Spirit Water Blood

Did you gasp in horror and disbelief when you heard that the accused murderer of Jessie Davis, a pregnant white female race traitor in Ohio, appears to be her black cop boyfriend, who is also the father of the two-year-old mullato left alone to wander around the crime scene after mammy was rolled up in a rug and dumped in the woods? How could a policeman do such a thing? (Committing an unintentional race crime, Canton Police Chief Dean McKimm stated that the arrest of Bobby Cutts gave “a black eye” to the department.) Did you also notice how quickly the story dropped to the bottom of the page once the body was found and the negro boyfriend was arrested? If you did indeed gasp in disbelief, then you are one of the few conspiracy theorists who still pursues the elusive killer of Nicole Brown Simpson.

Without “I AM NOT RACIST” tatooed on her forehead, Patricia Porter, mother of the murdered miscegenist, did her best to spin her daugher’s demise into a tragedy for the other victim-- the black father of her mongrel grandchild. Tearful, voice quivering, Porter emoted like a negro choir: “The most painful part of this for me… I pray every day that it is not Bobby Cutts.” Prayer denied. Any unctious afterthoughts about her daughter’s death also went unheeded. If this woman cared about her daughter, she would have dragged the girl kicking and screaming from under a married black cop. No doubt Jessie Davis was dragged kicking and screaming to her death. Have you noticed that whenever one of these white racial defectives gets slaughtered, dad is never around? Compare this nauseating pity-party with the grief suffered by the parents of two Knoxville kids massacred by black savages.

More Black Cops Off Duty cribbed in a white neighborhood.

In Memoriam: Rev. Nokomis Yeldell, pastor, missionary, inventor of the theft-proof collection plate.

Ron Paul Trails in this poll. Vote Today!

The youngest member of MENSA reinforces racist stereotypes.

The hideous effects of mongrelization.

All State education is a sort of dynamo machine for polarizing the popular mind;
for turning and holding its lines of force in the direction supposed to be most effective for State purposes.
—Henry Adams, The Education of Henry Adams

Grandmother was from a little Tennessee town with two general stores, one schoolhouse, and no post office. The general stores are gone, but the schoolhouse is still there and operating. This kind of country charm attracts city people who are seeking out “better” schools for their children. Grandmother would laugh at that last notion, because she hated her school. There was nothing wrong with the building itself; it’s red brick and quaint and surrounded by cotton fields just as it was in Grandmother’s day. (The scenery just screams to be put on a bank calendar.) The inside, however, has changed quite a bit. The classrooms are now about a third black, with the lower grades the darkest. But that was not a problem in Grandmother’s day. The colored schoolhouse, a tidy whitewashed building with beautiful polished wood floors, was just down the road. Grandmother hated her school because of how the system worked to distill each child into a clear, odorless product of the State-- a citizen bottled in bond.

The schools back then were themselves learning about modern education, which included the rudiments of hygiene, civics, and music appreciation. As there was no money for musical equipment, except for a second-hand church piano, music appreciation consisted of sing-alongs.  Once a week, all the students were gathered together in the gymnasium where they screeched out many of the same songs they sang in church. No matter, there were other songs more appropriate for State education. Because of a sing-along Grandmother learned to hate school.

There was nothing unusual the day Grandmother hated school. The children were herded noisily into the gym, where they fidgeted until the music sheets were handed around and they took a moment to ponder whether or not to appreciate the selections. Grandmother didn’t like one of the songs at all. She told the girl standing next to her that she would not sing that song, no matter what.  Her protest must have caught the attention of a teacher, or maybe the principal, because she was jerked out of line and positioned next to the piano where she would be obliged to sing THAT song in front of the whole school. What song? Marching Through Georgia With Sherman. 

What Grandmother was obliged to do was to celebrate the torment of her own people. She grasped the crisis if her schoolmates did not. Most likely they wiped their noses on their sleeves and shouted out the music in tuneless, lopsided harmony. What remains of these children is now called “The Greatest Generation.” The unripe Greatest Gens-- the immediate progenitors of the Beat Generation, which opened the Generation Gap, into which fell Generation X--perhaps humming Sherman’s march, walked home from school over paths that crossed Confederate veterans and Confederate widows going about their daily business. Did any of these children realize, upon encountering the familiar face of an old Rebel soldier, that their school was beguiling them? No. Like the thin, polished needle of a lobotomy probe, the damage schools do to children’s minds enters painlessly through the eye into the brain.

The Greatest Generation grew up beguiled and becalmed. School made them believe they were educated and worthy citizens, whether their education was useful or not. They were worthy because they recited The Pledge of Allegiance to The Flag. Whatever textbook lessons are forgotten, no one forgets the Pledge of Allegiance. Ever. So later, they voted in droves for Franklin Roosevelt and soon after enlisted in droves to fight the Japs and Nazis. The patriotism that once meant loyalty to folk and homeland was disfigured into an obsequious trust in the government.

Grandmother’s schoolhouse is now tuned to other songs about other marches. And sometimes, when the deracinated, colorblind children walk home from school, maybe they cross the path of a Great Generator or the widow of one, and they march past them like Sherman through Georgia.

