More anti-standard insanity from TOQ. The writer claims that morality is not universal and ethics must be viewed “through a biological lens.” How can this not lead to wars of annihilation? If they’re going to be consistent enough to say that morality is defined by blood, and the faith of the white man must, by definition, be limited to the white man, they should be honest enough to admit that this precludes any possibility of any sense of unity and common understanding among human beings. There is no logical endpoint for this philosophy but the total destruction of those who are not us.
In this post, the humanists make their intentions plain:
White men should no longer require any exogenous gods, whether new or old; we instead should strive toward godhood for our race. It is time for the white man to grow up and put away the fantasies of childhood, fantasies of gods and external intelligent forces controlling a destiny that should be ours, and ours alone, to mold.
“Away with you, Satan! For it is written, ‘You shall worship the LORD your God, and Him only you shall serve.’” ~ Matthew 4:10
The writer disingenuously claims that “in the short to medium-term, we must defend…traditional Christianity… Note that this doesn’t mean promoting Christian beliefs…” In other words, he affects a lie, pretending to accept that which he rejects. Why should anyone trust anything he says about race or anything else? What exactly are these people selling, and what does it have to do with the West that actually exists? The funniest part of the article is when he says that this ambitious program of animal existence is “a long-term, multi-generational project.” We’re still waiting for these losers to prove that they can successfully produce well-rounded children from stable marriages who share the same commitments as their parents. Instead, with each passing generation, Christians reveal these people for the fools they are and have always been.
Hey, TOQ editors! Now would be a good time for another article on Revilo Oliver or Friedrich Nietzsche! Time’s a-wastin’. Gotta save the West.
“Hostility to Radicalism, incessant, implacable hostility, is the essential definition of Conservatism.” ~ Lord Salisbury
Contrast the nihilistic stupidity of humanists with this Easter letter from the BNP. Nick Griffin apparently realizes that the British Isles, long since having lost faith in their phony churches and lying preachers, still realize that they have been ransomed:
Dear Fellow Patriot,
A special event that happened recently has changed my outlook on our struggle and the situation facing our sacred country. That event was the peaceful, sensible, mature debate with the Christian Party leader George Hargreaves and a large number of Christian Party members. I thoroughly enjoyed the entire debate which was noticeably absent of the usual hysterical fanaticism of the liberal-left.
It made me think long and hard about a new dimension of our struggle: our Christian religion, culture and traditions. In the past too much emphasis has been placed on the ethnic aspect of our present national dilemma, whilst the longest running feature of our identity has been overlooked: the fact that our country has been held together and guided for millennia by our common, ancient religion: Christianity.
And before you misunderstand me, I do not mean the gut-wrenching politically correct quasi-Marxist nonsense spewing forth from the treacherous leaders of the modern Anglican Church. I mean the traditional, upright, decent and honest Christianity that defended Europe from Islamic conquest, the Christianity of the Crusades and the Christianity of our forefathers.
There is nothing in traditional Christianity about world government, abolishing the nations, enslaving the world to finance capitalism and big business, eradicating traditional unique cultures and national identities, the promotion of sexual perversion, the glorification of treason, letting criminals run rampant and political correctness.
No, the Christianity of our forefathers was about honesty, family, patriotism, sacrifice, loyalty, king and country. For over 1,000 years Christianity held our people together and guided us through the centuries. If Christianity had not existed Europe would have been conquered by Islam centuries ago.
I made the irrefutable point during the debate with the Christian Party that the British National Party is the only political organisation in Britain that wants to keep this country fundamentally Christian, with Christian values, traditions and culture. Every other political party would happily allow Islam to engulf our Christian homeland.
After the General Election, all BNP leaflets will carry a Christian Cross to demonstrate our commitment to maintaining and preserving our Christian heritage as a nation. Politically correct scoundrels like Rowen Williams will cry foul but we have nothing to be ashamed of as we are the defenders of Britain’s Christian heritage, just like our Crusader ancestors in the Middle Ages.
So this weekend enjoy the Christian festival of Easter with pride and remember the War Heroes that fell in the many wars to defend our homeland. Be proud of your British, Christian identity and reject the false guilt and self-loathing of the liberal-left political class.
The darkest hour is just before the dawn, but be of good cheer for Christ Our Lord is risen!
There has been of late a hopeful resurgence of Calvinism. “By most logic, the stern system of Calvinism shouldn’t be popular today. Much of modern Christianity preaches a comforting Home Depot theology: You can do it. We can help.”
