What It Is, Is Ice Cream
July 2, 2011 
26 Comments
At least threescore “African American youths” are terrorizing white people in Peoria, Illinois.
And with perfect timing, a couple of days later, James McDonald of Peoria preached an anti-Kinist sermon on the sin of partiality. His text is from James 2, where the sin of partiality is defined as unwillingness to love your neighbor as yourself. The Apostle James is clear on what he means by this. He mentions two of the Ten Commandments and warns not to commit murder or adultery. Both of these begin the second table of the Law, or the last five of the Ten Commandments, which deal with how we are to treat our fellow man. The apostle likely highlights these two because they are the most serious crimes we can commit against our neighbor. They are being committed against the white race today at an unprecedented rate, but James McDonald and other race-mixers don’t consider the crimes against our endangered people to be worthy of a sermon.
As Rushdoony taught, and as every Kinist agrees, we show love for our neighbor (and everyone else) by our willingness to obey the second table of the Law. The Apostle James goes on to say, in one of the most controversial passages of the New Testament, that if a man claims to have faith but is unwilling to abide by these neighborly laws, his faith is worthless, for “faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead,” and “a man is justified by works, and not by faith only.” This calls into question the faith of all who support, whether by commission or omission, the violence to which our people have been subjected.
McDonald attempts to prove that Kinism is inherently wedded to the sin of partiality, but instead of defining partiality in the context of the book of James, as I did in the previous paragraphs, he turns to Noah Webster and defines it as “favoritism” and “prejudice.” He explains that favoritism is preferring one thing to other things, like a flavor of ice cream. But does this mean that failure to appreciate all flavors of ice cream is evidence of sin? He doesn’t say. He explains that prejudice is an opinion formed without sufficient knowledge. Does this mean that one is not allowed to order ice cream unless every flavor has been sampled? He doesn’t say. He then redefines prejudice as the irrational desire to have all flavors but one removed from the freezer. Already, we’re lost in the thicket of ludicrous sermon illustrations. A more accurate analogy is the McDonald family demanding that Baskin Robbins remove the sign out front advertising 31 flavors, because ice cream is just ice cream. Therefore, it is all to be mixed together in one bucket until it is a sickly shade of greenish-gray. The Kinist protests this insanity, saying that there ought to be 31 flavors and more, and vanilla ought to be recognizably vanilla.
McDonald eventually gets around to airing his complaint: “…when we choose to seek after physical attributes of another person or a group of people, we are showing partiality, and that stands in contrast to our testimony to be Christians.” So the desire to surround oneself with those of familiar race and heritage, for any number of reasons, including security of wives and children, or the promotion of a climate of trust for good business, or common national purpose, is now sinful. The overwhelming majority of Christians in history would not view this as sane, much less Christian.
Since the gospel is not restricted to one race, we agree that it ought to be preached to all peoples. This can be done even as we secure a future for our families and communities, and for our race, which is becoming a scant minority in the world. Every white child now born in this country is born as a minority, and protecting them, or by God’s grace, reversing the trend, has nothing to do with partiality in terms of the gospel.
Kinists agree with our Christian ancestors. Mankind is engineered for concentric circles of loyalty, beginning with the family. James McDonald is “partial” to his own family, not because he thinks his family is better than other families, but because his family is his own. Dare we say that his own family is his “favorite” family? Dare we say that he prefers his own family to others? Why must he “hold people at arm’s length”? The circles of loyalty radiate outward, and within each circle there are all kinds of people to be found, of varying intelligence or attractiveness or financial solvency. These distinctions are less important than the fact that our clan or our tribe or our nation or our race is our own. This is how God created us, and He tells us that we are worse than infidels if we do not provide for our own.
Well, churches are planted in these communities and are extensions of them. It is certainly true that some churches will be diverse, even ethnically diverse, and Kinists do not object to this. We should absolutely seek friendships with those who are not like us in various ways. This is not really the issue between us and Alienists like McDonald. The real issue is that we reject civil laws that destroy the families that comprise the churches of Christ, especially the legalization of miscegenation.
In his sermon notes, McDonald calls discrimination “a symptom of idolatry” because it “hamper[s] the advance of the Gospel.” He doesn’t define “discrimination,” but it can safely be assumed that it is synonymous with favoritism. And did “discrimination” in the woe-is-me era of institutional “racism” hinder evangelism? McDonald doesn’t say, for obvious reasons.
God does not show partiality, he says. Surely he has read Romans 9. “Jacob I have loved, but Esau I have hated.” Partiality is contrary to the mission of Jesus, he says. And two sentences later, he affirms that Jesus came to save a people of His own choosing. The world shows partiality, prejudice, and favoritism, he says, and Christians are not to be like the world. Now, this is fascinating. “The world” is in absolute agreement with McDonald on the propriety of miscegenation. Not a Christ-hater in existence would disagree with him. When will McDonald stop following the world? Will he counsel his son to be impartial to beauty when choosing a bride? Will his son believe the lie that faith is all that matters?
McDonald prints the following prayer: “Father, forgive us for looking at our brothers and sisters as strangers and foreigners.” Again, go to the Bible to define these words. There are varying degrees of familiarity, just as the tribe of Benjamin is “foreign” to the tribe of Judah, even though they share the same faith. And as McDonald knows perfectly well, this is tangential to the thrust of his argument, which is that the gospel is so important that everything else is not important. Thus, he says that he has no unity with the Clan McDonald or with Scotland. The message is that we too should view clans and nations as curious accidents of history, as museum relics, or landscapes for family photos, but as nothing that has bearing on how we live our lives. This is a fundamental misunderstanding of the second table of the Law, which assumes and depends upon social and genetic hierarchy.
