The Agony of Deceit

Rand Paul is learning the difficult task of trying to be an honest white man while remaining politically marketable in a Judaized establishment. He sought to avoid the smear of racism by making supplication to God’s Only Son, the Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King Junior. It didn’t take NPR long to make him look foolish. He was asked: “You would have marched with Martin Luther King but voted with Barry Goldwater?” Such contradictions are familiar territory for the racially retarded.

“[Rand] Paul felt the need to reassure us that he is not a racist by revealing that he gets emotional and weepy when listening to a Martin Luther King Jr. speech. That may tell us something about his vulnerable mental state, but nothing else.” ~ Elizabeth Wright

Fag-apologist George Will approvingly admits that the God-endowed right to private property was revoked in 1964 in the name of granting “civil rights” to Negroes, who were never intended to be fellow citizens in the first place. (The illegal 14th Amendment granted them fictitious “citizenship” in Lincoln’s new entity called the USA because sovereign states refused to do so.)

“One does not have to be a racist to recognize that the federal government has no constitutional authority to prohibit racial or any other kind of discrimination by private parties.” ~ Walter Williams, The Right to Discriminate

Gary North has some advice for Rand Paul: campaign to abolish the quota factory called the EEOC. He is correct that this anti-white agency “violates a basic principle of liberty: the employer should hire the person he thinks will best benefit his organization, if the candidate wants the job on the employer’s terms.” But since the Civil Rights Act repealed the right to private property, and colorblind “conservatives” applaud this as a victory for Equality, there is no chance that they can salvage freedom of association from the deal. We’ve long been of the opinion that Gary North is half-insane, and this is additional evidence. He cheers for everything done in the name of our dispossession, but as soon as Rand Paul says something negative about the CRA (and then quickly apologizes for it), he scratches his chin until he comes up with the idea to eliminate the EEOC without doing anything about the genocidal laws that gave it birth. This is like hacking at leaves rather than striking the root.

Rand Paul can win in November. All he has to do is tell his audiences that the reason he opposes the 1964 Civil Rights Act is because it created a system of racial quotas in hiring, where the best-qualified person for the job cannot get the job because he has the wrong color. He would then say this: “If I am elected, the first piece of legislation I will introduce on day one will be a bill to abolish the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.”

He would crush his opponent in November.

It’s good to oppose racial quotas, but not if it’s because you mistakenly believe that all races are equal and should enjoy equal citizenship under the same government, a thought which caused Thomas Jefferson to shudder. The real problem is equality, not just quotas. Liberty and equality are eternal enemies. (I speak not only of race; any society that treats men and women as equals will eventually disintegrate. Treating them as equals does not make them so, because they are not equal.) The trouble for libertarians is that every employer out there is already hiring “the person he thinks will best benefit his organization, if the candidate wants the job on the employer’s terms.” Many of these are illegal aliens. North says this “violates a basic principle of liberty,” but for whom? It seems to be a winning situation for everyone involved except for us “racists” who want to keep America for Americans. Obviously, race is crucial to considerations of liberty. (It’s no coincidence that Rand Paul hopes to be elected in 88% white Kentucky, and would not stand a chance in any less-white parts of the country.) It is equally obvious that pinhead libertarians love to talk about liberty without really understanding it. You would be much wiser to learn about liberty from our forefathers, all of whom were “racists.”

The good news is that the emotions and ideas that fuel popular movements never remain static. We could look back and recognize Arizona as being the spark that ignited a greater fire. You can see a hint of this in Gary North’s own article. He even calls The Bell Curve a “tour de force“! This would never have happened unless Rand Paul’s faux pas had given him the opportunity for a moment of honesty. One moment of honesty gives rise to another, and pretty soon there is honesty from white men everywhere rather than political posturing. This is how revolutions begin. The truth always spreads by necessity (in this case Arizona’s need to survive).

