Gilbert touch on what we Kinists have always said, which is that if neo-pagans want to prove the excellence of their weird religion, give us an example of what it has actually done for our race.
Now let’s return to the regularly-scheduled programming. Russia is a very different place. Consider that the Shogun-like subject of this documentary, who teaches young men (don’t miss his speech at 16:30) that God, the Fatherland, and the Tsar are a holy trinity on earth (i.e., spirit/water/blood or altar/bowl/throne), is tight with the Vice-Speaker of the Parliament, the Archbishop, and even President Putin himself. The mind searches in vain for anything to compare to this in America. Imagine if our Justice [sic] Department were to throw Murray Rothstein, Bernard Madoff, and George Soros in jail, and throw away the key, rather than turn a blind eye to terrorism committed against Jared Taylor and David Duke. Imagine if our State Department were to embargo Germany for its crimes against prisoners of conscience. Imagine if our president were to pay congenial visits and lend aid to patriots who are trying to restore America to its rightful owners. Imagine our enemies cowering in fear. Imagine if they were terrified to insult our race and our faith. Imagine if Larry David were Theo Van Gogh.
As I say, even this is not an accurate comparison because we American patriots are republicans who despise empire. The Russian right-wingers make no apologies for colonizing their neighbors. But consider their history. Even they admit that they are used to living under an iron hand. Now consider the belligerence of Western governments, all of which have been bribed and then hijacked by Jews. Though it’s regrettable, it’s not hard to understand how men like Hitler and Stalin and the Bushes rise to power. Their subjects are conditioned to believe, sometimes with good reason, that global threats can only be answered by totalitarian central governments.
A photo of Ernst Zundel taken moments after he emerged from the Mannheim Jew-dungeon for the first time in five years. Notice the smiles. Michael Hoffman writes these marvelous words:
This is a stunning contrast to the behavior and attitudes of many (though not all) of those poster soul-survivors of the Auschwitz slave labor camp, who, more than sixty years later, still pose with long faces, perpetually moaning, groaning, wailing, hectoring, spewing hatred and pointing fingers of accusation, while churning out a deluge of newspaper and magazine articles, books, novels, television shows and
films constituting a new level of institutionalized vengeance, which has been weaved into the very fabric of the post-Christian West.
I say post-Christian, but we are even heedless of William Shakespeare. Surely Portia’s famous speech to Shylock in The Merchant of Venice (Act 4, Scene 1), is now discredited by the mandarins of mediocrity. Yet, in Portia’s words we have our culture’s most eloquent reply to the perpetual Purim cry for vengeance under the rubric of justice. Here Shakespeare, as usual, put his finger on the heart of the matter: the vast chasm separating Judaism from the ante-Auschwitz West is their enshrinement of revenge and our obligation to mercy. [Again, you won't find a drop of the latter among pagans.]
Zundel’s merciless persecutors have learned nothing from history. In their hubris, in their certainty that they will prevail and control and edit the future, they believe they can demonize, imprison and torment prisoners of conscience with impunity. The Romans imagined this about the early Christians, the French Catholics about the Huguenot, the German Lutherans about the Anabaptists, the New England Puritans about the Quakers, the Anglicans about their recusant Catholic countrymen, and the Soviets about the Eastern Orthodox. Yet, in each case history teaches that in time, the severely oppressed dissidents emerged stronger than ever.
This too is the destiny of World War II revisionists, though today, in the midst of intense persecution and witch-hunting, it is a future difficult for many to envision. In this sense, Ernst Zundel, even at age 70, is not a man of the past but of the future.
Do we enshrine revenge against Muslims, who murdered, stole, and raped 1.25 million of our people? If we were to erect a monument to our martyrs, it would universally be denounced as “racist.” Let’s do it.
Paul Fromm calls Herr Zundel our Galileo.
Zundel is always called a Holocaust denier, even though everyone else is free to dispute the fact that the Allied firebombing of Zundel’s hometown of Pforzheim was a holocaust. “If I question certain claims about the Great Depression, am I a ‘Depression denier‘?”
The House Foreign Affairs Committee has barely voted to recognize the Armenian Holocaust as genocide. Obama and Hillary continue as holocaust deniers, but unlike Zundel, no one is threatening to imprison them for even a day.