Ironically, McDonald quotes Isaiah 56, which is about strangers joining in covenant with God as strangers, without the need to be born into the chosen nation. This clearly indicates that the subjects are strangers of blood, not merely unbelievers. Yet McDonald then jumps to Exodus 12, where the stranger “shall be as a native of the land.” Again, context is key. This refers to partaking the Passover. It does not suggest that the categories of stranger and native-born were erased for the sake of the covenant. See Numbers 11:4 or Leviticus 18:26 for just two examples (others). This is perfectly in keeping with the Kinist understanding of Scripture, and McDonald only contradicts himself.
I’ve said nothing here about “prejudice” because it is the most ridiculous charge of all, concerning Kinists. Who is willing to step up and accuse us of forming opinions, on anything we’ve written here or elsewhere, without sufficient knowledge of the facts? Certainly not McDonald.
There are other silly things that roll off, like 21st century preachers being convinced that a Mr. Simeon Black in the book of Acts was a Negro. He couldn’t have been a blacksmith or anything like that because he makes such a useful sermon illustration for race-mixers. Matthew Henry wrote that Simeon was called “the black” because of the color of his hair, but what did Henry know about the Bible? He was just another racist who refused to acknowledge the now-well-known truth that Moses married Aunt Jemima. Another funny moment is when McDonald calls the early convert Lydia an “Asian” for rhetorical effect. This makes it sound like the Romans and Aryans of Asia Minor dined on egg foo yung or curried yak. It’s like calling whites Asians because our race was named after the Caucasus Mountains, which are in Asia.
Hey James, what’s wrong with preaching the gospel to all and encouraging all to live as God created them, to the best of their ability? How is this “hate” or “idolatry”? It is what all Christians used to believe. Our churches and pastors have been afflicted by what a friend of ours calls egalitardation. This is a word that should be in Webster’s Dictionary!
By the way, I slay myself with the title of this post. James McDonald describes race relations with all the perspicacity of Andy Griffith describing a game of football. The difference is that Andy was joking.
Here’s a very timely article from Kinism.net on Lancelot Andrewes’ catechism on the second table of the Law. After our duties to God, ourselves, and the spiritual needs of our brothers, Bishop Andrewes describes the priority of temporal duties like so:
Our own bodies before other men’s… [then]
The bodies of our neighbors; and among them:
first to them that have need; and of those:
first to the household of faith, Gal. vi.10; and of them,
first to our countrymen, ps. cxxii.8, “brethern and companions”; and of these:
first them which are nosri, “our friends and acquaintance,” and of them,
first to our own, and, namely, them of our household, 1 Tim. v.8, and our kindred; and first the wife, Gen. 2.24, “they shall be one flesh;” “am not I better to thee than ten sons?” 1 Sam. 1.8.
Thus much the subject of our neighbor.
What a refreshing antidote to McDonald’s poisoned ice cream. Sound doctrine tastes even better. Can you believe that Andrewes placed our kin above those who are of the household of faith generally? It sounds like the racist who wrote Romans 9:3.
“Your great love afar is spite at home.” ~ Emerson
As a friend of ours has truly said, your religion doesn’t count for much if you need a verse in the Bible to prove to you that a white person should not marry a black person. It’s similar to expecting to find a verse in the Bible that condemns cannibalism. Matthew 7:16 shows that there are all kinds of things in life that are instinctive, or simply learned according to what works. “You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles?” No, they don’t, and they don’t need the Bible to tell them where grapes and figs will grow. Now consider governments and nations and families. What examples have existed, in the history of the world, of sustainable mixed-race societies where Christianity is established and wealth is accumulated?
“If you put Daniel Ritchie, and I, and Voddie Baucham on an island, with our Reformed beliefs, the Celt, the Slav, and the Bantu (or whatever Voddie’s genes are) will build exactly the same culture, led by our belief in the God of the Bible.” ~ Bojidar Marinov, a Bible Genius whose brain works faster than a whippoorwill’s sphincter in blackberry season
Objections answered by David Opperman.
“Given the precipitous decline in the birthrates of European countries,” this population expert recently testified to the U.S. Senate, “all anti-natal programs funded by the United States should immediately be replaced by pro-natal programs… Five centuries after the Black Plague devastated Europe, a White Pestilence is now decimating that same continent. Many nations, especially in Europe, are already in a death spiral, losing a significant number of people each year. Listen closely, and you will hear the muffled sound of populations crashing.” But to keep his job and remain on friendly terms with his pastorcide, he labels attempts to stem the tide of this destruction “xenophobic” and “ultranationalist.” Those words are more high-falutin’ than “racist.”
“One remarks nowadays all over Greece such a diminution in natality and in general manner such depopulation that the towns are deserted and the fields lie fallow. Although this country has not been ravaged by wars or epidemics, the cause of the harm is evident: by avarice or cowardice the people, if they marry, will not bring up the children they ought to have. At most they bring up one or two. It is in this way that the scourge before it is noticed is rapidly developed. The remedy is in ourselves; we have but to change our morals.” ~ Polybius, 204-122 BC
At mixed-race daycares throughout Montreal, researchers took Asian-Canadian children and French Canadian children, ranging in age from three to five years old, and paired them up in rooms with “attractive toys” such as a marble track or a Sesame Street-themed playhouse. When put in with members of the same race, children happily played together. When mixed with different races, however, the children usually opted to play alone. Preschoolers “express a preference for same-ethnic interactions,” reads the study.
A preschool in Sweden eliminates sexism by eliminating sex. It’s exactly what neo-Christians want to do with race! Since feminists are running the indoctrination camp, it’s really all about emasculation of boys. “Egalia gives them a fantastic opportunity to be whoever they want to be… From a bookcase she pulls out a story about two male giraffes who are sad to be childless – until they come across an abandoned crocodile egg.”
