We’ve had some great posts lately. I absolutely loved the quote from the Bishops’ Jubilee Council of the Russian Orthodox Church: "Christian patriotism may be expressed at the same time with regard to a nation as an ethnic community and as a community of its citizens. The Orthodox Christian is called to love his fatherland, which has a territorial dimension, and his brothers by blood who live everywhere in the world. This love is one of the ways of fulfilling God’s commandment of love to one’s neighbour which includes love to one’s family, fellow-tribesmen and fellow-citizens." Christian racists! How delightful. They’re called Kinists in our part of the world. It all fits very nicely with these fine Russians profiled earlier. Western Protestants have a lot of catching up to do, or else they’re going to be the laughingstock of Christendom. They will be counted among those condemned in this excellent quote from the Book of Wisdom, Latin Vulgate Translation: "But the children of adulterers shall not come to perfection, and the seed of the unlawful bed shall be rooted out. And if they live long, they shall be nothing regarded, and their last old age shall be without honour. And if they die quickly, they shall have no hope, nor speech of comfort in the day of trial. For dreadful are the ends of a wicked race."
June is Black Music Month (not to be confused with February, which is Black History Month), and iTunes is having a celebration of skin color.
The religion of Equality is a tool in the hands of Whites to feel superior to other Whites, and the last thing such narcissists will ever do is apply White expectations to their Black props. But this is true for all colored people. For instance, I recall a story on NPR months ago about Iraqis who saw Saddam Hussein’s face in the moon the night after his execution, and how this was an omen that signalled a curse on the country. The story was told with the utmost deference for the traditions and superstitions of these loonies. But if the story had been about White Catholics who saw the face of Mary in a tree stump or Shirley from the trailer park insisting she had been abducted by aliens the night before, the same scorn would be heaped upon it as is heaped upon Crazy Pat Robertson and his entertaining prognostications. Whites are always held to a higher standard, while naked, retarded Negroes get full-color spreads in National Geographic and are praised as the stewards of Cultures Worthy of Respect.
Bill Regnery writes: "In 1940 whites constituted 30% of the world’s population. This number now stands at 15%. If this trend continues our fraction will plummet to 8% at mid-century." But you can run down to Blockbuster right now and rent Children of Men, a Jew film about "Our Future" being in the hands of a Negro bastard.
Seen at VDare, by Pastor Bill Barnwell: "Likewise, after the Israelites returned to their land from national exile, they were forbidden by their priestly leaders from intermarrying with foreign persons (Ezra 9)." Sounds pretty straightforward, doesn’t it? Even a child could understand it. Even a child could understand Tobit 4:12-13: "Beware, my son, of all immorality. First of all, take a wife from among the descendants of your fathers and do not marry a foreign woman, who is not of your father’s tribe; for we are the sons of the prophets. Remember, my son, that Noah, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, our fathers of old, all took wives from among their brethren. They were blessed in their children, and their posterity will inherit the land. So now, my son, love your brethren, and in your heart do not disdain your brethren and the sons and daughters of your people by refusing to take a wife for yourself from among them." But here comes Pastor Bill to explain that God didn’t really mean it that way: "The appeal here in the Old Testament is not one of racial purity, but spiritual purity. Foreigners were indeed allowed into the Israelite community. Ruth the Moabite is a prime example of this." As Harry Seabrook has explained, this position is incredibly convoluted. If Ruth had truly been an ethnic Moabite, it would have been a violation of the law for Boaz to marry her (Deut. 7:3; Deut. 23:3; Ezra 9:2; Neh. 13:23). All kinds of silly things are said about this incident by Christians today, such as that Elimelech’s sons were punished with death for marrying Moabite women, but for Boaz it was okay. On the contrary, the Levirate Law of Marriage only applied to Israelites. No foreigner could have inherited land within Israel. Yet this story is used as one of the primary justifications for miscegenation today, along with the "Negro" wife of Moses, which all the commentators deny. Then Rev. Barnwell uses Galatians 3:28, the most-abused verse in Scripture, to suggest that race is meaningless. This is all standard-issue 21st-century mulattoism. The only thing that surprises is to read it at VDare. Come on, Peter, don’t drink that evangelical bathtub gin. You’ll wake up with a terrible hangover.
Weirdos. Make intercession for us, Saint Bernard! And if you think that’s weird…
"Would the fountain of your mind were clear again, that I might water an ass at it." ~ William Shakespeare
Hilarious interview:
Remember when women were pretty and wore dresses and covered their fair skin from the sun? They were also racists in those days (meaning that they actually secured a future for their posterity) and didn’t try to be men. Seems like a different world.
Here pickled in formaldehyde and painted like a whore
Shrimp-pink incorruptible, not lost or gone before.
