The Nazis had the good sense to expel the Frankfurt School from Germany along with the pervert “sexologist” Magnus Hirschfeld, who was among the first to use the word so beloved of today’s preachers, “racism.” But the Frankfurt School simply moved to New York, where its principals could infect the minds of Americans with their Jew-Cultural Marxism, which gave birth to the leftist hippie movement of the 1960s and then to the era of “political correctness,” in which all Christian traditions are condemned as racist, sexist, homophobic, or some combination of the three. It is simply thrice-reheated Marxism, and it has infected the Church too. Its primary goal is to subvert Christianity and Western civilization, and its most accomplished practitioners know that the best way to succeed in this goal is to destroy white people. (For more on this, see Generation5′s excellent and devastating response to the Thinking Housewife’s Jew-vapors.)
Bojidar Marinov, a Bulgarian who works for Gary DeMar at Autistic Vision, is a case study of Marxist and Gnostic purulence in the Church. What makes him such an odd fowl is his insistence that Kinists are the real Marxists and Gnostics. In a recent online debate, he writes that Marxism is materialistic determinism; that Kinists are biological determinists; and therefore, Kinists are Marxists. Likewise, just as ancient Gnostics believed in a “divine element” that mysteriously fell from the transcendent realm into the material universe, awakened Knowledge, and facilitated the Gnostic’s metamorphosis to pure spirit, Marinov alleges that Kinists believe there to be a “divine element” in their genes which determines moral nature and influences the will to obey (or disobey) God’s commandments.
The average “Christian” of today is very unlike the Christian of ages past. The old kind of Christian understood that God decrees both blessings and curses upon races, and that blood has as much to do with culture as faith. After all, we are beings of spirit and flesh. The new kind of Christian, having Jacobinism, Marxism, and all the other egalitarian cancers of our age growing within him, seeks to settle the nature versus nurture debate by denying that nature has any significance whatsoever. (To Marinov, belief in the dichotomy itself reveals a pagan mindset.) “There is no philosophically nor scientifically provable way to demonstrate how genes create culture,” he says. Nevertheless, evidence of genetic influence is ubiquitous. For example, black Christians in New Orleans and Japanese pagans in Kesennuma reacted in predictably different ways to similar natural disasters.
Again, Christians in our time view the character of man in different terms. Whereas the new kind of Christian views flesh as an impediment to worship, the old kind of Christian worshiped God with his whole being. He knew that his faith in Christ grew in the garden of familiarity, just as we are trained in customs by growing in families from the time we are newly born. He knew that genetic endowments and kinship are gifts from God, just as faith itself is a gift from God. Most importantly, he knew that the flesh has a share in the resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:46-49). He knew that one does not become more “spiritual” by an extreme mortification of the flesh, because both are fallen and both are redeemed. As R.J. Rushdoony writes in The One and the Many, “Matter and spirit are both created by God, both fallen in Adam and under the curse, and both objects of saving grace and the resurrection.”
We deny, therefore, that there is (in the words of Wendell Berry) “a cleavage, a radical discontinuity, between Creator and creature, spirit and matter, religion and nature, religion and economy, worship and work, and so on…the dualism of body and soul…” The flesh is part of the soul, not removed from it. The flesh is a bulwark against Hellenistic dualism. We affirm that man is partly the product of his genes, for this is how God created each one of us. We deny that we are capable of knowing the intimate details of how DNA influences morality, ethics, intelligence, achievement, or any other measurable property.
Ah, but this only proves that we are Marxists, writes Blowjammer the Vulgarian, because Marx was likewise incapable of explaining how material factors produced culture.
He just brushed the problem aside by calling his system “dialectical,” which simply means mixing the two unmixable sides of his dualism. Gramsci improved on Marx’s dialectics by introducing a kind of spiritual reality that works together with the material factors. Kinists learned from Gramsci. They are part of the cultural Marxism today.
Again, you can see that the calculus of culture is entirely spiritual, according to Marinov, and to introduce any other factor, even if it has been predestined by God Himself, is to attempt to mix that which cannot be mixed. This proves that Marinov is both a Gnostic and a Cultural Marxist. As our friend Dan puts it, “Gnosticism denies the material and Cultural Marxism denies the spiritual, but when combined they end up in the same place since, if all is matter then the spiritual is material (Cultural Marxism), while if all is spiritual then the material is spiritual (Gnosticism).”
You can read about proto-Marxist dialecticians in 1 Timothy 6. Paul tells us that they do “not consent to wholesome words,” but rather are “obsessed with disputes and arguments over words.”
Dan explains that this sort of dialectic obfuscation is the primary weapon of the Cultural Marxist.
They funded and promoted Malcom X’s Black Nationalists as they simultaneously funded MLK’s Integrationists. Why? So that by contrast between the two they could ease Americans into acceptance of their preferred plan – Integration. They’ve continuously played classes, races, and genders [and political parties] off against one another in the West to, according to them, bring down the White Christian Establishment. Conservatives as well as the Cultural Marxists themselves both wrote about this freely up until very recent times. Now the Alienists claiming to be the inheritors of conservative Christian tradition are suddenly pretending that the White Christian Establishment was not actually the Cultural Marxist’s intended target, but rather that the WCE was one and the same with Cultural Marxism from the beginning? Please. It is transparently obvious that these so-called conservative Christians have been co-opted by the very forces that they claim to be resisting.
As we never tire of pointing out, it is impossible for the “new kind of Christian” to prove that Kinists are guilty of Marinov’s charges when not even Alienists challenge the fact that we are in full agreement with countless generations of our Christian ancestors on the subject of race and kinship, and how these affect culture, marriage, and civilization, and how all of it is anchored by the Bible and tradition. Marinov knows it as well, and he cowers in fear to know that what he has written would have been uanimously derided at any time prior to 1950. He knows that his only comfort is to surround himself with those who have been equally steeped in Marxist lies.
When the flesh is viewed as a constituent part of the soul, it’s easy for the Kinist to agree with Henry Van Til that – in Marinov’s words – culture “is the product solely of man’s religion and nothing else.” Russell Kirk more accurately states that “All culture arises from religion.” But did Kirk mean by this that culture is entirely spiritual, with no ethnic component? Of course not. Kirk was not a neo-Gnostic; he agreed with Kinists. And notice that the question of where culture arises is just as important as what sustains it. Kirk writes:
When religious faith decays, culture must decline, though often seeming to flourish for a space after the religion which nourished it has sunk into disbelief. But neither can religion subsist if severed from a healthy culture; no cultured person should remain indifferent to erosion of apprehension of the transcendent.
Just as faith without works is dead, culture that is merely propositional, and is no longer viewed through the prism of a tribe’s ethnicity, history, and language, is dead. This is precisely what has happened to our own people. Faith has declined along with the bonds to the social hierarchies that God has ordained. Nathanael Strickland is correct that just as we are made in God’s image, our culture is made in our image, “in all its beauty and all its ugliness.”
Marinov takes the neo-Gnostic view that culture has nothing to do with our God-given, non-universal, ethnic nature, and this places him on the road to the heresies of Docetism and Nestorianism. We understand whole-being religion in the same sense that it is given in the parable of the talents. The master does not bestow trust or gifts upon all servants equally. The one-talent slave is condemned just as, in another parable, seeds that germinate do not necessarily survive. Faithful stewardship leads to greater blessings. Yet all of these things play out in the context of original sin, total depravity, and God predestining the elect to persevere. We are justified before God through faith and justified before men through works, just as Abraham was justified through faith in Genesis 15 (see Romans 4) and justified through works in Genesis 22 (see James 2). This is “faith working through love,” as it says in Galatians 5:6. Yet who can explain the calculus so that the human mind can understand its every minute detail? We admit that we cannot.
