Here’s a fun comment that was left over at Lee in the Mountains: “It’s Christmas morning and I was touched by hearing ‘Mary Did You Know’…and then shocked by being linked to a save-the-white-race message… Jesus taught us to love ALL people! And only love has a chance of saving this world…that is the real Christmas message.” What does love mean to the Alienist? It looks a lot like hate to us because it erases all distinctions. “Evil, be thou my good.” Being indifferent as to whether one’s own people survive or perish is anything but love. If I were to say that I don’t care whether my own children survive or perish, you would correctly call me a hateful father.
In this clip from the 2008 Together for the Gospel conference, a former Muslim named Thabiti Anyabwile talks about how he is trying to convince “the bruthas” (as phrased by moderator C.J. Mahaney) that race does not exist. It goes without saying that blacks do not believe this at all. Only emasculated whites believe that race does not exist. Therefore, Anyabwile is a black man who is clearly smarter than the white panelists, because he is capitalizing on a clever business opportunity in the white demographic.
Anyabwile’s game is to argue that race does not exist but ethnicities do. You will hear him say that “African-American” is an ethnicity. But he denies that ethnicity has any basis in nationality and citizenship. It’s the same liberal stance that the rest of the Church has adopted, which is that people groups coalesce from shared experience, but in the eschaton all colors will bleed into one. Therefore, the only “race” that matters is the collection of all Christians in the world, and the only identity of any significance is in Christ. “If you free yourself from race,” says Anyabwile, “you’re free to think of yourself as an individual.” Individuals are certainly easier to control, as every statist knows.
Tim Challies gives this review of an Anyabwile lecture: “Our entire outlook on life, he said, is so misplaced, so wrong-headed, so inadequate that we either need to change it now or commit ourselves to the closest mental health institution.” In other words, we are being asked by a revolutionary Negro to deny what the Bible commands and what our Christian forefathers believed, in the name of “love,” of course. Challies agrees that “believing in race is a bit like believing in unicorns, because race does not exist.” This is quite fascinating, because race is the subject that dominates public discussion more than any other by far, even in this age of excessive mixture. This is true even in places like Brazil that have been mixed for centuries. Challies equates the topic that is on everyone’s mind, and which consumes so much of our public resources, to a belief in unicorns. How can racism be a problem then? The hatred of something that doesn’t exist?
These men never seem to grasp the logic that if race is not real, neither is racism. Their position is akin to saying that marriage does not exist, but we have a problem with fornication. As David O has said, the very same people who are convinced that race is a Darwinian concept will do anything to deny that the war against so-called “racism” (meaning the war against the white race) is in fact cultural Marxism. Such double-mindedness and self-deception leads to the confusion of someone like Anyabwile, whose absurd argument is that race does not exist, or is at best a social construct, but ethnicities are real, because his black supporters will never accept the suggestion that they do not really belong to a distinct people.
At the conference, Albert Mohler says “the decoupling of race and ethnicity is extremely helpful.” He then turns to eschatology and surmises that the tribes, tongues, peoples, and nations are not according to blood but are rather “social,” “linguistic,” and “cultural” systems. Yet Mohler is forced to admit that “difference is good,” and that God delights in the differences in “all the ethnicities.” Then he reels it in, asking Anyabwile how the Judeochristian preacher is to reach those who believe that “they are who they are because of biology,” since “our eyes are organs of deception.” Anyabwile reiterates that the solution is to “remove race from your thinking” through “redefinition” and “questioning ourselves,” which affects our choice of friends, our choice of neighborhood, and most importantly, our choice of spouse. Then Mohler asked what was, for me, a laugh-out-loud question: “Anyone other than the Bible and you saying this?” It’s both hilarious and sad to watch the white men gush over how Anyabwile has re-engineered their thinking and led them back to Scripture, as though they had been orphaned in the darkness by their racist ancestors.
Anyabwile gives his effeminate admirers a brief Bible lesson, explaining that all are descended from Adam, and because of this, “we don’t peer back into Genesis 10 and develop some theory of changing pigmentation based upon curses or geography.” Instead, the Christian must believe that all races evolved immediately after the Flood, during a geological blink, a span of time that was no greater than a couple hundred years, of which the Bible says nothing. You’re just supposed to accept that their interpretation of Genesis and of history is the only possible interpretation.
You can guess Anyabwile’s explanation of Babel without even hearing it. He says that God deepened divisions among mankind because of sin. This is partly true, but it puts the cart in front of the horse. As you read last time in the quote from Vern Poythress, God protects us by separating us, because sin would multiply if we were allowed to be absolutely unified. Many small governments and nations are better than one global government and nation, because it forces us to mind our own business, which men are chronically unwilling to do. Yet the Alienist never acknowledges what Genesis 10 clearly states, that God began the process of separation and diversification prior to Babel. Genesis 11, therefore, is the story of rebels at Babel who refused to submit themselves to the Creation Mandate of Genesis 1:28, to fill and subdue the earth. Anyabwile is correct that “after Babel we’re yearning for something that only God can do through the gospel… The curse [of Babel] is reversed in that sense, but we didn’t do it. God did it.” We reply: If only God can unify men, and only through the gospel, stop placing heavy burdens on men, which they are unable to bear, telling them that their heritage is meaningless, that their people are not allowed to survive as distinct peoples, and that they are equal to and replaceable by all other human beings.
