We couldn’t be prouder of our friend Dan Brannan for leading a protest in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, where the Hindu god Ganesha is on public display. Here’s how it’s done.
You can see that the reporter accuses silly Christians of getting worked up about “art,” but the very second after some Jew protests the display of a nativity scene on public property, the same reporter will furrow his brow and express grave concerns over what is obviously a violation of the establishment clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution. Even the moronic director of the Constitution Party, for which Dan is a local chairman, is critical of the protest of idolatry, saying that it has no political value.
Here’s Dan’s side of the story, which includes a glimpse into how timid our people have become, as well as an excellent history lesson for all the liberals who deny that ours is a Christian country and who regard the display of pagan deities as “art.”
The art of Daniel Brannan. Support a real artist like Dan by purchasing a print or two.
Now, I’m not saying that a friend of ours did this to the statue of Ganesha, but I ain’t sayin’ he didn’t either:
You might remember Pat Robertson saying, six years ago, that ”Europe is right now in the midst of racial suicide because of the declining birth rate.” This was a shocking admission because race is not supposed to matter to Judeochristians, and Europe has more people than ever. Now look at this graph, from this article, coupled with the fact that 83.5% of all suicides are of whites (outnumbering white homicides by a factor of six), to get a feel for the level of desperation among whites. (The happiest countries are homogeneous.) When people are this desperate, they don’t want to have children. They are in a state of decline that only faith in their Redeemer, and a renewed love for kith and kin, can counteract. I was thinking of this when I saw that Alternative Right has published yet another laudatory article on Nietzsche, bringing the number of recent articles on the man to 27. And this is a website that has only existed for two years. But Nietzsche will not save the West; nor will Yockey nor Spengler nor any other masturbator. Only our Lord Jesus Christ will save the West, but not before He purges it of a lot of dead weight.
And the award for toughest immigration law in the country goes to…Sweet Home Alabama! The SPLC is in hysterics, calling the new law ”mean-spirited, racist, unconstitutional, and…costly,” which means, of course, that it makes perfect sense and will save the state a fortune. Wetbacks are even now high-tailing it for Tennessee and North Carolina. Stop subsidizing failure and you’ll have less of it.
The Methodist, Episcopal, Lutheran, and Roman Catholic churches have officially denounced the law as being contrary to the biblical mandate to care for neighbors and show hospitality to strangers. (Judeochristians are apparently incapable of helping anyone but politically equal citizens.) Baptists haven’t taken a position on the law yet, probably because the governor is a baptist, but you can guess how they’ll come down on it. They just had their annual convention in Arizona, and they passed a resolution that calls for “a just and compassionate path to legal status” for illegal immigrants. Language was added to say that this is not amnesty, but of course it is precisely amnesty. This is why Arizona was chosen for the convention. They even call enforcement of the law “nativism, mistreatment, [and] exploitation.” As a friend of ours says, “Modern Bapists (and most other Christians) have simply improved on God. They are nicer than God who did not measure up to their standards.”
Southern Baptists have also elected their first black VP, specifically for the purpose of making the leadership more “diverse.”
He comes from a New Orleans megachurch that began as all-white in the 1940s but was surrendered to blacks during the White Flight of the 1970s. As Richard Land says of the entire denomination, ”About 30 years ago we were virtually all white – by intention, sadly but true.” Now look at the miscegenation in this advertisement from the largest Southern Baptist church in the world. As our baptist friend James Edwards says, “We’re better people than this, and our faith deserves to have better stewards.”
“In 1965, New Covenant Presbyterian Church was the first church in Miami established specifically to encourage integration. It prompted glowing stories of its integration. By 2006, it had only one white member.” ~ Jared Taylor, White Identity, p. 45
What is a nation? Pat Buchanan answers (Oct. 20, 2006):
One idea is that we are united by our belief in equality and democracy and free markets. The other idea is of blood and soil, the idea that we are a separate and unique people among all the peoples of the earth, that we are united by history and heroes and holidays and language and literature and culture. And all these things together make us a different and unique people among the peoples of the earth. And this is what is threatened by a mass invasion, frankly, of strangers in our country… And I think there’s a sense on the part of the American people that somehow we are ceasing to be a country. We are like some giant mall, and nothing holds us together any more – not language, literature, beliefs, or faith, or anything.
“Kinism is not an ideology, it is a life force arising out of the memory and investigation of the neglected traditions of our fathers, those pre-modern traditions that more closely resembled the mutual understandings of the ancient Western church.”
Kevin DeAnna had a good appearance on RT. We like Kevin a lot, but I started to worry when he was asked to define Western Civilization. The reason I worry is because you will typically not hear from the pro-white movement at large what you will hear from Kinists, which could be summed up in two words: “white” and “Christian.” Kevin’s first answer led me to believe that he was going to flub it. He said that Western Civilization is “that cultural core, that thing we all have in common.” But he saved the day when pressed to elaborate; he said it is “a compound of several different influences, including the classical tradition, the Christian tradition, and the indigenous folk traditions of the European peoples.” This is an outstanding answer because it passes the “white” and “Christian” test. The only criticism I have is minor. Our enemies will easily interpret these words as “white” and “Christian,” and therefore the words might as well be said for the sake of simplicity and clarity. But Kevin’s answer is actually better because it takes into account our entire history, from the pre-Christian era to modern folkways. We Kinists would only stress that our nation has been baptized into Jesus Christ, and so, equipped with this long history, we will either be covenant-keepers or covenant-breakers. There is no neutrality.
Joel Courtney has the leading role in the new Spielberg/Abrams film, Super 8. His father is Dale Courtney, who belongs to Doug Wilson’s church, and is a longtime defender of Wilson, the Reichsführer of the Palouse. On his defunct blog, Right Mind, Dale used to post sexual comics of an interracial couple. Here’s one where the white woman gets topless for her buck and has her butt cheeks hanging out. Here’s a postcoital scene of the same characters. Oh, those Wilsonian Kirkers! Such an artsy bunch.
An Eastern Orthodox delegate tells the PCUSA General Assembly that they are no longer presbyterians but have in fact tried to invent a new religion.
