The Financial Times of London is predicting total economic collapse in America. Ian Mosely writes: “The collapse of the U.S. will start with the financial bankruptcy of the states. California, Illinois and New York will likely be the first states to go bankrupt and this could happen a lot sooner than most people think. Once the Blacks quit getting their welfare checks and are evicted from their Section 8 apartments, don’t expect things to stay peaceful.” There will be a domino effect, and large cities will quickly become war zones. Prepare now!
“The American empire is done,” says David Stockman, Reagan’s budget director. “Back when Reagan the ‘conservative’ started running up huge deficits (which Stockman is famous for having opposed), we got $1 of increase to the GDP for every $1.50 in borrowing. Now it takes $7 of borrowing to achieve a $1 increase in the GDP.”
The Great Default in pictures.
A baited banker thus desponds,
From his own hand foresees his fall,
They have his soul, who have his bonds;
’Tis like the writing on the wall.
~ Jonathan Swift
The imperial debt is now at $14 trillion, and it took only 7 months to add that final trillion. In the last year, 157 banks have failed, the most since the savings and loan crisis of 1992, which led to a massive bailout under Bush the First. The FDIC estimates that 860 “problem” banks remain.
”The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the people versus the banks.” ~ Lord Acton
Is it any wonder that the most dominant economy in the world is driven by the most cohesive ethnic group in the world? China is 90% Han.
We are living in the age of tribes—and China is just the start.
Such primitive racial instincts were supposed to be long ago passé: We’re supposed to be living in Thomas Friedman’s “flat” world or Kenichi Ohmae’s “borderless world.” By now, supposedly, everyone is increasingly interconnected and undifferentiated. Affairs should be managed neatly by deracinated professionals, working on their iPads from Brussels, Washington, or any of the other “global” capitals.
But most people do not really see themselves as members of a large multinational unit, global citizens, or “mass consumers.” Instead the drivers of history remain the essentials: the desire to feed one’s family, support the health of the tribe, and shape the immediate community. The particularistic continues to trump the universalistic.
President Coolie-Hu of China is calling the (Jew’s) international currency system “a product of the past.”

Hu knows that the dollar should be kept stable because it affects the flow of capital around the world. But Jews want to control the value and flow for their own benefit; they own the mortgage on the West. The income tax in this country was made necessary in order to repay the bankers who had agitated for war.

“The Yid and his bank are now ruling over everything: over Europe, education, civilization, socialism, especially socialism, for he will use it to uproot Christianity and destroy its civilization. And when only anarchy remains, the Yid will be in command of everything. For while the Jew goes about preaching socialism, he will stick together with his own, and after all the riches of Europe have been wasted, the Yid’s bank will still be there.” ~ Dostoevsky, circa 1877, a full generation before the Jewish Bolshevik Revolution
Franklin Sanders was thrown in jail for it, but now states are openly talking about alternative currency. Virginia’s Joint House Resolution 557 establishes “a joint subcommittee to study whether the Commonwealth should adopt a currency to serve as an alternative to the currency distributed by the Federal Reserve System in the event of a major breakdown of the Federal Reserve System.” In the event? After a hundred years that have seen the dollar lose more than 95% of its value, the Jew Federal Reserve has effectively bankrupted us, and only now are congressmen talking about auditing the beast.
It’s beginning to look a lot like Weimar:

“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.” ~ Thomas Jefferson

Ten things that would be different had the Jew Federal Reserve never been created.
“I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale.” ~ Thomas Jefferson to John Taylor of Caroline, May 28, 1816