"Bobby Shafto is forbidden to go to sea. That is sexist. His sister goes instead. However, an insensitive tidal wave kills Sister Shafto and all hands on deck. Bobby Shafto opens up a beauty shop and combs down his yellow hair."
Except for the small amount that has been incinerated, every bit of plastic ever made still exists.
"[P]eople are much more willing to be taxed for the benefit of people like themselves than for the benefit of the Other."
A diversity letter to send to your real estate agent.
The depleted military and warmongering Jews, always eager to sacrifice White men for their terrorist state.
"What exactly is so scandalous? How about Jesus punished in Hell for eternity by being made to sit in a cauldron of boiling excrement? That image appears in early manuscripts of the Babylonian Talmud, as does a brief account of Jesus’ trial and execution—not by the Romans but by the Jewish high court, the Sanhedrin. The Jewish community, to the extent Jews were even aware of these excised texts, has been content to let them remain obscure and unknown." ~ Peter Schaefer, Jesus in the Talmud
The great Dr. David Duke on the Phil Donahue show. Fifteen years, and his words are more meaningful than ever. Duke writes: "The truth is that there is no such thing as Judeo-Christianity. That would be like saying Satanic-Christianity."
Does it make sense to anyone out there that Doug Wilson does such an admirable job debating the atheist Christopher Hitchens but his "response" to Kinism and our published papers on the subject was merely to label it "skinism" and denounce us as being filled with "malice" and "vainglory"? Consider this sort of airtight logic applied to the racial views held by our Christian forefathers: "Is there such a thing as atheist hypocrisy? When another atheist makes different ethical choices than you do (as Stalin and Mao certainly did), is there an overarching common standard for all atheists that you are obeying and which they are not obeying? If so, what is that standard and what book did it come from? Why is it binding on them if they differ with you? And if there is not a common objective standard which binds all atheists, then would it not appear that the supernatural is necessary in order to have a standard of morality that can be reasonably articulated and defended?"
Another good line: "If one were to spill milk accidentally on the kitchen floor, and someone else came in and wanted to know what had happened, the one thing we can be sure of is that such an inquiring mind wouldn’t ask the milk. The milk wouldn’t know. It’s the accident." The entire debate is worth reading, but that last page is a slam dunk. Wilson asks Hitchens why psychopaths are considered evil if revulsion against psychopathology is merely the result of evolution. "Are you wroth over the fact that clams don’t have legs yet? When you notice that the bears at the zoo continue to suck on their paws, do you stop to remonstrate with them?"
I also like Wilson’s evidence for Christ being the life of the world: "The engineering that went into ankles. The taste of beer. That Jesus rose from the dead on the third day, just like he said. A woman’s neck. Bees fooling around in the flower bed. The ability of acorns to manufacture enormous oaks out of stuff they find in the air and dirt. Forgiveness of sin. Storms out of the North, the kind with lightning. Joyous laughter (diaphragm spasms to the atheistic materialist). The ocean at night with a full moon. Delta blues. The peacock that lives in my yard. Sunrise, in color. Baptizing babies. The pleasure of sneezing. Eye contact. Having your feet removed from the miry clay, and established forever on the rock."
"But running east down the aisle of a westbound airliner is not the same thing as ‘going east’… It doesn’t help to be mainstream if Niagara Falls is just two hundred yards off." ~ Doug Wilson
Wilson is a very good writer. "Richard Dawkins wants to raise our consciousness - to ‘raise consciousness to the fact that to be an atheist is a realistic aspiration, and a brave and splendid one’ (p. 1). And his new book, The God Delusion, certainly does have some high aspirations in this regard. As high, that is, as approximately one hundred and eighty pounds of protoplasm can have. Get a double-layered Hefty garbage bag and fill it with some kind of vegetable soup, shake it for a bit, and you have some idea of just how lofty an aspiration can actually be. But the point is apparently not how high the aspiration has to be, but what you can get other bits of protoplasm to say about it in the blurbs, which is almost as good. But they need to say it in an energetic enough way to sway the general mass of protoplasmic bi-pedal carbon units out there, which is to say, the reading public. Because if enough bits of protoplasm get together on this, we can get ourselves a consensus going, and first thing you know you are dealing with the voice of Reason. The voice of Reason is what happens when any kind of physical wave (sound waves are best) shudders through a portion of the vegetable soup, dispelling the voice of Superstition forever."
One of my favorite examples of atheistic inconsistency is Voltaire. He wanted his maids to keep their religion. In fact, atheism was not to be discussed in their presence because he knew his silverware and other belongings would be stolen.
