Just one day after our previous post, in which we wrote that “Sobran was the Chesterton of our time,” Ann Coulter also called him “the G.K. Chesterton of our time.” We’re not aware of anyone else making this connection, but since it’s unlikely that Ann reads this humble blog, we’ll chalk it up to coincidence. We almost agree with her that, with Sobran’s passing, “the world lost its greatest writer.” Coming from her, that is high praise indeed. Just as we did in our little article, Ann includes some of her favorite Sobranisms. One of these, a comment on Buckley’s laughable book, In Search of Anti-Semitism, is particularly interesting: “Its real message is not that we should like or respect Jews; only that we should try not to hate them. But this implies that anti-Semitism is the natural reaction to them: If it’s a universal sin, after all, it must be a universal temptation.” Another good one on big government: “Freedom has ceased to be a birthright; it has come to mean whatever we are still permitted to do.” Or as Sobran put it elsewhere, in America, “freedom is coming to mean little more than the right to ask permission.” It’s interesting that as the definition of freedom contracts, the definition of racism expands.
Ann is clever enough not to allow her association with and admiration for anti-Semites to tarnish her own career. This is why she had to write, in Sobran’s own eulogy, about her great “affinity to Israel.” She even calls Israel, which is one of the few nations on earth in possession of a nuclear arsenal and is funded and protected by the greatest military and economic powers in the world, an underdog at the mercy of a few suicide bombers. Well played, Ann. I give your performance four and a half Stars of David.
Oddly enough, Presbyterian Ann offers no such disclaimers when she speechifies at Homocon 2010. Knowing that she will encounter no resistance from her fastidious Jewish publishers, she gladly poses for a photograph with the founder of Boy Butter, a maker of anus lubricant for faggots.
“Can you be gay and conservative?” she shouted at the mostly male crowd… “You have to be!… And you know what the Muslims do to gays,” she said, flashing a knowing look…
“Everybody wants a gay neighbor,” Ms. Coulter said. Of conservatives, she added enthusiastically, “We’ve always liked gays!”
A bigot is “one who practices sociology without a license.”
“The U.S. Constitution poses no serious threat to our form of government.”
Jew Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic has his yarmulke in a twist because Sobran’s obituary in the New York Times did not condemn him as the vilest of all sinners – a Holocaust Denier. Therefore, it behooves Jew Jeffrey to inform the public that Sobran was nothing less than a “Nazi.” It’s easier to libel a dead man, isn’t it, Jeff? I don’t know what the whole world has against Jews. They seem to be charming.
That reminds me. I was helping my son with his homework the other night, and he had to find the three stages of the food chain. He knew “producers” and “consumers,” but was stuck on the third. “Jew lawyers?” I asked. No, sadly, the correct answer is “decomposers.” Eh, what’s the difference?
Non-Jews exist only to serve Jews, says this rabbi.
Moralizing Jew David Frum, kicking and screaming, is finally forced to fire a pedophile on his staff, but not without blaming it on a right-wing smear campaign.
“The government is full of Jews. Second, most Jews are disloyal… [G]enerally speaking, you can’t trust the bastards.” ~ President Richard Nixon, July 3, 1971
Nixon’s Vice President, Spiro Agnew, had more choice words on anti-Christs. He prided himself for being “in the vanguard of those who protest the domination of this country by Zionists.” He called the state of Israel “arrogant,” and because of the “so-called Holocaust” and “Zionist control of our news media,” the entire Western world has been “brainwashed.”
“America is the first empire in history to pay tribute to its satraps.” ~ Pat Buchanan
Aryeh Eldad, a member of the Israeli parliament, has called for Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to be assassinated while in Lebanon for a state visit. This is nothing less than a declaration of war, and it’s not the first time that Jews have done it against a rival state. You can be sure that these madmen will label any retaliation against them as Hitleresque extermination. Then they’ll carry on for generations about how they’ve been defamed, and they’ll shake down gullible Christians for land and unending transfer payments. Anything less would be anti-Semitic.
