The Nazis had the good sense to expel the Frankfurt School from Germany along with the pervert “sexologist” Magnus Hirschfeld, who was among the first to use the word so beloved of today’s preachers, “racism.” But the Frankfurt School simply moved to New York, where its principals could infect the minds of Americans with their Jew-Cultural Marxism, which gave birth to the leftist hippie movement of the 1960s and then to the era of “political correctness,” in which all Christian traditions are condemned as racist, sexist, homophobic, or some combination of the three. It is simply thrice-reheated Marxism, and it has infected the Church too. Its primary goal is to subvert Christianity and Western civilization, and its most accomplished practitioners know that the best way to succeed in this goal is to destroy white people. (For more on this, see Generation5′s excellent and devastating response to the Thinking Housewife’s Jew-vapors.)
Bojidar Marinov, a Bulgarian who works for Gary DeMar at Autistic Vision, is a case study of Marxist and Gnostic purulence in the Church. What makes him such an odd fowl is his insistence that Kinists are the real Marxists and Gnostics. In a recent online debate, he writes that Marxism is materialistic determinism; that Kinists are biological determinists; and therefore, Kinists are Marxists. Likewise, just as ancient Gnostics believed in a “divine element” that mysteriously fell from the transcendent realm into the material universe, awakened Knowledge, and facilitated the Gnostic’s metamorphosis to pure spirit, Marinov alleges that Kinists believe there to be a “divine element” in their genes which determines moral nature and influences the will to obey (or disobey) God’s commandments.
The average “Christian” of today is very unlike the Christian of ages past. The old kind of Christian understood that God decrees both blessings and curses upon races, and that blood has as much to do with culture as faith. After all, we are beings of spirit and flesh. The new kind of Christian, having Jacobinism, Marxism, and all the other egalitarian cancers of our age growing within him, seeks to settle the nature versus nurture debate by denying that nature has any significance whatsoever. (To Marinov, belief in the dichotomy itself reveals a pagan mindset.) “There is no philosophically nor scientifically provable way to demonstrate how genes create culture,” he says. Nevertheless, evidence of genetic influence is ubiquitous. For example, black Christians in New Orleans and Japanese pagans in Kesennuma reacted in predictably different ways to similar natural disasters.
Again, Christians in our time view the character of man in different terms. Whereas the new kind of Christian views flesh as an impediment to worship, the old kind of Christian worshiped God with his whole being. He knew that his faith in Christ grew in the garden of familiarity, just as we are trained in customs by growing in families from the time we are newly born. He knew that genetic endowments and kinship are gifts from God, just as faith itself is a gift from God. Most importantly, he knew that the flesh has a share in the resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:46-49). He knew that one does not become more “spiritual” by an extreme mortification of the flesh, because both are fallen and both are redeemed. As R.J. Rushdoony writes in The One and the Many, “Matter and spirit are both created by God, both fallen in Adam and under the curse, and both objects of saving grace and the resurrection.”
We deny, therefore, that there is (in the words of Wendell Berry) “a cleavage, a radical discontinuity, between Creator and creature, spirit and matter, religion and nature, religion and economy, worship and work, and so on…the dualism of body and soul…” The flesh is part of the soul, not removed from it. The flesh is a bulwark against Hellenistic dualism. We affirm that man is partly the product of his genes, for this is how God created each one of us. We deny that we are capable of knowing the intimate details of how DNA influences morality, ethics, intelligence, achievement, or any other measurable property.
Ah, but this only proves that we are Marxists, writes Blowjammer the Vulgarian, because Marx was likewise incapable of explaining how material factors produced culture.
He just brushed the problem aside by calling his system “dialectical,” which simply means mixing the two unmixable sides of his dualism. Gramsci improved on Marx’s dialectics by introducing a kind of spiritual reality that works together with the material factors. Kinists learned from Gramsci. They are part of the cultural Marxism today.
