...Such was Martin Luther’s description of what our people have become. How are we to restore the "honor of our Lord and of Christendom"? You can read his advice here.

"We are not hyphenated Jews; we are Jews with no qualifications or reservations. We are simply aliens; we are a foreign people in your midst, and, we emphasize, we wish to stay that way. There is a wide gap between you and us, so wide that no bridge can be laid across. Your spirit is alien to us; your myths, legends, habits, customs, traditions and national heritage, your religious and national shrines, your Sundays and holidays...they are all alien to us. The history of your triumphs and defeats, your war songs and battle hymns, your heroes and their mighty deeds, your national ambitions and aspirations, they are all alien to us. The boundaries of your lands cannot restrict our movements, and your border clashes are not of our concern. Far over and above the frontiers and boundaries of your land stands our Jewish unity… Whosoever calls the foreign land a fatherland is a traitor to the Jewish people… A loyal Jew can never be other than a Jewish patriot… We recognize a national unity of Diaspora Jews, no matter in which country they may reside. Therefore, no boundaries can restrain us in pursuing our own Jewish Policy." ~ Jew Jakob Klatzkin, Krisis und Entscheidung (Crisis and Decision), 1921

"It is wrong to say that the goyim forced the Jews to separate themselves from other societies. When the Christians defined the ghetto limits, Jews lived there already." ~ President Nachum Goldmann, World Zionist Organization, 1978

Jews have trouble controlling the Internet, but they’re starting with Wikipedia.

Writing the word "Jew" in ice cream will send you away for a month in North Dakota - but that’s only because there are no "hate crime" laws in North Dakota. If there were, the sentence might be closer to a year. The lesson to be learned (and I hope you racists are listening) is that anti-Christs must never be allowed to have their feelings hurt. Always smile when around them, and never be critical, or it’s off to the penitentiary with you anti-Semites.

Mark Potok, in this video, declares anyone opposed to MORE! MORE! immigration a racist. Not long afterwards he says that while the SPLC takes no position on immigration, its job is to tell you that those who are opposed to immigration are bigots. Likewise, those who are actively opposed to the North American Union are instantly discredited if they write letters to editors of newspapers stating that Jews control banking. You can see that anti-racist logic is self-referential at best. And if you think you have a constitutional right to form a militia, you’re a racist too. And Christians who love their own race (meaning Kinists) are vicious nativists. And he says that his well-funded group of Jews and fags and Jewish fags at the SPLC is not simply determined to monitor racists but to "destroy" them. It would all be ludicrous but the SPLC has hundreds of millions of dollars at its disposal, and a lot of lives can be destroyed with that kind of money. Potok’s "hate crime" statistics are particularly laughable, as we’ve shown here repeatedly. Don’t expect him to inform the public about these unknown serial killers. And notice how the pitch is unchanged since Jared Taylor reviewed Potok nine years ago. During the Q&A, James Lubinskas "wanted to know why Hispanics are a victim category for hate crimes but not a perpetrator category." Taylor writes, "I asked why the United States should seek diversity and dispossession while non-white countries may maintain their majority populations. [Potok] bravely took the position that non-white countries should seek diversity and dilution too!… Mr. Potok claims to believe that the question of race and IQ "’cannot be sorted out and never will be sorted out,’ but if the truth is unknowable it is odd that we must act as if we are certain race has nothing to do with IQ." There’s that impenetrable Communist logic again. "[The SPLC] repeatedly claims that even the mildest racial message creates an atmosphere of ‘hatred’ that can lead to violence, yet its very purpose is to stir up the worst sort of hostility against people who express certain ideas. If the leaders of the C of CC or the staff of AR are ever attacked, would the SPLC ever concede that it contributed to an ‘atmosphere of violence’? Finally, although it preens itself on respect for free speech, its legal strategies are a clear attempt to stifle speech. It brings civil suits for ‘conspiracy’ when there are insufficient grounds for criminal charges—in effect, bullying ideological opponents into silence. It is dawning on more and more people that ‘watchdog groups’ that call people names and try to shut them up may simply be unable to counter the ideas they oppose with anything like real arguments." It’s so true; you will never hear real arguments to counter anything argued by our side, but they’ll jump all over a gaffe from Lou Dobbs, for instance.

Jew "art" versus Aryan art.

I have trouble believing that a she-Jew would entice a 15-year-old Southern girl to pose for semi-pornographic pictures. Such things are simply not done.

"According to the experts, 62 percent of girls are sexually abused by the age of 18 - outside the YFZ Ranch. According to the experts, 31 percent of boys are sexually abused by the age of 18 - outside the YFZ Ranch. According to the experts, most rape victims are under 12 years old - outside the YFZ Ranch."