“And when he had opened the third seal, I heard the third beast say, Come and see. And I saw, and lo a black dress. And she that stood there had a pair of cute pumps, and her left arm akimbo.”
“Women’s bias against male strangers increases when women are fertile, suggesting prejudice may be partly fueled by genetics, according to a study by Michigan State University psychology researchers.”
Pixar’s latest film, Brave, stars a cute little red-haired Scottish girl. Unfortunately, it continues the feminist theme that girls should act like men. This black commenter is upset that in the year 2011, for crying out loud, we are still seeing fairy tales about white people.
I’m irritated by White people always using little redheaded girls as the go-to character to represent the bravery and triumph of overcoming marginalization and discrimination. I mean really???… After all, haven’t we established that Pixar’s target audience is no longer majority White?…
I’m saying why is our culture still so overwhelmingly wedded to European (and in particular Anglo-Saxon) folklore in 2011? And why when the mainstream decides to write a story about a misunderstood character bravely defying oppressive expectations to forge a path to their own true destiny it’s always some little red-headed White girl?…
I guess I am curious what mainstream American society has against little girls of color?
Lord knows we have (more realistic) stories to tell about being rejected, neglected, orphaned and oppressed and overcoming those odds to reach our dreams… I daresay it takes more bravery to be a young woman of color in this country than to be a redheaded White girl. Where are OUR epic tales of triumph?…
I’m sick of stories about brave little raggamuffin White girls.
Here you go, but for some reason I can’t find it at Netflix.
We’re looking forward to Warner Brothers finally releasing the Censored Eleven Looney Tunes cartoons this year. They’re going forward with it because they didn’t receive many complaints when they released some of the old “racist” material on the Golden Collection DVD set. The included disclaimer by Whoopi Goldberg was unintentionally hilarious; they said (through her) that the cartoons are extremely offensive, but they must be released because anything less would be pretending that racism did not exist. In other words, they’re going to censor racism unless enough money can be made from it, which is a principled stand of Judaic proportions.
Coal Black and de Sebben Dwarfs shows up on lists of the best cartoons ever made, but it’s not for children due to its celebration of Negro promiscuity. Coal Black’s name is “So White,” and she wears pigtails, no less. She is essentially drawn as an attractive white girl with black skin, which Disney also did recently to their first black heroine in The Princess and the Frog. (Even today, no one considers a full-blooded Negro woman to be an object of beauty.) So White’s enormous welfare queen drinks “Eli Whitney’s Cotton Gin” and has an enviable stash of whitewall tires and other items that were strictly rationed during wartime. Prince Chawmin’ has gold teeth, with dice for incisors, a zoot suit, a monocle, and chemically straightened hair. The lips are drawn to make him look like a white man in blackface. To really black it up, the director included a jazz soundtrack, a jitterbug, and sexual overtones. The planned murder of So White is called a “blackout.” Murder, Inc., advertises that they will “rub out anybody for $1.00; Midgets: 1/2-price; Japs: free.” So White is kidnapped, and then the scene cuts to the assassins, covered in her lipstick, dropping her off in the woods. She tells them “thanks for the ride.” It’s surprising that these double entendres about how she “earned” her freedom made it into the short. Ditto for the orgasmic power of Dopey’s kiss, which he calls a “military secret,” implying that, though he is diminutive in size, one of his body parts is a weapon. The Coal Black short is a good example of a talented director having what Dickens called “maudlin admiration” for savages.
Scrub Me, Mama, With a Boogie Beat is also notable for its depiction of Lazytown, where the men, who look like monkeys, do nothing but lay about, flies and mosquitoes encircling their heads. Even the fish are too lazy to bite. The only thing that wakes the men of Lazytown is when a very light-skinned mulatto woman from Harlem strides off a boat. She teaches the lazy Negroes that rhythm can help them work. It even makes their watermelon taste better. The not-so-shocking message of the story is that black men are energized by boogie music, suggestive dancing, and a light-skinned woman. Books, not so much. The soundtrack is by Stephen Foster and used to be the state song of Florida until it was deemed too racist; it refers to “darkies…a-longin’ for the old plantation.” Clearly, they do not long for it. There was work to be done on the plantation.
During the 1864 presidential campaign, an infamous “Negro Ball” was held on September 22 at the headquarters of the Lincoln Central Campaign Club in New York. Democrats were outraged by the flagrant race-mixing and showed that Lincoln’s designs on the “Union” would lead to more of what you see in this depiction of the event:
In the same year, this cartoon shows black men with white women. It’s meant to be as ludicrous as possible, but 150 years later, it has become painfully real. A Negro woman with the stereotypically ridiculous name of Dinah Arabella Aramintha Squash is elated that “de hebenly Miscegenation times” have come. (It was during the 1864 presidential election that the term “miscegenation” was coined.) Another Negro woman is called “Miss Snowball.” An aroused white woman is anxious for her black paramour to ask her father for her hand in marriage, and Henry Ward Beecher will conduct the rites of holy matrimony. A German bystander can’t believe what he is seeing.
Well, that’s just unthinkable, said the voters, and Lincoln was reelected.
You can see why he was reelected if you look at the propaganda. Here’s Thomas Nast, who created the image of Santa Claus that everyone now recognizes, showing that the North was too invested in Lincoln’s murderous rampage to turn back. Just as we see today in foreign wars of futility, when the suggestion to pull out is greeted with derision for failure to “support the troops,” as if the troops have any say in the matter, Democrats were rebuked for tarnishing the memory of fallen “heroes” with their compromise. The burning homes and desperate people in the background were really in the South! No Northern civilians were ever harmed, by express order from the Commander himself, but Nast used his considerable artistic skills to convince the public that Southerners would raze and pillage the North, as Yankee generals did in the South, if there were any sort of compromise. So remember that Santa Claus (but not the Father Christmas or St. Nicholas myths) is the creation of a filthy Yankee liar.