Amalgamutt Alicia Keys has a new song and video about miscegenation and how “racist” whites used to be horrified by “the unthinkable,” and how wrong they were for interfering with twue wuv. Does it make sense to anyone that the same people who denounce Southerners for rejecting miscegenation as “unthinkable” also assure us that Southerners routinely raped their harems of slave girls on the plantations? Something doesn’t compute here, kind of like Jewish math.

Popular adultery (aka miscegenation) is slowing.

The number of interracial marriages in the U.S. has risen 20 percent since 2000 to about 4.5 million, according to the latest census figures. While still growing, that number is a marked drop-off from the 65 percent increase between 1990 and 2000.

About 8 percent of U.S. marriages are mixed-race, up from 7 percent in 2000.

The following statement on Europe by Alexander Hamilton (Federalist #11) is a perfect summation of what causes our race to bend towards white supremacy and paternalism:

The superiority she has long maintained, has tempted her to plume herself as the mistress of the world, and to consider the rest of mankind as created for her benefit. Men, admired as profound philosophers, have, in direct terms, attributed to her inhabitants a physical superiority; and have gravely asserted, that all animals, and with them the human species, degenerate in America; that even dogs cease to bark, after having breathed a while in our atmosphere.

Thus, white liberals (who call themselves conservatives) adopt savages, knowing full well that they are savages, but believing they will be transformed when some of the whiteness rubs off on them. They assume this right of conquest to be theirs because they believe mankind is created for their benefit. Foolish Judeochristians, carried away by fables, add another layer to this insanity by convincing themselves that they are growing God’s kingdom by undoing God’s mistakes.

Anchor babies are given free American citizenship. The law specifically favors non-white immigrants and ties the hands of police to check their papers and deport them. These people get free health care, schooling, social services, driver’s licenses, “sanctuary cities,” and now Social Security. “The Senate voted yesterday to allow illegal aliens to collect Social Security benefits based on past illegal employment—even if the job was obtained through forged or stolen documents.” Meanwhile, Fred Reed comes out for amnesty and denounces any attempt to salvage our birthright as Nazism. Fred married a mestizo, and is published in The American Conservative by Scott McConnell, who married a Japanese. Just two more assclowns peddling their “conservatism” in America; hence the name of the magazine.

“Conservatism is the negation of ideology,” said Russell Kirk. This definition was never good enough for R.J. Rushdoony. Continuity, custom, and convention can be evil. Liberalism has all these things but by definition is not conservative. Faith is the difference. Whatsoever is not of faith, said Saint Paul, is sin. Sadly, with Rush it’s always a mixed bag. At 14:15 in the linked lecture, you can hear what he thinks about white dispossession, and whites becoming a minority in their own country.

So what? That doesn’t bother me in the slightest. What bothers me, and upsets me greatly, is that these people who are upset about the United States possibly ceasing to be a white country are not upset about the abandonment of Christian faith.

We Kinists agree with him on the latter part, but it doesn’t follow that “God doesn’t care two cents about godless whites.” We don’t have the luxury of pretending that our kinsmen are irrelevant to our own existence or the existence of our civilization. We agree that God owns our land and will give it to whom He will, but this doesn’t make our birthright of no effect. It is a gift from Him and we are charged with its stewardship. Jesus did not die on the cross to reverse His judgment at Babel and erase national borders.

Here’s another lecture, on hate crimes, that leaves much to be desired. But here’s a good interview of the great Southern pastor, John Weaver. Those of you who are interested in John Lofton, who came here with bombastic exhortations for Kinists to start reading their Bibles, before high-tailing it like the redcoats in 1812, can see him during his Amish beard phase in these videos. Chris Ortiz has done a fantastic job building the Chalcedon website. Generations will benefit from his work. It’s staggering to think of the vast knowledge freely available to all.