Race-traitor Michelle Malkin is promoting the idea of identifying as a raceless, faceless, colorless, and tasteless “American” on the census form. She uses these two quotes from white men from a bygone homogeneous era in the attempt to make future Americans as queer and fatherless as her own children.
“Here individuals of all races are melted into a new race of man, whose labors and posterity will one day cause great changes in the world.” ~ J. Hector St. John De Crevecoeur
“There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism… The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans, English-Americans, French-Americans, Scandinavian-Americans or Italian-Americans, each preserving its separate nationality, each at heart feeling more sympathy with Europeans of that nationality, than with the other citizens of the American Republic… The only man who is a good American is the man who is an American and nothing else.” ~ Theodore Roosevelt
This is basically the “melting pot” mythology of Jew Israel Zangwill, whose work has popularized the notion of the Statue of Liberty as a beacon for miscegenation. But even he could not describe the melting pot as being anything other than a crucible “where all the races of Europe are melting and re-forming.” Naturally, he was careful to include his fellow Jews, who were and are foreign to the West in every way, in this ambitious experiment: “Germans and Frenchmen, Irishmen and Englishmen, Jews and Russians, into the Crucible with you all! God is making the American.”
Of course, God made the American hundreds of years earlier. Jew Zangwill is referring to the New American given birth by Lincoln. Even so, the Crevecoeur and Roosevelt quotes refer only to the “races” of white men. This doesn’t prevent “conservatives” from using the quotes for their evil ends. One of the comments on that page is from a white man who seems distraught that one of his three children is identified as “White” on a birth certificate. This is because his “Choctaw-Hawaiian-Tibetan-Hutu-Inuit-Australian Aborigine” so-called “wife” mongrel gave birth in South Carolina, where “the race of the child is dependent on the race of the father. It supposedly goes back to the days of slavery.”
Our contemporaries easily forget (and who can blame them?) that Christianity was not always the emasculated travesty and laughingstock that it has become in our time. In fact, until recent generations, Christians had not forgotten their first Love or traded the one true faith for the false idol of Equality. As it once was, so shall it be again. In the meantime, read the fascinating journal of the 85th Annual Convention (1875) of the Protestant Episcopal Church, Diocese of South Carolina. This convention was held at St. Philip’s Church, one of the two jewels of the Charleston skyline.
In the wake of Lincoln’s War of Genocide, and as the tyranny of Destruction (aka Reconstruction) was ending, a mulatto church sought admittance to the PEC. Some in the denomination were persuaded that since the mulattoes were fellow believers, their church should be accepted as an equal body, and their leaders as equals to the white clergy. The response: “We deny that there is any Christian duty or obligation requiring us to do this thing.” The point is made that shared Christian faith does not give men the right to be represented in common church leadership. Nor does it give a common church the right to amalgamate congregations without any regard to preserving their God-given distinctions.
It is certainly true that every Christian polity should contemplate the spread of the Gospel among all peoples, and the extension of the Church over all nations. How shall this be done? Which is the best way of doing it? Rome answers these enquiries with the affirmation, that there is but one way of doing this, and that is by having but one temporal and infallible head, which shall govern and control a Church, interpenetrating all peoples, and ignoring all nationalities, except in so far as she can make them subservient to the temporal growth, prosperity, and expansion of her one form of ecclesiastical government. The doctrine and teaching of our mother Church is directly opposed to this; and claims that every nationality may have its own independent Church, decreeing its own rites and ceremonies, and having authority in controversies of faith, so that nothing be ordained that is contrary to God’s written word. Upon this fundamental Christian truth, she threw off the dominion of Rome, and established her own ecclesiastical polity upon her nationality. She has never abandoned this position, and still maintains it.
The Irish and Scottish Churches likewise have “always been distinct, although not different, from the English, for centuries asserting [their] right to [their] own Liturgy without question.”
