He is the Very Model of a Modern Major Pain in the Ass
Ron Paul calls a faggot Communist adulterer pederast rapist his "hero." Happy Take a Boy to Bed Day!
There was a lot of grief in the media about the Clintons being racist, but I considered it unworthy of comment because it was so obvious that Obamination and his wife and staff and supporters were lying about what the Clintons said and meant. Here’s the lesson, though: "If the media is willing to insinuate that Bill Clinton is a racist just to prop up Obama, just think what they’ll say about EVERYONE ELSE!"
Obama has lied about his racist pastor honoring Farrakhan for humanitarian work. "You can watch the three minute video tribute to Farrakhan that the Wrights posted on Youtube on 11/4/07 and see that they are praising Farrakhan to the high heavens for his stance on race in general."
Wouldn’t it be amazing if Romney and Obama are their parties’ nominees for president? Romney’s great-grandfather was a polygamist and Obama’s father was a polygamist. Romney is a heretic who makes flippy floppy and Obama is an agnostic pretending to be a Christian by joining a racist church.
The overwhelming majority of black men support Obamination (83% in Nevada), but it has nothing to do with skin color, of course. Blacks don’t really notice skin color. They’re all about content of character. But seriously, it’s amazing how everyone on the news is talking about an "insignificant" "social construct" (race) being so important for forming political "coalitions." Whites for Whites, blacks for blacks, women for women, and newcomer mestizos for whichever minority promises the most to them. Yet when elderly Whites do not vote for Obama, this is somehow evidence of their racism. Only then do neo-Babelists fret over race playing a role in voting decisions.
I heard some jabbering heads say that McCain’s victory in South Carolina is a triumph of good over evil since he now calls for the removal of the Confederate flag from a memorial pole. Eight years ago, he admitted that he was too scared to call for its removal. It was hard enough for him to avoid speaking at BJU where interracial dating was prohibited. But Huckabee got almost the same number of votes on Saturday, and he believes the flag is a state issue. He has a very good line, saying that if outsiders came to his state and told him what to do with his flag, he would tell them what to do with the pole. But this boldness on the part of McCain may ultimately be spun as what sealed his nomination, even though it’s not true.
It’s also very interesting to watch the old "Reagan coalition" collapse. And as it does, it’s worth recalling that Reagan, the only Republican president with lasting popularity in the 20th century, was swept into office largely by Christians who had organized under Jerry Falwell’s Moral Majority and similar grassroots efforts. And that would not have happened if Falwell had not made a name for himself by opposing racial integration mandates and creating private schools as safe harbors for White Christian children. So don’t forget that as our kinsmen have lost their way, they have really lost their way. Reaganite "conservatism" was never anything more than inspirational but meaningless catchphrases, much like the typical church sermon of recent generations - a shining city on a hill where philanderer Michael King is honored. Voters are still looking for someone to inspire them, but they continue to live on borrowed capital, much like our economy, which has been buoyed for decades by nothing more than speculation. It was "racism" that gave birth to the conservatism that propelled Ronald Reagan, for good or ill, into office. Now, in the almost complete absence of any political substance to sustain our kin, "conservatives," who have never conserved anything, will soon discover how far down the road their vehicle of Equality will carry them.
"The Bob Jones policy on interracial dating, I mean I spoke out on interracial dating. I spoke out against that. I spoke out against interracial dating. I mean, I support inter - the policy of interracial dating." ~ George W. Bush, February 25, 2000, CBS News
Princess Diana’s mother called her a whore for her interracial copulation. Mothers are always right. Britney is following in Diana’s footsteps.
Beware of all whoredom, my son.
I have a message from Shakespeare for all the miscegenists out there, like Othello: "[Thou] shall stand in fire up to the navel and in ice up to th’heart, and there th’offending part burns and the deceiving part freezes."
When Yankee law made sense. "Section 3 [of the Illinois Code] declares [interracial] marriages null and void, and anyone seeking to be married in violation of this law was to be given 39 lashes and imprisoned for up to one year. Any official who presided at the marriage of different races faced a fine of not less than $200 and would be ineligible for any future office in the state. By 1845, it was illegal for people of differing races to cohabit. Those who did so were believed to be living in an ‘open state of adultery and fornication.’ Anyone convicted of violating this law was subject to a fine of up to $500 and imprisonment for not more than a year. If this was not a sufficient deterrent, ‘for the second offense the punishment shall be double, for the third treble, and in the same ratio for each succeeding offense.’"
"Far from the liberal affair that abolition became in America, abolition in England was peaceful and resulted in the repatriation of most free blacks back to Africa. The cause of abolition in England that Wilberforce took up was often associated with keeping Britain white and preventing her reliance on alien labor."
