We wish to reiterate our fascination with chattering racist-hunters going on and on and on and on about a man who has tried very hard to not be called a racist, but thanks to a page published first by Dennis Wheeler, then by Little Geneva, then by Spirit/Water/Blood, has been denounced as a racist by seemingly everyone. Even Alan Colmes and Victor Davis Hanson have weighed in. The controversy proves that you are a racist, or at least are widely perceived as such, if you think that interracial relationships can be allowed to produce a “natural revulsion” in anyone. McCain continues to absolve himself of racism and blame Dennis Wheeler for various infractions, but the fact remains that he is being criticized for only one thing, really: his statement that miscegenation is naturally revolting to many people and, as he put it, in all capitals, “THIS IS NOT RACISM.”

Comes now the League of the South to defend McCain and accuse Wheeler and to assure that there is nothing to see here, folks, so move along now; that it was “neither great nor a real debate,” was just a lot of “bickering,” and was “boring” besides. “Wheeler’s position of excluding minorities [was] rejected, [and] he was kicked out of the League.” Now blacks, mestizos, Filipinos, Koreans, Iranians, and anyone else who wants to pretend to be Southern is welcome to join. They’re all going to march together and speechify against Yankees! Hot damn. Honey, where’s my gray hat and hard tack? Deion, Jose, and Phuc Mei are waiting in the car. We’re off to win our Southern Independence! And don’t forget the “get out of jail free” card: “Murray Rothbard, the great economist, who was Jewish, was a charter member.” The League refers those who are “interested in an organization that excludes on the basis of race rather than values” to “the Congressional Black Caucus.”

As we’ve mentioned before, these fellows have blown every opportunity to stand for something meaningful. Dennis Wheeler tried to help them out, and so did the original Kinists. Harry was invited to speak at one of their gatherings about five years ago, and though Michael Hill and Tom Moore said they loved the speech (as did Franklin Sanders, with mild reservations), the leadership made sure that Harry was never invited back, partly because Harry considers Dennis to have been a mentor. (You can see how some of the characters discussed here overlap. For instance, Joe Morecraft officiated at Dennis Wheeler’s funeral, being a good friend.)

The upshot of the League’s effort to distance itself from Harry’s seminal speech and Kinism in general was this evasive statement on race, written a few months later. It is also linked from the December 8 post, mentioned above. This is incredibly disingenuous because, as Dennis wrote here, the League used to know their roots, even if they were reluctant to press the issue. I’ve added some bolds.

The League of the South position paper on race and culture states: “The League seeks to protect the historic Anglo-Celtic core culture of the South because the Scots, Irish, Welsh, and English have given Dixie its unique institutions and civilisation. Should the Christian, Anglo-Celtic core be displaced, then the South would cease to be recognisable to us and our progeny. We must maintain this all-important link to our European heritage from which we have drawn our inspiration. Anglo-Celtic Southerners and their European cousins have a duty to protect that which our ancestors bequeathed us. If we will not promote our own interests, no one will do it for us.”

Never mind the silly Grady McWhiney “Celtic Thesis” which was popular for a time and sought to downplay Saxon and Norman genes as having any influence in the South. The point is that this – not the 2005 statement – is what was actually on the table at the time of the Great Southern League Race Debate, as the League knows very well. It could have been written by any white racialist, nationalist, or separatist, except for the chicken word “culture” in place of “race,” which implies that culture is fixed to a place rather than a people. Even then, Jared Taylor mocked the desire of the League to form an “Afro-Hispanic-Celtic Confederacy.”

Someday, perhaps the League will explain how they can criticize Lincoln and all the Yankee children of Father Abraham for creating a “propositional nation,” founded on the basis of “ideas” and “values” rather than race, while at the same time creating a Southern Independence organization that is fundamentally ideological. As soon as they turn from their folly in Mr. Rogers’ land of the make-believe South, they can start making a difference in the lives of real Southerners. If any still exist, that is.

The theology of the Confederacy.

“One conclusion I reach in A Conversation About Race is that if a white person is not INDIFFERENT to the subject of his race, he MUST then be a White Supremacist! There can be no middle ground for people with ancestors from Europe. All others are allowed, and encouraged, toward racial or ethnic advocacy, in today’s PC culture, but not whites.” ~ Craig Bodeker

Joy Jew Behar asks, “Isn’t it a little racist to call it Black Friday?”

Not at all, says KFC.

