Isaiah 34:10, Revelation 14:11, Revelation 19:3.
No one knows more about Hitler and the Third Reich than David Irving. Irving says he doubts that there is anyone alive beside himself who has shook more hands that shook Adolf Hitler’s hand. Listen to this very good speech. He tells the story of how he has been fined and imprisoned for the modern Jew-crime of free speech and free thought. Listen to the protesters outside this meeting who are trying to drown him out, so terrified are they that someone, somewhere can freely express ideas that they find disagreeable. He’s a brave man who has loved truth more than fame and fortune, and that’s a very rare thing indeed. At one time, he was one of the world’s highest-paid historians. Now, he says his wife is “frantic with fear.”
Everyone wants to know Irving’s estimate of Jewish casualties during the war, which in itself is an odd thing. Sixty million deaths in all seem to pale in comparison, unfortunately. Though entire cities were incinerated in minutes by Allied bombers, no one cares. It’s even worse than not caring; they don’t even care to know about it.
Nevertheless, Irving’s estimate can be heard at 1:31:17:
From all causes, during the entire period of the Nazi regime, from 1933 to 1945, I would estimate that up to four million Jews will have died from all causes, including air raids, starvation, epidemics, being worked to death, dying of natural causes, everything else…
I think probably as many as 100,000 Jews died in Auschwitz, which was a brutal slave labor camp, where they had no business being. The fact that they died in that camp of “natural” causes – epidemics, mostly typhus – is neither here nor there. Of those 100,000, probably about 10,000 were actually physically murdered, in the criminal sense…
And of course, it raises the logical question: If you’re going to [exterminate] them…why ship them all the way across Europe and kill them when they arrive? It doesn’t make sense…
Here’s the death estimate from all camps, notarized in 1984 by the International Red Cross:
Irving is not nearly as accurate in parsing his estimate of four million deaths of Jews (from all causes, in all places). Depending on the day, he says that anywhere from hundreds of thousands to three million (2:28) Jews died in the Reinhard camps and the eastern front, and that Himmler was “the brains behind the operation.” In spite of his belief that millions were liquidated, he is still considered a “holocaust denier” because his conspiracy theory doesn’t conform to the official, Jew-approved conspiracy theory.
We saw the same thing happen ten years ago. Everyone believes in a 9/11 conspiracy. The difference is that the “respectable” theory is a conspiracy of 19 Saudi Arabians, funded and trained by former CIA employee Osama bin Laden, with former CIA employee Saddam Hussein having some connection that was never explained but was somehow deserving of a war in Iraq. All who dissent from this official, respectable conspiracy theory are called “conspiracy theorists.” Their disputes and questions go unanswered because they are widely considered to be nonconformist kooks with a devious agenda, not unlike “holocaust deniers.”
The odd thing about this is that the “respectable” conspiracy theorists have to keep revising their theories. In 1990, the estimate of 9 million deaths at Auschwitz, cited in the French documentary Night and Fog, was revised down to 1.5 million, and then lower. In 1963, the Encyclopaedia Britannica claimed that 2 million died at Mauthausen. The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum has now revised this number down to 14,000. There sure are a lot of Holocaust Deniers out there.
World War II was a horrible time for everyone involved. It was mankind’s worst blood-letting, and it almost erased the white race from the face of the earth. Many were treated brutally, and many lives were lost, Jews included. But as you know, it is no longer good enough to merely acknowledge the suffering of Jews. The religion of Holocaustianity demands sacrifice! Punishment awaits all heretics.
The holy scriptures of this religion are the proceedings of the post-war Nuremberg trial, which was a stunning miscarriage of justice that set new and dangerous precedents in jurisprudence and erected the framework of “hate speech” laws that have crippled the West for generations. Articles 19 and 21 of the Charter of the International Military Tribunal prove it to have been no court at all: “The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence… The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof…” There was no possibility of appeal.
Read what men at the time said of the farce:
No matter how many books are written or briefs filed, no matter how finely the lawyers analyzed it, the crime for which the Nazis were tried had never been formalized as a crime with the definiteness required by our legal standards, nor outlawed with a death penalty by the international community. By our standards that crime arose under an ex post facto law. Goering et al deserved severe punishment. But their guilt did not justify us in substituting power for principle.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas
About this whole judgment there is the spirit of vengeance, and vengeance is seldom justice. The hanging of the eleven men convicted will be a blot on the American record which we shall long regret.