“The Reformed doctrine of Total Depravity depends upon the genetic heritability of sin. This is a very Kinist assumption. And it is presently Kinists alone who admit to this aspect of Calvinism. Therefore, in order to be a true and thorough Calvinist one must be a Kinist.” ~ Dan Brannan
Constitutionalism also becomes a quagmire for the Alienist, says John Marshall. Does one era have the right to rule, by law, their progeny? If not, then the entire notion of a constitution is unlawful. Those who argue against constitutionalism in the name of “freedom” are really advocates of anarchy.
Our failure to explain the secret counsel of God also extends to the dynamics of genes and culture. As our friend Ben correctly observes, if Marinov is incapable of explaining precisely how electrical impulses in the brain alter mental states, he ought to “either renounce [his] belief that brain states have any causal influence whatsoever on mental states, or renounce [his] ridiculous assertion that kinists must demonstrate the causal process by which genes contribute to culture.”
Marinov refuses to concede the point, to his own damage. He insists that all who believe that material realities can affect immaterial realities are pagans. This is why he explains away “femaleness” by speculating that God matches female chromosomes to female spirits.
Just don’t bring up the subject of IQ and biological correlation, because that would be racist, and we’re trying to run a clean operation here. Remember: Alienists affirm that skin color is inherited but never intelligence; diseases, but never abilities. We Kinists stand with Christendom in believing that God uses secondary causes, including our own works, to effect his will. Marinov accuses anyone who believes this of being “outside of Christ.”
He disgorges his venom upon Kinism, calling it “a religion of hatred… There is no principle in kinism except hatred. Pagan hatred… Kinists are nothing else but pagans and socialists. They learned their philosophy from Marx and Gramsci, and they learned their tactics from the Fabians… I think our churches need to excommunicate these pagans from their midst.”
Daniel Ritchie agrees, claiming that “Kinism is a denial of the gospel.”
Ritchie accuses us of being “damnable heretics” and the “enemies of Christ.” We only wish that these lunatics would be consistent enough to accuse our Christian ancestors of the same, for we agree with the dearly departed white men. But this they are afraid to do.
They are also afraid to revile non-whites who agree with us. When a Pakistani named Joel writes that Kinists are correct, Blowjammer heaps none of the anathemas upon him that are reserved for white Kinists. Instead, he patiently attempts to persuade Joel that he has not fully considered the implications of Kinist doctrine. The reason for the difference in approach is because Joel is not white, and therefore Joel must be held to a different moral standard. Above all, he must be convinced that he is being victimized by the white man. This is, once again, Cultural Marxism boiling over.
Joel writes:
All in all, my culture was very primitive historically, although quite civilized by standards of the Old World, in B.C. and early A.D. for a few centuries, but that was mainly due to the impact of the White-blooded Aryans. It is also interesting that the word Aryan has its roots from the Sanskrit word “Arya,” and has a meaning along the lines of “Noble.” But as we know it, modern day Pakistan is backward and primitive culturally; I would say this is due first and foremost because the Japhethic Blessing was not held onto when the Whites came.
Now in bringing up the Japhethic Blessing, may it be added that that blessing was founded in Christ, yet to be bestowed providentially through the race. It was the Japhethites who would extend the tents. It was through the instrumentality of the White-Japhethites that the Gospel spread and technology, music, sciences and the arts expanded. All that the non-whites have, more or less, is in some way bestowed upon them by the white race.
We must acknowledge that the white race is superior in that sense. This is not to say a non-white cannot be intelligent, or even to say that they cannot advance. They can surely advance, but what they advance by is that which is generally given them via the white race. In all that though, the white race should not boast, because it is not of them, but of God who gave it to them. God may have providentially given Japheth the curse and Ham the blessing if providentially Japheth’s son had committed the sin instead of Ham’s; but NO, God decreed otherwise. Why? Because it pleased Him to do so!
Blacks and all other non-whites just need to accept it and move on. There is no racism here, it is God’s blessing. The non-whites can still develop culture, they can still advance, but let God be God. [In other words, let the master give to his servants the number of talents he wishes.]
Now touching more precisely the matter of interracial marriage. In this section let me clarify that I am married to a Romanian, and given my previous post that would seem to many to mean that I am against Kinism, I believe that interracial marriage, being generally, but not essentially, against the marriage of Adam and Eve, should be avoided.
I advocate non-interracial marriages as the norm and strongly discourage interracial marriages unless there is a very pressing reason why it should be otherwise…
I believe we need to work toward a Strong Kinism in our general understanding all around the world…
In conclusion it should be noted that it is not only the Whites who are Kinists. I am chocolate brown and I love distinction and I believe distinction needs to be upheld strictly and worked towards as the ideal.
The Vulgarian fumbled for his encyclopedia of incantations, looking for the spell that would cloud Joel’s mind. The purpose was not to prove that anything Joel wrote was false. Instead, it was all about what Joel’s wife will think of him, and who his children will marry, and don’t your inferior genes discredit your testimony, and shouldn’t you be white before we believe anything you say. You know the script.
Blowjammer tells him:
My children have always known that their advance depends on nothing else but their moral standing before God – no genes, no external or material circumstances can be of any excuse for them, it is all covenantal, never material or genetic, matter obeys their spiritual commitment.
Matter obeys the power of commitment! This is the same Neo-Platonism preached by the Christian Science and Scientology cults. The Bible tells us the exact opposite:
Can the Ethiopian change his skin or the leopard its spots? Then may you also do good who are accustomed to do evil. (Jeremiah 13:23)
If the Vulgarian simply held erroneous ideas about the power of his “commitment,” or some such nonsense, it would be bad enough. His great offense is that he equates the obvious recognition that, by God’s grace, whites have been a tremendous blessing to the world, and whites should survive, with non-whites having “lower ethical value before God because of…’inferior genes’…” We Kinists do not believe any such thing, and unlike the dialecticians, we state precisely what we believe, free of Hegelian synthesis. The enemy of truth is the enemy of the faith.
To round this out with an amusing little footnote, Becky Belcher Morecraft (Joe Morecraft’s wife) read some of the back-and-forth that was prompted by the Vulgarian’s slander, and she waxed indignant:
Please tell me how to remove my name from this list… I am disheartened to find grown men who claim the name of Christ arguing and calling each other names like very naughty little boys! I understand defending the Truth, but much of this has simply degenerated to name-calling… This is why my husband has chosen not to waste his time in these little internet skirmeshes [sic]… “To the Law and the Prophets!”
The reason this is funny is because her egotistical husband claimed in a recent sermon that “God hates Kinism,” without bothering to define Kinism or explain why God hates it or why it is wrong. Just the one-liner was sufficient. This, of course, is the same as name-calling, and is certainly no better than spouting off self-righteously on an Internet forum. Perhaps the old saying should be amended: “To the Law and the Prophets, on everything but Kinism!”
Hey, look! Two more liberals have rowed out to meet Kinism head-on:
Sometimes they’re just in the wrong place at the wrong time, like this young man who chose an unfortunate American Eagle shirt for his yearbook photo.
People tend to focus on the symptoms rather than the cause of the downfall of our civilization. If Christians ever do talk about the cause, they chalk it up to a general lack of faith. While this is true, it’s not very specific. Arnold Jagt observes that Alienism is the source. Those who are alienated from their own children support abortion and public schools. Those who are alienated from their own sex become effeminate and support sodomy. Those who are alienated from their families support feminism. Those who are alienated from their culture support multiculturalism. Those who are alienated from their race support multiracialism. Those who are alienated from their nation support non-covenant immigration. Those who are alienated from their economy support socialism and quotas. Kinism is not just about race; it is an entire Christian worldview.
