Clearly, Corey wants a show trial to enhance her résumé for governor. But in Florida, for a person to be convicted of second-degree murder, there must be evidence of a depraved mind, as was the case with this guy, who stuck his girlfriend’s head on a pole in the living room. Corey must feel that it’s a safe bet in this case as long as a black jury will be drawn from the half-black population of metro Orlando. As usual, it all comes down to race.

While white people continue to pretend that race doesn’t exist and is merely a social construct, blacks, who are a mere 13% of the population, rally around their young violent men, who are a mere 3% of the population, and prove once again Disraeli’s aphorism that race is the key to history. Racial unity, coupled with the eagerness of Jews to promote black grievances in the media, turns the black race into a juggernaut against which deracinated whites cannot hope to compete.

You’re already familiar with the details of the Zimmerman-Martin case, and how the police believe that Martin was the aggressor. You know the global campaign of bullying that followed which led to Zimmerman’s arrest. It’s very telling that the “Justice for Trayvon” movement (more accurately called “Poisoning the Well for Trayvon”) grew ever more belligerent, even as the Justice Department itself convened a grand jury.

Zimmerman’s white father says there is “so much hate” coming from the president, the NAACP, and countless other organizations seeking notoriety that “justice,” a word that blacks like to toss around, is the one thing that won’t be forthcoming. It’s sad that a white man can only come to such a realization when his life begins to fall apart. His “son” George will never be able to live a normal life. He’ll be hounded and threatened wherever he goes, especially if the courts do not bend to the will of thugs, including the thugs with titles of “Esquire.”

There’s even a “Kill Zimmerman” Twitter page to prove that terrorism is legal. The niggerese description reads: “This Page Is 4 Da Ppl Who Believe Zimmerman Should Be Shot Dead In The Street The Same Way TRAYVON Was. No Justice No Peace.”

A rap group from New Jersey called Zimmerman Killers has a song about torturing Zimmerman and members of his family and inciting a race war.

“It’s a disgrace he hasn’t been shot yet,” says Mike Tyson, who will go on to easily find work in Hollywood and elsewhere and will never have to pay for his words.

The Black Panthers have placed a $10,000 bounty on Zimmerman’s head. These geniuses assert this authority because they say they follow “street law,” which is “God’s law,” whereas American law is “the white man’s law.” Because they follow a different law, they don’t view themselves as American citizens. “So I have no right to respect American law,” concludes their spokesman and philosopher, Minister Mikhail Muhammad. The Zimmerman family has sent Attorney General Eric “My People” Holder a letter asking why these black thugs have not been arrested. How can anyone place a bounty on someone’s head and get away with it? How does this not fit the U.S. Department of Justice’s own published definition of a “hate crime”? The Zimmermans believe this is because the Panthers are as black as Holder and Obama.

“Let me tell you, the things that’s about to happen, to these honkeys, these crackers, these pigs, these pink people, these —- people. It has been long overdue. My prize right now this evening…is gonna be the bounty, the arrest, dead or alive, for George Zimmerman. You feel me?” ~ Michelle Williams, chief of staff for the New Black Panther Party

Here are some of the celebrities who support the Black Panthers, and not a single one of them will be called to account for it.

Sambo Spike Lee and Jewess Roseanne Barr also tried to provoke violence against Zimmerman and his parents by tweeting their home address, reasoning that it “was good to let ppl know that no one can hide anymore.” Except that Sambo Lee put another elderly couple in fear of their lives by tweeting the wrong address, and we can only hope that he’ll be brutally sued for it.

Al Sharpton rode into town on a donkey, barely missing Palm Sunday. He asked, “Are you afraid of violence?” Even the NAACP had to distance itself from Sharpton’s calls to “move to the next level” in civil disobedience.

Louis Farrakhan, who admires Cain, calls Jesus a Muslim, and says that the prophet Elijah would be recognized as a “nigger” today, threatened “retaliation” over Martin’s killing.

Farrakhan is still waiting for Negro E.T., who is driving Ezekiel’s wheel, to vaporize all crackas.

Jesse Jackson announced that Trayvon Martin was a “kid shot down in cold blood by a vigilante,” that he was “hunted down like a rabid dog in the street,” that he was “murdered and martyred.”

T-shirts bearing Zimmerman’s face and the words “Pussy Ass Cracker” are being sold. Obama voters are entrepreneurs! Of course, the word “nigger” on a t-shirt would be racist.

A group of about forty fat college students who call themselves the Dream Defenders marched from Daytona to Sanford, smelling ripe. They walked by day and slept in black churches by night. When they arrived in Sanford, they forced the police department to close by blocking the entrance. No one was arrested. If the protesters had been “racists” they would have been arrested instantly.

Protests went international. At the U.S. Embassy in London, about 300 people marched for 3 hours with “No Justice, No Peace” placards, and then they released 17 black balloons in Martin’s honor. These protesters are not disturbed in the slightest that the president of South Africa, Jacob Zuma, sings about killing white men.

Predictably, when a Peruvian who was adopted by Catholics with a Jewish surname shoots a black pre-felon, all the world treats it as a case of white racism, marching in the streets and singing We Shall Overcome. One way or another, Whitey is to blame.

The honkifier goes all the way to 11.

This article is an amazing specimen.

So is this one.

They are joining the Trayvon Martin crusade by the hour now.

It feels like an echo from another era — when there was racial injustice in the headlines, when federal troops were dispatched to comb Southern swamps to look for blacks who had vanished.

Martin’s mother told a reporter, “They killed my son, and now they are trying to kill his reputation.” Who is “they,” you ask? The white race, of course.

Jews invented a new term when Zimmerman was called a “white Hispanic” throughout the media. Strangely, they’ve never referred to Obama as a “white African American.”

The Today Show brazenly edited Zimmerman’s 911 call. Edited version:

Zimmerman: This guy looks like he’s up to no good. He looks black.

Actual version:

Zimmerman: This guy looks like he’s up to no good. Or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about.

Dispatcher: OK, and this guy — is he black, white or Hispanic?

Zimmerman: He looks black.

The president of NBC News admits that this editing decision went through a senior producer, script editors, and a legal review, and they all “missed” it. Meanwhile, the network continues to employ the “Reverend” Al Sharpton, who is trading time as both an activist and a commentator. If he were white, this would be recognized as a conflict of interest, but being black has its privileges. Even Fox News is a sponsor of Sharpton’s National Action Network.

Black “journalists” are not even pretending to be unbiased.

This cartoon shows the complicity of the Jew-media in weaving a one-sided narrative:

The artist was fired for it.

The media at large is still circulating years-old photos of Martin, making it look like as though a man with a gun attacked a little boy. They are portraying Martin as “an A and B student who majored in cheerfulness,” who “was not a violent or dangerous child” and “not known for misbehaving.”

Martin’s father lied on TV, saying that “Trayvon is not the confrontational type of person.” He was the kind of person who was suspended for vandalism and for being caught with 12 wedding bands, earrings, a screwdriver that the school officer described as a “burglary tool,” and an empty bag with traces of marijuana and a pipe. Five days before the two-week suspension was imposed on Trayvon that precipitated his visit to Sanford, his brother tweeted: “yu ain’t tell me yu swung on a bus driver.” Contrary to the famous press pictures, Martin had become a football player with gold teeth and multiple tattoos who posted to Twitter as “No Limit Nigga.”

None of this stopped the parents from trademarking Martin’s illustrious name. His father calls him “the lamb of God,” and his mother says he’s wearing a hoodie in heaven.

Martin’s own tweets prior to his death were published, and they reveal the young scholar to be well on his way to entering a degree program in aeronautical engineering.

According to Debbie Schlussel, “[W]ith [Martin's] criminal record and vile filth, it’s becoming more and more apparent that George Zimmerman may have unintentionally performed a service to the world. How many more crime victims and sufferers of his violence would the world endure from this thug [Martin] had he lived?”

Obama jumped in front of a camera to say that young Trayvon looked like the son he never had (a statement of racial politics).

More people who look like Obama’s offspring: the lineup of criminals at the Sanford Police Department.

As Tom Fleming writes, “If we unpack his flabby rhetoric, Mr. Obama is saying, first, that he knows the facts of the case enough to know that a brutal murder has been committed and that, second, his sympathies are engaged because the victim is black.”

As Pat Buchanan observes, this was quite unlike Obama’s condolences on behalf of other, more equal races. “When Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was shot during a rampage by a crazed gunmen, Obama stepped in with a splendid address to cool the passions and call a halt to the false and fevered accusations of moral complicity in the monstrous crime of a lone killer.” Now it’s guilty until proven guilty.

The HNICs in your House of Representatives call it “vigilante justice” in House Resolution 612 and hope to turn the crime into a referendum on gun control.

According to a Reuters poll, 91% of blacks believe that Martin was unjustly killed, compared to 35% of whites. It’s very similar to the O.J. Simpson divide but also very similar to the Rodney King case, because the threat of an even more serious riot looms. As Steve Sailer points out, like the cops who whomped hell out of Rodney King, Zimmerman will not be protected under the Constitution’s ban on double jeopardy; “the government gets two shots at defendants whose unsatisfactory verdicts cause black riots.”

The Dark Side keeps fishing for excuses. They’ve tried to blame Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” law, but it doesn’t apply in this case of assault.

They’ve said that Zimmerman didn’t appear to be bleeding after the shooting. But Officer Timothy Smith wrote in his report that Zimmerman was bleeding from the back of the head and nose and had grass stains on his back. As late as April, the defense team was still finding video “experts” to contradict what the police and eyewitnesses saw, and what these “experts” had to say was turned into front-page news.

They’ve said that the shrill screams recorded on the 911 call must be from Martin, the little boy of legend who wears the hoodie. But Martin’s own father denied it.

Police also said that Trayvon’s father, Tracy Martin, told them the voice pleading for help was not Trayvon. The family claims the police are lying, and pointed out that once the audio quality was cleaned up the father said that the voice did indeed belong to his son.

“Once the audio quality was cleaned up” is code language for “once the lawyers got to them.” (The same thing happened when Martin’s mother said the shooting was an “accident.” Her lawyer got her to quickly retract the statement.) As you can hear for yourself, the one who is screaming sounds like the one whose primary language is not ebonics. At any rate, eyewitness testimony always trumps the conjecture of so-called audio and video “experts.”

They’ve called Zimmerman a “self-appointed” neighborhood watchman, as though he was an overzealous pretend cop whose patrols were counter-productive. Read this amazing Miami Herald article which criticizes him for being a habitual 911 dialer but admits that he apprehended one thief and aided in the apprehension of other criminals. “He helped solve a lot of crimes,” says the secretary of the homeowners association.

They’ve said that Zimmerman should have been tested for alcohol, but the poe-leese are well aware of who has been drinking too much.

They’ve said that Zimmerman’s reference to “assholes” while on the phone with the 911 dispatcher was a racial slur. But you and I are not allowed to infer anything at all from the women’s jewelry that cops found in Martin’s possession in October. Let’s be sure that we conform only to politically correct prejudices.

Facts continue to get in the way of Zimmerman’s lynching. According to testimony received by the police, Martin doubled back, approached Zimmerman from behind, exchanged hostile words, and as Zimmerman reached for his phone, Martin went into full black mode and communicated with his fists. According to Zimmerman’s father, as Martin was beating Zimmerman in the face for nearly a minute, the gun was exposed, and Martin said something to the effect of “You’re going to die tonight.”

“Why would Zimmerman, with a holstered gun to protect himself, close in and start a fistfight with a teenager half a head taller? A grown man with a gun his adversary does not know he has – would he not more likely stand some distance away, to pull it out if needed?”

Most offensive of all is the suggestion that if Zimmerman uttered the words “f-ing coons” instead of “f-ing cold,” as most now believe, or said “nigger” while his head was being pounded into the road and his nose was being broken, it bears on the guilt or innocence of either party. Blacks kill other races without ceasing, but when one of them is killed, the accused must prove, in the court of public opinion, that he is not a “racist”; that he has never even thought of uttering a racial slur; that he has black friends and has invited them to his house to share the salsa bowl; that he mentors poverty-stricken black children; that he finds non-white women atttractive; that he vows to diversify his family as one would diversify a stock portfolio; and above all, that he is an “American” and a “Christian” according to the new definitions of the words.

Despite occasional exceptions, the police know how to do their jobs. They interview witnesses and investigate. They are not allowed to make up a reason to arrest Zimmerman. That’s Angela Corey’s job.

John Piper takes the occasion of the Martin shooting to suck up to the anti-whites in his congregation with his usual guff about how the “ethnocentric self” must be crucified with Christ. He quotes Hebrews 13:3: “Remember those who…are mistreated, since you also are in the body.” But he would never write a missive about the abuse, persecution, murder, and rape of whites. He would simply say that race is a social construct. Whenever blacks unite racially at times like these, when they view an attack on one of them to be an attack on all of them, no one ever tells them that race is a social construct, least of all the lying, worthless preachers.

Piper’s article is a textbook mighty-white PDP. It’s breathtaking in its rush to judgment. First, Piper writes that “Zimmerman claims self-defense.” But no sooner is the period tacked on to this sentence than Piper implies that Zimmerman must be lying, because “the pieces…simply don’t add up.” Now Piper dons his detective badge and explains why Zimmerman is a liar:

Zimmerman is a hundred pounds bigger and ten years older. He had the gun, not Martin. Reportedly he has been arrested before on assault charges. As he was following Martin in his truck, he called 911 and was told “we don’t need you to do that.” The police were on the way. But Zimmerman followed him anyway. His comments on the 911 recording (I listened to them) suggested possible racial frustration that “they always get away.” Martin’s call to his girlfriend suggested he was troubled by being followed. Not all the witnesses corroborate Zimmerman’s story.

What the East St. Louis?

1) Zimmerman is not even close to being a hundred pounds heavier than Martin. More like ten pounds heavier. He is six inches shorter and eleven years older.

2) Zimmerman was authorized by law to pack heat. If he had not been carrying, he would likely be dead right now.

3) Prior arrest did not prevent him from being granted a concealed carry permit, and it has nothing to do with this case.

4) It was likely because he was told “the police were on the way” that he knew he had better follow, or else Martin would get away, as so many others do. It’s like being told “the check is in the mail.” Later, when Martin was pounding his head into the pavement, his initial suspicions about police promptness were confirmed. Nevertheless, when the 911 dispatcher told Zimmerman that pursuit of Martin was unnecessary, even though it was not a compulsory order, as Sanford’s own chief of police confirms, Zimmerman complied, as his return to normal breathing during the call indicates.

5) If you’re frustrated, says Piper, it had better not have anything to do with race. In Zimmerman’s very words about “assholes” always getting away, Piper detects a hate crime!

6) Martin’s call to his girlfriend is irrelevant. A man whose job is to protect a neighborhood can follow whoever he wishes to follow on public roads and sidewalks. There have been numerous articles proving that the residents greatly appreciated Zimmerman’s volunteer work as their “eyes and ears.” They know that the police don’t prevent crimes. In fact, they were looking for more volunteers just like Zimmerman, and they printed this in the neighborhood newsletter: “If you’ve been the victim of a crime within the community, after calling the police, please contact our captain, George Zimmerman…so we can be aware and help address the issue with other residents.”

7) “Not all the witnesses corroborate Zimmerman’s story.” Like Mary Cutcher, who first said that she didn’t want to get involved, then provided sworn testimony to police that was consistent with the information Zimmerman provided, then changed her story, saying, “I know this was not self-defense. There was no punching, no hitting going on at the time, no wrestling.” Yes, folks, this is the star witness who proves to Piper that “there appears to have been little effort to discern if [Zimmerman's] self-defense claim is valid.” Detective Piper declares the Sanford police to be incompetent. Case closed.

Piper concludes: “Jesus died and rose again to say no to racial reactions that result in dead boys.” Did Jesus also die to prevent a man from committing attempted murder by doubling back and beating another man with his fists, even if he had felt insulted by being followed?

The Dark Side will argue in court that Zimmerman infringed Martin’s civil right to walk the streets unmolested. The Justice Department’s civil rights division even has a term for this: “streets theory.” But notice the double standard. The same people will argue that Zimmerman had no right to use the same streets to pursue Martin, even though the pursuit was abandoned.

It’s important to see that if the racial tables were turned, there would be no story, because blacks would protect the perceived murderer, and whites would not even so much as yawn at the passing of one of their own. And if Martin had been white, and if he had attacked and killed Zimmerman, with or without eyewitness confirmation, the millions of “Hispanics” who are now stone silent (even with the life of one of their own on the line) would be filling the streets with their Aztlan banners, and Zimmerman, the reputed “white Hispanic” would suddenly be transformed into an honorable diversity. The Jew-media would drive the story in a predictably anti-white direction, and everyone reading this knows it.

The lesson to learn is that, contrary to what most white Christians now believe (or say they believe), race is vital. If Zimmerman were black, Rep. Hank Johnson would not say that Martin had been “executed.” Florida Rep. Frederica Wilson would not allege that “this sweet young boy…was hunted down like a dog, shot on the street, and his killer is still at large.”

Here is the fashionably foppish Frederica in her church attire:

Pat Buchanan writes:

Listening to the heated rhetoric coming from demonstrations around the country, from the Black Caucus and TV talkers — about how America is a terrifying place for young black males to grow up in because of the constant danger from white vigilantes — one wonders what country of the mind these people are living in.

The real America is a country where the black crime rate is seven times as high as the white rate. It is a country where white criminals choose black victims in 3 percent of their crimes, but black criminals choose white victims in 45 percent of their crimes…

As Heather MacDonald of the Manhattan Institute has written, from January to June 2008 in New York City, 83 percent of all identified gun assailants were black and 15 percent were Hispanics.

Together, blacks and Hispanics accounted for 98 percent of gun assaults.

Translated: If a cabdriver is going to be mugged or murdered in New York City by a fare, 49 times out of 50 his assailant or killer will be black or Hispanic.

This is why the Zimmerman case has energized blacks. In the absence of the Great White Defendant, they’ll take what they can get. Anything to divert attention from reality. This is why Sharpton ebonizes: “Violence is killing Tray Martin. Don’t act like we are the ones [who are] violent. We didn’t shoot nobody.”

All you ever hear about on Fox News and at your Church of Lies is that Muslim terrorists are the great threat to liberty that our anointed imperial soldiers are protecting us from. Statistics show that young black men are a threat 42,150 times greater than Muslim terrorists. The average American is 1,531,100 times more likely to be killed by a black man than by a Muslim. Half of all murders are the work of one percent of the population. If sanity reigned, this obvious threat would be eliminated, plain and simple.

A tale of two teens. “When Blacks attack Whites, the media refuses to report on the race. But when the roles are switched, suddenly the media notices race.”

Here are a few stories from the same timeframe as the Martin shooting that never rose above the local news.

• In Kansas City, a 13-year-old white boy named Allen Coon was chased home from school, doused with gasoline, and set on fire by two older blacks, screaming, “This is what you deserve! You get what you deserve, white boy!”
• A white Tulsa couple who had recently celebrated their 65th wedding anniversary was attacked in their house by a 20-year-old black man named Tyrone Dale David Woodfork. Nancy Strait, 85, was sexually assaulted and battered to death while her husband, 90-year-old WWII vet Bob Strait, was shot in the face with a BB gun and was left in serious condition.
• Haley Pettersen, a 15-year-old white girl in a leg cast in O’Fallon, Illinois was walking her dog when she was attacked by two black girls who said, “This is our territory, white girl!” One girl grabbed Haley by the hair, and the other one started hitting her in the face. The blacks ran off only when some neighbors came out. The attack left Haley with a swollen left eye. (If you’ve listened to any of the pundit chatter about Zimmerman, you know that young Haley had no reason to believe that her life was in danger. Sometimes you just have to take a beating.)
• In Kansas City (again), an unnamed 50-year-old white man was left with a fractured hip and other injuries after being beaten by a group of blacks shouting racial epithets.
• Gary Allder, a white man in San Antonio, came home to find that his house had been burglarized, ransacked, and tagged with racial slurs such as “Die Whitey.”
• Travis Eugene Winemiller, 16, a white Polk County, Florida inmate, was beaten, choked, and strangled until he was unconscious by three black inmates. They then hogtied Winemiller and said, “This is how you slave a real cracker,” and threatened to kill him.
• Jacob Appel, a 15-year-old autistic white boy, was attacked by three blacks at his bus stop in Palm Bay, Florida. The blacks taunted, used racial slurs, and chased the victim into the street where he was nearly struck by a car. The only reason the blacks were caught is that one of the attackers posted the video on his Facebook page.

And here’s a 78-year-old Ohio man who was almost killed on behalf of Trayvon Martin, simply because he is white.

We can’t list all the stories about violence against whites because they go on and on. But they are almost never called hate crimes. Take the first example above. Were the black “youths,” as they’re called in the newspapers, convicted of a hate crime? Of course not. Coon’s name gets about 18,000 hits on Google versus 21 million for Trayvon Martin, at the time of this writing.

Google News is an even more accurate barometer of Jew-News. “Trayvon Martin” gets 34,700 results. “Omar Thornton”: 1.

With 50 million self-identified “Latinos” in America and “multiculturalism” the new civic religion, “we’re supposed to be sensitive to their culture, but a crucial part of their culture consists of terms like mestizo, mulatto, Indio, and so forth.” Whites are so afraid of using such terms during this era of genocide that a search for “George Zimmerman mestizo” at Google News yields (now) four whole results.

Racial profiling is necessary, writes Walter Williams.

God would never racially profile, because he knows everything, including who is a criminal or terrorist. We humans are not gods; therefore, we must often base our decisions on guesses and hunches. It turns out that easily observed physical characteristics, such as race, are highly interconnected with other characteristics less easily observed…

According to the Uniform Crime Report for 2009, among people 18 or younger [just a few percent of the population], blacks were charged with 58 percent of murders and non-negligent manslaughter, 67 percent of robberies, 42 percent of aggravated assaults and 43 percent of auto thefts. As for murder, more than 90 percent of the time, their victims were black. These statistics, showing a strong interconnection among race, youth and crime, are a far better explanation for racial profiling and suspicion than simple racism.

This black law “professor” claims that even suspecting blacks of crime is a hate crime.

According to the FBI’s new hate crime rules, a “Hispanic” can be a victim but not a perpetrator.

George Zimmerman posted an ugly website of his own. One page entitled “My Race” quotes Thomas Paine with an added underline: “The world is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion.” As any Kinist will tell you, nothing could be more Satanic. Most “Christians” now agree with Paine.

If you want to see why establishment “conservatism” is a joke, watch as Glenn Beck is afraid to answer a simple question from Katie Couric: “What do you mean when you refer to white culture?” He fumbles his words and refuses to answer. Never mind that Katie Couric interprets the very words “white culture” to be “racist,” which she would never say about black culture or any other kind. Every race and ethnicity on earth except whites is allowed to have their own culture. The point is that you can’t answer this question and not be called a racist. Which means that you’re either going to be a Kinist and embrace your people or be an Alienist and deflect the question as well as loyalty to your people. “Conservatism” is now a combination of oikophobia (the repudiation of inheritance and home) and xenophilia (preference for the alien). The paradox of the oikophobe seems to be that any opposition directed at the theological and cultural tradition of the West is to be encouraged even if it is “significantly more parochial, exclusivist, patriarchal, and ethnocentric,” writes Roger Scruton.

Since white people are constantly seeking to enhance their social status, they are the most likely to leapfrog loyalties.

The default human tendency is toward concentric loyalties. If you look at people in Szechuan or Paraguay or Burkina Faso, you’ll notice that they tend to feel the most duties and allegiance toward people whom they consider most like themselves, moderate amounts toward people moderately close to them, and so forth onward and outward.

But the Western liberal is noteworthy for feeling loyalty toward his inner circle, however defined, then ostentatiously leapfrogging over a whole bunch of people who are kind of like him but whom he despises, in order to embrace The Other.

Watch Baratunde Thurston praise “the black friend” for defusing explosive situations by diplomatically rejecting stereotypes. Now watch the hilarious response from RamzPaul.

No, Black Friend, you have to pay for those Skittles.

No, Black Friend, you can’t attack someone for asking you a question.

And no, Black Friend, not all white women are interested in you.

Kevin Swanson, the impastor with the annoying, over-enunciated radio voice, wants to “get to the core issues” of the Trayvon Martin case, which means that he has nothing to say about the Trayvon Martin case. Instead, he shows that he’s white by arguing that race doesn’t exist. “I don’t even believe in race, I don’t even want race,” he says. And then he says: “I hate the idea of racism.” Which must mean that his definition of racism is any acknowledgement that race is real. And since most people in the world, except for some hyper-pious white people, cherish race, one can easily infer that Swanson accuses most of the world of the sin of racism. This includes a jury on which he served. He congratulates himself for “single-handedly” hanging the jury, which was all-white, when he came to the defense of an “African American” defendant. He concludes, of course, that the jury was racist. Otherwise, they would have agreed with him. Instead, they “hated” him, he says.

Swanson is so full of himself and his false piety that he resembles a pufferfish. He talks about how LBJ’s socialism impoverished black families, and the slave trade split up black families, and nearly half of all murder victims are black. But what about the white victims? Do they earn mention? He drops a hint of his concern for the white plight at 20:05:

The mistake is people aren’t doing the Great Commission… The bottom line is segregation doesn’t work. Apartheid doesn’t work. Putting Indians on a reservation doesn’t work… It doesn’t work to segregate all these tribes into their own little areas, and we can have our own nice little, safe little life all by ourselves… You can try to have your nice little, separated Christian existence away from all the pagan tribes, but no, you’ve got to get into the pagan tribes, no matter where they are… There are no other options. You’re either going to have to go into the inner cities, you’ll have to go into the African tribes in South Africa… Mexico, and all over the world, and disciple the nations. Otherwise, the nations are going to come here, and you’re probably going to have a fair amount of anarchy and tyranny going on until somebody disciples the nations, meaning, you take some young men…[and] disciple those young men until they’re ready to have their own families and disciple their own families…and hopefully become future elders and pastors in the Church of Jesus Christ, and voila, you’ve got a biblical social system on your hands.

Please ask yourself this question: Which of our fathers would have agreed with this? Can you name even one? They were great missionaries, to be sure, but which of them believed that the lives and chastity of their women and childen, and the survival of their nations, must be placed at risk because we have no choice but to mix the world for the sake of the gospel? If this amalgamationist view was rare or nonexistent in times past, on whose authority are we to believe that our fathers did not understand the Great Commission? Are we to take Swanson’s word for it? He plainly admits that anarchy and tyranny are on the breakfast menu until we “disciple” those who are flooding across the border and teach them to stop dumping their trash in the woods and crucifying themselves on Good Friday. Obviously, Swanson cares more for the alien than for the women and children of his own people, in direct violation of 1 Timothy 5:8.

Because we identify Swanson for what he is, he reserves a portion at the end of the show (25:30) for denouncing Kinists as “vile” “evolutionary” “cultists.” He says his friend, R.C. Sproul Jr., has also been “persecuted” by Kinists for adopting black children. Yeah, we’re all torn up about that. R.C. moved to the small mountain town of Mendota, Virginia, preaching a gospel of hate and boasting that his small church was the most racially-mixed in a radius of 50 miles. He boasted that his fecund congregation would turn his region of southwest Virginia “coffee-colored” in a generation. Today, R.C. works for Dad in Sanford, Florida, where young Trayvon was dispatched, and it’s doubtful that he would be employed at all if not for Dad. All his grand, Satanic dreams have come to naught, and not because of Kinists. It’s because men like R.C. and Boy Swanson strive against the purposes of the Almighty. To put it in terms that any Calvinist will understand, they’re destined to fail.

Having discoursed on the horrors of racism with his quadroon co-host, Swanson can’t resist engaging in a bit of racism himself. After caricaturing our position on “kind” or “kin” and putting forth a theology that completely ignores the law in Lev. 19:19 (for starters), he guesses that Kinists must want to marry their own sisters to protect the gene pool, and asks, “Are these guys located in the far-off hills of Kentucky?” How many pastors do you know who make jokes about the impoverished but faithful residents of Appalachia being sodomites and incestuous? His co-host asks: “How many teeth do they have?” Hey guys, you forgot to mention trailer parks. When do the jokes about beaners and watermelon eaters commence?

In this video, Swanson quotes James 1:27 as a directive to adopt children, and if you don’t have tens of thousands of dollars to do it, your church must raise the money for you! All in the name of the “gospel,” of course. Faith without works is dead and all that. If you oppose this plan of action, it means that you’re hopelessly mired in the racist past and should be brought under church discipline for denying that all people are created in God’s image. As our friend Christian Gray mocks, if two Haitians can be bought for the price of one Russian, well, that’s just good stewardship. What soul-winner could pass up a two-for-one Haitian bargain?

Elizabeth, Colorado, where Swanson produces his show, is 91% white with no blacks. So close to Denver and yet so far! It hasn’t had a murder in 11 years or a rape in 3. It’s just the sort of white enclave where you won’t find any Trayvons but will find an abundance of Reformatard preachers who pontificate about racial equality.

Swanson agrees with the European Union’s Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000: “The European Union rejects theories which attempt to determine the existence of separate human races.” And with “The Race Question” from UNESCO in 1950: “There is…no biological justification for prohibiting intermarriage between persons of different ethnic groups.” And with the United Nation’s Declaration on Race and Racial Prejudice: “All human beings belong to a single species and are descended from a common stock… The differences between the achievements of the different peoples are entirely attributable to geographical, historical, political, economic, social and cultural factors. Such differences can in no case serve as a pretext for any rank-ordered classification of nations or peoples.” And with the Humanist Manifesto II: “We deplore the division of humankind on nationalistic grounds. We have reached a turning point in human history where the best option is to transcend the limits of national sovereignty and to move toward the building of a world community in which all sectors of the human family can participate… For the first time in human history, no part of humankind can be isolated from any other… We thus reaffirm a commitment to the building of world community…” And with Article 123 of the 1936 constitution of the Soviet Union: “[A]ny advocacy of racial or national exclusiveness…is punishable by law.” But does he agree with our Christian fathers? Not in the slightest.

Here’s a good example of Swansonesque hypocrisy. John Derbyshire, who is the guy in the striped shirt in this Bruce Lee movie, has been raked over the coals for this article about “the talk” that white people must have with their children to educate them in the ways of the negroid. Our children must be warned that blacks and whites exhibit traits which are quite different on average.

These differences are magnified by the hostility many blacks feel toward whites. Thus, while black-on-black behavior is more antisocial in the average than is white-on-white behavior, average black-on-white behavior is a degree more antisocial yet.

A small cohort of blacks—in my experience, around five percent—is ferociously hostile to whites and will go to great lengths to inconvenience or harm us. A much larger cohort of blacks—around half—will go along passively if the five percent take leadership in some event. They will do this out of racial solidarity, the natural willingness of most human beings to be led, and a vague feeling that whites have it coming. [This is precisely what has happened in the aftermath of Trayvon Martin's killing.]

Thus, while always attentive to the particular qualities of individuals, on the many occasions where you have nothing to guide you but knowledge of those mean differences, use statistical common sense:

Avoid concentrations of blacks not all known to you personally.

Stay out of heavily black neighborhoods.

If planning a trip to a beach or amusement park at some date, find out whether it is likely to be swamped with blacks on that date (neglect of that one got me the closest I have ever gotten to death by gunshot). [Note: Myrtle Beach. Memorial Day weekend. Say no more.]

Do not attend events likely to draw a lot of blacks.

If you are at some public event at which the number of blacks suddenly swells, leave as quickly as possible.

Do not settle in a district or municipality run by black politicians.

Before voting for a black politician, scrutinize his/her character much more carefully than you would a white.

Do not act the Good Samaritan to blacks in apparent distress, e.g., on the highway.

If accosted by a strange black in the street, smile and say something polite but keep moving.

The mean intelligence of blacks is much lower than for whites. The least intelligent ten percent of whites have IQs below 81; forty percent of blacks have IQs that low. Only one black in six is more intelligent than the average white; five whites out of six are more intelligent than the average black. These differences show in every test of general cognitive ability that anyone, of any race or nationality, has yet been able to devise. They are reflected in countless everyday situations. “Life is an IQ test.”

There is a magnifying effect here, too, caused by affirmative action. In a pure meritocracy there would be very low proportions of blacks in cognitively demanding jobs. Because of affirmative action, the proportions are higher. In government work, they are very high. Thus, in those encounters with strangers that involve cognitive engagement, ceteris paribus the black stranger will be less intelligent than the white… [And therefore, probably less competent.]

People are so worked up about the article because it’s true, and some people hate the truth. You and your loved ones will be much safer if you follow this advice, regardless of whether you like it. The original article has scored, oh let’s see, more than 5,000 comments at the time of this writing. My favorite one, directed to the liberals: “Is there something statistically incorrect about this article?” No answer.

Derbyshire can sometimes be a fool, but it was for this lucid moment of truthfulness that he was fired from National Review by editor Rich Lowry. After the Trayvon Martin shooting, Lowry wrote a ridiculous column called “Al Sharpton is Right” which accuses Zimmerman of being a vigilante and a racist. Now, Lowry writes that Derbyshire’s “column is so outlandish it constitutes a kind of letter of resignation.” Having cancer, it might have been the Derb’s intention to go out with a bang.

Jared Taylor writes that Derbyshire’s crime lay in “pointing out something that is not only true but that everyone knows to be true.”

John Derbyshire…must be fired, silenced, and disgraced because everyone—from the mooncalves at Huffington Post to the “conservatives” at National Review—lives by the very rules Mr. Derbyshire put into print. I have no doubt at all that Rich Lowry avoids crowds of blacks, does not live in a black neighborhood, and would never send his children to a black school. He may babble racial moonshine to his children, but the real “talk” he gives them is exactly the one Mr. Derbyshire wrote about. Mr. Lowry’s real “talk” is the way he lives his life.

And that is why Mr. Derbyshire had to go. There is nothing cowards and hypocrites hate more than brave men who live by their convictions.

Richard Spencer recalls one of John Derbyshire’s most enjoyable passages. In reviewing Robert Putnam’s E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First Century, Derbyshire noticed the curious structure of the book:

• The Prospects and Benefits of Immigration and Ethnic Diversity (three pages)
• Immigration and Diversity Foster Social Isolation (nineteen pages)
• Becoming Comfortable with Diversity (seven pages)

I’ve had some mild amusement here at my desk trying to think up imaginary research papers similarly structured. One for publication in a health journal, perhaps, with three sections titled

• Health benefits of drinking green tea
• Green tea causes intestinal cancer
• Making the switch to green tea

Days after firing Derbyshire, Lowry also fired Wimpy Weissberg for speaking to people at American Renaissance conferences who do their own thinking. James Edwards just sent out an email with a very funny title: “If you can’t trust a guy named Weissberg, who can you trust?” That’s what I always say! Still, Wimpy’s final column for National Review could not have been more apropos. Someone needs to thwart Lowry a new one. NR used to be a good magazine. Buckley once hired great writers like James J. Kilpatrick, who wrote: “Segregation is a fact, and more than a fact; it is a state of mind. It lies in the Southern subconscious next to man’s most elementary instincts, for self-preservation, for survival, for the untroubled continuation of a not intolerable way of life.” This is how Christians used to think. Now those old Christians are called haters.

“A man must have a local habitation, within a particular family and race, or else he will never know the true God.” ~ CWNY

This is empirically verifiable. Bret McAtee quotes Donald McGavaran’s Homogeneous Unit Principle: “People become Christian fastest when least change of race or clan is involved.” In other words, the less likely one is to cross God-ordained boundaries, the more likely it is that he will become a Christian. This is why most churches have always been homogeneous and always will be homogeneous. As Rev. McAtee observes, those who pretend that it is the work of the gospel to bring an end to homogeneous churches are impeding the gospel itself.

“It was, therefore, base ingratitude in the posterity of Seth, to mingle themselves with the children of Cain, and with other profane races; because they voluntarily deprived themselves of the inestimable grace of God. For it was an intolerable profanation, to pervert, and to confound, the order appointed by God. It seems at first sight frivolous, that the sons of God should be so severely condemned, for having chosen for themselves beautiful wives from the daughters of men. But we must know first, that it is not a light crime to violate a distinction established by the Lord.” ~ John Calvin’s commentary on Genesis 6

Bon sang ne saurait mentir (good blood cannot lie). Mal sang ne peut que mentir (bad blood cannot but lie).

Contrary to what neo-Christians believe, unity is not one of the marks of the Church. As Rev. McAtee writes, “Unity is the residual effect of the marks of the Church being pursued… Unity is not biblical unity when it is pursued only for the sake of unity.”

Speaking of unitards, Tim Keller, John Piper, and Anthony Bradley recently hosted a conference called “Race and the Christian.” Keller’s focus on corporate responsibility is very interesting. He uses Daniel 9, where Daniel repents of the sins of his ancestors, and Joshua 7, where Achan’s sin results in the stoning of his entire family, as proof that white guilt is legitimate, and we must repent of slavery and everything else that blacks don’t like. Of course, the irony is lost on him. If whites as a race are culpable for the “sin” of some of their ancestors owning African slaves, and if Germans as a nation are culpable for the Holohoax, and if a man’s entire family is culpable for his sin alone, it logically follows that all blacks must pay dearly for crimes committed by their Trayvons. I can’t wait to see Keller try to back out of this one.

Keller looks more like a serpent than James Carville. Like all white liberals, he is so absorbed in his white supremacy that the actions of others don’t even register. Other races are props; they are like children whose every tantrum must be pacified. And just as when juveniles exhibit anti-social behavior, we immediately recognize that it reflects poorly on the parents, so the white liberal narcissist holds to a dark kind of substitutionary atonement for his black protégés who he views as stunted human beings who can’t be held accountable for their actions. The sentimental liberal always takes upon himself the role of Great White Father, and all his talk about amalgamating races and cultures is devoted to the messianic goal of turning all people “white.” He seeks to recast the world in his own image. It’s ironic that we Kinists are called racists. We take a much higher view of the dignity, and therefore the responsibility, of all people.

Greg Johnson has written the best article ever on metrosexual White Saviors, focusing on Jason Russell and the Kony 2012 video.

The modern version of white idealism on display in Kony 2012 is premised on white guilt and self-hatred, but it is equally supremacist and grandiose, for if one is guilty of everything, then one is responsible for everything, i.e., one can do anything. Every time one pities another, one secretly congratulates oneself for being superior. Every time one blames one’s race for the world’s woes, one slyly congratulates oneself as being part of the only people who really matter, the only real agents of history. Everybody else is just along for the ride.

This is white supremacy, if the word means anything.

Getting back to the “Race and the Christian” conference, Anthony Bradley comes to the meeting with typical Negro flair (with matching bowtie and shoes but without other accoutrements from this page) but somewhat restrained black elocution (having wild hand gestures and theatrical oratory but mercifully free of whooping cadence or a backup organist). Contrary to the doctrine of the Apostle Paul, he says in a mocking tone, “God has a wonderful plan for your life…as a slave.” The rest of his speech seems to be a lot of big words strung together incoherently. I’m sure this impressed his seminary professors. For instance, listen to his insane, rambling question at about the 8 minute mark in the Q&A session, followed by perplexed looks from Piper and Keller.

Bradley complains that he has only five or ten minutes on the first day of class to dispel the prejudices of his students as to what black men are like. He blames this inconvenience on “white privilege” rather than common sense and statistics.

At 20:12, he gets to the topic of interracial marriage and strings together more buzzwords to endear himself to ladies of both sexes: “How do we think biblically, how do we think about the gospel, how do we think about the kingdom and all that God has in creation as relates to those who object to interracial marriage…?” What? It’s funny that Piper and Keller don’t even really listen to his questions. Piper’s response is asinine and completely foreign to what our ancestors believed. “I think it’s idolatry to insist that you should only marry within your race,” says Keller.

Bradley asserts that the “heartbeat of Christianity” is now in the global south and is no longer with whites, the historical standard-bearers. The assertion goes unchallenged.

“There have only ever been two non-materialist civilizations in the history of the world, the ancient Hebrew civilization and the ancient European civilization. If you tell me that they are one and the same, I won’t dispute you, but whether the Europeans are the ancient Hebrews or whether their adherence to dictates of the living God made them seem like unto the ancient Hebrews does not have to be decided definitely before we can act on the sure and certain faith that the European people are the Christ-bearers, born to champion Christ against the satanic liberals and the colored barbarians.” ~ CWNY

Piper says that it’s “idolatry…to fear the browning of America.” He implies that nationhood is not exclusive, in conformity to the 1936 constitution of the Soviet Union. He holds to the neo-Christian idea that nationalism is a relic of paganism that has no place in a Christian order. Again, this is absolutely contrary to what our Christian ancestors believed. It’s interesting that Piper uses the word “fear,” as though there could be no rational explanation for why our forefathers restricted naturalization to whites only in the 1790s. This is precisely what fags do with the word “homophobia.” By using this clever word, they imply that anyone who opposes sodomy is merely being fearful. The connection should come as no surprise since Piper and his crew are race fags.

Prior to a viewing of Boss African American at their next be-in or love-in, Piper and Keller need to show this video to their “Native American” friends, seeing as how we all come from Adam:

George Zimmerman’s jury will want to watch it too, as soon as the kangaroo court convenes.

How slavery began in America.

“If the Jacobin equality is that which intuition teaches to be ‘inalienable,’ then it was inconsistent that the Africans, though pagans, aliens, lately savage, and utterly unfit to wield the higher franchise of civic life without ruining society and themselves, should be ‘held to service or labor’ under other citizens. It was iniquity that they should be denied any franchise attainable by any other citizen. As this was ‘self-evident,’ and the equality ‘inalienable,’ no constitutions, laws, or covenants could legitimate the difference between African and American. But they all became null and void in attempting to do so. Yea, God himself was quite roundly notified, that he had better not legitimate it, or he would be repudiated also! And when some eight millions were unable to see this Jacobin logic so, a quarter of a million of them were killed, their homes desolated, and half a continent clad in ruin! Thus practical is this science of philosophy!” ~ R.L. Dabney

“Let them be but once free, remove the depressing shackles of slavery, unbind their arms, said they, and soon we will see a race fully equal to the whites; agriculture will progress, commerce be fostered, and the cause of education and religion be advanced; Euclids were to spring from the mountains, Aesops and Dumas’ were to write verses and romances in the valleys, and the golden shores of the Artibonite were to witness a pastoral peace and happiness, unequaled in the happy valley of Amhara, or in the future Utopia of the Jesuits, on the banks of the Panara!” ~ W.W. Wright, Free Negroes in Hayti, via Occidental Dissent

Going to college with black people. Another scholarly chimpout.

Song and dance, rather than study, helps black kids prepare for standardized tests. It remains to be seen whether their scores actually improve, but by all reports the black kids feel much better about their chances.

Look at the names of these people.

A herd of Trayvons in Baltimore. Buy guns, white paple. (Like you need more encouragement.)

A move is underway, especially on CNN, for professional adult journalists to stop acting like kindergarten teachers and saying “the N word” or writing “n–ger” instead of the black man’s favorite word, “nigger.” By doing so, they play along with the stupid rule that only blacks are allowed to say the word, and whites are not even allowed to say it if it is part of a news story. It’s a very good thing when a double standard comes to an end. Whoopi Goldberg agrees, but when she says the word on The View, she is bleeped by the censors. “Let’s call it what it is,” she says. She mocks the “burial” of the word by the NAACP and its removal after the fact from Roots. We live in a time when racial slurs against blacks are network news but the murders of whites are not even found in the local news. Yet Anthony Bradley thinks “white privilege” is the problem.

Kanye West be all entrepreneurial ‘n shabazz. Earlier this year, he put out the call on Twitter for “architects, graphic designers, directors musicians, producers, AnRs, writers, publicist[s], social media experts, app guys, managers, car designers, clothing designers, DJs, video game designers, publishers, tech guys, lawyers, bankers, nutritionist[s], doctors, scientists [and] teachers” so that he could hire them all and revolutionize technology. Of course, everyone expects his tech startup to flop. Some clever people made a parody site pretending to be West’s new product: a pathetic whois domain lookup branded with the niggerism “Who dat?” It purports to be “the Facebook of websites.”

Transvestite Negro Tyler Perry was stopped by white cops in Atlanta for turning left from a right lane. The cops didn’t bow and kiss his ring. They detained him until a black cop arrived who allegedly spoke to them in a hushed tone. Mama Perry recognized this as a blatant case of racism and went on Facebook to ask, “[D]o you see how quickly this could have turned for the worse?… RACIAL PROFILING SHOULD BE A HATE CRIME INVESTIGATED BY THE FBI!!!”

While the median net worth of whites was ten times the median net worth of blacks in 1988, the last year of the Reagan administration, the ratio was 19 to 1 in 2009, the first year of the Obama administration. With Hispanics, the ratio was 8 to 1 in 1988 and 15 to 1 in 2009.

Obama’s new budget is $3.8 trillion with $1.43 trillion in new taxes.

Meanwhile, the empire is “buying” (with phony-baloney money) 61% of all new debt, having borrowed all they can from foreigners. Get ready for massive inflation, as if the current 8% inflation rate and 15% unemployment aren’t bad enough.

“Clearly I was now a hate group, and with tax season upon us, I called my accountant to find out if there was a tax deduction for that. There wasn’t.”

Jew Kagan, the “Justice” on your empire’s Supreme Court, believes that we should be glad to have money taken from us and then awarded to us, regardless of whether it is laden with coercive conditions. How could money be bad?

“The U.S. intelligence community will now be able to store information about Americans with no ties to terrorism for up to five years under new Obama administration guidelines.”

Does it look to you as though Obama himself has ties to terrorism?

Here’s the NSA’s new global spy center, which will be fully operational next year.

“Anything and everything you’ve ever said or done, from the trivial to the damning—phone calls, Facebook posts, Twitter tweets, Google searches, emails, bookstore and grocery purchases, bank statements, commuter toll records, etc.—will be tracked, collected, catalogued and analyzed by the UDC’s supercomputers and teams of government agents. In this way, by sifting through the detritus of your once-private life, the government will come to its own conclusions about who you are, where you fit in, and how best to deal with you should the need arise.”

Foreign enemies are so 20th century. Now the enemies of the American empire are the American people themselves. No court order is necessary for surveillance. Don’t forget: The terrorists hate us for our freedoms.

The same thing is happening in Britain, but the Judaic empire there is not even trying to conceal it. All calls, emails, texts, and websites visited will now be monitored.

This article stating that a new Japanese surveillance system can scan 36 million faces in seconds must be a joke. All Japanese look alike.

For only 200 bucks, you can prove your patriotism by wearing the empire on your face.

“If birds gather on any spot, it is unoccupied.” ~ Sun Tzu, The Art of War

‎”Despite its protests to the contrary, modern Christianity has become willy-nilly the religion of the state and the economic status quo. Because it has been so exclusively dedicated to incanting anemic souls into Heaven, it has been made the tool of much earthly villainy. It has, for the most part, stood silently by while a predatory economy has ravaged the world, destroyed its natural beauty and health, divided and plundered its human communities and households. It has flown the flag and chanted the slogans of empire. It has assumed with the economists that ‘economic forces’ automatically work for good and has assumed with the industrialists and the militarists that technology determines history. It has assumed with almost everybody that ‘progress’ is good, that it is good to be modern and up with the times… [Modern] Christianity connives directly in the murder of Creation.” ~ Wendell Berry, Sex, Economy, Freedom & Community, p. 114

“It’s been said that if I tell you our society is ruled by an oppressive elite, you will call me a liberal, a reformist, and an idealist. If I tell you who that oppressive elite is, you will call me a Nazi, a racist, and an anti-Semite.” Read this excellent review of The Hunger Games, a movie that is very instructive for our time. Our people are accused of being filled with hate, when in reality they are filled with fear. They are so utterly subjugated that they cheer for their own demise.

