We know that racial affinity and kinship are ubiquitous among human beings and animals, but would you believe that plants fight to be among their own kind as well? "Researchers at McMaster University have found that plants get fiercely competitive when forced to share their pot with strangers of the same species, but they’re accommodating when potted with their siblings… ‘The ability to recognize and favour kin is common in animals, but this is the first time it has been shown in plants,’ said Susan Dudley, associate professor of biology at McMaster University in Hamilton, Canada. ‘When plants share their pots, they get competitive and start growing more roots, which allows them to grab water and mineral nutrients before their neighbours get them. It appears, though, that they only do this when sharing a pot with unrelated plants; when they share a pot with family they don’t increase their root growth. Because differences between groups of strangers and groups of siblings only occurred when they shared a pot, the root interactions may provide a cue for kin recognition.’" Consider the southwest. There are no mestizo-funded hospitals, libraries, or other beneficent organizations even in a place like Los Angeles where mestizos are numerous, in part because the common attitude is to come here and take, not to give, just like these plants which "grab water and mineral nutrients before their neighbours get them." "Though they lack cognition and memory, the study shows plants are capable of complex social behaviours such as altruism towards relatives, says Dudley. Like humans, the most interesting behaviours occur beneath the surface." Gardeners are encouraged to "arrange their plants like they would plan the seating at a dinner party." But when Kinists call for the same kind of segregation, we’re called racists. I prefer to be called a "plantist," but "racist" will do.
I don’t know who writes these things, but someone has defined Kinism as "toned down racism." Whatever. Doesn’t seem too helpful when the word "racism" means a dozen different things. I guess if we’re "toned down," that makes us moderate.
Exorcism, 21st century-style: testing for "hidden racism." The test is being condemned "as a potential ‘Kafkaesque nightmare’ where individuals are penalised for thoughts in their deep subconscious."
Harvard professor Robert Putnam has reluctantly concluded that diversity damages trust and what he calls "social capital." People "act like turtles. The effect of diversity is worse than had been imagined. And it’s not just that we don’t trust people who are not like us. In diverse communities, we don’t trust people who do look like us." The "difference between living in an area as homogeneous as Bismarck, North Dakota, and one as diverse as Los Angeles is roughly as great as the difference between an area with a poverty rate of 7 percent and one with a poverty rate of 23 percent, or between an area with 36 percent college graduates and one with none." Can I just pause for a moment and ask you Christians why you would hate your children so much that you would subject them to "diversity"? Putnam rattles off several ways in which cosmopolitanism fragments communities: Lower confidence in local government, local leaders, and the local news media. Lower political efficacy – that is, confidence in our own influence. Lower frequency of registering to vote, but more interest and knowledge about politics and more participation in protest marches and social reform groups. Less expectation that others will cooperate to solve dilemmas of collective action (e.g., voluntary conservation to ease a water or energy shortage). Less likelihood of working on a community project. Lower likelihood of giving to charity or volunteering. Fewer close friends and confidants. Less happiness and lower perceived quality of life. More time spent watching television and more agreement that "television is my most important form of entertainment." Yet Putnam so loves his job and the respectability it brings that he calls all of this chaos desirable. He is representative of most White folks in this regard. Our people are like Lot in Sodom, willing to sacrifice his own daughters to the fags who want to rape his houseguests. To do otherwise would be bad for business. God have mercy on us, just as He had for Lot. We are pitiful creatures in need of a Savior.
Almost 100% of college kids are in favor of mating with savages, and they make a lot of noise about the joy of diversity, which is a holy sacrament of their religion, but when it comes right down to it, they prefer racism. UCLA "now has so many separate identity-group graduations that scheduling them not to conflict with one another is a challenge. The women’s studies graduation and the Chicana/Chicano studies graduation are both set for 10 a.m. Saturday. The broader Hispanic graduation, ‘Raza,’ is in near-conflict with the black graduation, which starts just an hour later… A gay student with a Native American father and a Filipino mother could attend the Asian, Filipino, and American Indian ceremonies, plus the mainstream graduation and the Lavender Graduation for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgendered students."
"Two things are necessary for the continued existence of a race: it must remain itself, and it must breed its best. Every race is the result of ages of development which evolves specialized capacities that make the race what it is and render it capable of creative achievement. These specialized capacities (which particularly mark the superior races), being relatively recent developments, are highly unstable… [W]hen a highly specialized stock interbreeds with a different stock, the newer, less stable, specialized characters are bred out, the variation, no matter how great its potential value to human evolution, being irretrievably lost. And, of course, the more primitive a type is, the more [predominant] it is. This is why crossings with the Negro are uniformly fatal." ~ Lothrop Stoddard, The Rising Tide of Color, 1920
Leave a Reply