Is Kevin Swanson of Elizabeth, Colorado, the wealthiest OPC pastor in the world? How many other non-megachurch pastors do you know who live in a $620,000 house with 7,380 square feet on 20 acres? The Jesus business is booming. This is one of the interesting tidbits of information that you’ll find in Tribal Theocrat’s latest podcast, which covers Swanson’s obnoxious mishandling of the Zimmerman-Martin story. The podcast is fantastic, and among many excellent points made therein, Christian Gray observes that semitically correct hirelings like Swanson love to make racist jokes about inbred white Kentuckians but would never dare to utter a blasphemous word against one of the most inbred groups in the world, Ashkenazi Jews. You have to know how to straddle the hobby horse of hate if you want a thriving career.
Go to 1:02:00 in this Voice of Reason interview to hear Christian Gray give an excellent and refreshing defense of the faith.
Swanson notices that more violent crimes are being committed in public schools than among adults in the country at large. He doesn’t mention a word about race, but can a solution even be considered without taking race into account? It’s ironic that the same Christian homeschoolers who appropriately advocate religious segregation also advocate racial integration, which will have a far more devastating effect on their precious children. Swanson admits it himself at 15:18 when he says that peer groups and pop culture are more toxic than the ideas that are shared in public schools.
Interracial “marriages” like Swanson’s have jumped 28% in the last decade, now comprising 10% of all married couples. The rarest combination is an Asian man with a black woman (9,000). The most popular is a white man with an Asian woman.
According to the American Journal of Public Health, white women “married” to black men are 12.4 times more likely to be murdered than white women married to white men. And white men “married” to black women are a staggering 21.4 times more likely to be murdered than white men married to white women.
The number of children born to black and white couples and to Asian and white couples almost doubled in the last decade. Over all, biracial births are now 7% of the total.
Whites now account for less than half of all births in their own country.
The tipping point has officially been reached. (The year 1981 was when feminism reached a similar tipping point.) Just in time for the baby boomers to retire and become dependents, diversities now account for 92% of population growth. Whites are actually expected to look upon this massive replacement as a retirement plan. What could be racist about that? Has there ever been such a devastating curse poured out on a disobedient people?
Clyde Wilson is upset about the demographic news. I wonder why. For years, he has said that there is a Yankee problem but not a Negro problem. Funny how “racism” is a bad thing, until it isn’t.
Here’s the Skittle Bandit at the 7-Eleven, right before he was shot. We now know that he was high at the time, and you can see him fishing around in his pockets and acting strange, just as George Zimmerman told the 911 dispatcher. Would you want this guy followed by security, or would you mind him strolling past your front door? Prosecutors have made repeated mention of the Skittles and iced tea, as though they somehow prove Martin’s intentions. They also keep repeating that Zimmerman did not have a concussion, as though this somehow proves that Martin did not deserve to be shot.
A medical report on George Zimmerman shows that he had a “closed fracture” of his nose, a pair of black eyes, two lacerations to the back of his head, bruising in the upper lip, and a minor back injury the day after shooting Trayvon Martin. An autopsy of Martin confirms that he had injuries to his knuckles when he died (from pounding Zimmerman’s face “mixed martial arts” style, according to one eyewitness who is obviously a racist) as well as THC (marijuana) in his blood and urine. You’ll recall that Zimmerman’s impression that Martin was “up to no good or he’s on drugs or something” was instantly greeted with catcalls by esteemed ministers of the gospel and other human rubbish, and an obvious cover for racism. All of this evidence supports Zimmerman’s claim that he acted in self-defense, and it is devastating for Angela Corey and her dream of becoming governor. But as we all know, it all comes down to race. If the jury is mostly-black, the facts won’t matter. Also buried in this story is a sentence that speaks volumes:
The FBI was not able to determine whether it was Zimmerman or Trayvon who could be heard crying out for help in 911 calls.
So the FBI, at least, is unimpressed by the parade of “audio experts” that were trotted out by news agencies, who said they were beyond certain that it is Martin’s voice screaming for help in the recordings.
In spite of it all, the FBI wants to charge Zimmerman with a hate crime, which carries death as a maximum penalty, unlike his current charge, which carries a maximum of life in prison. Once again, it all comes down to race. “What the government would have to prove is that Mr. Zimmerman acted out of hatred toward African-Americans. That’s why he came into contact with him. That’s why he shot and killed him,” says one legal analyst. So the very thing that whites now believe doesn’t exist means everything in reverse. It’s like when reporters are not allowed to notice the race of people committing crimes but consider race to be of vital importance when disparities in imprisonment are reported. How can it be that race is the key to history and doesn’t exist? Would you think me odd if I were to claim that sex doesn’t exist but urology and gynecology are promising careers for medical students? And of course, Zimmerman’s lawyer has to work within this bizarro world that is so adored by neo-Christian jackals. First he is obligated to prove that race means nothing to Zimmerman, and it never has. Then he must show that one race and the degree to which it has been worshipped mean everything. To this end, a picture of Zimmerman’s mother in the arms of her black grandfather is being circulated. And they never stop talking about Zimmerman mentoring a black child in a dangerous neighborhood, even though the implication is quite offensive. It implies that a man in Zimmerman’s position who has not mentored black children and does not have one of their kind in the woodpile would be incapable of mustering a defense for his actions. It robs the dignity of all races but one, and in the name of equality, no less.
In spite of the total lack of evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Zimmerman is guilty of second degree murder, it’s unlikely that he will receive a fair trial, because (as I keep saying) it all comes down to race. Remember the open-and-shut case of Anne Pressly’s gruesome rape and murder by Nigger Curtis Vance. DNA evidence, Pressly’s direct testimony, and Vance’s own confession proved that Vance was the attacker, but after only three hours of deliberation, the judge agreed to a mistrial because the seven black jurors refused to convict. “Neither the prosecuting attorney nor the judge had any hope that the jury would agree on basic facts, or could be persuaded by reason. After a mere three hours, they just agreed to drop the trial.”
Jew Alan Dershowitz of Harvard Law School believes that Corey has “no choice but to drop the second-degree murder charge against Zimmerman — if she wants to act ethically, lawfully and professionally.”
There is, of course, no assurance that the special prosecutor handling the case, State Attorney Angela Corey, will do the right thing. Because until now, her actions have been anything but ethical, lawful and professional.
She was aware when she submitted an affidavit that it did not contain the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. She deliberately withheld evidence that supported Zimmerman’s claim of self-defense.
Dershowitz believes that Angela Corey’s arrest affidavit is “so thin that it won’t make it past a judge.”
An affidavit that willfully misstates undisputed evidence known to the prosecution is not only unethical but borders on perjury because an affiant swears to tell not only the truth, but the whole truth, and suppressing an important part of the whole truth is a lie.
How incompetent do the Sanford police appear now? Imagine a New York Times article about “police missteps” in the investigation that don’t amount to a hill of Skittles. The presumption of the story is that the police failed to rustle up the evidence and witnesses that must exist, somewhere out there, to prove that Zimmerman committed murder. This is journalism?
Writer Bob Owens explains why Angela Corey’s arrest affidavit is so thin. The affidavit accuses Zimmerman of “profiling” Martin even though “Martin was unarmed and was not committing a crime.” But nothing was said about Martin’s race during the 911 call until the dispatcher asked. NBC News thought they could get away with doctoring the audio to make it sound like a clear case of profiling. They thought wrong. I can’t wait to see the Department of Justice attempt to prove that a man of one race can only suspect a man of another race when the latter is armed and is clearly in the process of committing a crime. They also must now prove the highly speculative charge that Zimmerman “assumed” that Martin “was a criminal.” What Zimmerman actually said was that Martin looked “like he’s up to no good or he’s on drugs or something.” If Zimmerman is not allowed to report suspicious behavior without being accused of a hate crime, what are we to do with the Department of Homeland Security, which promotes a program called “If You See Something, Say Something,” aimed at encouraging civilians to report suspicious behavior?
Angela Corey succeeds in proving nothing but her own incompetence. She even lies in the affidavit: “The police dispatcher then informed Zimmerman that an officer was on the way and to wait for the officer.” This is absolutely false, and the defense will send it through the wood chipper. According to the affidavit, Zimmerman “disregarded the police dispatcher and continued to follow Martin.” In fact, Zimmerman obeyed what the dispatcher told him to do, even though it was merely a suggestion, as the chief of police admits. There is simply no substance to what the prosecution is attempting to prove, nor is there evidence that “Zimmerman confronted Martin” or that Martin “was trying to return to his home.”
