Jason Russell said recently that his life’s dream was to make Hollywood musicals “like Moulin Rouge, Chicago, and Hairspray.” Helllooo, Frisco! A few days ago, he was not arrested, amazingly, for masturbating in public, vandalizing cars, and public intoxication, but was merely taken to a hospital for treatment. By the way he waves his arms in the videos here and here, it looks like he’s auditioning for a musical.
The aim of the “Bony” 2012 project is to encourage “humanitarian interventionism” against a ruthless Ugandan warlord who hasn’t been in Uganda for six years. Just wait until you see the whiter-people who comprise the ranks of this army of war-hungry Facebookers. It’s a sea of white faces, and only white faces, working on behalf of African children. They’re getting the word out and wearing bracelets and gearing up to placard cities overnight on April 20 and lobbying to send the U.S. military into a new quagmire. This is what whiter-people do. It doesn’t matter to them that Africans have never secured their own liberty, and therefore will not be able to maintain any peace imposed on them. They simply want to do something for Africa. Whiter-people raise awareness; they moralize with passionate intensity; they “belong and connect.” Despite the stated goal of creating videos to show “that genocide cannot exist,” they would never waste a drop of sweat for their own race, because they are Alienists, and their love affair is always with the Other.
They don’t give a fig for genocide occurring in the south of their precious Africa, because it is the genocide of whites. Still, a perverted, propositional kinship is very important to them; they are all worked up about homophobes, creationists, and racists contributing to the Kony cause. They don’t want the ideological homogeneity of their movement to suffer, African children be hanged.
Ugandans don’t like this campaign at all. The African Youth Initiative Network screened it for more than 5,000 of them a few days ago, and rocks were thrown at the screen, and organizers and the press fled for their lives. Further screenings have been cancelled. Now Ugandans are protesting what they see “as a foreign, inaccurate account that belittle[s] and commercialise[s] their suffering,” and they’re going to ban Kony 2012 t-shirts and bracelets from entering the country.
Obama deployed one hundred advisers into central Africa, purportedly to assist in the hunt for the warlord. “Is it possible that Kony 2012 is being used, perhaps even without the knowledge of the Invisible Children charity, to carry out a [fifth generation warfare] operation?” The empire has been running thin on excuses to intervene in oil-rich countries. Youthful white do-goodism combined with viral Internet memes kind of obviates the need for false flag operations. Think of all the money that could be saved if covertly wiring skyscrapers to implode is no longer necessary. The graduates of Liberty University can be the empire’s free reconaissance squad!
The deployment of American military personnel in a country that has recently discovered oil is not mere serendipity. What we are witnessing is the manipulation of “protest” in order to hide foreign policy intentions. The US government can quite honestly say that it has been forced to intervene in Uganda due to unprecedented popular support.
The idealistic liberal activists will be waving flags and singing God Bless America, even though they hate God, His blessings, and the American stock. They really just want to praise themselves. They are narcissists, and their favorite props have always been black children.
The military is controlled by the slaves of Jew bankers, whose business plan is to control the world’s dwindling supply of oil.
They know what the Rothschilds knew; politics and armies are nothing, money is everything. From age to age, the Jew remains the same, but his days in the West are numbered. “Woe to the inhabitants of the earth and the sea! For the devil has come down to you, having great wrath, because he knows that he has a short time” (Rev. 12:12).
Congo, Ivory Coast, Sudan, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, even Kenya. Take your pick, for it is the essence of Africa, the recurring A-Z of horror. And as surely as Nelson Mandela took those steps from captivity to freedom, his own country will doubtless shuffle into chaos and ruin.
Mark my words. One day it will be the turn of South Africa to revert to type, its farms that lie wasted and its towns that are battle zones, its dreams and expectations that lie rotting on the veldt. That is the way of things. Africa rarely surprises, it simply continues to appal…
The construct is as follows: white, inglorious and bad; black, noble and good; empire, bad; independence, good; the west, bad; the African, good. Forgotten in all this is that while Europeans were settling and spreading from the Cape, the psychopathic Shaka Zulu was employing his impi to crush everyone – including the Xhosa – in his path, and the Xhosa were themselves busy slaughtering Bushmen and Hottentots. Yet it is the whites who take the rap, for it was they who won the skirmishes along the Fish and Blood Rivers and who eventually gained the prize.
What suffers is the truth, and – of course – Africa. We are so cowed by the moist-eyed mantras of the left and the oath-laden platitudes of Bono and Geldof, we are forced to accept collective responsibility for the bloody mess that is now Africa. It paralyses us while excusing the black continent and its rulers.
This parody of white guilt on the Conan O’Brien show is very funny. The Help is about a Jew who rewards a Southern feminist for betraying her people, whose only purpose in the film is to be humiliated and degraded. The black characters, by contrast, are “imbued with both homespun wisdom and impeccable moral rectitude.” They are all caricatures, not characters, and Hollywood rising to give the black actress (and only the black actress) a standing ovation, as though her performance or the film itself were based on reality, is truly funny.
Here’s why most whites will sacrifice themselves for any cause except their own: because “white behavior optimizes for social status, not physical safety, wealth, or national survival.” Gen5 writes:
Most of the world optimizes for three different things: wealth, power, and beauty. For whites we can add a fourth good, social status, oddly achieved through “public displays of piety” (PDPs) towards the religion of their time, multiculturalism.
Wealth: “The family fortune that is the birthright of their children is going to be poured down the rat-hole of Africa so the parents can enjoy the adulation of their white liberal friends.” Corporations will gladly waste investment capital for costly diversity sensitivity training (which according to the Harvard Business Review, does nothing to slow discrimination lawsuits).
Power: Politicians would rather lose races than appeal to majority white interests. Even Ron Paul, who knows better, has praised MLK and Rosa Parks as “heroes” and has complained about blacks being “victimized” by the criminal justice system. Beauty: White men marrying non-white women of objectively inferior beauty and compatibility for the sake of claiming superior social status on the race issue. This is also the case for fertile Christians who abstain from having natural children so that they can adopt non-whites from Third World countries. As Gen5 points out, the New York Times even published an article about Mitt Romney’s insufferably white family, implying that he will or ought to be hurt politically because of it. Therefore, just like the old saying, “follow the money,” Gen5 tells us that answers to questions about why white people are self-destructive hinge on what enhances their social status.
So many white advocates are naively on a quest for broadcasting the truth, as if men were swayed by facts, when the larger mission is creating spheres of influence where social status is not a false fitness signal but rather something that correlates with true goods, including national survival.
Everyone will know that we’re winning when our virtual communities become churches, businesses, neighborhoods, and other networks that are able to deliver real benefits to members, and we will benefit from the protection of networks, which are stronger than the sum of their nodes.
Consider the example of a pastor who promotes miscegenation. Where does this pastor live? If in a lily-white area, you can attack him as a hypocrite. If he is the rare true believer who lives in the inner city, you can attack him as a foolish person who puts his family in unnecessary danger. The beauty of the other side being demonstrably wrong is that they are always fools or hypocrites. Either charge diminishes social status quite effectively.
David Opperman has an excellent series of articles (part 1, part 2) on the wunderkind of mediocrity, David Bahnsen, son of the famous theologian Greg Bahnsen. As you might recall, we used to give Little Davie and his buddy Andrew Sandlin the business for teaching Reconstructionists and other conservative Christians that their votes were wasted if they weren’t given to Republicans. These tools formed a lonely thinktank in California called the Center for Cultural Leadership, and their motto was “Creating a New Kind of Christian.” You can see why this gave us the vapors; if you’re not talking to us about the old kind of Christian, you’re not talking to us. We called their organization the Christian Culture Club, a pun on Boy George’s team of limp-wristed culture reclaimers. Their burning desire was to be “relevant” to popular culture. Their every effort was in the service of “incrementalism,” being the idea that the great reversal of our nation’s debauchery will never come at all if we aim too high. Therefore, we must ally ourselves with those who are most likely to win elections, having the expectation that we will get only a smidgin of what we desire, and then push for a smidgin more in the next election. In other words, before we become a Christian nation, we must endorse those who teach that Islam is a religion of peace, that Jews worship the God of the Bible, that sodomy is not to be punished, that we can spend our way out of the hole, etc. Yea, though I walk through the Valley of the Lesser of Two Evils, saith Brother Bahnsen, I shall incrementally climb the Mount of Relevance until I survey The Greater Good. It’s like a perverted Pilgrim’s Progress.
Bahnsen inherited a large share of jingoism from his father. He was foolishly convinced that Reagan rejected Keynesianism and that George W. Bush would be a tax-cutting Reaganite.
He called Pat Buchanan a racist and claimed that import tariffs are a violation of the Eighth Commandment, while international free trade prevents producers from stealing from consumers. Yes, you read that correctly. Fellow cheese log James Jordan agrees, writing: “We are not authorized to steal from people on the basis that they are not citizens of our particular nation.” These people believe that equal access to markets is a necessity of the Christian faith, and they believe the same about equal access to citizenship because it corresponds to their belief that nationhood is an ungodly relic of pagan racialism. Jordan is explicit: “Do we as Christians believe in ‘nationalism’? No, we don’t. We believe in the international, catholic, universal community of the Church. We also should believe in international, catholic, universal free markets and free trade.”
Bahnsen gave a hearty “AMEN!!!!!” when a pastor named Kevin Johnson wrote: “The family has in some sense in the covenant community been replaced by the family of the Church.” As you know, our purpose in life as Kinists is to expose and condemn this as devilry, douse it in kerosene, then hold hands and watch it burn while singing Negro spirituals. But enough about our Thursday evening fellowship meals.
“History is littered with civilizations which undermined the family. The family is God’s ordained life for man, and it endures.” ~ R.J. Rushdoony
“In Scripture, the family is the basic institution of society, to whom all the most basic powers are given, save one: the death penalty. (Hence, the death penalty could not be executed on Cain.) The family is man’s basic government, his best school, and his best church. The decay of the family is the decay of civilization.” ~ R. J. Rushdoony
Bahnsen supported George W. Bush for being pro-life, but this was because, like his father, Bush spoke out against abortion on occasion and never vowed to outlaw it. “Nobody could outlaw it on day one!” Bahnsen panted, and Michael Peroutka is “PATENTLY DISHONEST, and EXTREMELY DANGEROUS” for believing that such a thing was possible or desirable, he wrote in his characteristically capitalized manner.