Uh-oh. Something’s coming over me… I think my feet have the spirit!
Meanwhile, here are some other PCA geniuses who can’t understand why Korean presbyterians like their own language and want their own churches. The first law of whiter-people is that everyone should be a whiter-person. Lane Keister proves it with this comment:
I have to admit that I also am baffled by the existence of the KLP [Korean Language Presbyteries]. I can certainly understand it as a stop-gap measure that would prevent the language barrier from being an issue so that they could actually be Presbyterian. But the ongoing existence of these Presbyteries is an admission of defeat that we cannot overcome the language barrier. Surely the standards have been translated into Korean by now! There are many Koreans who are completely fluent in both English and Korean. Why couldn’t we simply erect a Korean secretary who would be responsible for translating the GA minutes into Korean every year, and who would also be responsible for translating the standards into Korean if that has not already been done? Then, as Andy says, integrate the KLP into the English-speaking Presbyteries as they become fluent in English. This can happen gradually, one church at a time, perhaps.
The second law of whiter-people is that everyone must communicate in English, the language of whiter-people. Another asks, with a straight face:
Shall the Korean Presbyteries be won over through acts of love, encouragement and charity to join with their English-speaking brothers or [be] forced to submit to integration whether they like it or not?
Elsewhere, RC Sproul Jr, Master of the False Choice, writes:
We have to have more children before the west is overrun. Though the west has been profoundly blessed by the impact of the gospel, it is the gospel, not the west that matters. We don’t need more white children; we need more covenant children. We don’t need more Americans; we need more Christians. We don’t need more Republicans; we need more citizens of the kingdom of God.
So the West is being overrun, but we should not care about this because we happen to believe that the West matters, or that a white West matters, or even that America matters. Our only concern should be that we are not overrun by those who are not Christians. Find just one Christian who lived prior to 1950 who believed what Sproul the Lesser writes here, and I’ll eat my Scofield Rapture Bible. If this is what they mean by Semper Reformanda, they can shove it.
“Before the Flood God did not cut out the Adamic apostates or the Cainitic murderers, but at the Flood He did cut out the mixed civilization of the Sethite compromisers. The great sin of the Sethites in Genesis 6:1-3 was that they intermarried with the Cainites, thereby giving the spiritual strength and vitality of the Church to the forces of wickedness. The result was a disastrous mixed civilization. After the Flood God allowed Adamic apostates to live, but cut out the Cainitic murderers by instituting capital punishment, preventing mixed civilizations.” ~ James Jordan
Abraham Kuyper affirmed the curse of Canaan (Lectures on Calvinism: The Stone Lectures of 1898):
From the high-lands of Asia our human race came down in groups, and these in turn have been divided into races and nations; and in entire conformity to the prophetic blessing of Noah the children of Shem and of Japheth have been the sole bearers of the development of the race. No impulse for any higher life has ever gone forth from the third group.
Christians today love to complain about the curse of Canaan as a theological conclusion, but no one can deny the truth of what is stated here about Hamites.
In China it can be asserted with equal right that Confucianism has produced a form of its own for life in a given circle, and with the Mongolian race that form of life rests upon a theory of its own. But what has China done for humanity in general, and for the steady development of our race? Even so far as the waters of its life were clear, they formed nothing but an isolated lake. Almost the same remark applies to the high development which was once the boast of India and to the state of things in Mexico and Peru in the days of Montezuma and the Incas. In all these regions the people attained a high degree of development, but stopped there and, remaining isolated, in no way proved a benefit to humanity at large. This applies more strongly still to the life of the colored races on the coast and in the interior of Africa; a far lower form of existence reminding us not even of a lake but rather of pools and marshes.
The problem with Kuyper, as John Marshall states in the article, is that he became an advocate of blood mixture, as long as the right kind of blood was mixed. In the quote above, you can see him blame the rest of the world’s failure to act white on “isolation.” He believed that admixture would result in a “higher perfection” to a “richer type,” which is the now-thoroughly debunked theory of hybrid vigor. As John also states, the very history of Rome contradicts the theory.
Still, Kuyper was an important figure. He was Prime Minister of the Netherlands more than a hundred years ago, but he was a far greater influence upon the world in the realm of theology. His Calvinism was marked by a rejection of dualism and the embrace of sphere sovereignty, in which no one area of life is sovereign over another. Church, state, and family are competent in their own (sometimes overlapping) jurisdictions. None of these should seek totalitarian control or regulation of human activity outside its own limited sphere of competence. Therefore, Kuyper wisely rejected both the French idea of rights deriving from the individual and the German idea of rights deriving from the state. This led to a reform of the roles of church and state in the Netherlands. Kuyper required office holders to affirm the standards of the Dutch Reformed Church, and he fought liberalism within the church. He famously said, “[T]here is not a square inch in the whole domain of our human existence over which Christ, who is Sovereign over all, does not cry: ‘Mine!’” He was a great influence on Francis Schaeffer, Cornelius Van Til, and R.J. Rushdoony, but perhaps his greatest legacy was in South Africa, where he inspired Christian Nationalism (i.e., institutional Kinism by another name) and the identification of the Afrikaner Dutch Calvinists as the kern der natie (core of the nation). It was this Christian Nationalism working through the Gereformeerde Kerk that brought South Africa to life again following the Boer War. The Kuyperians of the Afrikaner Broederbond established Apartheid, and all officials of the Afrikaner National Party swore oaths affirming the “sovereignty and guidance of God in the destiny of countries and peoples” and to “seek the development of South Africa’s life along Christian-National lines.”
Here’s what has happened to South Africa since the overthrow of this Christian order.
Meredith Kline, the father of “two kingdom” theology, was a Jew. Unlike Kuyper, Kline believed that the kingdom of God is the Church, which is in line with the thinking of most Christians today, who falsely believe that the only race worthy of consideration is the “race” of the Church.