Be sure to listen to the Political Cesspool tomorrow night. The first hour will feature activists discussing the (second) rally to be held in Knoxville, TN, this Saturday at 1 pm. Be there if you can! Patriots will gather once again at the old county courthouse to force the Jew media to report on White ethnic cleansing. And the Jews are being compelled to comment on it, but only through their own Satanic prism. They and their lackeys keep saying that the police don’t call the Knoxville murders hate crimes, so it’s no big surprise that the stories have not been reported.

Here’s an example where you can drink in the pseudo-wisdom of the Negro mind enthralled to his Jewish masters.  You can see that it was entitled "The Loonies of Knoxville" when it was published in Seattle. In the Baltimore Sun it was entitled "Racial Oppression is a One Way Street!" That’s called balanced journalism, folks. He keeps bringing up the Duke rape case, apparently oblivious to the fact that it was not a rape at all. He drips contempt not only for the victims but for their mourners, who are called "loonies," "lunatic fringe," "white supremacists," "abysmally, stupidly, self-servingly wrong," "crackpots, incendiaries and flat-out racists," "obscene and ludicrous." He ends his screed with this: "I have four words for them and any other white Americans who feel themselves similarly victimized. Cry me a river."

We’re proud that scurrilous Youtube videos are mentioned in this article on the New Jew-Free Media, since ours was the best and most popular of the Youtube videos produced two weeks ago. (Anything we can do to further the noble cause of Hate.) Here’s a funny line from the article: "Neo-Nazis and other white supremacists have jumped on the case as well, drawn to the state where the Ku Klux Klan was founded in 1865. Hate groups have organized rallies in Knoxville and set up Web sites under the victims’ names to spew racial invective." Yeah, that’s the only reason for outrage over the brutal murders. It just wouldn’t be the same if it had occurred in West Virginia. I’m sure most people think of the KKK when they think of Tennessee, just as they think of terrorism when they think of Israel. (God bless our mounted knights who protected White chastity and property during the Yankee-funded reign of terror called "Reconstruction." God bless them to the 10th generation.) And you know what "racial invective" is, don’t you? Using racial statistics when discussing crime.

This article, like most that you’ll read on the subject, is one big lie. It says that blacks are the victims in 68% of "hate crimes." (Lie - see below.) This is why the Jews invented the concept. They had to somehow alter the perception of reality in their readers, in much the same way as one might club a fish over the head to paralyze it before gutting it. Yet how many "hate crimes" has the FBI recorded? Only 5,000. But in 2005, "there were more than 645,000 victims of cross-racial violent crimes between blacks and whites in the U.S. In 90 percent of those crimes, black offenders attacked white victims." Which means that blacks are up to 250 times more likely to do criminal violence to whites than the reverse. The Jewish concept of a "hate crime" is necessary so the DA can say, "This ain’t one," and convince everyone to return to the 24 hour coverage of the Paris Hilton Tragedy. "There is absolutely no proof of a hate crime," said special counsel John Gill. Chris Newsom’s mother makes far more sense: "If this wasn’t a hate crime then I don’t know how you would define a hate crime. It may have started out as a carjacking, but what it developed into was blacks hating whites. To do the things they did, they would have to hate them to do that." Poor Mrs. Newsom doesn’t understand that "hate" crimes, which are punished more severely than "regular" crimes, only take place if the word "nigger" is used. Therefore, her ruddy boy could not possibly have been the victim of a hate crime.

By the way, the FBI reports hate crimes against Hispanics but not by Hispanics because it conflates White and Hispanic stats in order to Jewily skew reality. See The Color of Crime.  Blacks are twice as likely as Whites to commit hate crimes. Blacks are as much more dangerous than Whites as men are more dangerous than women.

"Negroes rank proportionately very high in the prison population. In the South, ‘over half the inmates of State prisons are Negroes, and this is true of some prisons in the North.’ Duffy believed that prejudice against the Negro accounted for some of this, although he recognized that these Negro prisoners were guilty men. It is quite likely that sometimes a guilty Negro faces greater severity because of his race, but it is also true much is tolerated and excused in him because of his race also. The Southern pattern for decades was severity in some things (such as rape) and indulgence in many things (such as petty theft, violence between Negroes, drunkenness, and the like)." ~ R.J. Rushdoony, Institutes of Biblical Law, p.382

Apparently, race-mixing women are either ugly, fat, or seldom shave their pits.

Eighty-three percent approve of miscegenation on this, the 40th anniversary of the "Loving" versus Virginia decision. Faithful Christians have obviously dwindled to a small remnant.

At about the 11:30 mark in this sermon, the pastor explains that the biblical prohibition against marrying strangers meant that God’s people were not even to dwell among the strangers.

Here’s a handy lexicon for those of you who are still mired in the quicksand of ignorance, grasping for a vine. My favorite: "color-blind" = "blind."

"The term ‘folk’ has for its primary meaning a group of kindred people, forming a tribe or nation; a people bound together by ties of race, language, religion, custom, tradition, and history. Such a common tie we call folkways. A folk thus possesses a sense of solidarity and is quite different from a conglomerate mass of people. It has most if not all of the characteristics of nationalism. Indeed, it may be contended with much force that there can be no true nationalism where the population does not constitute a folk." ~ Frank L. Owsley, who was quite obviously not a "21st-Century Christian"

Think about that quote. Patriotism and national solidarity do not exist when the Folk have been destroyed. All that remains is the cage-like security of totalitarianism.

