Kony 2012 has become the most viral video in history. It took just one week for it to get well over 100 million views. It’s remarkable, but for reasons unintended by the effeminate producers.
Jason Russell said recently that his life’s dream was to make Hollywood musicals “like Moulin Rouge, Chicago, and Hairspray.” Helllooo, Frisco! A few days ago, he was not arrested, amazingly, for masturbating in public, vandalizing cars, and public intoxication, but was merely taken to a hospital for treatment. By the way he waves his arms in the videos here and here, it looks like he’s auditioning for a musical.
The aim of the “Bony” 2012 project is to encourage “humanitarian interventionism” against a ruthless Ugandan warlord who hasn’t been in Uganda for six years. Just wait until you see the whiter-people who comprise the ranks of this army of war-hungry Facebookers. It’s a sea of white faces, and only white faces, working on behalf of African children. They’re getting the word out and wearing bracelets and gearing up to placard cities overnight on April 20 and lobbying to send the U.S. military into a new quagmire. This is what whiter-people do. It doesn’t matter to them that Africans have never secured their own liberty, and therefore will not be able to maintain any peace imposed on them. They simply want to do something for Africa. Whiter-people raise awareness; they moralize with passionate intensity; they “belong and connect.” Despite the stated goal of creating videos to show “that genocide cannot exist,” they would never waste a drop of sweat for their own race, because they are Alienists, and their love affair is always with the Other.
They don’t give a fig for genocide occurring in the south of their precious Africa, because it is the genocide of whites. Still, a perverted, propositional kinship is very important to them; they are all worked up about homophobes, creationists, and racists contributing to the Kony cause. They don’t want the ideological homogeneity of their movement to suffer, African children be hanged.
Ugandans don’t like this campaign at all. The African Youth Initiative Network screened it for more than 5,000 of them a few days ago, and rocks were thrown at the screen, and organizers and the press fled for their lives. Further screenings have been cancelled. Now Ugandans are protesting what they see “as a foreign, inaccurate account that belittle[s] and commercialise[s] their suffering,” and they’re going to ban Kony 2012 t-shirts and bracelets from entering the country.
Obama deployed one hundred advisers into central Africa, purportedly to assist in the hunt for the warlord. “Is it possible that Kony 2012 is being used, perhaps even without the knowledge of the Invisible Children charity, to carry out a [fifth generation warfare] operation?” The empire has been running thin on excuses to intervene in oil-rich countries. Youthful white do-goodism combined with viral Internet memes kind of obviates the need for false flag operations. Think of all the money that could be saved if covertly wiring skyscrapers to implode is no longer necessary. The graduates of Liberty University can be the empire’s free reconaissance squad!
The deployment of American military personnel in a country that has recently discovered oil is not mere serendipity. What we are witnessing is the manipulation of “protest” in order to hide foreign policy intentions. The US government can quite honestly say that it has been forced to intervene in Uganda due to unprecedented popular support.
The idealistic liberal activists will be waving flags and singing God Bless America, even though they hate God, His blessings, and the American stock. They really just want to praise themselves. They are narcissists, and their favorite props have always been black children.
The military is controlled by the slaves of Jew bankers, whose business plan is to control the world’s dwindling supply of oil.
They know what the Rothschilds knew; politics and armies are nothing, money is everything. From age to age, the Jew remains the same, but his days in the West are numbered. “Woe to the inhabitants of the earth and the sea! For the devil has come down to you, having great wrath, because he knows that he has a short time” (Rev. 12:12).
Africa and the truth, suffering together.
Congo, Ivory Coast, Sudan, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, even Kenya. Take your pick, for it is the essence of Africa, the recurring A-Z of horror. And as surely as Nelson Mandela took those steps from captivity to freedom, his own country will doubtless shuffle into chaos and ruin.
Mark my words. One day it will be the turn of South Africa to revert to type, its farms that lie wasted and its towns that are battle zones, its dreams and expectations that lie rotting on the veldt. That is the way of things. Africa rarely surprises, it simply continues to appal…
The construct is as follows: white, inglorious and bad; black, noble and good; empire, bad; independence, good; the west, bad; the African, good. Forgotten in all this is that while Europeans were settling and spreading from the Cape, the psychopathic Shaka Zulu was employing his impi to crush everyone – including the Xhosa – in his path, and the Xhosa were themselves busy slaughtering Bushmen and Hottentots. Yet it is the whites who take the rap, for it was they who won the skirmishes along the Fish and Blood Rivers and who eventually gained the prize.
What suffers is the truth, and – of course – Africa. We are so cowed by the moist-eyed mantras of the left and the oath-laden platitudes of Bono and Geldof, we are forced to accept collective responsibility for the bloody mess that is now Africa. It paralyses us while excusing the black continent and its rulers.
This parody of white guilt on the Conan O’Brien show is very funny. The Help is about a Jew who rewards a Southern feminist for betraying her people, whose only purpose in the film is to be humiliated and degraded. The black characters, by contrast, are “imbued with both homespun wisdom and impeccable moral rectitude.” They are all caricatures, not characters, and Hollywood rising to give the black actress (and only the black actress) a standing ovation, as though her performance or the film itself were based on reality, is truly funny.
Here’s why most whites will sacrifice themselves for any cause except their own: because “white behavior optimizes for social status, not physical safety, wealth, or national survival.” Gen5 writes:
Most of the world optimizes for three different things: wealth, power, and beauty. For whites we can add a fourth good, social status, oddly achieved through “public displays of piety” (PDPs) towards the religion of their time, multiculturalism.
Wealth: “The family fortune that is the birthright of their children is going to be poured down the rat-hole of Africa so the parents can enjoy the adulation of their white liberal friends.” Corporations will gladly waste investment capital for costly diversity sensitivity training (which according to the Harvard Business Review, does nothing to slow discrimination lawsuits).
Power: Politicians would rather lose races than appeal to majority white interests. Even Ron Paul, who knows better, has praised MLK and Rosa Parks as “heroes” and has complained about blacks being “victimized” by the criminal justice system. Beauty: White men marrying non-white women of objectively inferior beauty and compatibility for the sake of claiming superior social status on the race issue. This is also the case for fertile Christians who abstain from having natural children so that they can adopt non-whites from Third World countries. As Gen5 points out, the New York Times even published an article about Mitt Romney’s insufferably white family, implying that he will or ought to be hurt politically because of it. Therefore, just like the old saying, “follow the money,” Gen5 tells us that answers to questions about why white people are self-destructive hinge on what enhances their social status.
So many white advocates are naively on a quest for broadcasting the truth, as if men were swayed by facts, when the larger mission is creating spheres of influence where social status is not a false fitness signal but rather something that correlates with true goods, including national survival.
Everyone will know that we’re winning when our virtual communities become churches, businesses, neighborhoods, and other networks that are able to deliver real benefits to members, and we will benefit from the protection of networks, which are stronger than the sum of their nodes.
Consider the example of a pastor who promotes miscegenation. Where does this pastor live? If in a lily-white area, you can attack him as a hypocrite. If he is the rare true believer who lives in the inner city, you can attack him as a foolish person who puts his family in unnecessary danger. The beauty of the other side being demonstrably wrong is that they are always fools or hypocrites. Either charge diminishes social status quite effectively.
David Opperman has an excellent series of articles (part 1, part 2) on the wunderkind of mediocrity, David Bahnsen, son of the famous theologian Greg Bahnsen. As you might recall, we used to give Little Davie and his buddy Andrew Sandlin the business for teaching Reconstructionists and other conservative Christians that their votes were wasted if they weren’t given to Republicans. These tools formed a lonely thinktank in California called the Center for Cultural Leadership, and their motto was “Creating a New Kind of Christian.” You can see why this gave us the vapors; if you’re not talking to us about the old kind of Christian, you’re not talking to us. We called their organization the Christian Culture Club, a pun on Boy George’s team of limp-wristed culture reclaimers. Their burning desire was to be “relevant” to popular culture. Their every effort was in the service of “incrementalism,” being the idea that the great reversal of our nation’s debauchery will never come at all if we aim too high. Therefore, we must ally ourselves with those who are most likely to win elections, having the expectation that we will get only a smidgin of what we desire, and then push for a smidgin more in the next election. In other words, before we become a Christian nation, we must endorse those who teach that Islam is a religion of peace, that Jews worship the God of the Bible, that sodomy is not to be punished, that we can spend our way out of the hole, etc. Yea, though I walk through the Valley of the Lesser of Two Evils, saith Brother Bahnsen, I shall incrementally climb the Mount of Relevance until I survey The Greater Good. It’s like a perverted Pilgrim’s Progress.
Bahnsen inherited a large share of jingoism from his father. He was foolishly convinced that Reagan rejected Keynesianism and that George W. Bush would be a tax-cutting Reaganite.
He called Pat Buchanan a racist and claimed that import tariffs are a violation of the Eighth Commandment, while international free trade prevents producers from stealing from consumers. Yes, you read that correctly. Fellow cheese log James Jordan agrees, writing: “We are not authorized to steal from people on the basis that they are not citizens of our particular nation.” These people believe that equal access to markets is a necessity of the Christian faith, and they believe the same about equal access to citizenship because it corresponds to their belief that nationhood is an ungodly relic of pagan racialism. Jordan is explicit: “Do we as Christians believe in ‘nationalism’? No, we don’t. We believe in the international, catholic, universal community of the Church. We also should believe in international, catholic, universal free markets and free trade.”
Bahnsen gave a hearty “AMEN!!!!!” when a pastor named Kevin Johnson wrote: “The family has in some sense in the covenant community been replaced by the family of the Church.” As you know, our purpose in life as Kinists is to expose and condemn this as devilry, douse it in kerosene, then hold hands and watch it burn while singing Negro spirituals. But enough about our Thursday evening fellowship meals.
“History is littered with civilizations which undermined the family. The family is God’s ordained life for man, and it endures.” ~ R.J. Rushdoony
“In Scripture, the family is the basic institution of society, to whom all the most basic powers are given, save one: the death penalty. (Hence, the death penalty could not be executed on Cain.) The family is man’s basic government, his best school, and his best church. The decay of the family is the decay of civilization.” ~ R. J. Rushdoony
Bahnsen supported George W. Bush for being pro-life, but this was because, like his father, Bush spoke out against abortion on occasion and never vowed to outlaw it. “Nobody could outlaw it on day one!” Bahnsen panted, and Michael Peroutka is “PATENTLY DISHONEST, and EXTREMELY DANGEROUS” for believing that such a thing was possible or desirable, he wrote in his characteristically capitalized manner.
Ignore obscure Christian retreatists who accuse our President of murder, and those who vote for him as accomplices to murder… For life, and for Bush, David L. Bahnsen
Sandlin (Rushdoony’s former editor) called Peroutka “a national socialist”!
Before long, Bahnsen was complaining about the state of public schools, saying that Bush had thrown too much money at them, and the federal government should get out of the business of education, “HOWEVER, the notion that this federalized education fiasco is to be abolished TOMORROW is contra-intelligent, and anti-Christian, to the core.” Yes, “anti-Christian”! And since the beast cannot be dismembered tomorrow, we need more of the same in the hope that someday we will get less of it. If you don’t follow me here, you are hopelessly irrelevant.
Bahnsen has certainly been consistent. He voted for principled conservative Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2003 and then pretended to get upset about the promotion of an “immoral and wicked lifestyle” when Arnold forced California insurance companies to recognize faggots as being married. Yet no amount of feigned outrage can dissuade the Relevant Incrementalist from voting Pragmatic Publican every time. Rather than repent of his decision, Bahnsen wrote that Arnold was “not a sign of regress. At worst case, he is a break-even.”
In the summer of 2006, Bahnsen wrote that it was “the first 4th of July I am blessed to spend as an ideologically self-conscious ‘neo-conservative.’” He exulted that “[U.S.] troops around the world [are] fighting to maintain peace.” Naturally, he endorsed the Jew-view of Norman Podhoretz that propping up the terrorist, anti-Christ, racial state of Israel is of one piece with “the values of Western civilization as a whole.” This was a three-point shot on the court of ethical casuistry. According to Bahnsen, the wealthy state of Israel must be “supported” for vague reasons having to do with democracy and capitalism, which are in actual practice race-worship and usury.
As you see in the Opperman series, the Jew is at the chewy center of the Tootsie Roll pop:
Bahnsen is nothing if not a committed Zionist, and he persistently exudes support for arch-Zionists such as Paul Wolfowitz, Jonah Goldberg, and John Bolton, among numerous others. Zionism has committed America to an entangling alliance with an overt enemy of Christian civilization, and if the unequal yoking principle in 2 Corinthians 6:14 means anything, it must stand to condemn such an alliance with the stated enemies of Christianity.
Well, as Russell Kirk said, politics is the preoccupation of the quarter-educated. At any rate, this is all helpful background to the quotes from Bahnsen that you see in Mr. Opperman’s articles. For instance, Bahnsen writes: “SOME of what Ron Paul says he wants to do, I want to do too. But I want to do it over a generation, because it absolutely will never get done if it is not done over a generation.” It should be obvious, especially in light of the utter failure, decade after decade, of Republicans to accomplish anything remotely biblical, that this is a dearth of principle, not a strategy. It’s also a good way for Bahnsen to shift blame for his crackpot theories to future generations, long after he will have to answer for what he has taught, similar to how Doug Wilson claims that Africa will be a “glittering civilization,” oh, shall we say, 500 years from now.
This statement by Mr. Opperman is a fine conclusion to the whole mess:
Cheering on a winner simply because you know that he will win is the mentality of a coward, and we live in an age of pervasive moral cowardice. The suggestion that we are making incremental progress of any sort in a healthy direction is simply preposterous.
He also writes:
I can easily picture a David Bahnsen-esque thinker in the waning decades of the Roman Empire; a man who mocked those who warned that Rome’s imperial policies were leading her native citizens to inevitable destruction. This Bahnsen analog likely would have taken great comfort that his opinions were solidly in the mainstream and that Roman ascendancy would last forever… The idea that Rome could ever be sacked by Germanic Christian Goths would never have occurred to Roman Bahnsen, and he would mock those who dared question the future of Roman dominance over the world’s affairs.
To give an answer to the imperial cheerleaders in Rome, God sent Salvian the Presbyter, who was one of the teachers of St. Patrick and was called “the master of bishops.” While Augustine explained why God had allowed the Roman empire to fall, Salvian considered the point to be superfluous. The real question, he said, is why Rome did not fall sooner. While Augustine wrote that the fall of Rome was not the worst thing that could have happened, Salvian wrote that the worst and most unjust thing would have been if Rome had not fallen.
Salvian paints a vivid picture of the lustful delirium of the people at their “games,” even as their cities were being taken. He writes that when the Vandals took Carthage, it was difficult to distinguish the shouts of those at the games from the shouts of those who fell defending the walls.
The barbarian peoples were sounding their arms around the walls of Cirta and Carthage and the Christian population of Carthage still went mad in the circuses and reveled in the theaters.
Does this sound familiar?
Rome “is dying,” he writes, “but continues to laugh.” In Trier, with “the nude and torn bodies of both sexes, infecting the eyes of the city as they were torn to pieces by birds and dogs,” the people (including the Christians) remained obsessed with escapism and pleasure. The state gave the people 175 holidays each year!
There was rampant corruption among the aristocrats (Salvian himself was most likely descended from the Gallo-Roman aristocracy) and rampant mania for entertainment among all classes. It’s just like today, with the civic corruption of the bankers, lobbyists, and politicians, and the corruptions of mind and body among average people who are obsessed with Hollywood and fantasy. Above it all, we hear incessant strains of “God Bless America” and “Land of the Friedman, Home of the Braverman.” The Christians of Rome also chanted the equivalent of “God Bless America,” and when Rome was overcome by its enemies, they were shocked to discover that God was no longer “blessing” them. Salvian writes:
The Church herself, which should be the appeaser of God in all things, what is she but the exasperator of God? Beyond a very few individuals who shun evil, what else is the whole assemblage of Christians but the bilge water of vice? How many will you find in the Church who are not either a drunkard or a beast, or an adulterer, or a fornicator, or a robber, or a debauchee, or a brigand or a murderer? And, what is worse than all this, they do all these things almost unceasingly…
See the countless thousands of Christians daily tarrying at the games where base performances are enacted. Can God watch over people like this? Can He watch over those who revel in the circuses and who commit adultery in the theater?… We ever serve the devil in the obscenity of the games and do this knowingly, understandingly and with well-considered deliberation… To Christ, therefore (O monstrous madness), to Christ we offer circuses and mimes, to Christ for His favors we return the indecencies of the theaters, to Christ we offer as sacrificial victims the vilest of games… Was it for this He hung on a gibbet, whom the world feared as He hung there?…
By the way, when you read about theaters and circuses and mimes, don’t for a minute think that it was anything as benign as a modern carnival. The mimes performed perverted sex acts. Bestiality was the halftime show in the Colosseum.
Whatever is of an impure nature is done in the theaters. Whatever is luxurious, in the wrestling schools. Whatever is immoderate, in the circuses. Whatever is mad, in the arena pits. Here there is wantonness, there lasciviousness. Here there is intemperance, there insanity. And everywhere, the devil.
Salvian could see that Christians brought these horrors upon themselves, just as is the case in America today.
He said: “Woe unto you who laugh because you will weep”; and “Blessed are you who weep because you will laugh.” But we are not satisfied with laughing and rejoicing, unless we rejoice with sin and in madness, unless our laughter is mixed with impurities, unless it is mixed with disgraceful acts…
I believe God clearly wished to show them why they were perishing, since at the actual moment of perishing they were doing that very thing through which they had come to final perdition… Therefore, let nobody think that city perished only at the time of its own ruin. Where such things are done, the inhabitants had already [morally] perished long before they [physically] perished…
[A]ll these calamities which we have suffered have been borne, not by the lack of God’s providence or through His neglect, but rather in justice and judgment, in a most uniform dispensation and worthy retribution.
The American empire will fall just as the Roman empire fell, and when it happens, supporters of wickedness like David Bahnsen will wonder why God has forsaken them. When the system of usury on which they depend collapses, they will have nowhere to turn. We will need a Salvian in that day, and may God restore the years that the locust has devoured.
Salvian also saw that once a people had been conquered by “barbarians,” the last thing they wanted to do was return to subjugation under Rome. As “barbarians” they were free, and Salvian recognized that this was all according to God’s plan.
It’s common for Alienist preachers today to exaggerate the depravity of their European ancestors in the futile and profoundly dishonest attempt to prove that blood has nothing to do with behavior, and the gospel can make everyone equal in every way.
Brian Schwertley, for example, likes to say, without any proof whatsoever, that fifteen hundred years ago his Irish ancestors were painting their buttocks blue and eating each other. But in the real world, Salvian agreed with Tacitus and others that (despite being ignorant of the gospel) the Vandals were remarkably chaste, the Goths remarkably pious, and the Franks, Saxons, and other tribes possessed a host of rude virtues that made them a blessing to refugees.
We [Romans] love impurity; the Goths abominate it. We flee from purity; they seek it. Fornication among them is a crime; with us a distinction and an ornament. Do we think we can face God, do we think that we can be saved, when every crime of impurity, every base and shameful act, is committed by the Romans and censured by the barbarians? Here and now I ask them who think we are better than the barbarians: Tell me which of these vices is committed even by a very few Goths, or which of them is not committed by the Romans or by nearly all Romans? And we wonder when the soil of the Aquitainians, or all of our own is given by God to the barbarians, since the barbarians are now cleansing by chastity those lands which the Romans polluted by fornication.
He goes on to say that Spain was likewise given over to the Vandals, “the most chaste among the barbarians.”
By the captivity of the Spaniards, God wished to show in two ways how much He hated carnal lewdness and loved chastity, when He put the Vandals in command solely on account of their great chastity and subjugated the Spaniards solely on account of their great impurity.
His appraisal of the European tribes:
The Gothic nation is lying, but chaste. The Alani are unchaste, but they lie less. The Franks lie, but they are generous. The Saxons are savage in cruelty, but admirable in chastity…
And then there is Africa. Buckle your seat belt.
Among almost all Africans, I know not what is not evil… Their impurities and blasphemies must not be spoken here, because…they have surpassed the evils of other races, but in impurity and blasphemy they have even surpassed themselves… Who does not know that all Africa always burned with the obscene resinous tree of lust, so that you might think it was not a land and site of men, but an Aetna of unchaste flames? Just as Aetna is naturally heated with certain inner burning fires, so that land is constantly heated by the abominable fires of fornication. Nor do I wish my assertations to obtain full credence in this matter. The testimony of the human race is required. Who does not know that almost all Africans are unchaste, with the exception, perhaps, of those converted to God, that is, those changed by faith and religion?… It is so infrequent and unheard of that an African is not unchaste as it is novel and customary that an African is not an African. So general is the evil and impurity in them that whosoever among them would cease to be impure would apparently not be an African.