Again, you can see that the calculus of culture is entirely spiritual, according to Marinov, and to introduce any other factor, even if it has been predestined by God Himself, is to attempt to mix that which cannot be mixed. This proves that Marinov is both a Gnostic and a Cultural Marxist. As our friend Dan puts it, “Gnosticism denies the material and Cultural Marxism denies the spiritual, but when combined they end up in the same place since, if all is matter then the spiritual is material (Cultural Marxism), while if all is spiritual then the material is spiritual (Gnosticism).”
You can read about proto-Marxist dialecticians in 1 Timothy 6. Paul tells us that they do “not consent to wholesome words,” but rather are “obsessed with disputes and arguments over words.”
Dan explains that this sort of dialectic obfuscation is the primary weapon of the Cultural Marxist.
They funded and promoted Malcom X’s Black Nationalists as they simultaneously funded MLK’s Integrationists. Why? So that by contrast between the two they could ease Americans into acceptance of their preferred plan – Integration. They’ve continuously played classes, races, and genders [and political parties] off against one another in the West to, according to them, bring down the White Christian Establishment. Conservatives as well as the Cultural Marxists themselves both wrote about this freely up until very recent times. Now the Alienists claiming to be the inheritors of conservative Christian tradition are suddenly pretending that the White Christian Establishment was not actually the Cultural Marxist’s intended target, but rather that the WCE was one and the same with Cultural Marxism from the beginning? Please. It is transparently obvious that these so-called conservative Christians have been co-opted by the very forces that they claim to be resisting.
As we never tire of pointing out, it is impossible for the “new kind of Christian” to prove that Kinists are guilty of Marinov’s charges when not even Alienists challenge the fact that we are in full agreement with countless generations of our Christian ancestors on the subject of race and kinship, and how these affect culture, marriage, and civilization, and how all of it is anchored by the Bible and tradition. Marinov knows it as well, and he cowers in fear to know that what he has written would have been uanimously derided at any time prior to 1950. He knows that his only comfort is to surround himself with those who have been equally steeped in Marxist lies.
When the flesh is viewed as a constituent part of the soul, it’s easy for the Kinist to agree with Henry Van Til that – in Marinov’s words – culture “is the product solely of man’s religion and nothing else.” Russell Kirk more accurately states that “All culture arises from religion.” But did Kirk mean by this that culture is entirely spiritual, with no ethnic component? Of course not. Kirk was not a neo-Gnostic; he agreed with Kinists. And notice that the question of where culture arises is just as important as what sustains it. Kirk writes:
When religious faith decays, culture must decline, though often seeming to flourish for a space after the religion which nourished it has sunk into disbelief. But neither can religion subsist if severed from a healthy culture; no cultured person should remain indifferent to erosion of apprehension of the transcendent.
Just as faith without works is dead, culture that is merely propositional, and is no longer viewed through the prism of a tribe’s ethnicity, history, and language, is dead. This is precisely what has happened to our own people. Faith has declined along with the bonds to the social hierarchies that God has ordained. Nathanael Strickland is correct that just as we are made in God’s image, our culture is made in our image, “in all its beauty and all its ugliness.”
Marinov takes the neo-Gnostic view that culture has nothing to do with our God-given, non-universal, ethnic nature, and this places him on the road to the heresies of Docetism and Nestorianism. We understand whole-being religion in the same sense that it is given in the parable of the talents. The master does not bestow trust or gifts upon all servants equally. The one-talent slave is condemned just as, in another parable, seeds that germinate do not necessarily survive. Faithful stewardship leads to greater blessings. Yet all of these things play out in the context of original sin, total depravity, and God predestining the elect to persevere. We are justified before God through faith and justified before men through works, just as Abraham was justified through faith in Genesis 15 (see Romans 4) and justified through works in Genesis 22 (see James 2). This is “faith working through love,” as it says in Galatians 5:6. Yet who can explain the calculus so that the human mind can understand its every minute detail? We admit that we cannot.
