Wrighteousness Exceeding That of the Pharisees
One of the main points in Obama’s Trinity United Church of Christ’s "Black Value System" is "Disavowal of the Pursuit of ‘Middleclassness.’" Which is why Jeremiah Wright has taken church funds and bilt hissef a 10,340-square-foot mansion in an exlusive Chicago enclave. He nows pours club soda by the heated indoor pool and wonders how the Oppressed are doing.
Wright, who attended one of the best (White) high schools in Philadelphia, grew up middle class, and pastored the largest black church in Chicago, should be treated "with mercy, considering the likelihood that we would have come through segregation just as damaged as he," says self-loathing idiot Mike Huckabee.
Black "pastors" at a prestigious forum that would have been closed instantly to White nationalists are showing full support for Wright. This is because blacks are not as easily intimidated as Whites and know it is in their best interest to stand with one of their own. "Wright’s sermons, the summit pastors said, were a continuation of the same long-standing black tradition of ‘prophetic preaching’ that produced Dr. Martin Luther King. ‘If Martin Luther King Jr. were pastoring a church today, it would look very much like Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, Ill., and the sermons you would hear him preach would sound very much’ like Wright’s, Rev. Frederick Haynes III, senior pastor at Friendship West Baptist Church, said." Wright himself was not there because he was concerned for his safety - the very thing that he and Obama criticize Whites for doing when they express their fear of diversity. Sauce for the goose and gander.
"When even the best of black America turns out to be connected at the hip to a demented America hater, we realize that black America is not intellectually equal with us, does not share the same moral sense with us, is not in its heart a part of the same country with us, and does not deserve any special deference from us. And that is the real, and very valuable, racial lesson that whites have received from Barack Obama." Even the neocon priest Richard John Neuhaus is not fooled: "Whites are invited to make their peace with the fact that these are the children of Stepin Fetchit and Amos and Andy who have replaced humor with the shuffle of political extremism but are still entertaining the country by doing their black thing."
Some have called Wright’s Marxist black Liberation Theology a sort of Kinism for blacks. This article is helpful in that regard. "The first waves of this movement, in Latin America, were designed to make Christianity appealing to the people by addressing their felt needs, the desire for armed revolution and Marxist economics. Liberation theology only works if one can connect with real or perceived oppression and then make the Scripture illustrative of how to navigate out of that situation. The Kingdom of God is a means to a social, economic, or political end." White hucksters - Joel Osteen foremost among them - have cashed in on this perversion of the gospel. The difference is that the black radicals speak of racial oppressors whereas the White radicals are abstract in their diagnoses. "Both are at heart Mammon worship." Contrast this with Kinism, which affirms that there is a chasm of sin between us and the Father which only the sacrifice of Christ has bridged. Kinists desire healthy communities which are the necessary basis for a universal communion in Christ. We do not desire money or fame. It is strange indeed that neo-Christians identify us with devilry simply because we seek separation from various elements that do our people harm. Christian parents pull their covenant children from public schools for the very same reasons that Kinists oppose pluralism and multiracialism, and such parents would be very correct in denying that their faith and their obligations under the covenant would become of no effect if they did not have an enemy to react against. On the contrary, it is their faith which compels them to the good work of separation, not the aggressions of their enemies. But then, liberals have always smeared conservatives as merely reactionary, as though a lurch to the left is inevitable and only those with ulterior motives could oppose it.