And he was speaking primarily of the Carthaginians, Berbers, and Libyans in north Africa! You can imagine what he would have said if sub-Saharan Negroes had entered into his realm of experience.
Rushdoony greatly admired Salvian for perceiving “that history is warfare.”
“Dylan Thomas was speaking not only to his father but to all Europeans when he urged us to ‘Rage, rage against the dying of the light.’” ~ CWNY
“[H]eaven itself is often lost for want of striving, but is never had on easier terms.” ~ Richard Baxter
Japan is all cleaned up after just 11 months. See more. That’s because the Japanese are in Japan. If Haitians were in Japan, it would never be clean again. Haitians claim that they need another three years to clean up from their earthquake, despite receiving billions in foreign aid, mostly from your paychecks.
What has changed in the last century?
“Mount Olive is a small town in rural North Carolina, best known for its pickle factory and southern charm. Less than two years ago the Census listed this place as having zero immigrants from Haiti among the town’s 4,600 inhabitants. But over the past 18 months that has changed as thousands of Haitians have flocked to the area.”
“The experience of Liberia and Haiti show that the African race are devoid of any capacity for political organization and lack genius for government. Unquestionably there is an inherent tendency to revert to savagery and to cast aside the shackles of civilization which are irksome to their physical nature. Of course, there are many exceptions to this racial weakness, but it is true of the mass, as we know from experience in this country. It is that which makes the negro problem practically unsolvable.” ~ Secretary of State Robert Lansing, 1918
“The British are as gullible as we are. Hundreds and hundreds of times, at least, they gave scholarships to Blacks from Basutoland or Kenya or Nigeria or one of their other possessions, and the result was almost always the same. With the money given him, the savage bought himself a good wardrobe, attended an English school, learned to play soccer, attended Oxford, wrote a charming essay on Wordsworth or on ancient law, copulated with half-witted English women who thought him ‘romantic’ and themselves ‘broad-minded,’ and when he got tired of living on English generosity, went home to his tribe where he had a well-roasted baby served up to him as a delicacy of which he had been long deprived by the stupid prejudices of the stupid British.” ~ Revilo Oliver
At 1:07:30 in this sermon, Rushdoony is asked if voodoo is still practiced in the South. Rush quotes from Norman Mailer, who he says has “put his finger on the situation” and is “remarkably discerning.”
He said the goal of the average liberal today was to be – in his words – a white nigger. Because, you see, sharing the perspective of magic, all you need to add to that is witchcraft, and where are you going to seek for power? Below. And so his goal, to be a white nigger, to have that closeness to that which is primitive, animalistic, and hence the appeal.
Send the Kinist video to your friends.
Some vocabulary words that are good to know.
A pervasive sense of entitlement percolates through society, wherever blacks are found. Just look at this amazing graphic called “tech is racist.” Warning: This is not satire! The assumption is that blacks and whites are equally meritorious and should be employed in the same jobs, to the same degree.
But racist venture capitalists are not giving them enough money to start their own companies, despite a booming tech industry, you see. And besides, web cameras can’t detect contrast in black faces, so that’s racist. And Microsoft thinks that people want apps to keep them safe, so that’s racist. The funniest part of all is at the end, where Iris on Android phones is asked if whites are superior to blacks. The answer: “Whites are not superior to blacks. Just different. Like Dr. Verwoerd and the original, genuine policy of Apartheid always said.” Hilarious!
Listen to former South African Prime Minister Hendrik Verwoerd on separate development. Now realize that the African National Congress is seeking to change the constitution to mandate a one-party Communist state. Of course, most of these black Communists are “Christians.” (The country is 80% black and 80% Christian.)
White men are shocked once again to discover that their sense of fair play is unrequited.
The ANC has also expanded prohibitions on employment to include the “Cape Coloured” mulattoes. So even those of mixed race suffer along with the whites.
Young white South Africans are leaving the country at a pace consistent with the advent of “widespread disease, mass natural disasters, or large-scale civil conflict.” Most white men aged 24 to 34 have already left. There is only one word for this – genocide – and it was all caused by white people loving democracy more than their kin.
No “Invisible Children” bracelets for that little girl! “Christians” are indifferent to the liquidation of her race because they’re so busy flying to Uganda and designing websites and producing videos and streaking.
The highest average murder rate in the world is found in Honduras: 159 murders per 100,000 inhabitants. But for white farmers in South Africa, the murder rate is more than 300 per 100,000. Yet white South Africans are being denied refugee status in America because they have no right to claim discrimination in “non-racial, democratic, post-apartheid South Africa.” Besides, there’s no room here for our South African cousins when there are so many Mexicans-With-Family-Values who want to live the American Dream.
The letters “USA” are racist when chanted at high school basketball games near the Mexican border. While Mexicans, wherever they may be found, never hesitate to express national and racial patriotism, these white school administrators are so scared of the tarbaby that they are going to punish any student who chants “USA” at another game. White schoolkids will soon learn a very different version of history when they read about the Alamo and Cortez.
In France, textbooks are being revised solely to avoid insulting minorities. Instead of teaching about Napoleon and the French Revolution, they’re teaching about the African “kingdom” of Monomotapa! The true French now worry that their identity will disappear along with their history.
Here’s an old Nazi publication called “France’s Guilt.” You have to admit that France has become exactly what the Nazis predicted.
Why do whites allow it? Because it enhances their social status, as Gen5 says. Of course, we’re not Utopians. We criticize liberals for believing that they can change human nature, and we’re not going to be any more successful in changing white nature. This is why Gen5′s proposal to provide incentives for white status-seekers is quite brilliant.
“Black Power!” exclaims P. Niggy at an NBA All Star game, with a raised fist. But you know what’s really racist? The band at Southern Miss chanting “Where’s your green card?” to a Puerto Rican Kansas State player.
A pond in Vermont is racist. After you drive through Jewtown, hang a right at Pickaninny Buttes, and straight on to Squaw Tit.
Refusal to acknowledge racism is racism.
Coaching is racist.
Rubber bands are racist too.
Sombreros and prison garb are racist.
Everyone went nuts over an ESPN headline that referred to a “chink in the armor” of a Taiwanese NBA player, Jeremy Lin. The Professionally Offended wrote that using the word “chink” is like using the word “nigger.” So once again, perfectly useful words like chink and niggardly are off-limits because the feelings of hyper-sensitive diversities will be irreparably damaged. We can’t allow playground taunts to be heard by precious grown men, especially not men who are paid millions of dollars to play games. Other words that are strictly forbidden when writing about Lin: 1) no headlines about “an Asian who knows how to drive” to the basket; 2) his name is not “Grasshopper”; 3) no jokes about takeout boxes or fortune cookies will be tolerated.
We predict that the new book, Rise of the Black Serial Killer, will shatter a very popular myth into a million tiny shards. Order it here.
Dear God, please kill this nigger now. Amen. That has to be the ugliest creature ever to walk the earth. God never intended for a human being to look like that.
“Murderers and hogs never look well till they are hanged.” ~ Edmund Burke
“Life is not valued in Detroit. It’s a war zone here. We need some ground troops patrolling these streets; they send them all overseas, but they need to be here.” You can call the antebellum Southerners “racists” to your heart’s content, but they all correctly predicted that if you set the Negro free from slavery, you would have to spend far more to fund a police state to control him. Sow the wind and reap the whirlwind (Hosea 8:7).
Segregated restaurants in the South never had to deal with Chuck E. Cheese violence. Safety is racist, as Microsoft has learned.
“Desegregating the prisons is what created the [prison] gangs in the first place.” ~ Otto Scott
The average person, who would shudder to be called a white supremacist, excuses black criminality by implicitly treating blacks like animals. “Oh, he walked down that street at night? It’s too bad that he was shot, but he should have known better.” This is on the order of comments regarding that queer from Siegfried and Roy: “It’s too bad that a wild beast tore him limb from limb, but he should have known better.” We “racists” are actually much more respectful of black dignity for wanting crimes to be punished (and for opposing affirmative action quotas). Liberals turn a blind eye to black criminality because they believe that blacks are sub-human. Now Winston Smith tells us that a man was recently attacked by a Muslim for dressing as zombie Mohammed on Halloween, and the attacker was arrested for assault. The judge, who is also a Muslim, threw the case out of court and called the victim a “doofus” for provoking the pious servants of Allah, who are bound by honor to retaliate with violence whenever their pedophile-prophet is lampooned, as does a black man whenever and wherever he hears white lips utter his favorite word, “nigger.” His fists are duty-bound to swing, you understand. This is a mockery of law and order, not to mention the effective establishment of Sharia law in Oklahoma, which the voters of that state have outlawed via an amendment to the state constitution (later overturned because no court had ever invoked Sharia law).
Winston is too busy overcoming adversity to complain about it.
New York City cops arrest an average of five public school kids each day, and 94% of them are Dutch and Welsh. Just kidding! I really had you going there. No, 94% are black and mestizo, of course. Let’s hope that Head Start and No Child Left Behind lower this all the way to 90% in the next few generations. No price is too high. Let’s also hope that cops finally begin to judge students on the content of their character, not the color of their skin. I have a dream today.
“There was a survey done recently of school kids, of all races, and they were asked to name the three greatest Americans of all time, not including presidents. The top three were Martin Luther King, Harriet Tubman, and Rosa Parks. Needless to say, those kids aren’t going to turn into eager Young Republicans in sync with the values of a bunch of old White folks.” ~ James Edwards
In Cincinnati, Ohio, more than $10,000 is spent per high school student per year, yet in one all-black high school with a 14% graduation rate, an additional $40,000 is being used to pay students to go to class. The old “racist” Southerners are vindicated once again. Sure, you can abolish slavery, but you’ll go broke after you do.
At 54:20 in this sermon, Dr. Rushdoony is asked his opinion on a trade school that was to be built in Watts (the Los Angeles ghetto) with tax dollars, and what he thought about Negro leaders pushing instead for the construction of a junior college.
Well, I don’t see any point in either the junior college or the trade school, for the simple reason that this will be education provided freely for people who have abundant opportunities to get an education of almost any sort, who can go anywhere in Los Angeles and get it, and they’re not using the opportunities they have. Why provide people with opportunities when they don’t want them? And they will sit in school year in and year out and make no attempt to learn anything, and then we are supposed to provide something further for them because ostensibly we have deprived them. This, to me, is utter nonsense. And it is fantastic the extent to which they expect these things.
I was speaking at Fuller Seminary this past Tuesday, and they have had a conference there on race and equality, and this one man – a United Presbyterian Negro leader, a Dr. Willmore, I believe – spoke five or six times and gave the standard civil rights justification; the reason why these people riot is they have a cause, and their cause is the cause of Christ, and so on and so forth. This is the essence of his position, and of course they sat there and took it. And I tried to get him to realize, but of course it was futile, he was blaming not just the white man but the white Christian, which is a peculiar thing. And he was saying it was the white Christians who were the worst, these who believed their Bible and had family devotions, they were the ones who would go into the slave quarters and break up the families, and separate and sell husband and wife and children, who would be deliberately nasty. And I said, isn’t there a great deal of mythology in your thinking? First, you admit these people believed their Bible from cover to cover, and then you say these people who were so moral in their homes went out there and did these things. And I said, can you document this? I said, I doubt that you can. I said, you have continually blamed everything that happens to the Negro on the white man, in particular on the good, Bible-believing, white Christian. I said, what about the responsibility of the Negro? Of course, he wouldn’t answer, because he was not concerned about that. I said, I don’t like the word equality… Instead of talking about equality of rights, why not talk about an equality of responsibility? I said, why aren’t you for that? And again, he wouldn’t answer. There’s no dealing with these people except in terms of good, hard realities.
Now, a couple of things stand out about this commentary. First, notice that Rushdoony and his church had not deprived blacks of anything, and yet they were expected, along with other whites, to make reparations to those who had not been deprived themselves, but whose ancestors had been allegedly deprived by slavery. So all of a sudden, though we hear today from white preachers that race doesn’t exist, it turns out that race is of utmost importance to blacks and Jewish Holohoax “survivors” in determining who pays the money and who receives the money, and the obligations extend from generation to generation. We Kinists are accused of believing in salvation by race, which we categorically deny, but few seem to mind that whites are routinely accused of guilt by race. Whites bend over and take it, but Rush correctly called it nonsense. It’s far worse than nonsense; it’s genocide. With these racially-demarcated lines of financial obligation firmly in place, the black man dares to pretend that he is in pursuit of equality!
Notice also that this black “Reverend Doctor” is rather typical of what is believed today by black Christians, who only agree to take the name of Christian because many whites now agree with them that slavery was evil and sinful. If most whites disagreed with them, they would either not take the white man’s religion or pervert it into the unbiblical mess that it is today. The point is that their true religion is “civil rights,” and it leads them into the very traps in which Rushdoony snares them, namely, bearing false witness against godly Christian families and preaching all manner of fiction to besmirch their honorable names. By doing so, they besmirch the name of Christ! They have sinned, and yet they are encouraged in their sin at all levels of church and state.
Here’s a black sophist who reminisces about being raised in the “traditional African American home, dominated by a matriarch,” being his grandmother, who had ten children to raise. He is untroubled by such normalizing of dysfunction because he falls back on racial terms: “there is power in identity.” His speech is shot through with liberal howlers, such as “the threat of terror shaped the lives” of blacks during “Reconstruction.” Poor, innocent black people threatened by insane white people who loved to lynch for no reason. In Eric Holder fashion, he claims that “we” have a hard time talking about race and history, meaning that “we” have a hard time agreeing with him. He says that Germany now finds it unconscionable to enact capital punishment because of its WWII history, yet southern states in America have no problem enforcing the death penalty. Yes, you read that correctly: Southerners in favor of capital punishment are like Nazis.
The point of his talk is that the death penalty is evil. And when he says that Alabama ought to be ashamed for permanently removing the right to vote from felons, he again resorts to racial terms, implying that blacks must not be impeded in voting their interests as a race, even if it means that black criminals must be granted suffrage, because even black criminals can be relied upon to vote in accord with the black mainstream, just as Jewish atheists are still welcomed by their fellow Jews.
True to Marxist form, he implies that all poverty is the result of injustice. Thus, wealth is equated with “privilege” in the minds of blacks, not hard work and risk. They believe that whites are undeserving of their wealth because it is inherited (a fundamentally unbiblical prejudice), and now the same social connections that make this privilege possible must reach across the racial divide to do the same for blacks and other non-whites who have been impeded by the privileged from doing it themselves. As black “theologian” J. Kameron Carter puts it, “the poverty of dark flesh is where one finds the wealthy God,” and whites can only be restored to communion with Christ by uniting themselves with the black victims of racism “since that is where Christ is.” (This reminds me of Jesse Jackson at the 1992 Democrat Convention, saying that Jesus was born to a single mother and a homeless couple, and when Mary told Joseph that he was not the father, he “abused” her. Stunning, isn’t it, how similar the family of Christ was to the average black family?) At any rate, this is how blacks pretend that they advocate racially-transcendent “justice.” They talk a lot about tearing down racial barriers and forming “rainbow coalitions,” but not for the purpose of eliminating one iota of racial consciousness on their part; it is always for the purpose of taking what does not belong to them, which in the old days was called envy and theft. Keep in mind that this is what black Christians believe too. Their sense of “justice” is unbiblical and perverted. See, for example, their St. MLK excusing riots and threats of murder as “the desperate language of the unheard.” It’s all about them, you see. The only crime is that they are not “heard.”
This very eloquent, erudite, and sophisticated black speaker suggests, with a straight face, that states should not spend money to execute murderers and rapists, but instead they should use this money to hire policemen to patrol the streets and ostensibly prevent murders and rapes before they occur. He characterizes this burgeoning police state as “compassionate,” but compassionate for whom? Certainly not for the white folks who can no longer enjoy liberty but are forced to live under tyranny and surrender their inheritance to strangers. Such concerns do not enter the black “Christian” mind because they are irrelevant to the race that is loudly pretending to transcend race. It’s an effective shell game they play, but the racially aware white man can see directly through it.
Notice, by the way, that TED has become a humanist “church” with its own “life coach” and “sermons.” The trinity of this anti-church is found in the initials: Technology, Entertainment, Design.
The Olympics have become a showcase of the modern police state. When the games were hosted in Peking, there were endless articles about how the Communists were clamping down on the Chinese and presenting a false sense of peace and freedom, and every day there was talk of the Tiananmen Square protests. Well, polyglot Britain will far surpass Chinese totalitarianism for the Olympics this year. There is a rule that prohibits anti-Olympics posters from being displayed in private homes. Public roads will be off-limits to the public, open only to corporate sponsors. As many as 50,000 troops will be mobilized.
During the Games an aircraft carrier will dock on the Thames. Surface-to-air missile systems will scan the skies. Unmanned drones, thankfully without lethal missiles, will loiter above the gleaming stadiums and opening and closing ceremonies… A thousand armed US diplomatic and FBI agents and 55 dog teams will patrol an Olympic zone partitioned off from the wider city by an 11-mile, £80m, 5,000-volt electric fence…
London is also being wired up with a new range of scanners, biometric ID cards, number-plate and facial-recognition CCTV systems, disease tracking systems, new police control centres and checkpoints. These will intensify the sense of lockdown in a city which is already a byword across the world for remarkably intensive surveillance…
Particular glee that Israeli-style security arrangements are now being widely implemented is evident among the CEOs of large Israeli security and defence contractors, which are doing especially well in the security boom…
Already, the Qatar royal family have bought the 1,400 homes of the Olympic village in a deal worth £557m…
All this in a city convulsed by massive welfare, housing benefit and legal aid cuts, spiralling unemployment and rising social protests. It is darkly ironic, indeed, that large swaths of London and the UK are being thrown into ever deeper insecurity while being asked to pay for a massive security operation, of unprecedented scale, largely to protect wealthy and powerful people and corporations.
You can tell that a revolution is brewing. The Third Worlding of the West continues, First World liberty is dead, and Jews are selling to the police state the surveillance equipment that is used to control the increasingly irate masses of incompatible races and religions. The tension is going to build until this powderkeg explodes. But hey, won’t it be fun to watch the parade of nations during the opening ceremony?
The Marxism of the aforementioned TED speaker is closely connected to Derrick Bell’s Critical Race Theory, which was adapted from the Jew Frankfurt School’s Critical Theory, which was designed to overturn established Christian standards and convince young people to rebel against tradition. The late Andrew Breitbart released a 1991 video of Barack Obama, when he was a 30-year-old law student at Harvard, hugging Bell at a rally. In the retarded commentary following the video, watch Soledad O’Brien, the mulatto with the ridiculous name, try to redefine Critical Race Theory. Harvard professor Charles Ogletree bragged that he “hid” this video during the 2008 presidential campaign, having surmised the potential political fallout. (Jeremiah Wright was another CRT albatross, and he had to be tossed for the same reason.) While lecturing at the University of Chicago School of Law, Obama assigned Bell’s book, Faces at the Bottom of the Well, which promotes the idea that black people are failures because white people cause them to fail; whites will always maliciously seek to dominate blacks; and since the Constitution is unable to protect blacks from being victimized, quotas and special privileges are needed to compensate for the endemic racism of the white majority. America is irredeemably racist, and so “America” must be redefined and reorganized, which is a polite way of saying that the white race must perish. As we’ve often said, blacks will only identify as “Americans” if “America” is the post-Lincoln empire. They have no love whatsoever for the Old Republic, which was the true USA. At least neo-Americans today are honest enough to admit that their citizenship is merely propositional and ideological, and they don’t really belong to a nation at all, according to how the term is historically defined. In fact, they glory in it.
Because of his Marxist training in CRT, Obama writes that black violence stems from “humiliation and untrammeled fury,” as though blacks can’t really be blamed, because it’s the fault of Whitey on the moon. He laments that the Constitution “says what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf…” Forget CRT, this is typical Commie blackness, and it shows that our forefathers were correct; we can’t be joined to these people under the same government. Those who call themselves Christians are not to be believed if they are impenitent thieves.
When Barack Obama was growing up, his nanny was an Indonesian transvestite. And when he lived in Hawaii, he was close to Frank Marshall, a man he describes as his “mentor.” Marshall lived in Hawaii because he was ostracized for being an advocate of legalized pederasty. But you know what’s really hateful? Obama’s white grandmother, who he calls a “racist.”
Since “community organizing” is so valuable that it got Obama elected president, Jared Taylor now announces that he is “active in the white community,” just to make whiter-people cringe.
During “African American History Month,” Obama launched an organization called African Americans for Obama. No, not this kind of African American, silly. It’s a privileged title. Strangely, Ron Paul has not launched an organization called “Whites for Ron Paul.” It’s a good thing the candidates know what is racist and what is not.