We allowed ourselves to be usurped by aliens, foremost among them the Jew. We have lost much as a result. Hayek lists a few of the things we have lost in The Road to Serfdom:
The virtues possessed by Anglo-Saxons in a higher degree than most other people, excepting only a few of the smaller nations, like the Swiss and the Dutch, were independence and self-reliance, individual initiative and local responsibility, the successful reliance on voluntary activity, noninterference with one’s neighbor and tolerance of the different and queer, respect for custom and tradition, and a healthy suspicion of power and authority.
It all seems like a distant memory. Now our enslaved people love bondage. They live on theft and love the thieves.
“So what did we do? We sold the Arabs to win the favour of the Jews, especially the Jews of the United States of America… Englishmen are still respected for their honesty in the East, but unless we acknowledge that we made a terrible blunder, in going behind the back of the Arabs who were fighting for us in order to please the Jews who were financing us, our credit cannot long endure.” ~ F. Yeats-Brown, European Jungle, 1939, p. 196
When a German dares to dispute the “facts” presented by a sainted “Holocaust survivor,” Noah Klieger, he is beaten and expelled from the building. One of the unfalsifiable “facts” claimed by Jew Klieger is that “tens of millions [of Germans] were overjoyed by the mass extermination of the hated Jews.” Well, clearly, anyone who so much as doubts this statement deserves to be beaten and left to rot in jail. Welcome to Jew-justice. Klieger laments that Germany is still full of these “anti-Semites.”
Jews sue Edelweiss Restaurant in Chicago for failing to provide security for patrons when David Irving hosted a book-signing there. The assumption of the anti-Christs is that a man who denies their sacred Holohoax fable should expect to be attacked as a matter of course, and any businessman who thinks that there is a constitutional right to freedom of assembly should expect to be bankrupted. Behold what Alienists have wrought.
Notice the disdain in this Jew-video for Nordics, beauty, purity, peace, and harmony.
Whites have grown accustomed to seeing themselves mocked (and men especially, as patriarchy is standard comic buffoonery), but it’s obvious that other races do not mock themselves in this way, and whites would not do it either if they had not been trained by their media masters.
Read about the father of the European Union, whose father was a close friend of Theodor Herzl, the founder of Zionism, and who married several Jews himself. He was a mongrel who wanted Europeans to become negroid mongrels.
The man of the future will be a mongrel. Today’s races and classes will disappear owing to the disappearing of space, time, and prejudice.
A Gnostic Utopia! The end of physics and oxygen!
The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its outward appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.
Remember that the goal of the enemy is to create anchorless, defenseless individuals. There’s a saying from the Trojan War: “Beware of Greeks bearing gifts.” Beware of the Jew who entices you with words like “freedom” and “liberty” but seeks to remove the hedge of protection from you, meaning your race and religion.
You should read it. It’s all about how Jews are superior because they’re inbred, and they are the “spiritual leader race” of both Communism and Capitalism. He says the Europeans are quantity-people and Jews are quality-people. He even goes so far as to say that Jews are “perfect” and “the superiority of their spirit predestines them to become a main factor of the future nobility.” Therefore, whites and Jews must intermarry to form a master-mongrel race, and only anti-Semites would oppose this.
Modern anti-Semitism is one of the many reactionary phenomenons of the mediocre against the supreme… The main roots of anti-Semitism are limitedness and envy: limitedness in the religious or the scientific; envy in the spiritual or financial realm.
“Just who the hell do you people think you are?”
The Helen Thomas Lifetime Achievement Award has been retired because Helen Thomas is critical of Jews. Her long career that gave rise to the award is counted as meaningless, and all because she believes that “Congress, the White House and Hollywood, Wall Street are owned by the Zionists. No question.” This earns her the label of “anti-Semite,” which is a person who Jews don’t like. Contrast this with Kobe Bryant. He was once charged with rape, which used to be considered far more significant to Christians than a distrust of anti-Christs. But now Christians offer up their very children as sacrifices to the gods of entertainment. Nike is releasing a shoe in his honor during Black History Month, and it bears the Black Power flag decal that is popular with the Nation of Islam and the New Black Panther Party. The flag was designed by Marcus Garvey, and the funny thing about this is that Garvey wanted all blacks out of America and the Caribbean. He applauded Senator Theodore Bilbo’s bill to repatriate all blacks to Liberia, as Lincoln also had desired.
In similar news, the NFL won’t allow Rush Limbaugh to own a team because they don’t want to associate the league with his political views, but they’re more than happy to sponsor the Penthouse Super Party and other XXX-rated parties.
I always get confused on MLK Day. Are we supposed to celebrate by smacking around some white hookers, or are we supposed to steal something? The video above is like one of King’s fantasies. As Michael Eric Dyson wrote in the MLK biography, I May Not Get There With You:
King preferred very light women… According to one friend, King “said that he was willing to fight and die for black people, but he was damned if he could see anything pretty in a black [dark-skinned] woman…”
Unlike Obama, King stayed in Oslo, Norway, for the full Nobel Prize ceremony. It was the blondes.
It takes a lot to shock us, but when the National Association for the Appreciation of Clogged Pustules met in Columbia, SC, as they do every year on King Kong’s birthday, to denounce federalism, interposition, nullification, and a lot of other words they can’t pronounce, we were shocked. And the reason we were shocked is because they boxed in a statue of the notorious “racist” and slaveowner, George Washington. It is a violation of state law to cover a state monument. The next day, there wasn’t a peep in the Jewmedia, but you can only imagine the venom that would pour through every orifice of the Jew if whites gathered near a statue of His Holiness, the Reverend Kong, and threw a white sheet over it “so as not to offend anyone,” as one NAACP spokesman said of what was done to the Washington statue. At one point in the gathering, South Carolina NAACP president Lonnie Randolph went nuts over a formal ball held in Charleston last month to mark the 150th anniversary of the state’s secession. Randolph, in negritudinous hyperbole, compared this dance of the Virginia Reel to the massacre of Indians at Wounded Knee, the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and a celebration of 9/11.
There are 731 MLK streets, and 335 of them are in Florida. Don’t you think there should be one just south of the Neuse River in North Carolina? Thanks to our friend Maggie for that idea.
“Now we name schools after the people who destroyed them… And the whole world wonders after the beast. Every politician in America, even the ‘conservative’ ones, bow down and worship him every third Monday in January.”
Our Godking who hailed from Atlanta,
Hallowed be thy name.
Thy dream come true,
Thy will be done,
In Obamaland as it is in Europe.
Give us this day our daily affirmative action,
And don’t forgive us our trespasses,
As we love the feeling of race guilt in the morning.
Forgive those who trespass against us,
For they did it because of racism.
And lead us not into temptation,
To vote for white nationalists,
But deliver us from from our own cracka existence.
For thine is Black Power,
And the bling, and the bitchez,
For ever and ever.
Amen.
~ Franz
Here’s an excellent article from James showing how the “conservatives” of today are cozying up to Communists and other scum. Didn’t you know that Michael King, who FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover called “the most notorious liar in the country,” was a “conservative” who opposed “big government” and would be voting Republican if he were alive today? Here’s more lavish praise from the Heritage Foundation, this time on Frederick Douglass, who praised the murderer John Brown with these words: “His zeal in the cause of my race was far greater than mine—it was as the burning sun to my taper light—mine was bounded by time, his stretched away to the boundless shores of eternity. I could live for the slave, but he could die for him.” There sure is a lot of conserving going on out there.
”There is a discriminating conservatism, which values and seeks to preserve the principle of old institutions, and which understands the conditions of their value. It seeks to save the kernel even at the expense of the shell. There is also an unthinking conservatism, which, by a blind association of ideas, cleaves to the forms of institutions once valuable, overlooking the conditions of their utility, and the principles which remain stable under changing forms, or even demands mutations of form in order to remain stable. This conservatism seeks to keep the shell at the expense of the kernel.” ~ Robert L. Dabney
Interposition/nullification was on King’s list of wicked evil in his “I Have a Dream” speech, but nullification is precisely what Obamacare faces, led by Idaho and six other states. Alternative currency? Nullification of imperial tyranny? It’s like the 19th century all over again!
James also writes about a 1968 Sports Illustrated article called “The Anguish of a Team Divided.” It’s about a black football player dancing with a white woman at a restaurant and horrifying the patrons. It wasn’t so long ago that white people still loved their race.
Now sports teams have lapdances at halftime. Remember when white people were known for civility and manners?
It’s funny how those who call for “civility” and are mortified at the sight or sound of the word “nigger” do not hesitate to use the word “cracker.” Chris Matthews uses it almost as frequently as Brian Schwertley. No one gets upset about it because only one race is forbidden from using racial slurs.
Here’s a very clever site that collects all tweets that contain the word “nigger” (all of them written by black people, of course) and replaces the word with “slave.” If it’s good enough for Huck Finn, it’s good enough for Twitter.
You can tell that rapper Lil Wayne hates The Nigger Word.
Chimpout! Here’s another one, and it’s always amazing to see the people who sit and watch the wildlife swing at each other, just as casually as they would watch Wheel of Fortune.

Here’s an article saying that 86 teens are pregnant at one Memphis high school (about 20% of the female population), and so of course, the newspaper finds a stock photo of a pregnant white girl to use. As you can see, in about the last ten years, the number of white students at this school has fallen from nearly 400 to 9. Yes, nine students versus almost a thousand blacks. There are probably no more than five white girls in the entire school, yet the photo leads you to believe that whites are to blame for spawning bastards in Memphis.
Whites are the journalistic scapegoat, as in this example:

Celebrate black love! But don’t you dare celebrate white love (in a magazine called Ivory?), or you’ll be fired, excommunicated, and shunned.
Here’s a group called Mocha Moms. Since it’s all about mothers and children, you’re supposed to overlook the fact that the board is all-black, and the organization focuses on “mothers of color” (i.e., non-whites) in its very name. They rationalize that they are not “racists” because they grant membership to anyone who supports their goal of helping non-white women to raise their children. But imagine if a support group existed whose goal was to help white women “devote more time to their white families and white communities”? Do you think it would be granted 501c3 tax-exempt status? Do you think, like Mocha Moms, it could excuse its racial partisanship by saying: “It is not unlike many other support groups established for a particular segment of the population.” No, it would be compared to the KKK and Hitler, as everyone knows. The first plank in the Mocha Moms platform is absolutely hilarious for its irony: “The first [pillar] is non-exclusivity. We wanted to create an organization where ALL at-home mothers of color would feel welcome.” This is like me saying, “Of course I’m not a racist. I love all white people.” Every sentence written about Southern slavery on the site is a lie. Even the high number of incarcerated blacks is called a repercussion of slavery. It all builds to this pathetic conclusion: “[I]nstitutionalized racism has prevented African-American men from being able to provide their families with enough income [to] allow their wives to be at-home mothers.” There, you see? Black men aren’t chronically lazy (not even worth minimum wage, according to the Chinese in Africa) and hedonistic. The white man is to blame for whatever black people lack! The president of Mocha Moms uses this as a tagline: “Jegna is an Ethiopian (Amharic) word that means: a very brave person who is a protector of a culture, the rights of her people, and their land.” Culture, people, land. It’s race through and through, but if you “very bravely” speak the r-word, it means you’re a racist.
White heroism is purposely muted in the Jewmedia. USA Today publishes the news that blacks and mestizos are “twice as likely as whites to have performed heroic deeds” because they have a long history of resisting oppression. White suffering is also ignored. The message that “black children are an endangered species” is considered perfectly appropriate for billboards, but no one wants a career to be ruined by calling white children an endangered species, even if it’s far more true.
”There is no difference between the races. We don’t have a problem with different people. Our grandparents had the problems with race… We should just have babies with each other… It doesn’t matter… Racists are out of touch. We just treat them like crazy men.” ~ Glenn Beck