In 1907, William Montgomery Brown, the Episcopal bishop of Arkansas (previously the Archdeacon of Ohio) wrotethese six propositions that were affirmed by an almost unanimous vote and are every bit as true today:
(1) No race can amount to anything without self-government; (2) The only realm in which the Negro in these United States can hope to govern himself is that of religion; (3) Under present conditions, the American Negro, speaking generally, is degenerating instead of advancing; (4) The Afro-American can be saved from utter ruin and extinction only by the bridging of the ever-widening and deepening gulf which now exists between him and the Anglo-American; (5) This necessary bridging cannot be done without the complete drawing of the Color-Line around the Social, Political and Religious Realms; and (6) The necessity for self-government and for the bridging of the gulf between Anglo-Americans and Afro-Americans by the drawing of the Color-Line makes it necessary that American Negroes should have a wholly independent, autonomous Church…
The essence of religion is obedience to God’s will. Now it manifestly is God’s will to have different races of mankind, otherwise he would have made all alike. He drew the Color-Line, and the failure to recognize it is irreligious, because it is disobedience. To argue that it should be recognized in the social realm, but that the contrary is true in the religious realm, is to take an irreligious position, because the unity of God and nature would be denied… The hypothesis that the Christian religion does away with human distinctions in the religious realm will not stand, because it denies the unity of nature, and such denial involves the rejection of the fundamental doctrine of Christianity, the Divinity of Christ, for God is the author of nature; and if Christ was Divine, He could not have disregarded its unity…
“Righteousness exalteth a nation”… The whole family of facts here assembled, especially those that establish the greater and faster growing criminality of the Northern Negro, show clearly that education is not the cure for his ills. Generation after generation of coddling and sympathy in the North has not effaced a single racial trait nor raised by a single notch the average character, moral or mental or physical, of hundreds of thousands of the pick of their race. Nearly forty years of devoted and enthusiastic effort to elevate and educate the Southern Negro lie stretched out behind us in a dead level of failure. We grant freely and gladly that there are exceptions, rare and remarkable enough. But that the average of the Negro, both moral and physical, has fallen and is falling measurably under all endeavors to lift him up, is a fact that shines out clear in the light of the foregoing statistics…
There may be a good deal of spiritual unity between sheep and deer, but, as they do not naturally herd together, there cannot be said to be any schism between them when, in the pasture or corral, they gravitate each kind to themselves. Even among the same species of animals different varieties or breeds manifest a strong tendency to consort together. Owing to this natural disposition there is very little of social comity between St. Bernard dogs and rat-terriers. If dogs had any organizations corresponding to State or Church, how absurd it would be for some Republican or Catholic-minded dog to set up a howl against the sin and danger of schism because the rat-terriers and the Newfoundlands manifested a preference for Kings and Bishops of their own breed. Bees and ants are said to have queens. Think of a swarm of honey-bees choosing a bumble-bee for its queen, or a hill of black ants elevating a white or red ant to their throne. But to expect honey-bees to be satisfied with bumble-bee or black ants with white ant queens would be about as reasonable as to expect Afro-American Churchmen to be satisfied with Anglo-American Bishops…
One race cannot admit another race to political and ecclesiastical equality because, to do so is to open the way to social equality. If, for the purpose of illustrating our meaning we say that social equality represents the marriage relationship, we may claim that political and ecclesiastical equality represent the courtships which lead to that relationship. And in view of the main purpose of this essay, it is important to note that of the two courtships, the one which is promoted by ecclesiastical equality is more dangerous than that which grows out of political equality…
The Anglo-Saxon branch of the Aryan Race is happily exceedingly jealous of its blood. The Southern part of the American branch of our race is especially guarded against the introduction of Negro blood into its veins. It is, indeed, true that many Mulatto children throughout the South bear witness to the shameful mixture of Anglo-Saxon with African blood, but they are all born of Negro women by impure white men who are degenerates. The white women of the South are pure. They are a high-minded, proud, spotless race. If they were not this, the Anglo-Saxon people in America would rapidly degenerate into a lowgrade, mongrel breed, and that would be the end of American civilization, and the beginning of barbarism…
Judeochristians today, like Gary North, continue to accuse Southern Christians of having legalized rape on their plantations. But this is a lie, and lies are to be expected of liars. As the bishop notes, miscegenation was very rare in in the South. When trust was broken, it was far more likely to be broken by a transient farmhand than an owner. See the 1860 Census:
Bishop Brown prefaces his book with this brief speech by John Temple Graves:
On this great question I stand now, where Webster stood and Henry Clay; where Thomas stood, and Abraham Lincoln, and Henry Grady, and Councill and Turner and the rest—where in time all men will stand who see the light and dare to face it.