And while the Confederate flag is strictly off-limits in hyper-tolerant public schools, not so for t-shirts celebrating the first national Pretty Brown Girl Day, which has been launched to encourage “girls and women of all shades of brown…to embrace the beauty of their skin color.” If you think that embracing the beauty of white skin is also to be encouraged, it only shows that you’re a racist. And quite frankly, I’ll bet that you also want to kill six million Jews. “Women should be taught to appreciate their skin from birth,” says co-founder Sheri Crawley. Except for white women, of course. And by the way, what does it mean to appreciate skin color if miscegenation is considered a perfectly acceptable alternative lifestyle choice?
It’s funny how social constructs must be pure, except for white social constructs. Even the self-identified mestizo (mixed) construct must be pure. Of course, it would be evil racism for white social constructs to band together to protect their own political interests.
How do you like this sentence?
Dingoes are generally classified as a subspecies of wolf, Canis lupus dingo, although in the past they have been classified as a subspecies of dog and as a separate species.
The word species is harder to define than the offspring of a Kardashian. If you allow dogs to mate randomly, like they’re mudsharks with tramp stamps, you end up with a mutt resembling a dingo. As your half-witted preacher will tell you, there is neither Saint Bernard nor pocket poodle, for we are all one in the family Canidae. All the same, there are still haters and bigots, like the people in New South Wales who instituted a breeding program to protect dingo purity. I’ll bet these purebred dingos even wear doggy-sized sheets over their heads with cutouts for their eyes and snouts.
At 45:45 in this sermon, Rushdoony is asked if the Ethiopian wife of Moses was black. His answer, as I’m sure you can guess, is contrary to what you would hear from almost any pastor today, and it’s very instructive for the future of our own apostate country.
No, because first of all, the Ethiopians, although they do represent a great deal of mixing today, are not an African people. And at that time, which was of course several thousand years ago, they didn’t have that element of mixture that they have acquired since. Ethiopia in the ancient world was an advanced country with quite a bit of culture. It was a Christian country in the early centuries and quite advanced for some time, a center of a great deal of learning. And it drifted into heresy in the fourth and fifth centuries and began after that its decline, and today the Church there is just a relic of superstition, and the people have for over a thousand years lived far more poorly than their ancestors did and in greater ignorance. The clergy themselves are ignorant in a way that would have staggered the clergy of the early centuries in Ethiopia. But the Ethiopians even today look down on the African peoples. There are three groups of people in Ethiopia – the Ethiopians, the Arabic peoples, and the negroid – and the negroid are very heavily discriminated against by the other two.
Share the Kinist video. By Ethiopians, I think he’s referring to the Oromo and Amhara, who share almost two-thirds of their genome with Caucasians. The country is very much like Brazil, with the blackest at the bottom. And even the blacks distance themselves from the blacks of greater Africa. Notice that Ethiopia was once great, but after excessive miscegenation it’s a horror. Our lying preachers are taking us down the same path. Don’t miss the funny story told by Rush at 55:45.
In Pakistan, see the partially-white descendants of Alexander the Great’s soldiers. Alexander attempted to unite Europe and Asia through miscegenation, and thank God, all of his designs came to nothing.
Mark Rushdoony doesn’t like it when his father is quoted approvingly by Kinists. He left the following comment under the video above:
My father, R.J. Rushdoony never subscribed to The Kinist belief that the races ought not to be mixed, so his addressing the question of Moses’s wife should not be taken as implying that he did. I was not present at most of the weddings he performed, but I know that he in fact performed at least one interracial marriage. Using his words to imply that he believed in Kinism, which he did not, is, at best, misleading.
Sure, Mark. Whatever you say. Was it the “white nigger” quote that set you off? I mean, in this day and age!
Interracial “marriages” are now at a record 15%. It’s high time for the Church to return to recognizing only legitimate marriages.
A medical cure for “racism” has been discovered, using a study group of 36 white men, of course: a heart pill called propranolol which deadens “nerve circuits that govern automatic functions” like fear and anxiety. Despite the fact that this drug is clearly stupefying patients and impairing their mental state (a drug-induced Williams Syndrome), it is said to be “of considerable ethical interest.” A philosopher from Oxford says: “Such research raises the tantalising possibility that our unconscious racial attitudes could be modulated using drugs, a possibility that requires careful ethical analysis.” In other words, the goal of eradicating natural “racism” is so noble and virtuous that, after “careful ethical analysis,” the FDA will be able to purge this great toxin from the body politic. Just one problem: Propranolol doesn’t work on Kinists. “The main finding of our study is that propranolol significantly reduced implicit but not explicit racial bias.”
Pat Buchanan has been excommunicated from MSNBC with bell, book, and candle, but Al Sharpton is still gainfully employed by the network, with his shucking and jiving about how “white folks was in the caves when we was buildin’ empires.” Sharpton even went on Meet the Press to lecture Rush Limbaugh on “civility” and “civilized speech,” which is like O.J. Simpson becoming a marriage counselor.
As Enoch Powell once observed, all political careers end in failure, and Pat’s career failed to the benefit of us all. Though the purging will be blamed on his latest book, Suicide of a Superpower, it’s not surprising that he wore out his welcome among the liberals, and I’m sure Buchanan himself expected it to happen. The writing on the wall was plain to see, because as soon as you say that Europeans are dying off, and something needs to be done to stop it, you have become a racist. Here’s why: Europe has more people than ever, and so does America, and if people are just people and all people are replaceable, no one cares what happens to the white race. (This is the new, certified Judeochristian position.)
Buchanan lists the groups who made trouble for him, despite his best attempts to remain palatable for public consumption: blacks via Color of Change (for appearing on the Political Cesspool), Jews via the ADL (for appearing on the Political Cesspool), and queers via a “human rights campaign.” Clearly, James Edwards needs to work harder on the pink triangle demographic. Buchanan even implies that Jews are the enemies of free speech. In short, he has been branded as a racist, homophobe, and anti-Semite by the same people who whine and moan about McCarthyism. They are the true blacklisters! As Jared Taylor has said, Joe McCarthy was trying to protect his country from infiltration by a foreign power with which we were engaged in a long Cold War. Today, the targets of the blacklisters are not powers of any kind but rather humble pundits like Buchanan and writers like Taylor and bloggers and radio hosts and other small fries whose “crime” against Truth, Justice, and the American Way is having opinions that fall outside the liberal mainstream. Truly, the Bill of Rights is meaningless.
“In America the majority raises formidable barriers around the liberty of opinion; within these barriers an author may write what he pleases, but woe to him if he goes beyond them. Not that he is in danger of an auto-da-fe, but he is exposed to continued obloquy and persecution. His political career is closed forever, since he has offended the only authority that is able to open it. Every sort of compensation, even that of celebrity, is refused to him. Before making public his opinions he thought he had sympathizers; now it seems to him that he has none any more since he has revealed himself to everyone; then those who blame him criticize loudly and those who think as he does keep quiet and move away without courage. He yields at length, overcome by the daily effort which he has to make, and subsides into silence, as if he felt remorse for having spoken the truth.” ~ Alexis de Tocqueville
Here are some quotes from Pat’s book:
If [political commentator Heather] MacDonald’s statistics are accurate, 49 of every 50 muggings and murders in New York are the work of minorities. That might explain why black folks have trouble getting a cab. Every New York cabby must know the odds, should he pick up a man of color at night…
They are trying to transform a Western Christian republic into an egalitarian democracy made up of all the tribes, races, creeds, and cultures of planet Earth. They have dethroned our God, purged our cradle faith from public life, and repudiated the Judeo-Christian moral code [gag] by which previous generations sought to live…
When the faith dies, the culture dies, the civilization dies, the people die.
But along with it comes this nonsense:
Back then, black and white lived apart, went to different schools and churches, played on different playgrounds, and went to different restaurants, bars, theaters, and soda fountains. But we shared a country and a culture. We were one nation. We were Americans.
“Diversity can work…[if we are] steeped in Americanism… The melting pot worked, but our elites don’t believe in it anymore.” ~ Pat Buchanan (31:16)
The nonsense didn’t save him from being fired. There’s no reason for any of us to succumb to moderation.
As our friend Winston asks, “Strange, isn’t it, how Pat Buchanan was fired for lamenting the coming end of White America, but hate-mongers are applauded for celebrating it?”
This new war of the blacklisters is driven by the same envy that motivated the abolitionists. As Revilo Oliver writes:
It is most instructive to read the abolitionists. They spout quotations from the Bible, and they babble about “human rights” and “equality.” But they cannot completely conceal their real animus and inspiration. Their venom is directed against the plantation owners of the South, most of whom, though by no means all, were ladies and gentlemen. The abolitionists had in their minds a picture, partly correct, of the Southern landowner as a man far superior to themselves in education, culture, and humanity. And for that they hated him, implacably. They also had in their feverish minds a picture, totally false, of the planter as a man of unbounded wealth and leisure who spent his life lolling on a wide veranda and sipping mint juleps. And they envied him passionately. They had a picture, equally false, of the Southern lady as one who spent her days in fairy-like ease, waited on hand and foot by obsequious slaves. They had a picture, largely correct, of those women as being accorded by men a chivalrous respect that was almost unknown in the North. And so they yearned to humiliate and destroy that Southern lady. That was the real inspiration of their frantic “do-gooding.”
You can take the true measure of what has happened to our national mentality by just remembering the name of that distinguished horse thief and homicidal manic, John Brown, who, financed by a conspiratorial group that called themselves the Secret Six, was sent into the South to start a slave revolt. As everyone admits, his purpose was to get all the White women of the South raped and butchered, and to get all the White men of the South barbarously mutilated and butchered. What does that make of him in contemporary opinion? Why, he was a “champion of human rights,” “a martyr of freedom,” and all that. He wanted to butcher, it’s true, but to butcher White men and women. That is to say, White slime, like ourselves, as we wallow in ecstasies of self-abasement and self-hatred. And that suffices to make him admirable, to make him noble. And so his soul goes marching on – over the hot coals, I hope.
The same Yankee do-goodism lived on. Witness the Vietnam War:
We are Americans, White men of the West. And if we were sane, no truth would be more obvious and unquestionable to us than the fact that, so far as we are concerned, all the teeming population of Vietnam is not worth the life of one American soldier. But if anyone suggests that, why everyone is horrified: “Are we not the world’s slaves to be used for do-gooding? Who cares about your son and mine – they’re expendable.”
And now even sons of the South have turned into Yankee do-gooders, exuberantly offering their flesh as fodder for Israel.
And of course, do-gooders everywhere have kept the cult of their sainted prophet alive.
Down in Memphis, somebody shoots a Black automobile thief, noted Communist agent, and bloodthirsty inciter of riots and revolution against us. What happens? Half the White nitwits in this country snivel and sob and mourn, saying tearfully, “What a wonderful man he was. He wanted to kill White slime like us. Wasn’t that sweet, wasn’t that noble, wasn’t that saintly, wasn’t he just like Jesus?”
We are Americans!
What do we owe the rest of the world? Nothing, absolutely nothing.
What are the “civil rights” that we owe our Negroes if they insist on having them? A free ride to Africa.
What do we owe the self-chosen people? Ordinary courtesy and considerate treatment so long as we are convinced that it is to our advantage to have a cohesive body of 12 to 15 million aliens reside in our country and own a large part of it.
What do we owe to the unspeakable gang that now rules us in Washington? A fair trial…
The only alternatives now are to fight or to whimper. But if you think that you can escape, good-bye and good luck. To the rest of you I suggest that we shall see our problem clearly when we say to ourselves:
We are Americans. This is our country. He who would take it from us, by force or by stealth, is our enemy. And it is our purpose – nay, it is our duty to our children and to their children and to our yet unborn posterity – it is our duty to use all feasible means to destroy him.
Buchanan is correct that only Jews want war with Iran. Jew Krauthammer is saying that Israel must strike now to “prevent a second holocaust.” And we must help the Jews, because if Iranians infiltrate our country, as one commentator writes, “they will take control of our financial institutions, our media, our government, academia, and even our churches. Along with this they would probably be major players in organized crime, pornography, and the sex trade. They would probably get so cocky they would even start dictating that we accept our own demise by opening our borders to the third world, while restricting immigration to Iran for Iranians only. Why do those people hate our freedom so much?” If we don’t do something now, the terrorists will win!
I love the sound of freedom in the morning.
Warmonger Rush Limbaugh hasn’t been the focus of so much attention for 20 years. I think his comments about Sandra Fluke, the student who says she is having so much sex that she wants government-mandated insurance coverage for contraception, were spot-on. The only problem was that he apologized. What else can a woman who wants to be paid to have inconsequential sex be called, asked Limbaugh, than a prostitute? And what does it make us, if we agree to pay for her sex, but whoremongers? Sandra the Slut also wants employers to pay for sex changes. Never mind that her starting salary will be $160,000.
Hillary Clinton praises Sandra Floozy as one who is “assuming the risks that come with sticking your neck out,” like a democracy activist in Burma who has spent 11 years in jail for writing a letter.
Jew Gloria Allred is seeking to sue Limbaugh for defamation. There is a statute on the books in Florida, where Limbaugh lives, which stipulates that anyone who “speaks of and concerning any woman, married or unmarried, falsely and maliciously imputing to her a want of chastity” is guilty of a misdemeanor. Apparently, a woman who admits to having premarital sex is nevertheless to be considered as chaste. This means that “slut” is now like the word “nigger” and can only be used by the appropriate groups. A journalist who reports on slutwalks should probably call them s-word walks to avoid a lawsuit. This reminds us of how we have been confronted by pastors for using the word “nigger.” A Christian must never use this word, they say, because its very use implies Hate. My response to them is that I don’t accept double standards.
“I know the word nigger as an admonishment, an endearment, a criticism, and an invective. So I use it; I don’t run from it. I don’t have an issue with it or who says it.” ~ Samuel L. Jackson, the highest-grossing movie actor of all time
The idea that some words can be used only by the privileged makes a mockery of language. I like to ask pastors if they use words such as midget or Indian or Eskimo, all of which are considered by their respective groups to be as offensive as the word “nigger.” The response is always yes, we do in fact use those words. The English language is beautiful, but it would be a pile of stink if every word that someone considers to be offensive were expunged from it.
At any rate, the word “slut” turned out to be a mild invective for Rosie the Riveted, although one CPAC blogger called her a “shiftless rent-a-cooch from East Whoreville.” Shakespeare might have called her a puking idle-headed dewberry or a pox-marked flax-wench.
Here are the words that liberals use for right-wing women. Madame Fluke received a personal call from Barack Obama to see if she’s okay and thank her for speaking on behalf of women, but Christian women will receive no such condolences from the president for being called names.
The left-wingnuts are painting Limbaugh as being a rabid hater who is on the verge of leading his Zionist listeners in an insurrection, but the fact is that Limbaugh is rather milquetoast, and he is paid a lot of money for knowing how far to push the envelope of controversy and knowing which lines he must never cross. Call this what you will, but it has nothing to do with principle. An honest man is hated; he is certainly not sponsored by corporations. Even what Limbaugh is now experiencing is just a drop of what honest men experience daily. As someone once said, “Wherever the Apostle Paul went, there was either a revival or a riot. Everywhere I go, they serve tea.” Of course, having much less to lose, the average man of honesty is not usually the subject of a media witch-hunt. Liberals will never stop dreaming of a world in which immorality is without penalty.
As America becomes an increasingly heathen country, God ordained marriages are becoming a thing of the past, resulting in more illegitimate children.
Since all things righteous must be condemned, and all things shameful must be extolled, there is a new crusade afoot to eradicate illegitimacy as a negative stigma.
Illegitimacy is becoming the norm.
About three-fourths of all black children are bastards, yet Jew-TV never fails to portray blacks as wholesome Americans who are exemplars of virtue. If there is any wisdom to be dispensed in front of a camera, blacks will be recruited for the role, in contradistinction to reality.
And how are whites portrayed? Well, Jews have created a new Jew-show on Jew-TV, aired Sunday evenings, of course. It’s called “Good Christian Bitches.”
James Edwards is abolutely correct that “if defending the country, our families, and now our young Christian women were left to Christian/conservative leadership, America’s defeat before Jewish supremacism would be assured.”
In the context of Russia’s Jew-Soviet history, it’s absolutely amazing that Vladimir Putin is promising to protect Christianity worldwide. Vladimir Lenin is turning over in his grave, or maybe he’s just turning on the rotisserie. Of course, here in formerly-Christian America, politicians say “God bless America” and “In God we trust” and then protect the interests of Jews, Albanian Muslims, witches, queers, and anyone you can imagine except Christians. Putin is also using nationalist rhetoric, warning of “an unnamed foreign threat.”
Alaska Airlines is afraid of offending anyone, except Christians. As is true of race, diverse religiosity becomes a religion of its own, and the only heresy is agreeing with dead white men.
Jew Menachem Rosensaft writes that those who oppose massive, non-white immigration to America are a “scourge,” but “permanent, eternal Jewish sovereignty in the State of Israel is non-negotiable.” Yea, verily, “Israel’s Jewish Essence is Non-Negotiable,” he writes, without a hint of racism.
Apologies in advance for this disgusting news item, but the insanity of treating anti-Christs as our equals demands it. Two-thirds of newborn Orthodox Jewish boys in New York City are molested by a “mohel” as he performs fellatio (“metzitzah b’peh,” i.e. “oral suction”) on them during the bris milah (circumcision). It’s hard enough to get past this religious faggotry, but there’s more. One rabbi caused the death of one child and brain damage to another in 2004 because he passed Herpes Simplex 1 to them. Then he passed it to another child in 2007. Last September, another Jewish boy was killed by being fellated by a diseased faggot.
And here’s something even more unthinkable, which testifies to the political clout of anti-Christs: Under the administration of Governor George Pataki, the state Department of Health had guidelines for legalizing this perverted practice, but they were rescinded just one year later. Now the Jews (most of whom are lawyers) are claiming ignorance of the law. You can have a God-fearing nation or, like Buchanan, you can have the shit stew known as the “melting pot.” Make your choice.
After listening to Jew Michael Savage in this clip, I wonder why people hate Jews. They’re absolutely charming.
“Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our own society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity, which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace. Seeing America undo traditional societies, they fear us, for they do not wish to be undone. They cannot feel secure so long as we are there, for our very existence – our existence, not our politics – threatens their legitimacy. They must attack us in order to survive, just as we must destroy them to advance our historic mission.” ~ Michael Jew Ledeen
The New World Order is what Jews call “the kingdom of God.”
Excellent news: Bishop Richard Williamson’s conviction in Germany for telling the truth has been overturned. It’s a great setback for the Jewish war against free speech.
Germans were building jets with complex parts made from magnesium and aluminum alloys while the Allies were still building propeller planes with steel plates. The Jet Age and the Space Age were brought about by ideas and factory equipment stolen from Germany, like this forging press and the next-generation heavy presses now in operation around the world (but not here in America). Every Boeing or Airbus jet you’ve ever flown was built by these presses.
Germans issued public warnings against smoking about 30 years before Americans realized that those little cancer sticks are dangerous.
But legend has it that the same Germans tried to exterminate the race of Jews with exhaust from diesel engines. I guess the engineers were on vacation when that decision was made. Yeah, that must be it.
Are Jews teaching Indians to be usurers? Okay, I guess that’s a dumb question.
If you’re feeling oppressed by usury, just become a Jew, and creditors can only collect principal, not interest. Jews don’t afflict each other with the sin of usury; that’s only for the goyim cattle.
“We are completely dependent on the commercial banks. Someone has to borrow every dollar we have in circulation, cash or credit. If the banks create ample synthetic money, we are prosperous; if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent monetary system. When one gets a complete grasp upon this picture, the tragic absurdity of our helpless position is almost incredible – but there it is.” ~ Robert Herman Hemphill
The Ministry of Truth is one of our favorite websites. One of the fascinating images you’ll find there is this frontispiece of William Cobbett’s 1834 biography of President Andrew Jackson.
To the right is a hanged Indian, and on the ground before him are his instruments of war: a gibbet, tomahawk, scalping knife, and horn. To the left is a hanged Jew with an equally dangerous instrument of war on the ground before him: a central bank note.
John Demjanjuk, rest in peace.
It’s interesting that the “orders of creation” doctrine is considered to be proto-Nazi. The idea here is that all people are born into a framework of universal orders, including race and sex. Karl Barth vehemently rejected the doctrine, positing instead that all human institutions, structures, and ethical norms must be derived from God’s Word. (Some have taken biblicism of this sort to amusing extremes in the area of geocentrism: “the Bible says the earth is motionless.”) You can see how Barthianism attempts to shut down natural revelation, but the controversy also bears a striking resemblance to the division between Alienist and Kinist schools of thought. While the Alienist begrudgingly makes an allowance for the family (since we all have them, naturally), he is a gnostic whose common refrain is that faith is all that matters, that kinship is an accident of history, and that blood covenants (i.e., nationality and ethnic solidarity) are idolatry, or at best, stopgap measures given to us because of our “hardness of heart” (Matthew 19:8).