The New York Times is publishing a gift guide this year for white men, white women, and precious white children. Just kidding.

The Sugar Plum Fairy is now a wigger!

Speaking of which, here is race-mixing “pastor” John Piper breakdancing with his “adopted” black “son.” How fitting.

Opposition to a government takeover of leechcraft is only legitimate if it has black support. Whites who have their own ideas need to be investigated by the authorities.

For blacks, crying “racism” is like using the American Express card, says Rev. James Manning. “Every black person in America is employed in the racism industry.” More truth: “Billy Graham is fully involved in the Communist takeover of America,” he says. I’m so happy to come across a black man with good sense that I feel like clicking my heels together. “The churches are overrun by thieves, liars, traitors, and Satanists.” My only complaint is that merely “restoring the Constitution” is not going to save us.

On today’s episode of Uh…What? the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department and the Equal Employment Opportunity Office inform us that race, the most perdurable human difference, does not exist. On tomorrow’s episode, French chefs will explain that butter is a culinary construct.

Madness on parade.

Hofmann was weak-kneed with love. When the Masai appeared again to guide her through Mombasa, she took it as a sign. A 27-year-old blonde beauty from the world’s neatest country, she went home to Switzerland, sold her clothing shop and returned to Kenya without knowing what would happen next… Against all logic – she was warned that women are less valued than goats – she moved in with him and his mother. Home in Barsaloi was a manyatta, a hut made of sticks and cow dung, and the diet was goat meat, sugary tea, and milk mixed with blood.

She only avoided ritual genital mutilation by lying to the savages. Then she lost all her money, nearly died of malnutrition, and was beaten by her “husband.” And if that doesn’t prove her mental illness, she now looks back on her attempt at becoming a Negress with fondness.

Once you go black, you don’t go back…alive. More to the point, as they’re learning at Boise State, once you go black, we don’t want you back.

“Even Luther picked up on [the biblical word for illegitimate meaning mongrel] by translating it as ‘Mischling’ [mixling] (German), which has only one definition: ‘A Mongrel, one of mixed race.’ And I think he very appropriately translates ‘assembly’ as ‘the body politic’ because mongrels weren’t banned from heaven, only from the Israelite nation.”

“My blonde-haired natural daughter Shiloh is the outcast in our family.” ~ Brad Pitt, using the term “family” as loosely as possible

Congolese pimps dress in pink.

On a similar note, here’s a well-tailored chimp on a velocipede:

The Amazing Race show on CBS was just won by a very attractive Aryan couple. They defeated a couple of fags, who are also brothers, and a miscegenated couple who like to pretend that they are “married.” The latter was comprised of a black woman who won the Miss America contest and a white man. In every interview, the black woman talked about how her mother is very unhappy with their “marriage.” But being selfish, the wishes of her parents were not high on her list of priorities. We Christians are held to a higher standard than mutts.

Sarah Palin’s father suggests that his daughter left Hawaii as a student because there are too many Asians on the island. Her next stop, White-aho, was much more conducive to decent living.

Tiger loves him some “big haired” women.

The most interesting thing to come out of the Tiger Woods affair(s) is that, despite bursting onto the world stage as a self-described “Caublinasian” (Causcasian, Black, Indian, Asian), the mongrel’s thoughts and actions are Negro to the core. From his Lincoln Navigator with custom chrome rims to his Nordic whore “wife” to following his uncircumcised penis wherever it leads him, he is true to his origins. Now we hear that he was introduced to Elin Nordegren by his fellow mongrel, Derek Jeter. Aside from the objective fact, known worldwide, that white women are the most beautiful creatures on earth, these kinless bastards, who are wreathed with laurels by the kikenmedia for hitting balls, know that there is nothing easier for them nor more humiliating for their greatest enemy, the white man, than the sexual domination of white women. In any war, after the messy business of killing soldiers, barbarians then make war on women and children. Through rape, they pass their seed to future generations, and the latter victory is far more complete than the former.

As Rev. Manning says, every black person in this country is engaged in the racism industry. But blacks are some of the biggest racists of all, which only tells us that the word “racist” is meaningless. They can’t seem to get into this whole “content of character” thing that they keep preaching to the rest of the world.