Notice, also, that contrary to the Harper’s Weekly caption, the condition of Negro slaves was never the reason for waging war, at least not prior to 1864. The Emancipation Proclamation from the previous year was strictly a war measure, and was of no effect for slaves in states that were under Yankee control. It was only during Lincoln’s reelection campaign, when all other attempts to justify his unconstitutional actions had been exhausted, that ending slavery became the purpose of his fratricide, and this is the propaganda that has stuck ever since.
More propaganda from Nast. To the far right, notice that the “rights of the states unimpaired,” which were the very basis for our secession from the king, are pathetically reduced to the freedom of masters to whip their slaves mercilessly. This is straight out of the fiction of Uncle Tom’s Cabin. And to the left, the lament that “the constitution itself has been disregarded” shows Lincoln unfurling the Emancipation Proclamation. In retrospect, we wonder how people could have been so stupid as to equate illegal presidential decrees with the Constitution itself, but these were very ingenious lies that reached an apex in the hideously devious but beautifully poetic Gettysburg Address.
Copperheads had their own cartoons, of course. Here are the Democrats riding a train to a restored Union while Lincoln and the “Miscegenationists” crash their train into the rocks of Confiscation, Emancipation, Abolitionism, and a $400 billion Public Debt. Four hundred billion? Those were the good old days!
According to the Congressional Budget Office, publicly-held debt as a percentage of GDP is now at 70% and will climb to 90% by the year 2020. It’s all unraveling, and we couldn’t be happier. The evil empire will fall without anyone firing a shot.
Here you see Columbia, the goddess of the empire, telling Lincoln that he has swollen the earth with the blood of her children, and she doesn’t know what she has gained from it. It was during the 1864 election that Republicans were able to work the lie into the consciousness of succeeding generations that the massive bloodshed was worth the cost since the slaves were freed, as though they could never have been freed peacefully. Lincoln’s martyr status helped a great deal with spreading the lie.
Here is some British mockery of a British Quaker whose opposition to slavery leads him to shake hands with Lincoln, a militaristic half-wit who tramples the U.S. Constitution.
More British mockery of reelected Lincoln, who is depicted as a Phoenix rising from the ashes of Commerce, the Constitution, a Free Press, States’ Rights, Habeas Corpus, and financial Credit, all of which he destroyed.
Democrats also mocked Republicans by drawing cartoons about the day when the office of the president would be occupied by a Negro spearchucker from the circus. Well, that’s just unthinkable, said the voters. And now we have Obama.
Instead of at Fort Sumter, Lincoln’s War might have started officially at the Alamo on February 16, 1861. There would have been a great deal more symbolism if it had.
On that day, when Major General David Twiggs, commanding officer of the Federal Department of Texas, arrived by wagon at his office in the long barracks adjacent to the Alamo, he was confronted by a committee headed by Samuel Maverick who demanded that Twiggs surrender all Federal troops, garrisons and supplies on Texas soil to the State of Texas. Maverick and his committee were backed up by a force of about 1,000 Texas militiamen commanded by Col. Ben McCulloch. Fewer than 200 U.S. Army soldiers were stationed at the Alamo that day and they were mostly Quartermaster non-combatant troop. So, Twiggs did surrender that day – almost two months before the South fired its cannons at Fort Sumter – but history does not accord this event prominence because the entire surrender took place without a single shot being fired and no blood being shed. There is a very special irony of Twiggs’ surrender: later that very same day, Federal lieutenant colonel Robert E. Lee (who at that time was the commanding officer of the 2nd U.S. Cavalry at Fort Mason in Mason, Texas) rode into San Antonio. Lee was on his way back to Washington, D.C., where he declined President Lincoln’s offer to assume command of all Federal Army forces. As history records, Lee resigned his Federal commission, then went across the river to Arlington House, his wife’s family’s plantation (now Arlington National Cemetery) – and the rest, as they say, is history.
Stonewall Jackson laughed loudly when he heard this joke told by Major Wells Hawks: In the early days a Pilgrim father was going out to the woods with his gun. He met a man who asked, “Where are you going?” “Out in the woods,” he replied. “I thought you were a Calvinist.” “I am a Calvinist.” “Don’t you believe you can’t die until your time comes?” “I know I can’t die until my time comes.” “Then why carry a gun?” “Because I might meet an Indian whose time has come!”
State temples (aka public schools) don’t do anything well, but the two people they’ve tried to teach children about more than any others are Abraham Lincoln and the Reverend Doctor. They even fail at this.
On history tests given to 31,000 pupils by the National Assessment of Education Progress, the “Nation’s Report Card,” most fourth-graders could not identify a picture of Abraham Lincoln or a reason why he was important…
If the racial gap in academic achievement persists for the next 40 years, as it has for the last 40, virtually all of the superior positions in the New Economy and knowledge-based professions will be held by Asians and whites, with blacks and Hispanics largely relegated to the service sector.
The teacher’s union won’t allow this “school” in Harlem to close, despite only 2 of 88 eighth-graders passing the state math or reading exams last year. Their reason: Because the Department of Education has not done enough to “fix” the school. Translation: The DOE has not given the teachers raises. The principal is named Rashaunda Shaw. She’s likely an Irish lass, with a name like Shaw.
Homework is racist, and L.A. schools have a solution: Allow homework to comprise no more than 10% of a student’s grade. That’ll teach the uppity white and Asian kids.