“The Reformed doctrine of Total Depravity depends upon the genetic heritability of sin. This is a very Kinist assumption. And it is presently Kinists alone who admit to this aspect of Calvinism. Therefore, in order to be a true and thorough Calvinist one must be a Kinist.” ~ Dan Brannan
Constitutionalism also becomes a quagmire for the Alienist, says John Marshall. Does one era have the right to rule, by law, their progeny? If not, then the entire notion of a constitution is unlawful. Those who argue against constitutionalism in the name of “freedom” are really advocates of anarchy.
Our failure to explain the secret counsel of God also extends to the dynamics of genes and culture. As our friend Ben correctly observes, if Marinov is incapable of explaining precisely how electrical impulses in the brain alter mental states, he ought to “either renounce [his] belief that brain states have any causal influence whatsoever on mental states, or renounce [his] ridiculous assertion that kinists must demonstrate the causal process by which genes contribute to culture.”
Marinov refuses to concede the point, to his own damage. He insists that all who believe that material realities can affect immaterial realities are pagans. This is why he explains away “femaleness” by speculating that God matches female chromosomes to female spirits.
Just don’t bring up the subject of IQ and biological correlation, because that would be racist, and we’re trying to run a clean operation here. Remember: Alienists affirm that skin color is inherited but never intelligence; diseases, but never abilities. We Kinists stand with Christendom in believing that God uses secondary causes, including our own works, to effect his will. Marinov accuses anyone who believes this of being “outside of Christ.”
He disgorges his venom upon Kinism, calling it “a religion of hatred… There is no principle in kinism except hatred. Pagan hatred… Kinists are nothing else but pagans and socialists. They learned their philosophy from Marx and Gramsci, and they learned their tactics from the Fabians… I think our churches need to excommunicate these pagans from their midst.”
Daniel Ritchie agrees, claiming that “Kinism is a denial of the gospel.”
Ritchie accuses us of being “damnable heretics” and the “enemies of Christ.” We only wish that these lunatics would be consistent enough to accuse our Christian ancestors of the same, for we agree with the dearly departed white men. But this they are afraid to do.
They are also afraid to revile non-whites who agree with us. When a Pakistani named Joel writes that Kinists are correct, Blowjammer heaps none of the anathemas upon him that are reserved for white Kinists. Instead, he patiently attempts to persuade Joel that he has not fully considered the implications of Kinist doctrine. The reason for the difference in approach is because Joel is not white, and therefore Joel must be held to a different moral standard. Above all, he must be convinced that he is being victimized by the white man. This is, once again, Cultural Marxism boiling over.
All in all, my culture was very primitive historically, although quite civilized by standards of the Old World, in B.C. and early A.D. for a few centuries, but that was mainly due to the impact of the White-blooded Aryans. It is also interesting that the word Aryan has its roots from the Sanskrit word “Arya,” and has a meaning along the lines of “Noble.” But as we know it, modern day Pakistan is backward and primitive culturally; I would say this is due first and foremost because the Japhethic Blessing was not held onto when the Whites came.
Now in bringing up the Japhethic Blessing, may it be added that that blessing was founded in Christ, yet to be bestowed providentially through the race. It was the Japhethites who would extend the tents. It was through the instrumentality of the White-Japhethites that the Gospel spread and technology, music, sciences and the arts expanded. All that the non-whites have, more or less, is in some way bestowed upon them by the white race.
We must acknowledge that the white race is superior in that sense. This is not to say a non-white cannot be intelligent, or even to say that they cannot advance. They can surely advance, but what they advance by is that which is generally given them via the white race. In all that though, the white race should not boast, because it is not of them, but of God who gave it to them. God may have providentially given Japheth the curse and Ham the blessing if providentially Japheth’s son had committed the sin instead of Ham’s; but NO, God decreed otherwise. Why? Because it pleased Him to do so!