As always, the heroes are white, the villains are whites, blacks serve as moral mascots to help us tell good from evil, and a few non-whites run around for scenery and to fill a quota of some sort. Whether unconsciously, accidentally, slyly deliberately, or with the kind of sanctimonious liberal racism that presumes only whites can be moral actors for good or evil, the message is for us…

The Capitol that is the center of evil in Panem is driven by purposeless exploitation. Rather than grim faced blonde Herrenvolk oppressing the colored masses of the Districts, Collins presents an exaggerated portrait of our own progressive elites. They are effeminate and hysterical physical weaklings with pointless lives. The complicated edifice of power reaches its zenith not in a black-garbed order of Übermenschen fanatically dedicated to an occult quest, but in a contemptible menagerie of spoiled sexual deviants that give themselves cat whiskers and brightly colored wigs to look “attractive”…

Like residents of the Capitol, many Americans can only be termed alive in the purely technical sense, as they have no purpose to their existence beyond living vicariously through the people on an electronic screen…

Hailing from the Appalachian coal country, [the heroine] is from the one group that our own society despises beyond all others… [See Kevin Swanson's hilarious jokes about rednecks.]

Of course, if she openly dissents from the Capitol, even with the slightest remark, Katniss, her family, and her friends will all be destroyed. The white advocate of today can sympathize.

Benedict, the Pope of Satan, calls for a “true world political authority” with “real teeth” in his new encyclical entitled Caritas in Veritate, or Charity in Truth. The purpose of this Marxist world government would be “to manage the global economy; to revive economies hit by the crisis; to avoid any deterioration of the present crisis and the greater imbalances that would result.”

What would Martin Luther say? He called the papal decretals “decraptals.” He called Pope Paul III “Her Sodomitical Hellishness Paula III” and “Fart-Ass.” He said the pope was like “a sow on a harp” who “conjure[s] horse dirt into our mouths.”

Oh, dearest little ass-pope…don’t dance around… For the ice is…solidly frozen this year…you might fall… If a fart should escape you while you were falling, the whole world would laugh at you and say…”How the ass-pope has befouled himself”…

You should not write a book before you have heard an old sow fart; and then you should open your jaws with awe, saying, “Thank you, lovely nightingale, that is just the text for me.”

Luther commissioned a woodcut by Lucas Cranach that depicts the pope being born, expelled from the anus of an enormous she-devil. (More woodcuts.)

But this is nothing compared to the prophet Ezekiel, who in chapter 23 calls Israel a prostitute who loves to have her virgin nipples fondled by Assyrians, and lusts after their genitals, which are as large as those of donkeys, and whose seminal emission is like that of stallions.

You can find insults befitting any of today’s Babelist preachers at the Martin Luther Insult Generator. One of my favorites, which makes me think of John Piper: “Perhaps you want me to die of unrelieved boredom while you keep on talking” (The Bondage of the Will, p. 244).

The authority of natural revelation refutes the biblicist. Does not even “the light of nature,” as the writers of the Westminster Confession called it, teach you that race is real?

[I]f an alienist asks you to provide a verse or two proving kinism, tell him that instead of asking, “Chapter and verse?” he should be asking, “Why do you believe that to be true?” All truth is God’s truth, and all of nature bears the authority of nature’s God. While Scripture should be upheld as perfectly inerrant, investigations of natural revelation should not be discounted as unworthy. Indeed, such a denigration of nature is one reason why the modern church cares about ridiculously in-depth studies into topics like biblical poetry, all while congregants are entirely ignorant of real and pressing issues today, like race and the Jew…

Scripture does support kinism, but nature does as well—perspicuously. And if the biblicist wishes to reject the kinist’s appeal to natural revelation, simply because it is natural revelation, then he must accept the full consequences of such rejection. He must accept all the implications involved in spurning nature, which ultimately is destructive of our religion.

And by all means, when they ask for the “explicit verse of Scripture” that outlaws miscegenation, tell them it’s right next to the verse that decrees only that which is explicit to be authoritative.

Christians at large are more likely than the non-religious to be political leftists, according to this research, and more likely to value equality above freedom.

“[T]he idea of human equality is the source of many of the most mischievous errors of our times. No one call tell how much false philosophy, false legislation, and false philanthropy have been based upon it.”

The ruins of Heritage USA. More. A fitting metaphor for the business of modern churches in general.

Alienist George Galloway gets to the point we made earlier about Pat Buchanan’s perceived “racism.” He asks, how could a white Brit be a minority in his own land when there are continuous waves of immigrants coming to the island? We’re to the point now that a conservative commentator can’t hold down a job in the news business unless he agrees that people are just people, and monoculture is sterile, and multiculture is enriching. Diversity of every kind is demanded, but not diversity of opinion.

A very interesting article from David Yeagley on the difference between Eastern and Western music. “The Western mind is three dimensional, whereas the Oriental mind tends to be only two. (We might say the West is Trinitarian, as it were.)”

David Yeagley is correct that white women have mixed “the grand old Christian missionary template” with a messiah complex and feminism, becoming a curse. Laura Ingraham is a perfect example.

Feminism perfected: a “marriage” of one and a vow “to relish a lifelong love affair with my beautiful self.” I am Woman, hear me roar!

Here’s another thing about the East that is completely unlike the West.

“So long as western people imagine that there only exists a single type of humanity, that there is only one ‘civilization,’ at different stages of development, no mutual understanding will be possible. The truth is that there are many civilizations, developing along very different lines, and that, among these, that of the modern West is strangely exceptional, as some of its characteristics show… The word civilization, which our ancestors did very well without, perhaps because they had the thing itself, spread during the 19th century under the influence of new ideas. The scientific discoveries, the development of industry, of commerce, of prosperity and of material welfare had created a kind of enthusiasm and even a kind of prophetics. The conception of indefinite progress, dating from the second half of the 18th century, helped to convince mankind that it had entered upon a new era, that of absolute civilization.” ~ René Guénon

“Everyone of the children of Israel shall camp by his own standard, beside the emblems of his father’s house…” ~ Numbers 2:2

“The…commandments…make it a duty on the part of the people of God to keep the physical and moral order of the world sacred.” ~ Keil and Delitzch on Leviticus 19:19

The village of Dmanisi in Georgia is called the cradle of European civilization. Pictures here and here.

Saxon and Norman principles, written by C. Chauncey Burr in 1863.

Despite its Spenglerian flaws about history moving in cycles as a god unto itself, the poem A Word From the Outer Dark by Robert E. Howard strikes disturbingly close to home. As a friend of ours says, it could only have been written by a white man.

My ruthless hands still clutch at life –
Still like the shoreless sea
My soul beats on in rage and strife
You may not shackle me.

My leopard eyes are still untamed,
They hold a darksome light –
A fierce and brooding gleam untamed
That pierced primeval night.

Rear mighty temples to your god –
I lurk where shadows sway,
Till, when your drowsy guards shall nod
To leap and rend and slay.

For I would hurl your cities down
And I would break your shrines
And give the site of every town
To thistles and to vines.

Higher the walls of Nineveh
And prouder Babel’s spires –
I bellowed from the desert way
They crumbled in my fires.

For all the works of cultured man
Must fare and fade and fall.
I am the Dark Barbarian
That towers over all.

You lolled in gardens where breezes fanned
That blossom’s shivering shard;
But we were bred in a naked land
Where life was bitter hard.

You raped the grapes of their purple soul
For your wine cups brimming high;
We stopped to the dregs of the muddy hole
That was bitter with alkali.

And you grew flabby and round of limb,
Short of nerve and breath
But we grew rugged and lean and grim
In our naked grip with death.

Silk was too harsh for your dainty skin,
Red wine too poor for your drought;
We hunted the holes that the rain stood in
And stripped the wolf for our clout.

Round were your bellies, soft your hand,
Soft with fat of earth;
Yours was the wealth of a smiling land,
Ours the desert’s dearth.

You sang beneath the locust tree,
Forgetful of hunger and hate;
“It’s always been, it will always be!”
Even then we were at your gate.

You lolled the fountain and golden hall
Until that frenzied morn
When we burst the gates and breached the wall
And cut you down like corn.

We reaped the yield and we plowed the field
With red and dripping shares,
And you could not fight and you could not run,
You could only die like hares.

Grim was the barter, red the trade,
With dripping swords for coins,
And your women screamed in the trampled sand
With bruised and bleeding loins.

Skilled was the brain and skilled the hand
That shaped the stubborn stone,
But the brain spilled on the bloody sand
When iron split the bone.

The hand that traced the gilded frieze
That scrolled the written page,
It could not turn the driven steel
Backed by the primal rage.

Of what avail the harp and lute,
Gemmed girdle and purple cloak
When the dripping ax was smiting home
In the flame and the blinding smoke?

Blood smeared your satin and silk and lace,
You heard your children moan,
And your elders howled in the market place
Where we stripped them skin from bone.

And where your bearded judges sat
And bade men live or die,
A naked slayer roared and waved
A bloody scalp on high.

Over the ruins arched and spired
The billowing smoke cloud waves;
And you who lived when the sword was tired,
You live but as our slaves.

Our hard hands clutch your golden cups,
Our rough feet crush your flowers;
We stable our horses in your halls
And all your wealth is ours.

We have doffed our wolf skin clouts for silks,
We wear them clumsily.
Our eyes are bleak, our beards unshorn,
Our matted locks stream free.

But our sons will trim their beards and hair,
Don cloaks of crimson hue.
They will take your daughters to their beds,
Till they grow soft as you.

They will trade their freedom for harps and lutes,
Discard the bow and the dart;
They will build a prison of satin and gold,
And call it Culture and Art.

They will lie in the lap of a sleeping land,
Till it rusts unman and rot them
And they scorn their blood and the calloused land
And the fathers who begot them.

But our brothers still dwell in the sun-seared waste
And their sons are hard and lank;
They will hunt the wolf-pack that we chased,
And drink the water we drank.

The hungers we know they too will know
The scars of fangs and of briars;
In the rocks where they crouch when the sandstorms blow
They will find the marks of our fires.

They will know the hungers that we once had
While the stream of centuries runs,
Till they burst from the desert, hunger-mad,
To slaughter our slothful sons.

It was not as the flowers,
each soft Spring recurrent;
it was not as His Spirit in the mouths and fuddled
eyes of the eleven apostles;
it was as His flesh: ours.

The same hinged thumbs and toes,
the same valved heart
that — pierced — died, withered, paused, and then
regathered out of enduring Might
new strength to enclose.

Let us not mock God with metaphor,
analogy, sidestepping, transcendence;
making of the event a parable, a sign painted in the
faded credulity of earlier ages:
let us walk through the door.

The stone is rolled back, not papier-mâché,
not a stone in a story,
but the vast rock of materiality that in the slow
grinding of time will eclipse for each of us
the wide light of day.

And if we will have an angel at the tomb,
make it a real angel,
weighty with Max Planck’s quanta, vivid with hair,
opaque in the dawn light, robed in real linen
spun on a definite loom.

Let us not seek to make it less monstrous,
for our own convenience, our own sense of beauty,
lest, awakened in one unthinkable hour, we are
embarrassed by the miracle,
and crushed by remonstrance.

(John Updike, 1964)

“[I]t appeared an unworthy thing that in the celebration of this most holy feast [Easter] we should follow the practice of the Jews, who have impiously defiled their hands with enormous sin, and are, therefore, deservedly afflicted with blindness of soul… Let us then have nothing in common with the detestable Jewish crowd; for we have received from our Saviour a different way.” ~ Roman emperor Constantine during the First Council of Nicaea in 325 AD

Jason Russell said recently that his life’s dream was to make Hollywood musicals “like Moulin Rouge, Chicago, and Hairspray.” Helllooo, Frisco! A few days ago, he was not arrested, amazingly, for masturbating in public, vandalizing cars, and public intoxication, but was merely taken to a hospital for treatment. By the way he waves his arms in the videos here and here, it looks like he’s auditioning for a musical.

The aim of the “Bony” 2012 project is to encourage “humanitarian interventionism” against a ruthless Ugandan warlord who hasn’t been in Uganda for six years. Just wait until you see the whiter-people who comprise the ranks of this army of war-hungry Facebookers. It’s a sea of white faces, and only white faces, working on behalf of African children. They’re getting the word out and wearing bracelets and gearing up to placard cities overnight on April 20 and lobbying to send the U.S. military into a new quagmire. This is what whiter-people do. It doesn’t matter to them that Africans have never secured their own liberty, and therefore will not be able to maintain any peace imposed on them. They simply want to do something for Africa. Whiter-people raise awareness; they moralize with passionate intensity; they “belong and connect.” Despite the stated goal of creating videos to show “that genocide cannot exist,” they would never waste a drop of sweat for their own race, because they are Alienists, and their love affair is always with the Other.

They don’t give a fig for genocide occurring in the south of their precious Africa, because it is the genocide of whites. Still, a perverted, propositional kinship is very important to them; they are all worked up about homophobes, creationists, and racists contributing to the Kony cause. They don’t want the ideological homogeneity of their movement to suffer, African children be hanged.

Ugandans don’t like this campaign at all. The African Youth Initiative Network screened it for more than 5,000 of them a few days ago, and rocks were thrown at the screen, and organizers and the press fled for their lives. Further screenings have been cancelled. Now Ugandans are protesting what they see “as a foreign, inaccurate account that belittle[s] and commercialise[s] their suffering,” and they’re going to ban Kony 2012 t-shirts and bracelets from entering the country.

Obama deployed one hundred advisers into central Africa, purportedly to assist in the hunt for the warlord. “Is it possible that Kony 2012 is being used, perhaps even without the knowledge of the Invisible Children charity, to carry out a [fifth generation warfare] operation?” The empire has been running thin on excuses to intervene in oil-rich countries. Youthful white do-goodism combined with viral Internet memes kind of obviates the need for false flag operations. Think of all the money that could be saved if covertly wiring skyscrapers to implode is no longer necessary. The graduates of Liberty University can be the empire’s free reconaissance squad!

The deployment of American military personnel in a country that has recently discovered oil is not mere serendipity. What we are witnessing is the manipulation of “protest” in order to hide foreign policy intentions. The US government can quite honestly say that it has been forced to intervene in Uganda due to unprecedented popular support.

The idealistic liberal activists will be waving flags and singing God Bless America, even though they hate God, His blessings, and the American stock. They really just want to praise themselves. They are narcissists, and their favorite props have always been black children.

The military is controlled by the slaves of Jew bankers, whose business plan is to control the world’s dwindling supply of oil.

They know what the Rothschilds knew; politics and armies are nothing, money is everything. From age to age, the Jew remains the same, but his days in the West are numbered. “Woe to the inhabitants of the earth and the sea! For the devil has come down to you, having great wrath, because he knows that he has a short time” (Rev. 12:12).

Africa and the truth, suffering together.

Congo, Ivory Coast, Sudan, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, even Kenya. Take your pick, for it is the essence of Africa, the recurring A-Z of horror. And as surely as Nelson Mandela took those steps from captivity to freedom, his own country will doubtless shuffle into chaos and ruin.

Mark my words. One day it will be the turn of South Africa to revert to type, its farms that lie wasted and its towns that are battle zones, its dreams and expectations that lie rotting on the veldt. That is the way of things. Africa rarely surprises, it simply continues to appal…

The construct is as follows: white, inglorious and bad; black, noble and good; empire, bad; independence, good; the west, bad; the African, good. Forgotten in all this is that while Europeans were settling and spreading from the Cape, the psychopathic Shaka Zulu was employing his impi to crush everyone – including the Xhosa – in his path, and the Xhosa were themselves busy slaughtering Bushmen and Hottentots. Yet it is the whites who take the rap, for it was they who won the skirmishes along the Fish and Blood Rivers and who eventually gained the prize.

What suffers is the truth, and – of course – Africa. We are so cowed by the moist-eyed mantras of the left and the oath-laden platitudes of Bono and Geldof, we are forced to accept collective responsibility for the bloody mess that is now Africa. It paralyses us while excusing the black continent and its rulers.

This parody of white guilt on the Conan O’Brien show is very funny. The Help is about a Jew who rewards a Southern feminist for betraying her people, whose only purpose in the film is to be humiliated and degraded. The black characters, by contrast, are “imbued with both homespun wisdom and impeccable moral rectitude.” They are all caricatures, not characters, and Hollywood rising to give the black actress (and only the black actress) a standing ovation, as though her performance or the film itself were based on reality, is truly funny.

Here’s why most whites will sacrifice themselves for any cause except their own: because “white behavior optimizes for social status, not physical safety, wealth, or national survival.” Gen5 writes:

Most of the world optimizes for three different things: wealth, power, and beauty. For whites we can add a fourth good, social status, oddly achieved through “public displays of piety” (PDPs) towards the religion of their time, multiculturalism.

Wealth: “The family fortune that is the birthright of their children is going to be poured down the rat-hole of Africa so the parents can enjoy the adulation of their white liberal friends.” Corporations will gladly waste investment capital for costly diversity sensitivity training (which according to the Harvard Business Review, does nothing to slow discrimination lawsuits).

Power: Politicians would rather lose races than appeal to majority white interests. Even Ron Paul, who knows better, has praised MLK and Rosa Parks as “heroes” and has complained about blacks being “victimized” by the criminal justice system. Beauty: White men marrying non-white women of objectively inferior beauty and compatibility for the sake of claiming superior social status on the race issue. This is also the case for fertile Christians who abstain from having natural children so that they can adopt non-whites from Third World countries. As Gen5 points out, the New York Times even published an article about Mitt Romney’s insufferably white family, implying that he will or ought to be hurt politically because of it. Therefore, just like the old saying, “follow the money,” Gen5 tells us that answers to questions about why white people are self-destructive hinge on what enhances their social status.

So many white advocates are naively on a quest for broadcasting the truth, as if men were swayed by facts, when the larger mission is creating spheres of influence where social status is not a false fitness signal but rather something that correlates with true goods, including national survival.

Everyone will know that we’re winning when our virtual communities become churches, businesses, neighborhoods, and other networks that are able to deliver real benefits to members, and we will benefit from the protection of networks, which are stronger than the sum of their nodes.

Consider the example of a pastor who promotes miscegenation. Where does this pastor live? If in a lily-white area, you can attack him as a hypocrite. If he is the rare true believer who lives in the inner city, you can attack him as a foolish person who puts his family in unnecessary danger. The beauty of the other side being demonstrably wrong is that they are always fools or hypocrites. Either charge diminishes social status quite effectively.

David Opperman has an excellent series of articles (part 1, part 2) on the wunderkind of mediocrity, David Bahnsen, son of the famous theologian Greg Bahnsen. As you might recall, we used to give Little Davie and his buddy Andrew Sandlin the business for teaching Reconstructionists and other conservative Christians that their votes were wasted if they weren’t given to Republicans. These tools formed a lonely thinktank in California called the Center for Cultural Leadership, and their motto was “Creating a New Kind of Christian.” You can see why this gave us the vapors; if you’re not talking to us about the old kind of Christian, you’re not talking to us. We called their organization the Christian Culture Club, a pun on Boy George’s team of limp-wristed culture reclaimers. Their burning desire was to be “relevant” to popular culture. Their every effort was in the service of “incrementalism,” being the idea that the great reversal of our nation’s debauchery will never come at all if we aim too high. Therefore, we must ally ourselves with those who are most likely to win elections, having the expectation that we will get only a smidgin of what we desire, and then push for a smidgin more in the next election. In other words, before we become a Christian nation, we must endorse those who teach that Islam is a religion of peace, that Jews worship the God of the Bible, that sodomy is not to be punished, that we can spend our way out of the hole, etc. Yea, though I walk through the Valley of the Lesser of Two Evils, saith Brother Bahnsen, I shall incrementally climb the Mount of Relevance until I survey The Greater Good. It’s like a perverted Pilgrim’s Progress.

Bahnsen inherited a large share of jingoism from his father. He was foolishly convinced that Reagan rejected Keynesianism and that George W. Bush would be a tax-cutting Reaganite.

He called Pat Buchanan a racist and claimed that import tariffs are a violation of the Eighth Commandment, while international free trade prevents producers from stealing from consumers. Yes, you read that correctly. Fellow cheese log James Jordan agrees, writing: “We are not authorized to steal from people on the basis that they are not citizens of our particular nation.” These people believe that equal access to markets is a necessity of the Christian faith, and they believe the same about equal access to citizenship because it corresponds to their belief that nationhood is an ungodly relic of pagan racialism. Jordan is explicit: “Do we as Christians believe in ‘nationalism’? No, we don’t. We believe in the international, catholic, universal community of the Church. We also should believe in international, catholic, universal free markets and free trade.”

Bahnsen gave a hearty “AMEN!!!!!” when a pastor named Kevin Johnson wrote: “The family has in some sense in the covenant community been replaced by the family of the Church.” As you know, our purpose in life as Kinists is to expose and condemn this as devilry, douse it in kerosene, then hold hands and watch it burn while singing Negro spirituals. But enough about our Thursday evening fellowship meals.

“History is littered with civilizations which undermined the family. The family is God’s ordained life for man, and it endures.” ~ R.J. Rushdoony

“In Scripture, the family is the basic institution of society, to whom all the most basic powers are given, save one: the death penalty. (Hence, the death penalty could not be executed on Cain.) The family is man’s basic government, his best school, and his best church. The decay of the family is the decay of civilization.” ~ R. J. Rushdoony

Bahnsen supported George W. Bush for being pro-life, but this was because, like his father, Bush spoke out against abortion on occasion and never vowed to outlaw it. “Nobody could outlaw it on day one!” Bahnsen panted, and Michael Peroutka is “PATENTLY DISHONEST, and EXTREMELY DANGEROUS” for believing that such a thing was possible or desirable, he wrote in his characteristically capitalized manner.

Ignore obscure Christian retreatists who accuse our President of murder, and those who vote for him as accomplices to murder… For life, and for Bush, David L. Bahnsen

Sandlin (Rushdoony’s former editor) called Peroutka “a national socialist”!

Before long, Bahnsen was complaining about the state of public schools, saying that Bush had thrown too much money at them, and the federal government should get out of the business of education, “HOWEVER, the notion that this federalized education fiasco is to be abolished TOMORROW is contra-intelligent, and anti-Christian, to the core.” Yes, “anti-Christian”! And since the beast cannot be dismembered tomorrow, we need more of the same in the hope that someday we will get less of it. If you don’t follow me here, you are hopelessly irrelevant.

Bahnsen has certainly been consistent. He voted for principled conservative Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2003 and then pretended to get upset about the promotion of an “immoral and wicked lifestyle” when Arnold forced California insurance companies to recognize faggots as being married. Yet no amount of feigned outrage can dissuade the Relevant Incrementalist from voting Pragmatic Publican every time. Rather than repent of his decision, Bahnsen wrote that Arnold was “not a sign of regress. At worst case, he is a break-even.”

In the summer of 2006, Bahnsen wrote that it was “the first 4th of July I am blessed to spend as an ideologically self-conscious ‘neo-conservative.’” He exulted that “[U.S.] troops around the world [are] fighting to maintain peace.” Naturally, he endorsed the Jew-view of Norman Podhoretz that propping up the terrorist, anti-Christ, racial state of Israel is of one piece with “the values of Western civilization as a whole.” This was a three-point shot on the court of ethical casuistry. According to Bahnsen, the wealthy state of Israel must be “supported” for vague reasons having to do with democracy and capitalism, which are in actual practice race-worship and usury.

As you see in the Opperman series, the Jew is at the chewy center of the Tootsie Roll pop:

Bahnsen is nothing if not a committed Zionist, and he persistently exudes support for arch-Zionists such as Paul Wolfowitz, Jonah Goldberg, and John Bolton, among numerous others. Zionism has committed America to an entangling alliance with an overt enemy of Christian civilization, and if the unequal yoking principle in 2 Corinthians 6:14 means anything, it must stand to condemn such an alliance with the stated enemies of Christianity.

Well, as Russell Kirk said, politics is the preoccupation of the quarter-educated. At any rate, this is all helpful background to the quotes from Bahnsen that you see in Mr. Opperman’s articles. For instance, Bahnsen writes: “SOME of what Ron Paul says he wants to do, I want to do too. But I want to do it over a generation, because it absolutely will never get done if it is not done over a generation.” It should be obvious, especially in light of the utter failure, decade after decade, of Republicans to accomplish anything remotely biblical, that this is a dearth of principle, not a strategy. It’s also a good way for Bahnsen to shift blame for his crackpot theories to future generations, long after he will have to answer for what he has taught, similar to how Doug Wilson claims that Africa will be a “glittering civilization,” oh, shall we say, 500 years from now.

This statement by Mr. Opperman is a fine conclusion to the whole mess:

Cheering on a winner simply because you know that he will win is the mentality of a coward, and we live in an age of pervasive moral cowardice. The suggestion that we are making incremental progress of any sort in a healthy direction is simply preposterous.

He also writes:

I can easily picture a David Bahnsen-esque thinker in the waning decades of the Roman Empire; a man who mocked those who warned that Rome’s imperial policies were leading her native citizens to inevitable destruction. This Bahnsen analog likely would have taken great comfort that his opinions were solidly in the mainstream and that Roman ascendancy would last forever… The idea that Rome could ever be sacked by Germanic Christian Goths would never have occurred to Roman Bahnsen, and he would mock those who dared question the future of Roman dominance over the world’s affairs.

To give an answer to the imperial cheerleaders in Rome, God sent Salvian the Presbyter, who was one of the teachers of St. Patrick and was called “the master of bishops.” While Augustine explained why God had allowed the Roman empire to fall, Salvian considered the point to be superfluous. The real question, he said, is why Rome did not fall sooner. While Augustine wrote that the fall of Rome was not the worst thing that could have happened, Salvian wrote that the worst and most unjust thing would have been if Rome had not fallen.

Salvian paints a vivid picture of the lustful delirium of the people at their “games,” even as their cities were being taken. He writes that when the Vandals took Carthage, it was difficult to distinguish the shouts of those at the games from the shouts of those who fell defending the walls.

The barbarian peoples were sounding their arms around the walls of Cirta and Carthage and the Christian population of Carthage still went mad in the circuses and reveled in the theaters.

Does this sound familiar?

Rome “is dying,” he writes, “but continues to laugh.” In Trier, with “the nude and torn bodies of both sexes, infecting the eyes of the city as they were torn to pieces by birds and dogs,” the people (including the Christians) remained obsessed with escapism and pleasure. The state gave the people 175 holidays each year!

There was rampant corruption among the aristocrats (Salvian himself was most likely descended from the Gallo-Roman aristocracy) and rampant mania for entertainment among all classes. It’s just like today, with the civic corruption of the bankers, lobbyists, and politicians, and the corruptions of mind and body among average people who are obsessed with Hollywood and fantasy. Above it all, we hear incessant strains of “God Bless America” and “Land of the Friedman, Home of the Braverman.” The Christians of Rome also chanted the equivalent of “God Bless America,” and when Rome was overcome by its enemies, they were shocked to discover that God was no longer “blessing” them. Salvian writes:

The Church herself, which should be the appeaser of God in all things, what is she but the exasperator of God? Beyond a very few individuals who shun evil, what else is the whole assemblage of Christians but the bilge water of vice? How many will you find in the Church who are not either a drunkard or a beast, or an adulterer, or a fornicator, or a robber, or a debauchee, or a brigand or a murderer? And, what is worse than all this, they do all these things almost unceasingly…

See the countless thousands of Christians daily tarrying at the games where base performances are enacted. Can God watch over people like this? Can He watch over those who revel in the circuses and who commit adultery in the theater?… We ever serve the devil in the obscenity of the games and do this knowingly, understandingly and with well-considered deliberation… To Christ, therefore (O monstrous madness), to Christ we offer circuses and mimes, to Christ for His favors we return the indecencies of the theaters, to Christ we offer as sacrificial victims the vilest of games… Was it for this He hung on a gibbet, whom the world feared as He hung there?…

By the way, when you read about theaters and circuses and mimes, don’t for a minute think that it was anything as benign as a modern carnival. The mimes performed perverted sex acts. Bestiality was the halftime show in the Colosseum.

Whatever is of an impure nature is done in the theaters. Whatever is luxurious, in the wrestling schools. Whatever is immoderate, in the circuses. Whatever is mad, in the arena pits. Here there is wantonness, there lasciviousness. Here there is intemperance, there insanity. And everywhere, the devil.

Salvian could see that Christians brought these horrors upon themselves, just as is the case in America today.

He said: “Woe unto you who laugh because you will weep”; and “Blessed are you who weep because you will laugh.” But we are not satisfied with laughing and rejoicing, unless we rejoice with sin and in madness, unless our laughter is mixed with impurities, unless it is mixed with disgraceful acts…

I believe God clearly wished to show them why they were perishing, since at the actual moment of perishing they were doing that very thing through which they had come to final perdition… Therefore, let nobody think that city perished only at the time of its own ruin. Where such things are done, the inhabitants had already [morally] perished long before they [physically] perished…

[A]ll these calamities which we have suffered have been borne, not by the lack of God’s providence or through His neglect, but rather in justice and judgment, in a most uniform dispensation and worthy retribution.

The American empire will fall just as the Roman empire fell, and when it happens, supporters of wickedness like David Bahnsen will wonder why God has forsaken them. When the system of usury on which they depend collapses, they will have nowhere to turn. We will need a Salvian in that day, and may God restore the years that the locust has devoured.

Salvian also saw that once a people had been conquered by “barbarians,” the last thing they wanted to do was return to subjugation under Rome. As “barbarians” they were free, and Salvian recognized that this was all according to God’s plan.

It’s common for Alienist preachers today to exaggerate the depravity of their European ancestors in the futile and profoundly dishonest attempt to prove that blood has nothing to do with behavior, and the gospel can make everyone equal in every way.

Brian Schwertley, for example, likes to say, without any proof whatsoever, that fifteen hundred years ago his Irish ancestors were painting their buttocks blue and eating each other. But in the real world, Salvian agreed with Tacitus and others that (despite being ignorant of the gospel) the Vandals were remarkably chaste, the Goths remarkably pious, and the Franks, Saxons, and other tribes possessed a host of rude virtues that made them a blessing to refugees.

We [Romans] love impurity; the Goths abominate it. We flee from purity; they seek it. Fornication among them is a crime; with us a distinction and an ornament. Do we think we can face God, do we think that we can be saved, when every crime of impurity, every base and shameful act, is committed by the Romans and censured by the barbarians? Here and now I ask them who think we are better than the barbarians: Tell me which of these vices is committed even by a very few Goths, or which of them is not committed by the Romans or by nearly all Romans? And we wonder when the soil of the Aquitainians, or all of our own is given by God to the barbarians, since the barbarians are now cleansing by chastity those lands which the Romans polluted by fornication.

He goes on to say that Spain was likewise given over to the Vandals, “the most chaste among the barbarians.”

By the captivity of the Spaniards, God wished to show in two ways how much He hated carnal lewdness and loved chastity, when He put the Vandals in command solely on account of their great chastity and subjugated the Spaniards solely on account of their great impurity.

His appraisal of the European tribes:

The Gothic nation is lying, but chaste. The Alani are unchaste, but they lie less. The Franks lie, but they are generous. The Saxons are savage in cruelty, but admirable in chastity…

And then there is Africa. Buckle your seat belt.

Among almost all Africans, I know not what is not evil… Their impurities and blasphemies must not be spoken here, because…they have surpassed the evils of other races, but in impurity and blasphemy they have even surpassed themselves… Who does not know that all Africa always burned with the obscene resinous tree of lust, so that you might think it was not a land and site of men, but an Aetna of unchaste flames? Just as Aetna is naturally heated with certain inner burning fires, so that land is constantly heated by the abominable fires of fornication. Nor do I wish my assertations to obtain full credence in this matter. The testimony of the human race is required. Who does not know that almost all Africans are unchaste, with the exception, perhaps, of those converted to God, that is, those changed by faith and religion?… It is so infrequent and unheard of that an African is not unchaste as it is novel and customary that an African is not an African. So general is the evil and impurity in them that whosoever among them would cease to be impure would apparently not be an African.

And he was speaking primarily of the Carthaginians, Berbers, and Libyans in north Africa! You can imagine what he would have said if sub-Saharan Negroes had entered into his realm of experience.

Rushdoony greatly admired Salvian for perceiving “that history is warfare.”

“Dylan Thomas was speaking not only to his father but to all Europeans when he urged us to ‘Rage, rage against the dying of the light.’” ~ CWNY

“[H]eaven itself is often lost for want of striving, but is never had on easier terms.” ~ Richard Baxter

Japan is all cleaned up after just 11 months. See more. That’s because the Japanese are in Japan. If Haitians were in Japan, it would never be clean again. Haitians claim that they need another three years to clean up from their earthquake, despite receiving billions in foreign aid, mostly from your paychecks.

What has changed in the last century?

“Mount Olive is a small town in rural North Carolina, best known for its pickle factory and southern charm. Less than two years ago the Census listed this place as having zero immigrants from Haiti among the town’s 4,600 inhabitants. But over the past 18 months that has changed as thousands of Haitians have flocked to the area.”

“The experience of Liberia and Haiti show that the African race are devoid of any capacity for political organization and lack genius for government. Unquestionably there is an inherent tendency to revert to savagery and to cast aside the shackles of civilization which are irksome to their physical nature. Of course, there are many exceptions to this racial weakness, but it is true of the mass, as we know from experience in this country. It is that which makes the negro problem practically unsolvable.” ~ Secretary of State Robert Lansing, 1918

“The British are as gullible as we are. Hundreds and hundreds of times, at least, they gave scholarships to Blacks from Basutoland or Kenya or Nigeria or one of their other possessions, and the result was almost always the same. With the money given him, the savage bought himself a good wardrobe, attended an English school, learned to play soccer, attended Oxford, wrote a charming essay on Wordsworth or on ancient law, copulated with half-witted English women who thought him ‘romantic’ and themselves ‘broad-minded,’ and when he got tired of living on English generosity, went home to his tribe where he had a well-roasted baby served up to him as a delicacy of which he had been long deprived by the stupid prejudices of the stupid British.” ~ Revilo Oliver

At 1:07:30 in this sermon, Rushdoony is asked if voodoo is still practiced in the South. Rush quotes from Norman Mailer, who he says has “put his finger on the situation” and is “remarkably discerning.”

He said the goal of the average liberal today was to be – in his words – a white nigger. Because, you see, sharing the perspective of magic, all you need to add to that is witchcraft, and where are you going to seek for power? Below. And so his goal, to be a white nigger, to have that closeness to that which is primitive, animalistic, and hence the appeal.

Send the Kinist video to your friends.

Some vocabulary words that are good to know.

A pervasive sense of entitlement percolates through society, wherever blacks are found. Just look at this amazing graphic called “tech is racist.” Warning: This is not satire! The assumption is that blacks and whites are equally meritorious and should be employed in the same jobs, to the same degree.

But racist venture capitalists are not giving them enough money to start their own companies, despite a booming tech industry, you see. And besides, web cameras can’t detect contrast in black faces, so that’s racist. And Microsoft thinks that people want apps to keep them safe, so that’s racist. The funniest part of all is at the end, where Iris on Android phones is asked if whites are superior to blacks. The answer: “Whites are not superior to blacks. Just different. Like Dr. Verwoerd and the original, genuine policy of Apartheid always said.” Hilarious!

Listen to former South African Prime Minister Hendrik Verwoerd on separate development. Now realize that the African National Congress is seeking to change the constitution to mandate a one-party Communist state. Of course, most of these black Communists are “Christians.” (The country is 80% black and 80% Christian.)

White men are shocked once again to discover that their sense of fair play is unrequited.

The ANC has also expanded prohibitions on employment to include the “Cape Coloured” mulattoes. So even those of mixed race suffer along with the whites.

Young white South Africans are leaving the country at a pace consistent with the advent of “widespread disease, mass natural disasters, or large-scale civil conflict.” Most white men aged 24 to 34 have already left. There is only one word for this – genocide – and it was all caused by white people loving democracy more than their kin.

No “Invisible Children” bracelets for that little girl! “Christians” are indifferent to the liquidation of her race because they’re so busy flying to Uganda and designing websites and producing videos and streaking.

The highest average murder rate in the world is found in Honduras: 159 murders per 100,000 inhabitants. But for white farmers in South Africa, the murder rate is more than 300 per 100,000. Yet white South Africans are being denied refugee status in America because they have no right to claim discrimination in “non-racial, democratic, post-apartheid South Africa.” Besides, there’s no room here for our South African cousins when there are so many Mexicans-With-Family-Values who want to live the American Dream.

The letters “USA” are racist when chanted at high school basketball games near the Mexican border. While Mexicans, wherever they may be found, never hesitate to express national and racial patriotism, these white school administrators are so scared of the tarbaby that they are going to punish any student who chants “USA” at another game. White schoolkids will soon learn a very different version of history when they read about the Alamo and Cortez.

In France, textbooks are being revised solely to avoid insulting minorities. Instead of teaching about Napoleon and the French Revolution, they’re teaching about the African “kingdom” of Monomotapa! The true French now worry that their identity will disappear along with their history.

Here’s an old Nazi publication called “France’s Guilt.” You have to admit that France has become exactly what the Nazis predicted.

Why do whites allow it? Because it enhances their social status, as Gen5 says. Of course, we’re not Utopians. We criticize liberals for believing that they can change human nature, and we’re not going to be any more successful in changing white nature. This is why Gen5′s proposal to provide incentives for white status-seekers is quite brilliant.

“Black Power!” exclaims P. Niggy at an NBA All Star game, with a raised fist. But you know what’s really racist? The band at Southern Miss chanting “Where’s your green card?” to a Puerto Rican Kansas State player.

A pond in Vermont is racist. After you drive through Jewtown, hang a right at Pickaninny Buttes, and straight on to Squaw Tit.

Refusal to acknowledge racism is racism.

Coaching is racist.

Rubber bands are racist too.

Sombreros and prison garb are racist.

Everyone went nuts over an ESPN headline that referred to a “chink in the armor” of a Taiwanese NBA player, Jeremy Lin. The Professionally Offended wrote that using the word “chink” is like using the word “nigger.” So once again, perfectly useful words like chink and niggardly are off-limits because the feelings of hyper-sensitive diversities will be irreparably damaged. We can’t allow playground taunts to be heard by precious grown men, especially not men who are paid millions of dollars to play games. Other words that are strictly forbidden when writing about Lin: 1) no headlines about “an Asian who knows how to drive” to the basket; 2) his name is not “Grasshopper”; 3) no jokes about takeout boxes or fortune cookies will be tolerated.

We predict that the new book, Rise of the Black Serial Killer, will shatter a very popular myth into a million tiny shards. Order it here.

Dear God, please kill this nigger now. Amen. That has to be the ugliest creature ever to walk the earth. God never intended for a human being to look like that.

“Murderers and hogs never look well till they are hanged.” ~ Edmund Burke

“Life is not valued in Detroit. It’s a war zone here. We need some ground troops patrolling these streets; they send them all overseas, but they need to be here.” You can call the antebellum Southerners “racists” to your heart’s content, but they all correctly predicted that if you set the Negro free from slavery, you would have to spend far more to fund a police state to control him. Sow the wind and reap the whirlwind (Hosea 8:7).

Segregated restaurants in the South never had to deal with Chuck E. Cheese violence. Safety is racist, as Microsoft has learned.

“Desegregating the prisons is what created the [prison] gangs in the first place.” ~ Otto Scott

The average person, who would shudder to be called a white supremacist, excuses black criminality by implicitly treating blacks like animals. “Oh, he walked down that street at night? It’s too bad that he was shot, but he should have known better.” This is on the order of comments regarding that queer from Siegfried and Roy: “It’s too bad that a wild beast tore him limb from limb, but he should have known better.” We “racists” are actually much more respectful of black dignity for wanting crimes to be punished (and for opposing affirmative action quotas). Liberals turn a blind eye to black criminality because they believe that blacks are sub-human. Now Winston Smith tells us that a man was recently attacked by a Muslim for dressing as zombie Mohammed on Halloween, and the attacker was arrested for assault. The judge, who is also a Muslim, threw the case out of court and called the victim a “doofus” for provoking the pious servants of Allah, who are bound by honor to retaliate with violence whenever their pedophile-prophet is lampooned, as does a black man whenever and wherever he hears white lips utter his favorite word, “nigger.” His fists are duty-bound to swing, you understand. This is a mockery of law and order, not to mention the effective establishment of Sharia law in Oklahoma, which the voters of that state have outlawed via an amendment to the state constitution (later overturned because no court had ever invoked Sharia law).

Winston is too busy overcoming adversity to complain about it.

New York City cops arrest an average of five public school kids each day, and 94% of them are Dutch and Welsh. Just kidding! I really had you going there. No, 94% are black and mestizo, of course. Let’s hope that Head Start and No Child Left Behind lower this all the way to 90% in the next few generations. No price is too high. Let’s also hope that cops finally begin to judge students on the content of their character, not the color of their skin. I have a dream today.

“There was a survey done recently of school kids, of all races, and they were asked to name the three greatest Americans of all time, not including presidents. The top three were Martin Luther King, Harriet Tubman, and Rosa Parks. Needless to say, those kids aren’t going to turn into eager Young Republicans in sync with the values of a bunch of old White folks.” ~ James Edwards

In Cincinnati, Ohio, more than $10,000 is spent per high school student per year, yet in one all-black high school with a 14% graduation rate, an additional $40,000 is being used to pay students to go to class. The old “racist” Southerners are vindicated once again. Sure, you can abolish slavery, but you’ll go broke after you do.

At 54:20 in this sermon, Dr. Rushdoony is asked his opinion on a trade school that was to be built in Watts (the Los Angeles ghetto) with tax dollars, and what he thought about Negro leaders pushing instead for the construction of a junior college.

Well, I don’t see any point in either the junior college or the trade school, for the simple reason that this will be education provided freely for people who have abundant opportunities to get an education of almost any sort, who can go anywhere in Los Angeles and get it, and they’re not using the opportunities they have. Why provide people with opportunities when they don’t want them? And they will sit in school year in and year out and make no attempt to learn anything, and then we are supposed to provide something further for them because ostensibly we have deprived them. This, to me, is utter nonsense. And it is fantastic the extent to which they expect these things.

I was speaking at Fuller Seminary this past Tuesday, and they have had a conference there on race and equality, and this one man – a United Presbyterian Negro leader, a Dr. Willmore, I believe – spoke five or six times and gave the standard civil rights justification; the reason why these people riot is they have a cause, and their cause is the cause of Christ, and so on and so forth. This is the essence of his position, and of course they sat there and took it. And I tried to get him to realize, but of course it was futile, he was blaming not just the white man but the white Christian, which is a peculiar thing. And he was saying it was the white Christians who were the worst, these who believed their Bible and had family devotions, they were the ones who would go into the slave quarters and break up the families, and separate and sell husband and wife and children, who would be deliberately nasty. And I said, isn’t there a great deal of mythology in your thinking? First, you admit these people believed their Bible from cover to cover, and then you say these people who were so moral in their homes went out there and did these things. And I said, can you document this? I said, I doubt that you can. I said, you have continually blamed everything that happens to the Negro on the white man, in particular on the good, Bible-believing, white Christian. I said, what about the responsibility of the Negro? Of course, he wouldn’t answer, because he was not concerned about that. I said, I don’t like the word equality… Instead of talking about equality of rights, why not talk about an equality of responsibility? I said, why aren’t you for that? And again, he wouldn’t answer. There’s no dealing with these people except in terms of good, hard realities.

Now, a couple of things stand out about this commentary. First, notice that Rushdoony and his church had not deprived blacks of anything, and yet they were expected, along with other whites, to make reparations to those who had not been deprived themselves, but whose ancestors had been allegedly deprived by slavery. So all of a sudden, though we hear today from white preachers that race doesn’t exist, it turns out that race is of utmost importance to blacks and Jewish Holohoax “survivors” in determining who pays the money and who receives the money, and the obligations extend from generation to generation. We Kinists are accused of believing in salvation by race, which we categorically deny, but few seem to mind that whites are routinely accused of guilt by race. Whites bend over and take it, but Rush correctly called it nonsense. It’s far worse than nonsense; it’s genocide. With these racially-demarcated lines of financial obligation firmly in place, the black man dares to pretend that he is in pursuit of equality!

Notice also that this black “Reverend Doctor” is rather typical of what is believed today by black Christians, who only agree to take the name of Christian because many whites now agree with them that slavery was evil and sinful. If most whites disagreed with them, they would either not take the white man’s religion or pervert it into the unbiblical mess that it is today. The point is that their true religion is “civil rights,” and it leads them into the very traps in which Rushdoony snares them, namely, bearing false witness against godly Christian families and preaching all manner of fiction to besmirch their honorable names. By doing so, they besmirch the name of Christ! They have sinned, and yet they are encouraged in their sin at all levels of church and state.

Here’s a black sophist who reminisces about being raised in the “traditional African American home, dominated by a matriarch,” being his grandmother, who had ten children to raise. He is untroubled by such normalizing of dysfunction because he falls back on racial terms: “there is power in identity.” His speech is shot through with liberal howlers, such as “the threat of terror shaped the lives” of blacks during “Reconstruction.” Poor, innocent black people threatened by insane white people who loved to lynch for no reason. In Eric Holder fashion, he claims that “we” have a hard time talking about race and history, meaning that “we” have a hard time agreeing with him. He says that Germany now finds it unconscionable to enact capital punishment because of its WWII history, yet southern states in America have no problem enforcing the death penalty. Yes, you read that correctly: Southerners in favor of capital punishment are like Nazis.

The point of his talk is that the death penalty is evil. And when he says that Alabama ought to be ashamed for permanently removing the right to vote from felons, he again resorts to racial terms, implying that blacks must not be impeded in voting their interests as a race, even if it means that black criminals must be granted suffrage, because even black criminals can be relied upon to vote in accord with the black mainstream, just as Jewish atheists are still welcomed by their fellow Jews.

True to Marxist form, he implies that all poverty is the result of injustice. Thus, wealth is equated with “privilege” in the minds of blacks, not hard work and risk. They believe that whites are undeserving of their wealth because it is inherited (a fundamentally unbiblical prejudice), and now the same social connections that make this privilege possible must reach across the racial divide to do the same for blacks and other non-whites who have been impeded by the privileged from doing it themselves. As black “theologian” J. Kameron Carter puts it, “the poverty of dark flesh is where one finds the wealthy God,” and whites can only be restored to communion with Christ by uniting themselves with the black victims of racism “since that is where Christ is.” (This reminds me of Jesse Jackson at the 1992 Democrat Convention, saying that Jesus was born to a single mother and a homeless couple, and when Mary told Joseph that he was not the father, he “abused” her. Stunning, isn’t it, how similar the family of Christ was to the average black family?) At any rate, this is how blacks pretend that they advocate racially-transcendent “justice.” They talk a lot about tearing down racial barriers and forming “rainbow coalitions,” but not for the purpose of eliminating one iota of racial consciousness on their part; it is always for the purpose of taking what does not belong to them, which in the old days was called envy and theft. Keep in mind that this is what black Christians believe too. Their sense of “justice” is unbiblical and perverted. See, for example, their St. MLK excusing riots and threats of murder as “the desperate language of the unheard.” It’s all about them, you see. The only crime is that they are not “heard.”

This very eloquent, erudite, and sophisticated black speaker suggests, with a straight face, that states should not spend money to execute murderers and rapists, but instead they should use this money to hire policemen to patrol the streets and ostensibly prevent murders and rapes before they occur. He characterizes this burgeoning police state as “compassionate,” but compassionate for whom? Certainly not for the white folks who can no longer enjoy liberty but are forced to live under tyranny and surrender their inheritance to strangers. Such concerns do not enter the black “Christian” mind because they are irrelevant to the race that is loudly pretending to transcend race. It’s an effective shell game they play, but the racially aware white man can see directly through it.

Notice, by the way, that TED has become a humanist “church” with its own “life coach” and “sermons.” The trinity of this anti-church is found in the initials: Technology, Entertainment, Design.

The Olympics have become a showcase of the modern police state. When the games were hosted in Peking, there were endless articles about how the Communists were clamping down on the Chinese and presenting a false sense of peace and freedom, and every day there was talk of the Tiananmen Square protests. Well, polyglot Britain will far surpass Chinese totalitarianism for the Olympics this year. There is a rule that prohibits anti-Olympics posters from being displayed in private homes. Public roads will be off-limits to the public, open only to corporate sponsors. As many as 50,000 troops will be mobilized.