You know about 365Black, where McDonald’s proudly believes “that African-American culture and achievement should be celebrated 365 days a year – not just during Black History Month… Like the unique African Baobab tree, which nourishes its community with its leaves and fruit, McDonald’s has branched out to the African-American community nourishing it with valuable programs and opportunities.” The slogan is “deeply rooted in the community.” Don’t you dare call this racist! Don’t you realize that blacks received cradle to grave care centuries ago and were expected to work?
The very thought of doing all that work is still hard on them. Yosemite’s only black park ranger says that blacks don’t like to visit national parks today because the memory of working the soil is so oppressive to them. That’s right, now even the soil is racist, and there’s a lot of it.
McDonald’s is even promoting the “gospel” through “inspirational” singer Hezekiah Walker.
Now KFC wants in on the act, and they’ve ripped off the name KFC360. The KFC tax write-off is a little different, though; it’s a handout program for anyone who isn’t white. They’ve sprinkled the website with the words “community,” “heritage,” and “family,” which is fine unless it’s done by “white supremacists.”
Jared Taylor explains affirmative action to an imbecile.
Someone please give this family a reality show.
It’s nice to see Africans in America celebrating the Caribbean. It’s a small world after all.
Carter Strange was nearly beaten to death, but it can’t be called a hate crime because he’s not a transsexual.
Why violent crime has declined of late.
“I remember asking a Korean shop owner in my home city, why, during a spate of black riots, was his business the only business in five blocks of businesses that was not touched by rioters. His answer was quite simple: ‘I don’t taken any b___ from niggers. They know I’ll shoot them.’ The Korean shop owner did not believe in the Noble Savage.” ~ CWNY
The difference between a white flash mob and a black flash mob. A liberal white flash mob is the opportunity to celebrate “the beauty of humanity” and play with lightsabers. And here you can see a Christian flash mob. There’s nothing like white kids with their impeccable sense of white rhythm trying to keep up with jungle music. This is what church youth groups are all about.
Wow, poor Heidi is not a pretty girl. It might benefit the War Against Hate if she stays clear of the cameras.
“How can a company built on ‘diversity’ build a better plane than a company built on competency?” Ask Lockheed Martin, or as we like to call it, African Airlines.
“You’re firing me because I’m black!” “No, we hired you because you’re black. We’re firing you because you’re useless!”
Meanwhile, 60% of Jamaicans want a return to white rule. Negroes, more than anyone, realize that they aren’t cut out for law and order. But whites need this boondoggle like they need a hole in the head. British rule over Jamaica is the very thing that led to Enoch Powell’s prophetic “rivers of blood” speech.
Even legal immigration is a horror story. Notice the small numbers from Russia, the UK, and Canada.
The sheriff in Arizona who caught hell for being interviewed on The Political Cesspool show wonders why 28,500 U.S. troops have been stationed on the Korean border for 58 years, but we have a mere 1,200 National Guard troops on the Mexican border, and only until September 30. That’s 192.5 soldiers per mile along the Korean DMZ but only 0.61 soldiers per mile along the Mexican border, a ratio of 315.5 to 1.
I can’t believe it. Advertisements featuring white people and clean living! Who knew that bottled water is racist? I guess you have to go to Norway to see what our own country was once like before the preachers took a dump on it.
Southern Baptists grew to be the largest Protestant denomination in the country, dominating the South, with their open-mouth smiles, preacher hair, moist handshakes, and Arminian feel-good theology. But as whites decline in number, baptists are looking to recruit swarthy neo-Americans for Jesus, or Hay-zoos, or whatever they call him. From 1998 to 2007, the number of “ethnic minorities” in the SBC has doubled, to 8 percent.
Part 1 and Part 2 and part 3 of a response to the SBC’s “Jesus was an illegal immigrant” theology. More from Nil.
The chairman of missions at the Lutheran Church’s Concordia University says that the historic creeds need to be rewritten to make churches more inviting to Muslims.
The liberal habit of treating the Constitution (and the Bible, for that matter) as a “living document,” to be interpreted according to one’s feelings, is a fundamentally Jewish invention, says this rabbi. Jews have four levels of interpretation for every word in the Torah: literal (peshat), subtle (remez), creative (drash), and hidden (sod). He admits that the Talmud completely changes the meaning of the Old Testament Scriptures. Law professors, many (or most) of whom are Talmudists, are now teaching law students how to do the same thing to the Constitution.
The Poles, like all other white people, lost WWII. Rev. Tadeusz Rydzyk said recently, “The tragedy of Poland is that Poland hasn’t been ruled by Poles since 1939.” He says his country has become “uncivilized” because it is being run by those who “do not have a Polish heart.” Well, obviously, only a Nazi would talk this way. The World Jewish Congress has called on the Vatican to expel Rydzyk from his order of priests. The Simon Wiesenthal Center is calling for his excommunication. As James Edwards says, “People will forgive you when you’re wrong; they will never forgive you when you’re right.” And then James proves that he doesn’t understand Jewish math, which clearly makes him a Nazi too.
James, please use the following equation for calculating the number of Jews killed by Hitler. It produces a magical solution every time. Give it a try.
This message of sensitivity and empathy has been brought to you by John Hagee Ministries.
And now we can all rest easy because these Amish traveled all the way to Israel on the jets of the “English” to repent of their silence during the Great War. Since the Amish are pacifists, one can only guess how they were supposed to know of alleged extermination plans that were so “secret” there is no proof of them.
We pray for a full recovery for Lawrence Auster from pancreatic cancer. We have our differences with Mr. Auster, but there is no denying that he is a brilliant man who has made important contributions to the “right” way of thinking, and Al Gore’s information superhighway wouldn’t be the same without him.
As was documented here years ago, George W. Bush believed that invading Iraq would cost about $50 billion, and would be paid in Iraqi oil. At the worst, said he and Cheney, the price tag for making the Middle East safe for democracy would be a couple hundred billion. Five years ago, it became clear that the total cost would be more than two trillion. Oh, how the warmongers laughed at this estimate!