Our friend Randall expands on this idea by noting that “ownership is key. But we define it differently than old Israel did. In Amerika, ownership of land goes to whoever has the deepest pockets, with no restraints, and the needs of families be damned. In Israel, ownership was widely distributed by lot to every family and tribe, except Levi. And all the laws of Israel were calculated to maintain that broad distribution. it was all very unamerican, and yet, not socialist either. For example, debt was restrained to a term of seven years or less, and usury entirely forbidden. Every 50 years, all lands sold reverted to their original owners and all (Israelite) slaves were set free. Families understood that they held land in trust for their heirs. Thus we have Naboth refusing to sell his ‘heritage’ to Ahab the King. Indeed, he seems aghast that Ahab would even suggest such a thing. There is no such mind-set here in Amerika. Here, we move every five years, and there is no concern for our heirs, only our short-term property values. And even these are produced by funny money manipulations resulting in inflation and spawning still more usury. The typical American is profoundly short-sighted, neither honoring mother and father nor patiently developing an inheritance to bequeath to sons and daughters. But to a large degree, our laws governing ownership, money and banking have created the mess we’re in.”
And those usurious laws are Jewish to the core. As you read that paragraph, I’m sure you tallied in your mind all the commandments we break on a daily basis. The result is that when Christians now speak of “heritage,” it’s like Brian-the-Brain Schwertley’s idea of heritage: food and dress. But these are the by-products of heritage. In the Bible, heritage is blood and soil.
Of course, food, dress, and art are good indicators of difference. As our friend John writes:
Asians are the worst when it comes to gentility and refinement. Just look at their culture, food, music, and architecture. When I walk into an Asian restaurant it’s the antithesis of western identity. Western restaurants produce a sense of warmth and comfort (at least they should). Asians restaurants are dainty and abstract, a reflection of Asiatic creativity. Its as if there’s an assault on my senses from the music to the furniture to the use of chop sticks! A chop stick and a fork are two diametrically opposed eating utensils. Have you ever observed an Asian eating with chop sticks? They have to slurp and munch their jaw. The food doesn’t go elegantly into the mouth the same way a fork does or a proper soup spoon. There’s a reason why the French and Italians designed different utensils for eating. Historical banqueting in Europe forced the need for proper etiquette and dining protocol.
“Insensitivity” is now considered more obscene than theft, rape, or murder. Alexandra Wallace is the “racist” of the week, whose criticism of Asian lack of manners has somehow become a national news story. She is being harrassed by non-whites, who know that whites are too timid to rally behind one of their own. Her class schedule was even posted online to accommodate those who are issuing death threats. Wallace understandably felt alone, without support from her own people, and so she groveled before her accusers, even though it did no good; her own professor called her comments about Asian boorishness “inexcusable.” And since she got the clear message that her “constitutionally protected” speech was inexcusable, she dropped out of UCLA.
Jared Taylor is correct when he tells her: “your sin was not what you said but who you are.”
[W]hen populations change, culture and behavior changes. I hope you will learn that as a white woman, as someone descended from the stock who built this country and established its institutions, you have the right to notice and care. If newcomers are changing this country in ways you don’t like, you have the right to say so. You have the right to want your country to remain part of the West rather than become a chaotic mix of conflicting peoples and cultures.
Even though she may not realize it yet, Alexandra Wallace wants to see in her race what the women of the dust bowl wanted to see in their husband’s faces: steely-eyed defiance. Read the quote that Winston Smith posted from John Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath:
The people came out of their houses and smelled the hot stinging air and covered their noses from it. Men stood by their fences and looked at the ruined corn, drying fast now…
And the women came out of the houses to stand beside their men – to feel whether this time the men would break. The women studied the men’s faces secretly, for the corn could go, as long as something else remained. After a while, the faces of the watching men lost their bemused perplexity and became hard and angry and resistant. Then the women knew that they were safe.
Our women need to know that they are safe. To hell with anyone who willfully places them in jeopardy, starting with the lying preachers.
Here’s another college student who recently wrote an essay questioning the immoral anchor baby law, and hundreds of people turned out to protest her free speech. Never forget that the Bill of Rights was written by white men. Other races don’t have much use for liberty.
In these cases of academic thoughtcrime, the frenzied and feverish fulminations from Alienists are reminiscent of Roland Freisler. He was the Nazi judge who carried a reputation for being a Communist sympathizer, and so to ingratiate himself to Hitler, he shouted at and berated the defendants who came before him, and sent 90% of them to their deaths, including Sophie and Hans Scholl. It’s bizarre that people like us are accused of being Nazis when our white-hating and Christ-hating enemies look for every opportunity to deny us our rights to free speech and assembly and contract, just like you-know-who.
Before we leave the subject of Asians, let’s say a good word for the Japanese, who are enduring unbelievable hardships. There’s a reason why Hitler called them the Aryans of the Orient. This is all the more true in light of how little is being donated to their cause. Meanwhile, Americans will do anything to pacify shiftless blacks. Blacks receive official apologies for constitutionally-protected slavery that ended hundreds of years ago. The craven clergy speechify about one-sided “racial reconciliation” as if it were synonymous with the gospel. Then blacks receive quotas for work they’re not qualified to perform. Dayton, Ohio, is even willing to hire F students for public service as long as it allows them to avoid being called racist. That’s the prime objective, not public safety.
A liberal presbyterian in Kansas City testifies: “When we are with Christ, it will be a multicultural experience. If heaven is multicultural, our churches should be multicultural. Also, our churches should reflect the increasing multiculturalism in our country.” But then he shows how little he understands of heavenly unity when he says: “In the future, I think we will see more mixed-race families, and the racial divides will continue to melt away. But for the near future, we will continue to have division.” He implies that the divisions God Himself has imposed are evil, and they must be eradicated through amalgamation, and only then can we know unity.
Branches that but blight their roots
Yield no sap for lasting fruits.
~ Martin F. Tupper, Victorian poet
Here’s another article in the jaw-dropping PCA series on race that is being written by blacks only. This one is all about preserving black “culture.” No one from the PCA would ever say that white culture is worth preserving. That would be downright Kinist! The Negro author laments that “my culture [is] being erased or pushed aside” by gentrification, meaning whites moving into traditionally black neighborhoods because of the appeal of depressed property values. Notice that he has no problem in identifying that which is non-white as his culture, even though his education and career are thanks entirely to whites. Now he has returned to the “safer and cleaner” neighborhoods but to “serve black or ethnic minorities still in the community.” He hosts “community forums on race, class, and neighborhood issues” and has to work hard not to “embrace white, middle-class values and cultural perspectives.” He finds that his people are “cynical about white churches, other white institutions, and even white residents. I too struggle with this as I see well-meaning white evangelicals with little empathy to the plight and mindset of black people in rapidly changing communities.”
Bingo! You were waiting for it, I know. It all comes full circle, and blame is laid at the feet of Whitey for not coughing up more money.
[P]eople of color find themselves stuck: they believe they’re unloved, unappreciated, and inferior to their white counterparts who have freedom to move and thrive in gentrifying communities. This mindset is not just sin bred from past discrimination; it is fostered by a lack of brotherly love on the part of white evangelicals and secularists alike. Church policies and values that cause black seminarians to scorn their own culture or that fail to recognize black pastors as full partners in ministry can only produce churches in the favored mold rather than dignify other ways of thinking and doing church in the PCA. A loving posture from my white Christian brothers would be refreshing.
Race-mixers are always predictable. They couldn’t function without their double standards. You will never hear them say that whites and white culture should not be erased or pushed aside. You will never hear them say that community forums on race are good for whites, as is the need for whites to embrace their own “values and cultural perspectives.” You will never hear them criticize non-whites for having little brotherly love and empathy for the plight (and the future) of white people in rapidly changing anti-communities. You will never hear them praise whites who devote their time, money, talents, and energy primarily to their own race. You will never hear them say that “church policies and values” should encourage white pastors to love their own white people and culture. And you will never, ever hear them say: “A loving posture from my non-white Christian brothers would be refreshing.”