China has the right to be Chinese, Nigeria has the right to be Nigerian, Israel has the right to be Jewish, but Britain has no right to be British, and America has no right to be American. As Arthur Kemp laments here, it is said that the British were wrong to colonize Africa, but it’s considered perfectly acceptable for Africans to now colonize Britain. Foreign aid goes to countries like Zimbabwe, whose people hate our guts, and to India and Israel, who have satellites and nuclear weapons, and are hardly starving. It is not our responsibility to subsidize any but our own people. It is hateful, said the Lord Jesus Christ, to take bread from our children and give it to dogs. Our children must be filled first (Mark 7:27)! And if your son asks for bread, it is hateful to give him a stone. If he asks for meat, it is hateful to give him a snake. If he asks for an egg, it is hateful to offer him a scorpion. "Christians" today are overflowing with hatred. The point of these verses (Luke 11:11-13) is that even pagans have more sense.

"As Sam Dickson has pointed out, White people in every White country around the world hold tens of thousands of meetings in organized committees every single day to figure out how to help non-Whites; while conversely, no such meetings are organized anywhere by non-Whites out of concern for the rapidly declining numbers of White people, who singularly represent the philanthropic impulse in the world." Yet at the same time, as Ehud very correctly points out, Whites suffer from a "Christ complex which overly maximizes duties to those remote to us at the expense of those closest to us. Even Emerson, that great Transcendental Abolitionist, has recognized this strange impulse when he says, ‘Your great love afar is spite at home.’" Dickens famously parodied such behavior. And this is precisely why we mock those who accuse us of being "White Supremacists." As with so much else, the very opposite is true. It is the non-Kinist White person who assumes the mantle of supremacy for his race as he undertakes the herculean task of policing and feeding the world. Steve Sailer calls it the "Invade the World, Invite the World" sickness, and only Whites are susceptible to it. We Kinists are more than happy to take an impartial scientific look at how the races stack up in various categories, but we don’t love our own on that account (or hate others on that account). We love our own because they are our own.

Back to Ehud’s latest outstanding article: This "is all caught up with a basic Perspectivalism in which Whites presuppose their own superiority by virtue of their seemingly innate status as ‘the blessed of the earth.’ Their dual association of Christ with the conquering hero and suffering servant manifests in their social aims as a personal masochism animated by a Crusader’s spirit." Again, they invade the world and invite the world. No people on earth would do this unless they "presuppose their own superiority." And yet, in this upside-down world, we are called supremacists! Ehud cautions: "we did not always capitulate to these morose inclinations. We once monolithically denounced such attitudes as deluded Jacobinism and Marxist Utopianism. As Rev. Wayne Rogers has said: ‘The ministers to our forefathers had the Bible but not socialism; and for them segregation was compatible with Christianity. The only difference is socialism. The Bible hasn’t changed; and if socialism is omitted, segregation and Christianity are still compatible.’ Rev. Rogers rightly sees the modern social theory as having seduced us from the biblical concept of responsibility relative to familial proximity as espoused by the Apostle: ‘If anyone does not take care of his own, especially those of his own household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever’ (1 Timothy 5:8)." One’s household, in this verse, is a subset of one’s own. And to understand what one’s own encompasses, Ehud directs us to John 1:11: "He came unto His own, and His own received Him not." This "is clearly speaking of Jesus’ people, His ‘kinsmen according to the flesh’ (Romans 9:11) over whom Paul would lament. And if one’s ‘own’ is one’s people, we have a duty toward the physical and religious preservation of our race as contiguous to the call of familial consanguity. Your race is your extended family and the neglect of it is a violation of the fifth and seventh commandments which propound our duties toward family. This is what Rushdoony calls the Trustee Family. It was the Christian world order for the first 1,950 years of the Church."

We pause now to let all of this sink in. We are called "White Supremacists" for following the commandments of God, and we are called such names by those who have replaced the Messiah with the messianic state. But since it is nigh impossible for them to overcome their own instincts, they have perverted what is vaguely recognizable as charity into that which threatens their own survival. We Kinists worship the God who formed us from the dust of the ground; the White Supremacists have reformed God in their own ideological image, which is merely to say that they worship themselves, and their churches help out in every way possible.

"Want to help non-Whites? Banish from their minds the idea that we owe them education, welfare or even citizenship. We don’t. And it is nothing less than a satanic yoke upon both groups to suggest that we must be their ‘surety’ (Proverbs 11:15)… Any hope for a Theonomic nation must first secure and define its own national identity (ethnicity); without this basic bedrock Theonomy will ever be a more and more ephemeralized abstraction which devolves ultimately into pietistic irrelevance. In fact, if we neglect to meet the minimum standard set by St. Paul—to take care of ‘our own’—we reject the precondition to the establishment of God’s Law in our land, following after the example of the Deicides who rejected the reign of the true King in favor of the one-world governance of an Imperial Caesar. God forbid." And God forbid that Ehud should ever stop writing. This rebuke should have been sent out generations ago.