It is simply not accurate to assert, as Anyabwile does, that “alienation,” by which he means diversity, is “a product of the Fall.” It never fails to perplex us that Christians today are incapable of balancing the age-old ideas that 1) we can be unified in the Spirit but distinct in the flesh, and 2) God is pleased by this. They are so eager to divorce themselves from their own righteous ancestors that they divorce themselves from sanity as well. This is what leads to the confusion of affirming ethnicity but rejecting race.
At the conference, a story is told of a black man who was likely assuaged of his enmity with the white race when Mahaney prayed over his broken foot. Anyabwile then says that he was likewise impressed when, for the first time in his life, a white man held a door open for him and called him Sir. The theme is that whites are the oppressors and blacks are the oppressees, and it has taken the hundreds of years that we have been in close contact with each other (at least here in the South) for the oppressors to begin to cease their oppression, because it has taken them as long to finally obey what the Bible commands. Never is there a hint of suggestion from these men that blacks ought to feel shame, much less strive to compensate, their white hosts for the unspeakable crimes that their people have committed. There is only the double standard that whites must accept the falsehood that Southern slavery bore evil designs against the black race, and that all white men and women, whether descended from slaveowners or not, owe an eternal debt to blacks that will not be considered paid until the white race disappears through miscegenation. This is genocide, and the “pastors” in the room lavish Baba Booey with effusive praise for it, as though he is a prophet that has worked a miracle in their midst.
In this clip, Anyabwile has more to say about the “staggering magnitude of injustice against African-Americans in the name of the gospel.” He apparently denies that there has been a staggering magnitude of injustice against white people by “African-Americans.” He then says that love is antithetical to familiarity! In other words, the only way to demonstrate love is to treat every person as the equal of every other, which is truly anti-familial and truly hateful and truly satanic.
It’s amazing to see how these people twist 1 Peter 2. Let’s look at verse 19: “Now, therefore, you are no longer strangers and foreigners, but fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God…” The Alienist completely ignores the qualification of the last five words, just as they love to quote the first part of Acts 17:26 but not the second part. They leap to the conclusion that if we are all Christians, we must therefore intermarry and combine into one nation, government, and people. It cannot be stated enough that this is completely at odds with what Christians have believed until recent times. It is not Christianity at all; it is unitarianism.
One last thing about Anyabwile. Coming in at #1 in his Top Ten Tips for Talking About Race: Don’t Talk About Race. I don’t care who you are, that’s just funny.
Speaking of comedy, Little Stevie Halbrook is back with another scholarly opus, and this one is rich. As you read here first, Halbrook has promoted the work of Rev. John Weaver, which presents a conflict of interest in his jihad against Kinism, because Weaver agrees with us about race, and with all honest Christians down through the ages. As we pointed out, Weaver has correctly taught that God created the races for His own glory and purposes, that interracial marriage is the sin of adultery, and that it leads to idolatry. Halbrook knew that he had to shift quickly into damage control mode, and he surely agonized over how he was going to justify his praise of Weaver while denouncing Weaver’s blatant Kinism. The results are quite entertaining, and even somewhat shocking.
He says it is “slander” to call Weaver, an “important and respectable theologian,” a Kinist.
Kinism is a heresy, and one of the most perverted theological systems ever developed in the name of Christianity.
Calling someone a kinist is like calling someone a murderer, or a rapist. Perhaps worse.
This is why it’s fun to read Little Stevie. He goes so over-the-top in the attempt to justify his own miscegenation that he embarrasses even those who are on his side. You might think that only heresies like Gnosticism or Arianism could win the title of “most perverted theological system ever developed in the name of Christianity,” but Kinism has vaulted over the top, like an Olympian on steroids. And being a Kinist is “perhaps” worse than being a murderer or rapist!
It gets better, if you can imagine, when Halbrook attempts to explain the qualifications for being a Kinist.
To be a kinist, one must…hold that God commands races to be segregated. As such kinists must oppose not only interracial marriage, but interracial nations, interracial friendships, and even interracial Christian fellowship.
If one does not hold to this foundational tenet of total racial segregation, one is not a kinist. To be a kinist one must oppose racial “mixing” of any kind.
And just like that – hey presto! – we are no longer Kinists. Not only are we in favor of interracial friendships, we actually do have friends of other races; and where race is concerned, they make a lot more sense than Halbrook. We have business associates and other acquaintances who disagree vehemently with our beliefs, and yet we remain friends, and productive friends at that. We also acknowledge that in times of adversity, such as when the Church was subjugated by Rome, or today when Americans are oppressed by an even more expansive, pagan empire, we must make the best of an inferior situation. There should most definitely be interracial fellowship, and in most cases it will look a lot like inter-ecclesial fellowship. No one is surprised that baptists and presbyterians do not worship together most of the time, because their beliefs would cause them to clash. Yet they can love and care for each other to the best of their mutual ability. This isn’t rocket science. We absolutely affirm “the Gospel’s power to transform interracial societies.” It’s true that Kinists would restrict citizenship, just as our own forefathers did. But citizenship is already restricted. You can fly to Ireland and the Irish will welcome you, but this doesn’t make you an Irish citizen. It also does not mean that the Irish have excluded you because they hate you. Rocket science, it’s not.
So much for Halbrook’s expertise on the “foundational tenets” of Kinism. He is wrong about almost everything he writes in this article, including the slander that we are guilty of “race worship.” And he’s still no better off regarding Weaver. He blindly asserts that “not all who oppose interracial marriage are kinists,” but not even we are Kinists according to the silly criteria that he has diagrammed. (And if we ain’t Kinists, honey, ain’t nobody Kinists.)