"In the midst of a world of light and love, of song and feast and dance, [Lucifer] could find nothing to think of more interesting than his own prestige." ~ C.S. Lewis
"To make a black man more white, if it is even achievable, is not to improve him, it is to make of him a monstrosity. And though it is a harsh truth to acknowledge, the black man in the U.S. is marooned, a civilizational orphan. He is no longer fully African, but he can never be, nor should he want to be white… The kulturkampf is part and parcel of what it means to participate in, and be a product of a culture. That is, to believe it is best, to take it seriously, to see it as flowing from the deep fountains of identity, not from the artificial, corporate identifications of the cosmopolitan cultural marketplace, where all cultures are equally accessible to everyone for the simple reason that they are all equally superficial, all equally make-believe. If we did not have powerful reasons for believing the culture in which we found ourselves was best, then it could not survive… Men do not die for what is arbitrary… Kinism of a sort is possible among blacks, one supposes, but it will not and cannot look like white Kinism. The outpost of black separatism is the nearest black thinkers might approach Kinism, as Kinism is a European doctrine, a confluence of ideas, some of which are utterly alien to the black soul. An historical realization blocks their path: as long as the sun rises, internecine, tribal hatred will be a powerful undercurrent in black civilization. It is only their status in the U.S. and their history here that provides impetus to unity. They possess the cheap and false unity of a common enemy, just as we whites possess the false unity of agreement to the rules of polity, and not much else, our racial and civilizational unity having largely been destroyed by liberalism. In Africa there is no unity of race or kind; indeed, there is no ‘Africa’ in the same way in which there is a ‘Europe.’ And if the black man returns to his natural state of being, he will be at ethnic war with those of his own race until Christ has fully penetrated his civilization… There is no other way to say it but that the black man is the descendant of Africans, and he is suited to his own civilization, if in generosity it may be called that, and not to the civilization of the European."
A perfect glimpse of "the cheap and false unity of a common enemy" is seen in Obama’s own definition of the world: "where white folks’ greed runs a world in need, apartheid in one hemisphere, apathy in another hemisphere." It’s all Whitey’s fault! Obama even "blames racism for breaking up his parents’ marriage, not his father’s polygamist ways..." Auster writes: "This is the black racist version of Christianity, in which the principle of evil is identified with the white race and the principle of good is identified with the black race, or with all nonwhite races. That’s the message that so touched Obama that he became a Christian." The sad part is that White neo-Christians identify this dung as legitimate Christianity simply because of the history of the messengers themselves, and this is what Auster calls "the soft bigotry of low expectations."
Speaking of which… It seems straight out of Tom Wolfe, but James Watson, possibly the foremost scientist in the world, made some true statements about black people, lost his job because of them, and for penance donated the legal maximum ($2,300) to Barack Obama’s campaign in January. In his Really Big Speech, Obama called for a national conversation on race. But when a White man opens his mouth and tries to converse, bad things happen. So remember that the black definition of "conversation" means to agree with whatever the most liberal of them tells you.
Lawrence Auster has the very best title I’ve yet heard for Obamination: "the politician formerly known as the Prince of Peace."
Obama proves that being "biracial" is to have no identity at all. The only thing such a person can do, in order to find some sense of belonging, is drift to those who loathe their own heritage or are clueless about it.
It’s hard to believe, but only recently have geneticists been able to distinguish between dogs and wolves. They are very close genetically yet quite different, as everyone knows. The dog breed is "a construct zoologically and genetically equivalent to a race of man." Human racial differences "are around ten times the difference between the sexes within each race and larger than the differences that distinguish the two species of chimpanzee… But while it’s OK to talk about differences among dog breeds, not so for human races." Studying what various dog breeds do best is quite fascinating. It takes a tremendous amount of intelligence and willpower for a sheepdog to suppress his wolf-like instincts at the command of his master. And there is a reason why we have the expression "a pack of hounds" but not "a pack of terriers." Certain breeds exhibit not only intelligence but conscientiousness. Others are intelligent scofflaws. Still others are downright stupid. No one in his right mind would deny that coaxing these marvelous traits out of a few genes is a very good thing, but leave a dog to his own fancy and he’ll mate with anything he can. We in the human world instinctively know that it is best to mate with our own kind and are strongly attracted to them, but we have perverts like Ken Ham telling us that we should throw everything in the blender and see what kind of dark green mush comes out of it. The Ken Hamites of the world truly are as filthy as dogs.