Alack, for Christ’s might,
These things go not aright;
Our lanterns give no light;
All Bishops be not bright;
They be so full of spite,
They care not whom they bite;
Both friend and foe they smite
With prison, death, and flight;
So daily they do fight
To overturn the right;
So we be in the plight
That losing of our sight
We know not black from white,
And be thus blinded quite,
We know not day from night.
~ an anonymous poem from English Reformers contra the Roman bishops; citation taken from R.H. Bainton’s The Church of Our Fathers, p.160
Excellent racial maps from the New York Times. Hint: Move to where the white people are.
CNN admits that California’s “whitest county is one of the most desirable places to live in the world,” and therefore it must be forcibly integrated. Obama’s “Justice” department has decreed that the county is so mighty-white that it must be in violation of the 1965 Civil Rights Act.
.jpg)
One hundred percent of rapes in Oslo last year were committed by Turks and Africans.
“They cannot be allowed on the shore,” says Marine Le Pen of her France. “Send boats out to feed them. But they must not set foot on land.” This is very similar to The Camp of the Saints. Fiction is not far removed from reality.
“If you claim a mixed race nation can be a strong, healthy nation then you can’t make excuses when your multiracial nation fails to respond to disasters as well as a racially homogeneous nation does.” ~ CWNY
Rev. Manning explains why there has been no looting in Japan after the epic devastation.
It’s because the Japanese are not black. Even the black megachurch “pastors” high-tailed it out of New Orleans after Katrina. They flew out on their private jets without a thought for the poor people who had bought those jets for them. New Orleans was as close to a “black Titanic” as we’ve ever seen, and the women and children were treated like filth, as usual.
Black people turn on each other like dogs in the night…
Why can’t black leaders admit that we are a barbarous, animalistic, maniacal, helpless people? We can’t do anything except destroy! We can’t build! The only thing we can do is destroy! And were we not here in America under the strong, watchful hand of the military and police, we would tear up America in a heartbeat. Everyone knows this is true. So why do we lie?…
Only God can help us… You leave black people to themselves, they’ll kill each other.
As he says, the more we cover it up, the more we place all people in jeopardy. While Manning’s love for his own people is unquestioned and admirable, we simply cannot afford the police state that is necessary to cage the Negro. Our primary responsibility is to our own, and our own are dying from the savage burden.
Rudyard Kipling gave essentially the same warning in his poem, The Truce of the Bear.
Horrible, hairy, human, with paws like hands in prayer,
Making his supplication rose Adam-zad the Bear!
I looked at the swaying shoulders, at the paunch’s swag and swing,
And my heart was touched with pity for the monstrous, pleading thing.
A Tennessee man builds a massive cross, soaks it in fuel, attaches to it gunpowder-filled shells, and ignites it in front of the home that his white niece shares with her n-word, and he does it “to protect his family,” but he denies that the race of the n-word had anything to do with his actions.
Now little girls with Barbie dolls will be taught that the ideal mate for Barbie ought not to look like her. In the real world, white women who marry Negroes are 12.4 times more likely to be murdered.
We wrote earlier about the difference between Negroes and Irish. Blacks, being of low intelligence, fuel their resentment against whites by believing tall tales about their compulsory transatlantic voyage being the worst tragedy in history, second only to the Holohoax. One of the most absurd examples of this was when Congressman Major Owens claimed, on the floor of the U.S. Congress, that so many slaves were thrown overboard from the slave ships (a hundred million, he said) that sharks continue to swim the route to this day. But as Rushdoony taught, what the slaves endured was relatively comfortable for the time. Hundreds of years later, blacks are still squealing for reparations. The Irish, conversely, acquit themselves like men. Resentment over loss can be understandable, but while blacks have agitated for government theft to fund their laziness, the Irish have helped build America.
Acquirit qui tuetur.
“He obtains who defends.”
Read the lyrics to “Back Home in Derry,” about a coffin ship bound for Australia, and listen to the music here and here.
In 1803 we sailed out to sea
Out from the sweet town of Derry.
For Australia bound if we didn’t all drown
And the marks of our fetters we carried.In the rusty iron chains we sighed for our wains
As our good wives we left in sorrow.
As the mainsails unfurled our curses we hurled
On the English and thoughts of tomorrow.Oh Oh Oh Oh I wish I was back home in Derry.
Oh Oh Oh Oh I wish I was back home in Derry.At the mouth of the Foyle, bid farewell to the soil
As down below decks we were lying.
O’Doherty’s scream jibbered out from a dream
Of a vision of bold Robert dying.The sun burned cruel as we dished out the gruel,
Dan O’Connor was down with a fever.
Sixty rebels today bound for Botany Bay,
How many will reach there this even?I cursed them to hell as our bow fought the swell.
Our ship danced like a moth in the firelights.
White horses rode high as the devil passed by
Taking souls to Hades by twilight.Five weeks out to sea we were now forty-three,
Our comrades we buried each morning.
In our own slime we were lost in a time,
Endless night without dawning.Oh Oh Oh Oh I wish I was back home in Derry.
Oh Oh Oh Oh I wish I was back home in Derry.Van Diemen’s land is a hell for a man
To live out his life in slavery.
When the climate is raw and the gun makes the law
Neither wind nor rain cares for bravery.Twenty years have gone by and I’ve ended me bond
And comrades’ ghosts are behind me.
A rebel I came and I’ll die the same.
On the cold winds of night you will find me.Oh Oh Oh Oh I wish I was back home in Derry.
Oh Oh Oh Oh I wish I was back home in Derry.
Miss Ireland is an adulteress. I’m sure her parents are proud.
A gold mine of Rushdoony lectures. Prepare to be learned.
Egypt got tired of waiting for Israel to be wiped off the map, so they went ahead and did it, literally.
RT has done what the American Jewmedia will never do: interview Michael Hoffman.
“Every six hours we have another billion-dollar deficit” from the Jew-squeeze on Libya alone. (It’s not a war, says Obama, but rather a “kinetic military action.”)
Meanwhile, the debt jumped $72 billion on the very same day that the U.S. House voted to cut spending by $6 billion. Doomed and clueless, which is fine by us. The end is nigh.
.jpg)
Even as the issuer of Liberty Dollars is convicted of “conspiracy against the United States” in Charlotte, a North Carolina legislator wants the state to soften the impending collapse of the dollar by establishing an alternative currency backed by gold and silver.
The First Bank of the United States was established for twenty years to finance Revolutionary War debt. The Second Bank was established almost immediately afterwards to finance debt for the War of 1812, but it also failed to survive its limited charter because Andrew Jackson swore to kill it, and he did.
It took more than a decade for the bankers to recover from this defeat, organize the Republican Party, and agitate for war upon the South, which was the great enemy of centralized bankers. As we all know, the banksters had the consummate victory. They loaned money to the United States to make war upon the Confederate States, and then they loaned more money to rebuild the country’s infrastructure. The income tax became necessary to pay interest on these loans. Both North and South were enslaved. The debt has never been paid off because debt entrenches the power of the managerial class, as Keynes taught. In other words, the government jewed the people in the same way that bankers jewed the government.
But remember that the rationale for the central banks was that states were issuing their own currency, and so the U.S. Congress had no way of regulating interstate commerce. Taxes weren’t easy to collect either. Now we’re very close to seeing the dollar collapse, and those who try to place real value behind the promise to pay for goods and services are being convicted of “conspiracy against the United States.” This is because the “United States” is a corporate appendage of the Jew-banks and no longer represents the American tribe of the white race.