Getting back to amnesty and such, Judeochristians have exacerbated the problem by misapplying certain Bible verses about treating the stranger as the native-born. (Atheist white nationalists then assume these horrific misapplications to be representative of Christian orthodoxy, but we’ll deal with that another day.) In the Bible, there are at least three words for “stranger,” and while it is quite right to abide by just weights and measures with all men, it was never the case that all strangers were treated as the native-born of Israel. For example, interest could be charged to aliens but not to blood sojourners, though both could be categorized as “strangers.” Deuteronomy in the NIV refers to these respectively as “foreigners” and “brothers.”

The boycotters had better hurry up because 17 states now have anti-wetback laws. At this rate, Massachusetts will be all alone in boycotting the rest of the country.

Reds and browns unite! “ONE RACE, ONE PEOPLE, ONE NATION!” Being anti-white is the true reason for their unity, but they are ostensibly united under the banner of the indigenous, as though this has anything to do with the price of rice. Caucasians were on this continent before anyone else, but this is irrelevant to the fact that our fathers founded a nation for their own posterity, and it is our duty to defend it against all threats, foreign and domestic.

The country’s first megaplex succumbs to wets and jigs and gang turf wars. Remember when West Side Story was considered entertainment?

Don’t you love South Carolinians?

This is a stunning example of immigration fraud.

“Could you imagine if big-name white political figures and white pop stars were speaking at something called a ‘White Power Convention‘?”

I wonder if any of these companies would support white interests and white survival. Would they oppose the slogan, “For the white race everything, outside the white race nothing”?

An army of security personnel will do wonders for maintaining the illusion of peace and brotherhood in the new, negrified South Africa. The World Cup will be an enjoyable event for those who can afford protection. The rest of us will stay here and watch our tax dollars circle the bowl clockwise before disappearing from sight.

Here’s another of those stories we see all the time. It should be on the front page of every newspaper, but it doesn’t fit the liberal agenda. If this poor boy were a queer, God forbid, he would be famous. Hate crime legislation would bear his name. Notice that the attackers were whipped into a frenzy because their ancestors were enslaved hundreds (even thousands) of years ago. White people are culpable for such attacks when they allow others to propagate myths about American domestic slavery. Blacks, who naturally have very low intelligence, take the false witness to heart and act out of rage. As Otto Scott points out here (16:10), the white race is the only race on earth that has ever ended slavery. But as Rushdoony points out, it is considered a crime if a white man says anything negative about a diversity. This is most common when discussing IQ differences, which white liar-pastors interpret as hatred.

When a hate crime isn’t a hate crime.

What a white man can expect when incarcerated with savages.

Tea Partiers have Uncle Tom Fever. Notice the key phrase of the campaign ad: “They’re not going to call me a racist.” This is clearly the most important thing in life for white people. The most advanced stage of Uncle Tom Fever is called Tranny Fever. “One of the worst symptoms of Uncle Tom Fever is an irresistible urge to horribly embarrass yourself.”

Chicago has been ordered to hire firefighters “randomly.” This is the only way to get ignorant blacks hired, even after standards were lowered in 2006 to ensure that the EEOC’s four-fifths rule was met, “which means that all the test does is eliminate complete idiots.”

So while Rand Paul is being asked about how he would have voted in the last century, disparate impact laws in the here-and-now are designed to be genocidal. And remember: “if minorities fail tests at a higher rate than whites, it’s the test that’s wrong.”

In “just one year, deficient schools all over Texas have suddenly become good schools. It says so right there in the paper!” The secret: Lower passing grades to 43.6%, and hey presto! The racial achievement gap is closed! Why didn’t someone think of this before?

Walmart is liable for billions for not giving women the same amount of money for pressing buttons as men get for unloading trucks. Disparate impact quotas still have not leveled races and sexes with magically-delicious equality.

This is one of the issues that Craig Bodeker brought out in his excellent documentary. We are expected to stop heaven and earth if some black person somewhere doesn’t get the job he wants. (Of course, I’ve had many jobs that I didn’t really want, but no one advocated for me.) I hope we all would agree that rape is far more serious than job opportunities and demands more attention. But we’re expected to make potential lost jobs a matter of the gravest concern, and when one of us suggests that a hundred of our women being raped every day is a far more serious matter, we’re denounced as racists.