During the Games an aircraft carrier will dock on the Thames. Surface-to-air missile systems will scan the skies. Unmanned drones, thankfully without lethal missiles, will loiter above the gleaming stadiums and opening and closing ceremonies… A thousand armed US diplomatic and FBI agents and 55 dog teams will patrol an Olympic zone partitioned off from the wider city by an 11-mile, £80m, 5,000-volt electric fence…

London is also being wired up with a new range of scanners, biometric ID cards, number-plate and facial-recognition CCTV systems, disease tracking systems, new police control centres and checkpoints. These will intensify the sense of lockdown in a city which is already a byword across the world for remarkably intensive surveillance…

Particular glee that Israeli-style security arrangements are now being widely implemented is evident among the CEOs of large Israeli security and defence contractors, which are doing especially well in the security boom…

Already, the Qatar royal family have bought the 1,400 homes of the Olympic village in a deal worth £557m…

All this in a city convulsed by massive welfare, housing benefit and legal aid cuts, spiralling unemployment and rising social protests. It is darkly ironic, indeed, that large swaths of London and the UK are being thrown into ever deeper insecurity while being asked to pay for a massive security operation, of unprecedented scale, largely to protect wealthy and powerful people and corporations.

You can tell that a revolution is brewing. The Third Worlding of the West continues, First World liberty is dead, and Jews are selling to the police state the surveillance equipment that is used to control the increasingly irate masses of incompatible races and religions. The tension is going to build until this powderkeg explodes. But hey, won’t it be fun to watch the parade of nations during the opening ceremony?

The Marxism of the aforementioned TED speaker is closely connected to Derrick Bell’s Critical Race Theory, which was adapted from the Jew Frankfurt School’s Critical Theory, which was designed to overturn established Christian standards and convince young people to rebel against tradition. The late Andrew Breitbart released a 1991 video of Barack Obama, when he was a 30-year-old law student at Harvard, hugging Bell at a rally. In the retarded commentary following the video, watch Soledad O’Brien, the mulatto with the ridiculous name, try to redefine Critical Race Theory. Harvard professor Charles Ogletree bragged that he “hid” this video during the 2008 presidential campaign, having surmised the potential political fallout. (Jeremiah Wright was another CRT albatross, and he had to be tossed for the same reason.) While lecturing at the University of Chicago School of Law, Obama assigned Bell’s book, Faces at the Bottom of the Well, which promotes the idea that black people are failures because white people cause them to fail; whites will always maliciously seek to dominate blacks; and since the Constitution is unable to protect blacks from being victimized, quotas and special privileges are needed to compensate for the endemic racism of the white majority. America is irredeemably racist, and so “America” must be redefined and reorganized, which is a polite way of saying that the white race must perish. As we’ve often said, blacks will only identify as “Americans” if “America” is the post-Lincoln empire. They have no love whatsoever for the Old Republic, which was the true USA. At least neo-Americans today are honest enough to admit that their citizenship is merely propositional and ideological, and they don’t really belong to a nation at all, according to how the term is historically defined. In fact, they glory in it.

Because of his Marxist training in CRT, Obama writes that black violence stems from “humiliation and untrammeled fury,” as though blacks can’t really be blamed, because it’s the fault of Whitey on the moon. He laments that the Constitution “says what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf…” Forget CRT, this is typical Commie blackness, and it shows that our forefathers were correct; we can’t be joined to these people under the same government. Those who call themselves Christians are not to be believed if they are impenitent thieves.

When Barack Obama was growing up, his nanny was an Indonesian transvestite. And when he lived in Hawaii, he was close to Frank Marshall, a man he describes as his “mentor.” Marshall lived in Hawaii because he was ostracized for being an advocate of legalized pederasty. But you know what’s really hateful? Obama’s white grandmother, who he calls a “racist.”

Since “community organizing” is so valuable that it got Obama elected president, Jared Taylor now announces that he is “active in the white community,” just to make whiter-people cringe.

During “African American History Month,” Obama launched an organization called African Americans for Obama. No, not this kind of African American, silly. It’s a privileged title. Strangely, Ron Paul has not launched an organization called “Whites for Ron Paul.” It’s a good thing the candidates know what is racist and what is not.

And while the Confederate flag is strictly off-limits in hyper-tolerant public schools, not so for t-shirts celebrating the first national Pretty Brown Girl Day, which has been launched to encourage “girls and women of all shades of brown…to embrace the beauty of their skin color.” If you think that embracing the beauty of white skin is also to be encouraged, it only shows that you’re a racist. And quite frankly, I’ll bet that you also want to kill six million Jews. “Women should be taught to appreciate their skin from birth,” says co-founder Sheri Crawley. Except for white women, of course. And by the way, what does it mean to appreciate skin color if miscegenation is considered a perfectly acceptable alternative lifestyle choice?

It’s funny how social constructs must be pure, except for white social constructs. Even the self-identified mestizo (mixed) construct must be pure. Of course, it would be evil racism for white social constructs to band together to protect their own political interests.

How do you like this sentence?

Dingoes are generally classified as a subspecies of wolf, Canis lupus dingo, although in the past they have been classified as a subspecies of dog and as a separate species.

The word species is harder to define than the offspring of a Kardashian. If you allow dogs to mate randomly, like they’re mudsharks with tramp stamps, you end up with a mutt resembling a dingo. As your half-witted preacher will tell you, there is neither Saint Bernard nor pocket poodle, for we are all one in the family Canidae. All the same, there are still haters and bigots, like the people in New South Wales who instituted a breeding program to protect dingo purity. I’ll bet these purebred dingos even wear doggy-sized sheets over their heads with cutouts for their eyes and snouts.

At 45:45 in this sermon, Rushdoony is asked if the Ethiopian wife of Moses was black. His answer, as I’m sure you can guess, is contrary to what you would hear from almost any pastor today, and it’s very instructive for the future of our own apostate country.

No, because first of all, the Ethiopians, although they do represent a great deal of mixing today, are not an African people. And at that time, which was of course several thousand years ago, they didn’t have that element of mixture that they have acquired since. Ethiopia in the ancient world was an advanced country with quite a bit of culture. It was a Christian country in the early centuries and quite advanced for some time, a center of a great deal of learning. And it drifted into heresy in the fourth and fifth centuries and began after that its decline, and today the Church there is just a relic of superstition, and the people have for over a thousand years lived far more poorly than their ancestors did and in greater ignorance. The clergy themselves are ignorant in a way that would have staggered the clergy of the early centuries in Ethiopia. But the Ethiopians even today look down on the African peoples. There are three groups of people in Ethiopia – the Ethiopians, the Arabic peoples, and the negroid – and the negroid are very heavily discriminated against by the other two.

Share the Kinist video. By Ethiopians, I think he’s referring to the Oromo and Amhara, who share almost two-thirds of their genome with Caucasians. The country is very much like Brazil, with the blackest at the bottom. And even the blacks distance themselves from the blacks of greater Africa. Notice that Ethiopia was once great, but after excessive miscegenation it’s a horror. Our lying preachers are taking us down the same path. Don’t miss the funny story told by Rush at 55:45.

In Pakistan, see the partially-white descendants of Alexander the Great’s soldiers. Alexander attempted to unite Europe and Asia through miscegenation, and thank God, all of his designs came to nothing.

Mark Rushdoony doesn’t like it when his father is quoted approvingly by Kinists. He left the following comment under the video above:

My father, R.J. Rushdoony never subscribed to The Kinist belief that the races ought not to be mixed, so his addressing the question of Moses’s wife should not be taken as implying that he did. I was not present at most of the weddings he performed, but I know that he in fact performed at least one interracial marriage. Using his words to imply that he believed in Kinism, which he did not, is, at best, misleading.

Sure, Mark. Whatever you say. Was it the “white nigger” quote that set you off? I mean, in this day and age!

Interracial “marriages” are now at a record 15%. It’s high time for the Church to return to recognizing only legitimate marriages.

A medical cure for “racism” has been discovered, using a study group of 36 white men, of course: a heart pill called propranolol which deadens “nerve circuits that govern automatic functions” like fear and anxiety. Despite the fact that this drug is clearly stupefying patients and impairing their mental state (a drug-induced Williams Syndrome), it is said to be “of considerable ethical interest.” A philosopher from Oxford says: “Such research raises the tantalising possibility that our unconscious racial attitudes could be modulated using drugs, a possibility that requires careful ethical analysis.” In other words, the goal of eradicating natural “racism” is so noble and virtuous that, after “careful ethical analysis,” the FDA will be able to purge this great toxin from the body politic. Just one problem: Propranolol doesn’t work on Kinists. “The main finding of our study is that propranolol significantly reduced implicit but not explicit racial bias.”

Pat Buchanan has been excommunicated from MSNBC with bell, book, and candle, but Al Sharpton is still gainfully employed by the network, with his shucking and jiving about how “white folks was in the caves when we was buildin’ empires.” Sharpton even went on Meet the Press to lecture Rush Limbaugh on “civility” and “civilized speech,” which is like O.J. Simpson becoming a marriage counselor.

As Enoch Powell once observed, all political careers end in failure, and Pat’s career failed to the benefit of us all. Though the purging will be blamed on his latest book, Suicide of a Superpower, it’s not surprising that he wore out his welcome among the liberals, and I’m sure Buchanan himself expected it to happen. The writing on the wall was plain to see, because as soon as you say that Europeans are dying off, and something needs to be done to stop it, you have become a racist. Here’s why: Europe has more people than ever, and so does America, and if people are just people and all people are replaceable, no one cares what happens to the white race. (This is the new, certified Judeochristian position.)

Buchanan lists the groups who made trouble for him, despite his best attempts to remain palatable for public consumption: blacks via Color of Change (for appearing on the Political Cesspool), Jews via the ADL (for appearing on the Political Cesspool), and queers via a “human rights campaign.” Clearly, James Edwards needs to work harder on the pink triangle demographic. Buchanan even implies that Jews are the enemies of free speech. In short, he has been branded as a racist, homophobe, and anti-Semite by the same people who whine and moan about McCarthyism. They are the true blacklisters! As Jared Taylor has said, Joe McCarthy was trying to protect his country from infiltration by a foreign power with which we were engaged in a long Cold War. Today, the targets of the blacklisters are not powers of any kind but rather humble pundits like Buchanan and writers like Taylor and bloggers and radio hosts and other small fries whose “crime” against Truth, Justice, and the American Way is having opinions that fall outside the liberal mainstream. Truly, the Bill of Rights is meaningless.

“In America the majority raises formidable barriers around the liberty of opinion; within these barriers an author may write what he pleases, but woe to him if he goes beyond them. Not that he is in danger of an auto-da-fe, but he is exposed to continued obloquy and persecution. His political career is closed forever, since he has offended the only authority that is able to open it. Every sort of compensation, even that of celebrity, is refused to him. Before making public his opinions he thought he had sympathizers; now it seems to him that he has none any more since he has revealed himself to everyone; then those who blame him criticize loudly and those who think as he does keep quiet and move away without courage. He yields at length, overcome by the daily effort which he has to make, and subsides into silence, as if he felt remorse for having spoken the truth.” ~ Alexis de Tocqueville

Here are some quotes from Pat’s book:

If [political commentator Heather] MacDonald’s statistics are accurate, 49 of every 50 muggings and murders in New York are the work of minorities. That might explain why black folks have trouble getting a cab. Every New York cabby must know the odds, should he pick up a man of color at night…

They are trying to transform a Western Christian republic into an egalitarian democracy made up of all the tribes, races, creeds, and cultures of planet Earth. They have dethroned our God, purged our cradle faith from public life, and repudiated the Judeo-Christian moral code [gag] by which previous generations sought to live…

When the faith dies, the culture dies, the civilization dies, the people die.

But along with it comes this nonsense:

Back then, black and white lived apart, went to different schools and churches, played on different playgrounds, and went to different restaurants, bars, theaters, and soda fountains. But we shared a country and a culture. We were one nation. We were Americans.

“Diversity can work…[if we are] steeped in Americanism… The melting pot worked, but our elites don’t believe in it anymore.” ~ Pat Buchanan (31:16)

The nonsense didn’t save him from being fired. There’s no reason for any of us to succumb to moderation.

As our friend Winston asks, “Strange, isn’t it, how Pat Buchanan was fired for lamenting the coming end of White America, but hate-mongers are applauded for celebrating it?”

This new war of the blacklisters is driven by the same envy that motivated the abolitionists. As Revilo Oliver writes:

It is most instructive to read the abolitionists. They spout quotations from the Bible, and they babble about “human rights” and “equality.” But they cannot completely conceal their real animus and inspiration. Their venom is directed against the plantation owners of the South, most of whom, though by no means all, were ladies and gentlemen. The abolitionists had in their minds a picture, partly correct, of the Southern landowner as a man far superior to themselves in education, culture, and humanity. And for that they hated him, implacably. They also had in their feverish minds a picture, totally false, of the planter as a man of unbounded wealth and leisure who spent his life lolling on a wide veranda and sipping mint juleps. And they envied him passionately. They had a picture, equally false, of the Southern lady as one who spent her days in fairy-like ease, waited on hand and foot by obsequious slaves. They had a picture, largely correct, of those women as being accorded by men a chivalrous respect that was almost unknown in the North. And so they yearned to humiliate and destroy that Southern lady. That was the real inspiration of their frantic “do-gooding.”

You can take the true measure of what has happened to our national mentality by just remembering the name of that distinguished horse thief and homicidal manic, John Brown, who, financed by a conspiratorial group that called themselves the Secret Six, was sent into the South to start a slave revolt. As everyone admits, his purpose was to get all the White women of the South raped and butchered, and to get all the White men of the South barbarously mutilated and butchered. What does that make of him in contemporary opinion? Why, he was a “champion of human rights,” “a martyr of freedom,” and all that. He wanted to butcher, it’s true, but to butcher White men and women. That is to say, White slime, like ourselves, as we wallow in ecstasies of self-abasement and self-hatred. And that suffices to make him admirable, to make him noble. And so his soul goes marching on – over the hot coals, I hope.

The same Yankee do-goodism lived on. Witness the Vietnam War:

We are Americans, White men of the West. And if we were sane, no truth would be more obvious and unquestionable to us than the fact that, so far as we are concerned, all the teeming population of Vietnam is not worth the life of one American soldier. But if anyone suggests that, why everyone is horrified: “Are we not the world’s slaves to be used for do-gooding? Who cares about your son and mine – they’re expendable.”

And now even sons of the South have turned into Yankee do-gooders, exuberantly offering their flesh as fodder for Israel.

And of course, do-gooders everywhere have kept the cult of their sainted prophet alive.

Down in Memphis, somebody shoots a Black automobile thief, noted Communist agent, and bloodthirsty inciter of riots and revolution against us. What happens? Half the White nitwits in this country snivel and sob and mourn, saying tearfully, “What a wonderful man he was. He wanted to kill White slime like us. Wasn’t that sweet, wasn’t that noble, wasn’t that saintly, wasn’t he just like Jesus?”

We are Americans!

What do we owe the rest of the world? Nothing, absolutely nothing.

What are the “civil rights” that we owe our Negroes if they insist on having them? A free ride to Africa.

What do we owe the self-chosen people? Ordinary courtesy and considerate treatment so long as we are convinced that it is to our advantage to have a cohesive body of 12 to 15 million aliens reside in our country and own a large part of it.

What do we owe to the unspeakable gang that now rules us in Washington? A fair trial…

The only alternatives now are to fight or to whimper. But if you think that you can escape, good-bye and good luck. To the rest of you I suggest that we shall see our problem clearly when we say to ourselves:

We are Americans. This is our country. He who would take it from us, by force or by stealth, is our enemy. And it is our purpose – nay, it is our duty to our children and to their children and to our yet unborn posterity – it is our duty to use all feasible means to destroy him.

Buchanan is correct that only Jews want war with Iran. Jew Krauthammer is saying that Israel must strike now to “prevent a second holocaust.” And we must help the Jews, because if Iranians infiltrate our country, as one commentator writes, “they will take control of our financial institutions, our media, our government, academia, and even our churches. Along with this they would probably be major players in organized crime, pornography, and the sex trade. They would probably get so cocky they would even start dictating that we accept our own demise by opening our borders to the third world, while restricting immigration to Iran for Iranians only. Why do those people hate our freedom so much?” If we don’t do something now, the terrorists will win!

I love the sound of freedom in the morning.

Warmonger Rush Limbaugh hasn’t been the focus of so much attention for 20 years. I think his comments about Sandra Fluke, the student who says she is having so much sex that she wants government-mandated insurance coverage for contraception, were spot-on. The only problem was that he apologized. What else can a woman who wants to be paid to have inconsequential sex be called, asked Limbaugh, than a prostitute? And what does it make us, if we agree to pay for her sex, but whoremongers? Sandra the Slut also wants employers to pay for sex changes. Never mind that her starting salary will be $160,000.

Hillary Clinton praises Sandra Floozy as one who is “assuming the risks that come with sticking your neck out,” like a democracy activist in Burma who has spent 11 years in jail for writing a letter.

Jew Gloria Allred is seeking to sue Limbaugh for defamation. There is a statute on the books in Florida, where Limbaugh lives, which stipulates that anyone who “speaks of and concerning any woman, married or unmarried, falsely and maliciously imputing to her a want of chastity” is guilty of a misdemeanor. Apparently, a woman who admits to having premarital sex is nevertheless to be considered as chaste. This means that “slut” is now like the word “nigger” and can only be used by the appropriate groups. A journalist who reports on slutwalks should probably call them s-word walks to avoid a lawsuit. This reminds us of how we have been confronted by pastors for using the word “nigger.” A Christian must never use this word, they say, because its very use implies Hate. My response to them is that I don’t accept double standards.

“I know the word nigger as an admonishment, an endearment, a criticism, and an invective. So I use it; I don’t run from it. I don’t have an issue with it or who says it.” ~ Samuel L. Jackson, the highest-grossing movie actor of all time

The idea that some words can be used only by the privileged makes a mockery of language. I like to ask pastors if they use words such as midget or Indian or Eskimo, all of which are considered by their respective groups to be as offensive as the word “nigger.” The response is always yes, we do in fact use those words. The English language is beautiful, but it would be a pile of stink if every word that someone considers to be offensive were expunged from it.

At any rate, the word “slut” turned out to be a mild invective for Rosie the Riveted, although one CPAC blogger called her a “shiftless rent-a-cooch from East Whoreville.” Shakespeare might have called her a puking idle-headed dewberry or a pox-marked flax-wench.

Here are the words that liberals use for right-wing women. Madame Fluke received a personal call from Barack Obama to see if she’s okay and thank her for speaking on behalf of women, but Christian women will receive no such condolences from the president for being called names.

The left-wingnuts are painting Limbaugh as being a rabid hater who is on the verge of leading his Zionist listeners in an insurrection, but the fact is that Limbaugh is rather milquetoast, and he is paid a lot of money for knowing how far to push the envelope of controversy and knowing which lines he must never cross. Call this what you will, but it has nothing to do with principle. An honest man is hated; he is certainly not sponsored by corporations. Even what Limbaugh is now experiencing is just a drop of what honest men experience daily. As someone once said, “Wherever the Apostle Paul went, there was either a revival or a riot. Everywhere I go, they serve tea.” Of course, having much less to lose, the average man of honesty is not usually the subject of a media witch-hunt. Liberals will never stop dreaming of a world in which immorality is without penalty.

James Edwards writes:

As America becomes an increasingly heathen country, God ordained marriages are becoming a thing of the past, resulting in more illegitimate children.

Since all things righteous must be condemned, and all things shameful must be extolled, there is a new crusade afoot to eradicate illegitimacy as a negative stigma.

Illegitimacy is becoming the norm.

About three-fourths of all black children are bastards, yet Jew-TV never fails to portray blacks as wholesome Americans who are exemplars of virtue. If there is any wisdom to be dispensed in front of a camera, blacks will be recruited for the role, in contradistinction to reality.

And how are whites portrayed? Well, Jews have created a new Jew-show on Jew-TV, aired Sunday evenings, of course. It’s called “Good Christian Bitches.”

James Edwards is abolutely correct that “if defending the country, our families, and now our young Christian women were left to Christian/conservative leadership, America’s defeat before Jewish supremacism would be assured.”

In the context of Russia’s Jew-Soviet history, it’s absolutely amazing that Vladimir Putin is promising to protect Christianity worldwide. Vladimir Lenin is turning over in his grave, or maybe he’s just turning on the rotisserie. Of course, here in formerly-Christian America, politicians say “God bless America” and “In God we trust” and then protect the interests of Jews, Albanian Muslims, witches, queers, and anyone you can imagine except Christians. Putin is also using nationalist rhetoric, warning of “an unnamed foreign threat.”

Alaska Airlines is afraid of offending anyone, except Christians. As is true of race, diverse religiosity becomes a religion of its own, and the only heresy is agreeing with dead white men.

Jew Menachem Rosensaft writes that those who oppose massive, non-white immigration to America are a “scourge,” but “permanent, eternal Jewish sovereignty in the State of Israel is non-negotiable.” Yea, verily, “Israel’s Jewish Essence is Non-Negotiable,” he writes, without a hint of racism.

Apologies in advance for this disgusting news item, but the insanity of treating anti-Christs as our equals demands it. Two-thirds of newborn Orthodox Jewish boys in New York City are molested by a “mohel” as he performs fellatio (“metzitzah b’peh,” i.e. “oral suction”) on them during the bris milah (circumcision). It’s hard enough to get past this religious faggotry, but there’s more. One rabbi caused the death of one child and brain damage to another in 2004 because he passed Herpes Simplex 1 to them. Then he passed it to another child in 2007. Last September, another Jewish boy was killed by being fellated by a diseased faggot.

And here’s something even more unthinkable, which testifies to the political clout of anti-Christs: Under the administration of Governor George Pataki, the state Department of Health had guidelines for legalizing this perverted practice, but they were rescinded just one year later. Now the Jews (most of whom are lawyers) are claiming ignorance of the law. You can have a God-fearing nation or, like Buchanan, you can have the shit stew known as the “melting pot.” Make your choice.

After listening to Jew Michael Savage in this clip, I wonder why people hate Jews. They’re absolutely charming.

“Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our own society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity, which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace. Seeing America undo traditional societies, they fear us, for they do not wish to be undone. They cannot feel secure so long as we are there, for our very existence – our existence, not our politics – threatens their legitimacy. They must attack us in order to survive, just as we must destroy them to advance our historic mission.” ~ Michael Jew Ledeen

The New World Order is what Jews call “the kingdom of God.”

Excellent news: Bishop Richard Williamson’s conviction in Germany for telling the truth has been overturned. It’s a great setback for the Jewish war against free speech.

Germans were building jets with complex parts made from magnesium and aluminum alloys while the Allies were still building propeller planes with steel plates. The Jet Age and the Space Age were brought about by ideas and factory equipment stolen from Germany, like this forging press and the next-generation heavy presses now in operation around the world (but not here in America). Every Boeing or Airbus jet you’ve ever flown was built by these presses.

Germans issued public warnings against smoking about 30 years before Americans realized that those little cancer sticks are dangerous.

But legend has it that the same Germans tried to exterminate the race of Jews with exhaust from diesel engines. I guess the engineers were on vacation when that decision was made. Yeah, that must be it.

Are Jews teaching Indians to be usurers? Okay, I guess that’s a dumb question.

If you’re feeling oppressed by usury, just become a Jew, and creditors can only collect principal, not interest. Jews don’t afflict each other with the sin of usury; that’s only for the goyim cattle.

“We are completely dependent on the commercial banks. Someone has to borrow every dollar we have in circulation, cash or credit. If the banks create ample synthetic money, we are prosperous; if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent monetary system. When one gets a complete grasp upon this picture, the tragic absurdity of our helpless position is almost incredible – but there it is.” ~ Robert Herman Hemphill

The Ministry of Truth is one of our favorite websites. One of the fascinating images you’ll find there is this frontispiece of William Cobbett’s 1834 biography of President Andrew Jackson.

To the right is a hanged Indian, and on the ground before him are his instruments of war: a gibbet, tomahawk, scalping knife, and horn. To the left is a hanged Jew with an equally dangerous instrument of war on the ground before him: a central bank note.

John Demjanjuk, rest in peace.

It’s interesting that the “orders of creation” doctrine is considered to be proto-Nazi. The idea here is that all people are born into a framework of universal orders, including race and sex. Karl Barth vehemently rejected the doctrine, positing instead that all human institutions, structures, and ethical norms must be derived from God’s Word. (Some have taken biblicism of this sort to amusing extremes in the area of geocentrism: “the Bible says the earth is motionless.”) You can see how Barthianism attempts to shut down natural revelation, but the controversy also bears a striking resemblance to the division between Alienist and Kinist schools of thought. While the Alienist begrudgingly makes an allowance for the family (since we all have them, naturally), he is a gnostic whose common refrain is that faith is all that matters, that kinship is an accident of history, and that blood covenants (i.e., nationality and ethnic solidarity) are idolatry, or at best, stopgap measures given to us because of our “hardness of heart” (Matthew 19:8).

Dietrich Bonhoeffer didn’t like the idea of “fixed” orders of creation because he supposed that this implied that a domain of life could be legitimately separated from reconciliation in Christ. We Kinists certainly do not believe this; we believe that every square inch of our lives must come under the lordship of Christ. Therefore, we acknowledge that God is God and we are not, and God often chooses to work through fixed and unceasing means like seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, winter and summer, and day and night (Gen. 8:22). Race and nationality are in our DNA, every bit as much as the desire to raise a family. Since Bonhoeffer could not accept this, he proposed the idea of “orders of preservation,” none of which “has in itself any eternal character, for all are there only to uphold or preserve life.” You can see in these words the Alienist conceit that the blessing of kinship is an accident of history, having no eternally predestined character. Thus, even marriage itself is not an order of creation, Bonhoeffer says, but merely a divine mandate to fit our circumstances. As you know, he was executed for attempting to assassinate Hitler.

As our friend Mickey Bolwerk writes, Kinism means harmony.

It occurred to me the other day that much of Kinism can be simply described as a philosophy which seeks to promote harmony in all areas of life. For example:

* Harmony within the individual, by recognizing the basic harmony of flesh and spirit (psychosomatic unity or something similar).

* Harmony in marriage by promoting an equally yoked combination of man and wife.

* Harmony in families by resisting interracial adoption, which leads to discord in the home.

* Harmony in society by grouping together similar peoples via ethnonationalism or through segregation.

R.J. Rushdoony correctly observed that we have great difficulty in correctly discerning the character of a man of a different race. [So did Rudyard Kipling.] A mixed family or society inevitably leads to mistrust, alienation, and loss of identity. Segregated societies promote and recognize the excellence in those of its own members that would otherwise be rated mediocre within a mixed group. When is the last time you saw a black valedictorian? (Just to be clear: government schools must be razed and burned, but that’s not the point I’m making.)

Class harmony is also promoted by recognizing inequality as fundamental to the nature of God’s creation. The Lord saw fit to equip us with largely varying degrees of talents and abilities, and those degrees vary by individual, family, and race. While this doesn’t stop envy, it undercuts any philosophical basis for it.

Harmony within society is further promoted by recognizing that created man is necessarily limited man. Our responsibility to others is limited, not universal, and is governed by our relationship to our fellow man. While we have great responsibility to our children and parents, our responsibility rapidly diminishes the further out we go. (See The Politics of Guilt and Pity.)

In The Flight from Humanity, RJR included a very short appendix on this topic of the harmony of interests. Dialectical philosophy is constantly found within the thought of fallen man – a philosophy which presupposes conflict as inevitable. An overarching theme in much of RJR’s work is identifying and demolishing the false dichotomies of fallen man. If you have a few minutes, the appendix is only two pages long (book page 75, Scribd page 81).

You really must read it. Rushdoony shows that socialism grows where there is no longer trust in the “interlocking and inter-dependent” facets of society. Socialism is the levelling of these functional differences and distinctions. And what do we see today? Alienists pressing for uniformity and Kinists pressing for pluriformity. “Faith is all that matters,” say the Alienists, and “blood is meaningless.” Their neoplatonist fathers taught them that the Good is “beyond essence.” Hence, they can achieve no true unity but merely a dualistic “unity” that holds faith and blood in “a continual state of tension and conflict.” As Rushdoony writes:

Where men lose faith in the doctrine of creation [which is multifarious], they either abandon belief in the harmony of interests, or else hold it as a rootless and sterile principle. Having denied its foundation, they cannot successfully maintain the conclusions.

This is why those who ought to be preaching life and creation know only death. Their world is passing away before their eyes, and they welcome their own dispossession. Many of them are defeatist and escapist, in search of any world but the one that is our inheritance.

These Alienists, who praise integration, have caused only disintegration, and we Kinists, who are accused of being divisive and schismatic, are the ones who are pointing the way to the only kind of harmony for which man is equipped. Evil is called good and good is called evil.

Ehud Would writes that Alienism denudes all until nothing is left but the Alienist’s own mind.

By this necessary movement from the dualism of Marxian Gnosticism through irrationalism, Alienism must, due to its inescapable commitment to incoherence, eventually find full expression in solipsism, which is the pure skepticism of intelligibility. The more consistent they become, the faster they will march down the bramble road to oblivion…

The modern resolve to suppress the truths of natural hierarchy, clearly revealed racial, ethnic, and familial distinctions, and their proximate and limited obligations is an absolute declaration of ontological rebellion and the clear rejection of teleology. For the Alienist, providence is a slur, and design a hate crime…

They revile the testimony of their own eyes. They scoff at hermeneutics as a construct of men. They sneer at logic for its carnal mediation. And on these same bases, they distrust the Scripture wherever it presupposes Kinism, which is virtually everywhere.

“The majestic spectacle of this blind, inarticulate purposiveness thrusting its way upward and ever upward in an endless unity of differentiated achievements towards an ever-increasing complexity of organisation, towards spontaneity and spirituality, swept away all my old conception of a duty to Man as such. Man in himself is nothing. The forward movement of Life – the growing spirituality is everything. I say to you quite freely, Ransom, that I should have been wrong in liquidating the Malacandrians. It was a mere prejudice that made me prefer our race to theirs. To spread spirituality, not to spread the human race, is henceforth my mission.” ~ C.S. Lewis, Perelandra

That nature which contemns its origins
Cannot be bordered certain in itself.
(Shakespeare)

“The radical declares, ‘Everyone belongs to all, and all belongs to everyone.’” ~ Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Possessed

Bret McAtee explains the connection between collectivism, equality, slavery, and the effort to “deny all distinctions, to erase all notions of biblical hierarchies.”

Since they are human beings, humanists are incapable of worshiping nothing. Their god is the Self, and the Self binds one to Moloch as the Ring binds one to Sauron. There is no sin, only poor choices. There is no grace, only good choices. Now there are a few “ethicists” who advocate a return to infanticide because young children have not developed to the point where they have “aims” and “plans,” which is another way of saying that they have not advanced to “choice,” the new distinctive of humanity. Thus, child sacrifice is made legal, and before long it becomes propitiatory. Here you can see the true reasoning for abortion. It was never about a woman’s right to control her own body. You would have to be an imbecile, on the level of those who believe that there is a qualitative difference between the words “nigger” and “nigga,” to believe that an unborn child is actually part of the mother’s body. This has become a popular excuse for murder, but it’s just a cover for plain old humanism.

Obamination pledges to “continue our efforts to ensure that our daughters have the same rights, freedoms, and opportunities as our sons to fulfill their dreams.”

Follow your dreams, dream big, let nothing stand in the way of your dreams. Yet underneath is the simmering stench of latex and death.

Babies get in the way of dreams…

Roe v. Wade helps to fulfill little girls’ dreams.

“When Negroes have been able to ascend economically, statistics reveal they plan their families with even greater care than whites.” Thus wrote Martin Luther King, Jr., in 1966, in a speech on the occasion of his acceptance of Planned Parenthood’s Margaret Sanger Award. ”Negroes of higher economic and educational status actually have fewer children than white families in the same circumstances”…

Providing ready access to contraception to black families, King insisted, would help to free the Negro man, unlocking “the income potential he can command”…

It’s hard to imagine anyone less fortunate, statistically, than an African-American baby in the womb. For, although blacks make up roughly 12.2 percent of the population of the United States, black women account for between 30 and 38 percent of all abortions.

But at least they’re now able to “fulfill their dreams”!

“A few decades ago women spent less time with their children in order to pursue higher education and careers, and now they pursue higher education and degrees…in order to spend MORE time with their children.”

“Feminism is mixed up with a muddled idea that women are free when they serve their employers but slaves when they help their husbands.” ~ G.K. Chesterton

Integration of the military. And now this: “The Army is ordering its hardened combat veterans to wear fake breasts and empathy bellies so they can better understand how pregnant soldiers feel during physical training.”

Now this is the kind of hilarious news that delights us: The European Union spent $200,000 on a video that depicts a white warrior woman (women make the best warriors in our limp-wristed age) surrounding hostile races (black, Arab, and Oriental), with the message that if Europe stands together it will be easier to defend against the foreign, non-white, bloodthirsty hordes. It was immediately denounced as racist and pulled from distribution.

A friend of ours writes: “A lot of single Christian Women without a very close headship are similar to unattended negroes in their emotional roller coaster of thought processes and conclusions.” Ten thousand heads nod in agreement. Then another friend, with tongue in cheek, expressed his outrage over:

1. The notion that single Christian women should need headship.

2. The notion that single Christian women without headship are like unattended negroes.

3. The implication that negroes should need attending.

4. The notion that unless negroes are attended they are like single Christian women without headship.

5. The idea that both single Christian women without headship and unattended negroes are an emotional roller coaster in terms of thought processes and conclusions.

6. The notion that there is something wrong with emotions and that they are inferior to non-emotions when it comes to thought processes and conclusions.

As of last year, more than half of all children under the age of two in this country are non-white. The share of black households headed by women (mostly single mothers) now exceeds the number of black households with married couples. White Americans don’t realize the degree to which their lives are about to change because they still see mostly whites occupying positions of authority. This gives them the illusion that all is well. In the 2010 census, whites are down to 64 percent of the population (a five point drop in ten years, a sixteen point drop in thirty years), yet 45 of 50 governors and 96 of 100 U.S. senators are still white. If Jews are called white (like a dog’s tail might be called his fifth leg), whites are 92% of the directors nominated for Academy Awards and 96% of Fortune 500 chief executives, both of which are important metrics for merit, though the latter is far more susceptible to “affirmative action.” This means that the world is about to go topsy-turvy for the grazers. We are soon to enter a renaissance of Kinism, and it will take the false shepherds completely by surprise because, like the Pharisees and Sadducees of Matthew 16, they know how to discern the weather by signs in the sky, but they are incapable of discerning the signs of the times.

The national motto of the Dominican Republic: “Dios, Patria, Libertad” (God, Fatherland, Liberty). This gives the Alienist, neo-Babelist “Christian” of today grave concern, for this reason: How could God and fatherland be important? Are Dominicans saying that no one outside their fatherland is loved of God? (You can tell that I’ve been to church.)

Though we neglect to link to every episode, you really need to bookmark the excellent Tribal Theocrat podcast. Episode 17 contains superb commentary on Boy Kevin Swanson, who argues that whites sinfully take pride in skin color but blacks are “a people” and “a culture.” I love it when Boy Kevin talks about mythical “Anglo-Saxon cannibals” in the attempt to show that pre-Christian whites were as depraved as any African ever dreamed of being. (Rushdoony taught that white men never met a cannibal until they journeyed to the Caribbean, hence the name Carib.) Another funny line from the Boy Kevin Show: “Intelligence is largely a factor of those who are diligent at building their intelligence.” Christian Gray does an excellent job of refuting this nonsense in brief segments. He gets right to the point and doesn’t lose the audience by being long-winded. This is one of the qualities that makes the show unique.

I so badly want to punch this guy in the face. Is that wrong of me?

The word “Southern” is too divisive, according to the president of the Southern Baptist Convention, because it detracts from the Great Commission.

Oh, heartbreaker. The John Wilkes Booth bobbleheads have been pulled from the Gettysburg gift shop after only one week. That’s no way to treat an American hero.

“After being hunted like a dog through swamps, woods, and…chased by gun boats till I was forced to return wet, cold, and starving, with every man’s hand against me, I am here in despair. And why; for doing what Brutus was honored for, what made Tell a Hero. And yet I for striking down a greater tyrant than they ever knew am looked upon as a common cuttthroat… I hoped for no gain. I knew no private wrong. I struck for my country and that alone… I do not repent the blow I struck. I may before my God but not to man.” ~ John Wilkes Booth

Whitney Houston died, and the flags in New Jersey were lowered to half-mast for her! Though she had a tremendous talent, allow Andy Nowicki to get real for a moment. He eulogizes her by astutely observing that Saving All My Love for You “is a morally loathsome tune, celebrating a single woman’s adulterous relationship with a married man,” and I Will Always Love You is the “musical equivalent of waterboarding” and “an effective dog-whistle” for psycho chicks. “Not to mention that the plaintive whines of bitch-dogs in heat are more pleasing to the human ear than the song’s screechy, gushing, relentlessly insistent refrain.” But this is particularly impious of Mr. Nowicki, seeing as how Whitney crafted her art in “church” by singing “gospel” music. No appreciation for black “Christianity,” apparently. It’s art! The worst song of all in the Houston oeuvre, writes Mr. Nowicki, is “the grotesque, demonic audacity” of The Greatest Love of All. According to this song, Jesus Christ and St. Paul were mistaken; the greatest love of all is not “love of others (charitos) or love of God (agape), but love of self.” Whitney “promotes self-centeredness with the rapt enthusiasm of a fire-and-brimstone preacher… [S]he graciously awaits our applause for having learned to make love to herself her whole life through.”

I decided long ago, never to walk in anyone’s shadow
If I fail, if I succeed, at least I live as I believe
No matter what they take from me, they can’t take away my dignity!

It’s “a three minute orgy of gratingly sanctimonious, snivelingly drippy, aggressively confrontational, yet rhetorically incoherent musical vomitousness.” Much like the sermons of black preachers.

Christian pop music is, in my opinion, even worse. The agenda-driven “songs” could be churned out by a computer program. They all have the same nondescript melody, the same few chords, unimaginative lyrics, and uniformity of sound. It’s too lame to be called artistic in any sense.

“Look, fellas, religion makes no difference. Except maybe to a Nazi, or somebody that’s stupid.” ~ Frank Sinatra

Look at this headline from Business Insider: “White People Are No Longer Relevant in Pop Music Sales.” More than 81% of Billboard Top 10 best-selling albums are now made by non-whites. Shotgun stages an intervention.

There are four elements to music: melody, harmony, rhythm, and timbre. White people prize melody above all. Without melody, the harmonics will be dissonant at best. Blacks prize rhythm above all. In jazz, there is either no melody or just a taste of it at the beginning and end, while the rest of it is improvisation. Composition is always less important than performance, which is a distinctly non-white way of thinking.

The word “jazz” is a slang term for semen, and it first appeared in print in 1916 when the New Orleans Times-Picayune had a story about “jas bands.” The genre took shape when the descendants of slaves mixed African rhythms with European instrumentation. Rushdoony taught that voodoo underlies jazz music. Its popularity grew in the 1920s, and Nazis refused to allow Germans to be corrupted by it. They acknowledged a sort of “jazz” style as a valid musical genre but were determined to prevent an illicit Negro juke-joint atmosphere where it was played. Here are some of the rules they enforced for jazz performances:

In this so-called jazz type repertoire, preference is to be given to compositions in a major key and to lyrics expressing joy in life rather than Jewishly gloomy lyrics [in keeping with the blues progression]… however, the pace must not exceed a certain degree of allegro, commensurate with the Aryan sense of discipline and moderation… [S]o-called jazz compositions may contain at most 10% syncopation; the remainder must consist of a natural legato movement devoid of the hysterical rhythmic reverses characteristic of the barbarian races and conductive to dark instincts alien to the German people (so-called riffs)… musicians are likewise forbidden to make vocal improvisations (so-called scat)…

Having grown accustomed to a music industry that is forced to reinvent itself with every generation in order to stay “relevant,” these strangely detailed rules strike the man or woman of the 21st century as totalitarian. And so they were, but the purpose behind the rules is clear. We also tend to forget that there is such a thing as real music that elevates and inspires and does not feed base, animalistic emotions. This is because music, which usually purports to be about love, is in sync with the “romantic” mood of our post-Christian age. “Romantic love thrives on frustration,” wrote Rushdoony. “It likes to feel sorry for itself. And the essence of romantic love is that there be insuperable problems, star-crossed lovers, and that it go from frustration to frustration. And romantic love dies when it can get the one it loves.” Not surprisingly, today’s music industry is dominated by blacks and Jews who have a strong understanding and appreciation of the very thing the Nazis outlawed. (Atonal music is Jewish music; much of it was pioneered by Alban Berg, Arnold Schoenberg, and Anton Webern in the early part of the 20th century.) The atonality of jazz, including accents between the beats, is not really the point; it’s the immorality at the heart of the movement.

It’s amazing to me that mainstream evangelical figures who are interviewed on talk shows and asked direct questions about sin and hell are always painfully reluctant to state the truth, express their faith, and witness for Christ. It isn’t surprising when you see this sort of thing from Joel Osteen or Franklin Graham, when they are asked by people like Larry King if Jews go to heaven when they die; you know in advance that the cagey answer is going to be, “Well, I think God will sort that out, and I’m just here to talk about Jesus,” as if “Jesus” can be separated from His eternal Word. But to hear it from Kirk Cameron, for whom I have a lot of respect, is rather surprising. Piers Morgan asks him, point blank, “Is gay marriage a sin?” Now, listen, if you’ve ever been on the hot seat, in front of a camera, you know that the mind and tongue can be distant relatives, so I’m willing to cut him some slack. But the answer, as we keyboard commandos can easily type, is Yes. Instead, Cameron replies that he doesn’t support it and calls it unnatural, detrimental, and destructive. In the next part of the exchange, you can see why Christians are so ineffective against the resolve of liberals. Morgan says that if one of his children came to him and announced that he’s a faggot, the response would be, without hesitation, “That’s great, as long as you’re happy.” (In Matthew 7:12, our Lord calls the Golden Rule the sum of the Law and Prophets, but to the liberal, individual choice is the sum of all things.) Notice Morgan’s adroitness, without nuance or attempt to be clever. And what would Cameron do if this happened to him? He would “have a heart-to-heart talk” and “wrestle with the issues.” Effeminate churches are turning out effeminate men like the Kony jerkers.

Read about the amazing persecution of Dr. Andrew Fraser, who wrote here in the previous post that SWB “has helped me greatly in my effort to reconnect with the blood faith of Old England.” Having lost his job as a university professor because Australia has officially determined that opposing indiscriminate immigration is “unreasonable” and not “in good faith,” Dr. Fraser decided to become a theology student. Being one of the few white men at the school, he was not surprised to discover that minority status confers no benefits on white men. In fact, during one lecture, when he asked how racism can exist if race does not exist, a red dot was placed prominently on his name tag, “a stigmatic ritual intended to signal to all present that I no longer had permission to speak.” Imagine! He was then segregated from his tutorial group for fear that he would reverse the brainwashing of other students. Of course, Dr. Fraser stubbornly refused to change his opinions (those hateful little things), and he was charged with “academic misconduct” and suspended for one year. Minority opinions are now “misconduct,” and like the endangered white race itself, minority views are afforded no protection in this world of hate and intolerance that formerly-Christian churches have given us. The charges against Dr. Fraser were “intolerance,” “interference,” and distributing “offensive” materials. How are such subjective things determined? Well, through logical fallacies. For instance, when Dr. Fraser criticized Karl Barth for accusing German Christians who supported Hitler’s rise to power as betraying their primary allegiance to Christ, an Indian woman accused him of believing that the “Holocaust” never occurred. It’s difficult to counter charges of racism and anti-Semitism when those words can mean whatever liberals want them to mean. And the calculus for being officially offended is so complex in Australia that a formal complaint against Dr. Fraser that was submitted to the Australian Human Rights Commission by an Argentinian man was dismissed on the ground that he was not a member of a group reasonably likely to have been offended! There sure is a lot of reasoning going on out there.

White men can’t jump? No other race even tries. It’s another son of Japheth pushing to the limit the bounds of the possible.

“America was first discovered by Stone Age hunters from Europe, according to new archaeological evidence.” The Smithsonian and National Geographic are no longer able to dodge the facts. They’ve given up.

I love this painting of Bag End.

She had ribbons in her hair.

A 14-year-old has become the 32nd person in the world to demonstrate nuclear fusion. Guess his race.

Very nice words of praise from Vanishing American for a great man, Dennis Wheeler. We miss him.

T-Mobile is blocking access to the best sites on the web.

The TSA is a failure, according to this special agent. It “has spent approximately $60 billion since 2002 and now has over 65,000 employees, more than the Department of State, more than the Department of Energy, more than the Department of Labor, more than the Department of Education, more than the Department of Housing and Urban Development – combined.”

If you’re in the Atlanta area, NAS will host a pro-Western Civilization event at Emory University on March 21 called “Why Western Civilization? Tales from the Front.”

We don’t want to leave you with the impression that we’re xenophobes. We may not give equal time to other cultures, but we do want to take a moment or two to recognize them, and so here’s a picture of 59 Burmese python babies served in the mother’s flesh, coming soon to a grocery store near you.

Think of it as a delicacy.

But Sunic does have some great interviews, and I’ve never heard one better than this one with Dr. Andrew Fraser, who mentions Kinists at the 34 minute mark as being at the forefront of a new Reformation and battling the “mindless Christian universalism” that plagues the Church. And here’s the key: Fraser correctly sees that Kinists emphasize families and nations primarily rather than race. Meanwhile, atheists like Sunic are seeking a secular, white racial solidarity that has never had a context outside the Christian faith. “On that religion,” wrote Edmund Burke, “according to our mode, all our laws and institutions stand as upon their base.” Christless white racial solidarity has never existed and never will. Race is very important, but it exists above and outside where people live their lives. Sam Francis said it best, writing in American Renaissance in March of 1995:

An appeal only to race selects the thinnest possible reed on which to base a movement. Race, as it is understood today in scientific terms, is largely an abstraction, and while it serves to explain much about society, history, and human behavior, it remains too much of an abstraction to generate much loyalty or motivate much action. The skeleton of race acquires concrete meaning and generates concrete loyalties only as it takes on cultural and political flesh, as race becomes tied up with community, kinship, nationality, territory, language, literature, art, religion, moral codes and manners, social class, and political aspirations. It is precisely such accretions that convert the biological abstraction of “race” into the concrete category of a “people.”

Fraser reminds Sunic: “You will never get Germans to revive as a people by getting them to identify as Whites rather than Germans.” This is incontrovertible, and the same is true for Americans. Another excellent comment: “If a people don’t want to be great, they don’t deserve to exist.” (Again, read the parable of the talents or Mark 4:25.) Be sure to hear Fraser’s comments at the 43 minute mark too.

We greatly enjoyed hearing Dr. Fraser speak at one of the Amren conferences. He’s an Australian advocate of Christian tribalism who was charged with breach of his country’s Orwellian “Racial Discrimination Act” for writing these indisputably true words: “Experience practically everywhere in the world tells us that an expanding black population is a sure-fire recipe for increases in crime, violence and a wide range of other social problems.” As Charles Dickens, who was born 200 years ago last Tuesday, wrote, the Negro is such a “sulky tyrant…to his women,” praise Heaven “that his race is spare in numbers.”

I saw an interesting Facebook thread in which someone trotted out the old line that “there is only one race, the human race.” A friend replied: “My pastor says there’s only one race, the human race. But every week we sing psalms and hymns that say things like ‘Israel’s chosen race,’ ‘His blood atoned for every race,’ etc. The denial of race is truly mind-numbing.” Then came the following exchange, which shows why Alienists are not dealing with a full deck.

Kinist: Your family crest profile photo is very Kinist.

Race-Mixer: Only if you limit your definition of Kinism to pride of one’s heritage.

Kinist: What’s the difference between heritage and race?

Race-Mixer: Heritage may be somewhat broader than race.

Kinist: If you believe there is only one race then you believe there is only one heritage. Thus, that coat of arms belongs to all, thus none. Also, if there is only one race, how can heritage be “somewhat broader”? What’s broader than an all-encompassing single race?