Ignore obscure Christian retreatists who accuse our President of murder, and those who vote for him as accomplices to murder… For life, and for Bush, David L. Bahnsen
Sandlin (Rushdoony’s former editor) called Peroutka “a national socialist”!
Before long, Bahnsen was complaining about the state of public schools, saying that Bush had thrown too much money at them, and the federal government should get out of the business of education, “HOWEVER, the notion that this federalized education fiasco is to be abolished TOMORROW is contra-intelligent, and anti-Christian, to the core.” Yes, “anti-Christian”! And since the beast cannot be dismembered tomorrow, we need more of the same in the hope that someday we will get less of it. If you don’t follow me here, you are hopelessly irrelevant.
Bahnsen has certainly been consistent. He voted for principled conservative Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2003 and then pretended to get upset about the promotion of an “immoral and wicked lifestyle” when Arnold forced California insurance companies to recognize faggots as being married. Yet no amount of feigned outrage can dissuade the Relevant Incrementalist from voting Pragmatic Publican every time. Rather than repent of his decision, Bahnsen wrote that Arnold was “not a sign of regress. At worst case, he is a break-even.”
In the summer of 2006, Bahnsen wrote that it was “the first 4th of July I am blessed to spend as an ideologically self-conscious ‘neo-conservative.’” He exulted that “[U.S.] troops around the world [are] fighting to maintain peace.” Naturally, he endorsed the Jew-view of Norman Podhoretz that propping up the terrorist, anti-Christ, racial state of Israel is of one piece with “the values of Western civilization as a whole.” This was a three-point shot on the court of ethical casuistry. According to Bahnsen, the wealthy state of Israel must be “supported” for vague reasons having to do with democracy and capitalism, which are in actual practice race-worship and usury.
As you see in the Opperman series, the Jew is at the chewy center of the Tootsie Roll pop:
Bahnsen is nothing if not a committed Zionist, and he persistently exudes support for arch-Zionists such as Paul Wolfowitz, Jonah Goldberg, and John Bolton, among numerous others. Zionism has committed America to an entangling alliance with an overt enemy of Christian civilization, and if the unequal yoking principle in 2 Corinthians 6:14 means anything, it must stand to condemn such an alliance with the stated enemies of Christianity.
Well, as Russell Kirk said, politics is the preoccupation of the quarter-educated. At any rate, this is all helpful background to the quotes from Bahnsen that you see in Mr. Opperman’s articles. For instance, Bahnsen writes: “SOME of what Ron Paul says he wants to do, I want to do too. But I want to do it over a generation, because it absolutely will never get done if it is not done over a generation.” It should be obvious, especially in light of the utter failure, decade after decade, of Republicans to accomplish anything remotely biblical, that this is a dearth of principle, not a strategy. It’s also a good way for Bahnsen to shift blame for his crackpot theories to future generations, long after he will have to answer for what he has taught, similar to how Doug Wilson claims that Africa will be a “glittering civilization,” oh, shall we say, 500 years from now.
This statement by Mr. Opperman is a fine conclusion to the whole mess:
Cheering on a winner simply because you know that he will win is the mentality of a coward, and we live in an age of pervasive moral cowardice. The suggestion that we are making incremental progress of any sort in a healthy direction is simply preposterous.
He also writes:
I can easily picture a David Bahnsen-esque thinker in the waning decades of the Roman Empire; a man who mocked those who warned that Rome’s imperial policies were leading her native citizens to inevitable destruction. This Bahnsen analog likely would have taken great comfort that his opinions were solidly in the mainstream and that Roman ascendancy would last forever… The idea that Rome could ever be sacked by Germanic Christian Goths would never have occurred to Roman Bahnsen, and he would mock those who dared question the future of Roman dominance over the world’s affairs.
To give an answer to the imperial cheerleaders in Rome, God sent Salvian the Presbyter, who was one of the teachers of St. Patrick and was called “the master of bishops.” While Augustine explained why God had allowed the Roman empire to fall, Salvian considered the point to be superfluous. The real question, he said, is why Rome did not fall sooner. While Augustine wrote that the fall of Rome was not the worst thing that could have happened, Salvian wrote that the worst and most unjust thing would have been if Rome had not fallen.
Salvian paints a vivid picture of the lustful delirium of the people at their “games,” even as their cities were being taken. He writes that when the Vandals took Carthage, it was difficult to distinguish the shouts of those at the games from the shouts of those who fell defending the walls.
The barbarian peoples were sounding their arms around the walls of Cirta and Carthage and the Christian population of Carthage still went mad in the circuses and reveled in the theaters.
Does this sound familiar?
Rome “is dying,” he writes, “but continues to laugh.” In Trier, with “the nude and torn bodies of both sexes, infecting the eyes of the city as they were torn to pieces by birds and dogs,” the people (including the Christians) remained obsessed with escapism and pleasure. The state gave the people 175 holidays each year!
There was rampant corruption among the aristocrats (Salvian himself was most likely descended from the Gallo-Roman aristocracy) and rampant mania for entertainment among all classes. It’s just like today, with the civic corruption of the bankers, lobbyists, and politicians, and the corruptions of mind and body among average people who are obsessed with Hollywood and fantasy. Above it all, we hear incessant strains of “God Bless America” and “Land of the Friedman, Home of the Braverman.” The Christians of Rome also chanted the equivalent of “God Bless America,” and when Rome was overcome by its enemies, they were shocked to discover that God was no longer “blessing” them. Salvian writes:
The Church herself, which should be the appeaser of God in all things, what is she but the exasperator of God? Beyond a very few individuals who shun evil, what else is the whole assemblage of Christians but the bilge water of vice? How many will you find in the Church who are not either a drunkard or a beast, or an adulterer, or a fornicator, or a robber, or a debauchee, or a brigand or a murderer? And, what is worse than all this, they do all these things almost unceasingly…
See the countless thousands of Christians daily tarrying at the games where base performances are enacted. Can God watch over people like this? Can He watch over those who revel in the circuses and who commit adultery in the theater?… We ever serve the devil in the obscenity of the games and do this knowingly, understandingly and with well-considered deliberation… To Christ, therefore (O monstrous madness), to Christ we offer circuses and mimes, to Christ for His favors we return the indecencies of the theaters, to Christ we offer as sacrificial victims the vilest of games… Was it for this He hung on a gibbet, whom the world feared as He hung there?…
By the way, when you read about theaters and circuses and mimes, don’t for a minute think that it was anything as benign as a modern carnival. The mimes performed perverted sex acts. Bestiality was the halftime show in the Colosseum.
Whatever is of an impure nature is done in the theaters. Whatever is luxurious, in the wrestling schools. Whatever is immoderate, in the circuses. Whatever is mad, in the arena pits. Here there is wantonness, there lasciviousness. Here there is intemperance, there insanity. And everywhere, the devil.
Salvian could see that Christians brought these horrors upon themselves, just as is the case in America today.
He said: “Woe unto you who laugh because you will weep”; and “Blessed are you who weep because you will laugh.” But we are not satisfied with laughing and rejoicing, unless we rejoice with sin and in madness, unless our laughter is mixed with impurities, unless it is mixed with disgraceful acts…
I believe God clearly wished to show them why they were perishing, since at the actual moment of perishing they were doing that very thing through which they had come to final perdition… Therefore, let nobody think that city perished only at the time of its own ruin. Where such things are done, the inhabitants had already [morally] perished long before they [physically] perished…
[A]ll these calamities which we have suffered have been borne, not by the lack of God’s providence or through His neglect, but rather in justice and judgment, in a most uniform dispensation and worthy retribution.
The American empire will fall just as the Roman empire fell, and when it happens, supporters of wickedness like David Bahnsen will wonder why God has forsaken them. When the system of usury on which they depend collapses, they will have nowhere to turn. We will need a Salvian in that day, and may God restore the years that the locust has devoured.
Salvian also saw that once a people had been conquered by “barbarians,” the last thing they wanted to do was return to subjugation under Rome. As “barbarians” they were free, and Salvian recognized that this was all according to God’s plan.
It’s common for Alienist preachers today to exaggerate the depravity of their European ancestors in the futile and profoundly dishonest attempt to prove that blood has nothing to do with behavior, and the gospel can make everyone equal in every way.
Brian Schwertley, for example, likes to say, without any proof whatsoever, that fifteen hundred years ago his Irish ancestors were painting their buttocks blue and eating each other. But in the real world, Salvian agreed with Tacitus and others that (despite being ignorant of the gospel) the Vandals were remarkably chaste, the Goths remarkably pious, and the Franks, Saxons, and other tribes possessed a host of rude virtues that made them a blessing to refugees.
We [Romans] love impurity; the Goths abominate it. We flee from purity; they seek it. Fornication among them is a crime; with us a distinction and an ornament. Do we think we can face God, do we think that we can be saved, when every crime of impurity, every base and shameful act, is committed by the Romans and censured by the barbarians? Here and now I ask them who think we are better than the barbarians: Tell me which of these vices is committed even by a very few Goths, or which of them is not committed by the Romans or by nearly all Romans? And we wonder when the soil of the Aquitainians, or all of our own is given by God to the barbarians, since the barbarians are now cleansing by chastity those lands which the Romans polluted by fornication.
He goes on to say that Spain was likewise given over to the Vandals, “the most chaste among the barbarians.”
By the captivity of the Spaniards, God wished to show in two ways how much He hated carnal lewdness and loved chastity, when He put the Vandals in command solely on account of their great chastity and subjugated the Spaniards solely on account of their great impurity.
His appraisal of the European tribes:
The Gothic nation is lying, but chaste. The Alani are unchaste, but they lie less. The Franks lie, but they are generous. The Saxons are savage in cruelty, but admirable in chastity…
And then there is Africa. Buckle your seat belt.
Among almost all Africans, I know not what is not evil… Their impurities and blasphemies must not be spoken here, because…they have surpassed the evils of other races, but in impurity and blasphemy they have even surpassed themselves… Who does not know that all Africa always burned with the obscene resinous tree of lust, so that you might think it was not a land and site of men, but an Aetna of unchaste flames? Just as Aetna is naturally heated with certain inner burning fires, so that land is constantly heated by the abominable fires of fornication. Nor do I wish my assertations to obtain full credence in this matter. The testimony of the human race is required. Who does not know that almost all Africans are unchaste, with the exception, perhaps, of those converted to God, that is, those changed by faith and religion?… It is so infrequent and unheard of that an African is not unchaste as it is novel and customary that an African is not an African. So general is the evil and impurity in them that whosoever among them would cease to be impure would apparently not be an African.