“Aryeh Eldad told Israel Radio flat-out what needs to be done. If there had been found a person who could have eliminated Hitler on the eve of World War II, Eldad said, this would have changed the course of history, certainly that of the Jews. Israel was founded so that Jews would be responsible for their fate and never again face extermination, he said, and it is now in a situation where it can ‘eliminate in South Lebanon the man de-legitimizing our very existence’ and threatening to annihilate it. Eliminating Ahmadinejad today is like eliminating Hitler in 1939,” the legislator said (Los Angeles Times, Oct. 13).
A Republican running for office in Ohio has participated in WWII reenactments, dressed as a Nazi.
Iott, a member of the Ohio Military Reserve, added, “I’ve always been fascinated by the fact that here was a relatively small country that from a strictly military point of view accomplished incredible things. I mean, they took over most of Europe and Russia, and it really took the combined effort of the free world to defeat them. From a purely historical military point of view, that’s incredible.”
Through their media channels, Jews roll out the usual suspects to depict this sort of thing as the ravings of a lunatic. Can Winston Churchill be placed in the same category? He wrote of Hitler:
In fifteen years…he has succeeded in restoring Germany to the most powerful position in Europe, and not only has he restored the position of his country, but he has even, to a very great extent, reversed the results of the Great War… [T]he vanquished are in process of becoming the victors and the victors the vanquished… [W]hatever else may be thought about these exploits they are certainly among the most remarkable in the whole history of the world…
One may dislike Hitler’s system and yet admire his patriotic achievement. If our country were defeated I hope we should find a champion as admirable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among the nations…
There must not be lacking in our leadership something of that spirit of the Austrian corporal who, when all had fallen into ruins about him, and when Germany seemed to have fallen forever into chaos, did not hesitate to march forth against the vast array of victorious nations and has already turned the tables so decisively upon them.
How about what future president John F. Kennedy wrote in 1945?
After visiting these places [Berchtesgaden and Obersalzberg], you can easily understand how that within a few years Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived.
He had boundless ambition for his country which rendered him a menace to the peace of the world, but he had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.
We study many ruthless dictators in history who accomplished great feats, and a great many of them were far more ruthless and less accomplished than Hitler. But since Jews control everything that passes through the eyes and ears of the people of Europa, we must agree with them that Hitler was the very offspring of Satan himself.
This is why the hapless fellow in Ohio can kiss his political career goodbye. What, does he think that his own people control his country? If you’re keeping score at home, it’s still perfectly acceptable to dress as a Yankee in Civil War reenactments. As Michael Hoffman says, feel free to dress as an Israeli soldier too! You can pretend to gun down thousands of Palestinian and Lebanese civilians, and a grand time will be had by all. “A magnificent performance!” we’ll say, and slap our knees. But if you dress as a Nazi, we’ll report you to Mikey Kikerson at the ADL. Pissing on images of Jesus Christ? Jews think that’s hilarious.
According to Joel McDurmon, Martin Luther’s landmark book, On the Jews and Their Lies, is “a vitriolic tract,” is “filled with radical rhetoric,” is “over-the-top,” and written with “a careless pen.” Luther “went too far in his language,” he chides. Oh come on, Joel, have some guts. As Don Corleone said to Johnny Fontane, “Act like a man!” How about reprinting anything that Luther said about Jews, and show why he was wrong? Did you graduate from the anti-Kinist school of debate? Then, to top it off, Joel declares the “best and most scholarly work” on the Talmud to be a book by some liberal from Princeton. No, my fresh-faced lad – I just want to pinch your cheek! – the definitive work on the Talmud is Judaism Discovered by Michael Hoffman. Crossing the tape in a photo finish is The Traditions of the Jews by Johann Andreas Eisenmenger, which is one of the rarest books in the world and has been basically unavailable for almost 300 years. Thank God that Hoffman owns a copy and has made copies for sale. It seems that Gary DeMar, who boasts a library of tens of thousands of volumes, and his staff have some reading to do. This might teach young McDurmon to cease idiotic statements such as: “Modern Judaism is not Judaism.”
