One of the very best blogs in existence - possibly the very best - is "Cambria Will Not Yield." Some recent highlights follow.
What are we to say of those conservatives who feel that every solution is political? "They want us to vote for anti-immigration candidates and to write protest letters and sign petitions. Those types of measures work when those who govern have not declared your race of people as non-people, but when you have been declared a non-person no candidate will be permitted to run who represents your interests and no letter you write or petition you sign will be taken seriously. There is no solution to the white man’s dilemma within the confines of democratic government… Democratic government is no longer a means to an end in the countries of the West. It is the end… Shakespeare is the supreme poet of the West. He speaks to us still, reaching out over the years as if the years were only a few short days. In Hamlet he depicts a young King, a legitimate King, who has a quite natural horror of shedding human blood. But as the full meaning of kingship and kinship comes upon him, he courageously, despite augury, does what needs to be done. He realizes that he cannot turn to anyone else to ’set it right.’ He is the legitimate king. If he won’t fight for legitimacy, who will? And so it is with the white Christian remnant. We are the legitimate heirs of the civilization of Europe. If we won’t fight for it, who will?" Certainly not Salvadorans or Kenyans or Koreans or any other neo-American. This is precisely what Kinists have said for years. We believe in republican government but know that it can only work on a smaller, homogeneous scale. And what has been the record of popular rule? Has it succeeded in protecting us from aliens as kings have done? Not at all. I’ll be excited about congresses and parliaments when they have the will to expel hostile aliens, as Ferdinand and Isabella and many other great monarchs have done.
"Our Revolution, so wise in its conception and so glorious in its execution, was the mere assertion by adults of the rights of adults, and had nothing more to do with philosophy than the weaning of a calf. It was the act of a people seeking national independence, not the Utopian scheme of speculative philosophers, seeking to establish human equality and social perfection… Throw our paper platforms, preambles and resolutions, guaranties and constitutions, into the fire, and we should be none the worse off, provided we retained our institutions - and the necessities that begat, and have, so far, continued them." ~ George Fitzhugh
It’s very easy to compress the scope of history and generalize that our fathers were built of sterner stuff. While it may be true to a certain degree, G.K. Chesterton knew that heroism is the instinctive response of the honorable meek to tribulation. He wrote in chapter 12 of Heretics: "Many modern Englishmen talk of themselves as the sturdy descendants of their sturdy Puritan fathers. As a fact, they would run away from a cow. If you asked one of their Puritan fathers, if you asked Bunyan, for instance, whether he was sturdy, he would have answered, with tears, that he was as weak as water. And because of this he would have borne tortures."
"If I don’t see the honor code, I don’t see Christianity. Bush can blab about his ‘born again’ status all year long, but I know he is not a Christian because he has no honor. He has nothing but the secularized law, and the law, divorced from Christianity, is a whore." Christians ought not be joined to whores. John Calvin believed that Christians ought not oppose ungodly rulers but rather outlive them. John Knox took a different approach, calling it blasphemy to submit to the ungodly. It was Knox, rather than Calvin, who was the founder of America. I believe that Knox’s understanding of Romans 13 is the correct one. That chapter was written to Christians. It has nothing to do with pagans and Judeochristians.
"This is one of the most glorious pages in the history of the European peoples, and it is presented – and believed to be by Southern and Northern white liberals – as an infamous period of white history."
"’Place a hand on my kith and kin and I’ll find you and kill you though all the forces of hell stand in my way,’ was the sentiment of William Tell."
"I will forgive much if a man is sound on the race issue, and I will forgive nothing if he is not."
"Why do the Old and New Testaments read like fairy tale books and why does our Lord speak in parables if we were meant to theorize about God in the manner and style of the heathen Greeks?"
"In the 50’s and 60’s, it was possible to be polite with well-meaning people who really believed all black people were just like the black people in To Kill a Mockingbird and A Patch of Blue. But one can’t be polite to those people any longer. The issue has become too clear, too deadly clear, to permit country club whites to bask in the warmth of Western culture while simultaneously handing that culture and the people who created it over to savages. It is a war, not one we chose, but a war nonetheless… Tennyson longed for a leader that would not lie. I long for a leader that is not afraid to be called a racist."