And he was speaking primarily of the Carthaginians, Berbers, and Libyans in north Africa! You can imagine what he would have said if sub-Saharan Negroes had entered into his realm of experience.
Rushdoony greatly admired Salvian for perceiving “that history is warfare.”
“Dylan Thomas was speaking not only to his father but to all Europeans when he urged us to ‘Rage, rage against the dying of the light.’” ~ CWNY
“[H]eaven itself is often lost for want of striving, but is never had on easier terms.” ~ Richard Baxter
Japan is all cleaned up after just 11 months. See more. That’s because the Japanese are in Japan. If Haitians were in Japan, it would never be clean again. Haitians claim that they need another three years to clean up from their earthquake, despite receiving billions in foreign aid, mostly from your paychecks.
“Mount Olive is a small town in rural North Carolina, best known for its pickle factory and southern charm. Less than two years ago the Census listed this place as having zero immigrants from Haiti among the town’s 4,600 inhabitants. But over the past 18 months that has changed as thousands of Haitians have flocked to the area.”
“The experience of Liberia and Haiti show that the African race are devoid of any capacity for political organization and lack genius for government. Unquestionably there is an inherent tendency to revert to savagery and to cast aside the shackles of civilization which are irksome to their physical nature. Of course, there are many exceptions to this racial weakness, but it is true of the mass, as we know from experience in this country. It is that which makes the negro problem practically unsolvable.” ~ Secretary of State Robert Lansing, 1918
“The British are as gullible as we are. Hundreds and hundreds of times, at least, they gave scholarships to Blacks from Basutoland or Kenya or Nigeria or one of their other possessions, and the result was almost always the same. With the money given him, the savage bought himself a good wardrobe, attended an English school, learned to play soccer, attended Oxford, wrote a charming essay on Wordsworth or on ancient law, copulated with half-witted English women who thought him ‘romantic’ and themselves ‘broad-minded,’ and when he got tired of living on English generosity, went home to his tribe where he had a well-roasted baby served up to him as a delicacy of which he had been long deprived by the stupid prejudices of the stupid British.” ~ Revilo Oliver
At 1:07:30 in this sermon, Rushdoony is asked if voodoo is still practiced in the South. Rush quotes from Norman Mailer, who he says has “put his finger on the situation” and is “remarkably discerning.”
He said the goal of the average liberal today was to be – in his words – a white nigger. Because, you see, sharing the perspective of magic, all you need to add to that is witchcraft, and where are you going to seek for power? Below. And so his goal, to be a white nigger, to have that closeness to that which is primitive, animalistic, and hence the appeal.
Some vocabulary words that are good to know.
A pervasive sense of entitlement percolates through society, wherever blacks are found. Just look at this amazing graphic called “tech is racist.” Warning: This is not satire! The assumption is that blacks and whites are equally meritorious and should be employed in the same jobs, to the same degree.
But racist venture capitalists are not giving them enough money to start their own companies, despite a booming tech industry, you see. And besides, web cameras can’t detect contrast in black faces, so that’s racist. And Microsoft thinks that people want apps to keep them safe, so that’s racist. The funniest part of all is at the end, where Iris on Android phones is asked if whites are superior to blacks. The answer: “Whites are not superior to blacks. Just different. Like Dr. Verwoerd and the original, genuine policy of Apartheid always said.” Hilarious!
Listen to former South African Prime Minister Hendrik Verwoerd on separate development. Now realize that the African National Congress is seeking to change the constitution to mandate a one-party Communist state. Of course, most of these black Communists are “Christians.” (The country is 80% black and 80% Christian.)
White men are shocked once again to discover that their sense of fair play is unrequited.
The ANC has also expanded prohibitions on employment to include the “Cape Coloured” mulattoes. So even those of mixed race suffer along with the whites.
Young white South Africans are leaving the country at a pace consistent with the advent of “widespread disease, mass natural disasters, or large-scale civil conflict.” Most white men aged 24 to 34 have already left. There is only one word for this – genocide – and it was all caused by white people loving democracy more than their kin.
No “Invisible Children” bracelets for that little girl! “Christians” are indifferent to the liquidation of her race because they’re so busy flying to Uganda and designing websites and producing videos and streaking.
The highest average murder rate in the world is found in Honduras: 159 murders per 100,000 inhabitants. But for white farmers in South Africa, the murder rate is more than 300 per 100,000. Yet white South Africans are being denied refugee status in America because they have no right to claim discrimination in “non-racial, democratic, post-apartheid South Africa.” Besides, there’s no room here for our South African cousins when there are so many Mexicans-With-Family-Values who want to live the American Dream.
The letters “USA” are racist when chanted at high school basketball games near the Mexican border. While Mexicans, wherever they may be found, never hesitate to express national and racial patriotism, these white school administrators are so scared of the tarbaby that they are going to punish any student who chants “USA” at another game. White schoolkids will soon learn a very different version of history when they read about the Alamo and Cortez.
In France, textbooks are being revised solely to avoid insulting minorities. Instead of teaching about Napoleon and the French Revolution, they’re teaching about the African “kingdom” of Monomotapa! The true French now worry that their identity will disappear along with their history.
Here’s an old Nazi publication called “France’s Guilt.” You have to admit that France has become exactly what the Nazis predicted.
Why do whites allow it? Because it enhances their social status, as Gen5 says. Of course, we’re not Utopians. We criticize liberals for believing that they can change human nature, and we’re not going to be any more successful in changing white nature. This is why Gen5′s proposal to provide incentives for white status-seekers is quite brilliant.
“Black Power!” exclaims P. Niggy at an NBA All Star game, with a raised fist. But you know what’s really racist? The band at Southern Miss chanting “Where’s your green card?” to a Puerto Rican Kansas State player.
Refusal to acknowledge racism is racism.
Coaching is racist.
Rubber bands are racist too.
Sombreros and prison garb are racist.
Everyone went nuts over an ESPN headline that referred to a “chink in the armor” of a Taiwanese NBA player, Jeremy Lin. The Professionally Offended wrote that using the word “chink” is like using the word “nigger.” So once again, perfectly useful words like chink and niggardly are off-limits because the feelings of hyper-sensitive diversities will be irreparably damaged. We can’t allow playground taunts to be heard by precious grown men, especially not men who are paid millions of dollars to play games. Other words that are strictly forbidden when writing about Lin: 1) no headlines about “an Asian who knows how to drive” to the basket; 2) his name is not “Grasshopper”; 3) no jokes about takeout boxes or fortune cookies will be tolerated.
Dear God, please kill this nigger now. Amen. That has to be the ugliest creature ever to walk the earth. God never intended for a human being to look like that.
“Murderers and hogs never look well till they are hanged.” ~ Edmund Burke
“Life is not valued in Detroit. It’s a war zone here. We need some ground troops patrolling these streets; they send them all overseas, but they need to be here.” You can call the antebellum Southerners “racists” to your heart’s content, but they all correctly predicted that if you set the Negro free from slavery, you would have to spend far more to fund a police state to control him. Sow the wind and reap the whirlwind (Hosea 8:7).
Segregated restaurants in the South never had to deal with Chuck E. Cheese violence. Safety is racist, as Microsoft has learned.
“Desegregating the prisons is what created the [prison] gangs in the first place.” ~ Otto Scott
The average person, who would shudder to be called a white supremacist, excuses black criminality by implicitly treating blacks like animals. “Oh, he walked down that street at night? It’s too bad that he was shot, but he should have known better.” This is on the order of comments regarding that queer from Siegfried and Roy: “It’s too bad that a wild beast tore him limb from limb, but he should have known better.” We “racists” are actually much more respectful of black dignity for wanting crimes to be punished (and for opposing affirmative action quotas). Liberals turn a blind eye to black criminality because they believe that blacks are sub-human. Now Winston Smith tells us that a man was recently attacked by a Muslim for dressing as zombie Mohammed on Halloween, and the attacker was arrested for assault. The judge, who is also a Muslim, threw the case out of court and called the victim a “doofus” for provoking the pious servants of Allah, who are bound by honor to retaliate with violence whenever their pedophile-prophet is lampooned, as does a black man whenever and wherever he hears white lips utter his favorite word, “nigger.” His fists are duty-bound to swing, you understand. This is a mockery of law and order, not to mention the effective establishment of Sharia law in Oklahoma, which the voters of that state have outlawed via an amendment to the state constitution (later overturned because no court had ever invoked Sharia law).
Winston is too busy overcoming adversity to complain about it.
New York City cops arrest an average of five public school kids each day, and 94% of them are Dutch and Welsh. Just kidding! I really had you going there. No, 94% are black and mestizo, of course. Let’s hope that Head Start and No Child Left Behind lower this all the way to 90% in the next few generations. No price is too high. Let’s also hope that cops finally begin to judge students on the content of their character, not the color of their skin. I have a dream today.
“There was a survey done recently of school kids, of all races, and they were asked to name the three greatest Americans of all time, not including presidents. The top three were Martin Luther King, Harriet Tubman, and Rosa Parks. Needless to say, those kids aren’t going to turn into eager Young Republicans in sync with the values of a bunch of old White folks.” ~ James Edwards
In Cincinnati, Ohio, more than $10,000 is spent per high school student per year, yet in one all-black high school with a 14% graduation rate, an additional $40,000 is being used to pay students to go to class. The old “racist” Southerners are vindicated once again. Sure, you can abolish slavery, but you’ll go broke after you do.
At 54:20 in this sermon, Dr. Rushdoony is asked his opinion on a trade school that was to be built in Watts (the Los Angeles ghetto) with tax dollars, and what he thought about Negro leaders pushing instead for the construction of a junior college.
Well, I don’t see any point in either the junior college or the trade school, for the simple reason that this will be education provided freely for people who have abundant opportunities to get an education of almost any sort, who can go anywhere in Los Angeles and get it, and they’re not using the opportunities they have. Why provide people with opportunities when they don’t want them? And they will sit in school year in and year out and make no attempt to learn anything, and then we are supposed to provide something further for them because ostensibly we have deprived them. This, to me, is utter nonsense. And it is fantastic the extent to which they expect these things.
