1210433298 http://spiritwaterblood.com/ Reformed Confederate Theocrats en admin@swb.com Copyright 2008 2008-05-10T12:07:00-05:00 http://spiritwaterblood.com/index.php/site/the_constitution_party_dodges_a_lincoln_lover/ http://spiritwaterblood.com/index.php/site/the_constitution_party_dodges_a_lincoln_lover/#When:11:07:00Z This is classic! Listen to John Lofton twist Phil Donahue up in a pretzel. Feminine Phil is all about the Constitution when it will prevent a war he doesn’t like, but when Lofton quotes those who wrote it to the effect that it was only intended for a religious people, the sparks fly. And the best part is Donahue’s first choice of response to the assertion that unbelievers go to hell: "Do Jews go to hell?" In other words, the Donahue test for a Christian worth his salt is the willingness to hurt the feelings of anti-Christs. Wonderful radio. And then Donahue calls Lofton a racist for his anti-Semitic "intolerance." I just love listening to old tapes of R.J. Rushdoony and Otto Scott and John Lofton sitting in a living room chatting with each other. Only one of them is still with us. Don’t miss Donahue’s quote of Tennyson. You’ll also want to hear Lofton’s interview of Alan Keyes. It’s the first time I’ve really heard anyone try to draw forth the hideous conclusions of staking everything on the phrase "all men are created equal," as Keyes has done for his entire political career. Lofton probes Keyes on his "almost worshipful view of the Declaration of Independence." Our country was founded on the Bible, says Lofton, not a document of secession, as important as it was.  Lofton is referring to the pioneers who settled this land over a hundred years before the Declaration was written. Keyes resists him on the point, insisting that "the United States of America" was not founded prior to 1776. And this is fascinating, because blacks can only claim allegiance to the monstrosity that emerged from the fratricide of the 1860s. Keyes, in true Abolitionist form, characterizes Lincoln’s War as "a struggle between the godly principles of the Declaration...and [for the South] merely human, secular, selfish, scientific, materialistic principles. Those principles were defeated during the course" of that war. To which Lofton responds, "What?" Lofton denounces Lincoln as a "murderous tyrant," but Keyes responds that "all the bloodshed was worth it to uphold" the compulsory union. Lofton asks if Keyes thinks secession is ungodly and unconstitutional. Keyes’ answer is almost too bizarre to be believed. He says yes, of course secession is unconstitutional, because the hallowed equality clause is what makes self-government possible. In other words, the South could only have legitimately seceded if there had been no slaves. (Keyes calls slaveholding a “criminal activity.") He digs himself a deeper hole when he explains: "People have the right to act as a community to achieve certain goals and objectives," but not if they cross the line of the sacred equality clause. By the same standard, America should never have seceded from Britain. Some people were not free then! So apparently, our ancestors had no "right to act as a community" after all. The only solution for the modern-day abolitionist is to revere Lincoln as the Founding Father of a new "nation," lending credibility to the (post-1787) government he inherited, while lamenting that some things were left undone until MLK came along. Throughout it all, murder and theft are justified in defense of ideology.  Lofton nails the root of the problem when he rejects Keyes’ idea of "statesmanship" as the substitution of "conscience" for God’s law. This carries over into the debates on abortion and faggotry, where Keyes holds the opinion, in Lofton’s words, that "We can’t enforce God’s law until people are willing to go along with it." Now, be sure to read this brilliant article from TJH. The Constitution Party dodged a bullet by nominating Chuck Baldwin instead of Keyes, even though Keyes is more well-known. Sadly, I fear this was due to shelf life more than anything else. Ten or fifteen years ago, would the CP have rejected Keyes? I strongly doubt it. Still today, the party has no objection to the equality idolatry he was pushing then. We Southerners view his lies as the praise of genocide and incitement to more of the same. TJH writes: "For Keyes, America is not a tribe consisting of the Founders’ descendants and those that have been grafted in to that tribe. It is not about concrete persons. No, for him America is the abstract principle ‘all men are created equal,’ along with borders within which a government is installed which can exercise power to enforce the abstraction, regardless of what individual persons reside within those borders… [T]here are basically two different models of conservatism. The Tribal view starts with the people that constitutes the nation, regardless of its accidental Constitution. The Wordist view starts with the Constitution (or here, the Declaration), and it is a matter of comparative indifference what people happen to live under it. Lincoln was a Wordist." By the way, Lofton’s softly-spoken retorts while his guest is pontificating are simply hilarious. Near the end, he says, "If you refuse to repent, there’s nothing I can do about it." Do you think the Constitution Party would ever agree with these Constitutionalists? "In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896 the Supreme Court expressly declared that under the [illegal] 14th Amendment no person was denied any of his rights if the States provided separate but equal facilities." Later, the Supreme Court, under "Chief Justice Taft, a former President of the United States, unanimously declared in 1927 in Lum v. Rice that the ‘separate but equal’ principle is ‘within the discretion of the State in regulating its public schools and does not conflict with the 14th Amendment.’" What is the Constitution Party’s position in returning to Constitutional fidelity? I’m talking to you, Chuck Baldwin. Michael Hoffman explains (part 1, part 2, part 3) that Whites were not enslaved for a brief period of time, and White "indentured servitude" was nothing less than slavery. "Scotland was a veritable industry for White slavery," he says. (He is careful to exclude apprenticeship.) Blacks only became more popular as slaves when it became evident that they were (ironically) docile. Whites, much like Indians, refused to live under slavery. The history Hoffman presents really helps one to understand the Victorian era popularized by Dickens, and the pre-Victorian era. He explains that many petty offenses in England were criminalized and made punishable by death. The "criminals" were shown "mercy" by shipping them off to America, and then Australia, as slaves. This relieved the upper class of supporting the poor. The fatality rate was higher when transporting White slaves than when transporting black slaves. The idea, says Hoffman, that the concept of "White Supremacy" reigned, ensuring that Whites always had a higher station than blacks, is "a tissue of falsehood." As we all know, the truly dangerous work was done by the Irish because black slaves were so valuable. The point of this should be obvious. Slavery has been the universal experience of humankind, and it’s not going away. Lincoln’s genocide certainly did nothing to curtail it. But even though at least twice as many White slaves were sold to Muslims as the number of blacks transported to America, Whites don’t live with an eternal grudge against the world. They make the most of their lives and don’t beg for handouts. Blacks, on the other hand, are the world’s panhandlers. But in their defense, "subsidized manumission" is drummed into them by "whiter-people" who use minorities as props for their own inflated sense of superiority. My friends and I are having a hearty laugh at the Democrats, who have lectured everyone on race for 40 years. I especially love Obama’s exhortation that there needs to be "a national conversation on race." The only requirement is to agree with him. Rosie O’Donnell defends Jeremiah Wright based on his "genetic memory" of the Tuskegee Institute. I also claim a free pass for anything I have ever said due to my genetic memory of being enslaved by Muslims. The man of many faces. "If you are white and racist enough to notice you are not part of Obama’s rainbow, don’t worry. You can still join groups for students, women, veterans or the LGBT crowd." Obama suggests that blacks who visit Africa are disappointed because it’s not "authentic." No, they’re disappointed because Africa is the armpit of the world, and blacks have made it that way, though it is "rich beyond the dream of poet’s fancy" in natural resources. "They go hoping to see what the black man can accomplish without the white man around holding him down, and, well..." John McCain refused to speak at Bob Jones University until they lifted their interracial {gag} dating ban, and he would never darken the door of an organization called "The White Race," but he has no qualms whatsoever about speaking to "The Race" that seeks to reconquer the American Southwest. Put July 12 on your calendar! A Missouri pastor named Thomas McConnell has written a biblical defense of the use of mules. It’s all very strange because he is forced to assume that the word translated "mule" in the Old Testament is what we know as a mule today, and that God approved of its use. Another assumption is that the prohibition against hybrids in Leviticus 19:19 forbids the mating of animals that are closely related, not of animals that are clearly different. Without these two assumptions, the second of which is kooky, the argument falls apart. Let’s look at the second assumption first. McConnell argues that the Law bans the cross of, for instance, the Black Angus with the white-faced Hereford but not of a horse with a donkey, whose offspring is sterile. His belief that the latter’s "hybrid vigor" is somehow biblically acceptable is a mystery. But not really, if the main premise is accepted. So were mules considered acceptable to the Hebrews and to God? In Easton’s 1897 Bible Dictionary, under the heading for "mule," it says: "It is not probable that the Hebrews bred mules, as this was strictly forbidden in the law (Lev. 19:19), although their use was not forbidden… Mules are not mentioned in the New Testament. Perhaps they had by that time ceased to be used in Palestine." I see a couple of possibilities here. One is that the word "pered," translated "mule," is an unknown equid "set apart" from the horse, the camel, and the ass, but not what we know as a mule today. I think this is very unlikely, because just as surrounding nations ate unclean meats, I can believe that Phoenicians were breeding mules for the very reasons that Reverend McConnell states, and that Hebrews traded with them. But the fact remains that the Hebrews themselves were not allowed to hybridize plants and animals, and in the year 2008 we can see very clearly that God’s wisdom does not fail. Apparently, the Hebrews came to realize this too, since their use of mules evidently came to an end. Call us "legalists" if you will, but detecting the various "kinds" of animals, plants, and human beings is not a difficult task. We think God did it correctly the first time, and we deny that His work can be improved. The only hybrids we like are hybrid engines. England’s Prime Minister David Lloyd George explaining bud pruning and graft-crossing of apple trees to the House of Commons in 1939: "Unless you are very careful...the old stock breaks out and...destroys the tree. You do not get either a Pippin or a Bramley… [T]he tree is so utterly muddled between the one and the other that it produces only sour desiccated crabs." "Lions and tigers have been bred to create ligers, the world’s largest cats. And there are also zorses (zebra and horse), wholphins (whale and dolphin), tigons (tiger and lion), lepjags (leopard and jaguar) and zonkeys (zebra and donkey)." Soon, if miscegenists have their way, there will be a humanzee. Progress marches on. "It was God’s work," said the late Mildred Loving, who was impregnated by a rapist and pretended to be his "wife." And how do you like the spin that she was "courted" as an 11-year-old?  Actually, God agreed with the state of Virginia that the two perverts, "cohabiting as man and wife," worked "against the peace and dignity of the Commonwealth." Isn’t that something? Just a few short years ago, real men walked the hallowed soil of Virginia, and they wrote laws. Even if one is not a Christian, he presumably has enough sense to not be an utter pervert. There is an ancient Eastern (and “racist") saying: “A bamboo door should match a bamboo door; a wood door should match a wood door.” Imagine being charged with "racial harassment" for reading an anti-KKK book. If you want to see a fine example of semitical correctness, take a look at the ongoing campaign of the Jews to have a fine scholar fired. In the eighth paragraph, you can see an old journalistic contextual trick. And as usual, the one thing you will never see is a logical rebuttal of MacDonald’s arguments. Not even scholars have the guts to attempt such a thing because they know they can’t argue with the truth. The writer of the article considers it a journalistic accomplishment to discredit MacDonald by printing what some commenter at VNN said about exterminating Jews. This cowardice has to place tremendous stress on MacDonald’s family and personal life. "People won’t be seen with me; they won’t talk to me; they won’t have lunch with me." College has become nearly worthless because every professor knows what will happen if he strays too far from the reservation. MacDonald is not tenured, by the way. I wish he were. It’s hilarious that so-called intellectuals will deny the hand before their face if it challenges their semitical correctness in any way. William Saletan can plainly see the racial IQ and achievement gap, and admits that it really exists, but convinces himself that it must be one of those truths that is truly false, if you follow me. "Even if hereditary inequality among racial averages is a truth, it’s less true, more unjust, and more pernicious than framing the same difference in nonracial terms… To the extent that a social problem is genetic, you can’t ultimately solve it by understanding it in racial terms." Likewise, if balancing your budget is a mathematical affair, it’s important to realize that it can’t be done by adding and subtracting things. "We can’t just be ‘race realists’… We have to be realists about racism." It all makes perfect sense if you partake of methamphetamines. Behold, it