“It took more than a decade for the bankers to recover from this defeat, organize the Republican Party, and agitate for war upon the South, which was the great enemy of centralized bankers.”
I don’t want to detract from your main theme in this post but since you have mentioned this I would very much appreciate any links or references on the above. Without anything solid to rely on I have long thought such to be the case but have found little detailed research on the subject. Thanks for anything that may be offered, and keep up the good fight!
Good question. Maybe someone else could recommend a good book on the subject.
I know that the people who rallied behind Jackson were trying to carry forward the ideas of Jefferson, and these became the Democrats. The people who rallied behind Henry Clay (Lincoln’s mentor) in opposition to Jackson were the “National Republicans,” and these later morphed into the Republicans.
Jackson’s opposition to central banking was very much at the center of this political rivalry. The pro-bank side was initially defeated, but the defeat of the South allowed them to take control of the whole country via the power of interest rates, and that allowed them to get what they had wanted from the beginning through the Federal Reserve. A hundred years later, our currency is almost completely devalued, all according to plan.
One of Jackson’s main arguments against the central bank was that it was privately owned by foreign stockholders who were hostile to the country. (Two-thirds of the stockholders in the First Bank were from Britain, most or all of them Jews, particularly Rothschilds.)
“More than 8,000,000 of the stock of the bank is held by foreigners who are more dangerous than the military power of an enemy,” Jackson said.
His 1832 reelection was remarkable in light of the fact that the bankers poured $3 million into Henry Clay’s campaign, and that was when $3 million was serious money.
In early January of 1835, Jackson paid off the final installment of the National Debt. On January 30, 1835, an assassin tried to kill Jackson but failed. Some say that Jackson claimed the Rothschilds were behind it, but I haven’t seen proof for this.
When Lincoln took office, tariffs were tripled and greenbacks were issued that were not redeemable by gold and silver. The Republicans went hog-wild.
http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h256.html
Senator John Sherman, the brother of the famous murderer, General William T. Sherman, was chairman of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee at the time. He said:
“Nationalize as much as possible, even the currency, so as to make men love their country before their states. All private interests, all local interests, all banking interests, the interests of individuals, everything, should be subordinate now to the interest of the government.”
Kentucky Democrat Lasarus Powell knew that the result of the 1862 Legal Tender Act was “utterly to destroy the rights of the states. It is asserting a power which if carried out to its logical result would enable the national Congress to destroy every institution of the States and cause all power to be consolidated and concentrated here in Washington, D.C.”
And that’s where we are.
Administrator:
In your last post you suggested that we form kinist churches. I agree with your intent, but I think this focus is too narrow. The essence of our disagreement with the Christo-Babelists is not really ethnic and racial. The real difference is theological, The Incarnation versus Gnosticism.
Many of the Babelists, it seems, are strongly influenced by the Hindu-derived New Age spirituality that holds that only spirit is real, and matter doesn’t matter. By following this path, they show love not for God, but for the ruling world system.
That system basically teaches that reality is anything you wish it to be. If you don’t believe in the existence of sin, just wish it away. If you want to believe that men and women are exactly the same, that’s fine too. Wish anything you want into existence. Ye shall be as gods.
The Incarnational view, so well revealed in the Incarnation of Christ, affirms the reality of both spirit and matter, in proper hierarchy and balance. We who affirm this view–the historic Christian view–are not “materialists.” We simply respect the material world as God’s created order. One great benefit it offers is a practical reality which restrains our our “spiritual” impulse to play God.
If we wish to form new churches, perhaps we should call them “Incarnational churches.” Kinism natually would follow from this doctrinal position.
So why do so many Christians tend to the Gnostic view? One reason is the belief, unsupported in Scripture, that in Heaven, the ultimate reality, we will exist as spirits, all the same and equal, who float around in the clouds.
In contrast to this popular (and rather unappealing) view of Heaven, is the biblical teaching that in the afterlife we will have physical, glorified bodies like that of the Resurrected Christ. There, according to the Bible, we will dwell in our nations.
A very good recent book on this topic, though it offers a few passing concessions to P.C., is Randy Alcorn’s “Heaven.” It effectively makes the case that Heaven in many ways will be like the physical earth–but an earth purged of evil and sin. It will be far more diverse, lively and real than a realm of disembodied spirits.
Incarnational Churches! Excellent idea! I love it. This is what Kinists are: Incarnationalists.
Here is the late Alan Stang’s review of “Red Republicans: Marxism in the Civil War and Lincoln’s Marxists” (iUniverse, Lincoln, Nebraska, 2007) by Southern historians Walter D. Kennedy and Al Benson, Jr.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Stang/alan30.htm
Luther,
“Incarnationalists.” Notice the word “nation” in the word! Like Admin, I LOVE IT! And so would Chesterton:
“The simplification of anything is always sensational.” ~ G.K. Chesterton
Thanks fellow. Another splendid job! I’m proud of you and thankful for you as always.
Should read “Thanks fellows.”
I assume you guys saw the story about the Haitian minister who preyed on women at a Dutch Reformed church in Iowa. If not, see:
http://www.woi-tv.com/Global/story.asp?S=14324014
and
http://www.press-citizen.com/article/D2/20110327/NEWS01/103270323/0/NEWS/Ex-pastor-s-alleged-behavior-shock-Pella-church
—According to court papers filed on Thursday, Edouard sexually abused three “emotionally dependent” women, and had sexual contact with a fourth.
Court documents said all four victims went to him for private counseling.
They go on to state that some of the acts took place in the basement of a home on Cedar Street in Pella, a place that Edouard used as a study. The documents say the women told him to stop or resisted, but he “overpowered them” and then threatened them, to keep them quiet.—
I personally prefer Kinist Churches. And maybe using “Incarnationalists” as a descriptive, not a title. All the name changing could be confusing to some, not simpler. As the old saying goes, if it aint broke don’t fix it.
Whoever wrote this line has my undying devotion: “Our women need to know that they are safe. To hell with anyone who willfully places them in jeopardy, starting with the lying preachers.”
“Whereas the new kind of Christian views flesh as an impediment to worship, the old kind of Christian worshiped God with his whole being.”
I just bought “The Flight from Humanity” (Rushdoony, 1973) at a frowsy but friendly and well-stocked used Christian bookstore. He explores this with depth.
“Wallace understandably felt alone, without support from her own people, and so she groveled before her accusers”
Doesn’t this Alexandra Wallace girl have a father, of whom would be the headship role for her?
More on the Haitian minister named Patrick Edouard, who is charged with sex crimes against four different women from Covenant Reformed Church in Iowa over several years:
Steve Schlissel is indirectly responsible for this mess. He once called Edouard a “Haitian man with the bearing of a prince.” Remember Urban Nations, his scheme to evangelize NYC with ESL classes for aliens? Well, Edouard was on staff there in the mid-1990s. On Schlissel’s watch, this alleged predator married Greetje Huisman, who came from the Netherlands to volunteer at Urban Nations. She became Grace Edouard and bore
Soon after his marriage, Edouard went off to Mid-America Reformed Seminary. During this period, according to the Des Moines Register, he taught catechism at a Presbyterian church in Valparaiso, Ind., “and led worship in churches throughout the Midwest.”
Somehow the Haitian passed an ordination exam. Normally this includes knowledge of docrine, hermenutics and church practice, along with basic Greek and Hebrew. While many budding ministers spend months or years finding a job, Patrick Edouard “graduated from seminary in 1998 and immediately became pastor of Covenant Reformed Church in Toronto.”
Edouard became pastor at Covenant Reformed in August 2003. Police also say Edouard exhibited “a pattern or practice or scheme … to engage in sexual contact against … emotionally dependent female” congregation members between 2003 and 2010. While this black minister was preying on his white congregation, he was also rising in power within the demonation. At one point he was chairman of the URCNA committee studying the Federal Vision.