(Speaking of Beck, it was hilarious to see Jews go off on him for listing nine international villains, eight of whom are Jews. An actual quote from Mormon Glenn: “I believe it was the Byrds who first coined the term, ‘To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose under the heavens.’”)
In Haiti, black men still can’t be persuaded to clean up rubble from the earthquake. One year after the quake, only 5% of the rubble has been removed! And it’s not like the men are busy; 80% of them are unemployed. The other 20% have women to do their heavy lifting. The Bible has a very simple formula for these bums: let them starve. But no, white people know better. (Here’s a man who is alarmed to find that online dating services are dominated by Mrs. Jellybys.”The supreme goal of women my age appears to be to start an NGO in a Third World country.” This is the very definition of Alienism, exalting the Other above the Familiar.)
Haitians know how white people think, and so they’re listening for the whistle announcing the arrival of the gravy train. UNESCO stands ready to oblige, and the first step is to blame the tragedy on white people. Here it is in the Globe and Mail:
This situation is unacceptable… What began as a natural disaster is becoming a disgraceful reflection on the international community. Official commitments have not been honoured and only a miniscule portion of what was promised has been paid out.
Well, that explains it. Negroes are unable to clean up one of their disgusting countries because white people break their promises. Now the birth rate has tripled, because rape is the Negro specialty. Paul Fromm writes:
The article introduces the pudgy Milla Charles who has just popped out twins. She is sitting with “these yet unnamed twins, wondering how she will care for them when she has nothing more than a tent. She was ‘not responsible’ for getting pregnant, adding that the father ‘doesn’t care’ to be involved in the situation!”
I would sooner use my Jew Reserve notes for kindling.
Wanted: White employers in Zimbabwe. Whites don’t seem to be taking the bait. As a friend of ours says, concerning black employment: “Give me one black man, you’ve got a good worker; two, and you’ve got half a man; give me three niggers and you ain’t got shit.”
If I may quote the more eloquent Brother G.K. Chesterton, and I believe I may:
[T]he family is older than the state; and this means that agreement is older than coercion. No doubt there was much coercion mixed up with it. A man may have dragged a woman to a wedding as a nigger-driver drags a nigger to a plantation. But there are at least an impressive number of instances in which the woman will want rather less dragging than the nigger…
The black man and the white man have no interest in each other beyond what the black man can get by eating the white man, or the white man by working the black man. Otherwise, they would simply tend to get further and further apart. But the sexes tend, without any coercion, to come together. Consequently, in all moralising or legislating about sex, we must constantly allow for an element that does not exist in any other caste, section, or division.
Rev. James Manning agrees:
You can’t train a black man to understand the world, he says. There’s not two cents of difference between a mass murderer and a black doctor when it comes to understanding the world. Only God can help. There’s something wrong with the black man’s mind. They don’t know how to run a nation, and the worst thing that ever happened to South Africa was when it was turned over to Nelson Mandela and black people. Black people need to admit it, he says. “You can get mad with me all you want, but you can’t prove me wrong.” The only things they have ever accomplished have been under the tutelage and discipline of whites. His message to women:
What’s wrong with you black women, voting for Barack? Don’t you understand, it should have been a black womb if you’re going to have a black president?… Your men treat you like dogs, and then your pastors pimp you in the churches… What’s wrong with y’all niggers?
If wishes were rockets then beggars would fly.
But he had big dreams, namely, using a catapult-inspired “firing system” to send a 10×6 aluminum and copper rocket holding ten Zambians and a 17-year-old African girl (and her cat) to Mars. He figured he could get them to the moon by 1965. All he needed was $700 million from UNESCO to fund the project.
But the girl got pregnant from associating with Negroes, and white people would not cough up the funds, so the Zambian Space Program died.

All heck broke loose after Amy Chua, a Chinese women in an interracial marriage, wrote an article in the Wall Street Journal called “Why Chinese Mothers are Superior.” No, white people are not upset about the double standard that a newspaper would never allow a rebuttal article entitled “Why White Mothers are Superior,” though they should be. They are upset because it’s true that Asians are superior in earning grades, but the Eastern methods employed do not fit with Western ideals. They strike the average white reader as child abuse that mistakes technical mastery for education. It’s an interesting snapshot of what divides the East from the West, and it also offers a lesson in IQ. Personal IQ is less important than what we’ll call kin IQ. We all know of people who are very smart yet socially inept. Their personal aptitude can’t salvage their corporate awkwardness. David Brooks writes about this in his New York Times article that calls Chua a wimp.
Managing status rivalries, negotiating group dynamics, understanding social norms, navigating the distinction between self and group—these and other social tests impose cognitive demands that blow away any intense tutoring session or a class at Yale.
Yet mastering these arduous skills is at the very essence of achievement. Most people work in groups. We do this because groups are much more efficient at solving problems than individuals (swimmers are often motivated to have their best times as part of relay teams, not in individual events). Moreover, the performance of a group does not correlate well with the average I.Q. of the group or even with the I.Q.’s of the smartest members.
Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Carnegie Mellon have found that groups have a high collective intelligence when members of a group are good at reading each others’ emotions—when they take turns speaking, when the inputs from each member are managed fluidly, when they detect each others’ inclinations and strengths…[when they can] read intonations and moods, [and] understand how the psychological pieces each person brings to the room can and cannot fit together.
Of course, we “racists” know that Rudyard Kipling said all of this, far better, in his poem, The Stranger. The in-group is greater than the sum of its parts, thanks in large part to its instinctive fluidity. Perhaps it’s not surprising after all that a career gal who abandons her own people is tone-deaf on what constitutes true achievement. Take a man like Yo-Yo Ma, the famous Chinese cellist who has mastered Western music (even bluegrass), but is terrified of improvisation, and who has also abandoned his people. There is no comparison between a man like this and the Wright Brothers or other pioneers of the unknown. Most of the world’s population is in southern Asia, yet for achievement, they still can’t hold a candle to the relatively few white people across the Pacific. As the old saying goes, the white man invents and forgets, the yellow man copies and remembers, and the black man does neither.