SEPARATION is the logical, the inevitable, the only way. No other proposed solution will stand the test of logic and experiment.
For no statute will permanently solve this problem. No anodyne of law, no counter-irritant of legislation will quiet it longer than the hour of its application. The evil is in the blood of races, the disease is in the bones and the marrow and the skin of antagonistic people.
Religion does not solve the problem, for the Christ Spirit will not be all-pervasive until the millenial dawn.
Education complicates the problem. Every year of enlightenment increases the negro’s apprehension of his position, of his merit and attainment and of the inconsistency between his real and his constitutional status in the Republic. Education brings perception, and ambition follows, with the aggressive assertion against the iron walls of a prejudice that has never yielded and will never yield. The conflict is irrepressible and inevitable.
Time complicates the problem by giving increasing numbers and additional provocation to the Negro, and increasing danger to the struggle which logic and destiny render certain.
Politics complicates the problem by bringing times of fierce conflict when the passions and prejudices of faction may be moved to partisan alignment with the deep and lurking dangers of the Race Question.
We have come in God’s providence to the parting of the ways. In the name of history and of humanity; in the interest of both races, and in the fear of God, I call for a division. We can make it peaceably now. We may be forced to accomplish it in blood hereafter.
Compare this article that calls Afrikaners “white supremacists” who ran their country “according to their belief in white superiority” (they hatefully gave blacks their own residential areas, post offices, and courts!) to this article in which the present-day rulers of South Africa defend a popular song that promotes white genocide called “Kill the Boer.” Whites are called evil and racist for giving blacks their own institutions when they were obliged to do nothing more than run them off as trespassers. These free gifts under apartheid were the very reason given for why whites should be stripped of their own inheritance, government, and future. Now the erstwhile black recipients of white kindness and wealth have taken control and are complaining that they are still not being given enough, and the only way to settle the account is through murder. “These songs cannot be regarded as hate speech or unconstitutional,” ANC Secretary General Gwede Mantashe told reporters. “Any judgment that describes them as such is impractical and unimplementable.” We do not exaggerate when we call Negroes savages. This is what the vast majority of them are, and perhaps it is all they ever will be. We don’t really know the answer to that question, but we know for certain that we are not obliged to give another drop of blood or another tear or another cent to them in the hope that they will change. Those days are over, and our only concern now is to give our children a future.
More than 3,000 white South African farmers have been murdered by savages since 1994. As you saw on TV, 3,000 deaths at the World Trade Center meant something.
Add to the list Eugene Terre’blanche, whose death has been repeatedly announced by Matt Drudge with the epithet “white supremacist.” Anyone who reads such headlines will conclude that Terra’blanche had it coming. Here are some representative comments. The media shares the guilt of murder.
What greater privilege is there than to stand in front of your own people and to be able to say, after all the years, you were faithful. And that you are still faithful and thankful to be able to stand and know that you have never been a traitor to the path, the truth, or will of the Volk.
Terra’blanche wanted to create three white republics that would allow blacks to be admitted only as guest workers. He was bludgeoned to death by two of these Negro workers, which only goes to show that the charity he extended to blacks was imprudent. The same could be said of our own Southerners, who should have picked their own cotton.
White South Africans (whose descendants here are not called African-Americans) are living under siege, and no one on earth, except for us “racists,” cares at all. “A woman is raped every 26 seconds in South Africa, the most violent ‘non-war zone’ in the world; 40% of those are children, 65% are gang rapes. It is commonplace for children and babies to be raped in the new and improved South Africa. Blacks even molest animals to avoid catching HIV. Under black rule, South Africa is also an innovator and world leader in murder, assault, robbery, and hijackings.” Those who think this is a desirable state of affairs are not called black supremacists; those who steal white-owned land are not called black supremacists; those who sing songs about killing white farmers are not called black supremacists; those who shoot and bludgeon white farmers to death are not called black supremacists. Whites, on the other hand, who comprise only about 5% of the population of South Africa; who are four times more likely to be killed than were American troops in Vietnam; who nevertheless want all people to have a free, representative government and patria; these are called supremacists. Historically, whites are the only people in the world who have respected the rights of minorities. But in the case of the minority of whites in Africa, not even most whites care what happens to them.