It’s like watching that poor beauty contestant talk about maps. You just feel kind of bad for them.

These Romans have a devastating refutation of Kinism. It’s that little verse in Galatians, and it’s making me cry “no mas!”

All jokes aside, these people were given a very good education by our friend Christian Gray, who writes such a perfect response to them that if you can do any better, I’ll boil my copy of Coming of Age in Samoa and eat it. CG informs them that ethnonationalism is “divinely sanctioned in the OT (Deut. 32:8), affirmed in the New (Acts 17:26-27), and even acknowledged as existing in the eternal state (Rev. 21:24, 22:2).” Consider Deut. 32:8, which is the basis for Acts 17:26-27. “When the Most High gave to the nations their inheritance, when he divided mankind, he fixed the borders of the peoples [or 'established the bounds of the nations,' according to the Septuagint] according to the number of the sons of God.” Its sister verse is Ecclesiasticus 17:17: “For in the division of the nations of the whole earth he set a ruler over every people; but Israel is the Lord’s portion.” The “ruler” set over each nation could be a guardian angel, as the ancient Hebrews believed. Daniel 12:1 and 10:20 indicate that there could also be a fallen angel dedicated to destroying each nation. (I have it on good authority that the demon of America is named Hyman Lipschitz.)

The message of Deut. 32:8 is that the land is divided and subdivided according to the particular needs of particular peoples. Even the land set aside for Israel was proportional to its needs and population. While impastors now preach that nationality is irrelevant, Christians used to believe the exact opposite. They believed that while Israel was God’s special project, all the nations as nations are important to Him, and He sends His angels to protect them.

Getting the average Christian these days to understand this is like teaching algebra to turtles. The confusion always stems from Babel, so let’s get a few things straight.

The narrative structure of Genesis 10 and 11 is disputed by some. Genesis 10 is the table of nations, and Genesis 11 is the account of Babel. Does chapter 10 precede chapter 11 chronologically? Some believe that it does, and others believe that chapter 10 is a preliminary overview of history while chapter 11 focuses on a specific aspect of the history (a common practice in Hebrew literature).

Whatever the case, we know that after the Flood, mankind obeyed the command to separate “into their lands, everyone according to his language, according to their families, into their nations” (Gen. 10:5). The question is whether this dispersion began prior to Babel. Many believe that it did not because of the first verse of chapter 11: “And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.” At first glance, this seems to indicate that 10:5 had not yet occurred. After Babel, we see in 11:9 that “the Lord confused the language of all the earth; and from there the Lord scattered them abroad over the face of all the earth.” Either 10:5 precedes 11:9 or they coincide.

Side note: It’s important to remember that “the whole earth” and “the face of all the earth” do not necessarily refer to the entire globe. It means “the land” or territory, or the extent of the land, or the inhabitants of the land. “Whole earth” comes from the Hebrew words kol erets. See 2 Samuel 24:8 for a clearly localized example. The “face of all the earth” used in Gen. 7:3 to refer to the extent of Noah’s Flood and in Gen. 11:9 to refer to the extent of dispersion from Babel is the same kol erets used in Gen. 4:14 to refer to the extent of Cain’s banishment. Cain was not banished to outer space. Another example to prove that erets does not necessarily mean the planet is found in Gen. 12:1: “Now the Lord had said to Abram: ‘Get out of your country [erets], from your family and from your father’s house, to a land [erets] that I will show you.’”

One verse that falls between 10:5 and 11:9 adds an interesting twist to the timeline in question: the mention of Peleg (10:25). “Peleg” means “division” in Hebrew and “sea” in Greek. From it we derive the word archipelago; this is what the Greeks called the Aegean Sea and its chains of islands.

Matthew Henry writes:

The reason of the name of Peleg (v. 25): Because in his days (that is, about the time of his birth, when his name was given him), was the earth divided among the children of men that were to inhabit it; either when Noah divided it by an orderly distribution of it, as Joshua divided the land of Canaan by lot, or when, upon their refusal to comply with that division, God, in justice, divided them by the confusion of tongues…

The plot thickens. In other words, many (like John Calvin) believe that the division of Peleg’s time was of languages and peoples, following Babel. But there are competing theories. In the quote above, Mr. Henry mentions one of them – that prior to Babel, the sons of Noah agreed to disperse, eventually resulting in the partitions that still exist today: Europe for Japheth, Asia for Shem, and Africa for Ham. See Gen. 10:32. What’s the point of being painstakingly literal with the word erets yet ignoring the literal statement in 10:32 that the nations were divided right after the Flood? The 70 nations in that chapter are divided like so: 14 from Japheth, 30 from Ham, and 26 from Shem.

In 1472, Isidore of Seville printed a map of the world that had been drawn in 636 AD. It’s called the T-O map because it places a cross within the circle of the world, and Jerusalem at the center of the continents, which are divided to the sons of Noah.

This has the same layout as one of the earliest known maps of the world, by Anaximander (circa 610-546 BC), which places the Aegean Sea at the center. Here’s a reconstruction of Anaximander’s map:

If this is the division to which Gen. 10:25 refers, and not separation caused by confused languages at Babel, it supports the theory that diverse nationalities began to form (10:5) prior to Babel.

Estimates vary, but the Septuagint places Babel at 700 years after the Flood. In the year 1300, Giovanni Villani calculated that Peleg lived 200 years after the Flood and 500 years before the events at Babel. Others, following the Masoretic (Hebrew) text and assuming no genealogical gaps to exist, estimate the migration from Ararat to Shinar to be about 250 years.

John Calvin evinces his uncertainty:

If any one should prefer the opinion commonly received among the Jews; the division of the earth must be referred to the first transmigrations, when men began to be distributed in various regions: but what has been already recorded in the preceding chapter, respecting the monarchy of Nimrod, is repugnant to this interpretation. Still a middle opinion may be entertained; namely, that the confusion of tongues may perhaps have happened in the extreme old age of Peleg. Now he lived nearly two hundred and forty years; nor will it be absurd to suppose that the empire founded by Nimrod endured two or three centuries. I certainly, – as in a doubtful case, – freely admit that a longer space of time might intervene between the deluge and the design of building the tower.

It’s easy to understand why Calvin was uncertain. For example, the genealogy in Luke 3:35-36 places Peleg at five generations removed from Shem. But in Gen. 10, the separation of the Gentiles (“every one according to his language“) occurred during the lives of Japheth’s grandsons (two generations). It also places Nimrod at two generations removed from Ham. This means that if you accept Luke’s account, which agrees with the Septuagint, as accurate, and if you presume that the Masoretic text of Genesis has no genealogical gaps (as many do), you can’t easily argue that the division of the earth in Peleg’s time was caused by Babel.

Let’s put it this way: It’s highly plausible that Gen. 10:5 and Acts 17:26-27 refer not to Babel but to the plan of God, spoken through Noah after the Flood, for how the land was to be divided to the nations as an inheritance. This theory is supported by various apocryphal and historical sources, including Archbishop Ussher. The Conflict of Adam and Eve with Satan states that “In the days of Phalek (Peleg), the earth was divided a second time among the three sons of Noah; Shem, Ham and Japheth,” after having been divided previously among the three sons by Noah himself. It makes perfect sense that this was done. At the very least, it minimized the threat of war.

We still don’t know exactly what occurred in Peleg’s time, but you can see that the popular theory that languages originated at Babel, and from Babel the nations first dispersed, is full of holes.

One theory is that the division of Peleg’s time was cataclysmic. A clue is to be found in his name: the division of the sea. If Peleg lived prior to Babel, perhaps a great earthquake or storm divided a portion of the land, causing men to fear that another devastating flood would come upon them. This could explain the important reference to the height of the tower of Babel and how it connects with the very purpose of constructing the tower, which was to challenge God, to make an immortal name for the people and an eternal monument to their power.

At any rate, we know that the Babelists rebelled, and God intervened, confounding their language, thereby forcing them to comply with the creation mandate to fill the earth and subdue it, first pronounced in Gen. 1:28 and reiterated in Gen. 9:1. Whether Babel was the origin of the multiplicity of earthly languages or the story of one large group of men in rebellion doesn’t really matter. The lesson learned from God’s judgment at Babel does matter, however, and this is where a major problem exists in our time.

Your average preacher will tell you that the problem at Babel was prideful defiance of God and the hubristic construction of a tall building to rival God’s authority. He will tell you that Babel was where different languages originated, thereby causing the tribes of men to disperse throughout the earth for the first time. And here it comes: He will tell you that if not for the sin at Babel, multiple languages would not have divided mankind. Thus, the very existence of the distinct lands, languages, families, and nations in 10:5 is the result of sin, he believes! He will tell you that Pentecost has overturned God’s judgment at Babel, and the resurrection of Christ now allows us to build a Christian Babel, because unity is never a bad thing. This is why, contrary to every other Christian who has ever lived, he promotes mass immigration, English as a universal language, miscegenation, and interracial adoption.

The difference in Alienist and Kinist viewpoints is very important to understand. The Alienist interprets the judgment at Babel as punishment for pride resulting in a temporary dispersion due to linguistic confusion. He believes that since Israelites who had been scattered to surrounding nations heard the gospel preached in their own languages on the day of Pentecost in Acts 2, and understood it, all boundaries have now been erased: linguistic, cultural, ethnic, national, racial. He believes that Pentecost has reversed Babel. We reject this idea. While God’s judgment at Babel was indeed punishment for sinful pride, which still exists today, we also recognize it as a merciful safeguard to curtail imperial ambition that is still in effect today.

John Calvin agrees with us, or, you know, we agree with Calvin:

Now, although the world bears this curse to the present day; yet, in the midst of punishment, and of the most dreadful proofs of Divine anger against the pride of men, the admirable goodness of God is rendered conspicuous, because the nations hold mutual communication among themselves, though in different languages; but especially because He has proclaimed one gospel, in all languages, through the whole world, and has endued the Apostles with the gift of tongues. Whence it has come to pass, that they who before were miserably divided, have coalesced in the unity of the faith. In this sense Isaiah says, that the language of Canaan should be common to all under the reign of Christ (Isaiah 19:18), because, although their language may differ in sound, they all speak the same thing, while they cry, Abba, Father…

So the Lord scattered them abroad. Men had already been spread abroad; and this ought not to be regarded as a punishment, seeing it rather flowed from the benediction and grace of God. But those whom the Lord had before distributed with honor in various abodes, he now [at Babel] ignominiously scatters, driving them hither and thither like the members of a lacerated body. This, therefore, was not a simple dispersion for the replenishing of the earth, that it might every where have cultivators and inhabitants; but a violent rout, because the principal bond of conjunction between them was, cut asunder.

This is Kinism in a nutshell. Our global unity as Christians is not to be found in a common language, common government and borders, common ancestry, or common culture. These, along with common faith, are what make a nation strong, as all of our fathers believed. But our unity as Christians is found in the blood of Christ, which transcends but does not erase natural boundaries.

Here’s a very good, and sadly all too rare, exposition of Scripture. The writer points out what a lot of people miss, which is that Babel was founded in Shinar “as they journeyed from the east” (Gen. 11:2). This appears to support the theory that the great migration was already under way.

In this article from 1984, James Jordan turbocharges his Alienism, claiming that “leaving and cleaving” in marriage ends the corporation of the extended family. The family must be “incorporated for only one generation,” he says, or else a clan will take shape between the family and the Church, which is pagan. He calls it “patriarchal familism.” And you thought this was satire! We know that all Alienists believe in a strict hierarchy of individual – immediate family – Church, but it’s not often that you see one of them admit it so plainly.

Our friend Nil completely incinerates this Alienist tripe in his recent article on the Fifth Commandment. The Westminster Larger Catechism asks: “What are meant by father and mother in the fifth commandment?” Answer:

By father and mother, in the fifth commandment, are meant, not only natural parents, but all superiors in age and gifts; and especially such as, by God’s ordinance, are over us in place of authority, whether in family, church, or commonwealth.

As we’ve often said, this commandment is the very basis of patriotism. Alienists (even the Westminster sticklers) have redefined the purview of the commandment to be only parents, and only Christian parents. As a consequence, the Alienists have become “murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers” (1 Tim. 1:9).

Nil writes:

The Divine Designer has constituted us to live among our own, to be naturally fitted for familial and national life. We are therefore not to treat all peoples and races equally, since one of them is ours.

God loves some nations more than others.

Their general line of thinking runs something like this: God is love. God loves all men equally. Therefore, all barriers, i.e. race, nation, national boundaries, etc., must fall so as to permit God’s love to equalize all men (presumably even if that means an equal level of misery)…

Nationhood is not an arbitrary human arrangement but a principle of divine order. The separation of vastly different peoples helps reduce conflict and promote fruitful diversity. Massive uncontrolled immigration defeats God’s order. Love and compassion fare poorly in chaos – and also in the tyranny that often follows chaos.

This article, by the way, was a huge inspiration for the formation of Kinist principles more than a decade ago. Learn it, love it, live it.

Rees Davis, a professor of medieval history, explains nationhood and national identity. To show how concepts have changed, he quotes another professor who defines a nation as “a named human population, sharing a historical territory, common myths and memories, a mass, public culture, a single economy and common rights and duties for all its members.” A medieval historian would consent to the first three, he says, but definitely not to “a mass, public culture, a single economy and common rights and duties for all its members.” These are the statist marks of empire, capitalism, and democracy, respectively, and they have no relation to what really defines a nation. As Richard Weaver said, “When democracy is taken from its proper place and is allowed to fill the entire horizon, it produces an envious hatred not only of all distinction but even of all difference.” As CWNY writes in this excellent article, democrats seek “liberty from God, equality with the ape, and fraternity with the devil. And the Goddess of Abstract Reason was the lodestar that guided the Europeans to the wonderful utopian inn in which the negro is worshipped and adored in the chapel by the staircase and abortions are provided in the room down the hall.”

Continuing with the professor, who incidentally is not a Kinist:

[Medievals themselves] believed that they indeed all belonged to peoples (gentes) and nations (naciones). We should respect their view of themselves…

Whilst modern ethnicities and nations are ultimately seen as social, cultural and political constructs, medieval peoples were divine creations. The Old Testament was replete with gentes; so was the contemporary world. Furthermore, their identity was not a matter of perception or belief; it was a matter of blood. In his encyclopaedia of definitions (so frequently cited by medieval authors) Isidore of Seville defined a gens as “a multitude sprung from one principle.” It was in the wake of this assumption that medieval authors expended so much ingenuity in tracing the descent of peoples from their eponymous founder and assumed that blood descent, actual or fictive, was a qualification for membership of a people or nation. We have of course forsworn such racist assumptions in our discussions today; but we should not visit today’s sensitivities on yesterday’s societies…

The first step of ethnogenesis is to disidentify with the Other. Then a unique name is taken. Then there must be self-government.

But if a people is to acquire an acknowledged political identity, its ethnic cohesion needs to be contained within, and cultivated by, some of the institutions of common governance. If this does not happen – as is the case, for example, with the Kurds today – then there is a disjunction, and often acute tension, between ethnic aspiration and governmental power.

The great sixteenth-century French commentator, Claude Seyssel, analysed the issue with characteristic acuteness: “all nations and reasonable men prefer to be governed by men of their own country and nation – who know their habits, laws and customs and share the same language and life-style as them – than by strangers”…

The best of all solutions is for governmental power to identify itself with ethnic or national identity. The state thereby becomes, as social anthropologists point out, the focus of ethnic identity.

When a plurality of ethnicities merge – or worse, a plurality of races – the bond of blood is replaced by a political construct that invariably becomes a sort of civic religion, with its own commandments, rituals, and heresies. The irony, as all Kinists know, is that race is now called a social construct by those whose entire lives are built around social constructs.

Finally, a nation must have memory, myth, and folklore. Common race is absolutely crucial for this.

There was no greater disaster or breach in the success story of English nation and kingship than the Norman conquest of 1066. Yet within two or three generations of that disaster, English historical mythology was revised to accommodate and absorb the event.

The same was true in Scotland, where “the process of the forging and articulating of a sense of national identity was compressed in a much shorter period than in England and culminated in the Declaration of Arbroath 1320, which is assuredly one of the most eloquent
and remarkable affirmations of national identity in any country in the middle ages.”

The God of Order hates egalitarianism. “The Law of Kin Rule” by Ehud Would is one of the best articles you’ll read on this subject. (When Ehud comes through the feed, you ask your wife to keep your dinner warm, because reading it can’t wait.) Thomas Jefferson, who wrote “that all men are created equal,” also wrote Virginia’s citizenship policy a few years later, in 1779: “that all white persons…shall be deemed citizens of this commonwealth… [and] all others not being citizens of any the United States of America, shall be deemed aliens.” The first naturalization act of the United States in 1790 confirmed this by admitting only whites to the new country. But the belief is common these days that many years had to pass so that Abe Lincoln and Alan Keyes could explain to us what the Declaration of Independence really means.

Joel McDurmon, Director of Research at Gary DeMar’s American Vision, where Bojidar Marinov squeezes out his nuggets of wisdom and where overpriced crap like this is sold, explains that Americans used to follow the Bible:

The U.S. Constitution returned to the pre-1066 Anglo-Danish standard of “kith and kin.” The word “King” is related to the English “kin” which has an ethnic reference. “Kith and kin” means “same country and family.” Without this quality among a leader, there cannot be any true loyalty to the people. And while this sounds like a side matter, it is not: a ruler who identifies with the people almost as a family will fight to defend them and their liberties. A ruler, however, without that loyalty will more likely be less interested in defense. It’s the difference which Jesus taught between the shepherd and the hireling.

Blowjidar Marinov has finally lost his mind.

In an article against “materialistic determinism,” he tries to make the case that IQ doesn’t exist and intelligence is not heritable. As you know, real scientists, as opposed to those who play scientist on the Internet, know that intelligence is about 80% genetic and 20% environmental. Marinov is rather typical of Christians these days, who are so opposed to evolution that they go to the extreme of denying that genes have any role whatsoever to play in “culture, or ethics, or art, or anything else.” He asks us to stop believing our own eyes and experience, and believe instead that intelligence is “a matter of choice” and “commitment.”

The fact of the matter is that racial distributions are out of phase. This means that at the lower end, more than 20% of American blacks have IQs below 75, but only 5% of whites are below 75. At the upper end, only 2.5% of blacks but 16% of whites have IQs over 115. Obviously, this means that some very smart black people exist, but as a whole they are overrepresented among the retarded and underrepresented among the professional class. Is it “racism” or lack of commitment or lack of faith in Christ that causes blacks to be awarded less than 1% of all doctorates in the hard sciences? No, it’s simply nature. The black-white intelligence gap is 15 points, one standard deviation, a gap that is as intractable as the black-white achievement gap that school officials have been trying to close for decades by spending trillions of your dollars. The differences are huge in abstract reasoning, substantial in comprehension and problem-solving, minor in verbal skills, and very small in memory and rote learning.

Comes now Blowjidar to announce that he he has found the silver bullet “which completely destroys [the] case” that racial distributions are – to any degree – out of phase genetically: homeschoolers. This is Marinov’s thesis, and he’s more than welcome to prove it with the scientific method:

No matter what genetic, educational, cultural, geographic background homeschoolers come from, they consistently score way above their peers from public and private schools when it comes to SAT, ACT, admission tests in colleges and universities, or any other “intelligence” tests out there…

As if the IQ of the nation has been concentrated in those only who have decided to homeschool their children.

Unfortunately, if you expect to see actual proof in Marinov’s article, you will be disappointed. Then he changes the subject, rattling off factors such as morality, fidelity, thrift, self-discipline, self-restraint, and industriousness. All of these do build character, and if they have anything to do with intelligence, we at least know that they can’t be measured in the same way. IQ isn’t everything!

But this is a far cry from asserting that intelligence has nothing to do with genes, especially when the data prove otherwise. You can’t allow non-controversial traits like hair color and eye color to be “materialistically determined” but pretend that intelligence is out of bounds because the self-esteem of some races might be damaged (a concern that strangely never manifests itself when whites are ranked lower than Asians). You can’t pretend that genes influence milk yields in cattle or a dog’s ability to hunt but are meaningless for human beings. Identical twins who are raised in very different homes remain similar both physically and behaviorally.

Race-mixers are well aware of the intractable gap, and they always try to find an agreeable reason for it. For many years, it was common to hear them say that if only blacks, who profess to be the most Christian people on earth, would really act like Christians, it would show that no racial differences exist. This hasn’t changed anything, and it’s why Marinov has latched onto homeschooling as the antidote for blackness. Any realm of white achievement could have been chosen, with the hope that any blacks who are able to keep pace can be passed off as quite average and not at the upper end of the bell curve.

For a sampling of how confused Christians are on this subject, Gary North called The Bell Curve a “tour de force.” John Piper believes the book claims that “whites are superior to other races.” Of course, the authors believed no such thing. This is simply more false witness.

Marinov is also dead wrong that what made The Bell Curve controversial in the 1990s was the authors’ uncertainty about the percentages (40% to 80% heritable, they said); it was the simple fact that the establishment went nuts about it being a “racist” polemic, even before it was published. As Kinists know, the only way to make so many people that angry is by telling the truth.

In spite of all the heavy breathing, the U.S. military remains absolutely convinced of the value of IQ tests.

We like Al Cronkrite, and it’s because we like him that we want him to realize that he is straddling a fence in this article, and he won’t be able to continue for long. He’s going to move willingly to one side or the other, or be pushed. The double-minded man will get the hell off the fence. That’s an ancient proverb that I just made up.

Alienists believe that all the Old Testament prohibitions on intermarriage were strictly religious. The ancient Jewish historian Josephus, who was in a better position than modern race-mixers to know the traditions of the Hebrews, writes in Antiquities of the Jews that King Solomon’s crime was not merely religious in nature.

But although Solomon was…the most glorious of kings, and the best beloved by God…[h]e grew mad in his love of women and laid no restraint on himself in his lusts; nor was he satisfied with the women of his country alone, but he married many wives of foreign nations… And he transgressed the laws of Moses, which forbade Jews to marry any but those of their own people.

“A people dwelling alone, not reckoning itself among the nations” (Numbers 23:9). This agrees with the book of Tobit, which denounces the act of marrying outside one’s own people as whoredom, decay, and famine.

Read this very good article by Ralph Watson for more. Ralph writes that even if it could be argued that Miriam and Aaron were “technically correct in denouncing Moses’ marriage, their motive in advancing this pretext was as malicious as their desire to remove Moses from power…” In either case, the Alienists are left with no way to prove that Moses married a black woman. They do like to invent their crazy stories.

A friend of ours wrote a fascinating blurb about London Times correspondent Douglas Reed, who made a literary name for himself between the world wars. We often talk about how strangers, unlike the Volk, have no love for the patria. After four hundred years, blacks in America have no real bond with the land they call home. In another four hundred, Mexicans will have no real love for North Carolina. Such was the case with the Jews in Germany. It shocked Mr. Reed that Jews who had emigrated to Britain after dwelling in Germany for centuries evinced not a shred of love for their homeland and vehemently supported bombing it. Reed contrasted the attitudes of these Jews with the English Jacobites who had fled England after some of them tried to murder Queen Elizabeth. Being true sons and daughters of England (white folk), the Jacobites spent their exile mourning their absence from the fatherland and praying that they could someday return.

“By the rivers of Babylon we sat and wept when we remembered Zion” (Psalm 137:1).

Our friend writes:

Reed questioned whether a race that could shed itself of all loyalty and affection for their homeland, blithely support devastating war policies against it, and rejoice in the suffering of its people showed much promise to their new country of domicile.

How prophetic. Reed recorded such misgivings in his book Disgrace Abounding, and the obvious lack of sympathy for the “chosen race,” despite his being opposed to Hitler, spelled the end of his career. As you know, semitical correctness was just beginning to spread its wings.

Jews are now trying to start a new world war.

Jew Charles Krauthammer says Israel will strike Iran between April and June “to prevent a second Holocaust.” Who’s threatening whom?

“Serve the Jews or die,” says a charming Jewish lady on a bus, who isn’t getting anywhere near the same media coverage as Emma West. Neither is this guy. Funny how that works. America now ranks at number 47 in the world for freedom of the press, behind Niger, Tanzania, Ghana, and Botswana.

Jew Andrew Adler of the Atlanta Jewish Times ponders the possibility that “U.S.-based Mossad agents” will “take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel in order for the current vice president to take his place, and forcefully dictate that the United States’ policy includes its helping the Jewish state obliterate its enemies.” Then he writes: “Order a hit on the president in order to preserve Israel’s existence.” The column was pulled, and being a Jew, Adler will likely get away with it, but the Secret Service should be focused on the Mossad right now. Jews know the history of the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand triggering WWI, not to mention the bloodbath that followed the 9/11 false flag event.

“Deadly attacks on Iranian nuclear scientists are being carried out by an Iranian dissident group that is financed, trained and armed by Israel’s secret service, U.S. officials tell NBC News…”

This anti-Christ wants Iran to be indicted for war crimes for its “state-sponsored Holocaust denial.” What about its anti-Hollywoodism? As we’ve always said, Jews want to outlaw free speech because they equate it with “pre-genocide,” as the Reasonable Rabbi puts it. He calls for a host of others to be punished with, um, genocide for the sin of offending Jews. This is necessary, he says, if “the grandchildren of the victims of Hitler’s Final Solution are to have hope for the future.” Perpetual reparations would also give them hope for the future. I’m just putting that out there. Mull it over, and we’ll discuss it at the next board meeting.

The idea that the “final solution” was Hitler’s idea is amusing. Theodor Herzl, the father of the state of Israel, wrote that Zionism is “the final solution of the Jewish Question” in an 1899 letter to the Russian Czar. Hitler strongly supported Zionism.

Jew Ginsburg of the Supremacist Court tells Egypt not to use the (late) U.S. Constitution as a model for their own but to go in search of Jacobin models elsewhere. Our evil-wicked-hateful-bigoted and decidely non-Jewish ancestors required that only whites could be naturalized as Americans and only Christians could hold office. They built the great country that Ruth Ginsburg and her fellow anti-Christs are dismantling. Eleven of the first 13 colonies required faith in Jesus Christ as the most basic qualification for holding public office. In New Hampshire, until 1877, state senators and representatives were required to be Protestants. In Virginia in 1610, the punishment for blasphemy was to pierce the blasphemer’s tongue with a bodkin. But blasphemy of the Jewish kind – protesting the doctrine of the Trinity or the Christian religion – was punishable by death. In 1628, Virginians were forbidden “to marry without lycence or asking in church.” Non-Christian marriages were not even recognized as legitimate. In 1642 it was decreed that “All nonconformists upon notice of them shall be compelled to depart the collony with all conveniencie.” Clearly, these people were not fans of what is now called “human rights.”

Jew-Communists had their own satanic punishments for blasphemy. From The Memoirs of Aron Simanovich, quoted in The Nature of Zionism by Vladimir Stepin, Moscow, 1993, and translated from Russian to English by Clive Lindhurst:

When the Reds occupied a city, they took hostages – such as people wearing ties or workers in their Sunday best. They stripped them naked and then bound onto the stomach of the murder victim an empty flower pot into which a ravenous, starving rat was placed. Through the small water hole in the base of the flower pot a red-hot iron rod was pushed to torment the rat and make him wild, causing him to try to burrow himself away from the rod – and deep into the abdomen of the horrified human victim.

Between 1929 and 1931, the Jew-Soviet Union experimented with changing the length of a week to five days and then six days. They were inspired to do this by the French Republican Calendar of the Jacobins, in which each week was 10 days, each day was 10 hours, each hour 100 minutes, and each minute 100 seconds. This was an attempt by the Jacobin revolutionaries to both decimalize and strip religious content from the calendar. The days of the week were literally “first day,” “second day,” etc. They also renamed the months of the year, keeping twelve months in four seasons. Since the atheist revolutionaries liked literal names, the Brits mocked them mercilessly for their witlessness, calling the months of the French year, separated by seasons: “Wheezy, Sneezy and Freezy; Slippy, Drippy and Nippy; Showery, Flowery and Bowery; Wheaty, Heaty and Sweety.” In 1837, Thomas Carlyle modified these silly names, calling them Vintagearious, Fogarious, Frostarious, Snowous, Rainous, Windous, Buddal, Floweral, Meadowal, Reapidor, Heatidor, and Fruitidor; all of which would be good names for Negro children, coincidentally.

Of course, Communist attempts to change God’s design for one Sabbath in seven days fell flat. The human body is hard-wired to conform to natural cycles as well as natural affections. We also learn in Scripture that the land is to rest one year in seven. Failing to abide by this rule is what caused 70 years of captivity in Babylon, one year for every cycle of seven that Israel failed to give the land a rest. Farmers now get around this by fertilizer and crop rotation, but disruption of the natural cycle causes pests and diseases to proliferate.

God’s law is designed for our earthly existence. You can’t change the length of the work week and remain in good health. Many believe that it is harmful to do even cardio exercises seven days a week. While we usually think of commandments five through ten as governing our carnal existence, the fourth commandment applies as well. It all comes down to loving God and loving our neighbor, as Jesus said. God imparts His law to us in a way that takes into account our condition. If we had been created as asexual beings there would be no seventh commandment, yet it is given to us as a universally binding law. This means that there is a natural morality built into the world (Romans 2:14-15). The heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament shows His handiwork. Day unto day utters speech, and night unto night reveals knowledge. There is no speech nor language where their voice is not heard. They go out into all the earth, and their words to the ends of the world (Psalm 19). But without the Spirit’s guidance, we suppress the truth (Romans 1:18).

The Jew-Soviets are now utterly vanquished, and Russians still sing Kol Slaven:

How glorious is our God in Zion,
No tongue can fashion praise of worth!
Exalted on His throne in heaven,
Mighty is He upon the earth.
The night and day, they sing in elation:
The Lord is glorious in His creation.

And Estonians still sing “My Fatherland, My Happiness and Joy.”

May He be guard, may He be shield,
For ever may He bless and wield
O graciously all deeds of thine,
Thou dearest country mine!

It’s nearly impossible to imagine Americans joining in a united ethnic, cultural, religious festival of song as you see here and here, but it’s important to remember that the Estonians were not able to sing freely until 1991, when they took advantage of the coup in Moscow to declare their independence from the long, dark, Jewish night of the 20th century.

Martin Luther wrote in Tabletalk what awaits those who ”are contrary to all men” (1 Thess. 2:15):

When we read that Judas hanged himself, that his belly burst in pieces, and that his bowels fell out, we may take this as a sample how it will go with all Christ’s enemies. The Jews ought to have made a mirror of Judas, and have seen therein how they in like manner should be destroyed. An allegory or mystery herein lies hid, for the belly signifies the whole kingdom of the Jews, which shall fall away and be destroyed, so that nothing thereof remain. When we read that the bowels fell out, this shows that the posterity of the Jews, their whole generation, shall be spoiled and go to the ground.

I may compare the state of a Christian to a goose tied up over a wolf’s pit to catch wolves. About the pit stand many ravening wolves, that would willingly devour the goose, but she is preserved alive, while they, leaping at her, fall into the pit, are taken and destroyed. Even so, we that are Christians are preserved by the sweet loving angels, so that the devils, those ravening wolves, the tyrants and persecutors, cannot destroy us…

“Here on our church in Wittenberg a sow is sculpted in stone. Young pigs and Jews lie suckling under her. Behind the sow a rabbi is bent over the sow, lifting up her right leg, holding her tail high and looking intensely under her tail and into her Talmud, as though he were reading something acute or extraordinary, which is certainly where they get their Shemhamphoras [their 72 names of God].” ~ Martin Luther

This is the Wittenberg Judensau (1305), which is to this day on the facade of the Stadtkirche, the church where Luther preached.

Here’s a photo of the same.

In 1988, on the 50th anniversary of Kristallnacht, Jews caused there to be a structure erected next to this monument stating that during the “Holocaust,” six million Jews were murdered “under the sign of the cross.” The implication is obviously that any Christian who opposes the filthy idolatry of anti-Christs is but a step away from killing them all, while holding a cross, no less. And of course, forcing the idolaters to leave a Christian country or state is the same as “murdering” them.

Here’s a Judensau woodcut from Munich (1470):

This one also dates from the late 15th century and stood at the entrance to the Jewish ghetto in Frankfurt. It was demolished in 1801.

At the top is Simon of Trent, a 3-year-old boy who went missing during Easter of 1475. His body was found in the cellar of a Jewish family’s house in Trent, Italy. It was believed that Simon’s blood was used in religious rituals. The entire Jewish community of Trent was arrested, confessions were obtained under torture, and fifteen of them were burned at the stake.

All known locations of Judensau monuments.

Most of these monuments depict the eating of excrement, as Jews dig with their tongues for their Talmud.

Can you imagine any church today being so bold as to shove it in the face of the enemies of Christ?

This church in Lodden, Norwich, has a mural depicting the murder of a young man named William at the hands of Jews in the year 1144. Jews were expelled from Britain in 1290 and were invited to return 350 years later when Oliver Cromwell was jealous of the business that wealthy Jews in Amsterdam were conducting with the Spanish Main.

Read On the Jews and Their Lies by the Father of the Reformation.

The first part of a review of Michael Hoffman’s Judaism’s Strange Gods. “To talk about the ‘Judeo-Christian’ faith is like talking about a chaste whore or a vampire who is allergic to blood.”

German scientists built the only flying bombs, the only jet fighters (almost radar-resistant stealth fighters), and the only helicopters used in WWII. After the war, they built NASA’s Saturn V rockets. But during the war, Germans allegedly tried to exterminate an entire race using the most inefficient methods imaginable, like generating carbon monoxide from diesel engines. (While the exhaust is carcinogenic, diesel engines are safe enough to be used in underground mines because they produce so little carbon monoxide.) An even taller tale was the planned destruction of the USA using a planned space station. A gigantic magnifying glass was to be built at the space station, which was to focus light from the sun, boil the sea, and destroy all non-Nazi life on earth. This was profiled in the July 23, 1945 edition of Life Magazine. And you thought killing only six million people was a big deal!

No story was too ridiculous for the Jew-press.

And while Hitler was supposed to be the bad guy, the Allies made Sherman, Sheridan, and Custer look like pikers in their genocidal lust.

George Bernard Shaw advocated killing 75% of all German women under the age of 60 to bring an end to the war.

War, after all, is simply a letting loose of organised murder, theft and piracy on a foe.

Others were proponents of mass compulsory sterilization and amalgamation. U.S. Ambassador Clare Boothe Luce approved of sterilizing all Germans but admitted that this was impractical. Ernest Hemingway was also a fan of sterilization and was more forthright about the goal in view being total annihilation. He believed that sterilization would be much more effective than decimating the population of Germany by war, for “war is like pruning a tree. The roots and the seed must be destroyed if there is ever to be any lasting peace in Europe. The answer to the Nazi claim that Germans are a superior race and other races shall be slaves is to say, and mean it, ‘We will take your race and wipe it out.’”

The most notorious psychopath of all was war criminal Winston Churchill.

You must understand that this war is not against Hitler or National Socialism, but against the strength of the German people, which is to be smashed once and for all, regardless of whether it is in the hands of Hitler or a Jesuit priest… I do not want suggestions as to how we can disable the economy and the machinery of war; what I want are suggestions as to how we can roast the German refugees on their escape from Breslau.

(Another quote from Churchill, in a letter to the Morning Post in 1901, that is sure to make every Yankee orgasmic: “There is one way to overcome the resistance of the Boers, and that is by a prolonged process of attrition. In other words, we must kill them out so as to teach their children to love us.”)

There were countless others in positions of power who were eager to exterminate an entire nation, even well before the “extermination camp” legend was promoted. Upon touring Buchenwald, Marion Bennett, a young congressman from Missouri, said he was “convinced that every German must be killed.” After thoughtful reflection, he realized that murdering 70 million souls was “impractical,” and so he decided that they should be enslaved instead. Bennett rendered this judgment mere weeks before Jew Billy Wilder produced a documentary at the camp, and the Allied psy-ops team (led by Jew Albert Rosenberg) set up a table displaying a lampshade allegedly made of human skin, shrunken heads, and a human pelvis ashtray. The heads were even presented as evidence at Nuremberg! General Patton even wrote in his memoirs about a human brain that was kept alive by German scientists at Buchenwald! In 1948, despite the legend of the tipping floor, the Allied Commissions of Inquiry ruled that no one was killed by poison gas at Buchenwald. And today, not even Jews believe the ludicrous stories that were presented as facts by the psychological warfare department of your government (the award-winning producers of Oklahoma City and New York City and the not-ready-for-primetime Operation Northwoods). Alas for fresh-faced Congressman Bennett back in 1945, deciding that starvation, typhus, and aerial assaults had nothing to do with the corpses that had to be removed from the camp, but instead jumping to the conclusion that this was the personal and premeditated handiwork of every man, woman, and child in Germany, each of whom was beyond redemption.

Policemen feed news of the future to reporters! Just think of what one could do with this talent at the horse track.

Elie Wiesel was at Buchenwald because he and his father voluntarily left Auschwitz to remain with the Nazis rather than wait for the Soviet “liberators” to arrive. This gave him new opportunities to narrowly avoid the gas chambers. (“I was always in the last hundred near the gate. They stopped. Why?”) He claimed that 10,000 persons were sent to their deaths each day at Buchenwald. Surely many of these were dispatched by the body-crushing elevator, the bear at the camp zoo, and maybe even the rhinoceros. When the bear wasn’t eating Jews, it ate steaks, according to the Jews, who dearly wished that they could have eaten steaks too. Instead, they “subsisted on ‘Viking Salad’ (rotten liver sausage, fish heads and potatoes), and tea made from acorns.” When Wiesel was “liberated” from Buchenwald, he sped off to nearby Weimar to steal clothes and potatoes and rape German girls. But don’t worry – the rape was not committed in a vengeful manner. So that’s a relief. Wiesel, the rapist, won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986.

The Auschwitz-Birkenau soccer field, right next to the “gas chambers.”

The only picture of the Krema II crematorium at Auschwitz, while under construction, shows no holes on the roof for the introduction of poison gas. No holes, no holocaust.

Modern crematories need more than two hours to cremate a single corpse. Here’s a Jew, as honest as the day is long, who testified under oath, in an affidavit submitted to the Nuremberg trials, that the “four ovens” at Auschwitz could cremate four hundred corpses in only five minutes. That’s gol-danged hot, let me tell you. But this doctor, who testified at the Belsen war crimes trial, has upped the ante. His claim is 80,000 in one night!

Haircuts, tattooing, gassing, dragging bodies, cremating, pulverizing bones, and burying remains were hard work, like when the elevator breaks down at Jonah Hill’s house and he has to walk upstairs to take a dump. Thus, at Auschwitz, both the SS and the Jewish inmates raced bicycles in the gas chambers to stay physically fit during extermination breaks. This was the testimony of eyewitness Ditlieb Felderer, so you’re required to believe it. Don’t make me report you.

Circumcisions in the queue for the “gas chamber”? With a Nazi’s knife? Circumcisions on the cattle cars?

Other things to do with infants, from the sacred Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin (2A) Folios 42B-54B:

As taught in Niddah 44b, intercourse with a girl less than three has no legal significance. Thus, for example, if a father commits incest with his daughter who is less than three, he is not liable to the death penalty.

In international news, a snake has died after being bitten by a Jew. Our condolences to the snake’s family.

Now Israel is deporting Sudanese! And you’re not going to believe this: The Sudanese are being held in a $67 million concentration camp, or as it is euphemistically called, a “detention centre.” It’s like a holocaust. Can you believe that the borders are being closed to those who want to live the Israeli Dream?

Clergymen and scientists agree: Jews are superior! But if any white man uses that s-word, he’s a supremacist.

Israel is the “most easterly outpost of Western civilization,” except for Russia, Armenia, Georgia…

Who could imagine living like this? Who filled all “the jobs that white people refuse to do”? See the new Australia.

I sent James Edwards this clip of Howard Stern discussing Pat Buchanan’s appearance on the Political Cesspool show. To be denounced by scum like Howard Stern is a badge of honor. Stern himself would never broadcast anything that could be called racist.

Here’s a Youtube video for the ages. It just doesn’t get any better than this. A Jew in an ESPN nigger-pundit suit goes to “Bishop” Eddie Long’s “church” with a “priceless” scroll from “Auschwitz and Birkendall” and pulls off the foreskin!

By the way, speaking of foreskins, here’s a Lego recreation of 1 Samuel 18:27 for your edification:

Then the “bishop” is wrapped in the scroll because he’s a king! “As a Jew I speak life over you!” A Jew with dual citizenship in Israel, no less. Then Schlong is throned as a king, raised into the air, and pranced around like Idi Amin. The whole thing about a “new birth” at the end of the Negro worship refers to the fact that Schlong was accused last September of molesting several boys, then settled out of court, allegedly using church money, and then his wife divorced him. Next thing you know, Schlong apologizes to the ADL for making a mockery of their gutter religion. For what it’s worth, the Jews don’t believe for a minute that the scroll in which he was wrapped is actually 312 years old and survived “Auschwitz and Birkendall” undetected. But I’ve heard crazier stories about the place.

In 1894, Charles Otken wrote in The Ills of the South:

The enormous licentiousness existing among this [Negro] people is well known. It is a moral contagion. It deadens the perception of the right. Here are negro women by scores in every county, with houses full of children, but no fathers to own them. Here is a mother with four girls; she has no husband, and never had. Her oldest daughter has two children, and that daughter has no husband. It is a common state of things, and no one talks about it. Can this condition go on without terrible consequences? Can virtue bloom in Sodom? Can the degradation of our “Brother in Black” go steadily forward in its progress of ruin, and the white race escape the contagion? In a high moral sense, the civilization of the Huguenot, the Cavalier, and the Puritan is in danger…

There is a difference between the Anglo-Saxon people and the negro race. Color is the least difference. Character, exhibiting itself in honor, in high incentives to action, in rational obedience to law and constituted legal authority, characterizes the white race in a far higher degree than the black race. The black man is far more disposed to construe liberty into license than the white man. Self-restraint is a hard lesson for him to learn. To this quality of his character is to be traced the increase of crime. It matters not whether his residence is in Connecticut or Massachusetts, Alabama or Mississippi. Wherever restraints are the least felt by the blacks, there crime is on the increase.

“These characteristics of the Saxon, his practical ability and faculty for abstract thought; his passion for conquest and power, and his love of liberty, truth, and justice, whilst they make him a colonizer and a ruler, also render his rule beneficent. Churches, charities, law, order, industry, wealth, arts and letters, follow his footsteps. He is not a destroyer, but a builder; and although he will be a master where he can, he is a kind master, and his authority is a shelter and a protection.” ~ Sidney Fisher, The Laws of Race

As a friend writes: “The Romans remarked regularly concerning the high morality of the Alani, the Suevi, the Goths, and even the otherwise notorious Vandals; according the Romans, the Northern Europeans seemed to more or less follow God’s law before Christianity ever reached them. With this in mind, it makes great sense to me that Paul reported great success for the gospel in Caesar’s household, ‘especially among the Praetorians,’ who were all Germans and Scandinavians.”

The sons of Japheth, pushing to the limit the boundaries of the possible, as they have always done:

White men can’t jump? No other race even tries.

The “speed gene” in thoroughbred race horses has been traced back to a single mare that lived 300 years ago. Of course, it’s unbecoming for us Christians to use the word “thoroughbred” because it implies that some horses are superior to others. Galatians 3:28 tells us that all horses are equal, and if they don’t run at the same speed then breeding them with enough donkeys and zebras ought to slow down the equine supremacists among them. That 17th century mare was a hater. If only there had been a church for horses, the mare could have learned that faith without mulattoes is dead, and we would not have the Triple Crown today.

Since black women are three times less likely than white women to marry, a book has been written called Is Marriage for White People? But it’s really just an excuse to promote miscegenation for black women, many of whom believe that black men are a lost cause. One of the women interviewed “is firm about dating and marrying in her race,” but she is not called a racist for this because she isn’t white. The comments on the page show what people really think about the state of black marriage, and therefore the comments are more interesting than the article.

“The few white women who have given birth to mulattoes have always been regarded as monsters and without exception they have belonged to the most impoverished and degraded caste of whites, by whom they are scrupulously avoided as creatures who have sunk to the level of the beasts of the field.” ~ Philip Bruce, The Plantation Negro as a Freeman

That’s just because they weren’t homeschoolers, says Blowjidar.

As everyone is taught in school, white supremacism springs from the soul of Hitler like Brahma springs from the navel of Vishnu. But apparently, mischling supremacism is perfectly acceptable, nay, scientifically provable! The Jew begins her article:

White supremacy is so last century. These days it’s on-trend to be a mixed-race supremacist.

We then read the words: “biological advantages,” “biologically preferable,” “genetically superior,” “greater protection from illness or genetic abnormality,” “genetically healthier and more attractive,” “more attractive and more successful,” “the new ideal of physical beauty,” “the beautiful people,” “the perfect face,” “fashionable,” “like being in one of those fairy tales,” “the new excitement.”

You can’t have it both ways. You can’t argue that races ought to mix and race doesn’t exist. Races can only mix because race exists.

The Nuremberg Laws to prevent mischlings.

“Unless history is a false teacher, it is not possible for two distinct races not homogeneous, that is, which can not assimilate by intermarriage and the mingling of blood, to exist upon terms of political equality under the same government. One or the other must go to the wall.” ~ Senator J.J. Ingalls, Atlanta Constitution, 3 December 1888

John Piper, King of the Jungle, writes: “Nothing binds a pastor’s heart to diversity more than having it in his home.”

In the continuation of his review of Bloodlines, Nil correctly observes that if interracial marriage is “a positive good” to be “celebrated,” as Piper claims, “then are not most people’s preferences for a spouse of the same race defective in some way?” Hence the “sin” of racism.

His deep-seated and backwards racial error is definitively encapsulated by a rhetorical question he poses: “For what does it profit a man if he gains complete diversity and loses his own soul?” (p. 40). No Christian should ever view those as competing goods.

Indeed not. I especially appreciate Nil’s observation that Piper’s “amalgamation as an obligation” has no exit strategy, which makes it unlike any other kind of biblical restitution or reconciliation.

If I were to wrong someone, there is generally some time or another when I would realize I had done as much as could be expected of me in making it up to him. For example, in Old Testament law a thief had to repay 125% of the value of what he stole; he was not required to continue making repayments indefinitely. But can we ever honestly say that John Piper and the white race have finally finished making restitution to other races? Of course not. Though Piper tries to distinguish the debt Christ paid on Calvary from the debt he owes to blacks, he actually betrays his own Messiah-complex.

Bingo. This is the most important point of all. Those who denounce us Kinists as white supremacists are the true supremacists, because they have a Messiah complex and want to remake other races in their own image. They are the keepers of the secret flame, and all the world will live in peace if all the world agrees to dress in whiteface and speak effeminately. A little abasement is a small price to pay if it ensures that all peoples will be drawn like mosquitoes to the Great White Father, in whose name all propositional nations of the earth will be blessed, White without end, Amen.

For proof that Piper lives in a fantasy world, he writes that there will be “racial harmony” when “the old earthly stabilities” have been “shaken up.” He suggests that those who are “resentful” and “threatened” by the New World Order and “possessive of culture and place” are not really trusting in God. Or as he puts it in his effeminate way:

How do you feel about all this? Does it feel threatening or exciting? Do you feel possessive of culture and place? Or do you feel like God is at work with amazing kingdom possibilities? Do you feel resentful that the old earthly stabilities are being shaken up? Where is your stability?

He implies that only a hater and reprobate would not want earthly stabilities to be “shaken up.” He implies that if they are shaken up, it proves to us that God is in control. What fresh hell is this? Apparently, Christians who enjoy stability need to get in touch with their own feelings. As we never tire of saying, this is completely foreign to what our Christian ancestors believed, going back as far as you like.

Piper’s favorite characters from literature are the witches from MacBeth:

Black spirits and white, red spirits and gray;
Mingle, mingle, mingle, you that mingle may.

By the pricking of my Thumbs,
Something wicked this way comes.

T.D. Jakes has a word from the Lord and a jigaboo in his hoochie-coo: “The embarrassing thing is that we as churches are not doing as well as the nightclubs are at integrating. We have to challenge that.”

