Many thanks to Rushdoony’s Chalcedon Foundation for proclaiming the truth to our dying nation through Chris Ortiz. Jewish supremacy and Michael Hoffman are mentioned in this post. "If the positions of power currently held by Jews in the areas of banking, investment, entertainment, news media, the justice system, lobbying, setting defense policy, etc., were held by conservative Christians, the Christophobics would be marching in the streets over the religious tyranny." In another post, Chris laments the Jewsmedia blackout on the "racially motivated" Knoxville murders. "It was a crime on White kids. Well, how do we respond to that? We don’t. We ignore it. White people deserve it. They had it coming. There will be no march on Knoxville. [Actually, there will, this Saturday!] There are no Sharpton-like advocates for middle-class White kids. If there were, they would be dismissed as racist lunatics - another ‘David Duke.’ The crime itself is racially motivated, and the resultant silence is racially motivated. Most Whites are reluctant to voice their anger because they fear being labeled a bigot. That’s so terribly sad. I’m glad that ethnic groups have their advocates. You need those voices to help insure the well-being of your constituency. The crimes perpetrated against Blacks during the 60s were heinous and evil. But, so is this crime perpertrated against Newsom and Christian. Yet, nobody says a word. Repent, America!" And this is precisely what we want to hear from preachers. As Chris says, their silence is racially motivated, and that’s why we harp on race and faith. We Kinists take seriously the admonition in Proverbs 24:11-12 to "Rescue those being led away to death; hold back those staggering toward slaughter. If you say, ‘But we knew nothing about this,’ does not he who weighs the heart perceive it? Does not he who guards your life know it? Will he not repay each person according to what he has done?"
If you’ve been following the story, as you only could if you’ve been reading blogs, you know that Knoxville’s WVLT TV said: "Since the murders were first reported, several white supremacist and racially focused groups have accused both prosecutors and media of covering up what they see as a racially motivated crime, planning to hold rallies this spring and early summer." In other words, you’re a Klansman if you notice racial motivation. I ask you, what’s the point in getting worked up about ol’ debbil racism? The true danger is in perverting justice, which these days seems to be the exclusive domain of the self-consciously "anti-racist."
The "Knoxville authorities are going to great lengths to justify not filing hate crime charges."
Here’s a good line from ABC News, which took four months to cover the story: "Christian’s father, Gary Christian, wore a Confederate flag T-shirt to the first hearing for one of the defendants and then pointed at the man as if firing a gun." That’s a Southron, my friends. Back in the good old days we could have solved this problem with a rope.
For neo-Americans, the fall of the Confederacy was not the last gasp of Christendom but the commencement of "the one-hundred year process that led to the civil-rights movement." Anthony Bradley assumes that there "must have been NO CHRISTIANS in any cities where blacks were being lynched for things like ‘insulting a white woman.’" Actually, this proves that there were plenty of Christians in those days. Christians avenge rape, and sometimes vigilante justice is the only kind of justice. Vigilantism is the only thing that held abolitionist criminals in check, botgh before and after the War. Until 1974, homicide in Texas was legal "when committed by the husband upon the person of anyone taken in the act of adultery with the wife, provided the killing takes place before the parties to the act have separated" (Texas Penal Code 1925, article 1220). The cuckolded husband casts the Paul Hill matter in an interesting light, does it not? I believe it was Gary North who argued that Hill’s actions would only have been justified if he had killed the murderer while committing the very act of abortion. We are told by one commenter on Bradley’s page that it is evil for a White man to be proud of being "an eighth generation southern Presbyterian" or revere his slave-owning ancestors as "spiritual fathers." It is then called a violation of the book of James that Negroes were not granted officership in White churches. Dabney, Thornwell, Machen, and Jonathan Edwards are called racists. But can you imagine the state of churches at that time if Negroes rather than "racists" had guided them?
Here’s an excellent essay by our old friend George McDaniel. Did you know that the first woman in the U.S. Senate, Rebecca Latimer Felton, said that lynchings were by far preferable to allowing rapes to go unpunished?
I warned those representative men of the terrible effects that were already seen in the corruption of the Negro vote… That week there were seven lynchings in Georgia from the fearful crime of rape. I told them that these…would grow and increase with every election where white men equalized themselves at the polls with an inferior race and controlled their votes by bribery and whiskey. A crime nearly unknown before and during the war had become an almost daily [occurrence]… [I]f it takes lynching to protect woman’s dearest possession from drunken, ravening human beasts, then I say lynch a thousand a week.
George writes: "It was a horrible, brutal crime brought about by a terrible necessity. All of them were adamant, however, that if vigilantism was the only way to protect white womanhood, then so be it."
"Large swaths of Baltimore could be declared emergency areas subject to heightened police enforcement—including a lockdown of streets—under a city councilman’s proposal that aims to slow the city’s climbing homicide count." I’ll give you two guesses as to what Baltimore has in abundance. No, not Mennonites. Try again. And don’t even get me started on Cincinnati. Why are the hearts of Christians so filled with hatred for their wives and daughters?
Houses are cheaper than cars in colored Detroit and children in colored India are cheaper than buffaloes.
"Controversial Latino groups, including the National Council of La Raza, were granted virtual veto power over the immigration bill hammered out yesterday by Senate Republicans, Democrats and the White House, the Washington Post reported." And though wetbacks have broken every other immigration law, we really, really expect them to obey this one, and if they don’t, we’ll have to pass another. Take Ted Kennedy, for instance. In 1965 he said: "The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs." In 1986 he said: "This amnesty will give citizenship to only 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal aliens. We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this." In 2007 he says: "Now it is time for action. 2007 is the year we must fix our broken system." The illegal will be declared legal, the lion will lie down with the lamb, and the ghetto will burst forth in song.
Leave a Reply