Bob Jones University has posted a statement that attempts to justify their treason and infidelity. Like all lies, it starts out strong. And then we arrive at this sentence:

For those made new in Christ, all sinful social, cultural and racial barriers are erased (Colossians 3:11), allowing the beauty of redeemed human unity in diversity to be demonstrated through the Church.

Remove the word “sinful” and see if the sentence has the same ring to it. Then ask yourself what in the hell is so sinful about “social, cultural and racial barriers.” Is the fence surrounding your property also sinful? How about the lock on your front door? How about border guards? Separate bathrooms for men and women? Your last will and testament? Now read Colossians 3:11, compare it to Galatians 3:28, and notice that these verses say nothing whatsoever about racial or sexual distinctions being erased. In fact, the reason why the Colossians verse rather than the Galatians verse appears in the college’s statement is because a fundamentalist college still wants girls to wear dresses and keep to their God-ordained roles. In other words, they want racial equality but not sexual equality.

Some true statements follow to make the lie above more palatable. Confectioner’s sugar makes the stuff on the proverbial shingle more presentable. And throughout, a concept of “love” is suggested that was foreign to the church for thousands of years. One does not “love” by resolving to avoid anything that someone might consider “racially hurtful.” This is because what is considered “racially helpful” to those without discernible heritage involves your daughter’s virginity and a substantial cut of your paycheck, not to mention the balance of the culture which was an inheritance from your fathers. Welcoming destruction has nothing to do with a “Christlike spirit” or spiritual “harmony.” Far from it.

Dear Christian, please explain how abortionists, sodomites, and liberals are wrong about every moral issue except miscegenation.

And their ancestors, who were anti-abortion, anti-sodomy, and Christian, were wrong about segregation. Is that possible? No, it isn’t. You must choose, Mr. Backsliding Fundamentalist. Either the faith of your ancestors is wrong and Satanism is right, or your ancestors were right: sodomy, abortion, and race-mixing are wrong and Christianity is true.

At least the liberals are consistent. They condemn all the white man’s heritage and make it clear the world will be a better place when there are no white people left on the face of the earth. The Fundamentalists at Bob Jones University want to hold to part of the white man’s heritage, whatever part of that heritage that makes them feel good about themselves, and jettison whatever part of the heritage that makes the liberals angry. “Please, Mr. Liberal, tell me I’m being good.” And what do the liberals tell such fawning sycophants? They tell them, “That’s a beginning, but keep on jettisoning.” And eventually the Born-Again Integrationist can be seen wandering aimlessly through the desert, sighing wistfully and asking, “Whatever became of me?”…

This idea that the white man and his heritage can be eliminated and the Gospel of Christ maintained is an international phenomenon, not limited to the Catholic and Protestant churches of America. Wherever there are white clergymen, the new gospel that abominates the white and worships the black is proclaimed. And it is nothing more than a cowardly capitulation to the powers of this world…

The white man who still cherishes his heritage has spent the last fifty years trying to win the liberal whites back and convert the blacks. That strategy hasn’t worked… The black-and-white Church is not our church, because it is not a Christian church, and their nation is not our nation, because it is a multi-racial nation that belongs to Satan. Let Satan support his church, and his minions support his nation. It’s time for the white liberal and the black man to worry about the white counter-revolutionary, and not for the white man to sit cowering in his house wondering when the multi-cultural police will come for him…

If we give up on the white race, we will never again see the face of Jesus Christ. He will become a phantom that haunts our nightly dreams but fades away in the light of day.

This is essentially what Flannery O’Connor said of the postbellum South being Christ-haunted. But they had a better excuse than we have today. Their heroes and best men had been murdered and their whole world was torn away from them. We live in a world of plenty, and the heroes have returned. They are featured in scathing press articles and news segments and called names by deicides. We have no excuse if we fail to listen to them. If we fail to heed their warnings then we ourselves, not an invading enemy, will be guilty of robbing the future from our own children.

J. Gresham Machen and his parents were good old Confederates (i.e., “racists”).

J. Gresham Machen shared his family’s southern aristocratic sympathies throughout his life. Regarding the Confederacy, he wrote to a correspondent in 1925 that he was convinced the southern states “were acting in the plainest possible exercise of constitutional rights, and that the real revolution was entered into by those who endeavored to prevent such plainly guaranteed rights.” He also shared southern attitudes toward race, combining affirmations that blacks could represent “the best part of human nature” with the most adamant insistence that blacks and whites should remain socially separated. In fact, the matter mentioned earlier that he was so furious at Warfield about in 1913 was the seminary’s permission to allow a black student to reside in the dormitories in which Machen had a room. (Warfield, interestingly, was a progressive on the race question, coming from the side of the Kentucky Breckinridges who supported the Union.)