U.S. Senator Robert A. Taft
This kangaroo court at Nuremberg was officially known as the “International Military Tribunal.” That name is a libel on the military profession. The tribunal was not a military one in any sense. The only military men among the judges were the Russians… At Nuremberg, mankind and our present civilization were on trial, with men whose own hands were bloody sitting on the judges’ seats. One of the judges came from the country which committed the Katyn Forest massacre and produced an array of witnesses to swear at Nuremberg that the Germans had done it.
Rear Admiral Dan V. Gallery, U.S.N.
I think the Nuremberg trials are a black page in the history of the world… I discussed the legality of these trials with some of the lawyers and some of the judges who participated therein. They did not attempt to justify their action on any legal ground, but rested their position on the fact that in their opinion, the parties convicted were guilty… This action is contrary to the fundamental laws under which this country has lived for many hundreds of years, and I think cannot be justified by any line of reasoning. I think the Israeli trial of Adolf Eichmann is exactly in the same category as the Nuremberg trials. As a lawyer, it has always been my view that a crime must be defined before you can be guilty of committing it. That has not occurred in either of the trials I refer to herein.
Edgar N. Eisenhower, attorney, brother of President Dwight D. Eisenhower
My opinion always has been that the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials were acts of vengeance. War is a political and not a legal act, and if at the termination of a war, should it be considered that certain of the enemy’s leaders are politically too dangerous to be left at large, then, as Napoleon was, they should be banished to some island. To bring them to trial under post facto law, concocted to convict them, is a piece of hideous hypocrisy and humbug.
Major General J.F.C. Fuller
To me the Nuremberg trials have always been totally inexcusable and a horrible travesty of justice. This is especially true when such trials are used to punish the men of the military services who were directing those services in time of war, and thus giving nothing more than an expression of the basic purposes of their whole adult life. In the execution of their wartime duties, these officers naturally carried out, to the letter, the orders and directions which they received from the head of their government. If an officer…should ever, for one instant, consider disregard or disobedience to his government’s orders, all cohesion in the military services would fail, from that moment, and the military sevices would fail in the one reason for their existence – the waging of successful war in the interests of their country.
Rear Admiral Robert A. Theobald, U.S.N.
I am quite clear that any trial of defeated foes by their victors is a mistake and a precedent which should not be followed among what are commonly described as civilised nations.
Dr. George Peabody Gooch, British historian and author
[The Nuremberg] war-crimes trials were based upon a complete disregard of sound legal precedents, principles and procedures. The court had no real jurisdiction over the accused or their offenses; it invented ex post facto crimes; it permitted the accusers to act as prosecutors, judges, jury and executioners; and it admitted to the group of prosecutors those who had been guilty of crimes as numerous and atrocious as those with which the accused were charged. Hence, it is not surprising that these trials degraded international jurisprudence as never before in human experience.
Professor Harry Elmer Barnes, Ph.D.
The Tribunal claimed in theory the right – it certainly had the power – to declare any act a war-crime. But it interpreted Article 6 of the Charter creating it, as excluding from its consideration any act committed by the victorious powers. As a consequence, any act proved to have been committed by the victorious powers could not be declared by the Tribunal a war-crime. For this reason, the indiscriminate bombing of civilians which had indisputably been initiated by Great Britain was excluded from consideration as a war crime by the Tribunal.
F.J.P. Veale, English jurist and author
Harlan Fiske Stone, Chief Justice of the United States, called it a “high-grade lynching party.” It didn’t matter. The verdict was a foregone conclusion. A Gallup poll at the time showed that two-thirds of the American public wanted Hermann Göring executed without a trial.
At around the 30 minute mark in the Irving video above, you’ll hear confirmation of Admiral Gallery’s quote above. The Russians have now admitted the guilt of the Soviets for the massacre of Poles in the Katyn Forest, yet at Nuremberg it was blamed on the Germans. And since Holohoax laws are being enforced throughout Europe, such that the fiction presented during the “trial” has become sacralized, it means that to accept the Russian admission of guilt makes one a Naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. In France, it has been a crime since 1990 to contester (challenge) any part of the Nuremberg Charter, including the manufacture of “Jewish soap.”
At Nuremberg, it wasn’t just a question of jurisdiction. Proof for the alleged crimes was highly questionable or nonexistent. Yet even today, the judgment is used as the basis for hauling 90-year-old men into court to answer for crimes committed 70 years ago, for which there is neither evidence nor witnesses.
The prosecution at Nuremberg essentially argued that Germany had no right to fight against Stalin and the encroachment of Communism, but the West had every right to fight Hitler in the same way. The defense pleaded the necessity of a George W. Bush-style preemptive attack on the Communist menace.
