…so said Pliny to Trajan.
Expecting white people to be represented in a mural in an area that is overwhelmingly white is racist. An Arizona talk show host has been fired for questioning why the largest figure in the mural, ten times larger than the others, is black, when he says he knows all of four black families in the area. “The focus doesn’t need to be on what’s different, the focus doesn’t need to be on the minority all the time.” This statement was followed by the perennial favorite of white folks everywhere (say it with me now): “I am not a racist individual.” He was fired anyway, despite his assurances. The attached video is absolutely unbelievable; white people cheering for their own dispossession.
You’d think that if we’re not supposed to care about race, we shouldn’t care about race. But, just like radical left wingers, “colorblind conservatives” think that not caring about race means caring a great deal about race, and imposing racial quotas in order to show just how “little” we care about race.
When you fly into Atlanta’s Hartsfield Airport (the largest airport in this former nation) and ascend the escalator to the terminal, you’ll see above your head a huge, 70 foot wide mural with hardly any white people in it. It’s rather ironic in light of the city’s slogan: “The City Too Busy to Hate.” This was painted after the 1996 Olympics, when the city was majority black. Now, I think the city has reverted to being slim-majority white, but rest assured that even now, if such a mural were to be painted, it would be considered racist for there to be more than a token number of whites represented.
The focus must certainly be “on the minority all the time” because popular orthodoxy dictates that whites must pay for their crimes of racism by going extinct. Even the rules governing elections must change if the vote favors whites. Whites must not be allowed a heritage to celebrate. They must be scorned until they are shamed into killing themselves. (See Germany, South Africa, etc.) This genocide is done in the name of LOVE, of course, and all attempts to resist it are HATE. The idea is that once you realize you are EVIL, you should be glad to perish. You should consider it your duty. This is the “redemption” of the anti-gospel.
Speak of the devil. R.C. Sproul Jr. is back with more of his anti-Christian and anti-white folly, and of course, once again, he is the Victim. (Accept no victim substitutes.) For a man who doesn’t believe in race, he sure does write about it a lot, and always with veiled references to us.
Still others draw lines [for family] based on secondary genetic markers. They believe that their family consists of those who share a common genetic makeup. Their loyalties go to a particular skin color. These folks consider my own family to be “race traitors” because God has blessed us with a little boy whose ancestors hail from Africa. My little boy may have brown hair, brown eyes, and brown knees, but he is a Sproul, and like the rest of us, he is called to seek first the kingdom of God…
My kin are not those who can trace their lineage back to the British Isles. My kin are those who have been bought by the blood of the Lamb.
If this weren’t posted on the Ligonier website, you would think it’s a parody of anti-familism! What Sproul dismisses as “secondary genetic markers” are considered so important to God that He has used them to divide men from Genesis onwards. God does not desire an amalgamated humanity resembling Sproul’s frankenfamily. Instead, He seeks to bless our covenant children with homogeneity, from which flows safety, security, and trust. It’s important for all men to have loyalty to their own heritage and kindred, even as they honor their own parents above the parents of others. This is the very definition of the Fifth Commandment. As it says in Proverbs 13:22, a faithful man leaves an inheritance to his children’s children. This birthright is passed according to blood, and therefore by what Sproul dismisses as “a particular skin color.” Race-traitors and hate-pastors like Sproul believe instead that a faithful man leaves an inheritance to “those who have been bought by the blood of the Lamb.” To reject the gift of lineage, as P.C. Fool Jr. does, is to join the ranks of the fatherless, which the Apostle James tells us is pitiable. Each passing year proves the wisdom of Sproul’s former presbytery in defrocking him from the ministry.
Notice that Sproul refuses to call his “son” an “African” or “black.” He always uses something more verbose, like “having ancestors who hail from Africa.” This is his way of saying that where the boy was born and to whom makes no difference whatsoever—he’s a Sproul, dangit! If the Apostle Paul had agreed with this then Romans 9:3 would have completely lost its impact. Instead of one of the deepest and purest statements of love in our language, it would have been reversed to a statement of unambiguous hatred.