The very honorable black columnist Elizabeth Wright asks a question that is very pertinent to her race: “How is it possible to win the respect of others if you produce nothing?” Nothing but crime statistics, that is.

This is a voter.

Road signs get creative.

Empathy is racist.

Claudia Schiffer is racist.

White robes are racist, even when used to denounce racism. I hope you people are writing down these rules. So help me, I’ll flunk you if you don’t pay attention.

Private property is racist.

Lactose tolerance is racist.

Astronomy is racist. (Hallmark has ordered a complete recall out of deference to black imbeciles.)

Read James Edwards’s new book for the final word on the matter.

Down in Texas, a white patriot is being called a terrorist. Also in Texas, a white terrorist is being called a patriot.

No months remain for white people.

“Make this world a blonder place.” How delightfully racist!

Is this what you had in mind?

The black governor of Massachusetts believes that opposing Obama’s policies “borders on sedition.” Now that’s what I call African politics! At this rate, whites will soon be bowing before another Idi Amin.

The cowardly American Academy of Pediatrics is trying to give doctors the right to “nick” the clitorises of savage girls so that the parents won’t go for full female genital mutilation. The correct way to handle this problem is to prevent savages from gaining entrance to white Christian civilization.

“Women do almost all the daily work in southern Africa: cooking, finding food, raising children, and tidying up around the hut, which leaves men free to spend the day pursuing more amiable interests, like drinking until they can barely stand or form sentences.” Liberals think feminism is the answer to Negroism. Apparently, women are now supposed to give men a small allowance so that they don’t drink away the rent money. Good luck with that.

Bristol Palin, a feminist chip off the old block. “A baby is extra work but doesn’t interfere with a woman’s independence.”

Steve Sailer absolutely nails the desire of women to make bad decisions feel fashionable in this review.

“No nation has ever demonized manhood to its own reward.”

Flooded While White. Compare the woman at 8:20 to every savage from New Orleans that you saw on the news back in 2005. Hint: The “amazing part of the country” to which she refers is a white code phrase, like “good schools” and “good neighborhoods.”

You remember that after Katrina, Kanye West famously said that “George Bush doesn’t care about black people.” Volunteer Staters are not saying the equivalent about Obama, which is good, because no one would listen.

The reason for no looting when white men are free. We’re not the most subtle people in the world at sending messages to diversities.

This headline makes me laugh. The problem is not sodomites, you see. Oh, heavens no. The problem is the skinheads who attack them. Jews are creative writers.

We don’t have much to say about the flotilla holocaust by murderous Jews, except that it’s quite entertaining to read Lawrence Auster’s verbal hysterics. Here he has a fit because Pat Buchanan equates Israel’s blockade of Gaza with Stalin’s blockade of West Berlin.

Here’s a video that supports Alex Linder’s statement that “Jews are a genetic criminal clan masquerading as a religion.”

“The ADL says it’s ‘inappropriate‘ for people like Newt Gingrich to compare people to Nazis, but it’s perfectly okay for them to label others as such.”

Yes! Rahm Emanuel is hereby an anti-Semite. Now we can teach him the secret handshake. Welcome to the club, Rahm.

Israel offered to sell nuclear weapons to white South Africa. You have to wonder if this meets Rachel Maddow’s approval, or maybe it’s more important to focus on who got to sit at lunch counters 50 years ago. The lesbian Jewish freak of nature certainly has no problem with the fact that Israel builds apartheid walls and prevents Palestinians from even walking in some areas, not to mention the segregated schools and marriages there.

Why do we never hear in the press that “some say” the Israeli flag is a symbol of apartheid and hatred? In fact, far more people in the world today believe this than believe what is said about the Confederate flag.