Mao Tse Tung (or Zedong, as it’s now spelled, to keep linguists at NPR employed) takes the title of greatest mass murderer in history: 45 million in just four years. But remember, since Jews are more special than goy-cattle, nothing else can borrow the title of Holocaust.
Juan Williams was fired from NPR for saying that it makes him nervous to see Muslims dressed in Islamic garb. As James points out, all the “conservatives” like Huckabee and Palin who are calling for NPR’s funding to be cut didn’t have a word to say when Rick Sanchez was fired from CNN for stating the incontrovertible truth that Jews control the news business. If they didn’t, Helen Thomas would still be employed.
It would be far more worrisome to see Muslims passing as White and Christian. Anything that makes them more alien is a good thing. As a friend of ours says, we should be “glad to see Blacks with Rasta hair and wild Nigerian garb. I want every Muslim to wear a turban or a veil and preferably to carry a scimitar. I feel the same way about English-only. I don’t want Hispanics to learn to speak English. I want them to remain as foreign as possible.”
German Chancellor Angela Merkel admits that what she calls multiculturalism “has failed, utterly failed.” By “multiculturalism,” she means the hope of liberal, godless democracies to tolerate a cacophony of conflicting interests yet try to instill a common taxpaying purpose in the squabbling nationalities. This is what America is trying to do too, and Merkel is correct: it doesn’t work. Judeochristian neo-Babelists define “multiculturalism” as the mixture of Christian culture with non-Christian culture. They foolishly believe that it is appropriate for any number of kindreds to mix so long as they are all Christian. It is not clear that this state of affairs has ever existed in the world, and certainly does not exist today. As usual, the anti-Kinist relies on fantasies and abstractions. Kinists consider multiculturalism to be synonymous with multiracialism and religious pluralism, which are to be avoided at all costs. Since Merkel doesn’t understand what prevents disparate peoples from integrating, she thinks the solution is for them to learn to speak German. Our own leaders will likewise soon abandon the pretense of supporting multiple nations under one government and will press hard for English-only. They will make the same mistake the Germans are now making, which is to assume that common language can undo God’s design for separate blood-nationhood. Everyone keeps trying to return to Babel, but the way is closed forever. We “racists” tell them exactly what they’re doing wrong, but they refuse to listen, because, after all, we’re “racists.”
“They see no relationship between faith and land. As a result, the U.S. and the Western world have embarked on a suicidal course. They reject the concept of Christendom and embrace instead the humanistic ‘family of man,’ and thus immigration policies…are based on myths and illusions of a destructive nature.” ~ R.J. Rushdoony, Commentary on Numbers 36:1
Anti-Kinists are what Joe Sobran called Alienists. Alienism, he wrote, is “a prejudice in favor of the alien, the marginal, the dispossessed, the eccentric, reaching an extreme in the attempt to ‘build a new society’ by destroying the basic institutions of the native. The most terrible fulfillment of this principle is Communism.” Alienation is the fingerprint of the Left. Thus, we are constantly told of “the hostility of the native for the alien, the majority for the minority, the respectable for the marginal, white for black, Christian for Jew, and so forth. We have prejudice, bigotry, racism, anti-Semitism, nativism, xenophobia, bias, discrimination, and so forth. But these words are themselves prejudicial: They sum up, one-sidedly, a vast range of sentiment and behavior without admitting reciprocal moral realities: the hostility of Jew for Christian, black for white, marginal for respectable, minority for majority, alien for native, abnormal for normal.”
Brilliant words from our friend Mark on the impotence of the modern Church:
The type of close knit community within which the church might function as a caring, disciplining extension of the family no longer exists. There is no sense of community as family and kin. The very idea itself doesn’t even exist except in the minds of a few who are labeled as idealistic fanatics. The entire concept is alien.
There can be no effective church because there is no Biblical sense of community, and that because there is no Biblical sense of family, and that because there is no Biblical sense of covenant. It is a reformation that is required and by that I mean an exodus from the organized church (small c) by those who understand and are willing to start over. The church is dead. Long live the Church.
“Most of your Christian friends will not agree with this.” And that is shameful.
This is an excellent sermon on baptism and the covenant.