The most laughable line of all is that “a struggle ensued.” The whole point of arresting Zimmerman after the fact was to show that the police on the scene were wrong, and Zimmerman did not act in self-defense, and that he is liable for the confrontation. This is the best they can do, to tell us what we already know, that “a struggle ensued”? Where is the proof that Zimmerman was to blame for it?
There are simply no facts in this affidavit to remotely support the charge of second-degree murder according to Florida’s statute, which reads:
The unlawful killing of a human being, when perpetrated by any act imminently dangerous to another and evincing a depraved mind regardless of human life, although without any premeditated design to effect the death of any particular individual, is murder in the second degree…
There is nothing in this affidavit nor among the publicly known facts about the case — nor even among the allegations from the victim’s family or their attorneys — that comes even remotely close to reaching the “depraved mind” standard. At most, the prosecutor would face making a difficult manslaughter case, and even then would risk having the lesser charge thrown out for insufficient evidence.
I am comfortable with saying that Corey’s multiple references to “justice for Trayon” during her press conference combined with this breathtaking affidavit strongly suggest a political motivation.
I live and work in central North Carolina, just miles away from where an overzealous, politically minded prosecutor named Mike Nifong attempted to railroad athletes from the Duke University lacrosse team in a similarly racially charged environment just a half-decade ago.
Nifong was disbarred and found guilty of criminal contempt for his actions. Angela Corey’s affidavit against George Zimmerman looks to be treading dangerously close to that same path.
Indeed, Angela Corey needs to get used to hearing her name mentioned in the same sentence with Mike Nifong until the day she dies. But regardless of how this case is resolved, it remains open season on whites, and we will only fix the problem when we determine as a race to make our own way in the world. You know, like those old “racist” Christians who are disowned by most “Christians” living today.
George Zimmerman’s lynch mob on Twitter. Isn’t it amazing that the KKK is infiltrated by the feds to watch for signs that blacks are being intimidated, but the less-favored can be intimidated openly?
The Black Panthers are free to use a noose in their intimidation of Zimmerman, and it’s not considered a hate crime. But when “nooses” (rodeo ropes, actually) were hanged in a tree on the campus of Jena High School, the FBI considered it to be a hate crime. What would the Black Panthers actually have to do to get in trouble? Even when they intimidate voters at a polling place, Eric “My People” Holder drops the charges.
The true facts (or “troofax” in Niggerese) from the New Black Panther Party, which is supported by a cast of athletes (“affaletes”) and celebrities. A brief lexicon to help you interpret the troofax: Life sentence = “lie senta.” Coward = “cowa.” Destroy = “diskroy.” Remember, if you deny that all languages are equal, you’re a language supremacist. Hide the fear, the pastor’s here. A thousand points of light.
A CNN legal analyst exhibits black supremacism on the air when he says that charges against Zimmerman should be dropped because he “has significant multiracial, multicultural roots.”
Meanwhile, over at Fox News, a black feminist calls Tucker Carlson a “bow-tying white boy.” Unlike lesser offenses committed by whites, no on-air apology followed, nor discipline from the network. In fact, the feminist said on the air that she had not done anything wrong.
Robert Lifson of American Thinker pointed out that if Tucker Carlson had ever called Louis Farrakhan a “bow-tying black boy,” he would be out of a job…
“There is an obvious double standard according to which blacks needn’t worry about showing the kind of ‘racial sensitivity’ that is always required of whites,” says Jared Taylor of American Renaissance…
Zimmerman has plastered his website with this quote from Edmund Burke: “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is that good men do nothing.” As this very good Canadian writer observes, Zimmerman is “particularly ill-equipped to understand what is being done to him and why.”
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is indeed that good men do nothing, but as a corollary to it, those are exactly the sort of men that evil will go after. It does no good to read Burke quotations to a Kardashian society which makes its determinations, not on truth or justice, but on its omnipresent need for entertainment. Trying to reason with it only makes it angrier. Talking about virtues and decency to people who have none either confuses them or infuriates those few who understand the concept in some distant way…
George Zimmerman has been chosen to serve as a gladiator in the circus that distracts a bankrupt nation from the criminal folly of its leaders, large and small. He has been assigned white team colors, had an NRA badge pinned to his lapel, and is being shoved out into the stadium while the lunatic mob howls for blood. The Emperor of Hope and Change has already made the thumbs down gesture, the courtiers are rushing out to fix the match.
Like Kafka’s protagonist, Zimmerman has been protesting all along that this is some sort of mistake. And he’s right. It is a mistake. Had the engineers behind the lynch mob gotten a good look at his photo, they might have pulled back and looked for a better victim. Someone who more properly fit their bi-coastal idea of a “cracker” to string up on the crooked scales of Lady Justice. But once a mob has gotten started, it’s hard to shut it down. And there’s no real need to stop…
Zimmerman thinks it’s a mistake because he’s not guilty. But as Kafka might have told him, guilt or innocence has little to do with it. Zimmerman wasn’t indicted on charges of shooting a man, but of being a racist, of being the living embodiment of American inequality, NRA lawmaking and a dozen other sins. These are not charges that he can ever shake, because they are not legal crimes, they are political crimes…
The beast that is doing its best to swallow up Zimmerman knows no facts or truths, it has no virtues, only goals. It cares nothing for what he did or did not do. Its only goal is to swallow him whole. It has eyes made of cameras, teeth made of guns, network cables for guts, a mind made of slogans and a nervous system that always needs stimulation. The beast may fail in its task, but it will let out a brief howl and move on to the next victim…
We are all Zimmerman. One of us might be next. One of us will be next.
When a single “white” kills a black in self-defense, it’s a WHITE RACIST MURDER SPREE THREATENING BLACKS ACROSS THE COUNTRY. When blacks target and kill whites across the country, it’s random, meaningless, purposeless, and a great opportunity for the well-named Governor Brownback of Kansas to sign an apology for segregation.
Zimmerman is in trouble for “profiling” Martin as a potential burglar, but your Department of Homeland Security is now using technology that will try to biometrically profile subjects for “pre-crime” by monitoring “physiological and behavioral cues, like elevated heart rate, eye movement, body temperature, facial patterns, and body language, and analyze these cues algorithmically for statistical aberrance in an attempt to identify people with nefarious intentions.” The false positives will be far more numerous than a man like George Zimmerman knowing what kind of person is likely to commit a crime. Philip K. Dick saw it all coming.
The silly thing about all the ink spilled over “profiling” is that everyone does it and no one admits it. It’s the perfect avocation for white hypocrites. Steve Sailer suggests this thought experiment: If a woman, alone late at night in a big city, can take two equal paths to reach her destination and wishes to be safe, and she can see that one will require her to walk past six men and the other will require her to walk past six women, which do you think she will choose? The answer is obvious to all sexual profilers, which is to say everyone. Instead of being offended by this, decent men will remember an old virtue called chivalry and politely understand why the decision is made. This is because good men recognize the imperative of protecting what St. Peter calls “the weaker vessel.” There is no such humility on the part of weaker races.
In Norfolk, Virginia, a white couple was brutally beaten by dozens of black “youths,” and the local newspaper didn’t take notice of it for two weeks, and then only in an opinion piece, despite the fact that the victims were reporters for the paper. Then the paper criticized “white supremacists” for reporting the event! You know that if dozens of white people attacked a black couple, you wouldn’t be able to hide from the news. There would be no other news. If you’re white, your life is cheap. Even the responding officer coded it as “simple assault,” despite the fact that at least 30 people participated in the attack. The next day, one of the victims searched Twitter for news of the attack, and he saw this:
“I feel for the white man who got beat up at the light,” wrote one person.
“I don’t,” wrote another, indicating laughter. “(do it for trayvon martin)”
Keep in mind that John Derbyshire was fired from National Review for giving the very advice that would have saved this couple from the swarm: “Stay out of heavily black neighborhoods.”
National Review used to be quite different. Here’s William F. Buckley in 1961, opposing racial integration because the empire usurps local and state governments.
After the theatrics of wearing hoodies on the floor of the House, Democrats backed away from their proposed “Trayvon Amendment” to pressure states to outlaw self-defense. Poor Trayvon has been denied justice once again! Wasn’t it bad enough that he was cut down by Racism in the prime of his life?