State temples (aka public schools) are so horrendously pitiful that most people get all the way through college believing that Lincoln’s War was fought to end slavery. Lawrence Auster has one of the best, short history lessons you’ll ever read here. It takes great skill to say so much in so few words. In retrospect, it was perhaps not asking too much to confine slavery to the existing southern states, as northerners required. Southerners should have had the right to migrate west and take their property with them, but given the way in which this issue tore the country apart, it would have been a worthwhile concession. The North’s motivation was to keep the West for whites, and there was certainly nothing wrong with that. It was just a bad deal for our entire race. If the South had agreed, we would be mercifully free today of all the silliness in the history books about the Yankee’s love for equality and the need to bathe the South in blood so that Negroes could live the American Dream, and someday spread the legs of white girls.

As Sam Francis wrote in the July 27, 1995, column that got him fired from the Washington Times:

If the sin is hatred or exploitation, they [Southern Baptists repenting of their support of slavery in the 19th century] may be on solid grounds, but neither “slavery” nor “racism” as an institution is a sin. Indeed, there are at least five clear passages in the letters of Paul that explicitly enjoin “servants” to obey their masters, and the Greek words for “servants” in the original text are identical to those for “slaves.” Neither Jesus nor the apostles nor the early church condemned slavery, despite countless opportunities to do so, and there is no indication that slavery is contrary to Christian ethics or that any serious theologian before modern times ever thought it was.

Not until the Enlightenment of the 18th century did a bastardized version of Christian ethics condemn slavery. Today we know that version under the label of “liberalism,” or its more extreme cousin, communism.

“Did not the South have the same right to secede from the Union as the 13 colonies did to secede from England? Did Lincoln have the right to use blockade and invasion to drive Old Dixie down? His predecessor James Buchanan did not think so. Was the Civil War essential to ending slavery, when many states had already abolished it by legislation and every nation in the hemisphere ended it without a civil war, save for Haiti?” ~ Pat Buchanan

Texas, as usual, is not playing along very well with the imperial shell game. Now they’re teaching kids that the “separation of church and state” doesn’t appear in the Constitution at all, and that our economic system is free enterprise rather than (Jewish) “capitalism.” What’s next? Soon they’ll be teaching kids that Texas was robbed of its republican sovereignty by Lincoln, just 15 years after voluntarily entering the federal compact. Schools need to stick to the three R’s: racism, recycling, and reproductive rights. Steer clear of the unspeakably obvious.

We owe Dr. Ron Rumberg a great debt for writing this incomparable paper on the rape of Galatians 3:28 by pulpit pirates. My friends and I heard him speak in the church where Robert E. Lee is buried on the 200th anniversary of the birth of the greatest American. Here’s another great one on castration.

He told us if we provided not for our own we are worse than infidels. He revealed that His Word is the only acceptable guide for faith and practice. Thus, we should love God and love no other. We are to love our wives as we love no other women. We are to love and correct our children in a way we love no others. We are to follow the Bible as we follow no other book. We are to love our forefathers as we love no others. We are to love our race as we love no other. We are to love our local church as we love no other. We are to love our heritage as we love no other… However, if we listen to the humanists, the politically correct and the neocons then all of this partisan teaching is racism. It appears that the historic Biblical hermeneutic has been replaced by the humanist, egalitarian, French Revolution hermeneutic. It is the hermeneutic of egalitarian love.

Now the abolitionist agenda is being forced on Christian people of the South, declaring that they cannot be Biblical or partisan, but must favor the extermination of their heritage, must submit to the removal of the moral standards of their ancestors and should hate their race or extol another above it. Have you been thus castrated?…

This new wave of political correctness aimed at the castration of the Southern people will lead to the impugning of our holy God, the rejection of the deity of Christ, the compromising of the inspiration of Scripture, the abandonment of the sanctity of marriage, the replacement of the biblical norm of the home, the redefining of the masculinity of men, the removal of the separation of nations, the dishonor of our fathers and mothers, and the eradication of our Confederate heritage.