The comedy continues when Halbrook contacts Weaver for clarification. He does not ask Weaver, “Are you a Kinist?” for fear that Weaver will say Yes. Instead:
[H]e has told us that he does not oppose interracial Christian fellowship. Not only this, but despite his disagreement with interracial marriage, he has told us that he has preached in many churches with interracial couples.
Moreover, he said Christians in interracial marriages are welcome to join his church. Clearly then Weaver, unlike kinists, considers church unity much more important than race.
So what have we learned?
- Just like other Kinists, John Weaver does not limit friendship and charity to those of his own race.
- Just like other Kinists, he preaches the truth to anyone who will listen.
- He allows couples who are in sinful unions to join his church, where they can hear about how they are adulterers and idolaters, with the ultimate goal being repentance.
I suppose if you huff sufficient quantities of Jenkem, this will convince you that John Weaver is not a Kinist. Where does this leave the dutiful theonomist? As a friend of ours writes, “According to Deut. 19:16-21, those who bear false witness should have the punishment rendered to them that would have been rendered to those falsely accused.” Since Halbrook has borne false witness against us by attributing to us beliefs that we do not hold, and has slandered us by saying that we are worse than murderers and rapists, what is to be his punishment? Will there be any at all?
Halbrook would have us believe that because the borders of kingdoms change and have changed, that this makes them arbitrary. However this is analogous to arguing that because a family might be poor today but wealthy tomorrow, this makes private property irrelevant.
It thrills our souls to see Kinism proliferating through such highly-skilled and highly-educated men and women.
Here’s another page from the same site in which Ehud makes the excellent point that that the Alienist interpretation of Galatians 3:28 is fatally flawed. If the “wall of separation” between “Jew and Greek” has been obliterated, why does Christ Himself say that there are other “sheep not of this fold” (John 10:16)? The Alienist will reply that Pentecost drew the Gentiles into the fold. And the Kinist will answer him that this was true in a spiritual sense only, because Galatians 3:28 also refers to males and females being unified. Even Alienists acknowledge that sexual distinctions remain in effect. Game, set, match.
As Scott Terry says, the “difference between the alienist and the kinist is the difference between the rapist and the honest couple enjoying their marriage bed. The one is at war with God-ordained order, and the other seeks to foster, promote and enjoy it.”
All the Alienists who have gone off on Kinists for the quote at kinism.net about “the confluence of pagan and Christian traditions” are now celebrating Christmas. Ah, sweet hypocrisy. While they may not celebrate Halloween, for a number of good reasons, they do piously observe the pagan ritual that follows a week or so later. As our friend Scott remarks: “It’s amazing to me that so many of the Christians around me refuse to celebrate Halloween (because of its distant ties with paganism) and yet become upset with me for not voting.”
We’re officially calling for an intervention on behalf of Crazy Uncle Honky, otherwise known as John Lofton, our favorite fundamentalist and biblicist. He has become so incoherent that even Lindsay Lohan wants him to get professional help. He’s a danger to himself and others. Here is a glimpse into the latest episode of Loftonian lunacy.
Jaime Castillo: “Anything done that is unwise is a sin. Especially if the person already knows it is unwise, and he still does it anyway.”
J-Lo: “Sez who? Sin is the violation of God’s Law. Which law of God does [black/white] Christian marriage violate? Be specific, pls.”
JC: “There are certain commandments that can be rightly inferred, without being specifically mentioned. Can you marry an infant? Obviously not. How about a two-year-old? Nope. A three-year-old? No. Enough already. What is the right age for marriage?”
J-Lo: “I do not know. Haven’t thought about age question. Would have to search Scripture on this…”
Amazing! Lofton’s extreme biblicism precludes him from denouncing child molestation because he can’t find a specific verse for it. Jaime had read Lofton’s badgering tactics long enough to know how to trap him. Jaime is a brilliant Kinist who is…gasp! not white! Don’t tell Halbrook or he might lay an egg.
Lofton is also unable to find a single verse that explicitly permits women at the communion table. He can’t find a specific verse that commands the baptizing of infants. Yet we join him in approbating these practices. As David O tells us, the Pharisees tried to pull a Lofton on Jesus in Matthew 19:1-9 when “they demanded an exact Bible verse that said that divorce was wrong. Christ rebuked them by making a very logical inference from the institution of marriage itself.” Marriage is relevant to the discussion of Kinism, because just as Adam said that Eve was “bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh” in Gen. 2:23, we find Scripture littered with references to a people being of the same flesh and bone. The idiom is always used to refer to close kin relations. Notice that Alienists are incapable of accepting the use of this term in Scripture because the only line in their script is that we all descended from Adam. Therefore, what the Bible actually teaches about kin relations is meaningless to them.
“And Laban said to him, ‘Surely you are my bone and my flesh’” (Gen. 29:14). Ken Ham was not present to correct Laban and inform him that even the Canaanites were of his bone and flesh. Silly Bible!
“Remember that I am your own flesh and bone” (Judges 9:2). Abimelech apparently did not understand that people are just people.
“Then all the tribes of Israel came to David at Hebron and spoke, saying, ‘Indeed we are your bone and your flesh’” (2 Sam. 5:1 and 1 Chron. 11:1). What was this, the Third Reich?