Some relevant remarks from our very wise friend and mentor, who is quoted here often:
One of the problems in creating White cohesion in America is that Whites who chose to come here…were willing to leave their villages and homes, their kindred, their countries…for economic advantage. Personality patterns are probably affected by genetics. If that is so, America has an unusual amount of anti-social, individualistic genes in its gene pool. These are people descended from ancestors for whom family, society, country, language and religion were secondary values. It is a hard task to induce such people to think and act as a team. I used to believe the propaganda I heard that the French Huguenots were different because they came here with no choice. They had to be killed or convert…or leave France. But even with such people we are still confronted with a pattern of behavior in which quarrels over how many sacraments there are, transubstantiation, and the validity of the Pope’s claim to head the Christian Church were more important to the French Huguenots than liaising and meshing with their neighbors amidst whom their ancestors had lived for hundreds of years. Granted, the situation with refugees like the French Huguenots is somewhat different than other immigrants who only came here for comfort and economic advancement, but at the core you still find this pattern of anti-social inclinations, i.e., placing ideas about religion far above being French.
This strikes at the heart for every Reformed Christian. Despite being in possession of priceless Reformed theology, the Reformed are among the most uncooperative and divisive people you will ever meet in your life. They will always place ideas, both good and bad, above the most basic necessities of true religion, being the care and stewardship of our own people. See James McDonald, for instance.
Meet Stinnet Ballew, a fundamentalist baptist who shrieks like a black preacher but nevertheless makes some good Kinist points about Scripture, if you can stand to listen to all eight minutes of it. This frankenfamily clearly needs someone to yell at them:
“The question which haunts the dialectical culture is this: how to have unity without totally undifferentiated and meaningless oneness? If all things are basically one, the differences are meaningless, divisions false, and definitions are sophistications, in that the tyranny, or destiny, of oneness is the truth of all being. But, if all things are basically many, and if plurality is ultimate, then the world dissolves into unrelated particulars and becomes, as some thinkers insist, not a universe but a multiverse. And every atom is in a sense its own law and being. The first leads to the breakdown of differences and the liberty of atomistic individualism and particularity; the second is the breakdown of fundamental law into nihilism and the retreat of men and their parts into isolated and private universes.” ~ R.J. Rushdoony, The One and the Many
Alan Keyes demonstrates why even the best of blacks cannot be relied upon to understand federalism, republicanism, and constitutionalism. In America, their identity as citizens is bound to an illegal and tyrannical usurpation of power by Lincoln followed by an illegal amendment to the Constitution that declared them equal citizens. So to Keyes and all other blacks, the Fourteenth Amendment is simply a restatement of a God-given, inalienable right vouched by the Declaration, not the Constitution. But of course, the Declaration was never intended to be a governing document. Secondly, one line about all men being created equal has nothing to do with citizenship, nor did our founding fathers believe there to be any connection. Thirdly, citizenship is by definition exclusive. There is no possible way to view it as a God-given, inalienable right. But this Negro view of America’s foundational documents is very closely related to the anti-white “Christian” churches today who pretend that we’re not able to preach the gospel and minister to those who are not our political equals.
In this very good article, Hate the Sin and Hate the Sinner, Nil Desperandum attacks Christian clichés and popular falsehoods.
If cleanliness is next to godliness then whiteliness wears a halo.
Businessweek has released a list of the ten most affordable places to live in the country. The places are also rated for quality of life factors like crime, unemployment, “family income, poverty, commute time, air quality, diversity, and share of families with children.” That part about “diversity” is the big joke that Businessweek is hoping you won’t scrutinize, and to throw you off the trail they’ve featured Negroes in the first three pictures on the page. With figures taken from the U.S. Census Bureau, here are the white populations in the top ten:
1. Cass County, North Dakota | 93%
2. Brown County, South Dakota | 95%
3. Cleveland County, Oklahoma | 83%
4. Story County, Iowa | 91%
5. Olmsted County, Minnesota | 89%
6. Onondaga County, New York | 84%
7. Yellowstone County, Montana | 91%
8. Pulaski County, Arkansas | 61%
9. Lafayette Parish, Louisiana | 72%
10. Cumberland County, Maine | 94%
That’s an average of 85% white. In the top five, the average is 90%. (Keep in mind that whites are now 69% of the population of the country as a whole.) Businessweek could have saved the Negro pictures for the next story on brood mares and could have simply told us to go where the white people are. But this is one of the benefits of being a “racist.” You know such things implicitly and can save money on subscriptions to pretentious magazines.
Here’s an alarming statistic: Real estate has fallen by one-third since its peak in 2007, which is greater than the 31% slide when John Steinbeck wrote The Grapes of Wrath. America in 2011 is compared to Rome in 200 AD or Britain on the eve of WWI: “an empire at the zenith of its power but with cracks beginning to show.” What are the warning signs of collapse?
[M]ilitary overstretch, a widening gulf between rich and poor, a hollowed-out economy, citizens using debt to live beyond their means, and once-effective policies no longer working. The high levels of violent crime, epidemic of obesity, addiction to pornography and excessive use of energy may be telling us something: the US is in an advanced state of cultural decadence…
Britain’s decline was extremely rapid after 1914. By 1945, the UK was a bit player in the bipolar world dominated by the US and the Soviet Union, and sterling – the heart of the 19th-century gold standard – was rapidly losing its lustre as a reserve currency. There had been concerns, voiced as far back as the 1851 Great Exhibition, that the hungrier, more efficient producers in Germany and the US threatened Britain’s industrial hegemony. But no serious policy action was taken. In the second half of the 19th century there was a subtle shift in the economy, from the north of England to the south, from manufacturing to finance, from making things to living off investment income. [Usury alert!] By 1914, the writing was on the wall.
We’re now about $100 trillion in debt, and our currency is worthless. China has divested 97% of its Treasury bills, which is a vote of no confidence in the dollar. The writing is on the wall, just as it was in Daniel 5, when King Belshazzar was told that his life had been weighed in the balances and found wanting.
The creator of the TV show COPS confirms what you’ve long suspected, that something is fishy with the casting. It’s all because he believes that the truth will “contribute to negative stereotypes.”