The charge against the defendants was conspiracy. Conspiracy! The Allies could just as easily have been accused of “conspiring” against the Germans. But this was done so that the defendants would be lumped together rather than tried individually. Thus, there was no distinction between Göring and Streicher, though the latter had absolutely nothing to do with the German planning or conduct of the war. Streicher was sent to his death for writing mean things like this very blog post. Count Four against him was for “crimes against humanity by stirring up hatred against the Jews.” This is not yet a crime in America, though Jews are doing everything in their power to bring an end to the right of free speech secured by our Christian forefathers.
Nuremberg was quite the Jewish production. The American delegation was about 75% Jewish, according to U.S. Executive Trial Counsel Thomas J. Dodd’s estimate. Therefore, it’s not surprising that in the place of the judge’s stand was erected a giant video screen; a case of “documentary” covering for the lack of documentation. The arresting images had the desired effect on the jurors and audience.
John Ford, of Western fame, was the chief propagandist and included clever little animations in the ostensibly objective video, including one which showed concentration camps dotting Germany. Jew Simon Wiesenthal has said that “there were no extermination camps on German soil” (Stars and Stripes, Jan. 24, 1993), and that “gassings” of Jews took place only in Poland, in camps that were liberated by the lying Soviets and then kept hidden for many years behind the Iron Curtain.
The British invented what they called “concentration camps” during the Boer War (1899-1902) in South Africa, for the purpose of holding Afrikaner women and children. These were the first of their kind. Approximately 30,000 died in the camps. Americans interned Japanese in concentration camps during WWII. Britain was also the first country to practice mass civilian bombing, on May 11, 1940. Towards the end of the “trial,” the prosecution adopted a new term: “policy of genocide.” The word “genocide” was invented by Raphael Lemkin, a Polish Jew, in a book published in 1944. The term “extermination camp” was also coined in November of 1944, by Jew Rudolf Vrba. The “holocaust” mythology did not begin to grow until the 1970s.
The first appearance of the term “gas chamber” was in December of 1941, when German author Thomas Mann appeared on the BBC to declare that in German hospitals, the wounded, elderly, and feeble were being culled with poison gas. Classic wartime propaganda. It’s very similar to what Iraqi soldiers were accused of doing in Kuwait hospitals, which was enough to secure American commitment in the conflict, but which later was found to be lies.
A sign at Dachau is surprisingly honest, at least in the fine print, right under the big words “GAS CHAMBER”:
One might say that the bookends of the 20th century were the lies about the Lusitania and Colin Powell’s yellowcake uranium presentation to the United Nations, where he said that “every statement I make today is backed up by sources, solid sources. These are not assertions. What we are giving you are facts and conclusions based on solid intelligence.”
One of the video spectacles during the opening days of the Nuremberg “trial” that produced a very emotional response was of a bulldozer pushing corpses into a pit. There was, of course, no explanation that it was not a German soldier who drove the machine, and no context was provided for the many starving and diseased wanderers who had come to the camp in the closing days of the war, looking for food and supplies. Josef Kramer, the commandant of Bergen-Belsen, even sent a delegation to British Field Marshal Montgomery’s troops to warn them that they were approaching a huge den of infection, and the typhus had to be prevented from spreading among the Allied soldiers and the German population.
Footage was shown of corpses neatly arranged in rows at Nordhausen, victims of an Allied bombing raid. The “documentary evidence” was propaganda. No one at the “trial” seemed concerned that the horrific images they saw were due, even in part, to Allied bombings which had broken supply routes and caused the general population to starve to death. Nothing spreads disease like lack of food and clean water. No one at the “trial” seemed to notice that there were far more photographs of sick or dying prisoners and refugees than dead prisoners and refugees. Given the circumstances, it was a wonder that so many of them lived. Confederate and Yankee prisoners of war did not fare as well in the 1860s. As Arthur Butz writes in The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, “The simplest valid reason for being skeptical about the extermination claim is also the simplest conceivable reason: at the end of the war they were still there.”
According to David Irving, the Nazis didn’t realize that the British had built the world’s first computer, as big as a house, and were intercepting and deciphering all communications between Auschwitz and the chief of the SS in Berlin. Unaware that their enemies were listening, why would the Nazis not have been truthful about tens of thousands of executions per day? Instead, the daily report was of a “miniscule” number of deaths, due mostly to illness, but also to executions and hangings. (Anne Frank died of typhus at Bergen-Belsen, just weeks before the end of the war. Her father arrived at the camp sick but recovered at the camp hospital. Obviously, the Nazis restored him to health so that he wouldn’t have to be carried to the gas chamber on a stretcher.)