The independent white homeland that Terra’blanche advocated was a fallback position, like segregation here after the War. Paradoxically, it was this very desire on the part of whites that blacks should rule themselves that ended apartheid. It was an experiment in ending paternalism, and it has resulted in terror for white people on that continent. Notice that Jews in Israel are doggedly holding on to their apartheid state because, despite the lies they tell to gullible whites, they know that they would not survive on equal political footing with Palestinians. Whites must relinquish control of their countries in order to prove they are not “racist,” but Jews will never relent, because they invented the word “racist” and control its application in the media.
The fact that the US was so hostile to White Christian South Africa, yet is now engaged in two Middle Eastern wars for the convenience of the closely parallel phenomenon of Israel is really the definitive word on the state of ethnic politics in America.
Rev. Manning says God has shown him a thing or two, and I can’t dispute the truth of it. Wisdom is vindicated by her children (Luke 7:35).
“The proposition that individuals can differ by innate mental ability and that races can differ by the average of such abilities:
1) conflicts with no major Western religious tradition;
2) conflicts with no major Western philosophical tradition;
3) is consistent with everyday experience;
4) is probably believed by the majority of ordinary people of all races;
5) is consistent with the weight of evidence from the most exhaustive and sophisticated empirical studies;
6) is consistent with, indeed is an almost inevitable implication of, the most basic version of evolutionary theory, which theory all educated people are supposed to accept.
And yet the operative assumption of government policy and the protocols of almost all public journals are that this proposition cannot be true.”
Ehud makes an excellent point here. How could the Supreme Court conclude that “separate is inherently unequal” in schools when the founding fathers, in the Declaration of Independence, justified the establishment of the republic on the principle that peoples are entitled by God and nature to “separate and equal” stations? Roll that one around in your head for a while, unless you’re a preacher, in which case hairspray takes precedence. We can have liberty or we can have equality, but we can’t have both.
As an important corollary, read these wonderful excerpts from the Texas Declaration of Independence from Mexico. You will immediately notice that the very same document could be written today and mailed to Rome-on-the-Potomac. “[T]he whole nature of their government has been forcibly changed, without their consent, from a restricted federative republic, composed of sovereign states, to a consolidated central military despotism.” What is “the first law of nature”? The “right of self-preservation.” What gives us the authority “to abolish such government, and create another in its stead”? Our “sacred obligation to [our] posterity.” Focus on that last word, “posterity.” It all comes back to race. The Tea Partiers don’t realize this yet. They still think their nation was founded on ideas rather than blood. “The necessity of self-preservation, therefore, now decrees our eternal political separation.”
“A century and a half ago, John C. Calhoun, one of the most prescient observers of the American regime, remarked that the South was the balance wheel of the Union which prevented the whole from flying apart under the stress of the manias that regularly seized hold of the mainstream.” It’s amazing that the South remains the most conservative region of the country in spite of the fact that this is where most of the blacks live. (Diversities have never been fans of limited government.)
Michael Hoffman has a good article on why consistent Christians cannot belong to the Republican Party. Of course, belonging to that other party is even more unthinkable.
“They’re pigs, Neil!” Ted Nugent, folks. That’s a man. He’s no ass-kisser.
Tocqueville knew that despotism in a constitutional republic “would be more extensive and more mild; it would degrade men without tormenting them.”
Above this race of men stands an immense and tutelary power, which takes upon itself alone to secure their gratifications and to watch over their fate… [It seeks] to keep them in perpetual childhood… For their happiness such a government willingly labors, but it chooses to be the sole agent and the only arbiter of that happiness; it provides for their security, foresees and supplies their necessities, facilitates their pleasures, manages their principal concerns, directs their industry, regulates the descent of property, and subdivides their inheritances: what remains, but to spare them all the care of thinking and all the trouble of living?…
The will of man is not shattered, but softened, bent, and guided; men are seldom forced by it to act, but they are constantly restrained from acting. Such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence; it does not tyrannize, but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd…
Our contemporaries are constantly excited by two conflicting passions: they want to be led, and they wish to remain free. As they cannot destroy either the one or the other of these contrary propensities, they strive to satisfy them both at once. They devise a sole, tutelary, and all-powerful form of government, but elected by the people. They combine the principle of centralization and that of popular sovereignty; this gives them a respite: they console themselves for being in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own guardians. Every man allows himself to be put in leading-strings, because he sees that it is not a person or a class of persons, but the people at large who hold the end of his chain.