It was a real knee-slapper for them. Now we learn that the price is at least $3.7 trillion and counting. Everyone thought Obama would end the war, but he has not even closed Abu Ghraib or Guantanamo. His policy is identical to Bush’s, and now he has even started a costly war of his own in Libya. He and his handlers have convinced the War Crimes Tribunal to indict Kaddafi, who is a threat to almost no one, of crimes against humanity. With no end in sight, could we reach $10 trillion? Is there enough money in the world to fund the wicked dreams of American imperialists? More than a quarter million people have died directly from the Bush-Obama war, and many more indirectly; 365,000 wounded; 7.8 million displaced. “For every person killed on September 11, another 73 have been killed since.” And what is there to show for it? A ruined American economy, massive Christian persecution, more expensive oil, and the deaths of SH and OBL. If anything, the governments of Iraq and Afghanistan will be worse, and Iran will retaliate with a vengeance. Have a nice day!
The Peoria experience should be reminding Euro-Americans of the happiness and freedom enjoyed by the Europeans in Spain under the Moorish enforcers of Jewish despotism.
However, if you rely on joogle for your research you will not be able to find any historical sources that would indicate Spain under Moorish occupation and enforcement was anything except an enlightened multi cultural paradise where Jews, Christians and Muslims lived happily together.
Moors were mauros – black. According to the Chanson Roland “blacker than ink with large noses and ears” and with “nothing white except the teeth” – the Sarazins. Does this describe the noble African Americans on the rampage against the Whites in Peoria?
I think the Chanson mentions that the conquered Visigoths were under tribute of
100 virgins a year to the caliphate.
The true information now would seem to survive only in the fictions that looked back to the Moorish occupation, such as Sir Walter Scott’s “The Vision of Don Roderick” – the last Gothic King of Spain.
XXII
“And the proud Moslemah spread far and wide
As numerous as their native locust band
Berber and Ismael’s sons the spoils divide
With naked scimitars mete out the land
And for bondsmen base the freeborn natives brand.
XXIII
Then rose the grated Harem to enclose
The lovliest maidens of the Christian line…
What the Europeans got out of the Moorish enforcement of Jew tyranny in Spain was slavery, tribute payments to the Caliphate and Islamic law.
No wonder Martel seized Church property in order to raise an army against this advance into the Frankish lands. Succeeded in Oct in the year of our Lord 732. Deo Gratias.
The Epistle of James was written right on the eve of the great Jewish rebellion (66-70 AD) against Rome. Judea was like a tinderbox back in the those days, ready to explode. Rival Jewish factions were ready to attack even each other, and in such an atmosphere James had full reason to strictly warn Jewish Christians from getting carried away by murderous mentality.
“In his sermon notes, McDonald calls discrimination “a symptom of idolatry” because it “hamper[s] the advance of the Gospel.””
In some cases, discrimination can really be a symptom of idolatry. But even more pointedly, LACK of discrimination can be a clear symptom of idolatry! For what is syncretism but a spiritual version of promiscuous race-mixing, or gender-bending (or vice versa)?
Lack of discrimination is one of the fundamental cornerstones of modern liberal-”Christian” apostasy and idolatry – joining the whole world into one gloriously ecumenical Babelist entity:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlfvBgBDpm0
“Another funny moment is when McDonald calls the early convert Lydia an “Asian” for rhetorical effect.”
Silly stuff like this would be pretty insignificant in itself, except that it speaks of propagandistic intellectual dishonesty, the readiness to basely flatter modern liberal prejudices with anachronistic comparisons.
Before the Seljuk Turks brutally overran Asia Minor in the late 11th century (provoking the First Crusade in response), Asia Minor was definitely (for the lack of better word) “Aryan” land pure and simple.
“The liberal habit of treating the Constitution (and the Bible, for that matter) as a “living document,” to be interpreted according to one’s feelings, is a fundamentally Jewish invention, says this rabbi. Jews have four levels of interpretation for every word in the Torah: literal (peshat), subtle (remez), creative (drash), and hidden (sod).”
This esoteric four-level system of Scriptural interpretation (Pshat, Remez, Darash, Sod, PaRDeS) that the rabbis use has its equivalent in the RC “quadriga”-method. So said an enthusiastic Romanist apologist Art Sippo:
Quote:
“The Medieval Quadriga is not only true, it is a tradition that we have inherited from the Jews. Their method of exegesis was called Pardes and is obviously the source of the Quadriga.”
http://www.surprisedbytruth.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=6207
Both PaRDeS and Quadriga denigrate the literal meaning (pshat) of the Biblical text, thus empowering the priestly-rabbinic caste of official interpreters over the laymen. Like this old book (written back in the 1790s) put it:
pp. 435-36
http://www.archive.org/stream/historyofchurchoc01miln#page/434/mode/2up
“No man, not altogether unsound and hypocritical, ever more hurt the church of Christ than Origen. From the fanciful mode of allegory introduced by him, uncontrolled by scriptural rule and order, arose a vitiated method of commenting on the scriptures, which has been succeeded by a contempt of types and figures altogether, just as his fanciful ideas of letter and spirit tended to remove from men’s minds all right conceptions of genuine spirituality. A thick mist for ages pervaded the Christian world, supported by his absurd allegorical mode.
The learned alone were looked at as guides implicitly to be followed; and the vulgar, when the literal sense was hissed off the stage, had nothing to do but to follow the authority of the learned. It was not till the days of Luther and Melancthon that this evil was fairly and successfully opposed.”
Re the Peoria apostate. “Let them alone. They are blind leaders of the blind and if the blind lead the blind they will both fall into the ditch.”