I was speaking at Fuller Seminary this past Tuesday, and they have had a conference there on race and equality, and this one man – a United Presbyterian Negro leader, a Dr. Willmore, I believe – spoke five or six times and gave the standard civil rights justification; the reason why these people riot is they have a cause, and their cause is the cause of Christ, and so on and so forth. This is the essence of his position, and of course they sat there and took it. And I tried to get him to realize, but of course it was futile, he was blaming not just the white man but the white Christian, which is a peculiar thing. And he was saying it was the white Christians who were the worst, these who believed their Bible and had family devotions, they were the ones who would go into the slave quarters and break up the families, and separate and sell husband and wife and children, who would be deliberately nasty. And I said, isn’t there a great deal of mythology in your thinking? First, you admit these people believed their Bible from cover to cover, and then you say these people who were so moral in their homes went out there and did these things. And I said, can you document this? I said, I doubt that you can. I said, you have continually blamed everything that happens to the Negro on the white man, in particular on the good, Bible-believing, white Christian. I said, what about the responsibility of the Negro? Of course, he wouldn’t answer, because he was not concerned about that. I said, I don’t like the word equality… Instead of talking about equality of rights, why not talk about an equality of responsibility? I said, why aren’t you for that? And again, he wouldn’t answer. There’s no dealing with these people except in terms of good, hard realities.
Now, a couple of things stand out about this commentary. First, notice that Rushdoony and his church had not deprived blacks of anything, and yet they were expected, along with other whites, to make reparations to those who had not been deprived themselves, but whose ancestors had been allegedly deprived by slavery. So all of a sudden, though we hear today from white preachers that race doesn’t exist, it turns out that race is of utmost importance to blacks and Jewish Holohoax “survivors” in determining who pays the money and who receives the money, and the obligations extend from generation to generation. We Kinists are accused of believing in salvation by race, which we categorically deny, but few seem to mind that whites are routinely accused of guilt by race. Whites bend over and take it, but Rush correctly called it nonsense. It’s far worse than nonsense; it’s genocide. With these racially-demarcated lines of financial obligation firmly in place, the black man dares to pretend that he is in pursuit of equality!
Notice also that this black “Reverend Doctor” is rather typical of what is believed today by black Christians, who only agree to take the name of Christian because many whites now agree with them that slavery was evil and sinful. If most whites disagreed with them, they would either not take the white man’s religion or pervert it into the unbiblical mess that it is today. The point is that their true religion is “civil rights,” and it leads them into the very traps in which Rushdoony snares them, namely, bearing false witness against godly Christian families and preaching all manner of fiction to besmirch their honorable names. By doing so, they besmirch the name of Christ! They have sinned, and yet they are encouraged in their sin at all levels of church and state.
Here’s a black sophist who reminisces about being raised in the “traditional African American home, dominated by a matriarch,” being his grandmother, who had ten children to raise. He is untroubled by such normalizing of dysfunction because he falls back on racial terms: “there is power in identity.” His speech is shot through with liberal howlers, such as “the threat of terror shaped the lives” of blacks during “Reconstruction.” Poor, innocent black people threatened by insane white people who loved to lynch for no reason. In Eric Holder fashion, he claims that “we” have a hard time talking about race and history, meaning that “we” have a hard time agreeing with him. He says that Germany now finds it unconscionable to enact capital punishment because of its WWII history, yet southern states in America have no problem enforcing the death penalty. Yes, you read that correctly: Southerners in favor of capital punishment are like Nazis.
The point of his talk is that the death penalty is evil. And when he says that Alabama ought to be ashamed for permanently removing the right to vote from felons, he again resorts to racial terms, implying that blacks must not be impeded in voting their interests as a race, even if it means that black criminals must be granted suffrage, because even black criminals can be relied upon to vote in accord with the black mainstream, just as Jewish atheists are still welcomed by their fellow Jews.
True to Marxist form, he implies that all poverty is the result of injustice. Thus, wealth is equated with “privilege” in the minds of blacks, not hard work and risk. They believe that whites are undeserving of their wealth because it is inherited (a fundamentally unbiblical prejudice), and now the same social connections that make this privilege possible must reach across the racial divide to do the same for blacks and other non-whites who have been impeded by the privileged from doing it themselves. As black “theologian” J. Kameron Carter puts it, “the poverty of dark flesh is where one finds the wealthy God,” and whites can only be restored to communion with Christ by uniting themselves with the black victims of racism “since that is where Christ is.” (This reminds me of Jesse Jackson at the 1992 Democrat Convention, saying that Jesus was born to a single mother and a homeless couple, and when Mary told Joseph that he was not the father, he “abused” her. Stunning, isn’t it, how similar the family of Christ was to the average black family?) At any rate, this is how blacks pretend that they advocate racially-transcendent “justice.” They talk a lot about tearing down racial barriers and forming “rainbow coalitions,” but not for the purpose of eliminating one iota of racial consciousness on their part; it is always for the purpose of taking what does not belong to them, which in the old days was called envy and theft. Keep in mind that this is what black Christians believe too. Their sense of “justice” is unbiblical and perverted. See, for example, their St. MLK excusing riots and threats of murder as “the desperate language of the unheard.” It’s all about them, you see. The only crime is that they are not “heard.”
This very eloquent, erudite, and sophisticated black speaker suggests, with a straight face, that states should not spend money to execute murderers and rapists, but instead they should use this money to hire policemen to patrol the streets and ostensibly prevent murders and rapes before they occur. He characterizes this burgeoning police state as “compassionate,” but compassionate for whom? Certainly not for the white folks who can no longer enjoy liberty but are forced to live under tyranny and surrender their inheritance to strangers. Such concerns do not enter the black “Christian” mind because they are irrelevant to the race that is loudly pretending to transcend race. It’s an effective shell game they play, but the racially aware white man can see directly through it.
Notice, by the way, that TED has become a humanist “church” with its own “life coach” and “sermons.” The trinity of this anti-church is found in the initials: Technology, Entertainment, Design.
The Olympics have become a showcase of the modern police state. When the games were hosted in Peking, there were endless articles about how the Communists were clamping down on the Chinese and presenting a false sense of peace and freedom, and every day there was talk of the Tiananmen Square protests. Well, polyglot Britain will far surpass Chinese totalitarianism for the Olympics this year. There is a rule that prohibits anti-Olympics posters from being displayed in private homes. Public roads will be off-limits to the public, open only to corporate sponsors. As many as 50,000 troops will be mobilized.
During the Games an aircraft carrier will dock on the Thames. Surface-to-air missile systems will scan the skies. Unmanned drones, thankfully without lethal missiles, will loiter above the gleaming stadiums and opening and closing ceremonies… A thousand armed US diplomatic and FBI agents and 55 dog teams will patrol an Olympic zone partitioned off from the wider city by an 11-mile, £80m, 5,000-volt electric fence…
London is also being wired up with a new range of scanners, biometric ID cards, number-plate and facial-recognition CCTV systems, disease tracking systems, new police control centres and checkpoints. These will intensify the sense of lockdown in a city which is already a byword across the world for remarkably intensive surveillance…
Particular glee that Israeli-style security arrangements are now being widely implemented is evident among the CEOs of large Israeli security and defence contractors, which are doing especially well in the security boom…
Already, the Qatar royal family have bought the 1,400 homes of the Olympic village in a deal worth £557m…
All this in a city convulsed by massive welfare, housing benefit and legal aid cuts, spiralling unemployment and rising social protests. It is darkly ironic, indeed, that large swaths of London and the UK are being thrown into ever deeper insecurity while being asked to pay for a massive security operation, of unprecedented scale, largely to protect wealthy and powerful people and corporations.
You can tell that a revolution is brewing. The Third Worlding of the West continues, First World liberty is dead, and Jews are selling to the police state the surveillance equipment that is used to control the increasingly irate masses of incompatible races and religions. The tension is going to build until this powderkeg explodes. But hey, won’t it be fun to watch the parade of nations during the opening ceremony?
The Marxism of the aforementioned TED speaker is closely connected to Derrick Bell’s Critical Race Theory, which was adapted from the Jew Frankfurt School’s Critical Theory, which was designed to overturn established Christian standards and convince young people to rebel against tradition. The late Andrew Breitbart released a 1991 video of Barack Obama, when he was a 30-year-old law student at Harvard, hugging Bell at a rally. In the retarded commentary following the video, watch Soledad O’Brien, the mulatto with the ridiculous name, try to redefine Critical Race Theory. Harvard professor Charles Ogletree bragged that he “hid” this video during the 2008 presidential campaign, having surmised the potential political fallout. (Jeremiah Wright was another CRT albatross, and he had to be tossed for the same reason.) While lecturing at the University of Chicago School of Law, Obama assigned Bell’s book, Faces at the Bottom of the Well, which promotes the idea that black people are failures because white people cause them to fail; whites will always maliciously seek to dominate blacks; and since the Constitution is unable to protect blacks from being victimized, quotas and special privileges are needed to compensate for the endemic racism of the white majority. America is irredeemably racist, and so “America” must be redefined and reorganized, which is a polite way of saying that the white race must perish. As we’ve often said, blacks will only identify as “Americans” if “America” is the post-Lincoln empire. They have no love whatsoever for the Old Republic, which was the true USA. At least neo-Americans today are honest enough to admit that their citizenship is merely propositional and ideological, and they don’t really belong to a nation at all, according to how the term is historically defined. In fact, they glory in it.
Because of his Marxist training in CRT, Obama writes that black violence stems from “humiliation and untrammeled fury,” as though blacks can’t really be blamed, because it’s the fault of Whitey on the moon. He laments that the Constitution “says what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf…” Forget CRT, this is typical Commie blackness, and it shows that our forefathers were correct; we can’t be joined to these people under the same government. Those who call themselves Christians are not to be believed if they are impenitent thieves.
When Barack Obama was growing up, his nanny was an Indonesian transvestite. And when he lived in Hawaii, he was close to Frank Marshall, a man he describes as his “mentor.” Marshall lived in Hawaii because he was ostracized for being an advocate of legalized pederasty. But you know what’s really hateful? Obama’s white grandmother, who he calls a “racist.”
Since “community organizing” is so valuable that it got Obama elected president, Jared Taylor now announces that he is “active in the white community,” just to make whiter-people cringe.
During “African American History Month,” Obama launched an organization called African Americans for Obama. No, not this kind of African American, silly. It’s a privileged title. Strangely, Ron Paul has not launched an organization called “Whites for Ron Paul.” It’s a good thing the candidates know what is racist and what is not.