“A new study published this week in the German magazine Der Spiegel revealed far-right thoughts are common in Germany today. One-third of Germans said they would send foreigners home if there were not enough jobs to go around. One-sixth of Germans said Jews have too much influence.” Knowing that propaganda is their only defense, Jews are into exhibits. Here an exhibit, there an exhibit, everywhere an exhibit. German museums are even given the special privilege of exhibiting swastikas, which are banned by law for everyone else. Germans can expect to be exhibited to death until the brainwashing works and they finally come to agree with Jews that their Christian ancestors were wicked anti-Semites for trying to defend themselves against the Communist terror that enveloped Europe.
Violating the fifth and seventh commandments fills a person with guilt.
“One of the key underlying problems that lead to interracial relationships is the problems with both sexes of the white race. Modernity has made white men feminized, weak, lazy, and deadbeat. White women have generally become more aggressive, masculine in demeanor and even looks, and less delicate. This is why certain white women turn to black men for their perceived masculinity, and white men to Asian women for their perceived femininity. Again, the church should be working to correct this underlying problem rather than turning to interracial marriage as the solution to the problem.” ~ David O
R.J. Rushdoony understood God’s law better than most, and his nitwit son-in-law, Gary North, called him a racist and humanist because of it.
He elevated hybridization in society to the status of covenantal evil, making its eradication a foundational principle in his social theory. In doing so, he moved from covenantalism to racism… This is humanism, pure and simple. It is John Dewey disguised as John Calvin: community over confession. If taken seriously, it could all too easily become Martin Bormann disguised as Martin Luther: race over reformation.
“Things spiritual cannot be proven by the dialectical. That is why Philip does not respond to Nathanael’s question, ‘Can anything good come out of Nazareth?’ with a Socratic dialogue. He says, ‘Come and see.’” ~ CWNY
David is probably asking himself whether John Lofton is really this dumb or if he just plays an idiot in the movies.
“Only an integral Christian people acting as a people who believe in a personal God who created distinct races and distinct individuals can resist liberalism.” ~ CWNY
“The character of an ancient family is a peculiar heritage, sacred but destructible; and woe to him who destroys or suffers it to perish!” ~ Sheridan Le Fanu, Uncle Silas
“Kinism is what used to be known as living your life in this world as a human being in the context of Faith, Family, Race, and Nation, the four pillars of Western Culture according to God’s design. It is really no more complex than that, but without these things we cease to exist as a people.” ~ Rev. Ross Mahan
Keep an eye on the Faith and Heritage website. The statement of principles:
We affirm that all men, of every race, ethnicity, and tribe, are created in the image of God. However, this common humanity does not mean that all groups are equal in every respect, just as two brothers can share a common family but be blessed by Providence with vastly differing talents and abilities. We affirm that many of these differences have genetic components and thank God for the diversity of mankind.
We affirm that every race and ethnicity not only has the right, but also the duty to defend its homeland, borders, culture, and existence from those seeking to destroy them. We affirm that each generation has the duty to preserve its own particular culture, blood, and soil as well as the true faith of Christianity as an inheritance to those generations following it.
We affirm the multi-national multi-racial makeup of Christ’s Church. We further affirm that the nations and races are themselves individual expressions of Providence, separated and cultivated by God to check the spread of evil and add to His glory, to be preserved kind after kind in this world and eternally in the world to come. We affirm that all attempts to amalgamate humans into one mixed mass are in open rebellion against God’s law and His sovereignly created boundaries.
We affirm that all men are fallen and in need of the saving grace of Jesus Christ. We further affirm that this grace, not race or ethnicity, is the sole source of our salvation.
We affirm that the deep and healthy Traditional Western Christian culture is far superior to the shallow, decadent, perverted, and sick culture that now saturates the Western world. We affirm the Traditional over the Modern, the Eternal over the Materialistic, and the Local over the Global. We affirm traditional gender roles, the complementarian model of marriage, and the family as the primary building block of society. We reject feminism and its legacy of divorce, illegitimacy and poverty. We stand against homosexuality, all other forms of sexual deviancy and the egalitarian ideology that enables them.