Dietrich Bonhoeffer didn’t like the idea of “fixed” orders of creation because he supposed that this implied that a domain of life could be legitimately separated from reconciliation in Christ. We Kinists certainly do not believe this; we believe that every square inch of our lives must come under the lordship of Christ. Therefore, we acknowledge that God is God and we are not, and God often chooses to work through fixed and unceasing means like seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, winter and summer, and day and night (Gen. 8:22). Race and nationality are in our DNA, every bit as much as the desire to raise a family. Since Bonhoeffer could not accept this, he proposed the idea of “orders of preservation,” none of which “has in itself any eternal character, for all are there only to uphold or preserve life.” You can see in these words the Alienist conceit that the blessing of kinship is an accident of history, having no eternally predestined character. Thus, even marriage itself is not an order of creation, Bonhoeffer says, but merely a divine mandate to fit our circumstances. As you know, he was executed for attempting to assassinate Hitler.
As our friend Mickey Bolwerk writes, Kinism means harmony.
It occurred to me the other day that much of Kinism can be simply described as a philosophy which seeks to promote harmony in all areas of life. For example:
* Harmony within the individual, by recognizing the basic harmony of flesh and spirit (psychosomatic unity or something similar).
* Harmony in marriage by promoting an equally yoked combination of man and wife.
* Harmony in families by resisting interracial adoption, which leads to discord in the home.
* Harmony in society by grouping together similar peoples via ethnonationalism or through segregation.
R.J. Rushdoony correctly observed that we have great difficulty in correctly discerning the character of a man of a different race. [So did Rudyard Kipling.] A mixed family or society inevitably leads to mistrust, alienation, and loss of identity. Segregated societies promote and recognize the excellence in those of its own members that would otherwise be rated mediocre within a mixed group. When is the last time you saw a black valedictorian? (Just to be clear: government schools must be razed and burned, but that’s not the point I’m making.)
Class harmony is also promoted by recognizing inequality as fundamental to the nature of God’s creation. The Lord saw fit to equip us with largely varying degrees of talents and abilities, and those degrees vary by individual, family, and race. While this doesn’t stop envy, it undercuts any philosophical basis for it.
Harmony within society is further promoted by recognizing that created man is necessarily limited man. Our responsibility to others is limited, not universal, and is governed by our relationship to our fellow man. While we have great responsibility to our children and parents, our responsibility rapidly diminishes the further out we go. (See The Politics of Guilt and Pity.)
In The Flight from Humanity, RJR included a very short appendix on this topic of the harmony of interests. Dialectical philosophy is constantly found within the thought of fallen man – a philosophy which presupposes conflict as inevitable. An overarching theme in much of RJR’s work is identifying and demolishing the false dichotomies of fallen man. If you have a few minutes, the appendix is only two pages long (book page 75, Scribd page 81).
You really must read it. Rushdoony shows that socialism grows where there is no longer trust in the “interlocking and inter-dependent” facets of society. Socialism is the levelling of these functional differences and distinctions. And what do we see today? Alienists pressing for uniformity and Kinists pressing for pluriformity. “Faith is all that matters,” say the Alienists, and “blood is meaningless.” Their neoplatonist fathers taught them that the Good is “beyond essence.” Hence, they can achieve no true unity but merely a dualistic “unity” that holds faith and blood in “a continual state of tension and conflict.” As Rushdoony writes:
Where men lose faith in the doctrine of creation [which is multifarious], they either abandon belief in the harmony of interests, or else hold it as a rootless and sterile principle. Having denied its foundation, they cannot successfully maintain the conclusions.
This is why those who ought to be preaching life and creation know only death. Their world is passing away before their eyes, and they welcome their own dispossession. Many of them are defeatist and escapist, in search of any world but the one that is our inheritance.
These Alienists, who praise integration, have caused only disintegration, and we Kinists, who are accused of being divisive and schismatic, are the ones who are pointing the way to the only kind of harmony for which man is equipped. Evil is called good and good is called evil.
Ehud Would writes that Alienism denudes all until nothing is left but the Alienist’s own mind.
By this necessary movement from the dualism of Marxian Gnosticism through irrationalism, Alienism must, due to its inescapable commitment to incoherence, eventually find full expression in solipsism, which is the pure skepticism of intelligibility. The more consistent they become, the faster they will march down the bramble road to oblivion…
The modern resolve to suppress the truths of natural hierarchy, clearly revealed racial, ethnic, and familial distinctions, and their proximate and limited obligations is an absolute declaration of ontological rebellion and the clear rejection of teleology. For the Alienist, providence is a slur, and design a hate crime…
They revile the testimony of their own eyes. They scoff at hermeneutics as a construct of men. They sneer at logic for its carnal mediation. And on these same bases, they distrust the Scripture wherever it presupposes Kinism, which is virtually everywhere.
“The majestic spectacle of this blind, inarticulate purposiveness thrusting its way upward and ever upward in an endless unity of differentiated achievements towards an ever-increasing complexity of organisation, towards spontaneity and spirituality, swept away all my old conception of a duty to Man as such. Man in himself is nothing. The forward movement of Life – the growing spirituality is everything. I say to you quite freely, Ransom, that I should have been wrong in liquidating the Malacandrians. It was a mere prejudice that made me prefer our race to theirs. To spread spirituality, not to spread the human race, is henceforth my mission.” ~ C.S. Lewis, Perelandra
That nature which contemns its origins
Cannot be bordered certain in itself.
(Shakespeare)
“The radical declares, ‘Everyone belongs to all, and all belongs to everyone.’” ~ Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Possessed
Bret McAtee explains the connection between collectivism, equality, slavery, and the effort to “deny all distinctions, to erase all notions of biblical hierarchies.”
Since they are human beings, humanists are incapable of worshiping nothing. Their god is the Self, and the Self binds one to Moloch as the Ring binds one to Sauron. There is no sin, only poor choices. There is no grace, only good choices. Now there are a few “ethicists” who advocate a return to infanticide because young children have not developed to the point where they have “aims” and “plans,” which is another way of saying that they have not advanced to “choice,” the new distinctive of humanity. Thus, child sacrifice is made legal, and before long it becomes propitiatory. Here you can see the true reasoning for abortion. It was never about a woman’s right to control her own body. You would have to be an imbecile, on the level of those who believe that there is a qualitative difference between the words “nigger” and “nigga,” to believe that an unborn child is actually part of the mother’s body. This has become a popular excuse for murder, but it’s just a cover for plain old humanism.
Obamination pledges to “continue our efforts to ensure that our daughters have the same rights, freedoms, and opportunities as our sons to fulfill their dreams.”
Follow your dreams, dream big, let nothing stand in the way of your dreams. Yet underneath is the simmering stench of latex and death.
Babies get in the way of dreams…
Roe v. Wade helps to fulfill little girls’ dreams.
“When Negroes have been able to ascend economically, statistics reveal they plan their families with even greater care than whites.” Thus wrote Martin Luther King, Jr., in 1966, in a speech on the occasion of his acceptance of Planned Parenthood’s Margaret Sanger Award. ”Negroes of higher economic and educational status actually have fewer children than white families in the same circumstances”…
Providing ready access to contraception to black families, King insisted, would help to free the Negro man, unlocking “the income potential he can command”…
It’s hard to imagine anyone less fortunate, statistically, than an African-American baby in the womb. For, although blacks make up roughly 12.2 percent of the population of the United States, black women account for between 30 and 38 percent of all abortions.
But at least they’re now able to “fulfill their dreams”!
“A few decades ago women spent less time with their children in order to pursue higher education and careers, and now they pursue higher education and degrees…in order to spend MORE time with their children.”
“Feminism is mixed up with a muddled idea that women are free when they serve their employers but slaves when they help their husbands.” ~ G.K. Chesterton
Integration of the military. And now this: “The Army is ordering its hardened combat veterans to wear fake breasts and empathy bellies so they can better understand how pregnant soldiers feel during physical training.”
Now this is the kind of hilarious news that delights us: The European Union spent $200,000 on a video that depicts a white warrior woman (women make the best warriors in our limp-wristed age) surrounding hostile races (black, Arab, and Oriental), with the message that if Europe stands together it will be easier to defend against the foreign, non-white, bloodthirsty hordes. It was immediately denounced as racist and pulled from distribution.
A friend of ours writes: “A lot of single Christian Women without a very close headship are similar to unattended negroes in their emotional roller coaster of thought processes and conclusions.” Ten thousand heads nod in agreement. Then another friend, with tongue in cheek, expressed his outrage over:
1. The notion that single Christian women should need headship.
2. The notion that single Christian women without headship are like unattended negroes.
3. The implication that negroes should need attending.
4. The notion that unless negroes are attended they are like single Christian women without headship.
5. The idea that both single Christian women without headship and unattended negroes are an emotional roller coaster in terms of thought processes and conclusions.
6. The notion that there is something wrong with emotions and that they are inferior to non-emotions when it comes to thought processes and conclusions.
As of last year, more than half of all children under the age of two in this country are non-white. The share of black households headed by women (mostly single mothers) now exceeds the number of black households with married couples. White Americans don’t realize the degree to which their lives are about to change because they still see mostly whites occupying positions of authority. This gives them the illusion that all is well. In the 2010 census, whites are down to 64 percent of the population (a five point drop in ten years, a sixteen point drop in thirty years), yet 45 of 50 governors and 96 of 100 U.S. senators are still white. If Jews are called white (like a dog’s tail might be called his fifth leg), whites are 92% of the directors nominated for Academy Awards and 96% of Fortune 500 chief executives, both of which are important metrics for merit, though the latter is far more susceptible to “affirmative action.” This means that the world is about to go topsy-turvy for the grazers. We are soon to enter a renaissance of Kinism, and it will take the false shepherds completely by surprise because, like the Pharisees and Sadducees of Matthew 16, they know how to discern the weather by signs in the sky, but they are incapable of discerning the signs of the times.
The national motto of the Dominican Republic: “Dios, Patria, Libertad” (God, Fatherland, Liberty). This gives the Alienist, neo-Babelist “Christian” of today grave concern, for this reason: How could God and fatherland be important? Are Dominicans saying that no one outside their fatherland is loved of God? (You can tell that I’ve been to church.)
Though we neglect to link to every episode, you really need to bookmark the excellent Tribal Theocrat podcast. Episode 17 contains superb commentary on Boy Kevin Swanson, who argues that whites sinfully take pride in skin color but blacks are “a people” and “a culture.” I love it when Boy Kevin talks about mythical “Anglo-Saxon cannibals” in the attempt to show that pre-Christian whites were as depraved as any African ever dreamed of being. (Rushdoony taught that white men never met a cannibal until they journeyed to the Caribbean, hence the name Carib.) Another funny line from the Boy Kevin Show: “Intelligence is largely a factor of those who are diligent at building their intelligence.” Christian Gray does an excellent job of refuting this nonsense in brief segments. He gets right to the point and doesn’t lose the audience by being long-winded. This is one of the qualities that makes the show unique.
I so badly want to punch this guy in the face. Is that wrong of me?
The word “Southern” is too divisive, according to the president of the Southern Baptist Convention, because it detracts from the Great Commission.
Oh, heartbreaker. The John Wilkes Booth bobbleheads have been pulled from the Gettysburg gift shop after only one week. That’s no way to treat an American hero.
“After being hunted like a dog through swamps, woods, and…chased by gun boats till I was forced to return wet, cold, and starving, with every man’s hand against me, I am here in despair. And why; for doing what Brutus was honored for, what made Tell a Hero. And yet I for striking down a greater tyrant than they ever knew am looked upon as a common cuttthroat… I hoped for no gain. I knew no private wrong. I struck for my country and that alone… I do not repent the blow I struck. I may before my God but not to man.” ~ John Wilkes Booth
Whitney Houston died, and the flags in New Jersey were lowered to half-mast for her! Though she had a tremendous talent, allow Andy Nowicki to get real for a moment. He eulogizes her by astutely observing that Saving All My Love for You “is a morally loathsome tune, celebrating a single woman’s adulterous relationship with a married man,” and I Will Always Love You is the “musical equivalent of waterboarding” and “an effective dog-whistle” for psycho chicks. “Not to mention that the plaintive whines of bitch-dogs in heat are more pleasing to the human ear than the song’s screechy, gushing, relentlessly insistent refrain.” But this is particularly impious of Mr. Nowicki, seeing as how Whitney crafted her art in “church” by singing “gospel” music. No appreciation for black “Christianity,” apparently. It’s art! The worst song of all in the Houston oeuvre, writes Mr. Nowicki, is “the grotesque, demonic audacity” of The Greatest Love of All. According to this song, Jesus Christ and St. Paul were mistaken; the greatest love of all is not “love of others (charitos) or love of God (agape), but love of self.” Whitney “promotes self-centeredness with the rapt enthusiasm of a fire-and-brimstone preacher… [S]he graciously awaits our applause for having learned to make love to herself her whole life through.”
I decided long ago, never to walk in anyone’s shadow
If I fail, if I succeed, at least I live as I believe
No matter what they take from me, they can’t take away my dignity!
It’s “a three minute orgy of gratingly sanctimonious, snivelingly drippy, aggressively confrontational, yet rhetorically incoherent musical vomitousness.” Much like the sermons of black preachers.
Christian pop music is, in my opinion, even worse. The agenda-driven “songs” could be churned out by a computer program. They all have the same nondescript melody, the same few chords, unimaginative lyrics, and uniformity of sound. It’s too lame to be called artistic in any sense.
“Look, fellas, religion makes no difference. Except maybe to a Nazi, or somebody that’s stupid.” ~ Frank Sinatra
Look at this headline from Business Insider: “White People Are No Longer Relevant in Pop Music Sales.” More than 81% of Billboard Top 10 best-selling albums are now made by non-whites. Shotgun stages an intervention.
There are four elements to music: melody, harmony, rhythm, and timbre. White people prize melody above all. Without melody, the harmonics will be dissonant at best. Blacks prize rhythm above all. In jazz, there is either no melody or just a taste of it at the beginning and end, while the rest of it is improvisation. Composition is always less important than performance, which is a distinctly non-white way of thinking.
The word “jazz” is a slang term for semen, and it first appeared in print in 1916 when the New Orleans Times-Picayune had a story about “jas bands.” The genre took shape when the descendants of slaves mixed African rhythms with European instrumentation. Rushdoony taught that voodoo underlies jazz music. Its popularity grew in the 1920s, and Nazis refused to allow Germans to be corrupted by it. They acknowledged a sort of “jazz” style as a valid musical genre but were determined to prevent an illicit Negro juke-joint atmosphere where it was played. Here are some of the rules they enforced for jazz performances:
In this so-called jazz type repertoire, preference is to be given to compositions in a major key and to lyrics expressing joy in life rather than Jewishly gloomy lyrics [in keeping with the blues progression]… however, the pace must not exceed a certain degree of allegro, commensurate with the Aryan sense of discipline and moderation… [S]o-called jazz compositions may contain at most 10% syncopation; the remainder must consist of a natural legato movement devoid of the hysterical rhythmic reverses characteristic of the barbarian races and conductive to dark instincts alien to the German people (so-called riffs)… musicians are likewise forbidden to make vocal improvisations (so-called scat)…
Having grown accustomed to a music industry that is forced to reinvent itself with every generation in order to stay “relevant,” these strangely detailed rules strike the man or woman of the 21st century as totalitarian. And so they were, but the purpose behind the rules is clear. We also tend to forget that there is such a thing as real music that elevates and inspires and does not feed base, animalistic emotions. This is because music, which usually purports to be about love, is in sync with the “romantic” mood of our post-Christian age. “Romantic love thrives on frustration,” wrote Rushdoony. “It likes to feel sorry for itself. And the essence of romantic love is that there be insuperable problems, star-crossed lovers, and that it go from frustration to frustration. And romantic love dies when it can get the one it loves.” Not surprisingly, today’s music industry is dominated by blacks and Jews who have a strong understanding and appreciation of the very thing the Nazis outlawed. (Atonal music is Jewish music; much of it was pioneered by Alban Berg, Arnold Schoenberg, and Anton Webern in the early part of the 20th century.) The atonality of jazz, including accents between the beats, is not really the point; it’s the immorality at the heart of the movement.
It’s amazing to me that mainstream evangelical figures who are interviewed on talk shows and asked direct questions about sin and hell are always painfully reluctant to state the truth, express their faith, and witness for Christ. It isn’t surprising when you see this sort of thing from Joel Osteen or Franklin Graham, when they are asked by people like Larry King if Jews go to heaven when they die; you know in advance that the cagey answer is going to be, “Well, I think God will sort that out, and I’m just here to talk about Jesus,” as if “Jesus” can be separated from His eternal Word. But to hear it from Kirk Cameron, for whom I have a lot of respect, is rather surprising. Piers Morgan asks him, point blank, “Is gay marriage a sin?” Now, listen, if you’ve ever been on the hot seat, in front of a camera, you know that the mind and tongue can be distant relatives, so I’m willing to cut him some slack. But the answer, as we keyboard commandos can easily type, is Yes. Instead, Cameron replies that he doesn’t support it and calls it unnatural, detrimental, and destructive. In the next part of the exchange, you can see why Christians are so ineffective against the resolve of liberals. Morgan says that if one of his children came to him and announced that he’s a faggot, the response would be, without hesitation, “That’s great, as long as you’re happy.” (In Matthew 7:12, our Lord calls the Golden Rule the sum of the Law and Prophets, but to the liberal, individual choice is the sum of all things.) Notice Morgan’s adroitness, without nuance or attempt to be clever. And what would Cameron do if this happened to him? He would “have a heart-to-heart talk” and “wrestle with the issues.” Effeminate churches are turning out effeminate men like the Kony jerkers.
Read about the amazing persecution of Dr. Andrew Fraser, who wrote here in the previous post that SWB “has helped me greatly in my effort to reconnect with the blood faith of Old England.” Having lost his job as a university professor because Australia has officially determined that opposing indiscriminate immigration is “unreasonable” and not “in good faith,” Dr. Fraser decided to become a theology student. Being one of the few white men at the school, he was not surprised to discover that minority status confers no benefits on white men. In fact, during one lecture, when he asked how racism can exist if race does not exist, a red dot was placed prominently on his name tag, “a stigmatic ritual intended to signal to all present that I no longer had permission to speak.” Imagine! He was then segregated from his tutorial group for fear that he would reverse the brainwashing of other students. Of course, Dr. Fraser stubbornly refused to change his opinions (those hateful little things), and he was charged with “academic misconduct” and suspended for one year. Minority opinions are now “misconduct,” and like the endangered white race itself, minority views are afforded no protection in this world of hate and intolerance that formerly-Christian churches have given us. The charges against Dr. Fraser were “intolerance,” “interference,” and distributing “offensive” materials. How are such subjective things determined? Well, through logical fallacies. For instance, when Dr. Fraser criticized Karl Barth for accusing German Christians who supported Hitler’s rise to power as betraying their primary allegiance to Christ, an Indian woman accused him of believing that the “Holocaust” never occurred. It’s difficult to counter charges of racism and anti-Semitism when those words can mean whatever liberals want them to mean. And the calculus for being officially offended is so complex in Australia that a formal complaint against Dr. Fraser that was submitted to the Australian Human Rights Commission by an Argentinian man was dismissed on the ground that he was not a member of a group reasonably likely to have been offended! There sure is a lot of reasoning going on out there.
White men can’t jump? No other race even tries. It’s another son of Japheth pushing to the limit the bounds of the possible.
“America was first discovered by Stone Age hunters from Europe, according to new archaeological evidence.” The Smithsonian and National Geographic are no longer able to dodge the facts. They’ve given up.
I love this painting of Bag End.
A 14-year-old has become the 32nd person in the world to demonstrate nuclear fusion. Guess his race.
Very nice words of praise from Vanishing American for a great man, Dennis Wheeler. We miss him.
T-Mobile is blocking access to the best sites on the web.
The TSA is a failure, according to this special agent. It “has spent approximately $60 billion since 2002 and now has over 65,000 employees, more than the Department of State, more than the Department of Energy, more than the Department of Labor, more than the Department of Education, more than the Department of Housing and Urban Development – combined.”
If you’re in the Atlanta area, NAS will host a pro-Western Civilization event at Emory University on March 21 called “Why Western Civilization? Tales from the Front.”
We don’t want to leave you with the impression that we’re xenophobes. We may not give equal time to other cultures, but we do want to take a moment or two to recognize them, and so here’s a picture of 59 Burmese python babies served in the mother’s flesh, coming soon to a grocery store near you.
Think of it as a delicacy.
I see you are quoting overrated anti-Christian ranter Revilo Oliver. I wrote years ago a little critique of that same error-laden article of his that you cited:
http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=5107&highlight=basutoland
“Notice also that this black “Reverend Doctor” is rather typical of what is believed today by black Christians, who only agree to take the name of Christian because many whites now agree with them that slavery was evil and sinful. If most whites disagreed with them, they would either not take the white man’s religion or pervert it into the unbiblical mess that it is today.”