is I, Super-Negro! Last year’s Juneteenth celebration. Some people get excited just thinking about the Emancipation Proclamation. A fictional computer user named "Blackie White" has caused "consternation, hurt and distress" among college students. The poor, sweet, hypersensitive darlings. I just want to hug them. Does baby need a binky? Why we need to be in Iraq for a hundred years. Oil is up, blood is down. Reconstructionists exclaim, "Give us more war propaganda!" It’s not just Gary DeMar; it extends to Dapper Doug Phillips and anyone else who treats "patriotism" as a commodity. War sells books. Doug Phillips has posted some extraordinary quotes from Communists on destroying Christendom by removing women from their families. When he’s not hiring his friends to hack and "investigate" those who are critical of his cult, he does excellent work. I’m not sure if that was a compliment, but it was the best I could muster. Here’s another good quote that Little Napoleon posted, taken from Paul Johnson and the 29th Congress of 1846: "Early in the 19th century, America was achieving birth-rates never before equaled in history, in terms of children reaching adulthood. The 1800 census revealed a population of 5,308,843, itself a 35 percent increase over ten years. By 1810 it had leaped to 7,239,881, up another 36.4 percent. By 1820 it was 9,638,453, close to doubling in twenty years, and of this nearly 80 percent was a natural increase. As one Congressman put it: ‘I invite you to go West and visit one of our log cabins, and number its inmates. There you will find a strong, stout youth of eighteen with his Better Half, just commencing the first struggles of independent life. Thirty years from that time, visit them again; and instead of two, you will find in that same family twenty two. That is what I call the American Multiplication Table.’" Those were the good old days when White folks could thrive because they didn’t have to subsidize blacks, Jews, Mexicans, Muslims, and North Koreans. They were "racists" who cared for their own, and God blessed their efforts. "The nation which takes thought for its own genetic future is most likely to have a future." ~ Professor C.D. Darlington of Oxford, 1958 Here’s something very good from Doug Wilson. If it is an evangelical requirement to be "firmly opposed to the imposition of theocracy on our pluralistic society," I can say with confidence that I ain’t one. A victory for the emasculated! "This disposes of the rule in California that the male surname is the marital name to the same trash bin where dowries were once tossed out," said Mark Jew Rosenbaum, legal director of the Southern California chapter of the ACLU. This picture really does say it all, doesn’t it? And please notice, if you will, where the agreeable and conscientious may be found. Some fascinating illustrations of mortgage delinquency. I truly hate the "National Day of Prayer," the "National Cathedral," and all other forms of idolatry. According to Jorge Bush, the National Day of Prayer is "a chance for people of faith around the world to stop at the same time to pause to praise an Almighty." (Costco was having a sale on Almighties last time I was there.) A union of church and state would be far better than nationalizing a non-faith for fear of offending anti-Christs. Ravi Zacharias, with the collusion of James Dobson’s wife, was scheduled to deliver the opening non-prayer at this year’s event, but Ingrid Schlueter exposed the fraud in advance. You might recall the news from last year or the year before that Lutherans refused to participate in the hatefest because they take the unusual view that one is to pray to Christ, not the Spirit in the Sky or a can of albacore tuna. Ravi’s typically "evangelical" excuse is that Christians must work within the bounds that pagans set for them. His desire to reach the lost with inspirational platitudes did not preclude him from pulling his radio show from Ingrid’s network. In Bolivia, White farmers are at war with "the impoverished indigenous majority who back Morales, himself an Aymara Indian and the nation’s first indigenous President." Obviously, Bolivia is not the only place on Earth where "10% of the population [Whites] controls more than 90% of arable land." Whenever unhindered by quotas, this will always be the case. And the solution of minorities is always the same: Communism, or some variant of it. They call theft "land reform." In 2004, Miss Bolivia, Gabriela Oviedo, didn’t win many friends in the country’s majority by suggesting that Bolivia should not be considered an "indigenous" (i.e., non-White) nation: "I’m from the other side of the country. We are tall, and we are white people, and we know English." That’s my kind of woman. May her children rise up and call her blessed. Guadalupe Gutierrez-Juarez should be relieved that he has Christ-haters in the government to protect him with a mere prison sentence. It means that I won’t be able to introduce him to some people I know. The geniuses in charge of public education consider the tautology that "half the kids are below the median in educability" a "damnable heresy." Hence ridiculous and ineffective programs like No Child Left Behind. The assumption is always that racial IQ gaps can be closed with increased spending, and the fact that it never works has deterred no one. Evelyn Waugh’s description of Rudyard Kipling’s conservatism evinces the distance I perceive between Kinists and the lying, race-mixing preachers that plague us Sunday after Sunday. Kipling, said Waugh, "was a conservative in the sense that he believed civilization to be something laboriously achieved which was only precariously defended. He wanted to see the defences fully manned and he hated the liberals because he thought them gullible and feeble, believing in the easy perfectibility of man and ready to abandon the work of centuries for sentimental qualms." "The coming of a world state is longed for, and confidently expected, by all the worst and most distorted elements. This state, based on the principles of absolute equality of men and a community of possessions, would banish all national loyalties. In it no acknowledgment would be made of the authority of a father over his children, or of God over human society. If these ideas are put into practice, there will inevitably follow a reign of unheard-of terror." ~ Pope Benedict XV, 1920 If you recall, we were the first to announce that American Renaissance conference videos would soon be available on YouTube. They’re here, and more are on the way. No need to thank us. We’re just trying to do our part to spread the hate around. 2008-05-10T11:07:00-05:00 http://spiritwaterblood.com/index.php/site/sharers_in_their_lies_cursing_and_blasphemy/ http://spiritwaterblood.com/index.php/site/sharers_in_their_lies_cursing_and_blasphemy/#When:15:24:00Z ...Such was Martin Luther’s description of what our people have become. How are we to restore the "honor of our Lord and of Christendom"? You can read his advice here. "We are not hyphenated Jews; we are Jews with no qualifications or reservations. We are simply aliens; we are a foreign people in your midst, and, we emphasize, we wish to stay that way. There is a wide gap between you and us, so wide that no bridge can be laid across. Your spirit is alien to us; your myths, legends, habits, customs, traditions and national heritage, your religious and national shrines, your Sundays and holidays...they are all alien to us. The history of your triumphs and defeats, your war songs and battle hymns, your heroes and their mighty deeds, your national ambitions and aspirations, they are all alien to us. The boundaries of your lands cannot restrict our movements, and your border clashes are not of our concern. Far over and above the frontiers and boundaries of your land stands our Jewish unity… Whosoever calls the foreign land a fatherland is a traitor to the Jewish people… A loyal Jew can never be other than a Jewish patriot… We recognize a national unity of Diaspora Jews, no matter in which country they may reside. Therefore, no boundaries can restrain us in pursuing our own Jewish Policy." ~ Jew Jakob Klatzkin, Krisis und Entscheidung (Crisis and Decision), 1921 "It is wrong to say that the goyim forced the Jews to separate themselves from other societies. When the Christians defined the ghetto limits, Jews lived there already." ~ President Nachum Goldmann, World Zionist Organization, 1978 Jews have trouble controlling the Internet, but they’re starting with Wikipedia. Writing the word "Jew" in ice cream will send you away for a month in North Dakota - but that’s only because there are no "hate crime" laws in North Dakota. If there were, the sentence might be closer to a year. The lesson to be learned (and I hope you racists are listening) is that anti-Christs must never be allowed to have their feelings hurt. Always smile when around them, and never be critical, or it’s off to the penitentiary with you anti-Semites. Mark Potok, in this video, declares anyone opposed to MORE! MORE! immigration a racist. Not long afterwards he says that while the SPLC takes no position on immigration, its job is to tell you that those who are opposed to immigration are bigots. Likewise, those who are actively opposed to the North American Union are instantly discredited if they write letters to editors of newspapers stating that Jews control banking. You can see that anti-racist logic is self-referential at best. And if you think you have a constitutional right to form a militia, you’re a racist too. And Christians who love their own race (meaning Kinists) are vicious nativists. And he says that his well-funded group of Jews and fags and Jewish fags at the SPLC is not simply determined to monitor racists but to "destroy" them. It would all be ludicrous but the SPLC has hundreds of millions of dollars at its disposal, and a lot of lives can be destroyed with that kind of money. Potok’s "hate crime" statistics are particularly laughable, as we’ve shown here repeatedly. Don’t expect him to inform the public about these unknown serial killers. And notice how the pitch is unchanged since Jared Taylor reviewed Potok nine years ago. During the Q&A, James Lubinskas "wanted to know why Hispanics are a victim category for hate crimes but not a perpetrator category." Taylor writes, "I asked why the United States should seek diversity and dispossession while non-white countries may maintain their majority populations. [Potok] bravely took the position that non-white countries should seek diversity and dilution too!… Mr. Potok claims to believe that the question of race and IQ "’cannot be sorted out and never will be sorted out,’ but if the truth is unknowable it is odd that we must act as if we are certain race has nothing to do with IQ." There’s that impenetrable Communist logic again. "[The SPLC] repeatedly claims that even the mildest racial message creates an atmosphere of ‘hatred’ that can lead to violence, yet its very purpose is to stir up the worst sort of hostility against people who express certain ideas. If the leaders of the C of CC or the staff of AR are ever attacked, would the SPLC ever concede that it contributed to an ‘atmosphere of violence’? Finally, although it preens itself on respect for free speech, its legal strategies are a clear attempt to stifle speech. It brings civil suits for ‘conspiracy’ when there are insufficient grounds for criminal charges—in effect, bullying ideological opponents into silence. It is dawning on more and more people that ‘watchdog groups’ that call people names and try to shut them up may simply be unable to counter the ideas they oppose with anything like real arguments." It’s so true; you will never hear real arguments to counter anything argued by our side, but they’ll jump all over a gaffe from Lou Dobbs, for instance. Jew "art" versus Aryan art. I have trouble believing that a she-Jew would entice a 15-year-old Southern girl to pose for semi-pornographic pictures. Such things are simply not done. "According to the experts, 62 percent of girls are sexually abused by the age of 18 - outside the YFZ Ranch. According to the experts, 31 percent of boys are sexually abused by the age of 18 - outside the YFZ Ranch. According to the experts, most rape victims are under 12 years old - outside the YFZ Ranch." China has the right to be Chinese, Nigeria has the right to be Nigerian, Israel has the right to be Jewish, but Britain has no right to be British, and America has no right to be American. As Arthur Kemp laments here, it is said that the British were wrong to colonize Africa, but it’s considered perfectly acceptable for Africans to now colonize Britain. Foreign aid goes to countries like Zimbabwe, whose people hate our guts, and to India and Israel, who have satellites and nuclear weapons, and are hardly starving. It is not our responsibility to subsidize any but our own people. It is hateful, said the Lord Jesus Christ, to take bread from our children and give it to dogs. Our children must be filled first (Mark 7:27)! And if your son asks for bread, it is hateful to give him a stone. If he asks for meat, it is hateful to give him a snake. If he asks for an egg, it is hateful to offer him a scorpion. "Christians" today are overflowing with hatred. The point of these verses (Luke 11:11-13) is that even pagans have more sense. "As Sam Dickson has pointed out, White people in every White country around the world hold tens of thousands of meetings in organized committees every single day to figure out how to help non-Whites; while conversely, no such meetings are organized anywhere by non-Whites out of concern for the rapidly declining numbers of White people, who singularly represent the philanthropic impulse in the world." Yet at the same time, as Ehud very correctly points out, Whites suffer from a "Christ complex which overly maximizes duties to those remote to us at the expense of those closest to us. Even Emerson, that great Transcendental Abolitionist, has recognized this strange impulse when he says, ‘Your great love afar is spite at home.’" Dickens famously parodied such behavior. And this is precisely why we mock those who accuse us of being "White Supremacists." As with so much else, the very opposite is true. It is the non-Kinist White person who assumes the mantle of supremacy for his race as he undertakes the herculean task of policing and feeding the world. Steve Sailer calls it the "Invade the World, Invite the World" sickness, and only Whites are susceptible to it. We Kinists are more than happy to take an impartial scientific look at how the races stack up in various categories, but we don’t love our own on that account (or hate others on that account). We love our own because they are our own. Back to Ehud’s latest outstanding article: This "is all caught up with a basic Perspectivalism in which Whites presuppose their own superiority by virtue of their seemingly innate status as ‘the blessed of the earth.’ Their dual association of Christ with the conquering hero and suffering servant manifests in their social aims as a personal masochism animated by a Crusader’s spirit." Again, they invade the world and invite the world. No people on earth would do this unless they "presuppose their own superiority." And yet, in this upside-down world, we are called supremacists! Ehud cautions: "we did not always capitulate to these morose inclinations. We once monolithically denounced such attitudes as deluded Jacobinism and Marxist Utopianism. As Rev. Wayne Rogers has said: ‘The ministers to our forefathers had the Bible but not socialism; and for them segregation was compatible with Christianity. The only difference is socialism. The Bible hasn’t changed; and if socialism is omitted, segregation and Christianity are still compatible.’ Rev. Rogers rightly sees the modern social theory as having seduced us from the biblical concept of responsibility relative to familial proximity as espoused by the Apostle: ‘If anyone does not take care of his own, especially those of his own household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever’ (1 Timothy 5:8)." One’s household, in this verse, is a subset of one’s own. And to understand what one’s own encompasses, Ehud directs us to John 1:11: "He came unto His own, and His own received Him not." This "is clearly speaking of Jesus’ people, His ‘kinsmen according to the flesh’ (Romans 9:11) over whom Paul would lament. And if one’s ‘own’ is one’s people, we have a duty toward the physical and religious preservation of our race as contiguous to the call of familial consanguity. Your race is your extended family and the neglect of it is a violation of the fifth and seventh commandments which propound our duties toward family. This is what Rushdoony calls the Trustee Family. It was the Christian world order for the first 1,950 years of the Church." We pause now to let all of this sink in. We are called "White Supremacists" for following the commandments of God, and we are called such names by those who have replaced the Messiah with the messianic state. But since it is nigh impossible for them to overcome their own instincts, they have perverted what is vaguely recognizable as charity into that which threatens their own survival. We Kinists worship the God who formed us from the dust of the ground; the White Supremacists have reformed God in their own ideological image, which is merely to say that they worship themselves, and their churches help out in every way possible. "Want to help non-Whites? Banish from their minds the idea that we owe them education, welfare or even citizenship. We don’t. And it is nothing less than a satanic yoke upon both groups to suggest that we must be their ‘surety’ (Proverbs 11:15)… Any hope for a Theonomic nation must first secure and define its own national identity (ethnicity); without this basic bedrock Theonomy will ever be a more and more ephemeralized abstraction which devolves ultimately into pietistic irrelevance. In fact, if we neglect to meet the minimum standard set by St. Paul—to take care of ‘our own’—we reject the precondition to the establishment of God’s Law in our land, following after the example of the Deicides who rejected the reign of the true King in favor of the one-world governance of an Imperial Caesar. God forbid." And God forbid that Ehud should ever stop writing. This rebuke should have been sent out generations ago. Neo-Americans are neo-Platonists who equate the physical with mud because ideology is all that matters to them. Naturally (pardon the pun), they view race and kinship as "immaterial." Consider this quote from lipstick-warmonger Peggy Noonan: "[T]he essence of American patriotism is a felt and spoken love for and fidelity to the ideas and ideals our country represents and was invented to advance—freedom, equality, pluralism." This is completely the opposite of what Kinists believe, and so it is quite accurate to say that Kinists, not paleoconservatives, are the mirror opposites of neoconservatives. "Six weeks ago, Obama blamed whites’ ‘surprise’ at Wright’s ‘anger’ on racial segregation, meaning that their surprise at Wright was their own, racist fault. This week, Obama says that he himself is surprised and shocked at Wright’s anger. And this confused young man, who doesn’t know who he is or where he’s been or what he’s been hearing for the last 20 years, wants to be the president of the United States?" It’s hilarious that Obama convinced everyone, in a speech that was hailed as the greatest thing spoken since Lincoln met a bullet, that his lunatic White-hating pastor was taken out of context. Then his pastor-of-hate gives a speech proving that nothing was taken out of context. Jew Krauthammer, in his very good column, calls it the Annunciation and the Renunciation. And now, because the Magical Negro has spoken (for the second time), the New York Times has labeled any further attempts to link the two radicals "race-baiting"! As Jew Steyn observes, everything changed when Obama felt that Wright had disrespected him for calling him a lying politician. And what you don’t want to do is disrespect a black man, even if he’s a mulatto with a baritone. They respond with violence, which is probably not the best quality in a president. Meet Obama’s new "wonderful young pastor." How Obama will lose the black vote. Jews created the "homosexual movement" and run it from top to bottom. A list of faggot politicians. Where is King Asa when we need him? He is certainly not to be found among the lying, effeminate, race-mixing pastors of our age. "And Asa did that which was right in the eyes of the LORD, as did David his father. And he took away the sodomites out of the land, and removed all the idols that his fathers had made." ~ 1 Kings 15:11-12 I heard Ken Jones, a black pastor in California, say something very good. He said we would never think of going to a surgeon who is afraid of blood but we love to seek out pastors who are afraid of discussing sin. Can you see the hidden message here? I love the early work of Bruce Cockburn. Here’s a sample. I think you can also find "Wondering Where the Lions Are" on YouTube, which is an excellent Christian song, and the album "Humans" is possibly his best. The most annoying song ever. I couldn’t even make it to the halfway point. Speaking of which, the American Jew-media is trying to convince everyone that Bollywood is not really the exclusive domain of ultra-light-skinned, upper-caste Indians. It’s a nice try. Many things in life mystify me, Bollywood foremost among them. I had not really been afflicted by it except in small doses, until I ate at an Indian restaurant recently. There were TVs on every side of the room playing, in an endless loop, the hyper-sexualized, poorly-acted, effeminate song and dance routines that Indians love to watch. It was an assault on the senses, much like "black worship." One-fourth of all children under age 5 in this country is mestizo. "Nobody ever stops and counts. Counting is racist." White people love to throw money at problems, such as AIDS in Africa. Now they think they can pay black people to stop having sex, using money stolen from your children. Throwing bread to dogs. Ronald Reagan’s Department of Education issued the famous "Nation at Risk" report in 1983. It warned that "the educational foundations of our society are presently being eroded by a rising tide of mediocrity that threatens our very future as a Nation and a people." Of course, by 1983, our future as a nation was already in the books. But it bears remembering because those who are not racially-aware are destined to make a series of foolish decisions that lead to catastrophe. One such foolish decision was to open wide the borders, cater to every need of those who crossed it with unprecedented spending, and hope beyond all reason that some benefit could be derived from it. As Sailer says, "what the schools do matters less in the big picture than who the students are… The future turned out to be foreseeable, for the few who cared to notice back in the 1970s." You know, the "racists." Wordists versus tribalists. (And here is the best thing you’ll ever read on Alan Keyes, from our friend TJH, which I want to comment on next time.) "There is only one rule here," said Robert E. Lee upon becoming the president of Washington College. "Every man is required to be a gentleman." Now we live like this. If this is your daughter, you suck as a parent. 2008-05-05T15:24:00-05:00 http://spiritwaterblood.com/index.php/site/charity_is_natural/ http://spiritwaterblood.com/index.php/site/charity_is_natural/#When:00:25:00Z This article is a very good example of how Christians today fail to think like trinitarians. They find it impossible to grasp that there can be both one and many at the same time. The Late Presbyterian Church says: "As Christians, we recognize that the boundaries of God’s kingdom are not the same as the boundaries of nations… In God’s kingdom, national borders have no ultimacy." By which they mean that there should be no national borders at all. Joe Morecraft shovels the same swill when he says, again and again, that race is "insignificant" in God’s eyes. And so are your sex organs, apparently, so move to San Francisco and join the party. Notice how things have changed in Rome.  Popes now talk about "citizenship in the world community," and "a communion that is not based on ethnic, cultural or social membership, but on common justice." In other words, it is now illegitimate to form states in the way that they were formed throughout all of human history, which also happens to secure the greatest peace. Tom Tancredo is correct that this is "faith-based marketing," not the gospel. In contrast to the modern non-gospel, "St. Thomas Aquinas, discussing charity in the Summa Theologica, wrote that real charity is a) natural, b) divine, and c) directed at those closest to God. Further, according to Thomistic philosophy, our obligations are to those connected to us by nature, to friends rather than to strangers, and to one’s country rather than to the world. Pius XII himself spoke for this tradition when he observed that ‘There exists an order established by God, which requires a more intense love and a preferential good done to those people that are joined to us by special ties. Even our Lord has given the example of this preference towards the country, when He cries on the destruction of Jerusalem." And Saint Paul said he would sacrifice himself to be accursed if it would save his "kinsmen according to the flesh." Ernst Zundel needs to make room in his jail cell for these haters. Can’t you just see Hitler oozing out of their every pore? Keeping everything you’ve just read in mind, I want you to turn your attention to this article by Walter Williams. First, let me say that I like Mr. Williams. He has a contrariness that is highly admirable in our age of eunuchs. But read his laundry list of black pathologies that have drained our treasuries for generations, and realize that even he expects us to pony up more of the same, for no other reason than a declaration from Abraham Lincoln that turned strangers into co-equal citizens. Our first obligation is to our own people, and old-fasioned "racist" Christians of years gone by never had to learn this. They were born knowing it. Williams denounces the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931 as "racist" and "discriminatory" because it gave an edge to White labor. Well, what’s wrong with that? This is precisely why Northerners were opposed to the western extension of slavery. The West was to be for White people only. Kinists reject the idea that it is our responsibility to subsidize anyone who happens to dwell within our borders. We seek a biblical polity that makes it impossible for us to be dispossessed by placing the power of the vote in the hands of strangers. As Scripture dictates, we will have only our kin to rule over us. Obviously, this is nonconformance to the Dream of Michael King. Forty years ago, he exclaimed that he had been to the mountaintop and seen the promised land. A few hours later he was banging whores in his motel room, and a few hours after that a demon was poking him in the ass with a pitchfork. So passed the patron saint of Equality, but in all the years hence it has been difficult to understand how anyone will know when his Dream has at last come to fruition. In almost every news piece in recent weeks to mark the anniversary of the assassination, our late nation is called "a work in progress." But even in the 1960s, there was nothing to hinder blacks from reaching their full potential. The "problem" was that Whites wanted their own space, as well as laws to prevent intermarriage. King’s legacy was to remove the last few legal barriers between the races. So now, whenever it is said that the Dream hasn’t been realized, it means that there is still voluntary resistance to total amalgamation. Long may it endure. Norman Vincent Peale was once denounced by the Pittsburgh Courier (a black newspaper) for advising a black girl against marrying a White boy. The editor responded that "it is not possible to have people of different races, nationalities, and religions living together, working together, and playing together and bar them from intermarrying. We now have a national law that requires that they get their education together… Intermarriage is as necessarily Christian as interfaith and inter-racial education. We will have to have desegregation in that area of life, and it has already begun to move heavily." I’d like to know what Christian homeschoolers think of this. Here’s a man saying what has now become conventional wisdom - that it is "necessarily Christian" to integrate both races and religions. Most homeschoolers are logically inconsistent in this area because they support religious separation when it suits them but not racial separation. Has one ever been able to exist without the other? Congratulations! "What the European liberal finds out when he goes a-whoring with the ‘vital natural races’ is that ’where man is not, nature is barren.’ He needs the Christian fairy land, not heathendom. Take a walk through the forests of Arden or share the oars with Ratty on his river. In those worlds, blood is sacred because it is animated by His spirit. And nature is revered because it houses His Kith and Kin… The white Europeans in The Wind and the Willows are Ratty, Mole, Badger, Mr. Toad, and all those animals who adhere to the same code as the four heroes. In the outer wood are the weasels and the stoats, the savage hordes of color, who do not see, when they view the ancient dwellings of the Europeans, home and hearth. They see only something to be plundered. And they get their chance when Mr. Toad, obsessed with his ‘cleverness,’ decides that ‘the plowed furrow, the frequented pasture, the lane of evening lingerings,’ cannot compare to the open road. And what Toad abandons, the weasels and stoats take. But they can do nothing but destroy, like the blacks in Rhodesia and South Africa; they can’t maintain or restore an ancient European dwelling. It is Ratty, Mr. Badger, and the Mole, who help Toad regain his ancestral dwelling. They face the barbarians of color and defeat them. They are greatly outnumbered, but they prevail because they fight for the homely virtues which only the European knows and treasures as his source of strength… ‘It’s my world, and I don’t want any other. What it hasn’t got is not worth having, and what it doesn’t know is not worth knowing.’ Toad’s open-road philosophy leads us to the savage horde barbarism of the stoats and weasels. Ratty’s river leads us back to His Europe." If your heart doesn’t want to leap from your chest when you read Cambria’s beautiful prose then I doubt you have a pulse. You may not have realized that one of the greatest works of English literature is "racist" to the bone. But why would you expect otherwise? It’s sickening that all those children were cruelly separated from their polygamist parents because one of Obama’s delegates made prank calls saying the children were taught to be "frightened of black people." So now you can have your children taken away from you if you teach them to be sensible but you have weird religious ideas. And Christians are too stupid to realize that they all fall into this category, in the eyes of Christ-haters. You can take one thing to the bank: The satanic government of this country would never have raided a camp of Muslim polygamists. There would be hell to pay. But Whites are afraid to organize because they are afraid of being called "racist." The government also has no problem with sodomites and pornographers. There is absolutely no chance of the Army invading San Francisco. The managerial state doesn’t like competition. At its root, the "problem" with domestic slavery was not abuse (which was largely fictional) but domesticity. As Dabney explains thoroughly in his magnum opus, Yankees were bothered to no end that the family was considered the main dominion of the slave’s government, and so they proceeded to rob the family (and consequently every other level of government) of its jurisdiction. Unfortunately for us today, the taskmaster on the Potomac is far more brutal than the taskmaster closest to home ever was. Likewise, the manufactured anguish over the Texas polygamists was not what they did in the privacy of their own homes. After all, when has the managerial state ever moralized against sexual abnormality? No, it was the fear that children might be "abused" if married off at young ages. The Texas legislature raised the marriageable age from 14 to 16, and when that didn’t work, it responded to possible abuse with honest-to-God abuse. And to make matters worse, all 400 children are now in the foster care system, where the likelihood for more real abuse jumps exponentially. This is why the Bible deals with polygamy as it does; the cure is worse than the disease. "As the makeshift mom hollers at you to swallow your zombifying meds – the Texas foster care system is notorious for pumping its charges full of psychotropic drugs – her flaccid live-in lover eyes you lustily." Obama the baby killer. Notice the racially-choreographed images in this commercial. Here’s another one of those articles saying that it’s racist if 15% of Whites vote racially, completely ignoring the fact that 80-90% of blacks vote racially. In this campaign season, it’s easy to see how Communist words like "transformation," "tolerance," and "responsible speech" have infected the minds of voters. Christians used to say what they meant, and "change" was not revered as virtuous. Now we hear politicians advocating change merely for the sake of change, and the Jews pulling the strings laugh themselves silly. It’s like being served gruel for four years. You get tired of it and demand change, so for the next four years the cook serves green mush. You get tired of it and demand gruel again, but it’s the same old slop. One problem is that there are only two pre-determined choices on the menu, but the greater problem is the willingness to eat them. This is what Cambria was saying in his recent post about the twin towers of atheism. It requires great skill to break the will of a people, but it requires absolute genius to convince them to break their own will and call it freedom. "[T]he most noteworthy Reformed ministries have said NOTHING for the last seven years about unjust war, government lying, torture, the growing police state, and the racketeering and theft within the military-industrial complex… I better not hear a word out of them when a ‘Democrat’ gets in office and does the very same things." As Eric Hoffer once said, all great movements eventually become a business, then degenerate into a racket. This has been true of the church, and if not for the Holy Spirit, the whole thing would be a lost cause. As Chris points out, preachers refuse to put their 501(c)3 incorporated status at risk even when the empire is breaking the Ten Commandments as fast as humanly possible. But they sure do get fired up for their biannual tithing sermons! War is a racket too, as Smedley Butler said, "conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many." "The supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evil… Those who knowingly shirk it, deserve, and not infrequently receive, the curses of those who come after." ~ Enoch Powell "The Declaration of Independence, which Lincoln always quoted selectively, says that the American colonies of Great Britain had become ‘free and independent states’—separate states, mind you, not the monolithic ‘new nation’ he proclaimed at Gettysburg. The U.S. Constitution refers constantly to the states, but never to a ‘nation’; and this is a fact we should ponder." This little boy is living the American Dream, knowing that one day he’ll be able to vote. Our founding fathers smile as they look down from heaven, because this is exactly the kind of person they wanted to entrust with their children’s future. It’s curious that we über-honkies are accused of being obsessed with blacks and Jews. Actually, we try to think about them as little as possible. It’s the SPLC that is obsessed with blacks and Jews. As Chris Ortiz writes, they have joined with other hate groups, like the ADL, "to exploit the Holocaust and Southern Slavery into a billy club designed to beat an ignorant population into submission. They have successfully made ‘racist’ the Scarlet Letter of the modern West." Michael Horton did a good show recently on how every book being sold at Barnes & Noble is "inspirational" and about the twelve steps to some secret knowledge that will turn you into Stuart Smalley. ("I’m good enough, I’m smart enough, and doggone it - people like me!") It is no wonder that neo-Gnostic Pelagianism is the religion of our age. We Kinists are called "racists" and other pejorative terms - by the way, isn’t it funny how some pejorative terms are considered perfectly acceptable while others are not? - by the very same people because an essential part of their religion is denying the importance of matter, or in this case race. Our "racist" forefathers couldn’t care less about gnosis. Their families and kin that took shape in flesh and blood were of utmost importance, and they knew that salvation was gracious, not from some inner willpower divined by Oprah. Using the word "nigger" is like eating pig’s feet. "We all black within," says "the rap Led Zeppelin." I ask you, who else could have thought to rhyme "Leviathan" with "a violin"? I think there’s no doubt that his hit song, "Be A Knicker Too," from his album, "Knicker," will win a dozen Grammies. Is it too much to hope that this could be the theme song for the Democratic National Convention this summer? Music is logical. Except for black music, of course. Manuel went down to Georgia. A storm is brewing. The "family" of the future. Vogue Italia is trying to do something about the absence of black women in advertising. That’s what you call betting against the market. "Tanning is out. Fair skin is in." Muslims say that Greenwich Mean Time was "imposed" on the world by Christians. And so it was, because Christians blessed the world with science. But Muslims want to be scientific too, and it all begins with the creation of Mecca Time, so named because Mecca is "the true centre of the Earth." I beg to differ. Every schoolchild knows that Auschwitz is the center of the Earth and human history. "It’s time to overhaul the government’s approach to food and farming… [W]e can’t afford a system that guzzles 100 billion gallons of oil each year in pesticides and the long-distance transit of packaged foods… Programs that revive local foods and small farms – via farmers’ markets, community-supported agriculture, and school purchasing programs – are gaining ground across the country. Consumers are clamoring for organic foods, and for more farmer’s markets where growers can increase profits while keeping food prices the same or lower than in supermarkets." Storey’s Guide to Raising Chickens says that hybrids are bred to desire only one thing: food.  "But this characteristic also makes them coop potatoes. When they’re not eating, they have nothing to do except sit around developing bad habits like cannibalism or getting sick and dying. Managing hybrids therefore requires careful attention." As with every other decision in life, go with the pure breeds. Choose life. Make love, not war. Give peace a chance. Our pal Harry tells us that he has both chicks and ducklings in the same brooder right now. Each of them huddles with its own kind for warmth. Isn’t it interesting that farm animals are segregationists? It reminds us of this poem. As Pierre L. van den Berghe said, "The degree of cooperation between organisms can be expected to be a direct function of the proportion of the genes they share; conversely, the degree of conflict between them is an inverse function of the proportion of shared genes." It’s all so simple, and it can be seen throughout nature. It was May when you were fried, In grease–hot, soy sauce, pain. You died. No one remembers you? Fearful, crushed, little friend. Fear not, I do. 2008-04-28T00:25:00-05:00 http://spiritwaterblood.com/index.php/site/big_big_news/ http://spiritwaterblood.com/index.php/site/big_big_news/#When:00:43:01Z Another excellent post from Chris Ortiz, who is worthy to be Rushdoony’s adopted son. He writes that China’s nationalism is "a great root to their strength." Here in the United States of Israel, "nationalism" is the dirty n-word, and Jews have taught our countrymen to be ashamed of it. Instead, they are taught to love "patriotism," which has come to mean cheerleading for warmongers and international bankers and buying Toby Keith CDs. "Certainly, patriotism is germane to the idea of nationalism, but patriotism is the solidarity of melting pot societies. Nationalism, as in China’s case, is rooted in land, blood, and race. China is filled with Chinese, and this constitutes much of their strength. And the arrogance of the West only solidifies their national constitution. America has no real solidarity. Raging patriotism was only evident after 9/11, but China doesn’t appear to require such crises. Granted, a totalitarian society, and its propaganda, play a central role in galvanizing that nationalism, but in the end, China has roots we don’t quite understand. And the only possible source of solidarity for America - Christianity - is so spiritually and theologically bankrupt that it cannot provide the sense of destiny and unity it once did. Pluralism of every kind has leavened its way through our national lump." So if the greatest source of solidarity for a people is Christianity and the second greatest source is "land, blood, and race," combining the two will be an unstoppable force for holiness. In short, it will be Kinist. Ethnonationalism (or call it nativism or tribalism, if you prefer) was the reason why the Baltics seceded from Russia and Slovakia seceded from the Czech Republic. Babelist Joe Morecraft denounces this solidarity which secures peace and brotherhood as "unbiblical." It has been truly said that those who are opposed to "nationalism" are 9 times out of 10 opposed to the existence of White people. In another excellent post, Chris tells us that "conservative Christianity retains record numbers of deluded hordes within their ranks prepared to send America’s best to die for the likes of Halliburton, Wall Street, the City of London, and Israel." Chris has identified precisely the true rulers of America. He is a man who can see clearly, as did the "anti-Semitic" hero Charles Lindbergh, whom you can hear being cheered and jeered in the attached video. "Our bond with Europe is a bond of race and not of political ideology. It is the European race we must preserve; political progress will follow. Racial strength is vital; politics a luxury." ~ Charles Lindbergh A very good quote from C.S. Lewis: "We direct the fashionable outcry of each generation against those vices of which it is least in danger and fix its approval on the virtue nearest to that vice which we are trying to make endemic." "How has the native American been driven from the positions of representation, of power and respect in his own land? How has he been chased out of the professions, out of government, of the universities, out of the sources of public information? How did the interloper from Asia, the ghetto creature from Kishnev, attain to his eminence whereupon he holds in his hands the decision of war or peace, and decides who are America’s friends, and who are America’s enemies?" ~ Francis Parker Yockey The SPLC is trying its Jewy best to get Dr. Kevin MacDonald fired. Their only weapon against the truth is hysterical emotion, but MacDonald responds as a true scholar, and it is amazing to behold. I was most taken by one of his footnotes, in which he quotes Israel Zangwill, who