Blacks and all other non-whites just need to accept it and move on. There is no racism here, it is God’s blessing. The non-whites can still develop culture, they can still advance, but let God be God. [In other words, let the master give to his servants the number of talents he wishes.]
Now touching more precisely the matter of interracial marriage. In this section let me clarify that I am married to a Romanian, and given my previous post that would seem to many to mean that I am against Kinism, I believe that interracial marriage, being generally, but not essentially, against the marriage of Adam and Eve, should be avoided.
I advocate non-interracial marriages as the norm and strongly discourage interracial marriages unless there is a very pressing reason why it should be otherwise…
I believe we need to work toward a Strong Kinism in our general understanding all around the world…
In conclusion it should be noted that it is not only the Whites who are Kinists. I am chocolate brown and I love distinction and I believe distinction needs to be upheld strictly and worked towards as the ideal.
The Vulgarian fumbled for his encyclopedia of incantations, looking for the spell that would cloud Joel’s mind. The purpose was not to prove that anything Joel wrote was false. Instead, it was all about what Joel’s wife will think of him, and who his children will marry, and don’t your inferior genes discredit your testimony, and shouldn’t you be white before we believe anything you say. You know the script.
Blowjammer tells him:
My children have always known that their advance depends on nothing else but their moral standing before God – no genes, no external or material circumstances can be of any excuse for them, it is all covenantal, never material or genetic, matter obeys their spiritual commitment.
Matter obeys the power of commitment! This is the same Neo-Platonism preached by the Christian Science and Scientology cults. The Bible tells us the exact opposite:
Can the Ethiopian change his skin or the leopard its spots? Then may you also do good who are accustomed to do evil. (Jeremiah 13:23)
If the Vulgarian simply held erroneous ideas about the power of his “commitment,” or some such nonsense, it would be bad enough. His great offense is that he equates the obvious recognition that, by God’s grace, whites have been a tremendous blessing to the world, and whites should survive, with non-whites having “lower ethical value before God because of…’inferior genes’…” We Kinists do not believe any such thing, and unlike the dialecticians, we state precisely what we believe, free of Hegelian synthesis. The enemy of truth is the enemy of the faith.
To round this out with an amusing little footnote, Becky Belcher Morecraft (Joe Morecraft’s wife) read some of the back-and-forth that was prompted by the Vulgarian’s slander, and she waxed indignant:
Please tell me how to remove my name from this list… I am disheartened to find grown men who claim the name of Christ arguing and calling each other names like very naughty little boys! I understand defending the Truth, but much of this has simply degenerated to name-calling… This is why my husband has chosen not to waste his time in these little internet skirmeshes [sic]… “To the Law and the Prophets!”
The reason this is funny is because her egotistical husband claimed in a recent sermon that “God hates Kinism,” without bothering to define Kinism or explain why God hates it or why it is wrong. Just the one-liner was sufficient. This, of course, is the same as name-calling, and is certainly no better than spouting off self-righteously on an Internet forum. Perhaps the old saying should be amended: “To the Law and the Prophets, on everything but Kinism!”
Hey, look! Two more liberals have rowed out to meet Kinism head-on:
Sometimes they’re just in the wrong place at the wrong time, like this young man who chose an unfortunate American Eagle shirt for his yearbook photo.
People tend to focus on the symptoms rather than the cause of the downfall of our civilization. If Christians ever do talk about the cause, they chalk it up to a general lack of faith. While this is true, it’s not very specific. Arnold Jagt observes that Alienism is the source. Those who are alienated from their own children support abortion and public schools. Those who are alienated from their own sex become effeminate and support sodomy. Those who are alienated from their families support feminism. Those who are alienated from their culture support multiculturalism. Those who are alienated from their race support multiracialism. Those who are alienated from their nation support non-covenant immigration. Those who are alienated from their economy support socialism and quotas. Kinism is not just about race; it is an entire Christian worldview.