What united us in one Protestant Episcopal Church in this country was our unity of race, the common origin and nationality of those who framed our organism… Why should we attempt to break down these partition walls rudely, by main force, to thrust discordant masses together, rather than leave them to coalesce, mingle and assimilate by the gentler and kindlier influences of time, if that can produce such amalgamation? Why has the Almighty suffered these permanent distinctions between peoples and races for centuries? Are we sure we are cooperating with His scheme and purpose in causing such diversities among men by abruptly forcing them into hurried commingling? It is our common Creator who has made one nation to differ from another, and we should not rashly insist that His work was unwise, and set ourselves to work to confound these distinctions, impressed upon His creatures by His Almighty and Creative hand, lest haply we may find ourselves fighting against God. And if anywhere this distinction of His should be reverently observed, so long as He permits it to endure, it is in the Church of Christ, who sent His Apostles, not to amalgamate different peoples, but to preach the Gospel to all nations… What necessity is there that this work of thwarting God’s arrangements (as it appears to us to be) should commence now, in the Church of Christ? Surely the necessity should be made so plain as to be apparent to every candid mind, and so urgent as to constrain every honest will…
We say, this [black] race, as a people, are not at this time in their history, qualified to take part in the Councils of the Church…
Notice how shocking this statement is to the Jacobin, egalitarian mind of the West today, which has been steeped in “rugged individualism” and laissez-faire morality.
If this Convention cannot be intrusted to the control of a majority of the colored people as members of it, because of their incapacity for government, then not one of their delegates should be admitted, so long as that incapacity continues—for our vacant parishes and deserted churches [the aftermath of genocide] in the low country put it into the power of the blacks to become the majority. If this people are indeed qualified at this time to take this Convention into their hands, and control it, and so regulate the internal affairs of this Diocese, then they must be the most extraordinary race of men the earth has seen, and their advancement more rapid than all other races known to us…
For ourselves we not only object to miscegenation, but denounce it as injurious to our race; and, as we believe, opposed to the law of God, as revealed in Scripture, and developed in the uniform course of His creation and the ordinances of what we call nature. We do not intend to encourage the commingling of these two races. We believe our race to be the superior race, and do not hesitate to assert and maintain our faith in this truth and intend to conform our ecclesiastical organization to this faith, and never can consent to give countenance and approval to such admixture, even when the result of lawful wedlock, but would leave all such admixture to bear the stamp and wear the livery of unlawful intercourse. We refuse to recommend to a body of Christian men that which we believe would tend to counteract God’s order in Providence or creation, and to obliterate distinctions which He has seen fit to make as manifest and as conspicuous as the sun at noonday, or as the stars at midnight…
[W]e have before us as the polar star to determine our course the Christian principle upon which our English divines and reformers relied for their guidance, and upon which our Church has stood in England, Scotland, Ireland, in these United States, and in all the British Colonies; that is, independent Churches for distinct nationalities or peoples. That is the principle; simple, clear, distinct and fixed, a sure and safe guide for us in our times and circumstances… The truth of this principle, spiritually and logically, is not to be found in the territory occupied by the nation or people, which is a mere physical connexion, but in the homogeneity of the people themselves.
Reading this makes me proud to be counted among the Redeemed. I can sleep better at night knowing that my homeland was once dominated by men who understood the Bible.
We Kinists are just like the South Carolina Fire-Eaters. We are among the few who continue to carry both the burden and the honor of the South. Most of our Southern contemporaries who are becoming allies in our cause for survival will be essentially sympathetic but will try to squelch the ancestral and biblical message to some degree. We think this is what Generation5 did recently when he wrote that Kinists are likely to ensure their “continued marginalization” through “their theological belief that interracial marriages are illegitimate and adulterous.” Perhaps so, but we have no alternative. That which is opposed to the law of God is unlawful and must be abolished. Where we are powerless to enforce the law politically, we must at least expect a clear voice of resistance from the Church. This is truly the question at hand: Will the Church resolve to be faithful or faithless?
Read Generation5′s latest on John Piper’s lunatic argument “that Christians should intentionally choose a difficult course by marrying interracially.” Edmund Burke addressed this Jacobin pathology way back in 1790: “You think you are combating prejudice, but you are at war with nature.” To be at war with nature is to be at war with both ourselves and God, the Creator and Master of nature.
This a marvelous quote from Sir Walter Scott: “The ties of Nature were knit by God himself. Cursed be the stoic pride that would rend them asunder, and call it virtue!” It’s very similar to what Burke said about tradition: “We owe an implicit reverence to all the institutions of our ancestors” (A Vindication of Natural Society, 1756). Consider how lying preachers have corrupted themselves and dishonored God. They don’t believe that unraveling natural bonds is anything less than virtuous, and they spit on the institutions of their ancestors as being the work of racists and anti-Semites.