The editor of the Chicago Tribune admits that the race of black criminals is deliberately hidden from the public to “guard against subjecting an entire group of people to suspicion.” Subjecting whites – especially women and children – to risk of murder, rape, and robbery is far less important to liberals than fostering “suspicion.” They would just hate for us to be “suspicious” of the scum they call “youths” or “teens” or Onionesque “area residents.” Here’s the funny thing about this: Isn’t the refusal to draw attention to the race of criminals an implicit suggestion that all young black people in a group are a violent mob?
Negroes are not welcome in pubs in Bangalore, India, for “security reasons.” James writes: “Putting the safety of your citizens ahead of the ‘hurt feelings’ of strangers is a lesson America ought to revisit.”
In Norway, all rapes in the last five years have been committed by non-whites. All that Norwegians had to do to spare their women from being violated is keep the scum out of their country, but asking the white man to love his own is asking too much these days.
Here’s a 2007 murder conviction that was overturned by the Washington Supreme Court because the prosecutor in the case used language that “cast doubt on the credibility of the witnesses based on their race,” and was therefore “racist.” James summarizes: “It appears as though you can now literally get away with murder if a judge believes that the prosecuting lawyer is a ‘racist.’ If doesn’t matter whether or not the suspect on trial actually killed people.”
“You would be incorrect if you claimed that the Scarlet Pimpernel only existed in the imagination of Baroness Orczy. He exists in the spirit of every European who refuses to allow colored barbarians to torture and kill other Europeans. Christian chivalry was embodied in Nathan Bedford Forrest, the first Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan; in Henry Havelock, the British avenger of Cawnpore and liberator of Lucknow; and in Andries Pretorious, the hero of Blood River, who led the punitive expedition against the Zulus after they massacred Piet Retief and his followers. The Scarlet Pimpernel is a true myth; he is the embodiment of the antique European’s vision of the proper response to bloody tyranny and the murder of the innocents. The response must be non-democratic – no petitions against murder and torture to a people addicted to murder and torture – and it must be violent if violence has been used against one’s people.” ~ CWNY
During Black Bike Week in Myrtle Beach, crime increases by 400%. The NAACP is now suing the city because business owners close shop when blacks invade the town. Can you believe those racist business owners?
“Unruly crowds” make life unbearable for whites.
McDonald’s gets tough on crime following the company’s support of 365Black.
Here’s a good example of the ignorance of Americans. John C. Calhoun was the last of our founding fathers, and his Disquisition and Discourse books are the very finest works on the Constitution ever produced in this country. You can’t honestly leave Calhoun’s name out of the company of men like Jefferson, Adams, Madison, and Mason. But because the South viewed Calhoun’s doctrines to be vitally important to the survival of federalism, some clown in Minnesota is doing his best to change the name of Lake Calhoun, saying that Calhoun was the “primo bigot” during the era of slavery.
“…[W]e are enjoined to celebrate a kind of reverse-Confucianism. Instead of worshipping our ancestors, we are told we must worship the men and women of the future, who will be clean and pure because they will be black and brown. The black Übermensch is the liberals’ god, because he is the embodiment of a future state of bliss. In this state of bliss there will be no imperfection because the sinful, imperfect race, the white race, will have ceased to exist.” ~ CWNY
Read The Noble Savage (1853) by Charles Dickens.
To come to the point at once, I beg to say that I have not the least belief in the Noble Savage. I consider him a prodigious nuisance, and an enormous superstition. His calling rum fire-water, and me a pale face, wholly fail to reconcile me to him. I don’t care what he calls me. I call him a savage, and I call a savage a something highly desirable to be civilised off the face of the earth. I think a mere gent [short for indigent; in this context a bum] (which I take to be the lowest form of civilisation) better than a howling, whistling, clucking, stamping, jumping, tearing savage.
This is what white people now call athletics.
It is all one to me, whether he sticks a fish-bone through his visage, or bits of trees through the lobes of his ears, or bird’s feathers in his head; whether he flattens his hair between two boards, or spreads his nose over the breadth of his face, or drags his lower lip down by great weights, or blackens his teeth, or knocks them out, or paints one cheek red and the other blue, or tattoos himself, or oils himself, or rubs his body with fat, or crimps it with knives.
Or wears his cap backwards, or lets his pants ride low, or cuts designs into his afro, or wears earrings and “bling,” or makes his false teeth sparkle, etc.
Yielding to whichsoever of these agreeable eccentricities, he is a savage – cruel, false, thievish, murderous; addicted more or less to grease, entrails, and beastly customs; a wild animal with the questionable gift of boasting; a conceited, tiresome, bloodthirsty, monotonous humbug.
There has been precious little improvement, despite centuries of Christian tutelage.
Yet it is extraordinary to observe how some people will talk about him, as they talk about the good old times; how they will regret his disappearance, in the course of this world’s development, from such and such lands where his absence is a blessed relief and an indispensable preparation for the sowing of the very first seeds of any influence that can exalt humanity; how, even with the evidence of himself before them, they will either be determined to believe, or will suffer themselves to be persuaded into believing, that he is something which their five senses tell them he is not.
This is the perfect description of most Christians today, and especially Christian women, which is pretty much the same as saying Christian pastors. They are possessed of a romantic view of the Noble Savage, which is the point of this 160-year-old essay. The savage is so noble that he must now be taken into white, Christian families and granted equal status with the blood heirs.
There was Mr. Catlin, some few years ago, with his Ojibbeway Indians. Mr. Catlin was an energetic, earnest man, who had lived among more tribes of Indians than I need reckon up here, and who had written a picturesque and glowing book about them. With his party of Indians squatting and spitting on the table before him, or dancing their miserable jigs after their own dreary manner, he called, in all good faith, upon his civilised audience to take notice of their symmetry and grace, their perfect limbs, and the exquisite expression of their pantomime; and his civilised audience, in all good faith, complied and admired.
Behold the Alienist. Him soar with buzzards. Heap big wampum when he squats.
Whereas, as mere animals, they were wretched creatures, very low in the scale and very poorly formed; and as men and women possessing any power of truthful dramatic expression by means of action, they were no better than the chorus at an Italian Opera in England – and would have been worse if such a thing were possible.