Did God divide the nations into linguistic groups, racial groups and cultural groups? Was it God’s idea to assert this as a corrective of man’s sinful intentions? Did God in the Book of Genesis give us the table of nations? Was that His idea? Has God rescinded His actions? Obviously, we have as much, if not more reason today, to believe that men are as depraved and disobedient to God as then. Regeneration does not remove these divisions, but it is the divine bestowal of life to dead sinners.

Are we going to submit to castration? Are we going to obey God or men? Are we in favor of honoring our Southern heritage or not? Are you ashamed of being from the South? Have the descendants of Confederates been castrated, or are they undergoing such treatment or are they submitting to such out of imposed false guilt feelings? Remember the admonition of the fifth commandment, “Honour thy father and thy mother,” even if they were Southern or Confederate. This is not optional!

“Where now is the horse and the rider? Where is the horn that was blowing? Where is the helm and the hauberk, and the bright hair flowing?” ~ The Two Towers

“Pro-White activism is something you can do when you are young and want to live like a college student. But it’s not a viable career option.” Sadly, Kevin MacDonald is correct. The most stinging blow of all is that young pro-white activists desperately need to get married and have big families, but they get almost no support from their own race, and volunteer work doesn’t pay the bills. Contrast this with Jewish advocacy groups which are well-funded by almost all Jewish professionals. Their Holohoax gig deflects all accusations of racism, and they are free to protect their own interests without fear of recrimination. Whites are still cowering with guilt because a couple hundred years ago a few of them gave mandatory employment to savages barely removed from cannibalism. This is why we could never be White Supremacists. We are often convinced that white people are only supreme in the art of being frightened by their own shadows. It’s certain that we’ll never get anywhere until whites are as interested in supporting their own causes as other races are interested in supporting theirs. But if you recall the quote from William Blake, you know that money and power are not what drive us. “I tell the truth not to convince those who do not know it, but to defend those that do.”

In our age of diversity-worship, escapists seek a return to tradition. The new Robin Hood movie, for instance, is about “an Anglo-Saxon nationalist” with a “visceral sense of birthright liberty” who participates in a non-democratic parliament without an inkling of “universal solidarity,” and who speaks of the French “as vile foreign invaders, almost as another race.” Just to drive the point home, the French are depicted as “olive-skinned, dark-haired, and quasi-Moorish. Even the insincere, shifty King John…is noticeably swarthy. In [Ridley] Scott’s England, complexion reflects character.” Tolkien wholeheartedly agreed. The film has a bit of obligatory feminism, but not a single diversity in Sherwood Forest.

In a recent BBC-produced version of Robin Hood, Friar Tuck is actually played by a black actor. (One shouldn’t hold one’s breath for reciprocation and the casting of, say, Hugh Jackman in the role of Nelson Mandela in a future biopic.)…

Libertarians aren’t up to the task of limiting government anyway, for quite unlike Robin, they lack any sense of community and birthright, and thus will only engage people in endless, abstract, braniac debates about how, say, the welfare state retards black entrepreneurship or how much minorities would benefit by the lowering of the minimum wage…

Men rise and fight against tyranny in defense of their people. No one has yet died for “free markets,” not to mention the right to enjoy cannabis and sodomy at will.

“Christianity went deep into the soul of the European. Even when he renounces Christianity, his new faith mimics, in a perverted form, the old faith of the Europeans. There is still heaven – the future without white people; there is still hell – the European past; there is still a God – the black race; and there is still a devil – the white race… You cannot convert the heathen to a religion of charity by sacrificing your own people to the heathens.”

“When the liberals tell us the Grimm’s fairy tales are too violent and too moralistic, what they really mean is the Grimm’s fairy tales are too Christian in their ethos. In the Grimm’s tales the good prevail over the wicked and the wicked people do the type of thing, such as betray their own kith and kin and support perversion, which modern liberals now do under the guise of virtuous behavior.”

“True to his instincts, true to his traditions, fearing nothing, loving only his own, loving and hating with all his heart – a Goth.” ~ Thomas Nelson Page

I’d like very much for these words to be on my tombstone: He loved and hated with all his heart.