CWNY explains why Christianity suits us as men of the West. We are neither of the Orient nor of Africa. We have understood, until recent times, that family, race, and faith are like the three legs of a stool.
When Christianity is the reigning faith, ties of nature have spiritual significance. A woman does not simply have a child and turn him over to the tribe; she becomes – when she gives birth – a part of God’s plan for the redemption of the world. She cooperates with God’s grace and brings forth a child to be consecrated to God. That natural tie between mother and child is a divine tie. And need I add that the father’s tie to his children is also ordained by God? But under liberalism, which is paganism revisited with a technological twist, biological entities such as children can be raised by the state, and their most important ties are to the state. It was and is inevitable that all family ties, ties of nature, will be extinguished before the American experiment in democracy comes to an end.
Democracy will not save us. As our friend from Cambria has written elsewhere, “Post-Christian Europe is hell, and you can’t vote hell away.”
It seems ridiculous to have to defend kinship, racial solidarity, and a Christian patriarchy, but the fact that it is necessary speaks volumes about the plight of the European man. He has lost his faith, and as a result he has lost his identity and his will to survive. Restore his faith, which is no easy matter, and the will to survive will follow.
Here is an engrossing review of Henry James’s masterpiece, The Bostonians, at one of the best blogs you’ll find anywhere, the Thinking Housewife. (Mark Twain said he would rather be damned to John Bunyan’s heaven than read this book.)
The story pivots on Olive Chancellor, the humanist and “female Jacobin,” the “woman without laughter,” the hater of tradition. “It was the usual things of life that filled her with silent rage; which was natural enough, inasmuch as, to her vision, almost everything that was usual was iniquitous.” And since nothing could be more traditional and purposeful for a woman than being a wife and mother, the feminist hates biblical marriage. James writes: “There are women who are unmarried by accident, and others who are unmarried by option; but Olive Chancellor was unmarried by every implication of her being. She was a spinster as Shelley was a lyric poet, or as the month of August is sultry.”
Olive represents the trash of our race that is good for nothing but to be burned. Verena Tarrant represents those who easily succumb to lies, out of a desire to please. And into their lives steps a Southern hero, Basil Ransom, whose last name is chosen to illustrate Verena’s salvation. “The masculine tone is passing out of the world,” he says. “It’s a feminine, a nervous, hysterical, chattering, canting age, an age of hollow phrases and false delicacy and exaggerated solicitudes and coddled sensibilities, which if we don’t soon look out, will usher in the reign of mediocrity, of the feeblest and flattest and the most pretentious that has ever been.” Basil, the Southern Christian, believes that women should be private and passive, and he is at war with the Northern Unitarians, who teach that women should be public and contentious. (In the present day they are even considered “warriors.”) He views the typical Yankee woman as “spare, dry, hard, without a curve, an inflection or a grace.” Basil considered the time in which he lived to be “talkative, querulous, hysterical, maudlin, full of false ideas, of unhealthy germs, of extravagant, dissipated habits, for which a great reckoning was in store.” “No wonder Verena fell for him,” writes the Thinking Housewife. Verena slips through Olive’s cold clutches, because a true woman is always attracted to a hero. Even a quiet whisper to Verena’s blood called her out of the darkness, and we have the same hope for our race.
“If we are unwilling to hold women strictly accountable for their actions, we have only one logical recourse available: a return to the ancient Roman legal doctrine that a woman is a perpetual minor. This would involve an end not merely to contemporary ‘women’s liberation’ but to an entire legal tradition that has developed within Christendom over centuries. For starters, it means women could no longer be permitted to hold property or enter into contracts. Although demeaning to women and inconvenient even for men, such a system is at least internally consistent. What is both inconsistent and morally indefensible is what feminism and the misguided gallantry of certain male conservatives are now combining to promote: freedom for women to do as they damn well please, with blame and punishment for men if the women are not happy with the results of their own behavior.” ~ Dr. F. Roger Devlin
The “self-evident absurdity of a female political leadership class. In a normal, man-centric political world, an occasional woman who is operating more or less within the standards of that world, such as Margaret Thatcher, can be a leader and function well. But once the political world become predominantly female, then it changes to something fundamentally different and inappropriate to politics.”