Wyclef Jean has a new song titled “Justice for Trayvon,” in which he “sings” that Martin could have been the president or Steve Jobs or an astronaut.
Among baptists, Richard Land rivals John Piper in the running for Chief Gasbag. Read Land’s letter of apology for his comments about Trayvon Martin. With a great show of piety about being committed “to the cause of racial reconciliation my entire ministry” and MLK being “a personal hero of mine since I surrendered to the ministry in 1962,” Land rattles off his anti-racist pedigree before apologizing to Fred Luter, who will be elected as the SBC’s first black president next month, for potentially “set[ting] back the cause of racial reconciliation in Southern Baptist or American life.” What was his great sin against the risen Christ, you ask? Well, brace yourself, because it’s just awful. He said that the “rule of law is being assaulted by racial demagogues” like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, “and it’s disgusting, and it should stop.” Have you ever read anything so racist? It’s like he wants to put a sheet over his head and ride out on a moonlit night with several nooses in his saddlebag. To think that a minister of the gospel could be so insensitive! Following the subsequent come-to-Jesus meeting with a contingent of mau-maus, Land wrote: “I overestimated the progress that has been made in slaying the ugly racist ghosts of the past in our history.” Luter responded: “I accept his apology and will look forward to working with him and others within this convention to tear down the walls of racism in our great country.”
These men always boast that they’re tearing down walls and jumping hurdles and other athletic feats, but let’s just say that measuring them for their tailored suits down at the Men’s Wearhouse is a job for two.
Land even sent letters of apology to Barack Obama, Jesse Jackson, and Al Sharpton.
Southern Baptists (like other denominations) are explicitly promoting ruinous “evangelistic adoption.” This is the idea that living a Christian witness doesn’t win enough souls, and the kingdom must now be grown by taking strangers and making them co-heirs with natural children, essentially keeping blacks in a place where they can be taught to act white, like on the old plantations. In its resolution of June 2009, the SBC equates physical amagamation with spiritual unity, writing that “creating an adoption culture in so many churches and families can point us to a gospel oneness that is determined not by ‘the flesh,’ or race, or economics, or cultural sameness, but by the Spirit, unity, and peace in Christ Jesus.” Right, because we have countless historical examples in which race-mixing has led to peace and harmony.
As recently as 1983, the Association of Black Social Workers and Allied Professionals called interracial adoption “‘internal colonialism’ and a new form of the slave trade.” They were correct.
For our kind of baptist, listen to these wonderful old recordings of Walter Martin (the Bible Answer Man) on the Long John Nebel radio show in New York City. Though not everything Martin taught was agreeable, he was a man among men, as entertaining as he was intelligent, and a great apologist for the cause of Christ. I don’t know of long-form debates that are more captivating than these radio shows. The job he does on Madalyn Murray O’Hair and Hugh Schonfield is priceless. From the moment they left the studio until the day their miserable lives ended, they did not forget the name of Walter Martin, I assure you.
Though by no means in the same rank, another baptist deserving mention was Dr. Bob Jones Sr. There was a “Ku Klux Klan Night” in Galveston, Texas, on December 3, 1923. Dr. Jones spoke to the group, and his speech was printed in the Galveston Daily News the next day. An excerpt:
I am sure no respectable, thinking white man or intelligent, well-informed Negro man could object to your limiting your membership to white Americans… That you limit your membership to Protestants can not be criticized by any fair-minded citizen… I am informed that you believe in white supremacy, and that you do not mean by this that you are the enemy of the Negro. Your leaders explain to me that when you speak of white supremacy you mean two things. First, you mean you are opposed to mixing the white blood with colored blood; colored blood of any race of any people. All decent colored people will agree with you in this position. In the second place, when you speak of white supremacy you mean that you believe that the dominant ideas which have given us our institutions is the Anglo-Saxon idea. This idea you propose to hand down to posterity…
I am glad to tell the world I stand for the principles of the K.K.K. as these principles have been outlined to me by the leaders of the order… When men call you a mob who tar and feather men and call you traitors to this country I resent it. They slander a big per cent of the best preachers and the best Protestant laymen of this country.
In 1958, following the Brown vs. Board decision, the then-sensible baptist Jerry Falwell knew that white children should not suffer by being mixed with black children in schools, and the Christian school movement was born, which also led to homeschooling. Falwell preached:
If Chief Justice Warren and his associates had known God’s word and had desired to do the Lord’s will, I am quite confident that the 1954 decision would never had been made. The facilities should be separate. When God has drawn a line of distinction, we should not attempt to cross that line.
Read about what has become of Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary. This happened because Falwell left Christ and joined himself to Satan.
The wife of North Carolina state senator Peter Brunstetter told poll workers that her husband authored the state’s anti-faggot marriage law to “protect the Caucasian race.” Whites wrote the Constitution, she said, and created this country.
“Government is a political partnership. No persons but the partners who formed the partnership are parties to the government. Here is a government formed by the white man alone. The negro was excluded from the formation of our political partnership; he had nothing to do with it; he had nothing to do in its formation.” ~ Senator Garrett Davis of Kentucky
As you can see in the video, a black man corners her and demands that she account for her use of the word “Caucasian,” which is apparently now a hate term. She doesn’t cooperate with him.
It’s interesting that desire on the part of the Right for the white race to survive in the country that was created by them and for them is construed by the Left as a Hitlerian attempt to keep oppressors in the majority. It’s obvious that the Left will not rest until whites become a minority and remain a minority. This used to be known as genocide. But you know what’s really hateful? The word “Caucasian”!
Corporations now boldly proclaim that a white minority is preferable to a white majority. Take KFC, Pizza Hut, and Taco Bell, for instance, which are proud to have an only 35% white workforce. Here you can plainly see that “diversity” is just a code word for white genocide.
For us, diversity is a way of life and a way of doing business… One of our HWWT2 principles – Believe in all People – underscores the importance of actively seeking diversity in others… We’ve also found that a diverse team makes for better problem solvers, services all our customers more effectively, and creates a richer culture for all of us to enjoy.
In our company-owned operations in the U.S. for example, about 35 percent of our associates are Caucasian and the remaining 65 percent are Hispanic, African American and/or Asian. In 2010, minorities and women made up 63 percent of our external management hires and 56 percent of internal management hires (promotions).
This woman isn’t feeling very “deeply rooted in the community.”
This sounds made up, but it’s sadly all too true. Shaquille O’Neal, who is functionally illiterate, has been awarded a doctorate. He’s a rapper too, of course. He calls himself a “nigger” and asks one of his ex-teammates to “tell me how my ass tastes.” Welcome to American higher education, once the envy of the world.
The best minds in Zimbabwe have come together to resolve the HIV crisis in Africa. Senator Morgan Femai proposes that women be forced to bathe less and shave off their hair to make them less attractive to the men of Africa. He is essentially saying that the Trayvons of Africa walk erect like men but are little more than beasts. While we disagree with him, it does appear to be true that the motto of the Negro is “anything with a hole.” This does not preclude them from becoming American voters, thanks to the victories of the Civil Rights Movement. The senator also demonstrated his knowledge of medical science when he said: “Women have got more moisture in their organs as compared to men, so there is need to research how to deal with that moisture because it is conducive for bacteria breeding. There should be a way to suck out that moisture.” O.J. Simpson has reportedly volunteered his services, but alas, the Juice is indisposed. Last year, another Zimbabwean senator encouraged scientists to invent a drug to stop married men from wanting to have sex with prostitutes, and told parliament that prisoners should be given sex toys in jail to stop them from engaging in fag acts.
Even those of you who are familiar with TNB will be amazed by this judge and his secretary. George and Weezy have moved out of the bush to a dee-luxe apartment in the sky.
In Ideas Have Consequences, Richard Weaver calls jazz, the black contribution to American culture, “the music of drunkenness.”
It is only natural that the chief devotees of jazz should be the primitive, the young, and those persons, fairly numerous, it would seem, who take pleasure in the thought of bringing down our civilization. The fact that the subjects of jazz, in so far as it may be said to have subjects, are grossly sexual or farcical—subjects of love without aesthetic distance and subjects of comedy without law of proportion—shows how the soul of modern man craves orgiastic disorder.
Seldom will you read a better description of the black soul than love without aesthetic distance and comedy without proportion.