For Auschwitz to have a total capacity of 60,000 bodies to cremate per day, as Jews claim, it would have required 2,000 tons of coal per day to be shipped into the camp. Yet the Allied aerial photos show no such thing – not even smoke from the crematory stacks, much less the “color-coded smoke” of Judaic myth. No fuel depots for the raging fires nor “open pits.” Flower beds can be seen surrounding the crematories. It’s amazing that the thousands of Jews who were marched daily to their deaths managed to step gingerly over these flowers and not trample them. The CIA retouched these photos before publishing them, adding the missing hatches (more on this below) on the “gas chambers,” but they forgot to make the camp look like a murder factory.
Russian archives record the precise amount of coal delivered to Auschwitz during the entire course of the war, from start to finish: 2,188 tons.
The sacred number of six million soon-to-be-dead Jews had been repeated by Zionists since the 19th century.
At Nuremberg, the magical number was made official by former SS major Wilhelm Höttl. Höttl claimed, under oath and by signed affidavit, that Adolf Eichmann visited him at the end of August 1944 at his apartment in Budapest, and Eichmann allegedly claimed to have recently submitted a report to Himmler, who had wanted to know the exact number of Jews killed to that point. The answer, of course, was six million. (Nine months before the war’s end, when starvation reached its apex?)
But Höttl had good reason to lie. He had embezzled from the SS during the war but contacted the Allies before he could be arrested. He was more than willing to give the Allies anything they wanted; the alternative was deportation to Hungary, where he would have assuredly been hanged by the Communists. This was the sterling character who gave us the number that is now illegal to question, and his cooperation won him early release from confinement. As Robert Faurisson discovered, the affidavit accuses Eichmann of using the anachronistic term “extermination camps,” but this was never used by anyone until November of 1944, three months after the alleged meeting. Later in life, Höttl searched for a dignified escape from his lie. First he said that Eichmann was drunk on that fateful night in Budapest. Then he accused Eichmann of having an inferiority complex that led him to exaggerate the real number. Then, shortly before his death of old age, he wrote: “The figure of 6 million seems, anyhow, to be magical.” Indeed!
The judges at Nuremberg refused to allow Höttl to be cross-examined, and accepted as fact that six million Jews were killed…killed at the hands of Eichmann himself!
A brief aside: At the show trial in Israel that sent Eichmann to his death, one Jacob Biscowitz testified that at Sobibor, the floor opened and bodies fell into railway wagons below. No one still believes this story. Nor does anyone believe that the bucket of human heads and other stage props shown during the trial were the work of the Nazis. You never hear the bucket of heads mentioned along with the piles of hair (for mattresses!) and eyeglasses and shoes. To further embarrass the Jews, who had kidnapped him from Argentina and hauled him to Israel, Eichmann scuttled his own testimony with an outlandish story about turning two farmer’s hovels into a hermetically sealed room and hauling a captured diesel U-boat engine 250 miles from the sea to connect to this “gas chamber.” Diesel engines don’t produce carbon monoxide. For a large volume of carbon monoxide, a simple and cheap wood gas generator would have done the trick. Eichmann also claimed to have witnessed Jewish blood “shooting out of the earth like a fountain” at a site where they “had been shot some time before.”
The “proof” of Auschwitz being an extermination rather than a concentration camp was founded on the testimony of camp commandant Rudolf Hoess (or Höß), who claimed that he oversaw the deaths of 3 million. The trouble is that no one still believes this. The official estimate by the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum of Jews who died at Auschwitz is 1.1 million, including starvation, disease, and all causes. This number is seldom questioned because it has the appearance of being a more conservative estimate than Hoess’s own testimony. Hoess might have been given a plea bargain in exchange for making up a large number, but it didn’t save him. He was executed by the Czech Commies a year later. Evidence that his testimony was intentionally false is supported by his reference to a camp named “Wolzek,” which didn’t exist, and that “Wolzek,” along with Treblinka and Belzec, existed prior to June of 1941. We know that Belzec, the first of the camps, was not constructed until November of 1941. Höess apologized to his wife for his confession, saying that it had been extracted from him under torture.
Additional “proof” for Auschwitz being an extermination camp hinged on the testimony of a French woman named Marie-Claude Vaillant Couturier, who worked opposite the train depot and saw people exiting trains as they arrived.
Listen to “holocaust survivors” themselves, in their own words, talk about various camp luxuries. There was a library with newspapers and books to borrow. There was a cantina with weak beer (oy vey!) and cigarettes. Prisoners paid for supplies with money they received (often from their kin in Vienna) or by Nazi-issued coupons that were redeemable in the cantina. Stamps and stationery were supplied to them by the genocidal Germans. There was a movie theater, an orchestra, quartets, various cultural activities, art classes, a grand piano, a theater stage in the dining room.