And while the Confederate flag is strictly off-limits in hyper-tolerant public schools, not so for t-shirts celebrating the first national Pretty Brown Girl Day, which has been launched to encourage “girls and women of all shades of brown…to embrace the beauty of their skin color.” If you think that embracing the beauty of white skin is also to be encouraged, it only shows that you’re a racist. And quite frankly, I’ll bet that you also want to kill six million Jews. “Women should be taught to appreciate their skin from birth,” says co-founder Sheri Crawley. Except for white women, of course. And by the way, what does it mean to appreciate skin color if miscegenation is considered a perfectly acceptable alternative lifestyle choice?
It’s funny how social constructs must be pure, except for white social constructs. Even the self-identified mestizo (mixed) construct must be pure. Of course, it would be evil racism for white social constructs to band together to protect their own political interests.
How do you like this sentence?
Dingoes are generally classified as a subspecies of wolf, Canis lupus dingo, although in the past they have been classified as a subspecies of dog and as a separate species.
The word species is harder to define than the offspring of a Kardashian. If you allow dogs to mate randomly, like they’re mudsharks with tramp stamps, you end up with a mutt resembling a dingo. As your half-witted preacher will tell you, there is neither Saint Bernard nor pocket poodle, for we are all one in the family Canidae. All the same, there are still haters and bigots, like the people in New South Wales who instituted a breeding program to protect dingo purity. I’ll bet these purebred dingos even wear doggy-sized sheets over their heads with cutouts for their eyes and snouts.
At 45:45 in this sermon, Rushdoony is asked if the Ethiopian wife of Moses was black. His answer, as I’m sure you can guess, is contrary to what you would hear from almost any pastor today, and it’s very instructive for the future of our own apostate country.
No, because first of all, the Ethiopians, although they do represent a great deal of mixing today, are not an African people. And at that time, which was of course several thousand years ago, they didn’t have that element of mixture that they have acquired since. Ethiopia in the ancient world was an advanced country with quite a bit of culture. It was a Christian country in the early centuries and quite advanced for some time, a center of a great deal of learning. And it drifted into heresy in the fourth and fifth centuries and began after that its decline, and today the Church there is just a relic of superstition, and the people have for over a thousand years lived far more poorly than their ancestors did and in greater ignorance. The clergy themselves are ignorant in a way that would have staggered the clergy of the early centuries in Ethiopia. But the Ethiopians even today look down on the African peoples. There are three groups of people in Ethiopia – the Ethiopians, the Arabic peoples, and the negroid – and the negroid are very heavily discriminated against by the other two.
Share the Kinist video. By Ethiopians, I think he’s referring to the Oromo and Amhara, who share almost two-thirds of their genome with Caucasians. The country is very much like Brazil, with the blackest at the bottom. And even the blacks distance themselves from the blacks of greater Africa. Notice that Ethiopia was once great, but after excessive miscegenation it’s a horror. Our lying preachers are taking us down the same path. Don’t miss the funny story told by Rush at 55:45.
In Pakistan, see the partially-white descendants of Alexander the Great’s soldiers. Alexander attempted to unite Europe and Asia through miscegenation, and thank God, all of his designs came to nothing.
Mark Rushdoony doesn’t like it when his father is quoted approvingly by Kinists. He left the following comment under the video above:
My father, R.J. Rushdoony never subscribed to The Kinist belief that the races ought not to be mixed, so his addressing the question of Moses’s wife should not be taken as implying that he did. I was not present at most of the weddings he performed, but I know that he in fact performed at least one interracial marriage. Using his words to imply that he believed in Kinism, which he did not, is, at best, misleading.
Sure, Mark. Whatever you say. Was it the “white nigger” quote that set you off? I mean, in this day and age!
Interracial “marriages” are now at a record 15%. It’s high time for the Church to return to recognizing only legitimate marriages.
A medical cure for “racism” has been discovered, using a study group of 36 white men, of course: a heart pill called propranolol which deadens “nerve circuits that govern automatic functions” like fear and anxiety. Despite the fact that this drug is clearly stupefying patients and impairing their mental state (a drug-induced Williams Syndrome), it is said to be “of considerable ethical interest.” A philosopher from Oxford says: “Such research raises the tantalising possibility that our unconscious racial attitudes could be modulated using drugs, a possibility that requires careful ethical analysis.” In other words, the goal of eradicating natural “racism” is so noble and virtuous that, after “careful ethical analysis,” the FDA will be able to purge this great toxin from the body politic. Just one problem: Propranolol doesn’t work on Kinists. “The main finding of our study is that propranolol significantly reduced implicit but not explicit racial bias.”
Pat Buchanan has been excommunicated from MSNBC with bell, book, and candle, but Al Sharpton is still gainfully employed by the network, with his shucking and jiving about how “white folks was in the caves when we was buildin’ empires.” Sharpton even went on Meet the Press to lecture Rush Limbaugh on “civility” and “civilized speech,” which is like O.J. Simpson becoming a marriage counselor.
As Enoch Powell once observed, all political careers end in failure, and Pat’s career failed to the benefit of us all. Though the purging will be blamed on his latest book, Suicide of a Superpower, it’s not surprising that he wore out his welcome among the liberals, and I’m sure Buchanan himself expected it to happen. The writing on the wall was plain to see, because as soon as you say that Europeans are dying off, and something needs to be done to stop it, you have become a racist. Here’s why: Europe has more people than ever, and so does America, and if people are just people and all people are replaceable, no one cares what happens to the white race. (This is the new, certified Judeochristian position.)
Buchanan lists the groups who made trouble for him, despite his best attempts to remain palatable for public consumption: blacks via Color of Change (for appearing on the Political Cesspool), Jews via the ADL (for appearing on the Political Cesspool), and queers via a “human rights campaign.” Clearly, James Edwards needs to work harder on the pink triangle demographic. Buchanan even implies that Jews are the enemies of free speech. In short, he has been branded as a racist, homophobe, and anti-Semite by the same people who whine and moan about McCarthyism. They are the true blacklisters! As Jared Taylor has said, Joe McCarthy was trying to protect his country from infiltration by a foreign power with which we were engaged in a long Cold War. Today, the targets of the blacklisters are not powers of any kind but rather humble pundits like Buchanan and writers like Taylor and bloggers and radio hosts and other small fries whose “crime” against Truth, Justice, and the American Way is having opinions that fall outside the liberal mainstream. Truly, the Bill of Rights is meaningless.
“In America the majority raises formidable barriers around the liberty of opinion; within these barriers an author may write what he pleases, but woe to him if he goes beyond them. Not that he is in danger of an auto-da-fe, but he is exposed to continued obloquy and persecution. His political career is closed forever, since he has offended the only authority that is able to open it. Every sort of compensation, even that of celebrity, is refused to him. Before making public his opinions he thought he had sympathizers; now it seems to him that he has none any more since he has revealed himself to everyone; then those who blame him criticize loudly and those who think as he does keep quiet and move away without courage. He yields at length, overcome by the daily effort which he has to make, and subsides into silence, as if he felt remorse for having spoken the truth.” ~ Alexis de Tocqueville
Here are some quotes from Pat’s book:
If [political commentator Heather] MacDonald’s statistics are accurate, 49 of every 50 muggings and murders in New York are the work of minorities. That might explain why black folks have trouble getting a cab. Every New York cabby must know the odds, should he pick up a man of color at night…
They are trying to transform a Western Christian republic into an egalitarian democracy made up of all the tribes, races, creeds, and cultures of planet Earth. They have dethroned our God, purged our cradle faith from public life, and repudiated the Judeo-Christian moral code [gag] by which previous generations sought to live…
When the faith dies, the culture dies, the civilization dies, the people die.
But along with it comes this nonsense:
Back then, black and white lived apart, went to different schools and churches, played on different playgrounds, and went to different restaurants, bars, theaters, and soda fountains. But we shared a country and a culture. We were one nation. We were Americans.
“Diversity can work…[if we are] steeped in Americanism… The melting pot worked, but our elites don’t believe in it anymore.” ~ Pat Buchanan (31:16)
The nonsense didn’t save him from being fired. There’s no reason for any of us to succumb to moderation.
As our friend Winston asks, “Strange, isn’t it, how Pat Buchanan was fired for lamenting the coming end of White America, but hate-mongers are applauded for celebrating it?”
This new war of the blacklisters is driven by the same envy that motivated the abolitionists. As Revilo Oliver writes:
It is most instructive to read the abolitionists. They spout quotations from the Bible, and they babble about “human rights” and “equality.” But they cannot completely conceal their real animus and inspiration. Their venom is directed against the plantation owners of the South, most of whom, though by no means all, were ladies and gentlemen. The abolitionists had in their minds a picture, partly correct, of the Southern landowner as a man far superior to themselves in education, culture, and humanity. And for that they hated him, implacably. They also had in their feverish minds a picture, totally false, of the planter as a man of unbounded wealth and leisure who spent his life lolling on a wide veranda and sipping mint juleps. And they envied him passionately. They had a picture, equally false, of the Southern lady as one who spent her days in fairy-like ease, waited on hand and foot by obsequious slaves. They had a picture, largely correct, of those women as being accorded by men a chivalrous respect that was almost unknown in the North. And so they yearned to humiliate and destroy that Southern lady. That was the real inspiration of their frantic “do-gooding.”
You can take the true measure of what has happened to our national mentality by just remembering the name of that distinguished horse thief and homicidal manic, John Brown, who, financed by a conspiratorial group that called themselves the Secret Six, was sent into the South to start a slave revolt. As everyone admits, his purpose was to get all the White women of the South raped and butchered, and to get all the White men of the South barbarously mutilated and butchered. What does that make of him in contemporary opinion? Why, he was a “champion of human rights,” “a martyr of freedom,” and all that. He wanted to butcher, it’s true, but to butcher White men and women. That is to say, White slime, like ourselves, as we wallow in ecstasies of self-abasement and self-hatred. And that suffices to make him admirable, to make him noble. And so his soul goes marching on – over the hot coals, I hope.
The same Yankee do-goodism lived on. Witness the Vietnam War:
We are Americans, White men of the West. And if we were sane, no truth would be more obvious and unquestionable to us than the fact that, so far as we are concerned, all the teeming population of Vietnam is not worth the life of one American soldier. But if anyone suggests that, why everyone is horrified: “Are we not the world’s slaves to be used for do-gooding? Who cares about your son and mine – they’re expendable.”
And now even sons of the South have turned into Yankee do-gooders, exuberantly offering their flesh as fodder for Israel.
And of course, do-gooders everywhere have kept the cult of their sainted prophet alive.