For a perfect example of what Tocqueville meant when he wrote this hundreds of years ago, see this clip of Chris “Thrill Going Up My Leg” Matthews and another liberal. They actually suggest that Tea Partiers have no reason to complain about the government because our government officials are elected. This is democracy as the antithesis of theocracy, and you don’t have to guess which of these we prefer.
“Future generations have a right to demand of us that they shall be born white in a white man’s land.” ~ Lothrop Stoddard
La Raza pretends that its name has nothing to do with race. Its founder wasn’t so coy. Jose Vasconcelos, who coined the term La Raza, explains that the true purpose of the organization is to be anti-white: “The struggle of Latinity against Saxonism has come to be, and continues being in our era, a struggle of institutions, of purposes and of ideals.” Whites are understandably singled out from the red, yellow, and black races. Vasconcelos hoped for a fifth raza to arise—la raza cósmica—the cosmic race, which would be a mestizo-mixture of all, “the union of all men in a fifth universal race, fruit of the previous [races] and an improvement [superación] over all the past [races].” Naturally, this would never be called racial supremacy. Though J.V. believed that of his fellow Mexicans, “90% of those contracting marriage…[are] ugly,” careful eugenics would bring about an “infinitely superior type to all that have existed.” (I wonder why this isn’t working for the weird-looking children Elin Nordegren carries around on her hip.)
The low types of the species will be absorbed by the superior type. In this way the Negro, for example, can be redeemed and, little by little, through voluntary extinction, the ugliest stocks will be less prolific, and the better specimens will yield to the more beautiful. The inferior races, when educated, will be less prolific, and the better specimens will ascend in a scale of ethnic improvement. Their type will not exactly be the white, but this new raza, to which the white himself will have to aspire with the object of conquering the synthesis. The Indian, by means of the injection of a similar race, will make the jump of myriad years…and in a few decades of aesthetic eugenics the Negro can disappear together with the types which the free instinct of beauty will designate as fundamentally recessive and unworthy…of perpetuation.
Though they would not put it in these terms, Judeochristian liar-preachers have the same goal in view for the diverse peoples of the world, since they all came from Adam. And oh heck, wouldn’t you know it? Vasconcelos was a Nazi sympathizer as well, and now his organization receives federal funds to wage war against white people who refuse to wage war against God.
The goal of “No Child Left Behind” is to close the racial achievement gap by raising off-white test scores. Absolutely nothing is being done to boost white, Jewish, and Asian scores, because then the gap would be even wider. Whites, Jews, and Asians are seeing their scores suppressed, even as they fund the system. Liberal do-gooders like Bill Gates are donating their fortunes to boost only the scores of off-whites. Gates knows what everyone else knows, which is that the gap is not going to close if all races are given equal resources. It’s intractable.
Higher taxes for white parents and violent schools for white children: such is the 56-year failed attempt to make black people white. Now California must rethink its math standards in order boost black scores while keeping white scores down.
Oh, I’d say we burn through a hundred or so ethnic-studies majors each year. They tend to last a little longer than women’s studies majors and art-therapy students, but Cuellen got mashed to a pulp pretty quickly. It usually takes ethnic-studies majors another year to realize that they’re wasting their precious youth on a Sisyphean endeavor… Every year, there’s a fresh crop to throw in the grinder… But the majority of them will march on like cattle to the slaughter, thinking that pure determination and hope can change young lives. I can hear their footsteps now, marching toward our offices like lemmings to a cliff.
We were just saying that of 3,000 students enrolled at Oxford in 2008, five were black. Of all Americans who claimed doctoral degrees in physics in 2008, only twelve were black.
Who says that Negro congressmen don’t understand science?
Now blacks are being bribed in the hope that it will train them to be civilized. White liberals love programs like this because they get to assuage their chronic white guilt and collect other people’s money too. (A huge chunk of the donations are absorbed by “administrative costs.”)
An Easter Sunday chimpout, in which we learn that it is disrespectful to blow whistles at Negroes because they’re no longer slaves.
Gonorrhea is now almost exclusively a black disease. Black illegitimacy is now at 72% and rising, and whites are now as promiscuous as blacks were 50 years ago. Perhaps soon we can replace “E Pluribus Unum” with “Anything With a Hole” on imperial currency. Washington, Lincoln, and Franklin could be replaced by Beyonce Knowles, Tyra Banks, and Mariah Carey.
