The Jig is Up an Offal Lot
It’s all about letting go of your fear.
It turns out that notorious racist James Watson contributed $2,300 to the Obama campaign in January. Will Obama be asked to return the money, as Ron Paul was asked when Don Black contributed?
If it’s okay for Michelle Obama to write a doctoral thesis on her "blackness" then I should have a long career in academia. This reminds me of the PCA’s resident Negro, Anthony Bradley, who has made Thomas Sowell the subject of his doctoral dissertation. Real heavy stuff there. Here he is front and center at this year’s PCA conference. I wonder if he ever fulfilled his wish of moving to where the White girls dance with Negroes in the nightclubs.
But we have to give Bradley his due. In this Fox News piece, he asks a very good question: "If Barack Obama has really submitted himself to his church like he’s claimed, why does he have a different expression of faith from his own pastor?"
Some fascinating comments by Hegel on Africans. "In Negro life the characteristic point is the fact that consciousness has not yet attained to the realization of any substantial objective existence – as for example, God, or Law – in which the interest of man’s volition is involved and in which he realizes his own being." And here we see why orthodox Christianity is like Kryptonite to a Negro: "Religion begins with the consciousness that there is something higher than man. But even Herodotus called the Negroes sorcerers. Now in Sorcery we have not the idea of a God, of a moral faith; it exhibits man as the highest power, regarding him as alone occupying a position of command over the power of Nature. We have here therefore nothing to do with a spiritual adoration of God, nor with an empire of Right. God thunders, but is not on that account recognized as God. For the soul of man, God must be more than a thunderer, whereas among the Negroes this is not the case. Although they are necessarily conscious of dependence upon nature – for they need the beneficial influence of storm, rain, cessation of the rainy period, and so on – yet this does not conduct them to the consciousness of a Higher power: it is they who command the elements, and this they call ‘magic.’" Or, if you will, the prosperity gospel, which grew out of Pentecostalism, which grew out of the negrified Azusa Street revival in 1906. Again, present-orientation precludes the universality of law. "Nothing but external force can hold the [Negro] State together for a moment. A ruler stands at the head, for sensuous barbarism can only be restrained by despotic power. But since the subjects are of equally violent temper with their master, they keep him on the other hand within limits… [W]ant of self-control distinguishes the character of the Negroes. This condition is capable of no development or culture, and as we see them at this day, such have they always been." And so, would Hegel have made sense of this thing called Black History Month? No, indeed. "For it is no historical part of the World; it has no movement or development to exhibit. Historical movements in it – that is in its northern part – belong to the Asiatic or European World… What we properly understand by Africa, is the Unhistorical, Undeveloped Spirit, still involved in the conditions of mere nature..."
"It’s been known for years that all non-Africans are descended from a small group, perhaps only a few dozen individuals, who left the continent between 50,000 and 100,000 years ago. But the Cornell study, published in the journal Nature Thursday, indicates that Europeans went through a second ‘population bottleneck,’ probably about 30,000 years ago, when the ancestral population was again reduced to relatively few in number."
The newest fad for non-Whites is to have their irises tattooed to acquire a different eye color. So there is hope for all people, if their budgets afford a host of dermatologists, cosmetologists, and ophthalmologists, to someday be as beautiful as Michael Jackson. A friend of mine recently took her little blonde-haired, blue-eyed Jewish Nightmare to the pediatrician, and the doctor half-joked about setting her boy up with his own daughter because "blonde hair and blue eyes are becoming very rare these days." There sure are a lot of racists out there.
William F. Buckley died on Wednesday at age 82. His was a life that held the greatest of promise, but he squandered it to gain the approval of the Jews who had bought him off. He was a Skull and Bones member at Yale and then was a CIA agent for a time. His magazine, National Review, gave a voice to the conservative movement, and like all conservatives in those days, it was thoroughly "racist." Then Buckley began to groan about "rank nativism" and urged Americans to "think in terms of institutionalizing native despotism."