[The angry denunciations of Tiger Woods] reflect blacks’ resistance to interracial romance… But Woods has declined to identify himself as black… This vexed some blacks, but it hasn’t stopped them from claiming Woods as one of their own. Or from disapproving of his marriage to Elin Nordegren, despite blacks’ historical fight against white racist opponents of mixed marriage… “[W]e still see him as a black man with a white woman, and it makes a difference,” said Johnson Cooper, a 26-year-old African-American from New York City. “There’s just this preservation thing we have among one another. We like to see each other with each other.”

Black women have long felt slighted by the tendency of famous black men to pair with white women, and many have a list of current transgressors at the ready.

“We’ve discussed this for years among black women,” said Denene Millner, author of several books on black relationships. “Why is it when they get to this level…they tend to go directly for the nearest blonde?”

That’s because black is beautiful…on a balance sheet. And everyone gushes over Michelle Obama’s arms because what else are they going to compliment?

Sorry, I don’t know how the picture of the Klan beauty pageant worked its way into the stack. Let’s return to the “black is beautiful” pictures.

Remember when TV used to be wholesome?

DiGiorno is selling more than just pizza.

I’m absolutely shocked by this ad, considering the source and the perverted times in which we live. What’s next, women in dresses?

A woman mov’d is like a fountain troubled,
Muddy, ill-seeming, thick, bereft of beauty;
And while it is so, none so dry or thirsty
Will deign to sip or touch one drop of it.

The feminization of race.

“Feminism and miscegenation are interconnected. Only a society which has emasculated men would openly condone intermarriage. Let me change that. Only a society in which white men have been emasculated would see the sort of tolerance for and celebration of intermarriage we are experiencing today.”

Never fear. These women will save us.

In Mencken’s 1937 obituary for J. Gresham Machen, there are amusing references to “the simian faithful of Appalachia” and to populist William Jennings Bryan being of “the Tennessee or barnyard school” of Fundamentalism. “[Bryan's] theological ideas were those of a somewhat backward child of 8, and his defense of Holy Writ at Dayton during the Scopes trial was so ignorant and stupid that it must have given Dr. Machen a great deal of pain. Dr. Machen himself was to Bryan as the Matterhorn is to a wart.” Mencken admired Machen, though he called John Calvin the “Geneva Mohammed” and said Calvinism occupied “a place, in my cabinet of private horrors, but little removed from that of cannibalism.” There was an ever-so-slightly logical point of reference between the two. Mencken writes: “Either [Christianity] was true or it was not true. If, as [Machen] believed, it was true, then there could be no compromise with persons who sought to whittle away its essential postulates, however respectable their motives. Thus he fell out with the reformers who have been trying, in late years, to convert the Presbyterian Church into a kind of literary and social club, devoted vaguely to good works.”

It’s very interesting to read this obituary with the mindset of a Kinist and notice that our war against liberalism closely matches Machen’s own great war against liberal infiltration of the Church. Notice that Mencken, despite being a skeptic, could clearly see which side was not being true to itself.

Claiming to be Christians as he was, and of the Calvinish persuasion, they endeavored fatuously to get rid of all the inescapable implications of their position. On the one hand they sought to retain membership in the fellowship of the faithful, but on the other hand they presumed to repeal and reenact with amendments the body of doctrine on which that fellowship rested. In particular, they essayed to overhaul the scriptural authority which lay at the bottom of the whole matter, retaining what coincided with their private notions and rejecting whatever upset them.

Just as Christians in our own time have jumped on the bandwagon of miscegenation, just because the illegal Fourteenth Amendment and various other imperial decrees have forced it upon them, so the liberals of Machen’s time sought to find biblical justification for the insanity of Prohibition.

[Machen] not only proved that there was nothing in the teachings of Jesus to support so monstrous a folly; he proved abundantly that the known teachings of Jesus were unalterably against it… The Presbyterian Church, like the other evangelical churches, was taken for a dizzy ride by Prohibition. Led into the heresy by fanatics of low mental visibility, it presently found itself cheek by jowl with all sorts of criminals, and fast losing the respect of sensible people. Its bigwigs thus became extremely jumpy on the subject, and resented bitterly every exposure of their lamentable folly.

Are you people reading this? Doesn’t it all sound familiar? Who agrees with the Christians of today on miscegenation? Certainly not any of the Christians of old. Instead, they are joined by almost every living Christ-hater and white-hater to be found. How must it feel for them to be cheek by jowl with the Aleister Crowleys of the world on a doctrine which they insist the Bible emphatically supports but which every one of our “racist” Christian forefathers rejected? As our compatriot Harry (who we call Captain Swift) has proved, these lackeys are of a dim cranial wattage, and they are “extremely jumpy on the subject,” as Mencken said, knowing that their only hope is to keep dissenters out of their narcissistic churches so that they can be denounced as ecclesiastical renegades.