is responsible for the propaganda inscribed at the base of the Statue of Liberty, which was designed to destroy the old Christian America and remake it in the image of Hymen Lipschitz. Arguing against the restricted immigration act of 1924, Zangwill exclaims, "If you create enough fuss against this Nordic nonsense, you will defeat this legislation. You must make a fight against this bill; tell them they are destroying American ideals." It’s a perfect quote, and it is just one of many that prove MacDonald’s point. Jews have always worked hard to replace American blood with American "ideals," as defined by Shmuley Silverfish and his Christ-hating kin. It was in 1924 that Whites made one their final efforts at self-preservation. Savor this soul-stirring quote: "Let me emphasize here that the restrictionists of Congress do not claim that the ‘Nordic’ race, or even the Anglo-Saxon race, is the best race in the world. Let us concede, in all fairness, that the Czech is a more sturdy laborer, with a very low percentage of crime and insanity, that the Jew is the best businessman in the world, and that the Italian has a spiritual grasp and an artistic sense which have greatly enriched the world and which have, indeed, enriched us, a spiritual exaltation and an artistic creative sense which the Nordic rarely attains. Nordics need not be vain about their own qualifications. It well behooves them to be humble. What we do claim is that the northern European, and particularly Anglo-Saxons, made this country. Oh, yes; the others helped. But that is the full statement of the case. They came to this country because it was already made as an Anglo-Saxon commonwealth. They added to it, they often enriched it, but they did not make it, and they have not yet greatly changed it. We are determined that they shall not. It is a good country. It suits us. And what we assert is that we are not going to surrender it to somebody else or allow other people, no matter what their merits, to make it something different. If there is any changing to be done, we will do it ourselves." ~ Representative William N. Vaile of Colorado, April 8, 1924 By the 1950s the enemy had become clear. It was the same enemy that Churchill identified in 1920 as engaged in a "world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality." "Communism is racial. A racial minority seized control in Russia and in all her satellite countries, such as Poland, Czechoslovakia, and many other countries I could name. They [Jews] have been run out of practically every country in Europe in the years gone by, and if they keep stirring race trouble in this country and trying to force their communistic program on the Christian people of America, there is no telling what will happen to them here… They whine about discrimination. Do you know who is being discriminated against? The white Christian people of America, the ones who created this nation… I am talking about the white Christian people of the North as well as the South." ~ Representative John Rankin, April 23, 1952 But notice how accomodating the rhetoric had become: "I believe that this nation is the last hope of Western civilization and if this oasis of the world shall be overrun, perverted, contaminated or destroyed, then the last flickering light of humanity will be extinguished. I take no issue with those who would praise the contributions which have been made to our society by people of many races, of varied creeds and colors. America is indeed a joining together of many streams which go to form a mighty river which we call the American way. However, we have in the United States today hard-core, indigestible blocs which have not become integrated into the American way of life, but which, on the contrary, are its deadly enemies. Today, as never before, untold millions are storming our gates for admission and those gates are cracking under the strain. The solution of the problems of Europe and Asia will not come through a transplanting of those problems en masse to the United States." ~ Senator Pat McCarran, March 2, 1953 Over 50 years later, the victory of the anti-Christ over God’s chosen is still not complete! Praise the Lord. His grace is sufficient. Jew propaganda that’s as simple as a pimple. "The old adage has it that, when visiting a foreign country, to ascertain who really runs things, one need determine only who is spoken about in whispers, if at all." "The U.S. State Dept.’s Office of Global Anti-Semitism now says the New Testament is a book of conspiracy theory! Yes, our government now rules that the Biblical record that Jews had Christ crucified is not only anti-Semitic; it’s conspiracy junk… While the New Testament is derided as ‘hate speech,’ not a word is said about the seething hatred contained in Judaism’s most sacred book, the Talmud." Pete Peters and Ernst Zundel discuss Schindler’s List, a work of pornographic fiction (i.e., Jewish history). Zundel’s deconstruction of Jewish fables is fascinating, and his significance is that when he was put on trial the first time, it was also the first time in 40 years that the fables were put on trial. The fables lost. "One gets a picture of two devils sent out from hell to try and corrupt the souls of men. One devil is sent to Russia and one to the United States. The Russian devil goes head-on against God and introduces Marxist atheism. He gets C-results. Satan is not very pleased with him. On the other hand, the American devil does not tackle God head-on. He uses the name of God to sell all his Satanic ‘isms’ – like capitalism and racial universalism. When he reports back to hell, he receives an A+ and is given a promotion." The SPLC is in anguish. After a brief sabbatical, "hate radio" returns to the Memphrica airwaves and across the world via the Internet on June 1. One of the first things our boys in the Pool will discuss is Eddie Miller’s recent trip to New York City. He walked around Times Square wearing his "David Duke for Senate" t-shirt. We all have to do our part to spread the hate around. Perhaps your church can host hate fellowship dinners on Thursday nights. We could fund hate scholarships. Hate telethons. Hate lapel ribbons. Hate prayer vigils. We have some big old news of our own: 1) Some "blasts from the past," the word "past" meaning seven years of Kinist archives, will be republished here once our blog software is upgraded to the next major version. And 2) Very soon you’ll be able to download large snippets of American Renaissance conference videos on YouTube, dating all the way back to 1994! And when I say soon, I mean very. You heard it here first. It seems fitting that "Soviet propaganda" style posters are being made for the Obama campaign. Jew Cohen fantasizes that Obamination is "the ideal post-nationalist Citizen of the World," even though Obama’s own words and life tell the opposite story. And sometimes it really is a story, as in the case of once being poor. Obama alleges that his mother received food stamps while paying for graduate school for herself and $15,000 a year in tuition for her little yellow-skinned mulatto. White women can have black babies, but black women can’t have White ones. "In Mexico, the story of the country’s black population has been largely ignored in favor of an ideology that declares that all Mexicans are ‘mixed race.’ But it’s the mixture of indigenous and European heritage that most Mexicans embrace; the African legacy is overlooked." "At first glance, prison rape might seem like a violation of civil rights. Yet you’re forgetting that the words ‘civil rights’ are used solely in a ‘Who? Whom?’ sense these days. If whites are violating the rights of blacks, that is a civil rights issue. If blacks are violating (literally) whites, as typically happens in cases of prison rape, well, that’s not a civil rights issue. That’s just something the cool cops on TV shows make jokes about when arresting the Great White Defendant." The word "carjacking" appears 14 times in this article. That’s what the press really wants to drive into your head. It’s why this writer for the Knox News takes ten paragraphs to get to the facts of the story. "I would never lose to a white boy," crowed a black boxer, four times. "There was no Don Imus or Michael Richards treatment for Hopkins, of course." What’s a gook to do? There are 11 prepositions in the opening sentence of Bill Clinton’s autobiography. I’m quite certain that such books are purchased only to make the buyer look sophisticated. They can’t actually be read. Two lies from the Pope in only two paragraphs. "Pope Benedict does the work of the devil in deliberately giving the impression that Judaism is an Old Testament religion whose holy days give reverence and glory to God… He dares not actually mention the name of God, not even God as He is named in the Old Testament (Yahweh), since the Mishnah superstitiously forbids the pronunciation of Yahweh’s name, except once a year. You will also note that Benedict did not dare to say ‘Praise the Lord Jesus Christ’ in that synagogue, since the invocation of the hated name of the Savior of Israel would have had a searing effect on the Pharisees present." I especially hate this sentence: "I know that the Jewish community make a valuable contribution to the life of the city, and I encourage all of you to continue building bridges of friendship with all the many different ethnic and religious groups present in your neighborhood." Racial and religious mixture leads to bloodshed and perversities, not "valuable contributions" and "bridges of friendship." Far from being "our greatest strength," diversity (i.e., cosmopolitanism) leads to: lower confidence in local government, local leaders, and the local news media; lower political efficacy—that is, confidence in one’s own influence; lower frequency of registering to vote, but more interest and knowledge about politics and more participation in protest marches and social reform groups; less expectation that others will cooperate to solve dilemmas of collective action (e.g., voluntary conservation to ease a water or energy shortage); less likelihood of working on a community project; fewer close friends and confidants; less happiness and lower perceived quality of life; more time spent watching television and more agreement that "television is my most important form of entertainment." Is Christianity turning into a fertility cult? "We discovered that God’s Word is holy and hot!" Vipers in diapers (a parody). Just before the 12 minute mark in this sermon, you will hear Ravi Zacharius say this: "God is the author of life, and in that authorship God reveals Himself not only as good but as holy...meaning separate. Life is then intrinsically sacred, not a conferred sanctity by society, not a pragmatic sanctity that prevents us from eating each other up, but an intrinsic sanctity, which means my race, my humanity, my sexuality, are sacred gifts given by God to me as I have been fashioned in His image. Modern-day artists reverse those very things, and that’s why violence and sensuality become the occupation of so many in their entertainment." We agree! Race and sex are divine gifts and are to be protected. Note that this contradicts almost everyone’s interpretation of Galatians 3:28, the most-raped verse in Scripture, today. To those with a hammer, everything looks like a Reformed-White-Patriarchal-Reconstructionist-Confederate-Agrarian-Tribalistic-"National Folk Religion." According to the speaker, Cynthia Kunsman, patriarchs imply that "Jesus did not make our relationship with the first Adam obsolete - which, certainly, all I get from Adam is sin and death. I don’t know what they’re gettin’ from Adam." Can you imagine her speaking this way about her own parents? "Adamic symbolism is [pause] I don’t want Adam. I don’t want justice. I want mercy." It’s all very convoluted, but I suppose the lesson to be learned is that those who prevent their daughters from being career gals are easier to hate if they also praise "racist" theologians. 2008-04-21T00:43:01-05:00 http://spiritwaterblood.com/index.php/site/tocqueville_was_a_racist/ http://spiritwaterblood.com/index.php/site/tocqueville_was_a_racist/#When:23:15:00Z The only thing patriotards remember about Tocqueville is that he said America is great because America is good. The only problem is that he never said this. And since all the best things he said are forgotten by patricidal warmongers, here comes Ehud to give them an education. Tocqueville wrote: "[T]he destiny of the negroes is in some measure interwoven with that of the Europeans… The most formidable of all the ills which threaten the future of the Union arises from the presence of a black population upon its territory." Ehud comments that "Condoleeza Rice has recently spoken of Negro inequality as America’s ‘Birth Defect’ but Tocqueville considered the Negro presence in America to be the nation’s true ‘Birth Defect.’" "You may set the negro free," said Tocqueville, "but you cannot make him otherwise than an alien to the European… If it be so difficult to root out an inequality which solely originates in the law, how are those distinctions to be destroyed which seem to be based upon the immutable laws of Nature herself?… His physiognomy is to our eyes hideous, his understanding weak, his tastes low; and we are almost inclined to look upon him as a being intermediate between man and the brutes." Neo-Christian Christ-haters offer an easy solution to this dilemma: have sex with the Negro and spawn little Obamas. But to Tocqueville, this was unthinkable. "Those who hope that the Europeans will ever mix with the negroes, appear to me to delude themselves." As Ehud notes, Tocqueville "concedes the fact that all historical manifestations of Negro liberation have resulted in the genocide of Whites; be it North Africa, the Belgian Congo, the West Indies, Haiti, Rhodesia, or modern South Africa, the results of Negro integration have played out the exact same way in every circumstance—an unrestrained descent into barbarism in which the European population is consumed by feral rape, and cannibalistic murder. He therefore knew that the Southern Whites were without alternative—slavery, or at the very least, social subordination of the Negro, must persist at least until some equitable means of relocation presented itself. Any alternative is a hellish proposition." Welcome to hell.  