The problem for Sproulian preachers of hate is that our spiritual kinship with the Christians of the world and our identification with them as a “chosen race,” a “holy nation,” and a “royal priesthood” (1 Peter 2:9) is only spiritually meaningful if our bonds of blood have physical meaning. My love for a brother in Christ is only significant to me if I know the importance of my brothers in the flesh. Otherwise, what does the word “brother” mean? A spiritual “nation” cannot exist in the absence of physical nations, just as the Church of the Elect cannot exist without physical, visible churches. How does one explain to a “brother in Christ” that there is no brotherhood and loyalty to genetic family and kin? Only a liar would traffick in such nonsense. And since, by his own admission, Sproul has no loyalty to his own kin, he expects the same of his “son.” He is not disturbed in the slightest about taking the boy from his own people, because he doesn’t recognize blood loyalty. But in the process, he has saddled the poor boy with a lifetime of disillusionment and quite possibly rage. If so, it will be spun as another strand in Sproul’s web of victimhood. Where does this leave his children of blood, who were born with the right to expect from their father a faithful inheritance, just as the heirs of our people have the right to demand a future from us?
Consider the absurdity of the race-mixing “Christian” who professes to loathe “racism” yet is himself a white supremacist who, in the sight of as many witnesses as he can find, painstakingly shoulders the White Man’s Burden. The number of white Christians who earnestly desire to assimilate a respectable number of blacks in their churches and communities is legion, yet they have no desire to be where blacks actually live, unless it is for a photo-op. The black people themselves are merely props for white vanity. Vain whites patronize blacks and mestizos by pretending that they have “traditional family values” and look the other way when the same steadfastly refuse to vote in accordance with their “traditional family values.” Liberals have never met a problem that paternalism (and of course, money) could not fix.
You can also see how the anti-gospel of our time carries with it gnostic heresies that are thousands of years old. The focus is solely on what we know rather than who we are, because it is believed that the flesh is wicked and must be suppressed in favor of heavenly things. This is the root of the idea that faith is all-important and things like blood and nationality are antiquated relics of the period of time prior to the Cross. You’ll hear many Judeochristians say that there can be no such thing as a Christian nation, and they cite Philippians 3:20 as proof, where Paul writes that “our citizenship is in heaven.” But it was also Paul who privileged himself, in Acts, to appeal to his Roman citizenship and then to Caesar directly.
If you think Sproul Jr. is a parody of the anti-familist fanatic, he’s a piker next to Gary North. This is from the March 1990 issue of North’s Christian Reconstruction newsletter:
Christians acknowledge that the church alone will survive as an institution in eternity. Both the family and historical civil governments will disappear in eternity. Non-Christians have no biblical doctrine of eternity, so they deny this unique status to the church. This is why both familism (patriarchal clans) and statism have been the chief rivals of the church in history.
“In Gen. 11 we have an attempt to build the first ‘United Nations’ building (Gen. 11:4), which kept the people together in a one-world government instead of spreading them out as national entities as God had intended. In Gen. 11:5-9, God frustrated the building of the tower by causing them to speak different languages, and then reaffirmed nationalism: Gen. 11:9. God further reaffirms nationalism in Deut. 32:8 and Acts 17:26. National entities will continue even during Christ’s millennial rule on earth (Isa. 2:4; 66:18; Rev. 12:5; 20:3,8), and perhaps even in heaven (Rev. 21:24,26). Nationalism is God’s order for the human race.” ~ John Eidsmoe, God & Caesar: Political Faith & Political Action
The average person can only relate to an inner group of 30-50 people. The next ring of loyalty extends to about 150 people. The circles radiate outward in a concentric pattern with steadily decreasing allegiance. Battle units provide a helpful analogy for loyalty, from squad to platoon to company. This is how the world works, and it fits the “racist” model. Human history does not comport with the rainbow-christian and colorblind-conservative model, in which we are to treat all souls equally. When liar-pastors teach that race is “insignificant,” and borders are meaningless by consequence, it makes about as much sense as telling the Army that squads, platoons, and companies are irrelevant to efffectiveness. This advice will be ignored because experience proves it to be false.