In other words, they are spectacles, which is why they predominate in the performing arts. But as every survey continues to prove, they are never considered to be exemplars of grace and beauty. Even when they are “rather picturesque to the eye,” wrote Dickens, they are “far from odoriferous to the nose.”
Mine are no new views of the noble savage. The greatest writers on natural history found him out long ago. Buffon knew what he was, and showed why he is the sulky tyrant that he is to his women, and how it happens (Heaven be praised!) that his race is spare in numbers.
Dickens affirms that a low Negro population is a blessing from God, and a large Negro population is a curse. This was how blacks felt about their witch doctors.
When the noble savage finds himself a little unwell, and mentions the circumstance to his friends, it is immediately perceived that he is under the influence of witchcraft.
Then a bystander, or someone who has offended the local witch doctor, or is indebted to him, is involuntarily sacrificed on behalf of the infirm.
Dickens touches upon the question of animal husbandry, which every white person understands implicitly. The most obvious evidence that the human nature is higher than that of a brute is the caretaking of animals, especially of “man’s best friend.” While it seems that almost every white person in the world owns at least one dog or cat, blacks have Michael Vick, and mestizos have cockfighting.
For evidence of the quality of his moral nature, pass himself for a moment and refer to his “faithful dog.” Has he ever improved a dog, or attached [to] a dog…? Or does the animal that is the friend of man, always degenerate in his low society?
It is not the miserable nature of the noble savage that is the new thing; it is the whimpering over him with maudlin admiration, and the affecting to regret him, and the drawing of any comparison of advantage between the blemishes of civilisation and the tenor of his swinish life. There may have been a change now and then in those diseased absurdities, but there is none in him.
In other words, the real problem with the Noble Savage mythology is not the savage himself. The problem is the white liberal who promotes the religion of equality, thereby wrecking Christian civilization. Notice that Dickens charges him with foolishly comparing “the blemishes of civilisation” with “the tenor of [the Negro's] swinish life.” A good example of this is that the citing of Negro crime statistics is sure to be followed these days by a preacher reminding his flock, in doleful cadence, that fifteen hundred years ago our ancestors painted their buttocks blue and ate each other. The truth of the tale is irrelevant! The point of the Schwertlian exercise is to show that everyone is violent, and therefore everyone is the same, and therefore the Negro crime wave ought to be ignored.
The “general stamping, ramping, and raving” in “Zulu Kaffirland” is “remarkable (as everything in savage life is) for its dire uniformity,” Dickens writes.
The noble savage sets a king to reign over him, to whom he submits his life and limbs without a murmur or question, and whose whole life is passed chin deep in a lake of blood; but who, after killing incessantly, is in his turn killed by his relations and friends, the moment a grey hair appears on his head. All the noble savage’s wars with his fellow-savages (and he takes no pleasure in anything else) are wars of extermination – which is the best thing I know of him, and the most comfortable to my mind when I look at him. He has no moral feelings of any kind, sort, or description; and his “mission” may be summed up as simply diabolical.
Quite obviously, Christian faith, or at least exposure to it, has improved the lot of the Negro, but it has not removed from him his predisposition. Some things might now be worse. He is still a “sulky tyrant…to his women,” all the more so because his women have the upper hand in a matriarchy subsidized by white taxpayers who never cease to whimper over him with maudlin admiration. Previously, he haggled for a wife as he might haggle for a bushel of potatoes in the market.
The ceremonies with which he faintly diversifies his life are, of course, of a kindred nature. If he wants a wife he appears before the kennel of the gentleman whom he has selected for his father-in-law, attended by a party of male friends of a very strong flavour, who screech and whistle and stamp an offer of so many cows for the young lady’s hand. The chosen father-in-law – also supported by a high-flavoured party of male friends – screeches, whistles, and yells (being seated on the ground, he can’t stamp) that there never was such a daughter in the market as his daughter, and that he must have six more cows. The son-in-law and his select circle of backers screech, whistle, stamp, and yell in reply, that they will give three more cows. The father-in-law (an old deluder, overpaid at the beginning) accepts four, and rises to bind the bargain. The whole party, the young lady included, then falling into epileptic convulsions, and screeching, whistling, stamping, and yelling together – and nobody taking any notice of the young lady (whose charms are not to be thought of without a shudder) – the noble savage is considered married, and his friends make demoniacal leaps at him by way of congratulation…
I always have to reach for my handkerchief when the Righteous Brothers sing Unchained Melody.
The women being at work in the fields, hoeing the Indian corn, and the noble savage being asleep in the shade, the chief has sometimes the condescension to come forth, and lighten the labour by looking at it. On these occasions, he seats himself in his own savage chair, and is attended by his shield-bearer: who holds over his head a shield of cowhide – in shape like an immense mussel shell – fearfully and wonderfully, after the manner of a theatrical supernumerary. But lest the great man should forget his greatness in the contemplation of the humble works of agriculture, there suddenly rushes in a poet, retained for the purpose, called a Praiser. This literary gentleman wears a leopard’s head over his own, and a dress of tigers’ tails; he has the appearance of having come express on his hind legs from the Zoological Gardens; and he incontinently strikes up the chief’s praises, plunging and tearing all the while.
It sounds like Oprah Winfrey’s final week of shows.
There is a frantic wickedness in this brute’s manner of worrying the air, and gnashing out, “O what a delightful chief he is! O what a delicious quantity of blood he sheds! O how majestically he laps it up! O how charmingly cruel he is! O how he tears the flesh of his enemies and crunches the bones! O how like the tiger and the leopard and the wolf and the bear he is! O, row row row row, how fond I am of him!” which might tempt the Society of Friends [Abolitionist do-gooders] to charge at a hand-gallop into the Swartz-Kop location and exterminate the whole kraal.
Shaka Zulu, the most powerful king in all of southern Africa, murdered 7,000 of his subjects when his mother died, then for a period of one year, murdered every pregnant woman in the kingdom along with her husband. Peter Brimelow writes that he killed “all his concubines’ children, sometimes with his own hands…[and] sliced open a hundred pregnant women to satisfy a fleeting interest in embryology.” At the very least, he could have been an affirmative action candidate for Vanderbilt’s obstetrics program.