There’s a snippet in the article about differences between White and Chinese newborns which struck me as an insight into how such people order their societies: "White babies started to cry more easily, and once they started, they were more difficult to console. Chinese babies adapted to almost any position in which they were placed." They even accepted cloths placed over their mouths!
Condi Rice says America has a "birth defect" for not recognizing blacks as "a founding population." And this is the kind of stuff we see every day. How many times can we comment on utter nonsense that is taken seriously by those in the highest echelon of power? How many jokes can we tell about idiotic statements that are so widely believed, not a single person will call for Rice to be fired? She won’t have to pull a Trent Lott on White Entertainment Television.
It’s already April, which means that it’s high time for another state to apologize for the slavery that ended over 140 years ago (not the slavery that exists today). You have to get a jump on the competition.
John Lofton has written a very disappointing article full of groaners, and Pat Buchanan liked it so much that he posted it on his own blog. "As Christians, we are commanded to be all one in Christ Jesus - period. No black, no white, no Greek, no Jew, no male, no female, etc. Your race, my race, they are utterly irrelevant to God. There is no ‘race’ in the Bible except as an athletic contest." By this line of reasoning, I was born with a penis purely by accident, and God has called me to walk the path of androgyny. I should tie a strand of twine around the thing and hope that it falls off, because it is utterly irrelevant to my salvation. All joking aside, this is the point that Harry tried to make to Joe Whorecraft. Let us walk in newness of life, thanking God for cleansing us of our sins, spiritually united to all other believers, of all colors, anywhere in the world. But we will never allow lying preachers to call the precious gifts that God has bestowed upon us "irrelevant" or "insignificant." The man who believes such things about his kin is called worse than an infidel in the Bible.
Here again, Buchanan, by way of criticizing Obama, defends the civil adultery movement, praises the mulatto race-mixer Ward Connerly, counts himself one of "the true friends of racial justice," and anticipates "a day, a few decades off, when there will be no racial majority, only a collection of minorities." In that day, he says, America will be the Balkans "if some races and ethnic groups may be preferred because of where their ancestors came from." Yeah, that would be shocking if Whites keep the country their own fathers gave them and refuse to accept invaders and usurpers as their equals. Doesn’t Buchanan know what happens to foxes who sneak into the henhouse? Notice that this excrement is being published by the "paleoconservatives" at Chronicles. What a sick joke.
Here’s something you never see - a black woman with White children. They look White, anyway. One is wearing a Bob Marley t-shirt, so they’ll grow up to be wiggers. Seeing a picture like this drives home the realization that adoption is very one-sided.
The NAACP says rules requiring youths to dress like civilized human beings are racist.
The lesson of the subprime mortgage crisis: "Social engineering by the Federal Government to put more racial minorities into houses has backfired."
"Recently," writes Kevin MacDonald, "Western societies have embarked on a public policy project in which the ethno-nationalism of white people is officially proscribed as an unadulterated evil. Multiculturalism only is encouraged and viewed as morally superior… As Muller notes: ‘In a global context, it is the [Western] insistence on universalist criteria [for immigration] that seems provincial’… For substantial stretches of U.S. history, it was believed that only the people of English origin, or those who were Protestant, or white, or hailed from northern Europe were real Americans… In a very short period, Europe and European-derived societies, which had achieved an unprecedented level of ethnic homogeneity following World War II, have developed a stifling political correctness, in which any tiny vestige of ethnocentrism on the part of Europeans is crushed with all the power the ruling elites can muster. This is taking place while the rest of the world continues to undergo modernization via the creation of ethno-states. Muller’s essay makes one realize that this multicultural fad really may be just a phase—and a backwardly echoing phase at that, recalling the failed multicultural empires of the pre-modern era… Jewish opposition to the ethnonationalism of Europeans and European-derived peoples is in remarkable contrast to their unswerving support for the Jewish ethnonationalist state of Israel — a rather glaring double standard, to say the least." Does it bother Joe Morecraft that he has so much in common with leftists?