White Men can’t jump across imaginary lines for the sake of their own race.  Ted Kennedy will never rush to the side of another Irish Catholic like Pat Buchanan if such action meant shoving aside negroes and queers. Blacks do not play politics over racial polarity. With the Presidential election looming, four-star ROTC cadet Colin Powell is turning black again to boost the candidacy of Barak Obama. 

Colin Powell is the textbook example of affimative action polished brass who was promoted to high rank without regard to his qualifications. Powell’s only officer training was from the ROTC program at New York City College, where he was a member of a black drill team. When Powell joined the Army, he was assigned to Korea where he served under a white general whose passion was to promote racial harmony by forcing his soldiers to watch repeated screenings of the movie Brian’s Song. 

During the Viet Nam War, Powell was put on the staff of General Westmoreland, where he performed as the general’s high profile bellhop to dispel the danger of mutiny among black draftees following the assassination of Martin Luther King. In 1980, the hot air inflating Powell’s career was chilled when his superior officer at Fort Carson, Colorado gave Powell a poor leadership evaluation that threatened to stunt his career.  But Powell’s political allies swept him up in their arms and pushed him further up the chain of command. Casper Weinberger gave him an office and an armchair with the fancy rank of “senior military assistant” and a couple more shiny gee-gaws to admire in the mirror.  All the sparkle that has been showered over Powell does not hide the fact that he never commanded troops in the field. 

We’ve had some great posts lately. I absolutely loved the quote from the Bishops’ Jubilee Council of the Russian Orthodox Church: "Christian patriotism may be expressed at the same time with regard to a nation as an ethnic community and as a community of its citizens. The Orthodox Christian is called to love his fatherland, which has a territorial dimension, and his brothers by blood who live everywhere in the world. This love is one of the ways of fulfilling God’s commandment of love to one’s neighbour which includes love to one’s family, fellow-tribesmen and fellow-citizens." Christian racists! How delightful. They’re called Kinists in our part of the world. It all fits very nicely with these fine Russians profiled earlier. Western Protestants have a lot of catching up to do, or else they’re going to be the laughingstock of Christendom. They will be counted among those condemned in this excellent quote from the Book of Wisdom, Latin Vulgate Translation: "But the children of adulterers shall not come to perfection, and the seed of the unlawful bed shall be rooted out. And if they live long, they shall be nothing regarded, and their last old age shall be without honour. And if they die quickly, they shall have no hope, nor speech of comfort in the day of trial. For dreadful are the ends of a wicked race."

June is Black Music Month (not to be confused with February, which is Black History Month), and iTunes is having a celebration of skin color.

The religion of Equality is a tool in the hands of Whites to feel superior to other Whites, and the last thing such narcissists will ever do is apply White expectations to their Black props. But this is true for all colored people. For instance, I recall a story on NPR months ago about Iraqis who saw Saddam Hussein’s face in the moon the night after his execution, and how this was an omen that signalled a curse on the country. The story was told with the utmost deference for the traditions and superstitions of these loonies. But if the story had been about White Catholics who saw the face of Mary in a tree stump or Shirley from the trailer park insisting she had been abducted by aliens the night before, the same scorn would be heaped upon it as is heaped upon Crazy Pat Robertson and his entertaining prognostications. Whites are always held to a higher standard, while naked, retarded Negroes get full-color spreads in National Geographic and are praised as the stewards of Cultures Worthy of Respect.

Bill Regnery writes: "In 1940 whites constituted 30% of the world’s population. This number now stands at 15%. If this trend continues our fraction will plummet to 8% at mid-century." But you can run down to Blockbuster right now and rent Children of Men, a Jew film about "Our Future" being in the hands of a Negro bastard.

Seen at VDare, by Pastor Bill Barnwell: "Likewise, after the Israelites returned to their land from national exile, they were forbidden by their priestly leaders from intermarrying with foreign persons (Ezra 9)." Sounds pretty straightforward, doesn’t it? Even a child could understand it. Even a child could understand Tobit 4:12-13: "Beware, my son, of all immorality. First of all, take a wife from among the descendants of your fathers and do not marry a foreign woman, who is not of your father’s tribe; for we are the sons of the prophets. Remember, my son, that Noah, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, our fathers of old, all took wives from among their brethren. They were blessed in their children, and their posterity will inherit the land. So now, my son, love your brethren, and in your heart do not disdain your brethren and the sons and daughters of your people by refusing to take a wife for yourself from among them." But here comes Pastor Bill to explain that God didn’t really mean it that way: "The appeal here in the Old Testament is not one of racial purity, but spiritual purity. Foreigners were indeed allowed into the Israelite community. Ruth the Moabite is a prime example of this." As Harry Seabrook has explained, this position is incredibly convoluted. If Ruth had truly been an ethnic Moabite, it would have been a violation of the law for Boaz to marry her (Deut. 7:3; Deut. 23:3; Ezra 9:2; Neh. 13:23). All kinds of silly things are said about this incident by Christians today, such as that Elimelech’s sons were punished with death for marrying Moabite women, but for Boaz it was okay. On the contrary, the Levirate Law of Marriage only applied to Israelites. No foreigner could have inherited land within Israel. Yet this story is used as one of the primary justifications for miscegenation today, along with the "Negro" wife of Moses, which all the commentators deny. Then Rev. Barnwell uses Galatians 3:28, the most-abused verse in Scripture, to suggest that race is meaningless. This is all standard-issue 21st-century mulattoism. The only thing that surprises is to read it at VDare. Come on, Peter, don’t drink that evangelical bathtub gin. You’ll wake up with a terrible hangover.