This is in many ways a very justified criticism, and yet I would oppose reckless generalization. After all, American Blacks are only a SMALL part of their race worldwide, and I would venture to guess that many millions of African converts in places like (say) Tanzania that are not so hung up on “civil rights” mythology as American Blacks, or even Blacks of South Africa.
As E. Michael Jones writes:
“The thing that Njeri finds most repugnant in African Americans is not their obesity or their funny names. The thing she finds most repugnant is their self-pity. They are always blaming their problems on the Wazungu, the white guys. And if there are no Wazungu handy, then they try to blame their plight on the Africans who, they claim, sold them into slavery. Njeri’s mother went to the United States and got so sick of hearing American blacks complain about being sold into slavery that she cut every conversation heading in this direction short by saying, “The difference between you and me is that we were faster runners.” Njeri’s favorite image in this regard is a black American standing in front of former slave quarters in Ghana or someplace like that on the West Coast of Africa, screaming “why?” as the video cameras recorded the anguish on her face.”
http://www.culturewars.com/2002/juju.html
No matter how you look at it, very many Africans have become Christians during the last few decades. It would amount to a seriously slanderous accusation to suggest that they are ALL some unorthodox Voodoo syncretists.
It would seem that only in places where Blacks are in direct contact with Whites can this phenomenon you describe be fully seen, and this is IMHO a “positive” argument for apartheid: if allowed into an carelessly indiscriminate contact with us, African Christians would soon learn the decadent vices of advanced civilizations. It would be good for their own spiritual well-being to avoid extensive contact with the current mostly-apostate Europe!
What would Black Christians gain if they had a slight rise in their material living standards (like being admitted to dole in Europe) but would lose their soul?
It’s a valid point that American blacks are the ones who are obsessed with “civil rights,” but that’s largely because there’s more money to steal in America.
True, there are African Christians, and they are not all syncretists, but none is well-known for being orthodox, which says a lot about the general climate.
I like the Revilo Oliver quote above, but I find precious little to quote from him because of the fact that he was anti-Christian.
“True, there are African Christians, and they are not all syncretists, but none is well-known for being orthodox, which says a lot about the general climate.”
You yourself brought up early Germanic peoples – they were largely Arian heretics, not pagans anymore, when they laid waste on the Western Roman Empire and set its civilization back for centuries (the genuine and powerful progress achieved in the HIGH Middle Ages was largely just making up for the losses of the EARLY Middle Ages).
Victorian-era writer Charles Kingsley was no basher of pre-Christian Germans – on the contrary, he was a highly racial-minded, proudly Aryanist admirer of their primitive virtues – and yet he could not help observing that their lifestyle had its negative side as well:
“We may object to the fact, that the dom-church and its organization grew up (as was the case in the vast majority of instances) round the body of a saint or martyr; we may smile at the notion of an invisible owner and protector of the soil: but we must not overlook the broad fact, that without that prestige the barbarians would never have been awed into humanity; without that prestige the place would have been swept off the face of the earth, till not one stone stood on another: and he who does not see what a disaster for humanity that would have been, must be ignorant that the civilization of Europe is the child of the towns; and also that our Teutonic forefathers were by profession destroyers of towns, and settlers apart from each other on country freeholds. Lonely barbarism would have been the fate of Europe, but for the monk who guarded the relics of the saint within the walled burg.”
http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?p=1009552&highlight=guizot#post1009552
And speaking of relics, even centuries after their conversion to orthodoxy, common European masses kept practising quite crude forms of piety (sometimes downright superstitious fetishism) during the Middle Ages – as Protestants, you should be ready to acknowledge that.
Thus it can be only expected that African converts, too, are not (generally speaking) going to be perfect immediately after their conversion. And again, I believe that letting them into a direct contact with our immoral secular civilization is not going to help their spiritual growth either.
Here is an admittedly hostile depiction of British travellers on the state of religion among the Bulgarians (B. Marinov’s people) in the 1860s, when they were still under the degrading Ottoman yoke – it could be said that they were still living in the Middle Ages:
http://www.promacedonia.org/en/sc/sc_7.html
“The ignorance of the Bulgarians with regard to all the precepts and maxims of the Gospels, and even of everything that concerns their religion, with the exception of its outward forms is, even to those who know their clergy, most astonishing; and even with these outward observances are mixed various curious relics of the old Slavonic Pantheism, a mixture which is tolerated by the priests either from ignorance of the presence of the Pagan element, or from reasons already mentioned. [See Chapters IV. and V.]
It would be useless to ask a peasant to quote any passage from the Bible, for there are few Papasses who are capable of doing so; they being frequently unable to write or read, and holding a book in their hands during the performance of Divine Service only to give themselves a greater air of dignity; the prayers, &c., they learn off by heart.”
And likewise another early-Victorian British traveller C. Macfarlane was forced to observe:
http://www.archive.org/stream/turkeyanditsdes03macfgoog#page/n499/mode/2up
“Admission into holy orders was sold to the most illiterate men and often to the greatest scamps. But everything in the Church, from the Patriarchate downwards, was bought and sold.
…
A gardener of Selyvria, a man forty years old, totally illiterate, and a terrible drunkard, lately bought himself into the priesthood, and was now levying contributions on the people. Dispensations and absolutions, even for the most heinous crimes, are constantly on sale.
…
All this is attended with most pernicious moral consequences; and the Greeks here are beginning to couple a disregard of religion with their disrespect for their clergy.”
“Jordan is explicit: “Do we as Christians believe in ‘nationalism’? No, we don’t. We believe in the international, catholic, universal community of the Church. We also should believe in international, catholic, universal free markets and free trade.”
That Jordan link you provide is dead, but this statement would be some really brazenly open “baptized libertarianism”, or atomistic capitalist globalism in a Christian guise. “Free trade” is an object of semi-idolatrous worship to people like this.
Jewish Communist Noam Chomsky has actually made an insightful comment on this subject:
“Over the long term, you can expect capitalism to be anti-racist — just because its anti-human. And race is in fact a human characteristic — there’s no reason why it should be a negative characteristic, but it is a human characteristic. So therefore identifications based on race interfere with the basic ideal that people should be available just as consumers and producers, interchangable cogs who will purchase all the junk that’s produced — that’s their ultimate function, and any other properties they might have are kind of irrelevant, and usually a nuisance.”
http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=79625&highlight=chomsky
Admin, I started to say how good it is to see a new entry here at SWB.
But then I thought better of it and decided merely to observe how gratified we all are to see that your full-time commenter now has fresh opportunities to display the staggering breadth of the insights he’s gained in less than three decades of life.
We do appreciate the work YOU do, Admin.
One of the great strengths of Spirit Water Blood is its ability to present the monstrous and so confront the post Christian American mind and sensibility steeped in White-hatred.
The Kinslayers are not yet ready to turn back (if they ever will be), but they have not yet completed their metamorphosis.
Therefore, we live in a time of unique possibilities.
In the ancient matter of NW Europe, it was the Kinslayers who became the dragons – the devouring powers in the thrall of outer darkenss and the spirit of Ranorak.
But we have reached the point where Grendel, the man-eater comes to Heorot. He has trod upon the tessallated pavement of the great hall. And from his eyes an ugly light burns forth. (It sounds better in Old English).
The time to which the Beowulf poet looked back is our time, the time in which the outer darkness comes to the centre of the realm and declares itself.
The Inklings J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis wrote about this in the English faerie they recovered and reworked for our time. They were bards. They knew very well what would awaken in the futurist projects of the post Christian liberals, materialists and ideologues.
Writing in his letters, Tolkien writes “It is the monstrousity and fairy tale quality of Grendel that really makes the tale important, surviving still when the politics have become dim and the healing of Danish-Geatish relations in an ‘entente cordiale’ between two ruling houses a minor matter of obscure history. To the political world, what looks silly is Grendel with his ‘corpse holding glove’ fixed with cunning bands (searo-bendum faest)” The Letters of J.R. Tolkien, 1981.
Those who know the mythology of the North, understand the concept of ruined and monstrous forms of life, taken by the powers of outer darkness – a mythology which has come down to us through the wisdom tales of faerie.
De-racinated, edjewmacated Whites who ‘have been ower lang at the college’ do not get this. (Apologies to Robert Louis Stevenson)
Confronted with Aztec organisations baying for the living hearts of the White population, the White PC’s are wont to focus on hypocrisy of ‘Aztec racism’. As if this were not in itself a tautology.
They are wont to flame on the blogs about the jewmedia censorship of black on white crime and suppression of the heinous quality of these crimes.
Confronted with the monstrous, this is not about hypocrisy and media suppression, anymore than Grendel’s appearance at Heorot was about the Danish-Geatish claims and conflicts.
The Whites should ditch the entire ‘searo-net’ Talmudic hate crime lexicon and look through the eyes of the older matter of NW Europe and its bardic vision.
The North could get hold of the mythos about “war in heaven” bound up with the story of the Evangelium because they understood the reality of the outer darkness and the spirit of Ragnorak.
This was not a philosophy or an ideology. This was a bardic understanding of ancestral history that gave rise to the heroic code of the North, its story and song.
The pagan Norse knew that human life is a warfare with the ancient powers of darkness and those it has in thrall. (The O.N. term for this is Orcs).
The ancient matter also encodes their knowledge that the human cause (their cause) is lost in that warfare.
Allow me to repeat: lost. The human cause is defeated.
But they did not thus concludeit would then be politic to become a profitable Orc.
They drew from this knowledge that they would have to fight for their own human cause.
This is the origin of the heroic code of the North which received a ‘modern’ English statement in the “Battle of Maldon” commemorating the English defeat by the Vikings (991 A.D.)
“Heart shall be bolder, harder be purpose,
more proud the spirit as our power lessens!
Mind shall not falter nor mood waver,
though doom shall come and dark conquer.”
When the Evangel was preached in NW Europe, that tragic sense of life became transformed into the tragic sense of a creation in travail – a new heaven and new earth a’borning in the victory of the holy Rood, the victory of Christ over the powers they knew had defeated their ancestors.
This is why Jesus Christ the King was hailed in Northwest Europe. He was hailed as the Divine King who took upon Himself a human nature to defeat the powers that had defeated us. This is why he was loved in his human nature as a suffering servant, a man of sorrows, a ridiculed prophet, the Lamb of God.
He was received by those who were able to embrace the Christ of the Evangel through the poetry and imagination of their bardic culture. The Christ of the Credo born in the reign of Caesar Augustus and crucified under Pontius Pilate is the hero lacked by their own supremely realistic and racial mythos.
Unlike us, ancient Northwest Europe and its heroic code did battle with the powers of outer darkenss. They recognized their defeat, but they met these powers in battle and the warfare of life – nonetheless.
Modern de-racinated Whites have done no such battle. We have been edjewmacated to think there is no such battle.
Today these powers return in force. And the human race is as helpless before them as were our ancestors. The heroic code of the North was forged in the pre-history of that long defeat. And it hailed as King the one whose holy Rood turned defeat into Europe anno Domine.
As the Inkling C.S. Lewis states in “Myth Became Fact” (1944) “We should not be ashamed of the mythical radiance resting upon our theology.”
And in this true myth there be dragons and orcs, then as now.
Thanks for that nice little slight, Wheeler. Checking your website, I can see why you don’t like my opinions: you are leaning towards the “Judaizing” heresy of considering Christianity as the religion of Whites alone:
“Over and over again, I have wondered if missionaries are increasingly aware – though they would rather die than admit it – that they are wasting their time among non-Whites.”
http://yonderfield.wordpress.com/2012/02/20/ancient-alienist/
In other words, you promote just the sort of falsehood I intend to oppose whenever I see it spreading among race-conscious orthodox Christians – people whom I greatly value and precisely for that reason do not like to see being misled into cultist paths.
Perhaps you are not merely “leaning” to Christian Identity-like heresy, Mr. MacPherson. Perhaps you are there already:
“And almost every one of them will bristle if you tell them, “Your nonwhite friend is not a Christian, you know.” They don’t know who they are, and they don’t know who God’s people are, and they attack anyone who differs from their spoon-fed pablum opinions.”
http://yonderfield.wordpress.com/2011/09/16/morningtime-thoughts-4/
“My dear brother, my dear sister – you with the white skin and the ability to blush: you are a child of Adam. To you the Scripture is addressed.”
http://yonderfield.wordpress.com/2011/09/10/sons-of-adam/
Old man, with such doctrines you are indirectly slandering God knows how many faithful ones of Christ that have lived and live in the third world, many of whom have shed their blood as martyrs.
You may call me a worthless soft youngster and self-righteously tout your own hardcore, salt-of-the-earth background. But granting all that might be said (partly with justification) in that regard, the fact remains that I am not the one who is promoting a stupid, hard-hearted, un-Biblical, ahistorical heresy.
I will say only this: if you keep going on this path consistently and brazenly enough, there is a very good chance that you may be, with all your precious manly life-experience, heading for everlasting damnation, to keep “integrated” company with countless unbelieving non-Whites.
Yes Wheeler, it seems you are a pretty standard CI heretic:
“After the flood subsided, Noah’s sons began, with their wives, to repopulate the earth with the seed of Adam. Meanwhile, the physical children of Satan (who had survived in other parts of the earth) were still growing and building cities and armies. …
And though many godly and well-meaning Christians have sacrificed untold resources and even their precious lives in attempts to share the gospel with groups of people to whom the good news was never addressed…”
http://yonderfield.wordpress.com/2011/05/26/i-cannot-stay-awa/
I will not conceal my position: I want people like you to either repent or be driven away from orthodox Kinist movement. Nothing could more effectively alienate sober and well-meaning Christians from Kinism than the adoption of your inane plagiarized-from-Talmud fables.
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre of the Holy Ghost Fathers stated: “Ours is a supernatural fight against the spiritual powers of the devil and of the fallen angels. It is a battle of giants and not just a matter of discussions and intellectual jousts.” Feb 23 1977.
Although Archbishop Lefebvre was the Apostolic Delegate 1948 – 59 to 18 African countries, he refers to what I would term the orc liberals, crypto Jews and Satanists infiltrated into the College of the Cardinals who overthrew the Vatican at the Vatican II Council.
Africa – long and deep in the slavery to the dark powers was not to be the Archbishop’s greatest battle.
You’ve missed the point, Petr. I didn’t say anything about disliking your opinions. I focused instead on the regular and tedious experience of checking the SWB website and finding it loaded with your comments.
“Oppose” me all you like, sir. Keep posting your excerpts and keep taking Admin to the woodshed for posting something with which you disagree and keep publishing everything that pops into your head. I am the unworthiest servant of Christ, but the truth of what I’ve posted publicly stands. If my remark about missionaries wasting their time is false, it should be easy for you to demonstrate this.
No Petr, we don’t dislike your rambling, endless, half-baked posts because of fear of being exposed by the great Orthodox Heresy Hunter. You are a dilettante, and full of yourself. You need to put tape on your mouth and spend the next 20 years getting a real education.
I for one appreciate your insights as well as your moderating influence, Petr. The last thing we need is to be carried away by the careless rhetoric which appears here on occasion, or by some heterodox anthropology.
The good folks at “Faith & Heritage” have written a short rebuttal of CI ideas:
http://faithandheritage.com/2011/05/sola-gratia-a-refutation-of-christian-identity%e2%80%99s-dual-seedline-theory/
“You are a dilettante, and full of yourself.”
That may well be partly true. I wish not to claim any infallibility for myself.
But Petr, though I do not doubt that God has worked through missionaries – even ones who apparently failed – Wheeler’s assertion stands: some of these missionaries were not God-appointed, and when any man is not God-appointed he is wasting his time and others’.
Did you read Wheeler’s article? His examples clearly showed men who put their families last. This is not godly.
I do not agree with Wheeler that only whites are appointed for gospel but who agrees with anyone on everything? He has much to say that is good.
“No matter how you look at it, very many Africans have become Christians during the last few decades. It would amount to a seriously slanderous accusation to suggest that they are ALL some unorthodox Voodoo syncretists.”
Petr, I can attest to the fact that quite a bit of that Christianity is like gold plated jewellery – faithful church attendance and hearty church involvement, mixed with a knowledge of some scripture, with little heart penetration and little adherence to the high standards the Word exemplifies.
The evangel has been in Africa, the Caribbean etc for decades, and in some of these places for centuries. It can’t be all blamed on whites. As God has His way I trust that a stronger purer expression of His life will arise among His children there but it isn’t the white folks’ fault; they aren’t gods, they’re men.
Petr, thank you for addressing me as “old man.” I accept that compliment.
Let me reiterate that I didn’t express any disagreement with what you wrote in your comments. I never said anything about your being “worthless,” nor did I “tout” my own background. Methinks the lad doth protest too much. I hope you’ll re-read what I actually wrote. You’re merely angry because I drew attention to what many have already noticed about you.
Thanks, incidentally, for calling me a heretic. I was making mental bets about whether you’d use that one or “Nazi” first.
As others have reminded you in the past, this is not your blog. It’s not mine, either. But it is headed by a friend, and I don’t intend to allow you to use one remark of mine to hijack the comments section yet once again for your own personal axes.
If you wish to attack me or criticize me or debate me, please email me and I’ll publish unedited it on my blog and we can have an open back-and-forth. But don’t launch into these petulant little flame-ons simply because someone pointed out that your online “personality” is tiresome.
I think we should send the Holy Spirit a sort of “Kony 2012″ video so He’ll become just as concerned with negros as some pious race-realists.
He, at any-rate, doesn’t seem worried about placating a politically-correct elite.
I’m no CI advocate, but I think it’s folly not to embrace / own the fact that European people’s are God’s holy standard bearers in the New Covenant age.
“Forget CRT, this is typical Commie blackness, and it shows that our forefathers were correct; we can’t be joined to these people under the same government. Those who call themselves Christians are not to be believed if they are impenitent thieves.”
Again, I fully believe in holding Blacks to strict Christian standards – let them either sink or swim upon them.
As the early Christian document Didache said about “Christ-monger” parasites:
http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/didache-roberts.html
“But receive everyone who comes in the name of the Lord, and prove and know him afterward; for you shall have understanding right and left. If he who comes is a wayfarer, assist him as far as you are able; but he shall not remain with you more than two or three days, if need be. But if he wants to stay with you, and is an artisan, let him work and eat. But if he has no trade, according to your understanding, see to it that, as a Christian, he shall not live with you idle. But if he wills not to do, he is a Christ-monger. Watch that you keep away from such.”
Thanks to Vittgen and Marlon for being thoughtful and kind toward me.
Petr, I’ll repeat my offer: email me and I’ll post it unedited on my website and we can hold an open, public exchange.
While I continue to await your reply, I’ll just note that my last comment was written this morning, in haste, before beginning my long workday. After rereading it just now upon my return home, I noticed a couple of things.
You wrote, “Old man, with such doctrines you are indirectly slandering God knows how many faithful ones of Christ that have lived and live in the third world, many of whom have shed their blood as martyrs.” It is true that I don’t know how many “faithful ones” have lived and now live in the nonWhite countries. If I look at people like William Carey or Pearl S. Buck’s father, I am forced to conclude that such men are not “faithful,” and are in fact worse than unbelievers, seeing as how they shun their own flesh and blood in favor of the dark stranger. And when I look at these countries today, I am forced to wonder if there are any “faithful” at all living within those borders. Where is the fruit, Peter? Where is the fruit? By your standard and in my opinion, the “Grizzly Man” shed his blood as a martyr.
As I noted briefly this morning, I have not called you a “worthless soft youngster.” Those are your words, not mine. This means that you have borne false witness against me on this public forum. I call on you to publicly repent; I await your response to my accusation.
“Stupid, hard-hearted, un-Biblical, ahistorical heresy.” My, my…you do love your adjectives, don’t you, Petr? If you agree to a public exchange on my website, we can address your name-calling and anything of substance you might have to say.
“With all your precious manly life-experience…” You know, Petr, one gets the feeling that someone, somehow, has touched a nerve of yours. Govern your defensiveness, sir.
The most notable thing you wrote was this: “I will not conceal my position: I want people like you to either repent or be driven away from orthodox Kinist movement. Nothing could more effectively alienate sober and well-meaning Christians from Kinism than the adoption of your inane plagiarized-from-Talmud fables.”
I was fighting against the destruction of my people before you ever drew a breath on this earth, Petr. You are hardly the great champion of Kinism.
“Repent or be driven away.” Of course! This is the exact position of all the simpering judeoxtian churches which have excommuniated and hounded and barred from the Lord’s table so many of my Kinist friends. “You shut your mouth or you leave. I’m right and you’re wrong! Shut up or get out!”