Let’s not forget the soccer teams that Jews formed to keep their minds off the long lines around the gas chamber (at Auschwitz, the sportplatz field was adjacent to it), and the screaming, and that awful sound of fingernails clawing concrete, and the wretched smell of burning flesh that lingered in the air. Soccer is good for toning the legs. The exercise can be very useful when Dr. Mengele is chasing you around the camp, trying to turn your skin into a lampshade. Be sure to see the footage of Theresienstadt, where soccer teams were organized by nationality. You see very well-fed athletes and a cheering throng of well-fed spectators. One “survivor” tells the story of when a couple of SS officers joined the game, one for the Poles and one for the Germans. He says pressure on the prisoners relaxed rather than intensified towards the end of the war, in 1944. British POWs at Auschwitz had their own team too.
One woman, who says she had to write out her own sheet music at Auschwitz (oy gevald!), often picked leaves from the trees and made tea for everyone in the camp. They probably couldn’t drink it outdoors because of all the ash that fell from the sky. There was a day care in the children’s barracks, with rooms full of toys. A woman tells of painting a large wall mural of a swiss chalet with cows and flowers in the meadow, and this inspired the children, who wanted Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs painted into the mural. The children then wrote a vaudeville play about Snow White. When asked how this could happen at Auschwitz, for crying out loud, and what the heck, she says that it was all kept very hush-hush – except that SS officers came to watch the play.
Many children were born at Auschwitz, and for some reason the clumsy Nazis sent the pregnant women to the hospital, missing the two-for-one special. (In Schindler’s List, Steven Spielberg hid the children in the cesspool, which makes a lot more sense than received history.)
What kind of retards were the Germans? What kind of extermination policies were these? Apparently, Auschwitz had a lot of things, but it lacked one very significant thing. Jewish historian Olga Wormser-Migot, in her book Le Système Concentrationnaire Nazi, 1933-1945, wrote that Auschwitz was “without any gas chamber.” The International Red Cross visited Auschwitz during the war and could not confirm rumors of gas chambers, and did not appear to notice the stench of burning flesh, but did verify that the slaves could receive postcards and packages in the mail and had other conveniences, like a swimming pool. The “tourist trap” gas chamber now on site was constructed by the Soviets three years after the war, and some fool built it with wooden doors that open inward, where the dead bodies allegedly piled up. Then some other fool had the idea to build this chamber that allegedly filled with explosive cyanide gas right next to the room containing coal furnaces that could reach temperatures of 900° C. We are asked to believe that German engineers were responsible for this absurd configuration.
The chimney doesn’t even connect to the crematory ovens.
Yet as inept as the Nazis were, they cleaned the ovens and chimneys before evacuating the camps? This is the testimony of the liewitnesses. They painstakingly collected their conspiracy documents and burned them, along with all the bodies they had already buried, and crushed the bones to powder, but forgot to do anything with the 7 tons of hair over here or the massive pile of baby clothes over there. The pile of baby clothes was 130 feet high, according to Kurt Gerstein, an SS officer who purposely discredited his confession by claiming that 25 million were killed at Belzec and Treblinka. This is a fascinating example of how Jews embellish their stories with emotion and Germans embellish their stories with precision. It’s common for those who are really innocent to plead guilty in order to get a lighter sentence which they know is inevitable. But it seems that the Germans were resigned to their fate and yet had the perspicacity to send a message to future generations. It worked. Gerstein was found dead in his prison cell in 1945, the alleged victim of “suicide.”
Only one set of core samples, only of Belzec, was commissioned by the Holohoax Museum, and the “graves” were oriented in such a way that they were directly underneath what were roads, barracks, a barber shop, a dentistry office, and a kitchen when the camp was in operation. Germans didn’t do anything like this when they identified the victims of the Katyn Forest, who were mass murdered by the Soviets. They actually exhumed the bodies.
Jew historian Yitzhak Arad writes that the Reinhard officers received orders to remove all debris, plow under the camps, and plant trees to hide the evidence. But while they were busy doing this, they accidentally left thousands of witnesses behind to tell the whole story of deception to the Soviets? The same witnesses say that they were beaten with rods on the way to the “gas chamber,” but seconds later the inept Nazis forgot that they had beaten them and tried to resume the ruse by giving each one of them a towel and a bar of soap and a haircut.