George Will writes in Newsweek: “Although women are a majority of the workforce, perhaps as many as 80 percent of jobs lost were held by men.”
“[W]hile single white women in the prime of their working years (ages 36 to 49) have a median wealth of $42,600 (still only 61 percent of their single white male counterparts), the median wealth for single black women is only $5.”
Half of all black women have genital herpes. The infection rate in the general population is no less shocking: 1 in 6. Whatever happened to chastity? Notice how the writer of this article, to avoid being tarred as racist, denies that the astronomical rate of black infection has anything to do with black behavior.
This reminds me of the recent Super Bowl commercial with Tim Tebow and his mother. Viewers could not even tell that it was a pro-life commercial because it was all about how a mother and her son have a strong relationship. Even though millions of dollars were spent to capture the attention of the largest viewership in television history, murder could not be called murder. Instead, it was cast as an inferior lifestyle choice. Actually, I’m giving it too much credit. Its message was merely to think twice, or get a second opinion, if your doctor tells you that your pregnancy is at risk. It had all the weight of “Try to not drink too many sodas, or you might develop pancreatic cancer.” Christians have learned that denouncing sin makes them unpopular. Hence the careers of Rick Warren and Joel Osteen.
Cory Doctorow praises his bra-burning mother for promoting baby murder. How touching!
Ah, memories. It’s the tenth anniversary of the dot-com bubble bursting. Ten years ago, $10,000 invested in the Wired Top 40 tech companies would be worth $6,870 today.
The next time your hungry kids hold up an empty soup bowl, tell them that the “stimulus” money is creating jobs in China. I mean, don’t they want the economy to be stimulated?
Aren’t you glad the recession is over? For the first time since the Great Depression, Americans took more aid from the government than they paid in taxes. Some states will delay tax refunds for months. In California, IOUs are again being considered as 80% of all income taxes are being paid out before they’re even collected. People are actually being told, six months into the year, to estimate total earnings for the year and pay 80% in advance. The house of cards is about to fall.
“If we run into such debts as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and our amusements, for our callings and our creeds, as the people of England are, our people, like them, must come to labor sixteen hours in the twenty-four, give the earnings of fifteen of these to the government for their debts and daily expenses, and the sixteenth being insufficient to afford us bread, we must live, as they now do, on oatmeal and potatoes, have no time to think, no means of calling the mismanagers to account, but be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves to rivet their chains on the necks of our fellow-sufferers.” ~ Thomas Jefferson, the greatest of all American presidents
“When the Constitution was written and the Senate was created, there were around 4 million people in America, or about one senator for every 150,000 people. For Congress to be as representative as it was in 1789, we’d need to elect 2,000 senators and 5,000 House members.” Obviously, this could never happen, leastways because no one could speak. The country is far too big, and still Pharaoh hardens his heart and refuses to let my people go.
This beer shall not escape the long arm of the law, even if wetbacks do. And if you’re white and buy guns after being fired, you’ll be suspected of mental instability. Stakeouts and SWAT teams are needed to keep this whole Second Amendment thing from getting out of hand.
If only Stonewall could return and clear the Shenandoah Valley of Mexi-trash. The job is left to lesser men.
Rupert Murdoch, an Australian, doesn’t believe the New York Times will sell itself any time soon, “least of all to a Mexican” like Carlos Slim. We enjoy good “racist” humor.
What’s the difference between liberal genocide and conservative genocide?
Leave it to Elizabeth Wright, our favorite black woman, to write the best article on Sarah Palin that has yet been written. It may never be bested.
If a “racist” is someone who prefers the company of members of his own ethnic group as opposed to others, why isn’t this an individual choice that a true conservative would endorse? Apparently it is not, for such a person, no matter how benignly he expresses his preference, is generally attacked by conservatives just as belligerently as liberals. After all, doesn’t he understand that rejection of others might result in “hurt” feelings? And isn’t it “feelings” that count over individual rights?
Is a “sexist” someone who rejects the notion that Nature made the two sexes equal? The rejection of this notion was, until very recently, a foundation stone of conservatism.