As soon as next year, whites will become a minority in their own country among newborns. White children are now less than 8% of Houston school in-mates and less than 5% of Dallas school in-mates. Meanwhile, every year there are 190,000 fewer Germans in the world.
Here’s another article on evangelicals for amnesty.
Political conservatives have long balked at an immigration policy that includes what they term “amnesty” for illegal immigrants, but the evangelicals see the issue differently.
“A significant part of our churches and denominations are part of the immigrant community so we have a very close connection and a very great interest,” Leith Anderson, president of the influential lobbying group National Evangelical Association, said Wednesday, “…but our interest is really rooted in what the Bible teaches how we treat people and how we treat particularly people who are aliens or strangers in the land.”
Anderson’s group last year authored a resolution in favor of reform using biblical immigrants Abraham, Joseph, Naomi, Mary and Jesus. Their examples, the group said, “reveal God’s hand in the movement of people and are illustrations of faith and God in difficult circumstances.”
Translation: God hates borders. This is clearly false to anyone who has actually read the Bible. Jacob had far more respect for his own brother Esau’s borders than alleged Christians have for ours.
As Jared Taylor mocks, there we were, choking on our own homogeneity, and the Guatemalans and Cambodians came to rejuvenate this dung heap of a country. Jared’s 2010 CofCC speech is excellent. It has more laugh lines than I’ve heard in any of his Amren speeches. I especially love his absurd example of homeowners in an all-white neighborhood finding that a litter of Mexicans has moved in. They say, “Hot damn, look at all this diversity (our greatest strength)! My property value will go through the roof!” That’s when the same white people quickly put their houses up for sale, move to an overwhelmingly white suburb of a suburb, and donate to the Somalian Relocation Ministry at their new megachurch.
Those of you who have never had the pleasure of witnessing a Sam Dickson speech will enjoy this (part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4), though the sound and picture are terrible. The facilities are also undesirable because, as you know, leftists used death threats to ensure that these American citizens were prevented from exercising their constitutional rights to speech and assembly. The “tolerant” are the most intolerant people you’ll ever meet. I’m not sure why Sam calls himself a liberal Christian when everything else about him is conservative.
We learn from Crazy Uncle Tom Fleming that when abrasive paleoconservatives meet abrasive libertarians, they call each other Nazis. C.U. Tom explains that libertines defected from the John Randolph Club because Hans Hoppe denounced Sam Francis’s economic nationalism, which Pat Buchanan tried to carry to the presidency, “as a form of national socialism.” Then Fleming replied that Hoppe has no room to talk after a reference in his speech to “Jews, Gypsies, and other human garbage.” Fleming carefully distances himself from nationalists as well as Nazis, but explains that he was compelled to respond to Hoppe, who is published by Peter Brimelow, who is therefore no longer Fleming’s friend. Crazy Uncle Tom has also called Roger Devlin a “misogynist” for his excellent essay on female hypergamy.
Meet the generation of perpetual adolescents, raised by feminists and the state.
Homeland Security is hard at work protecting the border. No, not the Mexican border, silly! They’re preventing Shi’ite aliens from crossing the border into Saudia Arabia from Yemen. What else did you think Homeland Security should be doing with your taxes?
Islam is all about fostering relationships.
Edgar Steele has been charged with trying to kill several people, including his wife. The FBI has a long history of entrapment, but if they really taped him planning the murders, it sounds as though he’s guilty. His political beliefs also bias the judicial system against him, as is clear from the article. The article ends with this “wink, wink” statement, which is supposed to make you reply, “Well, of course he’s a murderer, if he’s also a Holocaust denier.”
Last year, in response to the shooting of a security guard at the national Holocaust Memorial Museum by neo-Nazi James von Brunn, Steele said, “Why did von Brunn choose to unload at the National Holocaust Museum? Because it is an edifice to one of the most stupendous lies of modern times, paid for and maintained with taxpayer dollars, that’s why.”