Nobel Prize winner Elie Wiesel (a.k.a. Oily Weasel) “survived” the gas chambers too. He and his father were given the choice, by the murderous and barbaric Nazis, to stay at Auschwitz until the Soviets arrived or leave with them for Buchenwald, and they chose to leave with the Nazis. You remember Buchenwald. That’s where the U.S. Army’s Psychological Warfare Division, run by Jews, put shrunken heads and lampshades made of Jew flesh on display. It was a Billy Wilder-produced extravaganza. At Buchenwald, where Nazis allegedly killed 10,000 Jews per day, Weasel’s father died of dysentery, and Weasel played chess (Time Magazine, March 18, 1985). Have you ever tried to watch a chess game? It’s as much fun as swallowing and defecating diamonds every day for a year and a half, which is “survivor” Irene Zisblatt’s claim to fame.
Weasel later deflected questions about the Holohoax religion by calling it “a sacred mystery, whose secrets were confined to a priesthood of survivors. In a diffuse way, however, the assertion that the Holocaust was a holy event that resisted profane representation, that it was uniquely inaccessible to explanation or understanding, that survivors had privileged interpretive authority – all these themes continued to resonate.”
The Nazis were so confused about how to commit genocide that in 1944 they allowed the Council of Elders of the Jews in Vienna to build and operate Jewish hospitals, a children’s home and day school, a community kitchen, a bath-house, an elderly home, a clothes and furniture depot, a welfare division, a library, and a cemetery. Then, in an infamous act of anti-Semitism, an Allied bombing raid completely destroyed the children’s hospital.
Churchill, Eisenhower, and de Gaulle never mentioned gas chambers in their memoirs, yet we now live in a time when Jean-Marie Le Pen can be convicted in France for calling the gas chambers a “footnote of history.” (Jew Raul Hilberg devotes only one paragraph in three volumes to the manual crushing of the bones of 1.5 million bodies. But far from a footnote, this is central to the claim of the Jews that remains of the bodies no longer exist.)
The only alleged homicidal gas chamber that the prosecution ventured to show in a film, during the entire course of the Nuremberg “trial,” was at Dachau. But in 1960, Martin Broszat, of the Institute of Contemporary History in Munich, wrote: “Neither at Dachau, nor at Bergen-Belsen, nor at Buchenwald were any Jews or other detainees gassed.” A vast portion of the judgment at Nuremberg is based on erroneously alleged events at these camps. Yet still, we hear of men like Moshe Peer, who “survived” the gas chamber at Bergen-Belsen six times, and Alexander Donat, who survived nine “death” camps, with his wife! And if you think that’s amazing, William Lowenberg survived on his own saliva for three years by keeping a magical thirst-quenching pebble in his mouth. He never had to drink water. You wouldn’t want to be convicted of a hate crime for doubting these tall tales.
Auschwitz commandant Hoess claimed that guards entered the “gas chambers” only ten minutes after the Zyklon B had done its work. Zyklon B was invented by a Jew in 1922 to kill vermin such as lice, the carriers of typhus. At Auschwitz, the story is that it was dropped through four hatches in the roof. Unfortunately, these hatches were installed after the war by Polish Communists, as the curator of Auschwitz, Francizek Piper, admitted, and as Jew R.J. Van Pelt was forced to concede in 2009, going so far as to conclude that the lack of evidence makes conservation of the camp useless, and nature should be allowed to take it back. “No holes, no holocaust,” is the famous conclusion of Robert Faurisson, who calls Van Pelt “the last of the Jewish Mohicans.” Leaving aside the idea of using slow-acting hydrocyanic gas to kill anyone in such a short time, the guards themselves would have been exposed to great danger since it normally takes 20 hours to fumigate an area exposed to the gas. It adheres to surfaces as a substance called Prussian Blue, and as Fred Leuchter showed, it can even permeate brick and remain there for decades. It bonds with the iron in the brick. Even today at Auschwitz, there is a distinct blue color even on the outside of the de-lousing chamber, where it has seeped through the walls, but none at all around the so-called “gas chambers.”
Then, Hoess said the guards smoked cigarettes (kaboom!) and ate outside the chamber (yummy) after removing the bodies. This testimony was taken seriously at Nuremberg, as was anything else that might have incriminated the defendants.
Attempts by the defendants to exonerate themselves were ignored, but they managed to make themselves heard on a few key points. For instance, Göring insisted that the single document that mentions what has come to be known as the “final solution” was misinterpreted. It referred to a final territorial solution, according to Eichmann, not a final solution for extermination, as it has been understood. The plan was to extirpate the Jews from Europe, not to exterminate them. The program of evacuation, resettlement, and deportation was well-known and well-executed.