On the sex crime, someone dropped a dime to WHO-TV:
“[E]ach alleged victim had a particular weakness, a “stress in their life” that they said Rev. Edouard targeted and exploited. The source told Channel 13 that Edouard invited the victims to come to him for counseling. The sessions took place in Edouard’s study, which was located in the basement of the pastor’s home located in the nearby golf resort community of Bos Landen. Some people now wonder why the pastor wasn’t given a proper study at the church building. However, the source insists that the victims do not blame the church elders who oversee operations for what the alleged victims said occurred.
“The source told Channel 13 that the women were happy in their marriages and fulfilled in their lives. “Sure, they were stressed at times,” the source said, adding that the women eventually displayed, “drastic negative changes in their moods and certain behaviors.” The source said that Edouard threatened them, in order to keep them quiet. “He said, ‘You will lose everything,” according to the source. The source said that Edouard meant they would lose their husbands, children, homes, status within community, friends, and good names. The source said that Edouard warned them, “Nobody will believe you…”
“The number of alleged victims stands at four. However, the anonymous source said that there are likely more alleged victims who have not come forward. For now, the families await one or more criminal trials and live under the scrutiny of people who wonder why the women didn’t just reject the reverend’s advances”
In other words, we may only know a small part of the story. How many victims? I see no statements from Schlissel’s group, the seminary or the Toronto church. Will there even be investigations? What would you do if he wanted YOUR wife for “pastoral counseling?”
Great article! It’s amazing how Blowjammer the Vulgate continues to spread misinformation about Kinists.
One big thing you should call attention is that American Vision folks are largely in the business of “baptizing capitalism.” Or in a social sense, baptizing right-wing libertarianism. Their whole project seems to be largely about trying to make the Masonic-Unitarian theories of the original American founding fathers artificially match with orthodox Christian theonomy.
In other words, they are selling Lockean pluralism on a political level (Locke might have well been a closet Unitarian) while rejecting it on the theological level.
Marinov now regularly takes indirect impotent swipes ar Kinists – from his latest, comparing Kinism to Hindu casteism:
http://americanvision.org/4239/evangelize-the-missionaries-first-comprehensively/
“She had a view of man and of the value of human beings which is the ultimate view of all pagan religions: Human beings have their worth based on their racial-genetic complexion. Therefore, she knew, her own caste, being determined genetically, made her be less than a human being, one whom the higher castes, the true human beings wouldn’t even look at, let alone touch or (God forbid!) eat with her.”
So I do not think that it is really “Cultural Marxism” that American Vision writers are defending – at least intentionally. It’s more like capitalist-libertarian dogmatic individualism with a Christian coloring.
But to “give the devil his due”, I have actually seen some Kinists going off to the deep end and really doing something that might be legitimately called as “baptizing racism”. Such heterodox Kinists are preaching intenable Christian Identity stuff, not historical Christianity.
But people like Marinov are arguing in bad faith in the sense that they do not even TRY to differentiate between orthodox racial-ethnic sentiments and heretical race-idolatry. They just lump all pro-racial notions together indiscriminately, a typical trick of a dishonest debater.
Bojidor’s bloviation that genes don’t influence culture and morality is patently absurd.
Would he have us believe that the average intelligence level of a society (largely a a consequence of genes) has no effect on that society’s culture? Would he have us believe that the black man’s renown rhythm–which shows up wherever the black man is–has no effect on black music and dance?
Certainly the gospel can modify and sanctify what’s in our genes, but it doesn’t abolish their cultural influence.
As for morality, genes can dispose individuals and groups to certain sins, one example being the problem American Indians have with alcohol. Notice, however, that disposition is not biological determinism. The Holy Spirit indeed can free people from control by a disposition, although the disposition commonly remains to cause temptation.
So Pastor Morecraft says that “God hates kinism.” Actually He hates Babelism, as revealed in the Book of Genesis.
A few years ago I had a conversation with Morecraft after he gave a speech denouncing “racism.” I asked him if “racism” consisted of having a special affection and affinity for one’s race. He said no, that this was acceptable. Such, as we know, is the foundation of kinism.
It would be nice if the good pastor would learn something about a belief before anathematizing it. The same applies to most of the other kinist critics.
“Matter obeys the power of commitment! This is the same Neo-Platonism preached by the Christian Science and Scientology cults.”
The whole half-secular, half-mystical concept of “American Dream” – “all your dreams can true when you wish upon a star”, “the power of positive thinking” – seems to be loaded with this notion about how “happy thoughts can make you fly”, or how sheer will-power can enable one to overcome all possible material obstacles.
This idea, which sounds so endearing and even seemingly very spiritual to most people, is really closer to pagan magic than Christian piety that recognizes the reality of human fallenness and depravity.
And all these pro-capitalist anti-Kinists should be reminded that consistency would imply that if there are “no races in Christ”, then there should be “no mine or thine” in Christ either!
If the venerable familial ties are not to be considered in connection to lowly “material” issues like genes, even much less so should merely economic issues. Marinov and other pious defenders of free market should be told that truly “spiritual” Christians cannot possess private property – this egalitarian idea has had lots of proponents, from the Gnostic sectarians of antiquity to revolutionary Anabaptists of the Reformation era.
Why should any truly spiritual Christian be any more concerned for his property rights (especially when dealing with other Christians) than for the purity of his race?
“A very good recent book on this topic, though it offers a few passing concessions to P.C., is Randy Alcorn’s “Heaven.” It effectively makes the case that Heaven in many ways will be like the physical earth–but an earth purged of evil and sin. It will be far more diverse, lively and real than a realm of disembodied spirits.”
I am somewhat interested in Alcorn’s ideas myself. Here is an interesting piece of his, “Christoplatonism’s False Assumptions”:
http://www.thephora.net/forum/showpost.php?p=157698&postcount=1
“To distinguish the version of Platonism seen among Christians from secular forms of Platonism, I’ve coined the term Christoplatonism. This philosophy has blended elements of Platonism with Christianity, and in so doing has poisoned Christianity and blunted its distinct differences from Eastern religions.
Because appeals to Christoplatonism appear to take the spiritual high ground, attempts to refute this false philosophy often appear to be materialistic, hedonistic, or worldly.”
Anti-Kinists are very much employing this “spiritual high ground” in their rhetoric.
Below is another piece that opposes over-spiritualization of Christianity, and I’m afraid that it shows that you people actually cannot too confidently say that Christian church history is ENTIRELY on your side, for anti-Kinists, too, can point out lots of material that would support their matter-despising position – I have already myself posited that forced clerical celibacy was a medieval equivalent of modern Christian anti-racialism:
“Rushdoony, Neoplatonism, and a Biblical View of Sex”
http://bible.org/article/rushdoony-neoplatonism-and-biblical-view-sex
“But lest we think that this view of Christianity only plagued the ancients, let’s listen to a more up-to-date illustration. Michael Wigglesworth was a Puritan pastor (b. 1638-d.1705) who gave Puritans a bad name. Puritans, the Victorian era, etc., all seem to have received bad press nowadays—as though they were all up-tight, prudish, stick-in-the-mud, killjoys. This was certainly true of Wigglesworth, but hardly of the normal Puritan. Here’s just a few examples of his lifestyle:
“He . . . saw himself as guilty for lacking the Biblical attitude toward his parents [i.e., he had very little affection for them], and yet guilty for considering the creature at all. His blend of neoplatonism and Christianity ensured his guilt at all times.” (p. 39)
In other words, since the Bible teaches that children are to honor and respect their parents — and care for them in their old age — Wigglesworth condemned himself for failing to live up to this standard. On the other hand, as a neoplatonist, he felt that any consideration of fellow human beings was a sign of weakness, of giving in to his emotions, etc.: consequently, he felt guilty for even his dismal spark of feeling toward his parents.”