Down in Memphis, somebody shoots a Black automobile thief, noted Communist agent, and bloodthirsty inciter of riots and revolution against us. What happens? Half the White nitwits in this country snivel and sob and mourn, saying tearfully, “What a wonderful man he was. He wanted to kill White slime like us. Wasn’t that sweet, wasn’t that noble, wasn’t that saintly, wasn’t he just like Jesus?”
We are Americans!
What do we owe the rest of the world? Nothing, absolutely nothing.
What are the “civil rights” that we owe our Negroes if they insist on having them? A free ride to Africa.
What do we owe the self-chosen people? Ordinary courtesy and considerate treatment so long as we are convinced that it is to our advantage to have a cohesive body of 12 to 15 million aliens reside in our country and own a large part of it.
What do we owe to the unspeakable gang that now rules us in Washington? A fair trial…
The only alternatives now are to fight or to whimper. But if you think that you can escape, good-bye and good luck. To the rest of you I suggest that we shall see our problem clearly when we say to ourselves:
We are Americans. This is our country. He who would take it from us, by force or by stealth, is our enemy. And it is our purpose – nay, it is our duty to our children and to their children and to our yet unborn posterity – it is our duty to use all feasible means to destroy him.
Buchanan is correct that only Jews want war with Iran. Jew Krauthammer is saying that Israel must strike now to “prevent a second holocaust.” And we must help the Jews, because if Iranians infiltrate our country, as one commentator writes, “they will take control of our financial institutions, our media, our government, academia, and even our churches. Along with this they would probably be major players in organized crime, pornography, and the sex trade. They would probably get so cocky they would even start dictating that we accept our own demise by opening our borders to the third world, while restricting immigration to Iran for Iranians only. Why do those people hate our freedom so much?” If we don’t do something now, the terrorists will win!
I love the sound of freedom in the morning.
Warmonger Rush Limbaugh hasn’t been the focus of so much attention for 20 years. I think his comments about Sandra Fluke, the student who says she is having so much sex that she wants government-mandated insurance coverage for contraception, were spot-on. The only problem was that he apologized. What else can a woman who wants to be paid to have inconsequential sex be called, asked Limbaugh, than a prostitute? And what does it make us, if we agree to pay for her sex, but whoremongers? Sandra the Slut also wants employers to pay for sex changes. Never mind that her starting salary will be $160,000.
Hillary Clinton praises Sandra Floozy as one who is “assuming the risks that come with sticking your neck out,” like a democracy activist in Burma who has spent 11 years in jail for writing a letter.
Jew Gloria Allred is seeking to sue Limbaugh for defamation. There is a statute on the books in Florida, where Limbaugh lives, which stipulates that anyone who “speaks of and concerning any woman, married or unmarried, falsely and maliciously imputing to her a want of chastity” is guilty of a misdemeanor. Apparently, a woman who admits to having premarital sex is nevertheless to be considered as chaste. This means that “slut” is now like the word “nigger” and can only be used by the appropriate groups. A journalist who reports on slutwalks should probably call them s-word walks to avoid a lawsuit. This reminds us of how we have been confronted by pastors for using the word “nigger.” A Christian must never use this word, they say, because its very use implies Hate. My response to them is that I don’t accept double standards.
“I know the word nigger as an admonishment, an endearment, a criticism, and an invective. So I use it; I don’t run from it. I don’t have an issue with it or who says it.” ~ Samuel L. Jackson, the highest-grossing movie actor of all time
The idea that some words can be used only by the privileged makes a mockery of language. I like to ask pastors if they use words such as midget or Indian or Eskimo, all of which are considered by their respective groups to be as offensive as the word “nigger.” The response is always yes, we do in fact use those words. The English language is beautiful, but it would be a pile of stink if every word that someone considers to be offensive were expunged from it.
At any rate, the word “slut” turned out to be a mild invective for Rosie the Riveted, although one CPAC blogger called her a “shiftless rent-a-cooch from East Whoreville.” Shakespeare might have called her a puking idle-headed dewberry or a pox-marked flax-wench.
Here are the words that liberals use for right-wing women. Madame Fluke received a personal call from Barack Obama to see if she’s okay and thank her for speaking on behalf of women, but Christian women will receive no such condolences from the president for being called names.
The left-wingnuts are painting Limbaugh as being a rabid hater who is on the verge of leading his Zionist listeners in an insurrection, but the fact is that Limbaugh is rather milquetoast, and he is paid a lot of money for knowing how far to push the envelope of controversy and knowing which lines he must never cross. Call this what you will, but it has nothing to do with principle. An honest man is hated; he is certainly not sponsored by corporations. Even what Limbaugh is now experiencing is just a drop of what honest men experience daily. As someone once said, “Wherever the Apostle Paul went, there was either a revival or a riot. Everywhere I go, they serve tea.” Of course, having much less to lose, the average man of honesty is not usually the subject of a media witch-hunt. Liberals will never stop dreaming of a world in which immorality is without penalty.
As America becomes an increasingly heathen country, God ordained marriages are becoming a thing of the past, resulting in more illegitimate children.
Since all things righteous must be condemned, and all things shameful must be extolled, there is a new crusade afoot to eradicate illegitimacy as a negative stigma.
Illegitimacy is becoming the norm.
About three-fourths of all black children are bastards, yet Jew-TV never fails to portray blacks as wholesome Americans who are exemplars of virtue. If there is any wisdom to be dispensed in front of a camera, blacks will be recruited for the role, in contradistinction to reality.
And how are whites portrayed? Well, Jews have created a new Jew-show on Jew-TV, aired Sunday evenings, of course. It’s called “Good Christian Bitches.”
James Edwards is abolutely correct that “if defending the country, our families, and now our young Christian women were left to Christian/conservative leadership, America’s defeat before Jewish supremacism would be assured.”
In the context of Russia’s Jew-Soviet history, it’s absolutely amazing that Vladimir Putin is promising to protect Christianity worldwide. Vladimir Lenin is turning over in his grave, or maybe he’s just turning on the rotisserie. Of course, here in formerly-Christian America, politicians say “God bless America” and “In God we trust” and then protect the interests of Jews, Albanian Muslims, witches, queers, and anyone you can imagine except Christians. Putin is also using nationalist rhetoric, warning of “an unnamed foreign threat.”
Alaska Airlines is afraid of offending anyone, except Christians. As is true of race, diverse religiosity becomes a religion of its own, and the only heresy is agreeing with dead white men.
Jew Menachem Rosensaft writes that those who oppose massive, non-white immigration to America are a “scourge,” but “permanent, eternal Jewish sovereignty in the State of Israel is non-negotiable.” Yea, verily, “Israel’s Jewish Essence is Non-Negotiable,” he writes, without a hint of racism.
Apologies in advance for this disgusting news item, but the insanity of treating anti-Christs as our equals demands it. Two-thirds of newborn Orthodox Jewish boys in New York City are molested by a “mohel” as he performs fellatio (“metzitzah b’peh,” i.e. “oral suction”) on them during the bris milah (circumcision). It’s hard enough to get past this religious faggotry, but there’s more. One rabbi caused the death of one child and brain damage to another in 2004 because he passed Herpes Simplex 1 to them. Then he passed it to another child in 2007. Last September, another Jewish boy was killed by being fellated by a diseased faggot.
And here’s something even more unthinkable, which testifies to the political clout of anti-Christs: Under the administration of Governor George Pataki, the state Department of Health had guidelines for legalizing this perverted practice, but they were rescinded just one year later. Now the Jews (most of whom are lawyers) are claiming ignorance of the law. You can have a God-fearing nation or, like Buchanan, you can have the shit stew known as the “melting pot.” Make your choice.
After listening to Jew Michael Savage in this clip, I wonder why people hate Jews. They’re absolutely charming.
“Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our own society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity, which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace. Seeing America undo traditional societies, they fear us, for they do not wish to be undone. They cannot feel secure so long as we are there, for our very existence – our existence, not our politics – threatens their legitimacy. They must attack us in order to survive, just as we must destroy them to advance our historic mission.” ~ Michael Jew Ledeen
The New World Order is what Jews call “the kingdom of God.”
Excellent news: Bishop Richard Williamson’s conviction in Germany for telling the truth has been overturned. It’s a great setback for the Jewish war against free speech.
Germans were building jets with complex parts made from magnesium and aluminum alloys while the Allies were still building propeller planes with steel plates. The Jet Age and the Space Age were brought about by ideas and factory equipment stolen from Germany, like this forging press and the next-generation heavy presses now in operation around the world (but not here in America). Every Boeing or Airbus jet you’ve ever flown was built by these presses.
Germans issued public warnings against smoking about 30 years before Americans realized that those little cancer sticks are dangerous.
But legend has it that the same Germans tried to exterminate the race of Jews with exhaust from diesel engines. I guess the engineers were on vacation when that decision was made. Yeah, that must be it.
Are Jews teaching Indians to be usurers? Okay, I guess that’s a dumb question.
If you’re feeling oppressed by usury, just become a Jew, and creditors can only collect principal, not interest. Jews don’t afflict each other with the sin of usury; that’s only for the goyim cattle.
“We are completely dependent on the commercial banks. Someone has to borrow every dollar we have in circulation, cash or credit. If the banks create ample synthetic money, we are prosperous; if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent monetary system. When one gets a complete grasp upon this picture, the tragic absurdity of our helpless position is almost incredible – but there it is.” ~ Robert Herman Hemphill
The Ministry of Truth is one of our favorite websites. One of the fascinating images you’ll find there is this frontispiece of William Cobbett’s 1834 biography of President Andrew Jackson.
To the right is a hanged Indian, and on the ground before him are his instruments of war: a gibbet, tomahawk, scalping knife, and horn. To the left is a hanged Jew with an equally dangerous instrument of war on the ground before him: a central bank note.
John Demjanjuk, rest in peace.
It’s interesting that the “orders of creation” doctrine is considered to be proto-Nazi. The idea here is that all people are born into a framework of universal orders, including race and sex. Karl Barth vehemently rejected the doctrine, positing instead that all human institutions, structures, and ethical norms must be derived from God’s Word. (Some have taken biblicism of this sort to amusing extremes in the area of geocentrism: “the Bible says the earth is motionless.”) You can see how Barthianism attempts to shut down natural revelation, but the controversy also bears a striking resemblance to the division between Alienist and Kinist schools of thought. While the Alienist begrudgingly makes an allowance for the family (since we all have them, naturally), he is a gnostic whose common refrain is that faith is all that matters, that kinship is an accident of history, and that blood covenants (i.e., nationality and ethnic solidarity) are idolatry, or at best, stopgap measures given to us because of our “hardness of heart” (Matthew 19:8).