I think this response to Chua from Laura Wood is excellent:
American education is in need of great change. But it can’t be changed by aping the modern upwardly-mobile, rootless Asian parent, whose fixation on grades is nothing less than pathological and who does not see the purpose of that education as the transmission of a specific culture in its totality. The best of American education is founded on the great truths that lie at the center of Western culture. Without vision, children perish. The purpose of education is to form character and transmit culture. Asians will never love those truths and that past in the same way Western descendents of that past do, or at least once did. That love is what our children need. They cannot compete without it.
English, French, and German are so yesterday. Only racists want their children to learn those languages. Professional jack-off Nicholas Kristof tells us that Chinese and Spanish have the “cool factor.” Meanwhile, Steve Sailer has found that a whopping 26 white kids in the entire country aced the Advanced Placement Chinese test. And in Los Angeles, one of the largest Spanish-speaking cities in the world, it might be easier to see a movie in Persian than in Spanish.
One thing that can never be “educated” away is ethnocentrism. It’s literally in the blood. The New York Times writes this about oxytocin, “the hormone of love”:
The love and trust it promotes are not toward the world in general, just toward a person’s in-group. Oxytocin turns out to be the hormone of the clan, not of universal brotherhood. Psychologists trying to specify its role have now concluded it is the agent of ethnocentrism.
Sympathy is naturally delimited along ethnic lines, and researchers have discovered that this is due to in-group loyalty, not out-group hostility. A moment’s reflection on how a family works proves that there is nothing surprising about this, but we live in an irrational age. Oxytocin is one of God’s instruments to promote trust, cooperation, cohesion, benevolence, and altruism within the group, and also protection against those without who would harm the group. It’s called a “tend and defend” instinct, and even autistic children possess it. As far as we know, only children with Williams Syndrome lack the proclivity to stereotype. The lack of a healthy instinct is a physiological deficiency, but in our upside-down world, it’s the instinct that’s called evil. So in the same way that fags and feminists wage war with biology and can never hope to succeed, because they are “against nature,” as the Bible puts it, Alienists are constructing a world in which, as Allan Park writes, altruism is diminished, distrust is encouraged, and social divides become deeper and more permanent, leading to conflict. Dr. Robert Putnam discovered that under such conditions, men become withdrawn, like turtles, and they don’t even trust those who are like them. Putnam, a liberal, hated this discovery as much as liberal scientists hate the discovery of oxytocin. There is a feedback loop to the world, and nature will correct itself. Kinism will triumph.
Of course, the Alienist/Gnostic/Neo-Babelist/Anti-Kinist has an easy solution. He says that we must become so spiritual that genes and hormones no longer have an effect on us. This would cancel the act of sex, and therefore cancel all of us. It sounds far-fetched, but you can see it happening to a degree in neo-Christian apathy towards white genocide coupled with eagerness to adopt non-whites as the means of growing the kingdom.
Earth and blood and hearth. To reject this triumvirate is to invite paganism, no matter how Christian you think you might be. How are Christians to disciple the world, asks Ehud, if the very existence of nations has been outlawed by those who are incapable of defining the word “nation” biblically?
A biblical defense of ethnonationalism. Also not to be missed is this fantastic article on why white women hate themselves, and how this can be changed. Particularly interesting is the spectacle of the woman who stands in the checkout line at the grocery store and is taught by Jews to view “brazen hussies posing in retouched perfection” as the pinnacle of beauty. She is made to feel guilty for not being stick-thin, which is androgynous and anti-feminine, also by design. Through the rest of the media, her compassion is exploited, and she sends her money away to Haiti or Zimbabwe. Her lying preacher tells her that this is her Christian duty.
Lawrence Auster observes that the former pope had a very un-christlike view of culture and nationality.
Throughout the speech, John Paul II keeps evoking the larger wholes of culture and nation, but only in light of their subordinate function in fulfilling the spiritual strivings and psychological needs of the individual person. The larger whole has no existence or transcendent value in itself. Not only that, but to the extent that the Pope does value culture in itself, as when he speaks of “the spiritual sovereignty of a culture,” he seems to value it only insofar as it is threatened by Communist or colonialist domination. This explains why he has passionately defended the Polish national culture in the face of Communist tyranny, but has shown no concern about the self-undoing of America’s national culture through its attack on its own particularity. In this regard, and especially in light of his advocacy of open immigration, he’s behaving just like a multiculturalist. That is, when a culture (and thus its individual members) is being oppressed, he insists that it be defended and strengthened, in order to liberate its individual members from spiritual slavery. But when a culture is not being oppressed, but rather is voluntarily destroying itself through the same cult of individual rights and open borders that the Pope himself supports, he treats that culture as irrelevant. This shows how making the “human person” the criterion of all cultural values leads to the radical devaluing of actual cultures.
At 53:40 in this lecture, Rushdoony says:
Whereas once a common faith united various nations, now the loss of faith has revived ethnic particularities and divisions. Authority is a religious fact. Its absence in the modern state means both fragmentation into constituent elements and lawlessness and the rise of crime…
Without God’s justice, pseudo-justice prevails and new sins are invented. One such offense – a new sin – is “racism” or “racialism.” And as Otto Scott has pointed out, “racism” is a modern offense, a product of Darwin’s theory. Darwin plainly insisted on a disparity of ability among races. The term “primitive man” is a reflection of his theory. We need to remember that the ancient Christian liturgies referred to the “Christian Race,” and prayers were offered for the “Christian Race,” which embraced all peoples whatever their background. No group in history has been more under Christian influence or more given to intermarriage then the Europeans, or as they are contemptuously called in the United States, the WASPS (White Anglo Saxon Protestants).
Humanistic doctrines of justice also stress equalitarianism of a Utopian variety, again choosing to neglect the fact that Christianity has fostered more brotherly love than any other faith.
This comes across as very confused. Nations can be united in faith without being amalgamated, as history shows, and in this sense there can be ethnic divisions without fragmentation. This has always been the goal of the Christian West, and Rush is correct that racism is a new pseudo-sin, a “modern offense.” But he is wrong to define it as the belief in a “disparity of ability among races” and to associate it with Darwinism, because this would make Darwinists of all Christians who ever lived prior to Darwin. It’s nonsense. Today there are few who will admit it openly, but everyone believes in a “disparity of ability among races.” In spite of it all, it’s true that the “Christian Race” embraces all peoples.
As Ehud says, the Alienist is in a losing battle if he seeks to blame Kinism on the Enlightenment. “The French Revolution marked the first time that citizenship in a European state was based upon propositionalism (equality and fraternity) rather than ethnicity. And as expected, Alienism has accompanied every other Enlightenment ‘virtue’ to the present.” Thus they are left to explain why, if Alienism is a seminal virtue of Christianity, its growth has coincided with moral decline in every other area. And since the ungodly unanimously agree with Alienist views on race, by what stretch of the imagination can the Alienist be said to have exercised dominion in the present age?
The Belhar Confession was written by the Dutch Reformed Church for South Africans during apartheid, and it claims that all segregation is sin which always leads to enmity and hatred. Despite being loaded with liberation theology, it is now being accepted by other churches, including American Liberal Presbyterians. The Koreans note the “overwhelming” acceptance of Belhar by “evangelicals in the global South,” even though these “evangelicals” are baptists and Pentecostals who wouldn’t know the Heidelberg Catechism or Canons of Dort (to which the Belhar Confession has been made equal) if they were walloped in the head with them. The Koreans say it is “past time” to adopt the liberal Belhar standards because – and here comes the canard that ranks right up there with “diversity is our greatest strength” – “we live in a time in which the center of the church is shifting from the global North to the global South.” Whenever liberals start talking about how a time has come for the church to change, I reach for my pistol.
Our friend Scott’s riposte to the Alienist interpretation of Mark 3:34-35, which tracks closely to their horrific interpretation of 1 Cor. 7:39:
“Then he looked at those seated in a circle around him and said, ‘Here are my mother and my brothers! Whoever does God’s will is my brother and sister and mother.’” This means either 1) the prohibition against incest has been removed; 2) Christians cannot marry other Christians without committing the sin of incest; or 3) Christ was not abrogating physical bonds, but speaking about something else.
Los Angeles is spending $600 million a year to support illegal aliens. This is what Judeochristians call “the mission field.”
Here’s a fellow in Idaho who has repented of his involvement with Aryan Nations. I was hoping for more substance in the article, but instead it’s heavy on clichés, such as: “The foundation of racism is fear.” What does this mean? Here’s how he defines his former racism:
I was led to believe that without the white race, civilization as we know it would cease to exist. That the white race is the race of God and therefore it is the duty of the white race to bring forth His will, law, and word on Earth as it is in Heaven. That all non-whites are inferior to the white race and are subjected to our will, God’s will. The proof of this? The Holy Bible. This is just a small piece of the foundation of the “white power” movement. I’ve spent the last 10 years eating, sleeping, talking, walking, thinking and believing this lie.
I was wrong.
First sentence: It is by no means certain that civilization can continue without the white race, and certainly not Western civilization. If this is so obviously false, where’s the proof for it? He doesn’t say. Second sentence: I don’t know what “the race of God” means, but it is most certainly the duty of the white race to obey God’s “will, law, and word.” Why is he now convinced that this should not be done? He doesn’t say. Third sentence: The collective will of the white race (if such a thing could even be measured) is certainly not God’s will, and it is beyond me how anyone could believe otherwise by reading the Bible. This last point seems to be the only good reason he offers for leaving Aryan Nations, and it suggests that supremacy and subjugation flowed from some fundamental misunderstandings of Christian doctrine. It’s unfortunate that we Kinists are accused of the same things, even though our theological beliefs are quite different.
Adultery sure is popular these days.

In this 1953 issue of Jet Magazine, we see the Marshall Field heiress seeking permission from a judge to go overseas to live in a “non-segregated community.” The following article is about a big transvestite ball in Chicago. And the next article is entitled “Do Japanese Women Make Better Wives?”

It’s about a Florida Negro who found himself a war bride. His “wife” says: “I think only what I think Bruce wants me to think.” On the last page is an ad for skin-bleaching cream. “The nicest things happen to girls with light, bright complexions!”

This was all very scandalous for 1953, when almost all white people were still opposed to pacifying the self-hatred of black men (and their hatred of black women in particular) by sacrificing their virgin daughters to Molech.
Nearly 60 years later, little has changed. Elle Magazine puts the most beautiful (meaning the most Caucasian-looking) of Indians, Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, on its cover and lightens her skin until she looks like the girl next door.