So if I’m such a hell-bound heretic, where’s your concern for me, Petr? Why wouldn’t you spend time trying to get me to see the error of my ways, since you believe my soul to be in danger? Why the limited options of “repent or be driven into outer darkness?” You’re precisely like the effeminate preachers who fill the pulpits around the world, the same ones participating in the genocide of my people. The preachers will move heaven and earth to gain a dubious “convert” among the niggers or the mestizos or the whomever-has-the-darker-skin, but they won’t lift a finger to go to the young skinhead with a wife and two blonde children who lives in the ratty apartment complex two miles down the road from the church. Oh, no….that won’t do. It’s “Repent or be driven away!”
Perhaps you’ll have your way, Petr. Perhaps I’ll be driven away and my Kinist friends will stop talking to me and inviting me to their homes and coming to my home. Perhaps. Anything’s possible.
And perhaps you’ll bear up like a man and stop pissing in your panties when some old man – who commits the unforgivable sin of being unimpressed with your ability to cut & paste from arcane books – has the unmitigated audacity to suggest that you might merely “shush” from time to time on other peoples’ blogs.
Wonderful Kinsist scripture will be read and prayed throughout the world in the Western Church today March 21, 2012 for the Missa “cum sactificatus fuero in vobis” (Ps 30: 7 “When shall I be sactified in you?” on this Feast of St Benedict, Abbot, 4th week of Lent.
The answer is given by the Psalmist in the Gradual: Ps 32:12
“Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord” The nation. Beata gens, cujus es Dominus Deus eorum.
The Evangelium is addressed to nations. It is nations who are to come as nations to Christ the King.
And the nations of Europe from the Atlantic to the Urals did come to the font of baptism as nations. And we rose up as new creation in Christ from those waters.
This is the heritage of the White race.
St Benedict and his congregation evangelized Europa with the mission of “beata gens”. Their mission was the chanting of the psalter in the fields, the highways and byeways, in the chapels, in the libraries according to Ps 33:2 (also sung today) in honour of St Benedict
“I will bless the Lord at all times: His praise shall be ever in my mouth”
The bardic culture of the European nations responded as nations to the mission of St Benedict.
Here is a beautfiful Gaelic chant for the harp and barron which names Christ according to the meaning of Isaias 12:2 “Behold God is my Salvation (Yashua / Jesus)” The name of God is ‘my Salvation’ – the Christ.
“Criost liomsa (Christ with me)
Criost romhan (Christ before me)
Agus Criost i mo chroi’se (Christ in my heart)
Criost os mo chionn’sa (Christ above me)
Criost fum (Christ below me)
Argus Criost armo chroi’see (And Christ on my heart)
Agus Criost i mo chroi (And Christ in my heart)
A wonderful way to learn one of the ancient bardic tongues – Gaelic.
Beautifully sung by Donegal singer Aoife Ni Fhearraig from “Highland Cathedral”
“Gaelic Chant – Phil Coulter & Aoife – Pilgrim’s Way”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoG_u6Csv14
“As I noted briefly this morning, I have not called you a “worthless soft youngster.” Those are your words, not mine. This means that you have borne false witness against me on this public forum. I call on you to publicly repent; I await your response to my accusation.”
Well sir, pardon me for makign the assumption that you were referring to me in this piece (that I had not seen until yesterday, btw):
http://yonderfield.wordpress.com/2011/12/17/to-the-self-important-commenter/
““Repent or be driven away.” Of course! This is the exact position of all the simpering judeoxtian churches which have excommuniated and hounded and barred from the Lord’s table so many of my Kinist friends.”
It has ALSO been the position of every Christian church worth its salt that has ever existed. After all, peddlers of destructive heresies have never got along smoothly with Christians who are committed to Biblical orthodoxy.
Did you really think that you could posit the idea that non-Whites are more or less soulless creatures that have no part with the Gospel of Christ, and simply get away with it?
I’ve offered more than once to publicly tangle with you on my blog, Petr. Clearly, you’re not having any of that. You’re happy and comfortable here and you’re not going to be dislodged by some inferior sort, are you? So be it. I welcome the opportunity to discuss and defend my beliefs publicly, but I dislike using your boorish tactic of hijacking someone else’s website.
I’d forgotten the item I wrote about “The Self-Important Commenter.” Thank you for the correction; I apologize for accusing you of sin. And yes, I was referring to you in that essay, and yes, I meant every syllable.
You wrote, “Did you really think that you could posit the idea that non-Whites are more or less soulless creatures that have no part with the Gospel of Christ, and simply get away with it?” Let me rewrite that to try and give you some perspective:
“Did you really think that you could posit the idea that White Christians have the right to determine whom their daughters marry and the racial makeup of their own communities, and simply get away with it?”
Don’t fool yourself. In the eyes of the judeoxtian church, Kinists are every bit the “heretics” you accuse me and my ilk of being. Kinists are perhaps more respectable because they haven’t crossed That Line, but they are heretics. This is why they get barred from communion and excommunicated and driven from assemblies.Were you ever to take a stand, you’d find this out for yourself. But that’s not going to happen, is it?
Yet again you didn’t answer my question. Where’s your Christian compassion for ME and for those like me? Why the immediate leap from disagreement to hatred? Why no attempt to discuss, to debate, to show me where I’ve gone wrong? “Shut up and get out!” screeches the formidable Petr.
The answer is that such things are alien to you. Your game is “Gotcha!” Your game is to scour obscure texts and overload the comments section of other men’s blogs with excerpts for reasons unknown to any but you. Your game is NOT genuine concern over the souls you say are in danger. Your game is not to step out from behind your keyboard and actually do something for your people. As Vittgen already pointed out, you ARE a dilettante. You’re a dabbler. It’s all a mental exercise to you – rather interesting, but something you can step away from if there’s any hint of risk to your hide.
All of this keeps coming back to a simple truth: you’re not mad because of my beliefs. You’re mad because I drew attention to your obnoxious, self-centered behavior.
Enough for now. I have to work to earn my daily bread. I’ll leave you to your day of poring over the dusty works of St.Prissy and his sound refutation of calluses on the hands.
Petr,
Maybe this will sound a little heretical, but I’m starting to see a profound difference between contemporary Christendom and myself, as a professing Kinist.
There is something different between us that stretches back hundreds of years.
Kinism is more than orthodox theology with a few race-realist views thrown in for good measure. At least, it seems more than that to me.
We’re rebelling, not just against contemporary egalitarianism, but against the ravages of enlightenment rationalism and its syncretist version in theology.
We, of all people writing today, should be above segregation over differences of opinion about a few details in a conceptual scheme.
If our kin-loyalty does not take precedence over our loyalty to abstract minutia, then are we really different from the Enlightenment rationalists?
After studying the matter (to some small degree) I think it’s plausible that the Celtic nation has Semitic blood mixed into it. I think the archaeological work of E. Raymond Capt deserves attention, especially his work in comparing ancient Celtic language with ancient Hebrew. (Bill Cooper, in his “After the Flood” has also discovered some Semitic origins in Celtic peoples).
Now, I don’t think this has covenantal or eschatological importance, certainly not enough to warrant novel historical narratives and re-working of orthodox covenant theology — however, I don’t think we should *send from among us* those who think otherwise.
They’re our kin. Why break fellowship with them, while formally accepting negros who happen to share some of your beliefs?
Prima facie, seems like you’re placating the liberal elite to the detriment of your blood kin.
It gives the appearance of a cowardly impropriety.
Mr. MacPherson, regardless of how many of his beliefs I happen to accept or reject, is one of us (if anyone is). He’s something of a role model — someone to look up to.
I prefer our people, warts and all, to a church filled with negros. I’ll avoid that side of Heaven, if just to stay out of the cloud of afro-sheen.
“They’re our kin. Why break fellowship with them, while formally accepting negros who happen to share some of your beliefs?”
I am quite ready to have EARTHLY fellowship with non-Christian or heretical Whites – as long as they do not start getting truly obnoxious or actively hostile towards true faith. In general, I am ready to co-operate with unbelievers in all sorts of temporal political matters.
But SPIRITUAL fellowship with twisters of truth? Never.
Let’s make it clear: those whose deny the humanity of non-Whites (really, what casuistic absurdities would that lead to – like inquiries on whether White-looking Octoroons are fully human), are, among other things, setting themselves as malicious “accusers” (Revelation 12:10) of very many colored brethren of Christ – a devilish position.
“We’re rebelling, not just against contemporary egalitarianism, but against the ravages of enlightenment rationalism and its syncretist version in theology.”
Do you think we should imitate the un-enlightened theology of these people instead?
http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=5172&highlight=chasidus
“Chasidus explains that since Jews are endowed with an extra, Divine soul, they are completely different from non-Jews, not just a step above them, WHICH IN A WAY MAKES THE WORST JEW BETTER THAN THE BEST NON-JEW. It’s not just a difference in degree, but in kind. See Tanya chapter 2 for explanation of the nature of the Jew’s extra, Divine soul.
Non-Jews are endowed with an intellectual soul (as are Jews, though Jews’ intellectual soul is far more refined) and must use this intellectual soul to overcome their animal soul, under the guidance of the Jewish people, those who are G-d’s chosen to be a “light unto the nations,” to influence mankind and teach them about morality and proper behaviour, according to the noahidelaws.”
“Don’t fool yourself. In the eyes of the judeoxtian church, Kinists are every bit the “heretics” you accuse me and my ilk of being. Kinists are perhaps more respectable because they haven’t crossed That Line, but they are heretics. This is why they get barred from communion and excommunicated and driven from assemblies.”
What an immature contrarian attitude – just because the mainstreamers are (currently) wrong about something, we should therefore rush to the opposite foolish extreme, just in order to defy them! Proud Pharisaical cultists are made that way.
It’s a simple FACT that the “pre-Adamite” doctrine is a blatant heresy: it cannot claim any orthodox Christian legacy, and was promoted by Jews, occultists and Enlightenment-era rationalists:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Adamite
Let us say for the sake of argument there do exist congregations of African Christians forming national Church and holding to the orthodox doctrines of the one, holy, catholic Church of the Western rite.
After all the Apocalypse does depict the Redeemed from every nation, tribe, kindred and tongue.
In the African congregation of the Western rite, the mass would be in one of the ancient canonized rites such as Latin, Byzantine, Marionite, Coptic … and the catechism, homilies and hymns will be in the language of that nation.
The word central to this consideration is nation – ethnos. In the Biblical sense, an ethnos is built up of tribes, clan and kindreds of a single people.
As Christians, these people would be kinist in the sense that they would be adhereing to:
“If anyone does not provide for his relations and especially for his own family he has disowned the faith (of the one holy, catholic and apostolic Church) and is worse than an infidel.” 1 Timothy 5:8
This is one of the episcopal scriptures – the charge of the bishop. It is not optional for anyone who would hold to the faith we have from the apostles.
People who were providing for their relations and kindred have a history of being martyred for the faith until the nation is baptised.
If you travel in Europe, the private museums of the Church or national museums display paintings both historic and modern that depict the baptism of a nation in the persons of its king, royal family and nobility.
It is a special charism of the Holy Spirit granted to those who would take the Evangel to nations where the Church is represented only by individuals adhering to the holy faith. They are going there to engage in spiritual warfare with the powers that rule over that nation as well as physical ordeals with their human agencies that will oppose the baptism of the nation.
Traditionally, people make vows and form religious congregations for mission – such as the mission of the Holy Ghost Fathers to Africa. And there, they will confront the extreme racism of Africa, its history of selling their own people to foreigners, its voodoo, canabalism, its violence, its hatred of the White and the entire smorgasboard of pagan and diabolical customs.
I mean there exist libraries of material written by Christian missionaries to Africa on the customs of these nations.
The founded by our Lord is a catolicum and He desires, as our Christ and our King, to reign over these souls by means of his Sacred Heart. Therefore, men will be raised up for apostolic works in Africa and among Africans.
The West is not ignorant of the ways in which the unregenerate nations are in bondage to Satan.
And the Church is not ignorant of the ways in which whole populations of nations once regenerate in Christ have gone back to the bondage of hatred of God, rejection of his Christ and all the sins against nature flowing from it.
It is not a matter of prefering your own people ‘warts and all’ to negroes; it is a matter of the holy faith that you honour your own people first and do good to them precisely because their are ‘your own.’
This is a holy obligation. To do otherwise is a sin against nature.
And extending this to the nation, working to change it into something else or extinguish it – how could this possibly be interpreted as doing good to ‘your own’ by setting up within your own people the kind of cultural conflict that inevitably goes with the multi-cultural polities such as the Roman empire or multicultural America.
Extending it to the present diabolical shambles in the apostate West, it means that to honour the episcopal charge of the holy faith entails labour for your kindred as did St Padraic and St Columba.
Apostasy and the victory of the enemies of the Church (according to the pattern of Jude 3, 4) is the only reason why today you can have a full tilt ‘Jesus and me’ congregation full of Noachide judeoXtians, negroes insisting on pagan African customs and race hustling the White women, Xtian Zionists and white hating whites who can’t even do good to’their own’ in the order of nature by honouring the Divine commandment for the order to nature to be fruitful and multiply according to kind after kind.
In short a complete shambles and the overthrow of the seat of the Western patriarchate in Rome since Vatican II as well as all episcopal diosces aligned with it.
I agree with Petr that the Gospel is for all races. Though I’m kinist to the core, I’ve seen more than a few nonwhites who seem to bear the fruits of genuine faith. Keep up your comments, Petr. They make me think.
Wheeler: I also agree with you about churches that worship “The Other.” The one I attend seems inclined to send people and supplies to the four corners of the earth before considering the very real needs of the local (mainly white) community.
The distinction between “spiritual” and “physical” fellowship is a bit ambiguous and smacks of ad-hoc reasoning.
Might I remind everyone that this discussion should not focus on “CI” or beliefs thereof. (Mr. MacPherson’s views in that regard were interjected into the conversation on less-than-admirable terms).
What it’s really about is divesting ourselves of mind-forged manacles.
Here’s a question for you Petr:
Are regenerated infants heretics because they (presumably) twist truth?
I mean: infants surely have many of their beliefs wrong and cry about it at the tops of their lungs.
Do you not spiritually fellowship with them?
Let me refine my question further:
How many correct beliefs must a person have to gain entry into Paradise? (better ask the owl…)
Will we stroll up to the pearly gates and demand entry based on our good work of having believed all the correct things?
I doubt any of us would make it under those circumstances.
Let the pagans segregate based on conceptual schemes. We should fellowship based on racial affinity.
Let the negros (if they’re saved or not) deal with themselves.
Everything Petr has written in the past couple of days translates this way: “How DARE someone suggest that I’m not the Oracle of the Internet? How DARE someone suggest I take a break from leaving comments on websites?”
It’s a slick little maneuver he’s pulled here. “Let’s ignore what pissed me off in the first place and focus instead on the heretic hiding among us!” As if my kinist friends are all calling each other, exclaiming, “What the hell! I never knew MacPherson believed THAT!” As if my views haven’t been public and readily available for years. As if I’m ashamed of my views.
I’m not in the same intellectual league with SWB’s Admin (nor many of the other fine gents who regularly read and comment here). But I’m smart enough to notice that Petr sits in his dank basement and regularly fires off snotty critiques of what Admin posts here. The unforgivable sin in Petr’s mind is “Thou shalt not disagree with Petr, nay not in any way whatsoever.” No one can please him because no one’s as smart as he is. After all, he’s accomplished so much for Christ and sacrificed so much for his people, hasn’t he? We all know this, don’t we? So he’ll always be there as the one lone voice of reason in a howling wilderness of imbeciles and heretics.
Petr can lob adjectives all day long (“immature…contrarian”) and he can come up with a lengthy list o’ links to how how satanic I am, but he won’t stop squalling and simply have a back-and-forth with me on my website. He won’t because his widdle feewings got hurt when I said publicly what many people have already been thinking, that Petr needs to curtail his comments.
“Pay no attention to the fact that MacPherson was right and that I am in fact an annoying blog-hog! Let’s focus instead on gathering up wood so we can burn the heretic! Then after he’s gone, you can all pay more attention to me, Me, ME!”
Petr, did you think you could exhibit your popinjay tendencies here on the internet and simply get away with it?
Be a man. Stop squealing like a wiener on a barbecue and pretending that you are trying to protect the good readers of this blog from hellbound Wheeler. You’re angry because I drew attention to something that many others have noticed, and now I’m gonna pay. Isn’t that right?
“You’re angry because I drew attention to something that many others have noticed, and now I’m gonna pay. Isn’t that right?”
I am not so small and vain a person you slanderously try to depict me as. I honestly was first and foremost annoyed by the heresy I saw you promoting (although not VERY explicitly, as if you were yourself half-conscious of how foolish and distasteful it was), not by these personal slights you aimed at me.
Enough then with your self-pitying anti-intellectual populism. You cannot win the war of ideas, so you resort to crude ad hominems. You MAY be correct about some of my personal deficiencies, but I am in turn correct about you promoting at least one major heresy – that non-Whites are not descendants of Adam, perhaps even “physical children of Satan”, with all the consequences that would flow from it by implication. History teaches us that unchecked heterodoxy escalates and keeps piling up. Consider now yourself to have been “checked” and warned.
Enough has now been said about this subject, as far as I am concerned.
Yes, Luther, Petr speaks for the catolicum which our Lord envisioned when he gave the Commission to make disciples of all nations “pan ethne.”
That said, it should be possible to speak for the catolicum without coming across as a young whipper snapper to respected elders who have fought the good fight in the worst crisis the Church has ever faced.
No one should be under any illusion regarding the status of certain prodigious posters at every nationalist site of note. That SWB has been targeted for such assignment should be taken as an honor.
Rather lame paranoia there, CL. Everyone who challenges the cozy echo chamber-mentality (and defends basic Christian orthodoxy) is a government mole or something like that? Little hint, genius: true infiltrators are rather fond of posing as ultra-hardcore agent provocateurs.
Face it, Kinists will have to get rid of this “ghetto mentality” if they ever want their revival to break out into wider Christian public. Adopting (or merely tolerating) the CI position would give mainstreamers and Babelists a very handy justification or pretext to write off Kinism as race-idolatry and nothing more. Plus the fact that dual-seedline CInism is just plain dumb and easily refuted even without the PC factor.
1. “True infiltrators are rather fond of posing as ultra-hardcore agent provocateurs.” And how would you know that? How many infiltrators do you have contact with?
2. You tip your hand by speaking of “kinists” in the third person: “they will have to do this, they will have to do that.”
3. Your advice is purely pragmatic (“if they ever want their revival to break out…”) i.e. advice on how to generate success, which is quite in contradiction to your self-alleged zeal for “basic Christian orthodoxy.”
I think you’ve been exposed, Petr Pan. I saw through your flim-flam a long time ago.
“I think you’ve been exposed, Petr Pan. I saw through your flim-flam a long time ago.”
You real-ly, seriously think so? Well, I withhold myself from expressing detailed opinions about your IQ and overall grasp of reality.
I did not think I would necessarily win any popularity contests here with this position, but my conscience told me to do it.
“Ghetto mentality”?! Pfft.
‘Race idolatry’ and ‘dual seedline’ anthropolgy is Judaism and Pharisaism, Petr.
It has nothing to do with the heart and hearth of the Christendom; the filial peity of the House of faith and the kindred households of clan and nation holding to that faith.
The dialectic of the CInists and Babelists contrive a mere slave’s flattery of the Talmudic mindset. They are the ‘race idolators’ – for a’ that.
“The pith o’ sense an’ pride o’ worth
Are higher rank than a’ that”.
Cambria Will Not Yield’s latest post is appropriate for the ongoing discussion in the comments:
http://cambriawillnotyield.wordpress.com/2012/03/24/white-genocide/
Petr,
Here is a challenge: correct what you think is wrong or who you think is wrong in a way that does not denigrate the person.
Why all these mentions of IQ etc? Openly answer the things Vittgen speaks of. Clearly debate the issue with Wheeler on his blog.
This debate over the humanity of non-whites has been dealt with in the past on the blog, and the belief of (nearly) all is that non-whites are human.
For those who speak of non-whites as non-human, reprove, instruct, admonish in a right spirit.
You are winning neither hearts nor minds in the way you conduct yourself. Your manner is brash and arrogant – not suited to one who would correct others and you are not willing to dismantle the false beliefs of others.
So how then shall you proceed?
I’ve just returned from the local emergency room, where I was treated for chest pains.
What happened, you may ask? Why, I read Petr’s latest stern admonition, that’s what!
“Consider now yourself to have been ‘checked’ and warned.”
Have any of you ever laughed so hard you literally thought you were going to simultaneously have a heart attack and vomit? If so, then you know how I felt when I read those words.
“Enough has now been said about this subject, as far as I am concerned.” Well, let’s see now, Petr. Do you get to make this decision? No, you don’t. This ain’t your rodeo. It’s Admin’s. You don’t get to close the books on anything. Is this clear, or do you need further instruction?
