Watch as Taki T and Peter Brimelow turn on Michael Jones for speaking openly about "Jewish contributions to the Civil Rights movement, and to various revolutionary movements throughout history in general." Taki says Jones is "right on" but "too strident." Brimelow, who calls Jones a "Catholic bigot," is particularly upset that C-SPAN filmed the conference at which these men spoke but did not air it, presumably because Jones did not fawn over Jews, which is the preoccupation not only of paleconservatives but of the entire world.
And just why does Brimelow denounce Jones as a bigot? For beautifully-crafted statements like this: "If what’s left of the WASP establishment or the paleoconservatives or other men of good will want to do something effective in the culture wars, they will have to understand just who the enemy is in this battle. But in order to understand that, they will have to go back well beyond the ‘60s to understand what is going on. In order to answer that question we have to go back well beyond the 18th century, in fact 1800 years beyond it, back to the opening shot in the culture wars. This battle began 2000 years ago, at the foot of the cross, when Annas and Caiaphas, the Jewish high priests said to Jesus Christ, ‘If you come down from the cross, we will accept you as our Messiah.’ Needless to say, Jesus did not come down from the cross, and because he didn’t the Jews rejected Him, chose Barabbas, and became revolutionaries, condemned to seek heaven on earth by following one false Messiah after another from Simon bar Kokhbar, to Shabbetai Zevi, to Alex Portnoy, to Paul Wolfowitz… What do Jerusalem under Simon bar Kokhbar, the Soviet Union under Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamanev, and Radek, the short lived Soviet Republics of Bavaria under Kurt Eisner and Eugene Levine and Hungary under Bela Kun, the racial Apartheid state known as Israel under terrorists like Menachem Begin or Itzhak Shamir, or the neocon never-never land known as a free and democratic Iraq have in common? Death is what they have in common. Lots of people have to die to bring about the revolutionary Jew’s version of heaven on earth… No country can implement Talmudic thought—as our country has—and not suffer the consequences that rejection of Logos necessarily brings with it."
Alex Linder, though he does not agree with the statement above, also proclaims truths that make palecons quail. He advises: "Quibbling and nibbling is not a success strategy, Brimelow. Speaking the truth and laughing is… I think what really rankles Brimelow is that he knows that Jones offered the truest and fairest tribute to Francis - by showing what he didn’t BUT COULD HAVE and SHOULD HAVE said. Friends tell you what you need to hear, not what you want to hear." Linder asks Jones: "Do you and your Catholics know more about politics or do the jews? Are you able to get Rabbi Glickstein’s anti-Catholic lecture canceled in Tel Aviv, or is he able to shut down your lecture in South Bend?" And if AIPAC hates Catholics rather than Whites, why do they support the invasion of Mexican Catholics?
I agree with Jones that the "revolutionary Jew is our enemy because he is a rejecter of Logos, not because of his DNA." Yet the thrust of his arguments are patently strange. For instance, "The culture wars weren’t racial; they were ethnic… The culture wars are simply not understandable in racial terms." This is partly due, he says, to nappies during the Civil Adultery Movement viewing their Jewish handlers as White. Because of this, "Martin Luther King’s people noticed" that theirs was not a racial struggle. Of Whites, Jones says, "We have no common past… We have no racial identity. We have no common DNA. I am almost tempted to say that we have no we." This moves beyond strange into the realm of the obscene.
We Kinists know very well that our most venomous enemies are not strangers. Matthew 10:36 tells us that our enemies shall be those of our own household. However, Jones actually works against his argument when he notes that Jew-funded William F. Buckley was the trigger man to take out Sam Francis. This merely proves that Buckley is a Jewish lapdog and a traitor, which hardly puts him in a unique situation. I can introduce you to several thousand ministers [sic] of the gospel [sic] who are likewise traitors. Far more significant is that Francis would not have been fired in a country where Christians saw to their own affairs and did not allow pagans and heretics to lead them around by the nose.
The irony is that, though Jones sees three distinct religions (Catholics, Protestants, Jews) at the heart of the Culture Wars, it turns out that while criticizing Catholics and Protestants and the Lord they worship is perfectly acceptable, criticizing Jews is not, and this is why his speech will not be aired on "neutral" C-SPAN.
John Paul II, the Judas Iscariot of our time. He also "praised the Voodoo religion, when he met with its high priests in the African nation of Benin, on the grounds that Voodoo contains ‘the seeds of the Word’!"
The United [sic] States [sic]: a military proxy for Zionism.
How many Christians today are willing, as RJ Rushdoony was, to call the criminalizing of Holohoax denial tyrannical and a violation of the Ninth Commandment?
Leave a Reply