"The colored invasion will not be a slight alteration in British customs; it will be the end of Britain. All her history will be lost, and the ‘blessed plot’ of earth will be no more, for the colored invaders, be they devotees of voodoo, disciples of Mohammed, or followers of Hinduism, are all united in their hatred of white, Christian Britain… So, to conquer the inexorable we must dive down to the depths of our sacred heritage, pluck from it the European gauntlet, and fling it in the collective face of the invading armies of color."
Revilo Oliver: "When Cortes and his small but valiant band of iron men conquered the teeming empire of the Aztecs, he was immediately followed by a train of earnest missionaries, chiefly Franciscans, who began to preach the Gospel to the natives and soon sent home, with naïve enthusiasm, glowing accounts of the conversions they had effected. Their pious sincerity and innocent joy still lives in the pages of Father Shagun, Father Torquemada, and many others. For their sake I am glad that the poor Franciscans never suspected how small a part they played in the religious conversions that gave them such happiness. Far, far more persuasive than their sermons and their book had been the Spanish cannon that breached and shattered the Aztec defenses, and the ruthless Spanish soldiers who slew the Aztec priests at their own altars and toppled the Aztec idols from the sacrificial pyramids." As Cambria points out, only White men converted to Christianity when they were strong. They were not made Christians at the point of the sword. This is a unique fact of history. Non-Whites have accepted Christianity, sometimes only nominally, when Whites have been powerful and have returned to their false gods when Whites have been weak. We are now in a time of weakness, and we are urged to envision the faith as colored men, which is a faith that grows more unorthodox with each passing year.
"[Y]ou always should campaign for what you deem as right, being fully aware of its impossibility for the present, because a victory in which you do not achieve your goal is not a victory… Human beings in the aggregate, but not in every particular, will always go with the powerful rather than the principled… When the Saxons supplanted the Welsh, it was a tragedy because the Welsh culture was Christian and the Saxon culture was not. But over time, the Saxons adopted Christianity and formed a Christian culture. They were the superior culture when the largely pagan, partly Christian Normans invaded. And over time the Saxon culture Christianized the Normans. But it will not be thus when the people of color complete their invasion. Only the white European adopts, if he sees it as superior to his own, the religion of the conquered. The nations of color have never adopted the religion of a conquered people. They respect only strength, and a conquered people’s religion is seen as weak."
"The idea that white Christian churches can export a new, pure, nonwhite Christianity to other cultures is ludicrous. The Church has not stopped exporting white Christianity to other non-white nations; it has simply stopped exporting healthy, integral Christianity and is instead exporting decadent, liberal Christianity under the guise of a purer, non-racist brand of Christianity… One can only love the stranger when one has learned to love one’s own kith and kin. To short circuit the kith-and-kin system, which has worked well for thousands of years (why has the Faith diminished as more ‘enlightened’ views of race have gained ascendancy in the churches?), and to replace it with a bloodless racial universalism will ultimately lead to the extinction of the Christian Faith." And we’re almost there. "The white blood is an essential support for Christianity. Without it there would still be Christian churches, but there would be no Faith left on earth."
"Samuel Huntington has created a minor stir in academia by arguing in his book, Who Are We?, that the core culture of America is Anglo-Protestant. But he has created only a minor stir because he tells everyone in the introduction to his book that the preservation of the Anglo-Protestant culture, which he admires, does not depend on the survival of the Anglo-Protestant people who created it." Why is this false? "It is false because the Incarnation is true… A particular people created Western civilization in response to the love of a particular God. To claim that another people can carry the burden of that civilization and defend that civilization is the same as saying that all children should be placed, at birth, in a giant supermarket where they can be distributed at random to anybody who comes into the store. Christianity does not destroy ties of kinship and ties of blood. It deepens them. A curse on all those who would sever those ties which are the ties that bind us to Him."
Truly ye come of The Blood; slower to bless than to ban.
Leave a Reply