He’s just identifying himself as a left hand goat (Matt 25).
Like your sense of humor and your various links/pictures.
Race war on Puritan Board: Somebody found a video with John Piper and a rapper and posted it. Someone else complains about rap music and the racism charges start flying!
We’re told that rap “originated from African storytellers” and is good because “poor families who could not afford their own record players to come together and enjoy music.”
That’s completely bogus. Rap came from the 1970s as a reaction to disco. It is corporate pop music, just like most everything sold in record stores.
http://www.puritanboard.com/f24/rap-about-rpw-68583/
I found this new website:
http://traditionalchristianity.wordpress.com/
Don’t let the name fool you. I recommended they link Spirit Water Blood (and Cambria Will Not Yield, and Vanishing American) on their blogroll, so they could be, you know, more Tradtional Christian. They reject kinism, because there is a Diversity! [tm] of people posting there.
The Empire is, in my mind, better described “Babylon.” See Revelation 18-19 for a good description of the fall of Babylon, which all good Christians look forward to as God’s good judgment on a demonic empire. And the King on his white horse slaughters his enemies.
Isn’t Babylon derived from Babel? The kinist Christian sees this country as a modern Babel, or Babylon.
Petr, if you are going to be exercised about the sins of the Roman Catholic Church, at least be occupied about the real ones.
Quadriga is a hermeneutic the Apostles themselves used in their exegesis of Sacred Scripture.
St Augustine a doctor of the West clearly identifies history, etiology, analogy and allegory as the Apostolic basis of Scriptural study and exegesis.
The Scriptures themselves look back to historical events and use them as moral allegories by way of analogy.
“As it was in the days of Noe” prophetically describes a future event in terms of history, characterizes the etiology of that event and uses it as a moral exempla by way of analogy.
Our Lord was very skilled in the use of Quadriga and so was St Paul.
By way of contrast, the Church and the entire Christian world is scandalized by anti-pope Benedict publicly contradicting our Saviour in the Synagogue of Rome (Jan 7, 2010) and paying public homage to the Pharisaic religion.
He is in the same league as the KGB representative from the Moscow Patriarchate to that international Communist Body (the World Council of Churches)1971 – 74. I refer to the tobacco billionaire Vladimir who now styles himself as His Holiness Kirill, Patriarchate of Moscow.
I would be less worried about the Quadriga (if I were you) and more concerned about these two rabbis healing the Schism.
Zenit has reported that Benedict is keen to go to Moscow for some ostpolitik and ecumenical palaver.
The topic of racial differences is being discussed at the PuritanBoard. I think the OP is currently a Missionary or has been a Missionary in the past.
http://www.puritanboard.com/f40/genetic-differences-racial-differences-sons-ham-68623/
Oscar, that’s a thread worth reading, if only to see the Black Man [tm] show up and demand an enforcement of anti-racism, and the moderator blandly intone, “There is only one race — humankind.”
The bits on malaria were especially choice.
It’s kinda like,
Nigger come. Nigger get bit. Nigger can’t work.
Aryan come. Aryan get bit. Aryan exterminate mosquito.
These guys just can’t get it.
TheContinentalOp: Yes, the thread is worth reading. The thread illustrates the weakness of the anti-Kinist position and shows that there are Christians who are searching for answers on these important questions. The anti-Kinists use refried cliches like the one you mentioned, but some are more measured in their statements. I liked the Boer Afrikaner sharing some statements and personal experience. The link to Dr. Francis Nigel Lee’s essay entitled “Nationality, Race, and Intermarriage” was also good.
Many Christians see the racial/ethnic tension(s) in the United States, and in other parts of the world, so they seek Biblical answers to apply to their lives rather than listen to their Secular Taskmasters with their “solution” of a utopian Tower of Babel which seeks to devour all races/ethnicities/tribes/ into one.
You noticed the emotional knee-jerk reaction of one “Andrew Silva” (Portuguese? I don’t know this man’s ethnicity) accusing Kinists of the “sin of racism”. My question to the Melting Potters is this: Where in the Bible does God establish a Law that commands us to marry outside our tribe/people? Where is the Biblical Law that states that Christians should advocate the mixing of all races/etnicities/tribes/peoples so that there would be no more “racism” and ethnic identity?
One’s ethnic identity is a blessed gift from our Heavenly Father, not a curse. The differences among God’s various tribes and peoples are not something that Christians should want to destroy or deny. Christians should affirm their particular ethnic characteristics and sanctify them according to the Word of God for the Glory of God. This is the positive message of Kinism.
You know, I die a little when I see threads like that. Look at some of the statements:
“I would say that Dabney should be under church discipline if he were alive today.”
“In Christian circles, sin is usually called sin and is rejected, but for some reason racism seems to get a pass.”
“For some reason, what I consider racist views, have too-long been either swept under the rug at best or justified at worst in the church.”
How do you begin to talk to attitudes like that? These are the default views usually held by church leaders and elder. If you don’t believe race is a made-up label describing irrelevant factors, you’re an evil person who needs to be re-educated.
I find it hilarious that the post-modern blowhards at Puritan Board are supporting rap music. Have these deluded self-righteous pricks actually convinced themselves that the actual Puritans of actual history would have supported the cultural abomination that is rap music? I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised. The fact that the actual Puritans of actual history opposed intermarriage doesn’t seem to bother them at all.
Thanks for pointing out the Congressional testimony regarding the population collapse facing Europe. You should make it more clear, however, that the quote about the “White Pestilence” came from Stephen Mosher of the Population Research Inst, while the “xenophobic” quote came from Congressman Chris Smith.
Even if Mosher had said something about nationalistic violence, we should avoid uncharitably attributing motives to a man’s actions like saying “in order to keep his job,” especially when he is doing something positive to help us.