Mrs. Wright’s insight that modern paganism has reduced politics to a quest for a national fertility symbol is profound.
The empire is forced to make maps like this to prove that money borrowed from China is being distributed to blacks and mestizos too (click on diversity by county).
Join the National Guard and earn the cash to dress like a pimp. Buy a basketball and a Hendrix album. Where’s the bucket of fried chicken? Bow-chicka-wow-wow.
Outmanned and outsupplied but never outfought. The South will rise again to dance on the grave of this evil empire.
People are fond of easy explanations. As a friend of ours writes, blaming our present economic plague on subprime mortgages loaned to unworthy minorities is like saying that World War I was caused by the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, or World War II was caused by Hitler’s invasion of Poland, or the “Civil War” was caused by South Carolina firing on Fort Sumter, its own property. History does not tolerate such reductions, even if lazy popular accounts of history do for a time. Many factors contributed to each of these events.
John Derbyshire considers Jared Taylor’s “ethos of the South” to be “as odd and particular, in its own way, as Tibetan Buddhism.” For some reason, this reminds me of a John Prine song. Prine sings about his chain-smoking grandfather, a carpenter by trade, who “voted for Eisenhower because Lincoln won the war.”
“When a town gets below 50 percent white, it makes it very difficult for the town to maintain services.”
Los Angeles has been accused of civil rights violations because diversities there have still not turned white.
The head of the Detroit school board is illiterate, and his fellow Negroes believe this makes him “a great representative of his community.” Well, it’s hard to argue with that.
I guess equality isn’t working out as Kansas City planned. The city spent billions trying to make black and white kids equal, and now, long past broke, it is forced to close half of the schools. “The city used gobs of cash to improve facilities, but boosting lagging test scores and stemming the exodus of students were more elusive. Like other big-city districts, it finds itself struggling to become more than just the last resort for large pockets of poverty in the urban core.” It’s too bad that the fine people of Missouri will never get their money back, but this is what happens when you build a McMansion on the sand.
Obama is giving more than $4 billion of stolen money to the state temples to make it even more difficult to punish black “students” in their embryonic stages of criminality. The program is called “Race to the Top,” and it’s a) another set of quotas, and b) an opportunity for liberals to spend money that doesn’t belong to them to show that they care.
Queeundilin Suber, patron of the Chuck.
“This could be the year that the number of babies born to minorities in America outnumbers babies born to whites… Right now, roughly 1 in 10 of the nation’s 3,142 counties already have minority populations greater than 50 percent. But 1 in 4 communities have more minority children than white children or are nearing that point, according to the study.” Your lying preacher will tell you that this is completely irrelevant since we all came from Adam.
Hannah Giles, who played the part of the hooker in the famous ACORN sting, believes that her generation is “free and equal” and is not guided by nature. She believes that “race is not an issue” for her generation because it has successfully built a society that operates “at optimum levels” and is “able to conduct higher levels of human bonding.” This proves two things: 1) She did not engineer the sting; and 2) She must be a sociology major.
I’ve listened to Jane Goodall say that the only difference between us and apes is our more sophisticated language. It strikes me that Darwinists tend to be white paternalists, or what we might call white supremacists. If human beings are merely advanced apes then throwing money at perpetually problematic peoples becomes a matter of conservation and good stewardship, like saving the black rhino and giant panda from extinction. The implicit assumption is that whites, as the superior race, are in an entirely different caretaker class. Therefore, white endangerment is never a concern, just as minority responsibility is never really considered an achievable goal. The race of the white liberals is the pinnacle of evolution, and so progress, which drives them innately, must forever be on the side of the lower races.
Rape is such a problem among Negro savages that clitorectomies and other forms of genital mutilation are popular ways of sparing their daughters from the advances of the “men” of their kind. Now we learn that Cameroonians are ironing their daughters’ breasts until they shrivel away!
Two very good questions: “Why does African politics invariably lead to violence? And can you think of a non-racial reason why African politics are corrupt on a scale we cannot even comprehend?”
The Last White Man. All the liberals who wailed that apartheid was the worst thing in the world couldn’t care less about these murders, just as they refuse to acknowledge horrors close to home.