They know what sells magazines, that’s for sure. Answer: White women. Accept no substitutes.
Proof that glamorous women did not used to look like musclebound dykes.
Here’s a sister who could have had a normal life, but her empire recruited her as a “soldier,” and the liar Harold Camping has her waiting to be raptured. “If May 21 passes and I’m still here, that means I wasn’t saved.” The good news is that Camping, age 89, is closer than ever to his judgment.
In this old Hanna-Barbera cartoon about Adam and Eve, there is a fiery cross placed at the entrance to the Garden of Eden. You can guess what would happen if anyone tried to write this into animation these days. You can tell that it was created in a more “racist” time because Adam and Eve are white. This is now considered all wrong by an alliance of Judeochristians and Darwinists everywhere.
Do you think that Wikipedia is upset about Metapedia? We certainly hope so.
The National Journal confirms Steve Sailer’s theory that the two major political parties are becoming more racially divided. Sam Francis frequently called Republicans stupid for not catering to their white base. Democrats have never had qualms about catering to their base (blacks, mestizos, fags, socialists, etc.).
See how races group together, even on the island of Manhattan. Crime has dropped significantly in New York City as blacks have been driven out.
For all ‘is dirty ‘ide, ‘e was white, clear white inside.
The top ten most hateful quotes of 2010.
One of the reasons we despise Christians who use the language of the Left (including epithets such as “racist,” “anti-Semite,” Nazi”) is that they are encouraging a climate of violence against us. By calling us these names, there is little shock value left for a murderer like Jared Loughner, and that’s just fine by them. We watched as liberals tried to turn Loughner into a right-winger. The county sheriff blamed Rush Limbaugh, most others blamed Sarah Palin, and the government (according to Fox News) blamed Jared Taylor. Now we learn that Loughner was a Jew, and just as was true of Jew Dylan Klebold of Columbine fame, the Jewmedia has the murderer’s lineage surrounded by security. Loughner’s connection to Giffords through his synagogue has been kept quiet, and so has the Jew shrine in his yard.
The outpouring of emotion and speechifying by Obama in the week that followed was stunning. Sanctimonious politicians posed for the cameras and got all worked up about a freelance assassin. Hoffman writes: “Surely the act of assassination itself cannot trouble Senator McCain or any American, since we regularly finance assassination with our tax dollars. Hardly a week goes by in Afghanistan or Pakistan that U.S. forces do not shoot, bomb or burn an alleged Taliban leader, never mind if we gained our intelligence about the leader from one of his business or clan rivals.”
How is that Loughner’s victims are given such high-profile attention while abortionists are allowed to conduct their evil business? This beast should die the most painful and prolonged death imaginable, as should all abortionists. The only tools needed would be pliers and a hacksaw.
Loughner killed six, but Omar Thornton killed eight, and the latter specifically targeted the “racists” who fired him for stealing, and his family said “racism” caused him to snap. So why was the Thornton massacre ignored and the Loughner massacre treated to a week of national mourning? The answer is obvious. It’s like when the earthquake in Haiti was the only news fit to print. Then there was a flood in Nashville that was ignored. Now a terrible flood in Queensland, Australia, will get not a peep from the Negro president.
See the Christian Kinism storefront. These t-shirts will turn heads. Consumers, go forth to purchase!
We highly recommend this excellent new podcast from our friend Phinehas. Subscribe to his feed for more nutritious morsels of wisdom.
Do the same for the new Faith & Heritage website that has just debuted. Kinism is proliferating on the web. The pagans and atheists are falling further behind. They could at least try to give us some competition. Coming soon to a town near you: Kinist churches!

Finally, “We urge you, brethren, that you increase more and more.” (1 Thess. 4:10)