We are Christians who have not bowed the knee to the modern Babel, who refuse to apologize for our European heritage and commit collective cultural and ethnic suicide to appease the never-ending covetous demands of the West’s enemies and our corrupt treasonous leaders.
Our mission is threefold:
- To provide a forum and community of like-minded Christians who seek the preservation of their descendants in the lands of their ancestors, and who have not acquiesced to the contemporary idols of Cultural Marxism, multiculturalism, equality, and the heretical social gospel;
- To influence and encourage debate, theological, cultural, and otherwise, within our denominations to dislodge and discredit the current unfortunate monolithic Marxist multiculturalism of the institutional churches; and
- To evangelize and encourage those, among the most noble of our people, who have been alienated by the Church’s treasonous behavior towards their own homelands and people and thus drifted from the faith of their forefathers.
You don’t see the word Kinist here, just as you don’t see the word White, but it’s thoroughly White and Kinist. His truth is marching on! as the Yankees say.
(I think they mean winter of 2011.)
For comparison, here is the Council of Conservative Citizens’ Statement of Principles, written by Sam Francis (expanded here):
- We believe the United States is a Christian country.
- We believe the United States is a European country and that Americans are part of the European people.
- The United States is a sovereign and independent nation.
- The United States is a constitutional republic.
- We believe in States’ Rights, the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, and the Bill of Rights.
- The traditional family is the basic unit of human society.
- Private property and free enterprise are the foundations of our economy.
- Cultural, national, and racial integrity.
- A Strong National Defense.
- America First Foreign Policy.
- America First Trade Policy.
- Traditional Education under Local Control.
- Strong and Just Law Enforcement.
- Protection of the Environment and Natural Heritage.
Countless great ministers of the gospel in the last century and earlier could have written the same words. Ask the elders of your church if they have more in common with their own ancestors or with Communists. Then ask yourself if you want to be a Christian or a Communist.
Jim Russell will sue! This is wonderful news. Slanderers are now given fair warning. In this old clip from the Phil Donahue show, Russell was in the studio while Jared Taylor was being interviewed, and he asked a very good question. When told that whites should ensure that their own people survive, Donahue accuses racialists of believing that God loves whites more than non-whites. That’s not the point, replies Russell:
When football teams run low on thugs, they revitalize the economy by creating jobs for “Americans.”
This was the old Colonel Reb mascot at Ole Miss:
The new mascot is a black bear. That wears slacks. If you’re going to have a bear for a mascot, isn’t it racist to make it a black bear? Rumor has it that he will be named “Admiral Ackbear,” after the Star Wars character that makes you want to ask yourself, “What the hell is that thing?”
Next to a “pair of muppet-like characters,” a “land shark” and the intangible concept of “mojo,” only a relatively generic, inoffensive offering like a bear stood a chance of building a consensus as the least despised candidate.
Every city that has ever hosted the Olympics has done this very thing. The organizing committee recruits a team of experts to Photoshop the most inoffensive (i.e., bland) characters possible, and the end result, without fail, makes you want to ask yourself, “What the hell is that thing?” The fed-up people of Sydney, Australia, elected their own unofficial mascot for the 2000 summer games: Fatso the Fat-Assed Wombat. I’m sure he would be happy to be employed by Ole Miss.
Alas for Fatso, the immaculately-dressed black bear has finally allowed Ole Miss alumni to leave their racist past behind and has inspired them to cheer their Negro thugs to feats of derring-do. Mayors of large American cities are already writing their excuses for when camera crews demand to know why local NFL gangstas have been arrested. The bear himself already has endorsement contracts with the Men’s Wearhouse and Super Sugar Crisp cereal. I wonder how long it will be before we hear reports of him roaming around neighborhoods, knocking over trash cans in search of young white girls.
No one seems to be upset about the prominent “Brown Pride” tattoo on the chest of “Ultimate Fighter” Cain Velasques, but if any athlete were to boast “White Pride,” he would be called a Nazi and would be fired immediately.