Roughly one-eighth of this Christian-Newsom documentary is about how terrible and unthinkable it is that “racists” are drawing attention to the racial aspect of the most violent crimes in Tennessee history. Its core message is that sometimes awful, random things can happen to our kids, so the most important thing we can do is hug and kiss them, because we just never know when some tragedy can take them from us. Whoomp, there it is. And this is precisely what the “evil” and “wicked” racists protest, because crimes like these are entirely preventable; they should never have happened. But they did happen and will happen again and again because the very same white people who are now saying how much they love their children actually hate them if they willfully allow themselves to be guided by the blind and ignorant.
Blacks are allowed to be upset about “womb lynching,” but if whites oppose abortion (even secondarily) because it decimates their race, they are racists.
Liberals suddenly take up the cause of free speech when one of their own is fired for using the proverbial N-Word.
“The term ‘minority’ has become a title of nobility, much like Duke, Lord, Earl, etc., which entitles the holder to rights and privileges beyond those afforded to the common folk. Titles of nobility are expressly forbidden in the Constitution, but the Constitution has been a dead letter for a long, long time in America.” Investigations are racist.
“For sale” signs are racist.
The head of the Justice Department’s civil rights unit is trying to create hate crimes where none exist, as though he’s on the SPLC payroll.
The word “spook” is racist.
The word “hoodlum” is racist. (I hope you’re taking notes.) Blacks are not very bright. They tend to interpret any word which they don’t understand as a pejorative that should be punished to the maximum extent. A few years ago, this happened with the word “niggardly,” and it was all over the news, as blacks across the country rose in high dudgeon rather than open a dictionary.
Honoring famous black people is racist. “The school had actually approved these three, including a tranny and a double murderer, as appropriate subject matter for Black History Month, but when ‘white males’ follow the curriculum, they’re suspended and are probably facing termination… Isn’t that HATE nowadays, to suggest that transvestites are any less worthy of respect than anyone else?”
The SPLC, for whom “skinheads and Birchers and Glenn Beck fans are all tied together in one big ball of scary,” now considers 75% of the American public to be enemies of Truth, Justice, and the American Way. There sure are a lot of racists out there. “Apparently, supporting the Constitution is now considered radical.”
“Rather than monitoring hate groups, the Southern Poverty Law Center has become one.” ~ Carol M. Swain, black Professor of Political Science and Law at Vanderbilt University
I ain’t black and I ain’t yella – just a white boy lookin’ for a place to do my thing (the banned Merle Haggard song).
Post-Christian consumers of swineflesh and abusers of their own children who have acquiesced to the invasion of their own country. “So the demons begged Him, saying, ‘If You cast us out, permit us to go away into the herd of swine.’ And He said to them, ‘Go.’ So when they had come out, they went into the herd of swine. And suddenly the whole herd of swine ran violently down the steep place into the sea, and perished in the water” (Matthew 8:31-32).
Great news from the Netherlands! Geert Wilders is only critical of Muslims, not Jews, but his ascendancy is a harbinger of good things for Europe. We even have a Rep in Texas who supports him, which takes tremendous courage. Like Zundel, Wilders is a free-speech-criminal. I would love to hear someone explain how Wilders can becomes Dutch Prime Minister while Zundel spends seven years in a dungeon, both of them “guilty” of the same “crimes.”
Another very good sign: Despite being turned away from Britain by “hate police” last year, Wilders has been allowed to return to screen Fitna for the House of Lords. This is the very same film that caused him to be arrested in the Netherlands. At a press conference that day, he called Islam a “retarded culture” with a “fascist ideology,” which are similar to words that caused Nick Griffin to be dragged before the high court twice. The trouble is that the only hope for a post-Christian who condemns “fascist ideology” (as most Europeans today would describe Christianity) is democracy, and democracy will never save the West from the diseases that have put us on our deathbed. (Glenn Beck is calling Wilders a fascist.) Unless the West returns to its Liege Lord, it will lose everything. White skin and high intelligence won’t save it.
The first people granted asylum in this country because they were persecuted for homeschooling. Prohibition of homeschooling is the only law of the Nazis that Judeo-Germans still like. Now it has the purpose of preventing Christian families from avoiding close contact with Jews.