Serbia is trying to divide Kosovo along ethnic lines. Though this would be the very best way to end bloodshed, Joe Morecraft has been doing a chicken dance for the past 24 hours while he prays down fire on Belgrade for its "unbiblical nationalism."
Multiracialism is a "sedative rather than a stimulant, a slough rather than a precipice; blurring the edges of truth, the definition of virtue, the shape of beauty; a cracked bell, a mist, a death wish."
Another point about the extraordinary "Rivers of Blood" documentary: Margaret Thatcher’s culpability in the destruction of her country is clear. Enoch Powell predicted that Britain’s racially-agnostic policies would lead to race riots, and when they began to occur in Brixton and other places, Thatcher did what Americans have also done; she threw money at the rioters to appease them. When the money dries up, the riots resume, as we’ve seen before and will see again very soon. Mass migration leads to segregation and then to racial violence. "Those whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad." And the madness continues. Even today the mention of Powell’s name is taboo, precisely because he was correct, and the race fags hate him for being correct. Notice, at the very end of the documentary, that the proposed solution for dealing with multiracialism is a secular state. Only a totalitarian, godless state, using absolute force, can hold the lid on the powderkeg of so many races and religions. It is as that old revolutionary, Tom Paine, said: "All mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion." When the currency fails, the state fails. And then children die, women die, men die. How odd it is to hear Christians striving for the same goals but thinking they can do better.
I’m sure you’ve heard nothing about this on the news.
The most commonsense way to fight crime.
A black person is 5.6 times more likely than a white person to be a murderer, and so if Obama’s grandmother is not at least 5.6 times more cautious of blacks, we would consider her to be not very intelligent.
"Crisis-reaction-solution is the modus operandi of the tyrannical state. You create or take advantage of a crisis which in turn creates a reaction within the populace. You then come in and offer the solution thereby consolidating and increasing your power."
"The 4000 US soldiers killed in Iraq in the past five years were predominantly white and more than one in three came from poor southern states, according to a casualty analysis carried out by The Herald… By ethnic group, the dead were 75% white, 11% Latino and 9% black." This is something that Steve Sailer has pointed out very often. Southern Whites have a martial spirit in their genes. Even when they know very little about their forefathers, they fight for liberty in the same way. Sadly, they have trouble telling the difference between liberty and tyranny, which explains the careers of Lee Greenwood and Toby Keith.
Fitna, the stunning and graphic new video on the Koran, is being pulled from the web very quickly, but not from Podblanc. It’s becoming hard to find because the United Nations, Iran, Pakistan, and Indonesia have condemned it, but 24 hours was all it took. Muslims are threatening violence because that’s what Muslims do. Quite obviously, the post-Christian Netherlands is under a curse but still wants to retain various "freedoms" inherited from the old Christian order though long since perverted. Until we of the West crawl back to the Lord in repentance, we’ll experience the fulness of Deuteronomy 28. There are hopeful signs: A majority of the Dutch now call immigration their worst mistake ever.
"Focus on the Family, one of the largest Christian publishing and broadcasting organizations in the nation...has been reviewing, and if necessary editing, its broadcasts to avoid complications with Canadian ‘hate crimes’ laws." Christians are willfully becoming liars.
Fantastic! Chris Ortiz, in just two paragraphs, digs at Sproul and praises a "racist." "I’ve heard Presbyterian pastors dismiss Dabney as ‘angry and embittered.’ Others have dismissed him as a racist and unworthy of consideration. I deem him a giant, and one of the greatest warriors the Church of the Lord Jesus Christ has ever produced in its history. Like Rushdoony, a genuine prophetic mantle rested upon Dabney’s noble, Southern shoulders. If you can read Dabney, and remain indifferent, you might want to check your conscience for the scars of searing."