You wrote, “I am not so small and vain a person you slanderously try to depict me as. I honestly was first and foremost annoyed by the heresy I saw you promoting (although not VERY explicitly, as if you were yourself half-conscious of how foolish and distasteful it was), not by these personal slights you aimed at me. ” Actually, you are much smaller and more vain than I’ve suggested, and you’ve proven that, more than once, on these very pages. And you’re a black liar, boy. You were not “first and foremost” annoyed by the “heresy” you saw me promoting. You were initially pissed off because I gently mocked you. You were angered because I suggested that you might take some internet Imodium to help you with your diarrhea of the keyboard. It was only after you saw my contempt for your opinions that you lowered yourself to visit my vile den of heresies and read my words…and THEN you got on your high horse and decided to make ME the issue, instead of defending yourself against my allegations of your verbose self-importance. And incidentally…the reason you were able to so courageously ferret out my nefarious theological views is because you were able to visit my public website. Where is YOUR website where you write self-revelatory statements and essays, Petr? Oh…that’s right. You don’t have one. You prefer instead to play the little pilot fish who thought he should run his mouth.
“You cannot win the war of ideas…” Strange… I didn’t realize that I was in a war with other White people. I assume you’re White, so why do you feel that you must be locked in gladiatorial combat with anyone who says “You talk too much?” I’m not engaged in any war of ideas with my own people, Petr. I simply don’t like YOU. Do you have any questions about this? Or are you going to now show me that it’s a sin and a heresy to dislike someone?
“Crude ad hominems?” Don’t make me laugh again, please. Your entire manner of interacting with others in this comments section, in every new entry Admin posts, is a protracted exercise in personal attacks. And what is your favorite little pea-shooter of a weapon? “I’m smarter than you are!” See, for example, your most recent comment to Vittgen: “You real-ly, seriously think so? Well, I withhold myself from expressing detailed opinions about your IQ and overall grasp of reality.” Trust me, Peety-Weety…we’re all just consumed with relief that you haven’t unleashed the full fury of your superior intellect on us.
You’re a liar. You’ve misrepresented me and my views. Where have I said that non-Whites are nonhuman? Are you stupid enough to believe that “God’s word and His covenant are addressed to White people” equates to “Anyone who is non-White is an animal and has no soul?” You are imputing a slew of things to me that I have neither written nor suggested. You make many assumptions in your statements, and you are smug enough to feel that you will remain unchallenged. You want to talk about “slander?” You are practicing slander.
Yes, you’re a liar. You continue to ignore the plain fact that your problem with me stems from the fact that I suggested to Admin that you need to shut the hell up. Everything you’ve said since that initial thrust has been an example of “Hell hath no fury like a little boy scorned.” You’ve tried very hard to redirect attention (“He’s a heretic! He has no right to be among us – I mean among YOU kinist people – he has no right to be among you!”). Even someone lacking your prodigious intellect can see that you’ve evaded this fact and lied about it in retrospect.
More importantly, any average person can see that you’ve repeatedly sidestepped my invitation to publicly debate my theological beliefs on my website. My views are so “dumb” and so easily refuted…and yet somehow, you can’t bring yourself to pick up the challenge I issued. My, my…a liar AND a coward. My gauntlet-print really stings on that beardless face, doesn’t it?
“Self pitying anti-intellectual populism,”eh? So when a man notes that there are many who are smarter than he, this means that he’s full of self-pity, that he’s anti-intellectual, and that he’s scrambling for the approval of the low-rent masses, does it? Do you have any idea how asinine this sort of statement is? Can you not see how it demonstrates your arrogance? And can you not see how your arrogance is all the more revolting because you have no reason to be arrogant? What do you have that you have not received? And if you have received anything – intelligence, education, etc. why do you boast in it, boy?
Allow me here to attempt to instruct you a bit. You wrote, “I did not think I would necessarily win any popularity contests here with this position, but my conscience told me to do it. ” No, lad. That wasn’t your conscience talking to you. It was your ego. You know, that bloated tumor growing out of your backside, the one that whispers to you after you’ve tired of your GameBoy and the Krispy Kreme box is empty? The one that began growing the first time some well-meaning adult male told you, “You know, you’re a pretty smart young fellow!”? That’s your ego. You should not listen to him very often. He is misleading you. Try to distinguish between him and your true conscience. Your conscience is the lean little fellow growing out of your heart, the one who whispers (much more softly than your ego), “Maybe you should stop trying to PROVE that you in fact have a pair.”
But I do believe you got that “popularity contest” thing right.
I don’t hold out much hope for it, but perhaps you’ll mature enough at some point to reevaluate yourself in the scheme of God’s grand purpose for His people (you’ll note that I don’t assume you to be outside a state of grace just because you conduct yourself like anything BUT a Christian and a man). Perhaps someday you’ll just plain grow up. Perhaps not. In the meantime, you’ll continue to bescumber this blog with your yellow diaper detritus. But at least GOOD shit can be useful when composted and applied to crops. Yours lacks this benefit.
For now, you remain a condescending little cacafuego, a true feist in every sense of the word. You seem absolutely determined to be the Perez Hilton of the comments section of this fine blog. Well, keep it up, laddie. Someday, with good fortune, you’ll be the Charles Nelson Reilly of orthodox Christendom.
Yet again, I’ll remind you that your anger with me stems from the fact that I suggested to my friend Admin that you are a mouthy little asshole. And that anger led you to uncover the shocking secrets that only six billion other people can uncover: Wheeler MacPherson holds racial beliefs that not everyone holds!
I’ve repeatedly challenged you to a public back-and-forth about my theology and my doctrine on my blog, and I’ve done this in order to avoid doing what we’ve already done, to my distaste: hijack the comments section of a magnificent website that serves our people well. You’re in a difficult position, aren’t you, Petr? If you accept my challenge NOW, it’ll look as if you were forced or intimidated or (dare I say it?) browbeaten into it. And yet if you again ignore it, it’ll look like pure cowardice.
That pressure you’re feeling in your abdomen at this moment just MIGHT be the tofu pancakes you had for lunch; on the other hand, it just might be the barrel I’ve got you over.
“Consider now yourself to have been ‘checked’ and warned,” eh?
Tell you what, Petr. Consider yourself scorned and held in the lowest regard a White man can hold a squeaking little gerbil. But let me speak some words of comfort: in my hateful theology, even a gerbil like you may be elect.
Meanwhile over at The British Resistance, they are analyzing the immigration invasion. The Overlord (that would be Judaic Overlord) strategy is to use demographic shift as a means to prevent the betrayed and demographically overwhelmed British nation from resorting to the inevitable ‘Ceausescu move’.
The Judaic NW Overseers implementing the Islamisation of Britain with Paki, Punjabi, Somali immigration quotas (v high) are now clearly wearing ‘the political dhimmi’ label back and front.
http://thebritishresistance.co.uk
And they have worked their way round to comparing the present situation to the Arabic and Islamic invasion of the Eastern Roman Empire. As seculars, however, they lack the key to seeing why it took hundreds of years for the Christian East to fall – and may never have done but for events not the subject of this post.
The pointy end is that nations as nations saw clearly the difference between living under the rule of Christendom and living under Sharia. The West mounted the Crusades and came to their aid – essentially fighting on two fronts.
So The Resistance is yet to grapple with the thought that what escapes their notice is the strength of the holy faith on behalf of the nation. But they are getting there.
The British Resistance needs some kinist discussion on their forum.
“Openly answer the things Vittgen speaks of.”
WHAT things? There is nothing serious to talk about. Vittgen made weak, silly insinuations against me, nothing more.
I know that infiltrators are fond of using blustering rhetoric? Dude, that is, like, very common knowledge.
I sometimes speak in third person? Well Sherlock, so did Julius Caesar in his “Gallic Wars.”
And you Wheeler, it is ironically now YOU who is clogging this blog up with your blather. I will close this fruitless discussion with you whenever I please.
“You’re a liar. You’ve misrepresented me and my views. Where have I said that non-Whites are nonhuman?”
It would seem that you are now back-tracking, no longer speaking about “physical children of Satan.” You apparently don’t quite have courage in your convictions. By all means, be free to acknowledge with clear words that you consider non-Whites as descendants of Adam and partakers of the Gospel of Christ.
“You’re a black liar, boy.”
Really, huh? I have been MORE polite towards you, gramps, than you apparently would deserve. I have been personally attacked, slandered, and then you have the nerve to complain about my oh-so-arrogant attitude when I shoot back? But again, what would be the point of continuing this nonsense with you?
Yes, indeed. You are a black liar, boy.
Where have I back-tracked? You’ve selectively lifted words from my website and distorted what I wrote. I have never written that “non-Whites are physical children of Satan.” If you read carefully, you’ll see that I most certainly do believe that JEWS are physical children of Satan. This is no secret. I have also written that I believe the non-White races to have been created in the image of God, and that He pronounced them “very good.” Perhaps you missed these points because you were so busy imitating J. Caesar. Or perhaps you were busy thanking Heaven that you live your soft little mendacious coward’s life behind a keyboard.
By the way…is this what it sounds like when you close a fruitless discussion, Flauntingboy?
You’re angry because I pointed out that you comment promiscuously. That’s what this “fruitless discussion” stems from. You’re a hissy fit, personified. And once again you run away from the idea of a debate. Which zip code do you use: Rock, or Hard Place?
I was going to make a comment about the highly embarrassing nature of this idiotic interchange, but then I remembered The proverb.
“Like one who takes a dog by the ears is he who passes by and meddles with strife not belonging to him.”
My parting shot:
“If you read carefully, you’ll see that I most certainly do believe that JEWS are physical children of Satan.”
Even this would be a very heterodox position – and not very consistent either, for if Jews are “the seed of serpent” then why could not other groups be as well? ALL human beings are descendants of Adam, and usually it’s only CI blockheads who read Christ’s condemnation of Pharisees in the Gospels as a proof of literal satanic origin of unbelieving Jews.
So if I confused you with CIs, I could blame your own confused presentation of your ideas for it. It was a very human error on my part to mistake your tripe as typical CInism.
Azazel.
The Book Of Enoch.
Originally part of the Canon and removed at the Nicene Council.
Satan’s offspring. Period.
“Ye are of your father, the devil.”
Why should I answer any of your questions? You’ve refused to openly debate me, preferring instead to take hit & run potshots, peppered with your snotty little asides.
Your pizza-clogged intestines are tied up in knots of anger, and that anger’s origin is the fact that I observed that your too-frequent verbose comments are annoying. You haven’t refuted anything I’ve said. You’ve only proved my point.
I hope it’s now obvious to all what has been happening. Petr’s task was to smear the Kinist idea as being ‘Christian Identity.’ When the dissatisfaction level he engendered belatedly rose to the breaking point, he/it had the usual judeo-chimp out, with feces hurled in all directions.
His backstory was ridiculous: A twenty-something European(?) (Finn???) Orthodox (????????) somehow becomes attached to an obscure Southern agrarian Calvinist blog, the philosophy of which he clearly doesn’t agree with. Further, he was moved to post constantly with ‘corrections’ to the material, most of the ‘corrections’ being straight out of ADL/SPLC talking points.
How in the heck would a person in his putative position even know what the wacky ‘CI’ is, much less consistently misapply the label in the usual mindwar way?
lol
Admin – I’ve never been religious but after reading you prose I’m prepared to admit that you’re a wiser man than I.
It’s that I know for certain that you are factually correct that I am now seriously reconsidering my “disbelief”.
One who is so wise and also so brave should not be disregarded.
Thank you, You have a disciple in me.
P.S. Please bear with me in theology.
Thank you, MB. That’s very kind of you to say, and it’s really all that I’ve ever wanted – to teach the faith that brought our ancestors out of darkness and into the light. The false gospel that is being preached today has returned our people to darkness and bondage.
“Petr’s task was to smear the Kinist idea as being ‘Christian Identity.’”
Why do you keep dragging me back to this debate, you pathetic slandering simpleton?
I have not tried to obfuscate anything. On the contrary, I have aimed at clarity as I seek to draw a clear distinction between healthy orthodox love of kith and kin and heretical Kinolatry on the other hand.
And away with false modesty, I have made more interesting posts here (along with some uninteresting ones) than you ever. It’s just too bad if you are resentful about not being able to appreciate more complex forms of thought.
“Azazel.
The Book Of Enoch.
Originally part of the Canon and removed at the Nicene Council.”
Folks, can you see how easily CInism will lead from one error to another (in this case, Dan-Brownian conspiracy-mongering)? I was reacting to a very real problem.
Good post Admin.
Thank you for your work.
I think the Spirit Water Blood website is unique in the way it is able to consistantly situate kindred honouring principles and traditions in the Scripture and Tradition of the Church as well as European, Euro-American heritage, history and literature.
Yes, Tradition is one of the pillars of the Church. “Therefore, brethern, stand fast and hold the traditions which ye have been taught either by word or by our epistle” 2 Thess 2:15
And many of our most Kinist traditions come to us from the Apostles and Fathers. Others were created by baptised nations from once pagan customs that were taken up by the Church and pressed into service for families and parishes. Many of the hearth fire blessings and practices fall into this category.
Statements reductionist of the Christian faith to Kinism, conceived as an ideology, do and have received critical comment here.
So – well said, MB.
The Kinist project is extremely important to the post Christian West because our Judeo-Masonic Overlords use the financial arm of their power to destroy the pillars of human identity: race, religion, gender and national heritage with both social engineering and legal sanctions.
The Christian faith is an incarnational faith. The natural foundations of the human identity are taken up into Christian thought and life.
The idea that the human identity should be destroyed in terms of its natural foundations is thoroughly Babelist and Satanic.
The idea of St Thomas of Aquin is that grace perfects nature as theosis perfects grace. It is sin that is to be destroyed, it is the fallen human nature that is to be regenerated in the God man who took upon himself a human nature “and was made sin for us” upon the Cross.
Just as C.S. Lewis was not ashamed of the mythological radiance resting upon our theology, for the great needs of our time, we should not be ashamed of the kinist dimensions of regenerate human nature in Christ.
And for the great cause of our time, omnia instaurare in Christo, these should be strenuously defended against the powers of hell and the orcs.
Petr:
‘On the contrary, I have aimed at clarity as I seek to draw a clear distinction between healthy orthodox love of kith and kin and heretical Kinolatry on the other hand.’
lol @ ‘Kinolatry’
Where was that one coined? Montgomery, DC, NYC, or Tel Aviv?
Petr, as I am sure you are aware,The Book of Enoch is quoted in both Old and New Testaments – so it is ‘canonical’.
However, the prophet Enoch states in his preface that he wrote his scroll “for a distant generation, born in the last times”. This is the generation that would see the return of “the days of Noah” of Dominical reference.
Indeed, the days when both Enoch and Elias will return to preach to the nations.
We are hastening to those days as the last defenses of the Christendom fall.
So The Book of Enoch, even though it did not form part of the canon for the liturgy of the Church has always been canonical and will be increasingly contemporary as time goes on.
BTW, your statement to CL “that I have made more interesting posts … than you ever” is a real howler.
He has your number and you know it.
My guess is you are located at a Southern University in the Hillel House – which has an internet centre with special servers for the front line of the infowars.
But you have spewed your Jew on this messageboard and you are busted.
“lol @ ‘Kinolatry’”
Yes, genius. Are you not Bible-literate enough to know that any good thing in this world can become a source of corruption if it begins to be worshipped with divine honors? That is what idolatry is all about.
This is Christianity 101.
“My guess is you are located at a Southern University in the Hillel House – which has an internet centre with special servers for the front line of the infowars.”
What huh Lynda? I thought you were “on my side”, or at least the side of the sane. Are you really such a scatterbrained female as to buy into this?
“So The Book of Enoch, even though it did not form part of the canon for the liturgy of the Church has always been canonical and will be increasingly contemporary as time goes on.”
“Always canonical”? – nonsense. This is just the sort of confused heterodox thinking that CInism encourages (you seem to like to mix all sorts of trippy ideas with your already weird Sedevacantist worldview).
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01602a.htm
“But in the fourth century the Henoch writings lost credit and ceased to be quoted. After an allusion by an author of the beginning of the ninth century, they disappear from view.”
Petr is evidently nothing but an Edomite who task it is to cause discord. He dismisses Moses himself, as it was in Genesis that the story of Azazel and the other fallen angels came to earth and fornicated with earth women who then produced offspring. Period. Petr is arguing that Moses is a liar.
Enoch elaborated on the activity of the evil one’s, and Petr, in what has become the normal “Cafeteria Christian” style, simply dismiss the truth first and with his next move attempts to erase Enoch from the pages of history.
And why not? He too is of his father, the devil. Given their millenia-long history of murder, theft, lying and destruction, it only makes sense that such creatures would deny who they are, what they have done and what they plan to do. All the while they have infiltrated the Lord’s flock and then assumed positions of power,infiltrating the original Church and removing books such as those penned by Enoch, then spreading their falsehoods, filth and heretical depravity into every nook and cranny. Now they control almost every pulpit in the land, programming the flock their wholly-invented multicultural religion now saturated with antiChrist feminism of the first order. They are evil disguised as good, false prophets; the wolves in sheeps clothing who have come to ravage the flock.
Just keep gibbering on about Edomites, Enoch and et cetera, John. You make my case for me, showcasing how CI-cultist hijacking and corruption of kinist revival must be opposed.
White Kinists should not be like bigoted Negroes whom they so often (and justifiably) like to criticize as hypocritical frauds to whom it’s “my race, right or wrong.” THEY might be able to tolerate all sorts of un-Biblical nonsense-theologies from MLK to Farrakhan in the name of ecumenical Black solidarity – but frankly I would expect higher standards from my “own people”.
When you speak for the catolicum, Petr, I do support your statement.
However, your posts clearly and frequently are at issue with the SWB post in a way that attempts to impose a CI spin or ‘racist’ critique upon it.
Speaking for the catolicum is one thing, attributing racial idolatry by smear, inuendo and constant taking issue is another.
The Kinist thesis of Admin’s posts is that the honouring of kindred is part of the Gospel – as it happens, the part that is being signally repudiated by the Judeo Xtians.
And, just to make the polemics of the messageboard interesting, there are many respected posters on the messageboard who do see the Great Commission in terms of Kinism. This is limited. The Evangel is for all nations. We agree upon this.
But as Wheeler clearly states, the Christian father does not have to give reasons to justify his authority in his own household. And Christian fathers and families do not as a rule seek to extinguish the patrimony of the nation by permitting daughters to marry outside of the faith or the race.
Christian Whites will not be ‘guilted’ in this regard and any attempt to impose this is going run be at cross purposes with the message board.
The liberty that we have in Christ is at issue here, as is the father’s authority in his own household, as is the honouring of kindred.
You have replied to legitimate opposition in the way that Jews all over the NET flame when they are called on their mischief.
As for The Book of Enoch, quoted by prophets and apostles – if that is not cannonical – then nothing is.
I am so sick of this Christian Identity garbage lately. I’ve been dealing with their ilk on that cesspool “Stormfront” and they’ve driven me to my last nerve.
All their talk of Edomites and bloodlines; it’s absurd. And, now John is calling Petr an “Edomite”? How much thought did you put into that, John? Any? Or did you just type it?
These people need to realize they’re coming at Kinism from a position of weakness. You want to believe in your theologically-incoherent, ad-hoc system based wholly on novel and discredited (at least — highly controversial) historical paradigms? Fine. Just save your holier-than-the-rest-of-us attitudes for people who care about pyramids, UFOs and whatever other pop-filth is being peddled by the history channel. CI is akin to something you’d find in the New Age section at Barnes and Noble.
Now, there are a few “CInists” I respect — in spite of their ideological proclivities. I suspect two of them are paying attention to this comment-thread. I don’t doubt the passion of CI adherents nor do I doubt the merit of their hearts, their heroism in standing against a Satanic age, or their steadfastness against the onslaught of despair.
That said, I think Petr’s attitude, his insults and boasting, especially towards the end of this exchange (I suspect it’s at an end), were unfortunate and not in keeping with the Southern traditions of Chivalry and honor that I’m accustomed to. In fact, had this been a real life encounter at the local pub, I’d have decked him for what he said to Lynda.
Kinism needs smart, articulate and voracious readers, but we need them as friends and jovial comrades, not as conceited mavericks.
I’m walking my high-horse down off my soap-box now, but this sort of squabbling is infuriating to all of us.
Let’s stop it.
“Everything Petr has written in the past couple of days translates this way: “How DARE someone suggest that I’m not the Oracle of the Internet? How DARE someone suggest I take a break from leaving comments on websites?””
That is exactly what is going on. Petr says some interesting things and posts some interesting links. But wading through his stuff is quite like digging for information in a trash can. There may be some useful information there, but it so unpleasant getting to it.
“In fact, had this been a real life encounter at the local pub, I’d have decked him for what he said to Lynda.”
Nice white-knighting there. So a loose-mouthed female should be allowed to label me as a lying imposter without getting insulted in return?