“Judaism, since Christ, is a corruption; indeed Judas is the image of the Jewish people; their understanding of the Scriptures is carnal; they bear guilt for the death of the Saviour, for through their fathers they have killed the Christ.” ~ St. Augustine (anti-Semite)
It’s always fun to hear a U.S. Representative refer to the Jew Chief of Staff as “son of the devil spawn.”
Books are anti-Semitic. Jews are free to publish pornography and blasphemy to their heart’s content, but anyone who publishes opinions that offend Jews must be imprisoned.
Gary DeMar invites a Jew on his show who compares the murderers of babies today to Southern plantation owners (at 7:10). At the end, he repeats the fashionable lie that Hitler attempted to “eradicate…anybody who wasn’t an Aryan.” DeMar doesn’t correct any of this, of course. DeMar refers several times to the “black community” and to “black communities,” which are subsets of the unified “black community.” But he would sooner drop dead than allow the term “white community” to escape his lips, or to imply in any way that whites have interests of their own. Messianic Jews and Reformed Yankees are charming.
Migrant workers in Israel are not allowed to have children, and all illegal aliens are being deported. Strangely, this is not called racism, oppression, or xenophobia in the Jew-press. Messianic Jews invited on Christian talk shows do not liken these policies to apartheid or Nazism. I wonder why, since they’re “Christian” and all.
VP Biden calls Israel “home” and says that alignment with Tel Aviv “has been and will continue to be the centerpiece of American policy.” Yes, we know.
Steve Sailer has written an interesting article on how the banking establishment used to be dominated by blue blood Protestants rather than Jews (allegedly). They were not necessarily more ethical personally (“American liberalism was invented by the oldest and most socially respectable hereditary elite in the country’s least ethnically diverse region, and imposed from the top down”), but the bond of blood gave them long-term interest in their posterity, which was more valuable than money. “Of course, the old blue bloods weren’t thinking just of handing down their companies, but also of handing down their country.” The same can be said of the old monarchs. Even though history reveals many of them to have been swine, personally, they at least identified with and protected their people. The reign of a monarch, therefore, is always preferable to colorblind “democracy,” even if it’s not ideal.
At about seven minutes into this interview, slovenly-coiffured Charles Johnson and his metrosexual interviewer agree that Christians are child abusers and should not be allowed to feed themselves and their families. The Left appears to be as tolerant as ever. Never forget that Jews still have aneurysms over Joe McCarthy’s persecution and blacklisting of the Hollywood 10. Now that we’re no longer in an “anti-Semitic” era in which men are professionally ruined for associating with Communists, what do we have? We have the SPLC, ADL, and assorted neocons blacklisting men like Kevin MacDonald, imprisoning men like Ernst Zundel, making it impossible for “racists” to find work, and ruining all who disagree with them. What’s the difference? Choose you this day whom you will serve, but let us not deceive ourselves that two eternally-hostile religions can ever find peace and common ground. Democracy will not save us.
The Jew version of “free speech” in Britain is that you are free to hold semitically-incorrect opinions but are not allowed to organize around them.
“Hate” = debate. Therefore, to bring an end to hate in this world, we must outlaw debate.
Various abominations of nature. Race-mixing neo-Christians will tell you that these belong to the same “kind” simply because they are able to procreate. The bison is going the way of the white race, and to oppose this is “hate.” Are fans of the Westminster Dog Show also Nazis?
What is this, some kind of Haitian adoption scheme?
New parents of a Haitian orphan on their way home from Burger King:
“Whoever walks a mile full of false sympathy walks to the funeral of the whole human race.” ~ D.H. Lawrence
Child trafficking: If you’re a celebrity it’s called adoption.
Christian kookery springs eternal.
Miracles come to those who scream the loudest and grind their cabooses into bystanders. I’m pretty sure this is covered in the book of Philemon.
Fans of our old friend Badonicus will recall the time Professa Anfernee Bradley was asked if astral projection is a sin. He replied in the affirmative, saying that his Aunt Shirley’s butt sticks out so far that you could set a tray on it.
One of Bad’s toupee customers spotted at a Walmart:
The boobs who are running the PCUSA “will feature a feminist speaker who favors replacing the cross with a lactating breast.”
Have you heard of the Reformation?
Netflix considers all characters in a movie being white (clearly an oversight by the Jew producers) as harmful to children.