Petr: For years, American Vision has promoted a selective reading of history that emphasized the Christian elements of US origins to the expense of everything else. See the trilogy “God and Government.”
Even worse was Rushdoony, who claimed America was built as a Puritan theocracy based on the Ten Commandments.
Contrary to all this is the RPCNA, which argues that America was not built as a Christian nation. In order for it to become one, the state must be reconstituted to give formal recognition of Christ as King.
R. L. Dabney in his old days, seeing female suffrage coming, did not entertain high opinions about the future of the United States, sounding like the OT prophets in the sense that things must yet get much worse before they can get any better:
http://www.amprpress.com/women%27s_rights_women.htm
“He will set apart this fair land by a sort of dread consecration to the purpose of giving a lesson concerning this godless philosophy, so impressive as to instruct and warn all future generations. As the dull and pestilential waves of the Dead Sea have been to every subsequent age the memento of the sin of Sodom, so the dreary tides of anarchy and barbarism which will overwhelm the boastful devices of infidel democracy will be the caution of all future legislators. And thus “women’s rights” will assist America “to fulfil her great mission,” that of being the “scarecrow” of the nations.”
Luther:
“Many of the Babelists, it seems, are strongly influenced by the Hindu-derived New Age spirituality that holds that only spirit is real, and matter doesn’t matter. By following this path, they show love not for God, but for the ruling world system.
That system basically teaches that reality is anything you wish it to be. If you don’t believe in the existence of sin, just wish it away. If you want to believe that men and women are exactly the same, that’s fine too. Wish anything you want into existence. Ye shall be as gods.”
The philosophical school of “German Idealism” (that truly took off with Immanuel Kant) built elaborate thought-structures to defend this solipsistic worldview:
http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=68464&highlight=idealism
“The German Idealists posited that nothing exists outside of the mind of man except those things that man recognizes and acknowledges. If a tree falls in a forest, and no one hears it, does it make a sound? A German Idealist would answer no. A philosophical realist would say yes.
The German Idealists were the first men in Christian Europe to directly challenge the idea that “existence exists,” which is the first principle of philosophical realism. The realist versus idealist debates began only two centuries ago. Justice Kennedy would never have supposed that the individual can invent whatever universe he wants to live in if the German Idealists had not offered an intellectual approach to magical thinking.”
This “German Idealism” also greatly influenced the presuppositions of “Higher Criticism”, whose cancerous impact on Christian theology is well known.
Thanks for the information. I have a pretty good grip on the philosophical dimensions. I’m looking for more on specific names, dates, actions, especially of the behind-the-scenes types who almost always call the shots. Not nearly enough is available about the impact of the 48ers, for example. Again, I know what their outlook was but the details of what they actually did are hard to come by. Another example would be the deeds of men like Belmont, of whom not much more than general biographies can be had. The older the documentation the better, has been my experience. Unfortunately, it’s very hard to find, much less obtain.
The LOS-type material provides some useful links but I’ve found its careful observation of the PC code takes up most of its space. Hence, more detailed information can be had from the USA-worshipping types who’re actually proud of their idiocy.
Any way, sorry to take so much space away from your primary interest, which I know is more relevant to the present situation.
Still a fan,
Petr: The American Babelist thinking goes back even before Kant. Tragically, we must also blame Jonathan Edwards, who tried to make Protestantism consistent with the rising Lockean paradigm. He argued that the Fall only affected the moral motions of the will and left others intact.
This view went global through William Carey, the father of modern Baptists and world missions.
And btw; I could otherwise approve the other anti-dualities mentioned here, but the fundamental Creator-creature dualism would be best to leave alone. Deny that, and you’re in pantheism before you even know it.
“We deny, therefore, that there is (in the words of Wendell Berry) “a cleavage, a radical discontinuity, between Creator and creature, spirit and matter, religion and nature, religion and economy, worship and work, and so on…the dualism of body and soul…””
Very good point. I wasn’t sure myself what Berry means by that, but I looked up some similar quotes for context:
“A creature is not a creator, and cannot be. There is only one creation, and we are its members.”
http://www.ronnowpoetry.com/contents/berry/Healing.html
“Once the creator was removed from the creation, divinity became only a remote abstraction, a social weapon in the hands of the religious institutions. This split in public values produced or was accompanied by, as it was bound to be, an equally artificial and ugly division in people’s lives, so that a man, while pursuing Heaven with the sublime appetite he thought of as his soul, could turn his heart against his neighbors and his hands against the world…
Though Heaven is certainly more important than the earth if all they say about it is true, it is still morally incidental to it and dependent on it, and I can only imagine it and desire it in terms of what I know of the earth.”
http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/show/261798
“I was never satisfied by the Protestantism that I inherited, I think because of the dualism of soul and body, heaven and Earth, Creator and creation – a dualism so fierce at times that it counted hatred of this life and this world as a virtue. From very early that kind of piety was distasteful to me…
[From] the dualism of body and soul [comes the idea] that the body is a kind of scrip issued by the Great Company Store in the Sky, which can be cashed in to redeem the soul but is otherwise useless…
[O]ut of this life that we have presumed to despise and this world that we have presumed to destroy, we should somehow salvage a soul capable of eternal bliss?”
From an essay worth reading, “Wendell Berry’s Vindication of the Flesh”:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb049/is_2_56/ai_n29336074/
People struggling with the creator / creation dualism should read the Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien.
In the Letters, Tolkien sets out a philosophy of art that is incarnational.
All things that exist being created out of nothing by Him and for Him is the basis of Tolkien’s thinking.
Creation is a work of Divine art and man created in the image of God is revealed in the Incarnation as its subject. This is because, the Creator of all that exists willed to appear Himself within his own creation. He did not assume the nature of the spiritual order; He did not take upon himself the nature of angels.
Rather he took upon himself the nature of man and became flesh. This was forseen from the beginning.
Only the Creator can create real existences out of nothingness and ordain cosmos. The Second Person of the Holy Trinity by taking flesh has redeemded what Tolkien calls “his making creatures” in a mode that is peculiar to Divinity and the Divine image, man, within creation.
Our Lord, Himself the supreme poet lives his poetry in his own incarnation, life and death.
Those who write poetry and labour in the artistic forms after Him, work what Tolkien called “subcreatively” in the world and time that exists by the Eternal Word of the Spirit.
Only Western European Christian civilization raised all the arts to this level – a mode of communicating the great truths and themes of the Evangel for the repair and raising up of the fallen world of human culture which our Lord redeem through ‘His making creatures’ and over which he is King.
And I also add for our joy, the pattern of his throne in the heavens is the throne of David his father. The Queen Mother sits at the right hand of the King in the Davidic pattern.
And what could be more glorious than to labour in art to communicate this union of the Sacred Heart of our Lord and the Immaculate Heart of Mary for the redemption, salvation and theosis of our human race and indeed our world.
New Heaven and New Earth is abourning my friends, yes, even in these our troublous times.
I have just read Cambria’s latest at http://www.cambriawillnotyield.blogspot.com
April 9, 2011 “Sustaining Vision”
Out of many absolutely stellar essays, this is one of his best.
This essay takes us back to what we have been edjewmacated to believe were the the ‘Dark’ Ages. Cambria knows, as should we, that these were the ages of the Christic Light of ancient Europe. These were the ages in which the Davidic kingship was restored to Holy Church for the nations that had been baptised.
There was knowledge then of who the Israelites were. The pagan European nations worshipped in rites that are clearly detailed in the Bible as the rites and gods embraced by apostate Israel. And so these tribes were carted off into slavery by other nations like the Mesopotamians etc, with the Babylonian exile being one of the latest. But the story doesn’t end there.