Weirdos. Make intercession for us, Saint Bernard! And if you think that’s weird…

"Would the fountain of your mind were clear again, that I might water an ass at it." ~ William Shakespeare

Hilarious interview:

Remember when women were pretty and wore dresses and covered their fair skin from the sun? They were also racists in those days (meaning that they actually secured a future for their posterity) and didn’t try to be men. Seems like a different world.

Here pickled in formaldehyde and painted like a whore
Shrimp-pink incorruptible, not lost or gone before.

"Bobby Shafto is forbidden to go to sea. That is sexist. His sister goes instead. However, an insensitive tidal wave kills Sister Shafto and all hands on deck. Bobby Shafto opens up a beauty shop and combs down his yellow hair."

Except for the small amount that has been incinerated, every bit of plastic ever made still exists.

"[P]eople are much more willing to be taxed for the benefit of people like themselves than for the benefit of the Other."

A diversity letter to send to your real estate agent.

The depleted military and warmongering Jews, always eager to sacrifice White men for their terrorist state.

"What exactly is so scandalous? How about Jesus punished in Hell for eternity by being made to sit in a cauldron of boiling excrement? That image appears in early manuscripts of the Babylonian Talmud, as does a brief account of Jesus’ trial and execution—not by the Romans but by the Jewish high court, the Sanhedrin. The Jewish community, to the extent Jews were even aware of these excised texts, has been content to let them remain obscure and unknown." ~ Peter Schaefer, Jesus in the Talmud

The great Dr. David Duke on the Phil Donahue show. Fifteen years, and his words are more meaningful than ever. Duke writes: "The truth is that there is no such thing as Judeo-Christianity. That would be like saying Satanic-Christianity."

Does it make sense to anyone out there that Doug Wilson does such an admirable job debating the atheist Christopher Hitchens but his "response" to Kinism and our published papers on the subject was merely to label it "skinism" and denounce us as being filled with "malice" and "vainglory"? Consider this sort of airtight logic applied to the racial views held by our Christian forefathers: "Is there such a thing as atheist hypocrisy? When another atheist makes different ethical choices than you do (as Stalin and Mao certainly did), is there an overarching common standard for all atheists that you are obeying and which they are not obeying? If so, what is that standard and what book did it come from? Why is it binding on them if they differ with you? And if there is not a common objective standard which binds all atheists, then would it not appear that the supernatural is necessary in order to have a standard of morality that can be reasonably articulated and defended?"

Another good line: "If one were to spill milk accidentally on the kitchen floor, and someone else came in and wanted to know what had happened, the one thing we can be sure of is that such an inquiring mind wouldn’t ask the milk. The milk wouldn’t know. It’s the accident." The entire debate is worth reading, but that last page is a slam dunk. Wilson asks Hitchens why psychopaths are considered evil if revulsion against psychopathology is merely the result of evolution. "Are you wroth over the fact that clams don’t have legs yet? When you notice that the bears at the zoo continue to suck on their paws, do you stop to remonstrate with them?"

I also like Wilson’s evidence for Christ being the life of the world: "The engineering that went into ankles. The taste of beer. That Jesus rose from the dead on the third day, just like he said. A woman’s neck. Bees fooling around in the flower bed. The ability of acorns to manufacture enormous oaks out of stuff they find in the air and dirt. Forgiveness of sin. Storms out of the North, the kind with lightning. Joyous laughter (diaphragm spasms to the atheistic materialist). The ocean at night with a full moon. Delta blues. The peacock that lives in my yard. Sunrise, in color. Baptizing babies. The pleasure of sneezing. Eye contact. Having your feet removed from the miry clay, and established forever on the rock."

"But running east down the aisle of a westbound airliner is not the same thing as ‘going east’… It doesn’t help to be mainstream if Niagara Falls is just two hundred yards off." ~ Doug Wilson

Wilson is a very good writer. "Richard Dawkins wants to raise our consciousness - to ‘raise consciousness to the fact that to be an atheist is a realistic aspiration, and a brave and splendid one’ (p. 1). And his new book, The God Delusion, certainly does have some high aspirations in this regard. As high, that is, as approximately one hundred and eighty pounds of protoplasm can have. Get a double-layered Hefty garbage bag and fill it with some kind of vegetable soup, shake it for a bit, and you have some idea of just how lofty an aspiration can actually be. But the point is apparently not how high the aspiration has to be, but what you can get other bits of protoplasm to say about it in the blurbs, which is almost as good. But they need to say it in an energetic enough way to sway the general mass of protoplasmic bi-pedal carbon units out there, which is to say, the reading public. Because if enough bits of protoplasm get together on this, we can get ourselves a consensus going, and first thing you know you are dealing with the voice of Reason. The voice of Reason is what happens when any kind of physical wave (sound waves are best) shudders through a portion of the vegetable soup, dispelling the voice of Superstition forever."