Our friend Randall expands on this idea by noting that “ownership is key. But we define it differently than old Israel did. In Amerika, ownership of land goes to whoever has the deepest pockets, with no restraints, and the needs of families be damned. In Israel, ownership was widely distributed by lot to every family and tribe, except Levi. And all the laws of Israel were calculated to maintain that broad distribution. it was all very unamerican, and yet, not socialist either. For example, debt was restrained to a term of seven years or less, and usury entirely forbidden. Every 50 years, all lands sold reverted to their original owners and all (Israelite) slaves were set free. Families understood that they held land in trust for their heirs. Thus we have Naboth refusing to sell his ‘heritage’ to Ahab the King. Indeed, he seems aghast that Ahab would even suggest such a thing. There is no such mind-set here in Amerika. Here, we move every five years, and there is no concern for our heirs, only our short-term property values. And even these are produced by funny money manipulations resulting in inflation and spawning still more usury. The typical American is profoundly short-sighted, neither honoring mother and father nor patiently developing an inheritance to bequeath to sons and daughters. But to a large degree, our laws governing ownership, money and banking have created the mess we’re in.”
And those usurious laws are Jewish to the core. As you read that paragraph, I’m sure you tallied in your mind all the commandments we break on a daily basis. The result is that when Christians now speak of “heritage,” it’s like Brian-the-Brain Schwertley’s idea of heritage: food and dress. But these are the by-products of heritage. In the Bible, heritage is blood and soil.
Of course, food, dress, and art are good indicators of difference. As our friend John writes:
Asians are the worst when it comes to gentility and refinement. Just look at their culture, food, music, and architecture. When I walk into an Asian restaurant it’s the antithesis of western identity. Western restaurants produce a sense of warmth and comfort (at least they should). Asians restaurants are dainty and abstract, a reflection of Asiatic creativity. Its as if there’s an assault on my senses from the music to the furniture to the use of chop sticks! A chop stick and a fork are two diametrically opposed eating utensils. Have you ever observed an Asian eating with chop sticks? They have to slurp and munch their jaw. The food doesn’t go elegantly into the mouth the same way a fork does or a proper soup spoon. There’s a reason why the French and Italians designed different utensils for eating. Historical banqueting in Europe forced the need for proper etiquette and dining protocol.
“Insensitivity” is now considered more obscene than theft, rape, or murder. Alexandra Wallace is the “racist” of the week, whose criticism of Asian lack of manners has somehow become a national news story. She is being harrassed by non-whites, who know that whites are too timid to rally behind one of their own. Her class schedule was even posted online to accommodate those who are issuing death threats. Wallace understandably felt alone, without support from her own people, and so she groveled before her accusers, even though it did no good; her own professor called her comments about Asian boorishness “inexcusable.” And since she got the clear message that her “constitutionally protected” speech was inexcusable, she dropped out of UCLA.
Jared Taylor is correct when he tells her: “your sin was not what you said but who you are.”
[W]hen populations change, culture and behavior changes. I hope you will learn that as a white woman, as someone descended from the stock who built this country and established its institutions, you have the right to notice and care. If newcomers are changing this country in ways you don’t like, you have the right to say so. You have the right to want your country to remain part of the West rather than become a chaotic mix of conflicting peoples and cultures.
Even though she may not realize it yet, Alexandra Wallace wants to see in her race what the women of the dust bowl wanted to see in their husband’s faces: steely-eyed defiance. Read the quote that Winston Smith posted from John Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath:
The people came out of their houses and smelled the hot stinging air and covered their noses from it. Men stood by their fences and looked at the ruined corn, drying fast now…
And the women came out of the houses to stand beside their men – to feel whether this time the men would break. The women studied the men’s faces secretly, for the corn could go, as long as something else remained. After a while, the faces of the watching men lost their bemused perplexity and became hard and angry and resistant. Then the women knew that they were safe.