Kinism is proliferating on the web. The pagans and atheists are falling further behind. They could at least try to give us some competition.
I believe that our example of courage and cooperation has the capacity to be an extremely effective testimony to pagans and atheists. If we continue to demonstrate the power our faith brings to our lives, a good subset of them will come around on their own.
The arguments that Christianity is part of the problem are best answered by leaving them to argue while we’re at the forefront in defending our heritage.
“The French Revolution marked the first time that citizenship in a European state was based upon propositionalism (equality and fraternity) rather than ethnicity.”
Again, the Roman Empire would form a mighty exception to this rule:
http://www.oswaldmosley.com/the-hour-of-decision-part-3.htm
“From the time of the murder of the Gracchi and of their great opponent, the younger Scipio Africanus, the power of ancient Roman tradition to preserve the State dwindled rapidly. Marius, a man of the lower classes, and not even of Roman origin, created the first army that was based, not on universal conscription, but on the recruitment of paid volunteers who were personally attached to him, and proceeded with this army to launch a pitiless and sanguinary attack on the fundamental relationships in Rome. The older generations, trained for centuries in the statesmanship and sense of moral responsibility that had given Rome its position as a world power, were to a large extent exterminated. The Roman Sertorius attempted to found a rival state in Spain with the aid of the barbarous races there, and Spartacus roused the slaves of Italy to wipe out all that Rome meant. The war against Jugurtha and the Catilinarian Conspiracy revealed the deterioration of the ruling classes themselves, whose uprooted elements were prepared at any moment to appeal to the country’s enemy and the mob of the Forum in support of their sordid financial interests. Sallust was perfectly right – it was for the sake of cash, whereof the mob and the rich speculators were equally greedy, that the honour and greatness of Rome, its race and its idea, went down in ruin.”
And again, lest we overly idealize “those good old days” in nostalgic spirit – there was also the factor of “aristocratic internationalism” back in medieval and earely modern days. Aristocratic sneering-at-the-churls internationalism is a lot older phenomenon than the proletarian internationalism of Communism!
Basically, European aristos often felt more respect and concern for the noblemen of different ethnicities – but of their own class or caste – than for the serfs or villains of their own ethnicity.
In the Russian empire of old, a Tatar chieftain who converted to Christianity could well be made the feudal overlord of thousands of Great-Russian serfs. The very upper-class killer of Rasputin, Felix Yusupov, was descended from certain Yusuf Khan:
“In the 14th century Edigu, a Tatar from the Manghit tribe and one of Tamerlane’s greatest strategists, settled on the north shores of the Black Sea, establishing the Nogai Horde and laying the foundations for the Crimean Khanate. Edigu’s death was followed by infighting between his descendants, until, in the 15th century, Khan Yusuf became the head of the Nogai Horde.
Khan Yusuf allied himself with Tsar Ivan the Terrible, but the former allies eventually became enemies. Khan Yusuf’s daughter Sumbecca was Queen of Kazan, and when Kazan was razed by Ivan, Khan Yusuf’s daughter was taken as prisoner to Moscow. After Khan Yusuf died, another period of infighting between his descendants followed until the 17th century, when Abdul Mirza, another descendant, converted from Islam to Orthodox Christianity under the name of Dmitry. After the conversion, Tsar Feodor I bestowed upon him the title of Prince Yusupov.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Yusupov
And here’s a particularly stark example of what I’m talking about:
http://www.thephora.net/forum/showpost.php?p=927480&postcount=23
“Here’s a description by a contemporary witness, Dutch merchant traveller Isaac Massa, on how famous Czar Boris Godunov reacted in late year 1604 to the news that a pretender “False Dmitry” had invaded his realm and that common people in a frontier province had sided with him. He decided to send some of his Tatar auxiliaries to punish these insolent commoners:
Quote:
Boris’s cruel decree and the devastation of the Komaritsk district
Hearing of Dmitry’s passage through the land of Komaritsk, and that the inhabitants had taken the Pretender’s side and sworn him allegiance, Boris called to his side the Kasimov tsar Semeon, the son of the king of Kazan, the same one mentioned in this book in the part dealing with the life of the tyrant, and who had married the sister of the commander in-chief, Mstislavsky. Boris commanded this Semeon Bekbulatovich to gather the Kasimov Tatars, of whom he was leader, on a war footing. They formed a contingent of forty thousand horsemen. With these forces, he was ordered to report to the Komaritsk region and lay waste, burn, and destroy everything he found. The men and old women were to perish by the cruellest of torments. As for the young women and children, they could be sold or else carried off to bondage in Tatary. All this was done, for the Tatars are past-masters of this type of reprisal.”
(End quote)
This sort of policy beats even Ruby Ridge and Waco Siege, don’t you think? Imagine president Clinton unleashing a whole army of Lon Horiuchis upon the rebellious state of Idaho to wipe out its population.”
Besides, in pre-modern times absolutist rulers could show their sovereign favor to even very alien elements at the expense of their native subjects.
Those were the days of “divine right”, and the king could act like God in “electing to grace” any insignificant person they personally pleased.
For example, Czar Peter the Great apparently instated a low-born Portuguese Marrano Jew as the police chief of his capital St. Petersburg:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anton_Devier
“António Manuel de Vieira, known in Russia as Count Anton Manuilovich Devier, Антон Мануилович Девиер (1682?—6 July [O.S. 24 June] 1745), was one of Peter I’s foreign associates, who proved to be an efficient administrator in St Petersburg and Siberia.
His date and place of birth are uncertain – sources differ on whether he was born in Portugal in 1673-1674, or less likely in Amsterdam c. 1682. His mother was a Christian but his father was a Jew who moved with his family from Portugal to the Low Countries. During the Grand Embassy of Peter the Great to Europe (1697), the tsar was allowed by the Dutch sailors to command a ship, where Vieira served as a cabin-boy. He was taken by the tsar to Russia in the capacity of his page and orderly, gradually rising to the rank of adjutant-general in 1718.
That same year, he fell in love with Prince Menshikov’s sister and seduced her. They were apprehended by her brother, who ordered Vieira to be beaten to death. The latter, however, appealed to the tsar for mercy, and Peter ordered Vieira to be liberated and married to Menshikov’s sister the very next day. A month later, he was appointed the first chief of St Petersburg police. During his term in office, Vieira gained renown for his strict attitude towards brigands and outlaws who had previously crowded to the newly-built Russian capital.”
More here:
http://www.encspb.ru/en/article.php?kod=2804024752
Very good points, as always, Petr.
Count Coudenhove Kalergi seems to have been just the sort of product of “aristocratic deracination” I described.
“Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi was the second son of Heinrich Coudenhove-Kalergi (1859-1906), an Austro-Hungarian count and diplomat of mixed European origin, and Mitsuko Aoyama (1874-1941). His father, who spoke sixteen languages and embraced travel as the only means of prolonging life, had prematurely abandoned a career in the Austrian diplomatic service that took him to Athens, Constantinople, Rio de Janeiro, and Tokyo, to devote himself to study and writing. His parents met when the future countess helped the Austro-Hungarian diplomat stationed in Japan after he fell off a horse. In commenting on their union, Whittaker Chambers described the future originator of Pan-Europe as “practically a Pan-European organization himself”. He elaborated: “The Coudenhoves were a wealthy Flemish family that fled to Austria during the French Revolution. The Kalergis were a wealthy Cretan family. The line has been further crossed with Poles, Norwegians, Balts, French and Germans, but since the families were selective as well as cosmopolite, the hybridization has been consistently successful.”[3]”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Count_Richard_Nikolaus_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi#Family_roots
Kalergi was a decadent specimen of Habsburgian-Austrian nobility gone soft and rotten. Here is some further info about the social milieu that originally created his type…
Citing “Hungary in the Eighteenth Century” (a good academic book written in the pre-PC era, 1911), pp. 115-117:
http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924028383192
“In the third place, by constant residence in Vienna or in the neighbourhood of the Court, by having their sons educated in such surroundings, and by intermarriage with the leading Austrian families, the Hungarian magnates began to lose that strong national sentiment which had previously been their distinguishing feature. Though not yet an accomplished fact, we see the day approaching when the Hungarian aristocrats considered their national tongue and manners as strange and foreign. The fact that they represented not merely a privileged class but the whole nation, had always constituted the mainstay and the surest foundation of the authority of the nobility in opposition to the kingly power. Now the nobility itself began to be disloyal to its own traditions. That Hungarian aristocracy — which had been a military one for so many centuries, and in the course of the eighteenth century had been transformed into an official and governing class — now assumed the character of a Court nobility. Personal service in the immediate neighbourhood of the monarch at Vienna now became their chief ambition, supplanting in importance their duty (a duty which their birth should have obliged them to undertake) towards the country for which their ancestors had lived and died.
…
The deficiency of the means of communication and the decline of industry, together with the abundance and cheapness of labour and of food-stuffs, made it practically impossible for the magnates to spend their whole incomes, so long as they stayed in their own country. On Hungarian soil, like Antaeus, the nobles could not but derive fresh strength from mother earth.
Once on foreign soil this advantage ceased, and the strength derived from it was gone. In Vienna the Hungarians exchanged the simple and healthy enjoyments of their homes for the extravagances of a Court life on a high level of culture and civilization. In Court society they could not wear their ancestral costumes (which, though representing a value of thousands of florins, were often centuries old), but were compelled to adopt the dress of fashionable Europe. Their ancestral estates were unable to supply the wants of their owners who lived on foreign soil.”