I heard a very interesting show from Greg Koukl of Stand to Reason (July 22, 2007). In one part J.P. Moreland was exulting over the evidence that Christianity is sweeping the globe. He qualifies that the "Christianity" is sensationalistic and is spreading among "power cultures," meaning that it is manifested through "prophecy" or through "visions" of angels and the like to those who view its worth in terms of might. I don’t necessarily dispute the rise of Christian faith, but I know how White people think. They constantly hope that everyone in the world will become like them, and are rarely discouraged even though this never pans out. They’re like Paternalistic Pollyannas. Mr. Koukl also said that some men, such as Ken Ham of the Mulatto Dating Service and Doug Phillips of the Ministry Mafia, are placing heavy and unscriptural burdens on believers by insisting that the Bible teaches an age of 6,000 years for the universe. Koukl says this may or may not be a correct inference from the text, but the Bible simply does not teach it.
The part that really sparked my interest was a discussion of "hate crimes." Here’s an article that Mr. Koukl has written about it, if you don’t want to listen to the show. It’s mostly excellent. (I’m sure you realize, though, that no major evangelical figure can write or speak about such a hot topic without emoting in order to connect with women. Not once, but twice, he says that he cried when he read about faggot Matthew Shepherd being dragged behind a truck. Do grown men really cry when they read the newspaper?) He explains that never, until recent neo-Babelist times, has the law punished motive. The whole purpose of degree, such as in the case of murder, is not to pile on additional penalties but to allow for mercy in the case of probable accident. Now thought itself has been made a crime, as we can see from all the good men, such as Ernst Zundel, who are imprisoned for nothing more than what they believe. (And now even Zundel’s lawyer is going to jail for thought-crimes. And of course, the pastors who spend so much time emoting for women have no time to speak out against such atrocities.) And here’s the rub: any crime of passion involves motive and malice, which is to say that every murder is a "hate" crime. According to Webster’s New World Dictionary, "Hate implies a feeling of great dislike or aversion, and, with persons as the object, connotes the bearing of malice." The purpose of hate crime legislation is to skew crime statistics against Whites, not to seek justice for victims, and not primarily to disparage Christianity. Justice is supposed to be blind, but these phony laws protect groups rather than individuals. "Yet how does one make sense of a crime against a group that is a different crime from the one against the victim?" (And they are not the only laws that do this. We also have laws protecting the impersonal entity called the corporation. Thus, if a corporation ruins your life, you can sue the corporation’s bank account, but no person will have to pay for the crime.) The hypocrisy is obvious: The motive of the "hate" criminal is punished while the motives of those who are engaged in genocide against Whites and Christians is rewarded. The secular, satanic courts weigh these motives in their rigged balance to decide which more closely aligns with their feelings du jour. Yet by their own standards, other assaults animated by emotion are considered less abhorrent. "Generally, passion is a mitigating factor." Unless the Ox of Equality is the one being gored, and then the rules change. "Is a hit-man more noble because he lacks emotional connection to his victim?… The government is not as concerned with the hateful state of mind as it is with the particular group of people the hate is directed toward." On his show, Koukl used the example of a black man being called a nigger while he is beaten to death. The use of that word alone will give the murderer a much longer prison sentence. But as Koukl says, the use of that word does not necessarily imply racial hatred. Words are used all the time, when passions run high, that are not punishable for the very reason that passions run high.
Even the neocons at the Weekly Jew Standard see through the case of The Amazing Disappearing Hate Crime.
Does it make sense to anyone that Britain, the most crowded country on the European mainland, is building 2 million homes for migrants? "It means 263 houses must go up every day until 2026—the equivalent of five cities the size of Birmingham during the next 18 years."
The word "multiculturalism" has lost its luster. But it can still be used in a sentence. For instance, "My cows got out of the fence, and for an hour I had to walk around shoveling multiculturalism."
Says a man of his hometown, "I feel like an alien, like I’m on a street in Karachi." Thank a Christian.
One person can make a difference.
Freakish-looking Jessica Alba tells Elle Magazine that almost all of the leading ladies in Hollywood are "Aryan." Of course they are, because actors are supposed to be beautiful, just like hunters are supposed to have beer guts.
Like any red-blooded American, I despise French philosophy. Ernest Renan was one who tried to define the word "nation" and called it "a spiritual principle." That’s not entirely wrong, but it’s so far from being accurate that it might as well be wrong. According to Renan, "Man is a slave neither of his race nor his language, nor of his religion, nor of the course of rivers nor of the direction taken by mountain chains." I’m sure Thoreau would have agreed. But I do dearly love this line: "The Spartan song - ‘We are what you were; we will be what you are’ - is, in its simplicity, the abridged hymn of every patrie."