“All that is needed to make us the finest race on earth is to engraft upon our stock the negro element which Providence has placed by our side on this continent. Of all the rich treasures of blood vouchsafed to us that of the negro is most precious because it is the most unlike any other that enters into the composition of national life. The white people of America are dying for want of fresh blood. They have bone and sinew but they are dry and shriveled for lack of the healthful juices of life. The fact may be startling but the student of ethnology will be willing to admit that in course of time the dark races must absorb the white. Let the war go on until church and state and society recognize not only the propriety but the necessity of the marriage of white and black, in short, until the great truth shall be declared in our public documents and announced in the messages of our Presidents that it is desirable that the white man shall marry the black woman and the white woman the black man. It is only by the infusion into the very system of the vital forces of a tropical race that the white race may regain health and strength.” ~ the vampires – I mean, the authors of Miscegenation, 1864

“The embarrassing thing is that we as churches are not doing as well as the vampires in sucking fresh blood from the negroid neck. We have to challenge that.” ~ Churches of the West

The name of Black History Month has changed. No, not to that. And as usual, “African American history” is celebrated not through black people who actually made history but by bashing great Americans. Kind of like Ann Coulter calling Andrew Jackson a “racist scumbag.”

Since there is so much violence on Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevards all across this fair land, I propose changing the names to Sinbad Street or Cedric the Entertainer Avenue.

A black man celebrates the greatness of Dr. King and the racial integration of the Chuck E. Cheese lunch counter by punching a white grandmother in the face and dragging her by the hair.

The greatest heroes are identified by what they actually do, not by what they try to do. But the only man with his own holiday is not remembered for anything that he actually accomplished.

He was a hollow man that could not even write his own sermons and speeches. He was chauffered up to the front of the parades at just the right camera moment. His movement did not overcome anything. On the contrary, his small band of opponents were beaten down with the combined forces of LBJ, the nationalized militia, the FBI, federal marshals, corrupt judges, and an adoring and dishonest media. All King had to do was show up. What a difference from Washington.

Our friend Winston Smith discovered that the Hebrew name for Molech is spelled with only three letters: MLK.

Another friend noticed that Google’s commemorative image for MLK Day resembles a tapeworm in a dung patty:

White atheists and black Christians compared.

The Key to Sucksess, by Jesse Jackson. It’s what “racist” Christians used to call theft.

Watch as Queen Latifah and a room full of blacks accuse policemen of being racists.

Two admirable black men telling black folks exactly what they need to hear, including the fact that it’s safer for a black man to attend a KKK rally with a rope necklace than it is to walk at night to the corner convenience store.

Rev. Manning explains why black people make good slaves.

My job is to wake him up. My job is to bring the stark truth that has caused him to behave the way he behaves, live the way he lives, kill and cut and lie and cheat, and be dependent, and fail to recognize his rightful place before God, his opportunity and strength and responsibility. My job is to clean all that up…and make him a man. Because he’s not a man now.

Love of this kind is far more important than endless theological debates, and love of this kind can only be shown by a kinsman.

“They never will love where they ought to love, who do not hate where they ought to hate.” ~ Edmund Burke

Fear and self-loathing in Minnesota. More.

A young woman in Milwaukee calls the cops after someone throws a brick through her window. One of the cops who responds then rapes her!

Everyone immediately guesses that the rapist cop is black (and he is), so the reporter for the Daily Beast, in true white fashion, embeds a video in his report that chides commenters for being so concerned about race.

When servants reign, the lives of women are cheap.

‎”I have three daughters, but so help me God, I had rather find either one of them killed by a tiger or a bear and gather up her bones and bury them, conscious that she had died in the purity of her maidenhood, than to have her crawl to me and tell me the horrid story that she had been robbed of the jewel of her womanhood by a black fiend.” ~ Sen. Benjamin Tillman of South Carolina (1847-1918)

“My sister has been mugged many times by negroes, but after each mugging she is more vehement than ever in her defense of the essential goodness and divinity of the black man. While listening to her talk about the ‘black man’ I can’t help thinking of the words from the Bible: ‘Though he slay me, yet will I trust in him.’ My sister’s credo, which is the credo of all mad-dog liberals, is, ‘Though the black man slay me and thee and every white person, yet will I worship him.’ And why must the liberal worship the black man? Because the post-Christian white needs to worship something, and the black man fulfills that need.” ~ CWNY

A poem on responsibilities.

Three “juveniles” [i.e., nigger trash] who assaulted a white cab driver and his white passenger while shouting racial slurs will not be charged with a hate crime! “Just shouting racial epithets during the commission of a crime doesn’t rise to the level of ethnic intimidation,” says one “Tasha” Jamerson with the office of the district attorney. “If they had somebody who, two blocks before, heard them say, ‘We’re going to beat somebody up because they’re white, brown or purple,’ it might be different.” So this is an invitation to any and all premeditated assaults on white people, as long as the attacker keeps his plans to himself. It’s open season!

Compare this to the amazing case in 2005 of Glenn Moore, a black man who was in a New York neighborhood one night, looking for a car to steal. He was chased by some white men, one of whom, Nicholas Minucci, called him a “nigger,” said “We’ll show you not to come rob White boys,” beat him in the head with an aluminum bat, and robbed him of several articles of clothing. Minucci was charged with assault and hate crimes for using the dreaded n-word. Here’s where it gets interesting: Minucci was a wigger. He had plenty of black friends, and like them, regularly used The Nigger Word as a term of endearment and a gesture of solidarity. They probably hear it twenty times per minute in their rap music. Two black men testified for free on Minucci’s behalf, one a a hip-hop music producer, and the other a law professor at Harvard. They all tried to get the jury to understand that “nigger” is a common word, “a matter of parlance,” especially among young people. But after two days of deliberation, Minucci was convicted of second-degree assault as a hate crime and second-degree robbery as a hate crime.

For the exact same offenses, non-whites receive preferential treatment and serve less jail time than whites. This is a payoff to those who have demanded racial “equity” in sentencing, presuming that whites and blacks actually commit crimes at equal rates, and therefore it is unjust that more blacks than whites are in jail. This is Queen Latifah’s position in the video above.

White criminals are far more likely than black criminals to receive the death penalty. Young black men, who are just a few percent of the total population, commit more than half of all murders, yet they comprise only 28% of executed death row inmates.

The double standard on hate crimes applies equally to speech. Terrorists can shut down Jared Taylor’s peaceful conferences with death threats, and sadly, most people nod with approval. Hotels have canceled Taylor’s legally-binding contracts simply for fear of terrorist reprisal. But when the Council on American-Islamic Relations met in Arlington, VA, in 2009, one of the main speakers was an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. The Clarion Fund tried to persuade the Crystal Gateway Marriott to cancel the event.

The hotel would not budge. Marriott spokesman Thom Puccio pointed out that renting a room is not an endorsement. “We’re simply providing the space for them to hold their events,” he said. Marriott critics wanted to know if he would rent space to the KKK. Mr. Puccio refused to comment…

During the much-denounced McCarthyite period – which anyway lasted less than a decade – the Communist Party of the U.S. was always able to hold public meetings, even though the U.S. was engaged in a Cold War against a Communist superpower. Not one white nationalist country exists today, much less threatens the U.S…

Needless to say, our national climate of victimhood and hair-trigger claims of discrimination make everything worse. People now seem to think they have a Constitutional right not to be “offended.” What’s more, they take offense at the mere thought that something they don’t like might be said in a place where they can’t even hear it. The result is self-righteous bigotry that makes a mockery of traditional freedoms…

Most Americans say they believe in free speech; it’s time they let people practice it.

Taco Bell commits sacrilege against the chief apostle of the Civil Righteous religion. And just like that, the flame went out.

Republicans are trying yet again to convince voters that MLK was a conservative. Don’t miss this post from James Edwards.

Republicans boo the Golden Rule.

“The idea of a theocracy very much annoys me.” ~ Ron Paul, Bill Moyers Journal, 4 January 2008

Pastor Manning on the Jimmy Kimmel show explaining that Newt Gingrich has an Oprah in the woodpile.

“I believe in an America where millions of Americans believe in an America that’s the America millions of Americans believe in. That’s the America I love.” ~ Mitt Romney

Once Romney secures the nomination, there will be news stories about Brigham Young’s belief that the only thing worse than a dark-skinned person was a Jew. Preaching in 1854, Young looked forward to the day when the Lamanites would be made white:

Here are the Lamanites… Their wickedness was not so great as those [Jews] who slew the Son of God. Jesus revealed himself to them after he was slain, preached to them the Gospel. But in the fourth generation the Priesthood was driven from their midst… Is their curse as great as that of those in Palestine? No, it is light, in comparison. They began to thirst for each other’s blood, and massacred each other, from generation to generation, until they sunk into wickedness, and evil principles the most degrading, and have become loathsome and vile. Still the curse will be removed from them before it will be removed from the children of Judah; and they will become “a white and delightsome people” (Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 2, 1855, p. 143).

The most outlandish parody of Jewish paranoia is the New York Times’ deconstruction of Mitt Romney’s “meticulously cultivated whiteness.” You say that like it’s a bad thing! “Displaying remarkable restraint, Siegel refrained from associating Romney with the John Birch Society and George Wallace until paragraph seven. Subtle.” Usually, they go for the KKK or Nazis by paragraph two, so this shows that Romney is viewed as a moderate.

Ron Paul versus Mitt Romney on the Confederacy.

A very interesting article from Matt Parrott on Ron Paul’s libertarianism. Thanks to Christian Gray for the tip.

Everybody who cares about something greater than economic theory yet actively supports Ron Paul with time and money is a useful idiot…

[S]top entertaining the illusion that we can sneak up on our enemies with clever “implicit” angles. Our enemies are smarter than we are. Our enemies are organized more effectively than we are. Our enemies outnumber us. The one face card we have in this struggle is that we and we alone are the true representatives of the interests of the White American people. They’ve made it difficult to play that card, but it’s the only card we have. We should invest our time and money in figuring out how to play it, not in Murray Rothbard’s anarcho-capitalist fantasy of a world devoid of nation-states strong enough to curb his tribe’s limitless appetite for wealth and power.

Meanwhile, Democrats are securing the base and almost have enough to make a Tarzan movie. Obama has spent $1.6 million of your money to restore trashy “Chicano Nationalist” Aztlan murals in California. The murals depict the mestizo conquest of the Southwest and memorialize dictator Fidel Castro and mass murderer Che Guevara.

Obama has announced the creation of “African Americans for Obama.” As you know, an organization called “White Americans for Ron Paul” would be racist and bigoted. Romney wishes that he were “Hispanic” so that he could be openly racial too. As Andrew Fraser says, “Whiteness is viewed as a negative identity. It just means that you’re not black.”

“Hispanics are the only ethnicity to get their own question on the Census. There were only about 9 questions on the last Census and one was ‘Are you Hispanic/Latino?’ Ethnically, to the Feds, either you are Hispanic or you are non-Hispanic. If you are non-Hispanic, the feds don’t care about your ethnicity.”

Elle Magazine is being called “racist” for saying that blacks are beginning to embrace “white fashion” and understand “the importance of style” since Obama was elected.

Continuing the long tradition of the refusal of black people to tip, the Obamas gave 1% to charity last year.

Boo’s on first?

A friend of ours tells us that in the city of Atlanta, blacks are opposing the privatization of the city’s water system on the grounds that private enterprise is still intrinsically unfair to blacks (75% of them work for federal, state, or local government). Since this doesn’t take into account the number of blacks who are unemployed, which is always much higher than the number of whites who are unemployed, it means that the number of blacks who are employed in private enterprise is down in the single digits. Of these, many are employed at minimum wage places like McDonald’s. Optimistically, the number of blacks who hold reasonably remunerative jobs in the private sector is around 5%. Of these, many are unqualified for jobs that came to them by quotas. The EEOC comes down hard on companies that fail to conform to “diversity” mandates. Some of these quota jobs are very lucrative, like Michelle Obama’s job as “Vice President of Community Relations” at the University of Chicago Hospital, which pulled down more than $300k. The position no longer exists at the hospital because it wasn’t the kind of job that requires actual work. Our friend calculates that possibly less than 2% of all blacks hold legitimate jobs in private enterprise.

This shows how utterly impossible it is for the Republican Party to get anything more than the derisory 3 or 4% of the Black vote on election day. No matter how hysterically civil righteous and anti-white Republicans might be to try to get “a third of the Black vote” (the mantra one hears at Republican strategy seminars), they can just forget it. The Black community’s economic survival is completely dependent on give-aways, free lunches and coercive government pressure. Pulling the plug on these life support systems for African-Americans would be a catastrophe for them. Most of them would sink virtually to the status of their cousins in Haiti. Free enterprise and limited government just don’t work for Blacks.

Well, I guess this is bad news for Republicans but great news for Christian baby smugglers. They won’t have to fly all the way to Haiti to abduct children once the EEOC is padlocked and fumigated. John Piper’s church might have to build on an extra wing. The “families” are about to get larger!

“Today in Haiti we come to the real crux of the question. At the end of a hundred years of trial, how does the black man govern himself? What progress has he made? Absolutely none. When he undertakes the task of government, he does so, not with the intent of promoting the public weal, but for the sake of filling his own pocket. His motto is still, ‘Pluck the fowl, but take care she does not cry out.’ Corruption has spread through every portion and every department of the government. Almost all the ills of the country may be traced to their source in tyranny, the ineptitude, and the improbity of those at the helm of state… Can the negro rule himself? Is he congenitally capable?… Today, and as matters stands, he certainly cannot rule himself.” ~ Hesketh Prichard, Where Black Rules White, 1900

The League of the South still has not learned to stop linking to articles that condemn Lincoln as a “racist” for opposing the political equality of Negroes. Guess who else opposed this. Confederates! Who wasn’t a “racist” prior to 1950?

Before JFK was assassinated, he worried about his chances for reelection. He knew that the average voter was disgusted with him. “We’re the ones shoving the Negroes down his throat,” he said.

“Our age presents the strange instance of a numerous party, who think they can circumvent the resistless force of truth by systematically misnaming facts and fallacies, who are deliberately building a whole system of empire on the substitution of light for darkness, and darkness for light, of good for evil and evil for good, calling that master in our government which was servant, that patriotism which was treason, and that treason which was righteous defense.” ~ R.L. Dabney, 1882

Mark Twain famously blamed the influence of Sir Walter Scott for creating the honor-bound, aristocratic, feudal culture of the South, and therefore accused Scott of being responsible for the war:

Sir Walter had so large a hand in making Southern character, as it existed before the war, that he is in great measure responsible for the war. It seems a little harsh toward a dead man to say that we never should have had any war but for Sir Walter; and yet something of a plausible argument might, perhaps, be made in support of that wild proposition. The Southerner of the American Revolution owned slaves; so did the Southerner of the Civil War: but the former resembles the latter as an Englishman resembles a Frenchman. The change of character can be traced rather more easily to Sir Walter’s influence than to that of any other thing or person.

One may observe, by one or two signs, how deeply that influence penetrated, and how strongly it holds. If one take up a Northern or Southern literary periodical of forty or fifty years ago, he will find it filled with wordy, windy, flowery “eloquence,” romanticism, sentimentality – all imitated from Sir Walter, and sufficiently badly done, too – innocent travesties of his style and methods, in fact. This sort of literature being the fashion in both sections of the country, there was opportunity for the fairest competition; and as a consequence, the South was able to show as many well-known literary names, proportioned to population, as the North could.

“No one lightly dismisses the question of race. It is the key to world history, and it is precisely for this reason that written history so often lacks clarity – it is written by people who do not understand the race question and what belongs to it. Language and religion do not make a race, only blood does that.” ~ Benjamin Disraeli

“To destroy a people you must first sever their roots.” ~ Alexander Solzhenitsyn

‎From The Life and Letters of Robert Lewis Dabney:

In the year 1883, I moved to Texas. After a time, I there formed the acquaintance of ex-Governor Stockdale, of Texas, an eminent lawyer, and an old citizen, and a personal friend of Gen. Robert E. Lee before the war between the States, when he was Col. R.E. Lee, commanding a regiment of dragoons guarding the Texas frontier against the Comanches.

In the latter months of his life, and only a short while before his death, Governor Stockdale (who was, by the way, a native of Southern Kentucky) gave me the following narrative:

“He was at the White Sulphur Springs, Virginia, in the summer of 1870, in the autumn of which year General Lee died. Here the two old friends met for the last time.

“General Rosecrans, of the Northern army, was at the Springs, showing much attention to his former adversaries, and acting the magnanimous conqueror. He had been a war Democrat, and now a member of the Federal Congress, was acting again with the Northern Democratic party.

“There was quite a galaxy of distinguished ex-Confederates at the Springs also – lieutenant-generals, major-generals, senators, etc.

“One day Rosecrans approached General Lee, so: he said that everybody in the North knew General Lee was a representative Southerner, and everybody had perfect confidence in his truthfulness; and if he (Rosecrans) could be authorized by General Lee to say, on behalf of the Southern people, that they were now glad to be back in the Union, and loyal to the old flag, that that statement would do a great deal of good in Congress; that he (Rosecrans) could use it to assuage the bitterness of feeling among the coercion leaders, and make the Federal Government much more lenient towards the conquered States.

“With his usual polite caution, General Lee replied that he did not think he had the right to speak for the Southern people; that he now held no office by their gift, except the very humble one of a teacher of youth; that he had not even the right of citizenship, and hence did not think he had a right to speak for the Southern people. But Rosecrans was quite urgent; thereupon, General Lee said that many distinguished ex-Confederates were now at the Springs, from various parts of the Southern States, and from these General Rosecrans could learn their impressions of Southern feelings and purposes.

“Rosecrans caught at this, saying that he was not acquainted with most of these gentlemen, and he wished General Lee to bring him acquainted with them, in order that he might get their views. General Lee consented to invite a number of them to meet General Rosecrans at his parlor, on Paradise Row. Consequently, the next morning a species of small levee was convened there by General Lee’s invitation, and among them was ex-Governor Stockdale, of Texas.

“General Lee was very silent and very polite, greeting everybody with scrupulous courtesy and seeing them well-seated. He himself took the last seat in a plain chair by the open door…

[After the meeting was over] I [Stockdale] was…the last to approach the door. General Lee had given a very polite good-morning to each man as he passed out; as I said to him, ‘good morning,’ he gently closed the door before me, keeping the door-knob in his left hand, and said to me, as follows:

“‘Governor Stockdale, before you leave, I wish to give you my thanks for brave, true words. You know, Governor, what my position is. Those people [his uniform term for the Yankees] choose, for what reason I know not, to hold me as a representative Southerner; hence, I know they watch my words, and if I should speak unadvisedly, what I say would be caught up by their speakers and newspapers, and magnified into a pretext for adding to the load of oppression they have placed upon our poor people; and God knows, Governor, that load is heavy enough now; but you can speak, for you are not under that restraint, and I want to thank you for your bold, candid words.’

“Again, said Governor Stockdale, I thought he would dismiss me; but he still held the door closed, and after a time he resumed and uttered these words: ‘Governor, if I had foreseen the use those people designed to make of their victory, there would have been no surrender at Appomattox Courthouse; no, sir, not by me.’ Then, with rising color, throwing back his head like an old war-horse, he added these words, ‘Had I foreseen these results of subjugation, I would have preferred to die at Appomattox with my brave men, my sword in this right hand.’ He then dropped his head, and, with a sad look, added: ‘This, of course, is for your ear only. My friend, good-morning’; and with that he opened the door and I took my leave.”

A whole lot of PDFs, some very good, some awful.

John Calvin refutes Christian Identity.

Abram therefore was not called the father of many nations, because his seed was to be divided into many nations; but rather, because many nations were to be gathered together unto him. A change also of his name is added as a token. For he begins to be called Abraham, in order that the name itself may teach him, that he should not be the father of one family only; but that a progeny should rise up to him from an immense multitude, beyond the common course of nature.

There was no syphilis in Europe until the crew of Columbus fornicated with diseased natives and brought it back from the New World.

Ten great things about the Japanese.

A tourist from Tennessee was arrested at the 9/11 memorial in New York City for carrying a gun. She was unaware of NYC’s rule that only criminals are allowed to pack heat. This action struck the good Southerners of Tennessee as completely insane, and a rather humorous House Joint Resolution was passed to protest it.

The average female Marine, in addition to being ugly as sin, can’t even do two pull-ups. This ghastly, sterile cheerleader surely can.

Wheeler is giving baptists heartburn again. You can’t give them too much Bible in too few words or it causes indigestion.

Kent Hovind has always struck me as goofy, but it makes me irate that the busybodies at Pensacola Christian College turned him in to the IRS, that judges invent laws, and a great many other things about this case.

A movement is underway to choose apprenticeship over non-professional college degrees, which seems to be a custom fit for homeschoolers and a return to how things used to be done. It would be great if homeschoolers could lead an educational and occupational revolution.

These kids are your new voters. You’ve spent more than $10,000 per year for each one of them to be educated. Homeschoolers, try to keep up.

Conservationists lament the endangerment of the African black rhino but not of the white race. They like to complain about environmental resources being strained to the breaking point but then welcome millions of Mexicans across the border, leaving a sea of garbage in their trail.

The 1970s. Say no more.

The scariest Negro of the week.

Remember when people used to have a sense of humor?

Let me get a word in here. “I wanted to do something nice for our local Jewish Community, so I opened up a summer school for Jewish kids with attention deficit disorder. Unfortunately, I called my school a Concentration Camp.”

Horrifying news: Ron Paul was going to appear on the Political Cesspool in 2006! We’ve called out the National Guard and will meet this threat to liberty with steel eyes and frosted mullets.

Followers of Ron Paul are being called “non-cons.” I have to admit, it’s a catchy rhyme.

The old Ron Paul newsletters are fun to read. Our second-place winner in the New Hampshire primary (but first-place winner among young voters) was like a blogger before there were blogs. Some excerpts:

More excerpts and timeless advice from the newsletters:

Do your very best to keep your family away from inner cities.

I’ve urged everyone in my family to know how to use a gun in self defense. For the animals are coming.

Washington, with its racist government, racist radio, racist ministers, racist universities, and racist attitudes, is the black New Jerusalem.

To be white in Washington is to experience a culture that is anti-white and proud of it.

I think we can safely assume that 95% of the black males in [Washington] are semi-criminal or entirely criminal.

Our country is being destroyed by a group of actual and potential terrorists – and they can be identified by the color of their skin.

Order was only restored in Los Angeles [after the riots] when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks.

Opinion polls consistently show that only 5% of blacks have sensible political opinions…

Middle-class blacks and black political activists hold opinions not markedly different from the Crips and the Bloods.

Constitutionally and from the standpoint of our natural rights, we should be able to discriminate in renting or otherwise using our property – sexually, racially, religiously, ethnically, or just because we don’t like the person’s face.

Blacks have black schools, clubs, and neighborhoods. The same is true of Hispanics. It is human nature that like attracts likes. But whites are not allowed to express this same human impulse. Except in a de facto sense, there can be no white schools, white clubs, or white neighborhoods. The political system demands white integration, while allowing black segregation.

Blacks have “civil rights,” quotas, mandated hiring preferences, set-asides for government contracts, gerrymandered voting districts, black bureaucracies, black mayors, black curricula in schools, black TV shows, black TV anchors, hate crime laws, and public humiliation for anyone who dares question the black agenda.

The black leadership indoctrinates its followers with phony history and phony theory to bolster its claims of victimology.

Even [MLK's] ballyhooed “non-violence” was a tactic. He wanted to take power like Castro did.

…our rotten liberal culture, which admonishes whites faced with raging blacks to lie back and think of England.

“Black is Beautiful” is permissible, but “White is Beautiful” is “the slogan of bigots.” Oh?

The ACT-UP slogan is “Silence = Death.” But shouldn’t it be “SODOMY = Death”?

If you think that’s shocking, just wait until you read this:

“The race question,” said Adolf Hitler, “not only furnishes the key to world history but also to human culture as a whole. There is absolutely no other revolution but a racial revolution…”

To the enlightened and civilized, all of that sounded like gobbledygook. According to sophisticated books, the term “race” had little if any scientific status. There was no evidence that any “race” was superior to another. We were all part of “mankind,” though divided somewhat arbitrarily into “nation-states.” Our rational destiny was some sort of Parliament of Man.

Only it turns out that Hitler was, politically viewed, very nearly right. Race, or more antiseptically “ethnicity,” emerges as the critical factor in twentieth-century political behavior, with religion – another atavistic category, from the enlightened standpoint – running a close second. And, often, race and religion are intertwined, reinforcing one another.

These reflections are prompted by the deteriorating situation in South Africa, where race is the determinant, and by the fatuous things being said about South Africa in so many quarters…

You could argue that the present government in Pretoria is in fact, by most accepted criteria, the best on the continent of Africa. Blacks in large numbers are willingly emigrating to South Africa. No Berlin Wall keeps people from leaving South Africa if they want to do so. But, because of the factor of race, it is South Africa – not Uganda, not Mozambique – that is denounced by Mr. Reagan and even the Pope. Any tyranny, any caste system – even Cambodia’s or North Korea’s – is apparently more acceptable to our moral custodians than the South African racially based system.

So, that’s the way it is. In India, in Latin America, in Asia, race or “ethnicity” is the determining political category. Hitler seems to have won his debased argument…

[R]ace governs all.

The only problem is that this quote didn’t come from Ron Paul. James Edwards writes that it came from an editorial in the September 6, 1985, edition of National Review, “which was the voice of American conservatism in the 1980s. The editorial was published with the full approval of William F. Buckley; it’s very likely he wrote it himself.”

Could we get all the people denouncing Ron Paul as a racist to do the same to Buckley?

Ron Paul says repeatedly that he didn’t personally write the newsletters he published, but no one believes that he didn’t at least approve what was written, since it went out with his signature. Others are saying that there are only a few paragraphs that are offensive to leftists (not true), and he should be excused for overlooking them. Of course, his fellow congressmen pass bills that are thousands of pages long and don’t read a single word of them. But while leftists like to use the right-wing stuff in their scare campaigns, Paul’s economic proposals are what really scare them, because they know that he has a good chance of succeeding. A Jew York Times editorial gets right to the point: “Ron Paul long ago disqualified himself for the presidency by peddling claptrap proposals like abolishing the Federal Reserve, returning to the gold standard, cutting a third of the federal budget and all foreign aid and opposing the Civil Rights Act of 1964.” That last part is thrown in only to saddle racism to the rest of it. The message: Only a racist would want to take away a Jew’s livelihood!

John C. Calhoun, the last of our founding fathers, wrote the following in his monumental Disquisition on Government:

[I]t is a great and dangerous error to suppose that all people are equally entitled to liberty. It is a reward to be earned, not a blessing to be gratuitously lavished on all alike…not a boon to be bestowed on a people too ignorant, degraded and vicious, to be capable either of appreciating or of enjoying it… Liberty, then, when forced on a people unfit for it, would, instead of a blessing, be a curse; as it would, in its reaction, lead directly to anarchy,—the greatest of all curses…

These great and dangerous errors have their origin in the prevalent opinion that all men are born free and equal;—than which nothing can be more unfounded and false. It rests upon the assumption of a fact, which is contrary to universal observation, in whatever light it may be regarded. It is, indeed, difficult to explain how an opinion so destitute of all sound reason, ever could have been so extensively entertained, unless we regard it as being confounded with another, which has some semblance of truth;—but which, when properly understood, is not less false and dangerous. I refer to the assertion, that all men are equal in the state of nature; meaning, by a state of nature, a state of individuality, supposed to have existed prior to the social and political state; and in which men lived apart and independent of each other. If such a state ever did exist, all men would have been, indeed, free and equal in it; that is, free to do as they pleased, and exempt from the authority or control of others—as, by supposition, it existed anterior to society and government. But such a state is purely hypothetical. It never did, nor can exist; as it is inconsistent with the preservation and perpetuation of the race. It is, therefore, a great misnomer to call it the state of nature. Instead of being the natural state of man, it is, of all conceivable states, the most opposed to his nature—most repugnant to his feelings, and most incompatible with his wants. His natural state is, the social and political—the one for which his Creator made him, and the only one in which he can preserve and protect his race.

This goes straight to the heart of why libertarianism doesn’t work, and it is Ron Paul’s biggest problem. Dr. Paul gets a grade of F from NumbersUSA because his libertarianism gets in the way of preserving and protecting his race. The irony is that libertarians appeal to liberty. As Father Calhoun said, liberty becomes a curse when it is bestowed on a people unfit for it. This is straight out of the Bible.

“For three things the earth is perturbed, yes, for four it cannot bear up: For a servant when he reigns…” ~ Proverbs 30:21-22

A Servant When He Reigneth, by Rudyard Kipling:

Three things make earth unquiet
And four she cannot brook,
The godly Agur counted them
And put them in a book –
Those Four Tremendous Curses
With which mankind is cursed;
But a Servant when He Reigneth
Old Agur entered first.

An Handmaid that is Mistress
We need not call upon.
A Fool when he is full of Meat
Will fall asleep anon.
An Odious Woman Married
May bear a babe and mend;
But a Servant when He Reigneth
Is Confusion to the end.

His feet are swift to tumult,
His hands are slow to toil,
His ears are deaf to reason,
His lips are loud in broil.
He knows no use for power
Except to show his might.
He gives no heed to judgment
Unless it proves him right.

Because he served a master
Before his Kingship came,
And hid in all disaster
Behind his master’s name,
So, when his Folly opens
The unnecessary hells,
A Servant when He Reigneth
Throws the blame on someone else.

His vows are lightly spoken,
His faith is hard to bind,
His trust is easy broken,
He fears his fellow-kind.
The nearest mob will move him
To break the pledge he gave –
Oh, a Servant when he Reigneth
Is more than ever slave!

On his January 9 show, Rush Limbaugh made these “racist” but true remarks:

“I believe that whatever drives Obama and his party is the pursuit of money without having to work for it… If you look at the way the Obamas live, with Michelle and her separate vacations and not being concerned about how much it costs to take separate airplanes – an opportunity to live high on the hog without having it cost them a dime. They justify it by saying, well we deserve this, we’re owed this because of whatever happened to our ancestors.”

‎”Organized envy usually crystallizes into egalitarian norms whose origin is found not in custom but in government. This is a kind of uniformity from above: egalitarianism through coercion, either ideological, economic or social. These three facets are complementary, and Marxist-Leninist doctrine proclaims a utopia based on this triple equalization: that all think alike (ideological), that all belong to this one class only (economic), and that all share a similar patrimony (ethnic). Ideological egalitarianism requires a supreme definitory urging, an education, the means of communication to the masses that are centralized and directed, and an implacable censure for whatever is not the official ideology. This in short is cultural dictatorship, the ultimate weapon of egalitarianism. The envious find within this system a firm protection against originality, against free intellectual exchange, and against noetic superiority. Power alone is allowed to think; the rest can only be simple reformulators or applicators shaped by the same mold. To distinguish oneself is to fall into heterodoxy. For this reason, any thinker worthy of the name has been labeled within Marxism as ‘deviationist.’ Even within democracies there are certain dogmas that allow the labeling of those who disagree as ‘maladjusted.’ The envy of the intellectually mediocre establishes a canon so that it may denounce and condemn the independent thinker. The unity of the envious imposes an ‘orthodoxy’ that not only frees them from the effort to create and makes it easy to overlook the absence of creativity, but forces those who were formerly privileged and envied to an agreement, so that they may come to a pronouncement like the following: ‘Do not envy me; I am not different. I am equal to you, I believe your catechism to be true, and I condemn to moral exile all those that are not members of this club.’ In this manner, ‘the privileged’ have apologized for being outstanding and have promised to change their ways. This ruse neutralizes the envy of the establishment and allows free access to the communication media and to the budgets. ‘Either the syndicate of orthodoxy or the ghetto’ constitutes the dilemma that summarizes the tactic of the most refined manifestation of collective envy.” ~ Gonzalo Fernandez de la Mora, Egalitarian Envy, p. 97

“Men remain feeling guilty, for a false sense of guilt has no cure save the truth, and this is not forthcoming. Since the citizens are now guilt-ridden because of their education and political indoctrination, they are more amenable to robbery, and even murder. If the white man feels guilty towards the Negro, he is less capable of defending himself against the Negroes who turn into a revolutionary rabble, bent on theft and murder. The state finds it easier to rob men when men feel guilty for what they are and have, and the state drones on and on about the needs of the poor of the nation and of the world.” ~ R.J. Rushdoony, The Politics of Guilt and Pity, p. 46

You can see that diversity is always a means to an end, namely uniformity and then control. The more you hear a person talk about the need for diversity, the more you can be certain that the goal is to end it.

Consider the drive for “unity” in Europe. European kleptocrats thought that the introduction of the euro and the erasing of borders would overturn God’s design for nations divided along lines of religion and ethnicity. Ten years after the pomp that heralded “a new era in Europe,” Europeans are wondering when they will awake from the nightmare.

The European Union was built on the myth that we are one people with one common destiny – an “ever closer union,” in the words of the 1957 Treaty of Rome that founded what was then called the European Economic Community. We are now discovering that regional and national differences are not dissolving and that Europeans think and act very differently from one another. The British view of the state’s role is very different from the French view. The Greek or Italian concept of law is very different from that of Sweden or Denmark. Latvians have a very different view of Russia from Germans. What an Irishman is prepared to pay in taxes is very different from what a Dane or Belgian will allow…

[W]e have succeeded in building a European Union without Europeans.

They have exploited very real similarities that exist among Europeans in order to erase the differences, thereby giving them maximum control. They have also exploited envy, which is the fuel for their fire. It’s classical Marxism, and as de la Mora writes, its aim is ideological, economic, and ethnic uniformity. But it’s not working.

The faggot who writes the article is asked by one of his students, “What is a European?”

I found myself stuttering and stammering as I searched for an answer. I waffled for a bit about European values – freedom, democracy, human rights, the rule of law – but didn’t convince myself, let alone the class.

“European fundamental values are sacred,” Jan Peter Balkenende, then Dutch prime minister, said in 2004. When it came to actually defining those values, however, he was fuzzier, admitting, “We have been discussing the idea of Europe for the last 1,200 years, but we cannot grasp what it means.”

These are the same propositionalists who have run America into the ground since the time of Lincoln. They are nameless, faceless, and fatherless; wheels in a cog of false patriotism, squirrels in a cage of self-loathing. Is anything more pitiful than the man who doesn’t know his own identity? Yet this is the state of most white men alive today, which is why our race is dying. But it was not always so. The Dutch Prime Minister might not know how to define Europe, but our European ancestors suffered no confusion about their own identity, in part because they never considered the patria to be an “idea.” Like flesh and blood, it was real, and it was cherished because it belonged to them. Remember the ancient Greek aphorism? “Know thyself.” It was inscribed on the temple of Apollo at Delphi. How to get there has been the foremost question on the minds of white men for our entire history. John Calvin explained on page one of his magnum opus the paradox that without knowledge of self there is no knowledge of God, and without knowledge of God there is no knowledge of self, and that one can never attain to a true self-knowledge until he has first been known of God. This fundamental truth is suppressed by reprobates, such as Ralph Waldo Emerson in his poem, Gnothi Seauton.

The law, the gospel, and the Providence,
Heaven, Hell, the Judgement, and the stores
Immeasurable of Truth and Good,
All these thou must find
Within thy single mind,
Or never find.

“Every group regarding itself as emancipated is convinced that its predecessors were fearful of reality. It looks upon euphemisms and all the veils of decency with which things were previously draped as obstructions which it, with superior wisdom and praiseworthy courage, will now strip away. Imagination and indirection it identifies with obscurantism; the mediate is an enemy to freedom. One can see this in even a brief lapse of time; how the man of today looks with derision upon the prohibitions of the 1890′s and supposes that the violation of them has been without penalty!” ~ Richard M. Weaver

Propositionalists like to write inane things like “American values are clearly and succinctly defined in the Bill of Rights and U.S. Constitution,” which implies that Americans had no values prior to those documents being written, or that the sum total of our “values” (gad, I hate that word) are to be found on a few sheets of paper under glass in Washington City. They like to pretend that the universe sprang into being during the Enlightenment, which is another way of saying that the Mind is God, and all light and life emanate from it like shit from a goose’s sphincter. They don’t know themselves because they hate God.

In Europe, as in the West at large, they know that to forge a new, artificial unity they must shatter the old, organic unity, which was pluriform rather than uniform. To do this, lip service must be paid to diversity, even though its existence is contrary to the proposed new uniformity.

The EU prides itself on its differences, even as it tries to legislate them out of existence. Its motto is “united in diversity,” and few places on Earth have such a glorious mishmash of cultures, languages, landscapes, and peoples coexisting in such a small area. Diversity doesn’t equal tolerance, however, and the existence of differences doesn’t mean acceptance of them – a fact that has come glaringly to the fore as Europe has slipped deeper into crisis and relationships have strained among its members…

At the Congress of Europe in 1948, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill famously said, “We hope to see a Europe where men of every country will think of being a European as of belonging to their native land, and…wherever they go in this wide domain…will truly feel, ‘Here I am at home.’”

Some hope… Instead of borders being erased – the aim of the agreement Western European countries signed in Schengen, Luxembourg, in 1985 – they seem to be coming back into fashion.

We Kinists can easily see the problem here. We know that we are bound to Europe and to our European people, even if not joined to them under the same government. It is because we have a balanced racial awareness that we seek the good of our own kind but abstain from centralizing authority. It is our fear of God that compels us to love our neighbor according to God’s own law and order. But all who hate God love death.

Notice also the lament that the new “Generation E” continues to identify with “nation-states” rather than “Europe.” In both cases, the reference is to geopolitical bodies, governments, rather than distinct ethnic brothers and sisters who are bound in covenant, not to mention the mystic chords of memory. Like deracinated, Alienist preachers, the one-worlders refuse to accept that blood means anything. They insist that we must pledge our allegiance to an “idea,” when in fact we are merely the subjects of the kleptocrats, not citizens in any real sense of the word. Therefore, they will not hear of devotion to a people and patriotism in a real patria. Instead, they see only an obsolete loyalty to a “nation-state.”

As Chris Patten, former European commissioner for external affairs, has said, “The nation is alive and well – more potent than ever in some respects… It is the largest unit, perhaps, to which people will willingly accord emotional allegiance.” In fact, even the nation-state is too much for many Europeans. Europe has 16 more countries today than it had in 1988, thanks to the shattering of artificial states – the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, and Czechoslovakia. In Belgium, a country smaller than Maryland, there is such a vicious division between Flanders and Wallonia that until December there had been no government for well over 500 days – a world record.

Obviously, the EU is every bit as artificial and will be as short-lived as the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, and Czechoslovakia. The American Empire will join them on the dung heap of history.

It was believed that by giving all Europeans a common currency, the people would develop a common identity, which would allow the kleptocrats to achieve their real goal: convincing Europe’s sons and daughters to offer up their lives in “defense” of “Europe,” meaning the machinations of the European government. This has met with success in America, where the rulers freely tax from sea to shining sea and use the money to enrich themselves and prop up Israel, and the good-ole-boys fly the flag of the accursed empire from their pickup trucks and sign up to become fodder for Israel. Europe wants in on the act. After all, the same bankers are behind both enterprises.

But the structure of the New World Order is collapsing.

The European Union has constructed common institutions, laws, and even a currency. It has created all the symbols of a nation-state, including a burgundy passport that places “European Union” above one’s own nationality, and a flag, even if it is only voluntarily waved at the Ryder Cup golf championships. It even has an anthem: Beethoven’s “Ode to Joy,” though it doesn’t have lyrics and most Europeans don’t know it is their anthem. What it lacks is a people who share a common culture, language, or narrative – or at the very least are able to identify with the political construct that has been created in their name.

The European government can’t be voted out, and one state doesn’t trust another state to protect its best interests.

The EU has responded to this wave of euroskepticism by asking for more powers to govern states’ political and economic affairs…

Yeah, we know all about that. Hint: The empire doesn’t release power once it has been taken, and the excuse for taking it is always the same: security.

Rather than bringing the European Union closer to its citizens, the currency has widened the gap between rulers and ruled. Instead of ushering in a new era of prosperity, the euro has condemned millions of Europeans to decades of penury. And far from bringing together the peoples of Europe, it is on the verge of tearing them apart.

We two have paddled in the stream,
from morning sun till dine;
But seas between us broad have roared
since auld lang syne.

The difference between the Old West and the New West is that the Old Westerners loved themselves and their culture and wanted their heritage to continue. As Jared Taylor writes, “White Americans believed race was a fundamental aspect of individual and group identity. They believed people of different races differed in temperament, ability, and the kind of societies they built. They wanted America to be peopled by Europeans, and thought only people of European stock could maintain the civilization they valued. They therefore considered immigration of non-whites a threat to whites and to their civilization. It was common to regard the presence of non-whites as a burden, and to argue that if they could not be removed from the country they should be separated from whites socially and politically. Whites were strongly opposed to miscegenation, which they called ‘amalgamation.’” We will not survive unless we return to this self-love and common sense, and above all, gratitude to God for His gifts.

If you want to see a fine example of a nation that loves itself, rent Russian Ark from Netflix: one film, one single take, one continuous shot, 2000 actors, 300 years of Russian history, and a milestone in the history of cinema.

At the end of the film the camera moves towards a door, and as it opens we see that outside is a wild, raging sea, and the narrator understands, movingly, that the museum – and I think Russia herself – is actually an ark, eternally tossed about in turbulent waters. This is a wonderful metaphor, as it captures the sense of Russia having a God-given destiny to preserve Christianity and Western culture against any storms which may rage against it.

Although the film goes out of its way to avoid politics, politics is in a sense unavoidable, as everything you see is an utter repudiation of cultural relativism. To try and pretend as you see such beauty that notions of aesthetics are relative, and that what we are shown is not intrinsically superior to anything produced by modern degenerate Western culture, simply seems absurd. Because leftism revels in ugliness, perversion, and distortion, the film works as a powerful rebuke without ever having to say so.

Sadly, I do not think Britain (or probably America) could have had the cultural confidence to produce such a film. There is not a minority to be seen (apart from a few Persian diplomats) and there is no cultural cringe or sense of awkwardness about the fact that they are unabashedly celebrating themselves. This fact, along with the beauty of the women in the costumes (as I said to my friend, they are beautiful but never “hot” or “sexy”) and the civilised nature of the dancing and music means that I have to fight back tears as I watch the film and think about that which we have lost and are told to despise…

Eric Voegelin describes civilization as an island in the midst of an ocean of barbarism. In other words, civilization is not something which, along with its freedoms, is simply to be enjoyed like a consumer item, but is an uncertain, besieged enterprise whose existence must always be defended. Yet it is as a consumer item or a collection of consumer items that American writers, particularly “conservatives,” commonly talk about America now. This is especially the case when they defend mass non-Western immigration on the basis that the immigrants are not coming here to change America, but simply to “enjoy its freedoms.”

Also, don’t miss this wonderful Catalonian cultural celebration, which happened to set a world record. It is simply unthinkable that Americans could produce anything of the kind. You know it, I know it, and the American people know it, as Bob Dole used to say. There are no organic American myths and heroes because “America” long ago ceased to be a nation. Now we’re a multinational corporation run by Jewish bankers. Our “heroes” are produced by the media: soldiers who make the world safe for Israel, niggerball players, and actors and singers who allow us to escape into Jew-fantasy because reality is so horrible.

Our people have turned into vampires who prowl the recesses of the night because the Day will turn them to dust. The Catalans in this video unashamedly celebrate what Sinn Fein calls “We Ourselves” and what others have called FUBU (For Us, By Us). The Catalans survive. Spain will not hold them. To them the kingdom of heaven.

“The only freedom which can last is a freedom embodied somewhere, rooted in a history, located in space, sanctioned by genealogy, and blessed by a religious establishment. The only equality which abstract rights, insisted upon outside the context of politics, are likely to provide is the equality of universal slavery. It is a lesson which Western man is only now beginning to learn.” ~ Mel Bradford

Sam Dickson: The Idea and the Ideal of the Ethnostate.

Johann Fichte expressed the unity of language and nation in his Thirteenth Address to the German Nation in 1806:

The first, original, and truly natural boundaries of states are beyond doubt their internal boundaries. Those who speak the same language are joined to each other by a multitude of invisible bonds by nature herself, long before any human art begins; they understand each other and have the power of continuing to make themselves understood more and more clearly; they belong together and are by nature one and an inseparable whole.

Only when each people, left to itself, develops and forms itself in accordance with its own peculiar quality, and only when in every people each individual develops himself in accordance with that common quality, as well as in accordance with his own peculiar quality – then, and then only, does the manifestation of divinity appear in its true mirror as it ought to be; and only a man who either entirely lacks the notion of the rule of law and divine order, or else is an obdurate enemy thereto, could take upon himself to want to interfere with that law, which is the highest law in the spiritual world!

Let’s revisit the Kipling poem above about the nature of the slave. Has there ever been a better verse than this to describe the Negro?

His feet are swift to tumult,
His hands are slow to toil,
His ears are deaf to reason,
His lips are loud in broil.
He knows no use for power
Except to show his might.
He gives no heed to judgment
Unless it proves him right.

A 13-year-old white girl in Ocala, Florida, has been beaten unconscious by seven “teens” by the names of Zantavia, Ladricka, Javaris, Alphonso, Bria, Lamiracle, and Jebria.

“[I]t was her first day riding the school bus and none of the children would allow her to sit down… One 14-year-old girl said she punched the victim in the head 10 to 15 times because the girl allegedly called her a name.” A racial slur. This is the first lesson in Nigger Social Relations 101; the natural response to hearing unsettling words, for any reason at all, is to beat the life out of someone.

This was the second attack on the same bus in the last year, and last time the school persecuted the white victims and labeled it “a fight between two groups,” as though both the black attackers and the white defenders are equally culpable.

Rapes? Murders? Assaults? That’s all well and good for our precious little girls, but let’s not even think about segregation. That’s crazy talk, and racist too.

Just ask Barry Buckland, whose 14-year-old daughter was used as a spitting post and punching bag by three Negroes on a Portland transit bus. This man is so perfectly trained that he tells a reporter: “People have taken a grain of sand [the assault of my little girl] and tried to turn it into a 200-pound boulder [race-driven violence].” The girl herself, well-trained by her father, who is probably a deacon in some insane hate-church, has said that she doesn’t believe it was a racial altercation. But just read how it all started: “Karley made it clear that she didn’t appreciate the girls’ loud, distasteful remarks about a boy riding with her. They, in turn, didn’t like that she had the mettle to stand up for her friend. So, the thugs advanced.” This is a perfect description of what we’ve all seen a million times: boisterous, ill-mannered niggers who use their fists when “dissed,” which includes any request, however polite, for them to act civilized. The newspaper and all involved are doing their best to say “No hate crime here, folks! Move along now.” But if the tables were turned, and whites had assaulted a black passenger, it would be the biggest news story of the month. Barry Buckland – the name of this coward should live in infamy. He sacrificed his own child to the gods of political correctness, and all he got for it was a lousy t-shirt.

He who says he is in the light, and hates his daughter, is in darkness until now. He who loves his daughter abides in the light, and there is no cause for stumbling in him. But he who hates his daughter is in darkness and walks in darkness, and does not know where he is going, because the darkness has blinded his eyes. (paraphrase of 1 John 2:9-11)

A white man tries to reason with three Democrats using, you know, words, and naturally, fisticuffs ensue.

I was hoping for a broken nose.

“If you’re white your life is cheap, and all our people do is sleep.” Listen to the excellent song, 19 Years, about Gavin Hopley, a teenager who was chased, robbed, and beaten to death by a Muslim gang in Oldham, Lancashire, England. The song is sung by Lee Haggan.