Those nations migrated west under their Judahite kings. They might have lost the holy faith of the Covenants, but they kept their identities and their kingship.
Clovis was of that lineage and after he entered the baptismal fount at Rheims, the Davidic lineage of kings was anointed for a Christian nation. The Saxon saints and kings were of that lineage as were the kings of the Gaels of Dal Riada (both Eire and Scotia) and the Davidic lineage of Cymry (Wales). The Kings who took the name of David and Daffyd in Scotia and Cymry were of that lineage – racially they belonged to the Messiahnic lineage of Israel.
They were NOT descended from Jesus and Mary of Magdalaine, which Grail lore is a corruption of the true history by the enemies of the holy faith. The Jews.
The zenith of European government is King Edward the Confessor kneeling before the Corpus Christi in prayer and conference over the temporal authority for which he is responsible and for which God will demand an account. And then he speaks to his counselors in the delibertions of state.
It is Pope St Pius X gently reminding his mother at his coronation. “Mother, I rejoice with you, but you have to understand that if I fail in my duty, I could lose my soul.”
Not one given to predictions, I can confidently say that our troublous times will end the charade of Democracy in this its final fit – which is really plutocracy by means of the star chamber and secret socieites. Government by TWAT control andjewdicial terror is just its last gasp and it will be paroxsymal.
The governments of Magna Charta and Arbroath were not democratic in the sense we understand the term. They were Constitutional monarchies, the best model of which was the Bretton Parliament established by order of the King of France (and guarranteed by his Estate) for the self government of the Bretton people. Their signeurs were mandated to legislate on the basis of the Apostolic Law of the Church and to apply those precepts for the peace of their nation.
But before models of government like this could develop, a Christian nation will have its anointed kingship.
In his latest essay, Cambria revists this institution as a warrior kingship modeled upon the Person of Christ Jesus, our Saviour, in whom are met the prophetic office, the priesthood and the kingship.
Our Lord is the warrior king in the mould described by Cambria. He is the reigning warrior king – over all nations. And he is our King.
It is his desire to reign over all nations by means of his Sacred Heart.
“The Social Reign of Christ the King” Pius XI: “Quas Primas” December 11, 1925 given at Rome. The work of Holy Ghost Father Denis Fahey is the best available on this most important subject.
I am of the belief that the saints who have been speaking about these our apocalyptic times for centuries have been telling us about how the Christic Light of the Evangel would be rekindled in the nations of Europe where-ever they are and how God would raise up a warrior king of the Davidic lineage for these nations who are now pressed and oppressed upon all sides.
The operative word here is God. Kings are not elected. They are revealed. They are revealed to those who know what they are looking for and they are revealed to their enemies who know much better than we do what they are looking for. The rest of the people have to deal with it and the conflict that will then ensue.
Many, many saints have spoken of this even from earliest Christian times in the ‘Dark’ Ages.
He will come from the House of Blois which has been well hidden.
As the Jews intermarry with all the remnants of the oldest Davidic lineages, this branch of the House of Blois is completely hidden by Divine Providence. No one will know who they are or who the king is are until the hour is come.
Until the hour is come. J.R.R. Tolkien who was steeped in this lore wrote an entire trilogy to assist the modern dumbed down mind to get ahold of this prophetic knowledge by means of the imagination.
Like this. “Then Aragorn said: ‘The hour is come at last. Now I go to Pelargir upon Anduin, and ye shall come after me.”
“The Passing of the Grey Company”
The Return of the King.
If anyone would understand this matter better – just joogle Great Catholic Monarch. If you want to understand Catholic as catholic i.e. the catolicum of the ancient creeds – fine.
When the one who is to be the Great Monarch comes upon the scene, it is clear from the prophecies that St Peter’s Chair in Rome will be overturned. The enemies of the Church can not destroy the Rock, but they can certainly overturn the Chair at a given location and take possession of the infastructure of the Church which was created to serve its highest offices. Those who occupy those offices no longer have that infastructure.
This was exactly the situation that obtained when our Lord was revealed at his baptism by John. The Idumean (Jew)puppet king Herod had overthrown the Judaic kingship of the Macchabean princes in Jerusalem and the Idumean Pharisaic sect had control of the Levite priesthood. All the Covenant institutions had been infiltrated, subverted and corrupted and functioned as Golems of the Jews.
The enemies of the Church have also done their work too well by infiltration. I think it now requires a sex crime tab of at least 5 billion to get a Cardinal’s hat from that antiChrist, Benedict and his outfit.
The world sees this. And so does the Church which is now scattered.
So the Board is now set.
No one at present knows where the Holy Father and his bishops are. May God protect them! And may the prayers of Jacinta Marto and St Germaine of Pibrac watch over them.
But this situation is a pre-condition for the rise of the great Monarch who will restore the Davidic inheritance to the Church.
For it is faith and the Church with which God is concerned. The Kingdom of God has been established upon earth and the Divine mandate was to strike root, to establish, to occupy and extend the sceptre of our Lord to all nations through the Evangel, making disciples of all nations and baptism.
And yes, it does mean a victorious Christian nations throws down altars of human sacrifice to Satan. Preferably by the conversion of that nation, as in Europe.
The Kingdom will come into its own through warfare, martyrdom, indeed the warfare of Jesus of Nazareth will become so straight that He Himself asks: “When I return, will I find faith upon the earth?”
But before the reign of AntiChrist over the whole world, our Lord in his Sacred and magnanimous Heart wills to give victories to his saints. And in His providence and foreknowledge, He has reserved a culminating victory for our time.
Before the end will come, the Immaculate Heart of Mary will triumph. The Church of Darkness (the antipapacy 1958 – ?) will be thrown down in Rome and many nations will be added to the Church – as nations – just as the nations of Europe were added to the Church as nations.
Dieu et France.
Alienists, being neo-Docetists, deny the Regeneration, or Paliggenesia, of Christ by their derogation of materiality. When Paul speaks of the groaning of the creation to be born, this birth is not a birth of pure spirit, but a birth of the renewed creation in which is the entelechy of the perfect confluence and unity of spirit and flesh. Thus Paul relates in 2 Corinthians that this renwal is not so that we might be “unclothed” (pure spirit) but that what is mortal (flesh) may be swallowed up in life (made imperishable, unlike cursed, mortal flesh). Flesh is particularistic, and this particularism is what Kinists celebrate. If flesh had no quiddity, then there is no necessity for each thing to have its own “tent,” as it were. The differentiation of the flesh corresponds to that of the spirit. We know that men are saved as differentiated spirits, since God has elected to save many men, and the “you” that God knew before the formation of our “tents” is also a quiddity, or the salvation of a plurality of men is wasted energy, imperfection, and is the equivalent of God denying his own divinity.
“For while we are still in this tent, we groan, being burdened—not that we would be unclothed, but that we would be further clothed, so that what is mortal may be swallowed up by life.” 2 Corinthians 5:4
“Alienists, being neo-Docetists, deny the Regeneration, or Paliggenesia, of Christ by their derogation of materiality.”
Your comment may sound harsh, but it is a historical fact that within Christendom, dogmatic anti-racism (note, this is something different than mere opposition of overt chauvinism and bigotry) was first pioneered by heretical sects like the Quakers that believed in weird concepts of like “heavenly flesh” of Christ and belittled the importance of Him coming in flesh in the days of Augustus.
What really mattered to them was the continuous “spiritual incarnation” (get a load of that oxymoron) of Christ-spirit within the souls of believers – which meant that people became “little Christs” themselves. This notion was only few steps away from modern theological liberalism and pantheism.
Hey, guys, LOL at this home page:
http://1dl.us/hPk