No Just War Theory for these folks.
When war is afoot among the noble savages – which is always – the chief holds a council to ascertain whether it is the opinion of his brothers and friends in general that the enemy shall be exterminated. On this occasion, after the performance of an Umsebeuza, or war song – which is exactly like all the other songs [and probably played with the vuvuzela] – the chief makes a speech to his brothers and friends, arranged in single file. No particular order is observed during the delivery of this address, but every gentleman who finds himself excited by the subject, instead of crying “Hear, hear!” as is the custom with us, darts from the rank and tramples out the life, or crushes the skull, or mashes the face, or scoops out the eyes, or breaks the limbs, or performs a whirlwind of atrocities on the body, of an imaginary enemy.
It’s revival week down at the Keepin’ It Real Worship Center!
Several gentlemen becoming thus excited at once, and pounding away without the least regard to the orator, that illustrious person is rather in the position of an orator in an Irish House of Commons. But, several of these scenes of savage life bear a strong generic resemblance to an Irish election, and I think would be extremely well received and understood at Cork.
In all these ceremonies the noble savage holds forth to the utmost possible extent about himself; from which (to turn him to some civilised account) we may learn, I think, that as egotism is one of the most offensive and contemptible littlenesses a civilised man can exhibit, so it is really incompatible with the interchange of ideas; inasmuch as if we all talked about ourselves we should soon have no listeners, and must be all yelling and screeching at once on our own separate accounts: making society hideous. It is my opinion that if we retained in us anything of the noble savage, we could not get rid of it too soon.
While compared to our race, blacks seem to demonstrate what is, on its face, an admirable racial cohesion, we find that it actually bears no resemblance to white Kinism because it is founded upon selfishness and narcissism. As Dickens makes clear, it is incompatible with federalism, or even the small-scale democracy of pre-Christian Athenians or Germanic tribes. Yet we make these people voters, granting them the right to determine our own future, foolishly believing that they share with us a sense of cooperation and fair play. Genes are not so pliable. Now our own people are convinced that federalism must give way to imperialism, and our national borders must give way along with it, simply because savages were once held in slavery, their natural estate. Through willful acceptance of despotism, our own people have become savages and slaves.
The endurance of despotism is one great distinguishing mark of a savage always. The improving world has quite got the better of that too…
My position is, that if we have anything to learn from the Noble Savage, it is what to avoid. His virtues are a fable; his happiness is a delusion; his nobility, nonsense.
We have no greater justification for being cruel to the miserable object, than for being cruel to a William Shakespeare or an Isaac Newton; but he passes away before an immeasurably better and higher power than ever ran wild in any earthly woods, and the world will be all the better when his place knows him no more.
Dickens! We shall not see his like again. He correctly believed that Harriet Beecher Stowe’s influential novel, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, reached “a very overstrained conclusion and a very violent extreme, and a damaging absurdity to the slave himself, to set up the Colored race as capable ever of subduing the White. I pointed this out to Mrs. Stowe herself, who replied to me that she had not that intention. In her execution, however, I still think it to be there.”
Satoshi Kanazawa, who published in Psychology Today the unsurprising fact that most people consider black women to be the least attractive of all women, has been fired. That didn’t take long. But I will say that Weezy Jefferson looks good for her age:
Well, it turns out that the old study about racial differences in human skull size that, with much fanfare, was decidedly “refuted” by Dr. Stephen Jay Gould, was actually 100% correct.
In his book, The Mismeasure of Man, Gould tried to show that there are really no biological differences among the races of mankind. Anthropologists now “conclude that almost every detail of his analysis is wrong… Gould’s own analysis of Morton is likely the stronger example of a bias influencing results.” Too bad, so sad. Better luck next time, evolutionary religious zealots.
Geneticists have also discovered the gene that produces skin color, and it’s different in white people than it is in other races. “Nearly all humans of European descent have a version of the gene [that produces a protein critical for melanin] with one type of amino acid, threonine; nearly everyone else has another, alanine.”
After years of searching, the SPLC has finally found a group of black people who are being abused, but sadly for them, not by whites. They are suing an overwhelmingly black school, run by blacks, in an overwhelmingly black district, run by black administrators. Let’s blame it on racism.
The mascot of the University of California, Riverside, is ethnically Scottish, but the student body is 8% Black, 40% Asian, 29% Mestizo, 17% White, and 6% Other. Despite blacks being only 8% of the student body, they are 92% of the men’s basketball team. A conservative group called Exposing Leftists petitioned for affirmative action to be applied to the basketball team, and hilarity ensued as liberals stuttered that sports should be based on skill but academics should not, and anyone who disagrees is a racist. Why do students receive grades then?
In a survey of more than two dozen colleges and universities, “50% of students did not take a single course requiring more than 20 pages of writing [i.e., no more than two ten-page papers], 32% did not have any classes that required reading more than 40 pages per week, and 36% reported studying alone five or fewer hours per week… [T]he students in our study who reported studying alone five or fewer hours per week nevertheless had an average cumulative GPA of 3.16.” This confirms that institutions of higher learning have become costly degree mills.
“The German universities came into their own as the voice of the kingdom with Lutheran revolt, apart from which German universities cannot be understood. As Rosenstock-Huessy has pointed out, ‘the universities became the heirs of the bishop’s chair, the cathedra. The professor’s chair was called ‘Katheder.’ The university became the representative of the Holy Ghost in the German nation, and princes were only ‘God’s hangmen and jailers.’ The salvation-character of scholarship, utterly foreign to the rest of the world, is the religious key to the political building erected by the Reformation in Germany. Petrine authority over the visible life of the Church was given to the prince, but Pauline authority, over the spirit, and the right of inspiration, interpretation, and instruction belonged to the university. The university determined the nature of law, and the prince assumed its operation.” ~ R.J. Rushdoony, The Politics of Guilt and Pity, p. 276
Fred Reed is a gifted writer. Here he appraises the warmongering good ole boys in the Army of Jay-zuss. Fred married a mestizo, but we can’t all be perfect.