This is absolutely true, but according to the Jew-media, if you agree with it, you’re just a step away from taking to the streets to fire upon security guards. As we show repeatedly, such irresponsible lies from the press has the effect of inciting violence from small-minded thugs. But the inciters of violence are never taken to trial. They never have to pay for their hate speech. This goes to show that our Bill of Rights only works for white Christians, like the men who wrote it.
At almost age 90, Helen Thomas, the “dean of the Washington press corps,” has been fired for disputing the unquestionable doctrines of Zionism. So much blood has been shed and money spent to install Jews in a part of the world that will be eternally hostile to them, and where they are being rapidly outbred, that no one is allowed to speak an unfavorable word about it. Everyone is well aware of the new blasphemy laws, and they are all written by Jews. If you want to make a lot of noise about the British getting out of Ireland, no one will care. But voicing “heretical” opinions about Jews results in job loss for a woman whose career was called an “institution.” This is just like James Watson, the most highly esteemed scientist in the world, perhaps, losing his job for voicing “heretical” and entirely truthful opinions about Negroes. Yet we live in a world where Jew Larry David can piss on a portrait of Christ, call it entertainment, and get gullible white post-Christians to pay to have this filth brought into their homes.
Helen Thomas was the only White House reporter who opposed Bush’s War on Terra. Now, for offending the delicate “apple of God’s eye,” she has lost her job. Jews must never be criticized, but Jews are free to slander all others. Richard Jew Cohen, in the Washington Post, takes this opportunity to call Poles thieves, murderers and haters, and General George Patton a “hideous” “bigot.” So the nation of Poland is guilty of “sheer ethnic hatred” of Jews, but Jews are not guilty of “sheer ethnic hatred” of Poles. Once you cut through the emotionalism, you see that Thomas is correct: Jews would be much safer today in Europe than in Israel, despite the slander of Jews and their constant accusations of anti-Semitism. The West cut its own veins to give them a homeland of their own.
“In another time and place, perhaps even in the U.S.A. not long ago, shame would prevent such a mob attack on Helen Thomas, a 90 year-old woman… Note the disproportion between President Obama’s immediate condemnation of Miss Thomas’ casual remarks and his non-reaction to the American citizen shot four times in the head by Israeli IDF thugs aboard a humanitarian ship in international waters. The disparity reveals an insanity of rabbinic proportions.” (Our friend Winston Smith was the first I saw who made this point here.)
Remember the Liberty, but not if you want a career in Washington.
Regardless of whether or not the attack on the USS Liberty was a mistake, the failure of the United States government to protect the Liberty when it was under attack was absolutely deliberate. Then, when faced with conflicting testimony between the American survivors of the attack and the foreign country that attacked them, the U.S. government and media sided with the foreign government. No country would treat it ordinary citizens, much less its honorable servicemen, this way.
I love Steve Sailer’s erudition. This is so very true:
What you get in trouble for is saying what everybody figures is true. In contrast, the Vice President of the United States frequently says stuff that makes no sense, but nobody cares because it’s just random gibberish. Nobody is offended because it’s not true. What gets you in trouble is when you point out that the emperor has no clothes.
But it turns out that Hans Christian Andersen was wrong. No one would actually laugh at the naked emperor. Instead, they would turn with anger on the little boy for pointing out the obvious. They would call him a conspiracy theorist. There are entire industries based on convincing the public that obvious truths must be false. (One of these is that the anus is not a sex organ.)
Oh, dear. Jew Emma Lazarus is widely associated with the Judaizing of our country and with turning the Statue of Liberty into a beacon of heterogeneity. But her good will apparently did not extend to Orthodox Jews. “She suggested that another place, not America, should be found for that unappealing ‘mass of semi-Orientals, Kabbalists, and Hassidim.’” Such hatred. Such racism. What’s next, recolonization to Liberia?
It’s obvious that Egyptians care more about their own future than Americans. Every Egyptian who marries a Jew will now be stripped of his citizenship, and his children will be stripped of their citizenship as well. This is very similar to what we read in Ezra and Nehemiah.
