It seems that the media is focusing on Mike Nifong, the DA in the Duke case, in order to detract attention from the "nappy-headed ho" who should be severely punished for what she did to the Duke athletes. There is serious talk about suing him but not her. Another case of Whites being held to a higher standard.

The outrage over what Don Imus said was clearly manufactured, especially when it is compared to what is seen and heard on cable TV every day. (I thought about posting some "ho" lyrics from Beyonce, but then I remembered my baptism.) As was mentioned earlier, CBS is owned by Viacom, which also owns MTV, of which Jew Les Moonves, who fired Imus, is co-head. MTV is the reason why negroid words like "ho" have entered the mainstream vernacular. The Jews who pump this bilge now hypocritically feign outrage and use a White man as their scapegoat. But they have no intention of changing their spots; they’ve always been pornographers, and dogs always return to their vomit.

The Christian outrage over this website and Little Geneva are also manufactured and Pavlovian. The same sods who pay cash money to bring cable TV filth into their homes - this includes many pastors I know - love to moralize about websites that cost them nothing. Likewise, those who didn’t like the Don Imus show could turn it off. This is not to excuse his blasphemies but merely to point out the hypocrisy that those who inflated two words that Imus uttered into a national crisis are the same who first readily believed Crystal Gail Mangum’s lies and even now are trying to portray her as some sort of victim.  The Duke athletes didn’t have the luxury of tuning her out as Don Imus could have been tuned out. They are scapegoats too, as are all White men.

The hyperbole is also very interesting. When the Rutgers she-men showed up to their press conference (with ironed hair, of course), one of them said, "Not only did he steal our dreams, he hurt our character...our state, and all who have been associated." That sounds pretty serious. Should people this fragile be throwing basketballs at each other?

"Aren’t you tired of perpetually injured and whining blacks who think that their crocodile tears are like exotic jewels of emotion?  Perhaps my favorite moment in their latest weepy and slightly drunken racial lamentation was this response by, of all people, Al Roker: ‘I cannot tell you how many people have asked me about my thoughts on Don Imus.’ You’re a huge liar, Al.  No one will ever ask you about your thoughts on anything.  But the notion that, when some mildly edgy or tasteless remark makes us cry, we turn to a fat, cheerfully inane clown weatherman for words of healing is proof that we are but characters in an epic satire set in a world of sniveling morons… And as if to compete in this Olympics of emotional menstruation, whites everywhere have reacted with comical petrification and status-seeking.  As Steve Sailer points out, these donnybrooks of racial outrage give people the opportunity to display their moral and class superiority through flagellation of race criminals and advancement of a racial spoils system.  It is the secret to their behavior, more so than claims of ‘guilt’ which few if any whites genuinely feel about anything.  Guilt may motivate us to conceal things about ourselves, but it does not make us preen… Because contemporary racial outrage depends on status-seeking whites, the main antidote to it is shaming the preeners in their own language of moral condemnation.  As it happens this is quite easy to do, as every one of them is a fraud and hypocrite.  It is important though that they be laughed at and mocked when they are shamed, for this is something moral preeners cannot withstand (this is why they attack ridicule and humor with particular vengeance).  It is the one response that robs them of their status."

Housekeeping is racist, and so are slippers. So are sofas.

I suspect that Leon Trotsky, the Communist, would be pleased with how the etymology of his word, racism, has evolved. Wikipedia, the OED of our age, defines racism as "a belief system or doctrine which assumes inherent biological differences between human races, which determine cultural or individual behaviour." If you happen to notice that Asians are continually at the top in measures of intelligence and at the bottom in measures of aggression, regardless of environmental factors, just keep telling yourself that you’re not a racist. It’ll be good for your career. But that’s not all. "Some commentators describe racism as preference for one’s own ethnic group (ethnocentrism or ethnic nationalism), fear of foreigners (xenophobia), views against interracial relationships (anti-miscegenation), and/or generalizations about a specific group of people (stereotype)." I honestly don’t know anyone who is not a racist, according to this definition, which renders the word rather useless. Of course, it goes without saying that the whole world was avowedly racist before Franz Boas and Gunnar Myrdal preached an anti-Christian religion that Christians have since adopted. Their strong faith compels them that 2,000 years passed before Jews instructed the world in the ways of righteousness.