Dietrich Bonhoeffer didn’t like the idea of “fixed” orders of creation because he supposed that this implied that a domain of life could be legitimately separated from reconciliation in Christ. We Kinists certainly do not believe this; we believe that every square inch of our lives must come under the lordship of Christ. Therefore, we acknowledge that God is God and we are not, and God often chooses to work through fixed and unceasing means like seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, winter and summer, and day and night (Gen. 8:22). Race and nationality are in our DNA, every bit as much as the desire to raise a family. Since Bonhoeffer could not accept this, he proposed the idea of “orders of preservation,” none of which “has in itself any eternal character, for all are there only to uphold or preserve life.” You can see in these words the Alienist conceit that the blessing of kinship is an accident of history, having no eternally predestined character. Thus, even marriage itself is not an order of creation, Bonhoeffer says, but merely a divine mandate to fit our circumstances. As you know, he was executed for attempting to assassinate Hitler.
As our friend Mickey Bolwerk writes, Kinism means harmony.
It occurred to me the other day that much of Kinism can be simply described as a philosophy which seeks to promote harmony in all areas of life. For example:
* Harmony within the individual, by recognizing the basic harmony of flesh and spirit (psychosomatic unity or something similar).
* Harmony in marriage by promoting an equally yoked combination of man and wife.
* Harmony in families by resisting interracial adoption, which leads to discord in the home.
* Harmony in society by grouping together similar peoples via ethnonationalism or through segregation.
R.J. Rushdoony correctly observed that we have great difficulty in correctly discerning the character of a man of a different race. [So did Rudyard Kipling.] A mixed family or society inevitably leads to mistrust, alienation, and loss of identity. Segregated societies promote and recognize the excellence in those of its own members that would otherwise be rated mediocre within a mixed group. When is the last time you saw a black valedictorian? (Just to be clear: government schools must be razed and burned, but that’s not the point I’m making.)
Class harmony is also promoted by recognizing inequality as fundamental to the nature of God’s creation. The Lord saw fit to equip us with largely varying degrees of talents and abilities, and those degrees vary by individual, family, and race. While this doesn’t stop envy, it undercuts any philosophical basis for it.
Harmony within society is further promoted by recognizing that created man is necessarily limited man. Our responsibility to others is limited, not universal, and is governed by our relationship to our fellow man. While we have great responsibility to our children and parents, our responsibility rapidly diminishes the further out we go. (See The Politics of Guilt and Pity.)
In The Flight from Humanity, RJR included a very short appendix on this topic of the harmony of interests. Dialectical philosophy is constantly found within the thought of fallen man – a philosophy which presupposes conflict as inevitable. An overarching theme in much of RJR’s work is identifying and demolishing the false dichotomies of fallen man. If you have a few minutes, the appendix is only two pages long (book page 75, Scribd page 81).
You really must read it. Rushdoony shows that socialism grows where there is no longer trust in the “interlocking and inter-dependent” facets of society. Socialism is the levelling of these functional differences and distinctions. And what do we see today? Alienists pressing for uniformity and Kinists pressing for pluriformity. “Faith is all that matters,” say the Alienists, and “blood is meaningless.” Their neoplatonist fathers taught them that the Good is “beyond essence.” Hence, they can achieve no true unity but merely a dualistic “unity” that holds faith and blood in “a continual state of tension and conflict.” As Rushdoony writes:
Where men lose faith in the doctrine of creation [which is multifarious], they either abandon belief in the harmony of interests, or else hold it as a rootless and sterile principle. Having denied its foundation, they cannot successfully maintain the conclusions.
This is why those who ought to be preaching life and creation know only death. Their world is passing away before their eyes, and they welcome their own dispossession. Many of them are defeatist and escapist, in search of any world but the one that is our inheritance.
These Alienists, who praise integration, have caused only disintegration, and we Kinists, who are accused of being divisive and schismatic, are the ones who are pointing the way to the only kind of harmony for which man is equipped. Evil is called good and good is called evil.
Ehud Would writes that Alienism denudes all until nothing is left but the Alienist’s own mind.
By this necessary movement from the dualism of Marxian Gnosticism through irrationalism, Alienism must, due to its inescapable commitment to incoherence, eventually find full expression in solipsism, which is the pure skepticism of intelligibility. The more consistent they become, the faster they will march down the bramble road to oblivion…
The modern resolve to suppress the truths of natural hierarchy, clearly revealed racial, ethnic, and familial distinctions, and their proximate and limited obligations is an absolute declaration of ontological rebellion and the clear rejection of teleology. For the Alienist, providence is a slur, and design a hate crime…
They revile the testimony of their own eyes. They scoff at hermeneutics as a construct of men. They sneer at logic for its carnal mediation. And on these same bases, they distrust the Scripture wherever it presupposes Kinism, which is virtually everywhere.
“The majestic spectacle of this blind, inarticulate purposiveness thrusting its way upward and ever upward in an endless unity of differentiated achievements towards an ever-increasing complexity of organisation, towards spontaneity and spirituality, swept away all my old conception of a duty to Man as such. Man in himself is nothing. The forward movement of Life – the growing spirituality is everything. I say to you quite freely, Ransom, that I should have been wrong in liquidating the Malacandrians. It was a mere prejudice that made me prefer our race to theirs. To spread spirituality, not to spread the human race, is henceforth my mission.” ~ C.S. Lewis, Perelandra
That nature which contemns its origins
Cannot be bordered certain in itself.
“The radical declares, ‘Everyone belongs to all, and all belongs to everyone.’” ~ Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Possessed
Bret McAtee explains the connection between collectivism, equality, slavery, and the effort to “deny all distinctions, to erase all notions of biblical hierarchies.”
Since they are human beings, humanists are incapable of worshiping nothing. Their god is the Self, and the Self binds one to Moloch as the Ring binds one to Sauron. There is no sin, only poor choices. There is no grace, only good choices. Now there are a few “ethicists” who advocate a return to infanticide because young children have not developed to the point where they have “aims” and “plans,” which is another way of saying that they have not advanced to “choice,” the new distinctive of humanity. Thus, child sacrifice is made legal, and before long it becomes propitiatory. Here you can see the true reasoning for abortion. It was never about a woman’s right to control her own body. You would have to be an imbecile, on the level of those who believe that there is a qualitative difference between the words “nigger” and “nigga,” to believe that an unborn child is actually part of the mother’s body. This has become a popular excuse for murder, but it’s just a cover for plain old humanism.
Obamination pledges to “continue our efforts to ensure that our daughters have the same rights, freedoms, and opportunities as our sons to fulfill their dreams.”
Follow your dreams, dream big, let nothing stand in the way of your dreams. Yet underneath is the simmering stench of latex and death.
Babies get in the way of dreams…
Roe v. Wade helps to fulfill little girls’ dreams.
“When Negroes have been able to ascend economically, statistics reveal they plan their families with even greater care than whites.” Thus wrote Martin Luther King, Jr., in 1966, in a speech on the occasion of his acceptance of Planned Parenthood’s Margaret Sanger Award. ”Negroes of higher economic and educational status actually have fewer children than white families in the same circumstances”…
Providing ready access to contraception to black families, King insisted, would help to free the Negro man, unlocking “the income potential he can command”…
It’s hard to imagine anyone less fortunate, statistically, than an African-American baby in the womb. For, although blacks make up roughly 12.2 percent of the population of the United States, black women account for between 30 and 38 percent of all abortions.
But at least they’re now able to “fulfill their dreams”!
“A few decades ago women spent less time with their children in order to pursue higher education and careers, and now they pursue higher education and degrees…in order to spend MORE time with their children.”
“Feminism is mixed up with a muddled idea that women are free when they serve their employers but slaves when they help their husbands.” ~ G.K. Chesterton
Integration of the military. And now this: “The Army is ordering its hardened combat veterans to wear fake breasts and empathy bellies so they can better understand how pregnant soldiers feel during physical training.”
Now this is the kind of hilarious news that delights us: The European Union spent $200,000 on a video that depicts a white warrior woman (women make the best warriors in our limp-wristed age) surrounding hostile races (black, Arab, and Oriental), with the message that if Europe stands together it will be easier to defend against the foreign, non-white, bloodthirsty hordes. It was immediately denounced as racist and pulled from distribution.
A friend of ours writes: “A lot of single Christian Women without a very close headship are similar to unattended negroes in their emotional roller coaster of thought processes and conclusions.” Ten thousand heads nod in agreement. Then another friend, with tongue in cheek, expressed his outrage over:
1. The notion that single Christian women should need headship.
2. The notion that single Christian women without headship are like unattended negroes.
3. The implication that negroes should need attending.
4. The notion that unless negroes are attended they are like single Christian women without headship.
5. The idea that both single Christian women without headship and unattended negroes are an emotional roller coaster in terms of thought processes and conclusions.
6. The notion that there is something wrong with emotions and that they are inferior to non-emotions when it comes to thought processes and conclusions.
As of last year, more than half of all children under the age of two in this country are non-white. The share of black households headed by women (mostly single mothers) now exceeds the number of black households with married couples. White Americans don’t realize the degree to which their lives are about to change because they still see mostly whites occupying positions of authority. This gives them the illusion that all is well. In the 2010 census, whites are down to 64 percent of the population (a five point drop in ten years, a sixteen point drop in thirty years), yet 45 of 50 governors and 96 of 100 U.S. senators are still white. If Jews are called white (like a dog’s tail might be called his fifth leg), whites are 92% of the directors nominated for Academy Awards and 96% of Fortune 500 chief executives, both of which are important metrics for merit, though the latter is far more susceptible to “affirmative action.” This means that the world is about to go topsy-turvy for the grazers. We are soon to enter a renaissance of Kinism, and it will take the false shepherds completely by surprise because, like the Pharisees and Sadducees of Matthew 16, they know how to discern the weather by signs in the sky, but they are incapable of discerning the signs of the times.
The national motto of the Dominican Republic: “Dios, Patria, Libertad” (God, Fatherland, Liberty). This gives the Alienist, neo-Babelist “Christian” of today grave concern, for this reason: How could God and fatherland be important? Are Dominicans saying that no one outside their fatherland is loved of God? (You can tell that I’ve been to church.)
