Long Day’s Journey into Knoxville
Be sure to listen to the Political Cesspool tomorrow night. The first hour will feature activists discussing the (second) rally to be held in Knoxville, TN, this Saturday at 1 pm. Be there if you can! Patriots will gather once again at the old county courthouse to force the Jew media to report on White ethnic cleansing. And the Jews are being compelled to comment on it, but only through their own Satanic prism. They and their lackeys keep saying that the police don’t call the Knoxville murders hate crimes, so it’s no big surprise that the stories have not been reported.
Here’s an example where you can drink in the pseudo-wisdom of the Negro mind enthralled to his Jewish masters. You can see that it was entitled "The Loonies of Knoxville" when it was published in Seattle. In the Baltimore Sun it was entitled "Racial Oppression is a One Way Street!" That’s called balanced journalism, folks. He keeps bringing up the Duke rape case, apparently oblivious to the fact that it was not a rape at all. He drips contempt not only for the victims but for their mourners, who are called "loonies," "lunatic fringe," "white supremacists," "abysmally, stupidly, self-servingly wrong," "crackpots, incendiaries and flat-out racists," "obscene and ludicrous." He ends his screed with this: "I have four words for them and any other white Americans who feel themselves similarly victimized. Cry me a river."
We’re proud that scurrilous Youtube videos are mentioned in this article on the New Jew-Free Media, since ours was the best and most popular of the Youtube videos produced two weeks ago. (Anything we can do to further the noble cause of Hate.) Here’s a funny line from the article: "Neo-Nazis and other white supremacists have jumped on the case as well, drawn to the state where the Ku Klux Klan was founded in 1865. Hate groups have organized rallies in Knoxville and set up Web sites under the victims’ names to spew racial invective." Yeah, that’s the only reason for outrage over the brutal murders. It just wouldn’t be the same if it had occurred in West Virginia. I’m sure most people think of the KKK when they think of Tennessee, just as they think of terrorism when they think of Israel. (God bless our mounted knights who protected White chastity and property during the Yankee-funded reign of terror called "Reconstruction." God bless them to the 10th generation.) And you know what "racial invective" is, don’t you? Using racial statistics when discussing crime.
This article, like most that you’ll read on the subject, is one big lie. It says that blacks are the victims in 68% of "hate crimes." (Lie - see below.) This is why the Jews invented the concept. They had to somehow alter the perception of reality in their readers, in much the same way as one might club a fish over the head to paralyze it before gutting it. Yet how many "hate crimes" has the FBI recorded? Only 5,000. But in 2005, "there were more than 645,000 victims of cross-racial violent crimes between blacks and whites in the U.S. In 90 percent of those crimes, black offenders attacked white victims." Which means that blacks are up to 250 times more likely to do criminal violence to whites than the reverse. The Jewish concept of a "hate crime" is necessary so the DA can say, "This ain’t one," and convince everyone to return to the 24 hour coverage of the Paris Hilton Tragedy. "There is absolutely no proof of a hate crime," said special counsel John Gill. Chris Newsom’s mother makes far more sense: "If this wasn’t a hate crime then I don’t know how you would define a hate crime. It may have started out as a carjacking, but what it developed into was blacks hating whites. To do the things they did, they would have to hate them to do that." Poor Mrs. Newsom doesn’t understand that "hate" crimes, which are punished more severely than "regular" crimes, only take place if the word "nigger" is used. Therefore, her ruddy boy could not possibly have been the victim of a hate crime.
By the way, the FBI reports hate crimes against Hispanics but not by Hispanics because it conflates White and Hispanic stats in order to Jewily skew reality. See The Color of Crime. Blacks are twice as likely as Whites to commit hate crimes. Blacks are as much more dangerous than Whites as men are more dangerous than women.