You can never be anti-racist enough. Now Marvin Olasky is under fire for saying the obvious:
“In 2008 [Democrats] successfully used guilt over segregation to elect the first African-American president, but that may not work again as concern over Obamanomics trumps the ghosts of generations past.”
While Olasky even has an adopted black son, now he’s guilty of “racial bitterness,” if not outright racism itself. See the SWPL “Christian” rant here:
http://www.patrolmag.com/2011/07/07/jonathan-d-fitzgerald/marvin-olasky-has-jumped-the-shark/
James McDonald says that it is the sin of partiality to prefer someone because of physical traits. When I look at my son and see his physical similarity to me, I must confess that this makes me feel kinship, and a preference, for him. Does that really make me a sinner?
This man’s definition of partiality is strained, to say the least. To get a better insight I looked up partiality in the Layman’s Bible Encyclopedia. It defined it as, “The showing of undue favor to one person or thing over another person or thing; unjust bias of mind.”
I don’t think that showing a preference for one’s kinsmen is an “undue favor.” The Apostle Paul didn’t seem to think so.
The context in the Book of James is people holding a poor person in contempt while they seek the favors of a rich man–an exercise in greed and coveting.
This to me calls to mind how so many of our religious leaders strive to ingratiate themselves with liberal elites, at the expense of kinsmen and fellow believers.
Someone found Bob Jones’ 1960 Easter sermon defending segregation. FWIW:
http://bit.ly/m2cM7U
“Isn’t Babylon derived from Babel?”
Of course it is! I understand Babylon is a Greek version of the Hebrew word Babel, like Jesus is a Greek version of the Hebrew name Joshua.
Babel/Babylon is a sinister grey eminence lurking in the background of both OT and NT prophecies about end times. For this reason Christians should be on the strict lookout for any “babelist” tendencies.
“It’s kinda like,
Nigger come. Nigger get bit. Nigger can’t work.
Aryan come. Aryan get bit. Aryan exterminate mosquito.
These guys just can’t get it.”
Perhaps you should be a bit less smug about this Tim, as it took a long time before “Aryans” could develop technology to take care of mosquitos.
Before the 20th century, it was rather the Aryans who got exterminated by mosquitos, as White populations had a noted tendency to wither and die off in malaria-infested lowlands – even in Mediterranean countries like Italy.
I read Bob Jones’ sermon posted by The Monitor. It impressed me as a thoughtful and benevolent treatment of the racial issue. But the hostility of some of the commentators was a thing to behold. Frankly, it said much more about them than him.
They claim that their new egalitarian Christianity is the true faith, and that our ancestors, due to their racial beliefs, were at best second-class Christians,if indeed Christians at all.
So which faith is the true one? Christ gave a very good guideline, “By their fruits you will know them.”
What were the fruits of our Christian ancestors? Say what you like about them, but their faith shaped and directed society. Today, our secular society pretty much shapes most Christians. Let them boast all they want about their superior sensitivity and enlightenment. In terms of character and influence, their fruits are few.
Those Whites on that board are so hung up over this. It’s like their very salvation is valid ONLY if a Black is not offended or approves of it. Yes, “racism!” The sin so awful the Bible fails to mention it.
My life became quite a bit clearer, and a lot of things made more sense, when I accepted that racial differences are not only real but concrete. And guess what? I still love the Lord Jesus, more than ever in fact!
I understand His love for His own people; I understand Moses and Paul’s special burden for the Jews, because I now have a special burden for my own kind! Anyone who says this is a sin has a sickness.
We could see the racism-craze of modern clergymen as same sort politically charged theology that “divine right of the kings” doctrine was back in the 16th and 17th centuries.
Stuff like that was ultimately motivated by worldly concerns (pleasing the powers that be) but it was dressed up in respectable theological clothes (and generously subsidized by the establishment), and the person who denied or even doubted it was quickly branded as a seditious, perverse-minded troublemaker.
Divine-right theologians declared pompously that ANY attempt to resist “anointed rulers” was blasphemous, like modern anti-Kinist theologians pompously declare that ANY recognition of the reality of race is blasphemous.
Demagogic politicians have been called as “courtiers of people” – that is, the same sort base flattereres of masses that courtiers of old were to kings. And in the same manner, we could call equality- preachers as pandering court-theologians of Jacobinical demos-ideology.
Continuing on this theme, stuff like this really reminds me of the way modern Babelist theologians clearly enjoy shocking the sentiments of conservative Christians by denying that race exists or matters in any positive way – the rubbing-it-to-their-faces attitude:
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/2439/2439-h/2439-h.htm#2HCH0004
“The greatest Anglican doctors of that age had maintained that no breach of law or contract, no excess of cruelty, rapacity, or licentiousness, on the part of a rightful King, could justify his people in withstanding him by force.
Some of them had delighted to exhibit the doctrine of nonresistance in a form so exaggerated as to shock common sense and humanity. They frequently and emphatically remarked that Nero was at the head of the Roman government when Saint Paul inculcated the duty of obeying magistrates. The inference which they drew was that, if an English King should, without any law but his own pleasure, persecute his subjects for not worshipping idols, should fling them to the lions in the Tower, should wrap them up in pitched cloth and set them on fire to light up Saint James’s Park, and should go on with these massacres till whole towns and shires were left without one inhabitant, the survivors would still be bound meekly to submit, and to be torn in pieces or roasted alive without a struggle.
The arguments in favour of this proposition were futile indeed: but the place of sound argument was amply supplied by the omnipotent sophistry of interest and of passion.”
“The omnipotent sophistry of interest and of passion” – doesn’t that describe anti-Kinist fanatics pretty well?
World Magazine’s new cover story touts the joys of African adoption:
http://www.worldmag.com/articles/18357