Christianity and Liberalism, indeed. As a friend of mine says, rape, drowning in lye, grisly torture, dismemberment, brutal murder, and disposal in trash bags is too great a cost after allowing Negroes to drink from our water fountains. And if you don’t understand that simple fact, you’re not a human being, much less a Christian.

It gets to the heart of what Father James Thornton has said, and how we wish that more Christians were like him. His is not a Christianity “for the fainthearted and the perfidious.” He writes:

Our society is no longer healthy, but is sick or perhaps dying. While still robust, still believing in itself, its genius created a grand civilization. This creativity, however, has now been lost. It can no longer discriminate between the useful and dangerous, and, consequently, everything pours in and takes root in our unhealthy culture, often to the exclusion of the healthy, formerly unified elements.

Our former nation is like a garden overrun by weeds, and our leaders, both in church and state, are like gardeners who have lost the ability to discriminate between healthy seed and that which chokes healthy seed.

As the flood of undigested, foreign elements becomes greater and greater, the host culture becomes more distorted, more sickly, and less able to protect itself… Between that which is venerable and native, and that which is new and foreign, there are absolutely no distinctions. So it is with a society that has lost faith in the source of its greatness; so it is when a living ideal no longer exists to inspire it.

Interestingly, Richard Weaver writes similarly in his book, Visions of Order. He observes that the spirit of a culture “always operates positively by transfiguring and excluding. It is of the essence of culture to feel its own imperative and to believe in the uniqueness of its worth… Syncretistic cultures like syncretistic religions have always proved relatively powerless to create and influence… Culture derives its very desire to continue from its unitariness”…

That human beings are intellectually equal, or that such differences as do exist in individuals or groups are rooted, for example, in economic deprivation, would have been preposterous notions to most traditional Christian thinkers and teachers of past ages. That all cultures or peoples of the world are equally suitable as bearers of high Christian civilization would have been a laughable proposition to these men…

The Fathers of the Church taught that just as the spiritual world is organized hierarchically, so too should be the earthly world; any other kind of societal structure was regarded as something demonic, in that it promotes spiritual and societal disorder… Christianity is clearly not a religion of earthly egalitarianism…

Certain it is that insofar as this country was traditional in its religious beliefs, it strongly believed in the superiority of its European-derived way of life. There could be no question of overthrowing that order…

Gobineau, in his Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races makes clear that he believes that different races of men have been blessed by God with different attributes and that certain races of men are exclusively responsible for the creation and maintenance of high culture and civilization. The important matter for me is that this author was a devout Christian, and accepted as a matter of course that, a) men, and ethnic groups of men, are not equal in their inherent abilities, and, b) that all men, from the most noble to the most primitive, have within themselves a divine spark, the Imago Dei, that entitles each to the special dignity reserved for children of God…

Apart from traditional Christianity, there is no alternative path, in my judgment, which will lead us to the successful revitalization of our civilization. For 2,000 years the soul of European man has been Christian. Remove that soul, and we now know that European civilization becomes sterile and soon dies. European civilization is Christian. If we recognize that, we begin the mighty endeavor that will lead us to renewal and renaissance.

“This is my case: there ought to be inequality of condition in the world. For without inequality, there is no class; without class, no manners and no beauty; and then a people would sink into a public and private ugliness.” ~ Russell Kirk

Consider the vast differences between what Christians like Machen and Thornton and Kirk believe compared to the atheistic evolutionism of William Pierce. In the absence of true religion, Pierce had to create his own, and he called it “cosmotheism.” Mattias Gardell describes it as the idea that “man is part of nature and subject to nature’s laws, principal of which is the law of inequality and survival of the fittest. Evolving through a succession of states, the purpose of man is to ascend into godhood… Crowned by the superior white man, the different races are distributed on the ladder of evolution. History is a continuation of the broad evolutionary process and may be genuinely appreciated only from a racial standpoint.”

Conservatism “does not breed fanatics,” said Kirk. “It does not try to excite the enthusiasm of a secular religion. If you want men who will sacrifice their past and present and future to a set of abstract ideas, you must go to Communism, or Fascism, or Benthamism, but if you want men who seek, reasonably and prudently, to reconcile the best in the wisdom of our ancestors with the change which is essential to a vigorous civil social existence, then you will do well to turn to conservatism.” He refers, of course, to true conservatism, not its laughable counterfeit today.

Here is a short clip of Father Thornton from the same speech:

And while we’re complimenting the Orthodox, a friend told me that Russian canon law still forbids going to Jewish doctors for medical exams.

If you can line up in a straight row you can govern yourself.

“The most truly disadvantaged are those who are hated for their virtues, not their vices, who insist on playing the game of life with opponents who have long ago abandoned the rules, who stubbornly go on believing that a set of highly sophisticated institutions developed by and for a particular people at a particular point in time and space is operational for all peoples under all circumstances.” ~ Wilmot Robertson

Romans want to give Allah’s cab drivers their own diversity rooms.