Gun sales during the Obama administration are skyrocketing, up 66%. People in the gun industry are calling Obama the salesman of the year.
Much of the sales increase is driven by women, who can no longer afford to be demure ladies with all the “teens” and “youths” and “voters” roaming the streets now in the Age of the Ape.
Much that is beautiful and lovely in the world has been lost, thanks to suicidal Christians.
Ann Coulter turns the airhead all the way up to 11.
When we hear the voice of reason from a black man, we can’t help but post it. It’s a marvel. I wish James Edwards would interview this guy. James did a great job of not falling for this NBC hatchet job.
TOURÉ, the nig-yid, writes the funniest opening to an article that I’ve read in a long time:
After a recent event where I spoke about racial identity, a white woman sidled up to me, leaned in close so no one near us could hear, and said, “I’m racist.” Many people would be repelled. I was entranced. Here was someone who could tell me first hand how the racist mind worked.
A match made in heaven. Of course, he wasn’t talking to Jared Taylor or anyone else who might turn him inside out in a debate and hang him on the wall as a trophy. No, this is a woman who was there to confess her “sins” to him. “[T]here are no biological certainties about the races,” he writes. “Scientifically, there is only the human race.” It’s amazing that Time Magazine is not embarrassed to print this.
Blacks have turned that once-great city into a place where the ruins of an earlier civilization can be studied.
Dresden and Hiroshima look like shining examples of First World civilization today, while Detroit and East St. Louis look like they are still reeling from atomic bombings.
Truly, atomic bombs are safer than negroes, and the Japanese know it.
“In Atlanta, African-Americans are 54 percent of the population, but are responsible for 100 percent of homicide, 95 percent of rape, 94 percent of robbery, 84 percent of aggravated assault, and 93 percent of burglary.”
By contrast, Orania, the all-white homeland in the midst of South Africa, has grown from 11 to 900 people, and from a value of $200,000 to $60 million. Sounds like they’re doing the jobs that Americans refuse to do.
No roaming ’round the park at night
No spooning in the bright moonlight
If the man in the moon were a coon, coon, coon
This is the famous picture of the two black athletes at the 1968 Olympics who raised their fists in a Black Power salute, and the story of the white man who stood by and with them. He didn’t raise his fist, but he did wear a badge from the Olympic Project for Human Rights. His home country of Australia recognized him as a revolutionary and refused to send him to the following Olympic Games, despite the fact that he was ranked fifth in the world. He was even excluded from being a VIP when the Olympics were hosted in Australia in 2000. He sank into depression and literally used his silver medal as a doorstop. It’s poetic that a 23 foot high statue of the saluting blacks now stands at San Jose State University, and the place on the podium once occupied by the white man is empty. It’s where tourists stand to have their pictures taken with the black gods they revere. This is where it all leads, emptiness in what should be the place of honor. May the name of Peter Norman be remembered no more.
Rosa Parks enshrined at the National Cathedral.
And here is Rosa Parks’ successor. Strange that this lovely lady isn’t getting the press that Emma West received. And it makes you wonder why more people in this huge country don’t support public transportation. No one wants to save the environment if it means being too close to blacks. As is true with gun sales, the facts speak for themselves, regardless of what people say approvingly about integration.
There are as many foreign-born people in our country now as there are blacks.
The Swedish Minister of Culture was invited to a cake-cutting at World Art Day. Except that the government-funded cake looked like this:
She performed a mock clitoridectomy on the cake, at which time it screamed in agony. She then fed the slice to the “performance artist,” done up in blackface, whose head protruded through the table. It’s art, folks.
Oh, heartbreaker. The Fiji winner of the Miss World 2012 beauty pageant has been stripped of her crown. No, not because of drugs or alcohol. No, not because of a video making the rounds or for being caught in flagrante delicto with a politician or sugar daddy. She lost her title because she looks too white.
Jamaica is astir because the fastest man in the world was with a beautiful white Slav, until he dumped her.
Guess the race of the woman with “Britain’s most beautiful face.” Hint: She wouldn’t win any diversity awards. Meanwhile, People Magazine has pronounced Beyonce Knowles the most beautiful woman in the world.
Kill it with fire!
Here’s a woman who holds the world record for largest afro. At least she’s not trying to look unnatural, as every other black woman does with her hair.
“The circumstance of superior beauty,” wrote Thomas Jefferson, “is thought worthy attention in the propagation of our horses, dogs, and other domestic animals; why not in that of man?” He wrote that black existence participates “more of sensation than reflection,” which is another way of saying that they think with their sex organs. Then, as now, he could see that blacks are “more generally gifted than the whites with accurate ears for tune and time… Whether they will be equal to the composition of a more extensive run of melody, or of complicated harmony, is yet to be proved… But never yet could I find that a black had uttered a thought above the level of plain narration; never saw even an elementary trait of painting or sculpture.” The centuries roll by, and the gospel is unable to change the capacities of men, as much as the Babelist preachers wish it so.
As a friend of ours said while watching the Westminster Kennel Club on TV, I am amazed at what care people take to ensure that their dog is the purest breed possible but their daughter can marry any negro or mestizo who walks through the door.
John C. Calhoun’s prophecy in the Southern Address of 1849:
[W]hen once raised to an equality, [blacks] would become the fast political associates of the North, …acting and voting with them on all questions, and by this political union between them, holding the white race at the south in complete subjection. The blacks, and the profligate whites that might unite with them, would become the principal recipients of federal offices and patronage, and would, in consequence, be raised above the whites of the South in the political and social scale. We would, in a word, change conditions with them – a degradation greater than has ever yet fallen to the lot of a free and enlightened people, and one from which we could not escape…but by fleeing the homes of ourselves and our ancestors, and by abandoning our country to our former slaves, to become the permanent abode of disorder, anarchy, poverty, misery and wretchedness.
“Every person in your country, in a situation to be actuated by a principle of honour, is disgraced and degraded, and can entertain no sensation of life, except in a mortified and humiliated indignation. But this generation will quickly pass away. The next generation of the nobility will resemble the artificers and clowns, and money-jobbers, usurers, and Jews, who will be always their fellows, sometimes their masters.” ~ Edmund Burke, speaking another prophecy of America
CWNY writes that “Burke’s conservatism was rooted in the belief that men were bound to their past by unbreakable ties of honor and blood that could be traced all the way back to Christ’s birth in a stable in Bethlehem. And it was prejudice, so derided by liberals, that prevented a people from breaking ties to the past:
…we are generally men of untaught feelings; that instead of casting away all our old prejudices, we cherish them to a very considerable degree, and, to take more shame on ourselves, we cherish them because they are prejudices; and the longer they have lasted, and the more generally they have prevailed, the more we cherish them. We are afraid to put men to live and trade each on his own private stock of reason; because we suspect that this stock in each man is small, and that the individuals would do better to avail themselves of the general bank and capital of nations and of ages… Prejudice is of ready application in the emergency; it previously engages the mind in a steady course of wisdom and virtue, and does not leave the man hesitating in the moment of decision, sceptical, puzzled, and unresolved. Prejudice renders a man’s virtue his habit; and not just a series of unconnected acts. Through just prejudice, his duty becomes a part of his nature.
…Today a conservative stands for less taxes, negro worship, and the saturation bombing of all Israel’s enemies. A liberal stands for more taxes, negro worship, and the saturation bombing of all Israel’s enemies.”
As we’ve often said, Jefferson’s phrase that “all men are created equal” was an infamously poor choice of words. He meant that there is an important distinction between inherited and natural aristocracy. But Jefferson also wrote Virginia’s citizenship policy and agreed with Calhoun that not all men are prepared for the responsibilities of liberty. Now, of course, the phrase means that there are to be no legal, political, or social differences at all. Your Human Resources department now categorizes three sexes on personnel forms: male, female, and both. Obama, who is the first president to endorse fag marriage (what Martin Luther called “Florentine brides”), also believes that “transgendered” ought to be a protected class. And isn’t Human Resources itself discriminatory, and therefore hateful?
You can easily see that it has only taken a generation for those who endorsed miscegenation over traditional, Christian marriage to do the same on faggotry. During the Clinton years, the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy for the military was extremely controversial. Now that policy has been reversed and Barack Obama is the first “Gay-Female-Hispanic-Asian-Jewish President,” according to The Atlantic. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton have all but abandoned their masquerade as “ministers” and are encouraging faggotry as a civil rights imperative. “Obama had to move,” says Pat Buchanan, “or look like a malingerer in secularism’s next great moral advance into post-Christian America.”