“If the anti-Christian Christians of the new Christless churches would stop looking for the mythical, moderate blacks whom they can worship and adore and face reality, they would see that every humane, charitable impulse on this earth emanates from white people. It’s quite simple, Mr. Negro-worshipping Liberal. When the white remnant disappears so will charity.” ~ CWNY

“If the white race disappears, absorbed into a Babylonian, mixed race, mercy will disappear from the face of the earth. An old Christian hymn warns the sinner to ‘Look down, look down, that lonesome road before you travel on.’ The halfway house Christians need to look down the negro-worshipping road and see where it ends. It ends in a hellish, nightmare world of lost souls.” ~ CWNY

A Flint, Michigan homeowner is fed up with living near black people, who she calls “niggas.” It’s good that she didn’t succumb to Hate© by using two different letters in that word. “I put that sign up there because I’m disappointed in my people,” said the woman. “I did it to wake my people up.” Well, there will be no waking of anyone, says the NAACP (Niggers Arguing And Constantly Protesting), if hate-terms are going to be used. One commenter writes: “Let me get this straight. We have an organization that still uses an out-dated racial term in its very own name [Colored], commenting on someone else’s use of a commonly used derogatory racial term on her very own home.” Yes, you got it straight. While homes are being robbed, vandalized, and burned, and neighborhoods are war zones, the high-yellers who run the NAACP are fretting over words. They would make perfect white Christians.

Notice, as James Edwards observes, that if a white person had done this, it would have been a matter for the Department of Justice. When a black person does it, it’s just ho-hum.

Some white people are not so much cowards like Barry Buckland as just plain stupid. In this category, you would have trouble topping the story of this 26-year-old psychologist who hiked across Kenya with 75 other women and a portable pole on which she played the slut for throngs of likely rapists. I’m sure her father wishes he were dead. What has happened to our once-noble race and our once-lovely women?

An old-fashioned Christmas riot at the Mall of America. Something needs to be done about those unruly Swedes.

Another reason why lunch counters were segregated.

Another at-risk youth.

Dear State: Please, kill these people immediately.

Our greatest president, Thomas Jefferson, had the right idea about crime and punishment. This bill, introduced in 1778, would clear up many of the problems we have today. Some excerpts:

Whosoever shall be guilty of Rape, Polygamy, or Sodomy with man or woman shall be punished, if a man, by castration, if a woman, by cutting thro’ the cartilage of her nose a hole of one half inch diameter at the least.

Whosoever committeth Robbery shall be condemned to hard labor four years in the public works, and shall make double reparation to the persons injured.

And just for good measure, to put the holy rollers out of business:

All attempts to delude the people, or to abuse their understanding by exercise of the pretended arts of witchcraft, conjuration, inchantment, or sorcery or by pretended prophecies, shall be punished by ducking and whipping at the discretion of a jury, not exceeding 15 stripes.

In the same bill, Jefferson proposed amendments that would prevent free Negroes from entering Virginia of their own accord or remaining there for more than one year after they were emancipated. He proposed that any white woman who was pregnant with a mulatto child be forced to leave the state immediately after the birth and take her spurious brood with her. Failure to comply meant that she and the child were to be declared “out of the protection of the laws”; in other words, eligible for lynching.

Now, this is the cup the White Men drink
When they go to right a wrong,
And that is the cup of the old world’s hate –
Cruel and strained and strong.
We have drunk that cup – and a bitter, bitter cup
And tossed the dregs away.
But well for the world when the White Men drink
To the dawn of the White Man’s day!

A New York Times article leads off with this sentence: “Social behavior among primates – including humans – has a substantial genetic basis, a team of scientists has concluded from a new survey of social structure across the primate family tree.” It’s not necessary to buy into the evolutionary premise to recognize that genes have a lot to do with behavior (Rushton and Jensen have discovered that nature is 80% and nurture is 20%), which is the very thing that social scientists are employed to deny when it comes to racial disparities in schools and elsewhere. These Oxford scientists are challenging the idea that “social structure is shaped by environment,” that “complex societies evolve step by step from simple ones,” and “the so-called social brain hypothesis,” that “intelligence and brain volume increase with group size because individuals must manage more social relationships.” Here’s a good message for the school integrators: “Being rooted in genetics, social structure is hard to change, and a species has to operate with whatever social structure it inherits.” And another: “Primate species [tend] to have the same social structure as their close relatives, regardless of how and where they live.” Speaking of Worldstarhiphop videos: “With chimps, territorially based bands also exchange daughters to avoid incest but continue to fight with one another to the death because the males cannot recognize their kinship with relatives in neighboring bands.”

One hundred years ago, Detroit was 100% white, and it was magnificent. Now it’s 82% black and a hellhole. Race matters. But Detroit is not even the worst-run city in America. That dishonor goes to Miami. And the worst places on earth have something in common.

“Liberia was founded and colonised by black Americans to demonstrate what slave stock could achieve. They certainly showed us.”

Haiti two years later. These people have come to the conclusion that Haiti is still Haitian.

“In a century, the Belgian Congo was lifted from cannibalism to skyscrapers and automobiles. In half a century, it has returned to the jungle.”

Microsoft has patented a new “avoid diversity” feature on GPS devices.

How art thou racist? Let me count the ways.

Our galaxy is racist.

Water is racist:

Anyone who criticizes Attorney General Eric Holder is a racist. That “conversation” with the “cowards” must not be going very well.

A fugly mulatto explains in Psychology Today that whites who claim to be “colorblind” (i.e., every Alienist you know) are racists. She writes:

As a person of color, I like who I am, and I don’t want any aspect of that to be unseen or invisible. The need for colorblindness implies there is something shameful about the way God made me and the culture I was born into that we shouldn’t talk about. Thus, colorblindness has helped make race into a taboo topic that polite people cannot openly discuss. And if you can’t talk about it, you can’t understand it, much less fix the racial problems that plague our society.

You know how to “fix” the “problems,” don’t you? Ka-ching! $$$$. Viva Las Vegas!

But imagine if a white person wrote:

As a white person with a proud European heritage, I like who I am, and I don’t want any aspect of that to be unseen or invisible. The need for snowblindness implies there is something shameful about the way God made me and the culture I was born into that we shouldn’t talk about.

You know exactly what would happen. This is not at all what Attorney General Eric Holder expects a white person to say when he calls for a “conversation on race” with the white “cowards.” He expects grovelling followed by open wallets.

And you know what’s really bad? Colorblind messages create stress in minorities, causing them to be stupider.

Notice that the psychologist is a mulatto but belongs to the Delaware Valley Association of Black Psychologists, the Association of Black Psychologists, and African Americans in Behavioral Therapy. I wonder if there’s any such thing as the Delaware Valley Association of White Psychologists, the Association of White Psychologists, or White Americans in Behavioral Therapy.

RC Sproul’s magazine interviews a black pastor and tosses him a loaded question on slavery, straight down the middle. The answer reveals a lot about the unorthodox nature of black Christianity. The criterion for blacks to accept Christianity, a denomination, or a particular church is whether the institution of slavery is denounced as sinful. Since the Bible does not do this, it means that black Christians have an impaired understanding of the faith from the starting gate. Millions of whites have been enslaved throughout history, and viewing slavery as “sinful” has never been the determining factor for whether they convert to the faith. But if any church declares that slavery is not a sin, because the Bible does not call it a sin, no blacks will join – at least not these days. The intended point of this interview of Anthony Carter is that more blacks will join Reformed churches if Reformed churches will be more enthusiastic about repenting of the “sins” of their slaveowning fathers and working to integrate even the family.

Most of us like comfort. We like to be around people with whom we are comfortable and have much in common. This is particularly true when it comes to those places that mean the most to us – home and church. Thus, not only are our churches not integrated, but even more rarely are our families integrated.

Still, this lack of integration is not something with which we should be comfortable.

Carter reads things into the Bible that are simply not there and elevates them to matters of sanctification.

It is difficult to not celebrate culture, class, and ethnicity. Yet, this is what we are called to do.

Are we also called to split infinitives? He says that blacks can overlook the “racist” past of Reformed churches in the same way that early Christians accepted instruction from the changed Saul of Tarsus, once a murderer of the saints.

How can I, a black man, embrace the theology of men who owned slaves? I can joyfully embrace it because I realize that I am embracing the theology of the Bible and not necessarily the frail, fallible men who teach it. I can embrace the theology because it allows me to point out the sins of such teachers and yet the grace that is greater than that sin.

How could the early Christians embrace the theology of the Apostle Paul when, as Saul of Tarsus, he pursued, persecuted, and even consented to many of their deaths?

Translation: Slaveowners were like murderers. This reveals almost no comprehension of the Scriptures whatsoever, and Sproul and his gang of wiggers play into it for the sake of popularity.

‎”From the biblical perspective, therefore, slavery is not itself intrinsically evil; the failure to live as free men, the dependency or incompetence of a slave mind is, however, regarded as an inferior way. The believer cannot revolt against his situation, but he cannot become a slave in good conscience, voluntarily, for any form of slavery is an infringement upon Christ’s total rights over him (1 Cor. 7:22,23).” ~ R.J. Rushdoony, The Politics of Guilt and Pity, p. 24

Read Nathanael Strickland’s very good article on this interview, called On Being White and Reformed. N.S. is correct that a white pastor who wrote a positive, non-grovelling book for white people would simply be excommunicated. If he were to be interviewed, the questions would be hostile and misrepresentative, not the patronizing, fluttering softballs pitched to Anthony Carter. While Carter can talk of race and ethnicity to his heart’s content, the white author in our thought experiment would be challenged to prove that race and ethnicity exist as meaningful categories.

Further, both the interviewer and Anthony Carter have no issue with leaping to assign collective guilt to Southern whites for owning slaves and practicing “racism.” But if the interviewer had invoked the fact that 3% of the U.S. population, black males aged 13-35, commit more violent crime than all other groups combined, along with the collective implications of that fact, I would imagine that there would have been quite a different reaction.

As Nathanael observes, if “the vision of the Scriptures is clear” that families must be integrated, it means that those who oppose what the Scriptures “clearly” teach are in sin, and church discipline is needed. This is the Negro’s “vision of the Scriptures,” and it is contrary to what our righteous forefathers believed. The Negro’s “vision of the Scriptures” means the end of the freedoms of speech, contract, and association, and it replaces them with envy and theft of property. Call this what you will, but please, don’t call it Christianity.

Even Ron Paul knows that the Civil Rights Act abolished private property.

Adi Schlebusch explains that Paul’s rebuke of Peter in Galatians 2 pertained to soteriology, not to natural social order. Many race-mixers now twist the Apostle’s words to condemn racial segregation, but this commits violence upon the text, and no one can appeal to John Calvin in support of it.

John Piper “assumes that if whites deal with other races in any way other than suicidal groveling then they are indubitably transgressing the sixth commandment.” Read part 2 of Nil’s review of Bloodlines. No historical considerations like abolitionist or communist agitation are allowed in Piper’s survey of the South and its collective decisions; it’s all chalked up to bigotry on the part of whites. Piper reveals that he understands very little and is merely posturing for political points, “even though he has at other times provided book-length responses to scholars on important biblical and theological issues.” He writes that Christian support for segregation was ubiquitous yet sinful. (What else in history could be said to have ubiquitous Christian support that was sinful?) He slanders his parents by writing that “the whole structure of the relationship” with the Piper family’s black maid “was demeaning,” without mentioning a single instance in which the maid was maligned, injured, scorned, or victimized. You’re just supposed to take his word for it, apparently.

All this rhetoric communicates the novel notion that social or hierarchical inequality is equivalent to the denial of an inferior’s humanity – inequality is exactly how the “structure” is “demeaning.” As argued by Tribal Theocrat, this is perfectly egalitarian, and it utterly contradicts [Piper's] own arguments elsewhere that gender complementarity is not inherently demeaning. His obvious contradiction in this area, in addition to his implicit defamation of his parents, is profoundly disturbing…

Righteous men should reject his teachings and love their race.

Ken Ham, the Australian, race-mixing, Abe Lincoln lookalike, has a new video called “What is the Only Answer to Racism?” Answer: Agreeing with Ken Ham. “Boldly dealing with a topic that many in the church have not addressed” is a very funny line. As a friend of ours writes, it sure does take a lot of moral courage to go out on a limb and agree with MTV and Hollywood. Such bravery! Such derring-do! Another friend wonders if Ken will claim martyr status by treading the thorny topics of good nutrition and exercise, or perhaps reducing electric bills. The prophet Daniel was a wimp in comparison. Ham’s video is the same old song and dance. “Darwinian evolution is inherently racist,” he says, and by defining racism so broadly as to include support of the natural, historic order, he bears false witness against his fellow Christians who agree with Christian doctrines that long predated Darwinism. This takes us to Ken Ham’s other bonafide, which is that our godly forefathers were wrong, and if only they had understood “the Bible’s account of the true history of man,” they would not have been racists. Oh, if only we could agree with Ken, how holy we would be. If you ever hear a Kinist say that men of our time have chanced upon some new revelation that was hidden to our fathers, or some modern proof that our fathers were collectively mistaken, be sure to take my pulse.

“Is it possible God actually calls some Blacks to fall in love with Whites, and vice-versa? If that is true, then we should celebrate. Yes, celebrate! Let’s rejoice over the beautiful children born to interracial marriages and do everything possible to make them fully accepted. Let’s recognize the contributions intermarriage can make toward breaking down prejudice. And though we may not necessarily promote interracial marriages, let’s take the lead in defending, protecting, and supporting them in our churches… The entertainment industry has attempted to keep pace with the increasing number of intermarrying Americans. Television shows such as General Hospital and L.A. Law and major Hollywood releases like Jungle Fever, Mississippi Masala, The Joy Luck Club, and The Bodyguard have all highlighted interracial romances. This is one area where the media may be morally ahead of the church… American churches can become havens of safety and support for interracial couples… More creative heterogeneous churches may emerge, becoming places that feel like home to interracial families… We should rejoice over the barrier-shattering potential each Christian interracial marriage brings to our churches.” ~ Bilious Billy Graham, from a Christianity Today article, March 1994

Shield my eyes!

Franken-Ken also likes to deny the existence of the “curse of Ham,” which is a rhetorical trick. The curse was applied to Ham’s son, Canaan. Men have wondered about this for a very long time. It could have been because Canaan was a guilty party. It could be that Ham was not cursed directly because God had already blessed Ham (Gen. 9:1). It could be because God intended to punish Ham without debasing his entire line. It could be because there was no greater curse to which Ham could have been subjected than to see his youngest son cursed. But there is no doubt that Ham was cursed as a result of his actions, and for Ken Ham to pretend otherwise is the height of foolishness. In the same manner, the ground was cursed on Adam’s account, even though Eve committed the sin, because Adam was the responsible agent. Everyone knows the history of the race of Ham, and everyone knows that the bond of slavery has fallen upon that race primarily. According to Matthew Henry, the “fulfilment of this prophecy…contains almost a history of the world.”

“The modern church’s view of heaven is disgusting, teaching in essence that we will be un-sexed, un-raced, un-familied, and un-married aberrations when we reach the pinnacle of human existence and the joy of man’s desiring. This view is satanic in its denial of our humanity and in its death-wish to be removed from our worldly ties, better befitting eastern paganism than biblical Christianity… Given the fact that nations and tribes are composed of families (Gen. 10:5, 20, 31-32), it follows that all these corporate groupings will also exist in heaven. Scripture affirms a tenet belonging to the kinist side of the continental divide, by implication affirming the entire kinist outlook.”

Church as sex therapy, with a Negro anthem.

This clown, Russell Moore, accuses his childhood Sunday school teacher of being a “white supremacist” for telling him, after he put a coin in his mouth, “That’s filthy! Why, you don’t know if a colored man might have held that.” But he’s just getting started! He also says that her comment was “subversive of the gospel,” “dehumanizing of African-Americans,” and she was an advocate of “a twisted form of Darwinism.” She probably also wanted to kill six million Jews.

Oh nose! Judge Roy Moore of Ten Commandments fame is tied to…brace yourself…EXTREMISTS! Meaning Michael Peroutka, who is “affiliated” with the League of the South and has appeared on the James Edwards show. As the SPLC knows very well, there is nothing more “extreme” than the Ten Commandments, but opposing “racism” scores many more donation dollars for the Hate Headquarters.

John Hagee’s bouncers are busy, and I’m not talking about when he gets on the treadmill. Remember when the gospel used to be preached in churches?

Holy-rollers praying for war to smite the enemies of anti-Christ Israel.

We were right on 9/11. We were right from the beginning of the Iraq War. Back then, even paleoconservatives were saying that we must support our president and support our troops, and damn the torpedoes. Almost every Christian in the country was cheering for war, waving flags, and singing Yankee hymns of genocide.

Oh, how the “Christians” cheered. They wrote countless articles trying to convince the public that World War W satisfied Just War Theory. We warned that it could be like another Vietnam, and when Baghdad was easily taken, they laughed at us. It’s all going to be for nothing, we said. At the end of this exercise in folly, we said the empire would have nothing to show for it but two mountains: one of dead bodies and another of debt. At the close of 2011, the final convoy of American troops left Iraq. Obama claims that they leave behind “a sovereign, stable, and self-reliant Iraq.” But this is wishful thinking. The truth is that nothing has changed, and the president is too afraid to break the news to the public that their sons were slain in vain and their money has been utterly wasted.

This is a very interesting documentary by Byron Jost, the late producer of A Line in the Sand. One especially interesting part of it recounts a time when Bishop Fulton Sheen was beating Jew Milton Berle in TV ratings, and there were mass conversions to Catholicism as a result. It’s difficult to believe now that such a time existed in America. Sheen railed against Jew Sigmund Freud and the attempt by his cult of Jew psychoanalysts to redefine the soul. The classical Greek understanding of the tripartite soul was of a rider on a horse. Reason is the rider, passion is the horse, and will is the bridle. Christians understood that will (ethos), reason (logos), and passion (pathos) were inadequate substitutions for Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Jews placed the psychoanalyst in the position of high priest of the new religion that professed to condemn the Christian ways of the past as mental illness. To Jews, Christianity is just a synonym for anti-Semitism. Their goal was transvaluation, to change vice to virtue and virtue to thought crime. Freud identified himself with Hannibal, making war against Rome (the Christian West), and this is interesting because the Christian West is truly the New Israel, and Carthage was a Canaanite colony that began as a refuge for exiles from Palestine. Procopius of Caesarea, a fifth-century historian, recorded that in his time there was near Tangiers a column bearing this inscription: “We are they who fled before the face of Joshua, the robber, the son of Nun.” Carthage is now a heap of ruins in the suburbs of Tunis, and we pray that all the works of the Jews will meet the same destiny.

Secondly, Jew-Boasian anthropology pushed the idea that race is not important, that nurture is everthing and nature is nothing. Jew-antropology has been even more significant than Jew-psychology, because even “conservative” Christians have now been indoctrinated to agree that race is meaningless. Boas’s disciple, Margaret Mead, taught that Christianity is sexually repressive, and that Christian society imposes morality, and if we can throw off the shackles of Christian society, which seeks to repress us, we will live in freedom, like the ubiquitous gang-rapists that she allegedly witnessed in Samoa.

The Frankfurt School is the third prong of Jewish subversion that has given us the reigning climate of political correctness. The philosophy of the Frankfurt School was that Gentiles project their own lust for power on the Jew, accusing the Jew of oppression when they themselves seek the same power to oppress. Even positive feelings for parents, nation, and race on the part of the Christian were viewed by the Jew as sublimations of hostility. You see, the Christians are only saying that they have love, but really they are filled with hate; this was the ideal stance for the Jew to take against the Christian. The Jews knew that since patriotism is based on the Fifth Commandment, undermining the family would be the best way to undermine the nation. Hence, Jews have formed huge “entertainment” industries based on portraying the father of the nuclear family as a buffoon and every kind of deviant social bonding as a “family.” The Frankfurt School’s beef with Nazi Germany, from which they evacuated to New York, was not that six million Jews were in the process of being killed; those stories were invented after the war. It was because the Nazis were self-consciously exclusionary and gave the Marxist Jew no possible foothold in German society. The ethnic warfare that Jews have waged against the West ever since is designed to prevent another Christian ethnonationalist government from arising. Their greatest fear is a race of men who band together to say, “Our God is not your god; our nation is not your nation; our family is not your family.” Thus, they are driven to attack God, nation, and family by every means possible. But of course, their god, nation, and family are sacred.

Today, your lying preacher has accepted the Jew-lie that the majority must be indifferent to its own eclipse, because there is no majority, and our unity is founded on ideology. He didn’t learn this from Jesus Christ. He learned it from the wretched Jew. Vast numbers of white Christians today welcome the demise of their own race, which has been gifted by God and has blessed all peoples. All the world marvels and follows the Beast. “Who is like the beast?” they ask. “Who is able to make war with him?” As Dr. Sanchez states in the video, white men and women find that by turning queer or feminist, they leave their former weak estate, having zero moral authority, and join respected minority classes who are able to wield significant political influence. This is the triumph of the Jew, and it is made sweeter by their success in casting opposition to their program as deranged and even criminal. Scroll up and read the de la Mora quote again, about how the very system of Marxism is designed to punish “deviationist” and “maladjusted” thought by blocking access to funds and media until the offenders repent of their particularity and agree to join in the parade of collective envy.

“The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at. First, that the influence of home is obstructive. Second, that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten. Third, that verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective. Fourth, that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity… It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark gray… Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen… All the boys and girls will learn from an early age to be what is called ‘co-operative,’ i.e., to do exactly what everybody is doing. Initiative will be discouraged in these children, and insubordination, without being punished, will be scientifically trained out of them.” ~ Bertrand Russell

At about the 50:00 mark in this sermon, R.J. Rushdoony explains that the Enlightenment philosophy of the social scientists is a rejection of history and a rejection of culture.

After all, what difference does it make whether the white man in America has produced a great culture and the Negro has produced nothing?… So when you take all of these away from the white man and from the Negro, what’s the difference between them [according to the social scientist]? Just a little color… The Negro and the white man in the United States – strip both of them of everything, and what’s the difference between them?… Well, what is the Negro if he is not his past and his intelligence and his achievements? And what is the white man if he is not exactly what he has produced here in this country? And if you take away from us everything that our past has given us, our physical inheritance, our abilities, who are we then? I am no longer myself if you deny to me everything that my inheritance has given me, everything that my work has given me, everything that my thinking has given me.

Clearly, Rushdoony was not like the pansy preachers of today who tell us that faith is all that matters, and everything else is negotiable. What does it mean to be pro-life if you kill me and my people by taking from us what makes us who we are? Rush goes on to say that the Enlightenment man believes that by changing institutions, human nature will be born again. For example, they believe that if the institution of marriage is changed, as sex faggots and race faggots have done, biology itself can be conquered. No longer will white girls long to be with white men, but their affections will be learned from Benetton ads, and their children will be as dysfunctional as what they see in the Jew-movies. Such is the dream of genocide in the dark mind of the anti-Christ.

But as the Roman poet Horace said, “Naturam expellas furca, tamen usque recurret. [Though you drive Nature out with a pitchfork, she will still find her way back.]”

The good chaps at Empty Tomb Books recently bought ad space on WorldJewDaily, which amazingly was accepted. Why was this amazing? Well, take a look at the ad.

Have you ever in your life witnessed such anti-Semitism? It’s pretty much like a Holocaust, and it’s all Joseph Farah’s fault. I can almost feel the heat from the crematory ovens, or maybe it’s just the laptop toasting my nether regions. At any rate, it took three days for the ad to be pulled. WND didn’t want to be guilty of giving Judeochristianity a bad name, but frankly, I feel that three days of Jew-hatred is inexcusable.

Dances with Jews.

Anything for a buck.

Mel Gibson apologizes. This is so heartfelt that you might need a hanky.

Beautiful images from Teheran. Jews want nothing more than to destroy what you see in this video, and one can only hope that the destroyer is destroyed in the process.

“A Christian is not free to believe and promote a lie about any person or nation.”

And you thought Jews were clever in making up Holohoax history. Now they’ve taken the incident of the Epic Beard Man, who keeps the amberlamps in business, and have rewritten it for Spicy Spickerson.

Jews built a fence to keep Palestinians away, are now building a fence to keep Egyptians away, and will next build a fence to keep Jordanians away. But Mexicans just want to live the American Dream.

Bring the whole fam-damily! (There’s a disclaimer at the end to avoid to tarbrush of racism, because even the threat of hell is not as terrifying to the white man.)

Keep aliens illegal!

Look at the doll in the opening of this video. A friend who has some regular contact with Mexicans hears from them that black and brown gangs have essentially been given permission by the government to exist and wreak havoc, while white nationalist groups are hunted down for “racism.”

“The beginning of the Jewish attack on the South… The Civil Rights Movement was revenge for the Leo Frank case.”

As a child during the fashionable 1970s, I read many Archie comics, including Al Hartley’s Spire Comics, which were Christian-themed. I enjoyed reading them, but wow, some of them were awful.

Aren’t the clothes supposed to fall off dispensationalists? And how about that theology? “God’s love at the cross was for his enemies.” At least Calvinists can wash their hands of blame for these comics.

Even though comic books in the 1970s were mighty-white, the message of miscegenation, cloaked in the gospel, was there already.

The dispies were never bashful about their Jewish Supremacism.

Here it is again, in a comic about Corrie Ten Boom.

Corrie is sent to a “death camp” herself, but the bumbling Germans, HEY LOOK! WHAT’S THAT OVER THERE?

In spite of the born-again cheese logs, the Spire comics were pretty good for kids. Even the regular Archie comics, though created by a Jew who was a national commissioner of the ADL, never had to suffer “diversity.” They were all about being white, featuring a love triangle of colored people: blonde, brunette, and redhead. Thanks to strong character development, Archie at one time rivaled Marvel and DC comics in popularity. Now, the dog has returned to its vomit, and Archie is being produced by the Tolerant and Relevant. About a year ago, Archie had jungle fever.

To step it up a notch, the latest issue features a faggot, interracial marriage.

In the next issue, Archie himself will be raped by a coach in the shower at Penn State.

Lead us, Evolution, lead us
Up the future’s endless stair;
Chop us, change us, prod us, weed us,
For stagnation is despair:
Groping, guessing, yet progressing,
Lead us nobody knows where.
C.S. Lewis

The world’s first “chimeric” monkeys have been created with genetic material from not two but six parents. There is the requisite griping about “enormous ethical concerns,” because many of these frankenmonkeys “die of severe and unrelated malformations caused by the genetic modifications,” but all will be well if we can turn these macaques into voters and church communicants, and down the road maybe even give them some culturally-sensitive SAT exam questions. Progress demands it. We, your friendly editorial staff at SWB, propose a new term: “Chimerican.” This is a word for those who are derived from two or more genetically distinct sources, find phony religion from impastors, and base their citizenship on propositional Nothingness.

Blacks are always belly-aching about how their kids can’t understand exam questions written by whites because of the “cultural” divide. Some school administrators in Norcross, Georgia, attempted to do something about this by writing questions that blacks will understand, so that they can learn more in school. (You know that blacks wrote the questions because racism is never mentioned in the article.) Alas, there was snapping of necks and wagging of index fingers in Mudville when welfare matriarchs discovered that their children were being asked how many oranges were picked by slaves and how many beatings per day Frederick Douglass received.

In the Washington, DC, area, black “students” are suspended and expelled two to five times as often as whites. The Washington Post blames this on poverty first of all, right after a few paragraphs in which they admit that the same thing is happening in extremely wealthy suburbs like Fairfax and Alexandria, and in “school districts across the country.” It’s sad when liberals can’t stick to the script, even after they’ve been rehearsing it for decades. Other scapegoats suggested for the cause of this problem: racism and “unconscious bias,” single-parent homes, cultural insensitivity, zero-tolerance policies which disproportionately affect blacks because they naturally join gangs, lack of “positive-behavior initiatives,” lack of parental trust in the “system,” teacher training, “unequal access to highly effective teachers and differences in school leadership styles.” But don’t worry! The “experts” are hard at work on a solution: “many school leaders said they are increasingly focused on the problem and grappling with ways to close the gap.” This would be the same gap that has never even been narrowed. Every excuse in the book is offered to avoid telling the truth, which is that this story is about race. Vast sums of money are spent to employ people whose job is to lie.

The neo-American mentality in 1.25 minutes – ready, go.

Nearly 14% of college graduates from the classes of 2006 through 2010 can’t find full-time work, and only 55.3% of people ages 16 to 29 have jobs. This spells doom for their future careers since 70% of pay increases for the average person come during the first ten years in the workforce, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research. When compounded for the remaining years of employment, they stand to lose hundreds of thousands of dollars. Meanwhile, everyone is expecting a rebound in the economy, but I just don’t see it. Pay and productivity are stagnant while inflation climbs, and there’s nothing on the horizon like the personal computer boom of the 1980s to do wonders for productivity. Add to this the problem of debt that can never be repaid, and there’s probably no way to avoid the collapse of the dollar, which is why gold is priced so high. We’re on the eve of a revolution.

After looking at Ron Paul’s investment portfolio, a financial analyst says that he has “never seen such an extreme bet on economic catastrophe.”

A friend of ours on the left coast writes:

I have loved Apple Computers for decades. I have built my career and work on these machines. But in the end it is just another PC company with the usual multiculty agenda. I had a very disturbing problem at the UVillage store in Seattle a few days ago. While I was waiting for my wife to get some help with her new iPhone, I looked at the software for sale. An Apple sales guy came over and asked me if I needed some help and I said no. But then I added a question. I said, you know it would be nice, if my son could look at this software and see a positive role model for him. Your software has: (1) two blacks (a literacy program); (2) two blacks and a mexican and (3) the Diego program, with one black, one asian and three mexicans. I observed that when all this multicultural stuff started 50 years ago, the argument was that each child needs an appropriate role model, and so minorities should have appropriate role models. Well, fair enough. But now, little European-American (White) boys like mine (who was standing there) have no role models at all, and it would be nice if there were appropriate and positive role models for little boys like mine. (And dare I say it, like the little Steve Jobs.) Then, an obese White woman shoved aggressively towards my son and I and said, “You’re a freak, you’re a fucking freak.” I said, are you objecting to the idea of positive role models for little White boys? She said very loudly: “You’re a god-damned fucking freak!” And stomped away. I turned back to the Apple guy and said, well, too many people really hate little white children. And I added, Apple should still be considerate about positive role models for all kinds of children, not just minorities. The Apple guy looked at me and at my son, and pointing at a game software package, said here is one that looks like your son. It was a game with a yellow dinosaur with red polka dots on it. I asked him if he really thought that it looked like my boy, and he leaned towards me and said: “I will not say another word to you, I refuse to help you find anything.” And he walked away. This is simple bigotry and illegal discrimination on the basis of race and national origin. Apple Computer should be ashamed of itself. And poor old Steve Jobs is probably rolling over in his grave, because he wanted to bring computers to everyone, and yet today the corporation he built hates little White boys.

North Dakota appears to have the best protection for “racists” who are being punished for practicing free speech: “Makes it a discriminatory practice for an employer to fail or refuse to hire a person; to discharge an employee; or to treat a person or employee adversely or unequally with respect to application, hiring, training, apprenticeship, tenure, promotion, upgrading, compensation, layoff, or a term, privilege, or condition of employment, because of participation in lawful activity off the employer’s premises during nonworking hours which is not in direct conflict with the essential business-related interests of the employer.”

Winston Smith’s top ten most hateful events of 2011.

Darkness seeking to overpower Light?

This Ohio State linebacker was repeatedly called a “cracker” by black University of Florida players. “I’ve never seen more people swing at our players and call us racial slurs. I’ve never been called a ‘cracker’ more in my life than I have today.” Notice that no one cares about this kind of racial slur. Even the writer of the article warns that he’s “not trying to make light of the situation,” which is exactly what he does. But if the tables were turned, there would be no end to the whining, and it would only end by the school of the guilty white man paying a substantial bribe to a black advocacy group.

Never have so few done so little and been praised for so much by so many as the Tuskegee Airmen. You’ve heard that you should never go in with a Sicilian when death is on the line, but verily I say to you, never expect a history lesson when racism is on the line. George Lucas is saying that he tried to make the movie with an all-black cast. He probably doesn’t like to mention the fact that Star Wars was made with an all-white cast.

Et tu, Buckwheat?

A slice of Norwegian heaven, which looks just like the old “racist” America. We live in dark times indeed when beauty and peace and chastity seem like fantasies. Thank the Lord for His gifts.

Here’s a very interesting artifact, a letter from Rushdoony to Van Til in which some myths about George Washington, atheism, and citizenship are refuted.

Finally, two great men died recently, Francis Nigel Lee and Louis Andrews. They will be sorely missed. Pray that you can be one-tenth as effective as these men during the course of your life. It goes by so fast.

A key component to his obfuscation is to toss the blame on Kinists for conforming to the world since Charles Darwin’s theories hinged on racial superiority. How many times do we need to say it? Christians thought like Kinists long before Darwin was born. And we’re not Darwinists by a long shot. This is a guilt by association tactic that doesn’t stand up to a moderate breeze. And how does RC distance himself from “supremacism”? By denying that genes have any impact whatsoever on culture!

It is true enough that some cultures are better than others. What makes one culture superior, however, isn’t genetics, but the impact of the Christian faith. Low levels of melanin didn’t build Europe, the gospel did. Matching levels of melanin in turn won’t make a godly marriage. The gospel will. Away with legalism that adds to God’s perfect law.

He skips from one logical fallacy to another. Why didn’t he write “low levels of melanin didn’t build Japan”? It’s just foolishness from start to finish. Worst of all, it robs God of the gratitude owed to Him for the tremendous genetic gifts with which He has endowed our race, gifts that have blessed the whole world. It’s true that similarity in marriage does not necessarily correlate to godliness, but without question it contributes to harmony and fertility, just as dissimilarity in marriage most certainly alienates spouses and exacerbates ungodliness which ripples far beyond the realm of the immediate family.

The National Institutes of Health has found that whites with black partners “have significantly more depressive symptoms and less relationship satisfaction…” Not to mention that a white woman married to a black man is 12 times more likely to be murdered than if she were married to a white man. Choose life!

It’s anything but godly to diminish obedience to the Fifth Commandment by calling it “legalism.”

“The instinctive impulse to symbolically link together all appearances, until the living (not bare intellectual) idea of unity is reached, the inexhaustible richness of phantasy, the bold, fearless flight of thought, the metaphysical vein, the intensity, the incomparable recognition of personality, the unselfishness, the holy earnestness, the leaning towards reclusion, the untirable assiduity, the scientific achievements, the mystical contemplation, but also the long-windedness, the disposition to look at the dark side of things, the tastelessness, the characterlessness, the frequency of unclear thinking, that goes hand in hand with childish fabrications, the willingness to esteem highly the alien, and to underestimate own superb values etc.: all this can also be found in the Indo-Aryan, and in consequence we see ourselves as in a magnifying mirror. That will help us, to know ourselves, and to clearly separate the real own characteristics from those obtruded on, forced onto and funnelled into us.” ~ Houston Stewart Chamberlain

“The way to love anything is to realize it might be lost.” ~ G.K. Chesterton

Nil Desperandum has written an excellent response to Sproul at Faith & Heritage. You’re highly encouraged to read it. Just as Athanasians made creedal confession against Arianism, and as the Reformers made creedal confession against Rome, Kinists are making creedal confession against Alienism and the resurgence of Gnosticism. This is because, as Nil writes, “it is our zeitgeist.” We would not expect Christians in ages past to be faced with the same challenges we face, but it would be “disastrously naïve and foolish,” not to mention suicidal, to ignore the peculiar threats of the modern world simply because they were not faced to a similar extreme by our fathers. This dearth of wisdom in our corner of the contemporary Church is partly due to an obsessive reliance on precedent, which is ironic because we Kinists are the ones who are typically accused of living in the past. But it’s even worse than that. Nil writes:

The main problem with Sproul, Jr.’s usage of Scripture here can properly be called biblicism, or a worship of the Bible. It manifests itself usually by rote prooftexting and an absence of regenerate wisdom; and it is characterized by an unduly lax or harsh understanding of God’s law, fueled either by the request for impossibly specific Bible verses or by appeal to inapplicable passages with a can’t-you-see-the-obvious mentality. Against this biblicism, I contend that opposition to miscegenation should hardly require any biblical text (just like patriotism): it is grounded in racial realism, which is itself grounded in a healthy understanding of natural revelation. Though Scriptures may be provided on this issue, and though God’s Word serves as a wonderful and illuminating guiderail in leading our minds on the path of godliness, we are not confined to a knowledge only of supernatural revelation. God has revealed Himself both in His Word and in His world.

Nature has been called the 67th book of the Bible, not because science speaks with authority equal to Scripture but simply because God has ordained that we are not to learn everything there is to know about life from the Bible alone. The Bible itself refers to this fact in many places, such as 1 Cor. 11:14, which asks, “Does not nature itself teach you that if a man wears long hair it is a disgrace for him, but if a woman has long hair, it is her glory?” God is the creator and sustainer of nature, as Job came to understand. The first chapter of Romans tells us that the reprobate are without excuse because, from the foundation of the world, God’s invisible attributes have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made. Nature is therefore a holy witness. We understand natural functions and natural affections not strictly because we learned them from Bible verses but because God revealed them to us in nature and confirmed them in His Word. In Proverbs, the sluggard is told to go to the ant, to consider her ways and be wise. And guess what. In nature, kind pairs with kind. The birds do not seek an unnatural unity with “birdkind”; the species are divided, and without such divisions we would not be able to experience the rich diversity of nature, as God intends.

As a friend of ours puts it, if qualitatively distinguishing between races is a sin then it is also sinful to “value racial diversity” in itself, since by definition there can be no diversity without qualitative differences.

The root of the word kindness is the word kind, which is the same as the word kin. We are to bestow kindness primarily on our kin, as it says in 1 Timothy 5:8. The word king also comes from kin, which is why Deut. 17:15 tells us that the king must be a kinsman. In both cases, the West has rejected the faith. The problem in this case is not “legalism,” as Sproul calls it, but simple disobedience. To the Alienist, kin is merely skin, and skin is entirely irrelevant to the human condition.

The interracial adoption craze is fueled by the Alienist idea that faith is all that matters, that there is no qualitative difference between filial blood and strange blood as long as all parties involved are Christians. It is connected to the false contemporary understanding of Galatians 3:28, which is contrary to the historical Christian understanding. The idea is that if we can capture children young enough that their minds are blank slates and pump the right kind of knowledge into them, we can make them just like us, and God’s purposes for the world can go hang themselves. This is Gnosticism on stilts. Ironically, as a friend of ours observes, those who condemn Southern slavery as “man-stealing” are delighted by the international adoption racket, even after they are shown that many of the children are stolen from their parents or sold by their governments to Americans. Christians even participate in the abduction, convincing desperate parents that their children will be better off without them. A small army of gospeltards flew into Haiti after the earthquake with this as their evangelical mission. As our friend asks when he sees lovely, large families like the Sprouls demote their own children to co-heirs with black boys and Chinese girls: “Is love-making, conception, diet, health, breast milk, biology, genes, etc. worthless? Meaningless?” Don’t forget that the placenta goes two ways. Fetal cells are not attacked by the mother’s body, and they stay in her body, helping her to fight infection for 50 years. Marvelous are Your works, and my soul knows it well.

Listen to Christian Gray respond to Sproul and discuss the disease of allophilia.

Our prayers are with Denise Sproul in her battle against leukemia, and with the entire Sproul family. Do not go gentle into that good night.

John Piper on “why pastors should bless interracial marriage.” It’s interesting that he acknowledges prohibition of miscegenation in the Old Testament because it drew people away from God, but now he mocks the idea that this can still happen among Christians since in 1 Cor. 7:39, a Christian woman is told that “she is at liberty to be married to whom she wishes, only in the Lord.” This means that she is to marry only according to the will of the Lord. Otherwise, it would encompass same-sex Christian marriage or incest marriage. Even when he considers examples such as these to be beyond the pale, the Alienist still finds it impossible to condemn, under any circumstances, the marriage of an old man to a young girl, for instance. The father of the girl has no say in the matter, the Alienist believes, because if the two are believers, this is all that matters. One can only wonder what alternate universe Piper inhabits. He gives himself a pat on the back for “magnificently overcoming what the world regards as insuperable issues.” What? Piper stands to lose nothing for his “brave” stand against racism. He is in lockstep with the world. Why isn’t he brave enough to admit it?

Read Nil Desperandum’s critique of Piper’s new book, Bloodlines. Even though Piper promises to define his terms in a book about race, he “fails to do what every anti-racist in history has failed to do: provide a definition of racism, explain why it is sinful, and identify how many (or some) people are guilty of it. If any of those three criteria are not achieved then the lamentations of institutional racism are vacuous.” Piper writes that his pastoral staff spent months trying to define the word “racism,” but in the end they simply cribbed the PCA’s inadequate definition. How could any word take months to define, especially if it is so obviously contrary to Scripture? Piper “admires King’s ‘historic Christian vision,’ and he even takes seriously King’s and Ralph Abernathy’s showmanship in kneeling down in prayer while rebelling against the police (pp. 24, 25). He mourns the murder of James Byrd but fails to mention the deluge of black-on-white rapes that are destroying our women – over ten daily and 35,000 annually.” Piper is an effeminate showman in the same vein as the hucksters he admires, not a minister of the gospel.

The always-brilliant Ehud Would expounds on the dangers of the neo-Christian rejection of race and kinship. “The liberal White denial of race is one of the greatest impediments to real peace amongst the races.” This, of course, is the exact opposite of what is believed by Piper, who wishes that the very word “race” did not exist. Ehud shows that antique Christians were nothing like what passes for a Christian in the popular imagination today, and this made them more circumspect in their interactions with strangers. They were not willing to gloss over important differences, even for the sake of the gospel, because to do so would place their own precious children at risk as well as the stability of their civilization. This was the experience of United Christian Missions to Africa in 1899:

The sterility and unprogressiveness of negro civilizations, negro states, are as much due to the paralyzing death grip of Islam as to nature’s foreclosure of his intellectual powers when she mortgages the growth of his brain after puberty… Africa is home to the most man-like apes and the most ape-like men… The Negro has an animal-look…skin as rancid as a goat’s…and inherent mental inferiority… The negro is unmoral…an overgrown child… His animal spirits are irrepressible and the mothers do all the parenting… Anarchy is the dominant chord of the Hamite… The lost churches of Abyssinia… Africa was a land of death shades… Darkness covered the earth and gross darkness her peoples… Ethiopic Christianity shows the utmost amount of superstition that can overwhelm a church without killing it… [A]cceptance of this view [that they are truly Christians] strains our view of Christianity and the Church almost to breaking… [W]hatever extravagant ritualism…and fatal divorce between ethics and religion disfigures oriental Christianity reveals itself most hideously in Abyssinia… Negro theology, when eliminated of superstition, retains little religion.

This reminds me of the clip from this game show. A Polynesian man is honest enough to divulge his revulsion to how the average black person thinks and behaves, and he is denounced as idiotic, stupid, offensive, etc. But not a single one of his name-calling interlocutors attempts to prove that what he says is false, because people tend not to attempt the impossible. It ends with eye-rolling platitudes from a black man.

The missionaries quoted above were doing the work of the gospel in Africa, but like Albert Schweitzer after them, they knew that it would serve the black man least of all to pretend that he was something he is not.

Negroes did not even have a word in their native tongue for “promise,” “bond,” “oath,” “dedication,” “contract,” or “covenant.” Ehud writes: “Black Africans, unlike Europeans or Asians, have no ruins of past civilization, no archeological, written, nor even oral history of which to speak.” They could barely harness fire. This may not be the mark of Cain or the curse of Canaan, but it is certainly the sign of a race set apart from the world. In the words of Isaiah, they are “a nation scattered and peeled…a people terrible from their beginning onward.” Christians today, in their abortive attempt at compassion for the stranger, make war on their own sons and daughters. “Plainly put, the cost of denying the reality of race is carnage and death.”

Seven of the ten worst countries in the world are in Sub-Saharan Africa. Another is Haiti, which is an extension of Africa. The other two countries are current warzones. The top thirteen best-performing states are all overwhelmingly white.

Lying 501(c)3 impastors like Piper and Sproul have much in common with Judas, who stooped to betrayal for a small bag of coins. They are rewarded with respect and fat salaries for a time, but at the cost of dispossessing their own people. They are traitors.

Ehud shows that a willful blindness has set in among scientists as well as theologians. There is a war underway against biology and all of God’s created order.

[T]he next time someone tells you that “science has proven that race doesn’t exist” [remember that] when the greatest living expert on genetics said otherwise, he was immediately shunned by all of the government-sponsored think tanks and stripped of his funding. The law of political correctness dictates that science is not allowed to draw such conclusions…

As the American Society of Transplantation attests, the transfusion of blood, bone marrow, and organs is possible heterogeneously (cross-race) only through “the development of drugs that suppress the immune system.” This immunosuppression generally destroys a patient’s immune system for good.

R.C. Sproul Jr. might want to read Ehud’s article and amend his marriage-is-for-humans theory, if children matter at all to him.

Moreover, it is the Scripture which gives us one of the most clearly expressed refutations of the a-racial/anti-racial view, in that the text everywhere presupposes the legitimate, lawful, and ontological reality of races and ethnic groups. Specific terms are used redundantly throughout, such as Gentiles and nations (Heb. goyim/Grk. ethnos), which mean, just as the Greek hints, “ethnicities.” Similarly, the term peoples (Grk. genos) is the root of “genes,” “genetics,” “genealogy,” etc., and is generally translated by linguists forthrightly as “races.” There are even many words used in Scripture which denote taxonomical, lineal, and legal exclusion from a race: for instance, the term which appears as “other peoples” (Grk. allogenes) is the composite of two Greek words, allos (“other”) and genos (“races”). And the term rendered “illegitimate” or “bastard” (Heb. mamzer/Grk. nothos) in Deuteronomy 23:2 is candidly understood by linguists to mean “mixed-race, mongrel,” as is proved by its translation in Zechariah 9:6, which says “a mongrel race shall dwell in Ashdod.” These are not controversial matters to language experts, only to modern theologians who desperately seek to obfuscate the plain meaning of the text in favor of an egalitarian sociology. Wherever the text speaks in these overtly ethnic categories (which is virtually everywhere), moderns are compelled by the spirit of our liberal age, perhaps unwittingly, to spiritualize all said references. Even the word which is often rendered as “pagan” (Heb. zuwr) in the Old Testament of our English Bibles literally means “alien or foreign.” Any religious connotation assumed when one sees the word “pagan” in those texts is but an anachronistic eisegetical (misinterpretive) imposition made by translators. It is patently a racial or tribal term.

As we’ve said, the Alienist heresy is basically rehashed Gnosticism. Race must be destroyed so that purposely-rootless individuals may prepare for their transition to ghosthood. Families are useful vehicles for the gospel, because families raise a new crop of individuals, but nations are no longer to be baptized as nations, unless by accident. This is the new twist on the old Gnostic idea that the body is evil but the soul is divine and immortal. As Petr commented here recently, on the third century Petelian tablet the “soul” declares:

I am a child of Earth and of Starry Heaven;
But my race is of Heaven.

Or as Larry Norman sang to the dispie-sensational Jesus Freaks of the 1970s: “This world is not my home. I’m just passing through.”

Milton Friedman on why society is and must be based on families and extended families rather than individuals.

“A concept of individualism, the one that prevails, is relatively modern, coming into its own with the French Revolution and its aftermath. Instead of identifying a man as a member of a group, family, clan, or nation, in terms of his faith and culture, identification became purely personal. ‘I am myself. Nobody can define me. I am unique.’ That’s the mentality.” ~ R.J. Rushdoony (7:24)

See here and here for the latest feeble attempt of Bojangles Marinov to redefine the family. He asserts, contrary to all that is identifiably Christian for thousands of years, that allegiance that extends beyond father, mother, sister, and brother is “pagan” because Christianity only looks forward, never behind. Alienists are so eager to deny that blood and soil have any significance whatsoever that they make themselves look increasingly ridiculous.

You’ll be amazed by what militant amillennialist Michael Horton says here, beginning at 6:20. Horton is an outspoken advocate of the New Gnosticism. He denies that we should make “the moral law as expressed in the Ten Commandments” the law of the land, either as the Church or as individuals. He says we have no right to laws based on the law of Moses, because they were given only to ancient Israel. We’re only allowed to have laws based on conscience, he says, because anything more would be coercive. He even claims that Jesus “revoked” Mosaic legislation by fulfilling it and then “kicking it away.” This is the “radical two kingdoms” wackiness which Rev. Bret McAtee nicely summarizes here:

Simply put:

1. Life is divided into two realms, the common realm (Creation) and the Church realm (Redemption). In the common realm Jesus rules through Natural law, and arguments for and against issues with pagans must be based on Natural law alone. No Bible usage allowed. In the Church realm, Jesus rules through His revealed special revelation (Scripture), and every issue must be decided upon with warrant from God’s word.