“Palo Alto is 2 percent black. But after a rash of 17 robberies in one part of town, in which the suspects were described as black males in 11 of them, Chief Johnson told her officers to focus on black males.” And she lost her job because of it. Do you ever feel as though you’re trapped in a world between worlds, where everything is upside down and inside out?

Urban unrest and troubled youths. They could become nuclear physicists if only the poe-lease would do something about the knives.

Profoundly important questions from Dr. David Duke:

Could the deliberate misrepresentations of Whites by the media have something to do with why a gang of five Blacks tortured to death two White college students? Could the constant demonization of Whites, but suppression of their victimization, affect public perceptions and beliefs so strongly that nearly all of the tens of thousands of interracial rape and sexual assault victims in America are White women and their angry perpetrators are Black?

Could these constant malicious endeavors by journalists and the predators who control them have anything to do with why Whites are called “racists” if they speak up for themselves, as well as the extraordinary efforts taken to block First Amendment venues where such words might be shared?

Alex Linder deserves enduring praise for forcing the media to take notice of one of the most vicious crimes in our history, exposing the subsequent cover-ups in the Knoxville police department, and forcing justice in the case, when few others even cared. The career of James Edwards also took off as a prominent spokesman for our side, in large part because of what Alex did. If you had to choose only one of Alex’s radio shows, you would have to listen to this. It is so fascinating that, if you’re like me, you will want to listen to it again and again. It is about a time when White men still had testicles, and as vigilantes brought a murderer to justice. The murderer was a Jew, and his fellow anti-Christs were so outraged that one of God’s Chosenites had been treated in this way, the ADL was formed, and the NAACP after it. According to Alex, the NAACP is actually the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Who Would Be Offended If You Called Them That.

It is more important for diversitarians that the truth be hidden and the public remain in danger than to allow an off-White somewhere to be offended.

Where is the outrage? Where is the outcry?

As further proof that Steve Sailer deserves a Pulitzer, no one else in any other form of media has picked up on the story that Jorge Bush wanted to boost minority homeownership by 5.5 million by eliminating the need for down payments, or that the vaunted faith-based initiatives had a lot to do with this. If you could combine Sailer’s reporting with Drudge’s delivery, you would have a two-man wrecking crew that would lay waste to the mainstream media.

“I’m a strong candidate because I come from the baby-boomer generation, recognizing that we’ve got to usher in an era of responsible behavior.” ~ George W. Bush, April 27, 2000

Sid the Jew explains free speech and democracy to Derek Black.

“Kaganovich died peacefully in 1991, never paying for his many crimes. Contrast his death to that of Julius Streicher, a Nazi newspaper publisher who never committed a crime but was executed by the allies anyway.”

This review by Sam Francis of Paul Gottfried is very interesting. Francis shows, in a roundabout way, that Gottfried either doesn’t understand James Burnham’s theory of managerial totalitarianism, which was the inspiration for George Orwell’s 1984, or purposely changes the theory, keeping its name only, in order to deflect attention from the Jews who actually comprise the managerial class. From the pioneers of television, such as Jew William Paley, to the Jews who founded Google, we see the theory vindicated repeatedly. The anti-Christs are using technical skills, and technologies usually not invented by them, to wrest Western culture from Christendom, and they frame this in terms of “therapy” – curing the social “sins” of our Christian past – according to the perverse “theology” devised by Jew-Freudian psychoanalysts.

Francis writes that Gottfried does not consider the “managerial” or “therapeutic” state to “derive from its own structure or the interests of its controlling elite.” Instead Gottfried blames it on “Liberal Protestantism.”

A religious worldview gives direction to the managerial state’s progress toward a therapeutic regime concerned with the self-esteem of victims. This worldview is liberal Protestantism, understanding that term in the current sense and not in the way it might have been taken in the past (i.e., not as a movement to adapt Protestant theology to modern scientific and political trends so much as a theologically based ethic demanding recognition of and collective repentance for such “sins” as “racism,” “sexism,” “homophobia,” “anti-Semitism,” etc.).

The problem with this theory, as Francis shows, is that it “fails to establish any significant connection between this body of theological thought, on the one hand, and actual members of the managerial elite (or administrators of the managerial state, if you will), on the other.” In other words, we don’t see liberal presbyterians and episcopalians holding the reins of power and guiding the country in a therapeutic direction based on the principles of their theology. The closest Gottfried himself could come was an allusion by Bill Clinton to violence committed against Muslims way back during the Crusades. No, the identity of the managerial totalitarians is obvious. Francis writes:

If we are looking for the sources of the collective consciousness of “sins” such as “racism,” “sexism,” etc. and the systematic, politically enforced reconfiguration of American society, then the Jewish role in promoting racial egalitarianism, promoting feminism and subverting male social roles, instilling collective guilt, promoting mass immigration, and pushing multiculturalism (through Franz Boas and his disciples in anthropology, the civil rights movement, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt School, any number of Marxist and New Left movements, Jewish feminist ideologues like Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem, and Susan Sontag, pro-immigration lobbying by Jewish “public interest” groups and individual political figures, and the major architect of multiculturalism, Horace Kallen, not to mention the largely Jewish “neo-conservatism” of recent years) can hardly be ignored. Gottfried, however, does ignore it almost entirely…

So we see that even Jews who identify as paleoconservatives protect the interests of their tribe foremost. On one hand, this shows that they are human, and on the other, it shows that they do not belong with us.