Our friend Chad defines “Judeo-Christians” thusly: “Intellectual schizophrenics that high-five each other when Israelis shoot Palestinians crossing the 1967 borders, but recoil in horror when American nationalists even suggest denying welfare to illegal aliens.”
A list of differences between Christians and pagans.
A friend of ours who works for a homeschool curriculum company received a call recently from an irate homeschooling mother. The woman had worked herself into a froth because the seventh grade language arts course has a section on “the novel,” and the two books required for study in this section are The Diary of Anne Frank and The Hiding Place. (That’s right, of all the great novels written in the history of the West, this is what Christian homeschoolers are studying.) The woman exclaimed, “I’m sure that you and your company don’t mean to be anti-Semitic, but ma’am, those books are not novels. Those are the truth! How can you hide from that fact?!” This reminds me of when NBC aired Schindler’s List in 1997 during primetime, uninterrupted by commercials, unedited, with nudity and all. This was An Important Moment in broadcast history. Who would dare call it fiction?
Many of the Jews in our country emigrated from Russia in the late 19th century. Jews allege that they were persecuted by Christians and were the victims of unprovoked pogroms, but as usual, this was a lie. In 1881, Alexander III, also known as Alexander the Peacemaker, became the Tsar after his father was assassinated, and he issued this statement:
For some time the government has given its attention to the Jews and to their relations the rest of the inhabitants of the empire, with the view of ascertaining the sad condition of the Christian inhabitants brought about by the conduct of the Jews in business matters…
During the last twenty years, the Jews have gradually possessed themselves of not only every trade and business in all its branches, but also of a great part of the land by buying or farming it. With few exceptions, they have, as a body, devoted their attention not to enriching or benefiting the country, but to defrauding by their wiles its inhabitants, and particularly its poor inhabitants. This conduct of theirs has called forth protests on the part of the people, as manifested in acts of violence and robbery. The government, while on the one hand doing its best to put down the disturbances and to deliver the Jews from oppression and slaughter, have also, on the other hand, thought it a matter of urgency and justice to adopt stringent measures in order to put an end to the oppression practiced by the Jews on the inhabitants, and to free the country from their malpractices, which were, as is known, the cause of the agitation.
With this view, it has appointed Commissions (in all the towns inhabited by Jews), whose duty it is to inquire into the following matters:
1. What are the trades of the Jews which are injurious to the inhabitants of the place?
2. What makes it impracticable to put into force the former laws limiting the rights of the Jews in the matter of buying and farming land, the trade in intoxicants and usury?
3. How can those laws be altered so that they shall no longer be enabled to evade them, or what new laws are required to stop their pernicious conduct in business?
4. Give (besides the answers to the foregoing questions) the following additional information:
(a) On the usury practised by the Jews in their dealings with Christians, in cities, towns, and villages.
(b) The number of public-houses kept by Jews in their own name, or in that of a Christian.
(c) The number of persons in service with Jews, or under their control.
(d) The extent (acreage) of the land in their possession, by buying or farming.
(e) The number of Jewish agriculturists.
In addition to the above-named information to be supplied, every Commission is empowered to report on such conduct and action of the Jews as may have a local interest and importance, and to submit the same to the Ministry.
Notice the difference between Alexander’s care for the poor among his people and Norway giving rapists free access to young girls. This tells you all you need to know about democracy.
Because of their parasitical usury, Alexander banned Jews even from rural areas and shtetls within the Pale of Settlement, which included much of present-day Lithuania, Belarus, Poland, Moldova, Ukraine, and parts of western Russia. Of course, you won’t learn any of this by watching Fiddler on the Roof, although I do like the Sabbath Prayer in that movie.
Alexander III was succeeded by his son, Nicholas II, who was murdered with his wife and five children in 1918 at the command of Jew Yakov Yurovsky, and the Soviet Union was plunged into 70 years of darkness.
“They [international Jews] start wars by propaganda which sets one people against another. They profit before war by making munitions; during war, by loans; afterward, in a free-for-all grab.” ~ Henry Ford, quoted in the New York World newspaper, February 17, 1921
Haitians have learned Jewish math! Now all they need to do is buy a network of media outlets and infiltrate the judicial system. Then they can punish anyone who doubts what they say.
Here’s a screencap from a course on international business practices, wherein the dutiful corporate employee will learn that it is a crime to oppose the Jewish theft of Palestinian land:
Joseph Farah of WorldNetDaily makes Harold Camping sound like the voice of reason. Here Farah explains that God punishes us with natural disasters every time we tell Israel to stop stealing land from Palestinians.
It goes right back to Genesis and God’s pledge to bless those who bless the children of Israel and curse those who curse them… In God’s economy, there is Israel and then there are the other nations.
This is the standard dispensationalist line that God maintains a racial covenant with Israel, external to his spiritual covenant with the Church. It is for this belief in salvation by race rather than grace, and not speculation about when Christ will return and establish a millennial kingdom, that makes dispensationalism a heresy. The lie begins with the assumption that Khazars who call themselves the blood descendants of the ancient Israelites are the Israel of God, as mentioned in the New Testament. Judeochristians place great stock in the founding of the racist state of Israel as the prerequisite for Christ’s return. But the idea that Jews must be established in Jerusalem, where they can rebuild the temple and resume daily sacrifice, is every bit as blasphemous as the Jews of the first century continuing to sacrifice in the temple after the Atonement for sin had been made.
You will often hear Judeochristians like Farah quote Genesis 12:3. But of course, Americans have blessed the anti-Christ state of Israel more than anyone else, and what do we have to show for it? Do the blessings start to roll in before or after the Jew Federal Reserve causes our currency to collapse?
There is no blood-based salvation, either before or after the cross. But the identity of Christ is very much based on blood. Here is some very interesting info on the “house and lineage of David,” and as you read, ponder the ridiculous inconsistencies of race-mixers, who argue that the lineage of Christ was so malleable that Moabites and Canaanites were welcome to it.