“There was no pre-established guiding plan. As for the question of the decision, it is in part unsolvable: no order signed by Hitler has ever been found, doubtless because no such document ever existed. I am persuaded that the bureaucracies moved through a sort of latent structure: each decision brings on another, then another, and so forth, even if it isn’t possible to foresee exactly the next step.” ~ Jew Raul Hilberg, the most famous of all Jewish historians, in Le Monde des livres, October 20, 2006, p. 12
Faurisson has documented other loopy statements by Hilberg, who has said that the conspiracy came together “by an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus-mind reading,” and without any “basic plan,” through “basic understandings of officials resulting in decisions not requiring orders or explanations.” Hilberg explains that “no special agency was created and no special budget was devised to destroy the Jews of Europe… In the final analysis, the destruction of the Jews was not so much a product of laws and commands, as it was a matter of spirit, of shared comprehension, of consonance and synchronization.” Didn’t the Eagles sing about this paranormal phenomenon during the 1970s when they were smoking peyote? Of course, if Hilberg is correct about extermination ex nihilo – and who would dare to accuse a Jew of lying? – it completely contradicts the accusation of conspiracy at Nuremberg.
Perhaps the Nazis were guilty of telepathy. I mean, just look at them.
Robert Faurisson’s three questions have never been answered, even with a substantial reward on the line:
- Show us one single document that, in your view, proves that Hitler or any other National Socialist ordered and planned the physical extermination of the Jews.
- Show us that weapon of mass destruction which, as alleged, was a gas chamber; show us a single one of them, at Auschwitz or elsewhere; and if, by chance, you claim that you cannot show us any because, according to you, the Germans destroyed the “murder weapon,” provide us at least with a technical drawing representing one of those slaughterhouses which, as you say, the Germans destroyed, and explain to us how that weapon with such a fabulous killing performance had been able to work without bringing on the death of either those who ran it or their helpers.
- Explain to us how you have arrived at your figure of six million victims.
“I think that 65 years after the liberation of Auschwitz, we must be entitled to start to ask the necessary questions. We should ask for some conclusive historical evidence and arguments rather than follow a religious narrative that is sustained by political pressure and laws. We should strip the holocaust of its Judeo-centric exceptional status and treat it as an historical chapter that belongs to a certain time and place. Sixty-five years after the liberation of Auschwitz, we should reclaim our history and ask why. Why were the Jews hated? Why did European people stand up against their next door neighbors? Why are the Jews hated in the Middle East? Surely they had a chance to open a new page in their troubled history. If they genuinely planned to do so, as the early Zionists claimed, why did they fail? Why did America tighten its immigration laws amid the growing danger to European Jews? We should also ask for what purpose do the holocaust denial laws serve? What is the holocaust religion there to conceal? As long as we fail to ask questions, we will be subjected to Zionists and their Neocon agents’ plots. We will continue killing in the name of Jewish suffering. We will maintain our complicity in Western imperialist crimes against humanity… The Holocaust became the new Western religion. Unfortunately, it is the most sinister religion known to man. It is a license to kill, to flatten, to nuke, to wipe, to rape, to loot and to ethnically cleanse. It made vengeance and revenge into a Western value.” ~ Jew Gilad Atzmon
David Irving, in a speech linked above, can answer some of Mr. Atzmon’s questions.
In Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania in particular, the local populations had bitter scores to settle with the Jews, because during the one year when those countries were occupied, from 1940 to 1941, under the Hitler-Stalin pact – they were occupied by the Soviet Union – the NKVD, the secret police, which was the forerunner of the KGB, had occupied those countries with a reign of terror. And using Jewish officers, because the KGB or the NKVD was largely Jewish at that time, they had carried out a rule of liquidation and purge in those three countries, murdering hundreds of thousands of local, middle-class entrepreneurs, the priests, the businessmen, the intellectuals, were rounded up and driven off in the dead of night by these Communists, by the Jewish organizations, and murdered. And a year later, when Hitler’s armies invaded and marched through these countries, they found the local population busy solving the Jewish Problem for them.
You absolutely must watch this documentary, The Last Days of the Big Lie, that dissects various Jew-lies, from black drama queens who have pretended to be camp liberators to the way in which Holohoaxery gave birth to the war that followed Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait. It’s a fascinating glimpse into psy-ops on the order of 9/11. Hitler was correct that “the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood can be exploited.” The Big Lie works on our race because it never enters into our minds to tell epic lies, much less to conspire in their service. Therefore, the big lies in which Jews specialize tend to be believed.