One of my favorite examples of atheistic inconsistency is Voltaire. He wanted his maids to keep their religion. In fact, atheism was not to be discussed in their presence because he knew his silverware and other belongings would be stolen.

These extraordinary comments caught my eye:

Now I know why John Calvin called the Anabaptists “mad beasts” and said in Book IV (p. 1482 of the Library of Christian Classics version) of his Institutes that people who believe in Anabaptism should be sent to mental hospitals… Most Roman Catholics are Vatican II people that apologize all over themselves for events like the Inquisition, though more people are killed in Detroit every year than EVERYONE killed in the Inquisition. Yet you still can’t get over the Inquisition! You are complaining about a very insignificant remnant of traditional Latin-Mass Catholics, hated and excommunicated by their own ecclesiastical hierarchy, that are some of the only people with common sense when it comes to things like the IRS, Big Brother, Zionism, liberal media, abortion, etc. And you say that what they say today is just as heterodox and mean-spirited as what atheists today are saying?… Atheists today celebrate “art,” like the National Endowment for the Arts has done, which features such blasphemy as feces poured over statues of the Virgin Mary (props to the First Amendment for that one), and crucifixes in jars of urine ("Piss Christ"), and you’re attacking people who like to chant in Latin? And somehow the rosary is just as mean-spirited? You people really should be put in mental hospitals. I completely understand where Jean [Calvin] was coming from…

[M]ost Reformed are ex-baptists, not ex-Catholics. More than half of the Reformed people I’ve come in contact with grew up in the great so-called churches that “tolerance” and “freedom” finally spawned out of the sludge...and you know something? We left them. Reformed people leave them because they’re a sick joke...a disease that has plagued the American mind for over a hundred years. They’re a splotch on the history of the New Covenant...heck, they’re an embarrassment to human beings everywhere. Billy Graham, Rick Warren, Joel Osteen...or their more conservative counterparts in Bill Gothard, John Hagee, and Jerry Falwell...they don’t hold a candle to real Christian leaders. Men like Athanasius of Alexandria, Charles the Great (King of the Franks), and English Reformer Thomas Cranmer. They’ve made the Christian religion such a confusing mess with their thousands upon thousands of little schismatic sects that multiply by the hundreds every year. And every year, it becomes harder and harder just to find a congregation that has some sort of continuity with historic Christianity. And efforts to convert your fellow countrymen become practically impossible when the town is filled with an endless array of baptist and independent congregations, which quickly lure new converts with their promises of religious experience (in both their conservative and liberal forms)… “Liberty,” as you and [Roger] Williams want to define it, is antithetical to the propagation of the Gospel, and has put our people in bondage to the likes of Bill Hybels…

Yes, the Reformation was not the only event in the history of the Christian Church. This is indeed a good point. But if you’d study church history, you’d see your pleas for freedom and acceptance for baptist/quaker/independent congregations is totally at odds with the beliefs of both the Ante-Nicene, Nicene, and Post-Nicene Fathers, in both East and West (and I take it that’s who you’re referring to by “every generation since the apostles"). They didn’t want religious liberty for the Arian party, the Docetists, the Nestorians, or the Monophysites. And had they not chased them out of Europe, and into places like Ethiopia and the Orient, the Christian faith as we know it would never have survived. And no sooner than when Christendom backed off of lunatics like the Anabaptists, it quickly became associated with prominent Anabaptists like Charles Finney and Billy Graham, to the point that they have as much power and influence as the bishop of Rome - without any apostolic succession/continuity whatsoever! And things eventually got so bad that truly Protestant Christians (like D. James Kennedy, for example) have apparently forgotten why it ever mattered in the first place, and are just thankful to have "people of faith" "acknowledging God" in the public sphere. Indeed, simply not being Roman Catholic now makes one "Protestant" or "evangelical"… Indeed, you have not the slightest bit of gratitude for the men whose just concern for religious liberty gave you the very ability to sit comfortably in your chair and read this without fear of the gallows…

In short, let’s put phrases like "binding the consciences of men" and "legalism" squarely on the shoulders of where they are: the independent, democratic and congregational sects originating with the Anabaptists.

Someone named "Defender of the Faith" has published the piece on Anabaptists that Harry wrote 10 years ago.

Language is Sermonic.

"It is the opinion of Plato, that changes in the dress and habits of the citizens portend great changes and commotions in the state; and I am inclined to believe that when the language in common use in any country becomes irregular and depraved, it is followed by their ruin or their degradation. For what do terms used without skill or meaning, which are at once corrupt and misapplied, denote but a people listless, supine, and ripe for servitude? On the contrary, we have never heard of any people or state which has not flourished in some degree of prosperity as long as their language has retained its elegance and its purity.” ~ John Milton to Benedetto Bonomatthai, September 10, 1638

So our civilization declines in proportion to the loss of elegance and purity in our language. This reminds me of Badonicus’s justification for racially segregated churches: All things are to be done decently and in order (1 Corinthians 14:40).