Even “conservative” “Christian” “pastors” are caving on their once-firm stand against popular redefinitions of marriage, even though they have been fully on board with redefining it in favor of miscegenation. As we “racists” have always said, as soon as Christians no longer agreed with their ancestors on marriage, it was only a matter of time before marriage would be inclusive of all. You can’t argue that race doesn’t exist but sex must somehow remain sacred. Once you start down the path of perversion, it doesn’t end until you arrive in the town square of Sodom.
Michael Horton, who holds to “two kingdoms” theology, teaches that while the laws of the Old Testament are inspiring, they are now “obsolete” because they were given to a particular people at a particular time and have no bearing on how we live our lives. He is appalled by the thought that Christians could use the Bible to promote the stoning of queers, ban of pork, or touching menstruating women. Having denounced the holy Scriptures as crazy talk, he infers that America is not to be a baptized nation and “Christians should not seek to promote distinctively Christian doctrines and practices through the properly coercive power of the state.” This leads him (as expected) to “affirm domestic partnerships as a way of protecting people’s legal and economic security.” Horton claims that same-sex marriage is simply out of the question, until the scales tip even further in that direction, at which time he will emerge from his ivory tower to announce that a deeper truth has been revealed to him.
So-called conservatism, wrote Dr. R.L. Dabney in Women’s Rights Women, “never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is today one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will tomorrow be forced upon its timidity and will be succeeded by some third revolution; to be denounced and then adopted in its turn. American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader… It is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious for the sake of the truth, and has no idea of being guilty of the folly of martyrdom… No doubt, after a few years, when women’s suffrage shall have become an accomplished fact, conservatism will tacitly admit it into its creed, and thenceforward plume itself upon its wise firmness in opposing with similar weapons the extreme of baby suffrage; and when that too shall have been won, it will be heard declaring that the integrity of the American Constitution requires at least the refusal of suffrage to asses. There it will assume, with great dignity, its final position.”
The “conservative Christian” of today is like the “man with a wife and five children who responds to a home invasion by armed thugs by ignoring the thugs as they butcher his wife and children. Instead of fighting against the thugs, our modern conservative intellectual father runs to his study and saves his soon-to-be-published manuscript on the theory of the family.”
You remember Doug & Douger (Doug Wilson and Doug Jones), the preacherly duo who for years have promoted miscegenation and racial equality from the comfort and safety of the state of Whiteaho. Doug Jones once wrote that for a parent “to forbid…a marriage solely on the basis of race is sinful,” and to belong to a racially exclusive club is sinful and worthy of excommunication. This is what we love about Reformatards; they’re always making up new sins. As a friend of ours says, “It don’t take much brains to be an idiot.” We dragged Doug & Douger to the woodshed years ago (see here, here, and here for examples) when they wrote that the curse of sodomy has fallen upon America because Christian men have failed to be good patriarchs. They said the solution is not to stand with either side (with those trying to legalize or outlaw it) but to “embrace” the curse of sodomy, whatever that means. They even said that “gay-baiting,” whatever that means, is as bad as sodomy.
Christian fathers are a primary cause of the curse of homosexuality… We should, therefore, “own” homosexual sin…
That was eight years ago, and we urged Wilson to retract the foolishness, since we’re always looking out for his best interests. Instead, he dug in deeper, trying to change the subject, and lied about what he actually wrote.
But how a call for Christians to stop demanding civil reform as a substitute for reformation in the family and the church can be read this way is a mystery to me. What we have called for is for Christian fathers to repent first, and for the church to get its own house in order first, instead of turning to politics as some kind of savior.
He’s very slick. Again, we wrote six years ago: “All he has to do is admit that his original article was stupid, but he won’t do it.”
Remy Wilkins, the son of Wilson’s friend Steve Wilkins, was writing similar things at the time: “We have no right to oppose homosexual marriages until we return to the church in earnest.” (Remy’s wife graduated from Wilson’s Logos School.)
You can see a connection here to what Wilson wrote about Kinists. He said Kinists “misrepresent the biblical gospel so frightfully” because they “stumble at a fundamental point in biblical polemics. They apply their principles to others first.” In other words, we’re not allowed to point out the sins of other races, however they might adversely affect us, unless we first discuss the sins of our own race (as we do all the time). He was trying to get us to do what he did in “embracing the curse” of faggotry. You know the script that white supremacists like Wilson always follow: If there is a black crime epidemic, it must be the fault of whites, especially white Christian men, because they aren’t praying hard enough. Yet far from conceding that what we have written is true, regardless of whether we have followed his rules of polemics, he denounced us as “Satan’s emissaries“ and warned his readers not to believe anything we say simply because we are “racists.”
Well, guess what. The “racists” were right, as usual. Now Wilson has finally come around to partially retracting his queerness, and the way he does it almost as amusing as Archie Bunker explaining the origin of fags. He oozes another oil slick of charm, saying, Hey, I just got around to rereading what I wrote years ago, and since Doug Jones went nuts and left my anointed ministry, it occurs to me that he was trying to pull a fast one when we were embracing the stink, and I should have read his words better, but I wasn’t on board with it anyway, and how could anyone suspect that I, a minister of the gospel, would believe such a thing, etc. Read it for yourself and see if my paraphrase is off the mark. Of course, he still maintains that faithful Christians are to blame for the New Sodom, and this is not surprising, because it underpins his Alienism. Notice this line from the original article:
At its root, homosexuality is a love of sameness rather than difference. Jehovah teaches us to love difference, and in this fallen world obsessed with finding ways to deface God, homosexuality rejects difference in order to spite God.
You can see that whether he still embraces the curse of faggotry or not, Wilson views the lust that drives it as being identical to what drives ethnonationalism, tribalism, Kinism, or whatever you want to call the way in which God has ordered the world. Truly, God commands us to love others who are not like us, according to the law. We are to seek their peace and salvation. We are not to steal from them, murder them, covet what belongs to them, etc. A brief aside by Scott Trask, from The Christian Doctrine of Nations:
Differences between English and the Greek of the New Testament can cause misunderstanding. Christ’s commandment that Christians should “love their enemies” sounds in English like a radical, all-embracing injunction that would do away with ethnic or national differences. Greek, however, distinguishes between personal enemies and foreign enemies. It has three words for enemy: polemios (a foreign enemy), agonistes (a competitor or rival), and echthros (a private enemy; literally, one whom you hate). When Christ commands Christians to “love their enemies” (Matthew 5:44; Luke 6:27,35), he uses the word for one’s private enemy, that is to say someone with whom a Christian has quarreled. Never is this injunction applied to foreign enemies, the enemies of one’s people.
It’s very telling that men like Wilson who constantly preach love for the strange never preach love for the familiar. The reason is obvious: It would open them to the charge of Kinism, which many churches now consider to be a heresy. “Jehovah teaches us to love difference,” as Wilson says, but only after we secure a future for our own, according to 1 Timothy 5:8. As we’ve often said, sex faggotry and race faggotry stem from the same dysgenic root, but here you have a Man of the Wholecloth who is trying to make the opposite case, that sodomy and homogeneous nations stem from the same root. He didn’t learn this from the Bible or history. He learned it from a steady stream of revolutionaries who hate our Lord Jesus Christ and want nothing more than to exterminate His standard-bearers from the face of the earth.