It was hardly surprising that in 1992 he denounced Pat Buchanan as anti-Semitic. Russell Kirk had left NR at that point to become General Chairman of Buchanan’s presidential campaign. Contrary to popular opinion, it was Kirk, not Buckley, who created what we know as the conservative movement. When Buckley wrote God and Man at Yale in 1951, he called himself an individualist and a libertarian, not a conservative. When Barry Goldwater first ran for the Senate in 1952, he called himself a progressive, not a conservative. A few years later, these men and their sizable following were calling themselves conservatives, and it was because of the publication in 1952 of Kirk’s masterpiece, The Conservative Mind.
Joe Sobran was one who was tossed overboard at NR to make room for the Jews. So were Peter Brimelow and John O’Sullivan, who were prophetic voices of reason on immigration throughout the nineties. In the end, it was all handed over to dirty Jews like David Frum, who is pro-fag and pro-death. Buckley boasted: "I have an award in my trunk from the ADL, and continue to honor its anti-discrimination ideals. About a year ago New Republic editor Leon Wieseltier referred to me as the ‘most distinguished anti-anti-Semite in American Catholicism.’"
"If only I had sufficient perspicacity to pontificate on the non-salubrious condition of this afficionado of wearisome verbosity and multi-syllabic articulation."
We went from this:
Based on "the statistics evidencing median cultural advancement of white over Negro," the issue is whether "the claims of civilization supersede those of universal suffrage." Blacks, if given the vote, would "use it to levy even further (Negro facilities are for the most part paid for by dollars taxed from whites) against the propertied classes, which is [largely] composed of whites. I believe it is a man’s right to use his political influence to protect his property." ~ William F. Buckley, Jr, Up From Liberalism
To this:
"It seems to me that the idea traditionally defended of endeavoring to maintain existing ethnic balances simply doesn’t work any more." ~ William F. Buckley Jr. in a letter to Jared Taylor - see it at this link, which also happens to be one of my favorite Brimelow articles
And Brimelow’s obituary of Buckley is an absolute must-read. He considered Buckley’s "character to have been among the most contemptible I have encountered in public life… It was his personal failings that ultimately accounted for the four-decade fizzle of his once-brilliant career—and for the fact that, regularly credited with the making of the modern conservative movement, he must also be indicted for its breaking. Above all, he must also be indicted for the breaking, through out-of-control post-1965 mass immigration, of the nation that some of us thought the conservative movement was sworn to defend." Brimelow also gives us a hint of the moment in time when the Jews must have bought Buckley off. "In 1979, Buckley himself signed a consent decree with the Securities and Exchange Commission after allegedly attempting to avoid personal bankruptcy by unloading bad investments on a public company he controlled." At about this point in time, it seemed that "Bill Buckley was taken over by an alien from outer space," although Brimelow charitably surmises that the reason could have been "alcohol and prescription drugs." (There’s also a very interesting note on the pragmatism of Jews such as William Kristol who slavishly support pro-amnesty George W. Bush and then turn on his amnesty bill only because they think it might imperil Republican support for their war in Iraq, which is designed solely to benefit Jews. "I predict that Kristol will return to immigration enthusiasm once he has helped persuade Bush (or McCain) to attack Iran." Now the "Israel-First Likudniks" control the magazine which began with such grand conservative aspirations.) The end result: "Conservatives have essentially nothing to show for their moment in power except two completely unexpected colonial wars in the Middle East."
This sounds like every "conservative" you’ve ever heard:
"The most important issue of the day, it is time to admit it, is survival… [W]e have got to accept Big Government for the duration - for neither an offensive nor a defensive war can be waged...except through the instrumentality of a totalitarian bureaucracy within our shores… [I]f they deem Soviet power a menace to our freedom (as I happen to), they will have to support large armies and air forces, atomic energy, central intelligence, war production boards and the attendant centralization of power in Washington." ~ William F. Buckley Jr, in the January 1952 Commonweal
By the same token, Hitler was a conservative. As you know, Ronald Reagan was a bag of hot gas, but in keeping with the mythology that put him in office, he said this of Buckley, the quote above notwithstanding: "You didn’t just part the Red Sea—you rolled it back, dried it up and left exposed, for all the world to see, the naked desert that is statism."
In a related story, Young Americans for Freedom, which Buckley founded, has threatened to revoke the charter of the Michigan State chapter if it goes forward with inviting Jared Taylor to speak. The reason given is that "the forces of international Communism" are a threat to our country but multiculturalism is not. And that’s all you need to know about "conservatism," my friends. It is salt that has lost its savor, good for nothing.