“Now we learn that two more things are racist. First, if you’re running against an incumbent who is soft on illegal immigration, it’s racist to point that fact out in your ads. Second, if you’re racist enough to bring up immigration, it’s even more racist to depict illegal aliens as brown people sneaking across our border with Mexico.” And for the love of Jehoshaphat, don’t use the word “wetback.” Yes, President Eisenhower used it, but you’re not President Eisenhower, are you?
The first Indian president of Bolivia outlaws ol’ debbil racism. “We’ve had more than 500 years of racism,” he says, with one eye fixed on the Heap Big Wampum of lighter-skinned Bolivians. In that country, 55% are Indians of about three dozen tribes, 30% are mestizo, and 15% are white. Two-thirds of the population is in poverty, and the path to prosperity is clear: steal from the honkies. If racism has been around for 500 years, it means that the Indian tribes lived in peace and harmony and luxury before the arrival of the Paleface.
Coincidentally, theft of white wealth is also the proposed solution for America, where one-seventh of the population is unable to feed itself. Clearly, we need Guatemalans and Nigerians to support us in our childless dotage. No one received food stamps prior to 1964, but liberals are always surprised to discover that dependency follows subsidies like stank follows a skunk.
Whites are being blamed for not adopting black children. This is another case of subsidizing irresponsibility. For some reason, no one ever asks why black people are not adopting black children.
The ratio of blacks who will get HIV: 1 in 22. For whites, it’s 1 in 170.
The 25 most dangerous neighborhoods in the country. Damn menacing Swedes. Something needs to be done about them.
“When the white man is ready to declare that, ‘Yes, I am opposed to the barbarism of the sons of Ham; yes, I am opposed to sexless, bloodthirsty hag queens from hell; and yes, I am opposed to the reign of the unrepentant, pound-of-flesh Jew’; then and only then will the white man be able to call his soul his own.” ~ CWNY
The hero of all black men dies, leaving behind 100 widows.
In Kenya, whence hails the Obama brood, ought they to be called “schools” or “pederasty clubs”? More than a thousand “teachers” have been fired for abusing young girls, and those are just the ones who have been caught. The legacy of the Negro marches on. But it’s looking up! Harlem is opening its first major hotel since 1967. Sure, it’s because blacks are moving out, but still.
Meanwhile, diversities in Broward County, Florida, still don’t understand the purpose of the 911 emergency line.
Oh look, it must be the Royal Ascot opening day!
Something about this picture makes me feel all Europeanish inside. It must be the pink and green suit.
When the Hammer rescued Europe and the Faith. How much do your children know about this history? How much does your pastor know?
Now Europa and the Faith are defended by this moron:
How much do your children know about the heroine Hannah Dustin, the first woman in American history to be honored with her own statue? (From today’s coins, statues, and worship of even marginal off-whites, you would think that Sacajawea is the mother of our country.)
When Mrs. Dustin, the mother of nine, scalped her Indian abductors, the Massachusetts General Court rewarded her richly for the ten scalps. Can you imagine what would happen to her today? She would be arrested for a hate crime.
If your children don’t know about Charles Martel, Hannah Dustin, and other heroes of the faith, can you really call them educated?
This woman loves her some shooting galleries.
Wikipedia is a scam. It’s obvious that the Political Cesspool and Kevin MacDonald entries, as well as many others, are written by the SPLC. The text bends far to the left, and when our friends try to correct the rampant errors, their edits last for about two hours and are overwritten. Thus, Wikipedia maintains the illusion of being as balanced as an encyclopedia yet open to all. The SPLC’s entry has no incriminating evidence whatsoever, of course, aside from a few references to their Faganesque fundraising. That’s nothing compared to this.
John Vinson has written a devastating critique of the SPLC in the Spring edition of The Social Contract. It should all go into Wikipedia, of course, but try it, and watch as it disappears.
The SPLC is now joined to the Department of Homeland Security! It’s yet another case of the government subsidizing perversion and lies. As you might have heard, a man who belongs to Oath Keepers, which insists that the empire must honor the Constitution, had his newborn child taken from him by the hospital, simply because of his political beliefs. Can you imagine anything more horrifying? This is what happens when White Christians allow themselves to be enslaved by the enemies of their God and their Folk.