Neo-Americans are neo-Platonists who equate the physical with mud because ideology is all that matters to them. Naturally (pardon the pun), they view race and kinship as "immaterial." Consider this quote from lipstick-warmonger Peggy Noonan: "[T]he essence of American patriotism is a felt and spoken love for and fidelity to the ideas and ideals our country represents and was invented to advance—freedom, equality, pluralism." This is completely the opposite of what Kinists believe, and so it is quite accurate to say that Kinists, not paleoconservatives, are the mirror opposites of neoconservatives.

"Six weeks ago, Obama blamed whites’ ‘surprise’ at Wright’s ‘anger’ on racial segregation, meaning that their surprise at Wright was their own, racist fault. This week, Obama says that he himself is surprised and shocked at Wright’s anger. And this confused young man, who doesn’t know who he is or where he’s been or what he’s been hearing for the last 20 years, wants to be the president of the United States?" It’s hilarious that Obama convinced everyone, in a speech that was hailed as the greatest thing spoken since Lincoln met a bullet, that his lunatic White-hating pastor was taken out of context. Then his pastor-of-hate gives a speech proving that nothing was taken out of context. Jew Krauthammer, in his very good column, calls it the Annunciation and the Renunciation. And now, because the Magical Negro has spoken (for the second time), the New York Times has labeled any further attempts to link the two radicals "race-baiting"! As Jew Steyn observes, everything changed when Obama felt that Wright had disrespected him for calling him a lying politician. And what you don’t want to do is disrespect a black man, even if he’s a mulatto with a baritone. They respond with violence, which is probably not the best quality in a president.

Meet Obama’s new "wonderful young pastor."

How Obama will lose the black vote.

Jews created the "homosexual movement" and run it from top to bottom.

A list of faggot politicians. Where is King Asa when we need him? He is certainly not to be found among the lying, effeminate, race-mixing pastors of our age.

"And Asa did that which was right in the eyes of the LORD, as did David his father. And he took away the sodomites out of the land, and removed all the idols that his fathers had made." ~ 1 Kings 15:11-12

I heard Ken Jones, a black pastor in California, say something very good. He said we would never think of going to a surgeon who is afraid of blood but we love to seek out pastors who are afraid of discussing sin.

Can you see the hidden message here?

I love the early work of Bruce Cockburn. Here’s a sample. I think you can also find "Wondering Where the Lions Are" on YouTube, which is an excellent Christian song, and the album "Humans" is possibly his best.

The most annoying song ever. I couldn’t even make it to the halfway point.

Speaking of which, the American Jew-media is trying to convince everyone that Bollywood is not really the exclusive domain of ultra-light-skinned, upper-caste Indians. It’s a nice try. Many things in life mystify me, Bollywood foremost among them. I had not really been afflicted by it except in small doses, until I ate at an Indian restaurant recently. There were TVs on every side of the room playing, in an endless loop, the hyper-sexualized, poorly-acted, effeminate song and dance routines that Indians love to watch. It was an assault on the senses, much like "black worship."

One-fourth of all children under age 5 in this country is mestizo. "Nobody ever stops and counts. Counting is racist."

White people love to throw money at problems, such as AIDS in Africa. Now they think they can pay black people to stop having sex, using money stolen from your children. Throwing bread to dogs.

Ronald Reagan’s Department of Education issued the famous "Nation at Risk" report in 1983. It warned that "the educational foundations of our society are presently being eroded by a rising tide of mediocrity that threatens our very future as a Nation and a people." Of course, by 1983, our future as a nation was already in the books. But it bears remembering because those who are not racially-aware are destined to make a series of foolish decisions that lead to catastrophe. One such foolish decision was to open wide the borders, cater to every need of those who crossed it with unprecedented spending, and hope beyond all reason that some benefit could be derived from it. As Sailer says, "what the schools do matters less in the big picture than who the students are… The future turned out to be foreseeable, for the few who cared to notice back in the 1970s." You know, the "racists."

Wordists versus tribalists. (And here is the best thing you’ll ever read on Alan Keyes, from our friend TJH, which I want to comment on next time.)

"There is only one rule here," said Robert E. Lee upon becoming the president of Washington College. "Every man is required to be a gentleman." Now we live like this.

If this is your daughter, you suck as a parent.