2. The Church cannot and must not speak to issues that exist in the common realm. The Church must only speak to the redemptive realm and to individual personal morality that does not coincide with the public square. This means that ministers have no business praying at Town Meetings, writing Letters to the Editor about public square issues, or officiating at common realm events. Ministers as ministers belong to the Church and must not speak beyond the Church as ministers.

3. The Old Testament Moral law applies to believers in their personal private lives, and though it might apply to the common realm, the Church cannot do the applying. That is left to the believer alone to do.

4. No case law at all and no general equity at all from the case law applies today. So, from a Natural law view we might say incest is wrong, when arguing on policy in the common realm, but we cannot say it is wrong from a general equity Biblical case law view.

5. R2K denies that there is or ought to exist such a thing as Christian culture. R2K denies that there is such a thing as Christian education, Christian economics, Christian history, Christian jurisprudence, Christian art, Christian music, Christian politics, or Christian family, because “Christian” is a term reserved for the redemptive realm, and all these exist in the common realm. In point of fact, R2K denies any and all ideas of Christendom.

6. R2K advocates individual Christian involvement in common realm affairs, but it refuses to give a “thus saith the Lord” declaration on any of that involvement. So in practical terms, this means that one set of Christians could start a Christian Marxist club, and another set of Christians could form a Christian Limited Government club, and both sets of Christians would be equally honored in the Church, because the Church does not get involved in these common realm issues. Indeed, it is even possible that members of both clubs would be members of the same Church.

7. R2K advises to obey Caesar in every situation and policy UNLESS Caesar decrees that the redemptive realm must be shut down and worship must cease. Only then can the Church tell Caesar to take a hike. If Caesar mandates homosexual marriage, as one example, then Christians must support Caesar in this and only work against such policy within the confines of what Caesar determines to be law.

And they can oppose it in their personal lives (see point 3), but the R2K “church” will never back them up if they, for example, try to oust fags as youth leaders in various civic organizations (see point 6). The upshot is that Christian individuals must be totally isolated from their communities; the church is to be their only community, and their insane R2K pastor the only leader. Head for the hills before they start mixing the Kool-Aid.

The Top Ten Reasons Why I am Not a Baptist.

An amusing baptist slant on history in which the red dots (true Christians) are choked out in the non-baptist stream:

Here’s a Free Will Baptist church that voted against miscegenation and then promptly apologized for it. The church had resolved that “parties of such marriages will not be received as members, nor will they be used in worship services and other church functions, with the exception being funerals.” The vote was made necessary when a mudshark brought her buck from Zimbabwe to the service and invited him to sing. She quickly discovered that even Arminians know more than she about the Bible.

“But is not race-mixing Satan’s supreme triumph? If he can kill the white race then he can eradicate the past, the Christian past of the European people. Without that past there is no future for poor, unaccommodated mankind. It’s of no consequence to Satan if a theoretical Christ, fashioned to please the liberals and the colored races, exists in the Christian churches. All that concerns Satan is the non-abstract Christ, the Christ of the antique Europeans…” ~ CWNY

As Pat Buchanan writes in his latest book, “When the faith dies, the culture dies, the civilization dies, the people die.”

“The liberals and the halfway house Christians are fond of telling people like me, who write about the moral gulf between old Europe and modern Europe, that every sin known to man existed in old Europe just as it does now. And that is true; but we must make two distinctions. First, the antique Europeans did not deny that they were sinners. When they committed adultery they called it sin; when a woman killed her child, she was called a murderess. And the second distinction is like unto the first. When a man or woman sinned they were not supported by their peers; they were shunned. For instance, in antique Europe if a man was addicted to sodomy he had no support system. He knew if he couldn’t control his sinful desires then he must confine them to secret places where the outcast men dwelt. And repentance was possible, because if a man persisted in his sin he knew he lost the fellowship of his fellow men, just as Scrooge cast himself into greed-forged isolation by his illicit love of money. The sinner could be reclaimed, because there was a world beckoning to him in which people believed there was a such a thing as sin. Not so today… Today a sinner is lauded and told he is virtuous. He has a support system for his sin. Miscegenation becomes ‘striking a blow against prejudice,’ infanticide becomes ‘a woman’s choice,’ sexual promiscuity becomes ‘free love,’ and institutionalized blasphemy becomes ‘liberalism.’” ~ CWNY

Alienists only have a few examples to offer from the Bible to justify miscegenation, all of which we roundly dispute: Moses/Zipporah, Salmon/Rahab, Boaz/Ruth, and a few others on the periphery. They say that these were godly men whose mixed marriages were blessed, and therefore Irishmen are perfectly suited to marry equatorials. But isn’t it fascinating that they never use examples of godly men who had more than one wife to justify polygamy? Isn’t it curious that they never use examples of godly slaveowners like Philemon to justify slavery? Apparently, biblicism, like the American Express card, has its limits.

Our foul-mouthed Rosa Parks. She was arrested after this incident and will remain in jail until January. Her child is in state custody. Meanwhile… An 18-year-old white boy in London is chased to his home by a gang of blacks who slash his throat and leave him bleeding at his front door until he dies. Meanwhile… A gang of Somalian Muslim girls, screaming “kill the white slag,” repeatedly kick a white girl in the head as she lay motionless on the ground. The blacks walk free without being charged. The judge reasons that they could not have been drunk because their religion does not allow it. All the white sheeple who rushed to apologize profusely for the belligerence of our Rosa have nothing to say about these attacks, and not a word of apology or grief is heard from the fabled “black community,” lauded in story and song. All that the sheeple can do is lock their doors and hide.

The last gasp of “multiculturalism.”

The reign of terror is ending. More and more white people are pissed off and are growing courageous.

“Tolerance is the last virtue of a dying society.” ~ Aristotle

“There will always be an England.” ~ H.V. Morton

According to this CNN poll, whites give Obama negatives by an almost 2-to-1 ratio, while non-whites give him positives by a more than 2-to-1 ratio. One of these days, whites will realize that only they can determine their own future.

It’s a myth that North American Indians used fish to fertilize their corn. If anything, Squanto learned how to fertilize by observing Europeans. And while Squanto’s assistance to the Pilgrims was undoubtedly appreciated, his tribe had just been wiped out by a plague, making his advice about how to live off the land and paint with all the colors of the wind a bit less crucial than white people like to believe every time Thanksgiving rolls around. They believe myths about the “noble savage” because it serves their purposes.

Speaking of the noble savage, it’s interesting that Herman Cain took the opposite approach to marketing that corporations take. No respectable company dares to place white people in the foreground of marketing photos. The white man is always in the background, usually accompanied by a white woman, while black women and Asian women and beings of indiscernible patrilineage are at the center of the photo, depicted as the masters of industry, with their arms folded confidently across their chests. The message is clearly that a few white men are still allowed to keep their jobs only as long as they are willing to contribute to the hijacking of their civilization and economy. And God help the poor antiquarian who dares to suggest that women make the world’s worst executives. Even women hate to work for women. Corporate marketing is a different world on the other side of the looking glass; it tends to invert reality. Herman Cain bought stock images for his website that reveal his goals, just as other corporations boldly depict their non-white goals. For Herman, white women are front and center.

Here’s another example of reality inverted. In an article about one of the safest colleges in the country (because it is located in an overwhelmingly white area), the accompanying image is naturally a grinning black man.

If you’re Doug Phillips, the homunculus of patriarchy, you can place yourself in the back layer of a photo and still make it focused on you. Narcissists know how to do things like this.

Ultrasound is racist. Even unborn white children despise jungle noise.

Fiat has declared war on the white race, on beauty, and on good taste. The Jews are no longer even trying to be subtle. In reality, of course, three black men would run as fast as they could from three pregnant women.

The reason why lunch counters were segregated.

The true history of lynching.

Now we read that 60% of black girls under the age of 18 have been sexually abused by black men. Explain to me again why our “racist” Christian forefathers were wrong for believing that slavery is the best state of existence for the black man. Three percent of the population is responsible for more violence than the rest of the country combined. They are a staggering 5,000% more violent than whites. This is so lopsided that not even profession of faith can make up for it. “The least Christian White neighborhood is still a many times more moral place than the most Christian Black neighborhood.” Liberia is the most “theonomic” country in the world, and it’s a hellhole.

Fifty-one years after independence from Belgium, Congo women are being raped at 26 times the rate previously reported by the United Nations. Four women every five minutes.

Black people did invent Bluetooth technology though.

The White House has released an official proclamation called “The President’s Agenda and the African American Community” that details how we have all gone deep into debt to give free money to black people, which we are to take as wonderful news. It would be horrible racism and evil wickedness to suggest that anything should be done for white people, or even that white people should keep their money for their own children. Explain to me again how slavery was eradicated.

THANK God for pluck – unknown to slaves –
The self ne’er of its Self bereft,
Who, when the right arm’s shattered, waves
The good flag with the left.

Clearly, the system is to blame here.

The poor families of Channon Christian and Chris Newsom will not yet be able to close the saddest chapter of their lives, as our incomparable “justice” system assured them. New trials have been granted to the murderers. It’s stunning to think of how much money will be spent on the scum. Every day that they breathe air is an offense to humanity.

The prosecution prepares its case:

Polk County, Florida, School Board Chairmulatto Kay Fields, who appears to be one of the ugliest hybrids that ever grew from a zygote, is forcing two young white siblings to attend separate schools because racial “diversity is just as important as family” unity.

It’s HATE to insinuate that black men look alike. This boy was expelled from school for his unspeakable hatred. When asked for specifics, the superintendent replied, “It’s not what he said but how he said it.” Yeah, we get that a lot from those who don’t have a clue about how to prove us wrong.

You won’t find the word “equality” in the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, or the Federalist Papers. When Jefferson wrote in the Declaration that all men are created equal, he was making a very important and timely distinction between inherited and natural aristocracy. Obviously, the slaveowners who ratified his words did not intend that they should be interpreted as they have, with every person who breathes having equal capacities and rights. Of the French revolutionaries who idolized equality and gave birth to the new American religion, Edmund Burke wrote:

Nothing can be conceived more hard than the heart of a thoroughbred metaphysician. It comes nearer to the cold malignity of a wicked spirit than to the frailty and passion of a man. It is like that of the principle of evil himself, incorporeal, pure, unmixed, dephlegmated, defecated evil.

(Don’t miss the poem of the wolf and the lamb at that link.)

It’s a Wonderful Race. “Meet witch doctor Matunbo Lutamba Kinga.”

Check your region for mighty-whiteness. And please, be aware that we can’t all be perfect.

Proof that all races are equal:

Families in Russia with three or more children are now being given free land.

Ed Young, the “life coach” of this seeker church, is ultra-relevant and stars in rap skits like a wigger. But churches like this have to continually tantalize the audience to keep them interested in the “gospel,” so of course they’ve learned to cash in on sex sermons. This one shows all the places where a married couple can have sex every day. If Polycarp had known about this he might not have been burned at the stake.

Is every person in the world your neighbor? Heretic Tim Keller says heterosexuality doesn’t send you to heaven, so homosexuality can’t send you to hell. He says it’s “misleading” to call homosexuality sinful. Something tells me that he and Ted Haggard keep in touch.

Get a free copy of Greg Bahnsen’s By This Standard.

The KJV: When 400 years old you are, look as good you will not.

Hope for the Luddites of the 21st century!

For housewives of the 21st century who prefer animate rather than mechanical domestic servants, there may be a choice other than the robot… The RAND panel mentioned that by the year 2020 it may be possible to breed intelligent species of animals, such as apes, that will be capable of performing manual labor. During the 21st century, those houses that don’t have a robot in the broom closet could have a live-in ape to do the cleaning and gardening chores. Also, the use of well-trained apes as family chauffeurs might decrease the number of automobile accidents.

The twelve days of homeschool.

In Texas, white kids are being forced in school to recite the Mexican national anthem and pledge allegiance to the Mexican flag. It’s all part of the conquest of Aztlan. It’s funny that the Mexican salute looks similar to the Nazi salute. In Europe, an arm motion of that kind can get you arrested. Even dogs can get in trouble in Germany. An animal shelter trained this dog to stop raising his leg so high, but the answer to the problem was to put him in a sombrero. I like how the author of the article makes a special point of calling him a “crossbreed.” And this one calls him a “mongrel.” No, journalists, the word is “Mexican.”

Don’t just keep the aliens out of your country. Keep them out of your groceries too.

At first glance, the picture below looks like a before/after shot. But not so fast.

The line going down the center is the southern border of the empire, and Mexico is to the left.

Aren’t borders hateful, seeing as how all people are equal? In fact, all human beings are Americans in embryo, since America is merely an idea, a dream, a proposition, not a real land inhabited by a real nation.

“I think it was Robert Frost who said good fences make for good neighbors. The white separatist is the man who has the courage and the honesty to say he believes in fences and thereby creates the only genuine basis for good neighbors.” ~ Michael Hoffman’s White Separatism FAQ

It’s helpful to see pictures like this to contrast them with the lies of anti-Christs. Jew Albert Einstein called ethnic nationalism “the measles of mankind.” But of course, when the security of Jews is at stake, borders are good things.

Be sure to visit our friends at Empty Tomb Books, and order your copy of the new edition of Judaism’s Strange Gods. It’s a mini-masterpiece. To whet your whistle:

When Jesus said that Jerusalem was the “killer of the prophets” (Luke 13:34-35), He was indicating the propensity of that city when it is denuded of God, and when man’s pride and ego – as symbolized by Judaism – comes to the ascendant. Under these conditions, the so-called “Holy Land” is nothing of the kind. It becomes, rather, a God-forsaken sandbox where the spiritual heirs of the Pharisees further multiply their transgressions…

The weird cult of “Judeo-Christianity” is an oxymoron found on the lips of many Christians including even conservative ones. This abominable “Judeo-Christianity” contrivance is of a piece with the cloning of human and animal genes or any of the other alchemical mixtures of two mutually contradictory substances which we have witnessed these last few decades in the modern cauldron. The near-universal approbation and currency exerted by this cockamamie term exposes at one glance the level of abysmal historical ignorance which obtains today. The Church Fathers knew of no “Judeo-Christian” tradition, since Judaism did not exist before Christ. Before Him, there was the faith of the Israelites as it gradually decayed and was subverted by corrupt teachings such as were transmitted by the Pharisees and the Sadducees…

Judaism is Talmudism, not Old Testament, and those who revere the Old Testament teachings outside the prism of Talmud are its hereditary enemies. A counterfeit cannot be said to be the heir to a genuine article. Judaism, whether qualified as ancient or not, is totally alien to the only Biblical religion on earth today, Christianity…

The psychiatry of Sigmund Freud was premised on his diagnosis of many Judaics who were raised under Talmudic auspices. He then applied what he learned from their Talmudic-inspired dementia to his diagnosis of gentiles, who had no such background. As a result, non-Judaics were saddled with all sorts of bizarre penis-envy and incestuous oedipal complexes, as well as other mental sicknesses that were not part of their heritage. Weird concepts and strange imaginings never before encountered in mainstream psychological literature were suddenly being applied to all mankind. Overnight we were convinced of our own perversity, but a perversity we did not possess until the “scientist” Freud determined that we were burdened with these intrinsically Talmudic orientations. The fact is, Talmudists become insane as a result of trying to obey the Talmud (even though Hollywood propaganda has often associated such “hang-ups” with “Puritan” and “Christian” repression)…

The faith of Western Civilization, Christianity, has been supplanted by a new state religion, which is Judaism, presented in the palatable guise of Orwellian “Holocaust” Newspeak of which the figure of six million dead “Jews” is fixed, sacred dogma which in Germany, Austria, Switzerland and Canada it is a crime punishable by imprisonment to doubt or contest… Christians are not to obey or partake in any idolatry or false witness. The Six Million, if it is a wild exaggeration, would constitute a lie that has been made sacred and to which we in the West are expected to bow and bend our knee. There is a Biblical warning along these lines, about “not giving heed to Jewish fables…” (Titus 1:14).

UPDATE: Mickey Henry has given the readers 15% off on Judaism’s Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded if ordered before January 1. Use this coupon code at checkout: SWB-JSG.

Get this book too, and it will change your life. Use the coupon code F&H-PGP at checkout for an additional 15% off. These are perfect Christmas presents.

But now, for equal time, let us meditate upon the wisdom of the Talmud.

Not burying cut fingernails causes miscarriages. (BT Moed Katan 18a)

Adam had sexual relations with all of the animals in the Garden of Eden. (BT Yebamoth 63a)

After seven years, hyenas turn into bats. After even longer periods, they turn into thorns and demons. (BT Baba Kamma 16a)

That’s about all I can take.

“The Golgotha of modern mankind is Auschwitz. The cross, the Roman gallows, was replaced by the gas chambers… In Auschwitz, the Jewish people was the High Priest and the sacrificial lamb in one.” ~ Rabbi Ignaz Maybaum, The Face of God After Auschwitz, 1965

You might be surprised to know that the Nazis were very critical of this board game. But this shouldn’t stop you from drop-shipping it to your local Chabad House as a Christmas gift. What better time of the year to be generous? I’m dreaming of a blight business.

This article is about how Jews are in anguish because they can’t get the great Arthur Butz fired, which is what they want to do to everyone who disagrees with them. The first two sentences are amusing, though.

Students don’t have too many nice things to say about Arthur R. Butz. He is a professor of electrical engineering at Northwestern University, and according to his students, he is boring, his handwriting is too small to make out on the board and he leaves all the real teaching to the teaching assistants.

Anyone who has been to a major university knows that this is an accurate description of every professor.

This is why Ron Paul is under a media blackout. The other contenders show him what is required to be elected president. Mr. Paul was, of course, banned from this debate by the Jews because he is an “extremist.”

“The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of the Conservatives is to prevent the mistakes from being corrected.” ~ G.K. Chesterton

This is obviously a Ron Paul voter:

The SPLC is all that stands between Granny Warriors obsessed with Ron Paul and the Fourth Reich! Hate is on the rise! Send in your donations today! Human Events asks:

Is the SPLC, by its own criteria, the real hate group? It still carries weight in plenty of circles here in America, and so when it categorizes an organization as a hate group, many people of good conscience are influenced by that designation, one which is quite stigmatizing and destructive, as evidenced by the recent events involving [Focus on the Family] and [American Family Association] mentioned above. Yet it is the leaders of the SPLC who are either irresponsibly attacking other fine organizations, or worse still, knowingly defaming them.

Who then deserves the title of “hate group,” Focus on the Family or the Southern Poverty Law Center? Who has been guilty of demonizing others and spreading hurtful, inaccurate information? Whose actions and words have been hateful? The record speaks for itself.

Perhaps Human Events has learned from its own overreaction. The magazine unfairly fired Kevin Lamb following a mere phone call from Porky Beirich of the SPLC, who called him a “supremacist” or some other meaningless term.

Meanwhile, the ADL is hot on the trail of anti-Semitism. Dogs and vodka don’t stand a chance.

Questions that a friend of ours would like to see put to Newt Gingrich at the next Republican-Jewish affair:

1. When are Jews finally going to break the silence and begin talking about the Holocaust?
2. When is Israel finally going to get the amount of foreign aid it deserves?
3. Is the present level of assistance to our only ally in the Middle East enough and, if it is not, in your opinion how much more can Americans give to ensure the stability, vitality and security of those who have made the desert blossom like the rose?
4. What will you do as President legally to quell the tidal wave of anti-semitic speech and Holocaust-denial that is inflicting so much anguish on Holocaust survivors and other members of “the community”?

Did FDR provoke Pearl Harbor?

“Instead of friends, I see in Washington only mortal enemies. Instead of loving the old flag of the stars and stripes, I see in it only the symbol of murder, plunder, oppression, and shame.” ~ Rose O’Neal Greenhow

If you own guns or have more than seven days of food in your house, the empire suspects you to be a terrorist.

Though it oversimiplifies, this page about returning to the Middle Ages is very good.

“A recent incident on a railroad train justly illustrates the result of women’s ‘rights.’ A solitary female entered a car where every seat was occupied, and the conductor closed the door upon her and departed. She looked in vain for a seat, and at last appealed to an elderly man near her to know if he would not ‘surrender his seat to a lady.’ He, it seems, was somewhat a humorist, and answered: ‘I will surrender it cheerfully, Madam, as I always do, but will beg leave first to ask a civil question. Are you an advocate of the modern theory of women’s rights?’ Bridling up with intense energy, she replied, ‘Yes, sir, emphatically; I let you know that it is my glory to be devoted to that noble cause.’ ‘Very well, Madam,’ said he, ‘then the case is altered: You may stand up like the rest of us men, until you can get a seat for yourself.’ This was exact poetic justice; and it foreshadows precisely the fate of their unnatural pretensions. Men will treat them as they treat each other; it will be ‘every man for himself, and the devil take the hindmost’… And the society which will emerge from this experiment will present woman in the position which she has always held among savages, that of domestic drudge to the stronger animal… She will reappear from this ill-starred competition defeated and despised, tolerated only to satiate the passion, to amuse the idleness, to do the drudgery, and to receive the curses and blows of her barbarized masters.” ~ Robert Lewis Dabney

It’s the slow, sloppy slide into androgyny; life as the Negro has always known it, both before and after he heard the gospel.

An excellent quote from B.B. Warfield:

To Paul, the human race is made up of families, and every several organism – the church included – is composed of families, united together by this or that bond. The relation of the sexes in the family follow it therefore into the church. To the feminist movement the human race is made up of individuals; a woman is just another individual by the side of the man, and it can see no reason for any differences in dealing with the two. And, indeed, if we can ignore the great fundamental natural difference of sex and destroy the great fundamental social unit of the family in the interest of individualism, there does not seem any reason why we should not wipe out the differences established by Paul between the sexes in the church – except, of course, the authority of Paul.

As Bret McAtee observes, this Jacobin worldview carries over from a gynocracy to the destruction of cultures and ethnicities. It pretends “that just as women and men are undifferentiated cogs, so it is the case that men of different nationalities are likewise merely undifferentiated cogs that can be swapped in and out of the Statist created cultural machine of the New World Order.”

“Romantic love thrives on frustration. It likes to feel sorry for itself. And the essence of romantic love is that there be insuperable problems, star-crossed lovers, and that it go from frustration to frustration. And romantic love dies when it can get the one it loves.” ~ Dr. R.J. Rushdoony

Movies these days, and I guess most stories, are either explosions and car chases for men or romance for women. And the romance never moves beyond the excitement of the chase. Families as families are never honored, because that would be boring. As a consequence, young people are taught to be shallow and to thrive on frustration, as Rushdoony said. They never see even fictional accounts of life as it is meant to be lived.

If this is “unhate,” I’ll take a triple hate on the rocks, please.

The sons of Japheth continue seeking new worlds to explore. Dear God in heaven, I love white people.

Thanks to James Edwards for linking to our previous piece. James is well on his way to a Bob Costas level of broadcasting expertise. I only wish that his rewards were commensurate with his talent.

“It’s not just for money alone that one spends a lifetime building up a business, Mr. Jorkin… It’s to preserve a way of life that one knew and loved. No, I can’t see my way to selling out to the new vested interests, Mr. Jorkin. I’ll have to be loyal to the old ways and die out with them if needs must.” ~ Ebenezer Scrooge

Have a very merry Christmas and a happy new year. It’s a tradition at our house, when we tuck the children into bed on Christmas Eve, to don the kerchief and cap, light a few candles, and read Ed Sebesta’s holiday classic, No Plantation Christmas.

Abe Foxman’s yarmulke is in a twist. What’s the world coming to when not even a major columnist, pundit, and bestselling author (the book rose to #4 on the NYT list) is intimidated by Menorah Man? When the ADL writes about James Edwards, they use the hate-term “white supremacist” twice in one sentence. It’s twice as bad when a white supremacist is the host of a show that is also white supremacist. And then if white supremacists are listening on the other end, it’s thrice as bad.

Buchanan went on NPR to defend his freedom to be interviewed. “I think [ADL Director Abe Foxman] has called me even worse names than he is calling this radio station,” Buchanan said. “I think there’s an awful lot of smearing being done by the Anti-Defamation League, frankly, over the years, of individuals who simply disagree maybe with U.S. policy towards Israel, and a lot of name-calling… Am I supposed to vet all the people on these shows and get the list from Abe Foxman of what shows I can go on to?”

This is a very important historical development. Anyone else, at any other time, in Buchanan’s position, would be so concerned about assuaging the distress of leftists and avoiding their tarbrush of hate that he would immediately pull the Edwards interview from his website and make the rounds in the media to apologize for being so neglectful in his associations. Instead, Buchanan fires back at these thugs. It’s hard to imagine anyone else with such a prestigious career being so gutsy, but Buchanan is both Irish and German, so say no more.

Here’s a very comedic SPLC article that calls for Buchanan to be fired from MSNBC for the crime of being interviewed by someone with non-kosher opinions, meaning James. MSNBC has completely censored promotion of the book, even though the network employs Buchanan. The SPLC claims that Buchanan has “reacted furiously” to this McCarthyism of the Left, but it’s not true. Buchanan loves it that the terrorists and censors are helping him sell books.

James Edwards is a real troublemaker, and he deserves to be proud. He is perfecting his craft, is at least as good a broadcaster as overpaid tools like Hannity, and routinely produces bigger headlines than Limbaugh. Pound for pound, he is the best.

James writes:

Pat Buchanan appears on my show for a grand total of three interviews out of thousands of routine radio and television interviews over a career spanning decades.

The result is an ongoing, two-week eruption of rage…

Would they ever apply the same rules to, say, Martin Luther King? Just see what happens if one of us cites the enormous number of connections he had to the Communist Party.

Here’s a good Chronicles article that mocks the wailing lamentations over Edwardsgate.

Apparently, anyone expressing trepidation about the fact that the Census Bureau projects that by 2042 whites will, for the first time in history, no longer be a majority in the United States should be excluded from public life…

The Color of Change, on its website, states that it “exists to strengthen Black America’s political voice. Our goal is to empower our members – Black Americans and our allies – to make government more responsive to the concerns of Black Americans and to bring about positive political and social change for everyone.” In the political world Color of Change wants to create, allowing yourself to be interviewed by someone who describes himself as “pro-white” should be enough to get you fired, but wanting to “strengthen Black America’s political voice” is okay.

“We have witch-hunts now, only we call it anti-racism.” ~ Otto Scott (34:36)

“How long can you operate on the theory that the white race is on earth to take care of the black race?” ~ Otto Scott (48:58)

Buchanan deserves a lot of credit for working with those of us, like James and crew, who are more outspoken on racial matters. The only trouble is that one minute he’s praising the founding stock of the country, and the next he’s longing for the American “nation” of his youth, except for all that yucky segregation stuff that kept white girls from being raped. Thus, in his new book he writes that America was made great because it is a melting pot. This would not make America great even if there were none but white people here, and the stew certainly turns sour when other races are thrown into the pot. He seems to believe that before we were being flooded by other races, year after year, the multiracial melange “was united on a common faith, morality, history, heroes, holidays, holy days, language and literature.” This is simply not true. He also says that it’s “not the government’s job” to support and defend the Christian faith and the law of God! On the contrary, the government has no greater responsibility; it is a far greater responsibility than protecting the unborn, which is now the holy grail of conservatism. I hate to criticize Pat, because he goes as far as a “respectable” commentator and advisor to three presidents can go in defending our race. But what we need at this late hour is not Jewy nostalgia for melting pot mythology or misguided patriotism but the hard, cold truth.

Here’s a very good article in which Buchanan observes that we are no longer “one united people” but what Klemens von Metternich called Italy: “a mere geographical expression.” He correctly argues “that the America we grew up in is disintegrating, breaking apart along the fault lines of politics, race, ethnicity, culture and faith.” The only qualification we would offer is that the “America we grew up in” was already long in the process of disintegrating. With the exception of politics, Buchanan’s fault lines are the same blood and faith issues that Kinists warn are crucial to national health.

What holds us together, then?

We are not now and will not then be “descended from common ancestors.” We will consist of all the races, cultures, tribes and creeds of Earth – a multiracial, multicultural, multiethnic, multilingual stew of a nation that has never before existed, or survived. The parallels that come to mind are the Habsburg Empire that flew apart after World War I, and the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia that disintegrated after the Cold War.

No more will we all speak the same language…

As for “professing the same religion,” where 85 percent of Americans were Christians in 1990, that is down to 75 percent and plummeting…

The new secession that is coming…is not like the secession of 1861. It is a secession of the heart from one another.

Meanwhile, the lying preachers are saying that faith is all that matters, and everything else is fungible, that people are just people because they all come from Adam. They are liars, and their false religion is contrary to both Scripture and nature. Even the brains that God gave us balance unity (right hemisphere) and particularity (left hemisphere). Without the left brain you would not understand language, among many other things, and without the right brain you would not experience emotions, among many other things. People who suffer from Williams Syndrome have what is called pathological altruism, because they trust everyone and consider no one to be a stranger, and therefore have no racial awareness, but are also incapable of forming deep social connections. They are imbalanced. A sound mind balances unity and particularity, and so does a sound community. The Church is one kind of community; a nation is another; a family is another. None of these can sacrifice unity or particularity and expect to remain healthy. So when neo-Christian Alienists come to you preaching their heretical, gnostic gospel of race-mixing, mark them well, for like Satan, they come to steal, kill, and destroy. They devastate nations, races, and most importantly, trust in Jesus Christ, who is our only Hope.

Pat Buchanan writes that Lothrop Stoddard, the author of The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy and the Revolt Against Civilization, “was something of a prophet. He predicted Japan’s rise to power, its war with the United States, a second European war, the fall of the Western empires, mass immigration of peoples of color to the West, and the rise of Islam as a threat to Western civilization.” Racists get tired of always being right.

“Ethnomasochism, the taking of pleasure in the dispossession of one’s own ethnic group, is a disease of the heart… It come out of what James Burnham called an ‘ideology of Western suicide,’ a belief system that provides a morphine drip for people who have come to accept the inevitability of their departure from history.” ~ Pat Buchanan

“Did the God of the Pentateuch strengthen the people he had created when he destroyed the unity of their language and scattered them to the four corners of the earth? To hear men endlessly recite this mindless mantra, ‘Our diversity is our strength,’ when tribal, ethnic, and religious diversity is tearing nations to pieces, is to recall Orwell: Only an intellectual could make a statement like that. No ordinary man could be such a fool.” ~ Pat Buchanan

Demography is destiny.

“Not a single European nation, except Muslim Albania, has a birth rate that will enable it to replace its present population. By mid-century, Western man will be down to 12% of world population. By century’s end, he will be a tiny fraction, roughly equal to the white population of Rhodesia when Robert Mugabe came to power.” ~ Pat Buchanan

“In 1920, Western [i.e., White] people were nearly one-third of mankind. Today, Western man is down to one-sixth of the world’s population, shrinking to one-eighth by 2050, and not a tenth by century’s end.”

But it doesn’t need to be this way. We can turn it around quickly. All it takes is for white people to start loving themselves again, and stop believing the lies of deicides that the world would be better off without us. Take Russia, for instance. There were more births in Moscow in August than in any month since the Soviet Union fell. They’ve come a long way since this 1929 Soviet periodical in which Jesus is being tossed out with the trash by the masters of industry.

The task of the conservative, said Russell Kirk, is “to preserve a particular people, living in a particular place during a particular time.” Except that “conservatives” and most “Christians” no longer believe that particular peoples are worth saving. Only Kinists remain the true conservatives and the true Christians.

“To make us love our country, our country ought to be lovely.” ~ Edmund Burke, Reflections, p. 172

We used to know the meaning of the word lovely. Look at the artwork on the old silver notes. No Sacajawea or César Chávez or Rosa Parks; only loveliness.

The faith in which we stand,
The laws we made and guard,
Our honour, lives, and land
Are given for reward
To murder done by night
To treason taught by day,
To folly, sloth, and spite,
And we are thrust away.
The blood our fathers spilt,
Our love, our toils, our pains
Are counted us for guilt
And only bind our chains –
Before an Empire’s eyes
The traitor claims his price.
What need of further lies?
We are the sacrifice.
~ Rudyand Kipling

Like Kipling, Charles Dickens, who Chesterton called the last of the great men, “overstrains and overstates a mood our period does not understand,” a “sense of infinite opportunity and boisterous brotherhood. And we resent his undue sense of it, because we ourselves have not even a due sense of it.”

Some Alienists here are trying to salvage John Calvin from the infamy of Kinism, quoting him as saying that racial segregation among Christians is “wicked madness.” But on closer inspection, it’s obvious that Calvin is not advocating racial and political integration at all but rather the recognition and respect for covenant members, and the rebuke of those who create inappropriate covenantal divisions. The division created by Peter was “that they [Gentiles] had the same faith of the Gospel which he had, yet did he use them as strangers, because it was taken to be a kind of defiling, to be in company with them.” Calvin is correct that Christians of all tribes are “one flock” covenantally. We belong “to the body of our Lord Jesus Christ, and [are] the very children of God.” We have the same Redeemer, and we all belong to the household of faith. The error of the Alienist is in assuming that being of one flock covenantally necessarily entails being of one flock and one family in every other respect. This would annihilate nationhood and kinship, which are great gifts of God.

The difference is that we don’t view the institutional church as the kingdom of God. The kingdom of God consists of the church, the state, homes, farms, businesses, the nation, and all of creation. Christians tend to be afflicted by defeatism and conclude that, with all else lost to us, all we have is the Church, and this is all that will remain in eternity, because we’ll fly away to heaven and live as happy ghosts. But this is not what the Bible tells us at all. The heavens and the earth and our bodies will be resurrected, because everything God created is good.

As was said in a comment on the previous post, the Alienist sinks into a kind of Manichean heresy. Manicheanism was a Gnostic cult with close ties to Buddhism. It had a resurgence of popularity among the Anabaptists, who tried to stamp out inequalities in the world and cursed us with much of the race-mixing that infects the Church today. The basic idea of the Manicheans is that the spiritual world is light and the material world is darkness, and there is a dualism that pits abstract spirituality and the mind against the flesh and all matter. This is offensive to the Christian doctrines of the Incarnation, Resurrection, Baptism, and Holy Communion. We Kinists hate abstract spiritualism more than anything; it is our calling in life to oppose it completely. We’re the Alienist’s greatest whitemare.

“The struggle of our time is to concentrate, not to dissipate; to renew our association with traditional wisdom; to re-establish a vital connection between the individual and the race. It is, in a word, a struggle against Liberalism.” ~ T.S. Eliot

“Burke, the supreme anti-liberal of Europe, cut right to the heart of the liberals’ madness when he wrote, ‘I hate abstractions.’” ~ CWNY

“A man can never be considered an abstraction from what he is. To hold that we can discount a man’s race, heritage, intelligence, religion, and moral character, and then somehow deal with the real man is a common liberal fallacy; the result is only an abstract idea of a man, not a living man… [E]quality as a philosophical and religious faith is at work. All people are equals; woman is equal to man, and man is equal to God. As a result, there must be in principle a war against differences. Not only unisex but unihuman is the goal, the bland, neutral person… There must be a time of total destruction, the ‘time of the assassins,’ and the new world can only come when the old world is forgotten. This means a period of anarchy, racial amalgamation, and universal human hermaphroditism (‘the birth of male-and-female in every individual’) and then the new world may appear.” ~ R.J. Rushdoony, The Institutes of Biblical Law, Vol. 1, pp. 434, 437

Yet we have Christians today who speculate about what their raceless, anti-family, anti-national “heaven” will be like. Having suppressed their own humanity, they attempt to “fix” the eternal by draining it of life. It’s fortunate that God continues to love flesh and soil. He promises to resurrect both.

Notice the hypocrisy of the Alienists linked above. As our friend Scott observes, they like to pretend that the mixed multitude that left Egypt was absorbed into the nation of Israel, and ever after was Israel mixed. They even believe that Moses married a Negro. So how could Israelites, who lost their racial distinctiveness through alleged intermarriage, be “racists” for refusing to associate with Gentiles? These people are never logically consistent. If anything, by their own reasoning, Peter was a religious bigot, nothing more.

“The mixed multitude who were among them yielded to intense craving…” ~ Numbers 11:4

More on John Piper, who is having hot flashes over the Jim Crow era. But here’s the catch. As Tribal Theocrat writes, “Jacobins like Piper are upset that the facilities were separate, not that they were unequal.” The Supreme Court integrated schools in spite of the fact that facilities were equal.

But if the problem was merely that races were separated, why did no whites raise a clamor to be admitted into the black inner sanctum?

If the black man was equally free to use his initiative to grow and prosper his own communities, why all the fuss? Where were the whites who were upset that they couldn’t pee in the black man’s urinal? The reason for the fuss is that the goal of of equalitarianism is to amalgamate the races, not to make them politically equal.

And the races are being amalgamated because this is the most effective way to dilute the white race, eventually killing it. It is far more effective and inexpensive than waging formal war against our race. This is also the objective of the government-sponsored credits for businesses owned by minorities, women, the crippled, and anyone at all who is not an evil white male. It’s a war against white men dressed up as compassion for the oppressed.

Second, I ask which is worse: the enforcement of separate but equal facilities or the enforcement of whites to hire, live among, and fund certain classes against their will? Free association or enforced integration? Third, please tell me how a man who edited an anti-feminist book which repeats the argument that love and equality are defined not by emotion but by God’s law, can claim that something is unChristian because it is “not loving?” What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

It’s an excellent article, so read it. Don’t be stupid. Of course, when you’re finished you’ll still be no closer to understanding what “racism” means.

For Piper, racism is anything from encouraging blacks to remain in their own churches to kidnapping, gassing and incinerating 6 trillion Jews, or however many it was.

Fantastic. This means that, to the Alienist, every Christian who lived prior to 1950 was a genocidal maniac.

Our friend Phinehas wrote the following in dishonor of impastors and Christsheviks everywhere, with apologies to Johnny Cash.

One Foreigner at a Time

Well, I left seminary back in ’89
An’ went down south to spend my time,
The first year they had me preachin just to whites.

Every Sunday I’d teach them from up on high
And I’d always hang my head and cry
‘Cause I always wanted me a church full o’ browns and blacks.

One day I devised myself a plan
That should be the envy of most any liberal Preacher man,
I’d fill my church with peoples of every land.
Now gettin’ caught meant gettin’ fired
But I figured I’d teach those stuffy old whites before I retired,
I’d have the most mixed-up congregation in Dixie Land.

[CHORUS]

I’m building it one foreigner at a time
And it’ll cost you a hefty dime
Lock your doors when you come through our town
We’ll guilt you in to giving in style
You’re gonna know we’re completely wild
‘Cause we have the biggest rainbow church there is around.

So the very next day into the big city I drove in
With my big church van and with help from my friend
I went to the ghetto to round up any hoodlums I saw near.
Now, I wasn’t concerned with a dealer or a thief,
The whites wouldn’t mind a few with gold teeth
Especially if I spun stories to squash their fear.

The first day I got me a black hooker in pumps
And the next day I got me a drunk Injun and his junk,
Then I got me a carload of spics out sporting their chrome.
The numerous thugs I could get in my big church van
Like crooks, an’ spooks, and Chinamen
But the loads of drug smugglin’ illegals we snuck in my mobile home.

Now, up to now my plan went all right
‘Til we tried to get them to behave one night
And that’s when we noticed that something was definitely wrong.

The carload of spics turned out to be MS-13
And the hooker turned out to be a teen mother just 15
And when we tried to get them to sit quietly, all hope was gone.

So we found some ex-cannibals we thought would fit
And with a little help from a Wise Jew named Tim
We had that church singing a new song.
Now the church photo was another sight,
We had foreigners on the left and scared whites on the right
But when I pulled out my One Blood book the old folks did oblige.

The parking lot looked kinda funny too
But we ignored the gangsters and the riff-raff zoo,
Well, that’s when I noticed that the cars had been stripped clean.
About that time the head deacon walked out
And I could see in his eyes that he had his doubts
But he opened the church coffer and gave to the savages ‘til we were lean.

Next we moved the church uptown cause we’re low on fags,
All I teach is silly anecdotes, even to the black tranny in drag.
The Kinist pastors have laughed for years I found
But up at the Police Department, they didn’t laugh
‘Cause they had to hire and train additional staff
And every Sunday the SWAT team makes us their training ground.

[CHORUS]

I’m building it one foreigner at a time
And it’ll cost you a hefty dime
Lock your doors when you come through our town
We’ll guilt you in to giving in style
You’re gonna know we’re completely wild
‘Cause we have the biggest rainbow church there is around.

Ugh! Yow, KINIST
This is the ALIENIST PREACHER
In the MULTI-CULTURAL DEAD CHURCH Come on

Huh, This is the ALIENIST PREACHER
And negatory on how much I twist scripture to make a buck, KINIST
You might say it’s built me a big mansion on the hill
And I get no flack from the NAACP or SPLC.
Huh, now what percentage of foreigners does every church need?

You need 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 – is getting close
But you’ll need 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 to atone for your white skin.

“Do you know what the future historians will regard as the most important event of this age? It will not be Hitler or the Second World War, it will not be the release of nuclear energy, it will not be the menace of Communism. It will be the abdication of the white man.” ~ Lord Cherwell

It’s like Idi Amin all over again but on a much larger scale.

Otto Scott on terrorism (21:18):

Most of the people that I know have been acting like sleepwalkers. We’ve been living under the threat of physical violence in this country for a number of years, in every city, and pretending that it’s not true, that these are isolated, unrelated incidents. And when we hear “racism” in blaring tones, and when we look at the crime statistics, how can we deny the fact that there is an undeclared war underway? We’re afraid to even mention it. That’s terror.

At 27:48 in this Easy Chair talk, Douglas Murray demurs from the “racist” banter of Rushdoony and Scott:

Murray: What we’re saying is that, you know, we’ve got a group of tribes here on earth that can’t seem to get along. You know, if we were all created by God, why can’t we live together in harmony? Are we inherently tribal?

Scott: Yes.

Rushdoony: Yes, the family, the clan, or tribe, is still basic in most of the world, and it is a pattern that reasserts itself in time even in areas that become very cosmopolitan, because when you make life too impersonal, people rebel against that.

Scott: New York was a very reasonable city when we had an Irish neighborhood, a German neighborhood, a Spanish neighborhood, etc. We marry congenial people, we associate with congenial people. A certain distance allows for toleration, whereas familiarity, somebody once said, is contempt. For people who are very dissimilar, the reasons for arguing become very common and numerous, because their reactions are different and very unexpected…

Murray: We don’t seem to have progressed to the point where the family of man is achievable. We only extend our family group so far, to a tribe, and we can’t get beyond that…

Scott: There is an effort to deny that there are tribes. There is even an effort to deny that there are nationalities, or people as such, that there are Celts, that there are Anglo-Saxons, that there are Malays, that there are Germans or French or Spaniards. There is an effort to say that all cultural differences are on the surface, are trivial and unimportant, and everyone is basically the same, which comes very close to arguing that everyone is an integer, like a number, that you can shuffle back and forth, and that we’re not real personalities, we don’t represent separate cultures, or individual cultures even.

Rushdoony: Well, I think tribalism is as natural to people as is the family. There is an instinctive drawing together with those who are close to you, as against the outsider… We cannot destroy it. It is something that is basic to people. They want to feel common ties.

Scott: Aren’t we all creatures of God, and aren’t all families creatures of God, and aren’t nations creatures of God?

Murray: But we don’t seem to be able to get past the tribal stage. We accept the tribal group as the extended family, but when we get to the nation part, the next step, we can’t seem to…

Scott: Well, let’s take Great Britain… My people came from the British Isles, and I remember the first time I went to Britain, I was astonished to discover that everybody looked as though they were cousins. They looked very much alike… I looked like everybody’s cousin too over there… Well, the French have been in France forever. I mean, all of them can trace their families back for hundreds of years. All of us can… Russia’s family goes back forever, and there have always been Armenians. And yet we keep listening to a group of educated sophists who keep trying to tell us that this is unimportant.

“Tribalism is the family lived out consistently.” ~ Dan Brannan

“For the very fact that two men are alike, having, as it were, one form, makes them to be, in a manner, one in that form: thus two men are one thing in the species of humanity, and two white men are one thing in whiteness. Hence the affections of one tend to the other, as being one with him; and he wishes good to him as to himself.” ~ Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica

Pseudo-philosopher William Lane Craig flat-out denies that Christianity is “a white man’s religion,” yet seconds later says that “if anything, Christianity is today an Oriental religion.” He is yet another self-loathing white man who is repulsed by the thought of the white race continuing to be the standard-bearer of Christ, and who hopes that the white race is never more than a sliver of the world’s Christian population because he believes that the faith will have stagnated if it remains disproportionately white.

Whites used to preach their faith all over the world, but they never felt guilty about being the foremost representatives of Christ. Notice that Craig is positively giddy to characterize Christianity as “an Oriental religion,” not merely as having gained converts in the Orient. He talks about meeting with Chinese academics who are disillusioned with Confucianism, and one of them tells him that “Christianity in China is a flourishing, indigenous, Chinese religion, and we need to embrace it as such. Well, we were just blown away by this sort of admission on the part of this Chinese academic and this embrace of Christianity as an indigenous Chinese faith.” You must be a racist if you think that Christianity is indigenous to the white man. Craig hints at the source of his confusion when he claims that “Christianity is birthed out of Judaism.”

If you want to see how bad it is in the so-called churches, look at this nonsense from a coven called Grace Outreach Center.

You see distinct white, black, Mexican, and Chinese families, but this is only because the race-mixers need for families to come as they are. The end result will be an orange-mocha vomit color, as the next generations intermarry. Some friends pointed out a few other important things:

1. The white family is the only family not “at” the church.
2. The black family is closest to the church.
3. The church is called an “outreach center,” and the proximities make it clear who is most in need of evangelism.
4. The white male is the only one frowning.
5. The white male has a broken foot and is on crutches. This strips him of his power.
6. An apple is hitting the head of the white male. This makes him appear foolish and the subject of ridicule. Further, the apple is an Edenic sin association.
7. The white child specifically asks his mother for permission to go to church, not his father. The mother obviously runs the household.
8. The hair of the non-white females is of the same nature as the hair of white females.
9. But oops, the pointy hair of all the boys makes the Negro boy look like a piccaninny.

Problems with frankenfamilies.

A new excuse for other races to take on the appearance of white recessive genes. Tattooed irises and ironed hair will be the official Negro Halloween costume.

And still, Ken Ham churns out ridiculous fantasies like this:

“A new study that involved surveying 90,000 adolescent U.S. students showed that those who considered themselves to be of mixed race were more likely than others to suffer from depression, substance abuse, sleep problems and various aches and pains. Conducted by researchers at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the National Institutes of Health, the investigation found that adolescents of mixed race were more likely to have other health problems as well.”

A hapless wigger discovers that skin color makes a difference.

Gen5 is back with a fascinating lesson from the recent past about how we can triumph in the near future. It takes all types to bring about a revolution. Though Christians have the biblical example before them of one who plants, another who waters, and yet another who reaps the harvest, conservatives tend to split into factions. Ironically, as Dabney pointed out long ago, theirs has become the politics of expediency, not of principle. Liberals, on the other hand, are able to organize parties in which blue-haired grandmothers cast ballots alongside dreadlocked pimps and turtlenecked Marxists. Yet moderation is not the answer. Gen5 shows that the greatest ethnonationalist revolution grew from a slim minority of radicals all the way to a majority of opportunists, with principle at every step along the path. (Jefferson Davis, the most famous of the opportunists, became a great and eloquent defender of the cause of the South.)

To make an analogy, the abolitionists provided the raw fuel to provoke Southern secession. The rhetorical radicals like Rhett labored endlessly to cure and dry the wood and provide kindling for the fire, though always intensely discouraged that their efforts never resulted in spontaneous combustion. The reformed radicals of Yancey’s stripe, mostly in Alabama and Mississippi, provided the spark. The revolutionary insiders fanned the flames, and the opportunists availed themselves of the warmth of the fire and pushed those who created it aside.