Comparing the genealogies of Matthew 1 (Joseph’s) and Luke 3 (Mary’s), you can see that both Joseph and Mary were descended from King David. Therefore both were of the House of David. But Matthew’s account shows that unlike Mary, Joseph was also in the royal line of succession through King Solomon and therefore of David’s lineage as well (Luke 2:4). Mary was a descendant of Solomon’s brother Nathan.
Just before the Babylonian captivity God had cursed the royal line, saying that no King would ever come from them again (Jere. 22:28-30), and yet He had promised David that descendants of Solomon’s would rule over Israel forever (1 Chron. 17:11-14). Jesus was a blood relative of Mary’s, and therefore of the house of David. When Joseph married Mary, Jesus became his legal son and therefore entered the Royal line. Now He was of the house and lineage of David. But since He and Joseph were not biologically related, He escaped the blood curse. Thus Jesus became the only man since 600 BC qualified to become the King of Israel and sit on David’s throne, something Gabriel had promised to Mary (Luke 1:32-33)…
If you compare the genealogies in Matthew 1 and Luke 3 you can spot the similarities as well as the differences. One difference is that Matthew comes forward from Abraham, showing Jesus as a son of Abraham, while Luke goes backward to Adam, proving the humanity of Jesus.
Notice that both are the same from Abraham to David, but that in Matthew, David’s son is listed as Solomon while in Luke’s version David’s son is Nathan, Solomon’s brother. From then to Joseph the two lists are different with Matthew showing Joseph’s father as Jacob, while in Luke it’s Heli. The reason for this is that there were no words for father-in-law, grandfather, son-in-law, or grandson, etc. Everyone was either a father or a son. Jacob was Joseph’s true father and Heli was his father-in-law, Mary’s father.
From David to Joseph, Matthew showed the Royal line of Solomon of which Joseph was part. But Luke showed the line of Nathan, members of David’s family that weren’t qualified to become kings. These were actually Mary’s ancestors. So both Mary and Joseph were of the tribe of Judah, and descended from David and were therefore cousins, although far removed. According to the Law, since Mary had no brothers, she could only be her father’s heir as long as she married someone from her own tribe. That way her family’s land would stay in the tribal inheritance as required (Numbers 36). And although Joseph was in the Royal line of Solomon, neither he nor any biological son of his could ever be King, since the royal line had been cursed by God (Jeremiah 22:30). To sit on David’s throne as King of Israel, a man had to be both a pure biological descendant of David’s and a member of Solomon’s Royal line, but somehow had to sidestep the curse. When Joseph agreed to become Mary’s husband, he in effect adopted Jesus as his legal son, placing Jesus in the Royal line without inheriting Joseph’s cursed blood. Having no earthly father, Jesus was a pure biological son of David’s through His mother. Thus Jesus met both qualifications and became the only man in the world, then or now, fit to be Israel’s King.
A young man’s reading list. But why should young men have all the fun? This is very good, although I would have placed Dabney up near the top of the list.
“Der Struwwelpeter is one of the most famous German children’s books. Written in 1844 by Heinrich Hoffmann, it consists of 10 illustrated rhyming stories, most of which depict children being subjected to fantastic punishment for misbehaviour. One such story is Die Geschichte von den Schwarzen Buben (The Story of the Black Boys).” When three white boys mock a black boy, St. Nicholas dunks them in ink.
You need to see what Random House has done to Richard Scarry’s books for children. Mr. Scarry would be outraged at what they have done to his artwork, but that’s the least of it. The purpose of the changes was for entirely predictable indoctrination on sex and race. The feminism is not even subtle. Both mother and father have to be in the kitchen or the field together so that little tykes don’t get the idea that the sexes (sorry, “genders”) have ordinary roles. The policeman is now a female police officer. The fireman, previously called a “brave hero,” is now merely a fire fighter. The mailman is now a letter carrier. They got rid of the milkman entirely, presumably because “milkmaid” is even more horrifying to the lesbians at Random House. Females (no longer called “ladies”) even drive road rollers and play bass drums! The father pushes the baby carriage while the mother is in a corporate boardroom, I suppose. The “pretty stewardess” is now a flight attendant, and stop noticing her looks, you sexist! The “handsome pilot” is now just a pilot. The Indian mouse is not allowed to look like an Indian, nor is his canoe allowed to look like an Indian canoe. A “Chanukah” menorah (with Yiddish spelling, no less) has been added next to the Christmas tree. This makes the old books valuable racist collector’s items.
There is only one sex: the human sex. And “gender stereotyping” is now as evil as racial stereotyping. Welcome to the Diversity Wonderland that “Christian” ministers of the “gospel” have authorized.
Two feminists with thriving careers and husbands who don’t love them. You go, girls!
To make matters worse, Winnie-the-Pooh is a sexist.
Trees – the only wood these homely broads will ever see. (Thanks to our friend Colby for that joke.)
“Only White people feel guilt over environmental issues.”
The higher you go up the Mexican socioeconomic ladder, the whiter the Mexicans are. You can guess what their beauty queens look like. There is a universal definition for beauty, and the women of only one race set the standard.
“If you want to know why we can’t pass legislation in Texas it’s because we have 37, no 36 Hispanics in the Legislature. So, that’s part of our problem and we need to change those numbers,” said Rebecca Forest, a co-founder of Immigration Reform Coalition of Texas.
The city of El Paso will force white people to clean the excrement of illegal aliens from the streets. “Isn’t diversity wonderful? Illegal aliens are enriching us with the multicultural experience of getting to clean up their feces and urine, something we certainly wouldn’t be able to enjoy if they hadn’t come here.” They’re doing the jobs Americans refuse to do!
White kids wearing white t-shirts is, like, racism squared.
Oh, good. Geert Wilders is defending “homosexuals” and “unbelievers” from the threat of Islam. If he keeps this up, we’re going to make him an honorary member of the San Francisco city council.
In response to Terry Jones burning the Koran, we read about Methodists who vowed to burn their own churches in protest, and now we read about presbyterians who are distributing copies of the Koran in protest. Christians like these are going to put Satanists out of business.
Here’s an excellent deal: Wendell Berry’s The Art of the Commonplace, normally $26, now free as as e-book.
Joel Chandler Harris books for free. Download them for your iPad or Kindle.