According to what the Bible actually says, as opposed to the fantasy of Alienist equality, legitimate civil authority is based upon a credible claim of kinship with the governed (Deut. 17:15). The Bible never, ever considers the “one blood” theory of mankind as worthy of a moment’s consideration when it comes to tribal and national identity and governance. But Christians today, who are more unitarian than trinitarian, have stripped kinship of its biblical meaning. Since this has perverted their connections to their fellow man, it has perverted their understanding of God as well. This is why Kinists are called “heretics” for agreeing with their own Christian ancestors.
The same principle of kinship applies to marriage. Though Romans 7:3 forbids polyandry, there is not a verse to be found in the book that forbids polygyny. Nevertheless, we can infer from God’s arrangement for Adam and Eve that polygamy is not what He intends for marriage. Because Adam and Eve were of similar age, we can infer that it is inappropriate for an old man to marry a young girl, and it is not necessary to find within Scripture an explicit age boundary. Likewise, if we want to know how marriage to one’s own “flesh and bone” is determined, we must let Scripture interpret Scripture. Is your pastor willing to do this, or will he fish for an excuse to sinfully join what God has separated?
Peter Hammond is a longtime missionary and homeschooler who was born in South Africa and raised in Rhodesia. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Sudan has published an article stating that he “should expect to be bombed when he comes to Sudan… He should expect to be shot on sight.” This paper by Hammond on the Seventh Commandment contains this very good and very Kinist insight:
Considering how much the Scriptures teach concerning marriage, and the many passages forbidding cross cultural and inter racial marriages with unbelievers and being “unequally yoked“, it is extraordinary that there is so little preaching and teaching on this important matter.
Marriage not only involves two individuals, but two families. We need to honour our parents and seek the guidance of our church leaders when we consider marriage. Those who become “unequally yoked” are being short-sighted and selfish. They are neither considering their ancestors, nor their descendants. Nor are they placing God’s Word above their own emotions.
Of course, that’s just as much related to the Fifth Commandment. But here’s a curious thing. Another version of the same article has omitted the quote above.
Here’s a German man who castrated his teenage daughter’s 57-year-old consensual-rapist. Whatever you might think about this – and we’re not too upset about it – you can’t deny that the girl dishonored her father and sinned against God. But “Christians” today do try to deny it, if two people like this want to get married, because they take a libertarian rather than a covenantal view of marriage. And like Lofton, they deny that any age gap is too great unless a specific verse can be found that tells them so.
John Lofton and other biblicists are unwilling to accept that miscegenation is even so much as a bad idea unless they can find a specific verse that says race A is not to marry race B. Lofton’s mantra is “amazing grace, not amazing race.” As David O says, this is like suggesting “that being skilled at basketball has nothing to do with being tall or coordinated, but is only a matter of God’s grace.” It’s all of grace! It’s what the old “racist” Christians used to call providence. Yet as soon as we mention secondary causes to Alienists, we are accused of being “race worshipers.” Lofton also believes that domestic and civil governments are forbidden from forbidding what God’s law does not absolutely and categorically forbid. Try to wrap your head around that one. The upshot is that unless Lofton can find the exact words “Thou shalt not marry outside your own race” in the Bible, no one has the right to outlaw it. Jaime pinned him to the wall like a dried-out dung beetle because by the very same anti-logic, no one would be able to outlaw pedophilia or polygamy or a great many other things.
And lest you think that regulation and enforcement are different in the gelatinous mire of J-Lo’s brain:
As our readers are well aware, all states used to have laws that outlawed miscegenation. The marriage license was born as the means of conferring to interracial couples the “privilege” to marry, which had previously been forbidden. But if marriage is a privilege to be granted by the state, it is no longer a right. This is why you receive a birth certificate, not a birth license. (It’s not surprising that few people understand this. They also think that the Constitution grants rights, when in fact constitutions are enumerations of rights that already exist.) The state took upon itself the authority to redefine marriage, and it has never stopped redefining it. In surveys, vast numbers of people now believe that marriage has outlived its usefulness, and it all began with the state allowing the very same adultery that Lofton and his fellow Alienists believe is sanctioned by holy Scripture, even though it was never considered to be legitimate in the past. So when they complain about the state overstepping its bounds and regulating marriage, it’s a little too late – like when parachurch organizations suddenly get upset because they are called hate groups. (It was just fine with them when the “racists” and “anti-Semites” were the only haters in town.)
We hate to keep picking on Lofton, the fundamentalist-antinomian, but his mad ravings are evidence of the depths of absurdity into which a Christian will sink as soon as he scorns his kith and kin. Our friend Ehud is correct. Lofton’s “position is nothing less than a declaration of war on the family itself… The Mad Hatter wouldn’t even drink their tea for fear of contracting whatever sort of cytoplasmic parasite is eating holes through the Alienists’ brains… Kinism is proven true by impossibility of the contrary.”
Since Lofton communicates in rhyme, Mark Chambers wrote this brilliant poem for him, with a little help from Edgar Allen Poe:
Once upon one daytime dreary, through eyes that were a wee bit weary
While reading various theology posts on the screen of my PC
This guy named Lofton caught my eye, I’m not exactly sure quite why,
Unless it was the lousy argument and his poor philosophy
It could have been the argument and the poor philosophy
That seemed a wee bit odd to me.
And then as I continued reading, I could see this man was needing
Someone to show him how to read and think more logically,
And one more thing caught my attention, I’d be remiss if I did not mention,
That he simply would not answer a question, even when asked repeatedly
This guy refused to answer questions when asked repeatedly
Good Lord, I thought, how can this be?