One of the best documentaries you’ll see on Holohoaxery is One Third of the Holocaust, a study of the Reinhard camps where 1.5 million were allegedly killed, by diesel exhaust, in minutes at a time. The creator of this video has the audacity to go to the sources of the fiction, where we learn all kinds of interesting scientific facts, like how chimneys bellow fire, and the bodies of women, especially fat women (according to Yechiel Reichman), can be used as kindling to burn the bodies of men. We also learn that the best way to build a fire is a layer of bodies, a layer of wood, a layer of bodies, and a layer of wood. Except that the wood isn’t really needed since bodies burn on their own. Sometimes dried tree branches were used for kindling, according to the liewitnesses, but they also report that the camp perimeter was barbed wire intertwined with tree branches. Yet somehow, the fires raging day and night never caused the fence to ignite, even though it was a mere 14 feet away from the grill made of “old railroad tracks.” Somehow, though Jews themselves managed the burning of oh, let’s say, a quarter billion pounds of wood, and even admit that they smoked cigarettes, not a one of them thought to set flame to the fence and escape. They sure do make good movies about escaping from prison, though.
As for the Nuremberg “trial,” in 218 days and over 1,000 hours of testimony, the Reinhard camps (Treblinka, Belzec, and Sobibor), were discussed for only about 20 minutes. Belzec is mentioned one time, in the 12th volume of the 22 volume set of the court transcript, where there is a sentence fragment referring to a homicidal electrified floor in the bath-house, which never existed. Treblinka, where it is alleged that John Demjanjuk worked, was once alleged by Jews to be the location of homicidal “steam chambers.” These stories have been consigned to Wonderland, where lampshades, soap, and shrunken heads are found.
Tales of the Holohoax, a gift for the serious comics collector.
Jew Abraham Bomba claims to have been one of several barbers at Treblinka who cut the hair of 150 naked women, sitting on 16 benches in a room that measured 12 by 12 feet (later he said 18 by 18 feet). Just picture it. According to Eli Rozenburg, 400 were crammed into this space. Bomba adds that the room was cleared of the bodies in only one minute.
Only about half a million Jews lived in Germany in 1930, making them about 1% of the population. (They were 10% of Poland.) By 1939 many had emigrated, and about 270,000 remained. No more than five million Jews lived in lands that came under German control during the war. About two million of these were absorbed by the Soviet Union during the war. Millions more emigrated to other countries prior to and during the war, but mostly after the war, especially to America and Palestine. It’s interesting that in 1924, Hitler perfectly predicted that if the Jews are ever successful in founding their own Israel, they will not want to go there in large numbers but will take refuge in their host countries like America. But, he said, if they’re ever convicted of crimes, they will take refuge in Israel, from which it will be impossible to extradite them.
Read this excellent article and learn something you might not know: The bloody Brits offered Palestine to the Arabs before they offered it to the Jews, and then reneged on the deal. Until the reniggering, Emir Feisal actually welcomed the Jews, amazingly enough. This goodwill was extended for – get ready for it – racial reasons. Though the two sides were of different religions, Feisal said he was “mindful of the racial kinship and ancient bonds existing between the Arabs and the Jewish people…” Of course, the arrangement was never going to work, but for a time the Arabs thought they could live in peace with their cousins, with well-established boundaries between them, according to the Balfour Declaration.
We feel that the Arabs and Jews are cousins in race, having suffered similar oppressions at the hands of powers stronger than themselves, and by a happy coincidence have been able to take the first step towards the attainment of their national ideals together.
The Arabs are no longer so naive in dealing with Jews, but white people are just as stupid as ever, thinking they can butt into everyone’s business around the world with only positive consequences.
Arab hatred of Jews. Watch the animation at 8:20.
At the Nuremberg “trial,” a great deal was made of the Nuremberg Laws of 1935, enforced by Göring, that prohibited marriage and sexual relations between Germans and Jews. (One of the laws prohibited the employment of German women under the age of 45, of child-bearing age.) Of course, this was utter hypocrisy. The Nuremberg Laws were strikingly similar to laws that exist in Israel today which outlaw relations between Jews and Arabs or other foreigners. Even as America led the way in prosecuting the Nuremberg “criminals,” most of our states rightly prohibited marriage between whites and persons of other races. After all, ours used to be a Christian nation.
What more can be said about it? In the words of Mark Twain, “You can’t reason people out of something they weren’t reasoned into.”
“The first Russian premier who faithfully set and carried out the task of Jewish equal status, despite the will of the Tsar, died – was this History’s mockery? – at the hands of a Jew.” ~ Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
In the 13th century, Pope Gregory IX approved the order of Louis IX for the burning of 24 cartloads of Talmud volumes, for the reasons that:
- Rabbinic emphasis on the sanctity of their own oral law nullifies the Law of God found in the Bible
- The Talmud fosters anti-goy and anti-Christian bigotry
- The Talmud blasphemes Jesus Christ
The best spoof ever made by The Onion:
An art display created by Palestinian children, depicting the horrors of the Gaza war (2008-2009), is deemed by Jews to be unsuitable for children.