Tocqueville preceded Dabney in saying that "the negroes and the whites must either wholly part or wholly mingle," and 21st-century Christians have chosen the latter option. Tocqueville saw that "the white citizen of the United States is proud of his race and proud of himself," but this is now considered hate speech. Consequently, liberty has ebbed away, and this would not have surprised the Frenchman since racial amalgamation can only be effected via despotism. You can see that he predicted the rise of Lincoln, but even though Tocqueville was inclined towards the abolition of slavery, he recognized and appreciated the Christian structure of Southern society. "When I contemplate the condition of the South, I can only discover two alternatives which may be adopted by the white inhabitants of those States; viz., either to emancipate the negroes, and to intermingle with them; or, remaining isolated from them, to keep them in a state of slavery as long as possible… Such is the view which the Americans of the South take of the question, and they act consistently with it. As they are determined not to mingle with the negroes, they refuse to emancipate them." Obviously, the Christianity of that era, which sought to uphold the most lawful conditions for both races, even in an imperfect and undesirable situation, is virtually unrecognizable to neo-Christians today. So acquainted and comforted are they by despotism that they have forgotten what life was like before they were enslaved. And if you think Tocqueville was a racist, here’s a quote from C.S. Lewis in The Discarded Image: An Introduction to Medieval and Renaissance Literature: "Long before the empire fell, citizenship had ceased to have any connection with race [meaning ethnicity]. Throughout its history its Germanic and (still more) Celtic neighbours, if once conquered or allied, apparently had no reluctance to assimilate, and no difficulty in assimilating, its civilisation. You could put them into togas and set them to learning rhetoric almost at once. They were not in the least like Hottentots dressed up in bowler hats and pretending to be Europeans. The assimilation was real and often permanent." The UK has a solution to such hate speech today: jail time. "Where the law of God is set aside, man’s law, which is anti-law from before Plato’s day to ours, replaces it. The Christian is a man empowered by God’s grace and by His Spirit because he has a clean conscience before God (Heb. 10:22). Where God’s law and grace are rejected, the systems of government devised by man rest on sin, guilt, and injustice. The power of guilt to cripple and limit man is very great. We see it widely used today to make men feel guilty because they are successful, or white, or almost anything. We are held to be polluters of the air and earth and an accursed race of exploiters. The effects of this on millions is very severe. People are afraid to state obvious facts lest they be accused of racism, cultural imperialism, ideological oppression, and so on and on. Guilt is a very powerful means of controlling and castrating peoples. This guilt is created by manufacturing sins which have no place in God’s sight but are very important in man’s plans to govern over men and nations, and the earth as well. If we are held to be guilty because of our race and national past, there is no way of removing that ostensible sin and its guilt." ~ R.J. Rushdoony on genocidal White-haters "In 1950 whites and blacks were respectively 27.98% and 8.97% of world population. By 2060 these figures will almost reverse as blacks surge to 25.38% and whites shrink to 9.76%." There won’t be very many White people to pay for all the black welfare. Here are some interesting graphs for the decades ahead. Greece and the United [sic] States [sic] are at opposite ends of the spectrum for valuing "the common bonds of religion, cultural traditions, and ethnicity." Sometimes White hatred and self-loathing result in pet idolatry, as we showed recently. More often, it simply causes grumbling and worse about large White families. In this Washington Post article, families with more than two children are called "showoffs." It is said that having so many children "opens one up to charges of elitism." Please note that this is a uniquely White affliction and a uniquely Jewish gameplan. Muslims and Mexicans would never waste a split-second caring what anyone thinks about their families. Only browbeaten Whites stew in their guilt and lay awake at night worried about how they are received in public opinion. I never realized that Paul Gottfried, a Jew, coined the term "paleoconservatism." As we all know, paleos never discuss Jewish nihilism, and perhaps this is why. Now Gottfried has written an epitaph for the movement he helped along. (I think his second paragraph is a slight against Tom Fleming.) Well, good riddance to any persons or institutions who call themselves "conservative," regardless of the prefix, if they do not explicitly conserve the rapidly diminishing White race, and our American tribe in particular. Conservatism without blood is liberalism. We have great affection for Ron Paul, but Dr. Paul’s rare grasp of the late Constitution is pointless if he has been hired for any other reason than to prolong our people. Now the former paleos (neo-paleos?) are hoping that Bob Barr will be their new Ron Paul. Pointless! Though its political parties are still not as far to the Right as they need to be, Europe is far ahead of us. The irony is that Europeans are being baked in a crucible of Jewish anti-law, and we are allegely "free." Of interest: When Alex Linder tried to raise the proverbial Jewish Question at Taki’s site, all Sheol broke loose. "What political interest do Whites have in any association with blacks or browns? The answer is absolutely none. All we get from ‘minorities’ that are actually 92% of the world’s population are bills and violence." ~ Alex Linder Hostile strangers are welcomed with open arms while lovely families like this are banished to hell. Steve Sailer has made the point that tribalism is so central to the human condition that it can’t be transcended. When we see organizations, like the Army, which downplay skin color in favor of a new color, G.I. green, it simply means that they are trying to create a new kind of tribalism. This is essentially what neo-Christians do when they spurn their heritage as a thing unclean. And this gets to the heart of the problem, the heresies of Gnosticism and Unitarianism, which have grown up like weeds within Christendom. It has always been difficult, but especially in our troubled time, to think of God as triune, and worship Him in that manner, and order our lives accordingly. Those who strive for absolute unity in the flesh are functional Unitarians. In fact, every heresy begins with a denial of the Trinity. We still are not living the Dream. So the sex interest of one the apes who slaughtered Christian and Newsom lied to police, and though not charged, has an uncle in the Knoxville Police Department who also just so happens work "for the lead investigative agency in the case." Say no more. When measuring character by race looks particularly bad for the black race, the conclusion is obvious - that it’s foolish to measure character by race. It’s fascinating that Bloodsmut-Americans like Barack Obama, Halle Berry, and Alicia Keys all had black sperm donors and were raised by their White slut-mothers but identify wholly as black because that’s the way they look. As someone comments on this page, the reverse pathology is unthinkable: that a White man impregnates a black woman, leaves her, and the child grows up identifying wholly as White. It’s unthinkable because the child could never pass for White, and sure enough, it never happens. In the article, it says Alicia Keys has "read several Black Panther autobiographies and wears a gold AK-47 pendant around her neck ‘to symbolize strength, power and killing ‘em dead’… Keys’ AK-47 jewelry came as a surprise to her [White] mother, who is quoted as telling Blender: ‘She wears what? That doesn’t sound like Alicia.’" "She also loves to portray corn-rowed thugs as her ideal man in her music videos." "For those of you in the ‘When is Obama gonna play the Nigger-Word card?’ pool, the winner is ... Page 85! Congratulations!" This Ann Coulter article is a must-read. Until now, Steve Sailer has been the only person alive who has actually read Obama’s insufferable tomes. And here’s another good Coulter article. The conversation that led to Obama sacrificing his White grandmother to the juju gods of semitical correctness "consisted of his slacker grandfather making a series of excuses to avoid having to drive the sole bread-earner in the family to work. But Obama says, ‘The words were like a fist in my stomach, and I wobbled to regain my composure.’ (It was as if he had been punched by an aggressive panhandler at a bus stop!) And not because his grandfather’s sorry excuse reminded him that he came from a long line of callow, worthless men, both black and white." Obama’s "father’s policy views were similar to Robert Mugabe’s." By Obama’s own admission, the movie Black Orpheus "led directly to the birth of the demagogic anti-American leftist who might become America’s first black president." More. "In his autobiography, Obama is subtly contemptuous of his wandering, exotiphilic mother whose centrifugal tendencies took her from Kansas to Indonesia." But because he spent "four years as a small child in Indonesia and [a] handful of weeks in Kenya," he believes he has "a deep understanding of global affairs," and in fact claims "more relevant foreign affairs experience than Hillary or McAmnesty." In a sane world, Steve Sailer would win a Pulitzer. Mixed marriages are challenging. "Every child is a child of its race, and there is no escape from the almightiness of heredity. However weak the White man, his ancestors produced the greatness of Europe; however strong the black, his ancestors never lifted themselves from the darkness of Africa." ~ Senator Theodore G. Bilbo More hypersensitivity from the Professionally Oppressed. First blacks complained about mortgage redlining. Now they’re complaining about "reverse redlining." Do they ever not complain? How not to solve the "race problem." "A man was sentenced to two years in jail for driving his wife to suicide by calling her ‘black.’ This was in India, where...fair skin is highly desired, and where being called dark is ‘worse than physical torture,’ according to the court." Condi Rice has made a career out of playing the race card. Even the racist channel, Black Entertainment Television, has commented, "If you’re against the war in Iraq, you might as well consider yourself pro-slavery, according to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice." George Clooney excuses his mugging (which is threatened murder) by ‘machine-gun toting adolescents’ for the reason that ’they don’t have great TV out there.’" Russell Kirk’s widow "often tells the story of how Buckley was dumbfounded that Kirk could live and work in the tiny town of Mecosta, MI. He simply could not appreciate how Kirk could love the little platoon of which he, but not Buckley, was a part." Schools are very generous. "In its recent report to Congress, the U.S. State Department ‘Office of Global Anti-Semitism’ makes a startling policy statement. It says the New Testament record that the Jews had Christ crucified is ’classical anti-Semitism‘ - a historic form of hate." Naturally, there is no U.S. State Department Office of Global Anti-Christianity or U.S. State Department Office of Global Anti-Aryanism, because then the Jews who created the U.S. State Department Office of Global Anti-Semitism would be indicted, and such a thing could only set back the cause of peace. So my government considers me a hater. It’s probably only a matter of time before I’m labeled a terrorist. According to Reverend Pike, the State Department report also says it is "anti-Semitic" to: Allege "intentionally or unintentionally" that the state of Israel persecutes Palestinians. Criticize "intentionally or unintentionally" Zionism or Israel if such criticism leads to lowering of the public opinion of Jews or the government, military, or people of Israel (p. 33). Compare the behavior of Israel’s leaders and military (in suppression of Palestinians) to Nazis (p. 22). Publish cartoons depicting the Israeli government and military as similar to Nazis. Diminish the 6-million figure of Holocaust dead in any amount. [Oh, hallowed be thy name, Sacred Six Million!] Question that gas chambers were the primary means of killing 6 million Jews (p.22). Allege that Jews exert undue influence in Congress and the White House. Allege that Jews exert undue influence in the media. Claim there exists a "Jewish conspiracy" to dominate society (p.19). Allege that American Jews are equally loyal to Israel (p.19). Deny the people of Israel their "right of self-determination." This means upholding Biblical law that the Jewish people cannot reoccupy Palestine in unrighteousness. This also means denying them occupation through illegal settlements of all the territory promised to Abraham. Reveal hostility (as Christ did) toward Talmudic (pharisaic) Judaism. Zundel’s prison cell. The good news for Jews is that blasphemy is bringing in the big bucks in Hollywood and other major media outlets. "Artists" who depict the Lord Jesus Christ as a queer are still breathing, but this lovely lady has been sentenced to two years in prison for speaking the truth that "Muhammad would be considered a child molester under Austrian law because at age 53 he took a 6 year old girl named A’isha as his third wife and began having sex with her when she was nine." Protests at Olympic torch relays have turned violent. This has led the president of the IOC, Jacques Rogge, to intone, "Violence for whatever reason is not compatible with the values of the torch relay or the Olympic Games." But it was Adolf Hitler, not the ancient Greeks, who originated the torch relay! A she-Jew tells Gene Simmons (Chaim Witz) that he can’t put on enough makeup to hide his Jewish hook-nose. Jesse Ventura fired up his grill to roast some weenies, and you’ll never believe what happened. The flames melted the steel, and the whole thing fell to the ground at the rate of gravity. He used this unfortunate incident as an excuse to take over his neighbor’s back yard. Walter Scott "held abstract theory in religion in the same contempt he held abstract theory in politics. But he believed in and revered the non-abstract Christianity of Harold the Dauntless. There is no dichotomy, as the ‘New Age’ pagans would have us believe, between the European Christianity of Walter Scott and the Christianity of the early Church; they are one… Hillary is a votaress of Cybele without the sensuality, and McCain is a devotee of Mars without the passion… A demented Mau Mau like Obama could only rise to prominence in a post-Christian society. He alone among the candidates comes from outside the European tradition. He is not post-Christian; he is pure barbarian. He would be imprisoned or exiled in a truly Christian society, but in a post-Christian society, he is a god. There is one benefit to be derived from living in a society that has gone completely over to the devil. You have clarity… If we abandon Europe, we abandon Him." "While agreeing with the fundamentalists on the inerrancy of scripture, I must say that the modern fundamentalists such as the late Rev. Falwell and the prolific author Henry M. Morris (The Long War Against God) have preserved Holy Scripture at the expense of Christianity. And I say this because the fundamentalists, as represented by Falwell and Morris, have in the name of creationist theology jettisoned the European cultural heritage. This might seem like a minor thing; after all, what is a cultural heritage compared to the Holy Bible? But in cutting us off from the European cultural heritage, they have cut us off from the living God who is the source of the Holy Bible… Contained within the European cultural heritage is the truth that there is first that divine intimation in our heart and then the sympathetic connection with a divine element in the hearts of our kith and kin. Without that intuition and sympathy, we have no way of knowing or of caring about the truths of divine revelation… It is ironic that the fundamentalist, who deplores the liberal’s faith in evolution, is compact with him on the issue of the European cultural heritage. Both maintain that the European’s actions toward other races and his intuitions about the nature of reality were in error. But then how can we have faith in anything? If the one civilization that took Christ into its bosom is not essentially correct about the nature of man and his relation to God, then aren’t we all doomed to either Beckett’s despair or Montaigne’s skepticism?