Our women need to know that they are safe. To hell with anyone who willfully places them in jeopardy, starting with the lying preachers.
Here’s another college student who recently wrote an essay questioning the immoral anchor baby law, and hundreds of people turned out to protest her free speech. Never forget that the Bill of Rights was written by white men. Other races don’t have much use for liberty.
In these cases of academic thoughtcrime, the frenzied and feverish fulminations from Alienists are reminiscent of Roland Freisler. He was the Nazi judge who carried a reputation for being a Communist sympathizer, and so to ingratiate himself to Hitler, he shouted at and berated the defendants who came before him, and sent 90% of them to their deaths, including Sophie and Hans Scholl. It’s bizarre that people like us are accused of being Nazis when our white-hating and Christ-hating enemies look for every opportunity to deny us our rights to free speech and assembly and contract, just like you-know-who.
Before we leave the subject of Asians, let’s say a good word for the Japanese, who are enduring unbelievable hardships. There’s a reason why Hitler called them the Aryans of the Orient. This is all the more true in light of how little is being donated to their cause. Meanwhile, Americans will do anything to pacify shiftless blacks. Blacks receive official apologies for constitutionally-protected slavery that ended hundreds of years ago. The craven clergy speechify about one-sided “racial reconciliation” as if it were synonymous with the gospel. Then blacks receive quotas for work they’re not qualified to perform. Dayton, Ohio, is even willing to hire F students for public service as long as it allows them to avoid being called racist. That’s the prime objective, not public safety.
A liberal presbyterian in Kansas City testifies: “When we are with Christ, it will be a multicultural experience. If heaven is multicultural, our churches should be multicultural. Also, our churches should reflect the increasing multiculturalism in our country.” But then he shows how little he understands of heavenly unity when he says: “In the future, I think we will see more mixed-race families, and the racial divides will continue to melt away. But for the near future, we will continue to have division.” He implies that the divisions God Himself has imposed are evil, and they must be eradicated through amalgamation, and only then can we know unity.
Branches that but blight their roots
Yield no sap for lasting fruits.
~ Martin F. Tupper, Victorian poet
Here’s another article in the jaw-dropping PCA series on race that is being written by blacks only. This one is all about preserving black “culture.” No one from the PCA would ever say that white culture is worth preserving. That would be downright Kinist! The Negro author laments that “my culture [is] being erased or pushed aside” by gentrification, meaning whites moving into traditionally black neighborhoods because of the appeal of depressed property values. Notice that he has no problem in identifying that which is non-white as his culture, even though his education and career are thanks entirely to whites. Now he has returned to the “safer and cleaner” neighborhoods but to “serve black or ethnic minorities still in the community.” He hosts “community forums on race, class, and neighborhood issues” and has to work hard not to “embrace white, middle-class values and cultural perspectives.” He finds that his people are “cynical about white churches, other white institutions, and even white residents. I too struggle with this as I see well-meaning white evangelicals with little empathy to the plight and mindset of black people in rapidly changing communities.”
Bingo! You were waiting for it, I know. It all comes full circle, and blame is laid at the feet of Whitey for not coughing up more money.
[P]eople of color find themselves stuck: they believe they’re unloved, unappreciated, and inferior to their white counterparts who have freedom to move and thrive in gentrifying communities. This mindset is not just sin bred from past discrimination; it is fostered by a lack of brotherly love on the part of white evangelicals and secularists alike. Church policies and values that cause black seminarians to scorn their own culture or that fail to recognize black pastors as full partners in ministry can only produce churches in the favored mold rather than dignify other ways of thinking and doing church in the PCA. A loving posture from my white Christian brothers would be refreshing.