Aporopos, here on YouTube is fully available Disney’s 1953 film “Rob Roy, the Highland Rogue”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNSYsc1cfqg
I noted that the chief villain of this picture, “the Duke of Montrose” is just the sort of deracinated nobleman we are talking about – Montrose has sold out his Scottish heritage and loyally imitates the cosmopolitan fashion of London.
See around 0:10:45 for example…
When one studies history, one sees that many rotten phenomena of today are not SO unprecedented after all… they have just been given an extra modern twist.
For example, are inept or compromised US authorities failing to stop Black crime or southwest America from being flooded by Mexicans?
The commoner populations living in the frontier territories of southern Poland and Russia during the 16th and 17th centuries often got little efficient protection from their own feudal elites (who nonetheless were eager to tax them):
http://www.archive.org/stream/historymongolss00howogoog#page/n508/mode/2up
“Ivan did not like to trust Abdul Latif in the Krim, but he reconciled Mengli Girai by granting the young prince a suitable establishment in Russia. The Krim Khan thereupon sent his sons at the head of ninety thousand men to invade Lithuania. They ravaged Podolia, Red Russia, the Palatinate of Sendomir, the environs of Rseszof, Yaroslaf, Radom, and Belz, crossed the Vistula, and pillaged Opatof and Kunof. The town of Pasianof alone offered a slight resistance. They returned to the Krim with an immense booty, and the following year commenced to pillage other towns.
Well might the learned archbishop just quoted wonder how it was possible for an army of Tartars thus to traverse at discretion ten degrees of latitude, always marching through a hostile country and always plundering, and yet with no efforts made to defeat him, or to recover the plunder or prisoners he was carrying off. Well might he inveigh against a republic of rich proprietors who, each shut up in his castle, cared little for the citizens of the unwalled towns or the peasants, who were being swept off, and less for the common-weal and against a disintegrated oligarchy, with a king having little power, and an exchequer seldom full, and otherwise badly organised; and well might he long for some despotic hand to seize the helm, and make the rich and powerful sacrifice themselves somewhat for the good of the State, and organise a power strong enough to repel these barbarians.”
http://www.thephora.net/forum/showpost.php?p=852311&postcount=92
“Pan Gideon put his hand to his forehead where he held it rather long, till at length he said sadly, —
“Only a peasant or a magnate can live in the Ukraine. When an onrush of pagans strikes that country the peasant flees to a forest and can live for some months in it like a wild beast; the magnate can live, for he has troops and strong castles of his own to protect him.”
You absolutely must read this.
“Should We Sterilize Ourselves in Order to Adopt More Children?”
http://www.russellmoore.com/2010/12/03/should-we-sterilize-ourselves-in-order-to-adopt-more-children/
A young couple contemplates sterilizing themselves so that they can adopt orphans. They think this will be “honoring to the Lord.”
You can be sure of two things without even checking: 1) These people are white, because only white people agonize over such things; and 2) The orphans are non-white.
And a third point is obvious, which is that whites are being made to feel guilty for being white. See the women who says that she and her husband “had decided to adopt first and maybe sprinkle some bio kids in along the way” but settled on foster care instead. She’s not at all worried about destroying her people; her only concern is that she does not abort while practicing birth control.
This is exactly in line with what was said above about neo-Christian apathy towards white genocide coupled with eagerness to adopt non-whites as the means of growing the kingdom.
“Insanity in the name of Christ”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4FmpwXp2TU
Fr John left this very good comment at that page, but it looks like it was deleted:
I have come to the conclusion that trans-racial adoption is the ‘flip side’ to abortion. Both deny the couple a chance to have their own seed enfleshed, both are exhorbitantly expensive, and both are ‘blessed’ by the Moloch state, as a means of ‘diversity and tolerance.’
In short, Babelism. It also (in the case of couples no longer able to conceive) seeks to make MAN, God, determining who shall ‘open and close the womb.’
But, most aberrant of all, is the bringing of the ‘xenos’ the ‘Other’ into our land, where they will never fit in, never belong, and never adjust…unless it is to a paganized consumerist hedonism, which I call the “Mall Culture”. The amazing success of ‘The Blind Side’ is merely this impulse post-partum, oh, about 16 years.
Matt, you need to extradite yourself from that bastard, devilish “faith”of yours and join a solid, Reformed church before you worry about Kinism. Mormonism plus racialism still leaves you bound for am eternity in Gehenna.
One more shot against schmaltzy nostalgia and over-idealization of pre-modern times.
(Btw, I do NOT consider myself a peculiar basher of traditional Europe: I have often defended Middle Ages from crude anti-Christian Enlightenment propaganda. I just like “warts and all” history.)
Back in those days of yore, one could indeed find plenty of “kinism” in Europe – but it was often exaggerated to a sinister form of tribalism that one today can find only in the dark corners of Third World. “My hood, right or wrong.”
Like Victorian-era writer Charles Kingsley put it:
“No one, I believe, would have talked of the masses in the old feudal times; for then each individual was someone’s man, bound to his master by ties of mutual service, just or unjust, honourable or base, but still giving him a personality of duties and rights, and dividing him from his class.
Dividing, I say. The poor of the Middle Age had little sense of a common humanity. Those who owned allegiance to the lord in the next valley were not their brothers; and at their own lord’s bidding, they buckled on sword and slew the next lord’s men, with joyful heart and good conscience.”
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1335/1335-h/1335-h.htm
It was precisely the Christian sense of universalism (in its proper form) that helped Europeans to eventually transcend this sort of tribalist kinism or “localism”.
Still in the High Middle Ages, even such an ethnically cohesive and already Christianized nation as Norway could spend over a century in anarchical warlord chaos:
“Theodoricus the monk, who wrote a history of Norway in Latin c. 1180 ended his narrative with the death of King Sigurd the Crusader in 1130 as he considered it:
“…utterly unfitting to record for posterity the crimes, killings, perjuries, parricides, desecrations of holy places, the contempt for God, the plundering no less of the clergy than of the whole people, the abductions of women and other abominations which it would take long to enumerate” [1]
which had occurred since then. The English historian William of Newburgh, writing c. 1200, writes of Norway that:
“…for more than a century back, although the succession of kings there had been rapid, yet none of them had ended his days by age or sickness, but all had perished by the sword, leaving the dignity of empire to their assassins as their lawful successors; so that, indeed, the expression, “Hast thou killed, and also taken possession?” [cf. 1 Kings 21:19] may seem to apply to all who reigned there for so long a space of time.” [1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_war_era_in_Norway
Yet further, in pre-modern times the nobility could coddle even alien Talmudists at the expense of their Christian peasant subjects. Nowhere was this seen starker than in Poland, a country where feudal system continued perhaps longer than anywhere else in Western Christendom.
Truth-telling Jew Israel Shahak writes:
http://www.abbc.net/islam/english/books/jewhis/jewhis4.htm
“Outside the towns very many Jews throughout Poland, but especially in the east, were employed as the direct supervisors and oppressors of the enserfed peasantry – as bailiffs of whole manors (invested with the landlord’s full coercive powers) or as lessees of particular feudal monopolies such as the corn mill, the liquor still and public house (with the right of armed search of peasant houses for illicit stills) or the bakery, and as collectors of customary feudal dues of all kinds. In short, in eastern Poland, under the rule of the nobles (and of the feudalized church, formed exclusively from the nobility) the Jews were both the immediate exploiters of the peasantry and virtually the only town-dwellers.
No doubt, most of the profit they extracted from the peasants was passed on to the landlords, in one way or another. No doubt, the oppression and subjugation of the Jews by the nobles were severe, and the historical record tells many a harrowing tale of the hardship and humiliation inflicted by noblemen on ‘their’ Jews. But, as we have remarked, the peasants suffered worse oppression at the hands of both landlords and Jews; and one may assume that, except in times of peasant uprisings, the full weight of the Jewish religious laws against Gentiles fell upon the peasants. As will be seen in the next chapter, these laws are suspended or mitigated in cases where it is feared that they might arouse dangerous hostility towards Jews; but the hostility of the peasants could be disregarded as ineffectual so long as the Jewish bailiff could shelter under the ‘peace’ of a great lord.
The situation stagnated until the advent of the modern state, by which time Poland had been dismembered. Therefore Poland was the only big country in western Christendom from which the Jews were never expelled. A new middle class could not arise out of the utterly enslaved peasantry; and the old bourgeoisie was geographically limited and commercially weak, and therefore powerless. Overall, matters got steadily worse, but without any substantial change.”
“Mormonism plus racialism still leaves you bound for am eternity in Gehenna.”
danielj puts it crudely but is right nonetheless.
Nothing would give handier rhetorical ammo for Christian anti-Kinists than the toleration of notoriously bogus theology within the kinist camp, in the spirit of “Aryan ecumenism.” It will give them an excuse to dismiss Kinism as a mere “Christian Identity” aberration.
The David Manning Video was great! Love it.
Matt, you need to extradite yourself from that bastard, devilish “faith”of yours and join a solid, Reformed church before you worry about Kinism. Mormonism plus racialism still leaves you bound for am eternity in Gehenna.
Thanks for the heads-up, danielj.
Is there a table somewhere of Christian denominations that are and are not welcome? If your sentiment’s the general sentiment, then I’ll leave you guys be.
You’re welcome to comment here, Matt, but Mormonism is not Christianity.
Danielj,
“Brethren, even if anyone is caught in any trespass, you who are spiritual, restore such a one in a spirit of gentleness; each one looking to yourself, so that you too will not be tempted.” Galatians 6:1