Don’t forget to drain the bile from your lying preacher after every sermon. You don’t want it to start backing up through the nostrils.

“Racism is a funny thing. Monday it means one thing; Tuesday it means the exact opposite.” But regardless, if it’s called racist, your pastor will tell you that it’s sinful.

Doug Wilson is so full of hot gas that he could be paid to hover above sporting events. In this post he expresses surprise that any Jews today would celebrate the terrorists who bombed the King David Hotel in Jerusalem. One of the bombers, Menachem Begin, was elected Prime Minister! In July of 2006, the current Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, joined throngs of Jews in celebrating the 60th anniversary of the bombing! Jews love terrorists so much that they elect the filth to the highest offices. And trust me, Wilson’s ignorance won’t slow him down at all in waxing philosophic about the “sin” of “anti-Semitism.” When Tim informs the logorrheic pastor that his own “ethical casuistry” is “the sign of a very sick mind and heart,” Wilson smirks again at the suggestion that the Palestinians have retaliated against the Jews with what are effectively bottle rockets. But it’s absolutely true.

The inventors of modern terrorism, the Jews, have a well-developed army and a limitless source of funding from our own paychecks. They “have turned their neighbors into burned rubble like Dresden several times in the past ten years.” See Gaza and Lebanon, to say nothing of their many other war crimes. But you know what’s really evil to Doug Wilson? A few suicide bombers! He keeps seeing them on the news, and therefore he must consider them as a threat equivalent to billions upon billions of dollars per year in free jets, guns, and nuclear missiles, courtesy of the American taxpayer. At the link, you can also see the ravings of another moral idiot, Greg Bahnsen’s son, David. He approvingly quotes Christ-hater Norman Jew Podhoretz, who teaches that propping up the terrorist, anti-Christian, racial state of Israel is of one piece with “the values of Western civilization as a whole.” That would be a three-point shot on the court of ethical casuistry. According to Bahnsen, Israel must be “supported” for vague reasons having to do with democracy and capitalism, which are in actual practice racialism and usury.

I love this comment:

Tim,
I’d be interested to know how booby-trapping bodies is a “peculiarly jewish touch.” Maybe you didn’t mean it to come across that way, but it sure sounds like you’re posting from Little Geneva.

We wish!

Tim then makes the point that, though they pretend to be God’s chosen people, Jews are the sworn enemies of our Lord, and therefore, the “concept of a ‘judeo/christian’ ethic is actually blasphemous.” Two of the genius commenters there at Wilson’s Pit of Perpetual Pettifoggery call this statement a “diatribe,” and one accuses Tim of having “publicly railed against the character of a minister of the gospel in good standing, for which I believe you owe a public apology. It’s one thing to disagree with pastor Wilson (who I believe does have a deep and nuanced understanding of these issues) and quite another to defame his character.” Hilarious.

In Wilson’s next post, the “striking, stark, and obvious” evidence he presents for the “cultural superiority of the Jews” is that they are “capitalists and entrepreneurs.” Why a minister of the gospel would be more impressed with the ability to make money than with how the money is gained and how it is invested is anyone’s guess. Making money is actually rather easy if you’re prepared to abandon morality and prey on vices. The “entrepreneur” can do great deeds if lawful or become a national cancer if unlawful. If “culture” is based on unlawful deeds, one would expect a minister to shout it from the rooftops rather than praise the villains for their business acumen. And while Wilson is quick to utter the semitically-correct phrase, “the cultural superiority of the Jews,” would he ever praise the superiority of the white race? No, in that case he would change the subject and would refer to Judaism as a religion, even though that is not how Jews identify themselves (even atheists are Jews in good standing).

Here is where Wilson’s gaseous nickering begins to percolate. He writes:

[A]nti-Semitism therefore, while sometimes clothed in gospel talk, is the ungospel, the anti-gospel. It does whatever it can to impede the fulfillment of the Great Commission, including the fulfillment of that commission to the Jews. The Puritans knew that the conversion of the Jews was the linchpin to the successful evangelization of the world, and they prayed and labored to that end.