“Pride of race, like love of home and love of country, has been one of the mightiest forces making for human happiness and progress. Indeed, these three principles are indissolubly linked together in the hearts of men and in the experience of the race, and must stand or fall together. Surely it is not merely a coincidence that the forces which are battling to break down race pride, which they mistakenly identify with race prejudice, are the same forces which are insiduously seeking to undermine and destroy the love of home, and the love of country in all the lands upon which their baleful shadow has been cast.” ~ Dr. G.T. Gillespie, A Christian View of Segregation
“As to the business about being ‘rooted’ or ‘at home everywhere,’ I wonder are they really the opposite, or are they the same thing? I mean, don’t you enjoy the Alps more precisely because you began by first learning to love in an intimate and homely way our own hills and woods [in Ireland]? While the mere globe-trotter starting not from a home feeling but from guide books feels equally at home everywhere only in the sense that he is really at home nowhere? It is just like the difference between vague general philanthropy (which is all balls) and learning first to love your own friends and neighbors which makes you more, not less, able to love the next stranger who comes along. If a man loveth not his brother whom he hath seen–etc. In other words, doesn’t one get to the universal (either in people or in inanimate nature) through the individual – not by going off into a mere generalised mash.” ~ C.S. Lewis, from a letter to a friend, written June 31, 1930; also found on p. 912 of his Collected Letters
“A man needs to belong to a particular race of people; God made him that way, so he could learn to love God through His people. You can’t change a man’s need by denying it exists. We cannot love or belong to an idea of a family or an idea of a community or an idea of a nation. We must belong to an actual family, an actual community, and an actual nation… When [our people] looked on themselves as a people, distinct from other people, they kept the Faith. When they became non-distinct universal people, they lost the Faith. Perhaps, contrary to the modern churchmen, knowledge of the living God comes to us through the blood and not the mind.” ~ CWNY
As Nathanael Strickland says, the English words “home” and “homeland” don’t really do justice to the special need of belonging to a specific place, time, culture, and community. The German word Heimat is much better for describing the trinity of descent, community, and tradition.
As Nathanael says, this word is narrower than “homeland” and much deeper than “home.” In international law, there is growing respect and acceptance for the “right to one’s homeland” (German: Recht auf die Heimat; French: droit au foyer; Spanish: derecho a la patria) as a fundamental human right and a precondition to the exercise of the right to self-determination.
As Rudyard Kipling put it:
God gave all men all earth to love,
But, since our hearts are small
Ordained for each one spot should prove
Beloved over all;
That, as He watched Creation’s birth,
So we, in godlike mood,
May of our love create our earth
And see that it is good…
So to the land our hearts we give
Til the sure magic strike,
And Memory, Use, and Love make live
Us and our fields alike –
That deeper than our speech and thought,
Beyond our reason’s sway,
Clay of the pit whence we were wrought
Yearns to its fellow-clay…
“Race is sacred… One’s ethnicity is sacred… I dare not violate it,” says evangelist Ravi Zacharius, and racism is to be opposed for this reason. Um. What? How does one explain to a logician that he is being illogical?
Gallons of ink have been spilled in the attempt to prove Rushton and Jensen wrong that blood will tell. Now the skeptics admit, well, yeah, the “racists” are on to something. “Genetics were most influential on people’s sense of self-control and also affected their social and learning abilities and their sense of purpose.”
A study by the University of Massachusetts, published in Developmental Science, finds that babies as young as nine months old are better able to recognize faces and emotional expressions of people who belong to their race. The results showed that 5-month-olds performed consistently across all races, while 9-month-olds identified faces and emotions better when it came to their own race. If you’re honest, like a “racist,” you would conclude that racial awareness is healthy and normal and manifests itself as our brains develop. But you would conclude this BECAUSE YOU’RE A RACIST! AHH! AHHHH! For a response that your lying preacher can support, we turn to Lisa Scott, one of the “experts”:
These results suggest that biases in face recognition and perception begin in preverbal infants, well before concepts about race are formed. It is important for us to understand the nature of these biases in order to reduce or eliminate [them].
Here you have one of the psychologists who conducted the study saying that we need to educate the biology out of normal babies because what comes natural to them is incompatible with our enlightened, race-mixing society of the future. Yet the same people will argue that any aberrance of nature is to be trusted as healthy self-expression, including men acting upon effeminate inclinations and you-name-it. Marriage is now a free-for-all because restricting it to a man and woman of like faith and race is considered primitive and bigoted.
In Argentina, a person can legally change his or her sex without any surgery required.
Sweden is also hell-bound to eliminate sex. Some examples:
- A Swedish children’s clothes company has removed the boys and girls sections in its stores
- One Swedish preschool abolished free play because of concerns that when children play freely “stereotypical gender patterns are born and cemented”
- The Swedish Green Party wants to place “gender pedagogues” in every preschool to act as watchdogs
- In some Swedish preschools it is forbidden to use the terms “boys” and “girls”
- In one Swedish children’s book the words for mother and father were replaced as being too gendered
“But life has reached this pitch of licentiousness through the wantonness of wickedness, and lasciviousness is diffused over the cities, having become law. Beside them women stand in the stews, offering their own flesh for hire for lewd pleasure, and boys, taught to deny their sex, act the part of women.” ~ Clement of Alexandria
Sweden has also outlawed homeschooling, primarily because feminists want to outlaw the housewife, and many families are now leaving for Finland. “The Swedish government believes that [the] state takes better care of children than parents,” said Jonas Himmelstrand, president of ROHUS, the Swedish Homeschool Association.
“They who commit adultery against nature think themselves free from adultery.” ~ Clement of Alexandria
“The whole generation is womanised; the masculine tone is passing out of the world; it’s a feminine, a nervous, hysterical, chattering, canting age, an age of hollow phrases and false delicacy and exaggerated solicitudes and coddled sensibilities, which, if we don’t soon look out, will usher in the reign of mediocrity, of the feeblest and flattest and the most pretentious that has ever been. The masculine character, the ability to dare and endure, to know and yet not fear reality, to look the world in the face and take it for what it is — a very queer and partly very base mixture — that is what I want to preserve or rather, as I may say, to recover; and I must tell you that I don’t in the least care what becomes of you ladies while I make the attempt.” ~ Basil Ransom, The Bostonians
“Every home was a brick in the great wall of decent living that men erected over and over again as a bulwark against the perpetual flooding in of evil. But women made the bricks, and the durableness of each civilization depended upon their quality, and it was no good weakening oneself for the brick-making by thinking too much about the flood.” ~ Elizabeth Goudge, Pilgrim’s Inn
Feminists and sexual perverts have many things in common, including this: Just as race-mixers want the white race to be anything but white, feminists want girls to be anything but women. This is why Michelle Obama advises young girls to “resist gender stereotypes” and “dream big… You have to be able to see yourself as that scientist, as the next President of the United States. You can be first lady if you want to, but there’s also the presidency.” This is scarcely different than playing God with biology, and you know where that leads.
The banana provides an interesting case study in the inferiority of hybrids. Though it has been cultivated by men longer than possibly any other fruit, the banana as we know it today is sexually impotent and therefore highly susceptible to diseases. In the last century, diseases and the quality of the fruit have grown progressively worse. Our grandparents ate the Gros Michel cultivar. For about the last 50 years, we have eaten the less-tasty Vietnamese Cavendish, every one of which is genetically identical, because the Gros Michel banana went extinct from Panama disease. A disease called Black Sigatoka began to attack the Cavendish in the 1970s, and it was beaten back temporarily with pesticide. Back then, the plants were sprayed 10 to 12 times per year. Now a new strain of the disease is resistant to pesticide, and the plants are being sprayed almost weekly. Black Sigatoka has already wiped out the Cavendish crops in Southeast Asia, and it’s only a matter of time before it does the same in Latin America. The fruit’s lack of genetic diversity is why it’s only a matter of time. It took only five years for Panama disease to completely annihilate the Gros Michel clones. The Cavendish may have only five years left. It is now believed that bananas will only be available in the future if they are genetically modified, meaning that disease-resistant genes will be introduced directly into the plant’s genome. In the meantime, the industry is betting on the new “Goldfinger” hybrid, but it tastes like an apple.
The navel orange is a hybrid that suffers a similar fate. All navel oranges in the world descend from one tree in Brazil in the mid-1800s that bore the strange mutation. Lack of genetic variation from cloning is what caused the Irish potato famine of the 1840s. All the potatoes in Ireland descended from a very small number that were imported from South America in the 16th century. When blight struck, one-fourth of the Irish population died of starvation in a span of seven years. Almost all corn varieties are now hybrids, and one fungus in the 1970s devastated American crops. If you watch a documentary called King Corn, you’ll see what has become of the plant; it’s literally inedible. Genetically-modified corn from Monsanto will be sold at Walmart beginning this summer. This corn is alleged to harm the kidneys in two ways: from the grain itself and also from the pesticide-resistant rootworms that are proliferating. Some countries, like Hungary, France, and Peru, have banned GMO crops and foods. Weeds are even developing resistance to Monsanto’s Round-Up, which has been a surprise to Almighty Monsanto.
In short, we can allow organisms to develop naturally like Kinists or we can try (and fail) to play God with science.
As you know, immigration is like a banana. When it turns brown, it’s too late.