But again, I do-not-want this to be a mere miserable personal squabble. Lynda, you are still dead wrong about this assertion:
“As for The Book of Enoch, quoted by prophets and apostles – if that is not cannonical – then nothing is.”
“There may be some useful information there, but it so unpleasant getting to it.”
This may be partly correct (although I have both publically and privately received praise for my contributions as well), perhaps I should indeed cut down my commentary in here. Only I would not like my retreat to be seen as a legitimization of CInish ideas I have attacked.
Petr, your ability to lie is staggering.
“Only I would not like my retreat to be seen as a legitimization of CInish ideas I have attacked.”
You’re attempting to paint yourself as some stalwart champion of the One True Faith, a champion who ferreted out and “attacked” an inferior half-wit heretic who believes a pack of easily-refuted lies and errors. The fact is that you are angry because the comment I made to Admin about your annoying yammering stung you. Some sixty-eight comments later, you nobly acknowledge that “perhaps [you] should indeed cut down [your] commentary in here.” Such largesse! Such selflessness!
You haven’t refuted anything I’ve written on my website. You have run away, shrieking over your shoulder, at my numerous challenges to openly debate me about my beliefs. Whuffa mabber, Petey-Weety? Ooo uhfwaid of tumting?
But I will congratulate you one one thing: your strategy pays off. You’ve managed to redirect the attention of most of those commenting on this thread. They’ve ignored the fact that you’re an obnoxious, self-important little keyboard kommando who threw a public hissy fit because he got his little wrist smacked in a very indirect way. They’re allowed you to manipulate them into believing that all this sturm und drang is about Christian Identity (by the way, is THAT what I am?) and “garbage” beliefs and “easily refuted” heresies. I salute you, lad. Your strategy works. Very clever. But your kind always is. Must be something in the blood.
There’s no need for you to retreat, Petr. I’m more than happy to retire from the field. If your squalling is palatable to the readers of this blog while my mere objection to your verbose bullshit is offensive to them, so be it. You don’t have to retreat.
No, you just have to live with the very public fact that you wouldn’t debate me.
Yes, you’re a SMART little boy.
Congratulations. Now go indulge in your favorite pastime!
If there is a problem with Petr’s commenting, why didn’t admin say something? Apparently he has no problem with Petr’s commenting habits here.
There is nothing wrong with being a Southern gentleman, Petr, even when Southern manners are seasoned with cayenne.
One of the reasons for the meltdown on the messageboard is the comtempt you have heaped upon respected elders in the Kinist community in your posts.
Observing your behaviour, I said “you spewed your Jew”. Yes. I do think you are Jewish. So what. I could be wrong. But the behaviour fits.
Straining for CI gnats in the SWB posts and getting all picayune over comments which bring Kinist insights to the Gospel while imposing the camel of Talmudic pil pul on the messageboard is Jewish behaviour, Petr.
You should give this stuff up for Lent.
“Petr, your ability to lie is staggering.”
How many times do you think you’re allowed to bring such an obnoxious “railing accusation” against me? I could probably beat you in a debate, but I frankly don’t think you’re worth engaging – certainly not anymore at this point, low slanderer.
For those who have the eyes to see, I have provided already quite enough citations as evidence of your heterodoxy, and you have acknowledged them, proving yourself at least a semi-CInist.
Lynda:
“comtempt you have heaped upon respected elders in the Kinist community in your posts.”
Boo-hoo, spare me the victim act. People I have slighted have either deserved it by spouting blatant heresies, and/or they have insulted me first, attacking my honour and dignity.
“Yes. I do think you are Jewish.”
Well, what can I say. You’re stupid.
A star is risen upon Babel and that great bucket of KFC in the sky is raining nuggets.
The benefactors of perpetual succour – the lawyers bearing briefs have come to the aid of Trayvon’s grieving mother.
An Orlando firm has filed for trademark protection for “the name” Trayvon Martin.
That probably should be ‘The Name’.
Sabrina / Sybrina Fulton wants trademarks for use on digital materials, namely CDs and DVDs featuring Trayvon Martin and other (ahem) “products”.
Its gonna cost all the Babelized Whites out there baying for the blood of George Zimmerman (the 28 yr old neighbourhood watch captain). “Justice for Trayvon” is trademarked.
And in true democratic spirit, all the bruthas who are going to rap the message to the masses also have to pay if they want to rap “I am Trayvon”.
I foresee a huge chimp-out with the Jew lawyers. And I expect to see full coverage in SWB and The Political Cesspool.
I vote that Petr is a jew.
Thought-form indistinguishable, at any rate.
My namesake Wittgenstein said, “If God really chooses those who are to be saved, there is no reason why He should not choose them according to nations, races, or temperaments. God’s choice would thus follow a law of nature.”
In other words, if grace is of God’s free choice, then it cannot be an a priori that he “must” “distribute” that grace according to our conception of equity, proportion, balance, fairness, or any other measuring stick that we bring to the table under our own auspices.
W’s remark would need to be qualified a bit: God’s choice would not “follow” a law of nature, but it would define, create such a law. Or, said differently, it would be congruent with a “law” that he also established, perhaps in correspondence to his choice, or perhaps out of divine pleasures unrelated to that as such.
Thus, it seems like the CI mistake is, chiefly, elevating a speculation to a dogma. It violates catholicity if it insists that one must hold to a particular view of God’s election that cannot be proven, as a basis for fellowship.
Held as just that — a speculation — a, “hey fellows, if God’s plan were this … then a lot of mysteries of history would clear up,” it could only be held as positively harmful if it, say, dissuaded a young man from going into the mission field, who otherwise would have. But for most of us, that is not the case.
The offense begins where the pushy dogmatism begins. But I do not sense this in Wheeler MacPherson. Petr’s yapping is like that of a toy poodle when a new big dog has wandered over.
Even when asserted dogmatically — not every error is a heresy, fellows. This is the mistake the alienists make, even if their view on nations (contrary to fact) were true.
There may be a place for the official guardian of the gates of orthodoxy. But the position must be appointed, not laid claim to. I don’t know where Petr has been appointed to that position.
The claim of being “Finnish” almost seems like an inside joke. RamZPaul uses “Finn” as humorous ersatz for jew. Could this be yet another little subversive play such as the Tribe is so skillful at?
Only the claim of youth can be held as veridical, based on the obvious tone and attitude. Even older jews in their assassinations generally wield a bit of nuance and subtlety, Abe Foxman and Norman Podhoretz being perhaps notable exceptions.
Frankly, I normally just skip past Petr’s rambling troll posts. There is no cost in that. It does however dilute the debate in this the closest thing we have to a national assembly.
If we ever have a true national assembly, then I propose that all iPads and smart phones be checked at the door. I want to hear wisdom, not internet surfing smarts.
I will spare you the victim schtik, Petr. The goyim never get to win in the suffering sweepstakes. By temprament we don’t do suffering sweepstakes.
And yes, looking back over my life, I have acumulated a file marked – stupid. Maybe not as hefty as some might think, but not so slim either.
Ethnically, the Ashkhenaz are Turko-Finns according to Koestler’s ‘The Thirteenth Tribe’.
In his lectures at the Waldorf Astoria back in the 60s, Benjamin Friedman made a deal about this when he unilaterally decided to address the worst crisis in the history of the Catholic Church and so hammered the Zionists and the crypto Jewish revolutionaries flush with their Vatican II success.
According to Pope St Pius X, all the strength of Satan’s reign is not due to the Jews but to Catholics who will not defend the faith.
Well. Benjamin Friedman was definitely not one of those.
He just seized the high ground, as a Khazarian would I might add, and gave the liberals and the judaic bishops hell.
I still pray for the repose of his righteous soul.
Let us say just for the sake of argument that rather than being a Finn – you are Jewish. Why not post here as a Jew with a view? Think 500 words or less from time to time rather than consecutive tomes.
Admin has commended you on your scholarship and observations many times.
The Evangel, the Christian faith and the Church can not be reduced to a tribal cult. No reduction attempt from either the Jewish or a would be Christian side can succeed here because on this website people are working to situate white nation within the Gospel and Church history, as opposed to reducing the Gospel and Church history to white nation.
All strains of the ideology of liberalism are virulent. Delusional self hating Whites so infected will not recover racial and national honour by trying to invent Judaism for Whites.
And on CI / WN blogs, the Jews usually just tie these goy imitations up in knots anyway.
I have an announcement to make.
I denounce you all as heretics in need of the saving grace of Christ. As long as you pretend that racial differences are important or legitimate, you’re doing the Devil’s work.
Also, I’m marrying a negress named Shawneesha (she’s Puttummonaleesha’s sister). I met her in Wal-Mart. One look at the Oreo-cookie packaging, skillfully woven into her hair (held in place with fake weaves) and I fell in love.
I’m also getting a gold toof.
I encourage any of you to meet me at the local KFC, so we can discuss this further.
Peace out,
Your nigga in Christ,
Shotgun
Vittgen, you are a gentleman and a grave man. I say this with the intent to pay you a compliment, and I appreciate the sobriety of your most recent comment.
I’ll direct this comment to you, sir, since doing so would seem reasonable and (I hope) profitable.
First of all, I really enjoyed your Wittgenstein quote and your qualification of it. Very thought-provoking, and I’ll be doing some reading and meditating on this.
You wrote, “Thus, it seems like the CI mistake is, chiefly, elevating a speculation to a dogma. It violates catholicity if it insists that one must hold to a particular view of God’s election that cannot be proven, as a basis for fellowship.”
I tend to agree with the first sentence. I have often examined myself and wondered if this is what I am doing with my own reading of Scripture. I correspond via email (and some actual postal mail!) much more prolifically than I blog, and ANYONE with whom I correspond could tell you that I am very open about my doubts and unsettled areas about my OWN theology. I say this fully aware that I run the risk of hearing yet once again, “A double-minded man is unstable in all his ways!”, which means, of course, that anyone who actually comes out and says, “I’m not real sure about this particular thing I THINK I believe” is likely going to be accused of doublemindedness and instability. I disagree with that sort of wooden application of James’s statement.
Friends and those with whom I correspond would also tell you that I am still working my beliefs out with fear and trembling, as I have been doing for all of my adult Christian life. When I came to faith in Christ, I was a Baptist. And I believed with all my heart that it was I who chose Christ, not the other way around, and that I could, by a decision, thwart God’s purposes. I no longer believe this (or a lot of other things I believed back then), and I am grateful for the wise Christians who disagreed with me back then…they disagreed with me but didn’t break friendship or fellowship with me. Right now, I’m walking in the light that I have and doing the best that I can. Being prone to the sin of hot-headedness, I sometimes tend to make absolute statements about my beliefs…just as I did back in my dunkin’ days. My prayer is that if I’m wrong, I’ll have friends who will patiently show me I’m wrong WHILE REMAINING MY FRIENDS. And if I’m right, I plan to do the same. I have several friends to whom I’ve said, “I am YOUR friend and will remain so. Whether you’re MY friend or not is up to you.”
Now, the second sentence in that statement (“It violates catholicity if it insists that one must hold to a particular view of God’s election that cannot be proven, as a basis for fellowship.”)…I agree wholeheartedly. And I willingly admit that many of my “still in progress” beliefs are speculation. I believe at this point that they are well-considered and substantial speculations, but they are speculative. Again, I readily and regularly tell people this.
I very much appreciate your giving me the benefit of the doubt about me not being “pushy and dogmatic,” and I especially appreciate your remark about not all errors being heresies. Given sufficient longsuffering by Christ, many of us will have cause to retract or modify some of our “firmly held” beliefs before we depart this life.
I’d also like to note that I’m going to be posting on my own website some upcoming essays about my own beliefs, how I arrived at them, the weaknesses I still see in them, etc. Not having fleshed out some of my statements has allowed certain people to distort and mishandle and mislabel.
Again, thank you for your kindness and maturity, Vittgen. You have refreshed me on a day when I sorely needed it.
“Thus, it seems like the CI mistake is, chiefly, elevating a speculation to a dogma.”
Vittgen is still treating the CI error with too soft gloves, for doctrines like the denial of full humanity of non-Whites (as descendants of Adam) are not OK even as a matter of mere speculation – not any more than questioning the FULL divinity of Jesus Christ would be. That is not some open question that orthodox Christians are free to debate and disagree about.
Church fathers did not consider the semi-Arian position as OK, or something inherently superior to strict Arianism, and I shall not approve semi-CInist theology either (seeing how it bears such bad fruit as denigrating missionary work among colored peoples, for example).
The issue in both cases is real simple, and does not require high sophistication, only intellectual honesty and consistency. Either Jesus Christ is as fully divine as His Father or not, and all nations on earth are fully human descendants of Adam or not.
Vitgenn,
Very interesting comments. I think covenant theology presupposes the idea that nature and grace do “sync up” to a certain degree. In a very real and vital sense, the Faith is an inheritance for all those to whom it is given, and as such children should normally receive this inheritance where the parents are faithful to their trust.
It may also be that certain people have in their disposition something more amenable to receiving God’s Word — an idea which seems to be suggested by Christ in Luke 10:13. Also relevant may be Aquinas’ doctrine of prevenient grace — grace that “prepares the soul” for conversion.
All this said, God in His sovereignty is free in his choice to defy any expectations we might have with regard to who is “most likely” to believe. Jesus states clearly, “Out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham.”
Food for thought.
Racism never raises its ugly head until something uglier shows up first.
“Before I started working here, I wasn’t a racist.”
Do you have NEGRO FATIGUE?
Negro Fatigue, or NF, is one of the fastest-growing chronic fatigue syndromes. Month by month, the number of people who are experiencing the symptoms of NF is growing. It affects primarily white people and Asians, mostly between the ages of 25 and 55, although anyone can experience it. City-dwellers are more likely than rural inhabitants to display its symptoms, but NF can strike any white person of any age or locale at any time.
Are you among those suffering from NF? Know these warning signs:
1. Increased blood pressure when in the presence of Negroes, or when viewing images of Negroes on TV or in print
2. Lack of concern with what Negroes want, deserve, think, or feel
3. Diminished patience with behaviors typical of Negroes, e.g., talking loudly in public, crotch-grabbing, ruining theatrical movies etc.
4. Increased awareness of the number of Negroes in one’s immediate environment
5. Hyper-alertness when encountering Negroes in public
6. Lack of desire to view or listen to Negro music, video programming, motion pictures, or other entertainments
7. Anomalous behavior (e.g., walking away in mid-sentence) when conversing with other white people who seem concerned with the welfare of Negroes
8. Decreased resistance to using the “N-Word”
9. Increased feeling of annoyance when encountering the term “N-word”
10. Scrupulous avoidance of contact with Negroes at work, school, shops, etc.
11. Hatred or cold indifference toward professional and collegiate sports, especially basketball; increased interest in “white” sports such as hockey, swimming, etc.
12. Sudden lack of shame in “white” behaviors (e.g. earning a living, abiding by the law, monogamous marriage, wearing Dockers, etc.)
13. YOU A RACISS!
If you exhibit any or all of these symptoms, you may have Negro Fatigue. For help in living with NF, please contact your local European Self-Extinction League (ESEL) chapter, or write to:
NEGRO FATIGUE
Eric H. Holder, Jr.
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
The 2012 Summer of the Diversity Sons of Obama will be the hottest yet. Remember, they thrive best in hot Africn temperatures.
Here’s a sacred scripture from the past that now SWB-er has ever read. We reclaim a bit of White glory and racial pride when we realize just how correctly White men once thought about the Diversity Curse.
Hinton Rowan Helper’s Nojoque: A Question for a Continent, 1867
The same HRH of The Impending Crisis infamy, in which he told the South what it needed to hear, but we refused to listen, holding fast to the faith that the Negro was docile and happy when well-managed. We received Helper’s predicted condemnation, a fate he later predicted for the entire nation if it didn’t solve its Negro problem.
Through the Holder’s My People Diversity Sons of Obama, we just can’t stop ourselves from proving HRH right again.
snips:
On no part, to say the least, on no part of the territory of the United States, as at present organized, should any but the pure white races ever find permanent domicile.
****
He who is the Creator and the Ruler, the Upholder and the Disposer, of the heavens and the earth and the seas, and of all the things that therein are of every thing in the universe, both great and small will be exact in requiring of us perfect fulfillment of all the conditions of our being. In no manner, in no degree, may we, with impunity, shirk the obligations, whether altogether as we would wish them or otherwise, which he hath imposed upon us. What he hath made for us to love, that we must love ; and what he hath made for us to hate, that we must hate.
If, in a spirit of rebellion against the laws of nature, we love the negroes and other black things, we shall thereby only gain the low distinction of gratifying the devil; but if, on the other hand, assuming attitudes of antagonism toward the imps of Africa, toward the prince of darkness, and toward all the other monstrous representatives of blackness and abomination, “we hate them with perfect hatred,” as they deserve to be hated, and as we are required and expected to hate them, we shall thereby render highly acceptable and pleasing service to the Deity ; and, continuing to please him, will secure for ourselves unlimited and everlasting felicity in heaven.
****
Yet, in justice to these crotchety and misguided men of our own race, these fanatical and mischief-making champions of Black, these deluded and undignified associates of the negro, it is very proper that, even in their retirement, we should continue to demonstrate to them, that our dislike of the African is not, as they erroneously allege, a mere blind and bitter ” prejudice against color,” but that it is a natural and ineradicable aversion, a right and necessary antipathy, implanted in us by the Almighty Himself, who can do nothing wrong.
With as little impunity might we, who are fortunately possessed of a moderate share of common sense unbiased and unabused, persistently refuse to eat when hungry, decline to drink when thirsty, or scorn to repose when sleepy, as strive to repress our inborn and nature-nurtured repugnance to the negro. To give free play to this repugnance is as much a matter of duty with us as it is to yield to any other innate and ever-healthful requirement, a duty, indeed, which God has made absolutely obligatory on us ; and if we fail to obey His precepts in this regard, or in any other regard whatever, He will assuredly visit us with the severest possible condemnation.
It seems I missed an old fashioned battle royal. As to the question of CI, it seems as always that terms need to be clarified. Whose “identity” is in question? What does the Bible say? It is very easy to prove, using nothing but the 66 books of the Old and New Testaments, that “the Jews” and “Israel” are in no sense synonymous. I know that most of the readers of this blog believe the Scripture to be the full and inerrant Word of God. The Bible does not teach that the Jews and Israel are one and the same. There is no possible way to make 5/6 of the nation of Israel be “Jews” on any possible reading, understanding, or rendering of the term. That error is so old and so ingrained that even the great reformers and commentators made it. Simply put, there may be in this world some Jews who are of Israel; the majority of Israel are not now and never were in any sense Jews. The Bible clearly delineates a House of Israel and a House of Judah. To confuse the two is to misread the vast portion of prophecy. The result is inevitably either dispensationalism or an over- spiritualisation that reads into plain texts allegories that are simply not there. How can it be said,then, that those of us who believe and can defend using the canonical Scriptures alone that there are two houses, with two prophetic destinies, that are to be gathered together and reunited are beyond the pale of orthodoxy? I believe with complete conviction and no reservations that salvation is by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone, wholly apart from works. I can affirm, with very few reservations, the 1646 Westminster Confession and the original 39 Articles, with a Calvinist understanding. Is it possible that there is some entity in the world which does not want the distinction between the Houses to be known?
The other problem of course is the meaning of words. Adam is a transliterated word. It means ruddy or able to blush. There is no confusion of the words meaning. The vast portion of the world fits neither of these characteristics. There is logically an either-or proposition here. Either there was some unrecorded terrible event that occurred and twisted the genetics of the majority of people into something other than what it was before (perhaps like Morgoth’s production of the orcs in The Silmarillion?) OR there is not a common root. The only alternative offered is the Ken Ham solution, that Adam and Eve were chimaeras carrying multiple genetic codes. What does that idea do for the doctrine of “after its own kind”? If anyone has another idea which is Biblical and rational I have not heard it. The question deeply troubles my sleep some nights.
By the way, asking questions that are both scientific and logical is not in any way the same as denying the Deity of the Lord. The Scripture says that no one can say Jesus is Lord but by the Spirit of God. To have the indwelling Spirit is to be regenerate. The Bible says nothing about questioning matters that are questionable and about which the Bible gives little information.
“There is no question but that St. Augustine is the far greater church father than Salvian, both in his thinking and in his influence. However, at one point Salvian is clearly Augustine’s superior. Augustine saw the fall of Rome with grief, as a disaster and a theological shock which required great and profound historical analysis to justify. Very painfully, Augustine came to see the purposes of God in the fall of Rome. Salvian, on the other hand, welcomed it: the collapse of Rome was for him evidence of the justice of God and the certainty of His government. Because the sovereign, predestinating God governs all things, Salvian held, a corrupt order will of necessity be judged. Salvian wrote with a hard, blunt clarity. More than anyone else, he saw plainly what was happening, saw it like a trained newsman, and also as a man of faith.” ~ R.J. Rushdoony