By all means, let’s encourage evangelism throughout the world. But this is not the same thing as granting citizenship to Christ-haters and white-haters who have been responsible for founding every revolutionary movement that has served to destroy this country, not to mention mortgaging our future to the banksters who have enriched themselves and Israel at our expense. What does Wilson even mean by the word “anti-Semitism”? He might pretend to limit it to a refusal to evangelize, but he knows very well that the word has never had this meaning, and that’s saying something, because it is a word, like “racism,” that can mean anything you please. We have warned these lying pastors to stop irresponsibly using the malicious terms of the enemy, and of course they ignore us. So what does he mean? Who are these “anti-Semites” who clothe their wicked words in the gospel but are preaching the anti-gospel? Well, he is referring to people just like us, but he is clever enough with his weasel words to avoid specificity.

Furthermore, regardless of what the Puritans might have believed, Jews are not a special race whose covenant with God has been placed on hold, like a call to tech support. It requires a dispensational and Christian Zionist (i.e., heretical) mindset to believe that race for us is inconsequential, and the Jewish race is the only race that matters because that is the only race that becomes the “linchpin” of God’s future, eschatological design. So let’s recap. Number 1: Even semitically-correct racialists like Wilson have no idea if the anti-Christ Jews of today are related at all to the ancient Israelites. It is highly doubtful that they are, but Wilson is willing to err on the side of Zionist kookery (equating the rapacious Jews of today with the kinsmen of the apostle Paul, on their word alone) if it keeps him from teaching what could lead to real trouble. Number 2: Our perverse civil union with these leeches, and all that the “Judeo-Christian” heresy entails, is brought about because most Christians are futurists who desperately want to feel like they are reading the newspaper when they read the Bible.

There is nothing in the New Testament about a future mass conversion of the Jews except for the phrase “all Israel will be saved” in Romans 11:26. This refers to the Church, of course, not Hymen Lipschitz and his family tree of terrorists and pornographers. Such people might repent and believe in Christ (stranger things have happened), but there is nothing in the Bible that implies that the conversion of modern Jews is “the linchpin to the successful evangelization of the world.” The idea is utterly ridiculous.

All this talk about Wilson reminds me of a story I heard. Near Fredericksburg, Texas, where there is a large German-speaking population, a farmer walking down a country road noticed a man drinking with his hand from the farmer’s pond. The farmer shouted: “Trink das wasser nicht. Die kuhen haben dahin gesheissen” (“Don’t drink the water, for truly, the cows have shat therein”). The man shouted back: “I’m from New York and just down here campaigning for Obama’s health care plan. I can’t understand you. Please speak in English.” The farmer replied: “Use two hands, you’ll get more.”

The Bible scales new heights of relevance:

Anthropology tells us that the origins of humans are found in Africa. So in the St. John’s Bible, Adam and Eve are depicted as Africans.

The Wisdom books are represented by an elderly Native American woman. To honor his Jewish heritage, Jesus’ genealogy is illustrated with a menorah and the double helix shape of DNA.

And evil is depicted with skeletons from the Holocaust and the remains of the World Trade Center.

In rejecting race, the modern Church has rejected history. For rejecting history, it must be classified as radical. “Kinism is conceived, therefore, as a counterrevolutionary movement, which rejects the god of the National Convention for the God of Scripture, in whose leaves are inscribed the laws of freedom, for a lawless liberty is but the tyranny of the many over the few, if they exercise real power, and the few over the many, if they are oppressed by a mental serfdom.”

This is a very good statement from Dr. John Frame: “The gospel…is the announcement that God’s law will prevail. So the law is good news, gospel. And the gospel is law.”

When Ayn Rand denounced racism as “the lowest, most crudely primitive form of collectivism,” she was at least consistent enough to recognize that she was morally obligated to oppose “familism” as well. In fact, she said the “full expression” of “parents who search genealogical trees in order to evaluate their prospective sons-in-law” is “the wholesale slaughter of Nazi Germany.” We’ve tried to explain to Christians that they cannot logically support the collective of the family but pretend that the collective of race does not exist. Even Ayn Rand was more consistent.

“Humanity will be relieved to learn that church council members in the German state of Mecklenburg-West Pomerania (in the former East Germany) will henceforward be required to sign the following declaration: ‘I understand that xenophobic, anti-Semitic and racist ideologies are inconsistent with Christian witness.’ The Protestant Churches of Germany passed a resolution ‘to engage itself more strongly in the struggle against the Right’ this past October.”