“Cops can’t win when it comes to blacks. When the police step up patrols in high crime areas, they’re accused of racism, ‘hassling the black community,’ and violating civil rights. When they don’t step up patrols in high crime areas, they’re denounced for not caring about the black community, and, you guessed it, accused of racism.”
Here’s an uppity Negro who can get away with writing words that would get any white man fired if the roles were reversed. Here’s an article in which ownership of the country is placed squarely in racial terms, even though the word “race” is never used. Here’s another black “journalist” who equates lynching and bombing with protests against the empire spending money that it does not have. And here’s an article by Jew Frank Rich in which Tea Partiers are accused of “small-scale mimicry of Kristallnacht,” and the slogan “Take our country back!” heard at “virtually all white” Tea Party rallies is correctly said to be aimed at Negroes and faggots. Don’t leave out Jews, Frank!
Speaking of Kristallnacht, Pat Buchanan writes that after “that terrible night, half the Jews remaining in Germany fled.” Since there could not have been many more than six million Jews in all of Europe, and far fewer in Germany, I wonder when Buchanan will publicly repent of his Holocaust Denial.
Bishop Williamson will go on trial next week. His own society refuses to offer public prayers for him. The pope threw Williamson under the bus, expressed his “unquestionable solidarity” with anti-Christs, and stated his hope that “the memory of the Shoah will induce humanity to reflect on the unpredictable power of hate when it conquers the heart of man.” Now, as if by divine retribution, the pope must explain why he never defrocked a priest who abused 200 deaf boys.
The pope is comparing his present turmoil over pederasty to “the persecution of the Jews.” But when it comes to child abuse, Jews have a higher level of comfort. Remember this Jew who called for the public display of crucifixes in Italy to be outlawed?
See this article, in which merely viewing a debate is said to dishonor WWII veterans. But forcing kids to watch propaganda like Schindler’s List is considered perfectly appropriate. In fact, this Jew-film is considered so crucial to education that networks refuse to censor its full-frontal nudity even during primetime.
“Even if reason tells us, even shouts with all its force the very absurdity of this confrontation between the small and insignificant people of Israel and the rest of humanity…as absurd, as incoherent and as monstrous as it may seem, we are engaged in close combat between Israel and the Nations – and it can only be genocidal and total because it is about our and their identities.” ~ Yitzhak Attia of the Yad Vashem Holocaust Institute
“Jewry is well-known for these syndromes: Hysteria, depression, introspection, amnesia, manipulation, pathological lying, ambivalent identity, prophetic deception, sexual ambiguity, and so on. Every Jewish symptom is found in hysteria.”
Jews host a “Cracker Ball” to ridicule real Floridians.
I was just watching The Right Stuff, which is an excellent film, and it shows that the scientists who headed both the Soviet and American space programs were German. Isn’t it amazing that prior to WWII, Germans were winning all the Nobel prizes, and less than 15 years afterwards they were putting men in outer space? But for some reason, during the Great War for Zion, they thought up the most inept ways of killing millions of people that have ever been conceived. And we know this is true because Communists and Jews don’t lie.
There’s some good humor in that flick too. Alan Shepard has to relieve himself in his spacesuit, and he says, “Well, I’m a wetback now.”
Jews want blacks to live everywhere on the planet except in Israel.
Fight the Nazis by swallowing colon-cancer-inducing white bread! See the beautiful woman, nourished on a diet of fresh-baked crap, riding her motorcycle to war. This is what America is all about! You’re a great American, Sean Hannity, you’re a great American.
Imagine, if you will, an event called “The White Agenda is the American Agenda.” A speaker rises to exclaim, “The White agenda has always been the best thing for the nation.” Another says, “We have a Tea Party and a Coffee Party – we need a White Party.” Then a pastor says, “I love white people and I make no excuses for that.” How do you think the SPLC and ADL would react? How could such an event be held anywhere without the forces of Tolerance making death threats against the hotel staff, as is now customary?
This emasculated errand boy says whites are going to be in the minority by 2050, so now is not the time to get angry about it because this will be bad for business and our children’s future. Thanks, Nancy. I think I smell your cookies burning.