A cute homeschool video. They’re sponsoring a Haitian!
Good Lord, I love White people.
Why Ron Paul will never be president.
What right did Britain have to grant Jews someone else’s land? It’s another excellent post from Chris Ortiz, doin’ RJ proud. Some racist states are more equal than others.
"Just the other day I saw a very relaxed German couple with their children spending our reparations money on ice-cream and hot dogs," says Shmuel scornfully. "They were deliberately and maliciously acting in a way that suggested they were proud to be German, without any sense of shame or guilt. I suddenly felt very threatened by this kind of unspoken anti-Semitism and was overwhelmed by the urge to radio an Israeli F-16 fighter bomber."
One of Israel’s chief rabbis is calling for "state-sanctioned revenge" against Arabs.
It’s probably just a coincidence that this site was created by Jews.
Is Bret McAtee saying here that races cannot degenerate, because that would be Darwinist thinking? I heard a good comment recently from Chris Ortiz in his interview with a man from the John Birch Society. Ortiz said he used to be absolutely opposed to tyranny until he realized that his reaction was rather Pelagian. He came to realize that covenant-breaking leads quite naturally and inevitably to tyranny. And while it might very well be "French Enlightenment" to say every man must free himself from the shackles of tyranny, the sad fact remains that slavery is the natural lot of some. In other words, men are most certainly not created equal. It helps to view races in the same way. As our friend Chad has often told us, miscegenated, degenerate nations are walking, talking symbols of Judgment. A man ignores such Judgment at his peril. So what is Darwin saying in the referenced quotes? In part, he is saying the same thing R.J. Rushdoony said. The Armenian tradition before marriage was to exchange pedigrees to the seventh generation. This eliminated many congenital illnesses and made the Armenian people extremely healthy. Race-mixing Americans are, of course, far from healthy. Like it or not, eugenics has been practiced for as long as men have walked the earth. It is essentially intervention to improve hereditary traits. It is what every farmer does with his animals but what race-mixing Christians have learned to fear. Eugenics does not necessitate genocide, though it can certainly be used as a tool to that end. Please notice that Jews understand eugenics quite well, and they even practice it in reverse, having switched our immigration from 90% White to 90% non-White. They are breeding replacement people, who also happen to be quite sickly.
From a purely Darwinist stance, it is true that "the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races." But why must a Christian sign on to such a program? It has been only Christian beneficence that has prevented such a thing. McAtee quotes a Darwinist who said, "if such people were lower animals, we would probably kill them off to prevent them from spreading. Humanity will not allow this, but we do have the remedy of separating the sexes in asylums or other places and in various ways of preventing intermarriage and the possibilities of perpetuating such a low and degenerate race. Remedies of this sort have been tried successfully in Europe and are now meeting with success in this country." Of course Christian humanity did not support genocide. It was precisely because the black man is a man and not an animal that he has been treated as a man. But how does it follow that miscegenation should be encouraged, and that a degenerate race will not be the result? I can’t understand how Christians are able to go through life completely oblivious to what has been the univocal testimony of human history. As Cicero said, "To be ignorant of what occurred before you were born is to remain always a child."
Darwinism led to forced sterilization and to Margaret Sanger, whose "Negro Project" had the specific aim of eliminating the black population. But strangely, it’s more common to hear Christians denounce Darwinism and Sangerism and Nazism not because they were Jewish and collectivist, murderous, and imperialist, respectively, but because they were racist. See the recent story about a Planned Murderhood worker seeming to encourage the abortion of black babies. One problem with this is that regardless of what Darwin might have thought about blacks, only a small minority of Darwinists today identify as racialists. I don’t know of a single feminist baby-killer who is a racialist. And I don’t know why Christians consider the r-word to be a more devastating indictment of these ideologies than what they really are. Another illogical thing Christians say is that they want separation of church and state but not separation of God and state, but we’ll leave that for another day.