Now Matt might never come back, and be further closed to genuine (should I say orthodox?) Christianity.
I was not brought to an awareness of being White by having someone yell “Leftist race traitor!” at me.
Here’s another example of a pastor ignoring Deuteronomy 17:15, which requires a nation to be ruled by a near kinsman.
http://dougwils.com/index.php?view=article&id=8378
Doug Wilson says there are only three requirements: the fear of God, real commitment to truth, and a hatred of covetousness.
Sad.
Peter,
Do you think it would be fair to contrast the evil regimes of the past and the ones of our present as the latter having a self-conscious acceptance of their own evil, where as the former may not have been as self-conscious?
Certainly the Enlightenment brought about some sort of shift in world order right? At least in some sense?
You read it here three days ago, and it’s on the Drudge Report today:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110126/ap_on_re_us/us_health_care_nullification_3
Except we were wrong – it’s not six states that are joining Idaho in nullification, it’s nine.
Our good friends in Coeur d’Alene will be pleased to see that their representative is out in front, but of course, the Idaho Attorney General calls it unconstitutional. What the naysayers need to realize is that we’re quickly reaching the point where the Constitution will be scrapped and rewritten, and deservedly so.
The question is not whether nullification is constitutional but whether it is necessary. When your life is threatened, you take action, and the act of defense requires no legal justification.
Jefferson, who gave us nullification, filled more than half of the Declaration of Independence with the “long train of abuses…repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states.” This was the reason for the secession of 1776, the secession of 1860, and the soon-to-come secession of the 21st century.
South Carolina was the first state to secede last time, and it seems that this time Idaho will lead the way into a new dawn of freedom.
Note to Yankees: We’re still armed.
“Doug Wilson says there are only three requirements: the fear of God, real commitment to truth, and a hatred of covetousness.”
The verse that Wilson cites is Ex. 18:21, and even this verse states that the men are “out of all the people.” There is no reason to believe that the reference to “the people” is any thing other than the hereditary Israelites who are numbered in the books of Numbers and 1 Chronicles. Cross-referencing this verse above with Deut. 1:13-16 also confirms that these were men from among the tribes. “Conservatives” like Wilson will never accomplish anything by selectively quoting Scripture and excising portions that they don’t agree with.
Scarborough,
To be fair, it is good to recognize that the kinship-rule interpretation of such verses is not really known as a viable option today, due to the indoctrination of egalitarianism. I used to very easily and without hesitation buy into the whole “citizenship is by faith” criterion among theonomists, and it might be similar for Wilson. His list of criteria for civil rulers might not be a willful excision of Scriptural data so much as an ignorant omission of it.
In other words, for many, many alienists today, “they know not what they do.” On the other hand, if Wilson has been overtly confronted with the truth of kinship rule, then obviously I’m in the wrong on my application of it.
I went over to Theonomy Resources to read their attacks on kinism. They say that we oppose friendship and Christian fellowship with people of other races. When have we ever said such a thing? For the record, we don’t believe that benevolence stops with our kinsmen according to the flesh.
They also had an article claiming that when Rushdoony wrote that the weight of biblical law was against interracial marriage, he really wasn’t talking about biological race, but the races of Christians and nonChristians. How anyone could deduce that from what he wrote is beyond me.
Their proof text about a race of Christians is 1 Peter 2:9-10 where Peter addresses believers in Asia Minor as “a chosen race, a royal priesthood . . . who once were not a people, but are now the people of God.”
The text does not support the idea these these people were a hodgepodge of gentiles. The first verse states that it is a letter addressed to “the Dispersion,” the biblical term for Israelites living abroad. In verse 12 Peter distinguishes them from gentiles. The phrase about not being a people, but becoming a people of God is a literal fulfillment of the prophesy made by Hosea to the cast-off House of Israel.
To sum up, the race of the people Peter addresses is Israelite.
Luther, I’m convinced Halbrook (at Theonomy Resources) is on drugs. On a recent post he placed the origin of racialism squarely on the shoulders of the enlightenment. I usually try to ignore his stupidity, but this time I couldn’t:
http://phinehasfury.wordpress.com/2011/01/24/sleeping-with-the-enemy/
Now he’s got a post claiming Darwin was the father of Scientific Racism, which couldn’t be further from the truth. If Halbrook would read all of Descent of Man and not just what parts AIG told him to, he’d see Darwin was making a case for convergent evolution in the barbarian races. He fully thought the other races would eventually become great like the white race and the white race would die out. Yet, poor Stevie misses the context for the pretext he’s found. Besides, it stands to reason that a guy like Darwin, who thought his immediate cousin was an ape, would have no problem accepting a savage as a closer cousin. I’m no evolutionist, but even a dullard like Darwin shouldn’t be used to advance the alienist plank. However, these guys will stop at nothing to justify their own miscegenation.
On a closing note, the main evolutionist of Darwin’s time that held a racialist mindset was Ernst Haekel. Darwin, Huxley, and Spencer loathed him for it as well (which should be proof enough that Darwin’s ideas on race are juxtaposed to what Halbrook has suggested!). Haekel believed the savage races would always be savage, of which the mountain of evidence bears witness.
“when Rushdoony wrote that the weight of biblical law was against interracial marriage, he really wasn’t talking about biological race, but the races of Christians and nonChristians.”
These “theonomists” claim Rushdoony as a great exegete for their cause and then want to make such a ridiculous claim? The “weight” of Biblical Law is not against Christian/Non-Christian intermarriage. St. Paul’s explicit command forbids it, no inference necessary. These people are just being childish at this point. They are going to have to do something else with Isaac, Jacob, Samson’s father, Deuteronomy, and Nehemiah.
Incidentally, when Rebekah pressed Isaac to send Jacob to her brother Laban, what was her reason? For a bonus, look up “Laban” in a Hebrew dictionary or concordance. Words mean things.
“If Halbrook would read all of Descent of Man and not just what parts AIG told him to, he’d see Darwin was making a case for convergent evolution in the barbarian races. He fully thought the other races would eventually become great like the white race and the white race would die out.”
Really, can you provide some handy citations from Darwin on this? I am interested, but I have never myself bothered to read Darwin’s works…
The Christian Babelists are always trying to link racial consciousness to Darwinism and Nazism. It’s true that Nazis are Darwinists, but so are the Communists and all the rest of the aracial leftists.
Actually, Darwinism is far more consistent with the leftist view, which posits no fixed order in nature and endless change. Thus, through evolution, the races of mankind are probably insignificant, just fleeting transitions to something else, something perhaps not even human at all.
Creationism, however, is consistent with racial consciousness because it posits a God of order who created the races to serve his providential purposes. Mixing them thwarts those purposes.
A question I often pose to Christian Babelists is this. Are the races the product of random biological accidents (Darwinism) or the handiwork of God? They won’t answer. Either reply undercuts their position.
“Actually, Darwinism is far more consistent with the leftist view, which posits no fixed order in nature and endless change. Thus”
Luther, back in the days of French Revolution an Anglican clergyman Vicesimus Knox wrote a short book “Personal nobility; or, Letters to a young nobleman” (1793).
This was one of those works that back in their own day would have seemed quite “liberal-minded”, but nowadays would be seen as scandalously deficient in parroting the egalitarian party-line. Knox was basically seeking to instruct a young nobleman of his duties as a responsible member of the hereditary British elite, while warning him that foolish pride might lead the aristocracy of England to the same road as that of France.
At one point Knox pointed out that those materialistic philosophers that sought to deny the essential difference between men and animals (and whom short-sighted noble-born rakes were tempted to follow) were sowing the most fundamental kind of egalitarianism:
http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=630&chapter=210869&layout=html&Itemid=27
“But those who claim a dignity among their fellow-creatures, will never, if they are wise, study to lower the dignity of the whole race. If there be no dignity in human nature, there can be none in any partaker of it. Nobles will act wisely in maintaining religion in its full vigour, if they should be actuated solely by selfish or political motives.
If man be a reptile, incapable of sustaining a character at once good and great, how ridiculous to put a coronet on his head, and clothe him in purple! They are the greatest levellers, who aim at levelling man with the brute. If we are all asses, no ass among us will long be permitted to wear a lion’s skin.”
Also, well before Darwin there were already other forms of evolutionist theories (like those of Lamarck for example) being promoted. Back then they were clearly understood to be associated with radical-democratic ideology:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radicalism_(historical)#Popular_agitation
“To counter the established Church of England doctrine that the aristocratic social order was divinely ordained, radicals supported Lamarckian Evolutionism, a theme proclaimed by street corner agitators as well as some established scientists such as Robert Edmund Grant.”
Here’s quite a zealous statement – and no, it did not come from John Brown:
“But I suppose you are all too overwhelmed with the public affairs to care for science. I never knew the newspapers so profoundly interesting. N. America does not do England Justice: I have not seen or heard of a soul who is not with the North. Some few, & I am one, even and wish to God, though at the loss of millions of lives, that the North would proclaim a crusade against Slavery. In the long run, a million horrid deaths would be amply repaid in the cause of humanity. What wonderful times we live in. Massachusetts seems to show noble enthusiasm. Great God how I should like to see the greatest curse on Earth Slavery abolished.”