But that’s not all, oh no, not quite, there is one other thing not right
About the way he interacts with the questions put to him, you see
He thinks it his prerogative, to ignore the interrogative
And seems unaware that answering is considered courtesy
He doesn’t care that answering is deemed a courtesy
He has one standard for himself, and another for you and me.
Ambivalent about the color of a face, he thinks there’s no such thing as race
No matter the texture of the hair or the shape of eyes through which we see
His eyes cross; he becomes frenetic if you tell him these things are genetic
That the races are a matter of chromosomes and genes and DNA
The deoxyribonucleic acid that we just call DNA
GIVE ME CHAPTER, BOOK, AND VERSE!! is all that he can say.
That God made races is ALL FICTION, it’s CRAZY, it’s a CONTRADICTION!
He made from one blood everyone including you and me
This stuff about Japheth, Shem and Ham is FOOLISHNESS, it’s all A SHAM
Even though its inferred everywhere and plain for all to see
Anyone can see it who has been given eyes to see,
At least if the brain inside the head is larger than a pea.
But John goes mad—he’s acting crazy, his face is red, his thinking hazy
KINISM WILL BE EXPOSED AND IT WILL BE EXPOSED BY ME !!!!
KINISM WILL BE EXPOSED AND BE EXPOSED BY ME !!!!
I MUST DO IT YES I MUST, IT IS MY DENSITY…uh destiny.
Too much fun. Or perhaps you prefer something with a beat. Here’s a friend’s rendition of Golden Earring’s “Twilight Zone”:
Somewhere in a lonely miscegenated home there’s a guy starting to realize that eternal fate has turned its back on him. It’s 2 a.m.
It’s 2 a.m. –
The love is gone –
I’m sittin’ here waiting
The gun’s still warm
Thinking my mixing was an unwarranted taking of chances
There’s a Black storm on the loose, octoroon in my bed
Rapped up in expletives, all natural feeling dead
Cannot decode – my whole life spins into a frenzy
Help, I’ve stepped into the Twilight Zone
My “Home” is a mad-house, needs to be rezoned
My heritage’s been moved under moon and star
Where am I to go now that I’ve gone too far?
Soon you will come to know
When the gene pool is not your own
Soon you will come to know
When the bullet hits the bone
I’ve fallin’ down a spiral, destination unknown
A double-cross messenger, all alone
My children are all strangers, can’t get through, I’m so screwed
Well the night weighs heavy on his guilty mind
Takin’ his wife from across the border line
And when the hit-man comes
He knows damn well he has been cheated
And he says
For more on the old multifarious Christianity that today’s Judeochristians have abandoned, let’s revisit this excellent post by Ehud, which contains this excellent quote from G.K. Chesterton on Matthew Arnold:
One of the immense benefits conferred on us by Matthew Arnold lay in the fact that he recalled to us the vital fact that we are Europeans. He had a consciousness of Europe much fuller and firmer than that of any of the great men of his great epoch. For instance, he admired the Germans as Carlyle admired the Germans; …if he admired the Germans it was for being European, signally and splendidly European… Arnold did indeed wish, as every sane European wishes, that the nations that make up Europe should continue to be individual; that the contributions from the nations should be national. But he did wish that the contributions should be contributions, parts that is, of a common cause and unity, the cause and unity of European civilization. He desired that Germany should be great, so as to make Europe great…
The same could be said of races contributing to the betterment of mankind. This produces a balance that prevents us from falling to the extremes of “rabid individualism” or “hegemonic group identity.” It minimizes covetousness. If you are an amorous young man, Kinism might convince you not to take advantage of a girl you aren’t going to marry, because she will be a brother’s wife. My grandfather was the first in his family to go to college, and it would not have happened without shared sacrifice. He vowed to resist temptation while at the university because it would have dishonored all the relatives and friends who worked so hard to put him there. He could see that there was a debt to be paid. Without the bond of blood, the best hope for obedience is that it will be driven by fear, namely the fear of consequences. This is why Chesterton knew that identifying as fellow Europeans was “vital,” and that anyone who sought to minimize “the actualities of our Aryan civilization” was insane.
Here’s the Norwegian angel Helene Bøksle singing “My Land.” Translation:
I see your valleys and sky, I remember your waterfalls, a beauty so free, with no wind in you.
Chorus: You are the song that sings in me, the tone that never dies. You are my country, I never forget. I can hear you call me home again.
In times when the distance is great between us, we bear with hope, in the power of your song our hearts live long. (Chorus)
A new day will come when I shall see your sky and glorious valleys. May my heart have peace for ever and ever in your noble houses. (Chorus)
As every great artist knows, the best way to reveal God in art is to show the work of His hands. (This is why “Contemporary Christian Music” is such an artistic train wreck, and why you will never learn as much about the Christian faith in an ostensibly “Christian” novel as you will by reading Tolkien.) Similarly, praise for one’s own people is usually evinced in odes to the land. This is because land has always been intimately connected to flesh and faith. Contrary to the gnostics who are running churches today, this is where men have always found their identity. But it goes without saying that as Muslims come to dominate her land, the waterfalls ain’t cutting it for young Helene, except as a reminder of what used to be when her people were strong. There are a lot of things that go without saying, unless you’re talking to an Alienist gnostic who presumes to explain to you what Christianity is all about. If I may quote Mick Jagger, “You’ve got to scrape that sh!t right off your shoes.” Or is that what I said while working the poultry? Anyway, I like how the song refers to the land and people as “the tone that never dies” within one’s soul. Remember that the Fifth Commandment is the first commandment with a blessing: that your days may be long upon the land. This is not a reference to your personal lifespan. It refers to ethno-national longevity.