Caesar orders a family farm in Missouri to destroy $250,000 worth of cheese!
“It took from 1776, when the United States became an independent country, until 1990, the year after the Berlin Wall fell signaling victory in the Cold War, for the federal government to accumulate a total of $3 trillion in debt, according to the Treasury Department.” In less than two years, Obamination has borrowed the same amount. I’d say the SPLC’s funding is about to dry up.
Even Obama knows that with economic collapse, men rally “around kind of a tribal attitude and issues of race become more prominent.” That’s human history in a single sentence. Bastard Mulatto Obama’s own books show that he has spent the bulk of his life obsessed with tribal attitudes and issues of race. Even the sons of whores are unable to escape the flow of history. What George Orwell surmised about the English is every bit as true of Americans: They never see the writing on the wall until their backs are up against it.
“My rap palate has greatly improved,” says the 44th president of this joke of a government. Remember when white racist-sexist-homophobes like Washington and Jefferson filled that office?
The man who is teaching “at-risk youth” rap rhymes like “Old Dead White Men” just happens, accidentally, to be a Chosenite. He could just as easily have been German or Swedish, but as the luck of the draw would have it, he is of the Special Tribe. Through no fault of their own, we continue to find disproportionate leadership of Jews in every anti-White, anti-Christ revolutionary movement that exists. Obviously, Hymen Lipschitz and Uncle Sam Goldfarb are the victims of an international, anti-Semitic conspiracy!
More on Michelle Obama and her freakish trapezius muscles. We’ve gone from “the hand that rocks the cradle” to “the arm that lifts the barbell.” Whither femininity? Steroids will hasten the day when all men and women are equal, just as quotas will hasten the day when all races are equal. I have a dream today!
“Breaking down the sexual barriers between the races is a major weapon of cultural destruction because it means the dissolution of the cultural boundaries that define breeding and the family and, ultimately, the transmission and survival of the culture itself.” ~ Sam Francis, November 26, 2004
There’s some well-deserved praise of CWNY at the Thinking Housewife site, and of course there is the obligatory Yankee commenter who is shocked – SHOCKED! – that there are white people who are still “obsessed” with race. In the course of discussion, Laura Wood writes: “The cause of the Confederacy is tainted by its efforts to secede and its provocations against the North.” This is stunning ignorance. Why was the American government in 1776 not “tainted by its efforts to secede” from the king’s authority? What provocations? Impetuously firing on illegally-occupied state property and killing a horse? Why are the “provocations” (i.e., murder and arson) of Kansas redlegs and slave insurrectionists never said to have “tainted” the cause of the North? How is it possible for thoughtful people, in this day and age, to believe that it is just to declare war on one’s own people merely for seeking to establish a separate government? Is it wrong for brothers to separate peacefully, as did those famous slaveowners, Abraham and Lot?
”I must not write a word to you about politics, because you are a woman.” ~ John Adams, to his wife Abigail
Dan Brannan’s magnificent artwork:
We all wish we could have been in Nashville to hear Richard Spencer speak against anti-white discrimination, which is commonly called Affirmative Action. The liberal college students (sorry for the echo) dredged up the old excuse about racial disparities being caused by 400 years of oppression, etc. Richard asked: “How does slavery make you not able to take a test?” They also harp on a “lack of credentials” when they’re unable to explain away the truth. After all, if something is true, what do credentials matter? And if something is false, what do credentials matter? The Dean of Students at Vanderbilt told the newspaper that Spencer’s argument suffers from “gaps in evidence and inferential leaps,” which is a polished way of signalling that the dean doesn’t know what the hell else to say. He then praised the ability for those of “different beliefs, values, interests, concerns, backgrounds, perspectives and lifestyles” to have a “conversation,” by which we may “understand each other and ourselves”; which is all well and good, except that nine times out of ten, our side is shouted down, censored, and punished in various ways. Again, the dean doesn’t want to let the truth slip out. He’s losing.