It’s very interesting that Buckley looked and spoke very much like Taylor.
More here on Jared Taylor’s warm comments about Obamination. This is very strange in light of the fact that Taylor did not support Pat Buchanan’s campaign due to the choice of a black woman as Pat’s running mate. But I think it could be a calculated move. It becomes very hard to criticize White nationalists when the president belongs to a church of black nationalists.
Come away with the wicked and board the Ark of Global Oneness. If you are devoting your energies to "saving the planet" while your own people are being decimated, you are a hater of both God and yourself, and a lover of death.
When will Israel ever learn to accept the brotherhood of man? Immigrants just want to earn a living like everyone else!
Take a quiz on "Israeli democracy."
A fantastic cartoon! It gets right to the point, doesn’t it? If I may quote Martin O’Toole, that which allows for no doubt is a superstition, not a belief.
The UN Commission on Human Rights has found that Palestinian terrorism is the "inevitable consequence of (Israeli) colonialism, apartheid or occupation." I can’t wait to hear how the Jews will spin away from this one.
"Far from being a paranoid or a determinist, the conspiracy analyst is a praxeologist; that is, he believes that people act purposively, that they make conscious choices to employ means in order to arrive at goals. Hence, if a steel tariff is passed, he assumes that the steel industry lobbied for it; if a public works project is created, he hypothesizes that it was promoted by an alliance of construction firms and unions who enjoyed public works contracts, and bureaucrats who expanded their jobs and incomes. It is the opponents of ‘conspiracy’ analysis who profess to believe that all events – at least in government – are random and unplanned, and that therefore people do not engage in purposive choice and planning." ~ Murray Rothbard
"Every major Jewish organization in the United States including the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, the American Jewish Congress, the American Jewish Committee, the Jewish National Fund and many others all have programs and position papers discouraging Jews from intermarrying with the non-Jewish populace. During George W. Bush’s 2000 presidential campaign, the media roundly condemned him for speaking at Bob Jones University, a fundamentalist Christian school that discourages interracial dating. After much negative coverage, Bush was finally forced to publicly condemn BJU’s ‘racism.’ Strangely, the media had no criticism for the fact that both Bush and Al Gore gave numerous speeches to Jewish groups who had been denouncing all marriages between Jews and non-Jews for decades."
Here’s a funny "explanation" page from Google. Some words just shouldn’t be googled. Make a note of it.
Larry Norman died last week, three days before Bill Buckley. Norman sang, "We need a whole lot more of Jesus and a lot less rock and roll." In a similar vein, I’ve always been of the opinion that we need a whole lot less Chuck Baldwin and a lot more Michael Hoffman. What’s the deal with Baldwin, anyway? Read this article and ask yourself how a man can be so timid. "When Jesus saw the moneychangers in the Temple, He drove them off with violence. Yet, today’s pastors and Christians cannot even seem to see what these same moneychangers are doing to America." Moneychangers. He just can’t bring himself to criticize Jews. You’ll hear the same nameless, faceless enemies referred to as "Christophobes." When did Christian men lose their balls? The bright side is that money can be saved in the clothing budget because Christian wives can share their wardrobes with their big, brave husbands.
John Hagee, the Jew-worshiper who denies that Jesus Christ "came to earth to be the Messiah," has endorsed John McCain.
The Bible cure for flatulence.
"Every verse in the Bible is either law or gospel, either terror or comfort. Being Reformed means having the skill to distinguish the law from the gospel." Hilarious!
The thesis of this article is that Christianity is dishonorable. The idea is laughable on its face; since a good name is rather to be chosen than great riches, as the Scriptures tell us, a Christian man’s word of honor used to be his most prized possession. He considered his life, which he could not keep anyway, to be far less dear. In simplest terms, there is nothing like Foxe’s Book of Martyrs for atheists. Moreover, the honorable Christian man was held to be worse than an infidel if he did not provide for his own people, and especially his own family. This article is really the polar opposite of Kinism for arguing that fidelity to heritage and faith "cannot occupy the same space." Kinists reject any sort of dichotomy between tribalism and Christianity. But as is often the case, some interesting ideas can be gleaned, such as that honor and shame are the tribal equivalents of redemption and retribution in Christianity.