Although now considered fundamental, anti-racism is a recent growth. Many dictionaries did not include the word “racism” before the Second World War. The 1968 convention was the first the Democratic Party held without whites-only delegations. One of the first Roman Catholics to identify racial segregation as a sin died just last year. The dimension anti-racism adds to moral life is thus novel…
The anti-racist sees racism as pure pathology, like smallpox. It would be all gain if it and everything that might lead to it were utterly destroyed… Unparalleled evil though it is thought to be, racism is seen everywhere, whether there is evidence for it or not…
Life worth living depends on culture, and culture on ethnicity… Things that knit society together are therefore difficult to disentangle from implicit racial distinctions. Ethnic habits, loyalties and ideals order social life whether we like it or not. To forbid discrimination with respect to such things is to demand that things that are crucial to social life be ignored, a demand that cannot be satisfied… Anti-racism is thus at odds with basic principles of human life…
A world without transcendence lacks universal qualities that transcend particulars. Universals like redness or goodness refer as much to things that might exist as those that do exist. Since universals are not wholly contained in our experience in the way particular red or good things are, to deny whatever exceeds our experience is to deny them. It is nonetheless difficult to dispense with universals. Although not contained within experience, they order it and make it possible for us to comprehend and deal with it. We understand the world by calling things by names such as “red” and “good” that could also apply to other things, past, present and future. Without them, we are left with an inexplicable world of unbridgeable differences…
Moderns are nonetheless uncomfortable with universals. Denying transcendence and thus universals, as moderns do, makes classification arbitrary. If things do not have stable natures that precede our purposes, if the difference (for example) between the sexes is just a social construction that can as well be deconstructed, then classifying is simply an exercise of the will of the classifier, and to be defined is to be subjected to that will. Those who reject transcendence therefore insist on escaping definition as the necessary ground of their dignity, and part of escaping definition is throwing off ethnicity.
A black singer “felt her spirit wince” when her black friend married a white woman. I know the feeling; I can seldom get through an entire day without feeling my spirit wince. It always makes me laugh to see blacks do what this writer does. She claims immunity from racism by going back hundreds of years and blaming her feelings on plantation slavery. Millions of whites were also once enslaved, but their descendants never do this. And in order for blacks to do it, they must ignore all the slavery which is currently active, and which is far greater and far more brutal than occurred in the South. They’re not the brightest bulbs on the ceiling.
Hundreds of millions of dollars are being stolen from your paychecks every year to send to Senegal, and $28 million of it has been used to erect a monument to the Negro race. According to the president of Senegal, “Africa has arrived in the 21st century standing tall and more ready than ever to take its destiny into its hands.” Except that they couldn’t pay for their ridiculous statue, which oversees mountains of garbage, and they aren’t building it either. North Koreans are building it. Apparently, there is at least one Negro in the government who is smart enough to realize that the men of his race have never built anything of their own accord.
It’s funny that Michael Steele says that he has a “slimmer margin” of error in his party leadership job because of his race, just as Obama has among white voters at large. The truth, of course, is just the opposite. In spite of being so corrupt and incompetent that there are now shadow fundraising organizations for Republicans, Steele can’t be fired, because to do so would be to “disrespect” the handful of black voters who support the Republican Party. (Blacks are racially cohesive, even when whites pretend that race doesn’t exist.) So Steele is given even more chances than would be allowed a white man, just as the Second Coming of Christ has been eclipsed by Obama’s presidency. Really, this is just another opportunity for Steele to accuse his critics of being racists, just as Clarence Thomas played his cards on the “high-tech lynching.” This is what happens when you send a token to do a man’s job.
Disneyland, 1956 – nothing but white people as far as the eye can see. One person leaves this “racist” comment: “Wonderful film – a great trip back in time to a time before the country was destroyed.” Whites are now a minority in California. One can only imagine the lawsuits that would result today from trolleying park-goers hither and yon in cars labeled “monkeys” and “wild animals.” Little boys could buy toy pistols in Frontierland back then. Now little boys are drugged with Ritalin in the hope that they will turn into queers or at least little girls. Do they still shoot at hippos on the jungle cruise? I doubt it, if guns are even being airbrushed out of movies like E.T. They probably call it the “rainforest” cruise now.
“Open immigration is essential for a libertarian country,” writes a prominent libertarian. Patrick Ford responds:
As much as many would like to believe the growing [Ron Paul] libertarian movement is based on an outpouring of intellectual curiosity about the Austrian business cycle, it has a lot more to do with buzzwords like “liberty” and an irrational worship of the individual. In this way, it has a lot more in common with the “hope” and “change” movement on the left than it does with anything written by Schmitt or de Maistre or Jünger or Chesterton or Kirk or Evola or Buchanan.