… If we are severed from that heritage of the white man, we will descend to the spiritual level of the apes whom Darwin says are our progenitors. Presumably the fundamentalists would not like to see that happen, but then they should stop trying to Negroize Christianity and return instead to the segregationist, hierarchal, fundamental faith of their European forefathers." 2008-04-13T23:15:00-05:00 http://spiritwaterblood.com/index.php/site/the_new_face_of_christianity/ http://spiritwaterblood.com/index.php/site/the_new_face_of_christianity/#When:16:00:01Z "The church where Sen. Barack Obama has worshipped for two decades publicly declares that its ministry is founded on a 1960s book that espouses ’the destruction of the white enemy.’" And Whites can’t line up fast enough to vote for him. "What Obama is counting on is that white Americans don’t take blacks’ ideological views seriously." Again, this is the soft bigotry of low expectations. Read this excellent Sailer article and you’ll encounter a White writer who is called a racist but is actually respecting blacks by ignoring the double standards they construct. The remarkable thing, as Sailer observes, is that Obama is smart enough to count on the soft bigotry of Whites to get him out of a tight spot, and it has worked brilliantly. Sailer is correct that "nobody takes a black man seriously as an intellectual," and this is patently honest, not racist. As we see time and again, the true "racists" are the ones who call others "racist." The word "racist" is not the only Communist word that is stupid and meaningless; it is only the most-used. Pastor James Manning: "Obama is a Mac Daddy. Obama pimps white women and black women. He got started, you didn’t notice him until he brought out those big-chested white women with their tight t-shirts and their short pants. That’s what a pimp does. Oh, come on. You don’t get your campaign started with a big-chested white woman. She must be a 54D, double D. I haven’t trashed him. I haven’t trashed Obama. His African-in-heat father went a-whoring after a trashy white woman. He was born trash. I said he was born trash. I didn’t trash him. I’m speaking the truth about him." And be sure to see where Alan Colmes says those who preach the gospel should not call people names. I like this guy Manning. He says, "everything I do is Biblically rude… What I’m trying to say with that is if black people are looking for a black president, then why don’t they get a black president, get a black person who has a black father and a black mother rather than a mixture." And then Sean Hannity comes back at him with the tired old emotional play: "Pastor, do you believe God makes trashy children?" And Manning’s response is spot-on. He shuts down these two morons by pointing to their logical fallacy of extolling only hereditary virtue but not hereditary vice. We’ve looked so long and hard for an admirable black preacher that this is quite something indeed. Even better, here is a black man who really is interested in content of character. Remarkable. We Kinists do not hate black people. We want the very best for them, and the very best thing they could do, in our opinion, is listen to James Manning. "Funny how those who demand economic parity end up taking the biggest share." This is the Communism that Orwell addressed in his books, principally Animal Farm. Now, why is it that black nationalists and White race-mixers so easily drift towards Communism while White nationalists and Kinists are self-consciously opposed to it? The answer should be obvious. Thunderous applause for Obama’s pastor at fellow nutjob Maya Angelou’s birthday party. Blacks are apparently not as penitent as Obama pretends to be. Another wacko who likes to talk about her "inner Goddess of the Three Directions" is Alice Walker, who compares Obama to King and Mandela. And here’s Oprah’s "Christian" testimony. But please don’t forget, dear reader, that Africa is the epicenter of the New Christendom. "Obama’s wife, in her own senior thesis at Princeton, said that rather than being dedicated to humanity, or even to America, that she is dedicated to the Black community first." A direct quote: "There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I am obligated to this community and will utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit the black community first and foremost." You don’t mind having a First Lady with a history of black separatism, do you? And if you think Michelle’s history is intriguing, this is the excrement that Obama, a "Christian," calls "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset": "Allah is Supreme! Allah is Supreme! Allah is Supreme! Allah is Supreme! I witness that there is no god but Allah! I witness that there is no god but Allah! I witness that Muhammad is his prophet!" Read this article and imagine what would happen if Christians were a fraction as serious about their faith. Fitna is released on the Internet and students surround the Dutch embassy, setting tires ablaze and shouting for the death of Geert Wilders. YouTube finds itself blocked from entire countries. But in the West, Christians give Jews billions of dollars to blaspheme their Lord, and when asked why, they say something idiotic and unbiblical, such as: "I may not like what you say, but I’ll defend to the death your right to say it." That’s the Christian of the 21st century - sacrificing his life so that anti-Christs will be free from persecution as they piss on the Second Commandment. Mutts think "this business of race" is "absurd." Miscegenated couples view their children as "bridges" between "cultures." They mean "races" when they say "cultures," and even more interesting, they implicitly acknowledge that a bridge is neither here nor there. A bridge spans a divide between solid ground. Isn’t it far better to set your child’s feet on solid ground rather than burden him with the task of being a bridge? Which would you consider to be more loving? Someone needs to take out the trash. King Kong returns. "And while Jewish extremists promote race-mixing for Blacks and Whites, Israel does not even allow a legal marriage between a Jew and and a non-Jew." "’The new face of Christianity will be the black woman,’ said Dr. Kwok Pui Lan to an audience at Lexington Theological Seminary in Kentucky, according to the Lexington Herald-Leader. Kwok, a professor at the Episcopal Divinity School in Cambridge, Mass., is a pioneer in Asian feminist theology as well as postcolonial theology." If you read the article you’ll see that the new Black Woman’s Christianity has everything to do with social advancement and nothing to do with repentance of sin. But the important thing is that it’s called Christianity! And it’s sweeping the world, hallelujah! Of the conversion of Europe, Hilaire Belloc writes: "It was all done, so to speak, within the lifetime of a man. The link and cornerstone of Western Europe, the quadrilateral which lies between the Pyrenees and the Rhine, between the Mediterranean, the Atlantic, and the Channel, accepted civilization in a manner so final and so immediate that no historian has ever quite been able to explain the phenomenon." I thought of what Chris Ortiz said about tyranny when I saw this quote from Daniel Webster: "God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it." Ergo, those who don’t love liberty can expect slavery. Once again, Chuck Baldwin disappoints, only because he seems always on the verge of saying something spectacular, and then pulls his punches. I think it was Mark Twain who said the difference between the right word and the almost-right word is like the difference between lightning and a lightning bug. In the year 2008, we need writers and speakers and fighters who swing with all their might. Another excellent article from Chris Ortiz, who says "the Old South was fighting for much more than their own Christian liberty - they were fighting for Christian liberty in its entirety. And it was a battle whose fallen shared much with the blood spilled of Christian martyrs throughout history." There are some indispensable quotes from Dabney here, and Chris is absolutely correct that "The present debate over church and state is only such because both sides assume statism, i.e., a large centralized civil government teeming with political positions to fill. One side wants them filled with Christians while the other does not." Animal-human hybrids are now being created, which is a sin against God, although the Christians who support race-mixing would surely disagree. (After all, where in the Bible does it say that cow eggs cannot be injected with human cells? And the Apostle Paul never frowned on estrogen for man-breasts, as far as I know.) At the same time, there are massages, gourmet food, and yoga for idolized pets. Satin dresses and tuxedos for dogs are being sold. Churches are hosting pet dedication ceremonies. You know that time warp between farce and insanity? I’m still trapped there. "[W]hen Pope John said that he had ’no feeling of hatred—only loving charity and forgiveness’ for the Congolese troops who tortured and murdered white missionary priests and nuns, the new Christianity, the worship of the black man, was given official sanction. Every single white Catholic who still believed that Christ was God and man should have left the Catholic Church at that moment, for the head of the Church had just announced his atheism… The fact that the Mother Church has become a whore gives me no pleasure. But it does little good to deny it. Christ has been replaced, in the Catholic Church, by the great black Buddha. And the Protestant churches differ only in degree, not in kind." Why study the Bible when you can bounce around like friggin’ idiots? Only in Michigan is weightism illegal. It is a travesty that we judge people by their girth rather than the content of their intestine. I have a dream today! Can you imagine what would happen to this judge if he were White and he ordered Harangutang-Americans out of the courtroom? He wouldn’t even get a severance package. It’s rare to see a racist headline like this, but it’s true: "The suburbs of the US are no longer the same as those immortalised in 1950s movies, with white families living in big houses and the father driving off to work in his Buick, past manicured lawns." And the reason for this is because Christians signed on to the genocidal program of Jews. They did this to earn the favor of strangers because, having much earlier rejected Christ, they no longer considered their own culture worth saving. The people who call themselves Christians today are largely cosmopolitans and pluralists, reconciled, like the living dead, to existing in a place that they are unable to call their own. "Last year, a Snickers ad was pulled from airing on TV when gay activist groups complained that the ad, which showed two men eating a snickers and accidentally locking lips, was ‘offensive’ to gays. A GoDaddy ad was pulled in 2005 for sexual content. A pro-life ad was even pulled in Ontario this year because the pro-life message was somehow ‘offensive.’ Yet, an ad showing the west coast reconquered by Mexico doesn’t raise a peep?" Update: The company, which was until recently owned by the Bronfman Jews, has apologized and pulled the ad. Chosenites are somehow exempt from Canadian "hate crime" laws. "Four decades after [Jew] Hollywood’s first interracial kiss in ‘Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner’ shocked [Christian] mainstream America...mixed unions are forming at unprecedented rates" in Canada. "There were 289,420 mixed-race couples, married and common law, in 2006—one third more than in 2001, the last time the data was collected… Yet there was a time in North America’s not-so distant past that marrying someone of a different race wasn’t just taboo, it could land someone behind bars." Ah, the good old days, before Christians adopted paganism. Lawrence Auster writes that a Darwinist by the name of David Stove observed a fatal flaw in Darwinism. It is that natural selection has never been observable in humans. In order for this to occur, humans would have to share with animals an 80%+ mortality rate, and "it is obviously not the case that humans are engaged in an incessant competition for survival in which only a few individuals in each generation survive to bear offspring." Darwinists need to step up to the plate and answer, "what is the mortality rate required to produce human racial differentiation by natural selection?" We agree with Auster that Darwinism has failed to explain the origin of species, but there is undoubtedly differentiation within species due to genetic variation and natural selection. We just have to be careful about jumping to theoretical conclusions that men have ever lived like animals. 