Though we neglect to link to every episode, you really need to bookmark the excellent Tribal Theocrat podcast. Episode 17 contains superb commentary on Boy Kevin Swanson, who argues that whites sinfully take pride in skin color but blacks are “a people” and “a culture.” I love it when Boy Kevin talks about mythical “Anglo-Saxon cannibals” in the attempt to show that pre-Christian whites were as depraved as any African ever dreamed of being. (Rushdoony taught that white men never met a cannibal until they journeyed to the Caribbean, hence the name Carib.) Another funny line from the Boy Kevin Show: “Intelligence is largely a factor of those who are diligent at building their intelligence.” Christian Gray does an excellent job of refuting this nonsense in brief segments. He gets right to the point and doesn’t lose the audience by being long-winded. This is one of the qualities that makes the show unique.
I so badly want to punch this guy in the face. Is that wrong of me?
The word “Southern” is too divisive, according to the president of the Southern Baptist Convention, because it detracts from the Great Commission.
Oh, heartbreaker. The John Wilkes Booth bobbleheads have been pulled from the Gettysburg gift shop after only one week. That’s no way to treat an American hero.
“After being hunted like a dog through swamps, woods, and…chased by gun boats till I was forced to return wet, cold, and starving, with every man’s hand against me, I am here in despair. And why; for doing what Brutus was honored for, what made Tell a Hero. And yet I for striking down a greater tyrant than they ever knew am looked upon as a common cuttthroat… I hoped for no gain. I knew no private wrong. I struck for my country and that alone… I do not repent the blow I struck. I may before my God but not to man.” ~ John Wilkes Booth
Whitney Houston died, and the flags in New Jersey were lowered to half-mast for her! Though she had a tremendous talent, allow Andy Nowicki to get real for a moment. He eulogizes her by astutely observing that Saving All My Love for You “is a morally loathsome tune, celebrating a single woman’s adulterous relationship with a married man,” and I Will Always Love You is the “musical equivalent of waterboarding” and “an effective dog-whistle” for psycho chicks. “Not to mention that the plaintive whines of bitch-dogs in heat are more pleasing to the human ear than the song’s screechy, gushing, relentlessly insistent refrain.” But this is particularly impious of Mr. Nowicki, seeing as how Whitney crafted her art in “church” by singing “gospel” music. No appreciation for black “Christianity,” apparently. It’s art! The worst song of all in the Houston oeuvre, writes Mr. Nowicki, is “the grotesque, demonic audacity” of The Greatest Love of All. According to this song, Jesus Christ and St. Paul were mistaken; the greatest love of all is not “love of others (charitos) or love of God (agape), but love of self.” Whitney “promotes self-centeredness with the rapt enthusiasm of a fire-and-brimstone preacher… [S]he graciously awaits our applause for having learned to make love to herself her whole life through.”
I decided long ago, never to walk in anyone’s shadow
If I fail, if I succeed, at least I live as I believe
No matter what they take from me, they can’t take away my dignity!
It’s “a three minute orgy of gratingly sanctimonious, snivelingly drippy, aggressively confrontational, yet rhetorically incoherent musical vomitousness.” Much like the sermons of black preachers.
Christian pop music is, in my opinion, even worse. The agenda-driven “songs” could be churned out by a computer program. They all have the same nondescript melody, the same few chords, unimaginative lyrics, and uniformity of sound. It’s too lame to be called artistic in any sense.
“Look, fellas, religion makes no difference. Except maybe to a Nazi, or somebody that’s stupid.” ~ Frank Sinatra
Look at this headline from Business Insider: “White People Are No Longer Relevant in Pop Music Sales.” More than 81% of Billboard Top 10 best-selling albums are now made by non-whites. Shotgun stages an intervention.
There are four elements to music: melody, harmony, rhythm, and timbre. White people prize melody above all. Without melody, the harmonics will be dissonant at best. Blacks prize rhythm above all. In jazz, there is either no melody or just a taste of it at the beginning and end, while the rest of it is improvisation. Composition is always less important than performance, which is a distinctly non-white way of thinking.
The word “jazz” is a slang term for semen, and it first appeared in print in 1916 when the New Orleans Times-Picayune had a story about “jas bands.” The genre took shape when the descendants of slaves mixed African rhythms with European instrumentation. Rushdoony taught that voodoo underlies jazz music. Its popularity grew in the 1920s, and Nazis refused to allow Germans to be corrupted by it. They acknowledged a sort of “jazz” style as a valid musical genre but were determined to prevent an illicit Negro juke-joint atmosphere where it was played. Here are some of the rules they enforced for jazz performances:
In this so-called jazz type repertoire, preference is to be given to compositions in a major key and to lyrics expressing joy in life rather than Jewishly gloomy lyrics [in keeping with the blues progression]… however, the pace must not exceed a certain degree of allegro, commensurate with the Aryan sense of discipline and moderation… [S]o-called jazz compositions may contain at most 10% syncopation; the remainder must consist of a natural legato movement devoid of the hysterical rhythmic reverses characteristic of the barbarian races and conductive to dark instincts alien to the German people (so-called riffs)… musicians are likewise forbidden to make vocal improvisations (so-called scat)…
Having grown accustomed to a music industry that is forced to reinvent itself with every generation in order to stay “relevant,” these strangely detailed rules strike the man or woman of the 21st century as totalitarian. And so they were, but the purpose behind the rules is clear. We also tend to forget that there is such a thing as real music that elevates and inspires and does not feed base, animalistic emotions. This is because music, which usually purports to be about love, is in sync with the “romantic” mood of our post-Christian age. “Romantic love thrives on frustration,” wrote Rushdoony. “It likes to feel sorry for itself. And the essence of romantic love is that there be insuperable problems, star-crossed lovers, and that it go from frustration to frustration. And romantic love dies when it can get the one it loves.” Not surprisingly, today’s music industry is dominated by blacks and Jews who have a strong understanding and appreciation of the very thing the Nazis outlawed. (Atonal music is Jewish music; much of it was pioneered by Alban Berg, Arnold Schoenberg, and Anton Webern in the early part of the 20th century.) The atonality of jazz, including accents between the beats, is not really the point; it’s the immorality at the heart of the movement.
It’s amazing to me that mainstream evangelical figures who are interviewed on talk shows and asked direct questions about sin and hell are always painfully reluctant to state the truth, express their faith, and witness for Christ. It isn’t surprising when you see this sort of thing from Joel Osteen or Franklin Graham, when they are asked by people like Larry King if Jews go to heaven when they die; you know in advance that the cagey answer is going to be, “Well, I think God will sort that out, and I’m just here to talk about Jesus,” as if “Jesus” can be separated from His eternal Word. But to hear it from Kirk Cameron, for whom I have a lot of respect, is rather surprising. Piers Morgan asks him, point blank, “Is gay marriage a sin?” Now, listen, if you’ve ever been on the hot seat, in front of a camera, you know that the mind and tongue can be distant relatives, so I’m willing to cut him some slack. But the answer, as we keyboard commandos can easily type, is Yes. Instead, Cameron replies that he doesn’t support it and calls it unnatural, detrimental, and destructive. In the next part of the exchange, you can see why Christians are so ineffective against the resolve of liberals. Morgan says that if one of his children came to him and announced that he’s a faggot, the response would be, without hesitation, “That’s great, as long as you’re happy.” (In Matthew 7:12, our Lord calls the Golden Rule the sum of the Law and Prophets, but to the liberal, individual choice is the sum of all things.) Notice Morgan’s adroitness, without nuance or attempt to be clever. And what would Cameron do if this happened to him? He would “have a heart-to-heart talk” and “wrestle with the issues.” Effeminate churches are turning out effeminate men like the Kony jerkers.
Read about the amazing persecution of Dr. Andrew Fraser, who wrote here in the previous post that SWB “has helped me greatly in my effort to reconnect with the blood faith of Old England.” Having lost his job as a university professor because Australia has officially determined that opposing indiscriminate immigration is “unreasonable” and not “in good faith,” Dr. Fraser decided to become a theology student. Being one of the few white men at the school, he was not surprised to discover that minority status confers no benefits on white men. In fact, during one lecture, when he asked how racism can exist if race does not exist, a red dot was placed prominently on his name tag, “a stigmatic ritual intended to signal to all present that I no longer had permission to speak.” Imagine! He was then segregated from his tutorial group for fear that he would reverse the brainwashing of other students. Of course, Dr. Fraser stubbornly refused to change his opinions (those hateful little things), and he was charged with “academic misconduct” and suspended for one year. Minority opinions are now “misconduct,” and like the endangered white race itself, minority views are afforded no protection in this world of hate and intolerance that formerly-Christian churches have given us. The charges against Dr. Fraser were “intolerance,” “interference,” and distributing “offensive” materials. How are such subjective things determined? Well, through logical fallacies. For instance, when Dr. Fraser criticized Karl Barth for accusing German Christians who supported Hitler’s rise to power as betraying their primary allegiance to Christ, an Indian woman accused him of believing that the “Holocaust” never occurred. It’s difficult to counter charges of racism and anti-Semitism when those words can mean whatever liberals want them to mean. And the calculus for being officially offended is so complex in Australia that a formal complaint against Dr. Fraser that was submitted to the Australian Human Rights Commission by an Argentinian man was dismissed on the ground that he was not a member of a group reasonably likely to have been offended! There sure is a lot of reasoning going on out there.
White men can’t jump? No other race even tries. It’s another son of Japheth pushing to the limit the bounds of the possible.
“America was first discovered by Stone Age hunters from Europe, according to new archaeological evidence.” The Smithsonian and National Geographic are no longer able to dodge the facts. They’ve given up.
I love this painting of Bag End.
A 14-year-old has become the 32nd person in the world to demonstrate nuclear fusion. Guess his race.
Very nice words of praise from Vanishing American for a great man, Dennis Wheeler. We miss him.
T-Mobile is blocking access to the best sites on the web.
The TSA is a failure, according to this special agent. It “has spent approximately $60 billion since 2002 and now has over 65,000 employees, more than the Department of State, more than the Department of Energy, more than the Department of Labor, more than the Department of Education, more than the Department of Housing and Urban Development – combined.”
We don’t want to leave you with the impression that we’re xenophobes. We may not give equal time to other cultures, but we do want to take a moment or two to recognize them, and so here’s a picture of 59 Burmese python babies served in the mother’s flesh, coming soon to a grocery store near you.
Think of it as a delicacy.