Few seem to understand this these days. Our friend Laurel has modified this old rhyme to be more contemporary and relevant:
Jesus loves the little children
All the children of the world
But He cannot love the White
They are guilty in His sight
Jesus loves the other children of the world
You’ll find this in your genocide hymnal, right after Battle Hymn of the Republic.
“Dressed in civilian clothes and silk hat, Lee departed from Arlington on the morning of April 22, never to enter its friendly portals again.”
On December 20 we celebrated the 150 year anniversary of South Carolina declaring herself to be an independent republic. When the South was defeated, says a friend of ours, “British America yielded to the Melting Pot.” The South has still not recovered, and in the North, “the old stock aristocracy was pushed aside and its place in society and politics [was] taken over by the jumped-up White trash war profiteer plutocrats like the Bushes and later the even more odious and unsavory Kennedies.” The events that followed South Carolina’s secession “show what happens when Whites lose their moorings and become oblivious to their race. Ponder these things in your hearts and resolve that such catastrophic mistakes will never take place again when we have established our commonwealth of White ethnostate homelands.”
“If the North triumphs, it is not alone the destruction of our property, it is the prelude to anarchy, infidelity, and the ultimate loss of free and responsible government on this continent. It is the triumph of commerce, banks and the factory.” ~ Thomas J. “Stonewall” Jackson
The League of the South boasts that a Jew was Vice-President of the Confederacy while Yankees were expelling Jews from three Southern states, proving yet again that they still fail to grasp the importance of kith and kin.
“There is nothing new under the sun but there are lots of old things we don’t know.” ~ Ambrose Bierce
The latest audio to be released from the Richard Nixon library is characterized by Jack Shafer of Slate as “another tanker load of piss and bile on Jews.” So right away, we can see that Richard Nixon was a fairly good judge of character, as ironic as that sounds. He said, “Virtually every Irish I’ve known gets mean when he drinks.” He said Italians are “wonderful people” but “don’t have their heads screwed on tight.” He said Jews “are just a very aggressive and abrasive and obnoxious personality.” That’s putting it mildly. He also rejected the idea held by his Secretary of State that blacks would improve themselves and would benefit rather than burden America. He said any significant improvement among them would take “500 years,” which as Auster says, “is another way of saying never.” Preachers know all about this. They know that blacks have been Christians for centuries, but still they excuse the retrograde behavior and insist that somewhere off in the distant future (Doug Wilson pegs it at 500 years), they will really become Christians. This seems to be de rigueur for the postmillennialist.
When you ask a question of an Irishman, and he asks you, “Do you really want to know?” he is politely giving you the option to bail before giving you an answer you won’t forget. (He’s referring to Jews, of course.)
Jews have made the Kong mythos quite fashionable in advertisements. Your house is left to you desolate.
Here is the best review of the King Kong movies that you’ll ever read, from Jack Kerwick. The evolution of the male lead in the three films provides an interesting contrast of the times. In 1933, he called the jigaboos of Skull Island “evil.” In 1976, his goal is to rescue the beast as much as the beauty. He declares that “this is no longer the nineteenth century” when whites could take the lands of indigenous peoples with impunity. He accuses the oil baron of being an “environmental rapist” and threatens to incite “the kids” to “burn every Petrox gas station from Maine to California.” He loses the girl but vows to donate his advance pay for “sending Kong home.” Then he agrees to cooperate with the authorities only if Kong is captured “without injury.” When this doesn’t happen, he cheers when Kong kills his attackers. You can see in that forty year gap a tremendous lurch away from normal and biblical views on race and sex to terrorism and nihilism. Peter Jackson’s 2005 remake comes full circle by making the male lead a faggoty Jew “artist” who makes it clear that his “tough guy” image is merely an image. Masculinity itself had finally become unviable. This fits closely with race because it is the “Euro-American ideal of manhood that so incenses…the Left,” Kerwick writes.
In Kong ’33, white men knew exactly what must be done, as did the viewers; there was no confusion about race or matters of chivalry. In Kong ’76, the noble savages “are treated sympathetically while the white men lack self-assuredness and self-righteousness. White guilt, of which the original Kong had not a trace, pervades the characters of its first remake… Kong ’76 is designed to repudiate the older model of Eurocentric masculinity on display in Kong ’33…” Since Negro worship closely parallels white guilt, the jigs in Kong ’33 placate the beast with human sacrifice, but in Kong ’76, Jeff Bridges calls Kong “the mystery” and “the magic” of their lives. (You can see more of this in the evolving view of Indians from bloodthirsty savages to oppressed, peace-pipe-smoking, at-one-with-nature shamans.) Whites, having abandoned the God of Europe, have abandoned all claim on culture. But the identity of the savages and their “culture” is derived through their “god,” and Jessica Lange says a “curse” has fallen upon the white invaders for removing him from the island. In Kong ’05, Peter Jackson “selected the actors who would depict the natives from a variety of racial backgrounds and then had them painted in the same shade.” The most heroic character of the film is the only black actor. Perhaps, as the author surmises, Jackson was so eager to remake this, his favorite film, so that he could subvert it, and make it even more racially and sexually ambiguous. Though Jackson is not a Jew, this is the oldest of Jewish tactics. Christ gives us confidence and self-determination; the father of the Jews gives us ambiguity and confusion.