Advice on marriage from King James to his son, Prince Henry:
And lastly, remember to choose your wife as I advised you to choose your servants: that she be of a whole and clean race, not subject to the heredity sickness, either of the soul or the body: For if a man will be careful to breed horses and dogs of good kinds, how much more careful should he be for the breed of his own loins? So shall you in your marriage have respect to your conscience, honor, and natural weal in your successors.
Of course, your local representative of the Cadre of Religious Alienist Professionals (CRAP), who believes that he understands Christianity oh, so much better than the racists of the past, will tell you that you are in sin if you exhort your own children to do the same. All you are allowed to require of your children in marriage, according to the neo-Babelists, is that they marry Christians. King James continues:
For how can they love you that hated them whom of ye are come? Wherefore destroy men innocent young sucking Wolves and Foxes but for the hatred they beare to their race: and why will a Colt of a Courser of Naples give a greater price in a market than an ass-colt, but for love of the race? It is therefore a thing monstrous to see a man love the Child and hate the Parents: as on the other part, the infaming and making odious of the Parent is the readiest way to bring the son in contempt.
“Unity, in any event, is strength only when it is based on enduring family ties, on the unity of like peoples. That is why Aesop’s object-lesson on unity was given to brothers and not unrelated men. It is nothing short of lunacy, or Liberal unrealism, to attempt to weld civilized white men and uncivilized black men into an enduring ‘family unity.’ The two cannot mix: and all attempts to make them mix will work gravely to the detriment of the Whites, upon whom civilization exclusively depends. To my mind it is self-evident that the Anglo-Saxon and kindred peoples are absolutely irreplaceable, and that without them the civilization they engendered and represent would, with the possible exception of one or two curious deviations or malformations, soon cease to exist. Let there be no mistake about this. When we speak of civilisation we are referring to that which is wholly our own. There is no other civilization whatever. At best there are one or two minor foreign cultures. At best there are one or two successful foreign copyists of our civilisation’s more material aspects. But there are absolutely no imitators of its moral and spiritual uniqueness, because there are no other people like the Westerners whose possession it is.” ~ Anthony Jacob, White Man, Think Again!
Coriolanus, “the third most politically incorrect play of the Shakespeare canon, just behind the gleefully sexist Taming of the Shrew and the vigorously anti-Semitic Merchant of Venice,” has been turned into a movie. Don’t miss the first two paragraphs in Andy Nowicki’s review at Counter Currents.
Though much or all of what is written at Counter Currents is from an atheistic and evolutionary viewpoint, you’ll definitely want to read this article from Gregory Hood on Ray Comfort, John Piper, Mark Driscoll, John Hagee, and how “contemporary Christianity fits…seamlessly into modernity.”
However, to simply dismiss Christianity as a whole would be to ignore both [how] the history of the “Germanized” faith inspired many of Europe’s greatest triumphs as well as the heroic work and important philosophic contributions of folkish Christians such as those at Spirit, Water, Blood, the Kinist Review, and other kinists that emphasize Occidental Christianity. The development of Ray Comfort-style Judeo-Christianity — egalitarian, embarrassingly philo-Semitic, deracinated, and aggressively anti-intellectual — is something relatively new and not an organic process. Instead, it is the permissible channel by which resistance to the cesspool of modern American culture is funneled.
Read that last sentence again and ponder it well! It should be noted, however, that we strenuously object to James Russell’s thesis in The Germanization of Early Medieval Christianity that early Christianity was Germanized but the early Germans were hardly Christianized. Or as Hood describes it, that the faith of the West was transformed “from a universal salvation religion to a Germanic, and eventually European, folk religion,” from a “world-denying, egalitarian, and Jewish mystery cult spawned from the deserts of the East” to “a world-accepting, hierarchical, Germanic faith.” Christianity didn’t have to change to win the allegiance of Germans and Anglo-Saxons; just the opposite. In fact, ancient Israel served as the supreme model for tribalism. And now, as the apostle Paul writes in Romans 1:16, the gospel is salvation for all who believe, first for the Judean, then for the nations.
“My namesake Wittgenstein said, ‘If God really chooses those who are to be saved, there is no reason why He should not choose them according to nations, races, or temperaments. God’s choice would thus follow a law of nature.’ In other words, if grace is of God’s free choice, then it cannot be an a priori that he ‘must’ ‘distribute’ that grace according to our conception of equity, proportion, balance, fairness, or any other measuring stick that we bring to the table under our own auspices.” ~ our friend Vittgen
“It is clear…that a creature cannot bring along or possess any rights before God… All reward from the side of God originates in grace; no merit, either of condignity or of congruity, is possible.” ~ Dr. Herman Bavinck, Reformed Dogmatics, Vol. II, p. 570
But there is certainly no objection to this profound statement by Gregory Hood :
While the [neo-Christian's] occasional opposition to abortion or homosexuality may challenge the Zeitgeist, it is always framed on the grounds of ever greater egalitarianism. Thus modern churches are justified even in the eyes of their apologists not so much because their adherents believe it is true, but because they lead to liberalism and can make our great modern democracy run a bit more smoothly. Certainly, the American religious right believes its own creed about the need to embrace Jesus as Savior, but the doctrine has been organized in such a way that the institutions have no real worldly importance beyond getting out the vote for a Rick Santorum so he can call George Zimmerman “a sick man.”
When an isolated and powerless congregation really does challenge liberal beliefs, such as by banning interracial marriage, all the power of the system (and all of the other churches) join together to crush them and force adherence to the only dogma our society really cares about. Properly channeled, supervised, and controlled, American Judeo-Christianity is the tonic that lets the dispossessed white cultural conservatives accept what is being done to them, and gives them a foreign culture to study and defend rather than their own.
You really need to read that again!
In this time-lapse video of 1,000 years of European political boundaries, notice the many small states that comprised what is now Germany.
John O’Sullivan proves himself to be Peter Brimelow’s moral inferior. It’s sad to see a man grovel, and a “Commander of the British Empire,” no less.
Now they’re coming for the neocons, which has outraged the neocons. Naomi Riley wrote an article for the Chronicle of Higher Education stating that “black studies” programs “begin and end with blame the white man.” She was fired for it, not because she is wrong but simply because the liberal readers didn’t like it. The editor apologized to the sensitive subscribers for the “distress” that they experienced from being told that racially-privileged curriculum is “left-wing victimization claptrap.” These Tolerant and Compassionate do-gooders and feel-gooders couldn’t sleep until they saw to it that this woman was fired. They love all kinds of diversity except diversity of ideas.
White teens drink, smoke, and commit suicide at higher rates than blacks. (It’s strange that so-called “white supremacists” like us would notice this, don’t you think?) As Jared Taylor says, if the races were reversed, these pathologies would be blamed on the legacy of slavery or some other nonsense; anything would be blamed except the people who are deserving of blame.
If the facts were reversed, the data would be cited constantly as yet more evidence of the “racism” that permeates American society and that drives blacks to drink, smoke, and even take their own lives. If the facts were reversed, every time the suicide data, for example, came out we would be treated to ostentatious hand-wringing and soul-searching of the kind that accompanies the annual announcement of race differences in suspension rates.
But whites have nowhere else to place the blame but on their own shoulders. And since the promoters of the theory that “white-racism-explains-everything” recognize the obvious double standard, they bury these statistics. To do otherwise would expose their entire worldview to unwelcome scrutiny.
Speaking of buried news, according to the U.S. State Department and British Secret Service, Obama’s father was blacklisted in 1959 as an “anti-American, anti-white” terrorist.
Now everyone is a terrorist. Concerns about privacy while using Google and other social networks are just a cover for anti-American, pro-terrorist activities. And if you also own guns, forget about it. You should just wrap your head in a towel and call yourself Omar.
John Brown’s biographer calls Otto Scott Brown’s “most vitriolic enemy of the late 20th century.” One can hardly imagine a greater badge of honor or a more laughable critique of R.J. Rushdoony than calling him “a marginal Calvinist intellectual.” This is like calling William Tell a marginal archer. He writes that “Scott was so embraced by Reconstructionists” because “he shared their core white supremacist values,” and both Scott and Rushdoony were “extremely supportive of white Southern nationalism.” You say that like it’s something bad.
A friend of ours points us to this far superior review of Scott’s The Secret Six.