Rest in peace, David Lane. "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children."

We apologize for not killing more Yankees. We tried our level best.

“There are no non-Catholics in heaven....An individual Christian, even one who prays and reads his Bible faithfully, but who avoids coming to church, is living in a state of false security. He trades the catholic faith for a faith of his own invention. He is destined to become food for the lurking wolf and prowling lion. For as we confess in our Creed, the saving faith is not individual, but catholic.” Lutheran pastor, Father Hollywood, is right on. This is the unanimous consent of the Early Church Fathers, and those who hold anything to the contrary are manifestly damned. Contemporary evangelicals get all hot and bothered by these words, but this only proves they’d feel hellaciously uncomfortable in any church setting prior to 1776. Catholicism, while not propositional, is not exclusively identified with a building or a see (such as Rome or Antioch), but is at its core a people who hold steadfast to the Word of God. And the catholic faith is not one that is stripped of tradition, history, martyrs, but is rich in it, while holding firm to the Word as the final authority in all ecclesiastical matters. “It is not held privately, but confessed collectively and in public. We are branches of a common Vine, not separate plants. The true faith is not modern and contemporary, but timeless and eternal...the saving faith, the catholic faith, is not whatever the individual dreams up, interprets, or desires – but rather is a submission to what God our Father and the Church our mother have taught and continue to faithfully and unchangingly teach their children. For we children are born of water and the Spirit, cleansed by the Word and the mysteries, confessors of the same true faith held by all who have been made worthy to stand in the throne-room of the one true God, whom we worship both in His Unity and in His Trinity, through the incarnate Son, our Savior Jesus Christ, in the Unity of the Holy Spirit, now and unto eternity. Amen.”

filii autem adulterorum inconsummati erunt et ab iniquo toro semen exterminabitur
et si quidem longae vitae erunt in nihilum conputabuntur et sine honore erit novissima senectus illorum
et si quidem longae vitae erunt in nihilum conputabuntur et sine honore erit novissima senectus illorum
et si celerius defuncti fuerint non habebunt spem nec in die agnitionis adlocutionem

But the children of adulterers shall not come to perfection, and the seed of the unlawful bed shall be rooted out. And if they live long, they shall be nothing regarded, and their last old age shall be without honour. And if they die quickly, they shall have no hope, nor speech of comfort in the day of trial. For dreadful are the ends of a wicked race.

~ The Book of Wisdom, Latin Vulgate Translation

What do you think a man would have to do to deserve a no flight-zone place above his property, high-tech surveillance placed in his house, multiple roadblocks a mile around, have his neighbors evacuated, and his surrounding power lines cut off, as well as 6 helicopters along with the SWAT team and APC’s buzzing around...just to serve warrant? Shoot, for Mr. Ed Brown, it wasn’t international espionage, multiple kidnappings and murders, but Constitutional literacy that screwed him over. In liberty-rich Amerika, you can’t even walk your neighbor’s dog without being shot at by Big Brother.

We feel for Mr. Brown. We read some books about Martin Luther and John Calvin, and our lives have never been the same since.

An 11 year-old was arrested for using a rubber band gun and is facing felony charges. Priorities, priorities.

“The National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive , signed on May 9, 2007, declares that in the event of a “catastrophic event,” George W. Bush can become what is best described as a dictator, ”The President shall lead the activities of the Federal Government for ensuring constitutional government.” I’m just thankful we don’t have some sort of top-down deal with kings and queens. And you know what’s great about this? The man who’s going to ensure his populace, “constitutional government”, is the same man who screamed at a White House aide, “Stop throwing the Constitution in my face! It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!”

We here at Spirit Water Blood are mighty thankful for Steve Schlissel’s son-in-law, Dave Hodges. His exchanges with RTS-seminary student Steven Wedgeworth on the matter of race are quite interesting, to say the least. Wedgeworth, a die-hard Wilsonian and ecumenicist, parrots his hero Douglas Wilson with, “There is no more nationalism or ‘blood and soil’ after baptism.” This, my friends, is the very essence of liberalism. Water enriches soil, it does not eradicate it! He thinks baptism washes away the brown spots of the Ethiopian, but those physical spots can’t be removed even with Holy Baptism. I’m sorry Steven, but your familial obligations to your parents and siblings don’t disappear when you get sprinkled. And Mr. Spong, I hate to break it to you, but your baptism didn’t wash away those hateful genitals of yours either.

Wedgeworth, like Wilson, is Trinitarian except when it comes to race and kinship. Our Mother Church is one family, just like The Holy Triune God is one essence. And just as God is one in three, so the Church is one yet many. The oneness and being of God, however, does not absorb the plurality and diversity of the Godhead, and the oneness and unity of the Church does not absorb (or make of no consequence) the familial/national ties which combined make the Church catholic. Maybe one of these days Steven will put his trust solely in Christ alone instead of popular preachers.