There’s a difference between assimilating into the economy and assimilating into the culture, as Pat Buchanan says here. “We’re becoming a Tower of Babel.” The interviewer calls the new Texas school curriculum controversial for being sympathetic to Joe McCarthy. Funny how the liberals who love to demonize McCarthy never want to teach students about Alger Hiss. (Not even children in Christian schools know the name.) They truly hope that you’ll never read the book Witness by Whittaker Chambers. Instead, they hope that you’ll view the countless Jew-films on blacklisted Hollywood directors. One is “controversial” and the other is not.
The Almighty Genome is the latest idol of the reprobate to gloriously flame out. The next idol: Soccer. They can dress up their Wilsons as Tom Hanks did in that castaway movie. They’ll keep trying to find some false god to unite all people, but only the gospel can do it (and that’s not the gospel of race-mixers). White-worshippers, whose religion is race, are even more pathetic than Tom Hanks conversing with a piece of rubber on a deserted island.
The decline of France in pictures.
At the World Cup in South Africa, someone played a joke by pairing Nigeria with Germany on the schedule.
That’s just ghetto. I think we need to elevate the level of discourse in sports broadcasts.
These “traditional African instruments” are predictably so cacophonous that almost everyone who is not a savage wants them banned from the World Cup. Watch the clip from Zulu at the bottom of that page to see a reenactment of Rorke’s Drift, one of the finest acts of heroism in all of white history, right up there with Thermopylae and the Alamo. It is also an example of the angelic music of Europeans defeating the animalistic jungle grunts of savages.
In honor of the fine people that Zora Neale Hurston affectionately labeled “zigaboos” and “eight-balls,” we offer this piece of “traditional music,” with bombastic flatulence in the night:
We know that the making of fine music has nothing to do with IQ. Some of the lowest-IQ whites to be found are the hillbillies of Appalachia, and with instruments they crafted by hand, they invented genres that still rake in billions. It must be encoded in the blood.
“A lot of people [in Africa] still have that mentality that the European knows more,” said Thomas Mlambo, a well-known TV presenter and analyst on the South Africa-based sports network SuperSport. Mr. Mlambo has just been awarded the Nobel Prize for Perspicacity.
Obama’s National Academy of Sciences is now blaming low black IQ on the “post-traumatic stress” of living in the midst of rampant crime. Oh, good answer! I think these “scientists” deserve a round of applause. It’s not easy to come up with such clever excuses.
Praise the Lord for an “unprecedented” consecutive death penalty sentencing for the leader of the Knoxville Horror. Deena Christian asked the HNIC if he “bothered” to learn the name of her daughter before raping and killing her, but the answer to this question is obvious to anyone who is familiar with Tiger Woods. Tiger has still not apologized to the white bimbos he treated as meat, despite his public pretended repentance. At no time did he even buy them anything, even though he thought nothing of gambling away $150,000 on a single hand of poker with his friend, Michael Jordan. Nigger rapists are more at ease with abusing white women because there is no call of the blood. It is easier to despoil a competitor’s vineyard than your own. This is also the basis of the Jewish pornography and sex slavery industries. Many white men (Christian and non-Christian alike) have a weakness for Internet porn, but the best way to cure it is to have a racial awakening. As soon as you realize the motivation for polluting the minds and bodies of those poor young girls, it’s hardly possible to look at them without feeling nausea and anger. “Racism” and a delight in God’s law are the double-shot cure for porn addiction.
I highly recommend going to 44:23 in this Rushdoony conversation. Rush observes that the Negro only recognizes authority as brute force, and does not respect anything else. White compassion is interpreted as weakness by blacks. Whites simply don’t understand how they can pay for a Negro to go to college, only to be repaid with contempt. Otto Scott adds that these lessons have still not been learned by whites who wish to assist blacks in South Africa, or even in America. “The assumption here is that everyone is the same…there is no difference in ethnic groups… It is considered almost a sin to recognize cultural differences, yet they are very deep.”
“It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him.” ~ The Hobbit
Behold the black voter. Alvin Greene has won the Democratic primary for U.S. Senator in once-white South Carolina. He went to no campaign events, spent no money, gave no speeches, was kicked out of the Army, is unemployed, lives with his mother, and is facing felony charges for showing lewd photos to students. Clearly, he is an ideal representative for black people, and the black voters agree.