The thesis of this new book is that no political arrangement can allow for rejection of the most sacred religion known to man, Equality. Thus, Whites must not be allowed to organize and protect their own interests because their primary duty is to care for others, and Blacks would, at the very least, lose self-esteem by such shenanigans. It is therefore necessary to assume that Whites have the vilest of motives for even thinking such thoughts. It’s interesting that George Will, of all people, praised the 1994 founding of the League of the South as the heirs of the Agrarian intellectual tradition. Will said the organization would be of interest to those who “believe America is becoming too homogenized, that regional differences are being blurred and ancient passions are growing cold.” The paradox is that America’s high point in terms of regional cultural distinctives was when it was the most “racist.” Now that Whites are on the wane and Jew TV has tried to make everyone feel at ease in the melting pot (which is actually a blender) and we are closer than ever to a nationwide homogeneity, artificial though it may be, we find that the entire system is in peril. The usurpers thought that if they could extend the spring far enough it would never be able to recoil, but by all appearances, it is ready to snap back with unprecedented violence and rearrange everything according to natural order.

Who will bring the real world back to us? Mexicans? Koreans? Name one group of people on earth, besides Whites, who are actually interested in conserving the totality of White culture.

Of course, this is not to suggest that others do not appreciate excellence. Proficiency in classical White music is perhaps the best indicator of advanced civilization and high IQ. Jews and Asians score very high in this area, but Israel is declining because Ashkenazis are being outbred by Oriental Jews. Still, Jews and Asians have cultures of their own, and they bear little resemblance to ours.

“In fifty years, if present trends continue, Nigeria will be managed and controlled by ethnic Nigerians, China by ethnic Chinese, Japan by ethnic Japanese, Mexico by ethnic Mexicans, India by ethnic Indians, and so on throughout the non-white world, but our white children and grandchildren will have lost the autonomy and identity that comes from maintaining a majority in their own historical homelands.” This is hatred for our own, not love for the stranger.

“What is commonly described as racial or religious prejudice is sometimes only a reasonable prudence. At the bottom of it there is nothing more wicked than a desire to prevent dominance by a strange and more or less hostile minority.” ~ H.L. Mencken

In some African countries, foreign aid accounts for 10% of GDP and half of the government’s budget. This has continued in some cases for over 50 years, yet sub-Saharan Africa represents only 1% of global trade.

A Canadian university is now refusing to support charity for cystic fibrosis because it’s a White disease.

Cal Thomas as a limp-wristed King Josiah. “They must learn English, study and embrace the history of their host nation and, if they are Muslim, they will be allowed to worship only in existing mosques. No new ones should be built. Existing mosques must be monitored to make sure that hate is not taught and aggressive behavior toward their host countries is not promoted. If such behavior and speech are detected, the mosques should be closed and the imams arrested or deported.” Translation: “Oh, you thtop it, or I’ll give you thuch a pinch!” We need to make sure that we keep a few of these conservatives in a museum somewhere so they can do their funny dances and amuse the children.

Nothing says Merry Christmas like scalded and dismembered body parts. Every year at about this time, Aaron Wolf writes an excellent article, such as “Yankees Touching Harps of Gold,” about the war on Christmas. Here’s another that you don’t want to miss.

“This Holiday Season, give your wife the gift of a vasectomy”… At the Vasectomy Clinics of Chicago, Dr. Kiu Mostowfi will perform genital jihad on your jingle bells through elven magic.

How to have more good-looking children. (I was hoping for a diagram.)

Wayne Troutt’s Old Timey Ways. I crave more music like this, and believe me when I tell you that our enemies fear one good song more than a thousand books.

“It is a most amazing thing to behold a chorus of lovely Irish women gush to the world in general, ‘I’m just like you.’ What, indeed, is the point of working up an elaborate musical program showcasing the Celtic Woman if there is no appreciable difference between the Celtic Woman and any other random people of the world?”

Ethnic identifiers.

The Grimm stories are not really fairy tales.

Princesses aren’t black. After 50 years, they continue to blame this on low self-esteem or racism or God knows what, but the facts are the facts.

Seems that there isn’t much subtlety in this book.

Mom and Dad were a bit eccentric.