Race-mixers are always predictable. They couldn’t function without their double standards. You will never hear them say that whites and white culture should not be erased or pushed aside. You will never hear them say that community forums on race are good for whites, as is the need for whites to embrace their own “values and cultural perspectives.” You will never hear them criticize non-whites for having little brotherly love and empathy for the plight (and the future) of white people in rapidly changing anti-communities. You will never hear them praise whites who devote their time, money, talents, and energy primarily to their own race. You will never hear them say that “church policies and values” should encourage white pastors to love their own white people and culture. And you will never, ever hear them say: “A loving posture from my non-white Christian brothers would be refreshing.”
Alack, for Christ’s might,
These things go not aright;
Our lanterns give no light;
All Bishops be not bright;
They be so full of spite,
They care not whom they bite;
Both friend and foe they smite
With prison, death, and flight;
So daily they do fight
To overturn the right;
So we be in the plight
That losing of our sight
We know not black from white,
And be thus blinded quite,
We know not day from night.
~ an anonymous poem from English Reformers contra the Roman bishops; citation taken from R.H. Bainton’s The Church of Our Fathers, p.160
Excellent racial maps from the New York Times. Hint: Move to where the white people are.
CNN admits that California’s “whitest county is one of the most desirable places to live in the world,” and therefore it must be forcibly integrated. Obama’s “Justice” department has decreed that the county is so mighty-white that it must be in violation of the 1965 Civil Rights Act.
One hundred percent of rapes in Oslo last year were committed by Turks and Africans.
“They cannot be allowed on the shore,” says Marine Le Pen of her France. “Send boats out to feed them. But they must not set foot on land.” This is very similar to The Camp of the Saints. Fiction is not far removed from reality.
“If you claim a mixed race nation can be a strong, healthy nation then you can’t make excuses when your multiracial nation fails to respond to disasters as well as a racially homogeneous nation does.” ~ CWNY
Rev. Manning explains why there has been no looting in Japan after the epic devastation.
It’s because the Japanese are not black. Even the black megachurch “pastors” high-tailed it out of New Orleans after Katrina. They flew out on their private jets without a thought for the poor people who had bought those jets for them. New Orleans was as close to a “black Titanic” as we’ve ever seen, and the women and children were treated like filth, as usual.
Black people turn on each other like dogs in the night…
Why can’t black leaders admit that we are a barbarous, animalistic, maniacal, helpless people? We can’t do anything except destroy! We can’t build! The only thing we can do is destroy! And were we not here in America under the strong, watchful hand of the military and police, we would tear up America in a heartbeat. Everyone knows this is true. So why do we lie?…
Only God can help us… You leave black people to themselves, they’ll kill each other.
As he says, the more we cover it up, the more we place all people in jeopardy. While Manning’s love for his own people is unquestioned and admirable, we simply cannot afford the police state that is necessary to cage the Negro. Our primary responsibility is to our own, and our own are dying from the savage burden.
Rudyard Kipling gave essentially the same warning in his poem, The Truce of the Bear.
Horrible, hairy, human, with paws like hands in prayer,
Making his supplication rose Adam-zad the Bear!
I looked at the swaying shoulders, at the paunch’s swag and swing,
And my heart was touched with pity for the monstrous, pleading thing.
A Tennessee man builds a massive cross, soaks it in fuel, attaches to it gunpowder-filled shells, and ignites it in front of the home that his white niece shares with her n-word, and he does it “to protect his family,” but he denies that the race of the n-word had anything to do with his actions.
Now little girls with Barbie dolls will be taught that the ideal mate for Barbie ought not to look like her. In the real world, white women who marry Negroes are 12.4 times more likely to be murdered.
We wrote earlier about the difference between Negroes and Irish. Blacks, being of low intelligence, fuel their resentment against whites by believing tall tales about their compulsory transatlantic voyage being the worst tragedy in history, second only to the Holohoax. One of the most absurd examples of this was when Congressman Major Owens claimed, on the floor of the U.S. Congress, that so many slaves were thrown overboard from the slave ships (a hundred million, he said) that sharks continue to swim the route to this day. But as Rushdoony taught, what the slaves endured was relatively comfortable for the time. Hundreds of years later, blacks are still squealing for reparations. The Irish, conversely, acquit themselves like men. Resentment over loss can be understandable, but while blacks have agitated for government theft to fund their laziness, the Irish have helped build America.