This is by far the best Glenn Beck video ever. It’s just hilarious. He claims that the Revolutionary War was won by a black man, and a couple of Michael Jackson’s kids, off in the corners of paintings, were not merely slaves but were heroes who were crucial to the First War of secession and independence. He even calls them founding fathers! (This is even better than Rainbow Confederates pretending that slaves fought as soldiers in defense of the South.) As I said, it’s his best video ever. He talks to someone off-screen named David, and if I had to guess, it’s David Barton of Wallbuilders, who has made a career of peddling baloney like this. His biggest whopper is that we have lived under the Constitution for more than 200 years, completely skipping over the secession of the South and creation of a new nation, which was the most significant event in American history. Afterwards, the “USA” had to be reconstituted. Amendments to the old Constitution were passed illegally. The president became an emperor. Like Louis XIV, who ordered that the words Ultima Ratio Regmim (“the final argument of kings”) be engraved on French cannons, Lincoln crushed the attempt of millions to peacefully withdraw from a voluntary union. It would be wrong to honor such men by calling them kings. The origin of “king” is “kinning,” and when a king brings his own people under an iron yoke, he has forfeited the throne. (See this map for a visual on how decentralized was the Holy Roman “Empire.”) Now David Barton (I think) is teaching Glenn Beck a bastardized view of history that doesn’t even bear resemblance to what the old Yankees believed. Glenn Beck is awesome. As our friend Mark says, he induces gales of regilititious matickular spasmodics, augmented by wibxicretious phelegfarstions extraordinaire, as noted by Rosencrantz & Pizzahutterites in their seventeen volume ”Opus Day-O, Daylight Come and Me Wanna Add Syllables.”
Our former nation’s founding documents now require this disclaimer, since they were written by Christian, fag-hating “racists”:
This book is a product of its time and does not reflect the same values as it would if it were written today. Parents might wish to discuss with their children how views on race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity, and interpersonal relations have changed since this book was written before allowing them to read this classic work.
How the South was saved: by Andrew Jackson removing Indians far from us. It’s hard to hold his opposition to secession against him. He was a genuine hero.
On August 30, 1813, Creek Indians attacked Fort Mims, a makeshift enclosure about 40 miles north of Mobile, Alabama. They came in through an open gate and killed every man, woman, and child they could. They picked up small children by the heels and smashed their brains out against the stockade fence. They scalped the women, and cut unborn children out of pregnant mothers. Some 20 to 40 escaped but more than 250 people were butchered. Thus began the Creek War, and Andrew Jackson’s first major military command…
The great Shawnee chief Tecumseh was no doubt expressing his sincerest desires at an 1811 war council meant to stir up as many tribes as possible: “Let the white race perish!… Burn their dwellings, destroy their stock, slay their wives and children, that the very breed may perish”…
Andrew Jackson genuinely believed that what he had accomplished rescued these people from inevitable annihilation. And although that statement sounds monstrous, and although no one in the modern world wishes to accept or believe it, that is exactly what he did.
In Southern women, propriety, hospitality, and femininity have given way to Paula Deen and other exemplars of white trash. In like manner, the race of the Lees and Washingtons and Jeffersons and Calhouns are represented today by vile bastards like the Hank Williams progeny. We trust that our Lord will resurrect the South.
In an act of charity towards preachers everywhere, the state of New York is going to change its Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities to a name without the word “retard” in it. Lawmakers vow to continue calling us “racists” and “anti-Semites,” however, despite our displeasure with the words. Also, Native Americans must never be called “Indians,” simply because they dislike the word. Calling them by a name they don’t like would be a sin on our part, but it’s perfectly appropriate for anyone who wishes to call us “racists,” regardless of our wishes. This is what equality is all about.