Rushdoony had an interesting theory that Marxism, absolute in nature, was an indirect pre-evangelistic tool of God to purge the ancient religious relativism of the Far East.
Places that will never again be the same until the White race awakes from its stupor. "They’ve become a byword, a roost for the birds of the air and a haunt of jackals."
Ethnonationalism brings peace, not war, which is a Jewish fable. "Only after all the tribes of Europe had their own ethnically homogenous nation-states did peace and comity come… Americans, writes Muller, ‘find ethnonationalism discomfiting both intellectually and morally. Social scientists go to great lengths to demonstrate that this is a product not of nature but of culture… But none of this will make ethnonationalism go away.’" Nevertheless, "Any mention of nationalism without a mention of the world’s reigning nationalist agitators—i.e., the Jews—is pretty much a waste of ink."
"The high levels of identification and trust in Nordic societies reflect their homogeneity; common Lutheran antecedents, including a rigorous ethical code and heavy emphasis on education; and a consequent sense of the nation as one big family imbued with the golden rule." Those who say that culture is important and race is insignificant hold to a sort of social contract theory of government. It’s as though a random group of people gets together and decides by drawing straws that they’ll produce a particular culture, which must necessarily take shape from an idea rather than the genes. This tripe could only emerge from the mind of an intellectual. It has no bearing whatsoever on reality or history. "Racists" stick to the facts; liberals theorize. Christians, and especially their pastors, have bought into the liberal idea of "an infinitely plastic human nature imbedded in a uniform, static biological substratum—the ‘blank slate’—[which] was essentially the creation of anthropologist Franz Boas and his student Ashley Montagu, both of whom were Jewish."
"Unless otherwise abrogated in the New Testament, Israel’s ethnic insularity codes stand as the ethical and civic model for Christendom. On this basis many of Bahnsen’s devotees find themselves strangely adopting Kline’s perspective, which is to say that on the matter of ethnic insularity these Theonomists are thoroughly antinomian. They even use the same language as the Antinomians, saying that Kinism is ‘against the tenor of the New Testament.’ If they didn’t accept this response from the Klineans, why should we accept it from them? At best we can call their position an inconsistency, at worst, hypocrisy… Christianity entails Theonomy and Theonomy entails Kinism. To quote Van Til, this is so ‘by impossibility of the contrary.’"
The schools are doing a fabulous job. When tested, only 43% knew that "the Civil War was fought between 1850 and 1900, could identify the theme of 1984, and knew that the controversy surrounding Sen. Joseph McCarthy focused on Communism." The good news is that "97% could identify Martin Luther King Jr. as author of the ‘I Have a Dream’ speech." So at least recent liberal history is considered important in the schools.
"Nearly four decades after this rural Georgia county stopped segregating its schools by race, it wants to divide students again—this time by sex. Greene County is set to become the first school district in the nation to go entirely single-sex, with boys and girls in separate classrooms—a move born of desperation over years of poor test scores, soaring dropout rates and high numbers of teenage pregnancies." This is just hilarious, and the hypocrisy is beyond parody. Racially separate schools are evil and Hitlerian, but it’s okay to say "that boys and girls learn differently, and...separating them will allow teachers to tailor their lessons." What they don’t say in this article is that 1) separating White boys and girls in the classroom has never been an academic necessity; and 2) blacks and Whites learn differently. So the question you need to ask yourself is why it’s more important to give black children an environment in which they can learn than it is to give White children an environment in which they can learn. If you can’t afford private education and don’t want your precious child exposed to rapists, you’re—as the French say—shit out of luck. But these black girls are afforded the opportunity. That’s what the patriotards call Equality.
An example of why Al Cronkrite is such an excellent writer. And three cheers for Covenant News for publishing this.
Journalists are so predictable. Poking fun at Whites is "’essentializing’ complex identities—that is, stripping away all variety and reducing them to their presumed authentic essences." Jokes at the expense of non-Whites are "racist stereotypes."
If you want to listen to good stuff…
It was a joy to visit with James Edwards in Herndon. Here is the account of his trip. James is a lot like me; we both weep tears of joy at Ford’s Theater. You wouldn’t understand; it’s a guy thing.