The tragedy of most great movements in Church history is that they inevitably decline. The tragedy of New England Puritanism is that it did not. Instead, it mutated. Of abnormalities within the healthy Calvinist body there were plenty. Suddenly and strangely, however, they mutated into an aggressive cancer that proliferated in a paroxysm of counterfeit life. By the beginning of the nineteenth century, just a few generations after Jonathan Edwards, morality had become detached from Christ and from life in the Church; as Chesterton put it, all the ordinary virtues went mad.
The virtues, abstracted, became individually absolute, varying according to the pet cause of the reformer. Thus faddish diets, communalism, Transcendentalism, political reform, education, work with the disabled, and increasingly, the abolition of slavery, displaced Christ as the new saviors of New England.
The abolitionist cause, deified, could not admit of the gradual reform befitting a temporal cause. And this new Deity was no benevolent one. Its prophets ran the course from calls for disunion, to outright treason, to the demand for bloody sacrifice.
Just in time, along came John Brown, ripe for the plucking by these prophets. He was the archetypal fanatic: restless, charged with unhealthy brilliance, full of his own brand of religion, chronically in debt, inclined to paranoia: the personification of New England’s malignant tumor. His first wife went insane, and dementia temporarily struck his oldest son. Brown himself was not notably stable. In these circumstances he resembled more than one of his “Secret Six” sponsors and other prominent intellectuals: mental disorders of one kind or another hovered on the fringes of radicalism all over the North.
Otto Scott traces, with great skill, the labyrinthine movements of radicalism, from the effete Boston circles of Emerson and Thoreau, to the terrorism and treason of Bleeding Kansas, to the overwrought emotions in Washington, D.C., culminating finally, and embarassingly, in Brown’s miserable failure at Harper’s Ferry. It appears the slaves did not see things in quite the same way as their would-be benefactors and failed to join the insurrection. In fact, they completely ignored this new Christ erected on their behalf.
In the North it was different. Preachers all over the region compared Brown, on openly equal terms, to the old Christ they had discarded. John Brown’s Body was at least as efficacious as Christ’s body, and in even more mystical ways – ironically enough for the rationalists and skeptics of Boston. Bits of wood from his gallows were at least as current there as fragments of the True Cross in Rome, and at least as fraudulent.
Shocked by this attempt to incite a bloody revolt in their midst, by the open approval by the Northern establishment, and fearing the worst from the election of a Republican president, the South began preparing for secession.
This is also when they prohibited slaves from learning to read. To get around it, homicidal maniacs like Brown distributed comic books to them with instructions on how to murder their masters with farm implements. This background is entirely omitted when the fact is repeated today, and even the SCV boasts that Stonewall Jackson taught the little black children in his Sunday school class how to read the Bible, because he was not like those other evil, racist Southerners who kept their slaves ignorant. It’s a good idea to wear knee-high boots to a “history” class these days, and don’t forget the shovel.
Julia Ward Howe’s satanic “hymn” is sung in many churches, even in the South. It imagines the Yankee army to be an incarnation of God and the gospel to be the Yankee war machine. The Confederates are mere chaff to be burned.
Here’s an interesting quote from G.K. Chesterton on the two accomplishments of English Puritanism:
Before the Puritans were swept off the scene for ever, they had done two extraordinary things. They had broken to pieces in plain battle on an English meadow the chivalry of a great nation, bred from its youth to arms. And they had brought forth from the agony a small book, called The Pilgrim’s Progress, which was greater literature than the whole contemporary culture of the great Renaissance, founded on three generations of the worship of learning and art.
And then there’s the other side of the Puritans, as Wheeler reminds us:
If a Puritan wrote a lawnmower manual, it would have included three chapters covering such topics as “Reasons to own a lawnmower;” “Preparation for considering the possible purchase of a lawnmower;” and “Dangers of presumption in lawnmower maintenance” before even telling you what a lawnmower looks like. A lot of them were just weirdos.
Jefferson Davis, our late president, saw Benjamin Franklin as the quintessential son of the Puritans, a Yankee whose “soul was a true type or incarnation of the New England character – hard, calculating, angular, unable to conceive any higher object than the accumulation of money. He was the most material of great intellects. None of the lighter graces or higher aspirations found favor in his sight; and with true New England egotism, because he did not possess certain qualities himself, they were to be ignored or crushed out of existence everywhere. The hard, grasping, money-grubbing, pitiless and domineering spirit of the New England Puritans found in Franklin a true exponent… His school of common sense was the apotheosis of selfish prudence. He could rarely err, for men err from excess of feeling, and Franklin had none.” I don’t think I’ve ever come across a better paragraph about the Yankee soul.
“All the inexperienced emotions of the heart are against us; all the abstractions concerning human rights; all the theories of political dreamers, atheistic utilitarians, self-exalting and self-righteous religionists, who would reform or expunge the Bible, – in short, enthusiasts and fanatics of all sorts, are against us.” ~ Robert Barnwell Rhett
In an October 1918 interview by John Reed, Leon Trotsky said:
At the end of this war I see Europe recreated, not by diplomats, but by the proletariat. The Federated Republic of Europe—the United States of Europe—that is what must be. National autonomy no longer suffices. Economic evolution demands the abolition of national frontiers. If Europe is to remain in national groups, then Imperialism will recommence its work. Only a Federated Republic can give peace to Europe—and to the world.
What difference is there between today’s new “Christianity” and Communism?
The average pastor now agrees that nations must be abolished. At best, he considers nations to be relics of paganism that have lost their original meaning, like the days of the week being named after Thor and Wotan.
Our friend Dan asks: “Why are the urban the least urbane?” Another friend replies: “To this the Germans have answers that are most germane.”
White Settlement, Texas, is 86% white, and the people of the town rejected changing their name to “West Settlement” by about the same percentage.
Harvard law professor and Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren (a.k.a. Fauxcahontas and Taxajawea) enrolled herself as an Indian in law school directories for nine years because she hoped to gain the upper hand as a minority.
She claims that it was merely to meet other people with tribal roots, and any benefits derived were purely coincidental.
For years, under pressure to hire minorities, Harvard promoted Warren and her favored racial status in federally mandated diversity statistics. The Fordham Law Review called her Harvard Law’s “first woman of color.”
“These are my family stories,” she said. “I have lived in a family that has talked about Native Americans and talked about tribes since I was a little girl.” Many whites have these family stories, and they’re usually unsubstantiated. Such is the case with Warren. She claims that an aunt told her that her grandfather had high cheekbones, so it must be true. David Yeagley correctly identifies this white lust for the exotic as identity theft.
It doesn’t matter whether she has family stories, or some 19th century marriage paper in which one of her ancestors identified herself as “Cherokee.” What matter is whether Elizabeth Herring Warren has an ancestor on the Dawes Rolls. She does not. Therefore, she is not legally Cherokee Indian, and has no right to avail herself of any such privileges or advantages arising therefrom or pertaining thereunto. It is as simple as that.
But of course, one couldn’t expect a Harvard law professor to be aware of such legal matters. Nor can it be expected of one professor from the University of Chicago Law School, namely Barack Obama. While this is not necessarily proof that Obama was born on foreign soil, it at least vindicates the birthers as proof that Obama could never be trusted in the matter. He liked to play the same diversity quota game as Warren when it suited him.
Now comes word that one of Warren’s ancestors pushed Cherokees on the “Trail of Tears.”
Rushdoony served for almost a decade as a missionary to the Shoshone and Paiute Indians. He taught that Indians were cannibals and savages when white men first encountered them. Nothing could be sillier than to view them as being at one with nature, he said. There were hardly any deer until white men cleared the forests, because until then there was hardly any grain. When our people arrived, they could walk all the way to Illinois under the cover of trees.
Striking images of white folks (the real Native Americans) who are living off the grid.
The Awá, a tribe of just 355 Indians in Brazil, is one of the most endangered tribes in the world. Celebrities are joining in the cause to save them from extinction. Will anyone finally begin to care about the white race when we dwindle to such a low number, or will our worthless preachers still teach Galatians 3:28 from their unitarian Bibles?
Indians are like Jews and blacks in the sense that their race is popularly believed to matter perpetually, and no perceived injustice against them has a statute of limitations. It doesn’t even matter that Indians broke numerous treaties and committed countless atrocities. All that matters is what whites are perceived to have done to the Indians, and no amount of time erases the debt. This is why a U.N. official is now proposing that Mt. Rushmore be given to Indians. For whites, race is merely a social construct, but for non-whites, it’s a bank account.