Acquirit qui tuetur.
“He obtains who defends.”
In 1803 we sailed out to sea
Out from the sweet town of Derry.
For Australia bound if we didn’t all drown
And the marks of our fetters we carried.
In the rusty iron chains we sighed for our wains
As our good wives we left in sorrow.
As the mainsails unfurled our curses we hurled
On the English and thoughts of tomorrow.
Oh Oh Oh Oh I wish I was back home in Derry.
Oh Oh Oh Oh I wish I was back home in Derry.
At the mouth of the Foyle, bid farewell to the soil
As down below decks we were lying.
O’Doherty’s scream jibbered out from a dream
Of a vision of bold Robert dying.
The sun burned cruel as we dished out the gruel,
Dan O’Connor was down with a fever.
Sixty rebels today bound for Botany Bay,
How many will reach there this even?
I cursed them to hell as our bow fought the swell.
Our ship danced like a moth in the firelights.
White horses rode high as the devil passed by
Taking souls to Hades by twilight.
Five weeks out to sea we were now forty-three,
Our comrades we buried each morning.
In our own slime we were lost in a time,
Endless night without dawning.
Oh Oh Oh Oh I wish I was back home in Derry.
Oh Oh Oh Oh I wish I was back home in Derry.
Van Diemen’s land is a hell for a man
To live out his life in slavery.
When the climate is raw and the gun makes the law
Neither wind nor rain cares for bravery.
Twenty years have gone by and I’ve ended me bond
And comrades’ ghosts are behind me.
A rebel I came and I’ll die the same.
On the cold winds of night you will find me.
Oh Oh Oh Oh I wish I was back home in Derry.
Oh Oh Oh Oh I wish I was back home in Derry.
Miss Ireland is an adulteress. I’m sure her parents are proud.
A gold mine of Rushdoony lectures. Prepare to be learned.
Egypt got tired of waiting for Israel to be wiped off the map, so they went ahead and did it, literally.
RT has done what the American Jewmedia will never do: interview Michael Hoffman.
“Every six hours we have another billion-dollar deficit” from the Jew-squeeze on Libya alone. (It’s not a war, says Obama, but rather a “kinetic military action.”)
Even as the issuer of Liberty Dollars is convicted of “conspiracy against the United States” in Charlotte, a North Carolina legislator wants the state to soften the impending collapse of the dollar by establishing an alternative currency backed by gold and silver.
The First Bank of the United States was established for twenty years to finance Revolutionary War debt. The Second Bank was established almost immediately afterwards to finance debt for the War of 1812, but it also failed to survive its limited charter because Andrew Jackson swore to kill it, and he did.
It took more than a decade for the bankers to recover from this defeat, organize the Republican Party, and agitate for war upon the South, which was the great enemy of centralized bankers. As we all know, the banksters had the consummate victory. They loaned money to the United States to make war upon the Confederate States, and then they loaned more money to rebuild the country’s infrastructure. The income tax became necessary to pay interest on these loans. Both North and South were enslaved. The debt has never been paid off because debt entrenches the power of the managerial class, as Keynes taught. In other words, the government jewed the people in the same way that bankers jewed the government.
But remember that the rationale for the central banks was that states were issuing their own currency, and so the U.S. Congress had no way of regulating interstate commerce. Taxes weren’t easy to collect either. Now we’re very close to seeing the dollar collapse, and those who try to place real value behind the promise to pay for goods and services are being convicted of “conspiracy against the United States.” This is because the “United States” is a corporate appendage of the Jew-banks and no longer represents the American tribe of the white race.