2008-04-07T16:00:01-05:00 http://spiritwaterblood.com/index.php/site/wrighteousness_exceeding_that_of_the_pharisees/ http://spiritwaterblood.com/index.php/site/wrighteousness_exceeding_that_of_the_pharisees/#When:15:59:00Z One of the main points in Obama’s Trinity United Church of Christ’s "Black Value System" is "Disavowal of the Pursuit of ‘Middleclassness.’" Which is why Jeremiah Wright has taken church funds and bilt hissef a 10,340-square-foot mansion in an exlusive Chicago enclave. He nows pours club soda by the heated indoor pool and wonders how the Oppressed are doing. Wright, who attended one of the best (White) high schools in Philadelphia, grew up middle class, and pastored the largest black church in Chicago, should be treated "with mercy, considering the likelihood that we would have come through segregation just as damaged as he," says self-loathing idiot Mike Huckabee. Black "pastors" at a prestigious forum that would have been closed instantly to White nationalists are showing full support for Wright. This is because blacks are not as easily intimidated as Whites and know it is in their best interest to stand with one of their own. "Wright’s sermons, the summit pastors said, were a continuation of the same long-standing black tradition of ‘prophetic preaching’ that produced Dr. Martin Luther King. ‘If Martin Luther King Jr. were pastoring a church today, it would look very much like Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, Ill., and the sermons you would hear him preach would sound very much’ like Wright’s, Rev. Frederick Haynes III, senior pastor at Friendship West Baptist Church, said." Wright himself was not there because he was concerned for his safety - the very thing that he and Obama criticize Whites for doing when they express their fear of diversity. Sauce for the goose and gander. Black conspiracy theories. "When even the best of black America turns out to be connected at the hip to a demented America hater, we realize that black America is not intellectually equal with us, does not share the same moral sense with us, is not in its heart a part of the same country with us, and does not deserve any special deference from us. And that is the real, and very valuable, racial lesson that whites have received from Barack Obama." Even the neocon priest Richard John Neuhaus is not fooled: "Whites are invited to make their peace with the fact that these are the children of Stepin Fetchit and Amos and Andy who have replaced humor with the shuffle of political extremism but are still entertaining the country by doing their black thing." Some have called Wright’s Marxist black Liberation Theology a sort of Kinism for blacks. This article is helpful in that regard. "The first waves of this movement, in Latin America, were designed to make Christianity appealing to the people by addressing their felt needs, the desire for armed revolution and Marxist economics. Liberation theology only works if one can connect with real or perceived oppression and then make the Scripture illustrative of how to navigate out of that situation. The Kingdom of God is a means to a social, economic, or political end." White hucksters - Joel Osteen foremost among them - have cashed in on this perversion of the gospel. The difference is that the black radicals speak of racial oppressors whereas the White radicals are abstract in their diagnoses. "Both are at heart Mammon worship." Contrast this with Kinism, which affirms that there is a chasm of sin between us and the Father which only the sacrifice of Christ has bridged. Kinists desire healthy communities which are the necessary basis for a universal communion in Christ. We do not desire money or fame. It is strange indeed that neo-Christians identify us with devilry simply because we seek separation from various elements that do our people harm. Christian parents pull their covenant children from public schools for the very same reasons that Kinists oppose pluralism and multiracialism, and such parents would be very correct in denying that their faith and their obligations under the covenant would become of no effect if they did not have an enemy to react against. On the contrary, it is their faith which compels them to the good work of separation, not the aggressions of their enemies. But then, liberals have always smeared conservatives as merely reactionary, as though a lurch to the left is inevitable and only those with ulterior motives could oppose it. "In the midst of a world of light and love, of song and feast and dance, [Lucifer] could find nothing to think of more interesting than his own prestige." ~ C.S. Lewis "To make a black man more white, if it is even achievable, is not to improve him, it is to make of him a monstrosity. And though it is a harsh truth to acknowledge, the black man in the U.S. is marooned, a civilizational orphan. He is no longer fully African, but he can never be, nor should he want to be white… The kulturkampf is part and parcel of what it means to participate in, and be a product of a culture. That is, to believe it is best, to take it seriously, to see it as flowing from the deep fountains of identity, not from the artificial, corporate identifications of the cosmopolitan cultural marketplace, where all cultures are equally accessible to everyone for the simple reason that they are all equally superficial, all equally make-believe. If we did not have powerful reasons for believing the culture in which we found ourselves was best, then it could not survive… Men do not die for what is arbitrary… Kinism of a sort is possible among blacks, one supposes, but it will not and cannot look like white Kinism. The outpost of black separatism is the nearest black thinkers might approach Kinism, as Kinism is a European doctrine, a confluence of ideas, some of which are utterly alien to the black soul. An historical realization blocks their path: as long as the sun rises, internecine, tribal hatred will be a powerful undercurrent in black civilization. It is only their status in the U.S. and their history here that provides impetus to unity. They possess the cheap and false unity of a common enemy, just as we whites possess the false unity of agreement to the rules of polity, and not much else, our racial and civilizational unity having largely been destroyed by liberalism. In Africa there is no unity of race or kind; indeed, there is no ‘Africa’ in the same way in which there is a ‘Europe.’ And if the black man returns to his natural state of being, he will be at ethnic war with those of his own race until Christ has fully penetrated his civilization… There is no other way to say it but that the black man is the descendant of Africans, and he is suited to his own civilization, if in generosity it may be called that, and not to the civilization of the European." A perfect glimpse of "the cheap and false unity of a common enemy" is seen in Obama’s own definition of the world: "where white folks’ greed runs a world in need, apartheid in one hemisphere, apathy in another hemisphere." It’s all Whitey’s fault! Obama even "blames racism for breaking up his parents’ marriage, not his father’s polygamist ways..." Auster writes: "This is the black racist version of Christianity, in which the principle of evil is identified with the white race and the principle of good is identified with the black race, or with all nonwhite races. That’s the message that so touched Obama that he became a Christian." The sad part is that White neo-Christians identify this dung as legitimate Christianity simply because of the history of the messengers themselves, and this is what Auster calls "the soft bigotry of low expectations." Speaking of which… It seems straight out of Tom Wolfe, but James Watson, possibly the foremost scientist in the world, made some true statements about black people, lost his job because of them, and for penance donated the legal maximum ($2,300) to Barack Obama’s campaign in January. In his Really Big Speech, Obama called for a national conversation on race. But when a White man opens his mouth and tries to converse, bad things happen. So remember that the black definition of "conversation" means to agree with whatever the most liberal of them tells you. Lawrence Auster has the very best title I’ve yet heard for Obamination: "the politician formerly known as the Prince of Peace." Obama proves that being "biracial" is to have no identity at all. The only thing such a person can do, in order to find some sense of belonging, is drift to those who loathe their own heritage or are clueless about it. It’s hard to believe, but only recently have geneticists been able to distinguish between dogs and wolves. They are very close genetically yet quite different, as everyone knows. The dog breed is "a construct zoologically and genetically equivalent to a race of man." Human racial differences "are around ten times the difference between the sexes within each race and larger than the differences that distinguish the two species of chimpanzee… But while it’s OK to talk about differences among dog breeds, not so for human races." Studying what various dog breeds do best is quite fascinating. It takes a tremendous amount of intelligence and willpower for a sheepdog to suppress his wolf-like instincts at the command of his master. And there is a reason why we have the expression "a pack of hounds" but not "a pack of terriers." Certain breeds exhibit not only intelligence but conscientiousness. Others are intelligent scofflaws. Still others are downright stupid. No one in his right mind would deny that coaxing these marvelous traits out of a few genes is a very good thing, but leave a dog to his own fancy and he’ll mate with anything he can. We in the human world instinctively know that it is best to mate with our own kind and are strongly attracted to them, but we have perverts like Ken Ham telling us that we should throw everything in the blender and see what kind of dark green mush comes out of it. The Ken Hamites of the world truly are as filthy as dogs. There’s a snippet in the article about differences between White and Chinese newborns which struck me as an insight into how such people order their societies: "White babies started to cry more easily, and once they started, they were more difficult to console. Chinese babies adapted to almost any position in which they were placed." They even accepted cloths placed over their mouths! Condi Rice says America has a "birth defect" for not recognizing blacks as "a founding population." And this is the kind of stuff we see every day. How many times can we comment on utter nonsense that is taken seriously by those in the highest echelon of power? How many jokes can we tell about idiotic statements that are so widely believed, not a single person will call for Rice to be fired? She won’t have to pull a Trent Lott on White Entertainment Television. It’s already April, which means that it’s high time for another state to apologize for the slavery that ended over 140 years ago (not the slavery that exists today). You have to get a jump on the competition. John Lofton has written a very disappointing article full of groaners, and Pat Buchanan liked it so much that he posted it on his own blog. "As Christians, we are commanded to be all one in Christ Jesus - period. No black, no white, no Greek, no Jew, no male, no female, etc. Your race, my race, they are utterly irrelevant to God. There is no ‘race’ in the Bible except as an athletic contest." By this line of reasoning, I was born with a penis purely by accident, and God has called me to walk the path of androgyny. I should tie a strand of twine around the thing and hope that it falls off, because it is utterly irrelevant to my salvation. All joking aside, this is the point that Harry tried to make to Joe Whorecraft. Let us walk in newness of life, thanking God for cleansing us of our sins, spiritually united to all other believers, of all colors, anywhere in the world. But we will never allow lying preachers to call the precious gifts that God has bestowed upon us "irrelevant" or "insignificant." The man who believes such things about his kin is called worse than an infidel in the Bible. Here again, Buchanan, by way of criticizing Obama, defends the civil adultery movement, praises the mulatto race-mixer Ward Connerly, counts himself one of "the true friends of racial justice," and anticipates "a day, a few decades off, when there will be no racial majority, only a collection of minorities." In that day, he says, America will be the Balkans "if some races and ethnic groups may be preferred because of where their ancestors came from." Yeah, that would be shocking if Whites keep the country their own fathers gave them and refuse to accept invaders and usurpers as their equals. Doesn’t Buchanan know what happens to foxes who sneak into the henhouse? Notice that this excrement is being published by the "paleoconservatives" at Chronicles. What a sick joke. Here’s something you never see - a black woman with White children. They look White, anyway. One is wearing a Bob Marley t-shirt, so they’ll grow up to be wiggers. Seeing a picture like this drives home the realization that adoption is very one-sided. Donations are tax-deductible. The NAACP says rules requiring youths to dress like civilized human beings are racist. The lesson of the subprime mortgage crisis: "Social engineering by the Federal Government to put more racial minorities into houses has backfired." "Recently," writes Kevin MacDonald, "Western societies have embarked on a public policy project in which the ethno-nationalism of white people is officially proscribed as an unadulterated evil.  Multiculturalism only is encouraged and viewed as morally superior… As Muller notes: ‘In a global context, it is the [Western] insistence on universalist criteria [for immigration] that seems provincial’… For substantial stretches of U.S. history, it was believed that only the people of English origin, or those who were Protestant, or white, or hailed from northern Europe were real Americans… In a very short period, Europe and European-derived societies, which had achieved an unprecedented level of ethnic homogeneity following World War II, have developed a stifling political correctness, in which any tiny vestige of ethnocentrism on the part of Europeans is crushed with all the power the ruling elites can muster. This is taking place while the rest of the world continues to undergo modernization via the creation of ethno-states. Muller’