"What makes a people and a nation is a common and unique homeland and people, history and heritage, language and literature, song and story, traditions and customs." ~ Pat Buchanan
"Sustained generational participation in a nation’s historical tapestry is to civilized society what memory is to individual identity." ~ Bret McAtee
In 1946, Dr. Elton Trueblood (excellent name), a Quaker, wrote that when people find loyalty and homogeneity in their denomination, it "helps them to honor their fathers and mothers… This has never tempted me to despise non-Quakers or to suppose that other heritages are less honorable, and it has not hindered my loyalty to the Church Universal any more than my loyalty to my state has hindered my loyalty to my nation." This is equally true, if not more true, of racial heritage. "It is widely agreed that character is formed, not primarily by overt moral teaching, but far more by the sense of belonging. People grow by virtue of social membership… Conscious membership is the most powerful single stimulus in all human behavior. The mere notion of sharing in the life of a particular family may be a great incentive to better living. There are many who remember all their lives the special standards of their families, so that they can say, when a crisis arises, ‘Browns don’t do that.’" Throughout all of human history, virtue has won out over vice because a man remembers his father and his fathers and his people, and senses within himself, when all other senses fail him, that he must not shame them. This is what William Faulkner called "the fierce pull of blood." As Ehud writes in his typically brilliant way, tribalism (or Kinism) is "filial as much as ecclesiastic… [I]n order to honor our mothers and fathers we find ourselves obligated to promote the very state of affairs which will incline our hearts toward our ancestors." In other words, don’t hold your breath in the hope that a nation can survive on common religious faith alone, as your lying pastor is telling you. Common blood is needed too.
"Blood, honour, soil, faith and folk." It should be intuitive that a rich heritage is a well-understood heritage, and a well-understood heritage is an old heritage that has been renewed by corporate practice. But what do we hear from neo-Babelists today? We are told that the more multiracial a person is, the richer his heritage. On the contrary, a mongrel has no heritage at all, and this deficit of character prevents him from contributing to the growth and virtue of a people. We don’t even need to guess the destiny of such a disconnected and inwardly divided soul.
Failure to be as "racist" as our forefathers has led to numerous problems, some of which you may not realize. Ehud describes one of these: "Nowadays of course, ‘a jury of one’s peers’ has been stood upon its head to mean ‘impartial witness’ but its original and traditional meaning was ‘a group with vested interest.’ ‘A jury of one’s peers’ was by definition a group composed of relatives and neighbors of the accused. A community thereby would accept the inevitable consequences of their own rulings; if they exonerated a murderer they would still have to live next door to that individual and they would be subject to possible indictment themselves. In this way, those responsible for any possible subversion of justice would be directly impacted by their own malfeasance. Conversely, if the community dispensed a death sentence where none was warranted, they could be convicted of murder themselves or at minimum, suffer the preservation and emboldening of Murderers and Pedophiles amongst them." The new methods of jurisprudence are "disaster by design."
How long do you Christians expect religious fidelity to survive when social structures, cultures, and blood have been mixed beyond recognition? This is why David Duke summarizes Carleton Putnam’s thesis in Race and Reason as the "belief that a civilization is the product of the particular racial group that created it and that demographic replacement of the founding race, through race-mixing, immigration, and differential birthrates, will diminish and ultimately destroy the vitality of the culture and civilization." And religious faith as well. The double-minded way in which some men imagine the kingdom of God to be polyglot rather than bounded, and teach their children that race is insignificant, is what the great R.L. Dabney called "blind conservatism which saves the shell while it loses the kernel." Oddly enough, this is exactly what blind presbyterianism has done to Dabney himself.
"Our existence is one of dependence—dependence chiefly upon Christ Himself but penultimately upon a vast host of lesser entities in various categories of association—families, tribes, nations in their churches—all under God."
Here’s a book that professes to teach Christians "to love Jesus Christ more than family." There really isn’t any difference between "racism" and what is called by this woman "family idolatry," which is the idea that the family, rather than the church, is "the building block of civilization." Of the Victorian era, she writes, "The moral code included prohibitions against masturbation, premarital intercourse, extramarital intercourse, and homosexuality. Young adults were encouraged to marry only within their own religious and ethnic group. Interracial marriages were not discussed. Divorce was possible but rare. Marriage was assumed to be lifelong." She leads off with something that most would consider ridiculous and ends with the sanctity of marriage. In between, we find utter racism, which is BAD - BAD! - even though it apparently leads to good things, like marital fidelity. Alas, "members of middle-class churches are still relatively unaware of the extent to which most congregations are still sexist and racist." Apparently, the upper and lower classes are less susceptible to family idolatry and that awful word, Kinism. "Loyalty to ‘the family pew’ - and to ‘our kind of people’" leading "toward increasing homogeneity in the membership of congregations are troubling indicators of lack of concern about racism, sexism, and classism in the church." And all of these ism’s are keeping the neo-Victorians married for life, which proves that they love their families more than Jesus Christ, if you follow me. We’re also told that "Homophobia refers to an irrational fear of homosexual persons." Apparently, family idolaters "are likely to associate homosexuality with promiscuity." Tsk, tsk. Anti-racists never fail to make racism appealing. How many of our forefathers, throughout the millennia of Christendom, would have agreed with this statement? "The biblical tradition affirms the family but limits its significance."