We just have to live with terrorism because the alternative would be RACIST!

Conservatives love terrorists. And they believe deporting illegal aliens is “inhumane.”

The Talmud’s top 25.

Eight Catholic popes condemned the Talmud. Martin Luther, founder of the Protestant Church, ordered it burned. Pope Clement VIII declared, “The impious Talmudic, Cabalistic and other wicked books of the Jews are hereby entirely condemned and they must always remain condemned and prohibited and this law must be perpetually observed.”

If your pastor considers this hate talk, you should find a church where the gospel of Jesus Christ is preached.

“Every single priest in this church has been spat on. It happens day and night.”

Oily Weasel, on behalf of his tribe of Satanists, urges Hungary to imprison historians. May God richly damn this bastard, and may everything we know about his brood of kosher child molesters and murderers be lost forever to history.

Notice the differences between these two courses on race that are being offered at UCLA:

The first is “The Jewish People and America.” In gushing language befitting a public relations puff piece the university writes:

Learn about the extraordinary relationship between a wandering people and a golden land. Discover the lessons it teaches us about the evolution of the Jewish people from hopeful immigrants seeking a haven to esteemed citizens who found a home. This program documents remarkable achievement in the face of obstacles and ingenuity in creating opportunity in a new land. This story about Jewish hopes and the realities of the American promise provides penetrating insight into how an immigrant people forged liberating New World Jewish identities across the American landscape in commerce, arts and culture, sciences, law, higher education, medicine, entertainment, and more.

The second is “Understanding Whiteness in American History and Culture: Deconstructing White Privilege for the Reconstruction of an Anti-Racist White Identity.” Here the approach is quite different:

Eurocentric American history often masks the saliency of how the formation of Whiteness ultimately supports mechanisms of race and racism. This course outlines the historical development of Whiteness and critically analyzes the sociological results that stem from its birth. The course provides a historical framework of the birth of Whiteness; explores Whiteness (namely, White Supremacy and White Privilege) and how they impact people of color and uphold racial hierarchy to engage in a REconstruction of anti-racist white racial identity.

Notice the adjectives. Jews are “extraordinary,” “hopeful,” “esteemed,” “remarkable,” ingenious, and, as I’m sure Doug Wilson would agree, have been responsible for “liberating…commerce, arts and culture, sciences, law, higher education, medicine, entertainment, and more.” Whites are “privileged,” “racist,” “Eurocentric” Supremacists who “uphold racial hierarchy.” Each of the students in this class is paying more than a hundred thousand dollars for his own destruction. The victory of Jews could not be more complete.

David Irving created an environment of “tension” by the way he was sitting at his book table. The hate was visceral and palpable. An “area man” on the scene believes that he could sense Irving’s desire to stab six million Jews in the neck with his autograph pen. This report has been brought to you by “the Onion” and by the letters A, D, and L.

“An ADL study found 47 percent of Latinos hold strongly anti-Semitic attitudes,” which doesn’t bode well for the future of Zionism.

You are supposed to lose your job if you disagree with the SPLC.

The SPLC also attacks Chodakiewicz for wanting to add exhibits to the Holocaust museum about the suffering of Poles during WWII. The SPLC actually seems to suggest that only Jewish suffering should be allowed to be discussed in the taxpayer financed DC museum.

How could this be called anything other than Jewish Supremacism? Can you imagine any white person daring to suggest that white suffering is the only suffering that matters?

Next year, Germany will make the final payment on its World War I debt. Even a hundred years ago, this was valued at 100 million kilograms of gold. Now you can see why Hitler was determined to break the backs of those who had stolen Germany through aggression and usury. The main purpose of waging war against Hitler, regardless of the Holohoax mythology that arose after the fact, was to reinstate this debt, and in the year 2009 it is still being paid!

“Every appointee to the American government must endure a thorough background check by the American Jewish community.”

“The first president to host an official White House Hanukkah party, and the first to actually light a menorah in the White House residence, was George W. Bush, beginning in both cases in 2001.” And it will now be a tradition, but the only purpose of Hanukkah has always been to detract attention from Christmas.

I’ve heard many Christians remark favorably on the movie Shadowlands, since it’s about C.S. Lewis, their only complaint being that there was not enough focus on the faith that was at the center of Lewis’s life. They are all completely oblivious to the whole point of the Jew-movie, which is explained in this excellent article.

“Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.” ~ Dr. Raphael Lempkin (Polish Jew, legal scholar, historian), 1943

The incomparable Brendan O’Connell is facing 14 years in prison for these two excellent, excellent Youtube videos (part 1, part 2). Watch as Mikey Kikerson loses it when he is called a racist, a faux victim, and an apologist for homicidal maniacs. Like Brendan says, it’s time for Christians to get off their fat asses. Do not miss his speech at the end, in front of the bells of St. Martin in Perth.

Mike Huckabee’s “black hole of pure unreflective ego.”

The same liberals who screamed about Willie Horton’s name being tied to Michael Dukakis are eager to link Maurice Clemmons to Huckabee. Huckabee’s strategy to salvage his presidential campaign is to claim that he had to release the felon because “institutional racism” is rampant in Arkansas. But this is an appeal to blacks, who will never vote for him in 2012 anyway. At least Dukakis knew that blacks were his base, but it still didn’t help. Huckabee is “the same ‘Christian’ who attacked people who oppose illegal immigration as ‘racist’ and ‘unChristian,’ saying they’re drinking the wrong ‘kind of Jesus juice.’ He says the invasion of America by millions of illegal Hispanics is the Lord’s way of giving America a second chance to make up for how we treated blacks.”

Here’s another great example of why you can’t afford not to read James Edwards.

But here’s the final nail in the coffin of “Reverend” Huckabee’s presidential aspirations. In 2004, Saline County prosecutor Robert Herzfeld wrote a letter to the then governor and told him he was letting too many criminals go without giving it much thought, that he was refusing to even ask prosecutors for input on these decisions, and that his whole approach to clemency was “fatally flawed.” Huckabee’s Deputy Legal Counsel and Adviser on Criminal Justice replied to Herzfeld. His letter was three lines long. Here it is:

The governor read your letter and laughed out loud.

He wanted me to respond to you. I wish you success as you cut down on your caffeine consumption.

…He didn’t have to listen to those racist prosecutors, because Jesus tells him what to do, and Jesus isn’t a racist. And that crack about cutting down on caffeine consumption is going to rub a whole lot of people the wrong way, too, after the guy Huckabee let loose on society mowed down four police officers – in a coffee shop.

This country of ours, Israel West, has 5% of the world’s population and 25% of the world’s incarcerated population. As this graphic shows, one in every 15 black men is behind bars, which proves that a negligible or nonexistent black population is a blessing from God. Spending $44 billion per year on corrections is bad enough, but not as bad as it could get if blacks increase in numbers.

James asks: “Is it really wise to give the least intelligent portion of America’s population more and more power to dictate what we can and can’t do, say or think?… Why should blacks stop making baseless charges of racism, when they get what they want nearly every time?”

A black man says of Africa, “It’s liberating to be in a country where black people are in the overwhelming majority…because it renders issues of race less relevant. It provides a certain clarity. You can focus on what’s right or wrong, true or false.”

African governance in action.

From 1938 to the present, the problem of Africans is still with us, despite an ungodly amount of money wasted on them.

“We have a black president. We need a brown governor.”

Michael Moore’s next move.

“Spending our way out of the recession? Isn’t that like trying to drink your way out of alcoholism?” ~ Jay Leno

Tent cities were called Hoovervilles during the Depression, but now, when an Obamaville sign goes up in Colorado, there is such an outcry over “racism” that the sign maker himself is “outed.”

So what if you just walk away from your mortgage? Legally binding contracts should be honored, but consider how corporations are held to a different standard than individuals. If an individual homeowner walks away from a debt, it’s considered immoral, but banks are allowed to walk away from debt all the time, and no one gives it a second thought. Corporations regularly declare bankruptcy and restructure their loans. Families would likewise engage in “strategic default” but for the moral guilt and social stigma attached to it. Unscrupulous Jew bankers benefit from the shame of Christians, while they themselves are shameless. The law should prevent this anti-Christian leverage, but the people have spoken, and they have said, “Anything but theocracy.” So they’re getting what they want, and they’re getting it good and hard.

We used to be customers, now we’re employees.

“The bovine mother’s milk, unpasteurized, unprocessed, non-homogenized and wholly pure, natural and innocent. The stuff America was raised on. The stuff your parents fed you when you were a kid, if your family was lucky enough to have a cow. In [America] today, selling such a natural product is now apparently a criminal act.”

Anglo-Saxon gold.