"Negroes rank proportionately very high in the prison population. In the South, ‘over half the inmates of State prisons are Negroes, and this is true of some prisons in the North.’ Duffy believed that prejudice against the Negro accounted for some of this, although he recognized that these Negro prisoners were guilty men. It is quite likely that sometimes a guilty Negro faces greater severity because of his race, but it is also true much is tolerated and excused in him because of his race also. The Southern pattern for decades was severity in some things (such as rape) and indulgence in many things (such as petty theft, violence between Negroes, drunkenness, and the like)." ~ R.J. Rushdoony, Institutes of Biblical Law, p.382
Apparently, race-mixing women are either ugly, fat, or seldom shave their pits.
Eighty-three percent approve of miscegenation on this, the 40th anniversary of the "Loving" versus Virginia decision. Faithful Christians have obviously dwindled to a small remnant.
At about the 11:30 mark in this sermon, the pastor explains that the biblical prohibition against marrying strangers meant that God’s people were not even to dwell among the strangers.
Here’s a handy lexicon for those of you who are still mired in the quicksand of ignorance, grasping for a vine. My favorite: "color-blind" = "blind."
"The term ‘folk’ has for its primary meaning a group of kindred people, forming a tribe or nation; a people bound together by ties of race, language, religion, custom, tradition, and history. Such a common tie we call folkways. A folk thus possesses a sense of solidarity and is quite different from a conglomerate mass of people. It has most if not all of the characteristics of nationalism. Indeed, it may be contended with much force that there can be no true nationalism where the population does not constitute a folk." ~ Frank L. Owsley, who was quite obviously not a "21st-Century Christian"
Think about that quote. Patriotism and national solidarity do not exist when the Folk have been destroyed. All that remains is the cage-like security of totalitarianism.
Frost_Giant on 06.26.2007 at 01:32 AM
Good thoughts, Elsa. I don’t know. I could be mistaken, but I thought I definitely heard the DA wasn’t going to seek the death penalty. I’d just have to verify it. If it’s in fact true, I think the time for “justice outside the system” has arrived, and I would hope that, after conviction, a stout-hearted group of White men would find a way to engineer a very public lynching. Either way, the whole “hate-crime” thing is a lose-lose situation.
If it’s applied, it grants legitimacy to a ridiculous and superfluous legal innovation that we don’t want. If it’s not, it’s another slap in the face and blatant reminder of the double-standard, which is that Whites now have a less privileged status under the law than any of the cherished darkies.
Elsa Gould on 06.17.2007 at 11:15 PM
Is there a reason my response to Frost Giant wasn’t posted? It was about four days ago, before the most recent post. Just wondering. I’d message you about it but there’s not a way to do so on the site. Since this is moderated, you’ll get this before it would go online.
Thanks
JOHN WILKES BOOTH on 06.16.2007 at 08:51 AM
I’m so glad y’all are taking comments now--that helped make a special community at Little Geneva…
Elsa Gould on 06.14.2007 at 09:17 PM
You’ve more up-to-date info than I have, then, Frost Giant. After reading the list of charges that went on and on and on (but not long enough), I am naive enough to think, “How could they NOT get the death penalty?” Since the charges SO BLATANTLY omitted hate crimes, surely the prosecutor is looking to throw the book at THEM, to serve justice to THEM, even without setting the precedence of the hate crime charge added to deter future violence to whites. After all, people (especially anti-gays) have pointed out that if the CRIME should be punished, what difference does it make if the victim was black, white, gay or straight? Is the charge of “hate crime” making it a “thought crime”?
Frost_Giant on 06.13.2007 at 11:46 PM
^ I know it’s late and all, but that made no sense at all to me. WHY is it a good idea to let the blatant hate-crimes double-standard rear its ugly head yet again, especially in THIS exceedingly heinous case?? The last I heard, the prosecutor wasn’t even seeking the death penalty. Unless that’s inaccurate or has changed, it doesn’t sound much to me like he wants to see them “found guilty and buried.”
Elsa Gould on 06.13.2007 at 04:02 PM
Lemme tell ya why I’m glad they HAVEN’T been charged with hate crimes. I think the prosecutor is smart and wants to see these monsters buried and found guilty with what they’ve already been charged with. I wouldn’t want public sympathy to be played on AT ALL “fo de po black folk,” and miss out on a total conviction of these… THESE! Nail them (and all appropriate body parts) to the wall playing by THEIR OWN rules!