Look at this collection of freaks and rabble celebrating the 40th anniversary of legalized miscegenation. What a grand aspiration for your rosy-cheeked son or daughter. "Such discrimination was justified with bigotry disguised as religious truth. It seems unimaginable today that couples were once denied their freedom to marry because some said interracial marriage was immoral according to their biblical interpretation." These are the same people who don’t care for any biblical interpretation at all except for the one that makes a mockery of orthodox Christian faith. "We’re glad times have changed. America is a better place because of it. Love, commitment, and family — and marriage equality — matter to everyone." Not to us!

The purpose of this campaign is obvious. "The groups say they hope to use the couples and the court case to bolster their contention that marriage is a civil right that should know no bounds — even for those of the same sex… We want to draw some parallels and comparisons to show that oppression is oppression and intolerance is intolerance. Forty years ago there were a lot of situations that weren’t tolerated and as we have thankfully evolved around race and ethnicity, there’s still intolerance." Can you think of one other popular and recently-formed opinion to which Christians have largely conformed? Neither can I. The marriage license came about for the purpose of granting license to that which had formerly been illegal, namely miscegenation. Likewise, the driver’s license was originally a means of more easily tracking those who had committed crimes. Now Americans accept their slavery gladly. The Department of Homeland Security is now expanding the driver’s license to grant you the permission to enter federal [sic] buildings, board aircraft, and even obtain a job. And exactly how were Southerners abusive to their slaves? The author, Nancy Levant, is correct that "ethnic cleansing" of Whites is the goal.

As was said earlier here, the "racist" of today is the prophet of tomorrow. Sam Francis called the Republican Party the Stupid Party for years for, among other things, encouraging anti-White policies that would unquestionably hurt the party. He was fired and despised for speaking the truth. Now Rush Limbaugh himself, than whom there has never been a lip-locker with stronger suction, is saying the same thing, although he quickly qualifies that Whites themselves are not important, however important they may be for the political future of the GOP. (He somewhat echoes Samuel Huntington here who says that America has always had an Anglo-Protestant core but it’s no big deal if it loses either its Anglo or Protestant identity.)

And that’s not all. Ann Coulter is now talking about Anglo-Saxon benevolence! She still thinks colored people can be painted white, but what you are seeing here is the beginning of a transition to racial awareness among Whites, and it’s about time. Even Bill O’Reilly, the most obnoxious man alive, is saying that the (nameless, faceless) "far left" is trying "to break down the White, Christian, male power structure...and they want to bring in millions of foreign nationals..." Who is "they"? And if Americanism is an idea, what’s wrong with Mexicans? You know the tune, but still, this is an interesting shift. Also, Linda Chavez just called Lou Dobbs a racist for wanting to enforce border laws, even though he is married to a Mexican woman.

Victorians considered tan skin to be a sign of low class. The most beautiful women have always been the fairest. Apparently, the rest of the world agrees. Over 60% of Indian women use skin-lightening products. A "Unilever company called Fair and Lovely...features a sad, dark woman morphing into a happy, light-skinned woman." Ebony Magazine runs similar ads.

Here’s a black man who admits that "whites are far more likely to be the victims and blacks their assailants in interracial crimes than the other way around. Those crimes are seldom if ever labeled hate crimes." And they occur millions of times, he says. Then he says that blacks only seem to be nonchalant over the "heinous crimes committed by blacks against whites," and since they really are concerned, even though we can’t detect it, the loud screams of the "white supremacists" that a double standard exists "should be ignored." Thanks, Ofari, we appreciate your trenchant analysis.

The Duke lacrosse team will not be celebrated by Hollywood. They won’t be called the comeback kids. Theirs will not be the feel-good story of the year in People Magazine. They will be utterly forgotten, except by "racists."

Let’s see what else is happening in the news. Yoko Ono eats a dog. Another homeschooler wins a spelling bee. A froot loop church tells the IRS to go penetrate itself. Out with the old, in with the new at the founding company of Silicon Valley. Fred Thompson, another CFR member.

Your tax dollars going to people in other countries who make eyes at anything with a hole.

Demography is destiny. Yitzhak Rabin and Ray Nagin understand it. Why don’t you?

How to be a wigger.

"I am beginning to believe that black people, no matter where in the world they are, are cursed with a genetic predisposition to steal, murder, and create mayhem." ~ Leighton Levy, black journalist

One man’s very good explanation for what motivates him.

"Racism is alive and well and living in Canada, and it’s time white people started talking about it, say academics who are aiming to get that discussion going among the country’s educators… It’s time white people started talking about whiteness." What on earth do you think we’re doing here? No respect.

"Halliburton’s former engineering and construction subsidiary has a contingency contract with the Department of Homeland Security to construct detention facilities in the event of a national emergency." Allow me to translate that for you. You elected a "compassionate conservative" who manufactured a terror threat in order to enrich himself and his bonesmen buddies at Halliburton and the oil companies, and now this terrorist cabal is charging you three to four dollars per gallon of gas and is constructing concentration camps to silence dissent during the next manufactured crisis. 