The governor of Mississippi, Haley Barbour, threw his own people under the bus to keep his hope of winning the presidency alive. Even though he was trying to criticize the KKK, he got in trouble for speaking well of the White Citizen’s Councils and for failing to be sufficiently enthusiastic about listening to a Michael King speech when he was 15 years old, choosing instead to watch girls. Yes, according to the Jewpress, this now disqualifies him to be president, and as one Democrat spokesman has said, “not ready for the 21st century.” But as Pat Buchanan observes, it was another president, Woodrow Wilson, who correctly explained that the original KKK’s activities were limited to pranks, mischief, and frolicking.
While the 21st century wants nothing to do with a Southerner, Jimmy Carter says America is lubed for a sodomite president.
If Barbour does run, perhaps his campaign slogan could be “A chicken in every pot and a Negro on every block.” (Thanks to Pastor Ross for the idea.)
“The SPLC’s founder, Morris Dees, started out defending Klan members before he realized he could make more money suing them.”
While Los Angeles County saw an overall 21% drop in “hate crimes” last year, blacks and mestizos are still killing each other at high rates. Mestizos are suspects in 77% of anti-black crimes, and blacks are suspects in 48% of anti-mestizo crimes. The SPLC takes no interest in this though, since the participants are not white. Yet they find enough time to deny the Armenian holocaust!
Here’s a fundraising letter that Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council has dispatched in the wake of the SPLC denouncing anti-sodomites, and the FRC in particular, as Haters.
The surest sign one is losing a debate is to resort to character assassination. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), a liberal fundraising machine whose tactics have been condemned by observers across the political spectrum, is doing just that.
Stop right there. Notice that “observers across the political spectrum” have denounced the SPLC, but it doesn’t stop craven Judeochristians like Perkins from licking up everything the Jew-fags have to say about race. They can be wrong about everything else, but if they praise the reprobate MLK, they’re right, according to Judeochristians.
The group, once known for combating racial bigotry, is now attacking several groups that uphold Judeo-Christian moral views, including marriage as the union of a man and a woman.
Oh, but the “moral views” that used to be upheld were Christian, not “Judeo-Christian,” and those people also viewed marriage as the union of a man and a woman, of the same race. You perverted those “moral views.” Now you’re getting upset because someone has perverted your own “moral views”?
How does the SPLC attack? By labeling its opponents “hate groups.” No discussion. No consideration of the issues. No engagement. No debate!
Just like you don’t allow discussion or engagement with Kinists, who agree wholeheartedly with our Christian forefathers on race.
…This is intolerance pure and simple. Elements of the radical Left are trying to shut down informed discussion of policy issues that are being considered by Congress, legislatures, and the courts. The SPLC has even admitted that their goal is to censor our views in the media.
We need you to stand with us. Please visit StartDebatingStopHating.com, and join with other national leaders and me in telling the radical Left it is time to stop spreading hate-charged rhetoric about individuals and organizations simply because they disagree with our ideas. Our debates can and must remain civil – but they must never be suppressed.
The irony is killing me.
Remember, if they can silence pro-family organizations, they will attempt to use pressure and the power of government to target pastors and citizens like you who publicly stand for traditional principles. Make your voice heard.
Medieval Englanders were twice as wealthy as this list of modern-era black countries. Even after the Black Death, they were still wealthier. Here in the formerly United States, more black kids are dropping out of school after Obama became president. Not even he can inspire them to do their homework. This is in spite of the fact that black schools are given more tax money (in violation of the entire premise of the Brown vs. Board decision in 1954). In Missouri, black schools are given twice as much money, and poor white kids from the Ozarks still outperform blacks. Let’s blame it on “culture.” Or we could pretend we’re Judeo-preachers and reverse this trend by adopting all of them.
The “academic” problem is really a race problem. Just like when you hear people talk about “good neighborhoods” and “good schools,” they’re talking about race. Your lying pastor condemns this as hate talk, but he always clams up when you point out that the people in these bad “areas” are actually quite religious.
There is no way that a country whose population is half black/brown is going to be able to remain competitive in a global economy, or maintain any kind of “leadership” role. Anyone who thinks we’ll be on par with China in 50 years is dreaming.
When broken down by ethnicity, American students do reasonably well compared to the countries from which their ancestors came. “Where’s WikiLeaks when you really need it?”
In reading and math, the average white 13-year-old has the aptitude of the average black 17-year-old.
In Detroit, only 4% are ranked as proficient by the National Assessment of Education Progress. “What’s to be done about this tragic state of black education?” asks Walter Williams. Throwing more money at the problem will do nothing. And it has nothing to do with “cultural” differences. “Black academic performance is the worst in the very cities where large percentages of teachers and administrators are black, and often the school superintendent is black, the mayor is black, most of the city council is black, and very often the chief of police is black.”
“There is a limit to the capacity of any race for assimilating and elevating an inferior race, and when you begin to pour unlimited numbers of people of alien or lower races of less social efficiency and less moral force, you are running the most frightful risk any people can run.” ~ Senator Henry Cabot Lodge
“Houston, 1969: How did these white guys ever succeed without Black people?”
Racial segregation is at the lowest level in a century. This news is presented as though it’s a good thing, but if that were so, it would coincide with improvements in things like crime, illegitimacy, disease, poverty, etc., and the exact opposite is happening. It’s like what Jesus said in Matthew 16: “When it is evening you say, ‘It will be fair weather, for the sky is red’; and in the morning, ‘It will be foul weather today, for the sky is red and threatening.’ Hypocrites! You know how to discern the face of the sky, but you cannot discern the signs of the times.”