Conditions will grow ripe by circumstances outside our control, like the collapse of the dollar, but when the time comes, groups that might not particularly like each other must learn to work together to secure a future. This is why racial awareness is of crucial importance, and why the dualism of the corrupt “Church” of today must be purged.

Good to know:

If we can use the language of positive morality to advance our cause, we will have the wind at our backs when fighting the moderates whose sole motivating spirit is that of calculating delay and obstructionism…

Like ecological die-offs, political revolutions are never seen in advance by those who are its victims.

Dabney versus Locke in this very good article on civil authority, by David Opperman.

“Obedience to God and Caesar are not incompatible, provided each stays within his own proper sphere… The powers that be are ordained of God to protect the good and punish the bad (Romans 13), but if they start to persecute the good, they are no longer ordained of God.” ~ The Confession of Magdeburg, 1550

“If magistrates go against the rule of Christ they may be deposed.” ~ Ulrich Zwingli, Swiss reformer

“Just government is not founded on the consent of the individuals governed, but on the ordinance of God, and hence a share in the ruling franchise is not a natural right at all, but a privilege to be bestowed according to a wise discretion on a limited class having qualification to use it for the good of the whole.” ~ R.L. Dabney

What’s good for the state is also good for the church. Dabney extends the principle to ecclesiastical government. Read Ecclesiastical Equality of Negroes. “[W]hile the blessings of redemption are free to all, of every race or caste, the privileges of church office may be properly withheld from some, at the dictate of a sound discretion. This is scriptural truth.” And scriptural truth is quite foreign to the ears of the pious churchman of today, for whom the Unpardonable Sin is to transgress “the people,” the abstract entity that is always the excuse for waging war against real flesh and blood, kith and kin.

In this article, you can become more acquainted with the low-IQ voters who now determine your future.

When a black person “promises” he means “maybe I will and maybe I won’t.” But, I said, this makes nonsense of promising, the very purpose of which is to bind one to a course of action. When one is not sure he can do something he may say, “I will try but I can’t promise.” He said he’d heard whites say that and had never understood it till now. As a young Romanian friend so aptly summed it up, when a black person “promises” he means “I’ll try.”

These Danes are speaking very frankly about IQ differences.

“Why we don’t own this?” asks a concerned member of the local Rotary Club.

How to properly apologize for racism.

Tintin’s comic book adventure in the Congo is so dangerous for sensitive young eyes and delicate young minds that it is now being shipped in shrink-wrap and with a warning about its content. (It was long ago banned from bookstore shelves. Do bookstores still exist?) One of the frightfully racist panels in the book shows a black woman bowing to Tintin, saying, “White man very great… White mister is big juju man.” Hell, my wife tells me this every Sunday evening after dessert, and I haven’t shrink-wrapped her since our honeymoon.

Steven Spieljew has made a new movie about Tintin. I wonder if he’ll hire Whoopi Goldjew to tape a segment for the video release explaining that, yes, this is from a racist time, and yes, white people are racists, but to not release the film would be to pretend that the horribly racist past never occurred. This is what Warner Brothers hired her to do for the Looney Tunes DVD collection.

Pippi Longstocking is a racist, which is to say that she was written during the White Era. Her father becomes king of a South Seas island and is called the Negro King. Then black children throw themselves in the sand in front of white children. But there are redeeming qualities to offset the racism, says a German sheologian. It “has a strong female character, she is against adultism, grown-ups being in charge, and she is fiercely opposed to violence against animals…” Yes, one of the greatest problems in the world today is that adults are in charge. “Adultism” and “racism”; it’s hard to say which is worse. The sheologian defines racism as anything that meets the disapproval of blacks. “Only then can you say whether it is okay or not.” And should white literature continue? “It simply isn’t helpful if we want to help our children find their place in a multicultural society.”

The primary reason for Southern secession was not the tariff nor the Tenth Amendment. It was slavery.

To blacks, the enslavement of their ancestors by American Christians was the worst thing that has ever happened in the history of the world. But with relatively few exceptions, they were treated very well. They cost $40,000 each in today’s dollars, and no one shells out that kind of money without a whole lot of caretaking to protect the investment. Slaves today cost $90 apiece, and they are treated like dirt: a “disposable commodity, like styrofoam cups.” Tens of millions are now enslaved, most of them in Asia and Africa. James writes: “Apparently, it’s more important to talk about a tiny percentage of whites that held slaves hundreds of years ago than to talk about the non-whites who are actually doing it today.” That’s called equality.

“It was a veteran soldiery that repeopled the plantations and the homesteads of the South, and withstood the forces thrown against them during the period of Reconstruction. In addition to such racial traits as personal pride, self-reliance, and physical courage, they possessed also race pride, which is inestimable in a great popular struggle. This race pride after the war had only increased. However beaten and broken they were, the people of the South came out of the war with their spirit unquenched, and a belief that they were unconquerable.” ~ Thomas Nelson Page

Here you go, some of the best books you’ll ever read: Dabney’s Discussions (part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4, part 5).

Anthony Jacob, from his book White Man Think Again:

Unlike the white man, the Negro has never dominated his environment, and has always been completely dominated by it. In this respect we might compare Africa with Iceland and African art with Icelandic art. In spite of Iceland’s isolation and its almost absolute lack of raw materials suitable for artistic reproduction, Icelandic art – let alone Icelandic literature and poetry – has been incomparably superior to anything produced in Africa, notwithstanding the very great natural advantages enjoyed by Africans. In all branches of endeavor, the Icelanders have far excelled the Africans, and have behaved as a biologically refined people can be expected to behave, no matter how isolated and barren their country…

The Negro has been in contact with the Egyptian civilization, the Phoenician, the Greek, the Roman, the Arab, the Persian, the Indian and more latterly our own civilization; yet no spark of emulation was ever struck in his dull breast. If we travel up the west coast of Africa we find substantial building and ruins all the way from Mozambique to the Balun Islands, all showing unmistakeable evidence of foreign culture and occupation. But there is never any sign of any attempt by the Africans to copy or improve on these buildings. As has been noted, when East Africa was colonized in the late nineteenth century, the Africans possessed neither a road, nor a wheel, nor a piece of money despite the contacts mentioned. Today they have changed (changed, not evolved) because they have been literally snatched up in the white colonial machinery, and have had no choice but to change. But they obviously resent it, and revert violently whenever they have the chance. The very first things they destroy are the schools and mission stations and clinics which they associate with their enforced emancipation; and the first people they kill are those who have done the most to help them advance.”

“If you succeed in the passage of this [anti-lynching] bill, you will open the floodgates of hell in the South. Raping, mobbing, lynching, race riots, and crime will be increased a thousandfold; and upon your garments and the garments of those who are responsible for the passage of the measure will be the blood of the raped and outraged daughters of Dixie, as well as the blood of the perpetrators of these crimes that the red-blooded Anglo-Saxon White Southern men will not tolerate.” ~ Senator Theodore Bilbo

Soon we can expect to see African-style billboards in Dixie:

I prefer the billboards of white farmers.

No pardon requested.

This is funny. Some jackoff liberals in Idaho are preaching universal equality to a room full of white kids. Why don’t these Jacobins ever decide to live in south-central Los Angeles, or East St. Louis, or Detroit? Some people apparently have trouble appreciating diversity.

This venture capitalist, Michael Arrington, says he doesn’t know a single black entrepreneur in Silicon Valley, but he funds 100% of the black entrepreneurs who pitch ideas to him, but this has “nothing to do with skin color,” he says, because there is “zero race or sex bias in Silicon Valley.” Uh, what? It’s funny how white men always lose when someone claims to have “zero bias.” If there is no bias against merit, all the high-tech jobs will go to whites, Jews, and Asians, and relatively few women. (Silicon Valley companies are keeping their diversity data top secret.) Instead, two-thirds of Arrington’s investments go to women and non-whites, and he says this is “solely on the strength of their ideas,” which is obviously false. He even admits that investors are eager to “diversify” their portfolios, for the same reason that colleges openly break the law against racial quotas. And it’s not just whites who are the victims of “zero bias.” Imagine what goes through the mind of an Asian who reads articles like this which pretend that black people are the center of the universe. Blacks are only 13% of the population, but they have been given so many handouts that anything less than double representation makes them want to join in a chorus of We Shall Overcome. Bryant Gumbel is worked up about obscenely-paid black men in the 90% black NBA being treated like “slaves” on the commissioner’s “plantation.”

At Apple, which now has the highest stock market valuation in the world, Steve Jobs’s seven executives were all white. Even Asians are rare at Apple.

I’ll tell you one thing, they don’t make good TV like this or this anymore.

“Here’s to yesterday.”

Rick Perry, the man with a plan.

We secretly hope for a presidential race between Obama and Cain, or as Harry calls them, Amos & Empty. See Pokemon poetry, for example. The campaign will be a fantastic year of skinning, grinning, and bojangling.

This Republican ad campaign is comical on several levels. First, it appeals to black racial solidarity, including references to “our people” and “my own seed” as valid reasons to oppose abortion. (The white people who made the video are thoroughly deracinated.) Second, a black character uses the niggerism “ho” as well as the French term “tout suite” (“at once”) in the same sentence. Third, it asserts that opposing the Iraq War now makes you both a “racist” and an opponent of the pro-life cause.

A friend of ours sent to us this story of Croatia’s first interior minister, believed to be the first time in history that anyone affiliated with Stalin’s Communist regime has been arrested and charged with “crimes against humanity.” That’s right, at least 50 million deaths, and no one has been formally punished, in large part because of Jews like Elan Steinberg, the vice president of the American Gathering of Holocaust Survivors and their Descendants, who is outraged by last week’s arrest in Croatia.

Hilaire Belloc on usury, the cancer of the modern Jewified world.

The modern world is organized on the principle that money of its nature breeds money. A sum of money lent has, according to our present scheme, a natural right to interest. That principle is false in economics as in morals. It ruined Rome, and it is bringing us to our end.

The Official Counterfeiter, a PDF comic by Vic Lockman. Also see Money, Banking, and Usury.

“Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the Earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits.” ~ Sir Josiah Stamp, President of the Bank of England

Even John Calvin placed a 5% cap on usury and said that usurers were below whores and weren’t allowed in church.

But this is 2011, and so the Vatican has called for the creation of a massive new “world political authority” and “central world bank” with “universal jurisdiction” for the purpose of “building a more fraternal and just human family and, even before that, a new humanism open to transcendence.” Because, you see, independent states are “sectorial and isolated,” but the New World Order is “systematic and integrated…and geared to the universal common good.” And if you’re opposed to “good,” your name must be Satan. We say to hell with globalism in both church and state.

It’s interesting that Kinists are fighting the Jew from two angles: first in the Church, where usury is now a sacrament, and second among atheist white nationalists, for whom morality evolves, and is defined at any given moment by what is good for the white race. This elevates the white race to a god (a puny god that is helpless to save itself) and precludes the possibility that our race is being righteously judged. Jews, Jews everywhere.

“The socialist who is a Christian is more to be dreaded than a socialist who is an atheist.” ~ Dostoevsky

On the eve of Yom Kippur, the Jews transfer their sins to a chicken. At Kaparot, they twirl the scapechicken over their heads and recite their idolatrous prayers to a god who can’t hear. Michael Hoffman writes:

After the kaparot voodoo concludes, the perjurer’s ceremony begins: on Yom Kippur the infamous rite of Kol Nidrei takes place, almost always explained away to the outside world as a blessed ritual of begging God for forgiveness for oaths that were violated, contracts that were broken and promises that were not kept in the past year.

The trouble is, that pious picture is a phony.

Kol Nidrei is actually a ceremony whereby: 1. all the perjury you will commit in the coming year and 2. all contracts you will sign and violate in the coming year, and 3. all the promises you will break in the coming year, are absolved, with no heavenly punishment accruing as a result…

It’s a kind of invincible circuit that reinforces its own deceit. You have to pity people ensnared in this sordid charade of cajoling God into helping them cheat.

The Jew York Times doesn’t bother with any of these details, of course, but writes simply that Yom Kippur “is the Jewish Day of Atonement, the culmination of 10 days of contemplation, self-renewal and rededication to the path of righteousness.”

Big news: Get Judaism Discovered, Michael Hoffman’s masterpiece, for the Kindle and other e-readers, and get the second edition of Judaism’s Strange Gods at a very good price.

And now, something guaranteed to put another smile on your face.

“Let no Jew take a Christian woman to wife, nor any Christian seek marriage with a Jewess. For if any one admits anything of this sort, he will be charged with his crime just as if he has committed adultery, and furthermore liberty for accusations of this nature has been granted to the general public.” ~ Theodosius the Great to Cynegius, Codex Theodosianus, cited in J.E. Seaver, The Persecution of Jews in the Roman Empire, p. 47

“We wish to make clear to the Jewish elders and patriarchs that if, after the enactment of this law, anyone attempts…to reconvert a person who has given up the baleful sect of Judaism and has joined the cult of God, forthwith he and his accomplices are to be given to the flames and burned. Furthermore if anyone of the people has joined their evil sect and frequented their meeting places, he shall suffer his deserved penalty with them.” ~ Constantius (Constantine’s father) to Evagrius, Codex Theodosianus, cited in J.E. Seaver, The Persecution of Jews in the Roman Empire, p. 31

Christ-killers are pressuring the pope to punish Bishop Richard Williamson once again for writing that “only the Jews were the primary agents of the deicide because Pontius Pilate would never have condemned Jesus if the Jews had not asked for blood.” This is absolutely true, but the truth is anti-Semitic. On May 17, the executive director of the US Bishops’ Conference’s Secretariat for Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs said that one cannot charge the Jewish people with deicide at any time in history without falling out of communion with the Catholic Church.

“Jesus died on the Cross to save all of us sinful human beings from our sins, and in this sense all men were and are the purpose of his death. But only the Jews (leaders and people) were the prime agents of the deicide because it is obvious from the Gospels that the Gentile most involved, Pontius Pilate, would never have condemned Jesus to death had not the Jewish leaders roused the Jewish people to clamour for his crucifixion (Mt. XXVII, 20). Certainly the learned leaders were more guilty than the unlearned people, says St. Thomas Aquinas (Summa III, 47, 5), but they all cried together for Jesus’ blood to come down upon them and their children (Mt. XXVII, 25).” ~ Bishop Richard Williamson

“An ‘anti-semite’ in actual usage, is less often a man who hates Jews than a man certain Jews hate. The word expresses the emotional explosion that occurs in people who simply can’t bear critical discourse about a sacred topic, and who experience criticism as profanation and blasphemy. The term ‘anti-semitism’ doesn’t stand for any intelligible concept. It belongs not to the world of rational discourse, but to the realm of imprecations and maledictions and ritual ostracisms.” ~ Joseph Sobran, National Review, March 16, 1992

Once you get past the corny laugh tracks in the beginning of this video, there are some very interesting points raised about Auschwitz.

If you need a gift idea for Christmas, here’s a Lego concentration camp.

Watch out for Android phones. They’re anti-Semitic.

The Holocaust cult, writes Gilad Atzmon, “has priests (e.g., Simon Wiesenthal, Elie Wiesel, Deborah Lipstadt) and prophets (…those who warn of the Iranian Judeocide to come). It has commandments and dogmas (‘Never Again’) and rituals (memorial days, pilgrimage to Auschwitz, etc). It has an established, esoteric symbolic order (kapos, gas chambers, chimneys…). It also has a temple, Yad Vashem, and shrines – Holocaust museums in capital cities worldwide. The Holocaust religion is also financed by a massive global financial network… This new religion is coherent enough to define its ‘antichrists’ (Holocaust deniers) and powerful enough to persecute them (through Holocaust-denial and hate-speech laws).”

The Holohoaxers are showing this video of when the Nazis hosted a degenerate art display in Munich in 1937. Some of it is grotesque, some of it is lewd, some merely abstract. But the hoaxers won’t show what really outraged the Nazis and all good Germans, which was the sewer of Jewish “art” and “entertainment” typified by the pornographic cabarets of Berlin a few years earlier. From 1921 to 1933, Jews turned Berlin into the most debauched city in Europe, and when compared to Paris and Amsterdam, that’s really saying something. This book shows what the hoaxers will not show you: cabaret acts featuring queer boy scouts, theatrical spanking machines, nudist priests, gleefully incestuous families, and dentist chair molestations, not to mention the countless massage parlors, sex clubs, and torture dungeons. In short, it was Hollywood 2011. This lust for Jew-vomit did not abate from natural causes but because the Nazis brought an iron hand down upon the filth and sent the villains away in cattle cars. And if you think this was all in the past, you need to realize that a party is going to someday clean house in America too. Pornographers should prepare for the day by studying what happened to Magnus Hirschfeld.

“By 2050, Palestinians west of the Jordan will outnumber Israelis two to one. Syria, Jordan and Egypt, which had 40 million people at the time of the Six-Day War, will have 170 million. Militarily, Israel remains dominant, but neither time nor demography seems to be on her side.” Demography. It all comes back to blood, which the neo-Christian kingdomtards are preaching is as insignificant as dishwater.

Arabs call Negroes “abd,” which means “slave” in Arabic. And blacks here think that the word “nigger” is bad, when it simply means Negro. By calling them slaves, the Arabs mean that blacks are still slaves by nature, which is largely true even here.

It’s almost impossible to spot mixed couples on the streets of Basra. Women who marry a black man – it’s never the other way round – have to walk under the eyes of Iraqi tribal society.

“I know a mixed couple,” says Doha Abdulreda, a 20-year-old black hostess at Basra’s trade fair. “She’ll always hide under her Niqab (the Muslim covering over the face) when she walks next to her husband. Her family rejected her, that’s not uncommon here.”

American Indians also call blacks slaves, as you will hear in this Rushdoony lecture (8:41). Rush said that no one is more contemptuous of the Negro, for this very reason.

“There is not a single public Christian church left in Afghanistan, according to the U.S. State Department.” Meanwhile, almost half a trillion dollars has been taken from us and given to the government of that country.

A European member of parliament who has had enough of the threat of Islam. Imagine one of our worthless American politicians speaking with such passion about anything. Of course, when a white man is able to work up such conviction against the other famous anti-Christs in our midst, the Jews, you’ll know that Christendom has returned from the dead. And when it happens, liberty will dawn as the world has never seen.

European schoolchildren being forced to bow to a false god.

From 1969 to 2009, the number of employed, prime working-age men fell from 95% to 81.2%, and median annual earnings fell by 27%! But the important thing is that women can experience the fulfillment of a career. Children can be raised by the Almighty State.

When the Darkness Falls is an excellent history lesson for your kids, except that there are some parts with bad language. History is racist. And I’ll let you in on a secret: it also wants to kill six million Jews. The words truth and hate both contain a “t” and an “h,” if you know what I mean.

Strunk & White’s Elements of Style is now available online for free! Indoctrinate your children and turn them into grammatical supremacists.

Men and laundry.

“Reverse racist” means that many white women put themselves in situations they would not otherwise enter if the men were white. They assume their lack of trust in black men is racist, when actually it may be quite appropriate. Their overcompensation for “racism” often gets them killed.

Chicks with guns.

Listen to our friend Winston Smith’s excellent radio show.

This makes me want to stab my eyes and ears with sharp objects.

Instauration Online now has 87% of the back issues scanned and available. This is remarkable. Bloggers stand in awe of Wilmot Robertson’s accomplishment in publishing so much material over the span of 25 years, not even including his groundbreaking book, The Dispossessed Majority.

A prominent factor distinguishing races one from another is skin color, to be sure, but that is only because it is a visually recognizable component of race, not because it is the entirety of race.

Alienists love to press the point that all human beings have common ancestry in Adam, without ever acknowledging the fact that God has routinely subdivided Adam’s posterity, according to His will, and we ignore these divisions at our peril. The Fifth Commandment compels us to respect God’s purpose in the world and not arrogantly believe that our duty is to come along behind Him and clean up His mistakes, to recombine the lineage of Adam in new and dangerous ways that God never allowed in history.

“There is only one breed – the dog breed!” Such an argument is nonsense and repugnant to common sense, but Halbrook attempts such sophistry to disprove the reality of human races within Adam’s posterity. He must disintegrate the God-created category of race into meaninglessness…

If families can exist with all their distinctive physical and behavioral characteristics, and yet not compromise the physical unity of Adam’s race, then why cannot races do the same? If it is not “familist” to assert the plurality of families within the unity of humanity, then how is it “racist” to do so with larger groups – with very, very extended families? Halbrook’s careless argument from monogenism, in principle, would forbid the family itself. It is exceedingly dangerous.

This principle of variety-within-unity is perspicuously set forth by St. Paul in Acts 17:26a, yet Halbrook cites this passage to prove the exact opposite point. Paul says, “And [God] hath made of one blood all nations of men.” Halbrook does not notice the object which is made from one blood: a multiplicity of nations. Nations is in the plural, and the term refers not to an arbitrary collection of people within a geo-political boundary, but to a physically related people-group. Paul here teaches expressly that monogenism does not entail racial egalitarianism, but this is ignored by Halbrook.

Blacks have higher bone density and a lower risk of fracture and osteoporosis. This may be why they don’t like to swim; they may not be as buoyant. Their metabolism is lower than that of whites, which could be why so many blacks are obese. Due to at least 31 genes that are “differentially expressed,” they are also genetically more susceptible to hypertension, stroke, and cancer. These are just a few of many physiological racial differences. Race is not merely skin deep.

Part 2 is here, in which the point is made that Halbrook’s racial egalitarianism encourages envy, which leads to countless crimes against our race.

One of the great evils of our day is envy: people, especially non-whites, utterly loathe the fact that others are superior to themselves in wealth and ability. Halbrook perpetuates this idea with his unbiblical myth of equality. Whenever people are led to believe that different races are of equal ability then any observation they make of unequal abilities or unequal success will lead them to believe that these inequalities must have arisen through a series of injustices; and this sense of injustice will then generate moral indignation. In theory, these inferior people will be expressing supposedly righteous anger at the systematic inequalities of “institutional racism,” while in practice, inferior people will be burning with envy at the superior talents of others. In providing such a basis for envy, Halbrook’s racial egalitarianism is heretical and deserves to be destroyed.

Murder, rape, theft, and more, brought to you courtesy of the “Christian” Alienist. “Heresy” is an accurate word for the perverted gnostic gospel they preach, and it’s because, as Nil writes, conversion is not an abstraction from matter but rather the redemption of matter.

Grace does not replace nature but redeems it and builds upon it. God does not destroy the sinner to create some new spiritual being but redeems as much of the sinner as possible by destroying only that which is sinful in him.

Likewise, God does not destroy or replace race, but instead fits the various races into a unity that they could not otherwise know.

Halbrook has a lot in common with the Indian Guru Satya Sai Baba:

There is only one RACE
The race of humankind
There is only one religion
The religion of LOVE
There is only ONE language
The language of the HEART

There have been relatively few Alienist heretics in Christian history. It’s hard to even find much along these lines in ancient writings, but here is a relevant quote from Maximos the Confessor, who is revered as an Eastern Church father:

For him who is perfect in love and has reached the summit of dispassion there is no difference between his own or another’s, or between Christians and unbelievers, or between slave and free, or even between male and female. But because he…has risen above the tyranny of the passions and has fixed his attention on the single nature of man, he looks on all in the same way and shows the same disposition to all. For in him there is neither Greek nor Jew, male nor female, bond nor free, but Christ who “is all, and in all” (Col. 3:11; cf. Gal. 3:28).

This sounds more like Buddhism than Christianity. In general, Christian egalitarianism comes from the Anabaptists.

Anabaptist John Piper talks about “racism” here like it’s a bad thing. I kept waiting to hear evidence of cruel behavior in his wicked Southern past, and I never did. So I don’t get it. Is the purpose of this video just to get the ladies moist? Nice touch about the ovens at Dachau. That really tops it off with a cherry. What’s the deal with 48-year-old white women who have four natural children but are so selfish that they are displeased with what God has given them and must adopt a little stranger? If this is Christianity, why would anyone desire it? It’s ingratitude. It’s the Christianity of narcissists. And what’s the deal with the suggestion that opposition to this unnatural relationship is a denial that the “daughter” is created in the image of God? This is one of the classic non sequiturs that is a trademark of race-mixing Alienists.

It’s not at all surprising that Piper’s race-mixing has led him straight into pluralism. He writes:

…God himself is the foundation for our commitment to a pluralistic democratic order… Christians agree to make room for non-Christian faiths (including naturalistic, materialistic faiths)… [R]epression of free exercise of religion and persuasion is as wrong against Christians as it is against secularists. We believe this tolerance is rooted in the very nature of the gospel of Christ… [T]he spiritual, relational nature of God’s kingdom is the ground of our endorsement of pluralism…

This is a perverted American-baptist-evangelical religion, and it’s as far from Christianity as you can get. Piper makes it clear that he does “not…want to establish Christianity as the law of the land.” But the real history of Christendom has always been coercive. During the Middle Ages, do you think the national adoption of God’s law and the requirement of baptism to hold any kind of office was put up for a democratic vote? Yet this is what made us who we are. A man who invites a stranger into his home and heritage and makes her the equal of his natural children is at the very threshold of idolatry. John Weaver has preached sermons about how multiculturalism, miscegenation, and idolatry are intimately connected. John Piper is living proof of Dan Brannan’s dictum that only Christians who are lovers of kin are a threat to idolatry in the world today. The other “Christians” are no threat at all.

“Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to the small and arrogant oligarchy of those who merely happen to be walking about. All democrats object to men being disqualified by the accident of birth; tradition objects to their being disqualified by the accident of death. Democracy tells us not to neglect a good man’s opinion, even if he is our groom; tradition asks us not to neglect a good man’s opinion, even if he is our father.” ~ G.K. Chesterton

Here’s a far better, and shorter, video than Piper’s suckfest: The Ugly Duckling. This duck couple has four little quackers, just like the ungrateful Mrs. Piper, but they aren’t nearly as delighted as the Pipers to find a fifth in the nest. One look at the little stranger gives the he-duck the thought that his she-duck has been playing the harlot. This is what all Christians used to think of women whose children bore no resemblance to them or their husbands. But “Christians” today aren’t nearly as concerned about looking like whores, what with the “gospel” at stake. The she-duck adamantly denies being guilty of infidelty, then leaves the little stranger to fend for himself as she performs her God-given duty of caring for her own offspring. This used to be the joy of honorable womanhood until selfish, ungrateful 48-year-old “Christian” TV-watchers forced their wormy husbands to get with the program of the New America. The little stranger tries to climb aboard, but the she-duck tosses him off the bus and gives him a good scolding. If only Doug Phillips had been there to teach her how to grow the animal kingdom. I mean, why get all hung up on species or anything else having to do with God’s will? Dejected, the little stranger tries to move in with another family, on the good side of the tracks, in a good school district, but the racist mother chases him off and gives him what-for. Of course, there’s a happy ending, and the swan meets up with his own kind. Familiarity gives him identity, which is another way of saying that he turns into a racist too, and all is well with the world. His new-found racist mother places a much higher value on the color of feathers than the content of character. “Christians” today could never write a story like this.

Here’s another in an endless list of articles about “brave” pastors who are waging jihad against ol’ debbil racism. But in the fine print of such articles is always a statement about how most Christians want nothing to do with their race-mixing.

Ninety-two percent [of congregations] are homogeneous, meaning at least 80 percent of the congregation is comprised of a single racial group.

Christians are apparently still not on board with Dr. King’s Dream. Tsk, tsk. Our friend Colby reminds us that living the Reverend Doctor’s Dream involves joining the Communist Party and buying hookers. But that’s a small price to pay for racial reconciliation, which John Piper says is the greatest need in the Church today.

Let’s reach into the mailbag and see what falls out. Here’s a letter from a friend who is wondering what ever happened to the faith once delivered to the saints.

At the Reformed church we’ve been attending, the Pastor and his wife have one child, an adopted Chinese girl. They’ve been trying to adopt another Chinese child so that their first could have the company of someone like her. (To me, that screams volumes of which the Pastor and his wife are sinfully oblivious.) Their attempt to adopt another Chinese child fell through, so they’ve agreed to adopt a Nigerian child. Almost everyone at the church is giddy about the prospect, and are praying fervently for it to come to pass.

Since we’ve been attending this “church,” I’ve witnessed I don’t know how many child baptisms. A baptism always cheers me. Last week, three children were baptized – African kids who were adopted by a White couple with two natural children. (I feel so sorry for their two real children. I swear, they always look morose and detached. At church services, the family’s seating arrangement is niglet / mother / niglet / father / niglet / White daughter / White son. It’s damned disgusting.) During the baptism, the Pastor began to weep and blubber in something like ecstacy, apparently overcome by his perception that the whole thing was especially rare and exceedingly beautiful. I was sickened by it. I’ve never seen him behave like that over the White children he’s baptized.

Today, after the service, the Pastor invited everyone to join in a celebration of those childrens’ baptism. I became angry, so I left the sanctuary to get a drink. The fellowship hall was festooned for the occasion, and there was a large cake decorated with the names of the three African children. Again, I’ve never seen such done for any of the White children I’ve seen baptized, or make a profession of faith, or received into membership. I’m not saying that it should either always be done or never be done. I’m just mad as hell that the people are falling all over themselves because of the presence of these three Negro children, abandoned by their own people but rescued by White guilt, or White arrogance, or wasted White virtue.

Dear-bought and clear, a thousand year,
Our fathers’ title runs.
Make we likewise their sacrifice,
Defrauding not our sons.

A friend of ours observes that Alienists are like Arminians.

For Arminians, God is cruel if some are chosen by Him to have eternal life, because that would mean some are damned for not being chosen by Him. For universal racists [the one-race idolaters], God is cruel if He has chosen people to belong to distinct people groups and nations, because that would mean that some would belong to worse groups. They are repulsed that God would be sovereign in doing both.

This really is the point. Every heresy begins with dissatisfaction with the fact that God is God and we are not.

We at SWB take great pride in having been the first to introduce Cambria Will Not Yield to the world. Years ago, we were very impressed with his writing in print and encouraged him to expand to the web, and the rest is history. Laura Wood calls him “Tribal Dad” and posts this very good synopsis of his work:

The pseudonymous writer CWNY often argues that the white man has replaced faith in Christ with worship of the black man. CWNY’s argument is more subtle than that. He says rationalism ate away at the heart of the white Christian, who then turned in his lifelessness to the primitivism of the Negro. The liberal Christian sought to recover the elemental and fend off spiritual death.

In other words, the bonds of race can’t be avoided, for to stop running with the pack is to die. The bonds are routinely rejected by liberals only to be substituted by an oath of fealty to The Other. Any race or ad hoc group will do, as long as it satisfies the liberal’s masochism. A somewhat heated and amusing discussion follows at the link above about whether CWNY is too racist. He can’t be that racist; we know that he gets out in the sun when he can.

CWNY on the “inhuman hellhounds who have betrayed their own people and their God in order to serve the satanic abstraction called ‘The People,’ which in modern times has become equivalent to serving the negro,” whose history is a “boring continuum of blood and sex. The only time their histories rise to the level of interesting is when they intersect with the histories of the white people.”

At 30:42 in this talk, R.J. Rushdoony and Otto Scott briefly discuss what was lost as a result of racial desegregation.

Rushdoony: No one then would have imagined the kind of crime that goes on in black neighborhoods.

Scott: No, because they had their own community, and they didn’t consider it segregation.

Rushdoony: And their churches were stronger.

Scott: They had their own churches; not just their own clergy but their own physicians, their own dentists, their own lawyers, their own pharmacists, their own stores, and shopkeepers, and so forth. And they had all the role models in the world, whereas now the black bourgeoisie who gets successful moves away from the black community… The black community lost a lot with desegregation.

Rushdoony: Yes.

Listen at 17:45 in this very interesting talk. Scott and Rushdoony discuss good will and fellowship among racially segregated churches.

Scott: I remember when the early civil rights movement began in the fifties. And if you recall, the cameras would go down into the South, and several black people would appear in a white church and demand entry. And there was quite an outrage when they were not accepted or invited in. Well, putting that to one side as to whether that was a good tactic or not a good tactic, I remember discussing it with some fellows at the Overseas Press Club in New York at the time. And one of them expressed great outrage. And I said, well, have you ever been a member of a church? He said, well, I’ve been to church. I said, did you ever join a church? Have you ever been a member? Have you ever paid dues? Have you ever said you would obey the rules of the church? He said no. I said, are you under the impression that anybody that walks by attends church? Well, he said yes. I said, that’s not true. Catholics go into their church, Protestants go into their various churches. I said, these are not public institutions. They are the most private of institutions. Why should any band of strangers come with a camera crew to demand admittance?

Rushdoony: During the 1930s, California had a great many churches that were organized along nationalistic lines. The Japanese had their churches, the Chinese had theirs, the Assyrians…had their churches. And in fact, they are about the only group that has still been able to maintain them… But I recall that one of the strong groups that was immediately a target of dissolution was [the] Welsh churches. The Welshmen were quite numerous in this state at that time, and they had a number of churches. They had their own presbytery. They had, annually, since the Welsh are magnificent singers, a concert of some of the mass choirs from their churches, in some place like Los Angeles, often in a stadium, with great throngs attending because the Welsh are magnificent singers. [They were] destroyed.

Scott: How were they destroyed?

Rushdoony: Because it was felt that it was discrimination to have a Welsh church, and particularly since the Welsh churches classified as WASP, they had to be destroyed, and a rich heritage was just wiped out… And in due time this will be the direction of things, and [it] has been proposed that there be no discrimination in churches with regard to race, color, sexual preference, or creed…

Then, something that people forget is that prior to World War II, in the South, there was a close relationship between black and white churches. They were segregated. But usually a white church would take a black church under their wing and help them with building projects, with various activities, and regularly the pastors would exchange pulpits and have occasionally a joint service. Now, this was routine. But both the ungodly bigots on the far-out fringes, as well as the liberal bigots, helped destroy that.

At 15:55 in this sermon, Rushdoony explains that the “civil rights revolution” is contrary to Scripture because “the purpose of the law is not equality.” Throughout the Bible, right up until colonial America, citizenship and church membership were considered identical, he says. Restrictive covenants were in place for moral character and other reasons, such that even when everyone went to church, there were oftentimes relatively few church members (perhaps 15%). Just as in the Old Testament, slaves and criminals and foreigners and eunuchs were not allowed to be members, meaning that they were not allowed positions of authority, even though they were Christians. There are racial considerations, as Rushdoony confirms. He observes that the first Church council in Acts 15 permitted segregated congregations, yet with one standard of justice for all.

Restrictive covenants, of course, have been abolished by courts in recent years… Equalitarianism is a modern idea. It did not even exist until fairly recently. It cannot be forced back onto the Bible without violence and dishonesty… The purpose of the law is not to level men, to equalize them, but to establish God’s justice. In relationship to all men, I must maintain one law, God’s offer of salvation, God’s justice; in relation to my family, I can be partial; to my group and my society, restrictive. And I can do this in good conscience before God, provided I do not deny justice to others. This, then, is the biblical standard. Equality, which is the modern purpose of government, has no place in biblical law. It is totally hostile to biblical law. It is no wonder then that John Dewey declared that there is no place in democracy for biblical Christianity…

At 33:04 in this talk, we hear some very true comments about black entitlement.

Scott: The black people of the United States have become convinced that the white people have been placed on earth by God to take care of them, that it is our duty, our holy Christian duty, to support all the black people. They argue that we should bring in more Haitians. We’ve already brought in a million from Haiti, and the island only has three and a half million. They want us to bring them all. Then of course, all the rest of the Caribbeans will follow. Now, we have never really faced up to the consequences of having implanted that idea, that we are responsible for their lives. My own opinion, as a Christian, is is that God put black men on earth to take care of their own wives and children. That is their duty. And our duty is to take care of ours. And if we go beyond that, beyond being as good as we can in our own area, all we do is open up a chain of evils…

Rushdoony: Yes, and what they don’t say when they talk about these people of Haiti is that Haiti is one of the main locales in the world of AIDS.

Scott: Well, we are actually listening to men who tell us that we should bring in the diseased of the world, that it is our duty…

Only Portugal made the mistake of intermarriage. And it was a mistake, because within three generations Portugal ceased to be a first-class power. And they were great in their day. They were the great explorers, the great seamen, and so forth, and they had a very high culture.

At 13:41 in this talk, Rushdoony adds:

I believe that because the white man has lost his courage, he has lost his faith. And he is fearful about everything. All kinds of minority peoples who are being trained, brought along on the road to civilization, educated, and helped by the white man, have suddenly smelled fear in him and are becoming outrageous in their behavior, contemptuous, and a great deal of our social unrest, I believe, is because the white man has lost his guts.

“As the faith that gave birth to the West is dying in the West, peoples of European descent from the steppes of Russia to the coast of California have begun to die out, as the Third World treks north to claim the estate. The last decade provided corroborating if not conclusive proof that we are in the Indian Summer of our civilization.” ~ Pat Buchanan

“There is not a single year between 1970 and 2050 where Germany’s birth rate even approaches the replacement level of 2.1 children per woman. By mid-century, Germany will have been below zero population growth for 80 years. This is a nation slowly taking its leave of this world.” God help us.

The world’s largest sperm bank is no longer accepting redheads as donors. But redheads are extremely popular as mates in Ireland, where births are up 7.6%, the vast majority of which are white. The rest of the West should take notice. Ireland is reversing the decline of our race, and it’s because the Irish love themselves. Germany is dying because it has been taught by Jews to hate itself.

Redheads were the first Americans.

More than 97% of the National Register of Historic Places commemorates white men, which means “that the score is not even,” according to the Secretary of the Interior. Therefore, the empire will continue to pretend that diversities had some part to play in the founding of our formerly-white, formerly-Christian nation.

A BB&T bank announces a holiday to whites as Columbus Day and to mestizos as “El Día de la Raza” (The Day of the Race).

At 50:40 in this talk, Scott and Rushdoony reflect on the genocide of the white race.

Scott: A country that throttles its writers while claiming to be free is especially infuriating… The white Christians are the only white whales left on the horizon, and there are lots of Ahabs with spears looking for them. It’s a very strange state of affairs. And really, if we come down to it, I think that is what has killed our literature. We cannot tell the truth about our society. And if we can’t do that, how can you write?

It certainly is hard to write for money if you want to write the truth.

Listen at 27:57 in this talk.

Scott: We are undertaking a series of experiments in this country that have never worked in the history of the world. Now, that’s a long time. And it takes an awful lot of arrogance to fly in the face of the history of all humanity and say we are going to do something that has never been done before. We are going to make all people believe that race, ethnicity, class, background, size, and all other differences are going to be totally irrelevant.

Rush: Well, a minor point; it has been tried on a very small scale, some of the Greek city-states. And Aristophenes ridiculed the whole idea…in his plays. But it has never worked.

At 14:03 in this talk, Rushdoony observes that if not for the white gift of quinine to the world, 6 out of 7 people in India would not be alive. It also made colonialism possible in South Africa and Rhodesia, which were not populated until the white man pioneered the land. We routinely hear that white men brought diseases with them that wiped out the native population, but everyone conveniently forgets that the white man brought the cure. Otto Scott notes that the Indian gift to white people was syphilis, which “wiped out a fair percentage of Europe within a few decades, and is still a plague in the world.” But schoolkids don’t learn about that; they learn that whites killed Indians by diseases, probably on purpose, because they’re white, after all. To argue that whites deliberately developed immunities that other races could not “is to abandon reason,” says Scott, “because every race has certain strengths and weaknesses, and they are not all the same.”

Rushdoony: Yes, and the high ratio of sickle-cell anemia among blacks is due to the fact that they somehow survived malaria.

Scott: Yes, and of course as we know, the blacks in the United States lost tribal identity, and so they intermarried with each other. And some of the characteristics now are quite confused.

But instead of lamenting this loss of tribal identity and consequent ugliness as an aberrence of nature, it is now heralded as normative for the Christian.

Continuing at 21:39:

Scott: Nobody gives Europe credit anymore for anything, not even Europeans… Americans don’t give themselves credit anymore. To even talk about it is to start an argument.

Rushdoony: Well, you remember in ’87, how everybody in England, virtually, that we met was damning their own country for its colonialism, either damning it or apologizing for their past.

Scott: You remember, we both came to the conclusion that they were violating a commandment, they were dishonoring their own parents and their own heritage. I mean, honor thy father and thy mother. What sort of person is it that denigrates his heritage?

When we Kinists talk this way, Alienists call us evil. I’ve had several pastors vociferously deny to my face that the Fifth Commandment has anything to do with love of race or love of heritage.

“Here would I also eike another crime to bee vnpardonable, if I should not be thought partiall: but the fatherly loue I beare you, will make mee breake the bounds of shame in opening it vnto you. It is then, the false and vnreuerent writing or speaking of malicious men against your Parents and Predecessors: ye know the command in Gods lawe, Honour your Father and Mother: and consequently, sen ye are the lawful magistrate, suffer not both your Princes and your Parents to be dishonoured by any; especially, sith the example also toucheth your selfe, in leauing thereby to your successors, the measure of that which they shal mete out againe to you in your like behalfe. I graunt wee haue all our faults, which, priuately betwixt you and God, should serue you for examples to meditate vpon, and mend in your person; but should not be a matter of discourse to others whatsoeuer. And sith ye are come of as honourable Predecessours as any Prince liuing, represse the insolence of such, as vnder pretence to taxe a vice in the person, seeke craftily to staine the race, and to steale the affection of the people from their posteritie: For how can they loue you, that hated them whom-of ye are come? Wherefore destroy men innocent young sucking Wolues and Foxes, but for the hatred they beare to their race? and why wil a coult of a Courser of Naples, giue a greater price in a market, then an Asse-colt, but for loue of the race? It is therefore a thing monstrous, to see a man loue the childe, and hate the Parents: as on the other part, the infaming and making odious of the parents, is the readiest way to bring the sonne in contempt. And for conclusion of this point, I may also alledge my owne experience: For besides the iudgments of God, that with my eyes I haue seene fall vpon all them that were chiefe traitours to my parents, I may iustly affirme, I neuer found yet a constant biding by me in all my straites, by any that were of perfite aage in my parents dayes, but onely by such as constantly bode by them; I meane specially by them that serued the Queene my mother:  for so that I discharge my conscience to you, my Sonne, in reuealing to you the trewth, I care not, what any traitour or treason-allower thinke of it.” ~ King James VI & I to his son, Henry IX, Prince of Wales, teaching him that the love of parents extends to posterity, government, and race

And just like that, the American empire decrees that nationality has nothing to do with blood. (Preachers everywhere applaud vigorously.) Negroes are henceforth Cherokee Indians. An Indian, or an American for that matter, is whosoever or whatsoever the government declares him to be. So let it be written, so let it be done. David Yeagley writes: “No human beings on earth will ever be allowed to deny the Negro anything – even the fact that he’s not Indian… The Negro is aggressive, arrogant, and will not be denied, or threatened. All must bow to him. No race is without the Negro. No nation can deny the Negro. The Negro rules.”

“The color of a man’s skin is part of his essential soul; if he must deny that soul in order to exist he will pine away and die.” ~ CWNY

Memory, technique, and race.

The best definition of the word “racist” that you’ll see.

Barbara Walters is a racist. And the worst part of it is that she doesn’t even understand why she’s a racist. We here at SWB are appalled by her pronunciation of the word “nigger.” It’s inexcusable.

Toilet paper is racist.

Black men like their women the way they like their toilet paper: soft, white, and strong.

“The word ‘Niggerhead’ allegedly appeared on a rock that sat on a piece of land owned by the family of Rick Perry back in the early 1980s.” And Jesus wept.

Well, this is an unfortunate audio malfunction.

Dee Troof Gon’ Make U Free. I’m going to buy one of those suits, as sho’ as you’s born. Look at the armbands! Fantastic. I had no idea that Haitians are Levites.

“They smashed our window, ripped the plasma TVs off our walls, took all our jackets and rucksacks. I saw them go into Claire’s Accessories, break into NatWest, liberate our neighbours, Toni & Guy, of hair products. They carted off iPods from Currys, clothes from Debenhams, mobile phones from Carphone Warehouse. I was horrified. But Waterstone’s [bookstore], directly opposite us, was untouched. For the looters it was as if it did not exist.” Like kryptonite.

According to Interactive One, there are only three good black men for every 100 black women, with “good” defined as: high school diploma, employed with a modest income, has never been to jail or prison, no illegitimate children, and not aggressively pursuing white women. This reminds me of a Chris Rock joke in which the punchline is the black man who expects accolades for doing what he’s supposed to do. “I take care of my kids!”

You deserve a break today.

Elizabeth Wright remembers a better time.

Part of Elizabeth Wright’s website was lost, and this appears to be the latest cache. This is what she calls Martin Delany’s ignored admonition, taken from the anthology, African-American Social & Political Thought 1850-1920:

White men are producers – we are consumers. They build houses, and we rent them. They raise produce, and we consume it. They manufacture clothes and wares, and we garnish ourselves with them. They build coaches, vessels, cars, hotels, saloons, and other vehicles and places of accommodation, and we deliberately wait until they have got them in readiness, then walk in, and contend with as much assurance for a “right,” as though the whole thing was bought by, paid for, and belonged to us…

Until we are determined to change the condition of things, and raise ourselves above the position in which we are now prostrated, we must hang our heads in sorrow and hide our faces in shame. It is enough to know that these things are so; the causes we care little about. Those we have been examining, complaining about, and moralizing over, all our life time. This we are weary of.

What we desire to learn now is, how to effect a remedy; this we have endeavored to point out. Our elevation must be the result of self-efforts, and work of our own hands. No other human power can accomplish it. If we but determine it shall be so, it will be so. Let each one make the case his own, and endeavor to rival his neighbor, in honorable competition.

These are the proper and only means of elevating ourselves and attaining equality in this country or any other, and it is useless, utterly futile, to think about going anywhere, except we are determined to use these as the necessary means of developing our manhood. The means are at hand, within our reach. Are we willing to try them?

Sage but unheeded advice.

The do-gooder author of The Help is being sued by the black maid she portrayed, and is being called a racist to boot. Well, I’ll declare, as my grandfather used to say.

White liberals are the strangest people you’ll ever come across. The sickest, too; even bestiality appeals to them.

The Four Reformers by Robert Louis Stevenson might cause you to think of the unwashed Occupy Wall Street mob, for as long as you can stand it.

Four reformers met under a bramble bush. They were all agreed the world must be changed.

“We must abolish property,” said one.

“We must abolish marriage,” said the second.

“We must abolish God,” said the third.

“I wish we could abolish work,” said the fourth.

“Do not let us get beyond practical politics,” said the first. “The first thing is to reduce men to a common level.”

“The first thing,” said the second, “is to give freedom to the sexes.”

“The first thing,” said the third, “is to find out how to do it.”

“The first step,” said the first, “is to abolish the Bible.”

“The first thing,” said the second, “is to abolish the laws.”

“The first thing,” said the third, “is to abolish mankind.”

And progressivism marches on.

Humanists despise humanity.

Even liberals are no longer pretending that miscegenation has become normal. Instead, they bellyache about the “enduring norms” that prevent adulterers from feeling comfortable in their own frankenfamilies. It’s an implicit admission that miscegenation is not normal and never will be.

Only 2.9% of the population identifies as multiracial, but that’s a 32% increase in ten years.

Good fences make good neighbors. It seems obvious to us, but this team of researchers is just discovering that peace prevails when political boundaries are ethnic boundaries. When they are not, violence abounds.

Switzerland is recognized as a country of peace, stability and prosperity. This is surprising because of its linguistic and religious diversity that in other parts of the world lead to conflict and violence. Here we analyze how peaceful stability is maintained. Our analysis shows that peace does not depend on integrated coexistence, but rather on well defined topographical and political boundaries separating groups.

To paraphrase George Wallace: Separation now, separation tomorrow, separation forever.

Here’s a funny little graphic that Matt Parrott put together:

Announcing Amren 2012! It’s no exaggeration to say that Sam Dickson alone is worth the price of admission. He’s always the last to speak because Jared saves the best for last. With the safeguards now in place, terrorists won’t be shutting this one down. It’s in Nashville this time, which is one of the best big cities in the country. Lots to see, lots to do.