Fags are brewing up new diseases in their rectums to spread to the glorious mosaic and beautifully diverse tapestry. But it would be hateful to put these people to death as the Bible prescribes. They just need to be hugged. But watch out for the flesh-eating bacteria when you do!
Hal Lindsey compares radical Islamic jihadists to Confederate Southerners. It’s good to see that dispensationalists are still raving lunatics. I like consistency.
Steve Sailer noticed that the hysterical New Republic piece that calls Ron Paul an "Angry White Man" and "a man filled with hate" and a man who nurses "deeply held bigotry against blacks, Jews, and gays" was printed in a magazine whose editor has written the same thing about Palestinians and Arabs. He calls them "violent, fratricidal, unreliable, primitive and crazed...barbarian." They have created a "wretched society," are "cruel, belligerent, intolerant, fearing...murderous and grotesque...behave like lemmings" and "are not shocked at all by what in truth must seem to them not atrocious at all." Fellow Jew Eric Alterman wrote that "almost all of Peretz’s political beliefs are subordinate to his commitment to Israel’s best interests, and these interests as Peretz defines them almost always involve more war." Yes sir, racism is a funny thing. A Ron Paul newsletter, or your typical Kinist blog, is Hateful. Evil. Kind of like Hitler. But anti-Christs who use hate speech against their political rivals are simply protecting the needs of their tribe. This insane idea that Jews alone are allowed to be consanguineous is what Dr. David Duke calls Jewish Supremacism. And that’s exactly what it is. We are called White Supremacists, but we have never denied the right of others to govern their own affairs and lay claim to their own future as free men. What’s more, our holy book does not give the ministers of our religion license to be pederasts. I wish we could say the same for the Talmud.
The most interesting thing about this WWII propaganda from Disney is how Democracy has taken the place of Hitler. We have lost far more liberties in "the free world" than if we had been Nazis.
"It’s all run by Jews, even Disney. That’s funny, because Walt Disney was a terrible reactionary. If he found out that Jeffrey Katzenberg were running his company, he’d be spinning in his grave. That’s a wonderful bit of poetic justice." ~ Jew Rob Reiner on Hollywood, 1992
"’Holocaust-denial‘? A crime in more than a half dozen European nations and Canada. Resurrection-denial? Subject of lavish publicity and praise; a boon to cable television." Just don’t ever expect a lying preacher to draw this contrast. It might make a Jew cry.
"The Jew, who is something of a nomad, has never yet created a cultural form of his own and, as far as we can see, never will, since all his instincts and talents require a more or less civilized nation to act as host for his [parasitic] development." ~ Carl Jung, The Zionist Factor
"In the past decade, more than two dozen lawsuits related to church discipline have been filed as congregants sue pastors for defamation, negligent counseling and emotional injury, according to the Religion Case Reporter, a legal-research database. Peggy Penley, a Fort Worth, Texas, woman whose pastor revealed her extramarital affair to the congregation after she confessed it in confidence, waged a six-year battle against the pastor, charging him with negligence. Last summer, the Texas Supreme Court dismissed her suit, ruling that the pastor was exercising his religious beliefs by publicizing the affair." I recall that Doug Phillips of the Ministry Mafia (Howard’s Levitical son) gleefully reported this news because it got him off the hook for doing the same thing. He also gleefully reports when bloggers have been successfully sued. The reporter allegedly wanted to make him the subject of this Wall Street Journal piece. There’s nothing wrong in theory with church discipline, but in the hands of an unaccountable "pastor" with a Napoleon Complex, such as Godfather Phillips, it becomes a weapon. This is to say nothing of Dapper Doug’s extortion of indulgences and flat-out lies against innocent families, couched in high-blown religious rhetoric that would make a Puritan blush. Men who take the most honorable office of all and soil it with ego and vengeance will answer for much in the Day of Judgment. Be sure to read about the egotistical baptist pastor who threw an elderly woman in jail for refusing to roll over when she was shunned. The church is "unaffiliated with a church hierarchy that might review the ouster," as baptist churches are by definition.
The robber barons whose logo is a smiley face.
Three-year-old girls entering puberty because their parents feed them Frankenfoods.
Pretension, thy name is Negress.
Here’s a Celtic secessionist who says, "The reason we act like we do is in our DNA." I like racists.
Arthur for Britain, Roland for France, El Cid for Spain, and Tell for Switzerland.
"I had...all my life loved the mountain better than the plain; had been more pleased to walk than to ride; more proud to contend with shepherds in their sports than with nobles in the lists; and happier in the village dance than among the feasts of the German nobles." ~ Walter Scott