Hot on the heels of his excellent new book (our review is forthcoming), James Edwards interviewed Tim Adams, the former clerk of elections in Honolulu, who claims to have witnessed proof that Obama was not born in Hawaii. As everyone should now know, the 7-minute interview made such a splash that WorldNetDaily and other major media outlets ran with it. It has been hilarious to see the entire mainstream media scooped by so-called “racists.” But then WorldNetDaily returned to its old tabloid tricks. They now claim that Adams “burst onto the scene last week in a WND story.” They go on to say that their “original report about Adams’ claims has already been made into a YouTube video, getting thousands of hits.” But the original YouTube video came from James Edwards at the CofCC conference, as did the “original report.” Joe Farah is shameless, and he knows that no one “important” will call him on his lies.
But here’s the best part. Keith Olbermann jumps all over WND for picking up a story scooped by those who oppose miscegenation (yes, this is his argument, though he has no complaint when Israel does it), and for (as he puts it) quoting “white supremacists” during the term of a black president. You just can’t make this stuff up. Seriously, how does Olbermann get away with making so much money?
James Goldsmith correctly predicted what happened to our economy in 1987 and in the years since 2005. Listen to what he says about corporations (meaning banksters) having successfully eliminated Labor’s share of value-added. Profits rise, and the stock market with them, but it’s all smoke and mirrors because the equilibrium of the market has been destroyed. I remember Ross Perot taking his stack of charts on the Larry King show to debate Al Gore and explain why NAFTA and GATT were terrible for us. Goldsmith does a much better job of explaining it.
The debt is on its way to $20 trillion in the next five years, and that is undoubtedly a lowball figure, kind of like the amount of oil per day that was seeping into the Gulf, according to BP’s original estimate. We have as much chance of repaying this debt as BP has of relocating its lost oil, yet both of these are very bad things that could ultimately work for good.
Let’s put the spill in context. To whites, it’s an absolute catastrophe. But in Nigeria, more oil is spilled every year. Negroes wreck their lives enough on their own. They don’t need help from white polluters who avoid criminal liability by hiding behind the legal fiction called the “corporation.”
And now, we give you the blackest name in Blacktown, juxtaposed with a Scottish surname to make it all the more ridiculous.
A Jew, in the Wall Street Journal, calls Obama “The Alien in the White House.”
After having gone 365Black, McDonald’s also goes queer. We give them bonus points for being consistently anti-white. They’re following the same pattern as the Archie comics. First Archie gets Jungle Fever:
And the next thing you know, a fag character is introduced to the series:
Archie has come a long way since his Christian phase.
According to this study, the children of lesbians, “all conceived through donor insemination, were rated higher than their peers in social, academic, and overall competence, and lower in aggressive behavior, rule-breaking, and social problems, on standardized assessments of psychological adjustment.” The Apostle Paul was apparently not familiar with the Jewish science of pyschology when he said, in Romans 1, that faggotry is “against nature.”
Speaking of which, the “man” who recently called the Lord Jesus Christ a fag sang at the wedding of Rush Limbowel. The important thing is that Rush and Elton are not racists, because that would be bigoted.
All who hate God love death. Thus, Peter Singer asks in the New York Times:
So why don’t we make ourselves the last generation on earth? If we would all agree to have ourselves sterilized then no sacrifices would be required—we could party our way into extinction!
A model scout in Brazil sets out “to find the right genetic cocktail of German and Italian ancestry, perhaps with some Russian or other Slavic blood thrown in.” Even in such a huge country of mixed-race people, the only kind of diversity that matters when it comes to beauty is white diversity. “Indeed, scouts say that more than 70 per cent of the country’s models come from three southern states that hardly reflect the multiethnic melting pot that is Brazil, where more than half the population is nonwhite.”
This guy produces a huge amount of food on just one-tenth of an acre. Notice what he says at the end about lawns, which are almost totally useless, and one of the leading causes of pollution. Even before the BP oil spill, there were huge dead zones in the Gulf of Mexico, where no living thing moves, because of runoff from the millions of people who move to Florida and want a green, pristine lawn where one cannot exist without the heavy use of petroleum-based fertilizer.
Finally, please pray for our good friends Winston and Stan. Most of you reading this will have no idea how important these men have been to us (and to you), so just take our word for it. To lose them would be an immeasurable loss. Winston has heart disease and Stan has a very aggressive cancer.