These extraordinary comments caught my eye:
Now I know why John Calvin called the Anabaptists “mad beasts” and said in Book IV (p. 1482 of the Library of Christian Classics version) of his Institutes that people who believe in Anabaptism should be sent to mental hospitals… Most Roman Catholics are Vatican II people that apologize all over themselves for events like the Inquisition, though more people are killed in Detroit every year than EVERYONE killed in the Inquisition. Yet you still can’t get over the Inquisition! You are complaining about a very insignificant remnant of traditional Latin-Mass Catholics, hated and excommunicated by their own ecclesiastical hierarchy, that are some of the only people with common sense when it comes to things like the IRS, Big Brother, Zionism, liberal media, abortion, etc. And you say that what they say today is just as heterodox and mean-spirited as what atheists today are saying?… Atheists today celebrate “art,” like the National Endowment for the Arts has done, which features such blasphemy as feces poured over statues of the Virgin Mary (props to the First Amendment for that one), and crucifixes in jars of urine (”Piss Christ”), and you’re attacking people who like to chant in Latin? And somehow the rosary is just as mean-spirited? You people really should be put in mental hospitals. I completely understand where Jean [Calvin] was coming from…
[M]ost Reformed are ex-baptists, not ex-Catholics. More than half of the Reformed people I’ve come in contact with grew up in the great so-called churches that “tolerance” and “freedom” finally spawned out of the sludge…and you know something? We left them. Reformed people leave them because they’re a sick joke…a disease that has plagued the American mind for over a hundred years. They’re a splotch on the history of the New Covenant…heck, they’re an embarrassment to human beings everywhere. Billy Graham, Rick Warren, Joel Osteen…or their more conservative counterparts in Bill Gothard, John Hagee, and Jerry Falwell…they don’t hold a candle to real Christian leaders. Men like Athanasius of Alexandria, Charles the Great (King of the Franks), and English Reformer Thomas Cranmer. They’ve made the Christian religion such a confusing mess with their thousands upon thousands of little schismatic sects that multiply by the hundreds every year. And every year, it becomes harder and harder just to find a congregation that has some sort of continuity with historic Christianity. And efforts to convert your fellow countrymen become practically impossible when the town is filled with an endless array of baptist and independent congregations, which quickly lure new converts with their promises of religious experience (in both their conservative and liberal forms)… “Liberty,” as you and [Roger] Williams want to define it, is antithetical to the propagation of the Gospel, and has put our people in bondage to the likes of Bill Hybels…
Yes, the Reformation was not the only event in the history of the Christian Church. This is indeed a good point. But if you’d study church history, you’d see your pleas for freedom and acceptance for baptist/quaker/independent congregations is totally at odds with the beliefs of both the Ante-Nicene, Nicene, and Post-Nicene Fathers, in both East and West (and I take it that’s who you’re referring to by “every generation since the apostles”). They didn’t want religious liberty for the Arian party, the Docetists, the Nestorians, or the Monophysites. And had they not chased them out of Europe, and into places like Ethiopia and the Orient, the Christian faith as we know it would never have survived. And no sooner than when Christendom backed off of lunatics like the Anabaptists, it quickly became associated with prominent Anabaptists like Charles Finney and Billy Graham, to the point that they have as much power and influence as the bishop of Rome - without any apostolic succession/continuity whatsoever! And things eventually got so bad that truly Protestant Christians (like D. James Kennedy, for example) have apparently forgotten why it ever mattered in the first place, and are just thankful to have "people of faith" "acknowledging God" in the public sphere. Indeed, simply not being Roman Catholic now makes one "Protestant" or "evangelical"… Indeed, you have not the slightest bit of gratitude for the men whose just concern for religious liberty gave you the very ability to sit comfortably in your chair and read this without fear of the gallows…
In short, let’s put phrases like "binding the consciences of men" and "legalism" squarely on the shoulders of where they are: the independent, democratic and congregational sects originating with the Anabaptists.
Someone named "Defender of the Faith" has published the piece on Anabaptists that Harry wrote 10 years ago.
"It is the opinion of Plato, that changes in the dress and habits of the citizens portend great changes and commotions in the state; and I am inclined to believe that when the language in common use in any country becomes irregular and depraved, it is followed by their ruin or their degradation. For what do terms used without skill or meaning, which are at once corrupt and misapplied, denote but a people listless, supine, and ripe for servitude? On the contrary, we have never heard of any people or state which has not flourished in some degree of prosperity as long as their language has retained its elegance and its purity.” ~ John Milton to Benedetto Bonomatthai, September 10, 1638
So our civilization declines in proportion to the loss of elegance and purity in our language. This reminds me of Badonicus’s justification for racially segregated churches: All things are to be done decently and in order (1 Corinthians 14:40).
Rest in peace, David Lane. "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children."
We apologize for not killing more Yankees. We tried our level best.
Leave a Reply