This Egyptologist, Gliddon, argues for the “Caucasian race of the early Egyptians; who, while they do not appear to have looked upon Abraham as a Gentile, were by him considered worthy of his family. This would, probably, not have been the case had the Egyptians been Africans.” The editor feels obliged to wave a flag, warning of racism in this statement. “Here we have creeping out the American’s antipathy to the Negroid.” Oh, sure, blame biblical “racism” on Americans. Even though Gliddon believes that all men on earth came from Noah’s family, “the climate of Egypt will never change a Caucasian into a Negro… Asiatic in their origin, springing from the same stock as Shem or Japheth, and Caucasian, in their osteological conformation, the Egyptians were white men, of no darker hue than the pure Arab, Jew, or Phoenician.” The Bible itself tells us as much. Joseph looked just like the Egyptians, and his own brothers didn’t recognize him or suspect that he was not a native.

“Seldom have so many pretended to believe something so absurd.” At 36:00, Jared Taylor gives an excellent statement on Christianity.

An excellent snippet from something that a friend wrote:

Here’s a real jewel from page 1 of the Monday, November 9th, New York Times on the Fort Hood murders entitled “A Hard Time for Muslims To Serve Their Country”:

“‘Our diversity, not only in our Army but in our country is a strength,’ General (George W.) Casey said Sunday. ‘And as horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.’”

Castro has the slogan “Socialismo o muerte!” plastered all over Cuba nowadays.

Maybe our Army should have its own maxim:

“Diversidad o muerte!”

Or more truthfully:

“Diversidad y muerte!”

Welcome to Sichuan, China:

Lord, I love white men.

This is a very interesting article on the differences between vanguardists and mainstreamers in the White Movement. You can see that the Council (i.e., the former White Citizens Council, now the Council of Conservative Citizens) is the mainstream alternative to the Klan, both of them very different yet pursuing the same nationalist goals.

One thing that is striking about the description of vanguardists is how closely their distinctives mirror the Church. This is not too surprising, because as men like William Pierce made clear, they hope to supplant the Church. As is true of Christian sects, they have their own “esoteric rituals, symbols and dress.” Just as the Church opposes all anti-Christs (at least on paper), vanguardists have “a strong or exclusive emphasis on the Jewish Question.” Just as the Church stands for theocracy, vanguardists have “a skeptical or hostile attitude towards democratic politics.” Also, notice the references to doctrinal purity and “the elect few.” There are even conversions by way of evangelism, and penance. But these are not really rigid categories. Many a mainstreamer seeks to educate the public and build momentum while rejecting incrementalism and “the ectoral path to victory.” As for activism, it’s of interest that the Amren website is very similar to Lew Rockwell’s. Though libertarians are far from mainstream, Rockwell at one time had one of the most popular sites on the web. For white news, few could compete with Kevin Strom’s National Vanguard. But now the CofCC has come into the “vanguard.” Each side is uneasy with the other, for numerous reasons, but there is enough cooperation that “the typical White Nationalist is now a middle class, White male professional unaffiliated with any organization. These people are usually non-violent, college educated and internet savvy.” The question is whether these converts will repeat the mistakes of the past and, for the sake of respectability, pretend that they are fighting merely against “big government” rather than racial amalgamation.

To cut a long story short, the ex-segregationists became conservatives, got into the habit of voting for the Republicans, focused on “practical politics,” and became steadily deracialized over the next forty years. This is where their descendants still are today: checking the box for every fraud with an (R) beside his name…

That which is “respectable” is usually relative.

Next to a William Pierce or Alex Linder, who are unthinkable, a Jared Taylor can appear merely radical; next to a Jared Taylor, a Pat Buchanan can look “acceptable”; next to a Pat Buchanan, a Lou Dobbs can appear sensible…

In the “mainstreamers’” favor, the “vanguardists” have attracted the dysfunctional, kooky, sociopathic types that are always found in fringe politics. They have been unable to create viable or stable organizations. The “vanguardists” have no strategy aside for waiting on a mythic social collapse…

In the “vanguardists’” favor, it is easy to talk about winning elections, but in reality it is a near impossible mountain to climb. The racial situation is so far gone that victory at present looks like a pipe dream.

We will have to work together. Very good article.

“Tolerance” always entails intolerance against someone.

There’s just one more thing I want to say. Denial of global warming is like denial of the Holocaust. You’re all a bunch of haters and tax evaders who want to kill six million atmospheres!