Today’s episode of Adventures in MartinLutherKingLand.
“[T]he racial rape differential is international, which in turn suggests that the astronomically high rate of rape by blacks is caused not by social, cultural, or economic factors, but by racial factors.” Laura Wood links to this post here and here, and a bunch of white women jump all over her for having the audacity to deny racial equality. This fascinating comment follows: “I know statistically there are more rapes caused by blacks but Lawrence Auster as a Christian should know that God made us all the same.” Finally, Laura must defend herself from the incomprehensible charge of “racism.”
The “independent” people of Jamaica have had enough of the “stuffy” King James Bible, and so they’ve rewritten it in their own idiotic vernacular. While it’s good to see the Bible translated into other languages, patois, pidgin, and esperanto are not really languages. The real problem is that Jamaicans simply don’t understand the Bible and are not bright enough to have an appreciation for the refined English of the KJV.
“Haiti once had a promising future. Before 1789 as a French colony under White rule, San Domingo was as rich or richer in productivity as all the 13 American Colonies combined. It was considered the ‘crown jewel’ of the French colonial system, and was in fact the most prosperous colony anywhere in the world. Populated by 40,000 Whites, 27,000 freed Mulattoes, and 450,000 Black slaves and with a bountiful climate and productive soil, it supplied all of France and half of Europe with sugar, coffee, and cotton. But in 1791, the French government issued a decree ordering Haiti to give the vote to the Mulattoes, and soon after another ordering freedom for all the slaves. This resulted in a bloody civil war in which the entire White population (about 40,000 Frenchmen) was murdered, down to the last man, woman, and child. Rape, decapitation, and mutilation were committed almost universally upon their bodies.” ~ Carleton Putnam
You would think that major tourist attractions would spur economic development, but we’re talking about Memphrica.
If you watch the second video here, you’ll see that Jerry Falwell was able to sponsor his own voodoo ritual before he croaked. What’s that advertisement I see at 4:26? Oh, dear. And just so white kids can get in on the fascination with black clowns, here is a student choir at Liberty making a mockery of cathedral music by singing effeminate Negro Antoine Dodson’s “bed intruder song,” about the man who tried to rape his sister. Jerry must be proud.
A rape crisis counselor and ordained minister has been charged with rape. Quick, guess the race.
Cupcakes are racist, and what’s worse, they look like Fat Albert and friends.
“For ‘racist,’ substitute ‘monarchist,’ ‘bourgeois,’ or ‘kulak,’ or any of the other dehumanizing terms radicals and totalitarians use for dissidents. Those who accept the condemnation of established authority as a substitute for argument and debate are the enablers of oppression and mass murder. That’s been the pattern of modern radicalism, from the Terror of the French Revolution to the genocide of the Khmer Rouge.”
Sandra Bullock is People‘s Woman of the Year. Her accomplishments: Divorcing a whoremonger, “adopting” a Zulu, and playing “a Southern Christian woman who brings a 300-pound Black into her family home and neglects her biological children on his behalf.” Don’t forget the part in that movie where she gets angry with her friends for being concerned that her children might be raped. What a humanitarian Bullock is. What a role model for the yutes.
Toby Ord offers himself as a living sacrifice to the god of Equality.
Polar bear populations are dwindling, and inter-species mating has become a matter of grave concern to scientists. “As more isolated populations and species come into contact, they will mate, hybrids will form, and rare species are likely to go extinct.” They recommend culling hybrids such as the “pizzly,” which is a cross between the polar and grizzly bears. We propose organizing a committee of Alienist preachers who will explain to these scientists that God wants the bears to mix, because all bears came from the Adam and Eve of bears. Therefore, the pizzly has the same blood as the polar bear. Problem solved! Of course, however much the scientists oppose miscegenation for bears, they think it’s the best thing that whites can do, regardless of how much the race dwindles in size.
“A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it.” ~ G.K. Chesterton
Winston Smith has a good article here on the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” and the March of the Frankfurters.
Lawrence Auster has been the only writer we know to have noticed that “conservatives” treated “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” as though it was a law, when it wasn’t. So they merely “opposed repeal” rather than defended the actual law, which excluded fags from the military. Now everything has been reversed, and “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” now applies to those who morally disapprove of fags being in the military. They will be allowed to join, and as long as they keep their mouths shut, they won’t be convicted of a hate crime. The Vice President even goes so far as to say that fag “marriage” is “inevitable.”
We don’t know how many will find it of interest, but since William Pierce and Revilo Oliver are considered the holy men of the unholy white survival sect, here is a catalog of Oliver’s correspondence. If you scroll down to the “Warren” section, there are some dogmatic statements about how “everyone knows” that Mark and Paul were not actually two of the authors of the New Testament, because “everyone knows” that the New Testament was “compiled around the middle of the Fourth Century” from “stories that particularly appealed to their tastes and purposes.” Oliver authoritatively states that “we know absolutely nothing about what beliefs were prevalent among the various groups of Christians before 112,” and then proceeds to assert that “we” excludes “he.” He claims that “lying for the lord has always been a normal and habitual act of piety,” and then repeats lies about incest, cannibalism, nudism, sodomy, and “morbid aversion to women” among early Christians. Again, this is only of possible interest because “Vanguardists” are enraptured by Oliver, because he was very erudite and scholarly. Scratch beneath the cosmetic surface though, and you find that Oliver and Pierce did not really know Europa at all. A good acronym for their kind is DWEEB: Damned While Emphasizing Exceptional Biology.