Alexander Solzhenitsyn can tell you what happens next: "Before the camps, I regarded the existence of nationality as something that shouldn’t be noticed—nationality did not really exist, only humanity. But in the camps one learns: if you belong to a successful nation you are protected and you survive. If you are part of universal humanity—too bad for you." He’s using the word "nation" in the biblical and pre-Lincolnian sense. He believed "that the disappearance of nations would have impoverished us no less than if all men had become alike, with one personality and one face. Nations are the wealth of mankind, its collective personalities; the very least of them wears its own special colours and bears within itself a special facet of divine intention." That’s Kinism, folks, plain and simple.

We could learn important things from Solzhenitsyn about the threats we face, but the Jews have ensured that his last two books have not even been printed in English. He’s an "anti-Semite," you see, which means that he tells the truth about Jews. In The Gulag Archipelago, which had to be smuggled out of the Soviet Union on microfilm, he informed an incredulous world that the Jewish Bolsheviks had murdered 66 million in Russia from 1918 to 1957.  It’s not hard to understand why Germans gave Hitler so much power to keep Communism at bay. In his book Two Hundred Years Together, the Nobel Prize winner explains the role of the Jews in the Bolshevik revolution and Soviet purges. You can’t read about this because it presents a problem for Holocaustianity propaganda, and anything the Jews don’t like they try to outlaw, like the First Amendment. "Everything you add to the truth subtracts from the truth," said Solzhenitsyn. Like prefixing "Judeo" to the word "Christian." "Live not by lies," he said.

"Until I came to the West myself and spent two years looking around, I could never have imagined to what an extreme degree the West had actually become a world without a will, a world gradually petrifying in the face of the danger confronting it… All of us are standing on the brink of a great historical cataclysm, a flood that swallows up civilisation and changes whole epochs." ~ Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago

"At what exact point, then, should one resist? When one’s belt is taken away? When one is ordered to face into a corner? When one crosses the threshold of one’s home?… And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?" [Vigilante justice.] "...After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps were out at night for no good purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you’d be cracking the skull of a cutthroat. Or what about the Black Maria sitting out there on the street with one lonely chauffeur? What if it had been driven off or its tires spiked? The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!… If...if… We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more - we had no awareness of the real situation… We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward." ~ Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago

"If the book be false in its facts, disprove them; if false in its reasoning, refute it. But, for God’s sake, let us freely hear both sides, if we choose." ~ President Thomas Jefferson

We’re now officially $59 trillion in debt (a lowball figure), and your family’s share is $516,348. The paper in your wallet is utterly worthless.

This quote from the great John Taylor of Caroline has a lot of bearing on the epithets with which we are routinely labeled: "Political words of all others are the most indefinite, on account of the constant struggle of power to enlarge itself by tortured construction of terms." Like the word "racist."

Are you familiar with Texe Marrs? He used to be a spokesman for the "Religious Wrong." He was tight with Falwell and the other impostors, appeared regularly on "Point of View" with Marlin Maddoux, and was associated with Don Wildmon’s American Family Association. Now he is treated like a leper by these Judeochristians because he speaks against Jew worship. We don’t agree with everything he says, such as his KJV-only fanaticism, but that’s okay because we only agree with ourselves 85% of the time. We’re just glad to know that there are still Christians in the world who are not Jew-worshipers.

I pray you, think, you question with the Jew.
You may as well go stand upon the beach
And bid the main flood bate his usual height;
You may as well use question with the wolf
Why he hath made the ewe bleat for the lamb;
You may as well forbid the mountain pines
To wag their high tops and to make no noise
When they are fretten with the gusts of heaven;
You may as well do any thing most hard,
As seek to soften that – than which what’s harder? –
His Jewish heart.
~ William Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice

Mestizos cross the border into White areas because Whites have made those areas better, not into New Mexico, which is already filled with mestizos. Out of 50 states, NM is ranked 48 at people living below the poverty line, 47 at median family income, 49 at people without health insurance, 47 at high school dropouts, 48 at death due to firearms, 46 at violent crime. And the mestizo with the Anglo name, who has been governor of this state for five years, has the audacity to run for emperor. So your choices for emperor next year are: a mestizo, a negroid, a lesbian, and assorted baby-killers and adulterers. Yet "conservatives" will somehow select a champion race horse from this crowd. You know, because they’re trying to make incremental gains in reclaiming America for traditional values like democracy and capitalism.

When pre-Pope Ratzinger voiced his opposition to Turkey’s entrance to the European Union, the Vatican was quick to respond that this was merely Ratzinger’s personal view. Now it appears that Ratzinger has "grown in office," as the liberals used to say about conservatives who bent to the left after being elected. Ratzinger and a Monsignor now say the Vatican "desires" Turkish EU membership so that Whites and Muslims can "build together a common good in the European sphere and in the sphere of the world community." The Vatican also desires for America to be overwhelmed with mestizos, who are foreign to us in every way. Let me put it to you people very simply: Christianity that mandates open borders is not Christianity at all. It is a counterfeit.

Nothing like that Ole Time Religion, Pharisee style, to shake and rattle those evangelidiots who continue to believe that these imps of Satan are still God’s Chosen. Perhaps Reverend Hagee can come up with a rabbi alibi from scripture for this kosher pederast: http://bradgreenberg.blogspot.com/2007/06/orthodox-rabbi-and-manboy-love-assoc.html