I’m very impressed by this analogy for culture:
A culture is comparable to the floor of a forest. The first layer is made up of clearly recognizable leaves from the most recent autumn. The next layer is less recognizable, the one after that formless, and finally there is a rich mass of unremembered mold from remote times. But the plant atop this composition grows out of it all, is nourished by all, and contributes to it all. The composite layer is the plant’s heritage.
A culture is accumulated in the same manner, an accretion deposited by each generation. Six or eight generations back, the deposits become formless, but the influences persist. We cannot escape the consequences of what those old dead generations did and left to us. Daily we confront in others, and ourselves act out, influences whose social beginnings were old in Europe when Caesar’s legions sailed for Britain.
“It is now proposed to turn the control of the mothers of the land over to a few single ladies [lesbians] holding government jobs in Washington.” ~ Senator James A. Reed
“In place of family ties based on what seems natural and customary and supported by upbringing and social expectation, feminism would permit only ties based on contract and idiosyncratic sentiment, with government stepping in when those prove too shaky for serious reliance.” ~ James Kalb
It’s interesting that the sex organs bear the shape of the assertive and receptive roles of the sexes themselves. It’s as though they provide a picture for how men and women are to behave. “These two poles working together provide a unity of purpose in the physical world as humankind progresses on its spiritual journey.” Feminism denies this self-evident truth. But it’s not just self-evident, it’s God-ordained. When we deny the God who created us, we lose sight of what makes us masculine and feminine. Instead of monogamy and the traditional roles of men and women, we have hypergamy. Dr. Roger Devlin has a lot to say about this. We all know what happens to men when they are not civilized. For one, they treat women like meat. Women, having bought into the lies of feminism, seek not the kind of men who will provide for them and protect and cherish them; instead, they are attracted to the stereotypical alpha males (players). Whites mimic the behavior they see among Negroes, in other words.
Scott Roeder was barred from describing abortion procedures during his trial for killing Kansas murderer George Tiller.
Abortion is legal in Kansas, and prosecutors were careful not turn the trial into a referendum on abortion.
Because, after all, what place does motive have in a capital trial?
On Thursday, Roeder told the court that Tiller “dismembered living children with the nod of approval from the state”…
Thompson described Tiller as a devoted husband, father and grandfather and a strong believer in women’s rights… As he spoke, Tiller’s widow Jeanne cried. Roeder at times looked away, yawned and took a drink of water…
“The impact of his death on women throughout the world is like an earthquake,” Thompson said. “They ask, where can I go? What will I do?’ I have to say, ‘I’m sorry, I can’t tell you.’ That’s the impact of this crime.”
Here’s the best part. Wait for it…wait for it…
Thompson said Roeder targeted Tiller in a “hate crime” because Tiller provided abortion services.
The Wreck of the Titan, by Morgan Robertson, is the most astounding literary coincidence of all time. It’s about an “unskinkable” ocean liner, British-owned and made of steel, “the largest craft afloat and the greatest of the works of men,” “equal to that of a first class hotel.” It doesn’t seem like the author is even trying to be original, right? Just like the Titanic, the Titan is 800 feet long and sinks after hitting an iceberg in the starboard bow, in the North Atlantic, in April, “around midnight.” While the Titanic crashed into an iceberg 400 miles from Newfoundland while moving at a speed of 25 knots, the Titan crashes into an iceberg “400 miles from Newfoundland” at a speed of 22.5 knots. The Titan has too few lifeboats, “as few as the law allowed,” though the author gives it four more than the Titanic had. Here’s the catch: The book was published in 1898, 14 years before the Titanic’s fateful voyage. Robertson predicted the whole thing.
Isaac Newton had possibly the most visionary mind in history. Consider that at age 22, when Cambridge University closed down for two years to escape the bubonic plague, Newton went home and invented calculus. He had to invent calculus in order to discover the law of universal gravitation. And just like that, mankind was able to understand planetary motion, even though we still don’t know what causes gravity. He also proved that white light is composed of all colors. Then he turned 24. But as the article shows, he was much more captivated by theology than any of the physical sciences. How did he evaluate his herculean accomplishments as he approached the end of his life?
I do not know what I may appear to the world, but to myself I seem to have been only like a boy playing on the seashore, and diverting myself in now and then finding a smoother pebble or prettier shell than ordinary, whilst the great ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before me.
Unlike our vapid atheists and neo-pagans, Dr. Newton placed his soul in the loving care of his Creator and Redeemer. At no time did he ever believe that faith and science are at odds. He is now plumbing the depths of that vast ocean.